You want to just pull that agenda from the I didn't pull the agenda. I have it. Okay. >> All right. Good evening everyone. It is 400 p.m. and I'm calling the select board to order >> in accordance with the requirements of the open meeting law. Please be advised
that this meeting is being recorded and broadcast live over the Lunberg public access channel on Facebook Live on the Public Access Facebook page and will be uploaded to the Lunberg Access YouTube channel after the meeting. The agenda lists all the topics which may be discussed at the meeting and are those reasonably anticipated by the chair.
Votes may be taken as a result of these discussions. Not all items listed may in fact be discussed and other items not listed may also be brought up for discussion to the extent permitted by the open meeting law. Please stand for the pledge of allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the
United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> Okay, announcements. I will just remind everyone if you happen to be watching
this, uh, maybe you should just shut it off and get ready and head on down to the library because the library's 20th birthday party takes place uh, at 5:00 p.m. this evening and it's going to be a great event. So, you should consider going public comment. Is there any public
comment from the board this evening? >> No. >> Any public comment from the public? See if there's anyone on Zoom. Nope, not seeing anyone. All right, moving on. Old business discussion and vote on special town meeting warrant and booklet. So, we have a couple that we
left for today, but we're just going to run through it all and make sure we get everything once I find it. Where did I put so many copies now? >> Here's the one I'm looking for that I annotated. Okay. Article one, authorization to hear and
or accept the reports of officers and committees of the town. It's included and recommended approval 50. Article two, amending the fiscal year 2026 omnibus budget. We voted to include and we voted to defer and that should stay that way. Article three, authorization to pay
expenses from a prior fiscal year. Same thing. Oh, we do have a bill now. Haywood Hospital in the amount of $266. >> Okay. Article four. All right. So, this is the one that we have not voted on yet and it looks like it was merged. Um it's
just the storm water consulting in the amount of $42,900 and we're using um a unexpended capital project to pay for it. Okay. So I will move to include article 4 in the warrant. >> I think do we have anything? >> No, we didn't.
>> Second. >> Those in favor say I. >> I. >> Those opposed? No. >> No. >> Motion passes 421. Do you want to tell us why you didn't vote for that? uh just
>> and this is just for the funding of the [Music] consultant for the storm water. Mhm. >> So that's essentially helping establish the the the process to implement the stom water utility fee.
Is it I'm just I'm just concerned that overall the um the solution to the storm water issues is you know another example of the lack of funding appropriate funding from the state.
>> Uh you know and so this this $42,000 doesn't go to address any specific issues or problems. It's specifically to >> basically build up this. Yeah. So, it just seems it seems like we're spending 42,000 an additional $42,000
to for a foregone conclusion that there will be a storm water utility fee. Um, you know, if these were funds were going directly to address address a problem, um, you know, I'd feel I'd feel more more comfortable.
>> Okay. So, just to be clear, this we just voted to include it in the warrant. This is not whether to recommend approval or not. This is just to put it in the warrant so it can be discussed at town meeting. >> Right. So, we potentially could spend $42,000 on a consultant and then not
adopt a stomod. >> No, this article could go it's in the warrant. It would be voted on at town meeting and it could be voted down. >> That's the whole point of town meeting, right? Right. >> This is just to put it on the warrant, not that we recommend it or not. >> We have two votes. One to to include
articles in a warrant. And then the second vote is to whether we recommend approval, right, >> or not. >> Yes. I guess I just I guess I just struggle with actually I I'm fully in favor of it going on the warrant. That's not
>> So that was just that was that's what I'm saying. >> I apologize. I I was on the recommended side of things. So, what we can do is we can revote that and then we can vote to recommend >> figure out why we have so much feedback in here. My brain is not >> to the booth. We're getting a lot of feedback in here. So, maybe if we even just turn the volume in the room down a little bit. I think that would work.
>> Shut it off while they're not talking. >> Yeah, I shut mine off. Renee shut hers off. So, I think it's more than that cuz we only have one on right now. >> Maybe that one's >> Yeah, it might be the podium. >> Yeah. >> Is there a way to shut that off? I don't
actually know. I think she just did because now it sounds better. >> Okay. Thank you. All right. Sounds like we >> Thank you to the booth. >> Um so we can just revote that. Um so should we just do the same motion or should >> I make a motion to reconsider? >> Yeah, I think that's fine.
