All right. Good morning, everyone. Just before we get started, I'm going to ask that you make sure that you put your phone on silence or vibrate. Um, if you wish to make a call or answer
a call, I'm asking that you please step outside um as not to disrupt the courtroom. My name is Beatatric Gazo, special magistrate for the city. This is a court enforcement hearing for the city of
North Miami Beach. Today is July 1st, 2026. The purpose of this hearing, Junior, can you hear me? >> Yeah, I can hear you. >> Okay. >> Okay.
The purpose of this hearing is to determine if a code violation exists at your property as observed cited by a code enforcement officer of this of the city. If the city is not able to prove its case and I will dismiss the case and you may leave.
These proceedings are being recorded. Therefore, all persons who are speaking should do so one at a time to ensure that all testimony is clearly audible on the recording device. Do we have interpreters here? Yes, we do.
>> Okay. If English is not your primary language, then please inform me when I call your case. We have a translator who will assist you during the proceedings. When your case is called the property owner, agent for the property owner, and
any witness that you may have should come forward to the podium. When asked, please speak directly into the microphone and say aloud your name, your business or mailing address, and your relationship to the property. If you are not the property owner or an
attorney representing the property owner, then you must present a notorized power of attorney affidavit in order for your testimony to be taken on behalf of the property owner. For new cases, you will be asked for the record if you are aware of and
understand the violation that is being heard today and do you understand what is required to resolve the violation. Please answer accordingly. The city will present his case first and then the property owner and or violator will be given an opportunity to testify
on their own behalf to bring forward test um witnesses to testify to present evidence and photographs and to cross-examine the city's witnesses. Following the case presentation, I will issue a finding of fact on the case. If
I find that a violation of city codes exists or existed at your property, then depending on the case type, I will set an abatement date for the violation to be resolved. Or for repeat violations, I will impose a daily fine amount.
For new non-re repeat cases, my order will include an abatement date by which you must resolve the violation and the daily fine amount that I may impose at a future hearing date should the violation not be resolved by the abatement date.
If I find sufficient cause to postpone enforcement action at this time, I will table this case proceeding to another hearing date in the future. If you do not agree with my finding of fact or ruling, then the property owner may appeal the administrative order on
the case to the circuit court. An appeal must be filed within 30 days of the date of the execution of the administrative order to be appealed in accordance with Florida statutes. If a person decides to repeal any matters
considered um I'm sorry if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the special magistrate with respect to any matter considered at these proceedings then the person will need a verbatim record of the proceeding. This record includes the
testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The cost of obtaining the verbatim record shall be the sole responsibility of the appellant and it is recommended that persons who plan to appeal their case should provide their own court
reporter at this proceedings. Pursuant to city codes, if the city of North Miami prevails in prosecuting a case before the special magistrate, the city shall be entitled to recover all costs incurred in prosecuting the case. The current cost assessment amount is
$100 per case. Once the city records an order that imposes a fine and authorizes a lean against the property, then the city will charge additional administrative fees to record and release the lean. Mr. Clerk.
>> Good morning everyone and thank you for participating in today's special magistrate hearing. I will review the process by which today's hearing will be conducted. Please make sure your devices are always muted unless you are giving testimony on a case. If you would like to speak on behalf of a case once the
case is called, you should step up to the podium. Before giving testimony on the case, please state your name, the property address, and your relationship to the property in question. If you wish to have an interpreter in assists you during the proceeding, please indicate
this when your case is called, your magistrate. That concludes the instructions. Yeah. >> Are you ready to swear in? >> Usually does. >> Okay. Officer, good morning. If you are giving
testimony today on the case, please rise and raise your right hand as I issue the oath. Do you swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to give in these proceedings will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? If so, say aloud, I do.
>> Thank you. Please be seated. >> Thank you, officer. Are there Okay. Now, I was going to inquire as to whether there are any additions, corrections, or amendments to the hearing agenda. No, there are no um deletions to the agenda and the
abatement dates are August 13, 30 days. >> September 14, 60 days. October 15, 90 days. >> All right. 30 609. >> Would you like to swear the interpreters in right now? >> I'm sorry.
>> Would you like to swear the interpreters in? >> Um, let me just confirm the dates. >> Okay. um August 13th, September 14th, and um October 15th. Correct. Correct. Okay. Wonderful. Yes, Ev. All right. And the first case that we
will be calling is item number five. Interpreter. Oh, interpreters. Can you please stand? in frame. >> Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the translations which you are about to give in these proceedings will be accurate and correct to the best of your
knowledge, skills, and ability? Say I do. >> So for your start, I just want to correct the record. In my opening statement, I said the city of North Miami Beach. I want to correct it. The city of North
Miami. >> All right. All right. All right. >> All right. Proceed. >> Okay. >> The first item we'll be calling is item number five. Alarm Martin, case number C EPR 2025 00357.
This case was previously found guilty by Magistrate Suarez with an abatement date of June 17th where fines were set at 250 per day plus $100 cost assessment. And the person representing the property is Arle Martin. And the officer on this
case is Jonathan Lamestry. >> Good morning, sir. Please state your full name and relationship to the property. >> My name is Alan De Martin. Address 315. >> I'm having a hard time hearing you. >> One moment. He needs a translator.
>> Okay. All right. Please state your full name and relationship to the property. >> Okay. >> Alan Martin. >> Alan Martin. Yeah. >> Okay. My name is Alan D. Martin.
>> Your relationship to the property. >> I am the owner. Thank you, officer. >> Good morning, everyone. Coco compliance officer Jonathan Lamestry. Um, this case revolves around uh a building permit.
The address is 315 Northwest 26th Street. Um, this revolves I'm sorry. This case uh revolves around uh construction work um on the property without a permanent file. On December 6,
2025, um I received a complaint uh from the director of co- compliance regarding um construction work being done at the property. Um this is in regard to them uh doing their driveway without a permit and also
paving the swale area without a permit on file. As you can see from the photos, notice of violation was issued, notice to appear was issued, affidavit of posting, property appraiser.
This is the hand delivery of the notice to appear. And as you can see from this photo, um they repaved the entire swale area, um without a permit. They converted the swale into a basically a driveway of
their property. >> Uh the property owner did apply for a permit, but the building department did fail them um for because they're unable to get the permit for the swale area. Uh
that's all. >> All right, Mr. Martin. Can I translate? >> Oh, >> can I translate? >> Yes, absolutely. Um, next time you can ask the officer remind them >> because we tend to forget. We just keep
going. No problem. Just remind him to stop to give you an opportunity to um to translate. No problem. closer to the mic. >> Yeah. Okay. So yes, I did complete the work without a permit. However,
>> speak to the mic, please. >> Yes, I did complete the work without a permit. However, I did apply for a permit after the fact and went through the legal process of obtaining the permit >> and the officer just testified that it was denied.
