Maybe they look like RVs, uh, but they are not RVs. They are restroom trailers. And I have, well, you can see it through through the pictures that he has taken that they're they're not able to be, uh, occupied. Uh, nor are they RVs. Okay. So, you only have one RV on the
property. We only have one RV on the property. Yes. Okay. Let me ask the town, uh, what's your response to the waiver, uh, that he's referencing. I'm going to have to um I'll hand him I'll look at his amount, see when it was
dated. Um see if it was before the initial hearing so we could recover um admin costs. If not, look at that email, have them forward that email to me and if that's the
case, we're not seeing. Okay. Is there any way since he's here to check? Um do you have the email with you, sir? I I have um Yes, I do. Can you show Mr. Suarez that email? And as far as I'm concerned, it's only
one RV that we've seen. I didn't take in the So, you were not considering the the restroom trailers. Okay. What's What's the town's I don't see the RV ordinance online on Mic code yet. What's the waiver process? Can you refresh my memory on that? um the compliance if you have one it
depends on the size of the lot. Okay. But it's either you come to compliance saying you have an affidavit saying it's your own personal use and it's unoccupied or you get or you register it and get a permit for it. Okay. So if it is his own for personal use, he can get a waiver from your ordinance. That's and
then he doesn't need the permit. Okay. Just so I understand. So Mr. uh Leon, if you could show him that that email. They did read 1025, but this is okay. And Mr. Torres, can you get me that case
file back from him? Thank you. you. So, I guess given that there's um there's been some movement on his part that even predates the prior hearing. So, given that there's not enough to confirm compliance as of this
moment, I think what I'm going to do is reset this for the June 2nd hearing. My hope is that you won't have to come back. My hope I'm going to encourage the town to figure out where he is in the process and and hopefully you don't have to come back. They can comply you out if in fact you're you're qualified for the waiver. Um but you've shown the email to
the town and and they're not disputing the fact that you did send an email. So it's just a matter of that being processed through the town. Um, so what I'll do is, [Music] um, I'm not going to make any findings relative to whether the RV is still
there because I'm I'm not sure that that matters. You're actually your request, you should have, anytime you get a code enforcement uh, notice, come to the hearing. Um, if you would have come to the hearing last month or in March, I'm sorry, you with that email, you probably wouldn't have been found in violation. Okay? Um, so if you if it ever happens
again, make sure you show up u because I'm always inclined to give you as much time as I can to to comply because that's my ultimate goal is is for you to come into compliance with the town's code. Um, so with that said, I won't make any findings relative to the status of the RV given the town has to do some more investigating as it relates to your
waiver request. Um, what I'll do just so the record is clear is I'll find that uh the notice documents in the case file are sufficient to prove that the town had good service for this morning's hearing. uh given the notice of hearing and the uh mailing documents and posting
documents that accompany that. So what I'll do is I'll reset this um matter for fine assessment hearing should it be necessary on June 2nd. Keep in touch with the town. Um my hope is that they'll get back to you before June 2nd so that you don't have
to spend your time coming here if in fact your waiver uh request is granted. Um, but keep in touch with them and if you do have to come back and you're not uh out of the woods or out of code enforcement trouble and you don't have an affidavit of compliance, make sure you come to that hearing with everything that you've done from today forward so
that I understand what you've done to to get into compliance. Okay. Okay. All right. And that'll be a fine assessment hearing. Would you like me to resend the uh waiver or or you you sure you you
have it? Yes, we'll uh Okay. All right. Thank you, sir. Okay. Thank you. And I guess just so the record is clear in case 2520166 having found service, I'll reset this for uh fine assessment hearing on
62 at 9:00 a.m. Okay. The The next case will be PG PJG Florida Land Trust and that is at property 13265 11th Lane North which is case
number 2550300 04 and the section violation is 92-0 which is RV registration and that's item 13 the last on the agenda their final
assessment to be the third item. Bless you. Thank you. And Mr. Suarez, is this one yours? PG PJG. Okay. He's the the clerk has read uh the case into the record, so you can proceed whenever you're ready. John Suarez, code enforcement officer
for the town locks, presenting case 253 00004 property address 13265 111 north. Uh this case was initially heard on March 19th, 2025 with a ministry bound
for the town lock statue real violation of code section 92010 RV permit inspection maintenance requirements. Um a they were given 30 days for compliance. If not they were to pay $100 per day for the violation
thereafter. And at this time, as of May 1st, they were still a violation RBSO there. But at this time, we'd like to let the property own. Your name? Maria Guardas. Spell your
last name for me. Guard D. Sorry, spell it again. Gua GU A R D E R A S. Thank you. And what's your relation to the land trust? I'm the daughter of the owner. Okay.
