These proceedings are being recorded. I'm going to ask everyone to please stay muted. These proceedings are being recorded. Therefore, all persons who are speaking should do so one at a time to ensure that all testimony is clearly audible on
the recording device. If English is not your primary language, then please inform me when I call your case. We have a translator who will assist you during the proceeding. When your case is called, the property owner, agent for the property owner, and
any witness that you will have should come forward. Um, when asked, please click the raise hand button um on your screen so you can be acknowledged. If you are not the property owner or an
attorney representing the property owner, then you must present a notorized power of attorney affidavit in order for your testimony to be taken on behalf of the property owner. For new cases, you won't be asked. I apologize, my dog is
making an appearance. If you are for new cases, I will be asked for the record if you are aware of and understand the violation that is being heard today and do you understand what is required to resolve the violation? Please answer accordingly. The city will
present his case first and then the property owner and or violator will be given an opportunity to testify on the behalf to bring forward witnesses to testify and um to present evidence and photographs and to cross-examine the
city's witnesses. Following the case presentation, I will issue a finding of fact the case. If I find that a violation of city codes exists or existed at your property, then depending on the case type, I will set an abatement date for the violation to be
resolved. Or for repeat violations, I will impose a daily fine amount. For new non-re repeat cases, my order would include an abatement date by which you must resolve the violation and a daily fine amount
that I may impose at a future hearing date should the violation not be resolved by the abatement date. If I find sufficient costful enforcement action at this time, I will table this case proceeding to another hearing date
in the future. If you do not agree with my finding or fact and or ruling, then the property owner may appeal the administrative order to the cir on the case to the circuit court. An appeal must be filed within 30 days of the date
of the execution of the administrative order to be appealed. In accordance with Florida statutes, if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the special magistrate with respect to any matter considered at these proceedings, then the person will
need a verbatim record of the proceeding. This record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The cost of obtaining the verbatim record shall be the sole responsibility of the appellant and it
is recommended that persons who plan to appeal their case should provide their own court reporter at these proceedings. Pursuant with city codes, if the city of North Miami prevails in prosecuting a case before the special magistrate, the
city shall be entitled to recover all costs incurred in prosecuting the case. The current cost assessment amount is $100 per case. Once the city records an order that imposes a fine and authorizes a lean against the property, then the
city will charge additional administrative fees to record and release the le. Madame clerk. Thank you. Now, the police officer will give the pledge of allegiance. We ask everyone to turn on their
Sorry about that. Yes, everyone. If if everyone can go ahead and enable their cameras and the microphones. Thank you very much. need to see. We still need you to stay muted. Please mute your device. We just need I
apologies. Go ahead and mute. We just need to enable the cameras, please. Officer, you may proceed. I was just waiting. Special magistrate. Good morning. Good morning. Good morning, everyone. Okay. Uh, I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United
States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Now, everyone needs to so the officer could administer the oath. Yes. To the officers, please. Inspectors, please, if
you can all enable your cameras. Um, Inspector Kasmmer, I I can't see your camera. Thank you. All right, you may proceed, officer. Thank you. If you are giving testimony today on a case, please rise and raise
your right hand as I issue the oath. Do you swear affirm that the testimony you're about to give in these proceedings will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? If so, say aloud, I do. I do. I do. Thank you. Now, we're going to proceed with the
translators. Can you guys please mute your Thank you so much. Translators see more. There you are. Thank you very much. Uh Mr. Aruna, can you please I can't hear you. You're You're muted. Let me see.
We can't hear you. Mr. Auna, can you hear me? Now we can hear you. Thank you. All right, officer. You may proceed. Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the translations which you are about to give in these proceedings will be accurate and correct to the best of your
knowledge, skill, and ability? Please say I do. I do. Thank you. Thank you. All right, Mr. Cadet, you said yes, right? I'm sorry, I didn't see. Okay.
All right, Madame Clerk, are there any additions, deletions, or corrections to the hearing agenda? Uh, yes. So, um, do you want me to give you the, um, amendments first, or would you like me to read first, um, my
script? Um, no, go ahead. You can read your script and then we can do the, um, amendments. Perfect. Thank you. Good morning and thank you for participating in today's special magistrate hearing. I will review the process by which today's hearing will be conducted. Make sure
your device is always muted unless you are giving testimony on a case. If you're using two devices to participate in today's hearing, be sure your audio is only enabled on one device. When your case is called, if you're signed into Zoom, you will receive a notification
giving you access to audio and video so that you may give your testimony. If you are physically at the city hall in which to give testimony, you must sign in with a code clerk and await a text message indicating your case is ready to be heard. Upon receiving that message, you
should immediately come to the code compliance office to be provided with access to a computer. If you would like to speak on behalf of a case once the case is called, you should click the raise hand button to be acknowledged. Before giving testimony on your case,
please state your name, property address, and relationship to the property. If you wish to have an interpreter assist during your case, please indicate this when your case is called. Your magistrate, that concludes the instructions. So, the abatement
dates, let me know when you're ready. Um, sorry, I I couldn't hear you. Oh, cuz I was muted. I am. I am. Thank you. So, um 30 days is August 18th.
Uh 60 days is September 15th. 90 days is October 17th. And the one amendment that we have for today's agenda is uh case 15 has been closed. 15 is case number 15. Yes, ma'am. All
right. Great. All right. If you're ready, you can call your first case. Yeah, let me promote. Mr. Diaz, I have promoted you to be a panelist. If you can please access and up accept it.
Mr. Yes, can you hear me? Okay. Um, Mr. Diaz, pass his case. Let's call the next one. Next one. Uh, it's going to be Oh, wait. He's rejoining. Let's see. Here we go.
He's there. My apologies. I stepped away from Good morning, Mr. Diaz. Good morning, everyone. My apologies, Madam Magister. Good morning. Morning. Please. Uh, this his case is number six. All right. Read
it into the record. C E RB uh sir Baris SF SFR Holdings LP C E F A W202500105. Uh Mr. Das, if you can please rate uh raise your right hand. Do you solemnly swear or affirm the
testimony you're about to give in this proceeding shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? So help you God. Please say I do. I do. Thank you. The inspector for this case is Miss China Sanders. Good morning, Mr. Diaz. Can you please um state your full
name for the record in relationship to the property? Good morning. Kevin Diaz, council for Cberus SFR Holdings LP. Okay. Normally, we don't swear in the attorneys. Oh, understood. My apologies.
I promise to tell the truth anyway. Miss Sanders, Shannon Sanders, City of North Miami. We can see you, Miss Sanders. May I provide the magistrate with some background while we wait? Sure.
