Good afternoon everybody and welcome to the June 3rd workshop of the Martin County School Board. May we please all rise to say the pledge of allegiance. To the flag of the United States of America, to the republic for which it stands, one nation.
Miss falls, please call the role. Dr. Morardi, here. Mrs. Roberts, I I Captain. Mrs. Powers. Mrs. Russell here. Mrs. here. Okay. Board information share. Does
anyone have anything they'd like to share? Seeing none, we will move to public comment. Darlene Van Riper. Oh, wait one second. Darlene, I apologize. Citizen input is vital to the improvement of our district. Most times
your remarks may be listened to without comment from the board members or superintendent. This does not mean they are heard with any less intensity or concern. Where appropriate, the superintendent and staff will investigate your comments and report back to you and the board with an answer. We thank you for taking the time
and having the concern to make our district better. Your presentation to the board should not exceed three minutes. Letters or statements from others not present can be given to our clerk who will be sure that each schoolboard member and the superintendent receive a copy. To keep our record straight and authentic, our
policy does not permit you to read the statements of others into the record. Thank you. Am I on? You are. Okay, good. Thank you. Um, I am Darlene Van Ryer with the Martin County Taxpayers Association,
which is a 76year-old taxpayer watchdog organization. We are concerned about the recent news involving a contract with the sheriff's dep department to supply school resource officers. While the safety of our school
children is paramount, I have two grandsons myself. This contract is a three-year contract costing the taxpayers over $8 million per year. If my public school and I int attended a
fantastic public school, if my public school math serves me, that's $24 million over the lifetime of the contract for 34 officers. Granted, it will be divided between the sheriff's department and the
school district, but those two entities are funded out of the same taxpayers's pocket. Let us also keep in mind that the sheriff wants a new helicopter costing over $6 million and a shootute house for
$4.3 million. Fire rescue wants three new fire stations to the tune of $45 million. The House of Refuge is getting a $10 million makeover. And the Jensen Beach Restrooms Cafe building, which
burned down last New Year's Eve, must be rebuilt. This entire project will cost at least $4.5 million. Our public buildings are asking for nearly $8 million in 2026 to replace
generators, the Supervisor of Elections building expansion, and courthouse security entryway between buildings. These are just some of next year's budget requests. The Martin County Taxpayers Association appreciates the
importance of SRO's, but we also appreciate due diligence. We are counting on the school board to thoroughly research other suitable options. We know there are options allowed by statute. We know that
you will document your research so that the Martin County taxpayers can be assured that you are looking out for us as well as for our children. Thank you. Thank
you. Okay. We are going to um remove 4.01 budget workshop. It will be I believe at our June regular meeting the 16th. Um 5.01 superintendent
evaluation. Um we will all be getting notebooks from Mr. Shazo and Miss Falls will be sending us the interactive form that we can do on our computers. And the notebook will contain the artifacts of
uh what the superintendent said he would accomplish this past year. And we will fill out our evaluations and I guess we should have them back for the uh June meeting or the
July workshop. How how soon do you think we should the July workshop? Correct. Or the meeting the the July meeting. So, you have a little bit of time, but once once you get them, please uh work on filling them out so we can discuss them
at our July regular meeting. Thank you. Moving right along. Does anyone have any topics that they'd like to suggest for our July joint meeting? Miss Roberts. Yes. I don't know if everyone is aware,
but the um Martin County Commission has been talking with our staff about the playground at Jensen Beach Elementary School. And I know that that's an interlocal agreement as are all the
agreements that have to do with um property that we own that the county makes available for use for the community etc. I didn't know whether anybody thought whether we should discuss that then. I know that eventually it would be something that would have to go to both boards. I
believe that Dr. Miller has created a um a spreadsheet that has all the interlocal agreements for all the different properties like Hidden Oaks and like the playground and that type of thing. So I don't know what you all think.