So, um we received the notice. Okay. Um and I filled the paperwork and I sent it to my father to send it to the city because he's in like he's the owner, the primary owner of the property.
Um I I don't know if he send it but he's usually really responsible with those things. Okay. So uh two weeks ago I came here to the office the city and I asked them if they have received it. They
haven't. They told me they didn't. So I resent the papers to two emails over the weekend over this past weekend. Yeah. I mean, again, I know I may have I I should have come earlier. I'm sorry about
that. But yeah, and you're you're submitting what? A permit application. Yeah, that's what you submitted. Okay, Mr. Suarez, can I see your case file? Thank you. And don't go too far. You can
look at this real quick and then she can And I guess Mr. Suarez, just one question. The affidavit of service that you have in here, did you post the notice of hearing to the property as well? I only sent certified. Okay. But you got a signed green screen card delivered.
No, I did not. So this is not for the notice of hearing. Uh and I I thought you meant like uh the other green card like the property I want to sign that is for the that that is for the finest. Yeah. I need to find service. So without this you don't have service but they did deliver the notice
of hearing right. So you do have service that way. This is for the the notice of renotice of hearing, right? Okay. So, you have service that way. Let me ask you to show her the case file. He's going to show you the case file, ma'am. You can go over this side at your s. But
I just want to let you know on this side are the pictures of your property and this side is the notices that we sent to you. Okay. You can just go over it, make sure. So take a look at those documents and then I'm at the end of your you're looking at the documents I'm going to ask if you have any objection to the
documents. Okay. Okay. And there's a few papers there. So take as much time as you need. Okay. In some of these pictures, there's two RVs, but at the moment, there's only one RV and only one RV is going to stay at the property. Okay. And it's my own RV.
It's your own RV? Yeah. Okay. So, do you have any objection aside from noting that, do you have any objection to that case file being entered? Okay. All right. Mr. Can I see that case file back please? Sorry. Thank you. So, hearing what she has said, what's
the town seeking today? Sounds like she's trying to come in compliance even sending making sure herself bringing in the paperwork or sending paperwork over the weekend. So, the town is okay granting a 21day extension
reviews compliance. Okay. All right. So, hearing that then, do you want to reset this one for the second June hearing then to give essentially a month um And no compliance date, right? Just reset. Just reset. Okay.
All right. So, what the town is saying, just so you understand, is they're they're not asking me to um start any kind of fine today. They're asking me to give you more time because you're you're trying to get through the process and get complied. Um so, what I'm going to do is I'm going to just reset this matter for the June 18th. I
think is the right date. Let me just make sure. That's correct. Yeah. June 18th hearing. Make sure with the town um if you don't that's another more than a month, but make sure if you don't get any kind of communication from the town
within a week or so, come back to town hall and make sure you're getting movement on your application documents. There should be plenty of time for you to get through the process, but uh if you don't don't just wait to get response. Do like you did before. come in if if you think something may be wrong with the email system or the right
person is not getting whatever you sent. Uh make sure you come back to town hall. Um anything else you'd like me to hear? No. Okay. Thank you. All right. And given that this is just going to be a reset, I'll do the same thing as in the prior cases. So in case 25503
00004, I'll find based on the uh USPS delivery confirmation for the notice of hearing and the affidavit of posting uh posting the property posting that notice at town hall that town had good service for this morning's hearing. I will reset this matter for fine
assessment hearing on June 18th at 9:00 am. So hopefully ma'am you can get through the process and you won't have to come back on June 18th but make sure you communicate with the town. Okay. Yes. Thank you. Thank you. Madame Magistrate. We're back to the
violation hearing section new business and it's item number uh three which is uh Teresa and Timothy Brown or Bound and that's 13659 12 Plaza North. The case number is
255030125. The violation section is 92-010 which is RV registration compliance officer towns. The case number is 25503125. Respondent's name is Teresa
Bone and Timothy Bone. The property address is 13659 12th Place North Florida. On April 7th, 2025, the NOH was sent to the respondent by certified mail to the respondent. The NOH must certify posted notice on April 5th, 2025 at the
property and at town hall. Copy posted notice was mailed to the property owner. We also received confirmation that the green card was also signed by the property. The correction date was on April 23rd, 2025. An inspection on April 28, 2025
the following items in violation. Violations of code sections 92-010 and 92-015 RV permit inspection and maintenance requirements. The property has one RV on site without a permit or affidavit contact with the owner. No
contact has been received by the property owner. The town recommends a respon be found in violations of code sections 92-010 and 92-015. It is recommended that the respond be given to June 4 to 25 to correct the
violations or be charged to find out exceeding $100 per day for each state the violations continues to exist. It is also recommended that administrative cost in the amount of $234 and 5 cents be assessed and ordered be paid to the town