My request for for you ma'am would be to if we can extend this or continue it until next month. The reason being is I was just looped in this matter yesterday and luckily I had a hearing in Port St. Lucy that's settled so I was able to appear this morning.
My clients are a single family reat. So all these are occupied by tenants. Um or if they're not occupied, they're vacant because they're in transition of a tenant. We were just made aware of this concerning the fence issue. From my side, we need to figure out a what's the
extent of the issue and b is a permit required in order to cure it. If we can continue this for one more month, we're going to have a pretty good idea of how much time this is going to take us and what the extent of the damage is. Okay, Miss Sanders, I'm sorry. I'm having a problem coming
up with my video. It's telling me that I'm unable to log on. How old is this case? That case is from 2025. It was um Let's see. Yes. St. Yeah. Mar March 3rd, 2025.
All right. It's relatively new. Um, okay. So, you want a reset to August 18th? Council, let me confirm. You're saying August 18th. That that would be yes. Very helpful.
All right, let's reset 30 days. Is that all for you today? Yes, ma'am. All right, so thank you. Have a great day. Thank you, everyone. All right. Happy 4th of July. Same. Then case is going to be case number 16.
Time is uh golden. If you can please accept my invitation to promote you as a panelist. Good morning. Mornings. Case number 16,
Royal Palma Oper LLC in Mesh Vio 202300889. was found guilty by magistr um with an abatement date of June 20, 2024 finds save of $350 plus $100 cost assessment. Miss Golden, if you can
please raise your hand, your right hand. Do you so long swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give in this proceeding shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? So help you God, please say I do. I do. Thank you. And the officer for this uh
case is Mr. Jamie George. Good morning, Miss Golding. Good morning, Madame Magistrate. Long time no see. Good morning. Um, I'm Inspector Jamie for the city of New Miami. I'm inheriting this case from a previous
officer. This was um an annual housing inspection that was done for the the property. The um the violation was open May I'm sorry March 24 of 2023.
I posted the notice to appear. Give me one second. I posted the notice to appear on May 31st, 2025th. The notice to appear was mailed out as well. The final reinspection date was June 18th. I I did
speak with um Rahima yesterday. She went by to the building department yesterday um for the permit. There is a permit that is pinned for the door,
but um she stated that she went yesterday and and they couldn't locate the the permit uh like I guess the papers or whatever they did. um the building department. So
um I mean there's the the permit is still pending on in the system, but it's not issued as of today. Still not issued. All right. U Miss Golding. Good morning. Um Rahima Golding. I
I work as the compliance um and permit specialist for um for Royal Palma Apartments LLC. Um the permit was was submitted uh back in 2024,
I believe. Um we had some issues with locating the correct um product approval. We did finally get that and submitted it and to be honest, it just it kind of got
overlooked. Um, not kind of, it did get overlooked by myself. Um, and I did go to the building department yesterday, but I had been there um, a couple of weeks prior to try to push the the permit through. Yesterday morning when I
went in, they were unable to locate the file. I did call back um to speak with one of the permit clerks and he told me he had not located it yet, but that he would locate it and make the adjustments in the system before he left um
yesterday. I did not get an opportunity to follow up and see if it had been done, but that is where we are at this time. But it is I'm sorry. the um the only thing that was pending was an updated product approval.
So that has been provided. Okay. Um is that about right? Um Inspector George. Yes, ma'am. Okay. And um what are you seeking?
Um all I need is 30 days. Um, this is a really easy item and it should not take as long as it has. Yeah, the work is already done. We just needed to app get the door approved. So, um, I can make
sure that gets done before the 30 days. All right. Any objection, Mr. um, Inspector War? No, I honestly it's the I I would say it was it's not her fault that the building
department can't locate the file. So, she you know, she's doing her part to to get this uh violation in compliance. Understood. All right, let's reset 30 days. Thank you. All right, good luck to your
great senior year. Likewise. Bye-bye, everybody. Bye. Wait. Um, sorry about that. Aqua condo. Yes. Hi, this is Adriana. I'm present. Good morning. Okay. So, that's going to
be um three cases. Cases number three, four, and five. Would you like me to read them all once or you would you like me to go one by one magistrate? Uh, no. You can do them all. Give me one second. The question is for magistr. Thank you.
Right. Let me You're blocking my entire page so I can't access my Oh, my bad. If you scroll up, just scroll up so that I can see if um related. Of course. I see.
Would you like me to stop sharing and then go back up? I can do it. No, it's okay. Let's do them one by one. One by one. Yes. Okay. Um, Aqua Strata Condo Association case
number uh number three C EXC 2023 000034 found guilty by magistrate Smith must obey by May 16, 2025th. point set at 350 plus $100 cost assessment. Um the
officer for this case is Miss Sanders. Uh ma'am, I'm sorry. I'm not sure what's your name for Aquast. Adriana Moya and a board of directors. Adriana Moya, if you could please uh write your hand your right, sorry, raise your right hand. Do you solemnly swear
or affirm that the testimony you're about to give in this proceedings shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? So help you God. Please say I do. I do. And the inspector for this case is Miss Sanders. Miss Sanders, we can see you
now. Thank you. Thank you for your patience. I apologize. Of course. Hi, inspector. Hello. Hello. Hello. Shana Sanders, um, Neighborhood Services Department inspector. As already stated, this is a old case for 117,
I'm sorry, 1777 Venice Lane. Um, as of the reinspection date, compliance has not been met. Uh, I just want to confirm this is the one ending in 34 and uh, this is for,
uh, mildew removal and washing touch-up paint of the building. Is that correct? That's correct. That's correct. Okay. Um and I as I understand we're not changing the color of the building as such that we do not need permit for this. Is that correct?
