26. Can we have a um pledge of allegiance? Um Kenny, would you like to lead us in the >> pledgece to the flag, the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God,
indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Okay. Can we have a roll call, please? >> Chair Robert Flint. >> Vice Chair M. Michael McDear, >> present. >> Board member Kennet each.
>> Board member Ector Medina, >> present. >> Board member Marlene Monstein, Board member Dana Mcllori Fenolon >> present. >> We have a quorum. >> Okay. And please u mark uh the chairman
Rob Flint as absent. Okay. Um can we have the announcement to the please? >> Thank you Mr. Chair. This is a summary of the rules apply to the two items on today's agenda. These rules apply to
applications on specific parcels of land like zoning map amendments, special exceptions, variances, and conditional use requests. The board will sit like a court, hence the term quasi judicial, reviewing the facts presented at the hearing, applying the adopted rules as explained by staff in the staff report
and verbally. Board members can make site visits, but must disclose the evidence upon which they intend to rely from that visit. Board members will disclose at the beginning of each hearing whether they have had communications with individuals on behalf of the applicant or otherwise, including who the communication was with
and what the topic of the discussion was. All persons intending to speak to the board will be sworn by the clerk. Staff will then make a presentation and the board may ask questions. The applicant will make a presentation including expert witnesses, if any, and the board may ask questions. When the
public hearing is open, the public can make comments on the application limited to three minutes each. Citizen testimony must be factbased, not opinion. The board may ask questions and the applicant's attorney, if any, may ask questions on cross-examination. Members of the public can decline to be
cross-examined. Staff may present additional testimony to supplement or rebut arguments made. The board then deliberates based on the evidence presented. The board's decision must be based on competent substantial evidence, meaning based on the record, staff
presentations, expert presentations, and fact-based comments by citizens according to the standards set forth in the city code. The board may approve, deny, or continue the item. While staff previously read into the record, emailed or mailed comments since these are not
competent substantial evidence. For example, not sworn testimony subject to cross-examination, the board's decision cannot be based on what is contained in the emails or mailed comments, but they can be used to identify issues and help identify sources of information that do contain competent substantial evidence
upon which a decision can be based. So, written comments submitted before the meeting are part of the record and available for review by the board. Lastly, we ask each of you to treat this proceeding with respect and proper decorum. No calling out, interrupting speakers, or disrupting the proceeding.
Please give this proceeding the same dignity and respect as if you were in court. Disruptions are prohibited and enforcable pursuant to the city code. Please also silence your cell phones. Thank you. >> Okay. Do you want to swear everybody in now?
>> Yes. >> Okay. We ask um everyone who's going to speak on the pod podium to please stand. Uh do you swear or affirm that the testimony and evidence you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth,
and nothing but the truth? >> You might be seated. >> Okay. Um we have two minutes to that need to be approved. Um, we have the minutes of November the 19th, 2025.
Uh, if there are no other corrections to the minutes, can I have a motion to approve? >> Um, I do have one correction. Um, board member Dana Magalon's name. Um, just that there's a misspelling. >> Sorry, there's a misspelling to board
member Dana Mag's name. It's just the the Oi needs to be switched. So, it's just a spelling error. >> Okay. So, noted. Uh, do we have a motion to approve? >> So, move.
>> Okay. >> All right. All in favor say I. >> I. >> Okay. We move on to the January 21st, 2026 meeting, unless there's any corrections to the minutes. Do I hear a motion to approve? >> Same correction for the minutes. The the
spelling of of my name, Dana Maglor, Fenolon. >> Okay. Do I have a motion to approve? >> So move. >> Second. >> Okay. All in favor say I. >> I. >> Okay. Um there's no communication. Safy.
>> No, sir. >> Okay. Um we have no continue position uh petitions. Under new petitions, we have SE-1-26, a special exception to permit a private educational facility at 1125 Northeast
125th Street. a special exception use pursuant to article 4 division 2 section 4-202 of chapter 29 of the city of North Miami code of ordinances land development regulations LDRs to to allow a proposed
educational private school use at the property located 1125 Northeast 125th Street within the C3 commercial district said special exception is to be reviewed under the criteria area is set forth in article 3,
division 5, section 3504 of the LDRs. Um, any disclosures? >> None. >> None. Okay. All right. So, staff. >> Good evening. For the record, Safy BMA, planner for the community planning and
development department. As you read chair, this is a special exception to allow preschool at the gardens to be located at 11:25 Northeast 125th Street. This property is currently located in the C3 zoning district. Um, the school
aims to focus on early childhood development as well as school readiness. They will follow typical school hours Monday through Friday and per the applicant, they do tend to have 45 students as well as five teachers and one director of the facility.