So I guess I would like to know where we are in the process. I don't want to have the discussion with the county commission too early if but if there's information that we both should hear at the same time, I think it's appropriate. But I don't know where we are. I guess
I'd look to Dr. Miller. Sure. Good evening. Thank you. We have been for several months. We received the superintendent received a quest a request in November asking for a change to the interlocal agreement only for the playground area at Jensen Beach
Elementary School. and in discussions about that basically the the gist of it is they would like us to take over the operations after school hours. So that's the the the point of contention there. We are perfectly happy to continue to
utilize the playgrounds and our our fields and things during the school day and the interlocal. We've had success with it as it stands where the county takes over as part of their mission to provide fields and parks and services and things to the community during after
hours times. So that is the the current discussion about the changes that they would like made. We do have a meeting set up at Jensen Beach Elementary School within the next two weeks. We do
have Tyson Waters attending with us and I'm looking for the date here. And we do have staff including Mr. Koko who's been involved in the interlocal probably since its inception or seemingly since its inception for historical perspective as to how it's been going over time. So
a couple staff members, we do have Mr. Waters attending and then we've been um keeping Mrs. Roberts in the loop because obviously this is in her um school school board um district. So this is something that we have been um working
on and we can keep all of the board members up to date as to what happens after the next meeting that we have scheduled with the county and our staff. Then I I would I hear Mrs. Robert's request. I do think if we can't find a suitable understanding, then that would
would be the time that we would need to bring this to the joint meeting. You want to say something else? Well, I was just going to say I think it comes down to the county wants to close the park and stop doing what they do after school.
Um, and I guess we does Does their county commission commissioner that represents district 2 understand? Does she know? And that's Commissioner Vargas. So, Commissioner Vargas is aware that
there are discussions. I've spoken to Commissioner Vargas who has been told by her staff that this is an agreement that's completely worked out by staff and that the commissioners have nothing to do with it. Um, I've also talked to at least one other commissioner who was not even aware that these discussions
were happening. So, I don't know. Well, I guess um if we we have to decide if we're going to say we're going to if if they're going to throw their hands up for this park, are we going to take on the
responsibility of doing that? I mean, what is our position? What if they walk away from this park? I don't see that we're going to be taking up the the after hours. So, what is our position? I think we
should give staff direction on what our position is. Um, as a board so that they go into it knowing that I feel like they're picking and choosing a little bit because they want Palm City because, you know, Palms or Hidden Oaks because that's used by the, you know, for
baseball in the community and it's, you know, brand new and wonderful and now I I I don't understand. I guess I would have to understand why they're doing it. Um, so yeah, maybe we should have this conversation together. Um,
so I was just thinking that, you know, if we put it on the agenda and then asked for an update of just, hey, there have been some meetings, etc., that then it would at least give everybody, all the commissioners, the county commissioners, the ability to discuss it
and say what their intent is. I mean, I I agree with you that I don't think we're in the business of running parks during non-school hours. I think that's a and I'm not sure what that does to our insurance piece or any of that other kind of thing of where that goes. Um,
but and I do also think that they're picking and choosing what they want and where they want to go, meaning staff, not meaning not our staff, county staff, but right. Um, but I kind of feel like instead of letting it before we get to the point where our
staffs have worked out something, I think that everybody needs to kind of know. I mean, if the entire commission, if we sit there in front of the entire Martin County Commission and they say, "We have no interest in taking care of any of, you know, we're planning on getting out of all these interlocals. We don't want to have anything to do with any of them." I think that's something
we need to know, right? I don't think that the community um the Jensen Beach community and the playground moms who if you were here back then or during the beginning where we were building um Jensen Beach Elementary, the playground
moms were quite out in force. um they're not completely aware of all of this that's going on either. So, and I know that we've had over the years we've had comments and emails from them over holidays. Why isn't the playground open? Why can't I get into the playground? You
know, those back and forth things, but I mean, I think it's something that I don't know. I just thought if we discussed it at the joint meeting, it would maybe get us. So, at the meeting and at Jensen Beach Elementary, were the PTA and the playground group that raised
the funds, were they invited to that meeting? To my knowledge, no. The meeting is actually on the 18th with our staff, as I said, Mr. Waters and Martin County Board of County Commission staff as well as their attorney. Well, I happen to disagree that this is
something that's going to be worked out with staff. I mean, we have historically been very involved in the decision on opening and closing Jensen Beach or uh yeah, Jensen Beach Elementary and that park. So, I disagree that that position
from the county. So, we are going to have to approve I think and I don't know where the rest of the board stands on that, but I feel like we're going to be we're going to be the end um of the line and approve or not approve the interlocal agreement.