That is correct. Okay. Uh so we have hired the contractor. They have already pressure washed the building and they've put the primer on the wall. So they're working their way around the building. So it's in work. It hasn't completed yet, but it's in work. So, if you could
all allow us for a extension of time to finalize this, I'd be happy to either have you come back out or send you photos as soon as they're done. They should be done in about a week. Any objections from the city? Magistrate, if I can, I um I would
object to giving more time. I apologize, but this is a case that's been open since um April of 2023. Um whereas no contact has been made with me um aside for maybe the past month or two
regarding this matter. Um the case has already been heard last month for which the the property owners and or no one from the association showed up. So I I would like to go ahead and push this forward. Uh if I may, magistrate, uh one of the
issues that we had and the inspector was very kind to assist us with is that the uh correspondence and information that was being mailed out was going to an incorrect address. So we were not aware of these notices until about two months
ago we started uh receiving them in person. Um and then after that they came in the mail as well to the updated address that the inspector updated. So, if if you could please help us out to give us on this one a 30-day extension, we would really appreciate it. And I
know the inspector uh has been uh forthright and very patient with us, but we're a little community. We, you know, uh the insurance uh expenses of the building really took a toll on us. Um so, anything you guys can do to help us
out is really appreciated. and magistrate. I I have um Miss Shanny Gracie from the building department. She would like to say something as well. And that's what I was about to chime in to say. I see that I've been um um educated on with it being a commercial property
regardless if it's white that the permit is needed again because it's a commercial building. Please, that that is not a problem. we can pull a permit if you guys want us to pull a permit. If you'll allow us a 30-day extension to pull a permit and complete this work, uh that would be
mostly appreciated, especially now that we are on a holiday week as well. So, she raised the issue of notice. Did we have an issue with um giving them notice case? There was an issue of notice and the magistrate brought um some of these
um things up last week. It was not so much an issue. It's more so that the property that we were sending it to when we looked into Sunbiz, it was showing and it's still showing is that the business is dissolved um for whatever reason. And um he even stated that he
wanted to make sure and they'll probably even have a problem with obtaining a permit because it doesn't show as um the the registered agent that they had listed um on the on Sunbiz is um I guess they didn't changed over something but
again it's still showing that it's been dissolved. I've just been in contact with the the director which again it doesn't even show it's a director in Sunbez but we've been mailing it to both them as well as the property in addition
to posting the property. The uh association has been in place since 2006 2007. Um it is still in standing and um we had actually sent in proof
uh that the Sun misinformation was uh correct uh back in 2023. So, I apologize, but I'm not sure um my confusion here. So, if we if you could be so kind to allow us a little more time to get this matter resolved, that
would be most helpful. All right. So, in other words, you have been on notice since 2023. No, we did not receive any notice or we were not aware of anything since two months ago approximately when I first spoke to Shana and she called me on the phone and notices appeared at the
property. Uh and then uh I sent her an email showing her that the 2023 registration on Sunbiss showed the correct address, but the notices were never received nor by the board nor by the property manager PMI.
All right. So, if we if you would allow us some time to finalize the issues that we have, uh, that would be most helpful. All right. Um based on the testimony of the um officer, if I believe um that
they were only put on notice in the past few months, then I will give him my 30 days extension. That will be your final um continuence in this case. So I will give you the 30 days.
Um but if this matter comes back unresolved um then I'm going to um abate the monthly amount I mean the daily fine amount. Do you understand? Yeah. Let me ask you a question. The 30-day extension does that mean as soon as we have the
permit through the clock stops or are you asking me to complete the work and close the permit in the 30 days? Um well the building inspector has indicated that you do need to pull a permit in terms of the paint. Um
so if the permit is with the city um and you know the city has not um approved it then I will take that into consideration. But if there's no permit pending um or you submit it late, today
is um July 2nd, your next hearing is August 18th. If you bring it to the city on August 1st, then we have an issue. And I just want to make sure for clarification um because again, we have been speaking quite often about this
violation. So I I I think I'm understanding um Adriana's question has to be and I don't want this to happen as though she obtains the permit and I think we all know that when you obtain a permit they give you six months um to close it out to get the inspections done
to get you know finalized. I don't want them to let's say obtain the permit hypothetically August 1st and now they think that they're going to have an additional six months to um do this. So again, I just want to make sure on the record that we're still understanding that the 30 days um that you know I'm
kind of okay with if that's what we're deciding, but in 30 days since you're already saying you started the work, it's already been pressure cleaned um that it is to be permit obtained, property cleaned, pressure cleaned, painted, and in good standing on those
um at the reinspection. Not that you're granted an additional in this case. I don't have a problem with that. You're breaking up. Is anyone else hearing? Thank you. I can't hear her.
She's breaking up. Adriana, we can barely hear you. I I I can hear you. Can you You were breaking up. What were you saying? Yes. What did you say? Can you repeat? I want Yes. I wanted to thank the inspector and
I understand that we need to complete the uh pressure washing painting and have the permit open and hopefully close by then before the August 18th hearing date. Understand? Thank you. All right. Paul, the next case,
case number four, Apostra condo association. Case number CF O B 202300449. Found guilty by magistrate Smith. must abate by May 16, 2025. Find set at $350
plus $100 cost assessment. The officer for this case is Miss Tannis Ambers. Which case are we hearing? I apologize. Number four. Case number four. That's the GMP or the FOB. S um C F O. FOB.
Okay. Shannon Sanders, City of North Miami neighborhood service inspector. This is a um Oh, okay. Reports of previous compliance. This case has already been found guilty um with an abatement date of
we have May. Oh, yeah. May 16, 2025 upon my reinspection date. Um compliance has not been met. The business tax receipt has still not been obtained. It's Adriana. Just to bring you up to speed on this, I have spoken to the city
fire department. We're waiting for them to do their inspection. Um, I tried to ask them if they would expedite and they said they wouldn't. So, as soon as I get that, uh, I can, uh, submit the permit. Unless I can submit the permit without having the backup documentation just to
open the case uh and then follow up with the city of uh fire department and the durm information afterwards cuz that's what's taking me the longest. You guys have been without for two years without what? I'm sorry.
You have been operating. This is for the um this is the business tax receipt or for um business tax receipt. This one is for the business tax and magistrate. It's been longer than that. Um before I did before these violations was open. Um
I was the officer for the east side um of the um east side portion of the city. And I had gave courtesy notices. I did a minimum housing um inspection. It was trouble getting in and out of the gate of this property because it's a gated, you know, small apartment building, but
it is prior to the two years, but we'll focus on the two since that's when they were originally put on notice with the notices of violation, but it was about a year prior to this that they've been out um of um without having a business tax
receipt or certificate of use. All right. You wanted to say something. Was your hands raised? No, I I just wanted to say I appreciate the inspector's comments. Uh she's been forthcoming on uh the business tax. Uh she tried to assist us to get this
expedited. But my question again, I guess, is uh can we just submit the fee and the permit and then the back documentation to follow up or do we have to have everything together? Because the application says you have to have everything uh from the other two uh
entities when you submit the permit. When you're saying the permit, are you meaning the application for the certificate of use? Correct. Um, and if I can I I do believe and I'm really not sure. I do do believe we have the development services department on.
Could could someone answer that question even though we have the business tax receipt here? they have an additional certificate of use case and I don't think they can move forward with um doing anything with the business tax receipt before obtaining the certificate of use. Correct. It's kind of like a
chain effect is how I understood it when I read it. But pay perhaps there's a different way to do it so that we could right away file our application, pay the fee, and then meanwhile we're getting the backup documentation to complete the process. Okay. Who do you present?
