I felt bad for sure. Good evening everyone. I'm medical urban players and housing committee meeting to order. It is Thursday, November 6th. We have two items on our agenda tonight. First one we're going to take up is order number 251009512.
An application for a special permit from attorney Faulk on behalf of Farm Road Reality Trust Evangelist Roofing to operate a contractor yard in a pre-existing non-conforming building in the airport industrial park at 17 Airport Boulevard. We had the public
hearing on the 18th. Everybody has um the transcript. They can't hear me. >> All right. Never had to heat the microphone in this room before. Um, all right. We have Attorney Faulk present
with have a copy of the draft. I think everybody also got a copy of um the site plan and we'll let attorney Faulk open if he has anything he would like to talk to us
about. >> Roby counselors. Uh for the record, Brian Faulk with Myrick 100 Front Street in Worcester here on behalf of the applicant um and owner Farm Road Realy Trust and the operator Evangelist Roofing. Um as was mentioned, this is a special permit for a contractor's yard
at 17 Airport Boulevard. Also looking to change the use of a pre-existing non-conforming building uh which is the existing uh former hanger building on this uh on this location. Um as was mentioned, public hearing on August 18th. No one spoke in opposition. I
circulate to the council and to department heads. I submitted some edits to that decision last week um just to clarify the required findings for the pre-existing non-conforming. Um department heads indicated no suggested changes to the draft decision. Um and
following this special permit, if it's granted, we will plan review committee um to update the overall site plan for the airport industrial park, which has happened with each new um tenant and new special permit update to the existing overall site plan um for the uh for the
industrial park. Um and that gives site plan committee time to verify that we're complying with um scaping requirements which are important um for these for these uses. Um so as mentioned the draft decision references two plans which are number one the asbuilt that we submitted
with the application and number two a landscaping plan that was prepared in 2022 when the industrial park was being developed that shows the landscaping for this site and we would have to um as the conditions of approval for the special permit >> and I had commented to uh attorney
that I didn't see a landscaping plan on received so he did forward a copy we don't have print copies but you all should have received the email with the um downloaded copy of the landscape way site plan and I don't think they had any issues. N
>> you should also have all received um when I saw the no comments from I went back and looked at the comments that councelor Oing had made from the site plan review committee because there were some issues that I thought needed to be addressed. Everybody should have a
copy um in multicolor format the responses to the questions that I had. I don't think we need to go over those. I think they've been addressed in the actual special permit, but I I will if anybody thinks it's important to
document that again with the decision on the special permit. Uh it's order number 251009512. city grants the application for a special permit to farm road reality trust to change the use of a
pre-existing non-conforming structure and for a con airport boulevard unit 20 in the limited industrial zoning district as provided in this decision and subject to the following findings of facts and conditions. Number one, the applicant farm road realy trust is a
Massachusetts reality trust with an address of PO Box 8 Southboro Mass. Number two, the applicant owner of the property located at 17 Airport Boulevard, unit 20 being shown as a condominium unit of parcel 52 on assessor's map 73, the site number
three. Oh, I'm sorry. Yes. >> Yeah, I was just waiting for the opportunity time to bring this up, but uh in the airport development, there's still this huge When are they going to take care of that? >> Um through the chair. I I don't have the answer to that. I believe it's part of
that particular um condent site buildout, but I don't have an answer to you. I don't know. >> Okay. Because I my first reaction was the the material that was there was part of the route 20 construction, but still there 20's done. So, >> I mean, it's it I'm getting lots of
complaints about having that pile of dirt there. Okay. >> Understood. So, >> to my applicant's um my client's site, which is which is 17, which you know, this is unrelated to that, but I don't have an answer to you for that. >> Okay. They own that lot or is it still
owned by the owner of the airport? >> The the lot with the dirt on it? >> No, the lot with the airport hanger. >> Um Mr. Evangelist, Farm Realy Trust owns um they bought number 17. Correct. >> Okay. Okay. Thank you for the
clarification. Thank you, Madam Chair. All right. Uh, let's see. Where were we? Number three. In accordance with section 65012B, section 65017, and section 658 of the zoning ordinance of the city of Marboro,
the applicant proposes to change the use of a pre-existing non-conforming structure and for a contractor's the use as shown on the plans referenced in paragraph 5 below. The use consists of a building, accessory parking, landscaped areas. Number four, the app and through
its council filed with city clerk of the city of marble an application for a special permit for the use. Number five, in connection with the application, the applicant certified list of abutters filing fees, a site plan entitled proposed PL plan by control point
associates incorporated with the last revision date of May 9, 2025, and a landscaping plan entitled proposed landscape plan for the use area number 20 Airport Boulevard by Cornerstone Engineering dated October 13th, 2022.
collectively the plans attached here to as attachment A. Number six, the application complete by the building commissioner of the city of Marbor acting on behalf of the city planner for the city of Marboro in accordance with the rules and regulations promulgated by the city council for special permit.
Number seven, the site's located in the limited industrial zoning district. Number eight, the site has an area of 32,98 or minus as shown on the plans. Number nine, the site is pre-existing non-conforming with respect to the existing building side and rear
setbacks. Number 10, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the city council for the city of Marble and applicable statutes of the Commonwealth, the city council established a date for a public hearing on the applica and the city clerk for the city of Marble caused notice of the same to be advertised and
determined that notice was provided to a Butters entitled there to in accordance with the applicable regulations and law. Number 11, the Marble City Council pursu pursuant to master journal laws chapter 4A opened a public hearing on Monday.
Public hearing was held at the Marble City Hall, 140 Main Street. Hearing was closed on August 18th, 2025. Number 12, representatives presented testimony at the public hearing detailing the use describing its impact upon municipal
services, the neighborhood, and traffic. And number 13, at the public hearing, no members of the public spoke in opposition to the use. Based on the above, the city council makes the following findings and takes the follow. Num A, the applicant has complied with all rules and regulations promulgated by
the Marble City Council as they pertain to special permit applications. B, the city finds that a change of use of the pre-existing non-conforming structure would not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing non-conforming use and
structures. C. The city council finds that the pre-existing non-conforming structure has not been abandoned for a period of two years or more. D is that the proposed use is not enlarged to more than 25% of the floor and ground area of the pre-existing
nonconforming structure at the site. The city council finds that the proposed use of the site is in appropriate use and in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance of the city of Marbor winds terms and conditions as provided herein. City council makes these findings subject to
the completion and inherence by the applicant it successes to the conditions more fully set forth herein. F. The city council pursuant to its authority under Massachusetts General Laws chapter 48 and the zoning ordinance of the city of Malber hereby grants the
applicant a special permit to change the use of a pre-existing non-conforming structure and for a contractor's yard at seen airport boulevard unit 20 as shown on the plans filed subject to the following conditions which condition shall be binding on the applicant its
successors and/or assign construction in accordance with applicable laws. Construction of all structures on the site is to be in accordance with all applicable building codes and zoning city of Marbor and the Commonwealth and shall be built according to the plans as may be amended during site plan review.
