Let's go. >> Good morning, everyone. I'm going to call to order the Martin County Magistrate hearing for May 20th, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. If you'll please rise, join me in the pledge of allegiance. I pledge algiance to the flag of the
United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all for all. >> Okay. Be seated. >> All right. >> All righty then. >> Morning. Looks like we're just going to
follow along the uh the docket. Is that correct? Are there any >> No applications this morning? >> No applications. Okay, good. All righty. All right. So, the first case is um ENF2026020336. And the respondents are Ronnie Mogul and
Holly the estate of Holly Foster. And officer Krasco, you're going to testify. If you raise your right hand, do you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So, help you God. >> I do. >> Whenever you're ready.
My name is Deborah Carrasco and I have been sworn in. I'm a code compliance investigator for Martin County. The respondents Ronnie Mogul Holly Foster Estate are not present. The case concerns the property at 1215 Southwest Tropical Terrace in Steuart, Florida,
Martin County, Florida. This case was not generated from an anonymous complaint. According to the official records of the property appraiser of Martin County, the property owners are Ronnie Moaholi Foster Estate. A copy of the property appraisers record of
ownership is county's exhibit one. On February 25th, 2026, I inspected the property. At that time, I observed trash, overgrown grass, and inoperable vehicles. I took photos and left a door tag. I photographed the property property.
The photographs accurately show what I saw then and are marked as county's exhibits 2 through six, the door tag. >> Exhibit two. Exhibit three is overgrown grass the vehicle and then there's trash here on the ground.
>> Okay. >> Four some more trash and overgrown grass. >> All right. >> And these are overgrown here. These shrubs. >> That's exhibit five. Okay. >> That's on the other side.
>> Um yes. The the cars and things are over here. >> Okay. Okay. By the street. >> Got it. >> Yeah. And exhibit six, it's just the front of the property >> kind of head on. Okay. >> Yeah. Showing the this is a fence line here.
>> All right. >> Where am I at here? >> Seven. >> I did another inspection on March 10th. >> Ah, okay. >> 2026. Exhibits seven through nine accurately show what I saw then.
So again, the car is still here. The grass is still overgrown. That's the other side of the vehicle. >> All right, that's eight. >> And nine is just showing this these pales here
boxes. Based on the investigation, I issued a notice of violation to the respondents on March 11th, 2026, marked as county's exhibit 10. In the notice, I cited the following Martin County code violations. Section 67.201A, nuisance declared weeds under
growth. General ordinances of Martin County Code. Section 67.201B, 2011b general ordinances I'm sorry nuisance declared trash etc general ordinances Martin County code and section 91.34 generally inoperable general ordinances
of Martin County code in the notice of violation the respondents were given until March 25th to correct the violations compliance was not achieved and a notice of hearing was issued by certified mail on April 20th 2026 and is marked Bus
County's exhibit 11. The return receipt was not received on April 29th was not received. And on April 29th, 2026, the property and the Martin County Admin Building were posted. The affidavit of posting and the posting itself are marked as county's exhibits
12 and 13. >> Okay. And then 13 is just showing the posting. No call or letter from the property owners has been received or was received within the time allowed. Uh therefore, Rachel Sprdley Martin County abatement
coordinator went to the property again on May 19th, 2026 and saw that the site violations had not been corrected. At that time, she photographed the property. The photographs accurately show what she saw then and are marked as county's exhibits 14 through 16. All
right. And I'm sorry, who who actually took those? >> The last three were Rachel Sprdley. >> Okay. Rachel. >> So that's the property as of yesterday. >> Okay. And uh Miss Bradley, if you'll
just come there quickly down near and let me just swear you in. Do you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give will be the truth, old truth, and nothing but the truth? So have you gone? >> I do. >> All right. You took the photos. Do you saw what you saw? Any
>> I did. >> Um and >> it's still overgrown >> accurately shows. >> Yes, sir. >> Okay. Good. All right. >> 14 15 and 16. >> 16. >> Yep. I got them. >> Thank you.
