WEBVTT

METADATA
Video-Count: 1
Video-1: youtube.com/watch?v=LCE_9pDwOVI

Part: 1

1
00:00:01.040 --> 00:00:21.199
to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, liberty and justice for all. I hereby announce that this meeting is being held in accordance with chapter

2
00:00:21.199 --> 00:00:37.600
231 of the open public meeting act. Proper notice of meeting dates to Morris County daily recorded on board. This meeting is a judicial proceeding. Any questions or comments must be to

3
00:00:37.600 --> 00:00:54.079
issues that are relevant to what the board can legally consider in reaching a decision and appropriate to a judicial hearing must be maintained at all times. Reminder to members of the planning board and girls staff any use during

4
00:00:54.079 --> 00:01:09.760
this meeting should be sold for the purpose of business roll >> Mr. Wolf >> here >> Mr. >> here >> Mr. Bezel >> here >> Mr. Steer >> here Mr. Sam >> here

5
00:01:09.760 --> 00:01:29.520
>> Mr. Houston >> here >> here >> and Mr. >> here Okay, before we start, I just want to mention here tonight first item on our agenda is the approval

6
00:01:29.520 --> 00:01:50.000
of the meeting minutes from April 20th, 2026 members. Copy of this question. Can I have a motion to approve these minutes? So

7
00:01:50.000 --> 00:02:20.879
>> second call >> Mr. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Oh yes. Okay. Mr. >> Yes. >> Mr. >> Yes.

8
00:02:20.879 --> 00:02:37.360
>> Yes. >> Yes. >> And Mr. >> Yes. >> Okay. Next item on the agenda. Comments from the public. This is specifically for matters that are not on tonight's agenda. Public comment should be limited

9
00:02:37.360 --> 00:02:59.040
to one comment per person. This request is only to opportunity forever. Okay, I'll post this on the agenda. Move to committee reports. Mr. Bezel, any update on site committee?

10
00:02:59.040 --> 00:03:15.840
>> No sir. >> And I know on the master plan committee there are correct. Okay. Correspondences and bills. Are there any correspondence and bills? Yes.

11
00:03:16.640 --> 00:03:41.400
First one is purchase order number 20260766 from the 21st of April 2026 to Philips and Gradel for planning in the amount of $8750. The second is purchase order number 20260834

12
00:03:41.920 --> 00:04:01.640
from May 6, 2026 Anderson for engineering services the amount 290 and 10. That's it to approve these two bills. Is there a second

13
00:04:04.480 --> 00:04:20.079
roll call? Mr. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Mr. Bessel. >> Yes. >> Mr. Stefford. >> Yes. >> Mr. >> Yes. >> Mr. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> And Mr.

14
00:04:20.079 --> 00:04:39.520
>> Yes. Next item on the agenda is this application process. So back in April, we had a few documents, but I will turn some minor corrections

15
00:04:39.520 --> 00:04:57.680
to that and then we had asked for some legal input as well. I think we have gotten all of that out. So hopefully tonight go through whatever comments you have

16
00:04:57.680 --> 00:05:15.479
and then this Does anybody have comments from last set of just on the update from May 1

17
00:05:23.360 --> 00:05:55.479
second zoning board of adjustment and then page I think it should be on This applicant in their profession should present. >> Excuse me. That should be on all of >> Yeah.

18
00:05:58.560 --> 00:06:25.000
>> It's not anywhere. I do have >> it. Morris zoning board of adjustment on the top. Okay. And then it goes how to complete zoning and definition. Okay. I think probably 3A or something.