box in the event the compliance division is not contacted as required and the violations is not corrected. It is recommended that a B assessment hearing be held before magistrate on June 18,
2025 at any time of box 155 roads. Thank you. And for the record, is a respondent present? Seeing none. Thank you. All
right. Anything further? All right. In case 255030125, I'll enter the town's evidentiary case files composite exhibit one without objection. I'll find based on the notice documents in the case file, which include a signed
green card and an affidavit of posting, that the town had good service for today's hearing. I'll find based on the photographs in the case file and the testimony of the code enforcement officer that the respondents are in violation of sections 92-10 and
92-015 for the RV uh that's on the property without the required permit uh registration. I'll require respondents to comply with those code sections on or before June 4th or assess a fine of $100 per day for each day the violation continues. In the event of
non-compliance, I'll set this matter for fine assessment hearing on June 18th. And because I found respondents in violation of the listed code sections, I'll award the town its administrative costs in the amount of 23405 for today's hearing. Next one.
Madame Ed Street, the next item on the agenda is Sadlac Landscape Management, Inc. The property address is 3765 B Road, which is case number 2540021. The violation section is
92-010 RV registration. Good morning officer of the town. The case number is 2540021 corresponding name management. The property address is
3765 roads Florida on April 7, 2025. The NLB was sent to the respondent by a certified mail to the respondents. The NF was served by posting notice on April 6, 2025 at the property and at town hall. A copy of the post notice was
mailed to the property owner. We also received confirmation that the green card was signed and received by the property owner. The correction date was on April 23rd, 2025. an inspection on April 28, 2025 found upon items
remaining items in violation of code sections 92-010 and 92-015 permit inspection and maintenance requirements. The property is two on site without a permit or not. Contact with the owner. No contact has been
received by the property owner. The town recommends a respondant be found in violations of code sections 92-010 and 92-015. It is recommended that the respondent be 25 to break the violations or be
charged a fine not to exceed $100 per day for each state of violations continues to exist. It is also recommended that administrative cost in amount of $2345 be assessed in order to be paid
the town of Los Angeles. In the event the compliance division is not contacted as required in violation corrected, it is recommended that a fine assessment hearing be magistrate on June 18th, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. at the town of Los Angeles
girls 155 roads. I also have problem. Thank you. Thank you. these photos from April 6. There's like sprinklers or something on. Yeah, that's an RV behind that though. Okay, that was
from the initial sighting. Okay. The property difficult to see visibly, but that's but your testimony is that there's an RV behind that. It's the same one that's in the photos that are from a later date. Okay. Coincidence that the sprinklers were
All right. Anything further on this one? All right. For the record, is a respondent present? Seeing none, I'll enter the town's evidentiary case files composite exhibit one. Without objection. I'll find based on the notice documents in the case file, which include an affidavit of posting and a signed certified mail that the town had
good service for this morning's hearing. I'll find based on the photographs in the case file and the testimony of the code enforcement officer that the respondents are in violation of section 92-010 and 92-015. I'll require respondent to comply with those code sections on or
before June 4th or $100 a day fine will be assessed for each day that the violation continues thereafter. In the event of non-compliance, I'll require respondant to appear at the June 18th fine assessment hearing. And because I found respondent in violation of the listed code sections, I'll assess the town's administrative cost for today's
hearing in the amount of 23405. Madame Magistrate, the next item on the agenda is item number five, which is Janetta B. Smith. The property address is 15870 42nd Street North which is case
number 255040019. The violation section is section 92-010 which is RV registration compliance officer groves. The case number is 255040019. The respondent's name is
Janette B. Smith. The property address is 15870 42nd Street North, Los Angeles, Florida. On April 7, 2025, NLB is sent to the respondent by certified mail to the respondent. The NBO was certified
posted notice on April 6, 2025 at the property and at town hall. A copy of the posting was mailed to the property owner. The correction date was on April 23rd, 2025. An inspection on April 28, 2025. Found the following items and violations
of code sections 92-010 and 92-015 permit inspection and maintenance requirements. The property has three RVs on site which have permit or affidavit contact with the owner. No contact
received by the property owner. The time recommends the respond be found in violation of code sections 92-010 or 92-015. It is recommended that the respond be given until June 415 to correct violations to be charged
a fine not to exceed $100 per day for each day the violation 15 to exist. It is also recommended that the administrative cost in amount of $2345 be assessed in order be paid to the town of Los Angeles gross in the
account division is not contacted as required and the violations not corrected. It is recommended that a fine assessment period be magistrate on June 18, 2025 and town of act girls 155 road.