Number two, site plan review special permit is further subject to detailed site plan re review by the site plan review committee in accordance with the city of Malboro site plan review ordinance part building permit. Any additional changes, alterations, modifications or amendments as required
during the process of site plan review shall be further conditioned to the building permit and no final occupancy permit shall be issued until the applicant has complied with all conditions provided, however, that subsequent to the of this special permit and site plan approval. The site plan
review committee may authorize the phasing of site and building work depending upon weather conditions and other factors. Subsequent site plan review shall be consistent with the conditions of the special permit and the plan submitted, reviewed and approved by
the city council authority. Number three, modification of plans. Notwithstanding conditions one and two above, the city council or the site plan approve engineering changes to the plans. So long as said changes do not change the use as approved herein or
materially increase the of the use, reduce the green area, alter traffic flow or increase the size of the building. All is shown on the plans. Number four, incorporation of all plans, photo renderings, site evaluations, briefs, and other documentation provided
by the applicant as part of the application and as amended or revised during the hearing process before the city council and or the city council's urban affairs committee are here and incorporated into and become a part of this special permit and become condition
requirements of the same unless otherwise altered by the city council. Number five, storm water and erosion control management. The applicant at successors at its site superintendent during construction of the project is competent in storm water and erosion
control management. This individual's credentials shall be accept division of the city's department of public works and the city's conservation commission. This individuals shall be responsible for checking the site after storm events including weekends and evenings when
storms are predicted. This individual shall ensure that no untreated storm water leaving the site consist and the city's storm water regulation. This individual shall ensure compliance with the approved sequence of construction plan and the approved
erosion plan. The applicant, its successors and/or assigned shall grant this individual complete authority of the site as it relates to storm water and erosion controls. Number screening. In accordance with section 65018A48 of the zoning ordinance, the applicant
shall install solid fencing and vegetative screening used for the storage of vehicles, equipment, and materials from the street and adjacent properties and shall maintain such screening in good re shall comply with the requirements of all applicable city
ordinances. Number seven, outdoor storage areas. In compliance with section A48 of the zoning ordinance, the outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment, and materials shall be located on impervious and otherwise dustfree surfaces shall be stored with sufficient
protections to avoid damage to landscaped areas and to avoid interference with the proper functioning of storm water. Inf lawn areas shall be separated from adjacent parking storage areas with curbing and barriers to prevent the use of lawn areas for
materials or vehic. Number eight, indoor storage areas. Building areas used to store vehicles, equipment, and materials indoors shall be equipped with floor drainage systems designed to prevent fuel, oil, and other hazardous materials
from entering the storm water or sewer systems approved through the site plan review process. Vehicle repairs and maintenance. The site may not be used for major repairs of vehicles and equipment, but minor maintenance of vehicles and equipment which are exclusively as part of the use may be
performed indoors only subject to condition 10. Condition 10 is noise and air quality. The esters and/or sign shall comply with the city's noise ordinance and shall comply with all state and federal requirements governing air quality and
emissions. Lighting. Exterior lighting at the site shall be downward facing and shielded to minimize impacts on neighboring properties with the lighting planned for the site to be reviewed. The condition during the site plan review process. Exterior lighting at the site shall be shut off outside of operating
hours except for lighting necessary for security and emergency access. Number 12. Compliance with applicable laws. The applicant is successors and/or assigns agree to comply with all municipal, state and federal rules, regulation as they may apply to the construction, maintenance and operation
of the use. And number 13 is our standard recording of decision. So are there questions, comments from anybody on the committee? I'll start with them first. >> No. Any non
>> committee members? The only comment I have to this is what I understand this they're retrofitting the existing hey there's no new building construction going on right >> that's correct there'll be interior renovations um for the two um
contractor's uses within but it's not exterior exterior work has already been done which was improvements to the pavement and some storm water >> okay okay thank you for that that's all that was my only question thank you >> all right anybody councelor or Thank you, Madam Chair. Um,
we back at the, uh, previous hearing, I asked about those assess yellow ones. That's all been resolved. Uh, you have in your presentation from when you first came for the public hearing, you showed >> like a the yellow lot lines pretty much. Have has that been resolved?
>> Yeah, I mean, the the as we have doesn't show any encroachments other than we're within a few feet of the lot line because the building is is so old. Um, but the assessor's lines are not precise. the as bill shows that we're we're in compliance with um within the bounds of the property.
>> Okay. Especially the existing shed to remain that's right near that property line. So in the building itself at one two corners it's very close. So that's why I was >> that has been resolved and assessed by a land surveyor. >> Yep. >> It has. Okay. Thank you. And then on
screening with it being so close to the abuters, uh you do have fencing. Well, is that in or is that going in? It's it's going through the chair. It's going in. That landscape plan that is um also being attached as part of exhibit A shows a 4ft wood fence and some um
vegetated screening uh in the back of the property. So site plan committee presumably will take a fresh look at that when we're weeks. They'll require that. >> It's just a tight site. That's why the questions. And last is the engineering division at the department of public works is supposed to be a designated
person's called to keep an eye on storm water management. Um hopefully that will get relayed down at site plan and also W is noted in number five of the conditions. Excellent. Thank you. Thank you madam chair.
>> You're welcome. I think Mr. Dersio is well aware of utter and erosion control on all the projects. It's something that's been required for quite a while to prevent um issue of damage to the city water
supply and everywhere else. So, no further questions. >> Motion to approve or are we motion to approve order number 259512? It's been moved and seconded to of the
application for a special permit for attorney Faulk for Evangelist Roofing to operate a contractor yard in a pre-existing nast one more time. Further discussion seeing none. All those in favor one, two,
three, four, five. Your hand up. Yes, councelor Presci. All right. So we have this uh I can report this out on the 17th um referred to the to be put in proper form and then we can move forward. This is one of another one of
those that we extended to the June or December. But if we can get it off the table that'll be good. >> Thank you very much. >> Thank you. Let me get all this stuff put away and we can go to item number two. Mix up all my papers.