>> I'll make a motion to reconsider. >> Second. >> All right. Those in favor say I. >> I. I. >> Those opposed? No. Motion passes unanimously. Now we'll move to include article five four in the warrant. >> No, we just included it. Now we >> we haven't yet. We have to revote it because
>> Oh, you just reconsidered. >> Yeah. Yeah. I'm sorry. >> That's okay. >> Sorry about that. >> No, it's fine. >> Um, was there a second? >> I will second. >> Did we have a motion to >> I move? Okay. >> Okay. So, motions remain and seconded. Those in favor say I.
>> I. Those opposed, no. >> The motion passes unanimously. So, 50 to include. And now I will move to recommend approval. >> Uh, second. >> Any additional discussion? Those in favor say I. >> I. Those opposed, no. >> Nope. >> Motion passes four to one.
>> Okay. Article five, public access cable committee, transfer of funds, and it looks like it was updated. So, the only one here is the transfer sum of $35,271. Now, >> yes. So, um there was the 31,271 that um they had attempted to transfer
at the at the annual town meeting, but the retained earnings were not um certified as of yet. So, this uh basically replicates that vote to effectuate the vote that was intended at the annual town meeting. And there's a
$4,000 additional appropriation um from uh the retained earnings for a videographer or for additional videographer funds. Um, this just kind of the language here that was being changed cleans up the way that we're passing the money from the uh
retained earnings to the enterprise and excludes the general fund. >> Mhm. Okay. I will move to include article 5 in the warrant. >> Second. >> Any additional discussion? Those in favor say I. >> I. I. >> Those opposed, no. Motion passes unanimously and I will move to recommend approval for article 5.
>> Second. >> Any additional discussion? Those in favor say I. I >> those opposed. No. The motion passes unanimously. Okay. >> Article six, cemetery commission transfer funds included. Recommended approval 50-0. Article 7, authorization
to fund a sum of money for project estimators included. Recommended approval 50. Article 8, establishment of a special education reserve fund included. Recommended approval 41. Article 9, 41A, property tax deferral included. Recommend approval 50-0. Same
thing with article 10, 21 Main Street easement. Article 11, transfer the care, custody, and control of Kids Kingdom and the land it is on from the school committee to the select board included. Recommend approval 50. Article 12, notice of town meeting. Same
thing. Article 13, MBTA zoning act compliance. It was included and deferred for their public hearing. That's going to be on Monday. Same thing for the next one when I get there. Yep. Article 14, removing batuminous concrete requirements from common
driveways. And now article 15, amendments to the salary administration plan SAP position titles and grades. Um I'm not sure what we got for feedback on this one. Was there really much >> uh just instead of putting the asterisk in the grade column to move those
asterisks right next to the title. >> Okay. >> And leave the grade blank. And then instead of just saying subject to an employment agreement, um, labor council added provided that the other terms and conditions of employment for said position shall be subject to an employment contract in accordance with
section 70-30. Um, so it just clarifies that and I added to the summary the following language. The article also creates the position of special assistant to the assessor temporary. The board of assessors have um I need to add the the board of assessors
have received directives from the department of revenue to complete prior to the next full reevaluation in 2029. One of the directives is to review all residential neighborhood delineations in accordance with land value and then adjust them as needed prior to the next certification.
Consideration should be given to conducting a neighborhood study for all residential park parcels and market areas. Neighborhood three and the waterfront neighborhoods will need to be re annually reviewed and refined by the cessors. This special assistant will assist the town in working towards compliance with the do directives.
>> Okay. Is there any discussion on that? I will move to include article 15 in the warrant. >> Second. >> Those in favor say I. >> I. Those opposed? No. The motion passes unanimously. Okay. Article 16 salary administration plan amendment.
>> Sorry, what? to recommendation. >> Oh, my bad. I move to recommend approval for article 15. >> Second. >> Those in favor say I. >> I. I. >> Those opposed, no. The motion passes unanimously. Okay.