Hi, this is Raphael. I oversee licensing over at the development services department, Raphael Pedron. And that is correct. So, part of the initial CU application process is a review for um code enforcement um fines, leans, and
open permits. So, she would not be able not she I'm sorry, Aqua Aqua condo association would not be able to move forward until that is finalized. All right. Okay. In that case, since we have given them 30 days, um let's also
reset this one for 30 days so that the cases can run together. Raphael, since I on the phone, could I ask you a quick question? Yes, of course. Go ahead. Okay. Uh so, uh I at the city fire
department, I can get that information from them pretty simply. What is it that you need from us for the derm? Because I saw there that this a derm. Is it a letter from them or what is it that you need from them? Wait, can we pause for a moment, Raphael? I apologize. Um, you know, I'm not sure how many cases we
have on there. And again, we've been talking about this. Can Can we have that conversation cuz um off of off of this recording um so that you know she can get that because that case is for September for the certificate of use. So, we can give you all the information
that you need. um for for all of your cases um outside of this hearing. No problem. I really appreciate it, Inspector. Thank you. I will contact my address is doing is doing my job. Thank I apologize. I'm not trying to step on
nobody toes. But no, we've been talking about this for the past month or two. So, she's aware of what's been going on. We've Raphael, we've talked about it. That's why I wanted to bring them in. Um but we'll make sure she gets this information um before the day is out. if not on Monday when I return to work.
Thank you, Shannon. I appreciate it, Inspector. All right, next one. Case number five. Fakos condo association CEGMP 202300157 found guilty by magistrate
by May 16th, 2025. Fine said at $500 of 100 cost assessment. The officer for this case is Miss Jana Sanders. Um, Shannana Sanders, City of North Miami neighborhood service inspector. I'm gonna ask for a small favor. I um Cindy,
while I'm giving an update on this, can you pull up the sunbiz? Um, go through all of my photos and can we pull up the sunbiz for this, but Shannon Sanders, neighborhood service inspector, um, city of Stop right there. City of North Miami, um, for I'm sorry, um,
neighborhood services department. This is a old case that was already presented by magistrate um Smith. It was already adjudicated as of my last inspection um of the property for the repairs and or
replacement of the pool. Um violation has not been u compliance has not been met. The violation still stands. I don't see any permit applications on file. So I would like to move this case forward as well. I would like to request again on this
one a 30-day extension. I have uh the contractor uh Snap Industries that does uh concrete repairs uh is uh been hired to uh uh help us get through the permitting so I can have this uh permitting to you guys within the 30
days to be in compliance with this. Already spoken to them. Is there something that you wanted to say about the um the Sunday? No, I was just I was just trying to look at something. I you know I my computer's moving slow so I couldn't put up but no
I just was looking. Okay. All right. So this two have been ongoing for the past two years regarding the the pool. Um well uh yeah again though the notice uh we did not get the notice till a couple months ago on this matter as well just
like the other ones. So if possible, if you could allow us the 30 days to get in compliance with this, it would be much appreciated. And mag this is for this has been ongoing for I'm assuming this is closed. Um it's secured, correct?
That no tenants, no one can get around um the pool area. Is that No, that is not correct. Um they can fully access it just as I did to take these pictures. You can just open the self-closing gate and walk onto the pool area. And this
one because, you know, and I'll let building chime in if they need to. This is, you know, I would consider this, you know, life safety. This isn't safe and looks good in any kind of condition. Um, at the same time, we're now up on hurricane season. Those bricks and stuff
are very, very loose. They can become projectiles. So, with this one, I this is more so submitting an application. um which hasn't even been done. I I would like to possibly, you know, get this one um with a fine running to maybe get this
moving a little bit faster um with with getting this taken care of. I I believe this area should be secured and and so that no one can access it. You are That's not a problem. We can secure and lock the gates so nobody can
get in there while we close the permit and uh have the papavers uh put back in place. with the contractor. Inspector um Sanders, you said there was somebody else that needed to testify.
Good morning. Good morning. Officer Co. building officer Coulson speak. The area in question needs to be secured off. We were over there for something something else the other day, but we knew it was on the court docket. All those bricks need to be removed that's loose because
we are in storm season, gathered up, stored somewhere. The pool water needs to either be drained or clear because it breaks mosquitoes and no and we just like officer Sanders said, we walk straight through the gate. So this the whole pool area needs to be locked in and and locked from both sides where
nobody can enter the gate. They did have a pending permit from 27 from 2024, but there has been no action on it at this time for the pool area. So they're still waiting some more inspections, some more dockets to be turned in, but they have a
pending permit. So to us, a pending permit is like having no permit because there's been no action taken on it as this time. So it's been done some denials, some approvals. So they need to to come back and see what's going on with that permit and and they can move forward from there. But this case has
been open for a while. Yeah. Just see if I can comment on the permit. Unfortunately, our uh engineer coming in and out to Okay, you're coming to say the the pending permit was
because the drawings were uh several changes were requested to be done on the drawings and we've been going back and forth on this and the engineer is very busy, so it's not easy to uh get things turned around. So, my apologies for that. uh if we could agree to a small
one-time uh fine to uh to uh process uh we would be agreeable to that and also an extension of time if you be so kind and we will lock up the gates and put the papers away. Okay. One thing we use I'm sorry your honor you're using the same engineer
that the last denial was uh 41624. We we're a year later. So, that's what Officer Sanders is saying. We're over a year later and we still haven't got an update to those same plans that were denied. Then, when are we saying that you're going to have the plans updated
into the building department? I can help with that. I can help with that. Yep. I um basically I've been trying to work with you guys, but this one here is
unacceptable because of the um hazard that it pauses for your um tenants or not tenants the um your residents. So for this item item number five
um I do find that the violations still exist. I am going to ratify the daily fine amount. Um, let me access mine because you took yours down. Hold on.
What was the fine amount again? Uh, um, 500 500 May 16th, 2025th. All right. So, I will ratify the daily fine of uh daily fine amount retroactive to May
May 16, 2025. Um I'm going to give you 60 days um to get this thing resolved. So, because I do want I want you back here in well the case will be back in 30 days. So, in
30 days you can report where you are. But I have ratified the daily fine amount because this has been ongoing and if the um if your engineer has was aware over a year ago that um you know they
needed to make the changes the necessary changes to the plan that they have done nothing. um this is unacceptable and no one thought to secure the area um so that um kids at least don't have access to it, don't have access to the pool.
