If you'll take your seats, we'll go ahead and get started. >> Yes, ma'am. >> We're going to call this meeting to order. First thing we're going to do today is uh our fellow Lin Havian Jeff Snyder is
going to say the invocation for us and lead us in the pledge of allegiance. You would pray with me. Thank you Lord for this day. Thank you for this beautiful community that we live in. Uh thank you for the freedom that we have to gather and to uh make decisions uh
that benefit all of us. Lord, I pray that you would uh permeate this place with a spirit of peace. That you would give uh wisdom and discernment to our elected officials and that you would put uh a hedge of protection around our staff, our law enforcement, and our
first responders. Thank you for this time. Thank you for the opportunity that we have to live in this great city. In your name I pray. Amen. >> Amen. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation
under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> Thank you, Mr. Snyder. >> Okay, first thing on the agenda. Thank you, sir. All right. First thing on the agenda is
additions, deletions, and modifications. So, I know of one addition we have. We're going to have uh Mr. Corey Langford, the chairman of the charter review committee, come to give us a briefing tonight. Uh I will propose that
we put that on the agenda at the very first thing under new business. So, a new number 11 and push the rest down one number numerically. Uh are there any other possible additions, deletions, or modifications? >> Mayor, let's go ahead and do the item
for Commissioner Tinder to be uh present via telephone. >> Yes. Well, even before we get that farm, [clears throat] >> uh I'll make a motion uh to allow Commissioner Tender to attend through uh teleconference. >> I'll second.
>> Thank you. I have a first and a second. Uh for our public attending tonight, this is Commissioner Tinder is actually on a cruise right now with her family. She is dialed in, so she's going to be more comfortable than we are on a lounge chair somewhere soaking up some sun and some seawater. But uh uh we she is
dialed in with us and the rest of the commission is going to allow her to participate by phone tonight because we have a quorum here already. Florida law allows us to do this, but we have to uh formally approve her participation telephonically. So, that's what we're
doing now. Any questions or general comments about this? If not, Mr. Lightfoot, would you call the role? >> Commissioner Warick? >> Yes. >> Commissioner Peebles? >> Yes. >> Commissioner Perno? >> Yes. >> Commissioner Tinder? >> Yes. >> Mayor Lowry?
>> Yes. So, the eyes have it. Thank you all. All right. Now, thank you for that, Commissioner Warick. Now back to additions, deletions, and modifications. Does anyone have any other changes to the agenda tonight? >> Hearing none, if I can get a motion to
uh add the CRC brief. >> Motion to add the um >> charter review committee brief. >> I'll second that motion. >> Thank you. I have a a fir a motion and a second. Uh for the public, uh the
chairman of the charter review committee tonight is here for us. For those of you that have been attending our last uh several commission meetings, this has been a discussion point. The commission actually gave uh our charter review committee, which is a group of five citizens, tasked to help us review our
city charter every 5 years, uh an opportunity to come up with some wording. Particularly, we're looking to have a referendum added to the August primary ballot on August 18th. That would we're asking the voters of Linhaven to essentially authorize the
city clerk. Uh that would be a direct report to the city commission just like the city manager and the city attorney. So, they're coming up with some uh verbiage for that. Uh the chairman is coming back to back brief us on that and another possible uh referendum ad as
well. So that is why we are adding them to the uh agenda tonight. Any questions or discussions on that before we move forward? >> Hearing none. Mr. Lightoot, would you call the role? >> Commissioner War. >> Yes. >> Commissioner Peebles. >> Yes. >> Commissioner Pero.
>> Yes. >> Commissioner Tinder. >> Yes. >> Mayor Mayor Lowry. >> Yes. So 50. Thank y'all for that. That will be the charter review chairman's brief will be the new number 11. Number 11 will become number 12 and add one
number to each for the subsequent agenda items. With that, we have three proclamations tonight. Uh the first one is the month of the military child for 2026. I'm going to read it and then I will ask
Miss Whitney and Courtney Warick, two uh lifelong military children uh now young women to come up and accept this. So the proclamation, whereas thousands of brave Americans serve in the military and have taken the oath to support and
defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And whereas the children of those brave men and women have made significant contributions to our schools, community, and the country despite prolong and repeated absences of one or both of their parents. And
whereas Len Haven's military children are a source of pride and honor for us all, and it is fitting that we take time to recognize their contributions, celebrate their spirit, and let our men and women in uniform know that while they take care of us, we will take care of their children. And the recognition
of April as the month of the military child provides a special opportunity to pay tribute to military children for their commitment, their sacrifice, and their unconditional support of our troops. And whereas Linhaven residents are encouraged to observe this month by
connecting with military children and their families to provide support to all children affected by the deployment of their military parents and other caring adults in their lives. Therefore, I, Mayor David Lowry, and the commission do hereby ask all residents throughout the
city of Linhaven, Florida, to join us in recognizing the strength and resilience of our military children and youth and celebrate April 2026 as the month of the military child. So, would the wars ladies times two come
forward? >> [applause] >> All right, we have three proclamations tonight. That was the first. The second is for National Arbor Day. Whereas in 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of
Agriculture that a special day be set aside for planting trees. And whereas this holiday called Arbor Day was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska. And whereas Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and the world. And whereas trees
can reduce the erosion of our precious top soil by wind and water, cut heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce lifegiving oxygen, and provide habitats for wildlife. And whereas trees are a renewable resource, giving us paper,
wood for our homes, fuel for our fires, and countless other word products. And whereas trees in our city increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community. And whereas the city of Linhaven is once again been approved by
the Arbor Day Foundation as part of the Tree City USA program for our community forestry efforts and our commitment to create a greener, healthier community. Now therefore, this city commission does hereby ask that all residents throughout the city of Linhaven, Florida, join us
in supporting this worthwhile project to protect our trees and woodlands as we celebrate and proclaim April 24th, 2026 as National Arbor Day. Okay, our third and final proclamation tonight is professional landscape
architecture day and we will have Miss Patricia Castellano come forward to receive this at the conclusion of me reading this um proclamation. Whereas landscape architecture encompasses the analysis, planning, design, and stewardship of the natural and built
environment, translating vision into action to shape places that are healthy, safe, and resilient. Whereas Wednesday, April 1st, 2026 is recognized as professional landscape architecture or PLA day celebrating the licensed
professionals whose exper expertise in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics STEM is essential to the infrastructure and quality of life in Linhaven. And whereas the the United States approaches America 2000, excuse me, America 250, we recognize that
landscape architects have [clears throat] historically shaped and continue to steward the American landscape, creating enduring places that embody democratic values and cultural heritage and advance opportunities for future generations. And whereas the licensed practice of landscape
architecture is a critical safeguard for the public health, safety, and welfare, ensuring that outdoor environments from therapeutic gardens to playgrounds to complex storm water and transportation systems are designed [clears throat] with technical rigor and ethical responsibility.
Whereas landscape architects are uniquely qualified to address a changing climate through the resilient and sustainable green infrastructure design strategies to restore ecosystems, mitigate environmental hazards, and reduce the long-term financial burden of
disaster recovery on state and local governments. And the economy of Linhaven is strengthened by the work of licensed landscape architects and accredited programs at Florida International University and the University of Florida who together foster tourism, economic
development, and environmental protection. And landscape architecture is a regulated profession in all 50 states. in the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulations ensures the highest standards of professional competence through rigorous education, experience, and examination
requirements. >> [snorts] >> Now therefore, the Linhaven City Commission by virtue of the authority invested in us in Linhaven, Florida, do proclaim April 2026 as Landscape Architecture Month and Wednesday, April
1st, 2026 as professional landscape architecture day, calling upon all citizens to celebrate the landscape architecture and action and the essential role landscape architects play in shaping a resilient, safe, and enduring American landscape as we move
forward. forward with American 250. Castellano, would you come forward to accept this, please? >> [applause] >> All right. Moving on to the consent agenda. We have uh four items up tonight. An approval of our regular
meeting minutes for March 10th. Uh special meeting minutes for March 16th. We have the appointment of two individuals to the board of adjustment, Mr. John W. Ericson, Jr. and Robert Griffith. And then item 10, approval of
resolution 2026-03-528. Um, >> I'll read that resolution by title. >> Sure. A resolution of the city of Linhaven, Florida, approving an agreement with Garber Chrysler Dodge Truck Incorporated relating to the purchase of a 20125 Dodge Durango police
pursuit vehicle in the amount of $43,353. Okay. >> Like to make a motion to approve the consent agenda. >> I'll second that motion. >> Thank you. We have a We have a motion and a second.
Uh do we have any public commentary for the uh in specific regards to our four consent agenda items? >> Hearing none. Mr. Lightfoot, would you take the role? >> Commissioner War. >> Yes. >> Commissioner Peebles? >> Yes. >> Commissioner Pero? >> Yes.
>> Commissioner Tender? >> Yes. >> Mayor Lowry? >> Yes. The eyes have it. 50. Thank you. We have no old business tonight. We have no table business tonight. So, the next item on the agenda is our new number 11,
Chairman Cory Langford of the Charter Review Committee. Good evening, sir. Good to have you. Good evening, Commission. And uh thank you for making this addition to the uh to the agenda to hear hear this presentation. Mr. Harold, would you mind pushing the slides? Thank
you. So, most of you all know me, Corey Langford. I'm the chairman of the joint of the uh the charter review advisory committee. Uh so tonight the brief the the the presentation is kind of broken up into two parts. Uh one is just kind
of the just as a reminder um you know who we are when we meet um you know kind of some of our priorities uh deliverables that you all can expect from from us uh the timeline associated with those deliverables and then finally your your options as to what what you all can do with those. Um we'll we'll
shift over then to the the first two proposals after that. Uh so the members um again my name is Corey Langford. Uh the chairman, Mr. Ryan uh Mr. Ryan Scra is the vice chairman. Uh Mr. Tommy Tucker, Mr. Jamie Marlor and Mr. David Switzer are all part of the uh the committee. Um we all
work well together. Um very diverse uh backgrounds uh very different experiences and uh very very proud to to have them on the on the committee. Uh we meet twice a month. Typically it's the Wednesday after the committee meet after the commission meeting. Um that might
change. Some people are on vacations and different types of things. For example, in November and December, we only met one time a month and that was just due to the holidays naturally. Um from January through March, we met twice a month and we'll continue to do so unless you know there's some planned absences.