Thank you. All right. Is a respondent present in this case? No, ma'am. Seeing none, I'll enter the town's evidentary case files composite exhibit one without objection. I'll find based on the notice documents in the case file which include an affidavit of posting and a uh
USPS delivery confirmation that the town had good service for this morning's hearing. I'll find based on the testimony of the code enforcement officer as well as the photographs in the case file that the respondents in violation of section 92-010 and 92-015 I'll require respondant to comply
with those code sections on or before June 4th or $100 a day fine will be assessed for each day that the violation continues thereafter. In the event of non-compliance, I'll require respondent to appear at the June 18th fine assessment hearing. And because I found respondent in violation of the listed
code sections, I'll assess the town's administrative cost in the amount of 23405 for today's hearing. Madame Magistrate, the next item is item number six, which is Sandra L. Cardamom Calder with the property
address is 1181 West C Road. The case number is 255030 077. The se the violation section is section 92-010 RV registration. Morning the camp compliance officer
hel the case number is 2530077. Respondent's name is Sandra L. Hauldron. The property address is 1181 West Road, Florida. On April 17, 2025, the NOV was sent to the respondent by
certified respondents. The NOV was served by posting notice on April 17, 2025 at the property and at town hall. A copy of the poster notice was mailed to the property owner. The correction date was on April 29th, 2025. An inspection
on May 1st, 2025. found the following items in violations of code sections 92-010 and FBC 105.1 RV permit inspection and maintenance requirements and please remove unperceptive tank and obtain
necessary permits for property that RB on site without a permit or after contact with the owner no contact when received by the property owner the town recommends to respond be found in violations of code sections 92-010
and FBC for building code 105.1. It is recommended that that the respondant be given until June 4, 2025 to correct the violations or be charged a fine not to exceed $100 per day for each day the violations continues to exist. It is also recommended that
administrative costs in the amount of $2345 be assessed in order to be paid to the town box. In the event the compliance division is not contacted as required and violation is not corrected, it is recommended that appliance assessment hearing be held for the
special magistrate on June 18, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. at the time of Los Angeles 155 Los Angeles border. John Suarez for the town lockers. I have something additional your honor. On the initial inspection, I did make contact
with the property owner and he and there were contractors on site installing a subject in the rear of the property and got their own admitted to it. And we have pictures of that initial inspection.
Okay. But this photo of the gentleman in the backyard is what you saw. Yes. I see those were the contractors photo. It was there installing something and you talked to the respondent and he said that's what they were doing. Yes. Okay.
Okay. How long does it take to get a permit for a septic tank? Um, in our experience, it wouldn't be permitted. The Department of Health would perhap Okay. And we did site them for the unmitted
septic also because it is a It's usually grants at the department of health. Okay. Does the town code allow a septic tank? Uh we usually go through the department of health, but no, it's something we would not put into the question. Okay.