So enforcement. >> Yes, they did deny it. However, again, I did go ahead and follow through uh with everything that was required or asked of me uh for the permit. >> I think he's still a little confused.
Officer, at this point, is there anything pending or was it was his after the-act permit application denied? >> As you can see on the screen, I zoomed in so everybody could see. Um, you'll be able to see that it was denied
uh by zoning engineering >> as of when? >> May 28th for zoning. May 5th uh I'm sorry, June 5th. Uh it was denied by engineering. May 28th from zoning and it did get
approved by building on June 9th. However, each department has to approve the check off >> approved for the permit. >> Well, that's a surprise. >> Yes, that's on the screen right now. >> Okay. All right.
So as of right now, >> yeah, okay. Yes, I do understand. But they did give me a survey that um I needed to um follow through with, which I do have the survey here um and the letter that
indicates that I did follow through um with um the enforcement >> against special magistrate. Um they were found guilty by magistrate Suarez and they had to abate by June 17th. um they have not received their
permit after the fact permit for the for the driveway. >> I'm going to assume, and that's just an assumption on my part, having been doing this for many years, I don't think you're going to get a permit for that.
Unfortunately, it seems like you probably spent a lot of money paying someone to pave the swale area and you didn't pull the proper permit at the time. And if you did, um, you'd
probably learn by then that you you didn't have permission or authority to do so. Um, what are the chances of I don't want to guess. Is there anyone here from >> building? Yes, I do have >> um because I think he's still a little
confused probably because he was denied by um you know some of the departments and then he was approved by building so he's probably confused >> as to what to do next. So,
>> please state your name and and um >> Shaunie Pressie from the building department, building officer. >> So, in order to comply, you have too much um paved in. So, you're going to have to to comply, >> you have to follow their rules. They
tell you so much percentage could be paved. You're going to have to probably remove some of it. >> Can I translate for him? >> Okay. You speak to the mic, please. Court enforcement. It is an extension to where um the work
was done. I'm not sure if they're going to be able to undo uh the work that's already been completed. >> Well, that's the problem, sir. The way that the the work is in violation of city codes, and so we're not going to resolve it here today. you're going to
have to go to >> the building department, >> the building department and um meet with them and see what needs to be done. I don't know if you had a general contractor, whomever, you know, that you paid to get to do the job if you want to bring them
along, but you need to understand what needs to happen, what needs what you need to do to um be in compliance. right now you're you're in violation >> and um the magistrate had given you until June
17th by which to resolve the violation and um as of today it um it has not been abated and so the um >> your magistrate pardon me can I just
translate real quick? >> Yes, please. M. So violence. Okay. I understand. >> All right. Um, here's what I'll do. I'm going to
give you 30 days. I'm giving you a 30 days extension. So that you can uh meet with the what did we say? Zoning department building zoning and engineering and building.
>> Okay. You want to tell them? Okay. >> Okay. >> Okay. >> Okay. No problem. >> All right. Good luck to you. >> Okay. >> All right. Reset 30 days.
>> All right. Magistrate. The next item we'll be calling is item item number 10. Enterprise 305 LLC. Case number CES uh 2026 00003.
And the officer on this case is Shaunie Pressy and the person representing the property is John Jake. >> All right. Who's present for the >> joke? >> All right. Can the person please um come forward? >> Good morning. Please state your full name and relationship to the property.
John Ferris Jelkkey IV. I'm the owner of the Enterprise 305. I had a partner at one time who has since passed away uh unfortunately September 25th of 2025. He had 1%.
And what has happened is uh the 1% that he had, the Department of Justice in Colorado has put leans on all my properties. I have I've been in North Miami since I was born, 1958.
Um, I have uh three homes, waterfront homes in in Sansusi and I have one in Keystone Point, one in the Jockey Club and some others out uh in other parts of Florida.
I just got off the phone this week and last week and the Department of Justice has decided to get rid of these leans which has caused me a terrible financial hardship. I'm behind on my taxes. I'm in danger of having a
tax foreclosure. I spoke with Shaunie yesterday. I drained the pool at the residence with the unsafe structure. It's totally empty. I have pictures to prove it. >> Okay. Today I'm boarded up. >> Let me stop you for a second. Um, repeat your full name for me one more.
>> John Ferris Jelkey 4th. >> All right. Um, I'm not familiar with the case. Let me allow the city to present this um, her case first and then I'll give you an opportunity to respond. >> Thank you, >> officer. >> I was trying to get the pictures come up
with >> Shaunie Pressy. Um, officer for the building department. Um case in front of us is 11410 North Bay Sir Drive. Um 2025 we went to the unsafe structure
board regarding this property at hand. Um during that process um he did no one showed up from the property. Um the structure board found them guilty. As of today, they didn't um comply with any of
the um recommendations for the property and now we're here again because we need them to either comply or demolish. >> Okay. And what are some of the issues
>> um regarding the property? But it's like it's frozen maybe. Okay, maybe I go slow. Okay, let it go. So, as you see, that's the front door. >> Is it boarded up?
Okay. Was there fire? >> No, just over the years it just been deteriorating. >> Okay. It's definitely an eyesore. >> No doubt. I agree. And I'm willing to demolish the building or redo it, but I
need the lean removed at least temporarily so I can borrow money to pay my taxes and and to demolish. cost money to do everything as you know. >> So this property already um have other cases in um with the city is running
fines and leans with different cases. That's a different issue with the lean department. I already told him we need to go and speak to the Yeah. Huh? Oh. Oh, >> I'm sorry. What happened?
>> I didn't hear you. >> Oh, okay. I'm working on 14 different leans that I have with Edwin Morgan. I just paid to have the uh I'm going about the process the way Mr. Morgan told me. I'm 100% willing to comply.
In the past, I have had a problem with procrastination, which I'm no longer doing. I'm asking for some mercy. >> Okay. Are there any safety >> concerns? Um, yeah, people can go on the
property. The It's not the gate is like falling apart that he have towards the pool. He say he drained the pool, but people can just walk on the property. He got to secure the um property um more that's a part of um
>> I'll be happy to put a containment fence up. I think I need a permit for it. >> Correct. >> But I'll be happy to do all that. I'll be happy to comply and my intent is to beautify the properties I have because there the more money I get, the more money the city gets.
It's good for everybody. I do need a little I need some kind of an extension in order to get in order to borrow the money to do what I need to do. They will not loan money to me with leans and things. >> Let me hear from >> I need an abatement.
Let me hear from the city. >> Um, what are >> you seeking? >> As of today, the um, building official um, she just wants um, put it on record and if he doesn't comply, I guess you can adjudicated for 30 days if you would like.