Article 16, salary administration plan amendments, changes other than the personnel committee. Uh, so the biggest thing here that um, labor council added was language for the vacation time. So, let me just get it. >> And while you're pulling that up, Mr. chairman. So, the way that this article
will read um in the in the uh mailing is that to see if the town will vote to amend the SAP as shown on a document entitled November 18th, 2025 special town meeting article 16 SAP amendments relative to so-called fringe benefits or
indirect provisions such as holidays and vacations with pay, sick leave and the like dated October 27th, 2025 on file with the office of the town clerk. Um, so that's the language that will be included here. Um, but that the
handouts on this will be available or the the actual language will be available on Monday in the office of the town clerk and probably not until the end of business. Um, but will be available and filed on Monday and um will be available online and will be
available via handout. So those 17 pages of text that's over here that we're going to go through >> Mhm. >> won't be here. >> Okay. Thank you. Okay. So the vacation time is 70-18. Are we all there?
>> So are we not going over the comments and the sections? >> We can't. I just wanted to start because this was like the biggest thing here. So I just wanted to start with that. >> Okay. >> But yeah, we can go over all of it. Um Okay. So there's two parts that were added really to address how this is
actually going to happen. So the first part in the beginning, so all changes to section 70-18 shall be effected July 1st, 2026 as to employees employed by the town on or before November 18th, 2025. So anyone already employed by the town at the time of special town
meeting. It shall apply upon hire to employees hired after November 18th, 2025. And then if you go to the next page or two pages from here, um J it looks like. So to effectuate the transition from the
prior vacation leave benefit to the acrrualbased vacation leave system, any vacation time earned and unused as of July 1st, 2026 shall be converted into a one-time vacation bank. Employees shall be required to use at least one-third of their bank time during each of the
following three fiscal years. So FY27, FY28, and FY29. Bank vacation shall be used in accordance with town policies. All employees with a balance over 120 hours as of June 30th, 2026 shall receive a lump sum buyout of all time
over 120 hours. The bank vacation shall be maintained as a separate balance and used prior to newly acred leave in any given fiscal year provided employees may combine the last of their vacation leave from their vacation bank for a given year and acred vacation leave from the
given year to cover a single block of time. Employees may request and the town manager may approve subject to the availability of funds to be paid for a greater amount of their balance as of June 30th, 2026. Any remainder shall, as detailed above, be banked in three equal
increments for FY27, 28, and 29, unless the employee and town manager agree that the bank time shall be used in a shorter period of time. Beginning July 1st, 2026, employees employed on or before November 19th, 2025 shall begin acrewing vacation on a monthly basis as outlined
above. >> Now, this is the same language from the police contract. Is that correct? >> It's a little bit different. It's mostly the same. Um the biggest difference is that it gives if we it gives the authorization subject to availability of
funds that we can buy down the whole bank if we want. >> Y makes sense without having to cover shifts and everything else. >> Mhm. >> Mhm. >> Okay. >> Any other questions on that? >> Do you know do we have a lot of folks over 120? No, I don't think so.
>> No. the ones that are retiring. >> Gotcha. >> Next week. >> Okay. So, it doesn't sound like there's any >> Not all of them, but most of them, just to be clear. >> And if anyone were to leave, we pay out the vacation. Any vacation that's in the bank? >> Oh, yes. That's required by law. Yes.
>> Okay. >> Okay. So, it doesn't sound like there's any issue with that. >> Um, are there any other Renee? I know you wanted to Are there any ones in particular that you wanted to cover? No, I haven't had a chance to. >> So, do you want to some of the other ones here? I just see a lot of
>> comments. A lot of it's technical. That was >> some a lot of this is technical. So, >> um but let's go through just so folks feel comfortable of where we are because this document I'm going there were a couple spots where um labor council I don't think quite understood what we
what the objective was and needs to tweak the language around that. But um so the first change he made under job descriptions and interpretations, we had added new language that said job descriptions shall be reviewed at a minimum upon the exit of an existing
employee. And then he just added the language and before the town seeks to fill the vacancy so that it's clear that that there's a window there. Um in section uh C under that it said annually the human resources director shall make recommendations to the town manager and
the select board regarding annual cost of living increases for consideration at town meeting. His comment here was that the the traditional functions of the human resources director do not take into account um the town's overall financial picture and so that this
should change to annually the town manager shall make recommendations to the select board regarding so that's the change there if folks are good with that. Um, >> yeah. I mean, that means that we would
be approving it before it goes to town meeting for approval. Essentially, >> it's just it's requiring that annually it sorry, it's requiring that annually we're at least making recommendations so that even if it's the recommendation would be zero that that
would happen every year >> presented. >> Exactly. It's ensuring that it's presented and considered. Does it uh consideration at annual? Do we do we put at annual town meeting?