Uh we meet like right here in the in the chambers at 5:15. Um, for anyone that wants to wants to see what we're going to be discussing, that's on the city's website on our agenda is posted. So, feel free and uh and go take a look and see if it's something you're interested in. So, our priorities, um, so first of
all, you all asked us to stand up. Our top priority was to evaluate the city clerk position, um, whether it was it was viable and we should go in that direction. um we determined that uh not only were we going to review just that area, we were all we were we were going to do a
deep dive uh into the charter as well. Um so we chose to do it kind of sequentially, section by section, if you will. Um obviously we started with uh the city clerk in that area. Um that was more appropriate in the in the section 20s and so on and so forth. So we
finished that area. We're we finished one through uh seven, I believe, and then tomorrow we're going to begin on eight. So just to kind of give you an idea that's that's the pace at which we're moving. That pace could slow down or speed up as the complexity increases or decreases.
Uh so the deliverables to the commission. So what you can expect from us, we're normally going to provide you all with a draft ordinance and a draft resolution of the proposed change. Um that's a that's a formal uh formal way to provide that to you all. So, um, it
it the ordinance is going to be the proposed charger, the the verbiage, and the resolution is going to be the, uh, the ballot language to accompany that that verbiage. Um, so why do we why do we give that to you all in that format? Well, first of all, it provides kind of a launch pad for you all to to begin
with. You're not starting from scratch. This is not just something we drew up on a bar napkin and handed it to you. It's actually a a legitimate u formalized way uh to present that to you all. Um, so you can go from there. Uh, it also ensures version control, so we can kind
of track where we're at in that in that change process. Um, and then, [clears throat] uh, finally, and and this is just my personal opinion, um, I have a lot of respect for the city charter, as I'm sure many of you all do as well. Um, I feel like it's a very important document, and a document that
important, I think, um, a formal process is is warranted. Um so when we provide you all with these these deliverables, what does the maturity look like? Well, these these changes have all been discussed at length. Um that's the beauty of having a charter review uh
committee. We we have the the bandwidth and the ability to really deep dive into a really kind of a microscope or microscopic level into each one of these these things whereas you all are limited. I mean there's there's 20some items on the agenda tonight. So um
that's kind of the level at which we're discussing this stuff at an extremely granular level. Um it's when we do provide you all with with a proposed change, we have all voted the the the committee has voted on on those proposals. Um so it's not like this is
Oy Langford's idea and just one person is sending it to you. The entire committee has voted on on these proposals. Um, it may or may not be the final answer depending on what your your guys's actions are and uh and we'll we'll go through that here in just a moment. Um, and finally, you know, if
you if you all want something different from us, let us know. We're we're more than happy to receive feedback from you all. It does us no good to provide you all with something if it's not useful to you all. So, the timeline um it's a phased it's it's a phased approach based on the
election opportunities. Uh I know that's been a discussion um in previous meetings. Uh you all provided us with a kind of a a no later than date of 1 May for our initial submission to you all uh for for you all to go through that and determine what action that you're going
to take. Um we we looked at that and said, well, you know, we've got some things that are that are finalized right now. um do we hold on to these things and just drop them on the commission on one May and only give them a short amount of time to you know discuss and decide which way they want to go or you
know do we start incrementally providing you all with these with these proposals so that you can you can decipher uh you know you you all can decide what you want to do in a little bit more more time friendly situation. Um subsequent deliverable deadline dates you know
those are helpful. Uh we appreciate the fact that you all said, "Hey, one May, get get us what you need by by 1 May." Um you all have the election calendar from for Miss Nina Ward. So just look at that for those opportunities and uh kind of push those dates to us and we'll be
happy to uh to meet those deadlines. Um the [clears throat] more complex the issue, the further we're going to try to submit that to you all, you know, in earlier rather than later. Uh and you're going to see that tonight. uh there are some some complex issues that we're
looking at. Our goal is to provide you all with time to make a methodical decision um you know based on your constituent feedback versus you know a premature decision because you have a lack of time. So what are your options with these with
these deliverables when we bring them to you? Number one, you can submit as written for voter approval. Man, that that's awesome. We we did a good job, right? But we understand that's not necessarily going to be the case. You all can amend it and place it on the ballot. Um or you could return it to us
with comments. Hey, uh did you think about this? We're going to kick this back to you all. We want you to focus on on the implementation of this or this that whatever, right? Um we could have a joint workshop where the commission and the charter review uh committee can sit
down and and really kind of dive into this a little bit deeper. Um or finally, you can just take no action. You can wind it up and throw it in the trash can. Those are your options as far as we've seen it so far. So, with that, I'll pause. Does anyone have any questions as far as the committee and
what we're doing and and uh the deliverables? So, moving on. I know this is I know there's a long agenda, so I'm going to try to keep this brief, but there will be there will be a time for questions for any of these, but if you have questions in the middle of that, please let me know and we'll stop and address
it. So, proposal number one, um it's it's kind of large. uh includes sections 21, 26, 27, 28, 29, and 32. Um some a lot of those sections are kind of administrative in nature. Uh but we'll we'll start with section 21. Um it
section 21 really identifies and separates officers and department heads. Um so it's it's kind of it's kind of saying, hey, you know, the officers the commission hires and the officers report to the commission. Uh department heads obviously the city the city manager
hires those. However, the commission would confirm those individuals and those individuals are listed there. Obviously, that's not an all-inclusive list, but that's what the committee has decided that at a minimum, these are your department heads um that that's that's required. You can choose to add
more department heads to that. You would just establish that by ordinance, but as a minimum, these are the individuals that we say that's required for the city of Lhape. Um, finally, that that section will uh it identifies the requirement for a formal vote to confirm a department head
that's hired by the city manager. Um, this was kind of a discussion before. Uh, we looked at it. Some people read the charter one way, other people read it another way. We said, "Hey, let's take all the let's take all the perception away from it. Let's come out and say what it is that we need to say." Um and we're saying that uh that a
formal vote should be required in order to confirm um a department head. In the absence of a city manager, the mayor the mayor shall appoint department heads. Uh it still requires a majority vote though.
So that was section 21. Moving on to 26 and 27. Um this identifies the city manager and the attorney as a whistleblower complaint recipient. Um, we felt like that, you know, with with the whistleblowers, we wanted to give the city employees the maximum amount of
people that they could that they could go to with to whistleblow. Um, that included the city attorney. Um, so that was identified in in uh 26 and 27 28. Um, so this is kind of gets into the administrative portion there and and I'm
I'm just going to refer to the to my notes here because I was kind of confused. Thank you, Miss Amy, if you're listening for for getting me straight on that. Um, so 20 section 28 was already in the charter. Um, but uh it it now just outlines the qualifications of the
city attorney that moved from section 29 up to section 28. Section 28 was just reserve uh was the qualifications before. So, it's just kind of some administrative moving around in paragraph. Nothing verbiaged changed to the qualifications for the city
attorney. It just simply moved paragraphs to free up section 29. Section 29 is the uh position of the city clerk. Um this is where it identifies the position of the city clerk. It works at the pleasure of the commission. A lot of this is going to
sound a lot like it does for the city manager because it pretty much is. Uh this commission will determine the compensation. We we started briefly addressing the roles and responsibilities of a city clerk, but we did not want to handcuff the commission on what those roles and responsibilities
were. So, we just kind of hit it wave top level and said other duties as identified by the commission. So, you all have a wide range of ability to identify what those are. Section 32. Uh this is the final one in proposal number one identifies the
position of the city clerk would be the signatory of the election board canvasing results. So the ballot language I'm not going to read this to you all but it's it's there. It is captured it was captured in three separate questions because this is
kind of a large a large uh amount of areas within the charter. Um there there are three questions. So, I'll just kind of pause if if anyone just wants to from the audience or anyone watching online wants to read through that. Question two and three are a little bit
shorter. So two is basically talking about the whistleblower complaints and and uh three identifies who the uh who the department heads and uh the confirmation of majority vote. Again there's your options that you can
do with proposal one. Um we are not looking for a decision tonight on either of these two issues. Uh we wanted to get this before you all so you guys can start digesting this figure out discuss with your constituents um or or whomever as to which way we need to go with this.
