Okay. Uh, good evening. My name is Bob Connors. It is now 6:01 p.m. I'd like to call the November 18th special meeting of the Newbury Cons Commission to Newbury Conservation Commission to order. Mason, can you read the preamble
to to the remote open meeting and take a roll call? The members present. As a preliminary matter, this is Mason Farrett, conservation agent in the Newbury Conservation Commission. Please permit me to confirm that all members are present and can hear me. Members, when I call your name, please respond in the affirmative. Mary Rimmer, >> yes.
>> Mick Brown, >> yes. >> Harry Trout, >> yes. >> Woody Knight, >> yes. >> Frank Wetenamp, Dave Clifford, and Bob Connors. >> Yes. >> Good evening. This open meeting, the Newbury Conservation Commission is being conducted remotely consistent with Governor Baker's executive order of
March 12th, 2020 due to the current state of emergency in the Commonwealth. In order to mitigate the transmiss transmission of the CO 19 virus, we have been advised and directed by the Commonwealth to suspend public gatherings and as such the governor's order suspends a requirement of the open meeting law to have all meetings in a publicly accessible physical location.
Further, all members of public bodies are allowed and encouraged to participate remotely. Ensuring public access does not ensure public participation unless unless such participation is required by law. This meeting will feature public comment. For this meeting, the Newbury Conservation Commission is convening by Zoom call as
posted on the agenda of the Conservation Commission Conservation Commission section of the town's website identifying how the public may join. Please be aware that other folks may be able to see you and take care not to screen share your computer. Anything that you broadcast may be captured by the recording. Applicants or their
representatives may be called upon to speak and or share information to the screen if able on the fly. We're now turning to the first item on the agenda. But before we do so, uh permit me to cover some ground rules for effective and clear conduct of our business and to ensure accurate meeting minutes. The chair will introduce each speaker on the agenda. After they conclude their
remarks, the chair will go down the line of members inviting each by name to provide any comment, questions, or motions. Please hold until your name is called. Further, please remember to mute your microphone. Please use earbuds and please remember to speak clearly and in a way that helps generate accurate minutes. For any responses, please wait until the chair yields the floor to you and state your name before speaking.
Board and committee members should be called upon in a firstname alphabetical order to ease the process. After board and committee members have spoken, the chair will afford public comment as follows. The chair will first take questions through the chat function. When participants are using this function, please list your name, address, and then your question. The chair will then seek questions from the
public who wish to speak. They'll be asked to identify their names and addresses, questions, and once the chair has a list of all public commentators, they'll call on each by name and afford three minutes for any comments. Finally, each vote taken in this meeting will be conducted by roll call vote. >> Okay. Thank you, Mason. Upcoming meeting
dates, December 2nd and January 6th. All right. First order of business is a request for a certificate of compliance. D file number 05045971 new report turnpike applicant submitting a request for a certificate of compliance for the construction of a
driveway in the completion of mitigation planting area. Mason, why don't you give us an overview of what's before us and we'll take each one of these separately. two out of three seem pretty pretty simple.
>> Yep. Uh so this one here uh overall um this is a property that they were trying to sell and they're looking to close out three of these open permits. Um this one in particular was I believe from either 1997 or 1998 for the construction of the driveway with 80 square feet of wetland
replication required as well. Um there was no approved plan. This is one of the files that we did not have in hand at the town hall. Um I did have um a later plan that was used um for just the shape and general size of the driveway um but didn't have any square footage and it
also didn't identify where the wetland replication was. Um I was able to meet the um homeowner's broker out on the site to do a sitewalk. Um it's a gravel driveway and it seemed to be in compliance with the certified structure
location plan um that had been submitted in years prior um not before the construction of the driveway obviously but um you know prior to 2025. Um so I have some photos as well that I can share um and then I would just open open
it up to the board for any questions. >> Okay. You're going to you're going to post the pictures? Yep. >> Okay. Thank you, >> Harry. You have a better backdrop than I do. I'm living on the wrong part of the island here. >> This is where the driveway wraps around
here. Excuse me, that's the wrong one. And right here as well. Um, you may notice or recognize this property. This is right off a new report turnpike. So I can pull up um you know the entrance as well.