>> Could you give me 60? >> But that's the most we >> I have to close on a $2.2 million loan. It takes a little time. Could you give me 60 days, please? That's up to you, Anna. Um
what what can we do um to make sure that the property is secured and that it's not a um hazard or elf and safety.
Yesterday she asked me to drain the pool. I did so >> I have it being up. >> You have to come to the mic. You need to identify yourself. >> My name is Peter Wolfman and I'm >> He's one of my workers. >> I'm I'm an assistant to John. >> Okay. >> And we went and try We're trying now to
do everything we're supposed to do. Everyone's been really nice to us >> and um they gave us a small uh post-it note with five things to do to get it started. Okay. >> I believe we have that. >> So, I'm just here to check off boxes. Like
>> the pool was drained. It's not just some kitty pool. It's a multilevel. Like his homes are multi-million dollar from back in the day homes. And it was multilevel. Has jacuzzi that falls into this that falls into that. And I got it all
drained out like we were supposed to do. It took hours and hours and hours to pump it out. >> Right. So, that's done. Boom. I'm I'm here to make sure that this stuff gets done. So, I just want you to know that whatever you say, we'll we will comply.
>> How many items on the list? >> I believe Yeah, I have it right here. >> Okay. >> You want me to bring it to you, >> majesty? He wasn't sworn in. >> No. >> Yes, I he stood up. Yeah, he stood up. I saw him. >> Okay. >> Would you like to have this? >> I'm sorry. >> I can read it to you. >> Read it to me and tell me how many of
the um >> Okay. One is fee case. I guess that's a payment that we made. >> That's Mr. Morgan. Okay. Drain pool is number two. >> And that you did drain the pool >> complete. Okay. >> The third one is fence permit. >> Help me with that. >> That's not going to take overnight. What
he's asking you to do is to remove >> up the fence permit, >> right? Whatever. Fence permit. And he needs a demo permit. And we're here at Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. They wrote that on there. >> We're here. We're complying with that, too. >> I really need an extension right now. >> But the thing is that he can't get any
money loaned on that expensive stuff. and it takes a lot of little bit of time. If you remove the loan from the the lean from the house, we will knock it right out. >> That's not before me today. >> Okay. >> Um does he have any case other cases other than uh I'm sure he has other
matters but >> any of them before me today? >> No. So this is the only case I have in front of you, but this >> and this is the first time up, right? >> Yes. >> Okay. So sir, I don't have I I'm not able to make any rulings or set aside
any pending leans on your property. The only matter I have pending before me today is the one that we're dealing right now. >> Can we get 60-day extension showing that we're working on it because we already uh >> I will apply for all the permits? >> Absolutely. They the permits are going to take time anyway.
>> Okay. >> Unless you speed them up. What I will do is I will enter an adjudication because I do find that you are in violation. I will give you 60 days. >> Um and beyond the 60 days, if you're not
in compliance, there will be a daily fine. >> Okay. >> Will we have another uh time to come before you in the 60 days, like 58 days? >> Um so we can report. >> You can report. >> Yeah. We really want to get this taken
care of. You can report to the officer your progress if we you know I I will I will make a a determination based on on progress, you know, progress and I once I hear from everyone and what the
officer testified to cuz she's been uh very helpful to us. No one's giving us a hard time. >> Okay? >> You know what I mean? >> I wasn't done with my ruling because I want a clear record. It's an adjudication 60 days. >> Perfect. >> If it's not abated by the um
by within the 60 days, >> there will be a daily final. You're going to have to wait. Let me finish with my ruling. >> Adjudication. 60 days and $500 per day. >> That's after 60 days, man.
>> That is correct. >> Okay. One more question. >> Go ahead, sir. So, oh man, it's just there. The let's say we go to number three on the list where we drain the pool. Now, we're ready for a fence permit. >> Does that take longer than the 60 days to get? Cuz we can't just go slap up a
fence. >> So, that's my dilemma. >> Okay. >> Okay. So, go ahead. >> After allow her finish doing the ruling and then we'll speak in the back. >> Okay. >> Okay. >> Thank you. >> All right. Um I think your question is what happens
if you apply for for the permit. Okay. Um then when we come back in 60 days then the officer will let me know where we are in the process and um she should be able to pull the record and see that you've were given a permit number and
see where we are. Is that correct officer? >> Yes. >> Okay. Um just stay in contact with her to let her know what's going on. Okay. >> Fair enough. All right, good luck to you. >> Thank you. God bless. >> Okay, magistrate. The next item we'll be
calling is item number 20, OVO J. Mayor, case number CB PR 2025 00361. And the person representing this property is Soul Dad Mones. And the
officer on this case is Shana Sanders. >> Good morning. Please state your name and relationship to the property. >> My name is Brandon Mayor. I'm the son of Odia Mayor. >> Okay.
>> Hi, my name is Mos. Um his mother. My father is the owner of the >> Say that one more time. >> My father is the owner of the unit. >> I see that. >> Officer Sanders. >> Shana Sanders, City of North Miami code
compliance officer. This is a new case for a building without permit. Um, it was originally cited in December of last year where as I was doing my inspections, I drove by, saw the door open, saw some gentleman doing some work inside,
um, looked in the computer, saw that there was no permits obtained for what I visibly saw as um, kitchen cabinets that were being um, done. I opened the violations, spoke with the two gentlemen. They called, I believe it was
this um young lady on the phone. We talked via telephone. Um she said she didn't know that she needed a permit for um changing out of the cabinets. I gave her I think about a week or two to comply or submit the application. She
did submit the application to the city for the work that's being done. However, um the permit application has stayed at a standstill and has not been issued. I have not had any contact with the property owners um since I visited the
property. Um so I'll let her explain what's going on and what's the hold up as to why um the permit still has not been obtained. And again, I want to put on record she has submitted the application. However,
um it has not been obtained as of yet. >> All right, Mr. Mayor or Miss Munoz, >> I'd like to explain that my father is disabled. He It all happened in 2019. He suffered an aneurysm and a friend of his
named Marlene Salas took over. She did basically change or installing cabinets without a permit. I didn't know any of this. I just took
charge of this starting April of 2026. Did I did hear that she did start the process of trying to get permits for the cabinets and all, but I don't know the what was the results of that.
Apparently, it's still in uh standstill. >> Sorry. Um the thing is we tried to spoke with her but she don't we don't know nothing about this problem. We just get it in April from this year. So she don't answer she don't explain to us what's
going on and >> we're taking care >> now. We try to take care this but it's a lot of problem that she leave it for us. So we start to find out one by one. >> Okay.