Were you given any indication why they plucked Jensen Beach Elementary from the interlocal agreement? I do not know why. I did ask if they were going to be be requesting the same for Wildcat because they are very similar agreements for
similar purposes and I was told no, they weren't interested in revisiting the Wildcat interlocal at this time. I would like them to tell us their rationale. So I am in favor of bringing it up at at a joint meeting.
I agree. I think there's a sense of accountability there and then having an open discussion with everyone present. Yeah. Tell us to our faces what what it is you you are you know doing this for and then we can make a plan on our own.
But without having any information as to why it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. Yeah, I agree with that as well because otherwise I feel like we're going to be the bad guys in this whole situation where it's going to fall on us and we're not really in that business and then if we're going to take some
heat for that. I think we need to understand why that decision was made. So I would agree with the rest of the board on that front. Okay. So we have the Jensen Beach Elementary School for the agenda. Are there any other items that anyone would like to Michael? Do
you want to uh share the accomplishments of the uh school district as a whole at that meeting? We can do that. Anyone else? That might take a while. So
any do you did you have anything? Uh Miss Russell or Miss Powers? Anything? No. Okay. So, we'll do Jensen Beach Elementary School and school district accomplishments year 2425. Thank you everyone. And Madam Chair, I just want to thank the board
for taking that position. It's been um difficult for staff to navigate. We were just uh sent an agreement back in November requesting that we sign it, which we know better and we're not just going to sign something and it goes uh completely against everything that we
believe would be in the best interest of the district. If staff were to go to the meeting on the 18th and the county agreed to keep theou exactly the same that we're currently operating under, that would have been the intent of that meeting to just status quo. Let's move
forward as we are at Wildcat. Um if that was not the case then we would have let you know that we need to move to the next direction in the next direction but I do believe we're going to need your support on this. So you you then will take the position that we're not signing this interlocal agreement as you're
asking us to correct. Yes ma'am. And that has been our direction and our everything they send to us we send back that it's their responsibility. So yes. Okay. Thank you. Um go ahead. Can I just ask um so is are
we seeing only Jensen Beach Elementary because it is expiring or are we or all of them as a group came up and now this is the only one that has an issue. So my understanding is there's not an expiration date. They're valid until a new one is is put in place and either
party can request a new interlocal. The county, as Superintendent Maine mentioned, just sent the superintendent an email with a revised interlocal that basically put the responsibility for nighttime lighting for um permitting all
of the community events and things at both the fields and the playground at Jensen Beach Elementary and just asked for a signature to basically give us the responsibility that the county has had. So then that prompted the discussions that we've been having ongoing for
several months now. And the first question that I asked because that was logical in my mind. If you're going to do it for one school, were we going to do it for both? And the answer was no that they weren't interested in changing Wildcat. So there was no reason given to
the chair's point. There was no reason given as to why this one was selected. And we have had a good amount of commissioner um interest in Wildcat. We've been staff has walked the site. We've walked the site together with Commissioner Campy at Wildcat. He remains very um interested and invested
in in my opinion based on my conversations with him walking the the site, very um vested in it. And Commissioner Smith had been also very vested in the Jensen Beach playground. Um can we get a list of all of the umus
that are that are like this? Sure. we can send out that spreadsheet, see what all of them are and then um Good. Thank you. Thank you. I think um and I think we also should include in that the track, the the playground and
the track because I know that when we were building the school, Mark, correct me if I'm wrong, um the county was very much interested in us restoring the track that we used as a staging site for the school and restoring the track back
to a condition where the community could use it as a track. Correct. So we actually restored the track back to its original, but we also replaced the whole field so that it could be
reused. So they were very very specific on the football field and the track. Okay. So I I mean I think it's Yeah, I just think that whole thing needs to be included all together. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. We're going to move on to schoolboard policies.