>> I request that all of county's exhibits be received into evidence. Based on the testimony and the evidence, I request that the respondent be ordered to comply with the cited provisions of the Martin County Code by June 30th, 2026, and if not in
compliance by then, be required to pay a fine in the amount of $100 per violation for every day the violations continue thereafter. The county has incurred a cost of 575 conducting this investigation and requests that the county be reimbursed this amount at the
conclusion of today's hearing. Okay. Anybody here on behalf of Ronnie Mogul or the Holly Foster Estate? Looking out, seeing no one. Without objection, I'll accept into evidence. The county's exhibits 1 through 16 in
this case. Based upon that evidence and uh your testimony, I'm going to find that violations as charged do exist on the property and order compliance on or before June 30th, 2026 failing which a fine in the amount of $100 per violation
per day will occur and I'll further award costs in the amount of $575 to be paid to the county at the conclusion of this hearing. And it is so ordered. Okay. Next case is case ENF202630081
and the respondents are William Nagel and Melissa Vancur Nagel and Officer Krasco that's you as well. whenever you're ready. >> My name is Deborah Krasco and I have
been sworn in. I'm a code compliance investigator for Martin County. The respondents, William A. Nagel and Melissa Vancurgo, are not present. This case concerns the property at 8491 Southwest 17th Avenue, Stewart, Florida in Martin County,
Florida. This case was not generated from an anonymous complaint. According to the official records of the property appraiser of Martin County, the property owners are William A. Nagel and Melissa Vancuragel. That is the property appraiser
exhibit one. On March 11th, 2026, I inspected the property. At that time, I observed trash, overgrown grass, missing sight numbers, inoperable vehicle, and boat trailer. I left a door tag and took photos. At the time, I photographed the
property. The photographs accurately show what I saw then and are marked as county's exhibits 2 through 8. Door tag I left. Mhm. >> This is just the overall view of the property. This vehicle has a flat tire here.
This is the boat trailer with the boat on it all the way tipped up with trash on the side of it. >> Okay, that's >> four and five. Six. >> Number seven. Little bit of overgrown grass in here. >> I'm sorry. Go back to six. Is that the
same boat or is that a different >> That's the same boat. >> Same boat. Okay. Sailboat. Okay. Seven. >> Yep. Eight. All the things that were behind the boat. >> Okay. >> Based on the investigation, I issued a
notice of violation to the respondents. On March 24th, 2026, marked as county's exhibit 9. In the notice, I cited the following Martin County Code violations. Section 4.769, sighting address, land development
regulations, Martin County code. Section 67.201b, nuisance declared trash, etc. General ordinances of Martin County Code. Section 91.34A, general inoperable vehicles, general ordinances of Martin County Code. Section 2145,
Infestation, general ordinances of Martin County. and 60 section 67.201A nuisance declared weeds undergrowth general ordinances of Martin County code. The infestation ordinance was removed from this case. So then in the notice of violation, the
respondents were given until April 7th, 2026 to correct the violations. A re reinspection was done on April 8th, showing that some of the property was cleaned up. However, overgrowth grass is still present in some areas, and you can
see there are still no site numbers on the home or the garage. Uh, exhibits 10 and 11 accurately show what was seen at that time. >> Okay. >> You should have some overgrowth here in the grass.
>> All right. And did you take 10 and 11? No, that was also done by Rachel Spradley. >> Okay. All right. Go ahead. >> Compliance was not achieved and a notice of hearing was issued by certified mail on April 13th, 2026 and is marked as
county's exhibit 12. The return receipt was not received. On April 29th, 2026, the property and the Martin County admin building were posted. The affidavit of posting and the posting itself are marked as county's exhibit exhibits 13 and 14.
>> Posting the affidavit of posting. >> Okay. >> No call or letter from the property owners has been received within the allowed time. Therefore, Rachel Sprdley, Martin County abatement coordinator,
went to the property again on May 29th, I'm sorry, May 19th, 2026 and saw that the site violations had not been corrected. At that time, she photographed the property. The photographs accurately show what she saw then and are marked county's exhibits 15
through 17. I request that all of the county's exhibits be received into evidence. I'm sorry. Let me show you. So, they did clean up some here on the side of the boat. Tire is still flat. This part of the grass looks cut. I don't see any
sight numbers. Oops. On this one. >> Still overgrown grass other side of the boat. >> Was that U-Haul container there before? >> No, it was not. So maybe they're doing something. >> Yeah.
>> Okay. So those were exhibits 15 through 17. I request that all of the county's exhibits be received into evidence based upon the testimony and evidence. I request that the respondents be ordered to comply with the cited
provisions of the Martin County Code by June 30th, 2026. and if not in compliance by then be required to pay a fine in the amount of $100 per violation for every day the violations continue thereafter. The county has incurred a cost of 575 conducting this
investigation and requests the that the county be reimbursed this amount at the conclusion of today's hearing. >> Okay. And um Miss Bradley, you can just stay right there. You took the last three photos accurately shows what you saw.
>> Yes, sir. Okay. All right. So, um, anybody here on behalf of William Nagel or Melissa Vancoua Nagel? Seeing no one, uh, without objection, I'll accept into evidence the county's exhibits 1 through
17 in this case. Based upon the evidence, your testimony, Officer Kasco, >> and M. Bradley, I'm going to find that violations as charge do exist on the property. order compliance on or before uh June 30th, 2026 failing which a fine
in the amount of $100 per violation per day will acrewue and I'll further award cost in the amount of >> $575 to be paid to the county at the conclusion of this hearing and it is so ordered.
