All right. Uh, good evening everybody. Uh, we'll see if I can remember how Matt does this. Um, welcome to the May 11th uh, meeting of the planning board. Uh, we are here in the Botta room at town hall. Um, you can join us via
the Zoom link in the agenda or come on down here to town hall. Um, all right. Uh, we'll start off with board comment. Does anybody Oh, uh, we're going to try and go kind of quick tonight uh because we've got a hard cap
of 7 o'clock. So, we'll try and get through as much as we can. Um, any board comment? Nope. >> All right. Excellent. uh chair or director's report. >> Uh well, folks, by now I've sent you um example bylaws from a handful of
communities for senior housing and inclusionary housing. By the end of the week, I'll send you some more examples for uh cluster housing. Once again, I'd like to receive your comments by the end of the month. Any
way you want to give them to me. That way I can put together draft bylaws that we can look over together um in June and we'll spend the summer hashing out the language until we come up with something that we're all comfortable
with. And then we'll uh spend the fall shopping those bylaws around all the other boards, committees, commissions, and departments public forum. and then we'll bring them to next year's town meeting. So, that's really all I
have for you. >> Okay. Excellent. Thank you. Um, all right. In that case, uh, we will move on to the first thing on our docket. Uh, we have an ANR for Zero Reservoir Road.
This the one we just signed. So, Brian Marcetti here, Marti Engineering, uh here on behalf of STP Realy Trust. I believe Justin presented this to you at the last meeting. Um, so this revised ANR plan reflects the four
lots with uh the switch from when we were with a common drive now to individual access from their lots adding the uh proposed drainage easements to the three properties involved here. So as I said Justin presented at the last meeting he wanted to make sure everyone
was on board before we printed out the myars. So the myar has been delivered to board. So, you have everything here uh for signature. >> Lee, you you said the uh the board members have endorsed it. >> Oh, they're all signed.
>> I move we endorse the ANR for Zero Reservoir Road. >> I'll second. >> All right. Moved and seconded. Uh all in favor? I >> I >> Great. They could all be this easy, man. We'll get we'll get everything in at this rate.
>> Just approved. Approved. Approved. approved. >> All right. Um the only one that needs opening is Summer Street, right? >> 149 Summer Street. >> Yeah. Okay, great. Um then, oh yeah,
sorry, there's two. Um next up we have 30 Summer Street. >> That one requiring a special permit. You're not going to be able to vote on that tonight. >> Okay. Um, Graves has completed its second peer review and all outstanding
items have been addressed. So, unless the board has any other issues they want to raise, you should be able to close and vote on this matter at your next meeting night. >> Okay. >> Okay.
>> Yeah. Uh, Ryan, Proctor, Dillis, and Rory, I was here basically to echo that comment. If you're not able to vote tonight, then we might as well request a continuence of your next meeting. >> Sure. I move we continue uh >> June 8th >> I'm in the wrong one. Uh the project at
30 Summer Street, PBSW25-6, PBSA25-8 and PBSP25-9 to the 8 June meeting at 605. >> Second. >> Moved and seconded. All in favor? >> I.
>> Excellent. >> All right. Uh 222 West Townsen Road is next up. >> And this one, storm water permit. We don't have any problem with how many people we have on the board. Correct. >> No, you're good here. Um the applicant
has revised their plans to address Graves comments in their first peer review letter. We have since heard back from Graves with their secondary peer review and they said all outstanding items have
been addressed. So unless the board members have any other items to raise, you should be able to close and act on this these applications. >> I do have one Oh, they're all separate permits, aren't they? >> Correct. >> Okay. >> Yep. We did that on purpose so it' be
simpler to finish a project and move on >> and they'll be done one at a time. Corre he's starting two at one two finish those close them out. Move on to the second two. >> I guess I don't have any outstanding
issues then. >> Okay. And we went through this before everything got sent to Graves. Graves has come back and said that they're happy. >> Correct. Um, okay. If that's the case, then >> I would ask the public if public comment.
