>> THIS IS A HYBRID MEETING  THIS MEETING HAS BEEN PROPERLY  NOTICE AND WILL BE CONDUCTED  AS A HYBRID MEETING REQUIRING  THE USE OF COMMUNICATIONS  MEDIA TECHNOLOGY KNOWN AS CMT  A PHYSICAL FORM OF VOTING  MEMBERS IS PRESENT AND CITY  COMMISSION CHAMBER CHAMBERS, A  HYBRID MEETING ALLOWS VOTING  MEMBERS TO ATTEND AND  PARTICIPATE WITHOUT PHYSICALLY  BEING PRESENT IN THE ROOM  WHERE STORM IS CONVENED. WE  HAVE VICE MAYOR STOKES MYSELF  MAYOR WHITE COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL. COMMISSIONER LANGDON  AND WE WILL NOW HEAR FROM  COMMISSIONER AND WITH HIS  VIRTUAL ATTENDEES STATEMENT.  ARE YOU THERE COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE.  >> I AM BUT I MISPLACED  PAPERWORK, I'M LOOKING AL AND  GET BACK WITH YOU ON THAT.  >> NUMBER NOW.  >> I  >> WILL ALSO PRESENT WE HAVE  CITY MANAGER A LECTURE CITY  ATTORNEYS SLAYTON CITY.  >> CLERK HOUSE. ABOARD  SPECIALIST MERCK OKAY I DIDN'T  DO MY ROLLED POLICE CHIEF  HARRIS SAID THIS IN THE BACK  AND CHIEF TITUS THANK YOU VERY  MUCH. WE CAN DO THE PLEDGE  WHILE WE'RE WAITING RIGHT.  OKAY SO COULD WE HAVE WITH  YOUR BACK THERE. YES. YES,  PLEASE. UNITED STATES OF  AMERICA AND STANDS NATION  UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH  LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.  >> THANK  >> COMMISSIONER  >> I WANT WE CAN MOVE ON TO  APPROVAL OF AGENDA PAPER.  >> AND SO I'M LOOKING FOR A  MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.  SO MOVED ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A  MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.  I COMMISSIONERS STAY SECONDED  BY COMMISSIONER LANGDON  THERE'S NOTHING ELSE WE WOULD  DO VOICE VOTE FROM THE DAIS UP  VICE YES, NEAR DO AND THANKS.  >> AND MAYOR, I FOUND THE  PAPERWORK.  >> OKAY WE'RE IN THE MIDDLE OF  A MOTION WE JUST GOT TO DO THE  MOTION CONDITIONS. IT'S JUST A  PRIVILEGE END THIS IS A LOOK  AT WHAT IS THERE OKAY.  ♪ I GO AHEAD  ♪ COMMISSIONER AVERAGE.  >> YEAH IT WAS STUCK IN MY  NOTEBOOK, HAS AUTHORIZED BY  CITY COMMISSION POLICY NUMBER  2021 DASH I AM ATTENDING THE  HYBRID MEETING COMMUNICATIONS  MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES.  EXPERIENCING A MEDICAL  CONDITION. INCLUDING MANY  DISABILITIES PREVENTING ME  FROM ATTENDING THIS MEETING IN  PERSON AT THIS TIME, THANK  YOU.  >> ALL RIGHT SO LOOKING FOR A  MOTION APPROVE THE USE CMT FOR  A HYBRID MEETING SECOND WE  HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE  USE OF CMT FOR THIS HYBRID  MEETING MADE BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON AND SECONDED BY VICE  MAYOR. SO THERE'S NOTHING ELSE  LET'S DO A VO VICE MAYOR I'M A  YES THERE IS A YES MIND AND  SAY YES COMMISSIONER AVERAGE.  >> OKAY SO THAT DOES ASK FOR  2, 0, AND WE DID APPROVE  AGENDA. SO MOVING ON TO PUBLIC  NO PUBLIC COMMENT. THEY TO THE  CONSENT AGENDA. CITY MANAGER  HAS ANYTHING BEEN INVOLVED. DO  WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT.  >> SO I'M LOOKING OR A MAKE IT  I MOVE TO APPROVE THE ITEMS  AND THE CONSENT AGENDA SO WE  HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE  ITEMS IN THE CONSENT AGENDA  WHICH CONSISTS OF ONE ITEM 2  IS THAT OKAY THAT WAS MADE BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON AND  SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR SO WILL  DO A VOICE. VOTE I MAY REPLACE  MEASURES. YES MAYOR ZS LANGDON  SAY YES TELL US. MUCH. I MEAN  YES ALL RIGHT SO THAT PASSES 5  TO 0 MOVING ON TO PUBLIC  HEARINGS RESOLUTION NUMBER 2,  0, 2, 4 DASH R DASH 37.  ♪ >> CITY CLERK IN DOING THIS BY  TITLE RESOLUTION NUMBER 2024  DASH R DASH 37 RESOLUTION OF  THE CITY COMMISSION, THE CITY  IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA AS THE  GOVERNING BODY OF THE NORTH  PORT ROAD AND DRAINAGE  DISTRICT AMENDING THE NORTH  PORT ROAD AND DRAINAGE  DISTRICT BUDGET FISCAL YEAR  2023 TO 2024 FOR HURRICANE  FINANCIAL RECOVERY ASSISTANCE  AND THE AMOUNT OF 1 MILLION  DOLLARS PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS  PROVIDING FOR POSTING  PROVIDING  ♪ FOR COMPLEX PROVIDING FOR  SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING  EFFECTIVE DATE. CITY MANAGER  THIS IS YOUR ITEM.  >> THANK YOU THIS, FOR A  DOLLAR REQUEST FOR HURRICANE  BUT RECOVERY ASSISTANCE  SUPPORT WORK ASSIGNMENT W A 23  TO 18 CAN GIVE YOU. THAT DO  WANT ACTIVITIES BUT ROSS ARE  84. BUT IT RECOVERY FROM  NEEDED. WE HAVE TO YOU PROVE  IT IN WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS  YOU MAY HAVE. ALL RIGHT.  >> MOVING ON ANY QUESTIONS.  NOT SEEING ANY COMMISSIONER  EMRICH YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.  >> NO MA'AM.  >> DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC  COMMENT. I'M GOING TO CLOSE  THIS PORTION OF THE PUBLIC  HEARING AND LOOKING FOR A  MOTION. MAKE IT A HAT.  >> MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION  NUMBER 2024 DASH OR DASH 37%.  >> ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION  MADE BY VICE MAYOR TO ADOPT  RESOLUTION NUMBER 4 DASH R  DASH 3, 7, AS PRESENTED AND  THAT WAS SECONDED BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL.  >> IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE WE  ALL FOR A VOICE.  >> VICE MAYOR OF VICE MAYORS  AGAINST HERE'S E S LANGDON YES  COMMISSIONER HEMORRHAGE. YES  ALL RIGHT SO THAT PASSES 5 TO  0. ANY PUBLIC COMMENT. OKAY,  NO PUBLIC COMMENT. SO. YEAH SO  IT IS. 4 O 7 AND I ADJOURN  THIS ROAD DRAINAGE DISTRICT  MEETING.  ♪ AND IT BACK TO ENSURE OUR  BUSINESSES IN NORTH RESOURCES,  THEY IN ORDER TO HAVE OKAY 7  AND WE'RE CONTINUING WITH OUR  REGULAR MEETING THAT STARTED  THIS MORNING AND AND  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL WANT TO  THE FLOOR FOR A FEW MINUTES  YEAH IN IT'S NOW ALMOST 10  AFTER 4. WE HAVE SO MANY MANY  AGENDA ITEMS TO GO OVER.  >> I WANTED TO SEE IF I COULD  ♪ >> GET THE. CONSENSUS FROM MY  BORDER.  >> THE GENTLEMAN THAT'S HERE  HE'S BEEN HERE ALL DAY HE'S  HERE FOR ONE SPECIFIC ITEM AND  THAT HAS TO DO WITH GENERAL  BUSINESS REGARDING THE LEAD TO  FINES AND FORECLOSURES WE HAVE  LOT TO GO THROUGH BETWEEN NOW  AND THE TIME WE GET THERE, I'M  WONDERING IF MAYBE WE COULD  HEAR THAT ITEM NOW I DON'T  THINK IT'LL VERY LONG THIS WAY  HE CAN GO OUT TO STAY TUNED.  POSSIBLY JUST CONTINUING ALL  OF THE OTHER GENERAL BUSINESS  ITEMS TO THE 7.25 COMMISSION  SPECIAL MEETING THIS WAY THE  CLERK HAS TIME TO AMEND THAT  AGENDA TO INCLUDE THOSE ITEMS  ALL OF THE GENERAL BUSINESS  ITEMS EXCEPT FOR 6 TO BE.  >> SO WHAT NUMBER WHAT WHERE  YOU STARTED O 5 6, GENERAL  BUSINESS YEP. ALL OF THEIR  BUSINESS. NO NOT THAT 6 P.  WHICH IS FOR FINES RIGHT.  >> AND LIENS AND FORECLOSURE  TO HEAR THAT NOW NOW AND  CONTINUE ITEM 6 A 6 E D 6 D 66  F 66 AGE TO THE 7.25  COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING FOR  IF YOU'D RATHER I MAKE A  MOTION I'LL BE HAPPY TO DO  THAT NO MATTER  >> AND ME MINUTE TOO. WHAT YOU  WANT TO DO HERE. SATELITE YET  TO WANT BE DEFINITELY DO YOU  WANT EVERYTHING ELSE. THAT  THAT NOW. ANYTHING THAT IS  THERE ANYTHING YOU WE HAVE TO  ADDRESS THAT. ONLY BEEN THERE  WERE TIMES RIGHT.  >> THEY'RE ALL GENERAL  BUSINESS WANT  >> A MOTION YET HAT.  >> I THINK THE MOTION TO YOUR  ITEM 6 BE NOW. AND CONTINUE  ITEM 6 6 C 6 D 6 6 AF 6 G 6 H  TO THE JULY 25TH SPECIAL  MEETING.  >> A SECOND ALL RIGHT SO WE  HAVE A MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL TO MOVE  I BUSINESS THE 24 DASH 0, 9,  1, 7, HEAR THAT NOW AND TO  MOVE ITEMS 6 A D E AT THE AGE  TO THE SPECIAL MEETING ON JULY  25TH 2024. AND THAT WAS  SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR. WE'VE  BEEN WITH THAT. OK LETS TO A  VOICE VO VICE MAYOR SPEARS  MAYOR YES. LANGDON SAY YES, DO  THINK COMMISSIONER OKAY THAT  PASSES TO 0 SO WE HAVE OUR  TRAJECTORY YES ANYTHING.  ♪ ♪ YOU KNOW HE'S GOING. YEAH  RIGHT SO. WE'RE GOING TO HEAR  THAT NOW THAT  >> SO I SIC 6TH BE WE THANK  YOU. THANKS HER.  >> SUGGESTION THAT I WAS  ACCIDENT THEY WOULD NOT EVEN  HAVE TO IT'S A VOTING ISSUE  FOR HIM, YEAH, HE WAS HERE FOR  K. THAT'S WAY UP AROUND A GOT  MY  >> I TO ITEM GENERAL BUSINESS  THE 24 DASH 0, 9, 1, 7,  >> THE CITY MANAGER THIS IS  YOUR ITEM. THANK YOU.  DISCUSSION ABOUT BACK CITY  CODE 2 DASH FIVE-ELEVEN SO  WHEN THE WIND REALLY MEANS IN  BIG CITY CODE TO THAT 11 ACT  IT REQUESTED BY COMMISSIONER  ALL RIGHT COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL AWAY.  >> YES, SO  >> I'VE MULTIPLE CITIZENS  OVERTIME APPROACH ME ABOUT  FINES AND LIENS. IT. THERE WAS  LIKE 2 OR 3 OF THEM THAT CAME  ONE RIGHT AFTER THE AND IT'S  WITH THE GROWTH OF A LOT  FLIPPERS WANT TO BUY PROPERTY.  