19
00:06:27.840 --> 00:06:53.120
I think that should be. >> Okay. This is for the the cover sheet. I don't know what >> I had sent this. I think submitted it to everybody. >> May first I don't know that's why >> and I sent it into Karen and I think she

20
00:06:53.120 --> 00:07:08.880
distributed. >> So but it's under just her record, right? It's under not in the actual checklist application. It's in the cover sheet guide >> that you're referring to. Um and you're referring to updating uh on page number

21
00:07:08.880 --> 00:07:23.440
two application hearing process brief summary bullet number three review you want to add um completeness and applicant professionals at that meeting if applicant deemed complete during the schedule. So that's the verb you want to

22
00:07:23.440 --> 00:08:02.720
add for all of these. So where do you >> that'sing that >> that's fine. That's a again this is just a cover sheet guide. So this is not you know this this gets goes along with the

23
00:08:02.720 --> 00:08:18.960
checklist um any other documents that are here but again it's just that but it's not question >> no we can we can add that in very >> excuse me can I say something

24
00:08:18.960 --> 00:08:35.279
but if they're incomplete they have to attempt the this year. They never had to before. A lot of times they talk to the professionals like Bill. >> Yeah. They my opinion they should be here complete.

25
00:08:35.279 --> 00:08:52.560
>> Okay. But but I'm saying deemed incomplete a lot of times they don't intend. >> Well, a lot of times if that meeting gets canled anyway that meeting gets canled anyway. To me, I think that's a new point, but >> I agree with you, Jason, that I think

26
00:08:52.560 --> 00:09:10.160
they should be present and then if they, you know, write in and say, "Well, we're not going to be present. We're going to resubmitted them." >> That's fine. But let's make it, you know, so they should be present at that meeting >> because we may have questions and and

27
00:09:10.160 --> 00:09:31.760
often it's deemed incomplete and we may disagree with the professionals. I That doesn't happen very often. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. And again, that's just that's just in the summary and the coverage she got. It doesn't it doesn't impact the chat.

28
00:09:31.760 --> 00:09:51.440
But yeah, no problem. Not a problem. >> Um just just I just want to say for the record because it's been two months since we had our last meeting. Um, I went ahead just just so that the the public kind of I know they can't really follow along, but just so they kind of understand what we've done is uh based

29
00:09:51.440 --> 00:10:08.640
on the comments that we received in the I guess was the April meeting because we have a May meeting. Um, I went ahead and and updated the documentation and then I highlighted which actually on the photo copies it shows as a gray highlight and then I I crossed out the sections that

30
00:10:08.640 --> 00:10:25.839
we uh we all agreed that that could be removed. So, when we're when we're looking at the documentation, that's how it kind of breachs and that includes the uh the legal verbiage that was uh um requested to be answered into the documentation

31
00:10:25.839 --> 00:10:56.680
just for a point of clarification. >> For some reason, >> okay, talking about just This is the other >> sure sheet on flowchart. >> Yeah. Yeah. Flowchart.

32
00:11:00.079 --> 00:11:15.040
>> So, Bill, this this flowchart is essentially click by click. That's what it sort of looks like today. >> Yeah. The the intent here is that it gives everybody, you know, who's ever applying a step-by-step process. Actually, I believe it was a request from I'm not sure if it was Mr. Wolf or

33
00:11:15.040 --> 00:11:30.399
somebody to have this in. So, it's a visual representation of how this process goes. Um, and yeah, that's that's the intent is that like it's a click byclick, step-by-step process, and how this whole thing would go, what happens if it gets approved, if it doesn't get approved, what can you do,

34
00:11:30.399 --> 00:11:46.800
who you go to, that type of thing. >> It reads that way. It seems I think it's a good addition. I think it actually makes it a lot easier. I think just potentially two things. one, do they know which one of the three

35
00:11:46.800 --> 00:12:02.720
is there someplace that tells them is a site plan is a subdivision is now whoever they're working with the professional should >> but right home

36
00:12:02.720 --> 00:12:25.639
>> but should it be you know do we provide simple examples of something real terms that people can Well, they can call Karen. >> True. I mean, they can always be step number one.