Okay. And did you explain that to Mr. Calderon? I did. Okay. explain violations. Okay. Okay. All right. For the record, is a respondent present? Seeing none, I'll enter the
town's evidentiary case file as composite exhibit one without objection. I'll find based on the notice documents in the case file which include an affidavit of posting that the town had good service for this morning's hearing. I'll find based on the photographs in
the case file and the testimony of the code enforcement officers that the respondents in violation of sections 92-010 and section 105.1 of the Florida Building Code. I'll require respondent to comply with those code sections on or before June 4th or $100 a day fine will
be assessed for each day that the violation continues thereafter. In the event of non-compliance, I'll require respondant to appear at the June 18th fine assessment hearing. And because I found respondent in violation of those code sections, I'll assess the town's administrative
cost in the amount of 23405 for today's hearing. Okay. The next item on the agenda, Madam Magistrate, is item seven, which is Jonathan Wish. Property address is 14735o Drive. The case number is
2550 40039 section 92-010 which is RB registration info for compliance officer of the town of Los Angeles. The case number is
255040039. Respondent's name is Jonathan Wish. Property address is 14735 drive on April 17, 2025. The NBH was sent to the respondent by responded by certified mail correspondents. The NBH
was served by posting notice on April 17, 2025 at the property and at town hall. A copy of the posting notice was mailed to the property owner. The correction date was on April 29th, 2025. An inspection on May 1st, 2025. found
the following items in violations of code sections 92-010 RV permit inspection and maintenance requirements. The property has one RV on site without a permit or affidavit contact with the owner. No contact has been received by the
property owner at this time. The town recommends the respondent be found in violations of approve sections 92-010. It is recommended that the respondent be given until June 4, 2025 to break the violations are char not to exceed $100
per day for each state the violations continues to exist. It is also recommended that administrative cost in amount of $2345 be assessed order to be paid to the town of blocks grows in defend compliance division is not contacted as
required andor the violation is not corrected. It is recommended that a assessment period be open for discussion magistrate on June 18, 2025 at the time girls 155 Walk
All right. For the record, is the respondent present? Seeing none, I'll enter the town's evidentiary case files composite exhibit one. Without objection, I'll find based on the uh service documents in the case file which include an affidavit of
posting that the town had good service for today's hearing. I'll find based on the photographs in the case file and testimony of the code enforcement officer that the respondents in violation of section 92-010. I'll require respondent to comply with that code section order before June 4th or assess a fine of $100
per day for each day that the violation continues thereafter. In the event of non-compliance, I'll require respondant to appear at the June 18th fine assessment hearing. And because I found respondent in violation of the code section listed, I'll assess the town's administrative cost for today's hearing
in the amount of 23405. Madame Magistrate, the next item on the agenda is item number eight, which is Green Roots LLC. The property address is 3149C Road. The case number is 255040033 and this violation section is
92-010 RV registration. Good morning officer. The case number is 255040033. The respondent's name is Green Roots LLC. The property address is
3149C road box antig on April 11 2025. The respondent was sent to the NO was sent to the respondent by certified mail respondents. The NOV was served by posted notice on April 11th, 2025 at at
the property and at town hall. A copy of the posted notice is the property owner. The correction date was on April 29th, 2025. an inspection on May 1st, 2025 on the following items remain. Items in violation of code sections
92-010 RV permit inspection and maintenance requirements for properties as two RVs on site without a permit or affidavit. Contact with the owner. No contact has been received by the property owner at this time. The town recommends the respondent be found in
violation of code section 92-010. It is recommended that the respondent begin until June 4th, 2025. Depression violations are be charged to find not to exceed $100 per day for each state of violation continues to exist.
It is recommended that administrative cost in the amount of $2345 be assessing order to be paid to the time blocks acts. In the event the code compliance division has not contacted as required and both the violation is not corrected. It is
recommended that a fin assessment hearing be public magistrate on June 1825 and again by the time of blocks act 155 blocks act. Thank you. For the record, is a respondent
present. Thanks. All right. I'll enter the town's evidentiary case files composite exhibit one without objection. I'll find based on the notice documents in the case file which include an affidavit of posting that the town had good service for this morning's hearing. I'll find based on the
photographs in the case file as well as the testimony of the code enforcement officer that the respondents in violation of section 92-010. I'll require respondent to comply with the that code section on or before June 4th or $100 a day fine will be assessed for each day the violation continues thereafter. In the event of
non-compliance, I'll require respondent to appear at the June 18th fine assessment hearing. And because I found respondent in violation of the listed code sections, I'll assess the town's administrative costs in the amount of 23405 for today's hearing. Madame Magistrate, we're back
to fine assessment hearings, which is item number nine, Ram Drywall Services LLC. The property address is 14405 Tangerine Drive. The case number is 2533025. The section number, the
violation section is 92-010 RV registration. John Suire, code enforcement officer for the town of Lockachi girls, presenting case 2530025, property address at 14405 San
Drive. The uh there was initial violation hearing date on March 19, 2025 where the magistrate found for the town that they were in violation of code section 92010 RV per device maintenance requirements where they were given 30 days for compliance.