There anyone in the audience who has any public comment regarding any of these policies? Seeing none, we'll go to 6.01 11122 3122 4122 non-discrimination and equal
employment opportunity. I have a comment about all of these that have to do with the naming of the 504 ADA coordinator and the whatever the other one is, the two people that you're
naming. I know that in some places in a couple of these policies that we've seen um if it has to do with students so let's say it's discrimination and it has to do with students it's going to student services and ESSE and if it has to do with adults or employees it's
going to um it's going to risk and it's going to whoever the other one is you know but I think in one case in these policies you refer to all of them the list of all of them. You're saying that if it's a
student, go here. If it's a student, go here. If it's a employee or an adult, go here. It's employee or adult, go here. But when I read further into the policies, some of the policies that were then later just saying for students, you're going to go to ESSE and you're going to go to student services. I'm
just thinking that when we're putting those contacts, we should put that whole block of contacts and specify whether it's student or whether it's employee and just repeat that block over and over again. So that if you happen to be picking it up and you're reading in the
wrong policy, etc. that you would and you're directed to go somewhere, I don't want somebody to get frustrated with I think I'm going to the right person, but oh no, no, you're a student, so you need to be going to ESC. You need to not be doing that. And I think you can alleviate that by just repeating that
whole block in there each time. Does that make sense? Sure. So So 6.02 11122.01 3122.01 4122.01
01 prohibition against disability discrimination in employment. Good. 6.0362 3362 4362 anti-harassment. All
right. 6.04 42260 nondiscrimination and access to equal opportunity. Good. 6.05
2260.01 section 504 ADA prohibition against discrimination based on disability. All good. 6.06 06 5136 wireless communication devices.
This is a new policy, Miss Roberts. Um, so I had a couple comments on this. So I understand we're going to option 2B on page two and selecting the first three options, which is fine. Then when I get to page four,
um, you're selecting the option that picks classrooms. I guess it it says select option. And I don't know whether you're selecting the classrooms at the top or if you're selecting the if technology resources and other electronic equipment devices confiscated
but I want to talk about that for a minute if that was the intent to select both of those. So my first question is was the intent to select both of those miss falls. You see what I'm saying in the top paragraph I have classrooms as a selection.
Okay, that page three, right? Page four. All selections within option three. Yes. So that would be classrooms, gymnasiums, everything within that.
I don't know where you're reading. Hold on. Top paragraph on page three. H3. Page three. We're not selecting option three though, right? We're selecting option two. 2B. So we're not selecting anything that we're not selecting option
one. We're not selecting option 2 a or three or four or five. Correct? The only option we're selecting is the two. Here it says select option three. No. Oh, wait. I see what you're saying. I'm sorry. I'm looking at the other one
at the same time. Okay. Okay. Um, hold on a minute. Hang on. Over to another. Hang on. I had questions about that one, too. Questions. Set 513. Um, oh, I know. On page
three. Oh, wait. Let me start with page two. On page two, when you said on page two, on the first paragraph, select the first paragraph. On paragraph six, the third sentence should read, "Students who violate this provision and/or use a
wireless communication device to violate the privacy rights of another person may have their wireless communication device confiscated and held until a parent guardian picks it up." Okay, that says may. And I don't know whether you
intended it to be May or shall. May leaves it at our discretion whether we pick it up, whether we take it. So, I'm looking at the paragraph that says, "Except as authorized by a teacher, administrator, or IEP team. Students are prohibited from using WCDs
during the school day, including while offampus on a field trip to capture, record, or transmit the words and sounds, i.e. audio and or images of any student or staff member or other person. Using a WCD to capture, record, and or transmit audio and or pictures, video of another individual without proper
consent is considered an invasion of privacy and is not permitted. Students who violate this provision, and that's where I think you're giving me the language. Students who violate this provision and or use a WCD to violate the privacy rights of
another person may have their WCD confiscated. Okay. Should it be shall or may? Right. Should be shall. Okay. So, that should be shall until the parent picks it up. Right. Are we also selecting and may be directed to delete
the audio and or picture video file while a parent guard guardian is present? Okay. Um and then on page three going beyond option three, the fifth paragraph, one, two, three, four,
five, select the option. In the sixth paragraph, select the option. Do we want to say in that paragraph in particular particularly a agrarious offenses involving the invasion of another person's privacy,