37
00:12:26.880 --> 00:13:08.160
>> That's the way it works now. >> The only other thing was did we talk about at one point putting the um whatever it's called? We have so many days. >> I think that's what I'm thinking here. um on the checklist where we have

38
00:13:08.160 --> 00:13:24.560
the waiver. We have waiver requested but we don't have the reason. Now I know Bill usually goes through it as part of his review when there's waiver requested. So I don't know there should be something on there,

39
00:13:24.560 --> 00:13:40.639
you know, when they're requesting waiver why they're asking for the waiver. typically have to hear. >> Sorry. Go ahead. >> They present their case. >> Yeah. So, it's it's in testimony, right?

40
00:13:40.639 --> 00:13:56.560
But it's not on the check. That was just one of the things I part of your report is you actually list reasons why the waiverss are requested, but you list reasons why it should be approved. >> No, never do that.

41
00:13:56.560 --> 00:14:12.079
>> Okay. I just say I recommend it >> that they should they should discuss it after >> that's that's something um I think I have just two more on the checklist

42
00:14:12.079 --> 00:14:29.839
where we have um we don't specifically talk about unless I have mobile version about trash and recycling facilities so I don't know if it makes sense to add something about location and screening for refu recycling utility enclosures if

43
00:14:29.839 --> 00:14:48.399
that's something you wanted to put in there. >> Uh I assume the same thing for the fire stuff, fire lanes, hydra locations. Um that and then I think it's not on my copy. I feel like we had at the bottom

44
00:14:48.399 --> 00:15:04.560
the document revision dates, but I don't have it on my copy, so I don't know if it fell off, but on the bottom of the checklists, you might want to put the and maybe the revision date when the forms were updated. >> Sure,

45
00:15:04.560 --> 00:15:30.639
>> it might be on there. It might have just fallen off. I feel like it was on there at one point, but I don't see That's it. Yes. >> When you say timeline for a meeting, you know, 14 days prior

46
00:15:30.639 --> 00:16:42.639
to whatever those timelines are, right? 120 days. We can get that right, >> right? that into the chart as well. Okay. So, with a couple corrections updates that we just talked about

47
00:16:42.639 --> 00:17:20.240
tonight, I to make a motion presented the governor body. >> I think we need to go over it again. I just know as far as I know >> prior to our last meeting which was in

48
00:17:20.240 --> 00:17:37.679
April. I I don't think they've seen the most recent. >> So after making changes probably >> I'll send them over to Doug and >> I think we would like to look at them again and make sure that all these

49
00:17:37.679 --> 00:17:55.520
comments have got there's no rush. I mean >> no there's not. I guess I I I kind of feel like it would be good to have the council because I don't know what to expect anyone. I just want clarification, right? I I already introduced it to the council. Um

50
00:17:55.520 --> 00:18:11.280
I I brought it up in a in a prior meeting that had let them know that this was the we are approaching final draft version of it. Um so they have it in their hands to provide any comments. The intent there is to gather their comments. Um in conjunction with the

51
00:18:11.280 --> 00:18:26.960
comments from the planned so that once once we have a final document it doesn't need to go through multiple processes. So the council does already have it. next council meeting I'll ask if they have any if they have any additional input but yes the intends to come up

52
00:18:26.960 --> 00:18:45.200
with final version we're nearing you know we only have a couple >> and maybe when you get this all these comments send it out to the planning board and the council and make sure that

53
00:18:45.200 --> 00:19:06.480
doesn't help that date to respond Yeah, that's what we've been doing. We've been respon we've been putting deadlines on when when uh responses are being >> I think you said >> from board of just Yes. Yes.

54
00:19:06.480 --> 00:19:41.840
>> Okay. >> All right. I will uh I will do that postings. >> Yes. Yes. Okay. Uh on to the next item. New business. Okay. Planning board meeting will be July

55
00:19:41.840 --> 00:20:06.640
20th, 2026 right here. Uh do I have a motion to adjourn the next meeting? >> So move second. >> All in favor? >> Thank you.