>> Okay. So, >> um, >> that's what I was >> Looks like that property is occupied, right? >> Possibly. Yeah. >> And and you had no contact with the owners. >> They have not reached out to me at all.
>> Okay. >> Thanks, sir. >> All right. >> Okay. >> Officer Espion, good morning. >> Good morning. And we have a new officer. >> Yes. >> You can introduce yourself.
>> I'm Molly Grisulka. >> Grisulka. Okay. >> All right. Um, are you going to testify as well or just? >> Yes. >> Okay, great. Okay. If you'll both raise your right hands. Do you swear or affirm testimony you're about to give will be
the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So, I'll help you God. >> I do. >> Okay. Very good. Whenever you are ready. >> My name is Maria Aspot. I have been sworn in. I'm a senior code compliance investigator for Martin County. The respondents, Nicholas Watson and Thomas
Watson, are not present. This case concerns a property at 5083 Southeast Front Avenue in Stewart, Florida in Martin County, Florida. This case was not generated from an anonymous complaint. According to the official records of the property appraiser of Martin County, the property owners are
Nicholas Watson and Thomas Watson. A copy of the property appraisers record of ownership is county's exhibit 1. On February 20th, 2026, I inspected the property. At that time, I observed trash on the property and some high grass growing through the trash on the side of
the property. At that time, I photographed the property. The photograph accurately shows what I saw then and are marked as counties exhibits, too. I'll zoom in. Here's all the trash on the side. There's grass growing through it.
There's more trash in the front. Uh I believe there's a refrigerator there as well, a barrel, and it's just trash scattered throughout the property. >> Okay. Based upon the investigation, I issued a notice of violation to the owners on February 24th, 2026. Marked this
county's exhibit number three. In the notice, I cited the following Martin County code violation. Section 67.201A, nuisance declared weeds undergrowth general ordinances, Martin County code, and section 67.201B,
nuisance declared trash, etc. General Ordinances Martin County Code. In the notice of violation, the respondent was given until March 10th, 2026 to correct the violation. However, compliance was not achieved and a notice of hearing was issued by certified mail on April 15th, 2026
marked as county's exhibit number four. The return receipt was not returned. Therefore, on May 4th, 2026, I posted the property and the Martin County Admin Building. The affidavit of posting and the posting at the property are marked as county's exhibits five and six. Five
is the affid I'm sorry, five is the posting at the property and six is the affidavit of posting. Okay. >> While posting the property, I took additional photos showing that the violations remained. The photos are counties exhibits seven and eight.
Let me zoom in for you. Seven. You could see uh some of the high grass here, some back here, and then all the items scattered throughout the side, a tire in between the two vehicles, and other items back here. >> Mhm.
>> Number eight is a closer view of in between the cars that day. You can see the refrigerator, tires, other items to the right side of the white car. >> Okay. On May 19th, 2026, code compliance investigator
officer Grisel Zelka went to the property again and saw that the cited violation of trash had not been corrected. However, the weeds had been corrected at that time. She took the photograph of the property. She saw uh the violations that existed and are
marked as counties exhibits 9 and 10. nine. You could see that it has been mowed. >> Yes, >> there you can't see it well here, but there's a tire sitting here
and 10. I will zoom in. There are all types of items um through the front. Um, she did take these photos yesterday and I request that all the county's exhibits be received into evidence based upon the testimony and evidence. I request that the respondents be ordered
to comply with the cited provisions of the Martin County code by June 30th, 2026 and if not in compliance by then be required to pay a fine in the amount of $100 per for the trash violation per day for every day the violation continues
thereafter. The county has incurred a cost in the amount of $575 conducting the investigation and request that the county be reimbursed this amount at the conclusion of today's hearing. >> All right. Um, Officer Grisulka, you
took those photos yesterday um 9 and 10. >> Yes. >> And um your testimony is that the lawn has been mowed sufficiently, right? >> Yes. >> Okay. So, we're down to one violation. the the 67201B
trash. So, I'm going to interineate the the order and remove the uh the weeds and undergrowth um section. All right. Anybody here on behalf of uh
Nicholas or Thomas Watson? Looking out, seeing no one. Without objection, I'll accept into evidence the county's exhibits 1 through 10 in this case. Based upon the evidence and uh your testimony, both of you find that uh a
violation of um 67201B trash remains on the property and order compliance on or before June 30th, 2026 failing which a fine in the amount of $100 per day will acrue. And I'll further award costs in
the amount of $575 to be paid to the county at the conclusion of this hearing. And it's so ordered. Thank you. >> Okay. Thank you. Okay. >> Good morning. >> Morning, >> Officer Shanahan. Good. This is the
Brooks case, Michelle and Paul Brooks. It's K KCNF2026 020299 and whenever Oh, I've got to swear you in. Have you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give will be the truth
all truth and nothing but the truth. So hope you got >> I do. >> Okay, whenever you're ready. >> My name is Michael Shanahan and I've been sworn in. I am a co- compliance investigator from Martin County. The respondents, Michelle and Paul Brooks are not present. Case concern, excuse
me, case concerns of property at 5341 Southeast 48th Avenue, Stewart, Florida 34997 in Martin County, Florida. This case was not generated from an anonymous complaint. According to the official records of the property appraiser of Martin County, the property owner is
Michelle and Paul Brooks. A copy of the property appraisers record of ownership is county's exhibit one. Okay. On February 24th, 2026, I inspected the property. At the time, I observed trash and debris as well as inoperable vehicles.
