by audio live. All right. Good morning, everyone. I'm going to call to order the town of Laceachi Groves uh special magistrate hearing. It's June 18th. Verizon says it's 9:00 a.m. So, we can get started. My name is Amity Barnard. I'm the special magistrate for this morning's
hearing. I don't see any respondents in the room. Are there any uh respondents on the computer? No, ma'am. Okay. With that, I'll forego uh my normal description about process and how the hearing works, but I will start with swearing anybody in who's here to testify on any items on today's agenda, including staff, if you could stand and
raise your right hands. Do you all swear from to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Thank you. I'll turn it back to the town uh to call it first case. Good morning, Madame Magistrate. At this time, item one on the agenda for Churnney Associates, Inc. at 1666
C Road, Lockah Hatchee Groves, Florida. that item is going to be removed from the agenda and we'll proceed to and I believe that's because they came into compliance this morning. Uh and an extension was granted. An extension was granted by the town. So we will move on to item number
two. Okay. Item number two on the agenda is Sandra L. Carter Calderon. The property address is 1181 West C Road, Lockahhatche Grove, Florida 33407.
The case number is 2533077. The violation sections include 92-010 permit inspection and maintenance requirements um for RV. Good morning, your honor. For the record, code enforcement officer Suarez presented case 255030077
in reference to the property at 1181 West C Road. Copy of the notice of status fine assessment hearing along with the order finding violation was mailed certified on June 6, 2025 to the property owner, the Palm Beach property appraiser. Copy of the notice of status fine
assessment hearing along with the order finding violation was also posted on the property June 6, 2025. A copy of the same was posted here at town hall on June 6, 2025. The property was initially cited on ma March 5th, 2025 for the following
violations. Section 92010 RV registration permit inspection maintenance requirements and also FBC 105.1 work without permit for installing a uh semiseptic tank in the ground. That
is now complied with that was removed. The case was heard by a special magistrate on May 5th, 2025 where the magistrate found for the town. I have spoken with the property owner initially on April 15th in regards to the violation and ways to comply. My last
conversation with him was in person in the last two weeks and I informed them informed him of exactly how to come into compliance. He has two RVs on the property. He is only allowed to have one RV unoccupied. So, I told him either he
could remove one and sign an affidavit that it's unoccupied or remove them both. Um, as of June 17th, yesterday, 2025, the violation still exists. There are two RVs seen from the public right away without an affidavit or RV
registration permit on file. The town is requesting a daily fine be imposed of $100 starting on June 5th, 2025. The town is also requesting administration cost of $2345 to be assessed in order to be paid to
the town of Lax Groves. Okay. So any application in with none on none on filed. Okay. Have you tal did you talk to them the respondents after the last hearing or did you talk to them before? So, I spoke to them within two
weeks. I happened to catch them outside their property. Okay, that's when I explained to them and this if it wasn't last week, it was the week before recent. They told they told me they were trying to get rid of at least one RV or they were trying to remove them both,
but I told them you either remove once on affidavit for the one remaining or just remove them both by the time of this hearing. And they were still And they were still there as of yesterday. Both of them and the 105.1 section you said complied.
It is complied. And let me ask you, is this this is the same case file that you have? Yes, it's exactly the same. Your your affidavit of posting, is it notorized on your case? It is. It's on my side. Yes. Can I see that? Yes, ma'am. So, make sure if you do copies in the
future, make sure I have exactly what you have. Just because you're asking me to rely on what you have there just in services based on that affidavit, I want to make sure it's a sworn affidavit. Okay, perfect.
All right. So, you are asking for a fine starting on June 5th. Yes, ma'am. As per the order finding violation. Do you have those number of days calculated or No, I do not. So that's 14 days.
So that's 1400 and continuing. Do you know if the administrative costs for the prior hearing were paid? They were not. So I presume you want those reaffirmed. Yes, your honor. And you have a cost recovery sheet for
today. Should be in the very back of the right hand side. Well, I'm sorry. I don't have a second copy. It's just the cost recovery sheet looks the same. So, it's the same amount. that
it's night 18. How are we already all the way past the middle of June already? Good grief. Okay. Uh for the record, are the respondents present? Seeing none, I'll note that the respondents are not present in case 253
0077. Anything further from the town? Nothing further, your honor. All right. In case uh 255030077, I'll enter the town's evidentiary case files composite exhibit one without objection. I'll find based on the notice documents
in the case file which include an affidavit of service that the town had good service for this morning's hearing. I'll find based on the photographs in the case file as well as the testimony of the code enforcement officer that the respondents remain in violation of section 92-010
for the RVs that remain on the premises as of yesterday. Uh and that uh violation persists after the compliance date required in the prior order finding violation which required the respondents to comply on or before June 4th. So, I
will assess a continuing fine uh in the amount of $1,400. That's for the 14-day period between June 5th, yes, June 5th and today. And that fine will continue to acrew at $100 per day until compliance is achieved. I'll assess the town's
administrative costs for today's hearing in the amount of 23405. And I'll reaffirm the administrative costs for the May 5th hearing also in the amount of 23405. Uh, I'll have the order reflect that the compliant that the respondents did come into compliance also with section 105.1
um, which was listed in the prior order. All right, I will sign an order that reflects that ruling. Seeing no other cases, the next hearing appears to be July 7th. Yes. Is that it? Yes, ma'am. All right. I will adjourn
this hearing at 9:10. Thank you. Thank you, your honor.