All right. Good morning, everyone. I'm going to call to order the Martin County Code Enforcement Magistrate hearing for June 18th, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. And if you'll please rise, join me in the Pledge of Allegiance.
I pledge algiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. All right, please be seated. Um,
let's see. This morning, I think we're going to go right down the the docket the way it's presented. Uh first case is uh ENF 2025 0105553. Your honor, if I could just interrupt
for a moment on this one here, this case actually consist uh concerns a confidential owner. Um and so we're requesting because this is a public record. Yes. Um that on the uh on the record the court refer to as just as the
owner. Um the the county is satisfied that the respondent is the owner of the property and she has as you know entered into a stipulation. Okay. And and I have the stipulation uh in front of Yes. And the stipulation does contain her name but we are informed that it will be
redacted when it's recorded. All right. So um with that and and that's fine. I think that comports with Florida law and I think we're good to go. But uh you'll notice if you're looking at a docket that it does not contain the name of the
respondent in this case and there is a stipulation. Uh officer counselor, you're going to testify if you'll raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm the testimony about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So help you go. I do. Okay. Uh whenever
you're ready. Okay. My name is Chris Councelor. I've been sworn in. I am a co- compliance investigator for Martin County. The respondent uh is not present, but she has entered into a stipulated agreement. This case concerns the property at 5907 Southwest Cherokee Street located within Palm City located
which is located within Martin County, Florida. This case was not generated from an anonymous complaint. According to the official records of the property appraiser, uh the property owner is confidential. A copy of the property appraiser record is county's exhibit one.
On January 21st, 2025, I inspected the property. At the time, I observed an expired permit application for a garage that had been converted into a living space. At the time, I figured out the property, the photographs accurately show what I saw. Then, it's marked as county exhibits two and exhibit three
being the permit history. So, two basically this area here right in front of that car that used to be a garage and now you see two windows into living space. Uh, exhibit three is the permit history showing that the application for the
conversion is expired for the remodel application expired. Based upon the investigation, they issued a notice of violation to the property owner on January 27th, 2025. Marches County Exhibit 4. And the notice of violation, they were
cited to obtain a obtain to finish the application by obtaining a permit for the remodel for the garage conversion. uh in the notice of violation of respondent was given until February 24th, 2025 to correct the violation. Compliance was not achieved and notice of hearing was issued by certified mail
on April 9th, 2025, which is marked as county exhibit 5. The owner requested more time. So the case was removed from the May hearing and rescheduled for the June 18th, 2025 hearing. Compliance was still not achieved. So an amended notice of hearing was issued by certified mail on June 4th, 2025.
Exhibit six is de amended. Okay. Exhibit six. The return receipt was not received. So on June 4th, 2025, I posted the property a photo of the posting the affidavit of posting exhibits seven and 8. Seven is my posting on the gate.
Eight is my posted affidavit. And then I I have spoken we have spoken with the property owner discussed the violation. What need to be done to correct it? So, as of June 17th, 2025, the owner has entered into a stipulated agreement and the agreed fee of $350 has
was paid on June 17th. I request that all county exhibits be received into evidence and based upon testimony and the evidence request that the respondent be ordered to comply with the study provisions as stipulated in the agreement of October 1st, 2025, and if not compliance by then, be required to
pay a fine in the amount of $100 per day until the violation is corrected. And just for clarity, exhibit 9's basically the permit history has shown that the application is still not issued, but she has entered into the stipulated agreement. Okay, that's that's fine. Thank you. Um, so without objection,
I'll accept into evidence the county's exhibits one through nine in this case. And note for the record that uh $350 in costs have been paid to the county. Looking at the stipulation, it recites
the requirement for an active permit on or before October 1st, 2025. And uh I think that is it failing which there'll be a fine
uh in the amount of $100 per day. Okay, good. And and note for the record that it is signed by the respondent and by uh officer counselor on behalf of Martin County. And with that, I will approve this
uh stipulation and sign the agreed order. Thank you. Okay. Uh, you have one more. The Yakabone Family Trust. This is KCNF 202530274. And the response, Yakabone Family Trust.