Um we have a contractor uh on standby who could get the permits. We're just asking for either it to be dropped or for us to get an extension because I know Marina already had an extension on this, but she's out of the picture now and it's
between us and the city now. >> Okay. I'm going to tell you now it's not going to be dropped. Um, but I can give you an extension. Um, since you've stepped in now to assist your dad and
um, so I'm going to give you 30 days. Okay. 30 days so that you have time, you and your um your contractor to apply for the um after the fact permit.
>> Thank you. I appreciate it. >> Okay. Anything else? >> Is there anything else? No. >> Okay. All right. Good luck to you. >> Thank you. >> All right. All right, magistrate. The next item
we'll be calling is item number 22, Sadma Investments and Development LLC. Case number CF LR2023 000421. This case was previously found guilty by Magistrate Smith with an abatement date
of April 12, 2026. Fines are set at 350 per day plus $100 $100 cost assessment. Magistrate, there's two cases under this. Would you like me to >> uh >> read out the second one? >> No, let's Okay. Is it the >> They're back to back. The 22 and 23.
>> 2. Okay. The certificate. Yeah, we can read them. You can read the number 23. >> Okay. Item number 23, Sadimma Investments and Development LLC. Case number CZCU 2023 00803.
This case was previously found guilty by magistrate Smith with an abatement date of April 12, 2026. Fines were set at 350 per day plus $100 cost assessment. And the person representing this property is Derek
Morbells and the officer on this case is Jonathan Elementary. >> Good morning. Please state your full name and relationship to the property. >> Derek Marbles. I'm the portfolio manager, licensed realtor, mortgage broker for Saddam Investment. >> Okay. This is Willer Fertilian.
>> Owner. >> Owner. Okay. All right. Officer. >> Good morning everyone. Code officer Jonathan Leststery. Um, this case uh for case number 22, this revolves around the business tax receipt for All Day
Everyday, Inc. at 13990 West Dixie Highway. On May 4th, 2023, code off former code officer Jar Marillo opened a notice of violation regarding the business tax receipt. Um this was back on May 4th. Proper notice
was given. Notice of violation was posted um mailed out to the property owner on February 10th, 2026. Um they were found guilty by magistrate Smith and they had to abate by April 12th, 2026 and the fine set was at $350.
Um the case was correction. Um I did hand deliver the notice to appear to um the property owner and to uh the gentleman Derek. Um they did provide me with documents showing that they're you know working with Miami Day County to obtain the CU
and BTR. However, um and Mr. Rafael Padron, the administrative coordinator for business tax official, he'll be able to provide more information. Rafael Pedro, business licensing manager, city of North Miami. Um, the business has been undergoing the Dade County review
process for for so quite some time. The building review process with the county looks like it was approved as recently as May. Um, however, they still have not been able to obtain as a result of that their BTR and CU with the city. >> Okay.
>> Do we know why? >> They're just caught up with the county's process. Okay. >> Yes, sir. >> Okay. Uh the the origin of the issue is that we had a tenant. They abandoned the property. So, those notices that were
given out in 2023 were not even given to the current owner. We've taken it over. The first notice that we received was in 9 of 2025. We attended the hearing. We were given extension. From that point on, we applied for the permits, the
proper permits, which first you must start with Miami Dade, which we went for. The grease trap had to be updated, which we're doing. We have passed all of the durm uh qualifications. We then have to go to North Miami, which we have. It's in process in terms of the permit,
which I have a notice right here, uh, of the last updates, which were just 624. I replied to all conditions, and we are under review. We asked for an abatement for 60 days and everything should be complete. We have the name change for hotels and restaurants. I have we are
already approved with fire. We have WASA and I have DURM approval. So all I need is North Miami to prove that permit, the work to be done and then I'll get all my inspections, fire, durm, and um hotels and restaurants and we'll have it. >> Okay. This grease trap will trap you
every time. >> Yeah. Yes, it will. It's a It's very layered. I say >> a grease trap is a trap. >> Very layered situation for >> every situation. Um is the city okay with giving them an extension?
>> Okay. >> All right. We already have an adjudication. So, um Okay. We'll give you >> So, magistrate uh Sarz again um the case has been open for almost three years now. I understand that
they're working on it. Um, and again, it's it's up to you. Um, but again, with the case open for three years, it doesn't take this long or it shouldn't take this long to obtain uh CU and BTR. >> In response to that, magistrate, I have documentation of the length and the the
width of everything that we've had to do. We have complied 100%. You can go to DRM, you can go to the building department. It is. We have done everything that we've been asked to do in the timely manner we've been asked to do it. >> Okay. All right.
I'll grant them a reset. >> 60 days. >> Good luck to you. >> That was 60 days. You said >> yes. Okay. >> Is that for both? >> Is that for both? >> Special magistrate. Will >> that's for both. Correct. They run
together or NCU is going to run together. >> Thank you. >> All right, magistrate. That's everyone that's present. >> Oh, okay. >> Who's all here? >> Oh, sure.
It's number 13. >> 13. >> All right, magistrate. The next item we'll be calling is item number 13, Jamie L. Noble and Shirley Noble, case number CBPR 2024
00112. This case was previously found guilty by Magistrate Smith with an abatement date of May 18, 2026. Fines were set at 250 per day plus $100 cost assessment. And the representative uh the officer on
this case is Mr. Brentley Daniels and the representative of this case is Jamie Noble. >> All right. Good morning. Please state your full name and relationship to the property. >> Jamie Noble and I am the daughter of Jimmy Noble. Okay,
officer. >> Good morning, everyone. Officer Daniel, city of North Miami. I originally opened the case back in July, I'm sorry, on July 22nd, 2024 for building without permit for a black
fence. I'm sorry, black iron fence. Uh here's my original notice of violation. the notice to appear, affidavit of posting,
property appraiser, and here's the violation uh that I posted um on the property. Um Miss Noble did have a passing sometime last calendar
year um of her father. Her and I uh recently spoke. Our conversation was on and I'm looking for the date. >> June 1st. >> June 1st. Thank you, ma'am. And um she
advised me um on that date that the um petition um the um the petition for her father's home had just uh it was signed via probate on the 30th of May of this calendar year. Um, I did advise her
that, you know, that she would need to make an effort or an attempt to come down to the building department to at least fill out an application for the permit. And as of today, I did not see an application on file. >> All right, Miss Noble,
>> I actually did make an attempt to do an application. I was denied and told that the judge petition paperwork that was given to me was not sufficed that it needed to be put on the appraisal website that it was completed
and changed to my name for me to apply for the permit. Okay. So, where are we now? >> I'm waiting for Miami Day County to update the records to reflect my name as ordered by the judge
from my probate case. I do have those documents with me if you would like to see those. >> Okay. So, you went through the probate process? >> Yes, ma'am. >> Okay. And that's completed? >> Yes, ma'am. As of May 30th at 9:30 in the morning. >> And you have submitted it to the county?