Um but when I was on site there was no disturbance. It didn't look like the driveway um you know was falling falling in any uh portions or eroding at all. Um so it in my eyes it looked like this was in completed. Um, you know, as much as
we can tell, like I said, there was no approved plan in the folder. >> Okay. Is the applicant or who's going to present for the >> uh the applicant's broker is here and that's Nana. >> Okay. All right. Questions from the
members. Mary, questions on this? Um yeah, there wasn't anything in the um the you know the file shared file that um Mason provided to us for this me for this project that I could find. Um
I missed something there, but there is a filing that was what I was able to determine was there was a 1996 filing that was made. There's no evidence that that there was an order that was issued or recorded. I you know I don't have anything
I couldn't find anything at the registry um having to do with this filing or um there was only one recorded order for this location out of the three that are here before us tonight. So I don't know
um I mean they we don't have anything to act on. There's no recorded order. There's no I don't know exactly why we're asking for a certificate of compliance with for a project we know nothing about and that was never properly >> so the the closing attorney had shared
that it wasn't under registered land it was under um land >> recorded yeah I think it was um let me pull it up excuse me >> so is registered land not your >> not recorded
>> yeah not recorded >> correct >> okay >> it didn't show up under either, but um one of the orders came up under recorded land. The other ones don't come up at all. So, Mason, we're we're positive this is
registered land and >> yeah, uh I'm just trying to pull up the email that has >> 6 um it was you know filed I mean that the applicant
The D has the applicant as Apple Associates for that this filing who would have been the project engineer. >> So it's on the DOI portal. >> Yeah. >> I'll be honest, I haven't had a chance to Oh, >> what if I look under app?
See if this is the right one. Typically if the attorney >> Okay, I found it. >> Yeah. Okay. >> All right. Um Yep. 5459. >> Yep. >> Yeah. >> It's actually >> 04 >> recorded against Apple Associates.
That's why um and >> uh here it is. Sorry about that, guys. >> Yep. Um, so here is all the recording information for the three open files here.
>> Okay, great. Um, does it Let's see. See, I'm just trying to download this order because it doesn't show me what
>> So, when I pulled up when I pulled up the order, there was no approved plan with it, but I believe there were, let me I have a hard copy right here. I think it was four four or five special conditions. Um, out of the four or five, four of them were pretty much our
standard conditions. Um, and then the one that that was the only reason I knew that they were required for the 80 square feet of wetland replication. I believe that was the fifth one. Okay. But with no plan and it being 30 years old, it's hard to tell where anything was replicated if it if it was.
>> Yep. Understood. >> Okay. Mary, any any other questions? >> Um, no, not right now. I'm going to keep looking this up. So, >> okay. I'll circle back with you, Woody. Any any questions uh on this matter? No, I don't have any questions. Thank
you, Bob. Okay, >> Mason, when you're out there, wasn't was there anything disturbed or was everything pretty much? >> No. In terms of the driveway, no. Um, it it looked like it'd been there for a while. No expansion. >> But was most of the yard fully vegetated as well? Just
>> Yep. Yeah. No, no yard disturbance or anything like that. Um Yep. >> Okay. Thank you, Woody. Mick, any questions? You're right. >> Not so much u question just the confirmation like so it's a gravel kind
of looks like a crush stone you know gravel bit driveway. >> Yep. Yeah. And it's it's just kind of been compacted over the years. Um so it's pretty stable with the exception of some potholes and things like that on the on the >> And you didn't see any obvious like cuts into a wetland that were obvious or any
like grown over disturbance or something like that? So, >> nope. No. And then and you know to that point as well, they were all pretty much in upland areas. It wasn't really getting um you know close to the river that you know kind of goes through or around the property in this case, >> right? Okay. No, that was it. That was
it. >> Okay. Thank you, Mick Harry. Any any questions for Mason on this matter? >> Uh no questions at this time, Bob. >> Okay. I don't have any questions. Make sure I've Okay, I don't have any questions. Mary,
I'm gonna circle back to you. Any >> I'm good now. Thank you, Bob. I had what I needed. >> Okay. Mason, are there any raised hands from the public at this time? >> Seeing none. >> Okay. Do any members have a request for a site visit or any additional
information? Okay. Hearing none, I will entertain a motion to issue a certificate of compliance for file number 050459 71 Newbury report turnpike. >> So moved. >> Second. >> Second.