There any questions on proposal number one? >> Any questions among the commission? [clears throat] >> City manager, city attorney, any questions from y'all? >> Okay. Number two, nonaval alarm
assessment. This is uh this is the one that's probably a little bit more complex. Um and this is why we wanted to get this to you all sooner rather than later. Um this is all captured in section six. Uh basically section six is broken up into three paragraphs. Uh
paragraph A it there was nothing that changed within paragraph A that identifies the powers vested in the commission. We didn't make any changes to that. We simply put an A beside it because we had now have a paragraph B and C. So really that's what we'll focus more on tonight. uh is is paragraph B
and C. Sorry. There we go. So section B uh 6B uh this is the this these are these are going to be a mentality shift. So uh we're asking for the voters to approve a non-ablorum
assessment. Um it would be a 50 plus1 vote uh for to have to have a a non-ablorum assessment. Um so on that ballot uh if if the voters were to vote on a non-avalorum assessment, the city would be required to provide these seven
items to the voter to explain this is the defined start date and end date of the project that we're wanting to fund. Here's the methodology in which we're we're wanting to te to to assess you. Here's how much it's going to cost you on average per property within the city
of Linhaven. Here's how much the total project cost is. here's how much we're going to spend on it annually and here's how much it's going to be overall. Um here's how we're going to use the funds. Um and some of this stuff is is already out there, right? It's it's already it's already stated, but uh you now have a
consolidated list of some some things that are already required, but we're we're we're adding some things to that. Um a limit on annual increases, uh specific compliance and oversight requirements. Uh all of those would be provided to the voter when they go to
the ballot box to make a determination as to whether or not they wanted to fund uh project or a program for this matter um to the city. So continuation of 6B, this would last
for four years. If the voters if the voters approve this at the ballot box, the city's good for four years. Now, there's still a state requirement that the that the commission renew this annually. Okay. What we're saying is is that if the voters approve this, you all
have the ability for four years to approve this year after year. After that four years is up, if you want to continue doing it, you got to go back to the voter to ask for another four-year term essentially. Um, if the voters [clears throat] if the voters do not approve a
non-avalorum assessment, the non-avalorum assessment will expire at the con at the conclusion of that authorized term. limitations on annual increases. This is very simple. Right now in the Florida state statute, there are there's already
rules associated with um increases for a fire assessment. All we're doing is we're mirroring that. What that means is the statute says something essentially shall not exceed the average annual growth rate for Florida personal income over the previous 5 years. basically the
the the bureau uh the Florida Economic Bureau I might be butchering their name but they track all of this data right they look at the average for five years and if they say the the income growth over the last 5 years the average is 7% then you can increase the nonavalorum
assessment by 7% and that is it you can if you want to increase it more you can do that guess what you just got to go back and ask the voters Moving on to section 6C. Um, this is really going to kind of get into the the the implementation of the non-avalorum
assessment. Um, they must be spent obviously per the ballot language. We're asking you to spend the money how you told us you were going to you were going to spend it. You can't divert, transfer, co-mingle uh any of these funds for different programs or projects or services that you didn't expressly tell
the voters on the ballot. City must separately account for each authorized assessment program and publicly provide annual expenditures. Look, we're you can have multiple non-ablorum assessments if if that's what the citizens want. You just have to account for each of them individually
and you have to tell the citizens how you spent their money every year. the commission uh must adopt and implement procedures to ensure compliance. If you do not ensure compliance, those funds will be given back to the voters in Linhaven.
So again, tonight here are your options uh for for this proposal as well. However, the committee has requested is requesting rather a joint workshop and this is simply to answer your all's your questions. uh we're not asking for a public workshop uh because we don't know
what the answer is. We've we've figured out what needs to happen with this. We're simply we know that this is a major muscle movement from the way that we're currently doing business and we want to help you all understand how we got to the point to where we are now. Um sure some things may come up in that in
that joint workshop that we may need to re-evaluate and if that's the case we will absolutely do so and that's with any proposal not just this one. Um, I will say that with proposal number one and proposal number two, like I said, there was a vote on both of these proposals. Both of these proposals pass
the committee 5 to zero. There any questions on proposal two or anything we've discussed tonight? [clears throat] >> Um, no. I just going to say thank you for you guys doing that. I know you guys been putting in a lot of work with that, a lot of discussions, which is good. Um,
there's a lot of things I'd like to talk about, but we'd be here all night. So, um, I agree. I would like a joint workshop so we can have some discussions and questions and concerns and things like that. >> I definitely agree with that. I feel like this would warrant a workshop for
sure cuz we'd be here for a six-hour commission meeting otherwise. Um, and it'd be solely focused on this. So, I agree. And yes, thank you to all of you that have been part of this. I know you put a lot of work into it and it's is appreciated. Thank you.
>> Clearly, Commissioner Per more than willing to do a joint workshop. Just off top of my head though, your your time periods for uh for the u um a nonaval alarm assessment for four years, you know, come back to
the come back to the voters. That would that would and we we brought you all in a year early charter review. So you really want to time it to five years because charter review is supposed to meet every 5 years. So you don't want to
consistently bring the charter review back every four years unless that's what you want to do. on me cuz they cuz cuz cuz you're going to bring it back to the voters, you say after 4 years, but you got to have a charter review to do it cuz we're not going to just stick it out
there on on a ballot unless we have a citizen committee like we're doing cuz that's how we called for this in the first place. So >> yeah, we'll definitely talk about the uh the discussion of the timing. I believe we have an election every four years in the city of Linhaven. Uh, so that was
kind of the the intent behind that was aligning aligning the ballot with the elections. >> I tend to want to line it up with the charter review versus the election cycle. >> Thank you, sir. Commissioner Tinder, do you have any questions for Chairman
Langford? But um I could hardly understand anything you read. So I will definitely Is this something We're not voting on it, right? We're just having a discussion. >> Correct. Yes, ma'am. >> And we're talking correct. >> We're talking about doing a joint workshop between
>> Hello. >> Yes, ma'am. >> Hello. Hello. Hello. >> Can hear you. >> Oh, okay. >> Yes, ma'am. We're talking about doing a >> a joint workshop between the city commission and the charter review committee.
>> Okay, good. Okay. And when are we going to do that or you haven't decided that yet, right? >> We're about to. >> So I complete >> We're about to >> Yes, ma'am. We're about to uh turn that over to the admin folks to get that on the calendar. We're all in agreement
that needs to >> Oh, okay. >> So um >> Okay. Okay. >> Thank you, ma'am. So, Chairman Langford, I'll uh >> Thank you. >> I'll echo my colleagues, teammates up here. Um I really appreciate the work your fivep person team has put into
this. Um and you're doing exactly what we asked you to do. You tackled the city clerk right up front. I don't think that could have been any more straightforward. You made that look easy, but I know it wasn't. Uh uh but thank you for that. And I think the non-avalorum piece, we absolutely need
to get that right. And uh I look forward to doing a joint workshop with your team and seeing if we can't get all that ironed out. So, >> do we need to vote on that or just agree to do that? I >> I think you can just direct staff to
schedule the workshop. >> And mayor, just for question for mayor and chairman Langford, do you want to have a designate from the commission go to the workshop or do you want to do all five of you off commission? All five workshop. All five. All five committee.
>> All five. >> That's >> I'll send out an email, coordinate some dates, and we'll get something scheduled. >> I'm sure it'll be a short workshop. [laughter] >> Thank you, Chairman Langford. >> All right. So, number 11 is done. Now, we're back
to the original number 11. Now number 12 which is a quasi quasi excuse me judicial public hearing discussion and possible approval of development order application 26-01 exalt rehab facility uh 2851 highway 77.
>> Good evening ma'am. Hold on. So mayor this is a quasi judicial hearing and so that's basically the city commission is sitting like a court. So there's some minimal due process that's involved. Basically, you all's decision has to be based on competent substantial evidence and uh we
have to disclose exparte communications which are communications that you all have had regarding this item with anybody outside of this hearing. And so to ensure we have proper evidence, I'd like to go ahead and swear in the witnesses. And so if anybody plans on providing any testimony on item number 12, please go ahead and stand and uh
raise your right hand. You swear the testimony you're about to provide will be the truth upon penalty of perjury. >> Yes. >> Thank you. And if the commission can disclose any exparte communications that they've had uh about item number 12. Now >> I've had none.
>> None. None. >> None. >> None. >> Okay. Mayor. Thank you. Thank you, sir. Ma'am, the floor is yours. U Harold, if you could. Thank you.
Uh yes, this is a development order application for Exalt rehab facility. The owner applicant is Ryan Company's US uh incorporated. The location is 2851 Highway 77. Parcel number 128592000
and the property size is about 8.18 acres and the future land use map designation is commercial. Uh the existing use on the site it is vacant. The project engineer Jim Cena with uh PE with Panhandle Engineering is present if you have any questions for
him. Uh the reviewing engineer uh was Richard Futner uh PE with Dubberry Engineer. Uh he was unable to attend tonight but they do have representation with uh DT Horton is present if you have questions for him. Uh the traffic review engineer was Vincent Spar uh PE with
Kimley Horn. He is not present. Uh, a copy of the traffic study was included in your agenda packet for review. Uh, this is a request for a development order approval to construct a 39,300 ft 40 bed rehabilitation facility along
with a required landscape and parking and infrastructure improvements. The proposed development will result in a total trip generation of approximately 267 daily trips, 22 a.m. peak hour trips, and 22 pm peak hour trips with an
ingress egress on Highway 77 and East Baldwin Road. The site plans have been reviewed and have been found to be in compliance with the city's unified land development code, the ULDC, Highway 77 corridor overlay district, and Florida State requirements.
And this is the uh aerial of the proposed site uh the land use map uh indicating commercial and the proposed site plan. So if you then the renderings of the uh proposed facility
>> any questions from the commission? Can you go back a slide or show me on the map where the storm water is supposed to go? Is that off of uh Baldwin? >> Keep going. Uh the other way. >> Okay, >> that one. Is that on the right hand side
where the storm water's supposed to be? >> Um I'll defer that to uh Mr. Selena, Mr. Horton. >> Okay. Thanks. >> Come on up, sir. Good evening. >> And mayor, I had a question.