>> Good. Good catch. Yep. Thank you. Okay. He had a comment on a section that we weren't changing that I don't think we should go into at this point. Um, so section 70-11, this is where he did
not understand what we were trying to do. Okay. So I need to ask him to reddraft this to accomplish the mission. uh which is if you are on a grade and you get a promotion that when you when you move to
the next grade, we're going to take in into consideration what your step increase would have been that year and move you one at least to that. So there had been situations where people potentially were losing money. So he didn't quite capture that here. Um, I think with a conversation he can fix
that and I do not think that the board would need to vote again on that. Um, if you are in agreement with the concept as long as we find that it's accurately captured. >> That's fine with me. >> That's both an A and C. >> Yep.
>> Okay. In 70-12A, you see a lot of comments on the side that are actually quite simple. um it was a back and forth between he and I. So this um is language that in the event that the personnel committee does not
have enough members to conduct business, the select board shall have the authority to administer uh this provision of the SAP. And then in the next article, there's a potential that town meeting is going to dissolve the personnel committee. So how to handle
that? and um he basically indicates that you would handle it in the motion of the next article amending that next article >> if that makes sense. >> Yep, makes sense. >> Um and then uh these deletions and
changes that he have he has in BNC, I do not think that they're necessarily warranted or should be included. It's historical and I don't know why I wouldn't be striking it. So, I need to ask him that. Um, which ones? >> 70-12B. >> I just don't see what he struck. There's
no >> He struck He struck the um date. >> Is it C? >> It said effective July 1st, 2015. >> Oh, so >> and then he made parttime A and part time B bold for some reason, which that's this is this language should have been left alone. So I got to ask him why he touched it.
>> Okay. >> But I don't think that those should be touched. Okay. Okay. Um he added some clarification language around the grievance pro procedure. He actually recommended that we remove
this language entirely. Um but uh in the first um paragraph where we explain what the goal is and how we would like to see grievances settled in formally. He he added the language the preferred method of addressing
grievances is informally. he added with the employee supervisor. >> Mhm. >> Um and then he he gave um just a mostly a rewarding in B to make it more clear
about the timing, but it the 10 days was already in there. >> Mhm. >> Any questions about that? >> No. >> No. So, how do we leave it with the if your grievance is with your supervisor?
>> Uh, oh, that's in B. >> If the employee is not comfortable discussing the matter with their department head or if the matter is not settled, then they go to the HR director. >> Mhm. Okay. >> Okay. On the next page, um, that's a
rephrasing of the sentence. um just a change in order and then um the chairman had already talked about most of the changes in 70-18 to paid vacation. Um
there you see a striketh through in part A about employees being capped who are part-time A that just moved lower uh where we talk about the caps for other employees. And he suggested that um when we're
allowing folks to take um vacation time in the red that we require uh approval of the department head and the HR director. um >> based on, you know, wanting to approve that liability.
>> And then in the E, you see where he moved that part-time A cap down to that section. That's just a movement. And then the chair already talked about section J. >> Remind me part-time A, part-time B. >> Yes,
>> there's a cut off for the amount of hours. >> It's the hours. Yep. So, is it >> part-time A? I think it's 20 >> is employees working regularly scheduled um fewer than 20 hours per week and
part-time B is in other worlds considered a full-time employee uh or benefited employee is between 20 and 36. >> Part-time B is between 20 and 36. >> Yep. >> 20 kicks in benefits. >> Some Yep. was called part-time.
>> Yep. >> Yeah. It's a little strange. It >> I almost thought about changing this from part-time A and parttime B to fulltime A and fulltime B. And then I said, let's not confuse everybody. >> Okay. Thank you. So, all right. We have some technical things that are still
being worked out. >> Oh, no. We're still going. Hold on. >> Are we still going? >> We are. >> Where are we? >> We're on page 12. >> Oh, you're right. Okay. >> Um, he struck some language that he felt was superolous. um in e about being able to being
required to be in a paid status on the day before and after a holiday in order to be paid for the holiday. We had had clarifying language in there. Um he he believes that it's unnecessary because of the term paid status.
Julie uh believes it should stay for clarification to employees. Is there an opinion of that red language that he struck at the end? I see what he's saying, but I don't I also don't see the harm in leaving it.