So the property itself, it is a commercial building. Some uses that surround it. To the north is a multifamily residential building and to the east, south, and west are office buildings. This is the proposed floor plans. We have seven classrooms, one nursery, an
isolation office, as well as an office and a break room for the staff. And this is the site plan. The the school will be occupying two suites, suites 101 and 103. Um they do have dedicated parking for for the
school itself as well as a pedestrian walkway to aid with pickup and drop off for the students. So when staff did our analysis, we did find that the application met all six of their criterias. Um criteria number one, the use is a listed special exception in
the district where the property is located. Staff says yes. Um number two, there is appropriate provision for access facilities adequate for the estimated traffic from public streets and sidewalks so as to asssure the public safety and to avoid traffic congestion. staff says yes the the
school is located within a multi-tenant commercial building which does have different established ingress and egress and there is also a dedicated um walkway to aid in pickup and drop off. Number three, there are adequate parking
areas and off- streetet truck loading spaces for the anticipated number of occupants, employees, patrons, and the layout of the parking is convenient and conducive to safe operation. Staff says yes, there are um staff says yes, six spaces are required. However, the
applicant has dedicated a total of 12 spaces for the school itself. Number four, there is suitable landscaping or fencing alongside lot and rear lot lines adjacent to residential uses or residential zoning districts. The school itself isn't adjacent isn't
adjacent to the residential lot lines. However, they do have a 6ft high privacy fence that is there to kind of screen the outdoor play the outdoor play area for the children. Number five, the proposed special exception is reasonable in terms of logical, efficient, and economical
extension of public services and facilities such as public water, sewers, police, and fire protection. Fire protection and transportation. staff says yes, the school is a reasonable use for the commercial zoning district.
And lastly, the proposed special exception will constitute an appropriate use in the area and will not substantially injure or detract from the use of the surrounding property or the character of the neighborhood. Staff says yes, an educational use is an appropriate use and it will be located in along a commercial corridor near
different multifamily properties and it will not injure or detract from the neighborhood. >> Okay. So staff recommends approval. >> Yes sir. So staff does recommend approval. Um these are our conditions. We do ask that they comp comply with all
local, federal and state regul regulations as it comes to um Florida Department of Education. We do ask that they have that they get a certificate of use and business tax receipt. And we do ask that the amount of students does not um exceed 50. The reason why we make
this ask is um in our code um per student there is a required amount of outdoor play there is a a required square footage for the classroom size parking. So we just ask that um per their application and what they submitted that they don't exceed 50.
However, if they do decide maybe one day with all the new development that is coming that they would submit um plans to make sure that they that they do have the square footage to accommodate um the excess students that they wish to have. >> Okay.
>> And the applicant is here as well. >> Okay. >> Okay. Can we um uh open the public hearing? Anybody wishing to comment on this proposed project? Okay. All right. Yeah. You want to come
up, Laz? >> Uh, so the proper procedure would be for the applicant to make a presentation at this point. >> Yeah, >> please. Thank you. >> Okay. Can you all right? Great. My name is Dr. Lazro Raman. I'm live, eat, and play in
North Miami. I am not an attorney, nor do I represent in any legal form in terms of an attorney format. Uh, I work for the company and I'm just here because I orchestrate a process that I orchestrated somewhat before. And as part of that process, you know, we bring
bring them out here. Any of the questions in terms of the operation and stuff of that nature, it's one of the reasons why we I show up with the the owners. Okay. And the right now it's proposed for 45 students. Basically, all the all the
information given by the great staff uh is basically what encapsulates the the whole process. I know it's a bit long and it was quite the read in terms of the the letter of intent, but we wanted to make sure and the department was gracious enough to meet with us on a
one-on-one basis to try to get all those uh all make sure that we hit all the requirements that we needed to. >> Okay. Any uh any questions from any questions for somebody? What's the name of the school?