THEY KNOW THAT THERE'S FINES  AND LIENS THEY KNOW THAT  THERE'S BUT THOSE ARE SO  EXPENSIVE THAT MAKES IT. THE  FINES AND LIENS AND EVERYTHING  MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THE ACTUAL  PROPERTY'S VALUE FOR EXAMPLE,  THERE'S THAT HAS $700,000  MEANS AND FINDS IN THE  BASEMENTS. THAT'S NEVER GOING  TO GET DEVELOPED AND BECAUSE  HE'S BLACK TURN CITIES ON THE  CITY IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS. SO  >> I REVIEWED THE CODE AND THE  BIGGEST HICCUP IN OUR CODE IS  IS A RELIEF PROGRAM AND IF THE  RELIEF PROGRAM. BUT THE  BIGGEST IS DOES NOT APPLY. 2  LIENS FROM FINES IMPOSED AFTER  OCTOBER OF 2010. SO THEY THAT  IN THE COLD SO SO WE CAN DO  ANYTHING ABOUT SO THIS IS ONE  OF THE BIGGEST PROBLEMS. IN  OUR CODE THAT WE NEED TO  CORRECT. THE OTHER PROBLEM IS  IS WHEN YOU HAVE AN EXISTING  PROPERTY OWNER. WE HAVE TO  BRING IT INTO COMPLIANCE. AND  THEN ASK FOR RELIEF. BUT IT  DOESN'T APPLY IF IT'S AFTER 20  NOW THERE'S ALSO A PROPERTY  OWNERS THAT PROPERTY THAT'S  THROUGH FORECLOSURE OR  JUDICIAL AVENUES. BUT THE NEW  OWNERS. HAVE TO BRING PROPERTY  INTO COMPLIANCE AT THE TIME OF  APPLICATION. THEY THIS  PROPERTY. THEY HAVE TO BRING  NEW COMPLIANCE THEN THEY CAN  FILE THE APPLICATION AND HOPE.  THAT THE COMMISSION SAID YES  WE'RE GOING TO RELEASE SOME OF  THOSE FINES FEATS. AND THEN  THE OTHER SCENARIO IS WHERE  THERE'S AN ON PROPERTY OWNER.  THAT HAS ASSAILED THAT'S  PENDING AND THEY HAVE LIKE  BONA FIDE CONTRACT IN THEIR  POSSESSION. BUT YOU FOR HIM TO  GET RELIEVED OF FINES AND FEES  THEY HAVE AGREED TO BRING IT  INTO COMPLIANCE WITHIN 90  DAYS. AND WE ALL KNOW WHAT  SUPPLY CHAIN ISSUES HOW 90  DAYS IS NOWHERE NEAR ENOUGH  TIME TO EVEN GET A CONTRACTOR  SOMETIMES OUT COME TAKE A LOOK  AT IT.  >> ESPECIALLY IF THERE'S A LOT  OF THINGS THAT THEY NEED TO  FIX.  >> OR ELSE THE AGREEMENT FOR  WAIVING FEES AND FINES. THOSE  MAKES IT POINT IF THEY DON'T  BRING IN COMPLIANCE. BUT THEN  IT'S BACK TO THAT PESKY LITTLE  OCTOBER OF 2010 IT WOULDN'T  APPLY.  >> SO SO MY MY REQUEST IS IS  VERY SIMPLE. IS TO SEE IF WE  CAN STAFF TO REALLY WORK ON  THIS PART OF THE CO.  >> AND BRINGING THAT FOR  COMMISSION FOR FIRST READING  TO CLEAN IT UP AND MAKE IT SO  THAT IT EASIER TO BRING  PROPERTIES. THAT GOT TO THAT  ACTUALS BACK TO BEING PART OF  THE NEIGHBORHOOD INSTEAD OF  BEING A HINDRANCE TO THE  NEIGHBORHOOD. SO THAT THESE  POTENTIAL PROPERTY OWNERS OR.  FUTURE RESIDENTS. FLIPPERS  WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CAN CAN  ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING POSITIVE  IN THE CITY. I AM NOT IN ANY  WAY SHAPE OR FORM ADVOCATING  FOR A BEATING. SOME OF THE THE  REASONS FOR THESE FINES AND  PENALTIES, I'M NOT ADVOCATING  FOR WAIVING THE ADMINISTRATIVE  WHEN SOMEBODY IS PURCHASING  THESE PROPERTIES THEY KNOW  THAT HEY THE CITY HAS HAD TO  CUT GRASS AND BORN OF THAT  BUILDING AND MAINTAINING  CERTAIN THINGS FOR HEALTH AND  SAFETY. THOSE SHOULD BE PART  OF THERE REQUIREMENTS BRING  INTO COMPLIANCE AND PAY FOR  THOSE SERVICES AND THEY KNOW  THIS WHEN THEY BUY THE  PROPERTY. BUT A LOT OF THE  FINES AND PENALTIES. WE CAN WE  HAVE THE ABILITY TO REDUCE OR  ABSOLVED. SO I JUST WANTED TO  SEE ABOUT HAVING THE  CONVERSATION SO I HOPE I  CLEARLY THAT EXPLAINS WHAT  THIS CODE IT IS A VERY COMPLEX  CODE AND IT TOOK ME QUITE A  WHILE TO COME UNDERSTAND IT.  >> BUT THE BIGGEST THING IS  OVER 2010. THAT REALLY NEEDS  TO BE FIXED. AND I'M SURE  STAFF WILL BE ABLE TO ANSWER A  LOT OF YOUR QUESTIONS AND  THAT. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER  LANGDON.  >> YEAH, VERY INTERESTED IN  SUPPORT OF COMING UP WITH A  REASONABLE POLICY FOR ALL THE  REASONS COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL.  SUGGESTED I ALSO HAD SEVERAL  CONVERSATIONS SO MANY MISTAKES  TO AND THE AUDIENCE. BUT I  HAVE A LOT OF QUESTIONS YOU  KNOW THIS IS NOT A SIMPLE ONE  THERE A LOT OF MOVING PARTS SO  JUST A FEW THINGS I WOULD WANT  TO KNOW WHEN WE HAVE A  CONVERSATION ABOUT THIS IS  WHAT ARE OTHER MUNICIPALITIES  AROUND US DOING THAT'S ALWAYS  A GOOD PLACE TO START.  >> WOULD THIS BE A COMMISSION  AFRAID DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE  UP TO A CERTAIN DOLLAR VALUE  SELECT WHAT ARE THE AND THEN  WATER THE LEN THAT'S WHAT THE  POLICY BE. YOU KNOW THE CITY  RECOUPS ANY DIRECT COSTS OF  DEALING WITH THIS PROPERTY AND  THE REST IS IS UP FOR  >> I'D BE VERY INTERESTED IN  YOUR INITIAL FINE ON THAT.  >> I WE CAN BUT I WOULD LIKE  THIS TO COME BACK WHAT A  WINERY DIRECTOR DON'T SERVICES  WE CAN PROBABLY MAKE THIS  PRETTY QUICK AN EASY FOR YOU.  THERE ARE BETTER WAYS OF  HANDLING IT OTHER CITIES HAVE  BETTER WAYS OF HANDLING IT I'M  LORI AND I ARE BOTH FAMILIAR  WITH SOME OF THOSE WAYS TO DO  THAT. IT CAN BE AN  ADMINISTRATIVE IT COULD BE A  PROCESS WHERE WE TAKE A  REQUEST TO BE HEARING  MAGISTRATE. WE GET RULING FROM  HIM AND THEN WE BRING A  RESOLUTION TO THE COMMISSION.  WE DO WANT TO ENSURE THAT CITY  BECAUSE IT'S HARD ANY  CONTRACTOR COSTS.  >> AND COST THAT WE PAY TO  LIENS BECAUSE THAT IS A COST  BUT SOME OF THE INTEREST AND  PENALTIES RUN INTO THE  HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS ON THESE  PROPERTIES THIS THIS CODE THE  WAY IT'S WRITTEN IS IS NOT  CONDUCIVE TO ALLOWING US TO  BRING THESE PROPERTIES AND TO  WORK WITH THE THE BUYERS TO  BRING THESE PROPERTIES INTO  CONFORMANCE SO WHAT I WOULD  SUGGEST IS US WORK ON IT AND  BRING YOU BACK SOME OF OUR  BEST SUGGESTIONS. AND AND GO  FROM WE WE THINK THAT WE CAN  PROVIDES COUPLE OF OPTIONS  THAT MUCH SIMPLER MUCH CLEANER  AND WILL ACCOMPLISH EVERYTHING  THAT THE COMMISSION WANTS TO  ACCOMPLISH AND REALLY HELP  PEOPLE TO BRING THESE  PROPERTIES UP AND BE ABLE TO  RESELL THEM SO THERE. BIBLE  PROPERTIES IN ARE THERE NOW  AND ASSET TO THEIR  NEIGHBORHOODS RATHER THAN A  DETRIMENT.  >> VICE MAYOR TO SHORT AND  SWEET A BIT OF REAL SUPPORT OF  THIS IS A GREAT I LOOK FORWARD  STAGGERING BACK. YOU KNOW  PROPOSALS IT IS.  RECOMMENDATIONS SO.  >> ALL COMMISSIONER EMRICH YOU  HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD.  >> MAYOR NOT REALLY THAT'S A  GOOD IDEA THAT STAFF COME  SINCE.  >> I THINK IT'S A IDEA TO  THANK YOU COMMISSIONER DOUBT  THAT BRINGING THIS THIS  BECAUSE THOSE PLACES MUST BE  EYESORE THAT'S ALL I CAN THINK  AND I I REMEMBER WE HAD OUR  CRASH I ROUTE COMMISSIONER  MEMBERS THIS TIME HOW WE HAD  ALREADY HOUSES JUST ABANDONED  THEIR PROPERTIES AND WAS  REALLY NOT MUCH TO DO ABOUT IT  SO AGAIN STAFF THEY'RE THE  BEST WANTS TO COME BACK WITH  SUGGESTIONS IDEAS TO GET GET  RESOLVED AND ALSO BUT THOSE  HOUSES BACK.  >> WHERE THEY SHOULD BE SO  THEY'RE NOT A BLIGHT FOR THOSE  UNABLE OR WHERE WE GO FROM  HERE. COMMISSIONER NOW YEAH I  AM SO GRATEFUL. FOR SUPPORT ON  AND I LOOK FORWARD TO STAFF  BRING BACK RECOMMENDATIONS  OBVIOUSLY THERE WE ARE IN NO  POSITION TO DO ANYTHING TODAY.  >> BUT TO BRING BACK SOME  IDEAS AND SUGGESTIONS. I.  >> I WOULD BE MORE AMENABLE TO  BRING IT BACK AS A REGULAR  COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA FOR  DISCUSSION AS OPPOSED TO A  WORKSHOP SO THAT WE THEN WE  CAN GET THINGS MOVING AND  MAYBE EVEN BE ABLE TO HAVE  FIRST READING SHORTLY AFTER  THAT WORKSHOP BECAUSE I KNOW  THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT  ARE TRYING VERY HARD TO BRING  THEIR PROPERTIES NOT ONLY INTO  COMPLIANCE AND REMOVE THAT  LIGHT. BUT THEY'RE WAITING TO  FIND OUT IF THEY CAN GET SOME  OF THESE FEES AND ABSOLVED SO  I AM VERY GRATEFUL FOR IT I AM  SURE THAT ONE OF THE PARTIES  IS I'M. AND PUBLIC COMMENT IF  YOU WOULD LIKE.  >> IF THE COMMISSION WERE  MINIMAL WE COULD BRING BACK  OUR BEST SUGGESTION AS A FIRST  READING AND IF YOU WANT TO  MAKE CHANGES WE CAN DO THAT  BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND  READING THAT WOULD CERTAINLY  REDUCE YEAH THAT THE TIMELINE  BY SEVERAL WEEKS SO I HAVE A  FEELING THAT STAFF HAS BEEN  HEARING FROM A LOT OF  REPUBLICAN SLIPPERS PROPERTY  OWNERS ABOUT DOING SOMETHING  LIKE MAYO BEEN DISCUSSING THIS  FOR SOME TIME AND AND WE EVEN  DID A LEGAL REQUEST PREVIOUSLY  YEAH, I'M ON THIS ISSUE  BECAUSE WE WERE TRYING TO FIND  A WAY AROUND THE THINK FORWARD  YES, THINK I KNOW I KNOW SOME  OF MY COMMISSIONERS DON'T TIME  COMES.  >> PLEASE DO PLEASE DON'T ASK  ME MY LAST YEAR AND THINK THAT  THEY MIGHT BE ABLE BE DONE  BEFORE NOVEMBER OR NO NO AMBER  WE COME OVER HERE AND BEAT ME  IF I THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  >> OKAY SO LET'S SAY DO WE  HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON  THAT ALL RIGHT, OKAY.  >> ABOUT THIS SO SITUATION  WITH THE. WELL SO ABLE PUT THE  HOUSE IN THE END OF AND THAT'S  ONLY 5 WINDOW. SHE KNOWS DOING  A LITTLE BIT OF CARES ABOUT  THIS WE MEET ITS LIKE A VENUE  SO THAT THE TO JUSTIN FOR THIS  HOUSE WAS THAT IT WAS GIFT TO  STRUCTURE. SO WE WE MADE THE  RULE LIKE IN BUT IT HAS TO BE.  SO IN THE GARDENS THE CITY  CODES. SO THE HOUSE TOO LATE I  DON'T WANT IT'S DOING LIVES.  