the board reserves the right to confiscate the WCD and hold it until the end of the school year? Do we want to say that? I don't know why we don't. If someone's videotaping someone else in a locker room, why wouldn't we? I mean,
obviously, we would turn it over to the sheriff's office, but um someone is videotaping, wouldn't wouldn't or we would turn it over. Would they still be a student in the school at that point or would they be possibly expelled for doing that? We
could. Yes. So, if they're expelled, I don't know that we have the right to keep their phone. So, and I'm questioning more that the um the contradiction. On one place I'm saying I
shall confiscate it and then give it back when a parent or guardian picks it up. And then in another place I'm saying, but if you've been really really bad, I'm going to keep it till the end of the school year. Well, maybe that should just be a separate paragraph that or maybe if it's very egregious, then we
could keep it or it will be turned over to law. Well, it does say that until it is retrieved by or turned over to law enforcement. I'm just hold it until the end of the school year and then at the same time we're saying until it's retrieved by the parent or guardian or turned over law
enforcement. I don't Is it just me or does that Well, it's two separate things. One is an egregious offense. The other one was Well, it's in the same paragraph I'm looking at now. A confiscated device
will be marked in a removable manner with a student's name and held in a secure location building central office until it's retrieved by the parent guardian or turned over to law enforcement. Maybe that in particularly particular egregious offenses maybe that should go at the end
or I think it should have a line all by itself like a paragraph almost all by itself. Yeah. You know what I mean? Yeah. like between that paragraph that has the search and seizure and everything and before that somebody who discovers one. If you take that in
particularly egregious things and just put it out completely by itself so it doesn't have anything to do with any of the other ones. All right. Any more on there? Um and then on the other page three you want to select parents and guardians are advised the best way to get in touch with their child during the
school day is by calling the school office. And we are not selecting. They may use school phones to contact parents or guardians during the day or we are selecting that. I don't think we are because we're not allowing them to use their phones. No,
this is they're using a school phone. They're using a school phone. So if they if a child goes to the office, I think we would give them permission to call their parent if it was some sort of emergency. Right. Right. Right. So, I think you need both of those checked or permission for them to use their cell
phone because that's what we have said is that if you have an emergency, they have their cell phones. They just can't have the mount. But if they take it to the office and say, "I need to call my parent because of this." And they would give them permission to Okay. take their cell phone out and use it. Okay. That's
all I have for that one. All right. Okay. 6.07 5136.01 01 technology resources and other electronic equipment. This is a new Miss Roberts. On the last page,
that's where I meant on the last page. Um, you mean to select classrooms or you mean to select if technology resources or other electronic device is confiscated, it will be returned to the parent guardian after the student complies with any other disciplinary
consequences that are imposed or both? I would think we want to select classrooms, right? Sure. Okay. And what about the other one? So I don't this one is after that they
comply with any other disciplinary consequences imposed. I don't what does that even are you talking about that check box? Yeah. What does that mean? Um student services maybe. Do you know
what that means? So if a that mean like if they got in school suspension, they wouldn't get it until they were done completing that. Or if they got out of school suspension for something that they got out of school suspension, it's not going to be
returned to the parent until they've done their out of school suspension. Is that what that's saying? That's basically what that is saying. I I don't necessarily I think that was the whole point of having parents come is that we don't want to be a storage correct for so we would not be selecting that $2,000
iPhones that okay you would be responsible for Okay fine thank you right 6.085517 anti-harassment 6.09 9 5517.01 bullying and
harassment and those two are ones Diane that say both educational setting and workplace which is why I think the block the whole block needs to be there instead of just the student 6.105517.02 02 non-discrimination and prohibition of
harassment. This policy is being rescended. 6.115517.02 sexual violence. This is a new policy. 6.12 5517.03 dating violence and abuse. This is a new
policy 6.135722 A school sponsored publications and productions to which one? Dating and violence. Yeah. Okay. 6.12 Dating and Violence and Abuse. Dating violence and abuse. On page three, you had selected written
witness statements, narratives and notes and audio video video and digital recordings. All documentary evidence. You did not select emails, texts or social media posts pertaining to the investigation. Did you mean to? I know
that often when we get those hearings, we have those that information. It says I have it. It says H on mine. I have it as well. Ef GH. Yeah. Okay. Oh, FG. FG and H, not E.