At that time, I photographed the property. The photographs accurately show what I saw then and are marked as county's exhibits 2 through six. Two is an inoperable truck has since been removed. >> Okay.
>> Again, another inoperable truck with some tires, trash debris. The boat's not inoperable, but it's got some, you know, pieces of the boat stacked on top of it. Uh door tag,
and then just more debris back here. Based upon the inspe investigation, I issued a notice of violation to Michelle and Paul Brooks on March 10th, 2026. Marked County's exhibit 7 in the notice of I cited the following
Martin County code violations. Section 67.201B, nuisance, declared trash, etc. General ordinances, Martin County code. in sections 913.34A generally inoperable vehicles general ordinance Martin County code in the
notice the violation respond was given until March 24th 2026 to correct the violations I inspected the property again on April 17th 2026 excuse me at the time I photographed the property photographs actually show what I saw then and are marked as county
exhibits 8 through 10 that's just the front of the House trash debris on the left here. Still inoperable vehicles back here. And again, inoperable trash.
>> Okay. >> Okay. And compliance was not achieved and a notice of hearing was issued by certified mail on April 17, 2026 and is marked as county exhibit 11. The betro receipt was not received. Therefore, on May 1st, 2026, I posted
the property in the Martin County Administration building. The affidavit is marked as counting exhibit 12. A photograph of the posting is marked as counting exhibit 13. Exhibit 14 was included to show the violations still exist, which still
shows all the debris over here, inoperable vehicle. On May 6th, I received a call from the property owner, Michelle Brooks, who indicated she would have the violations cleared up prior to the May hearing. Therefore, I went to the property again on May 19th and saw that the sight of
violations had not been corrected. At that time, I photographed the property. The photographs accurately show what I saw then and are marked as counting exhibits 15 through 17. Uh, you can't really see the trash back here, but you I get closer. Here we go.
Still stuff here on the side of the house. Still the trucks here. Again, stuff on the side of the house. Stuff here underneath the trailer. Okay. >> On May 19th, I spoke with Mr. Paul Brooks, the homeowner, and he indicated the violations wouldn't be cleared up
prior to the hearing. Therefore, the respondent entered into a stipulation agreement paying $350 and agreed to come into compliance on or before August 31st, 2026. I request that all of the county's exhibits be received into evidence based upon the testimony and and evidence. I
request that the respondent Michelle and Paul Brooks be ordered to comply with the cited provisions of Martin County Code by August 31st, 2026. and if not in compliance by then be required to pay in a fine in the amount of $100 for every day for every vi violation that
continues thereafter. That's concludes my >> all right >> presentation. Okay. And you did say that they did pay the $350 in cost. Okay. >> All right. So I'm looking at the uh stipulation and agreed final order. It
does in fact recite what you just testified to. And um so without objection, I'm going to accept into evidence the county's exhibits 1 through 17 in this case. Note for the record that Michelle Brooks and
Paul Brooks have both signed the stipulation along with um Officer Shanahan on behalf of the county. I'm going to find it is appropriate to require the Brooks to rep
um to comply with the code on or before August 31st, 2026 failing, which there'll be a fine in the amount of $100 per day and also note that cost in the amount of $350 have been paid.
Okay. All right. So, ordered That's u actually how we hope that violations do get uh resolved. >> Mhm. >> Saves folks a lot of money to to do it that way. Okay. Uh next one is also your case.
It's ENF 202620311 and the um respondent is the estate of Fanny M. Moore >> and whenever you're ready. >> Okay. My name is Mike Michael Shanahan and I have been sworn in. I'm a code compliance investigator for Martin County. The respondent Fanny M. Moore
Estate is not present. This case concerns the property at 5902 Southeast Wesley Avenue, Stewart, Florida 34997 in Martin County, Florida. This case was not generated from anonymous complaint. According to the official records of the property appraiser, Martin County, the
property owner is Fanny M. Moore Estate. A copy of the property appraisers record of ownership is counties exhibit one. On February 24th, 2026, I inspected the property. At that time, I observed high trash debris, high grass, and inoperable
vehicles. At that time, I photographed the property. The photographs accurately show what I saw then and are marked as counties exhibits 2 through five. Two is the inoperable vehicles. >> Okay. >> Three is kind of high grass. And this
bike is still there sitting there like that. Um four again high grass trash and five again hide trash and high grass. >> Okay. And the the red marks on the
photos are yours. >> It's just me circling it because you can't I mean you can't really see through the grass that there's it's not even trash. It's kind of like um patio furniture but >> just sitting outside.