That's an issue. Um and not a problem. We will comply with that. Uh not a problem. We will comply with that in the next 48 hours. We'll have that secure. All right. Is there anything else for um for Acra? No, that will be the last things for
today. All right. Thank you, ma'am. Have a great day. Thank you everybody. Appreciate it. Um so that um does all the attendees that we have for today. Um if we could go ahead and release the translators for today's hearing.
Absolutely. Thank you. Thank you guys. You're free to go. Okay. we may proceed. Thank you. So, um we are going to start our agenda with case number one. Sorry about that.
Case number one, 1490 North123 LLC. Case number is PDF FAO2023000050. Found guilty by Magister Cassil. Must have by April 18th, 2025. Fine set at
150 + 100 cost assessment. The officer for this case is Miss Shana Sanders. Jana Sanders, neighborhood service inspector. Um, this is a case that's already been adjudicated. Um, as of my last reinspection, the violation still
remains. The, um, outstanding balance to Crywolf still remains unpaid. I am showing that I gave proper notice. The notice was mailed out, certified, and sent to the property owner as well as posted at the property
um both at the main office of the condo and on the front door of the unit um 111. All right. Based on the unreuted testimony of the code enforcement officer, I find that the violation still exists. Also find
good notice given proper notice. Owners have failed to appear. Um I hereby ratify um the $150 retroactive to April 18th, 2025.
Madam clerk, sorry about that. I was muted. My apologies. Case number two, 1525 Northeast 125 Street, Prestige Point. Case number MHVIO2023 01106.
The um inspector for this case is Mr. Jamie George. We heard that one. That one was Raha's case. That we heard that case already, I believe. Did we not? No ma'am on. Okay. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Did this officer in my ear
talking? I'm throwing off a little bit. I apologize. Y'all are honey. Good morning. Um, this is this uh violation was opened by the by a previous inspector. This was another annual housing inspection that was that
was conducted um this case was originally opened I'm sorry um back in 2023 on July 5th. The case was originally set to come to a
hearing back in August of last year, but that's when the hack occurred. So, I guess it's been postponed till now. The I posted notice to appear May 31st. The uh notice to appear was mailed out.
Final inspection June 18th. As of as a final reinspection, I I checked the uh the hallway lights, the emergency lights, and they still don't work. Based on the unreuted testimony of the code enforcement officer, the evidence
presented, I find that the violation does exist. Also find good notice. Given proper notice, owners have failed to appear. by fine in favor of the for city enter adjudication. Owners have 30 days by which to resolve the violation. If the violation is not resolved by the abatement date, there will be a daily
fine amount of $150. Okay. Um next next case is going to be case number seven ELA LLC CGM P205
000041 Magistrue this case um the inspector for this case is Mr. Gabriel Morales. Unfortunately Mr. Giver Morales had an emergency and he could not attend to today's magistrate, but we have um
Inspector Ferguson to go ahead and present uh his case on his behalf. Okay. Yes. Good morning, Madame Magistrate. My name is Michael Ferguson from NSD from the city of North Miami.
And um this case was uh was issued the violation was issued since January 28, 2025. And upon reins inspection there was no compliance met. Uh everything was sent there was no compliance. There was no
compliance met at all since uh since 6 months ago. Sorry. Tell me again about notice. Um the notice of violation was sent uh since um
this the 5th of of of of of June for this for this case and there was no compl compliance afterwards until today. Notice up here was mailed um they
certify mail in June 5th 2025. Yes. Okay. Um, let me see the damages. All right. What am I looking at? What am I missing? Um, the So, it's the ceiling damage.
Would you like me to zoom it in? Yes, of course. Okay. All right. I see. I was looking at the windows. I'm sorry. Oh, no worries. stealing the Okay. Yeah, the ceiling is uh is damaged.
What What's What am I What's on the windows or doors? What's the white stuff? Is that paint? It looks like paint to me. Yeah, it was supposed to be painted. This is This property is occupied. No, it's not occupied.
Okay. So, it's and that's when it was open. That photo is when it was opened. All right. Got it. Okay. Um, based on the unrebuted testimony of the code enforcement officer, I see that the violation does
exist. Also, find good notice given proper notice. Owners have failed to repair by fine in favor of the city enter an adjudication. Owners have 30 days by which to resolve the violation. If the violation is not resolved by the abatement date, there will be a daily
fine amount of $350. Case number eight, Elila LLC cpp 202500006. Um once again the officer for this case is Mr. Gabriel Morales but to present that case we have Mr. um Michael
Ferguson. Yes. Good morning again madame magistrate. My name is Michael Ferguson from NSD from the city of North Miami. uh the same thing is the is for the same property basically and the uh violation was issued on January 28th and uh
everything was m at the same time from uh 6th 2020 20 25th the violation was m and there still no compliances for as final inspection was 614 there's still no compliances for this uh for this property
what what is the what's the complaint Uh the list of complaint is the parking lot is deteriorating. They need to be uh it need it need to be resurfaced and uh the pave uh they need to the pavement itself uh the resurface the pave and the
stripe of the parking lot need to be done and they need to obtain a permit from the city of North Miami for that. If you if you look at the pictures the parking lot is not done. That's it right here. Okay.
Yeah. Okay. All right. Based on the unreuted testimony of the code enforcement officer and the evidence presented, I find that the violation does exist. Also find good notice. Given proper notice, the owners have failed to appear hereby
find in favor of the city entering adjudication. Owners have 30 days by which to resolve the violation. If the violation is not resolved by the abatement date, there will be a daily fine amount of $350. Thank you, Madame Magistrate.
Thank you. Next case is um case number nine, Ferrer LLC, CR E 2023 000030. found guilty by magistrate caso must
obey by June 16th, 2025. Fine set at $200 plus 100 of cost assessment. This case is also for Mr. Gber Morales. The officer to present this case is Mr. Inspector Stevenson Dorval.
Mr. Dorval. Good morning, Madam Mag. This is Inspector Dorval. Um this case is basically was um the original citation was written on the the on the 20 on the on 722 2023 and initial
notice went out on the 27th of July of 2023. Uh requested board hearing was on the 9th of August of 2023 and uh this case did finally go to magistrate before the board on the 5th on the um 8th of May of
2025. which the um resident was found guilty. And um basically what took place here was the um the trees was removed off was cut off was was cut down on the property without a permit. And even um getting a
permit after the fact is basically can change the fact that the trees was basically cut down. So uh the the resident was found guilty. Okay. Let me understand. So they did pull a permit.
No, as of today, they have not. As of today, they never pulled the permit, but they was told that it was advised that they could they should have pulled the after the fact permit. Okay. And they still haven't done anything since 2023? No.