Good evening. My name is Michael Varela. I'm one of the owners. Uh the name of the school is um Preschool at the Gardens. >> Preschool. So what is the u um what is the grade levels that you're going to be? >> Um uh grade levels will be from infant
to five years old. >> Oh, zero to five. >> Zero to five. Correct. >> Okay. Anybody else? >> No. >> Okay. All right. Thank you. >> Thank you. Um Debbie, you want to public hearing is
now open. >> I'm sorry I that didn't explain much about your school, but um hello Deborah Davies, 1165 Northeast 127th Street. My neighbors and I are not opposed to the idea of a preschool in this location,
but the devil is in the details and so we have some concerns and questions and it really wasn't very clear. So, you might have addressed this, but it wasn't clear at all in the presentation. Um, what outside space will be available for outdoor activities or will the children
be kept indoors all day? Where will parents drop off and pick up their children? Northeast 126th Street is already backed up with parents dropping off and picking up their kids at WJ Brian Elementary. So, how is this going to work?
This, especially now that I hear that it's going to be the same hours. The school will also need parking spaces. When we asked about the reduced parking for the Gardens restor, we were told that there would be extra parking on Northeast 126th Street and
also at this building. The garden's residence also was allowed 15% reduction from the normal 1.5 spaces per unit and is now charging residents $75 to park a second car. So many of them instead park
on Northeast 12th Avenue or Northeast 1266th Street as we all expected. Um we would also like to know what will happen if at some point the preschool leaves this location and another school or business wants to move in. Will the
variant you're looking at tonight also cover that or will they need to come back for a different variance at that point? Also, as more of this area is getting built up, we would very much like to see more trees along our streets. Most of the trees were cut down
at the gardens restaurant property. Horrible, including illegally cut down old growth mature trees. Can we stipulate some new shade trees along Northeast 126th Street as a community benefit to accompany this variance? Um,
another point, and I do not know the whole um, you know, I didn't see the whole um, plan, but it's a little concerning having little kids walking through the parking lot. So, I'm wondering how they're going to address that. So, thank you very much. I
appreciate your time. >> Okay. Any other comments? Anyone else? Anyone else? Going once, going twice. Public hearing is now closed. Um, go ahead. >> Well, I'd be interested in hearing some of the reaction.
>> Oh, we were going to I was going to ask them. So, >> sorry. >> I was going to ask them. >> Okay. >> So, um, Debbie made some, um, you know, some good points. Um, what are you going to do for recreation for these kids? It
appears to be no outside recreational space. >> We >> No, we do. >> We We Go ahead. Go ahead. No problem. >> By all means. No. And and and this is, you know, I'm I'm helping them collaboratively here, but they do have the answer. It's actually both on the
plans, Miss Davis. >> We also include Correct. So they're they're uh we do have a 3,000 square foot area that's specifically for the outdoor activities. So it's it is a a
holistic approach. We're not trying to keep the kids inside the the school. It's part of the curriculum for them to have. As a matter of fact, the planning and zoning department, one of the back and forths that we were going with was the fact that it needed to have a minimum amount of space based on what
the Mrs. Buma stated in terms of each kid including that outside part in terms of the go in terms of the more trees that's something that I can discuss and bring up to to my uh customer and also parking
spaces we made sure to have those out on the property. It's something that we will monitor uh there this is not their first uh rodeo in terms of of doing this and you know Mrs. Davis in a personal level, you know that I'm very reactive and these are conversations and
conversations are free and uh I think I may have covered most of the >> you have to be on the record. >> Yeah, Debbie, can you come up please? >> Conversations from the audience. >> And so >> thank you. I'm just wondering
>> ma'am. So the the board would have to decide whether she can have additional time. >> Yes. >> It's just one question. Um so where would the drop off and pickup be? >> Uh drop drop off and pickup will be on
the north side of the uh the building. Um so north of >> right on 126 >> on 126. >> So it would be in the parking lot, >> right? So the uh the the the parking lots will be the first 12 parking lots
will be right where the drop off uh will be on the north side of of the uh that entrance of the the building. There's an entrance on the on the south south on right on 125th. >> That entrance will be not we're not
using that entrance. We're using the north side of the building. >> Okay. And it'll be safe for children who are walking. 100% safe. >> They're not they're not walking. >> They can like really take off, you know? >> Yeah. They're not walking on the parking lot. They they're like really close to the entrance.