Um, a proper notice of find assessment hearing was sent certified mail on April 23rd, 2025. Also posted a fine assessment hearing on
uh at town hall on May 1st, 2025. They performed a reinspection and there is still an RP on the property without an affidavit for registration permit. Photographs were depicted fairly and
accurately timestamps. There was no contact with the property owner at this time. The code compliance division recommended respond be found in violation of the order date on March 19th, 2025. The assess the fine provided for an order amount of $100 per day
commencing on April 19th, 2025. and the administration cost of $2345. In addition to my testimony, I offer the enforcement by file for case 2530025 as a considered
to thank you. Thank you. And this one, same thing as that other one. You sent a new notice appearing. Same thing. Yes. Did you also send the order finding violation? It did not, your honor. I just sent the notice. How come? How come you're doing them like
that now? My concern is a due process concern. They don't have notice of the fine amount that you're asking me to impose on them because you're not sending the order. I mean, this came from the town lawyer.
This fine assessment copy and so I just use this order and figured the first notice of violation was I guess good enough, your honor. And then I sent this as just a notice of Are all the rest of the fine assessments
on today's agenda the same? They are. Okay. I'm I'm going to after I hear all the evidence, I'm I'm going to grant it, but I'm going to request in the future that you send a copy of the notice uh excuse me, the order finding violation with any notices of hearing that you send because I do not believe that the
respondent is on notice of the fine amount. There's nothing in the order finding, excuse me, the notice of violation or notice of hearing from the original hearing that indicates a fine amount. Uh nor is there anything in your notice. So going forward, if you're going to do
it this way and you're not going to send I think in the older days, you would just send certified mail the order finding violation. So, if you're changing process, I'm fine with defer to the town on that. But the order finding violation also needs to get sent certified mail uh to the respondent.
Yes, your sav. Um, no. I believe I think I'm under the impression that the special magistrate sends all the originals are sent to town hall that I draft and sign. I send them to town hall and then you guys typically send them certified mail to the respondents. Again, I'm fine doing a
separate notice of hearing, but I just want to make sure that the respondents I think you're setting yourself up for a problem if I'm being very candid. So, um, moving forward, we'll take Yeah, moving forward, just make sure if you want to do a a standalone notice of hearing. I'm fine with that. But go ahead and attach the order finding
violation to it. All right. In case 253 0025 uh for the record, the respondent is not
present. I'll enter the town's uh composite, excuse me, the town's evidentiary case file is composite exhibit one without objection. I'll find based on the affidavit of service in the case file as well as the
notice documents uh for today's hearing which also include delivery confirmation uh from USPS on the certified mail that town had good service for today's hearing I guess. Do you did you calculate the number of days from uh
April 19th to today? Um it was um from March 19th, was it? I'm sorry. No, the compliance date was April, but then they had until my order says they have until April 18th to comply, right? Yes. And then uh we
requested the buy and start at April 19th, right? So how do you know how many days that is between April 19th and today? Yeah. Let's if we can figure that out because it's cleaner if the order says the number of days so that the order for you. Yeah. Yeah, if you can get me that
total number of days that's through today. Okay. So, that's a $1,600 and continuing fine. All right. And you your 23405 was for today's hearing? Yes. Were the administrative fees for the prior
hearing paid? Not that I'm aware. All right. So, you want me to reaffirm those as well, I presume? Yes, sir. March. All right. I've entered the case file. I found good service via the posting and USPS
delivery confirmation. I'll find based on the photographs in the case file and the testimony of the code enforcement officer that the respondents did not comply with the uh code section found in violation at the previous hearing which is 92-010 by the required compliance
date of April 18th. Therefore, I will assess a fine in the amount of $1,600 in continuing at $100 per day. Uh that total fine amount is from April 19th through May 5th. Uh and and it'll
continue to acrew at $100 per day until compliance is achieved. I'll award the town it administrative costs for today's hearing in the amount of 23405. And I'll reaffirm the administrative hearing costs for the April, excuse me, March 18th hearing also in the amount of