All right, we're ready for item number two, which is order number 254, the application for a special permit from attorney Faulk on behalf of Taja Estates for the mixeduse project in the Malboro Village District consisting of 67 residential condominium units, street
level commercial space, 43 onsite parking spaces, and resident amenities at 63 to 175 Main Street. And before I turn this over to attorney Faulk, I believe everybody should have, if you've seen your email, noticed that there's a I did for Monday's urban affairs meeting
where because this posting only has a special permit and we also have the site plan and we have dares that we have to deal with. Those two things will now be finalized on Monday. Um so you have a little more time if you haven't looked at that site
plan um and looked at the stair which will be the details we have it it was in the most recent council meeting but anyway um so Fernand Faulk >> great thank you for record again Brian Faulk with my 100 front street in Worcester here on behalf of the
applicant Taja states of Malro LLC uh with me is from uh MP uh design consultants um doing the engineering work on the project and really everything else on the project um at a rapid pace. Um mentioned um what we're here to talk about tonight is the
amendment to the 2019 special permit. Um we can we can talk about the draft um and decision um that city department heads have um reviewed and added some comments to on Monday night. And also um the third item that we're looking for on
this which is the acquisition of a part of the stair uh property um just uh to the east of the site. Um, so and and I've mentioned this before. Um, we are really pushing here in terms of timing
uh more than would otherwise be the case because we're up against a hard January 12th deadline where this special permit lapses. Um, all of the uh permit extension acts that kept it alive all this time um no longer are in project. So, we're looking to get a shovel in the
ground on January 12th. So um backing up all the different appeal periods and getting a building permit reviewed and that's why we are um sort of running here with this particular application. Um so you have a draft special permit decision um before you. Department heads
reviewed that and had um no additional comments on it. Um they had a number of comments on the site plan um um decision which which you've seen on Monday, but the special permit decision before you um department heads didn't have any additional comments. I had a discussion with the city solicitor based on some
comments that he had raised with me. Um, and we haven't I assume he'll incorporate whatever his thoughts are on that into a final decision. Um, so there may be some tweaks coming from him. Um, but we had a good discussion about um, you know, where we're both coming from with how the decision should be put
together. Um really the special permit decision it really plans um it leaves everything else alone updates the applicant from um the former applicant owner to Taja esta states and then swaps a which is the prior um engineered plans
and architectural plans for the the current plans that we're proposing which are some tweaks to make the project easier to build and and more economically uh feasible. Um, so I I don't know if you want to go through the decision or if you want to go through the plan. >> Show what you have screened be before
you begin and then I can go through the decision. We'll see if anybody has questions. Sure. I don't know if you need to go through all of the especially the same as what we have as part of the >> So these what you have on the screen are
architectural plans that that just got um completed today. Um, and I'll explain why. Um, that uh resulted in some late breaking changes. Um, I know they're up on the screen. I don't know if we if we have the navigate through. >> Do do we have a >> Okay, I'll grab it. Bear with me for a
sec. >> And Attorney Faulk had not had time to print these out, but it's for everybody on Monday. So, you will have them to look at tonight. Um, >> we'll do a little scrolling. Okay. So these are a slight update from the
architectural plans that we submitted with the application that we um had public hearing um previously. And the biggest change you'll see in the front of the building right now is this corner right here. Um the building had gone straight to this and gone back as a as a
a rectangle. And we now have this this jog and this little utility structure in the bottom which is the transformer for the building. We had hoped that inside the building because it would look a whole lot better in terms of having um u in terms of the streetscape and then just the design of the building overall,
but the utility national grid building has to go outside. So, um we we tweaked the plans. We've got that outside um the building. It didn't cost us a whole lot of square footage in the same. We still have 67 units, 36 um onebedroom and
studio, 31bedroom. still have um more parkly. The previous plan from 2019 had 43 parking spaces. We now have 59. We're required to have 66. So, we have a delta of seven. And we'll do a payment in to make up the difference on on the zoning. So, I'm
just going to scroll through a little bit. You've seen these previously. Um they've now been updated to show uh in the building where we have uh the utilities going. Some of these are harder to see. Um cross-section of the design. Oh, another change I wanted to
point out. So, this right here is the ground floor where we have some of our parking, 10 of our parking spaces, and then our um lobby bank um trash recycling area. And then when we were before you for the public hearing, the
design plan showed at the time space 3,000 square ft, which was up a bit um from the 2019 plans, but just a single commercial space. Um we made some changes. So we now we have two commercial spaces. We have one here which is 92 ft² and then a completely
separate space here what we're calling retail B which was which is um 2700 square ft. Um so opportunity for not one business but two businesses and we think that will work better in terms of just the overall look that the city is going
a true mixed use um and more opportunities to get tenants in there with um two slightly smaller spaces rather than one one large space. And attorney while you're on that, if I may, I I was asked about the uh parking on that. So on that particular
level, it is the same entrance and the same exit only for those particular spaces, which is I can't see how many there are at >> Yep. 12 total, sorry. Yep. >> Okay. And then then when you get to the there's a separate in and out. I'll wait till you get to it. >> Correct. I'm just going to try to scroll down a
>> bit down. Yeah. On the top of the page. So this is the second floor um which is all parking and so we have um entrance area here um ramp up going that's all the on-site parking um and again this is
residentonly parking this is not for the public so um ne um residents who have um to the parking garages will have a remote to open and close the garage doors. This will be regular users, not just um anyone who happens to be downtown trying to figure out how
parking garage with a somewhat complicated garage entry system. These are residents. This is going to be their home. They'll be used to it. Um >> there is the potential though of somebody leaving the first floor and the second floor at the same time with both doors going up at the same time. Is that
correct? >> Um the and the second floor here at the same time. >> Yes. I mean, it's technically possible. Um, but they've got several car spaces between them. Uh, conflicts there um necessarily.