Right. Just so that it's very clear. is the the black bold that's crossed out. That's >> that was that was me. That was a strike out for me. >> Okay. So, I'm just reading the red strike out. >> Yeah, I think Yeah, it can stay.
>> Yeah. keep for clarity. >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> Okay. I do have a question about the sick leave benefit. Um there's no ramp up period. I believe this is going to have
that similar preamble language that says effective July 1st, 2022nd for all um new employees or for all employees currently employed. I need to check with him on that because I was expecting to see that date language here.
>> And what about the um consecutive days of work? Did that >> three three consecutive? >> I think he I think that that do you know what section that was? >> Uh E. >> Thank you.
>> So those he did not make any changes to that section. Mhm. >> But I thought we had wanted to change that. >> Yeah. Was it the three days >> because it would otherwise if they call in sick three days within a year. Yeah. >> Oh, consecutive. >> Three consecutive. >> Thank you, Glenn. Thank you. And more housekeeping, but it makes
makes reference to a doctor's certificate and a doctor's note like the last sentence starting with for the protection of and just to comment I I think that's wholly inade like >> where where do you see where's the certificate?
>> So for the protection the town the department head supervisor may require the presentation of a doctor's certificate >> and then the last sentence it says doctor >> no. >> Yeah. Yeah. I don't even know what a certificate would be. >> Yeah. So, let's make that note. No. >> Mhm.
>> And I And just a comment. It's still fine, but 3 days is I think inappropriate. Too too short. >> I don't disagree. I do think that's like across the board for >> Yeah, I'm sure. I'm sure it is. >> But I don't disagree. >> Yeah. >> Especially in the world of CO and
everything else. >> It's I know it's true for us, but it's at the discretion of the supervisor. >> Yeah. They require it. Yeah, that's kind of what gives me the the concern. Like you could have an employee that overshares their health and people won't ask them for a doctor's note and someone
who's very private >> won't and they may get they may get asked for a certificate. I I feel with um sick days like if it's 15 days a year, it kind of has a built-in checks and balance system in of itself. Like if
you use them all, you're really just penalizing yourself. But I just I just think it I think it leaves the three days leaves it open for like a dis disparit kind of application of that. You could pick and choose an employee. But anyway, that's we don't have >> that would be illegal.
>> Well, that would I mean >> well that's what I think that opens up to is just three three days is is is sure that might we can think about that down the road, but >> I'm like I'm still in favor overall. >> No, I get what you're saying though. But
so for now we're going to change certificate to note and three consecutive. Yes, I'll add those. >> Okay. >> All right. Almost done with this. >> On page 15, he just clarified the definitions around
non-exempt and then exempt on page 16. And that is all. >> Okay. So, um, I will reach out to Attorney Terry about these questions and clarifications likely over the weekend and I'm
expecting to connect with him on Monday and then I will incorporate them um and put them on the document that's on file with the town clerk. As a reminder, if there are things that are minor in nature that we want to change between now and town meeting, we can do that in the motion.
>> Yep. Gotcha. Okay. Any other discussion on any of this that we want to have tonight? All right. So, I will move to include article 16 in the warrant. >> Second. >> Any additional discussion? Those in favor say I. I. >> I. Those opposed? No. Motion passes
unanimously and I will move to recommend approval for article 16 >> with the changes we discussed. >> Well, it's not really in >> Yeah, that's fine. With the changes discussed tonight. >> Yeah. Yeah. Uh second. >> Those in favor say I. I.
>> I. Those opposed, no. Motion passes unanimously. >> Uh just so this board is aware, um I did present last night to the finance committee and I told them that there would be a financial impact of this article at least in the terms of vacation time. Um which I'm going to
codify for them before their hearing. Okay. >> So I'll share that with you all when I have that number. >> Great. Thank you. Okay. Article 17, Salary Administration, Plan Amendments, Personnel Committee. Um, >> what was Labor Council's review of that? >> So, there was only
one change. Oh, this printed upside down, half upside down. >> He didn't even redline it. He gave it to me over the phone. Okay. and 70-8 salary schedule
on pa bottom of page five. I just had that language was not struck in the original and I asked him what it even meant and he he just said so that's the change that's the only change is that language being struck between now and the last time >> but unless otherwise authorized. >> Yes. So there's really no changes that
>> he did not have any changes to this other than that. >> All right, cool. Any questions? >> I will move to include article sorry I >> 17 >> 17. Thank you. >> Did we have any other >> Sorry. Go ahead. >> Second but
do we have any other questions from the first time we discussed this? No. >> Okay. No, >> not that I've been tracking. >> All their questions were from the other article actual SAP changes. >> No, because we've got everything from DLS.