>> Correct. My um my lawyer did. >> Okay. All right. Um All right. Let's reset. I don't know if it's going to be done in 30 days. Um,
so it needs to reflect on the county record first before you're able to apply with the city. Correct. >> According to the office, yes. >> All right. Reset 60 days. Good luck to you. >> Thank you.
>> Thank you, your honor. >> Anyone else present? Do you have a case pending or everyone here just observing? At this time, magistrate, um, I don't think we have anyone. I would like to release the translators. >> All right. Thank you so very much, you
guys. >> Yeah. >> Bye. >> All right. The next cases will be heard in absentia. Um, do we need a break or everybody ready to
go? >> Is your call? >> Well, you're my clerk. If you need to use go. >> Okay, let's >> if the officers need to break. >> Let's keep going. >> Huh? Otherwise, >> we keep going.
>> Yeah. Stick with them. Yeah. Stick with their case. >> Okay. >> All right. The first item we'll be calling is item number one 1266 West Dixie LLC. Case number C ZCU 2025
000298. This case was previously found guilty by magistrate Suarez with an abatement date of June 17, 2026. Fines were set at 250 per day plus $100 cost assessment. And the officer in this case is Mr. Brenley Daniels.
>> Good morning everyone. Officer Daniel, city of North Miami. I opened a violation against 126 25 Westy Highway LLC for not having a certificate of use.
Let's see that. Here's my permit action report. Notice of violation, notice to appear, affidavit of posting, property appraiser, sunbiz,
and a screenshot showing uh that the CU has been expired since uh 2024. And as of this morning, um I did not see any application on file for renewal. Good morning, Rafa Pedro, business
licensing manager. This violation was for the commercial property owner of this address. They applied for their CU. They were subsequently approved for that CU. However, that's not released until they apply for the BTR. They were
notified in 2024, May of 2024, what's needed to finally receive their CU and apply for the BTR. and they still have not come in to um finalize their paperwork. >> Okay. Um
tell me you're getting about notice for today's hearing. >> I originally opened the violation back on October 15, 2025. Um notice for today's hearing?
>> For today's hearing? >> Yes. >> I'm sorry. Can Can you repeat that, Magistrate? >> How would they notice? How did they know about today's hearing? >> Um there was mailing. Give me one second.
Oh, um here's here's the posting. I posted it on the building >> date. June 1st, 2026. >> Thank you. >> All right. Now, let's
clarify it for me and for the record. You said the CU was issued. No, >> it has been issued or it has not been issued because Go ahead. It was approved but not issued because the condition of issuance is that they finalized their
business tax receipt process. >> Understood. All right. Based on the unrebuted testimony of the code enforcement officer, I find that the violations still exist and given proper notice, owners have failed to appear.
Um the daily fine amount of $250 is hereby ratified. All right. Thank you. >> Thank you, your honor. >> Thank you. >> All right, magistrate. The next item we will be calling is item number two,
1302 Northeast, 125 Street, LLC, case number CF LR20500 91. This case was previously found guilty by Magistrate Suarez with an abatement date of June 17, 2026. Fines are set at 250 per day plus $100 cost
assessment. And the officer on this case is Shana Sanders. >> Give me one second. This keeps freezing. I I'm I keep the the link won't open. Thank you.
Yours won't open either. Okay. Okay. Yeah. Yours is open. Is that it? Is that the case? All right. Okay.
Officer Sanders. Shana Sanders, city of North Miami co- compliance officer. I'm going to um ask that this case be dismissed and taken off the um off the docket. I was notified this morning by the licensing
coordinator that um they have obtained their business tax receipt and certificate of use. >> All right. >> So, compliance has been met. >> Awesome. >> Sha Shana, you can stay up there. I'll call your next case. All right. The next item we'll be
calling is item number four, Three Horizon South Condo, Inc. case number CM HH HS 202500854. And this case is for officer Shana Sanders. Shannon Sanders, City of North Miami co-
compliance officer. This case I'm going to ask to be tabled for a month. I received a phone call from the property owner um as well as the condo president notifying me that the elevator
certificate has been renewed. Um they sent me a copy of the email uh copy of the certificate. However, I told them I wanted to come by the property and visit it, make sure that it's actually posted, especially seeing that this case is um 2 years old. I want to go by and verify
myself that it indeed is posted. But again, I'm going to ask that this case be tabled to give me the opportunity to visit that property. >> All right, reset 30 days. All right, Shannon. >> Grace, seeing your inperson officer
Sanders. >> Thank you. Same to you. >> All right. The next item we'll be calling is item number three, 14140 Northeast 10th Avenue, LLC. Case number
CEBPR2024 000184. This case was previously found guilty by Magistrate Suarez with an abatement date of June 17, 2026. Fines were set at 350 per day plus $100 cost assessment and the officer on this case is Mr. Gabriel
Morales. >> Good morning, Magestring. Um, officer Morales was a city of Miami code for compliance. Uh, this case was um issued on 1220 2024 for the violation of uh
building a fence without a permit. Uh it was found guilty on uh 511 of 2026 by Magistrate Suarez and um the notice to appear was posted on June 1st of 2026. Uh per final
reinspection. Um no uh permit has been obtained as of uh June 8th of uh 2026. Um, and let me just pull up the pictures here.
This is the action report. Notice of violation, notice to appear, affidavit of posting, property appraisal, sunbiz, the
posting at the property, notice to appear, posting, and as you can see, the fence is still there at the property. >> Mhm. >> All right. based on the unrebuted testimony of the code enforcement
officer and the evidence presented that find a violation still exist. The um there was proper notice given proper notice owners have failed to appear. The daily fine amount of $350 is hereby
ratified. >> All right, magistrate. The next item we'll be calling is item number 11, EST of Hector L. Riviera, case number CBPR 2022 00417.
This case was previously found guilty by Magistrate Smith with an abatement date of January 12, 2023. Fines are set at 250 per day plus $100 cost assessment. And the officer on this case is Mr. Gabriel Morales. Good morning again magistrate officer
Morales uh with the city of North Miami code compliance. This violation was um also this violation was issued on 3162022 by a previous officer
um for building without a permit. Um it was found guilty on 1025 of 2022 by Magistrate Smith. Um, I posted the notice to appear on June 1st of 2026 and
per the final reinspection on June 8th of 2026, um, no compliance has been met. And we'll show you the pictures here. This is the permit action report.
Notice of violation, notice to appear, affidavit of posting, uh, property appraisal, and this is the metal fence panel that was installed without a permit. >> Okay.