>> And there will be some sort of an alarming system on the outside of the building to alert people that >> correct >> coming. I >> So, you'll you'll need to use your remote for the garage to go up to go in. And then down here it is two-way, the
ram way, but there will be a gating system at the top that will prevent someone from going down the ramp if someone's coming up the ramp. Um, and so we've we've worked with the engineer on this. Um, it's new to Malro, we'll concede, but it is fairly common in more
urban settings um where um space is at a premium and and parking needs to be um fit fitted as you can fit it. Um but again it will be resident only and there'll be a gating system to prevent you know conflicts on on that ramp. >> And I I know that um Mr. Depersio had
said that yes this is new and in theory it will work. So we'll see and I I'm going to let um go first and then we'll see who else had their on this specifically at this point. >> I'm parking. Yeah. Thank you Madam Chair. Um so just to follow up on the question. So if you're going in for the
alarm just for the alarm signing right. So like normally when I've interact with systems like this, right, it's on Boston where obviously you have Brias. When cars are going in, not as much as when cars are going in, when they come out, there's that beeping that goes and sometimes they'll actually there'll be an automated voice kind of like a
crosswalk that says, you know, vehicle, you know, caution. Is that planned for here? >> That is. And if and if you look again, we're going to talk about it on Monday, but the site plan decision, we lifted language that we had in the 2019 decision sort of details the pedestrian safety um features that have to be part
of this system subject to the city engineers approval. So there'll be an an alert for pedestrian, an alert for um drivers coming and going >> because since this will be operated by a remote, it would be nice if when that remote hits even on entry if someone's pulling alert. And then just the only other thing I want to flag and this is
going to sound funny coming from me who's always jumping up and down about parking and how there's not enough. So, you know, try and stay standing, Brian, when I say I appreciate the fact that we're trying to get more parking spaces downtown. Um, one of my main concerns is we're having people cross this sidewalk
for a private, but now we're crossing it to have it twice to achieve more parking. Um, and I'm a little concerned about the safety that that's going to cause and then also the trade-off of I assume that was I wasn't on the council for the >> Sure. >> Just gonna have Carlos absolutely.
>> All right. So, what what happened in here is it on the side level like on this it would be motion sensors >> on it. So, if there's there's people on the sidewalk, the gate for the people that are exiting the garage is not going to lift. Mhm. >> So the guy needs So like let's say you
open your garage to open the garage. If there's people on the sidewalk, the gate's not going to open. >> Only when the clear, the gate opens and the person enters. >> And for the per people that are entering the garage, I mean, they can visually see because they're on the street, they can see walk. So they're going to wait
until the sidewalk is clear. It's more for the people there building on the moment that they in the same situation on the other on the lower section. So, the guy's going to be like preparing to leave the garage. He's going to, you know, click the remote. If there's people, if the if the remote senses
there's people on the side door, it's not going to open. It only opens when the when the sidewalk is clear and and free of uh movement. >> That's great. I mean, those are great safety features. So the >> and then the regular alarm there that would be on the sidewalk to like once
that like the sidewalk's clear and the the garage is opening there's like a sec of of of moment that uh you know there will be a sign saying like car leaving the building so the person at that point waits until the car leaves the building. >> Yeah, that's helpful. I appreciate that.
My my concern still remains just with the second entrance in egress. Um because I think it's it's an interesting trade-off. One to get more parking which is and I wasn't on the council at the time but that prior the prior design that spot on the left where the extra 10 or 12 spaces is going that was retail. >> Yeah.
>> Before. >> So we actually have more retail than the prior plan surprisingly. That was just under 3,000 square feet. Now we're about 34 3500. So, um, we we're we're making >> So, what was that before if that wasn't parking before?
>> There was there was more uh resident um amenities on the B I'm sorry, to the back. The difference is we had parking. All the parking and the retail were on this ground floor. Okay. >> We had our seventh floor wasn't residential. It was a roof deck. The second floor wasn't parking. It was
residential. So, now we've got >> to kind of move that around and get parking on the So, we swapped the roof deck for um for units. That's how we kept the same. We had all we had all 43 parking spaces in this lower level. Some of them were back here, which is part of why that building never got built
because it was just not feasible. We we maxed out that ground level with 43 parking spaces and a little under 3,000 ft of retail. So now by getting rid of the roof deck and moving everything up a little bit, that can there and more retail. >> Great. Thank you for the clarifications. Thank you, Madam Chair. >> Councelor Ducet.
>> Thank you very much, Madam Chair. Um, so are they gates or >> there'll be both gates and garage door? >> Okay. Um, and so for the path going second floor, there's going to be two
garage doors. >> Yes. >> Okay. >> Right here, actually. >> And then on the first floor, there'll be one edge door. You >> see right here the garage doors? >> Yep. >> Okay. So, for the poor soul who has the parking lot that's right next to that
entrance and he's pulling out, how can he be aware if someone's pulling in at that time or what? You see what I'm saying? Go back to the diagram of the first floor. Scroll more. >> Yep. >> There we go. >> Yeah. So, the there's two park there's
one parking space immediately to the right of the entrance, right? >> Yep. I just want to make sure that there's no potential collision issues where people l who have parking spaces clo may be interfering with entrances.
>> It's a good point. So if someone in space one is backing up, is that door going to get open and someone coming in, >> right? >> Yeah. I I'll defer to Carlos, but I think the design to prevent that from happening. Okay. You wouldn't be as long as you know that's aware of the process and the systems design is set up. So basically there can be a situation where
someone outside presses to open the garage door and it's not going to open because someone's coming out of that one. >> Correct. >> Okay. So when when they press a garage someone opens the garage door and it's not going to open. I as a uh person
trying to get into my unit, how do I know that it at least acknowledges me for open? >> It's a good question. I I don't know that. Um do >> it's a it's a valid point. I mean we I I have been many garages uh like in tight
spots like uh in the city uh where we have like 40 50 cars and there's only like a 8ft garage door out of the building. >> I I I don't see uh uh or or we never had an issue wi with that per se. What
happened is that the majority of the the time is that uh as soon as the guy approaches this thing in here uh and he clicks like for the garage door to open, whoever's inside of the garage, it's going to know that there's some somebody trying to come in. It would not do a
movement on it. >> Uh on on that case when somebody's trying to leave and somebody's arriving at the same time, >> right, it's a race condition. >> It it would be it would be like an awkward condition. Yeah. Uh I mean the guy's going to have to wait on the outside of uh
>> Right. I I just want to make sure you don't end up in a deadlock. >> Yes. Uh >> cuz it's only one door. That's my biggest >> only one door. The majority of the cars that would be parked on on this area is the ones that are going to be like uh and that was the preference from like the fire department. That's where we
have uh the electric cars. >> Okay. >> That were going to be in here. And two of the spaces are the handicap spaces uh that we are required to have also technically we have out of the uh seven 18 spaces in there. I mean only I mean
assuming that we're not going to have any handicap person in here is we're going to have like 16 cars. So the chances of like that happening uh are very small. Uh it's it's hard to predict. Uh there's not like >> I can think of one handicapped person
that would love to live in this place. >> I'm not I'm not saying that we're not going to use all 18 spaces. I'm just saying that that could it's hard to predict. >> There are assigned spaces. Correct. >> Uh I assume that once uh I mean the rental of the building start happen
assigned spaces. >> So my spot I'm going to know how to get in out of that thing. Well my spot >> is going to be your spot once uh I mean >> if I can bring this all back. We got a lot to go through. I don't think it's our job to discuss what the potential
tenants of that building are going to have to deal with past site plans muster for design. I think we can leave the theoretical discussion for later. Presato, did you have your hand up for specific questions? >> Yes, I did. Thank you very much. Thank
you for being here. Um, uh, you know, I'm I'm not opposed to housing. Um, but it just seems like this building is not a really good fit for the spot. You guys are asking for quite a few things. Um, >> we're talking parking only right now.