>> Yes, ma'am. Uh, we've got the project engineer. Hang on, Judy. We're uh they're answering Commissioner Warick's question and then I'll ask you to ask yours, ma'am. >> Okay, no problem. >> Thank you, ma'am. This um graphic is actually zoomed in
too far. There's two they show up they show up better on those, but there's two large um storm water lakes along 77. So the entire frontage of the facility has lakes in front of it. So it's going
to have a nice view of the architecture of it. Okay. >> Um and then so that and we discharge to do DOT. So we have storm water permits from water management city and DOT. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Any other questions? I'll be glad to answer.
>> Commissioner Tinder, would you like to ask your question? Ma'am, >> I just want I just wanted to make sure that I understood. Is this going in the same place where the old Bay Med complex used to be there on that corner?
>> Yes, it was a um Wind Dixie and then it turned into an Ascension Healthlex and then um the same property. Yes, ma'am. >> Okay. Thank you. >> You Thank you, sir. Any other questions from the commission?
>> Okay. Next is we ask for witnesses, correct? Or >> Yes, sir. If there are any other witnesses that want to present testimony before the commission. >> Are there any other witnesses here in the public that uh in the general public that would like to come forth and and make a statement or present information
in regards to this proposal? Hearing none. All right. Um, so it's not on the agenda, but I believe the when this went to the planning board, it was passed unanimously. Correct. >> Yes, sir. >> Yes, sir.
>> Okay. On up, Miss Parker. >> Good evening. Have a question about this. Is this like a nursing home or a drug rehab or what type of um rehab facility is this? Do we
know? >> This is an acute uh inpatient facility that the uh residents will stay about 10 days and it's for uh brain trauma uh stroke uh and spinal cord injuries uh rehab. So, it's not long-term care.
>> Okay. Short-term. >> Thank you for that clarification. >> All right. Any other questions or uh information presentation requirements? >> Could I have one more question, please? >> Yes, ma'am. Go ahead.
>> I guess I'm asking Jamie this question because he's a money guy. But how how much will this increase our tax base? No idea that that definitely be more than what we get for vacant. >> Sure. >> So I I don't know. [laughter]
>> I'm not sure what the improvement value of it to even calculate that until it's built, >> but I I would say it'd be substantially more than a vacant lot would get. >> Oh yeah, absolutely. Okay. Thank you. >> Thank you. Well, if there are no other information,
um, presentations or witnesses, guess we can call the role at this point. >> Uh, so I'm going to have a motion, right? Motion. Uh, I'll make make a motion to approve, uh, this development order. >> Second. >> Thank you. Have a motion and a second.
Any other general commentary regarding this proposal? Hearing none. City manager, would you call the role? >> Commissioner War? >> Yes. >> Commissioner Pero? Yes, Commissioner Peebles. >> Yes, >> Commissioner Tinder. >> Yes,
>> Mayor Lowry. >> Yes, the eyes have it. 5. Thank you very much. Thank you all. All right, moving on to the original number 12, now 13. Discussion and possible approval of resolution
2026-03-526, Social Security Policy. And that's over to you, Mr. Jackson. Uh uh, Mayor, uh, the sponsorship was next, I think, as the agenda item >> got moved. >> It got moved. Okay. I'm sorry.
Uh, so yes. Um, do you want me to read that or do you >> So, well, it is the the sponsorship policy, but it's item 13 now instead of item 12. Uh, just because we pushed everything down. No, it was 11 was the quasi judicial and
then the next one was the resolution for social security policy. Oh, >> my agenda has sponsorship policy. I'm sorry. >> Yes. A resolution of the city of Linhaven, Florida, adopting a policy regarding the collection and use of social security
numbers. >> My apologies. my uh my hard copy doesn't match what's on the screen here. So, the other these two were reversed. >> Okay. >> So, >> it was added later into the agenda. >> So, my apologies for the confusion. So,
they're right here. I'm sorry. We're going to switch those two around inadvertently. >> So, social security policy. Let's close that one out and then we'll go back to the uh sponsorship. >> Yes, sir. And just uh circling back on this. This actually surfaced a month or two back. Uh, Miss Myers was going
through some things, noticed our social social security policy needed to be updated. This is the res resolution and updated policy for that. >> Okay. >> And Mr. Mayor, it basically just follows Florida law on on these issues.
>> Okay. >> I'll make a motion to approve. >> I'll second. >> Have a motion and a second. There any uh public commentary or questions regarding this? Miss Maroy? Tallahassee in Port St. Joe. I just want
to make sure I understand what you're trying to accomplish and if it's what I think it is, I think it's a great idea. Is this to make sure that documents don't go out
with people's social security numbers on them? For example, like an interview that you don't walk out the door with someone's social security >> mirroring state law on this.
>> All right. Thank you. I think that's really key and thank you for covering that. Yes, ma'am. Any other questions or commentary? Hearing none. If the city manager, I'll call the role. >> Commissioner War, >> yes.
>> Commissioner Peoples, >> yes. >> Commissioner Pero, >> yes. >> Commissioner Tinder, >> yes. >> Mayor Lowry, >> yes. So, we're 50 there. All right. Again, apologies for the the disconnect there. Our agenda got updated. We're
back to discussion and possible approval of resolution for the sponsorship policy. >> Sponsorship policy first. So, Mayor, you all received the uh sponsorship policy today from Amy. Uh, Commissioner Peeles had brought it up a couple meetings ago.
Um, it is not numbered because we do probably likely do not anticipate you all approving this tonight. I'll read it by title only and then go through and ask Mr. Jackson any questions on that. a resolution of the city of Linhaven, Florida, adopting a fundraising policy, incorporating recital, providing for
conflicts, providing for severability, and providing for an effective date. >> Okay. And and mayor, I know y'all just got this today, but but basically, um, it provides more formality to the sponsorship. Um, when the city requests
a sponsorship, it provides more formality. So there's not just soliciting one particular vendor, but you put out a a request for proposals typically and it provides some guard rails around the messages that will be um approved by the city as far as sponsorships. This is for any kind of uh
city city function. >> I looked forward or I looked through it uh when we got it earlier this afternoon and it looks very clear, direct and straightforward. So I don't have any issues or concerns. Does any other member of the commission uh have any
questions? >> Uh the one question I had was about endorsement of sponsor. Can we make it a requirement if they make any materials like flyers or brochures or anything like that? Does that it says on there? This is not an endorsement by the city of Linhaven or something like that or
does that already say that in here >> as far as sponsorship materials? >> Right. >> Uh we we could add that I believe. Yes. >> Right. What do you guys think? I I think it'd be a good idea to add that. >> Sure. >> Yeah, that'd be good. And then one thing
I'd add is um I looked at it today and I emailed Amy back and um of course thanked her for putting this together, but uh said that I wanted to look at digging into the the um I guess you
would call it like the naming of fields or whatever you want to call it like exclusive naming rights. I want to dig into that a little bit deeper and make it a little bit more specific. So, if you all want to look at that too and help me iron that out, that'd be great. You can give your feedback on that. I
think that's uh there's a tool we can use to help with that to just make it easier for everyone involved, whether that's the city or the sponsor. Okay. Any other questions or comments among the commission?
So, I've got those comments, mayor, and if you all could take a look at it, and I think we're going to bring this back uh with for the next meeting for final approval. Um, so just if you have more time, take a look at it. Send it to us or Chris and uh we've got the ones you mentioned here.
>> Yes, sir. So, initial review only at this point. >> Yes, sir. >> All right. Thank you for that. All right. Make sure we're next. Harold, could you scroll on down? Thank you. Make sure. Yep. The agenda picks back up as normal
with what was item number 14, now 15. Uh, discussion and approval of resolution 2026-03-527 approving the 10th Street change order with ESSC LLC. A resol a resolution of the city of
Linhaven, Florida, approving a change order to the city's agreement with ECSC LLC relating to the city's 10th Street utility improvement project in the amount of $826,172.93. >> Mr. Baker, >> right, the city is currently under a
CDBG grant where we're it's a $4.4 million grant for infrastructure improvements. Although it's called 10th Street, it goes from 8th Street to 17th Street and portions of Ohio to Carolina Avenue. So,
it's a rather large area. Up to this date, we've had numerous change orders, some credit, some debit, but it covered the grant covered it. What we've run into is a section of sewer line we thought we could repair
has to be replaced. The largest portion of this is for the road repair. Once they got into all the final testing and mixing of the roads, the roads will not meet compaction based on the design
they had. So to improve the roads, we're going to have to add a lime rock base. There was a total of 2.7 miles of road in the project and 1.2 two of those miles got to have this base material put in in order to be
FDOT certifications because it is federal money. So what we're proposing is we had three projects in the Certax budget we're proposing which was a
asphalt preservation project, Pennsylvania Avenue improvements and Sheffield parking. What we're proposing is to postpone those projects for now and use that money for this change order to complete
the job. Our grant writers are working with Department of Commerce trying to get additional funding for this project. And they will not hold that against us. If we go ahead and do it and pay for it, they find the money, they still will
reimburse us for it. So that's our request just to postpone those three projects already programmed so it doesn't add to the budget. >> Okay. So just to uh circle back. So basically you're
delaying those three projects so you can pay for it now so that you can go ahead and get that money reimbursed. >> We hope to. They're working hard with Department of Commerce to try to get the funding back. >> All right. There is no guarantee that we will get it back, but we will work with Department of Commerce to submit for it
and hopefully get it back. It does look promising, but there are no guarantees. >> And they've already been sent all this information on the change order. So, they are reviewing it and working on it. >> And this answers a lot of the public questions on why 12 Street hasn't been paved back yet. A lot of the the issues
there are a result of this change order. >> So, how long do we think this is going to take to complete? Once if approved and executed, they will get right to work on it. >> Yeah, they'll get started right away on it. They just wouldn't do it without approval. >> Right. From from start to completion.