All right. Based on the unreuted testimony of the court enforcement officer, I find that the violation still exists. Also find good notice given proper notice. Owners have failed to appear hereby um
find in favor of the city the um the abatement amount of $250 is hereby ratified. >> All right, magistrate. The next item we'll be calling is item number 12,
Gem Investments LLC, case number CFY2025 000070. This case was previously found guilty by a magistrate Suarez with an abatement date of June 17, 2026. Fines were set at 250 per day plus $100 cost assessment.
And this case is also for Mr. Gabriel Morales. >> Good morning again, Magistrate. Um, officer Morales was a city of North Miami code compliance. Um, this violation was issued on um, February
19th of 2025 for parking vehicles on the front lawn. Um, it was found guilty on May 11th of 2026 by Magistrate Suarez. And I posted the notice to appear on June 2nd of 2026. And per the final
reinspection on June 8th of 2026, no compliance has been met. This is the permit action report. Notice of violation, notice to appear, affidavit of posting, property
appraisal, uh, Sunbiz, uh, mailing to all addresses on Sunbiz, and as you can see there, they continue to park this, um, blue truck on the front lawn. >> All right. Based on the unrebuted
testimony of the code enforcement officer and the evidence presented, I find the violations still exist. Also find good notice. Given proper notice, owners have failed to appear. The daily fine amount of $250 is hereby ratified. >> All right, magistrate. All right, Gabe.
Gabriel, you're good. Thank you, Mr. Gabriel. >> You got one more. >> 24. Number 24. Item number 24, Skyline Insurance, case number CEGMP 2025
000091. This case was previously found guilty by magistrate Suarez with an abatement date of June 17, 2026. Fines were set at 250 per day plus $100 cost assessment. And this case is also for Mr. Gabriel Morales. Good morning again, Magistrate. Um,
Officer Morales with the city of North Miami code compliance. Um, I issued this violation on October 11th of 2025. Um, and then on May 11th of 2026, it was found guilty by Magistrate Suarez. I
posted the notice to appear on June 1st of 2026. And per my final reinspection um on June 8th of 2026. No compliance has been met. This is this violation is for the general maintenance of the property uh to pressure wash um and
paint uh stained and dirty areas of the property. I will show you evidence, permanent action report, notice of violation, notice to appear, affidavit of posting, property appraisal, SunViz,
um the mailing to both addresses on Sunbiz. And as you can see per that date, it's difficult to see there, but you can see the junk. It was also part part of it was also to repair the fence. Uh the
reason why is because they had a uh an aggressive uh animal dog at the property that would always get loose because of because of the fence being damaged. And I I received a complaint from a neighbor across the street um that the dog is
always loose and always attacking people that are walking around in the neighborhood. >> Um the dog has been removed already, but the fence is still in um it's it's not repaired. >> Let's see if And you can see here
pictures um of the the property, the walkway, all the junk they have there. the grass. You can see it's all overgrown. >> Yeah.
>> And this is posting of the notice. >> Okay. >> All right. Based on the unreuted testimony of the code enforcement officer and the evidence presented, I find that the violation still exist.
Also find good notice given proper notice. Owners have failed to appear. The daily fine amount of $250 is hereby ratified. >> Okay. Ventures. Okay. Gabe. >> Thank you, Mr. Morales. >> Thank you. >> All right. The next item we'll be
calling is item number 14. Juan C. Ramirez. Case number CEGMP 2025 000052. This case was previously found guilty by magistrate Suarez with an abatement date of June 17th, 2026. Fines are set at 250
per day plus $100 cost assessment. And the officer on this case is Mr. Joseph Des Sanchez. >> Good morning, Mister. >> Good morning. My name is code officer Joseph Dangis with the city of North Miami. I um opened a violation against this
case in uh March 19th of 2025. Um as my colleague just said, they went to court last month and nothing has been done. Basically, the the violation was for the gutters and the exterior of the
home to pressure wash and repaint the the front door of the house. Um, as you can see here, the the only thing that they've they've done was remove that gutter that's hanging, >> but everything else looks the same. So, I don't know if the gutter actually just
fell off or they actually tried to remove it. And um he contacted me the day before magistry last month to say, "Oh, is there anything that he could be he can do?" And I told him, "Well, at this time,
unless you already pressure wash the roof and painted the door, there's nothing that can be done." >> And I haven't heard from him since. And so, and nothing's been done. He has um got uh order to comply. NTA was posted,
and he just hasn't done anything. And this has been since 2025 of March. All you would have to do is just pressure wash the roof and repaint the door. >> All right. Stayed on the record when the property was posted.
>> The first original posting was 319 of 2025. >> You said June 19th. >> Oh, March 19th of 2025. >> No, no, no, no. Notice for today's hearing. >> Oh, for today's hearing. Yeah. I posted it um for um the order to comply and the
NTA was posted June 3rd. NTA was mailed and posted and on June 18th I posted the order to comply and nothing has been done ever since. >> Okay. All right. Based on the unreedited testimony of the code enforcement officer, I find the violation still
exist. Also find good notice. Given proper notice, owners have failed to appear. The daily fine amount of $250 is hereby ratified. >> Thank you, your honor. >> Thank you, sir. >> All right. The next item we'll be calling is item number six, Christine
Fern Allison. Case number CER CV 202500170. And the officer in this case is Jonathan Lestri. Good morning everyone. Co- compliance officer Jonathan Lamester. Uh this case
is in regard to an RV being stored on the side of the property at 1541 Northeast 131st Road. So on October 29th, 2025, uh the co-compliance department received a police case number
uh a police report uh case number 2025-64830. And this is in regard to an RV that was stored on the side of the property that caught on fire. Um the RV is no longer at the property.
However, um the RV was stored there without a variance on file, meaning the RV was not permitted to be stored there, as well as a resident was residing inside that RV as well. Uh the RV caught on fire and it caused damage
to the side of the house of the property. Um and the reason why I'm bringing this case up to court now, and again, RV has been removed from the property. However, um since the property did not have permission to have the RV stored on the property, since the RV caught on fire
and could have caused damage, not only burned down the house, but also caused damage to the neighboring properties, um the city's requesting a onetime fine um for the RV uh for the property owner for not having the RV uh not having a
variance for the RV. Um, as you can see, uh, notice of violation was posted, affidavit of posting, and as you can see on screen, this was the RV caught on fire on the side of the house.
Proper notice was given. This photo was back in September. 2025 via Google Maps showing that the RV was stored there at the time. And again, this is uh the aftermath of
the RV catching fire. I did hand deliver the notice of violation as well to uh the tenant at the at the property. >> And this is the police report from the North Miami Police Department. >> Date. You always have to put date on the record when notice was served
or when notice was provided. >> Um the notice to appear uh for the magistrate was posted on June 3rd, 2026. and the administrative staff uh mailed out the notice of violation to the property owner via property appraiser. >> Okay. Thank you.