NOBODY CARES ABOUT THIS HOUSE  10 YEARS WAS 2 YEARS IN A  MARKET WAS IT'S YOURS. YEARS  JUST FOR SO NOBODY CARES ABOUT  THIS HOUSE. AND NOT JUST JUST  AFTER JUST AFTER I WON I AM  NOT IN THE IN PROCESS OVERALL  FORECLOSURE. THAT IS MY SON  JUST YOU THAT IS MY CONCERN. I  MADE THIS FORMALLY AND I'M NOT  FORECLOSURE. SO TAKE IT FOR  YEARS, NOBODY CARES ABOUT THIS  HOUSE JUST JUST JUST RIGHT  AFTER I WON IT. IT'S ON THE  FOCAL HOW DID GET INTO THAT  OKAY. WELL I'M NOT GOING TO  FLIP AGENDA JUST SIGN,  WHATEVER WHATEVER SO SO TO  MAKE IT MONEY IS THEN SHOW A  SECOND THAT IT IS EVENTUALLY I  DON'T HAVE AN INTENTION TO  SELL IT. BUT I AM NOW THE  PROCESS OF A FORECLOSURE. JUST  WRITE UP WHAT AFTER THAT RIGHT  AFTER I BELIEVE THAT THE NEW  THE HOUSES OF 82. SO IT'S A  LITTLE AND NOW ALL OF UNDER  THE TO PUT CLOSURE I THINK  ALREADY. 4 BELOW. ALMOST  $6,000 LOOKING FOR THE  UTILITIES. IT DOES AND ALLISON  LIEN IT DOESN'T DOLLARS SO  TOTAL $20,000 AND ALL. FOUND  IT ON THE FLY. WAS AND ALL OF  THIS IS THAT THERE'S A PUT OUT  A STRUCTURE. IT AND SAY  SPECTOR IS NOTICED RENT. BUT  LITTLE IS ALREADY BEEN MOVED  UP FOR THEM TO THE OLD OLDER.  DIDN'T HOLD THE. IT'S BEEN  ACCORDING TO GOVERNMENT. BUT  THAT WAS OPEN. I HADN'T  EXPECTED INSPECTION.  INSPECTION INSPECTION SAID  THAT EVERYTHING OK I MOVE THAT  SO THAT IS ALL ON SAFETY  SECTION MORE.  ♪ ♪ >> BUT THING THE $16,000  >> THE WHOLE THING IS TO  CONVERT YOU TO KNOW THANK YOU  FOR SHARING YOUR STORY AND  SORRY. HEAR THAT STORY  >> COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL I  HOPE THAT THERE'S A  ♪ >> WAY WHEN WE HAVE THE  PROPERTY OWNER CITIZEN. WHO IS  MAKING A CONCERTED EFFORT TO  BRING A BUILDING INTO  COMPLIANCE THAT HAS ALL FEES  AND PENALTIES TO STAY ANY TYPE  OF FORECLOSURE WHILE WE WORK  THROUGH  ♪ THIS PROCESS. BECAUSE  ACCORDING TO OUR CODE OF THIS  PROPERTY SHOULD HAVE BEEN  FORECLOSED YEARS AGO. NOT WHEN  THEY'RE TRYING TO FIX IT SO IF  SOMEBODY FROM STAFF CAN LET ME  KNOW HOW THAT WOULD WORK.  ELAINE I SAME AS RAE ALREADY  WHEN SHE WAS DOWN. THAT WAS  GOING TO BE MY REQUEST THAT  STAFF.  >> FIRST LET ME ADDRESS THIS  ISSUE I THOUGHT WE'VE ALREADY  BEEN WORKING WITH OUR  ENFORCEMENT MANAGER IN OUR  OFFICIAL AND TO PUT THAT  FORECLOSURE ON HOLD. SO THAT  CAN GIVE THEM AN OPPORTUNITY  FOR THIS TO TAKE PLACE AND  THEY'LL BENEFIT FROM ALL OF  THIS WORK. SO WE'VE THEY HAVE  THEY HAVE BEEN BRINGING IT  INTO CONFORMANCE THEY'VE  WORKED BUILDING OFFICIAL THEY  HAVE GOTTEN THEIR INSPECTIONS.  THEY PAY THE HARD COSTS THAT  THE CITY EXPENDED SO. PUT THAT  ON HOLD WITH FORECLOSURE  ACTION ON HOLD. SAYS THEY JUST  RECENTLY BOUGHT IT SO THAT WE  COULD WILL GET THE CHANGED AND  THEN WE'LL BE ABLE SYSTEM WITH  THAT. BUT THAT WOULD BE INTENT  IS FOR. CLOSER ACTIONS, NOBODY  ENJOYS DOING THEY'RE REALLY  DIFFICULT SO INTENT WOULD BE  TO LIKE THIS COULD SEE THAT WE  WE CAN WORK WITH ELEMENTS  PEOPLE AND WE DON'T HAVE TO GO  THAT PROCESS.  >> YOU KNOW OTHERS THAT ARE  TRYING TO BRING PROPERTIES  INTO COMPLIANCE THAT ARE IN A  SIMILAR SITUATION.  >> ONE THAT WE WE DIDN'T WE  HADN'T YET MOVED FORWARD ON  THE FORECLOSURE YET, WE ARE  WORKING WITH THEM TO RESOLVE  THE ISSUES AND I'M SURE THAT  STAFF FORGO ANY OF THAT  FORECLOSURE ACTION IF THERE IS  A. ENTITY THAT IS REALLY  TRYING TO BRING IT INTO  COMPLIANCE ITS KIND IN THE  FACE RIGHT AND AND THAT ONE  HAD STARTED BEFORE ALL OF THIS  HAPPENED SO. IT WE HAD IT TOOK  SOME TIME HOPE THE WHEELS FROM  SOMETHING. I'M THE RESIDENT MY  CARD AS WELL SO THAT WE CAN  MAKE SURE THAT THERE UP TO  SPEED ON EVERYTHING THAT  WORKING THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  >> I MAKE A READY FOR PUBLIC  WRIGHTWOOD DOWN WITH PUBLIC  COMMENT GO RIGHT AHEAD.  >> I MAKE A MOTION TO INSTRUCT  STAFF TO BRING BACK TO  COMMISSION A DOCUMENT  REGARDING FINDS LANDS AND  FORECLOSURES FOR FIRST  READING.  >> ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION  MADE BY COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL.  YOU STRUCK STAFF. CITY MANAGER  YET TO DIRECTLY MANAGE MANAGER  TO INSTRUCT STAFF TO BRING  BACK SUGGESTED. I'M SORRY GO  AHEAD. SAY IT AGAIN  >> TO MAKE A MOTION TO  INSTRUCT STAFF TO BRING BACK  FOR FIRST READING. THE  ORDINANCE RELATING TO FIND  MEANS FORECLOSURES THAT IS  OUTLINED IN SECTION 2 DASH 5  DASH 1, 1, IN THE CITY CODE.  ♪ ♪ >> ALL RIGHT AND THAT WAS  SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR. I  >> HER OTHER EAR NEEDED THAT  WAS SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON.  >> IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE  JUST CAN CALL FOR A VOTE.  >> I JUST WANT TO FOR COMING  OUT. YES ARE YOU SAYING SO  LONG AND WAITED I APPRECIATE  THAT.  >> SO IT'S STILL A VOICE VOTE.  THANKS MADAM S MAYOR, THE S  LANGDON SAY YES MACDILL IS  ABSOLUTELY YES. COMMISSIONER  YES, OKAY THAT PASSES 5, 2,  LOOKING FORWARD TO THAT.  >> FIRST READING WHEN  ORDINANCE GREAT.  >> YOU KNOW THAT'S OR INSURER  REPORTED 24 DASH FIRST  CONTINUED.  >> CITY CLERK AND YOU'RE TYPE  I WILL NEED A MOTION MOTION TO  REVIVE EFFORTS TO REACH MIAMI  ORDINANCE.  >> IT ONLY SECOND.  >> MADE BY COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL TO DIRECT THE CITY  CLERK TO READ THAT ONLY IN  THAT SECOND BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON WILL DO A VOICE. VOTE  ICE MAYOR PLACE WHERE IS MAYOR  ZS YES. MCDOWELL, COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE.  >> YES ALL RIGHT SO HEAD TO  >> ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE FL  AMENDING THE UNIFIED LAND  DEVELOPMENT CODE REPEALING ALL  CHAPTERS EXCEPT AFTER 29 SIGN  REGULATIONS CREATING A NEW  CHAPTER ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS  CREATING A NEW CHAPTER TO  DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CREATING A  NEW CHAPTER 3 ZONING CREATING  A NEW CHAPTER FOR SITE  DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CREATING  A NEW CHAPTER 6 NATURAL  RESOURCES CREATING A NEW  APPENDIX THAT INCLUDES  DEFINITIONS AND TECHNICAL  SPECIFICATIONS FOR FINDINGS  PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL  OF DOCUMENT ABOUT IT THE PART  PATIENTS AND PROVIDING AN  EFFECTIVE  >> THANK YOU CITY MANAGER THIS  IS YOUR ITEM.  >> WE'RE GOING TO GO TO OUR  SAYS SERVICE OF TO THIS POINT.  IN EYE.  >> MAYOR COMMISSIONERS LORI  BARNES ASSISTANT AND SERVICES.  TONIGHT YOU HAVE ORDINANCES  ASSOCIATED WITH THE UNIFIED  LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ADOPTION  ON YOUR AGENDA BECAUSE THESE  ARE CLOSELY RELATED I'M ONLY  GOING TO GET ONE PRESENTATION  WHICH WILL BE VERY BRIEF  BECAUSE WORKSHOP ALL OF THESE  ITEMS MULTIPLE TIMES  >> I WILL AREN'T AS PART OF  THE PRESENTATION THOUGH I WILL  RECAP THE DIRECTIVES ON THE  JUNE 3RD WORKSHOP. SO THAT  YOU'RE CLEAR ON WHAT WE'VE  INCORPORATED BASED ON THE  CHANGE THIS REQUESTED ON THAT  DAY. VERY BRIEFLY THE HISTORY  OF THE ULDC REWRITE AND 2015  MILER ENGINEERING REVIEW, THE  ULDC AND PROVIDED  RECOMMENDATIONS, INCLUDING  REORGANIZATION LANGUAGE AND  CONTENT SIMPLIFICATION THAT'S  THE CHAPTERS CREATING SEPARATE  TECHNICAL DESIGN AND MANUALS  RETHINKING DEVELOPMENT  APPLICATIONS. AN AGREEMENT WAS  MADE THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA  FOR THE ULDC UP TO IT.  >> UNFORTUNATELY THAT EFFORT  DID NOT COME TO FRUITION AND  BEFORE I LEAVE THIS PAGE I  WANTED TO ADDRESS THE  RECOMMENDATIONS FROM WEILER  ENGINEERING. THE NORTH PORT  DEVELOPMENT SERVICES  DEPARTMENT HAS. ACCOMPLISH THE  MAJORITY OF THESE SUGGESTIONS  AND THIS ULDC REWRITE IT. WE  FROM 24 CHAPTERS TO 6 CHAPTERS  WITH APPENDIX FOR DEFINITIONS  AND IN HAND THAT'S FOR THE  TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS WHICH  WILL BE BEING REMOVED WITH THE  IT SURE ORDINANCE TO ADOPT THE  ENGINEERING AND DESIGN  STANDARDS I REFERENCE. THE  PAGE COUNTS OF THE ULDC  COMBINED INCLUDING THE  TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 3.38.  I'VE 196 UNDER THE CURRENT  CODE. WE HAVE REORGANIZED THE  PROVISIONS OF AIR AND SENSIBLE  PLACEMENT AS THEY ARE RELATED  TO ONE ANOTHER. AND WE HAVE  INCLUDED TABLES MAJOR SEAS FOR  MANNING THAT MAKES THE ULDC  EASY ALL-OUT EVEN FOR THE LAY  PERSON. AND 2018 2019 AND THE  ULDC EFFORT WAS REINVIGORATED  WITH THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL  TO CALVIN JIHAD AREN'T AN  ASSOCIATE. A NUMBER OF  WORKSHOPS AND PUBLIC OR FORMS  WERE HOUT BUT NOT MUCH WAS  ACCOMPLISHED AS FAR AS THE  REWRITE WAS CONCERNED THEY  HAVE SOME TRAPS THE DROUGHTS  DID NOT REALLY. WE CAN THANK  CURRENT REGULATIONS AND ANY.  SUBSTANTIAL WAY AND THEY WERE  STILL JUST AS WORTHY DIFFICULT  AS OUR CURRENT CODE. 2020  INVOLVED ADDITIONAL WORKSHOPS  TO LOOK AT SOME OF THOSE DROP  CHAPTERS THAT AND REWORKED.  AND 2022. WE SERVICES  APPROACHED A ULDC REWRITE WE  STARTED WITH A WORKSHOP IN  SEPTEMBER OF AT THAT TIME WE  WERE PROPOSING COMPLETION OF  THE PROJECT WITHIN 12 MONTHS.  