>> Um, you know, I was saying I'm not opposed to the housing. Uh, what I do have issue is this parking situation. Um it does it is going to make interest for pedestrians hands down because there are going to be more cars coming in through those parking garages than there were ever because right now there are zero
cars. Um as I've mentioned before, we really pride ourselves in making this city walkable city, pedestrian city. Great. Um what this shows is that we are uh we are actually more focused on cars and parking than we are about our
residents and the people that will be um you know occupying these or occupying the neighboring spaces, visiting the businesses down the street. Um I also have questions about, you know, when the city does shut down for like the Labor Day parade, uh the horrible parade we we
just had holiday stroll, what's going to happen with the residents here? Are they going to be able to reach their homes? >> Y they they would be affected just like every other property along Main Street or the parade route. It would be a temporary shutdown >> except there are no parking lots on Main
Street for residents. >> I can't anticipate that, but I would imagine there are parade spots where driveways are impacted when a parade route goes by. You can't come and go during the time of the parade and then it would would be >> um parades are not the only reason we shut down Main Street though. Uh I would, you know, ask my fellow
counselors to think about things like this. um these things will affect our community directly. I mean it it it's it could be some a simple issue as parking but you know it opens up another can of worms for others down the road. Um and I want you guys that so madam chair point
of information this council you were on it approved this plan that had parking just like this just not two floors to do this and it wasn't a problem. >> I was not on the council >> maybe to you hang I I got the floor. Hang on. >> All right. So, so if we're going to now
change the rules because we changed the downtown zoning to ask for this specifically. All right. And the council at that time in 2019 was okay with it on this council that were there then. So, you're welcome to try to challenge the whole thing
again, but you're going against what I call the will of the council back. Thank you, Madam Chair. >> Thank you for that point of information. Um, I would like to repeat I was not on the council in 2019. Um, so my comments are fresh and new. Um they later um
um sorry I just lost my complete train of thought. So that's there right um I would be open to having a parking lot you know down the street on Main Street but something that is right in the middle of of of Main Street. I I I have an issue with especially in terms of
safety um as as we've already addressed in in in a few points. um the bay doors opening. People are not used to that whatsoever, especially in here. Um this is not, you know, a busy city, a tight city whatsoever. It's not We don't need things like like parking lots with bay
doors that that are right in the main street. Um and and you know, that that's all I want to say about that. Thank you. >> Uh councelor uh Fill. >> Madam Chair, just a quick question about the change of plans from what we saw last time. You had mentioned the
transformers now going to be outside. I notice in that corridor electrical. So there those will be unaffected by the change to move the transformer outside. >> That's correct. >> Okay, good. Good to know. Um and then I notice floors three through seven above where the transformer that's all housing as well. Those are going to be units. I
assume those units will just be a little bit smaller because of the cut in. >> That's correct. A few of the units were impacted in terms of being a little bit smaller, but that was about it. It was about I think Carlos said the grand total impact was 400 square feet over the whole building. >> Gotcha. All right. Thank you. Thank you, Madam Chair. >> All right. And councelor Orm, did you have a question on parking?
>> Yes, I do. Madam Chair, I will state of parking at this section. Um, how many municipal Main Street parking spaces are we losing due to these garage doors? >> It would be four total. >> Four total. Okay. And again, the
businesses you're proposing, I have no problem with the idea of smaller retail A and B as you show. Uh how many the issue is they'll have employees and and I've seen this before employees sometimes like to park on reality. Um
and it concerns me on parking that we may not have sufficient parking for the non-residents. We're already taking away four sping more needs for people that come to work at this building, never mind the other buildings that we're trying to make sure stay occupied. So
that's concerned. The other question I had parking is related to the gate as well as the entire door system. If the power goes out, do you backup power system? Because if not, I'm curious how the garage doors will work
in that gate that's up on the second parking area. >> Um, for this building, I mean, >> for this building, we are required to have a generator. So we can uh uh I mean
need to feed the generator with is the elevator. Uh I think like there's probably enough power that we can add uh that to the garage doors and some econ also in the building. >> And I know you said generator for the elevator and I know it's not related to parking, but where's that generator
going to be going? >> Probably on the roof. >> On the roof. >> Yeah, it's on the roof of the building. >> Thank you for your answers. Thank you. >> Okay. I believe we still have timed parking on so somebody working fulltime at that building would not be able to park on Main Street or they would get
ticketed so they would be in the garage or if there were spaces reserved for employees. I don't know how that's working. >> I understand that, Madam Chair, but we don't have enough enforcement. It's already happening down where the old Ro Funeral Home used to be. People are parking down there during the
construction process, hurting the small businesses that are already there. So, it's very concerning. Thank you. >> And that's I think Felic is dealing with that one. Continue. I didn't mean to. >> Yeah, there were only two other things I wanted to note that were changes. And and this is the end. I'll have to scroll back. This is the end. Um this is the
stair design which we um when we were before you for the um for the hearing. Um but we designed this um in discussions with the site plan review committee. They've seen these. Um this would be the relocated stairs. Scrolling isn't working as well for me here. This is Main Street. This is our uh wonderful
utility spot. Um new stairs would be here um rather than sort of the crisscross u pattern that we have now. Landing area um which would um be where um it's a form of egress for our building. It's also a a means of egress
for the warn uh block. Um and then um just some images in terms of how it would look and landscaped. Um which is something that site plan review uh committee uh made sure that we included that this be unique and be a you know it will still it will still be a public staircase but we wanted to look the with
the downtown. And then the last thing it will take me a while to scroll up to it but I'll explain it. Um we have a rear green space um here a residence um we originally had that accessible only through the exterior. you had to come outside the building, go around the
stairs and come in. Um, plan committee, it was made apparent it was important to have that. Oh, did I pass that, Carlos? >> There we go. Um, so this is a redesigned third floor and uh we now have um a hallway with direct access to that green
space which is much better in different ways. Uh again, it cost us a little bit of space in one or one or two of the units. Um but now we have you know accessible space um for folks to go right out at grade to that space in the back. So um those are the three significant changes from the last time
we were before. Um split the retail um on the lower level um we made out the the transformer outside um at grade rear access from the building to the green space um and then the stair design. >> Said >> thank you very much madam chair uh to
the green space. Um, so the rectangle that's battling the back of the building, um, that's enclosed. So only available to >> to the people. >> Correct. It's res only. >> The hatch gray area be is that
>> landscape area on the slope. >> Oh, so it's a sl that's the sloped landscape area. Correct. Unaccessible. >> Correct. >> Okay. Okay. I just wanted to get that. >> It's it'll provide scenery, but it's not accessible for for residents. It's mostly rock, not green space, right? Well, it'll be it'll be a mix.