E F G E F G and H. They're all checked. Okay. All right. Sorry. Got it. That's okay. Thank you. Okay. Um 6.135722 school sponsored publications and productions. 6.14 weather related emergency response
and compensation. And I'm assuming then which one are you on? 8415. Okay. I'm assuming that there's a procedure for this the part about exempt employees and the superintendent. Um where is
it? A on page two. The superintendent will determine based on the nature of duties and level of involvement whether these employees qualify for straighttime pay at their hourly rate for all hours work beyond their standard contractual obligations. I'm assuming there'll be a procedure that goes there absolutely will be. We
discussed that. Yes, ma'am. Okay. Thank you. 6.15 8950 non-discrimination and equal employment opportunities. This policy is being rescended. 6.168952 section
504 ADA prohibition against disability discrimination and employment. This is also being rescended. 6.178960 non-discrimination and prohibition of harassment. This is also
being rescended. 6.188965 discrimination harassment complaint procedure. This policy is being rescended as well. Okay, we are now open to the board. Does anyone have
anything? I have one thing that I want to uh bring up for possible discussion at a future time. We were offered the ability to um be part of a suit for the jewel um social it was
a the and we discussed it at some point I believe a couple of months ago. I will just say that someone in the community reached out to me and asked why we were not going to be a part of it.
Um, I just wanted to have the discussion so that it was clear because the the person that watched us talk about it did not understand. And I thought for clarification, we could just discuss and see if it's something we wanted to
consider or not, but but kind of give our reasons as to why we should or shouldn't. And if and if you could put that on a a agenda item for the next workshop maybe and if nobody wants to discuss it
I'm okay with that too but I did say that I would bring it forward to the board for a possible discussion. Thank you. Can can you just explain a little I'm not following what you're So we there's this national suit that is being
put forth and school districts can join the suit. Oh okay. The suit is the the jewel the I don't really know the all the details but it is a national suit
for compensation and districts are uh supporting it. Yes. and it was brought to us. There did not seem to be a a flavor to do it. I got reached out to asked why. I said I would have the
discussion with the board at a future time to see if there was any. And Mr. George will explain the suit again, explain what we can or cannot do and what we could possibly gain from it. And I just brought it up for I understand.
Thank you, Madam Chair. You're welcome. Um, go ahead. Could we include the whole agenda item from last time, too? Like all the attach, you know, all the attachments and everything when we do that. Sure. That's Thank you. I guess we're going to have to have some
sort of um motion to reconsider a vote that we already took and then bring it back again. I think you have to do that in two separate meetings. Okay. We have to have a motion to reconsider, I think, which I guess we need to ask Mr. George, if we're going to reconsider the vote,
that's the We may not even get that far. I just wanted to have the discussion because the person who came to me said it's a lot of money and why wouldn't we as a board want to possibly get a a a
decision that would benefit us financially? Isn't there a deadline on that as well? There is a deadline, but I believe it is still open at this time, and that is why I'm bringing it forward again. But if we don't get past a motion to reconsider,
that's okay as well. I just wanted it out there. Okay. All right. So, this meeting is adjourned. Okay, we will now go into our uh June 3rd, 2025 special school board meeting.
Um calling the meeting to order and I need an approval of the agenda. Second. A motion by Miss Russell. Second by Dr. Morardi. All those in favor? I. Okay. Um, Mr.
Carver, did you want to say anything or are we just going to go ahead? I just have one question. Sure. I just curious um why these are being brought to us outside of a normal meeting. Jeff Carver, director of purchasing. Um
to answer your question, Mrs. Powers, um the um these were too time-sensitive that were intended to go in May. Um the food service uh item was delayed because of um some uh information that we didn't
have from the vendor. Um so we weren't able to get it on in time for May. And the managed print uh service RFP um it yielded many many questions from vendors and we we weren't able to get all the questions answered in time to get it on
the May agenda and get an addendum out to respond to the questions. And there the food service um item uh is going to require some menu changes. So the sooner that food service is able to
start that process, the um the better it will be for them for the beginning of school. And the um the current the staff member that is over printing is uh scheduled to retire at the end of June. And we just wanted to have um some time
with his historical knowledge of the printing um process uh to to help uh integrate the new vendor. Madam Chair. Yeah. Uh Mr. Carlo, can you explain some of those menu ch uh changes you just mentioned a moment ago? I I
don't have the details um on the uh it's just the items. We're we're going to be purchasing the food from a different vendor, so the branding is going to be a little bit different. Um but um the food services director um would be able to answer those questions much better.
Thank you. Anyone else? No. A motion for approval of 3.01. Second. Second. Motion by Miss Russell, second by Dr. Mario. All those in favor? I.
3.02. Do I have a motion? Motion for approval of 3.02. Motion by Miss Russell, second by Miss Roberts. All those in favor? I public comment. Do we have any public
comment? Okay. Open to the board. Okay. This meeting is adjourned. Thank you everyone.