How long do you think it'll take? >> Unless it's changed. They anticipate being completed by the end of April, beginning of May is >> I know we've been getting contacted a lot about about it. So, >> yes. Oh, I've had to do a lot of explaining to the residents. >> All right. Thanks.
And then worst case, if we don't get the additional grant funding from the Department of Commerce, we would reprogram and rebudget for the delayed projects and just go ahead and get this done as the closest gator to the boat in the most immediate need.
>> Yes. Otherwise, we would cover it with the sir tax, which there is funding in the sir tax right now to cover it, but we instead of amending the budget, we could just, you know, move the line items around without adding to it. and keep the project going as quickly as
possible. >> Okay. Any other questions from the commission? >> All I would ask is that I don't know if you all received the email today from someone that lives on 10th Street um to
potentially talk to the management. >> Yes, sir. I um I met with that family Friday evening um and we will be addressing all of their concerns with their driveway and the restoration of their yards. um got to handle. Okay, sounds good. >> Okay.
>> Well, if there's no >> question, please. >> Yes, ma'am. Go ahead. >> I um I just heard what Chris said and um as far as the one family, I don't know how many of those folks are in the audience tonight for public commentary,
but um do we have Chris the solution to getting this done? Um, do we have a solution to getting it done quickly? >> Yes, ma'am. Um, >> because let me just say this. Let let me
say this. The last time I was there, the day before I left, they were pumping water off of 10th Street over 9inth by the school. And over there, they were doing the same thing that they're doing on Kent. And I've already had a
complaint about that as well. But I just I mean these people were told that on December 9th of last year this project would be done before Christmas and we have paid these people hundreds of thousands of dollars since Christmas. I
just I we need to get some uh end to this somehow. And have they given you any assurance about when it will be done? >> They are working every day. Um the pump that you're talking about is dewatering. They're drying the ground out for the
rest of the underground work. Uh the majority of the underground, the water, the sewer, and the storm water is completed. Still a lot of roadway paving and restoration to do. Uh but they are making great progress on the project for what it is. It is water, sewer, storm water, and road. So, it's not an easy one. Uh but they have done some are made
some great progress. I know it's growing pains and and very frustrating for the residents around there, but it will be over very soon. Okay. Do you still stick with your estimate of the end of April? >> Yes, ma'am. That is the last time we talked. That was the end of April.
Beginning of May is the time frame they were telling us. >> Okay. All right. I also called the folks. I called a few folks over there at ECSC and nobody ever called me back. So, I hope you're getting better results
from them than I did. Um, I just want to see it over and done. We're losing people out of Glen Haven, moving to different cities because of this nightmare. >> When the >> Anyway, that's all I have to say about it. >> Yes, ma'am. When the project is
complete, the water manes will be upgraded with fire protection or improved fire protection, improved water man or water pressure. The sewer system will be lined in multiple places to help with the INI at the wastewater treatment plant as well as new storm water system there, especially on 10th Street to help
eliminate flooding as well as roads that have not been paved in years. >> Yeah. Roads that haven't been worked on. >> Okay. Thank you. >> 30 years. So >> long overdue and >> overdue. Gotcha. All right. Any other questions
or comments among the commission? Hearing none. Can I get a motion to approve? >> Motion to approve. >> Thank you, sir. Can I get a second? >> I'll second. >> Thank you. I have a motion and a second.
Is there any general commentary questions regarding this uh proposal? >> Miss Maroy. Good evening, >> Roy. I handed you all uh a packet. Um
Emerald Coast Site Construction LLC. You'll see their Sunbiz account. It was 72220. Then they folded. They dissolved in 24. Your contract, I believe, began around
that time. yet your new LLC uh that is the same address under Jason Bence that didn't begin until 2326. So I guess I'm a little confused.
You started this contract. I think you had a contract. kind of looked it up in the minutes and you have a lapse of this organization being in business.
Um, I I I went and I wanted to make sure that I was pretty correct about this. So, I went on the web page and I'd called the finance folks and asked for the actual address, not a post office
address, but an actual address. And I understand that y'all wire funds to these people. My understanding is allegedly one of the project managers is Adam Albert.
So what I'm going to ask for tonight through a public records request is their actual contract because this doesn't make any sense. Same name, same corporation. I went through a lot of names to try to make
sure that I could be as correct as humanly possible. But I think seeing the contract is also going to help because there's a gap in or ownership
and I believe it was during the time that you were negotiating the contract. So, you all have a copy of this, including the attorney, and I just gave one to finance. So, I'm going to be looking for that contract. That's my public records request. Thank you. Okay.
Thank you. Are there any other questions or general commentary regarding this proposal? Hearing none, if the city manager, I'll call the role. >> Commissioner Pero, >> yes. >> Commissioner Peebles, >> yes. Commissioner War, >> yes.
>> Commissioner Tinder, >> no. >> Mayor Lowry, >> yes. >> The eyes have it 41. We are now down to new item 15, old item 14. Uh, discussion and approval of resolution, excuse me,
discussion and approval of resolution 2026-03-529, approving the Minnesota sidewalk contract amendment. A resolution of the city of Linhaven, Florida, approving the first amendment to the city's agreement with BCL Civil Contractors Incorporated for the Minnesota Avenue Sidewalk
Construction Project. Mayor, this project is completed. All this is doing is during an audit of uh Department of Commerce for the CDBG grant, it was discovered that the record retention language and the contract said 3 years and it should have said six years. So, we will be bringing back all of our CDB
projects for a contract amendment even though this project is closed out just for auditing purposes. Department of Commerce asked us to change that from uh 3 years to six years. >> Okay. >> Motion to approve. >> Second. >> I have a motion and a second. >> Thank you, ma'am. I have a motion and
two seconds. Um, is there any general commentary or questions regarding this item? >> Hearing none. If the city manager call the role. >> Commissioner Ward. >> Yes. >> Commissioner Peebles. I'm sorry. Commissioner Pero, >> yes. >> Commissioner Peebles, >> yes. >> Commissioner Tinder,
>> yes. >> Mayor Lowry, >> yes. 50. Thank you for that. On to the next one. Uh, discussion and possible approval of resolution 020 or excuse me, 2026-3-530, public records and retention and
disposition policy. a resolution of the city of Linhaven, Florida, outlining the city's record retention and disposition policy, repealing all policies or resolutions in conflict here, and providing an effective date. Mayor, this language is basically just
mir mirroring uh Florida State statues on public records retention, but we need a policy in place for a lot of our grants uh requirements and audits. So, we recently updated the public record uh policy and just updating the retention policy to go along with it.
Copy that. Any questions or comments among the commission? >> No. Motion to approve. Second. >> Hold on. >> Yes, ma'am. Go ahead, Commissioner Tinder. >> I just wanted to um ask Chris if the retention part of this has it lengthened
or does it stay the same? >> It mirrors for >> retention of >> it mirrors Florida state statutes. So, it's varies by category. uh but whatever the Florida state statutes is and chapter 119 section 257.36 that is exactly what our policy will
follow. >> Okay. So is it lengthening it or shortening it? >> Neither. It's whatever the policy states is the requirement for a a record is what the city will follow. >> Okay. Okay. Thank you.
>> Yes ma'am. Any other questions or concerns? If not, we had a motion. Do I have a second? >> Second. >> Okay, I have a motion and a second. Any uh general public commentary regarding this specific proposal?
>> Hearing none. Would the city manager call the role? >> Commissioner War? >> Yes. >> Commissioner Pero? >> Yes. >> Commissioner Peeles? >> Yes. >> Commissioner Tinder? >> Yes. >> Mayor Lowry? >> Yes. Eyes have it. Thank you. Uh 16 is
or now 17 discuss and approve the RFQ document and job description for the city attorney. >> Yes sir. So based on discussions with the commission uh Mr. Bracie our procurement manager has put together an RFP um sent it to you all. You all have reviewed and provided comments. He's incorporated all of your comments back
into that. Uh Mr. Holton also approved or put together a job description uh for a part-time and full-time coun in-house council. You all have read those descriptions and incorporated any changes you all had under that and we are just looking for guidance from the commission to either approve these and
authorize staff to advertise or if you all would like to discuss further. >> Okay. among the commission. Any questions, discussions or proposed way ahead from here? You guys, I mean, you were kind of the
spearheading the in-house and Commissioner War kind of was uh spearheading the going out to RFQ. So, do I really want to lean on both of you on this? So, how do you all feel?
>> Sure. Would you like to go first, sir? >> I mean, I just uh went through it and I mean, there's pretty much in the agenda what I change or my recommendations was and just from past experience just uh
what I wanted to modify >> and you're cool. What's in the packet here? >> Yeah. The only thing only question I had was there was some dates in here. I think they got to be changed. Yes, sir. the dates are highlighted. They're just >> they just got to be changed. >> Yes. Are they just placeholders? >> And as far as I go, uh I want to cast
the broadest nets possible. We'll look at not only a law firm contract, but also the potential of a full-time in-house attorney as well as a part-time in-house attorney. See what uh talents judicial wise or JD-wise is out there and interested in supporting the city.
And uh then we'll come back together as a commission and as a team and look at them and and go from there. I uh my thoughts are for us to go ahead and approve the proposals as drafted. Uh Commissioner Warick's inputs were very good and straightforward.
Let's see what we get back. >> And Mayor, I would ask unless Mr. Jackson objects in the motion to include start advertisement date and the length of time for each. >> And what I guess uh well we'll have our
HR here tonight. Miss Hodes, what do you recommend in terms of advertisement length dates? also don't have open positions for this. So, in this approval, you'll be approving the addition of either a FTE
or a halftime FTE um or potentially more. Um it's a little bit harder from the advertisement uh position. Position description is one thing. there's more things that's wrapped up with that before we can actually go out and solicit and and be
able to respond to applications such as what is your um salary range? Are you expecting a position to support that position, etc. So, I can throw a net out there to to gather interest.