>> Yes. Thank you, >> Councelor Naban. >> Chair, um, just a real quick comment. I can tell by the way you guys have presented some of these updates this evening, you're not thrilled by the uh the change in the generator and what it's done to the building, but I have to tell you that I think aesthetically it was one of my concerns when you guys came to the public hearing. I think it
looks better now. I I like not having that big wide door for the for the utility room. So, >> yeah, you you have a second. I was just telling annoying to have that outside, but I think it actually makes the exterior of the building look better. It breaks it up a little bit. >> It It breaks it up a little bit. It's not as imposing right on the sidewalk and it does give you a nice door that
Thank you, >> Council Piato. >> Thank you. Um I had this question last time. Um what is that the Do you know the depth of that green space there from the the wall to the >> Oh, >> so like this is uh this is level on the
back of the building. uh uh that of like the improvements then that I propose when we start like working on this project in here. Some of the the old designs wouldn't work. So now we have like this area left the elevation inside of the building is elevation 402. We
need to have like a little handicap ramp in here and this elevation is 404. Uh we're going to have to put like this wall in here uh to separate. The idea is it to hide a little bit of that parking lot garage uh wall on the back of by
raising this and we're putting like trees in here from the building. We're not going to be able to see that wall. That was the intention in here. So, this area we're not just going to be able to access, but we're going to try to put a lot of trees and stuff on this area to uh hide that big wall on the back of the
building. The people on the back of the building looking up, they're going to see the grass in here. Uh they're going to see like a landscape wall and a lot of plants. >> That's great. I like that. Do you know the depth of that green space? >> Oh, this depth in here. This is about uh 25 ft.
>> Okay. So, not not terrible. How's the sunlight back there when wall in a wall between you? Do you think they'll have enough sunlight? >> Um >> you think they'll have any sunlight? >> Depends upon the time of day. >> Guess so. Yeah, >> we would say we we probably like on the summertime you're going to get like
probably about like three or four hours of sunlight in that. >> Okay. So, an alleyway. Um >> the the 2019 plan there were private patios back here. Um and then there was landscaping. There was no accessible yard space at all. So, is an improvement
again over the 2019 plan? >> I I do have a another comment about the staircase. I I initially when I saw this um I because it just shoved you know the sidewalk into a dark corner. Um even the transformer that cutout does help open
up that space a lot. Um I really I I I do like that you are going to be taking a bit more care of that staircase. Um I don't know if you heard some of the comments during our council meeting about you know losing the charm of area. Um I know it is a communal space as well. Um it's used by residents. It's
used by uh employees that that you know are are in the businesses next door. It's used by pedestrians coming up and down. So I I would like to keep that beauty and and and the the aesthetic that that you guys are presenting. Um I do have one more other question. Um it
but um these staircases are very inaccessible to people with handicap issues um with mobility issues. I don't know if that's something that you might wanting. I know it's if if you were able to purchase the property, we adding um you know a lift for for people with
disabilities. Um I know the does not have any. So that is also uh um you know something I take an issue with. But if if if your plan is to purchase this piece um I would like to see something like accessibility sake. >> Um did I see a hand over here? Councelor
Fill. >> Thank you, Madam Chair. And I owe you a Paul first time. I meant to tie it back to parking when we were talking about going up, but um on that same point, so those are all two bedrooms that are being affected, albeit it's a small square footage change. None of those are onebedrooms. They'll all still remain two-bedroom units.