>> Oh, yay. Of course. Uh, is there any public uh either here or on Zoom uh that would like to speak? I don't see any I don't see any hands on Zoom. Um, so we will move forward.
I move we approve Give me one sec. the project at projects at 222 West Towns and Road, PBSW26-2, PBSW26-3, PBSW26-4, and PBSW26-5
with the standard conditions and construction hours being, excuse me, Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturdays 8:00 a.m. to 12 to 1:00 p.m. No Sundays or holidays.
>> I will second. We also have to close the public hearing though. >> Oh, you're right. Well, I'll withdraw my motion. >> Motion to close the public hearing for 222 West Towns and Road Storm Roder permits. >> Second. >> Moved and seconded. All in favor? >> I I
>> I make my motion again. >> I'll second. >> Moved and seconded. All in favor? >> I. >> Wonderful. Thank you. Thank you very much. Okay, board members, you know the drill. I'll write up the decision tomorrow morning, send it to you and the
applicant. You've got any uh edits, um let me know. Um we don't hear back from you by the end of the week, Lee will call you in to sign the decision and once I get three signatures, we'll file it with the town clerk.
>> All right. Excellent. Um, next up we have 60 Cross Road and this is a storm water permit PBSW26-11. Uh, for the record, Chris Harrison with Hanning Engineering. Um, so we left off at the last meeting waiting on the
peerreview from Graves. Uh, we responded to that in kind. Uh, received his comment letter back a few days ago. No, all comments have been addressed. Um, in addition to that, it was also requested that a phasing plan or sequence, if you will, would be provided, which we did
provide. Uh, effectively, um, it starts at 64 Cross Road, transitions over to 68 and then to 30 Pine Grove with the addition being the last. uh with the intent that effectively as trades finish at each building, they kind of just move down the road. So, uh we did put that
into writing and was submitted online uh through the portal. Uh with that being said, if there's any other questions from the board, I'll be more than happy to answer them. Um and no, uh I didn't have any additional questions. Uh, and if Graves
has uh signed off, then uh does anybody else have anything they'd like to What's that? >> Public comment. >> Public comment every time. Um, is there anybody either here or on Zoom uh that would uh like to address anything or make any comments?
I do not see any. Um, so we I will accept a motion to close the hearing. >> Uh, so moved. >> Second. >> Moved and seconded. All in favor? >> I I >> All right. Um, I move we approve 6 the
project at 60 Cross Road PBSW26-11 construction hours to be Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturdays 8:00 a.m. to 100 p.m. Uh, and I would like to add a condition that the
phasing plan be attached to the decision and be incorporated in and that all construction phases included in each phase be complete and signed off prior to the issuance of occupancy or the submission of a bond.
>> I will second. >> All right. Moved and seconded. All in favor? I I >> Okay, let me make sure I capture your language, Adam. So before they seek a certificate of occupancy, what is it you want? >> Each of the phase each of the elements
outlined in the construction phasing letter is complete and signed off or a bond equivalent to the amount remaining for the work as placed and accepted by the board. >> Got it.
>> All right. Uh I think you're good to go. >> Great. Thank you. You're very welcome. So again, I'll write up that decision tomorrow, send it to you and the applicant. We don't receive any edits by the end of the week. We'll have uh Lee call you in
to sign. >> All right. Um and we are continuing 149 Summer Street. >> Just no. >> No, he's here. It's a site plan. Oh, it's right. Okay. Excellent. Uh 149 Summer Street. >> Uh the Lunberg Planning Board will hold
a public hearing on Monday, May 11th, 2026 at 6 p.m. Town Hall, 17 Main Street, Lunberg, Mass to hear and review a site plan approval application for the storage, display, and sale of 12 motor vehicles at 149 Summer Street, pursuant
to sections 250-8.4 of the code of the town of Lunberg. Subject property information. The location is 149 Summer Street in Lunberg, Mass. Assessor's Map 115, parcel number two. Owners are Philip
Smith and Lynn Jery Smith, 5 Hunt Road in Westford, Mass 01886. You can view the materials online at lunbergmma.al.opengv.com/arch opgov.com/arch with record ID PBSA-26-3
via an email request to the planning office planning at lunenbergmma.gov or in person at the planning office at 960 Mass Avenue in Lunberg. Board members, by way of introducing this project, uh this is site plan approval for the
storage, display, and sale of 12 motor vehicles on the property. The applicant already has a special permit for the zoning board for this use. They're not building any new buildings or parking.