Based upon in investigation, I issued a notice of violation to Fanny M. Moore estate on March 10th, 2026. Marked as counties exhibit 6. In the notice of not in the notice, I cited the following Martin County code
violations. Section 67.201B, nuisance, declared trash, etc. General ordinances Martin County code. Section 91.34, General generally inoperable vehicles. General coordin is Martin County Code.
In the notice, the violation respondent was given until March 24th, 2026 to correct the violations. Compliance was not achieved and a notice of hearing was issued by certified mail on April 6th, 2026 and is marked as counting exhibit 7.
>> Okay. >> The return receipt was not received. Therefore, on May 1st, 2026, I posted the property and the Martin County Administration building. The affidavit is marked as county's exhibit 8. The photograph of the posting is marked
as county exhibit 9. No call or letter from the property owner was received within the time allowed. Therefore, I went to the property again on May 19th, 2026 and saw that the cited violations had not been corrected. And at that time, I photographed the property. The photographs accurately show what I saw
then and are marked as counting exhibits 10 through 13. Again, the inoperable vehicles, high grass, uh trash, and again more trash. All right.
I request that all the county exhibits be received into evidence based upon the testimony and evidence. I request that the respondent Fanny M. Moore estate be ordered to comply with the cited provisions of Barn County Code by June 30th, 2026 and if not in compliance by then be required to pay a fine in the
amount of $100 per day for every day the violation continues thereafter. The county has incurred a cost in the amount of $575 conducting this investigation and request that the county be reimbursed this amount at the conclusion of today's hearing.
That's >> all right. Anybody here on behalf of the Fanny Moore estate looking out seeing no one without objection I'll accept evidence the county's exhibits 1 through 13 in this case based upon the evidence
I'll find that violations as charge do exist on the property and order compliance on or before June 30th 2026 failing which of fine in the amount of $100 per violation per day will acrue and I'll further award costs in the
amount of $575 to be paid to the county at the conclusion of this hearing. And it's so ordered. Okay. All right. Um let's see
the next one. Also, your case is ENF202630029 and the respondent is Roco Lamatrice and whenever you're ready. >> Okay. My name is Michael Shanahan and I've been sworn in. I am a co- compliance investigator for Martin
County. The respondent Roco Lamatrice is not present. This case concerns a property at 8415 Southeast Boxwood Lane, Hope Sound, Florida 33455 in Martin County, Florida. This case was not generated from an anonymous complaint. According to the official records of
property appraiser of Martin County, the property owner is Roco Latrice. A copy of the property appraisers record of ownership is county exhibit one. >> Okay. On March 9th, 2026, I inspected the property. At the time, I observed trash
debris. At the time, I photographed the property, and the photographs accurately show what I saw then and are marked as county exhibits 2 through 5. That's pretty much all the there's kind of like trash at the back of the house here. >> Looks like am I right? They're on
concrete pads or something. >> It looks like it used to be a shed or something and it's just a bunch of concrete um like it's just concrete block and wood and all kinds of stuff, debris. I'll have another better picture of it once we get around the corner. >> All right. >> Three is just a piece of wood sitting
there. Some of these things have been since taken down. >> Okay. Uh again, more stuff in front of the house. The side over here. And oh, maybe I have another picture, another thing. But inside the carport here, they got wood. There was some
fridge back here. I think they've taken it down since then. More wood. >> Okay. >> Based on Go ahead. >> And again, all the circles are yours showing. >> Yeah, I'm just showing where the violations. Yes, sir. Okay. Great. Thanks.
Go ahead. >> Okay. Based upon the investigation, I issued a notice of violation to Roco Latrice on March 10th, 2026, marked as counties exhibit 6. In the notice, I cited the following Martin County code violation section
67.201b, nuisance, declared trash, etc. General ordinances Martin County code. In the notice of violation, the respondent was given until March 31st, 2026 to correct the violation. Compliance was not achieved and a notice of hearing was
issued by certified mail on April 2nd, 2026 and is marked as count exhibit 7. The return receipt was not received. Therefore, on May 1st, 2026, I posted the property and the Martin County Administration building. The affidavit
is marked as counting exhibit 8. A photograph of the posting is marked as counting exhibit 9. No call or letter from the property owner was received within the time allowed. Therefore, I went to the property again on March 19th, 2026 and saw that the sighted violations had not
been corrected. At that time, I photographed the property. The photographs actually show what I saw then and are marked as counting exhibits 10 through 13. Again, the wood's still sitting there. They've cleaned up some of the stuff underneath the carport. >> Mhm. >> But there's still a few things in there.