>> Okay. >> Yeah. >> Just from experience, it's like >> they really just get away from you. Can I ask one more question? Is this like a Montasauri school or is it any specific type of alilio reano or >> it's a regular? >> Right. It's not a Montasauri. Okay. It's
not a Montasur. >> Thank you very much. China. Thank you everybody for letting me ask another question. >> Excuse me. Would the additional person identify yourself since you've been speaking? >> What's your name for >> last name >> and your >> my last name or dates?
>> Okay. Thank you. >> You're welcome. >> I do also just want to point out for the record that there is we have the site plan up on the screen. So, in that yellow box, that's where the 12 parking
spaces are dedicated. And then right at the on in like the teal teal bluish color, that's the dedicated walkway. And then in the bottom corner, that's where the dedicated play area. I have um visited the property and then it's a play area for the for the students.
Okay. >> Okay. All right. >> Okay. So, we'll now move on to board comments. Kenny. >> No, I think it's a good program. I'll walk by there. I see that it's under construction. I see the school there. I see plenty of trees there. You know, it
looks like Sherwood Forest in a couple of those areas. I mean, uh that's that's good. Something that we need. It's it's good formative education for the young people. You know, I think it's absolutely essential, especially as uh our population increases. We want to get
that education to our little ones, especially as you know, we have families that are working two jobs. Mother and father both work and it's absolutely something that we need, especially in this city. >> All right. Thank you, Kenny. >> Hi. Um I
I'm very pleased with having more preschools in the area. I think that is great. Um, I did have a concern about the traffic, um, being that it is off of the downtown, you know, off of 125th and
where it's going to spill in terms of where the traffic will the ingress and the egress. And so, I guess I want to know more so, not from them, but I guess from planning. Um, what have y'all done or what studies have y'all done in terms
of making sure that there's not too much traffic on that 126? Um, the resident made a really good point. I know that was my question originally and then you said, "Oh, well, you know, you kind of made a comment saying it's adequate, but
now that she kind of explained saying that there's going to be traffic coming from WD Bryant and and so forth, and I know that area as well, there's quite a bit of traffic. What are what are you guys doing or what have y'all done to be
sure that there's not going to be um a lot of traffic?" I know pickup lines are can be really terrible. I know I sit in one every morning. >> So, no no formal traffic study has been done. However, when we access that this
is a preschool, it's not like WJ WJ Brian where they have like it's a normal school where they have pick up at se from 7:00 a.m. and then um well, drop off at at 7:00 a.m. and pick up at 2:30. It's kind of more so like
come as come as you go. So, it's not a normal standard uniform, hey, you have to drop off your kids by 7 a.m. to 8 or hey, you have to come pick up your children by two from 2 to 3 situation. It's kind of like they work out their
schedule with the owners. Hey, you know, we need child care from this time to this time or this time to this time. So, it's not going to be a situation where all 45 students and all 45 cars are all dropping off and picking up their students at the same time. So, we kind
of assessed it based on on that. >> Yeah. You don't have a stacking problem. >> Okay. And the the hours again are from 7:00 a.m. to 6 p.m. >> From 7 to 6 p.m. Okay. You would anticipate that the majority
of folks would be coming after work, coming around 5:30, that kind of thing to pick up their children. So, really wouldn't interact or have any issues with the the elementary school traffic. >> Yes, ma'am. >> Okay. Okay. Thank you.
>> Okay. down here on the far right. >> Nothing. Hector, >> you cover everything already. I'm good. >> Okay. Um, yeah, it's um I think it's a good project. Uh certainly will serve the people who are living in the in the
build in the apartment in the apartment building. So, um I'm sure they'll be glad to have that resource. Now, one last question. You're fully licensed, correct? So this is one of the uh the first proc the first process that we have to go through the the ch uh change of views.
Once we have the change of views and your approval of of course um we have to go through the rest of the process and apply or obviously applying for department of children and family who are the ones that give us the u the license for
>> and that's one of the conditions obviously right? >> Yes. Yes sir. And so during their certificate of use and BTR process, they will have to provide all those licenses to us as well. >> Okay. Very good. Okay. Do I hear a motion to approve the item? >> So move. >> I'll second.