Um, they're simply storing 12 of these motor vehicles on the property for sale. Um, I assume you're the applicant. Anything else you want to add? >> Thank you, Mr. Jon. >> No. >> Okay.
>> Fairly straightforward. I didn't bother sending it to Graves since they're not disturbing any earth. >> Uh, I did have a few questions. Um there's an current repair garage there that's going to continue to operate and the motor vehicle sales will be
in conjunction with that. >> Uh yes. >> Okay. >> That was all my questions. >> Mr. chairman uh Kevin Murphy for the petitioner. >> All right. Um board members, any other
>> Yeah, I don't have any here. Um and I don't see anything else that appears to be needed from us. Public comment. >> Public comment. >> Oh, that's right. >> Well, you'll get it. Is there any uh public in the building or on Zoom who
would uh like to contribute? All right. Uh seeing none, um I will accept a motion to close the hearing. >> Uh so moved. >> Second. >> Moved and seconded. All in favor? >> I I >> I. >> Uh I move that we approve the site plan
for 149 Summer Street, PBSA26-3. Um we don't need construction hours. Uh, I would condition submit to the board that we condition all cars for sale will be parked in the spaces numbered 1 to 12 on the site plan submitted with the application and dated September 19th,
2025. The site will have all parking spaces shown on the September 19th, 2025 plan newly painted before the sale of cars commences. And no cars may be parked on or stored on site outside of marked
spaces. >> I will second. >> Moved and second. Uh all in favor? >> I >> I >> Okay, let me make sure I have your language right. All cars for sale shall be parked in the
spaces 1 through 12 as shown on the site plan. >> Mhm. >> Uh, no cars other than those shall be stored on site. >> No cars may be parked or sto stored on site outside of marked spaces.
>> Got it. And then all the parking spaces shown will be repainted before the sale of cars commences. >> Uh and with that, you are all set. >> Great. Thank you. >> You're welcome.
>> So that's another decision I'll put together tomorrow. >> You just blew up Steve's entire Tuesday. >> Mhm. >> Job security right there. 10 parameter, you can open the hearing.
Let the applicant make their presentation, ask your questions, let the public ask their questions. Uh but since uh this deals with special permits, you're going to need to continue this to our June meeting. And
also, we haven't received Graves's review yet. So, that's another reason to continue. >> Okay. Uh, the Lunberg Planning Board will hold a public hearing on Monday, May 11th, 2026 at 6 p.m. Town Hall 17
Main Street, Lunberg, Mass, to hear and review uh two storm water permit applications covering 12 single family house lots at the following addresses: 28, 36, and 44 Parmentor Road. 2814
22 28 384450 and 56 Ruth Street pursuant to chapter 204 storm water and storm sewers of the code of the town of Lunenburgg. The planning board will also hear and review two shared driveway special permits that
will serve seven single family house lots at the following addresses. 8142284450 and 56 Roof Street pursuant to chapter 250-6.4 A7 of the code of the town of Lunberg.