11. It shows they've cleaned it up a lot um in the back. I mean, the concrete um cinder blocks are still sitting there on the concrete pad. I'm not sure. They never called me back to let me know what they're doing with it. And same thing here. This is just a side
view of the concrete pad with the center blocks just sitting there. And then in the back of the house here, looks like it used to be a sled or or a slide, not a sled, a slide or something. Uh oh, yeah, >> maybe they had it one time.
>> And just more debris back here. >> I request that all the counties exhibits be received into evidence based upon the testimony and evidence. I request that the respondent Roco Lom Matrice be ordered to comply with the cited provisions of Martin County Code by June 30th, 2026, and if not in compliance by
then, be required to pay a fine in the amount of $100 for every day the violation continues thereafter. The county has incurred a costed amount of $575 conducting this investigation and request that the county be reimbursed that amount at the conclusion of today's
hearing. >> Okay. Anybody here on behalf of Roco Lamatrice? Looking out, seeing no one. Without objection, I'll accept into evidence the county's exhibits 1 through 13 in this case. Based upon the evidence and your
testimony, I'm going to find that it is a violation of 67201B does exist on the property. order compliance on or before June 30th, 2026, failing which a fine in the amount of $100 per day will acrewue. And I'll further award costs in the
amount of $575 to be paid to the county at the conclusion of this hearing and it is so ordered. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. Good morning again, Miss Bradley. >> Good morning, sir. How are you?
>> Good. Let's see. What have we got? Fine reductions. All right. All right. The first one is um the Bower case. It's ENF2080039. The respondent is Leonard Bower
and this is a request for fine reduction and it's a stipulation. >> Yes, sir. >> And you've been sworn in? >> Yes, sir. >> Whenever you're ready. >> My name is Rachel Sprdley and I'm the nuisance baitment coordinator for Martin County. I've been sworn in. This case concerns the property located at 1341
Southwest Sunshine Street Stewart in Martin County, Florida. So, exhibit one is the property appraiser showing that it is in an estate for Mr. Bower. >> Oh, okay. >> Um, on May 20th, 2026, an order finding violation was issued by the code
enforcement magistrate to Leonard Bower Estate for 67201.8, nuisance declared weeds undergrowth, general ordinances, Martin County code. Section 21.99, accessory structures, general ordinances, Martin County code.
And section 91.34.8, generally inoperable vehicles, general ordinances, Martin County code. So exhibit two is the original order that was put in place. >> Okay. So actually >> it's actually I'm sorry January 16th of
2019. >> All right. But um looks like Mr. Bower has been gone a while, right? Yes, sir. Okay. >> Okay. >> All right. January 19th >> 16th of 2019. Okay. Was when the order
was put in place. >> All right. >> Um compliance was required by February 28th, 2019. On August 15th, 2023, an affidavit of compliance with acred fines was issued reflecting an outstanding fine in the amount of $486,000
plus cost in the amount of $575. And that's exhibit three is the affidavit of compliance with fines. Staff has determined that a lean reduction is warranted. Leonard Bower Estate was responsible for the violation and brought the property into compliance. They have offered to pay
$7,500 to resolve the outstanding fines which have accured plus the cost in the amount of $575. In addition, staff has considered the $75,000 assessed value of the property. This fine reduction is in compliance
with the requirements of section 1.98B general ordinances. is Martin County Code and exhibit 4 is the request for the reduction that came from the attorney for Mr. Bower's daughter.
Okay. All right. Um, I'm looking at the actual stipulation which recites basically your testimony and note that it is signed by Ronda Michelle
Halert who is the sole heir of the estate and um and um Officer Bradley on behalf of the county And I find that it is appropriate to
reduce the fine to a total of $7,500 plus uh costs in the amount of $575 to be paid uh to the county within 30 days of the date of this order. And um while I'm at it, I'm also going
to accept into evidence the county's exhibits one through four in this case. And um along with this stipulation um um continuing finding that that it is
appropriate to do as requested in this step. Okay. All right. And next one is also uh Leonard Bower. >> Yes, sir. >> All right. Let me just see here.
Catch up with you. All right. So, the next case is um ENF20 18080073 and it's also in the name of Leonard M. hour. And what's the story with this one?