>> Okay. Okay. Uh roll call. All in favor? Mary? >> Yes. >> Woody? >> Yes. >> Nick? >> Harry? >> Yes. >> And Bob Connor's vote? Yes. All right. Make sure my pages don't stick together
tonight. Okay. Next matter is a certificate of compliance for D file number 050 089371 termpike, excuse me, 71 new report turnpike. Applicant is submitting a request for a certificate of compliance
for the construction of a deck attached garage and associated infrastructure. Mason, can you give us an overview and a recommendation on this matter if you have one? >> Yep. Uh, so for this one, they're requesting a partial certificate of compliance. Um, I can walk through some
of these photos. Um, the deck was constructed. Um, although it is kind of rundown now. It wasn't safe to uh to walk on, but the deck was constructed. They had poured the foundation um for the garage, but they had not built any
of the walls or anything like that. So this is the deck here. The garage was proposed to be here. So it was in the proposed location. Um just seemed to be never never finished. >> Was there an asbill plan with this from
the building department when the that showed the foundation was as >> um I had nothing in the folder. >> Okay. What was the what what year do you anticipate this was? >> Uh I think these last two were 2007 and 2008. I can double check that right now.
>> 0893. Is that what the one we're doing now? >> Uh yep. >> 0893. Yes. >> That was 2007. >> Okay. 2007. >> Yep. March of 2007. >> But there was a there was a plan that a
plan section that was included for with this one, wasn't there? That was done by Apple. >> Yes, I can pull that up. Prove planned. Yep. Can you guys see this?
>> Now, the obviously the deck is pretty clear. Is the foundation kind of on the top of the foundation? Is that Yeah. where you're >> uh So, here I mark it up a little bit. So, this is where the garage was right here.
>> Okay. >> Deck is here. >> So, that's just the foundation and the garage floor that we you show was shown in previous pictures. Okay. Yep. >> Okay. Mary, any what questions do you have on this one?
>> So, so they're saying that they this was for just the deck. Was that >> uh it so it's for the construction of a deck, attached garage, and associated infrastructure building. >> And that's what the uh the narrative had described on their notice of intent. >> Okay.
>> And you're but they're requesting a partial. It looks like they were both constructed. Is that not right? >> Full certificate. >> The good never built just foundation. >> Correct. Full certificate. But on the COC request, it's for, you know, these
portions of the work were done because um the garage was never fully constructed. >> Okay. So, you're just going to add a note to that or something, >> right? >> Okay. Yep. >> Got it. >> Okay. Anything else, Mary? >> Nope. >> Okay. Woody, questions on this matter?
>> No, I don't have any questions. Thank you. >> Okay. Thank you, Woody. Mick, any questions on this one? >> No. So, just to clarify, we're issuing an order of condition. We're issuing a, you know, a completion, but it's um
you're going to note that it's partial construction. >> Yep. Correct. >> Foundation only. That >> I'm just thinking that if there were any further construction here, it really wouldn't be impacting wetlands. Anything that would impact the ground or impact wetlands has already been done. Correct.
>> Within the footprint of the garage. Yes. >> Yeah. So, is there any need to do that note? >> Uh, it may just be >> full compliance. >> Yeah. True. >> Just >> I'm I'm just throwing it out there for for discussion. >> No, I think it's a good point you bring
up. >> No, I think for to clarify for the record, it's important to note that it wasn't completed. So >> it may not require that they revisit concom to to build that if they >> right >> don't vary from >> the foundation but that'll be a
determination that Peter will make if someone comes in with a building permit. >> Okay. Okay. >> That that would be would that be accurate Mason? >> Yeah. And he you he would usually task it to me and then from there um you know we can obviously look if there's going
to be impacts if they propose any expansion or you know something like that. Okay, Mick, anything else? >> No, no, no it. Thank you. >> Good question, Harry. Any questions on this matter? >> Nope, not at this time, Bob. >> Okay, thank you, Woody. Did I skip over
you or did you >> No, I'm good. I But now my wheels are turning. But if they were going to tear out the foundation, they'd have to come. They'd have to do something, >> right? Yeah. Any disturbance >> would would result again. And it would
it would still have to go back to the building department for a demolition permit and then that would give Mason uh they'd have to get a review and a sign off from Mason. So >> yeah, in this property the the river pretty much wraps around the entire
property. Um so I've actually talked with the closing attorney and the the new buyer. Um I can kind of give some perspective on >> environmentally sensitive the site is. just letting them know that when they do come in, excuse me, when they do uh
finalize the purchase, uh they should just come in and talk with me about, you know, what they are looking to do and and what's going to be needed from us. >> Okay. >> There's riverfront area on this site now that wasn't regulated at the time it was filed. So,
>> okay. Any other questions from the members before I see if there's any raised hands on the public? Okay. Mason, are there any raised hands from the public at this time? >> Seeing none. >> Okay. Do any members have a request for
a site visit or additional information? >> Okay. Hearing none, I will entertain a motion to issue a certificate of compliance for file number 050 0893 71 Newport Turnpike. >> So moved.