Okay. Um, who would remember this? Is Miss Sanders still there? I thought you guys used to have a one-time fine for for cutting trees. No, I I am still here. What was the question? Wasn't there a
time when there was a a a one-time fine for for removing um trees or Yes, in cases that are irreversible and or irreplaceable, they are um giving sometimes a one-time fine. things like
short-term rentals, tree cutting. Um, yes, to answer your question. Okay. So, I'm trying to understand why this one is a running fine, but anyways. Okay. So, based on the unreed testimony of the code enforcement officer, um, I
apologize. When was this when was notice given for today's hearing? Today's um the today's hearing notice was given on the June 5th of June 2025 of 2025 correct okay all right based on the unreedited
testimony of the code enforcement officer and the evidence presented I find that the violations still exist I also find good notice given proper notice orders have failed to repeat um I hereby find in favor of the city the daily fine amount of
what was 200 200 plus 100 um cost assessment. Okay. The daily fine amount of $200 is hereby ratified um retro active to June 16, 2025.
Thank you, Mr. Dval. Case number 10, Green Witch Association, Inc. CF OB 202300482. The officer for this inspector is Miss Shana Sanders from Greenwich. Shana Sanders,
neighborhood service inspector. This is a new case, a new case for um Greenwich Park 1130 Northeast 19th Drive. This is a case for
window screens that need to be installed and replaced. um on the existing windows. The property was initially inspected June 7, 2024, whereas a notice of violation was mailed out to the um
was mailed out to I'm sorry, 2023. Oh, wow. Um, my correction, this violation was originally cited on January 18, 2023 by then Inspector Tamara Patit, um, who's no longer with the city. So, it was passed on to me to follow up and
reinspect. I showed that we went back out on June 7th of 2024, reinspected the property. At that time, the violation still remained, so we moved it forward to be presented to the magistrate. I um
I posted the property for the notice to appear June 1st of 2025 for this hearing. Um, I am showing proper service was given. Certified mailing was mailed out
to the property by staff on June 1st and I posted the property on June 3rd. Um, again, as of my reinspection on June 17th, the violation
still remained. The window screen still remained in need of replacing. I'm sorry. Um, Miss Sanders, this this case is for the BTR. Oh my god, I'm so sorry. You Why you ain't stopping me with this? Oh my god. Which one is this? Where
number? Oh my god. You see, I was thrown a little bit when I said 2023. I apologize. So, scratch all of that. This is for the BTR. Yeah, this is what happens when you're trying to do dual task. I'm trying to upload photos for TCM and this that. I apologize. My apologies. 1470 Northeast 123rd Street,
quote off the Sanders, City of North Miami for the business tax receipt. This is also a new case that was originally cited June um um May 11, 2023. Whereas doing a um
annual housing inspection, it was observed that the business tax receipt had not been obtained. We mailed out certified mailing um tried to make contact with the property owner. I myself was the officer at that of this at that time. I did no they got no followup. I did have a conversation with
them maybe about a month or two ago. They said they were under new management and asked for more time. As of my last reinspection, the business tax receipt has not been obtained. Um and they were still working on it. I am showing proper
service was given. Um administrative staff did the mailed out the notice to appear. I posted the property myself um on um um sorry June 1st 2025.
Um and again as of my last reinspection the business tax receipt has not been obtained. Okay. Um based on the unreuted testimony of the code enforcement officer, um I I find that the violation does
exist. Also find good notice. Given proper notice, owners have failed to appear. Um this has been ongoing for two years now. Right. Yes. Since May 11, 2023. All right. Um I find in favor of the
city intern adjudication owners have 30 days by which to resolve the violation. If the violation is not resolved by the abatement date, there will be a daily fine amount of $250. Sorry, madam, you said 250.
250, correct? Thank you. And just so you know, since since you're new working with me, all cases that I rule on, um the the um cost assessment is automatic. Yeah.
Yeah. Thank you for that. Uh next case is case number 11, Green Witch Association, Inc. CE ZCU 202300807. Um the inspector for this um case is Miss Shannana Sanders as well.
This is for the certificate abuse Shannana Sanders, neighborhood service inspector. This is the companion case for the case that we just heard regarding the business tax receipt. This is a new case um being presented to you for the first time. Um it was originally
cited May 11, 2023 while doing an annual house inspection. One of the violations that was observed was that they did not have a certificate of use. They were put on notice and cited at that time as of my last reinspection. Um violation has
not been uh met. I did speak to um a staff from Greenwich um maybe about three months ago. They said they were under new management. They asked can I give them more time for which I did. But again as of my last reinspection um still no applications have been
submitted to the city. I am showing proper service was giving. administrative staff mailed out the notice to appear. Um as well as I myself
handposted um the notice um for this property on the door of um of the the building or the condo the management office um was was posted on June 1st of 2023.
I'm sorry. 2025. I was about to say we're going back to now. All right. Based on the unreed testimony of the code enforcement officer, I find that the violation does exist. Also find good notice given proper notice. Owners
have failed to appear hereby find in favor of the city and turn adjudication. Owners have 30 days by which to resolve the violation. If the violation is not resolved by the abatement date, there will be a daily fine amount of $250. Thank you, magistrate.
Next case is case number 12. Irwin Feldman TRS Filman um living TRS case number CBPR 2024 00166. This is also another um case for Mr.
Gabriel Morales, the inspector who's going to present this case as Mr. Uh, Kesner Jen Marie. Um, ma'am, if I can give a little bit background on this particular case. Um, we received an
email from Durm, Miami Day County Durham, with a list of different properties that have a grease trap without permits on their end. Uh, so this is one of the many cases that um that we open a
violation for this. I'll I'll have Mr. Jim Marie to go ahead and present the case now. Okay. Thank you. We We can hear you. We not Is it his earpiece?
No, we can't hear you yet. Sorry, technical bit difficulties. I understand. Uh, sorry. Good morning. I'm Inspector Kari. Good morning.
Um, I'm taking over this case for Inspector Mo or the violation is open was open November 25th and the notice to appear
was posted May 20 30 May 3125 as a final inspection date. No permit in the system. Okay. This was open on
11:25 24. Exactly. Okay. No permit on file. You said notice was given on May 31st, correct? May 31st. No. Okay. June, we send a notice to
appear um certify mail on June 5th, 2025th. Okay. All right. Based on the unrebuted testimony of the code enforcement officer, I find that the violation does exist. Also find good
notice given proper notice. Owners have failed to appear. Hereby find in favor of the city enter an adjudication. Owners have 30 days by which to resolve the violation. The violation is not resolved by the abatement date. There
will be a daily fine amount of $350. Thank you, sir. Thank you, Castner. Thank you. Next case is case number 13. Joan J. Parker, TRS CEPR 202300807.