>> No, we retain the same bedroom mix. Um just some of the units got a little bit smaller, but we still have 36 onebedroom/ uh twobedroom. >> Okay. I just didn't know if that there was a change and if that could affect how many >> we were origally thought that that might result in a couple of um switch. It
didn't work out that way. >> Okay. Thank you. Thank you, Madam Chair, >> and councelor Vital. >> Thank you, Madam Chair. The back to the grassy area, is that going to have ex or is that pretty much shut off during the night? >> I mean, we'll have exterior lighting back there. I don't know that we've thought through whether that'll be lit
at night um or not. Um so, >> there are some neighbors, you know, behind the cliff. >> Correct. >> So, I just was curious about that. >> Yeah. I mean, we have the standard lighting condition in the special permit that, you know, we can't be shining lights, you know, a budding ab budding property. So, we'd be subject to that. Um we haven't thought through you know
what would be the you know what level of safety lighting we have to have back there um off hours certainly could be a condition of approval. >> Thank you very much. >> Thank you Madam Chair. >> Councelor Oram. >> Thank you Madam Chair. Uh as we're on
this section with the Gron area which it's nice to see that u the retaining walls there has been discussion on the existing retaining walls. Are these all going to be new retain? Um, if you go back to the uh I think
like the one that we show here, I mean, if you go like to this one in here, uh, so the idea in here is that on the original plan when they approve it, like this whole area on the back of the building was unusual. Uh, there was
nothing. and it was like a big slope because there's a huge variation in height in here. So our intent was it to create like some usable space for the building on it. So we separate that into two areas like all the buildings all the
apartments that were on this level in here they will have like their own private patios on it. Uh and the elevation 402 uh and then the the green space is going to be like a little bit higher. So like imagine that uh it would be like on the top of the table. So the
deck the the green space is going to be on the top of this table and then we're going to have like a probably a 4ft fence over there to separate and give like privacy for uh and then uh the intention in here is that I mean I don't need to uh to do like a high of a wall
or anything more of a wall that I have control developing the site and make it like nicy and pretty uh to the benefit of the building. the I to make it at a certain elevation that I by putting plants in here I can hide the the wall
there that is above that is not like well maintained and is like in in the greatest shape. Uh and by doing that I I improve like the condition of the wall and then instead of having like right now that wall is about like about some
places like 15 to 20 feet high you only going to see like maybe 10 feet of that wall up above. So like small shrubs or trees that I buy like uh you know that we put it in here or other trees it will definitely hide like that whole wall in the cars there behind the the the wall
over there and it will give like for the building >> but I I think the specific question is you're not doing anything to that wall. >> We're not touching >> you don't own the wall. >> It doesn't belong. It's >> if I may the the wall in front of the plantings is that wall being put in by
you? There's wall in here. >> Yeah. And how high is that? >> It's going to be 8 ft. >> 8 ft high. And then you'll put the plantings in behind it. >> Yes. >> And there's no knowledge of the structurability of the wall, right? Because that's not owned by you. >> I'm improving the wall above because
instead of having like 20 ft exposed, it's going to be 10 feet now. >> I'm improving that. >> I'm just cur curious of the structurability of the wall in the back that's there right now. If it starts to decay. >> Yeah. >> Then it I'm just concerned it could
affect the project. Thank you, >> Council Ducet. >> Thank you much, Madam Chair. Just some great conversations sort of got me thinking of something. Uh you're going to be replacing the stairs, >> correct? >> Okay. So, those stairs are very commonly used today. So, when they get how long
until they get opened up again? >> Um that's to be determined. part of the site plan decision has a detailed construction plan that we have to enter the city um with the city engineers purview before we get a building permit. So will there be a period where it's
shut down? Yes, but it can't be for too long because those stairs provide egress u for our neighboring property. So they'll have to be reconstructed. There will be some disruption, but it'll be as quick as possible because for code purposes we have to get get those um done as fast as we can. >> Thank you for that answer. That's what I
was looking at. Thank you. >> All right. Other questions? Okay. Are you finished with your going through all of that or do you have more to go through? >> No, we're done. >> All right. Um, so we can begin going through the decision. Um,
>> Fox said, I think everybody did get the comments from all of the department heads and they were all pretty much picked to the special permit. So other than um >> the solicitor who did have some I think
he will resolve those with attorney Faulk once this is finalized by us. Oops, wrong thing. So, let me get paper. Okay, I have it here somewhere. Too many
papers. All right. The notice of decision grant of amended special permit. City Council of the City of Mocation to amend a special permit to Taja Estates of Malbor LLC with the mailing address of 95 East Main Street
in this decision. Um the findings of facts, the applicant is a duly organized and existing limited liability gilling address of 95 East Main Street, one sweet 100 Westboro, Massachusetts. Number two, the applicant is the prospective buyer of the property
located on 63 to 175 Main Street Malboro as shown on Malboro assessors map 70 parcel 76A 7778 7 portions of parcels 33A 3477A and portions of the adjacent city steer
land with a total area of 23,242 ft. the site. Number three, the site's owner is Vincenza Sambotaura with the mailing address of 22 Indian Rock Road, Wayland, Mass. Number four, the site is
located primarily in the Malbor Village District with a 98 square foot portion located in Number five. On October 7th, 2019, city council of the city of Malbor voted to grant a special permit authorizing the applicant to a mixeduse
development at the site the use in accordance with article 6 sections 65017 section 35035034 and section 65041 of the zoning ordinance of the city of Malboro recorded at the Middle Sex South
Registry of Deeds in book 70281 page 571 and registered on certificate number 26653, the original special permit. Number six, due to two statutes extending the
effective dates of various land use approvals, the original special permit will lapse on January 12th, 2026. Number seven, the original special permit was approved in accordance with the provisions of the zoning ordinance in effect into the 2023 amendment to the
zoning ordinance with respect to the Malbor Village District City Council order number 23187 not apply to the use in accordance with MGL chapter 48 section 5 and 6 and the express terms of said order. Number
eight, the original special permit authorized certain relief from the 2019 ordinance as follows. A, the seventh story building height of 81 ft, including within 50 ft of a residential zone authorized by special permit in
accordance with section 6504F1 and section 65041 attachment to note 12. B, total lot coverage of 94% authorized by special permit in accordance with section 65041 attachment to note 13.
Number C, the rear setback of zero ft authorized by section 65041 attachment to note 15. D, a mixeduse development over a 98 square foot portion of the P business authorized by special permit in
accordance with section 65017 attachment one and authorize the issuance of more than 100 residential units in the village district in a single calendar year authorized by special permit in accordance with section 654G1.
Number nine. On September 18th, 2025, the applicant by and through its council filed with the city clerk of the city of Malber and apt to amend the original special permit to modify the use under the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws chapter 48 section 9 and the zoning
ordinance application. Number 10. In connection with the application, the applicant submitted a certified list of abutters and filing fees. Number 11 in the applicant submitted a site plan entitled 163 175 Main Street Malboro
Mass plan set by MP Design Carlos Herrera PE last revised and I was told by attorney Faulk that that date will be November 6th, 2025. and a set of architectural
drawings entitled 163 Main Street Design Development by MP Design Consultants lasted the same date 116 2025 together the new plans attached as attachment A number 12 modified as shown on the new
plans would consist of a mixeduse development at the site with 67 residential units no change 59 onsite parking spaces which is a change from 43 and street level commerce space in a sevenstory
building with a height of 75 ft. It was 81 ft and not including a roof deck and shown on the new plans. Number 13. The application was certified as complete by the build acting on behalf of the city planner for the city of Malber in
accordance with the rules and regulations promulgated by the city council for the issuance of a >> chair. >> Yes. >> Sorry. I'd just like to go back to item 12 for a minute as we're going through this. Um, so there's nothing on the roof for
>> electronics and electrical compress, you know, the generators, the heat pump, whatever, you know, >> you know, HVAC systems, all that stuff. Correct. >> So, it's only the roof is only going to be accessible for maintenance, right?