>> All right. I want motion by Kenny and a second. Um, can we have a roll call, please? >> Vice Chair Michael Mcdermade. >> Yes. >> Board member Kennet each. >> Yes.
Board member Ector Medina. >> Yes. >> Board member Marlene Monstein. >> Yes. >> Board member Dynamoria Fenolon. >> Yes. >> The motion has approved unanimously. >> Okay. Thank you all very much. Good luck. >> Good luck.
>> Good luck. >> Thank you. >> Nomi staff. I appreciate your patience with me. Okay, moving on to our second item. Uh, SE-1-26 special exception to permit a private
I'm sorry. >> We'll do it again. >> Do it again. Um, our second item is, uh, V-1-26, a variance to allow a 7 foot 5-in dock to extend outward from the face of the
seaw wall cap at 1875 North Hibiscus Drive. A variance to article five section division 6 section 5-602 B1 of chapter 29 of the city and north Miami code of ordinances land
development regulations LDRs to allow a 7 foot5 in dock to extend outward from the face of the seaw wall cap where 6 feet is required at the property located at 1875 North Hibiscus Drive in the R1 zoning district. said variance is to be
reviewed under the criteria set forth in article 3 division 6 section 3-606 of the LDRs staff. Good evening again safy BNMA planner community planning and development department. So the item we have before
you is a variance for a dock to extend past the required 6 ft to a feet of 7 and 1/2. So, this this property is located in the R1 zoning district. As you could see, it's a single family neighborhood. And
just to the north, we have Little Arch Creek. And then here we can see the current conditions. This is to note that the dock is constructed. So, this is um a sort of after the fact variance. So when making our analysis, staff did
find that the applicant met three out of the six criteria. For criteria number one, special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land structure structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other land structures or buildings in the same
zoning district. For this one, staff says yes. The reason that this variance is before you today is because the dock was constructed based on an approval that was issued in error. So this applicant did go through the proper channels. It did go um for it building
um for it building permits and it was unfortunately approved by zoning and error. Number two, um special I mean number two, the unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. For
this one, staff says no. Number three, that the requested variance maintains the basic intent and purpose of the subject regulations particularly as it affects the stability and appearance of the city. Staff says yes, the requested 1 and 1/2 ft um extension does not affect the stability
or appearance of the city. Number four, the literal interpretations of the provisions of these LDRs would deprive the applicants of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of these LDRs. Staff says no. All waterfront properties are subject to that same
six-foot dock requirement. Number five, the variance requested is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land structure of building. Staff says no. Um the structure can be utilized without this without this variance. I mean they
w they would have to um >> substant >> they would have to come into compliance with the six foot requirement. However, they would be able to use the land, the structure and the building on on the property. And lastly, the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the
general intent and purpose of these LDRs and such variants will not be injurous to the area involved. Staff says yes. Um this has been reviewed and approved by DERM. They have to get that approval first before they even come and submit for their building permits. And it has been approved by other um city
disciplines such as engineering, structural and building. Um and as previously stated, the reason why it is here before you is because there was an error made by previous staff. Um they it was a proven error constructed and it was and it was when the applicant came
back for revisions that's when we were able to catch the error. So, like you guys have heard me say multiple times, in order for us to make a positive recommendation, you do have to meet four out of the six criteria. In this case, unfortunately, they do not meet four out of six. They do meet three
out of six. However, we don't want to recommend denial. We want to leave this approval completely up to you guys. However, we do understand that, you know, this this wasn't approved in error by staff. Um, they do have their um approvals from Miami Day County Derm. They do have other agency approvals.
It's just this one um minuscule error was caught at the end. So, we are here trying to make it right and we do have the applicant here with us today for any questions that you guys may have. >> Okay. Thank you, Stephie. Ma'am, you >> the dock was too big, they said, but we had everybody's approval, so the
contractor went along with the permit and built the job. I have pictures of the job. It's not so offensive. It's beautifully done. Um to have this removed would be extreme cost. It's I can't even begin to say what it it's.