23405. Madame Magistrate, the next item on the agenda is item number 10 on the agenda, which is the second item under fine assessment hearings. The case is Cander Farm LLC. The property address is 1180A Road. This
is case number 255020145. The violation section is 92-010 which is RV registration. John Suarez code enforcement officer of town road presented case
252045 addresses 118 a road. There was a violation hearing on March 19th where the magistrate for the town violation section 92010 RV per requirements. they were
to they were to come in flight on April 8th, 2025 or have a fine of $100 there afterwards. As of May 1st, they are still in violation. There is not a affidavit or a
permit on file. A proper notice of finance settlement hearing was sent via certified mail April 23rd, 2025. The property address was posted assessment hearing. A copy of the fin assessment hearing on April 23rd 2015
live. Also we posted that a copy of photographs were taken on May 1 violations with this the public compliance division and recommending them financing violation of the order dated March
1925 and be assessed applying an order amount of $100 per day commencing on April 19 2025 and administration cost of $434 $45. Thank you. Thank you. or have the administrative uh fees for
the Marshing been paid? Oh, yeah. Okay. All right. For the record, is a respondent present? Seeing none, I'll enter the town's evidentiary case files composite exhibit one without objection. Oh, fine. based on the notice documents in the case file which include
an affidavit of posting or service that the town had good service for this morning's hearing. I'll find based on the photographs in the case file as well as the testimony of the code enforcement officer that the respondent did not comply with the uh prior order finding
violation which required them to comp into compliance on or before April 18th. Therefore, I will assess a fine in the amount of $1,600 in continuing uh which is a period of 16 days from April 19th through today, May 5th. Uh that fine
amount will continue to acrew at $100 per day until compliance is achieved. I'll also assess the town's administrative costs for today's hearing in the amount of 23405. And I'll [Music] reaffirm the administrative
costs. Yeah. In the amount of 23405 for the March hearing. Madame Magistrate, at this time the last case on the agenda is item number 12, which is Tara Celely. The property address is
13009 Collecting Canal Road. The case number is 255020179. The violation section number is 92-010, which is RV registration. Sure. Don Suarez code enforcement
representing case 2550220179 property address is 13009 collecting Canal Road. The initial violation hearing was March 19th, 2025 where the master bond for the town
of Lach Rose with property was in violation of 92010 RV permit inspection maintenance departments. A notice of the fine assessment hearing was sent via certified mail on April 23rd,
2025. Was also posted at town hall. same date, April 23rd, 2025. As of May 1st, 2025, a reinspection was performed. There is still an RV on site without a proper affidavit or a permit. Registration not
filed. Photographs were taken. Have made no contact with the property owner. The co- compliance division recommends there's plan to be found in violation of the order that was dated March 19, 2025 and be assessed the fine
in the order amount of $100 per day commencing on April 19, 2025 as well as administration cost of $2345. In addition to my testimony, I'll experimentation when you didn't post this one, right? You just have a signed green card. Yes.
or the confirmation of delivery, I guess. Okay. For the record, is the respondent present? Seeing none, I'll enter the town's evidentiary case files composite exhibit one without objection. I'll find based on the uh notice documents in the case file, which
include USPS tracking confirmation of delivery on April 26th that the town had good service for this morning's hearing. I'll find uh based on the testimony of the code enforcement officer as well as the photographs in the case file that the
respondents did not comply with uh code section 92-010 by the date required in the prior order finding violation which was April 18th. I'll assess a fine in the amount of $1,600 and continuing at $100 per day until the
violation is complied. That period of time is 16 days from April 19th to May 5th. Because I've uh will issue that order, I will award the town it administrative cost in the amount of 23405 for today's hearing. Uh, same question on the admin costs for the
prior hearing. Are they unpaid still? Unpaid. Okay. So, in addition to the uh fine assessment, excuse me, the administrative cost for today's fine assessment hearing, I'll also reaffirm the March admin cost in the amount of
23405. All right. Anything further? No, ma'am. With the exception that um our next special magistrate um hearing is Wednesday, May 21st, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. All right. With that, I'll adjourn at
10:27.