>> Do we have a second? >> Second. Woody. Thank you. Roll call. All in favor? Mary? >> Yes. >> Woody? >> Yes. >> Mick? >> I >> Harry? >> Yes.
>> And Bob Connor's vote? Yes. All right. Okay. Next matter is a certificate of compliance D file number 050 0880 71 new report turnpike. Applicant is submitting a request for a certificate
of compliance for the installation of a wind turbine and associated concrete pads and anchors. Mason, can you provide an overview and a recommendation if you have one on this matter? >> Yep. Uh so this wind turbine is located I'll bring up the same site plan. Um and
then you can see it's over here. So this is the center support here. Uh each of the supports are about a 3x5 concrete pad. Um so the wind turbine sits on this one and then there's uh I believe three or four different guywire supports that are also on those roughly
3 to five uh foot concrete pads. Um so >> is the turbine operational or is it >> Yep. Yep. So it was up and running. Um and this was closed. They had closed out the the building permit and the electrical permit for the wind turbine uh when they had finished, but they had
never closed out their open order. Um this in their order of conditions did require an asbuilt plan. Um which they had reached out to the engineer to try and get. Um the engineer and them had kind of have had a fall through um and
he frankly was just not willing to provide that for them. Um, so I I was able to go out uh confirm the location of uh the concrete pads and confirm that they were in the proposed locations.
>> And you have pictures. Go back to >> Yep. So just to give people an idea, this is the center one here. Um, excuse me. At the base. Um, but they all sit on this, you know, just about 3x5 concrete pad. And then the guy wires go in to
stabilize everything. Okay, questions. Anything else, Mason, before I open this up to the member? >> Uh, no, besides that, there was no other disturbance in the area. Uh, this whole area was vegetated. You can see some of the trees starting to grow back in here. Um, no additional disturbance in those
areas. >> Okay, questions. Mary, questions from Mason on this one. >> Um, just a couple of quick notes that all three of these filings have different had different applicants. So, the certificate of compliance,
you just make sure you track the right the name for each each of them. This was under Janet Frasier. >> Mhm. >> And it was it looks like Apple did the plans and Apple doesn't exist anymore. Um and Apple Associates, the engineering firm
that used to be in Biffield and um >> yeah, so Apple Yeah, like you said, they're not there anymore. So they tried to reach out to the license installer and that's who had kind of refused to to provide the the asbuilt plan. >> Well, the only concern I had is that the
request for certificate of compliance checks the box that says there's a statement included by a professional engineer about compliance, but I I didn't see the any letter. Didn't >> we didn't have one. I thought that I had checked that off just because it
required it, not because uh it was provided. I think this is the one that um on the application it says it it checks off the box for um a statement from a from the engineer. If you want to pull that up um
say 0880. >> Yes. 0880 is the Yeah, I'm looking at that now. So, yeah, the wrong box was checked. I think that was interpreted as was it required as a part of the order of conditions. Um, but
no, it was not submitted. >> So, so it was not required or it was >> it was required in the order of conditions. It was not submitted with the certificate of compliance request. >> Okay. So I guess just
>> well we have to determine within our discretion Masons >> whether that's Yeah. fatal flaw or anything like that. Yeah. Okay. >> All right. Thank you. That was all. >> Okay. Thank you, Mary. Woody, any questions for Mason on this one?
>> No, I don't have any questions. Thank you, Bob. >> Thank you, Woody. Mick, any any questions? >> No, no questions. Okay, Mary, >> any questions on this matter? >> Uh, no questions, Bob. >> Okay, I do not have any questions. Mary,
any follow-up questions from you? >> No, it looks like it's a pretty minor project. >> Yeah, I don't think we're too concerned. Yeah, >> Mason and I talked about it and it was it came down to that he went out and he literally spent some time out there to verify that everything seemed to be in
its approximate location and certainly there was no disturbance to to any of the resource around what's been there for probably 15 or so years, 20 years. >> Okay. Mason, any any raised hand in the public at this time?