Thank you. Uh, my name is Chris Cer. I've been sworn in. I am a code compliance investigator from Martin County. The respondent of how did you pronounce that? Yakavone. Yakavone Family Trust is not present. Oh, you're not Italian. This case concerns a property at 6905
Southwest Woodbine Way in Palm City, Florida located within Martin County. This case was not generated from an anonymous complaint. Currently, the official records of the property appraiser. The property owner is the Ivakone family trust. Copy of the property appraiser record is county
exhibit one. Okay. On March 17th, 2025, I inspected the property. At the time, I observed an expired permit for an addition. At the time I photographed the property, the photographs accurately show what I saw. Then is marked as county exhibits three
and four with the expired permit letter as exhibit two. So exhibit two is the letter informing them that the permit is expired. Okay. I'm sorry. What was the date of that? Um
Okay. March. March 10th. Yep. Got it. Uh the property is gated, so I couldn't make my way onto the property. So uh that's the front of the property. And then I took a picture of the address bar. Based upon the investigation, I issued a notice of violations of the Yakavone
family trust on April 18th, marked as county exhibit 5. In the notice they were set for them following Martin County code violation section 105.1 as Florida building code as adopted by section 21.1 general ordinances of Martin County to renew their expired permit and the notice of
violation respondent was given till May 2nd 2025 to correct the violation. Compliance was not achieved and a notice of hearing was issued by certified mail on May 30th 2025 is marked as county exhibit six. Okay.
On June 4th, 2025, I amended the correction on the notice of violation and the notice of hearing. Both were issued by certified mail and are marked as county exhibit 7 and 8. Basically, on the previous notice, I asked them to complete the application. Um, but what had happened was a permit
had been issued, but when a revision is done, our system kicks it back to an application phase. So, that's why at first I thought it was just an application, but it was actually an issue permit. So, I'm dealing with an expired permit. All right. And later violations will show that work has been done.
So, seven and eight is the amended. We're basically going to tell them to renew their expired permit. That's the notice of violation. That's the notice of hearing as exhibit 8. The return receipt was not received. So, on June 4th, 2025, I posted the property. A photo of the posting and the affidavit
of posting remark exhibits 9 and 10. Nine's my posting. 10 my posting affidavit. No call or letter has been received from the property owner within time. Therefore, I checked the permit status again on June 17, 2025 and saw that the sighted violation had not been
corrected. A screenshot of the permit status is marked as county exhibit 11 with county exhibits 12, 13, and 14 showing aerial photos that work of the work that was done. So, 11 shows that the looking Yeah. Okay, that's fine. I
looking at 12. Yes, 12 is Show me what we're talking about. Okay. So 12 is basically 2021 that we just you just have a house there. Okay. Then exhibit 13. Oh, we now have this whole section over
here. That is the addition. And then exhibit and if I zoom in, the work still under underway. And then exhibit 14, the work is completed and the the section is completed. Do we know who the builder was? Uh, I
don't have that information with me. All right. Okay. Go ahead. Uh, and then just for the record, um, information came available me to me this morning that yesterday, um, someone dropped off a a permit renewal form, but it has not been paid for and it cannot be issued
because basically the contractor listed on the permit, um, has issue has uh, insurance issues that they have to be corrected before the permit would be re reactivated. Okay. But I still I've reached out to the phone number left on the I haven't
gotten any contact. So I request that all counties exhibits be received in evidence and based upon the testimony and evidence. I request that the Ivakov family trust be ordered to comply with the cited provisions of the Martin County code by July 31st, 2025 and if not compliance by then be required to pay a fine in the amount of $100 per day
until the violation is corrected. The county has incurred a cost in the amount of $575 conducting this investigation and request that the county be reimbursed at this amount at the conclusion of today's hearing. Okay. Anybody here on behalf of the trust?
Looking out, seeing no one, um, without objection, I'll accept into evidence the county's exhibits 1 through 14 in this case. Based upon that evidence and your testimony, I'll find that a violation as charged does exist on the property and order compliance on or before se uh July
31st, 2025 failing which a fine in the amount of $100 per day will acrue and I'll further award costs in the amount of $575 to be paid to the county at the conclusion of this hearing. Thank you, sir. And is so ordered.