>> This incident where the um where the house caught on fire was on October uh when the RV caught on fire was on October 21st, 2025. >> Okay. >> All right. Okay. So, the city is asking for an adjudication and a onetime fine.
>> Correct. >> All right. >> Yes, your honor. This this happens to be like a very serious issue here in the city with ERVs that are not permitted and that causes obviously a threat by having residents live in them. >> Yeah. It could end up very very badly.
>> Yes. Um, what is the suggested amount from the city? Special magistrate, our code doesn't provide for a set amount. So, it would be at your discretion, but the city doesn't want to you to take into account that this is an a serious situation that
we're trying to stop within the city. >> All right. Based on the unrebuted testimony of the code enforcement officer and the evidence presented, I find that the violation does exist. I also find good notice given proper notice. owner has
failed to repair. Um, based on the testimony, I do find that this was a um situation that could have um ended very badly, meaning that that could have
could have caused um fatalities. um individuals were um living in the RV based on the testimony of the code enforcement officer. So
um the people living there both in the house and the RV could have gotten badly hurt if not killed. And um so I do find that there was a health and
safety hazard. Based on that, I will enter an adjudication and issue on one time um a onetime fee of $1,500. >> Thank you. All right, magistrate. We'll be moving
on to the next item, which is item number 18. Mosart, M M Garcy, and Yolain. That's case number C OV 2026004. And the officer on this case is Jonathan Lamestry.
Good morning, co- compliance officer Jonathan Lamester and this violation is regarding a tow truck that's being stored on the property. The address is 620 Northeast 122nd Street. In May of 2026, our department received
a complaint from a resident um from the neighboring property um stating that there is a tow truck that's being stored at the property overnight. In the morning time and in the afternoon, the tow truck is not there. But at night time, the tow truck is being stored at
620 Northeast 122nd Street. I did work um a detail overnight where I did observe the tow truck being stored on the property, notice of violation, affidavit of posting, proper notice was given, mailing.
This is a Google map photo of September 2025 showing the tow truck being stored on the property during the day. Again, proper notice was given um on June 2nd, 2026. cuz I did post the
notice to appear before the magistrate and again the administrative staff did mail the notice of violation to u notice to appear to the property owner via property appraiser. However, um it should be noted that um the property owner did speak to our administrative
staff informing them that our staff uh that his tenant will no longer be parking his tow truck at the property. However, the city is requesting adjudication showing that the tow truck was at the property. it was being stored at the property and that if it does show
up again um we could take them as a repeat offender. So all the city's requesting for is an adjudication. >> All right. Based on the unrebuted testimony of the code enforcement officer, I find a violation does did
exist. also find good notice. Given proper notice, honors have failed to appear hereby find in favor of the city and enter an adjudication. >> Thank you. >> All right. And just so you know, I realize how this
works. I'm able to work it now. When I hit the um the case, I had to just, you know, flip over because it opens on a a different page. All right, the next item we will be calling is item
number seven, Curtis Henson, case number C E ODS 2025 00267. This case was previously found guilty by magistrate Suarez with an abatement date of June 17 and fines were set at $500
per day plus $100 cost assessment. And the officer on this case is Mr. Ray Casemir. >> Good morning. >> Good morning. >> Good morning, magistrate. Inspector Renard has the mayor. This case has been going on since
November of 2025, the 14th day. Proper notice was given for this hearing on June the 4th. This the notice of violation. The notice to appear from the previous
magistrate. the affidavit of posting, the property appraiser, and the violation. The violation currently still exists. Oh, okay. What's going on here? that. Well, that's that's what's in
their backyard. >> Still there. >> Okay. Have you had contact with anyone at the property? >> Have not. >> And it's occupied. >> It's occupied. Well,
>> went by there this morning just to make sure. >> Would hate to be their next door neighbor. Okay. And it still look like this. Same condition. >> Same condition. Nothing change. I went by there this morning. I took pictures this morning.
>> Okay. All right. Based on the unrebuted testimony of the code enforcement officer and the evidence presented, I find that the violations still exist. Also find good notice. Given proper notice, owners have failed to appear. hereby fine in favor of the city and
turn adjudication owners. Wait, it was already ruled. Okay. The daily fine amount of $500 is hereby ratified. Sorry. All right, magistrate. The next item we'll be calling is item number 8, Danic
Borrange. Case number CEO DS 2025 00290. This case was previously found guilty by magistrate Suarez with an abatement date of June 17, 2026. Fines were set at 350 per day plus $100 cost assessment. And
the officer in this case is Rainol Casemir. >> This 1610, right? >> Correct. >> Correct. Pretty much same thing here. I pretty much uh gave them
the notices on the same the same date which was June the 3. Proper notice was given for this day. This is the original notice of violation. The notice to appear,
the affidavit of affidavit of posting the property appraiser, the postings. This is the violation. Same condition. >> Also went by there this morning to
check. So, same thing. Okay. Based on the unrebuted testimony of the code enforcement officer and the evidence presented, I find that the violations still exist. Also find good notice given proper notice. Owners have
failed to appear. The daily fine amount of $350 is hereby ratified. >> All right. Thank you, Mr. Casemir. Yeah, it was 350. Um, the fine amount was already set. It's just ratified.
All right. Thank you, Mr. Kasm. All right, magistrate. The next item we'll be calling is item number nine, Duche Bank National Trust and Co. But I said it wrong.
Case number CES UH2026002 and the officer on this case is officer Shanny Pressie. >> What's the number? >> Number nine. Hi, Officer Shaunie Press on the case
for case number CEUH 202600002 at 1977 Northeast 119 Road. Um this case was a unsafe structure case also. Um we took them to unsafe structure board in
2024 and as of today it's moving up. As of today they still not in compliance. Um the order was either to repair or demolish and as of today they
haven't did anything they call Try and go to the next picture. I did not want Seaw wall part of the seaw wall is correct. Then testifiers to notice for today's hearing.
>> Yeah. the um notice of up here was sent out certified mail to the um property that's on record
June 2nd and then I posted a property also I believe that same day. I'm trying to get to that right now. action report. I'm sorry. Some more pictures. All right. And um
you said the property is currently unsafe. Yes, it's it's not occupied right now, but it's listed as unsafe structure. >> Okay. All right. Based based on the unrebuted testimony of the
code enforcement officer and the evidence presented, I find that the violation does exist. Also find good notice. Given proper notice, owners have failed to appear. Hereby find in favor of the city intern adjudication. Owners have 30 days by which to resolve
the violation. The violation is not resolved by the abatement date. There will be a daily fine amount of $500. Magistrate, the next item we'll be calling is item number 15, Keystone Residential Development LLC. Case number
CEBP PR 2026 000051. And the officer on this case is Shanny Preie. >> We have I think 15, 16, and 17. >> Yeah, they're all the same development. You want me to just read all three of
them? No, these are different um these are very different um charges. Let me see. Building without permit vehicular crash into reparable. No, call
them separately. >> Okay. >> So, which one? >> The first one I just had. Yeah. Yeah. >> 15. Yeah. So, this is my action report. I'm sorry.