This case was found guilty by Magistr Smith. must have be March March 14th, 2025th. Fine set at $350 plus $100 cost assessment. The inspector for this case is Mr. Jamie George.
Good morning, Insp Miami. Um, this case went to court and was found guilty. Yeah. Was found guilty by the ma magister Smith. Um the property owner.
I've I've been in contact with him. He But I'm not sure. I don't think he understands the severity of the violation cuz every time I call him, he's not aware. Like I I post the I posted the notice to appear this the recent one. and I posted the notice
appear on May May 31st. And the last time I spoke to him was June 18th, which was the final inspection date. And that day he uh he admitted to me that they did work on the
the upstairs unit, but at that time he said he wasn't aware that he needed a permit for the floorboards. He said that they did work on the floorboards. I told him he had to go to the building department um to obtain the permit for it. But
since then, I haven't he hasn't called me. He hasn't told me anything. And in the system, there is no permit on on file for the work that was done. I know he went cuz he he called me again that same day that he was there in the building department,
but um as of today, there's there's no permit in the system. And this has been ongoing since 2023. Yes, ma'am. Based on the unrebuted testimony of the code enforcement officer and the
evidence presented, I find that the violations still exist. Um I also find good notice. Given proper notice, owners have failed to repair. The um 13 the daily fine amount
3550 is hereby ratified retroactive to March 14, 2025. Thank you. Next case is case number 14, Prestige Biscane LLC. Case number CMHS
202300672. This case was found guilty by magistr was abate by December 4th, 2024. Point set at $350 plus $100 cost assessment. Inspector for this case is Mr. Alex Bernard.
Good. Good morning. Good morning. Good morning. Inspector Bernardan, Neighborhood Services. Um, so as of today, we'll be seeing a violation placed on proceed the proceed property on screens for their windows.
Can you guys hear me? I can hear you. Okay, perfect. Perfect. Okay, this is this violation was issued out since December of last year, I believe. Yeah. Yes. So, the violation was issued out
since December and no, December of 23 and it's still pending. There's nothing that's been fixed, nothing's been rectified of the issue. Um, when I did my inspection and the reinspection, um, the issues were still there. Uh, you can see from the pictures and everything
that we demonstrated. Yeah, these are the most recent pictures of the property. Okay. What am I looking at? So, their windows. There are no screens on any of the windows. Yeah, I do apologize. Those are I had to get as the closest windows I can get to. Um I took a few pictures.
Uh like that one is the best we got. Um, there are no screens or anything on any of the windows on the propert throughout the entire property. Okay. All right. I can see. All right. What did you say about notice? Excuse
me. Notice. Yeah, the notice was both issued and it was both it was also mailed to the property and the property June 6, 2025. All right. Thank you. Based on the unreedited testimony of the code enforcement officer and the
evidence presented, I find that the violations still exist. Also find good notice. Given proper notice, owners have failed to repair. The daily fine amount of 350 is hereby ratified
retroactive to December 4th, 2024. Perfect. Thank you, Madam Chair. Thank you sir. Next case is case number 17usi condominium mhbio 202300756.
The inspector for this um case is Miss Shana Sanders. Shannana Sanders, neighborhood service inspector. This is a new case for a minimum housing issue regarding um missing and or damaged screens
throughout the property. This case was originally opened January 18, 2023 by Inspector Tamara Petit um who is no longer with the city. So it's been passed on to me to follow up and reinspect. We reinspected the property
on June 3rd of 2024 whereas we noticed a violation still remained um at open at that time. So we melt out the notice. I believe at that time we were going through some changes at the city um
but for whatever reason I see it wasn't um the case wasn't presented um in June of 2024. Therefore, we went ahead and failed it for this case. I inspected the property on
June 17th and observed the v the per the screen still remained missing. I posted the property for the notice to appear on June 3 and again as of my reinspection
violation still remains. All right. Based on the unreuted testimony of the code enforcement officer and the evidence presented, I find that the violation does exist. Also find good notice. Given proper notice, owners have failed to appear. Hereby find in favor of the city intern
adjudication. Owners have 30 days by which to resolve the violation. If the violation is not resolved by the abatement date, there will be a daily fine amount of $350. Next case is case um 18, TA Harrell. Case number CBPR 2023
00895. found guilty by magistrou must have by April 18th, 2025. Fine set at $450 plus $100 cost assessment. Inspector for this case is Miss Shannon Sanders.
Shannon Sanders, neighborhood service inspector, property address 13105 Northwest 12th Avenue. As of my last reinspection on June 17th, um the violation still remains. I do show that they submitted an application,
which probably we we probably put that on record at our initial hearing, but they did submit an application for the enclosure back in August um 2023. However, I I I don't see any movement at
all with it. I don't see any denials. I don't see any approvals. I, you know, don't see anything at all going on with this application. Um I when I hand delivered the notice to the
property owner's um daughter, we had a conversation and we spoke of the lack of movement. She said no one had reached out to from the city. So I gave them a little nudge and said, you know, will you guys go and see what's going on? I have not had any further contact with
them um since my posting. So um again, that's my last reinspection. I by compliance has not been met. I am showing proper service was giving. I posted the prop well I was started to post the property but as I was posting
they opened the door so I kind of you know handd delivered it and I am showing certified mailing was mailed out um by the administrative staff on June 3 as well. I do have a concern though. Okay. Okay. You said that they submitted an
after the fact permit and there's nothing in the system as to whether or not it was approved or denied. So that would that says to me that's that's the city that that's not the resident.
And I'm going to say from what I'm observing, I see nothing in the system and and possibly building. Please, you know, chime in. I don't want to, you know, the city to, you know, look bad or throw anyone under the bus. Can you chime in and see what's going on with
this? Are you guys aware of of this case? I know you used to kind of see what's going on in the on the docket when we have building cases. Um, do you all have some update on this that I'm not aware of? Is the building inspector still present?
Um, they're I I see they're still logged in. I just don't Mr. um Coulson or Shnie Pressy, are you guys available? I think they may have stepped away from
their desk. Okay. So, I'm I'm only going by then. What I visibly see in the computer as of I mean, I'm looking now as we speak. I don't see anything other than an application submitted. I don't see none of the disciplines having reviewed it.