Okay. All right. All right. Let's see. Next case is case ENF2025 021 061-01. The respondent is Jessica Lango and
Officer Krasco. You're going to testify if you raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So, I hope you got I do. Okay. Whenever you're ready. My name is Deborah Krasco and I have been sworn in. I am a code compliance
investigator for Martin County. The respondent is Jessica T. Lango. She is not present. The case concerns the property at 3236 Southwest Ara Drive, Palm City, Florida in Martin County, Florida. The case was
not generated from anonymous complaint. According to the official records of the property appraiser of Martin County, the property owner is Jessica Tango. A copy of the property appraisers records of ownership is county's exhibit
one. All righty. On February 25th, 2025, I inspected the property. At that time, I observed grass that needed to be cut, trash that needed to be thrown away. At that time, I photographed the property. The photographs accurately show what I saw
then and are marked as county's exhibits 2 through 7. That's the posting or the excuse me, the door tag. Mhm. Some of the trash in front of her garage. That's exhibit three. Yep. Exhibit four. She has some
trash here. Looks like computer parts, wires. What is three a skeleton? Yes, it is. Oh, boy. And number five, the grass. number six is going to be the front more grass.
Okay. And seven and seven. The other side of the house. Okay. Okay. Um based on the investigation, I issued a notice of violation to Jessica Lango on April 3rd. Marked as county's exhibit 8.
Whoops. Ahead of myself there. Okay, I am lost here in my exhibits. Sorry. Nine is next county's exhibit 8. In the notice, I cited the following Martin County code
violations. Section 67.203 203 nuisance declared weeds under growth general ordinances of Martin County code and section 67.201b nuisance declared trash. In the notice of violation, the respondent was given until April 10th to come into compliance
and contact Martin County code enforcement upon doing so. On May 16th, 2025, I sent an amended notice of violation. Uh it was sent to include section 21.121.2
openable windows general ordinances of Martin County code. Respondent was given until June 4th to comply. So this is the amended. Do you recall where the what is it? A broken window somewhere or No, no, she has the
shutters. Shutters are up on the windows. Okay, got it. Yep. And on the same date, May 16th, 2025, I also sended an amended notice of hearing. And these are marked as exhibits nine
and 10. Okay, so that was exhibit 9. 10, the amended notice of hearing. Got it. The return receipt was not received. I posted the property and the admin building on May 29th, 2025. affidavit of posting and the posting
itself are marked as county's exhibits 11 and 12. No call or letter from the property owner was received within the allowed time. However, yesterday at 1:00 p.m. she was asking me, she called me finally
and asked me what she needed to do. And I explained that to her and explained the process of what was going to happen if she whether she came or not because she was saying she couldn't get off work. Mhm. So, um I did go to the property yesterday on June 17th, 2025
and saw that the cited violations had not been corrected. So, I photographed the property accurate and the photographs accurately show what I saw then and are marked as counties exhibits 13 through 15. So, again, the shutters are still on. She did cut some of the grass, but it's
still high here in the middle and in the back. Mhm. And then, so that's showing the middle skeleton going. No, it is not. It is still there, unfortunately, along with the other trash there. Interesting. Yep.
All right. I request that all of the county's exhibits be received into evidence based upon the testimony and evidence, I request that the respondent, Jessica T. Lango, be ordered to comply with the cited provisions of the Martin County Code by July 21st, 2025, and if
not in compliance by then, be required to pay a fine in the amount of $100 for every day the violation continues thereafter. The county has incurred the cost in the amount of $575. conducting this investigation and I request that the county be reimbursed this amount at
the conclusion of today's hearing. Okay. And just for clarity, let me see if I understand um per violation. Yeah. Okay. So, $100 um per violation per day, right? Yes,
sir. Okay. Violation per day. All right. So, anybody here on behalf of um Jessica Lango looking out seeing no one uh with objection I will accept into
evidence the county's exhibits 1 through 15 in this case based upon that evidence and your testimony I'll find that um violations as charged do exist on the property and order compliance on or before uh July 31st 2025 failing which a