>> Okay, so my name is Rachel Sprdley and I've been sworn in. I'm the nuisance abatement coordinator from Martin County. This case concerns the property located at 7977 Southwest Wildwood Drive, Stewart in Martin County, Florida. A copy of the property appraisers
uh record is exhibit number one. On January 19th, 2019, an order finding violation was issued by the code enforcement magistrate to Leonard M. Bower for section 67201.8 nuisance declared weeds undergrowth
general ordinances Martin County code. So a copy of the order is exhibit number two. Okay. >> Compliance was required by February 28th, 2019. On May 1st, 2019, an affidavit of compliance with acred fines
was issued reflecting an outstanding fine in the amount of $6,000 plus cost in the amount of $575. Staff has determined that a lean reduction is warranted. The respondents were responsible for the violation and brought the property into compliance and have offered to pay $600 to resolve the
outstanding fines which have occurred plus cost in the amount of $575. This fine reduction is in compliance with requirements of section 1.98B general ordinances Martin County code and exhibit 3 is the affidavit of
compliance with fines that was put in place. And then exhibit four is the same reduction letter from the attorney. >> Okay. All right. All right. Again looking at the fine reduction stipulation, it is executed by
Ronda Michelle Halker as sole of the estate of Leonard Bower and um makes the offer of paying $600 in fine plus $575 in acred cost
uh within 30 days of the uh execution of the order. and I'll find that that is appropriate. Is this an adjacent property? >> They are in the same area, but I think
they're like I think there's a street if I remember correctly. There's a street in the middle of them. Okay. >> But they are right in the same area. >> Got it. Okay. All right. So, um I don't know whether I did it. I'm accepting an evidence the the exhibits
one through four in the case and find that it is appropriate to execute the order. Okay. All right. Uh next is the Martinez and Gutierrez case. It's case ENF2020179-01. Fernon Martinez and Poliola Gutierrez
are the respondents. This is also a fine reduction stipulation. >> Yes, sir. >> Okay. >> My name is Rachel Spradley and I've been sworn in. I'm the nuisance abatement coordinator for Martin County. This case concerns the property located at 2655 Southwest Hunter Drive, Okachobee in
Martin County, Florida. On May 19th, 2021, an order finding violation was issued by the code enforcement magistrate to Fernand Martinez and Po Gutierrez for section 21.115 roofs and drainage general ordinances
Martin County code. So, exhibit one is the property appraiser showing the ownership. Exhibit two is the original order that was put in place. Compliance was required by June 30th,
2021. On April 10th, 2026, an affidavit of compliance with acred fines was issued reflecting an outstanding fine in the amount of $174,500 plus cost in the amount of $575. And exhibit three is the affidavit.
Staff has determined that a lean reduction is warranted. The respondents were responsible for the violation and brought the property into compliance and have offered to pay $17,450 to resolve the outstanding fines which have occurred plus the cost in the amount of $575.
This fine reduction is in compliance with the requirements of section 1.98B, general ordinances, Martin County code. And exhibit four is the request that came from Mrs. Gutierrez for the reduction. All right.
Okay. So, uh looking at the stipulation, it recites um the facts of the case as stated earlier. Um, the fine in the amount of $17,450 plus $575 would be paid to the county uh
within 30 days of the order the or um and um just for the record, I'm going to accept into evidence the county's exhibits one through four in this case. And uh note that Ferna Martinez and Pola
Gutierrez have both executed the the stipulation as as have you, Miss Bradley, on behalf of the county. You'll find that it is appropriate to enter the order requiring the
respondents to pay a total of $18,025 to the county within 30 days. Okay. Uh, next is the Nelson case. It's um case ENF 2023 06062.
It's Melba and George Nelson. And this is also a fine reduction stipulation. >> Yes, sir. Okay, whatever. >> My name is Rachel Sprdley and I've been sworn in this. I am the nuisance baitment coordinator for Martin County. This case concerns the property located
at 2805 Southeast Carol Street Stewart in Martin County, Florida. On November 15th, 2023, an order finding violation was issued by the code enforcement magistrate to Melbourne Nelson and George Nelson for section 67.201.8 nuisance declared weeds undergrowth
general ordinances Martin County code. So, exhibit one is the property appraiser showing that Mr. and Mrs. Nelson are the owners of record. >> Exhibit two is the original order that was put in place on the property.
>> Okay. >> Compliance was required by December 29th, 2023. On March 31st, 2026, an affidavit of compliance with acred fines was issued reflecting an outstanding fine in the amount of $82,200 plus cost in the amount of $575.
Staff has determined that a lean reduction is warranted. The respondents were responsible for the violation and brought the property into compliance and an offered to pay $4,000 to resolve the outstanding fines which have occurred. In addition, staff has considered the $40,000 assessed value of the property.
This fine reduction is in compliance with the requirements of section 1.98B, general ordinances, Martin County code. And exhibit three is going to be the affidavit of compliance that was recorded.