It's crazy. Um, if you look at the neighbor's property along with the owner's property, it's very close. I can pass the pictures around if you'd like to see them. I have several sets. We're asking just to give us this approval since we were already approved and we just moving forward. The owner has paid
for all the fees, requirements, everything that's required. We haven't heard any re rejections from the neighbors. So, we're just here to request that we get this permit finalized so we can close it out and move on. >> Okay. Uh, what is your address, please? >> My address,
>> 4706 Hayes Street in Hollywood, Florida. >> Okay. All right. >> I don't have to give my phone number, right? No. >> Oh, okay. Bet enough you have my house. At >> the beginning, you're supposed to give your name and address. >> Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't know that. Michelle Wilson, 4706 Haze, Hollywood, Florida.
>> That's fine. Okay. Yes, >> I suggest you do pass up the pass. >> I I saw the photographs earlier and >> is it okay if I >> Yes. Yes. Um so besides that I I would like to
advise the board. So the argument here is really a reliance argument and uh I just want to read the principle of Florida case law that deals with reliance so you're aware of it. It's a
three-part test and it it's called equitable estoppel. A doctrine of equitable stoppable may be invoked against a governmental entity where one a property owner in good faith reliance, two upon some act or omission of the
government, three has made such a substantial change in position or has incurred such expensive obligations and expenses that it would be highly inequitable and unjust to destroy the right he or she acquired even if under an erroneous permit. Um,
>> ridiculous. >> So, there's two other things you should know. The doctrine of equitable estoppel may only be applied against a governmental entity under exceptional circumstances. Uh, and it's up to you to decide whether this is such an
exceptional circumstance. Uh and the other is that in some cases, not many, um the deciding authority has decided that equitable establish should not be applied and that the corrective
action should be taken. It's something for you to make a determination in your quasi judicial capacity. If I could add one more thing, just so you know that once the dock was built, we've been through all the inspections by the out, you know, the inspectors that come and
check everything and we've got approved on behalf of all the inspections we've had for this dock and this is the only thing holding us up to close it out. So, it has been inspected by the city inspectors and it's passed. >> Okay. Thank you. Thank you.
>> I'm going to open public hearing. Is there anybody here comment? >> No. Okay. Close public hearing. Um, we'll start down. Marlene, you want to stop on the other end? Any comments? >> No comments. >> No problem.
>> Any? >> No, I'm good. I'm good with >> I have no comment. >> Okay. Um I think it's um what is it called? Equitable um >> estoppel. >> Equitable estoppel. Yeah, I agree with that. Uh I think it would be a
disservice um for us to not grant you this. So, um um >> I make a move that we approve. >> Do we have a motion by Kenny? >> I guess I'll second it.
>> Seconds it. Okay. Um roll call, please. >> Vice Chair Michael Mcderme. >> Yes. >> Board member Kenned. >> Yes. Board member Ector Medina. >> Yes. >> Board member Marlene Monstein.
>> Yes. >> Board member Dana Mcllori Fenolon. >> Yes. >> Motion has passed unanimously. >> Okay. All right. You have >> So we're okay. Everything can remain the same. >> You are you're good to go. >> Thank you so much for your help. I appreciate it.
>> Is that Is that a That's concrete up there. You made it's concrete dark. >> I I couldn't really see. >> It's a box. Is it wood or >> wood? >> It is concrete this one. Yes. I'm sorry. >> Yeah. It's nice job.
>> Yes. It really looks good. >> Thank you. >> Okay. Um, is there any Yeah, that would be a monster. Change that. That's all reinforced business. >> I don't know.
>> Okay. Safy, is there any old business to go? >> No, sir. No old business. >> Okay. And nothing under new business? >> Um, new business. I would just like to welcome our new zoning administrator, Daniel. we will be working hand in hand when it comes to um the board of adjustment and then for any other
>> sorry who >> Daniel yes I would just like to welcome our new zoning administrator we will be working hand inand when it comes to the board of adjustments and any other zoning planning inquiries or whatever concerns you guys may have you guys
could always reach out to the both of us >> okay very good >> okay being >> great it's nice to have someone else to bother Yeah. And thank you, Safy, very much. Okay. Uh being that there is no new business, uh do I have a motion to
adjurnn? >> I'll move. >> Okay. >> I'll move to adjourn. >> Kenny has a second. All in favor say I. >> I.