fine in the amount of $100 per violation per day will acrue. There are three violations um in this case. And uh also I'm going to award cost in the amount of $575 to be
paid to the county at the conclusion of this hearing. And it is so ordered. Okay. Um, next one is the Rogers case. It's ENF 2025
040772-01 Lloyd J and Deborah Rogers are the respondents. So, he was here and I spoke with him and we're going to push it to next month. Okay. So you're you're giving basically a continuence in the
correct. Okay. All right. Um since we've called it, let me just uh ask what was the nature of the conversation you had with Mr. Rogers? He said that one of them was an
inop um boat trailer. Mhm. And he said he aired up the tires again this morning that there's a slow leak in it and that's why it kept going flat. And he's going to go get that fixed. And as far as the trash part of it, he is um
in the process of building a playground for the neighborhood children. And so he is working on getting that done this week. Okay. Um All right. I'm going to go ahead and continue the case to July 16th, 2025 based on your
representations. All right. And then we've got uh the next case on the docket is being removed and that is uh KCNF20241000462 and
um looks like Haleene Eiglazius. And then the next case is officer Switzer, you've got that one. It's ENF202420252. Um, that's the Michelle D. Arthur's
revocable trust and Ronald Drao is the trustee in that case. Uh, anybody? Nobody here on that case. Okay. If you'll raise your right hand, do you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So, hope you go. I do. Okay. Whenever
you're ready, we can begin. My name is Kelly Switzer and I've been sworn in. I'm a code compliance investigator for Martin County. The respondent, Michelle D. Arthur's revocable trust and uh Ronald Dupa
trustee is not present. This case concerns the property at 9322 Southeast Athena Street, Hope Sound, Florida 33455. This case was not generated from an anonymous complaint. According to the official records of the property appraiser of Martin County, the property
owner is Michelle D. Arthur's Revocal Trust and Ronald Depaw trustee. A copy of the property appraisers record of ownership is county's exhibit one. On December 11th, 2024, I inspected a
property based on a complaint of people possibly living in a shed. I observed a home with trash and debris and also on file was an expired application for offense. At the time I photographed the property. The photograph accurately shows what I saw then is marked as
county's exhibits 2 through 4. So there's a mattress the front. This trash in the side yard. Okay. And then this is the shed that was in question.
Exhibit five is the expired permit application letter that was sent to the applicant. Based upon the investigation, I issued a notice of violation to the respondents on June 6, 2025. And the notice of of violation is marked as county's exhibit
six. In the notice, I cited the following Martin County Code violations. Section 67.201b, nuisance declared, trash, etc. General ordinances, Martin County code, and section 105.1, uh, Florida building code, permits when
required, incorporated by section 21.1, general ordinances, Martin County code. That one has since been removed. The work was not completed. Okay, let's see. I'm I'm still back on six. Oh. Oh, I see. You amended it in seven.
Yes. Okay. Got it. Okay. In the notice of in the notice of violation, the respondent was given until January 31st, 2025 to correct the violation and was informed the need to contact Martin County code enforcement upon doing so. An amended notice of violation was sent out February 4th, 2025 with a compliance
date of uh February 25th, 2025 to include additional code section one uh 12.5.03 permitted uses in the Hob Sound redevelopment zoning district general ordinances Martin County code. That code has since been removed.
The amended notice of violation is marked as county's exhibit 7. All right. So, what are we left with? Oh, uh, trash and inoperable. Compliance was not achieved and a notice of hearing was issued by certified mail on March 17th, 2025 and is marked as
county's exhibit 8. Um, our office received an additional complaint regarding the trash on site at an inoperable vehicle and again the possibility of owners living in the shed. The photo of my followup on are marked as county's exhibits 9 through
11. So there's trash here. More trash. There's an inoperable vehicle. And there's more trash by the road. An amended notice of violation was sent on May 25th, 2025 with the compliance date of June 11th, 2025 to include the
additional code for the 9 section 91.34A general generally inoperable vehicles general ordinances Martin County code. The amended notice of violation is exhibit 12. An amended notice of hearing was also issued by certified mail on May 27 2025.