Subject property information the address is 10 Parmentor Road Lunberg Mass. Assessor's map 136 parcel number 29. Applicant is Dillison Roy Engineering 1 Main Street Lunberg Mass 01462.
owner is PSG Ground Road LLC at 133 Lemonster Shirley Road in Lunenberg, Mass 01462. You can view the materials online at lunmberergmma.al.openggov.com/arch opengv.com/arch
with the record IDs PBSP-26-3 PBSP-26-4 PBSW-26-12 and PBSW26-13 or an email request to the planning office at planning lunenbergmma.gov of or in person at the planning office at
960 Mass Avenue in Lunberg. Great. >> Thank you very much. Uh Ryan Proctor, Adullis and Roy representing the applicant. Uh before I give my presentation where it's been acknowledged we have a special permit and we do need a supermajority. Would the board prefer I don't want to be disrespectful of the abiding time, but
would the board prefer if we defer this presentation to when you have a full board? >> It's entirely up to you. >> Okay. Um the chair can sign the Mullen rule certificate and participate after viewing. Um you're the applicant. It's
all at your peril. >> Okay. I will give a brief presentation then. Um happy to take any questions and then as noted we will um I expect that this will be sent to peer review. Um and we'll request continuence at that time. Uh so we have filed uh four applications all associated with the uh parent
project at 10 Parameter Road. I was here personally about two months ago I believe for the ANR for the creation of these lots and at that time we did have a discussion with the board on the phasing of the proposed project and the applications that we've submitted is in response to that discussion at that
time. So the four applications are really in uh sort of two parts. So I'll just read them out real quickly. the uh special uh the stormwater permit PBSW-26-12 and the uh special permit for the common
driveway PBSP uh-26-3 are for the construction of the plan I have on the top here on my board uh which is for five single family dwellings each with a private driveway and a common driveway that will serve four single family homes which are
identified as lots uh 5 6 8 and N the common driveway itself I'll speak to you first. So we are not seeking any waiverss uh for since this is new development. So um the common driveway is designed entirely within the uh as
defined in your bylaw and I do not believe we had any comments from the fire department or police department uh or I'm not mistaken any of the other uh departments in town on that application. The remainder of the lots will be accessed through the frontage on either
Ruth Street or Parmentor Street on the westerly portion of the site. For the individual lots uh for storm water management, we are proposing BMPPS typically with a roof uh excuse me driveway stone recharge trenches along the driveways ultimately discharging to
rain gardens each equipped with a sediment for bay uh at the bottom of the hill which is along the property frontage. For the common driveway itself, we have a little bit more of a conventional drainage system again with stone recharge trenches along the driveway. We do have an infiltration basin that I'll just point to along Ruth
Street and a rain garden uh along the upper portion of lot 8, I believe. We have uh erosion control barriers proposed along the property frontage and throughout the limit of work associated with the development. Each of the
proposed lots will be served by private septic and we have received an approval from the conservation commission and the Lunberg water district to extend water to this development. So we will have municipal water serving uh serving each of these lots. Uh with the exception of the water main extension, we are not
proposing any work within conservation jurisdictional areas for those two permits uh on Ruth and Parmentor that I just spoke of. uh with the exception of the three lots on the other common driveway which I have not spoken about because those are to the other two permits. So at that point I'd like to stop there
and see if there's any questions first on those uh six excuse me five single family lots and the common driveway serving the four lots and then I can go on to the the other two permit applications. >> How are you handling drainage
maintenance on the common driveway? So I believe there's an operation and maintenance agreement and manual that we've submitted. I assume that that would get um recorded along with any >> oper is there an association or some other way to financially guarantee that
that work is done by those four lots served by the driveway? >> I believe there will be an HOA created for those four lots only. >> Uh we'd like to see that before we approve everything. Okay. >> Yeah, we'll want to run that by town council. >> Okay. Um, do you have turning movements
of the firetruck on that common driveway? >> Yes, I believe it's on the detail page, which I can try to flip to. >> I can emergency turn around. >> Yeah, I didn't get all the way down there. >> Okay. >> Um,
>> okay. Was there any consideration for some sort of grass pave on the throat of that lot to make it an easier through than that multiple movement? >> Uh I'm sorry at the entrance of the driveway
>> uh where the fire department turnaround is. Yep. Was there any thought of like uh using some of some sort of grass pave system to make it like a U that isn't a permanent driveway, doesn't necessarily impact your storm water calculations, but provides for a movement where the
fire department isn't trying to do a three or five point turn at the end of a driveway. >> Yeah, I'm happy to look into that. I think that's a that's a good idea. And um we've talked about over time, I I think you were one of the proponents of this, either doing individual permits
for everything or phasing it. Uh so we'd look for you to submit a phasing plan that hits construction milestones. Uh I'm sure if you ask Steve, he would send you the one that was submitted for Crossroad. >> Okay. >> Or cross street. I always get them confused. Uh but it just gives us
something that we can attach to the decision. Gives us an easily identifiable recordable document so that going forward if this project is sold or in 10 years if they're still building these because interest rates in the market, we have
something that that's tied to it. >> Definitely. Yeah. And our intention was based on our previous conversations that each of the single individual lots here would be one phase, >> if you will, where they could be released at the end of construction. The common driveway itself with those four lots would be a separate phase.