Um, but this commission will have to make some future decisions if it's to be an in-house council. >> Understood. So, just for the advertisement period, would you recommend 3 weeks? 30 days? >> At least three weeks. >> Say we go with 30 days.
>> Sure. I'm good with that. >> For both? >> Yes. For for all portions. >> Is there a certain day you would like it started or >> yesterday? Got you. >> Um, >> I can do it tomorrow, not yesterday.
[laughter] >> You don't have a Delorean? >> No. >> Okay. >> No, I mean soon as you can, I guess. I mean, I don't have a specific day. Unless you guys do. >> Soon as possible for 30 days. Would that be acceptable? >> Yeah. All right.
Well, that's my recommendation going forward. Any other comments or thoughts? No. >> No. Hearing none. Um, can I get a motion then? >> Motion to approve. >> Can I get a second?
>> I'll second. >> Thank you. I have a motion of second. Do we have any general public commentary regarding this specific proposal tonight? Sorry, I disconnected by accident. >> All good worries. So, uh, Commissioner Tinder, we had a motion in a second. We
had no public commentary regarding this item. About to ask the city manager to call the role. >> So, Mr. Lightfoot. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Commissioner War. >> Yes. >> Commissioner Peebles. >> Yes. >> Commissioner Pero, >> no. >> Commissioner Tinder,
>> yes. >> Mayor Gary, >> yes. 41. All right. Next, discussion and possible approval of resolution 2026-03-531 approving the Tennessee Avenue sidewalk construction contract with BCL civil
contractors. >> Yes, sir. This is a u amendment to an existing contract that you approved in J excuse me January. FDOT after review of the contract, they wanted two additional forms added to the contract. Um there were because it's
federal money. These are federal forms that they wanted to put in there. And that's all this is is amending the existing contract with these two forms. One of the forms is the required contract provisions on federal aid construction contracts. The other one is
the wage rate table related to Davis Bacon Act. >> Any questions or concerns among the commission? Mayor, I'm going to read this resolution real quick. A resolution of the city of Linhaven, Florida, approving an amendment to the city's construction agreement with BCL Civil
Contractors Incorporated related related to the Tennessee Avenue sidewalk project. >> Thank you, Mr. Manager. I will eventually get that. I keep wanting to ask for inputs before you read. Um, now any questions or comments among the commission?
The only >> only question I have is the next agenda item that's going to be paid for by grant also, right? >> Yes. So the construction and CI will all be we will pay upfront of course and then get reimbured. >> Right. Okay. Thank you. Um I'll make a motion to approve.
Second. >> I have a motion and a second. Do we have any general questions or commentary from the audience on this particular issue? Miss [snorts] Maroy Christy Maroy. It's just a question. So these initials, you know, that's when
you look up this other company, this um Emerald Coast or Thank you. Emerald Coast site construction. You know, you can't find it under the initials. So, I think it'd be most
helpful if people could tell the general public who BL what that stands for and what CI what that name stands for just in case the public ever wants to look those things up.
>> So, mayor BCL is the name of the company. It's not like other companies that that is an abbreviation. that is the name of it. Um they've been in business over 30 years. Um but BCL Incorporated is the name. It doesn't stand for it for anything. That is the initials of their their kids actually.
Um >> Okay. >> And then CI is construction engineering and inspection. >> Okay. So if I looked up on Sunbiz B, >> you're sure it's going to pop up? >> Yes, ma'am. >> Thank you, sir. >> Yes, ma'am. >> All right. Thank you for that. Any other
questions or comments? Hearing none. Can I get a motion? >> We already do. Just got a vote. >> Oh, duh. I'm sorry. I had a brain fart. All right. Will the city manager call the role? >> Commissioner War? >> Yes. >> Commissioner Pero? >> Yes. >> Commissioner Peebles?
>> Yes. >> Commissioner Tinder? >> Is this number 19? >> No, ma'am. This is the new number 19. Yes, ma'am. the the amended contract with BCL construction. >> Oh, yes,
>> Mayor Lowry. >> Yes. >> Yes. So 50. Thank you for that. Now we're on to the new 19. The old, excuse me. Yes, the old 19. I guess it would be the new 20. discussion and possible approval of resolution 2026-03-532
approving the Tennessee Sidewalk CI services agreement with Panhandle Engineering and you said the CI stood for one more time >> construction engineering and inspection. >> Thank you for that. A resolution of the city of Linhaven, Florida, approving an agreement with
Panhandle Engineering related to the provision of construction, engineering, and inspection services to the city for the Tennessee Avenue sidewalk project. >> Mr. Baker, >> yes, it's exactly what he said. It is for the construction, engineering, and inspection for the Tennessee Avenue. We
did send out RFQS. We had multiple engineering firms submit. They were graded. They were reviewed by DOT and Panhandle came in as the number one choice and was even recommended by FDOT.
So, this is going to oversee the actual construction of the Tennessee sidewalk and it's fully funded by the grant. >> Okay, thank you for that. Well, with that, do I have a motion to approve?
>> Motion to approve. Second. >> Motion and a second. Is there any general commentary or questions for this specific proposal? Hearing none, city manager, call the role. >> Commissioner Wart, >> yes. >> Commissioner Pero, >> yes. >> Commissioner Peebles,
>> yes. >> Commissioner Tinder, >> no. >> Mayor Lowry, >> yes. 41. Okay, we're down to discussion and possible approval of resolution 2026-03-533, Concrete Crushing Services.
City Manager, >> a resolution of the city of Linhaven, Florida, approving an agreement with GF Coast Utility Contractors LLC, relating to the provision of concrete crushing services in an amount not to exceed $45,000. Uh, mayor, so we talked about this actually at last Friday's strategic
meeting as well as uh one several months back. So the city we stockpile uh concrete where we demo sidewalks, driveways uh for covert repair, water mane repair, uh any any type of concrete that we remove. Typically we would have to haul that off at our expense and a
company would crush it and they would turn around and sell the base. So talking with staff, we decided to see if we could get some bids out this year, this fiscal year to have a crushing service done on on site and we would crush the concrete we have and we would utilize that for road base. So, bids
were received and we received bids at $,750 a ton and we have a not to exceed amount of $45,000 because that is what we budgeted in the street department this year for that. It's for a three-year term and we will, if this works out, we will ask to put another 45 or $50,000 in the budget for fiscal year
27 and then approve another resolution to do the same thing. >> So, from my understanding, before we used to have to pay to remove that. Now we don't have to pay for it to get removed. We're just >> Yes. >> crush it and not only that, use that
material that we would normally have to pay a second time. >> Yes, sir. So, we had to pay an employee to load a dump truck, drive it off to to the site. Um, they would allow you to dump the concrete for free if we took it to a crusher or we would be charged tipping fees if we took it to the landfill. But if we took it to a crusher
for free, they would crush it and then turn around and sell the concrete base for road base. So this way we're going to crush it on site and see if we can save some money and stockpile some road base. >> Who came up with that idea? >> It was discussion between staff. >> Awesome. Well, Tom, thank you.
>> So, moving forward, just a side note, the Air Force has a great thing called the idea program. And when you come up with a way to save money and make things more efficient, this is effectively smarter recycling. Um, there's formal ways they can submit that and get
recognized for that. some type of performance award or presentation of a coin, a day off or something. Do we have anything like that currently in the city? >> No, sir. That was in one of the executive uh slides from Friday is to
implement something along the ideas program. Uh whether it was, you know, a percentage of what was saved or like you said a day off or some type of bonus. Uh but that is something we want to look at doing in the next year or so of implementing something like this or like that. This would be a great first guinea
pig to consider that for whoever came up with that. Kudos. Any other questions regarding this? >> No. >> If not, uh, can I get >> Make a motion to approve. >> Thank you, Miss T. >> Second. >> Have a motion in a second. Are there any
general public comments or questions regarding this proposal? >> Hearing none. City manager, call the role. >> Commissioner Tinder. >> Yes. Commissioner Pero, >> yes. >> Commissioner Peebles, >> yes. >> Commissioner War, >> yes. >> Mayor Lowry,
>> yes. [clears throat] All right, we are down to the old 21, now I guess 22. Discussion and possible approval of resolution 2026- 03-534. Requisition for pump repairs in the amount of $44,181
to Jim House and Associates, City Manager. a resolution of the city of Linhaven, Florida, approving an agreement with Jim House and Associates relating to sewage pump repairs in an amount of $44,181. The mayor, this is for some repairs
we're needing done at our lift for lift stations, uh, number 79, number 21, as well as decamp pump number one for our wastewater treatment facility and filter pump number three. Gymhouse and Associates is a sole source provider uh for flight pumps. So, we advertise it on
our website for that and once approved, the city will have our pumps repaired and put back in service. >> Thank you for that. Any questions or comments among the commission? >> I make a motion we approve. >> I'll second. >> All right, there we go. So, I have a
motion and a second. Do I have any questions or comments among the general public here regarding this specific proposal? Hearing none. Would the city manager call the role? >> Commissioner Tinder? >> Yes. >> Commissioner War? >> Yes. >> Commissioner Peebles?
>> Yes. >> Commissioner Pero? >> Yes. >> Mayor Lowry? >> Yes. >> All right. Thank you'all all for that. Now we're at public commentary. We have one person signed up for a public commentary tonight and that's Miss Christy Moy.