>> Seeing none. >> Okay. Do any members have requests for a site visit or additional information? >> No. Okay. >> I will entertain a motion to issue a certificate of compliance for file number 050
088071 Newport Turnpike. >> So moved. >> Do we have a second? Okay, Woody, that was you. Roll call. All in favor? Mary? >> Yes. >> Woody? >> Yes. Mick,
>> hi. >> Harry, >> yes. >> And Bob Connor's votes yes. All right. Okay. We have uh so we have a a couple of project discussions open space committee response. So team, I received
a communication uh from the assistant planner regarding uh the open spaces. They're doing an effort to update their open space recreation plan and they're reaching out to all of the different committees or
commissions uh that may have some uh overlapping interest or jurisdiction and I said I would bring it up at our next meeting. I sent off a uh a sample re I shouldn't say I sent off a response
for kind of the usual boilerplate that I would bring this up at our next meeting to discuss and pro and provide collective comments and in the meantime I would offer several preliminary observations. You know, basically
reciting what we always look at, protection of sensitive resource areas that should remain a core priority, particularly within the PLA noble district, salt marsh systems and areas vulnerable to sea level rise. Proving managed public access, walking paths,
trail connections, low impact recreation should be balanced with resource with resource protection and maintenance capacity. uh coordination between boards, OSC, planning, conservation, agriculture,
historical essential to avoid conflicting goals and to efficient efficiency efficiently leverage state grants once the plan is approved. Inventory and stewardship of planning of the town owned conservation parcels should continue to evolve, especially
where signage boundaries or trail conditions need improvement. So, those are kind of my boilerplate off-the cuff responses and but again, I said I would bring it up uh at a at a at the uh at a meeting,
so I opened that up for discussion. Barry, any what other thoughts would you like to add to this or >> were they just looking for general feedback or >> Yeah, they it it was just I think it was
more of a courtesy. Yeah, >> I just off of that as a starting point. >> Yeah. No, I I mean I know they've been meeting forever. Um and so hopefully they'll get something, you know, a draft that we can look at
sooner than later. The only um open space parcel that I'm aware of that the commission um has management responsibilities for is the one in Bfield the marsh great
marsh great meadow great meadow farm is that what it's called on um middle road. >> Yep. Mhm. >> And then there's other conservation restrictions that we hold where we're not responsible, the town isn't responsible for the maintenance, but the
conservation commission is the the holder of of the restriction. Um, so 105 High Road was one of them. >> Um, and I believe the Caldwell Farm Trail as well. >> Okay. and and you know those are properties
that you should probably walk once a year to make sure that the terms of the restriction are being abided by. >> There's Yeah, I think we talked previously about there being some need for some maintenance and improvement to
the Great Meadow property and but that's all I had. >> Yeah. No, I I think one of the things in and actually Woody, you could probably help out. We have a lot of property that have uh these abatement requests. Is it
61A for agriculture where that when they come up for sale, the town has the first refusal which could add to open space inventory. I'm thinking looking over the horizon that that's probably the the only limited
opportunities for additional open space that may be available in the town that doesn't get donated to, you know, Essex Green Belt or >> Yeah. But >> and and then we see it a lot as well with some of the newer subdivisions and and some of the bigger developments
going in. Um I know that I'm not involved in the project, but I believe 34 Central is proposing um a portion of that to be open space as well with a trail and recreational area. >> Yeah. So again, that's just more a
general discussion on a communication at this point. It doesn't require, I think, a a a formal response from the commission, but I I certainly wanted to bring you all up to speed on what has transpired and and as a starting point.
And to Mary's point, as as they create new documents, they'll be circulated to us for our review and we'll have the ability for additional comments. So, okay. The moving on the next matter
is conservation commission annual town report review. So once a year the each committee and commission or board uh typically submits an annual report for the town's annual report record. uh I
had just crafted with Mason the more chronologically the the number of meetings visits that I've circulated that with all of you. Um does it require a formal vote? Um
again I I always seek counsel from all of you and so what I'm going to do is I'm going to treat that treat this as where we have time. It had to be sub has to be submitted by I think uh November 21st is what the town administrator had
asked. Um so any questions on the document that was drafted and circulated? >> No, you did a great job. >> Yeah. No, I read through it. read through it and I yeah I had no comments or questions or edits or anything involved with >> well all I can tell you guys is we spent
a lot of time I think we had 80 odd agenda items couple of dozen site visits couple of dozen meetings >> um stipens may be in in order here at some point but but thank you all too that until you
quantify it in that fashion you really lose track of the amount of time and energy uh that we all put in. One, reviewing every every submitt that's on the agenda, approving it, and then executing the
associated documents after the fact. And hats off to Mason. He's got a pretty full agenda. Plus, he's playing with a dam over there and Biffield, too. So, he's pretty pretty busy. So, what I'd like to do is I will entertain a motion to authorize the chair to sign and
submit the annual town report as written if there's no objection. >> So, moved. >> Okay. Do I have a second? >> Okay. Roll call. All in favor? Mary? >> Yes. >> Woody? >> Yes. >> Nick, I >> Harry?