>> Correct. But I think what what I'm looking for is to not have what is there? Nine lots here. >> Yes. >> To not have nine lots open at the same time. >> Understood. Okay. >> To have two lots open and as one closes out the next one opens. Now, that's a
little more challenging with the common driveway, but I think that can be worked into a phasing plan where maybe the two front ones are or the the front one is done and then you ease into the back ones as you move along. >> Understood. Okay. All right. Um,
if that's all we have, then uh we can move on to public comment. Um, do we have anybody in the room or on Zoom that would like to address any of this? I will just note I do still have the
before. I'm sorry. >> Oh, I'm sorry. Yeah, if I skipped ahead, please. >> No, that's okay. There isn't one more common driveway that was lumped in together. I just I didn't want to go through everything and something get lost in translation. So, there is one more common driveway. you can take public comment first. Okay. >> Uh thank you. Uh so the second two
applications were uh PBSW-26 uh-13 and PB uh SP-26-4. I'll just pull this board up. So the remaining two applications were a common driveway only at the uh at the
turning point of Ruth Street. This project we did just open in front of the conservation commission at their meeting last week. I believe it was continued at that time. There were a few outstanding comments and questions that they had. Uh but again, this this common driveway is serving only three lots. The stormwater
management system is uh nearly identical to the single family lots and the other common driveways where we have stone recharge trenches along the proposed driveway ultimately discharging to one of two uh rain gardens or infiltration basins at the bottom of Ruth Street or
at the lower portion of the uh of the property. The entire property drains from the top of the hill uh down towards the road. So that's where ultimately all more of our storm water best management practices end up. Um, again, we are not seeking any waiverss for the common driveway application here. It is
designed in compliance with your regulations, and I do not believe that there are any department comments for this application either. That is all I have to say about that one. >> Uh, I didn't see a turning movement on that when I just looked at the plans. >> Okay. >> For the truck.
>> Um, I again assume if the fire department didn't comment, it's not a big deal, but it's something I'd like to have us to have on the record. >> Absolutely. There's one on the top. >> Oh, there's a turnaround. I don't see the turning movement.
>> I'm sorry. I'm sorry. >> Um, all of my comments for the last application stand for this one. >> Sure. >> Um, with the addition of it appears that your uh overflow for the detention basin is discharging into the road, which I
understand is the wetland, which I understand is the low point. My concern would be that if the town in the future decides, oh wow, we messed up. We needed to create that culde-sac, they now are receiving the overflow from
that detention basin onto their property and anything that comes out of it becomes their responsibility under the MS4. And um if there's a way to have that not be the case, that would be preferable. >> Okay. All right. We will look at that.