Good evening again. >> Um, just quick question. Um, as you well know, the the city of Lin Haven finally got your certificate of occupancy on
8:14 2025. Uh before that you had had this the leaks and my understanding was it was uh the fire sprinkler system. Uh regardless of that I would like to see
um any insurance claims payments concerning that because before that of course you had a temporary CO. Um, I'm going to stop there for tonight and I'll pick it up on the next one. Uh,
meeting concerning sort of an umbrella around that. But the last item that I wanted to just ask the question, you pulled up all that asphalt. So, I'm wondering what happened to the millings
when you pulled when when they pulled it all up. I mean are is that going to be recycled just like concrete? Where did it go? You >> asked about the millings. >> The millings. So millings mayor are are is the asphalt that you
pull up and that is also valuable material that you can and you probably already know this and but for the general public in in Gulf County we talk about millings and the value of those
millings. So considering how many roads you pulled up, I'm just wondering what happened with all that asphalt. >> Speak to that, sir. >> Yes, sir. Um, so in some of our contracts, we provide language in there where they have to transport the milling
to our yard where we utilize that back for public works projects. This one we did not have that. So it was sent to the asphalt plant to be recycled and used to make asphalt. >> Okay. So, you're going to reuse it or is the company that that pulled it up going to reuse?
>> The company took it off. We did not put the language in this contract to stockpile them the milling. >> I I think y'all need to revisit that. That's that's a great value to that company. That many roads. Come on now.
>> Thank you, ma'am. Any other public commentary tonight? Hearing none, we will move into uh the mayor and commissioner's reports. Um it's been two
months as of the 20th since I swore in. And I got to tell you, these two months have flown by in a blur. Some days it seems like two days and sometimes it seems like two years, right? But this has been a great learning opportunity. I am very grateful to my fellow four
commissioners and teammates for the opportunity to serve alongside of them and very very proud to serve as your 33rd mayor. Um we've been incredibly busy the last couple of weeks. We're already in the throws of budget. We just recently hired a a new city manager. Um
we've got a new police chief on board who's absolutely amazing. um things are are heading in a very positive and good direction for our city and uh I'm proud to be a very small part of that along with my teammates here and very proud to be supporting this great
city and our community. That's all I have tonight. Um we'll start uh with Commissioner Perno on my left and we'll just go straight down and uh wrap up with our uh caboose tonight. Uh Commissioner Tinder. So Commissioner Pero.
>> Thank you, Mayor. I don't have much to report. Uh I just want y'all to know it was a very busy week last week. Uh Monday we had the special meeting. Um Tuesday was St. Patrick's Day and then Friday we had the workshop u strategic
planning and Saturday we had the uh town hall meeting which was absolutely excellent. Um and that was that was just one week. Um um I I appreciate everybody who gave their time to all of
all of those efforts and everybody who's here tonight. Um it [snorts] was absolutely a great experience Friday to hear from all the department heads. I know it was it was kind of presented as their wish list for the budget, but just
their free thinking, their awareness of of of everything and honestly the some of the light-heartedness amongst everybody, it was it was a good feeling from other strategic meetings that we've had. I think it was it was it was and
that it's a a kind of a credit to y'all and where where where the city's at right now. So, um, and and and I I I'd like to assure all the citizens that that I think I think things are in a good place really. Um, and, uh, with
that being said, and a big thank you to our to our military and our first responders and all of our city employees. That's my report. >> Thank you, sir. Commissioner Peebles. >> Thank you, Mayor. Well, yes, it was a very busy week. Like Commissioner Pero
said, it was but it was very productive. It was busy in a good way. It was uh a lot of fun getting to hear from the department heads and staff on their wish list doing the town hall. Getting to hear We saw some people we've never seen
before at the town hall, so that was fun. Um not that we don't appreciate all of you. We do. Uh but I'm just saying it's cool to to see most of you were there as well as some that we haven't seen before. So that was very cool. Um,
and yeah, and we had a very busy week. We had stuff uh going on in the background, too, in terms of reviewing a bunch of documents before we came to these meetings. So, just wanted to put that out there. But, uh, yeah, it's been a great week and looking forward to the future. That's my report.
>> Thank you, sir. Commissioner Ward, >> um, yeah, I mean, pretty much said everything I would have said. Um, we've been very busy. I think we're going to be busy in the future cuz we're there's a lot of things we're trying to uh keep moving. So, I appreciate the staff and
everything they've been doing uh so that we can keep doing what we're we need to do. Um the town hall, yeah, it went excellent. I um I felt really good about it. I wasn't sure how many people had show up, but there was uh actually quite a few people that showed up. Uh the
atmosphere um was very positive. Um there was concerns that were brought up. They felt like their answer questions were answered and we even left feedback sheets and we got those back and they uh the feedback sheets came back with some really positive
um feedback from it and they really enjoyed it and uh that was one of the questions they asked is would you come back and I think just about every person said yep they come back and I hope more people come out. Um the next one's going to be on 25 April. um be 9 to 11:00 here
in the chamber. So, invite any residents to come out. I'll be happy to hear from you and uh talk with you. And uh I felt like when people left, they felt like uh I felt like they left in good spirits and um you know, things came out, which was good. Um the only thing I have is um
I talked to the city manager a little bit about this and asked him put it on the next meeting. Um, but I just wanted to kind of just mention it just so we can all kind of chew on it is um advisory boards and committees. Um, right now the way it's written,
you're limited to just one. What do you think about if someone wants to do more than one? Is it a good idea? It's a bad idea. I don't know. But I' like to just have a little bit of discussion on it. >> I'd love to chew on that. >> Yes. >> Yeah. Yeah. That sounds yummy. I don't
particularly the the the amount of people that have the awareness that want to that want to volunteer and be on the boards and stuff is is not a a true representation of the population. I wish
we can get more people outside to come in with their backgrounds and their their their you know their wants. And I'd I'd like to go back to the consent agenda and thank u m Mr. Griffin, right? And uh and and the other gentlemen uh
who who were who were volunteering to be on boards who I I haven't seen them before. So, >> it would be it I I honestly believe if someone's sincere and wants to serve on multiple boards >> and they they they have the background
and awareness and we don't have anyone else. I'm all for them being on multiple boards >> and then there's some things we need to discuss, you know, like you can't be on board of adjustment and planning, >> right? I don't think you should be, you know, if I think one board should trump
the other as far as the importance thereof, but honestly, uh, we we got some people who put their hearts into a lot of different stuff, you know, that and and and I'm I'm I am down, Jamie. I
think your feelings are such that you you would want someone to be on two different boards. Correct. >> Uh, >> the right person, the right >> I'm kind of neutral right now. I'm you know I'm you know me I'm in I usually I'm in research mode. So >> well I think if we approve it and talk about it I mean case by I don't know if
we want to make it case by case but I don't know if we want to make it you know but but there's there's there's warrant in that. I think there's people that want to give more to the city that that would be that would that it would be a good thing, >> right? But you know me, when I come back, I'll I'll formulate
>> you. You formulated however you want, but that's my opinion is that there are there there there is a there is a a a minority of people that care a lot, you know, that may not want to be a commissioner, but they want to serve and they do great job. and anybody anybody
outside. I mean, my my my my ultimate feeling is that hey, we need to encourage everyone in around the city to find that diamond in the rough, that guy who was an engineer who's retired or whatever who wants to come in, you know, to get
their experience, you know, and and and and, you know, get a little get a little bit of their knowledge to come to come and and help us. So, I'd like it to be outside, you know, like somebody who's who's who's had the experience who can serve on a board,
>> but I but there's there's people that are already doing it that could probably do a second board that are that are good at it. And we always see them, you know what I mean? >> And I think, you know, one of them was bald-headed and bearded that was here earlier. Lori's a good guy, you know what I mean?
As an example, not you not not that it's him or anything. No, >> but those type of people, you know, we're we're we're always seeing them, you know, and and it's it's a good thing. So, >> go ahead and chew on it. >> Chewing more. >> All right. That's all I had. Thank you.
>> Commissioner Peeles, do you have any thoughts on the two board while we're on that? >> Oh, yeah. Sure. I would say right off the bat, I think it's a good idea. I would like to, if I'm reviewing, I'd probably uh
maybe unless it's just like someone that's just an extremely strong candidate, I would like to give the priority to someone that's not serving on the board cuz I want to encourage more people to get involved. However, that I don't think that it should be as
strict only one board. But that like I mean this is first time talking about it. So that's just first thoughts in my head. And for the record, I tend to agree with Commissioners Pero and Pee, but I think it's a great idea. You might have situations where you might have two different boards where they might
conflict because they're decision-m and so you'd have to do one or the other, but short of that, if we don't have enough volunteers to go around and we have somebody willing to share double love with us in terms of love time, God bless them.
And with that, oh, and also real quick before Commissioner Tinder speaks, um, I just want to publicly thank Commissioner Warick for recommending the town hall. I really didn't think it was going to go that well. Just initial first blush thoughts. I'm like, people are going to give up their Saturday mornings to come
stare at us and talk to us. Um, but we had about 30 folks in total here. Uh, it was incredibly collaborative. You just really had to be here and about half of y'all were. It was very, very positive. It was very heartwarming. It was very collegial, respectful, even with
differences of opinions. Everyone got a chance to speak. In fact, multiple folks spoke multiple times and there were things across the board uh spoken from cyber security to protecting dolphins to children being able to plan their yard without being considered unaccompanied
to city business. I mean, it was a full range of things and I think everybody walked away with a little bit of a community warm fuzzy there. It was a really, really good trial run. So, thank you to those of you that participated for being here and giving us that feedback. And Commissioner War, thank
you sincerely for recommending that. Um, I regardless of anything else, it is a great community forum opportunity to give citizens an opportunity to come speak and engage in a less formal, less rigid uh venue, if you will. So
>> with that, Commissioner Tinder, you have a report for us tonight, ma'am. >> Well, a mini report. I want to thank all of the commission for approving my absence. Um much needed vacation. So I
really appreciate it. And I I think that we're making progress. I think we're heading in the right direction. And sometimes when you get so wound up and everything, you lose sight of that. And uh so my sight is regained. I have 10% left on my
phone. So I'm going to use that in the casino. So uh I appreciate y'all. Thank you so much. >> Make sure you bring us back a souvenir. >> Travel safe, ma'am. And enjoy. >> Yeah. Well, I thank you. Y'all behave.