And then exhibit four is the email requesting the reduction. Okay. All right. Um, I'll accept in evidence the county's exhibits one through four in this case. based upon the evidence and your testimony find
that it's appropriate to u reduce the fine from $40,000 the assessed value of the property to $4,000 um plus costs. >> Yes sir. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Yep.
$575. And um looking at the stipulation, it recites the actual outstanding fine was $82,200. and that George Nelson and Melbourne
Nelson have both executed the stipulation as have you, Miss Bradley, on behalf of the county find that it is appropriate to order them to pay a total of $4,575 to the county within 30 days.
And so ordered. Okay, the next one is the Puri uh trust case. It's ENF 2024 01000678. Um Francis H. Puri revocable trust of 2013
and that's also a an amended stipulation and agreed order. What have we got here? >> So this one's a little different. My name is Rachel Sprdley and I've been sworn in. and I'm the nuisance baitment coordinator from Martin County. The respondent Francis H. Perry Revokable Trust is not present. This
case concerns the property located at 5090 Southeast Burning Tree Circle Stewart in Martin County, Florida. Uh according to the official records of the property appraiser of Martin County, Francis H. Perry Revocable Trust 2013 is
the property owner. Exhibit one is the property appraiser's record of ownership. Okay. And then ex on February 17th, 2026, a stipulation and agreed final order was signed for section 21.115 roofs and drainage with a compliance date of May
13, 2026, which is March County's exhibit 2. So they did sign a stipulation agreement with us. Um, we have agreed to extend their time frame, which is what is in front of you now.
>> Okay. So, we are giving them now until July 31st of 2026 to find a roofing contractor to get their roof fixed, which is the reason for the extension
in your hand. that hard to find a roofing contractor apparently. Okay. Um, I'm going to accept end evidence exhibits one and two in this case and um
and extend the date for compliance to from February 18th, 2026 to July uh 31st, 2026 based upon the amended stipulation and agreed final order. Note for the record
that um John R. Piery has signed as power of attorney for the Francis H. Piery Revokable Trust of 2023. And um Miss Bradley, you have also signed on
behalf of the county. I'll go ahead and approve the agreed order. >> Thank you. Okay, next one is uh ENF202509 0692-01. Respondent is HSBC Mortgage Corporation.
What do we got there? >> My name is Rachel Sprdley and I've been sworn in. I'm the nuisance baitment coordinator for Martin County. This case concerns the property located at 18230 Southeast Ridge View Drive, Martin County or Tquesta in Martin County,
Florida. On December 17th, 2025, an order finding violation was recorded or was issued by the code enforcement magistrate to HSBC Mortgage Corporation for section 21.99 accessory structures general ordinances Martin County code. So, exhibit one is
the property appraiser showing the new owners of record. Exhibit two is the original order that was put in place for their retaining wall that was damaged on site.
Compliance was required by January 30th, 2026. On April 16th, 2026, an affidavit of compliance with acred fines was issued reflecting an outstanding fine in the amount of $7,200 plus cost in the amount of $575.
And exhibit three is that affidavit of compliance. Arashen Anderson and Rodney Anderson are the current owners of the property pursuant to a special warranty deed recorded in official record book 3552, page 1673, Martin County, Florida public
records. The respondents have no remaining interest in this property. Staff has determined that a lean reduction is warranted. The current owners were not responsible for the violation. However, they brought the property into compliance and have offered to pay $720 to resolve the outstanding fines which have accured
plus cost in the amount of $575. This fine reduction is in compliance with the requirement of section 1.98B general ordinances Martin County code and exhibit 4 is the request that came from Mr. Anderson for the reduction.
>> All right. Okay. So, without objection, I'll accept in evidence the county's exhibits one through four in the case find that it is appropriate to reduce the fine from $7,200 to $720
plus cost in the amount of $575. And uh note that R. Cassie Anderson and Rodney Anderson have both signed the stipulation on behalf of themselves as owners and as
have you, Miss Bradley, on behalf of the county find that it's appropriate to uh order the respondents to pay uh $1,295 to the county within 30 days to the date
of this order. Okay. And I see we've got uh the April um minutes which I have reviewed. Let me just I just want to look at one thing here.
Okay. All right. and uh note that they have been uh executed by Miss Bradley on behalf of the recorder um Julian Khain and by uh John
Colano was the code administrator and I'll go ahead and execute them today as well. Okay. All right. Um I think we are up to date. Any anything else that we've got? The
next hearing is >> June 17th, I believe. >> June 17th. >> All right. I am not here on the 17th of June. So, we will see um I'll see you in July, but
are you planning on having a hearing? >> Well, we'll have to now talk about that. I it it I mean you've got other another magistrate so >> okay all right so we're not sure whether at this point
um good all right um in that case we stand a journ thank you very much >> thank you