I have a comment. This might be a Lunberg comment and not a Dillisen Roy comment, but >> I'm not a fan that we don't have feedback from the fire department for this plan. >> I was just going to mention that. I will
double check with the chief tomorrow and make sure that he's reviewed the plan for adequate access. >> Okay, perfect. Thank you. only cuz there was so many comments about the fire road 15 that it's off of and the quality of that road and just I want to make sure that they
>> Well, we're up here on this one and 15 is down here. >> Yeah, but >> so but this is this is sort of a dead end and then this is driveway to homes along the lake. Um but I agree it would be it would be nice to ensure that the fire department is confident that the
the turning movements are okay with them. >> I Yeah, thank you for that comment. I agree. A brief we're okay with it is definitely better than looking at a green checkbox. So Yep. Thank you. Right. Um does anybody on the board have anything more they'd like to address?
Right. Uh if that's the case, uh then we will take public comment. Um yes, please. Um, if you could come up to the podium, uh, give your name and address and, uh, continue on with, >> okay, >> what you'd like to say.
>> Uh, my name is Judy Viviano and I live on 13 Ruth Street. Um, my I live on an access road where I have the right of way. So, I sit downwood before the lake. I'm right on the lake. This is above the
property is above me. I I would be very interested in looking at a plot plan because my concern in the future and I've had experience where we've had a lot of rain of flooding and if they clear cut the hill and build homes, it's
going to create there's nothing to absorb. Right now it's loaded with trees and everything. And if they cut all those trees, it's going to the rain isn't going to have any place to go. And my concern is that they have appropriate drainage along that area so that the
water doesn't flow down because I'm going to be the recipient of all the water because I sit very low and then it's going to go from me right into the lake. >> Okay. So plans like this we send to our consulting engineer to review.
Um we've done that and we're waiting to hear back with their comments. they will undoubtedly have some comments that they will want the applicant to address. So, if you keep an eye out for the
Graves comments on opengv.com or what is it? >> What's the address? >> OpenGV.com using the PV >> or just contact the planning department and we'll make sure you get a copy of the engineering review. There's probably
going to be a couple done with with this project. >> Yep. >> And I'll make sure to pass on your concerns to the engineer. Yeah, that's my biggest concern because I don't want to get flooded and and we did and I think it was last year when they had the
ice and the buildup >> because my neighbor clearcut a little piece of property and as a result I got an awful lot of water in my yard to the point where I was considering whether or not I had to do something about it and this is really going to be a concern.
>> Um >> so thank you. Yeah. Uh just to give you an additional piece of information, um the storm water um permits that we look to approve, part of what their >> um goal or idea is is they should be
setting up the property in such a way that any water that that is on the property doesn't leave the property. It infiltrates before. Um so I ideally the permits they have to go through should protect your property. >> Okay. For every storm water permit,
there are 40 standard conditions from soup to notch beginning to end. Okay. To >> make sure that they do it right. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Thanks very much. >> Uh would anybody else like to speak? Uh and I don't see anybody on Zoom. Um
Oh, yes. >> A quick question. If you could sorry just as formality if you could come up to the podium please. >> I just have a quick question. So when you do the continuence for this um there will be an opportunity to speak at the next meeting. >> Absolutely.
>> Okay. That's >> okay. >> Um all right. If we've taken public comment uh we need to continue this. Um so I will accept a motion for that. Uh, unless did you have anything else you
wanted to address? >> Question. >> Yes. >> Um, I frankly I'm not the design engineer on this project, but has this been sent to peer review already? >> Yes, it has. >> Okay, then we'd be happy to request a continuence to your next meeting, please. >> All right, sounds good. >> Thank you.
Uh motion to continue 10 Parameter Road storm water permits PBSW-26-12 and PBSW26-13 and special permits PBSP-26-3 and PBSP-26-4 to the planning board's next meeting on
June 8th, 2026 at 6:05 p.m. >> Second. >> Moved and seconded. All in favor? I >> I >> I >> thank you. >> Excellent. And 860 New West Townsen contacted us for a continuence, so we're
not dealing with that tonight. >> I move we continue 860 New West Towns and Road PBSA26-1, PBSP26-1, and PBSW26-1 to 8 June at 605.