>> Yes. >> And Bob Connor's vote chair. All right. Any any further comments? Anyone at Mary? Anything you like to add before we break? >> No. Thanks for doing those things. Um, keeping us in the loop. >> No. No. My pleasure. Harry, how about
yourself? >> No, not not right now. I think Mason wanted to say something. >> Yeah. Yeah. No, he he he goes last. I go for the members. There's a pecking order to my madness here. And I know most of you is not going to say anything, so Mason will get the final word. Woody,
any any comments you want to offer before we I move on to Mick? >> Enjoy your turkey and enjoy your sweets. >> Yeah. Thank you, Woody. Mick, how about yourself? Any any comment? >> No, no, I'm good. Again, just uh thank you for putting all those things together. Appreciate it.
>> Okay. No, my pleasure. And Mason, you have the final word before I look for a motion to adjourn. >> Well, yeah, I just want to say thanks first for everyone meeting on a short notice. Uh I know it's not always easy to accommodate. Um, but this was kind of a special situation um where, you know,
the homeowner was trying to move out and it was, you know, an elderly woman. She was in a tough situation. So, like I said, I appreciate everyone being able to meet on short notice. Um, and then I just wanted while we have everyone here, uh, Mike D. Rozo, who's representing the applicant for 16 Low Street, um, said
that they're going to be having everything staked out, so corners of the building and stuff, um, should be staked. I think he's going to refresh the flagging. Um, that'll all be done by the end of this week. Um, so he was looking to see if we'd be interested in doing a sitewalk early next week.
>> Sounds good. They were there today. >> All right. Well, why don't we do this then? That how does t Monday or Tuesday look say at 8:00. And what was the address? 16 low. >> 16 low. Yeah. And I had I had floated that to Mike uh for either Monday or Tuesday at 8 a.m. And he was good to go
for those. So, whatever's good for you guys. >> You know what? Let's just check the weather, too. See what's Yeah, they were there today with their tripods and couple guys. >> All right, so Monday has a 65% chance of
rain. Let's see when it is. Well, long as we're if we go at 8, it's not supposed to start to about 9. If we wanted to do Monday and Oh, sorry. That was no chance of rain on
Tuesday. Okay. What's our pleasure? >> I'm a fan of Monday. >> Okay. So, Monday at 8, Mary, how how does that work for you? >> Yeah, that works for me. >> Okay, Harry. >> Um, that's fine, Bob. >> Okay. What do you have about yourself,
>> Sam? Okay. But yeah, I mean, you know, honestly, as long as a couple of us get eyes on it, I I think that that's going to suffice. And I'll be honest, if if Mason does the sitewalk and feels everything is in the oil, that's that's pretty much good enough for me. So, all
right. Well, why don't we do this? Why don't we schedule that for Monday? >> I can uh I can send out an invite to everyone. >> Okay. >> What's the address on that one again, Mason? >> 16 Low. >> Oh, 16 Low Street. Okay. Yep.
>> What's the date on Monday? >> 24th. >> Okay. So, 11:24 at 8:00 a.m. at 16 Low Street. Yeah, you can send that out and let uh Mike D. Roza know. That'd be great. >> Yep.
>> Okay. Mason, any anything else? >> That's it for me. >> Okay, Mason, thank you. You've you've done a great job. you you've cleaned up some of the gaps we've had from our previous agents and it's a pleasure working with you. All right, I will
entertain a motion to adjourn. >> So moved. >> All right, Mick, you jumped right in there. I had a I had a Woody roll call. >> Want to get out of here. >> I know. And it you know, if Mason didn't have to be
>> I like you guys. I I could I could have beaten Mary's reckon, but All in favor? I think it was it was 24 minutes, wasn't it? >> Yeah, it was under 30 minutes. >> Yeah, >> that's that's a challenge, Bob. I
>> Well, you know what it is? The only way I can do that is we don't have a quorum and I just closed the meeting. That would be the only way. Just blow >> possibly do that. >> Thank you everyone. >> Yep. Have a good night. Have a great weekend. See you Monday. Yep. Every Thanksgiving.