The amended notice of hearing is marked as counties exhibit 13. Okay. Um, the return receipt was not received. Therefore, I posted the property and at the Martin County Administrative Building, the posting in the affidavit of postings are is marked as county's exhibits 14 and 15. There's
my posting. There's my affidavit. No caller letter from the property owner was received within the time allowed. Therefore, I went to the property again on June 17, 2025 and saw that the cited violations had not been corrected at the
time. I photographed the property property. The photographs accurately show what I saw then as marked as county's exhibits 16 through 18. So, there's more trash. Another the inoperable vehicle 16. 17. What are we? 17 is just some more
trash and debris. There's buckets laying around, whatever planter things. Um, there's the trash in the side of the yard. That's an 18. Okay. An 18. I request that all counties exhibits be received into evidence and based upon the testimony
and evidence, I request that the respondents, Michelle D. Arthur's revoke re revocable trust and Ronald Depuis trustee be ordered to comply with the cited provisions of the Martin County code by July 31st, 2025 and if not in vi in compliance by then be required to pay
a fine in the amount of $100 per violation for every day the violation continues thereafter. The county has conducted the county has incurred a cost of the amount of $575 conducting this investigation and request that the county be reimbursed this amount at the
conclusion of today's hearing. This concludes my testimony. All right. Thank you. Anybody here on behalf of the Michelle Arthur's Revocable Trust? Looking out seeing no one without objection accept into evidence the county's exhibits 1 through 18 in this
case. Based upon that evidence in your testimony, I'll find that violations as charged being the the 67201B trash and 91.34A generally interoperable vehicles do
remain on the property and order compliance on or before uh July 31st, 2025 failing, which you'll find in the amount of $100 per violation per day will occur and further award costs. in the amount of $575
to be paid to the county at the conclusion of this hearing. Thank you. That is so ordered. Thank you. Okay, moving right along. Let's see. Officer Espion, you've got the next
case. It is ENF2025 040209 and the respondent is Michael Leonard and nobody's here on behalf of Mr. Leonard. I see if you'll raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give will be
the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. So if you go I do. All right. Whenever you're ready. My name is Maria Espa and I have been sworn in. I'm a code compliance investigator for Martin County. The respondent Michael G. Leonard is not present. This case
concerns a property at 5629 Southeast Indigo Avenue in Steuart, Florida in Martin County, Florida. This case was not generated from an anonymous complaint. According to the official records of the property appraiser of Martin County, the property owner is Michael G. Leonard. A copy of the
property appraisers record of ownership is county's exhibit 1. On April 2nd, 2025, I inspected the property. At that time, I observed high grass and trash. At that time, I photographed the property. The photograph accurately shows what I saw
then and are marked as county's exhibits number two. Mhm. I'll zoom in for you. And the trash in the front, high grass along the whole side of the fence, and a little bit more trash here. Okay. Based
upon the investigation, I issued a notice of violation to the owner on April 7th, 2025. Marked this county's exhibit number three. In the notice, I cited the following Martin County code violation. Section 67.201A, Nuisance declared weeds undergrowth,
general ordinances, Martin County code, and section 67.201B, nuisance declared trash, etc. General Ordinances Martin County Code. In the vote notice of violation, the respondent was given until April 21st, 2025 to correct the violation and was informed
of the need to contact Martin County code enforcement upon doing so. Compliance was not achieved and a notice of hearing was issued by certified mail and regular mail on May 15, 2025, marked as county's exhibit 4. The return receipt was not received not
returned. Therefore, on May 22nd, 2025, I posted the property and the Martin County admin building, the affidavit of posting is marked as county's exhibit number five. No call. A letter from the property owner was received within the time allowed. Therefore, I went back to the
property again on June 17, 2025 and saw that the cited violations had not been corrected. At that time, I photographed the property. The photographs accurately show what I saw then and it's marked as counties exhibits 6, 7, and 8. Six is
the front. Seven is a side view of the grass along the fence. And number eight is the right side of the property from the front that is uh has high grass as well. I request that all of the county's exhibits be received
into evidence. Based upon the testimony and evidence, I request that the respondent be ordered to comply with the cited provisions of the Martin County Code by July 31st, 2025, and if not in compliance by then, be required to pay a fine in the amount of $100 per violation per day.