>> It probably would have been from >> Huh. >> If there was, it probably would have been from you, but maybe it was just the other one. >> No, it was just the other one. Okay. >> So, this one similarly would have a document um on file with town clerk. November 18th, 2025 special town meeting
art article 17 personnel committee dated October 27th 2025 which we'll also put online and um I don't think I had a summary written last time for you. So this is the summary largely from the beginning of the the kind of like white
paper type document that I had put together on personnel boards. Um but just including across the Commonwealth towns are suns setting personnel boards and committees and consolidating HSR authority under professional management and HR staff. This shift improves compliance speed, reduces fragmentation,
clarifies accountability and aligns with modern labor law and risk management. There has been sustained action in this area rather than a one-off trend. financial reviews by the division of local services. DLS routinely flag personnel boards and committees as a duplicative and unnecessary bureaucrat
bureaucratic layer and DLS has commented that towns are ultimately best served by having a professional manager who can develop and oversee a full-time structured personnel management program and this approach recognizes the growing importance of and risks inherent in personnel issues. Handouts on this
article will be available at town meeting and available online >> in advance of town meeting. Great. >> I'm going to be nitpicky. Can we capitalize town >> where >> towns in the summary across the Commonwealth? Towns. I just like to say
capital >> when it's plural. >> Yeah, that's what I was going to say. >> The the town. The town. >> Lunenburgg. The town is capital. Town. Town town and towns is a distinction. When plural, you don't capitalize. >> Well, no, it's about whether you're talking about the proper town.
>> I see. Okay. It just looks strange. >> Dad versus all the dads. >> Yeah. >> Right. >> Okay. >> Right. Right. I don't know why I just said dad, but I did. >> Gotcha. That's fine. Okay. Any other discussion? Okay. Um motion's been made and
seconded. Those in favor say I. >> I. >> I. Those opposed, no. The motion passes unanimously. Um Okay. So, I will move to recommend approval on I already I forgot which one it is again. Article 17. Second.
>> Any additional discussion? Those in favor say I. I. >> I. >> Those opposed? No. >> Nope. >> The motion passes 4 to one. >> Okay. >> All right. >> So, we did vote to appro to recommend approval of 16, right?
>> Sip. >> Yeah, we did. >> We did. >> Yep. >> I thought it was just to include. >> No, I did both. >> You did both. >> Are you sure? >> 100%. Did I miss it? >> We can vote. I know we Yeah, we did. >> Okay. Cuz I didn't write it down. >> We can do it again if you want. >> It was unanimous. >> I didn't write it down. I'm trying to
fill in my my sheet. >> I know. My sheet is so scratched up now at this point. >> Yeah, I know. That's part of the problem. >> Okay. So, that's the warrant in its entirety. Um, we have the booklet here, too, with the index.
>> Yeah. So I just I just printed out the pages that were not the warrant gets shoved in here. >> Um so I need to update the index as much as we can. Um
and then there is an updated letter from the chair with the the vacancies um as present. Um, I included um a little something for me to explain that uh the handouts in addition would be available and that documents on file
with the town clerk will also be posted online and a reference to the public hearing of the finance committee on November 13th and that just apprising voters that um final recommendations by the select board finance committee and other boards may be made up in up to and
including town meeting night um and encouraging them to attend. And then there will be at the end a handout on storm water um to >> uh meet one of our MS4 compliance requirements by mailing something to all the voters. >> Right. All right. Nothing really in
there to review. So, all right. We went through the warrant. That's pretty much it unless there's uh anything else anyone needs to say about this. All right. Upcoming meetings. We were meeting November 4th and then special town meeting is November 18th. Is there any
public comment from the public? Not seeing anyone. No one else is on Zoom. >> Any public comment from the town manager? >> No. >> Any public comment from the board? >> Nope. >> Is there a motion to adjurnn? >> So moved. Second. >> All those in favor say I. >> I. I.
>> Those opposed? No. It is 4.