No comments, no nothing. But I'm I'm looking here. Yeah. Right. So that's what I'm going by. Um because what we asked the um owners to do is to submit an you know something an after the fact
permit. You know, we have the building department on Miss Kasu. Okay. All right. Jenny, we can hear you. I'm sorry. Which number we on? I'm so sorry. I had to step away from my number 18. Number 18.
And this obtain a permit. Okay. For 13105 Northwest 12th Avenue. I believe they just submitted this. Hold on. Let me double check my notes because I wrote it down. Hold on. I'm 18. Okay. So, this permit is from 2023
and if I'm not mistaken, it's nothing has been updated since then. They have to go to Miami Day County. Hold on one second. Let me make sure I'm saying this correctly. I don't want to get the wrong information from what I remember.
Okay. So what it is once once they come in they'll get a process number we would then send them to Miami day county to get approved through fire and durm once they come back they'll bring the approval set to us and they have not done it as as of today and now the
permit application is considered abandoned they will have to start all over so the the it still remains all right we'll be voting the ex I'm sorry magistrate. Go ahead. Is it
showing abandoned or showing closed? What is it showing? Because So, right now it's still it's still in um it's still in working process because we was waiting for them, but we don't have any plans here in the system. How are they notified? Because if
they're not notified, could it very well be that they're thinking that this is open and pending? Just waiting for the So, no. Once once they come into the city, we give them the process number to go to Miami Day County. Where they at with Miami Day County, I have no idea.
They can be going back and forth with comments. We won't know because there that's their responsibility to submit to Miami Day County and once it get approved to bring it back to us and as of today, they still have not and it's been more than um what two years and I'm
quite sure that permit is considered abandoned in Miami Day County. So that's DM, right? Yes, ma'am. All right. Only the owner probably can answer that question as far as um where they at with that um with that process.
Inspector Sanders, you were going to add something. That's I was going to ask what you what your second question was. Have they been notified on that? Because when my conversation, she was, you know, she seemed to not know what was going on. She said she submitted it, but um you know I guess Shaunie already answered saying yes that when they
submit the application they're already directed to go to those um departments and or cities or whoever. All right. Based on the unreuted um testimony of the code enforcement officer and the
evidence presented, I find that the violations still exist. Also find good notice given proper notice owners have failed to appear hereby find in favor of the city. The um daily fine amount of 450 is hereby ratified retroactive to
April 18th, 2025. Thank you. Next case is case number 18 YMP Center Court LLC case number COD 2025 00000010.
This is also another case for um Inspector Gabriel Morales. We'll have Inspector Rainol Casemir to present on his behalf. Can you guys hear me? Yes, sir. Good morning, magistrate. Um, Inspector
Casemir, the violation that's at hand is the the lawn the the lawn area, the swell area that needs to be resided and was damaged because vehicles were parking on it. The initial um violation
took place on the 14th of January. We mailed out the violation on the 15th and as of as of as of today, no compliance has been met. Tell me about notice.
Yes, the Yeah, the notice was also sent out on the 15th of January. No, June June June 5th, 2020. June 5th. June 5th, 2025th. notice to appear was sent to certify mail because if you send me a notice to
appear back in January, I'm not showing up. Yeah, no, we did send it on June 5th. It was June 5th. I got that um mistaken with the notice violation letter, but it was June 5th. All right. And those are the photos, the recent
photo. That's the area. Yes. Okay. Based on the unreuted testimony of the code enforcement officer and the evidence presented, I find that the violation does exist. Also find good notice given proper notice. Orers have
failed to appear. Hereby find in favor of the city enter an adjudication. Owners have 30 days by which to resolve the violation. If the violation is not resolved by the abatement date, there will be a daily fine amount of $350. Thank you. Next case is case number 20,
YMP Center for LLC, MHVIO22000628. This case was found guilty by magistrate by July 19th, 2024. The fine was set at $500 plus 100 cost assessment. This uh case is also for um Inspector Gabriel
Morales and we have Inspector Rainol Casemir to uh present on his behalf. Inspector Casemir here. Um the case has been going on magistrate since 2022.
You guys found it guilty back in 2024. As of today, it's still no compliance. We mailed out the notice to appear on the 5th of the of June
and no compliance has been met. The violation is windows, doors, and screens. No windows, no window screens throughout the entire building. kind of vagely remember this case. It's
been Yeah, it's been a while. Yep. 2022. Okay. You said notice was posted and sent when? Yes. Yes, ma'am. When was that date? June the 5th. Okay. 2025. 2025.
Okay. Based on the unreuted testimony of the code enforcement officer and the evidence presented, I find that the violation still exist. Also find good notice. Given proper notice, owners have failed to appear. Um care by find in
favor of the city. The daily fine amount of $500 is hereby ratified retroactive to July 19th, 2024. Um well
straight that concludes today's agenda. That was a short one. It was unfortunately we had um issues with the system and we had to reschedu half of the faces. Well, I see a lot of new faces. Yes,
morning. Good morning and welcome to all. Good job everyone. Just so you know, I always ask for notice because I need to make sure that residents owners have proper notice. Um, and I make my ruling based on that. I
need to make sure that people have the opportunity to be heard. Um, because the law requires that we give them proper notice and due process. So, that's important. Um, thank you everyone.
Good. Thank you very much, Mag. Appreciate it. And and thank you for your patience. You know, we kind of figured I I was taught to swim. When I went to swimming class, as soon as I passed by the pool, the coach kind of threw me in and I had to learn to swim. Well, we have a couple of guys here that
we really like that are good part of our team and they're new. And we figured, hey, Gabriel, one of our team members, is out on on an actual emergency. And right it was kind of it was gracious of you to treat us in this fashion because really it's their first time and I think they did a good job. Thank you team. I
appreciate you guys. Absolutely. I understand that and yes everyone did a wonderful job covering for your colleague and considering this is your first time presenting um and I know about you know tech uh technical difficulties. You know we love Zoom but
we know every now and again stuff. I actually had a case where it was special set and I guess madam attorney would understand that and Comcast just completely cut out Wi-Fi. The entire neighborhood had no Wi-Fi and my case
was to start at three and it's 2:00. My client and I are sitting there panicking at my office and thank God for you know connections and support. I had to call a colleague of mine and say can my client and I come to your office for this hearing and luckily they said yes so I
do understand um we love Zoom but you know after all it's it's human you know errors stuff happen so I completely understand thank you so much everyone madam clerk you did an awesome job thank you I appreciate you thank you all right
thank you everyone seeing you madam city attorney I hope you're getting some sleep with the new baby and not my special magistrate. All right, thank you. Good luck to you guys. Bye. Thank you. Have an amazing day. You too. Bye. Bye.
Recording stopped.