>> Good night, ma'am. All right. So, uh, next we have our city manager report. >> Yes, sir. So, it's been a very, very busy first official week. U, we had the tree giveaway Saturday. Uh, shout out to
Ty Ferris and his team. Um, Winford Alexander and Brian Vascoy. Um, if you didn't get a chance to get by there, I pulled in at 803 and there was already just the line of vehicles leaving. It was unbelievable how fast those trees go. Uh so shout out to those guys for getting out there Saturday morning and
getting those. Uh the town hall as you all talked about. I feel that was a great great turnout. Our strategic meeting went very well. Um felt that staff was able to talk to the commission and get you know the plans for fiscal year 27 out as well as you know the next three to five fiscal years. Uh so it was
a great start on where we're going with that. Also had the chance to address the police department uh last week. uh talked to to both of those uh two day two different days to address everyone. Uh but feel that we're on the right track with our police department. Everything is moving forward there. A
lot of positive feedback. Um the mayor and I met with uh Missy Timonss today with a group from Comcast. Had a great meeting with them. It was really great to put some faces to to names of Comcast of the construction and the government affairs folks who do work in this area and the growth that Comcast
has coming not only to Bay County but to the panhandle overall. So, it was a great meeting and uh some good contacts for us in the future if we need them. Uh and just to clarify, the leak that we had back in August was not the fire line. It was a 2-in domestic line. Uh but we will get the public records
request fulfilled tonight uh for all that information. Um also before are any questions for Kiki and then I've got one more thing after that. I I also wanted to make sure you knew that uh the city did receive an insurance payment with regard to that
plumbing failure. The payment was received in November of 25. It was for $192,445. And the expense you all approved to serve pro for that restoration was in the ballpark of $102,000 $100657
for to serve pro. We did have a couple of other miscellaneous expenses >> that was approved by the commission. Um and any questions for Kiki for the um checklist? >> No, just uh one quick. It was a separate
meeting. So, since we gave into a separate one, I'm going to publicly give you kudos and to you and your team here. Uh, for those of you that weren't here, uh, at 5:00, we had an outside auditor come in, a CPA that spent quite a significant amount of time going through
uh, Kiki's books for her and her team uh, for the year the current year budget. Uh, the one we're actually executing or have executed rather, I should say. Um, last year when they came in and did this, there were 18 issues.
Uh, this year it was down to two and they were uh minor. Uh, they had nothing but good things to say about the books, the recordeping and the the tight uh, operation that Kiki runs with her and her team. So, publicly, thank you. It
even earned her this call sign of squeaky because she's so squeaky clean and straight shooting. When she walks on the tile floor and she squeaks, she's so tight with fun. So, that is a very good thing and a true compliment. Um, we truly appreciate you and your team. >> Thank you, mayor. I appreciate it. I'm
very proud of the finance team. They did a wonderful job. And >> mayor, if I may, steal two minutes of the time. I don't know if you've all heard yet, but we've got the podcast out. Uh, we released a second episode last week. Um, and would like to play a little bit of a trailer just to have it out uh for the folks watching the
meeting that haven't seen it yet to kind of advertise it and get it out there. Uh, great thing put together by Tai and River. And we'll just kind of showcase the podcast for two minutes if you don't mind. >> Sure. story. This is a good time and heart.
44 is community sounds and voices. in motion in this story. 21 small city fire ancient
power. Stories about what you are. Follow out. Nice. So, River's been doing a great job getting that out and uh if you haven't already, we'll ask that you subscribe to it and we'll definitely have a different episode every week and and showcase
something here in the city. >> Yeah. And she volunteers to do all this. So, tell her thank you for all she's doing. >> Has a great podcasting voice for sure. >> It's nice. All right. So, last but certainly not least, our
caboose for tonight, the city attorney, Mr. Jackson. >> Yes, sir. I do have one item. As the commission instructed at the last special meeting, um I got together with Mr. Lightoot uh with the advice of uh um Commissioner Borick and input from all
the commission and we have a city manager contract for your approval and review. Uh it's been distributed to the commission earlier today. uh is unchanged from that version and uh we await your um decision.
>> Okay. Any questions, comments, discussion among the board. >> Thank you, Commissioner Warick, for leading that up. >> Thank you. Um how do y'all want to move forward on this tonight? Do you want to review it
and prepare it for the next meeting? Uh are y'all ready to approve it tonight? We we did unfortunately we already lost one of our commissioners. So, but we still have a a quorum. It's really up to y'all how y'all want
to proceed with this tonight. Want to schedule it for the next meeting for approval or do you want to approve it tonight? >> I'm good either way. chairman. >> I I mean I I guess what I will say is that looking give some highlights since
people are here listening. Um it's a shorter term than the last contract. Was it 3 years? >> Right. >> Yes, sir. I can I can summarize the terms if you'd like me to do that. >> Go ahead. >> Sure. >> Sure. So, the the the terms of the contract are uh salary is $155,000 a
year. There's a car allowance of $500 a month. Uh leave, he is uh giving up his right to acrew leave and from now. Uh we'll get a payout of his current leave and then we'll have be limited to leave for 3 weeks uh from here on out with
permission from the or notification to the commission. It's a three-year term with a severance of 2016 and 6 weeks, which is similar to what we've done before. And the residency requirement, he has one year to move into the city. uh uh and comply with the city charter
and that was because the charter is being reviewed right now and may they may that requirement may change. Those are the major material terms of the contract. Okay. So, I'm good either way. Just curious how y'all want to close this out
tonight. Um I'm sure Mr. Lightfoot would like finality sooner rather than later, but um I'm good either way. The contract is ready has been agreed upon by >> all parties. Contract has been agreed to
by Mr. Lightfoot and this is the commission's agreement of the contract. >> All right. Well, so based on the highlights looking at this contract versus the previous contract, it's less money, less
time, less car allowance, less leave. I feel like we're saving the city money here. So, um, as from a financial standpoint, it's a no-brainer to me. Um, and then, you know, a three-year contract kind of puts it on a a
three-ear pillow pillow prove it contract type of deal versus, you know, like a longer term, say five years. Um, in baseball, we call it a pillow contract. You It's a short contract. the player has to prove themselves and then they may get a bigger contract in the
future if they prove themselves. Um, so that's kind of how I look at it. >> Commissioner Perno, >> I'm I'm I'm good if if you guys are all good. I mean, the only thing is that we don't have a commissioner here. So, I
don't know how you feel about that. >> If you want to wait for commissioner tender, I'm on board with that. Oh, sure. We just I mean, knowing how the vote went Monday, I mean, I don't I don't know if she she's going to have insight or or what, but
>> Well, tonight we we can >> if she was on the phone, if she was if she was here, it'd be be Let's go ahead. But, I mean, it's up to you guys. >> We could try to call her back and wrap this up tonight.
>> I don't know if that'll work. [laughter] She's probably got 5% right now. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> So, to be fair, to be fully transparent and fair on this, we just publicly talk about it tonight and then that'll be one of the first things on the agenda for our next meeting then and we'll go ahead.
>> Would you like it as an agenda item next time? And sure. >> Yes. >> Okay. >> Let's go ahead and put it new business. That way, Commissioner Tinder can be here. We can discuss it tonight. Uh, real quick, the only thing I, being an Air Force guy, was kind of scratching my head on was the automobile benefits. And
the thing that gained clarity for me on this was um, the city manager is a contracted employee. They're not a normal city employee. So, they typically are not allowed to use government vehicles unless you issue them one and assign them one. Uh, and so instead of
giving him a pickup truck with all the bells and whistles of a public works person, which he still has the certifications and has the ability to do on behalf of the city, um, allowing him to use his own vehicle and paying him $500 versus $750 a month we did with the
prior city manager, I believe, actually is more cost effective. He continues to use his own personal vehicle. he doesn't get mileage. So, if he goes to Pensacola or Tallahassee, that's literally part of his monthly allowance. So, that's that's new and different to me as a retired Air
Force guy. Um, and I've got a couple other Air Force veterans up here. You know, if you had a wing commander or a group commander, they would be assigned a government vehicle and that's what they would use, right? So, this was a little different to me, but I get it now. And it's it's actually more
cost-effective to do it this way, and it gives the city manager more flexibility to use their own vehicle. Um, whereas if they used a a city issued vehicle, it would be much more limited. They couldn't stop at Publix. They couldn't do, you know, those kind of things. So,
this makes sense to me. That was the only question I had, and I'm good otherwise. So, any other discussions before we wrap this up? good as well. But I just know that we we make our decisions as five, not four if we can. You know what I mean? So,
>> we'll save it. Uh, but just public discussion tonight. Anything else y'all want to discuss or say about the contract? >> Then, thank you. >> I'm all good. If if all parties have agreed and, you know, beneficial to all concerned,
truth, fair to all concerned, let's let's move forward. So, >> well, a special thanks to uh Mr. Jackson, our city attorney, and uh Commissioner Ward for spearheading this on behalf of the commission. Uh thank you, Mr. Lightfoot, for your uh due
attention to detail and and working with them. Um I guess that wraps us up tonight. if there's nothing else for the good of the order.