Shnie Pressie for um property address 10005 Northwest 123rd Street. Um this is for work without a permit. this um they did um work without a permit um from damages from a car collision that
happened in 2023 and they did the repairs without obtaining a permit. I posted on the property notice to appear was nailed out and posted um January I mean I'm sorry June 1st of 2026.
There go my affidavit of posting property appraisal. Um I tried to bring this case before and they done switch properties about I mean ownership about three times already. So this is the current owner now. Keystone
residential development and me posting it on the property and that's when it they had it boarded up and then you can actually see another picture where they repairing it and the
guy's working. >> Mhm. Okay. Based on the unrebuted testimony of the code enforcement officer and the evidence presented, I find that the violation does exist. Also find good notice. Given proper notice, owners have
failed to appear. Hereby find in favor of the city entering adjudication. Owners have 30 days by which to resolve the violation. If the violation is not resolved by the abatement date, that will be a daily fine amount of $400.
Okay, magistrate. The next item we'll be calling is item number 16, Keystone Residential Development LLC. Case number MHVIO20611 02. And the officer in this case is Shanny Pressie. Um, as I stated before, property address
10005 Northwest 123rd Street. And this is case MHVIO 2023 01102. The previous building official, he wrote it up as a MHVIO. As um vehicle crashed into the side of
the um property and it was damages, he asked for engineer letters and to repair the damages with the permit. As of today, um no permits was applied for, but they did um submit a engineer letter last month, but they still not in
compliance. And this is my action report. Notice of violation from me. um affidavit of um notice to appear posting on the property and mailed
outcertified mail some biz and then we shall have the same pictures cuz it's the same property all them all the three notices I put it in the same envelope and posted it on the property that same day June 1st
and then you see the previous pictures when they boarded it up and then the same pictures the they repaired it. >> All right. So, for this one, the the request was to provide an
engineers's letter and what was the second violation because >> um apply for the required permit. >> Okay. All right. So, that wasn't done. Got it. So they're in partial
compliance. But uh all right based on the unrebuted testimony of the code enforcement officer and the evidence presented I find that the violation does exist. Also find good notice given proper notice. Owners have failed to appear.
Um I find in favor of the city entering adjudication. Owners have 30 days by which to comply. If failed to comply within the 30 days, there will be a daily fine amount of $250. Okay, magistrate. The next item we'll be
calling is item number 17, Keystone Residential Development LLC. Case number RCC 0R2026003. And the officer in this case is Shanny Pressie. >> Um
same property address. Um name of the property owner is Keystone Residential Development. Um case number RCC 20260000003. Um this is for um not obtaining a reoccupancy
um transfer of title. It has been transferred over I believe three times at this property and they have as of today they not in compliance. Um sent out server notice and I pushed the case back I think twice already.
Um my affidavit um I post on the property my violation notice notice to appear and You got the sunbiz, the current owner,
and then my pictures that I post on the property. Okay. Based on the unreedited testimony of the code enforcement officer and the evidence presented, I find the
violation does exist. also find good notice. Given proper notice, owners have failed to appear hereby find in favor of the city entering an adjudication. Owners have 30 days by which to comply. If no compliance by the abatement date,
there will be a daily fine amount of $250. M state, the next item we'll be calling is item number 19, NMBB Partners LLC. Case number FYBRRR 2022 000079.
And the officer on this case is Shanny Presley. >> Shnie Pressy. Um case number FYBRR 2022 00979. Um this is Gartner resertification. Um as of today they not in compliance.
Um this case from 2022. A previous um inspector had this case and I just took over. Um that's my action report. I myself um sent out a notice of violation um May 18
of 2026. I had gave them to June which I think there was like 30 days to to comply and they still have not as of today. notice to appear was sent out
June 1st. uh affidavit of posting sunb certified mail certified mail and I'm trying to get to the pictures just a notice that the previous
inspector sent out to the property. Where's my picture? I don't know what's going on here. skin frozen. >> All right. Forgot to write down the date. Um, what was notice sent again?
>> June, I'm sorry. Yeah, June 1st, 2026. Got it. All right. Based on the unreedited testimony of the code enforcement officer evidence and evidence presented, I find that the violation does exist. Also find good notice given proper notice. Owners
have failed to appear hereby find in favor of the city enter adjudication. Owners have 30 days by which to resolve the violation. If the violation is not resolved by the abatement date, there will be a daily fine amount of $350. All right, magistrate. The next item
we'll be calling is item number 21, Sanusi Apartments Properties LLC, case number FYRR201 00097. His case was previously found guilty by Magistrate Suarez with an abatement date
of June 17, 2026. Fines were set at $500 per day plus $100 cost assessment. And the officer on this case is Shnie Pressie. >> Hi, Shnie Pressie for case number FYBRRR 2021 0097.
Um this is for 1795 Northeast 116 Road. Um as um the reertification was due in 2021. As of today, they still not in compliance. since 2021.
>> These old cases from previous and um individuals work for the city. >> Yeah, that's egregious. Okay. >> Go back. Did you testify to notice? >> Excuse me.
>> Notice >> the notice was mailed out June 1st of 2021. I mean 2026 and also posted the same day. Based on the unreuted testimony of the code enforcement officer, I find that the violation does exist. Also find good
notice. Given proper notice, owners have failed to appear. The daily fine amount of $500 is hereby ratified. The next item we will be calling magistrate is item number 25. So and Michael Properties LLC
case number FYRR2021 000184 and the officer on this case is Shiny Pressy. Case number FYBRRR 202100184, address 13200 Northeast 6th Avenue. Um, this again a case of resertification
from 2021. As of today, they still not in compliance. um notice was sent out, final notice and reinspection was sent out June 6 I mean yeah June 1st of 2026 and
property sitting not in compliance as of today get to that >> that's another 2021 >> okay based on the unreuted testimony of the code enforcement officer and the evidence presented I find that the violation does exist I also will find
good notice. Given proper notice, owners have failed to appear. Hereby find in favor of the city intern adjudication. Owners have 30 days by which to resolve the violation. If the violation is not resolved by the abatement date, that will be a daily fine amount, $350.
>> Okay, magistrate, that's that's it for today. That concludes today's hearing. >> All right, we're adjourned.