>> That's correct. >> Okay. A height of 75 ft does not include the equipment on the roof. >> That's correct. By zoning, it it doesn't have to include that. The height goes to the top ceiling of the top habitable floor. Yeah. >> So the the stuff on the roof doesn't count,
>> right? Which is also how you dropped it from the 80s something to 75. But that's fine. You know, just how did you do that? Just figured it out. Thank you. >> Um okay, let's see. Where was I? Number 15. >> 14. >> 14. Pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the city of Marboral and applicable statutes of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the city council established a date for a public hearing on the application and the city clerk for the city notice of the same to be advertised and determined that notice of the same was provided to a butters
entitled thereto in accordance with applicable regulations and law. 15. The Malbor City Council, pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 48, opened a public hearing on the application on Monday, October 20th, 2025. The public hearing was held in
Marble City Hall, 140 Main Street. The hearing was closed on October 20th, 2025. 16. The applicant through its representatives presented testimony at the public hearing detailing the application, describing its impact upon municipal services, the neighborhood,
and traffic. public hearing. Four members of the public spoke in favor of the application. One member of the public submitted a letter in favor of the application and two me in opposition to the application. Based on the above, the city council makes the following findings and takes the following
actions. A has complied with all rules and regulations promulgated by the Marble City Council as they pertain to special permit applications. B. The city council finds that the use of the site modified as shown on the new plans is an
appropriate use and in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance of the city of Malboro and subject to the appropriate terms and conditions as provided in this decision and in the original special permit. The city council makes these findings subject completion and adherence by the
applicant, its successors and/or assigns to the conditions and or signs to the conditions more fully set forth special permit as further specified below. C. The city council finds that the public safety will not be impacted by a reduction of
the underground rear and the reduction will yield a better design for the project. D. The city council pursuant to its authority is general laws chapter 4A and the zoning ordinance of the city of Marorrow hereby grants the applicant an
amendment to the original special permit in order to modify the site as shown on the new plan subject to the following conditions. Which condition shall be binding on the applicant its successors andor signs? Number one, construction in accordance with the applicable laws.
Construction of all structures on the site is to be in accordance with all applicable building codes and zoning regulations in effect the city of Malbor and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and shall be built in accordance with this decision and the new plans as may be amended during site plan review.
Number two, compliance with applicable laws. The applicant agrees to comply with all municipal, state, and federal rules, regulations, and ordinances as they may apply to the construction maintenance of number three, site plan review. The issuance of this decision is
further subject to detailed site plan review by the city council prior to the issue. any additional changes, alterations, modifications or amendments as required during the process of site plan review shall be further conditions attached to this the building permit and
no final occupancy permit shall be issued until the applicant has complied with all conditions provided however that went to the issuance of this decision and site plan approval. The city site plan review committee may authorize the phasing of site and
building work depending upon weather condition other factors. Site plan review shall be consistent with the conditions of this decision and the materials submitted reviewed and approved by the city council as a special permit granting authority. Four, incorporation of submissions, all plans,
photo rendering, site evaluations, briefs, and other documentation provided by the applicant and as amended or revised during the application hearing process before the city council and or the city council's urban affairs committee are here and incorporate part of this special permit and become
conditions and requirements of the same unless otherwise altered by the city council. The final architectural design of the site reasonably consistent with the new plan submitted by the applicant. The final exterior features of the site including landscaping shall be made good
condition and shall be reasonably consistent with the new plan submitted and representations made to the city council. Number five, monument donate. The applicant agrees that prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the use, the applicant shall donate
materials and engraving for a Gold Star family memorial monument to be located in the plaza behind Marorrow City Hall with plans and specifications for said monument to be provided by the city engineer and with installation of the monument to be the responsibility of the
city. Number six, relief granted in original except as modified is set forth in the new plans. The uses shall continue to benefit from the relief granted pursuant to the original special. And number seven, recording of decision
is our standard recording with the Middle Sex South Registry of Deeds. Excuse me. Is there questions, comments from that? Councelor Ducet.
>> Very much, Madam Chair. I know there's been a lot of talk about this one in particular, um whether or not it deserves to be here or not. Um but I think that what they're proposing today is a reasonable
uh approach to the site to make sure that what is um mixeduse residential and retail, which is what the original intent was to be passed. so many years ago. Uh changes that they recently did were good. Um I understand councelor Pel
Pello's uh concern about uh handicapped access considering I'm disabilities commission, but I've never seen an outdoor elevator that works on a regular basis for something like this. I'd love to see something, but because of the slope and stuff like that, I can't see
any type of handicapped access up this even though I think yes, it it is something that is part of the old school that long before handicap standards were made put in place. These, you know, original draft of stairs were put in place. So, we're, you know, I'd love to
see something be handicapped accessible, but I don't see it being possible. Um, my humble opinion, sir. But uh overall I'm in support of this. So I'll I'll leave it to someone else to uh motion to approve. >> Any other comments? Councelor Fchillo.
>> Thank you, Madam Chair. I uh looking at tonight's special permit, I see many uh you know, improvement was originally approved by the council. So um you know, recognizing that um and seeing what's before us, I move to approve the special permit. >> Moved and seconded to recommend approval
of the special permit. I just read through. Is there discussion? >> Thank you, Madam Chair. As a uh a member of a Gold Star family, I want to thank uh the developer for considering this gift to this uh it will be the only the
second memorial uh in the state that recognizes Gold Star families. So, I very much appreciate uh the offer. Thank you very much, Matt. >> Yeah, that was a pleasant addition as I read through this today going, "Oh, how nice.
All right. Uh, it's Oh, you don't have your hand up. Okay. It's been moved and seconded to uh recommend approval of the decision. All those in favor? One, two, three. Council Parci.
All right. So, as I said, um, continued the discussion on Monday for the site plan and the stairs. Um but this can be added to the list of things that will be reported out. Hope is that the solicitor will actually have the language
in proper form on that meeting so we don't have to refer it to him and then wait just to help push things along. And then um the only other thing when I was going through because you all received in your
stapled together packet you did receive the um site plan language but I believe there was a page missing. So I have a page to give to everybody and I'll tell you where it goes um once the meeting is adjourned. So
with no further discussion if someone >> motion to adjurnn >> to adjurnn all those in favor one two three four five so we are adjourned at 8 8:18 >> very