>> Second. >> Moved and seconded. All in favor? I >> I >> Great. Oh, look at that. We did make through all of it. Make it through all of it. >> Um, okay. Then we can move on to
decisions and business. Um, I assume Matt probably >> I haven't seen the master plan, so >> I'm not ready to discuss and approve it. >> All right. >> Okay. We'll make that a June item as well. >> Yeah. And then uh 250 and 356 Hollis
Hill Road uh tax title. Um let me get to that >> again. I think that this is the ones that we discussed briefly at our last meeting. The old Lake Lodge and the uh land in the rear. Um I think that there
are a multitude of things we could do with the lake lodge. uh I don't think financially that the claiming of it makes much sense or that we would find the funding to do so. Um
so yes, I think there are ways and things we could do with it. Uh and if the select board had a magic money tree or a secret sack of cash like in the cartoons with the money sign on it, I'd be all for it. But I think at this point
we need to worry more about um some longevity and economic development and put our energies into commercial reasonzoning and uh encouragement of of business. >> Agreed.
>> Yeah. Uh, I move we recommend the select board uh place these properties for auction uh unless another department or board has uh a pressing need for them and the money to pay for them. >> I will second.
>> All right. Uh moved and seconded. All in favor? I >> I >> Great. Um, does anybody have anything additional they'd like to discuss or outside of these? >> Nope.
>> Excellent. All right, then we will go on to committee reports. Um, I there wasn't uh haven't had a master plan steering committee since the last meeting. Um,
open space committee meeting is this Wednesday. Um, >> so you've invited me to that meeting. >> Um, I'm going to discuss with the open space committee the possibility
of setting up a conservation fund where they go to every annual town meeting and ask for a small amount of money that they can set aside for land conservation purposes.
2500, $5,000. Um, if you do that for three or four years, you're going to have enough money to pay for an appraisal of a property should one come up for sale through the
tax title uh through a a chapter withdrawal submission. Um, if you find a property that you think the town should buy and you want to interest a regional land
trust to help you with getting a grant for that purchase, they usually like to see that the town has some skin in the game. And that skin in the game usually takes the form of the town paying for the property appraisal. So, if you set
aside some money every year in a conservation fund, at some point you will have enough money to pay for a a property appraisal should a property come up through the chapter land withdrawal process. So,
that's what I'm going to pitch to you guys tomorrow night. >> Excellent. Excellent. Um, and I just double check the agenda is posted. It has the Zoom link, so you can just follow that. >> Okay. So, I may be in my jammies, but we'll for sure.
>> All right. Excellent. Um, is Matt Municipal Capital and Economic? >> Okay, great. Skip those three. >> Uh, stormwater task force meeting is on Thursday. I've got a three meeting week. >> Um, Montichus
uh regional planning commission. >> Uh, that meeting was last week. I had a conflict so I could not attend. >> Okay. And then the uh joint transportation committee >> is this week on Wednesday. >> Okay. Okay. On
these two items, uh MRPC representative from the planning board. >> Mhm. >> And transportation committee representative from the planning board. They've asked us who on the board they want
uh who who on the board wants to take that position for the upcoming year. So, I've placed that on the agenda for next month. >> Yeah. >> If you want to do it again, >> everybody hates it, so that's why I do it. >> Okay. Just know that I'll be asking one
of you to uh or to take over uh these positions for for another year. >> I'll be like Melly. >> That's it. >> That's it. Thanks. >> Um did everybody get an opportunity to go over the minutes from the last meeting?
>> All right. Great. Okay, I'll accept a motion then. >> Um motion to approve the planning board's minutes from our April 27th, 2026 meeting. >> Second. Moved and seconded. All in favor? >> I I
>> wonderful. Uh meeting schedule 6:00 as always. Um we have meetings June 28th, June 22nd, July 13th, and July 27th. All right. >> And the next one on the June uh 8th.
>> Yeah. Yes. Okay. Um All right. Um and if that's where everybody is, then I'll accept a motion to adjourn the meeting. >> So moved. >> Second. >> Moved and seconded. All in favor? >> I >> I Wow, look at that. All right.