The county has incurred a cost in the amount of $575 conducting this investigation and request that the county be reimbursed this amount at the conclusion of today's hearing. All right. Anybody here on behalf of Michael G. Leonard? Looking out, seeing no one. Without objection, I'll accept in
evidence the county's exhibits one through eight in this case. Based upon that evidence and your testimony, I'll find that violations as charged do exist on the property and order compliance on or before July 31st, 2025, failing which
a fine in the amount of $100 per violation per day will acrue and I'll further award costs in the amount of $575 to be paid to the county at the conclusion of this hearing. And it is so
ordered. Thank you, ma'am. Thank you. Okay. All right, Officer Joseph. Is this your first appearance? Oh, for my own case. Yeah, maybe. Okay. For this one anyway. Okay. If you'll raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm testimony you're about to give will be
the truth? the whole truth and nothing but the truth. So, I hope you got it. All right. Only for today. All right. This is case number ENF202530514 and uh the respondent is William Hoffman and whenever you are ready. My name is
Michael Joseph and I've been sworn in. I am a code compliance investigator from Martin County. The respondent William Hoffman is not present. This case concerns the property at 7550 Southeast Eagle A, Hopes Sound, Florida 33455 in Martin County, Florida. This case was
not generated from an anonymous complaint. According to the official records of the property appraiser of Martin County, the property owner is William Hoffman. A county a copy of the property appraisers record of ownership is county's exhibit one. Okay.
On March 18th, 2025, I inspected the property and a door tag was left to renew expired permit for a water heater change out. It was BL2023 040510. And I gave him 14 days to do so.
At that time, I photographed the property. The photograph accurately shows what I saw then and is marked as county's exhibit 2 with the expired permit letter as exhibit 3. There was the door tag. Just tell him to renew his permit. All right. There is the letter
for the expired permit. Okay. Will you just expand that a little bit? Just Okay. Based upon the investigation, I issued a notice of violation to William Hoffman on April 11th, 2025, marked as county's
exhibit 4. In the notice, I cited the following Martin County code violation. Section 105, permits when required, incorporated by section 21.1 general ordinances, Martin County code. In the notice of violation, the respondent was given until May 12th, 2025 to correct the
violation and was informed of the need to contact Martin County code enforcement upon doing so. Compliance was not achieved and a notice of hearing was issued by certified mail on May 19th, 2025 and is marked as county's exhibit 5. Good.
The return receipt was not received. So on May 30th, 2025, I posted the property and at the Martin County Administrative Building. A photo of the posting and the posting affidavit are marked as county's exhibit 6 and 7. posting.
There's the affidavit of posting. No caller letter from the property owner was received within the time allowed. Therefore, I ran the permit history on June 17th, 2025 and noticed that the cited violation had not been corrected. The permit remains expired. At that time, I screenshot the permit history.
The permit history screenshot is marked as county's exhibit 8. And there you can see that the hot water change out is still expired. Got it. I request all the counties exhibits be received into evidence based upon testimony and evidence. I request
that the respondent William Hoffman be ordered to comply with the cited provisions of the Martin County Code by July 31st, 2025 and if not in compliance by then be required to pay a fine in the amount of $100 for every day the violation continues thereafter. The county has incurred a cost in the amount
of 575 conducting this investigation and requests that the county be reimbursed this amount at the conclusion of today's hearing. Okay. Anybody here on behalf of William Hoffman looking out seeing no one? Without objection, I'll accept into evidence the county's exhibits one
through eight in this case. Based upon that evidence and your testimony, I'll find that a violation as charged does exist on the property and all other order compliance on or before um July 31st, 2025 failing which should
find in the amount of $100 per day will acrew a further award cost in the amount of $575 to be paid to the county at the conclusion of this hearing. And it is so ordered. Thanks, sir.
Thank you. All right, let's see. Um, couple other things to tidy up. Um, back oh gosh, I think two months ago, we
um actually approved the March uh 2025 minutes uh for the code enforcement magistrate hearing by signing them. and um but we never really actually entered that into the record.
So just know if you're keeping track of when we do our minutes that the March minutes have been approved and um and signed by uh the staff and myself. And so yet again that becomes part of the
record. As far as the April uh minutes, um I've reviewed those. They have been prepared by the staff and and signed u by Francine Shakonus, staff recorder, by John Colando as court as
code administrator. And I'm going to um approve them and sign them today. Uh so that the May 6 or I'm sorry the April 16th 2020 five minutes are now approved as well. The
May um minutes have been prepared. I've reviewed them, made some notes and changes and given them back to the staff and I'm sure those will probably show up at the next hearing for approval. And that takes care of let's see today is
the 18th and I think that brings us up to date with our our minutes. Uh fairly well. The next hearing is July 16th, 2025 here in chambers unless
there's anything else anybody else has. Okay. Seeing seeing nothing um we stand adjourned. Thank you. Thank you.