WE DID SUFFER SEVERAL SETBACKS  INCLUDING THE HEART CAN STOP  ARCHER OTHER UNFORESEEN  CIRCUMSTANCES. SO HERE WE ARE.  AFTER WORKSHOPS WITH WORKSHOPS  WITH COMMISSION. TRAVELING  DOWN THIS WINDING ROAD TOWARD  CHANGE. BUT THE CITY OF NORTH  PORT SORELY NEEDS BECAUSE IT'S  A COMMUNITY THAT WAS ITS  DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT IT DC.  NO FORESIGHT TO CREATE A CITY  THAT WAS FISCALLY SUSTAINABLE  AND CREATE A JOB OPPORTUNITIES  AND. ESTABLISHED A PLACE THAT  PEOPLE COULD LIVE WORK AND  PLAY. AS PART OF THIS WHOLE 22  MONTH ULDC PROCESS WE DID AND  ALL THE THROUGH 30 PLUS  MEETINGS WITH THE CITY  COMMISSION WITH THE PLANNING  AND ZONING BOARD WITH THE  CHAMBER WITH THE COMMUNITY  ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY  BOARD WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL  ADVISORY BOARD AS WELL AS  COMMUNITY NORTH PORT UNITED A  BOUNCE OTHER CONFERENCE. WE  PUBLISH POD CATS. CASTS  FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION  FLYERS AND WE MET INDIVIDUALLY  WITH MANY CONCERNED REST  THAT'S PRIMARILY ACTIVITY  CENTER SEX. THE J 3RD  WORKSHOP. THE COMMISSION  REQUESTED THAT WE INCORPORATE  A REQUIREMENT FOR COMMUNITY  MEETINGS FOR ALL PROJECTS  EXCEPT ONE INTO FAMILY  DEVELOPMENT THAT IS IN YOUR  UPDATED DRAFT. THERE WAS  COMMISSION CONSENSUS TO MAIL  NOTICES. WITH 1350 SQUARE FOOT  RADIUS FOR REZONE SPECIAL  EXCEPTIONS AND WAIVERS AND  1204 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS.  NOW YOU'LL SEE THAT THE SQUARE  FOOTAGE TERMINOLOGY IS NOT IN  THE DRAFT BECAUSE THAT WAS  MISSPOKE TO FALL TO 1320 FEET  BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT'S UNDER  THE CURRENT CODE. EVEN THOUGH  THE CONSENSUS INDICATED 1350  WE THOUGHT THAT WAS THE INTENT  THERE WAS TO DO WHAT THE  CURRENT WE DID NOT INCORPORATE  ADDITIONAL. ONE MILE NOTICE  FOR AGRICULTURAL PROPERTIES  THERE WAS NOT A CONSENSUS ON  THAT ITEM. AND AT LEAST ONE  COMMISSIONER INDICATED, THEY'D  BE WILLING TO CONSIDER UP BUT  ONLY OUR CURRENT REGULATIONS  CALLED FOR THAT AND WE DO NOT.  WE PROVIDED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE  APPROVAL FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT  AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLANS 100%  AND COMPARTMENTS WITH THE  ULDC. REGARDING PETS AND MY  NAME THERE WAS SUBSTANTIAL  CONVERSATION ABOUT THE  ALLOWANCES FOR PETS AND THE  CITY. WHAT LIMITATION SHOULD  BE PLACED ON. DEVELOPMENTS  THAT HAD. AND KHAN DIGGING  THAT WAS INCIDENTAL TO THEIR  SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND  WHETHER THERE SHOULD BE ANY  LIMITATIONS ON TRANSPORTING  BILL OFF SITE FOR THOSE  PROPERTIES. THERE WAS ALSO A  CONVERSATION ABOUT ELIMINATING  THE WORD MINING FROM THE  TABLES AND. THE DIRECTIVE FOR  STAFF TO COME BACK WITH  SOMETHING TO ADDRESS CONCERNS.  WHAT WE HAVE INCORPORATED THE  ESTABLISHMENT OF A SEPARATE  MINING CATEGORY AND THESE  TABLES. THAT MAKES IT CLEAR  WITHOUT OWING TO CHAPTER THAT  MINING IS PROHIBITED. ALL  STATE MINING IS ALSO IN THE  USE TABLES. AND CLEARLY  DEMONSTRATES THAT MINING IS  PROHIBITED WITHOUT HAVING TO  GO TO CHAPTER 4 TO LEARN THAT.  WE'VE CREATED ANY EVES  CATEGORY ALL EARTH MOVING  INCIDENTAL AND THAT IS FOR  SITE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATED  EARTH MAPPING. LIMITS BILL TO  BE IN HOT SIDE 2000 CUBIC  YARDS. ANYTHING ABOVE A 1000  CUBIC YARDS REQUIRES A SPECIAL  EXCEPTION AND REQUIRES THE  BONDING ASSOCIATED. ARE  PROVIDED FOR IN CHAPTER 4. THE  DRAFTING WELL OF THE ANY  EARTHMOVING. OVER.  >> A 1000. YOU MAKE YOUR YARDS  2. ALL RIGHT THERE WITH  MEMORIES FOR ITS URBAN LISA  WELL TODAY.  >> AND YOU ARE COMMITTING  BETWEEN A 1000 AND WON AND  2500. YOU MAKE YOUR HEART.  2550,000 CUBIC YARDS.  >> WOULD BE ALLOWED AS A  SPECIAL EXCEPTION AND MOST  ZONING DISTRICTS. ANYTHING  OVER 50,000 CUBIC YARDS WOULD  BE A SPECIAL EXCEPTION ONLY  AND ACTIVITY CENTER 6 AND TOWN  CHAPTER 4 THERE IS AREA BALL  ON BEING REQUIRED READING  BASED ON WHETHER YOU ARE A  GENERAL MINOR OR MAJOR PAT. OF  COURSE THAT ON THE REQUIREMENT  INCREASES INCREMENTALLY BASED  ON THE AMOUNT OF FELLING  YOU'RE HAULING. YOUR SITE. WE  UPDATED THE OFFER TABLE TO  ELIMINATE THE REDUCTION  AUTHORIZED WITH THE USE OF  FACTS. WE INCORPORATED.  ALLOWANCES FOR FENCES ON  VACANT PROPERTY PROVIDED THAT  THEY WERE OPAQUE AND MADE OF  NATURAL MATERIAL. WE ADDRESSED  THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SIGN  REQUESTS FROM. FROM THEIR MEMO  AND WE SENT THE CITY  COMMISSION A MEMO ON JUNE  24TH, WHICH INDICATED THE  CHANGES WE NEED WE DID MAKE  MOST OF THE CHANGES AND  ADJUSTMENTS THEY REQUESTED,  BUT THERE ARE A FEW THAT WE  WERE NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH WE  NON-RESIDENTIAL TO THE  TEMPORARY SIGN DEFINITION TO  CLARIFY THAT TEMPORARY SIGNS  FOR NON RESIDENTIAL USES  VERSUS LIMITED DURATION SIGNS  WHICH ARE ALLOWED WORK. WE  PROVIDED FOR PROHIBITION FOR  BUSINESS ACTIVITIES AND CT AND  CO BETWEEN 10:00PM AND AND WE  REMOVE IS TRYING DISTANCE  REFERENCE AND THE CORRIDORS  AND DESCRIPTIONS. WE MADE  SEVERAL UPDATES TO. THEY USE  TABLES AND CORRIDOR AND SEE  THE NEEDS CT HAS PROVIDED  CONSENSUS 3 OR MORE. ON 3RD.  WE UPDATED THE SOUNDING. NOW.  BASED ON FROM THE CITY  COMMISSION AT A NUMBER OF  DIFFERENT WORKSHOPS. THE FINAL  NUMBERS THAT WE HAVE. ACHIEVED  WITH THIS REPEAL AND REPLACE  OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AS  AN INCREASE OF FUNCTIONAL  INCREASE OF 12%. THERE ZONING  CHARTS AND OR ORDINANCE 2024  TESTS 15. IT GETS INTO MORE  DETAIL, BASICALLY WE INCREASED  OUR DRAFTED ACREAGE THAT  ALLOWED NONRESIDENTIAL  DEVELOPMENT BY 61%. SO WE NEED  TO DO A LITTLE MATH TO GET A  FOR COMPARISON. IF THE  COMMISSION MOVES FORWARD WITH  THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT  CODE ORDINANCES. 2024 1314, 15  WE WILL CONTINUE TO INTO THE  FUTURE WITH A MORE. MODERN  CODE. WHERE THEY'RE ON  ALLOWANCES FOR ADDITIONAL NON  RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHERE  THERE ARE LIMITATIONS ON THE  RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE  THAT WILL BE ALLOWED IN OUR  TRADITIONAL ZONING DISTRICTS  IN OUR CORRIDOR DISTRICT AS  WELL AS OUR ACTIVITIES CENTER  DISTRICTS. THE PLANNING AND  ZONING ADVISORY BOARD DID  RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ALL 3  PETITIONS TO REPEAL AND  REPLACE THE ULDC CHAPTERS IN  THE OFFICIAL SAID I'M AND THE  DEVELOPMENT SERVICES  DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS APPROVAL  OF ORDINANCES. WE DO HAVE OUR  OUTSIDE COUNCIL SAYS  INTRAPARTY IN FROM ONE  >> AVAILABLE IF ANY QUESTIONS  SHOULD.  >> I DIGRESS I JUST RECEIVED A  NOTICE FROM HER UNFORTUNATELY  SHE HAD TO OUT TO ANOTHER  COMMISSION MEETING SINCE OUR  MEETING WENT SO LONG THAT IF  THERE ARE ANY LEGAL QUESTIONS  THAT ARISE WILL TAKE NOTE WE  COLLABORATE WITH THE ATTORNEY  BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND  READING TO GET ANY ANSWERS  BACK TO YOU THAT YOU NEED. AS  WE HAVE WORKSHOP 10 WORKSHOP  AND WORKSHOPS. I DIDN'T HAVE  MUCH OF A PRESENTATION FOR YOU  TONIGHT. WE APPRECIATE ALL THE  INPUT THAT YOU'VE GIVEN US AND  ALL THE DIRECTION YOU'VE GIVEN  US AND WE THINK THAT WE HAVE A  FINAL PRODUCT REALLY IS GOING  TO BRING THE CITY INTO THE  FUTURE. AND IT IS GOING TO  CREATE AN ENVIRONMENT WHERE WE  CAN ACTUALLY ACHIEVE THE KIND  OF DEVELOPMENT CITY COMMISSION  WOULD LIKE TO SEE AND ALTHOUGH  WE DIDN'T ACHIEVE 18%  NON-RESIDENTIAL THAT YOU ARE  STRIVING FOR IN YOUR STRATEGIC  ACTION PLAN, WE'VE GOT TO 16.  AS A POTENTIAL SO WE'RE WE'RE  VERY PROUD OF THE WORK THAT  EVERYONE THE COMMISSION THE  PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD AND  ALL FROM ALL THE OTHER  ADVISORY BOARDS. AND STAFF AND  CREATING THIS DOCUMENT SO I'M  SURE THERE WILL BE QUESTIONS  AND I'M SURE THERE WILL BE  MOTIONS. BUT REALLY LOOKING  FORWARD I KNOW I THIS ULDC  REWRITE AND GETTING ON WITH  ALL OF THE OTHER GOOD WORK  THAT WE NEED TO ACCOMPLISH.  OKAY. THANK YOU OR WE START  TAKING COMMISSIONER.  >> QUESTIONS JUST FOR THE  BENEFIT OF OUR RESIDENTS  HAPPENED TO BE LISTENING OUT  THERE. THIS IS OUR FIRST  READING WE DO HAVE A SECOND  READING AND THAT'S AUGUST 6.  SO THIS IS NOT BANALITY OF  THIS AND JUST MAKE IT CLEAR  AGAIN UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT  AND THE AMENDMENT. THIS IS NOT  WRITTEN IN STONE THAT ONCE YOU  MAKE THESE CHANGES ARE ANY  CHANGES OR NO CHANGES THAT  NOTHING'S EVER GOING TO BE  DONE AGAIN.  >> I DO BARNES BRINGING OUT A  LONG LABORIOUS PROCESS THIS  HAS I WAS TRYING TO REFERENCE  POINT.  >> UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA. AND  THE CHAMBER AND I COULDN'T  BELIEVE IT WAS THE SAME THING  THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOW  LIKE SO LONG AGO THAT WAS. SO  I'M SO GLAD THAT WORK  >> GETTING SOME CLOSURE HERE  WE'RE GETTING TO THE END, I'M  HOPING IT'S GOING TO COME  SOONER THAN. AND I WOULD  ENCOURAGED COMMISSIONERS STICK  TO A 5 MINUTE QUESTIONS AND  WE'LL JUST GO THROUGH ROUNDS  THAT WAY SO THAT WE CAN EACH  GET OUR QUESTIONS OUT AND  PERHAPS GET YOUR QUESTION. I  MY SON'S ANSWERED WHAT WE'RE  ASKING TO PROCESS ALONG. SO  WE'LL START WITH. COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL. THANK YOU MAYOR.  >> YOU BROUGHT IT UP DURING  YOUR PRESENTATION LORI ABOUT  THE VACANT PROPERTY FENCE.  >> WHEN I LOOKED IN THE AND I  WAS SHOCKED TO SEE OPAQUE  OPAQUE MEANS CAN'T SEE THROUGH  IT.  >> THE MOTION WAS TO ALLOW  OFFENSE OF TRANSLUCENT NATURAL  MATERIALS EXCEPT IF TO BE ON  NATURAL MATERIAL SEE WHY. I  BELIEVE THAT SCRIVENER THE  CODE. HAS REQUIREMENTS FOR  OPAQUE NUS BUT THE THE WE'RE  TRYING LOSE IT NEVER COME  ACROSS THESE BECAUSE I WOULD  NEVER THOUGHT OF THAT WORD.  THAT IS A WORD THAT SUGGESTED  BY STAFF DURING THAT  DISCUSSION. SO THAT'S THE WORD  THAT I USED WHEN WE REACH THE  CONSENSUS UNANIMOUS TO HAVE  TRANSLUCENT SO THAT IT IT DOES  ALLOW PEOPLE TO SEE THROUGH IT  BECAUSE IT IS VACANT PROPERTY,  YES, MA'AM THAT WAS PARTNERS  ARE IT WAS INTENDED APARTMENT  THE CORRECTION. THANK YOU VERY  VERY MUCH I FIGURED THAT'S  EXACTLY WHAT IT  >> BUT I WANTED TO BE SAFE  BRING YOU KNOW RIGHT AWAY.  THANK YOU FOR THAT AND IT AND  I DON'T KNOW PAID OR IF YOU  JUST WANT TO USE THE WORD  TRANSLUCENT FLURRIES WERE.  >> OTHER THING THAT I WANTED  TO BRING UP AND I'M TRYING TO  GET THE HOUSEKEEPING STUFF  TAKEN CARE OF BEFORE GOING TO  THE BIG STUFF PAGE 2425 WE  TALKED ABOUT MAILING NOTICES  TO THE RESIDENTS. FOR MEETINGS  AND PUBLIC HEARINGS AND STUFF.  I KEPT GOING BACK TO THAT AND  I REALIZED WHY WAS STICKING  OUT. WHEN I COMPARED IT TO THE  CODE WE ARE USING THE WORDS.  THE RATINGS FROM THE PROPERTY  LINE AND I KNOW THAT SEEMS  VERY MUNDANE BUT IF YOU HAVE A  LARGE PROPERTY AND YOU DON'T  HAVE WHERE YOU WERE STARTING  THAT MEASUREMENT I THINK IT'S  VERY IMPORTANT TO HAPPEN IN  THE COLD. SO I WOULD AT SOME  POINT I WILL BE MAKING A  MOTION TO INCLUDE RADIUS FROM  THE PROPERTY LINE WITHIN THAT  MAILING NOTIFICATION OF THAT  1320 FEET. UNLESS YOU WANT TO  JUST DO A CONSENSUS NOW OCEAN  IT'S UP TO YOU GUYS WANT TO DO  THIS LITTLE STUFF WANT TO THAT  AS AS THEY COME TIME ARE OK,  THANK YOU. SO IT IS ON PAGE,  2425. IF YOU WANT TO GO TO  THAT AND SEE WHAT THAT THE  EXACT WORDING IS. SO WE WERE  REQUIRED TO SEND UP A  NOTIFICATION AND I JUST WANT  TO ADD THE WORDS RADIUS FROM  THE PROPERTY LINE. ALL RIGHT  SO THAT THAT YOUR MOTION TO  ADD THE WORK UNLESS YOU WANT  THAT'S FINE THAT IF WE DON'T  HAVE A CONSENSUS AMONG TURNER  AND GET THE MOST PLANNING  COMMISSION ALL RIGHT SO  THERE'S A CONSENSUS, I'M  ASSUMING YOU'RE YES I AM YES.  >> I THINK THE WORD RADIUS,  YEAH. RIGHT YES FROM THE  PROPERTY A PROPERTY RIGHT.  COMMISSIONER LANGDON.  >> I MEAN YES.  >> THERE IS A YES, VICE MAYOR  THERE'S YES COMMISSIONER  >> YES, THAT YOU COULD THANK  YOU VERY MUCH.  >> ALL  >> OTHER ONE IS AND I KNOW WE  SPOKE ABOUT THIS AT BUT I AM  ♪ GOING TO GO BACK AND TRY AND  GET A MOTION TO SEE WHERE IT  LANDS ON REGARDING THE TREES  ♪ PRIVATE PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL  PRIVATE PROPERTY.  >> THE CURRENT CODE THAT  PROPOSAL.  >> SAYS A MINIMUM 2 CANON  TREES OR EQUIVALENT  COMBINATION OF CANOPY IN  UNDERSTORY TREES AND PALMS  SHALLOW PLANTED OR PRESERVED  FOR 7500 SQUARE FEET LOT AREA.  AT LEAST ONE CANOPY OR THAT'S  EQUIVALENT. BOB I SHALL  PLANTED IN FRONT. GUYS I'VE  TALK TO ENGINEERS, I'VE TALKED  TO SEPTIC TANK PEOPLE I'VE  TALKED TO ARE HARASSED EVERY  SINGLE ONE OF THEM SAID YOU  PLANT A TREE, ESPECIALLY A  CANOPY TREE IN YOUR FRONT YARD  THAT HAS A SEPTIC TANK YOU ARE  GOING TO BE REPLACING THAT  SEPTIC TANK BECAUSE IT IS  GOING TO FAIL VERY QUICKLY  BECAUSE OF THE ROOT SYSTEM  COMMON SENSE TELLS ME THEY ARE  CORRECT BECAUSE I SEE CANOPY  TREES THAT A PULSE SIDEWALKS  ROADS THAT BECOME TRIPPING  HAZARDS OVER TIME. WE CANNOT  SEE WHAT'S UNDERNEATH AND I AM  SPEAKING FOR ALL SEPTIC TANK  PEOPLE. IN THIS CITY. THEY'RE  EXPENSIVE TO REPLACE. AND IT  IT MAKES IT HARD WHEN IT'S  BECAUSE OF TREE ROOTS MY  FATHER WAS A PLUMBER. AND THE  INFILTRATION OF THE TREE ROOTS  INTO PIPING. NOT JUST SEPTIC  TANKS PIPING IS TORIES I AM  GOING TO PLEAD WITH YOU TO  REMOVE THAT REQUIREMENT FOR  PROPERTIES THAT HAVE A WITH A  SEPTIC TANK. ARE THAT SR KNOW  UP.  >> I JUST WANT TO BE NEXT SO.  COMMISSION AND DOLLS DON'T I'M  GOING ENSURE THE DRESSING THAT  THAT'S ITEM DO THAT YOU WANT  TO YOU KNOW I SURE AM AND  ADDRESS THAT.  >> YOU READY FOR THAT.  >> MISSION DOING ANYTHING ELSE  ABOUT DONE I WILL BE HAPPY TO  MAKE A MOTION TO THAT.  >> WELL, I DON'T AGREE WITH  THAT AT WE WAIT HERE TO CAP  THE TREES OR THE EQUIVALENT. A  NATION OF IN UNDERSTORY TREES  WHICH CAN ALSO BE. YOU HAVE  TREES PEOPLE DO OF TREES IN  THE FRONT YARD KNOW AND I TELL  PEOPLE ELECTION. TREES AND  SITE SELECTION VERY IMPORTANT  9 NOT STICK THAT TREE RIGHT BY  YOUR SEPTIC TANK BUT OFF TO  THE SIDE TOWARDS THE FRONT  PEOPLE DONE THAT WE DO HAVE ON  PEOPLE IN THE IN THE THAT HAVE  MASSIVE OAK TREES THERE RIGHT  YOU ARE, BUT NO THEY'RE NOT  RIGHT BY THE SEPTIC TANK. AND  THEY'RE AND THE THING IS WHAT  I DO LIKE TO GET OUT, IS THAT  IT DOES STAY OR THE  EQUIVALENT. AT LEAST ONE KIND  OF VICTORY OR THE EQUIVALENT  OF UNDERSTORY TREES UNDERSTORY  MEANS A SMALLER SIZE TREE  SHELL BE PLANTED IN THE FRONT  YARD. SO YOU'RE YOU'RE TALKING  ABOUT TSAI. AGAIN WHEN PEOPLE  ARE TALKING ABOUT ARE LOSS OF  OUR CANOPY BECAUSE WE SEE  DEVELOPMENT LARGE-SCALE  DEVELOPMENT GOING ON YES IT'S  GOING ON. AND THAT'S A VERY  IMPACTFUL THING TO SAY BECAUSE  THEY'RE CLEARING ACRES AT THE  TIME. HOWEVER IT THEY'RE  PUTTING TREES BACK AND I I  ALWAYS HAVE TO PUT IT BACK TO  THE PEOPLE WHAT WHAT HAVE YOU  DONE WHAT DO YOU AROUND YOUR  UP AND SAY FOR THAT. AND  UNFORTUNATELY PEOPLE DON'T  HAVE HAVE A LOT OF OF MUCH I  RIGHT AROUND ALL THE TIME MY  BIKE AND TO SEE ART IF THE  ARTIST YARD, EXPAND TOUGHNESS  OF NOTHING AND THE FRONT DOOR.  SO AND WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT  PROBLEM IS THAT COMPANIES WILL  THEY HAVE A FINANCIAL INTEREST  AND THAT THEY'RE GOING TO TO  TELL YOU THAT, BUT IT'S NOT  IT'S NOT I YES DEFINITELY A  100% THIS IS GOING TO HAPPEN.  AGAIN PLACEMENT VERY VERY.  IMPORTANT THERE OTHER PLACES  THAT REQUIRE THIS AND I THINK  WITH THAT. DISCUSSIONS BEFORE  WITH ABOUT YES THERE TO HAVE A  CODE THAT SAYS YOU CAN YOU CAN  CLEAR CUT EVERYTHING AND NOT  PUT ANYTHING BACK. WE USED TO  HAVE CUTS THAT YOU SO MANY  TREES BUT THAT WAS PART OF OUR  TREE PERCENTAGE THAT WORK OUT  BECAUSE COSTS ABOUT HAVE TO  TREAT PLEASE GOING AROUND  MAKING SURE DO HAVE THOSE  TREES AND OF COURSE THEY  DIDN'T. BUT AT LEAST IT WAS AN  ATTEMPT TO TO GET PEOPLE TO  PLANT. YOU KNOW MY VOTE'S  GOING TO BE TO KEEP THIS IN  HERE BECAUSE I THINK ITS VERY  OWN THINKING AND DEFINITELY  DRESSING THE CONCERN THAT  PEOPLE HAVE ABOUT THE LOSS OF  OUR OUR TRIP THINK AND WE HAVE  MORE LAND AND THIS CUT IN THIS  AND THIS CITY THAT IS QUARTER  ACRE. FOR THE QUARTER ACRE.  FAMILY HOME SAID ANYTHING ELSE  AND THAT'S GOING TO BE THE  BIGGEST IMPACT. THAT'S MY  TAKE.  >> AND COMMISSIONER LANGDON DO  WANT TO ADDRESS NOW I'M GOING  TO HOLD MY COMMENT HELP TO GO  CLOSER THAT.  >> I JUST WANT LET YOU KNOW  WHAT I FEEL PRESENT AND FUTURE  MCDONALD'S GOING MAKE AM. I  JUST WANT I I DO HAVE ONE  QUESTION RELATED TO A MAN. I  KNOW WHEN PEOPLE WANT TO  REMOVE TREES, THEY'RE REQUIRED  TO GET A PERMIT AND THAT GIVES  OUR ARBORISTS AND OPPORTUNITY.  >> TO PERHAPS COACH THEM AND  TO KEEPING A TRUE IF IT MAKES  SENSE.  >> AND THIS SITUATION THOUGH.  >> IT IS THERE.  >> YOU KNOW YOU MENTIONED  SEVERAL TIMES MAYOR THAT  LOCATION AND THE TYPE OF TREE  THAT YOU SELECT OR BY THE WAY  IMPORTANT IS IS THERE ANY  OPPORTUNITY FOR OUR US TOO  INTERJECT THEMSELVES INTO THAT  PROCESS. MAYBE THAT'S MORE OF  QUESTION FOR STAFF AND I DON'T  WANT TO ADD COMPLEXITY IN  PROCESS AND BURDEN ON TO THE  HOMEOWNER. AHOY IF CAN HELP  PEOPLE. DO THE RIGHT TREES AND  PUT IT IN THE RIGHT PLACE THAT  WOULD BE A WONDERFUL SON.  >> GOOD POINT YEAH, SO SO WE  CAN DO IN THE ABOUT SOMEONE  WANTS TO REMOVE A TREE WHERE  NOW REQUIRING A CERTIFICATE OF  STONE IN COMPLIANCE. AND SO IN  ADDITION TO THE ARBORS  VISITING THE SITE AND TAKING A  LOOK AT THE TREE AND SEEING IF  THEY CAN GET SOME GUIDANCE TO  HELP SAVE THE TREE. IF THE  TREE IS REMOVED AND THE SITE  ALSO BELOW THE MINIMUM  TREE-PLANTING REQUIREMENTS AND  THEY'LL NEED TO REPLACE THE  TREE AND THAT GIVES THE  ARBORIST AND OPPORTUNITY TO  GUIDE THEM ARE COACHED THEM AS  TOO. YOU KNOW RIGHT TREE RIGHT  PLACE OR THE REPLACEMENT TREE  THAT THEY MAY NEED TO INSTALL  AND I KNOW OUR NATURAL  RESOURCES STOP IS OUT THERE IN  THE COMMUNITY. THEY'RE TALKING  TO PEOPLE THERE PROVIDING  INFORMATION ON A REGULAR BASIS  AND TRYING TO GET THAT MESSAGE  OUT THE RIGHT TREE RIGHT PLACE  MESSAGE. SO I THINK THAT YOU  KNOW. THE SIMPLE FACT THAT WE  HAVE A NEW NATURAL RESOURCES  DEPARTMENT IT'S GOING TO HELP  IMPROVE EDUCATION IN THAT AREA  ACROSS THE BOARD AND THEN ALSO  A NEW REVIEW PROCESS SO THAT  WE'RE MAKING GOOD DECISIONS  ABOUT WHAT TREES ARE BEING  REMOVED AND THE WHY BEHIND IT  AND THEN ALSO PROVIDING FOR  THAT REPLACEMENT TREE THE SITE  DOESN'T NEED ANYMORE. I THINK  WE'RE WERE LEAPS AND BOUNDS  FROM WHERE WE ARE RIGHT NOW.  THANK YOU TO THEM.  >> IS THAT A CONSENSUS FOR  THAT THAT AND THANK YOU FOR  BRINGING THAT UP YES AND I  KNOW WE DO HAVE A WHOLE TREE  LIST AND ARE SOMEWHERE BUT IT  DOESN'T REALLY ADDRESS.  >> WHERE THEY SHOULD BE  PLANTED. IT YEAH, THE CUT.  >> I CAN TELL YOU BECAUSE THE  NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION IS  RIGHT OUTSIDE MY OFFICE STORE  I HEAR EVERY DAY ALL DAY THEY  HAVE ALREADY GOTTEN VERY  INVOLVED WITH HOMEOWNERS  PROPERTY OWNERS WHEN I'M  BUILDERS ARE BUILDING A  PROPERTY. THEY'RE GOING OUT  THERE THEY'RE LOOKING AT THE  TREES THERE THERE.  >> IN SOME CASES THEY HAVE  CALLED THAT.  >> THE NOT THE BUILDER IT  CALLED THE PERSON BUYING THE  HOUSE HAVING HOUSE BUILT AND  SAYING KNOW YOUR BUILDERS  PROPOSING TO REMOVE ALL OF  THESE TREES BUT HERE'S SOME  SUGGESTIONS FOR YOU AND WE  HAVE ALREADY STARTED SEEING  THAT.  >> THE PROGRESS OF. HOMEBUYERS  SAYING I DIDN'T KNOW I COULD  KEEP THOSE TREES AND THEY'RE  TELLING THEIR BUILDER TO KEEP  SO WE'RE SEEING THAT AND I  THINK THAT AS WE CONTINUE  THAT. MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE  GOING TO BE FAMILIAR WITH  WHICH TREES CAN GO WHERE  THEY'RE TALKING TO THEM SUCH  NOT JUST CANOPY TREES BUT  UNDERSTORY TREES TO BECAUSE  THEY ALL PLAY A PART THEY'RE  HELPING THEM UNDERSTAND WHERE  THEY CAN PUT UNDERSTORY TREE  SO WE'RE ALREADY HAVING THOSE  CONVERSATIONS A LOT AND WE'RE  GOING TO BE EVEN MORE  INFORMATION OUT ACTIVELY AND  AND THEY'RE GOING TO ALL OF  OUR CITY EVENTS AND  EVERYTHING. TO HELP PEOPLE  UNDERSTAND WHAT WHITE TREE  RIGHT PLACE MEANS I THINK  WE'RE GOING SEE A LOT OF  BENEFITS FROM WE'RE ALREADY  SEEING SOME. I EXCITED TO SEE  THE HOME BUYERS GO NICE AND  THEY THEY ACTUALLY KEEP SOME  OF THOSE TREES EVEN WE'RE  STARTING TO SEE THEM WANTING  TO RELOCATE. NATIVE PALMS AND  THINGS LIKE THAT ON THEIR  PROPERTY WHERE IF IF THEY  CAN'T SAVE THEM IN THE  LOCATION THAT DIRECTOR MOVING.  >> I REALLY LIKE THAT  EDUCATIONAL CONSULTATIVE  APPROACH RATHER THAN HAVING  PENALTIES YOU KNOW FOR PEOPLE  I REALLY LIKE THAT APPROACH  AND IT'S ALSO GOOD TO HEAR I  THINK SOMETIMES WE FALL INTO  THE TRAP OF THINKING THAT.  PEOPLE DON'T WANT CITY  INTERFERENCE AND WHAT THEY DO  WITH THEIR PROPERTY. I THINK  WE ALL HEAR THAT A LOT. BUT IF  IT'S DONE IN THE RIGHT WAY AND  PEOPLE AREN'T SEEING THE LINES  AND AT THE END OF THE DAY THEY  CAN REALLY DO WHAT THEY WANT.  >> I THINK THAT'S A GOOD THING  AND I'M HAPPY TO HEAR THAT A  LOT OF SOON-TO-BE RESIDENT  OF NORTH PORT ARE WELCOMING  THAT WHAT.  >> AND THAT IT IS FACE OPTING  IN TREES BEING SAY THAT THAT  IS THE BEST ALTERNATIVE SO  THANK YOU.  >> ALL COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL  >> I AM STAUNCHLY AGAINST  REQUIRING  >> THE POPE DOES NOT SEPARATE  EXISTING HOMES FROM NEW HOMES.  SO WHEN I READ CODE IS IT THE  INTENT THAT NOW I AM GOING TO  HAVE TO PLANT A TREE ON MY  PROPERTY IN THE FRONT YARD. OR  IS IT THE INTENT THAT IT'S  ONLY NEW DEVELOPMENT.  >> NOTHING AND THIS HIGHS TO  EXISTING DEVELOPMENT THAT IS  IN PLACE BEFORE THE ADOPTION  AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS  COAT, SO EVEN. I UP PATIENTS  THAT ARE IN THE PROCESS RIGHT  NOW. WELL NOT THE SUBJECT TO  THIS REQUIREMENT.  >> BECAUSE I THE FIRST ONE  THAT I GET A NOTICE THAT I'M  IN NON-COMPLIANCE, I'M SENDING  IT TO MISS LORY NO MATTER  WHERE YOU AND I BUT THE OTHER  THING I WANT THE SEPTIC TANK  COMPANIES THAT I HAVE SPOKEN  WITH HAVE ABSOLUTELY 0  FINANCIAL GAIN. AS A MATTER OF  FACT THEY'RE GOING TO LOSE  MONEY BECAUSE OF THEIR  RECOMMENDATION TO NOT PLANT  TREES. IF THEY WANTED TO HAVE  FINANCIAL THE GAME THEY WOULD  HAVE SAID YES PLANT ALL THE  TREES BECAUSE WHAT FACING THE  SEPTIC TANKS. AND YES YOU  CANNOT SEE FROM MY FRONT YARD  WHAT MY BACKYARD LOOKS LIKE  JUST LIKE MY NEIGHBORS. MY  BACKYARD HAS A TON OF TREASON  ARE MY NEIGHBORS HAVE THE TIME  THE TREES IN THE BACKYARD, SO  YES, I AM COMPENSATING FOR THE  FACT THAT I DON'T HAVE A TREE  IN THE FRONT NEARBY SEPTIC  TANK. SO WITH THAT SAID AND I  KNOW NOT EVERYBODY IS EXACTLY  LIKE ME OR LIKE YOU. BUT AT  THE SAME TIME. THIS SEPTIC  TANK IS WHAT IS THE PROBLEM  AND YES IT WILL INFILTRATE  NOBODY HAS BEEN ABLE TO  CONVINCE ME THAT IS A  NON-ISSUE AND MAYOR WITH ALL  DUE RESPECT YOU'RE THE ONLY  ONE THAT SAYS THAT IT'S NOT AN  ISSUE. I WOULD MAKE A MOTION  IF THERE'S NO FURTHER  DISCUSSION BECAUSE I I'M JUST  THAT STRONG MAKE A MOTION TO  REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT TO HAVE  AT LEAST ONE TRUE IN THE FRONT  YARD. THE TIME OF CO. AT THE  TIME OF CO. WE'RE BASICALLY  REMOVING THAT REQUIREMENT. ONE  LEARN THE WHOLE THING. REMOVES  THE REQUIREMENT TO HAVE THE  TREES IN THE FRONT YARD  PROPERTIES THAT SEND TEAMS.  ALL RIGHT SO THAT'S THE ENTIRE  JUST TRYING ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE  A MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL MAKE SURE IT IS THE  ENTIRE DOING. NO IT'S NOT IT'S  NOT JUST 1 ONE PART THAT IS IN  THE FRONT YARD RIGHT AT LEAST  DO I WILL RESTATE MY MOTION.  TO REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT TO  HAVE AT LEAST ONE TREE IN THE  FRONT YARD. WHEN THE PROPERTY  IS CONNECT IS NOT CONNECTED TO  THE CITY SEWER SYSTEM SHOULD  JUST STICK WITH MY  >> I MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL TO  REMOVE FROM SECTION D AT LEAST  ONE CANOPY TREE OR THE  EQUIVALENT NUMBER UNDERSTORY  TREES AND PALMS BE PLANTED IN  THE FRONT DOOR WHEN THE HOUSE  IS NOT CONNECTED TO THE CITY.  SO  >> SO IF YOU COULD JUST STICK  WITH MY MOTION CLERK REPEATED.  THANK YOU.  >> TO WRITE A REQUIREMENT TO  HAVE AT LEAST ONE TREE IN THE  FRONT YARD ON THE PROPERTY IS  NOT CONNECTED TO THE CITY  SEWER SYSTEM.  >> THANK YOU STAFF WILL HAVE  TO ADJUST FOR SECOND READING.  >> ALL RIGHT THAT'S THE  MOTION. YOU'RE IN A SECOND.  ALL RIGHT SO THAT MOTION FEEL  THAT EXPENDED MY 5 MINUTES.  YES, SORRY DIDN'T MEAN PUT MY  TIME AROUND YOU GOT A FREE  PASS DOWN. BUT THAT'S GOOD  DISCUSSIONS.  >> I DON'T HAVE ANYBODY ELSE  PICK YOU, BUT I DID I HAD SOME  QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER AVERAGE  YOU HAVE QUESTIONS.  >> NO MA'AM.  >> THAT NOT QUESTION SO MUCH  HAVE ABOUT GOING BACK TO THAT  ONE THAT WE JUST. DIDN'T PASS  THE NORTH UP MOTION FOR BUT WE  TALKED ABOUT HAVING THE  ARBORISTS TALK WITH BUILDERS  IS THERE ANYTHING THAT'S GOING  TO BE ACTUALLY BUT THAT'S  GOING TO PART OF THE BECAUSE A  LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T EVEN KNOW  THEY HAVE THAT THAT OPTION.  >> AND IF YOU DON'T GIVE THEM  THAT OPTION THEY CUT ME TO THE  FACT WE DON'T KNOW YOU KNOW  THEY JUST SAID WE HAD TO DO  THIS SO THAT ME.  >> AND GREAT EVENTS LEE INTO  THAT PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.  >> IT'S AN ADMINISTRATIVE  FUNCTION AND IT'S SOMETHING  THAT THE STAFF IS ALREADY  DOING AND WILL CONTINUE TO I  DON'T KNOW THAT WE NEED TO  >> IT WOULD BE IT WOULD BE  LIKE CALL THE PLANNING AND  ZONING STAFF. WELL COLLABORATE  WITH PROPERTY OWNERS TO  FACILITATE THE APPROPRIATE  ZONING DISTRICT OR THEIR  PROPERTY. ORWELL. GIVE  DIRECTION ON HOW TO MAKE THEIR  DESIGN COMPLY WITH BUILDING  DESIGN STANDARD. SO YOU KNOW  OUR STAFF IS DOING OUT THEY'LL  CONTINUE TO DO SURE WHAT I  KNOW WHEN WHEN THIS NEW COMES  OUT WE'RE GOING TO BE DOING A  LOT OF AND KEEP IN MIND THAT  THIS PARTICULAR PROVISION IS  NOT. AFFECTIVE. TECHNICALLY  UNTIL JULY FIRST 2027. SO WE  HAVE PLENTY OF TIME TO EDUCATE  THE COMMUNITY AND STRIVE FOR  VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE BETWEEN  NOW AND WHEN WE CAN MAKE  COMPLIANCE I GUESS I WAS  GETTING AT WHEN WHEN THE  BUILDERS ARE THEY'RE THE ONES  FOOTING AND THE IS THERE GOING  TO BE ANY CONVERSATION ABOUT  THE RIGHT TREE IN THE RIGHT  PLACE OR JUST LET THEM GO  ALREADY IS BECAUSE WE GO.  >> WHENEVER WE GO OUT THERE WE  WE LOOK AT EVERYTHING WHAT WE  LOOK AT. YOU HAVE TO SEE  WHAT'S THERE AND OUR ARBORISTS  ARE FOLLOWING THAT THROUGH THE  PROCESS SO THERE WILL BE  DISCUSSION WITH THEM ON.  >> THE RIGHT TREES, THERE'S  THERE ALSO. OUR STAFF HAS  ALREADY PUT SOME INFORMATION  TOGETHER PUTTING MORE  INFORMATION TOGETHER ON  CHOOSING RIGHT INCLUDING PER  SEPTIC AREAS. PRESENCE HOMES  ARE BETTER APPROACH OR  UNDERSTORY TREES. THAT DON'T  HAVE THE EXTENSIVE ROOT  SYSTEMS. ANYONE NEAR SEPTIC.  SO THEY'RE ALREADY PUTTING  INFORMATION TO PROVIDE THAT TO  THE BUILDERS. AND THE  HOMEOWNERS AND OUR SOME OF THE  HOMEOWNERS HAVE BECOME MY BEST  ARE SOME HOME BUYERS ARE  BECOMING OUR BEST ADVOCATES  WITH BUILDERS TO SAVE TREES  ARE TO TO PLANT CERTAIN TYPES  RICE OKAY, THANK YOU SO MUCH.  >> AND JUST LAST JUST A  COMMENT ABOUT READING THIS  CORRECTLY THESE DIAGRAMS ON  THE PROTECTION ZONE, IT DOES  GO OUT TO THE DRIP LINE HOURS  BEFORE DIDN'T CORRECT CORRECT  OKAY. SUCH A GREAT IMPROVEMENT  AND I. SO WHEN SEE THOSE  LITTLE BOXES AROUND YOU KNOW  WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT RIGHT  YEAH, NO MA'AM OUR STAFF IS  ALREADY WORKING ** GETTING  BETTER PROTECTED SOUNDS  OUTSIDE OF THE CODE PROVISIONS  BECAUSE IF YOU'RE GOING TO TRY  TO SAY THAT RIHANNA TIED RIGHT  NOT GO THROUGH THE MOTIONS AND  HAVE THAT READ YEAR LATER IS  EVER THAT LITERALLY FOR  DECADES THAT WE TRY TO SAY  THAT REAGAN THING DID IS NOT  HEADED DOWN, BUT YOU DIDN'T  REALLY DO WHAT YOU HAD TO DO  TO SAY THAT RACE I APPRECIATE  >> COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL.  >> ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY  QUESTIONS OR. I I JUST ABOUT.  YEAH IN GENERAL NOT ABOUT  GOING TO BE HAPPY HEAR TAKE  AWAY YOUR TREES, I KNOW THIS  IS NOT TREE BUT WHEN WE TALK  ABOUT THE ACTIVITIES THAT ARE  6 SOUTH OF I 75 AMENDMENT  WORTH COMP PLAN AND BOTH.  >> WITHOUT THERE IS THAT UNDER  THE ZONING DISTRICT  DESCRIPTIONS CHAPTER.  >> 3.  >> THE MAP THAT'S INCORPORATED  AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AIR  AS WELL ALL LEST OF THE BLOCKS  AND ENGULFED FAMILY IS GOING  TO BE ALLOWABLE AND THEY SEX  OKAY.  >> AS I THINK WE HAD PUBLIC  COMMENTER WHO REFERRING TO  THAT THAT WE DID OR NOW THAT  I'M SO SO.  >> I KNOW ONLY GOING TO WANT  TO FOLLOW  >> WE HAVE SEVERAL PROPERTY  OWNERS AND AREA OF ACTIVITY  SOME RESPECTS THAT ARE WAITING  FOR THEIR BUILDING OR METS TO  ISSUE. SO WE CAN'T DO THAT AND  TELL. PLAN IS THE FACT WE HAD  A 31 DAYS BEFORE IT COMES  ACTIVE AND THAT THE ULDC  BECOMES EFFECTIVE ALLOWING  THOSE HOMES THERE. BUT THEY  ALL QUESTION WE HAVE AND WE DO  NEED FOLLOW WITH HIM IS IF HE  IS AND NOT AREA OF THE CITY  COMMISSION AUTHORIZED  SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. IF THE  PROPERTY IS GRAPHIC OUT GREAT.  IT'S AFTER OCTOBER 28. WE  DON'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY WAY  PART OF AND ALLOW THOSE GO  THROUGH UNTIL OF COMP PLAN AND  THE ULDC ACTIVE. THE PROPERTY  IS OUTSIDE THAT AREA WHERE THE  COMMISSION DIRECTED US ALLOW  AND I'M ALLOWED A SINGLE  FAMILY. SITUATION IS DIFFERENT  SO WE'LL DEFINITELY WANT TO  FALL WITH HIM WE CAN GET A  BETTER PICTURE OF WHERE HIS  PROPERTY IS LOCATED. THANK YOU  WANT SOME CLARITY  >> FUTURE PEOPLE THAT HAVE  QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT SO  UNDERSTAND WHERE WE ALL RIGHT  AND THAT'S IT THAT'S IT FROM A  COMMISSIONER AVERAGE.  ANYTHING.  >> NO MA'AM LIGHTNING AND  THUNDER AND OVER WERE ON THAT  IF YOU MAY ALL GET BACK ON THE  WAS LIKE HIM. HAD LET YOU KNOW  IT'S STORMING BAD OVER THERE.  >> OVER UP HERE ANY PUBLIC  COMMENT HERE, I'M SORRY GO  AHEAD. THAT'S A FEW MORE OKAY,  THEY ARE YOUR NAME RIGHT  CONDITIONS  >> SO YOU'LL RECALL THAT WE  HAD A LARGE DISCUSSION ABOUT  WAIVERS AND VARIANCES  MODIFICATIONS. AND HOW THERE  WAS A MINOR VARIANCE THAT  STAFF GETS TO APPROVE MAJOR  VARIANCES ZONING HEARING  OFFICER WOULD BE APPROVING.  >> AND WE  >> INTENSE CONVERSATION ABOUT.  COMMISSION'S ROLE TO APPROVE  THESE MODIFICATIONS AND  WAIVERS FROM THE CODE. AND I  KEPT GOING BACK TO THE SAME  QUESTION AND HOPEFULLY STAFF  WILL BE ABLE TO ANSWER ME  BECAUSE I COULDN'T FIND IT IN  THE DEFINITIONS. WHAT IS THE  DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A VARIANCE.  A WAIVER AND A MODIFICATION.  BECAUSE ALL 3 TERMS ARE USED  IN THIS CODE.  ♪ ♪ THE ONLY TERM THAT DEFINED IS  A VARIANCE. SO YOU COULD  PLEASE HELP ME UNDERSTAND  THOSE DIFFERENCES THAT WILL  HELP ME BE ABLE TO MOVE  THROUGH THE NEXT PART OF MY  DISCUSSION POINTS.  >> A VARIANCE IS A REQUEST TO  DEPART FROM STANDARDS AND THE  UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.  >> MOST OF THE TIME THOSE  VARIANCE REQUESTS ARE  ASSOCIATED WITH SINGLE-FAMILY  HOMES BUT THEY ARE NOT LIMITED  TO SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.  >> THEIR REQUEST IS AND A SIDE  PROCEED IN WHERE THERE ARE  STRICT CRITERIA THAT MUST BE  MET.  >> AND ORDER OR THE ZONING  HEARING OFFICER TO GRANT A  VARIANCE IF THE REQUEST AND  AND THE PROPERTY TO NOT MEET  ALL OF THOSE STRICT CRITERIA.  THE VARIANCE MAY NOT BE GRANT.  A WAIVER. AUTHORIZED.  >> THE CITY COMMISSION.  >> THROUGH THE MASTER CONCEPT  PLAN MASTER CONCEPT PLAN AS A  PUBLIC HEARING PAUSE I DO'S UP  PUBLIC HEARING THAT COMES TO  YOU. THE WAIVER DOES NOT HAVE  ANY SKIRT STRETCH CRITERIA,  WHATSOEVER. COMMISSION CAN  JUST SAY WHAT DO WE THINK THAT  THIS IS A GOOD PROJECT SO  WE'RE GOING TO GRANT THE  WAIVER. STAFF WILL STILL DO  THEIR JOB AND THEY ALL. IT  CLEARED AND THEIR STAFF NOW  SAYS. WHETHER THEY THINK  THERE'S GOING TO BE ANY  DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS. WHETHER  THERE OFFSETTING MEDICATION  THAT MAYBE SHOULD BE  INCORPORATED TO MINIMIZE THAT  AS A FACT THERE'S NO STRICT  CRITERIA THAT MUST BE  >> MODIFICATION IF THE TERM  THAT'S USED IN THE CURRENT  CODE OR DEPARTURES OF THE  CODE. THERE IS NO APPLICATION  PROCESS FOR A  MODIFICATION UNDER A DRAFT  CODE, THE ONLY PLACE BUT IT IS  SPECIFICALLY USED FAR  DEPARTURE FROM PROBABLY AND  BUY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IS  UNDER.  THE. SECTION 3.8. I REGARDING  MODIFICATIONS.  >> TO ELIMINATE THE  SUBSTANTIAL BURDEN ON  RELIGIOUS EXERCISE. AND THAT  IT INCORPORATED THE CAUSE. A  COURT CASE THE FEDERAL  RELIGIOUS LAND USE AND  INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS ACT  OF THAT REQUIRES US TO  PROVIDE. FRONTLINE  CONSIDERATION OF MODIFICATIONS  TO ALLOW FREE. RELIGIOUS  ACTIVITIES. REALLY WHAT IT  COMES DOWN BEST FOR CRITERIA  AND MOST PROPERTIES. A UNIQUE  CONDITION. THEY DO THAT THEY  THEY'RE USUALLY A SELF-CREATED  ISSUE. CONTRACTOR CREATED  ISSUE. IT'S USUALLY IT IT'S  NOT SUPPOSED TO BE BASED  ECONOMIC HARDSHIP. MOST OF THE  TIME THE REQUESTS ARE BASED ON  ECONOMIC HARDSHIP. SO QUOTE A  VARIANCE AND OFFICE A  COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, YES, CUT.  THE ALLOWANCE UNDER THE MINER  VARIANCES ARE MINIMAL. MOST OF  THE TIME WHEN WE HAVE A  COMMERCIAL PROPERTY COMING  FORWARD IN THEIR REQUEST AND  DEPARTURES FROM THE CODE THEY  HAVE MULTIPLE. REQUESTS TO  MODIFY THE CODE UNDER THE  CURRENT CODE OR. WAIVE THE  CODE UNDER THE PROPOSED ULDC.  SO I HOPE THAT HELPS CLARIFY.  >> THAT  >> MIGHT WANT TO DOUBLE CHECK  BECAUSE I THOUGHT I SOME  MODIFICATIONS ALSO IN HAVING  TO DO WITH WHAT AND STORMWATER  TERMS HAVE BEEN USED  INTERCHANGEABLY THAT MAYBE MY  BRING WAS INTERCHANGE IN TOO.  >> I AGAIN.  >> BASED ON THE CONVERSATION  THAT I HEARD THROUGHOUT THIS  WHOLE REWRITE.  >> THERE WERE SOME  COMMISSIONERS THAT WERE  MEANINGFUL TO REQUIRING THE  COMMISSION. YOU KNOW WHERE THE  LEGISLATORS AND WE WE MAKE THE  CO. AND IN MY OPINION WE  SHOULD BE THE ONLY ONES TOO  LOW TO ABSOLVE HOME INSURANCE  NOT STAFF. NOT A ZONING  HEARING OFFICER. WHEN WE HEAR  THAT. TOO OFTEN WE HAD TOO  MANY WE HAVE A LOT OF WE NEED  A WAIVER FROM THE CODE FOR  WILL WE KNEW WE HAD TO FIX THE  LIGHTNING COLD IN THAT WAS  SOMETHING WE ARE WORKING  TOWARD SO WE KNEW THAT WE WERE  JUST GOING TO BE APPROVING  ANYTHING THAT WAS RELATED TO  THAT KIND OF A WAIVER OF THE  CODE. APPROVE THEM IN THE PAST  AND IT WORKED AND IT'S IT'S  OUR JOB. AND I JUST. I DON'T  UNDERSTAND WHY WE CONSISTENTLY  SEEM TO BE WANTING TO GIVE OUR  AUTHORITY AND OUR  RESPONSIBILITY TO STAFF OR 2.  HEARING OFFICERS OR WHEREVER.  >> I EVEN REMEMBER SAYING I  CAN COMPROMISE AND SAY HEY  THOSE MINOR ONES ABSOLUTELY  YOU KNOW A MINOR VARIATION FOR  FOR THE BUILDING HEIGHT WITH  MAXIMUMS ARE THE DUMPSTER AND  CLOSURES AND AND SETBACKS OKAY  FINE. IT'S A MINOR MARION'S  AND STAFF CAN DO THAT. BUT WE  THE COMMISSION SHOULD BE  APPROVING ANYTHING ELSE ABOVE  THAT.  >> REQUIREMENT.  >> OF THE MINIMUM VARIANCE IS  AND TO HAVE A GO TO THIS  ZONING HEARING OFFICER.  ♪ ♪ IT JUST DOESN'T WELL WITH AND  I REALLY BELIEVE THAT THIS IS  PART OF OUR JOB IT DOESN'T  CHANGE ANYTHING EXCEPT WE ARE  THE ONES SAYING YES OR NOW WE  ARE ELECTED ONCE AND YES WE  CAN SAY NO.  >> AS AS THERE'S CRITERIA  RISEN CRITERIA.  >> BUT THAT'S OUR WORLD SO I.  >> I KNOW IS KIND OF A 5050.  >> KIND OF PROPOSITION IN  PREVIOUS CONVERSATIONS AND I  WANTED TO REVISIT AND SEE  ABOUT GETTING A MOTION. SO I  DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY ELSE  WANTS TO WEIGH IN ON THAT  TOPIC. AND ACTUALLY WAS A 2 TO  3. I HAVE IT DOWN HERE. TO OR  3 TO 2 ALSO SOMEWHERE TO I  HAVE IT HERE 3 DIDN'T GO FOR  IT SO IT'S UP TO YOU,  >> I WAS IMPRESSED WITH.  >> YES MISS BARNES THANK YOU  MADAM MAYOR I JUST WANT ADD  SOME CLARITY PARTLY THIS  ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS HEARS  ALL VARIANTS UP NATIONS. I'M  NOT ALREADY GRANTED TO  COMMISSION AND THE PAST. I  DON'T KNOW THAT ANYONE WHO IS.  A LONGER PERIOD OF TIME HAS  ANY OTHER INFORMATION BUT.  ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AND  THE ZONING HEARING OFFICER  ESPECIALLY THE HEARING  OFFICERS USED HAVE OUR TIME TO  TURN A RETIRED JOBS. SO THEIR  SCRUTINY WAS STRICT CRITERIA.  IS USUALLY WELL ON THE CITY  COMMISSION THOUGHTS REVIEW AND  APPROVE. THANKS KAY SHUNS  SOMETIMES THOSE HAVE A  COMPANION VARIANCE APPLICATION  BUT THE VACATIONS ONTO CITY  COMMISSION BECAUSE THERE'S NOW  THAT THERE'S NO ALTERNATIVE.  THE FLORIDA STATUTES REQUIRE  THAT THE GOVERNING BODY  APPROVED EDUCATIONS EASEMENTS  SO I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY  THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE  VARIANCE IN THE VACATION AND  THE REASONING BEHIND THE ZBA  APPROVING OR THE DOWN AND  HEARING OFFICER PROVING  >> OKAY SO WITHOUT WANT TO  MAKE A MOTION.  >> YEAH, I WANT I WANT TO MAKE  A MOTION. TO REQUIRE  COMMISSION.  >> TO APPROVE.  >> THE VARIANCES.  ♪ ♪ >> VARIANCE ABOVE THE MINOR  ♪ VARIANCE THAT'S ON PAGE 40  IT'S LISTED ON PAGE 40.  >> ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION  BY COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL FOR  THE COMMISSION TO APPROVE. ANY  VARIANCE.  ♪ ♪ AND THAT'S MISSION.  >> THE DOW IS A OF MINOR  VARIANCES ON PAGE 40 RIGHT.  THAT IS THE MOTION. DID YOU  GET THAT CITY CLERK. I HAVE A  SECOND. NOT HEARING A SECOND.  SO MOTION. THEY'LL SELECT  SECOND.  ♪ >> COMMISSIONER  ♪ >> ARE THERE PLANS TO DEFINE  WAIVER AND MODIFICATION AND  THE DEFINITIONS. MAKE A MOTION  THAT STAFF IS TO DEFINE  MODIFICATION AND WAIVER IN THE  DEFINITION SECTION. FIND  MODIFICATION DEFINED  MODIFICATION AND TO FIND THE  WORD WAIVER IN THE LIST OF  DEFINITIONS.  ♪ ♪ GETTING WHAT ACTUALLY  CONSTITUTES A MODIFICATION  WHAT CONSTITUTES A WAIVER. WE  CAN USE.  >> ALL RIGHT SO IT'S MOTION BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL THEY  HAVE THAT WANT TO BACK. ALL  RIGHT THAT'S THE MOTION TO I  HAVE A. SECOND FOR THAT.  >> SECOND MISTER DISCUSSION.  THEY TEND THAT DISCUSSION IS  REAL SHORT SWEET I REASON FOR  IT.  >> ALL RIGHT SO WHAT WE DO  HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND SO  WE WILL.  >> TAKE A VOICE VOTE ON THAT  MOTION. VICE MAYOR. NOW  LANGDON NO I DON'T. YES.  COMMISSIONER AVERAGE YOU  THERE.  ♪ >> CHANNING HARM IN IT  ♪ >> I WOULD. YES.  >> WELL YOUR VOTING TELL YOU A  YES.  >> I MEAN, YES DON'T SEE AND  WOULD HAVE BEEN MEANT.  >> NOW OKAY.  ♪ ♪ >> THAT. AND ALSO TO  ♪ ♪ YES,  >> THE FLIP OVER TO 71, SINCE  I SEE NO OTHER LIGHTS ON ALL  JUST CONJECTURE ON YOU WANT  WEIGH IN ON ANYTHING JUST  STOPPED ME PLEASE OK. PAGE 71  WE'RE TALKING  >> THE CORRIDOR DISTRICTS  HORIZONTAL DEVELOPMENT.  >> IT IS. RESIDENTIAL USE MAY  NOT EXCEED IT MAY NOT EXCEED  65% OF FAR. AGAIN THAT MAY  VERSUS SHAO. RESIDENTIAL YOU  SHALL NOT EXCEED THIS WAY IF  THEY WANT TO COME. AND HAVING  HIGHER THAN 65% I WOULD ASSUME  THE COMES TO COMMISSION MAYBE  GOES TO THE VARIANCE HEARING  THE ZONING HEARING OFFICER  KNOWS AT THIS POINT.  ♪ ♪ BUT I THINK IT SHOULD BE  CHANGED TO SHELL.  >> WE USE THE WORD MAY AIR  BECAUSE THE ALLOWANCES AND THE  COMPREHENSIVE ARE SLIGHTLY  DIFFERENT WHICH GIVES THE  >> LED THE TO OF THROUGH  WAIVERS TO THAT OUR VISION OF  THE ULDC.  >> SAYS AND IT SHALL.  >> AND THE OPPORTUNITY TO  APPROVE A WAIVER TO ALLOW 70%.  RESIDENTIAL IS KONG. SO WE WE  DO YOU PREFER THAT IT REMAINS  MAY. AGAIN THE COMPREHENSIVE  PLAN HAS AN ALLOWANCE THAT THE  COMMISSION COULD REAL APPROVE  UP TO 75% RESIDENTIAL  PERCENTAGE ON THE MIXED USE  PROJECTS.  >> AND THAT SAME PAGE. THANK  YOU FOR THAT EXPLANATION  STUFF.  >> ON PAGE 71. WE'RE TALKING  RESIDENTIAL PERMITS FOR  MULTIPLE BUILDINGS. CORPS ON  AND THAT THEY HAVE TO HAVE  INTERNAL CONNECTIVITY. I AM. I  WANTED TO BRING TO THE  ATTENTION AND MAYBE STAFF CAN  HELP  >> IS THIS SO THE DEVELOPMENT  COMES FORWARD AND THEY HAVE  MULTIPLE BUILDINGS THAT HAVE  TO BE INTEGRATED CONNECTIVITY  CAN THEY SAY HEY WE'RE GOING  TO DO THIS IS PART OF THE  BUILDING NOW THIS RESIDENTIAL  IN THIS RESIDENTIAL HIM IN THE  FUTURE WE'RE GOING TO DO THE  COMMERCIAL OR IS IT HAVE TO BE  DONE ALL AT ONCE BECAUSE THAT  IS NOT VERY CLEAR IN THE CODE.  >> I HAD THAT ARTICLE MAKES  USE OF ARTS GOING TO HAPPEN  ALL WALKS OF COURSE HAVE  TALKING WHITE SOX HOME NEXT  YEAR IS IS GOING TO THE  DEVELOPMENT ORDER THAT GETS  ISSUE OR A CAR MIXED USE  PROJECT. WELL AND CORPORATE  AND I ARE SANTEL MIXED USE  PROJECT INCLUDING. 250,000  SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL. THINGS  SPACE. 100 RESIDENTIAL UNITS  THEIR DEVELOPMENT ORDER OR A  YEAR. THEY DO HAVE AN  OPPORTUNITY TO EXTEND THEIR  DEVELOPMENT ORDER. IF THERE  COMES A TIME THAT THEY EITHER.  DON'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF  THEIR DEVELOPMENT ORDER WHICH  HAS A MIXED USE. ARE ALLOWED  PRESS EXPIRED WITHOUT  CONSTRUCTING THE  NON-RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT AND  THEY'LL BE SUBJECT  ENFORCEMENT.  >> WE WE.  >> DO NOT RECOMMEND  INCORPORATING.  >> HARD AND FAST TIME FRAME IN  WHICH WAS DEVELOPMENTS NEED TO  OCCUR. BUT AT THE SAME TIME WE  DON'T WANT. WE DON'T WANT THE  DEVELOPMENT 2 AND CLEARED.  NON-RESIDENTIAL OUT PARCELS  THAT LIE FALLOW FOR YEARS.  >> AND THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I'M  BRINGING THIS UP BECAUSE I'VE  SEEN TOO OFTEN WHERE THEY SAY  WE'RE GOING TO DO THIS AND  THIS AND THIS AND ALL THEY DO  IS THE RESIDENTIAL BECAUSE  THAT'S WHERE THE MONEY IS AND  THEN THEY SIT AND WAIT AND  THEY HAVEN'T PAD READY FOR  COMMERCIAL WE JUST APPROVED  ONE DOWN POCATELLO. WHO KNOWS  WHEN THAT COMMERCIAL COMPONENT  EVER BEEN TO GET BUILT AND I  REALLY THINK THAT WE NEED TO  STRICTLY STATE THAT THIS IS  NOT GOING TO BE FACED THAT IT  HAS TO BE DEVELOPED ALL AT THE  SAME TIME HORIZONTALLY  REGARDLESS OF HOW MANY  INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS THERE ARE  THAT ARE CONNECTED. IT HAS TO  BE ONE DEVELOPMENT THAT GETS  DEVELOPED ALL AT THE SAME  TIME.  >> I WE WANT THE COMMISSION  HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO APPROVE  A PHASED DEVELOPMENT HAVE A  300 ACRE NEXT HORIZONTAL MIXED  USE DEVELOPMENT. HOW COME MY  MANDATE THAT THEY BUILT IT ALL  AT LOTS. THEY MIGHT HAVE 3 OR  4 PHASES AND THAT PLAN WOULD  BE APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION  ASKED OR CONCEPT PLAN. YOU  KNOW I UNDERSTAND THE DESIRE  TO HA MOORE SPECIFICITY AND  MORE TEETH BUT IF WE HAVE  DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE PROJECT  THAT'S ISSUED. THEY DON'T  BUILD A MIXED USE. WE CAN  PROGRESS WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT  THEY CAN BE SUBJECT TO FINES  LIENS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE OF  THEIR DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND  SENDS IT IT'S NOT A HOMESTEAD  PROPERTY. I COULD BE SUBJECT  TO FORECLOSURE AND THAT THE  SENATE COULD SOMEHOW TAKE  COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON  THOSE PROPERTIES. SO YOU KNOW  I I THINK THAT WE'VE MADE THE  SITUATION WITH WHAT WE'VE  INCORPORATED HERE WITHOUT  WITHOUT GOING TO THE EXTENT  THAT WE MIGHT ACTUALLY  DISCOURAGE ANY DEVELOPMENT TO  OCCUR.  >> AT I'VE WORKED ON SOME OF  THE NATION'S LARGEST MIXED USE  PROJECTS. HERE BUT IN ANOTHER  STATE.  >> AND I CAN TELL YOU THAT  THEY NEVER WOULD HAVE HAPPENED  AND THEY NEVER WOULD HAPPEN IF  THEY COULDN'T BE.  >> I THAT IS SIMPLY THE WAY  LARGE PROJECTS HAPPEN. IF WE  REQUIRE. THEM TO BE BUILT ALL  AT ONE TIME IT WILL SIMPLY  MEAN THAT WE WILL NOT GET ANY  DEVELOPMENT.  ♪ SO AS THE BOLD YES, BUT I CAN  TELL YOU THAT THAT THE  PROJECTS THAT I WORKED ON AND  THESE ARE LARGE PROJECTS. I  MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF  SQUARE FEET. THEY SIMPLY WOULD  NOT HAPPEN IF THE PROJECTS  COULD BE FACED. IT'S JUST THE  ECONOMICS OF IT. IT IT SIMPLY  THERE'S NO OTHER WAY TO  POLITICS.  >> I UNDERSTAND THE ECONOMICS  OF IT, BUT AT THE SAME TIME  THE PURPOSE OF REZONING OUR  CITY, ESPECIALLY IN THESE  CORRIDOR AREAS IS TO HAVE  NON-RESIDENTIAL.  >> AND IF THEY HAVE A  DEVELOPMENT AND ALL THEIR ONLY  HAVE TO DO IS START DEVELOPING  AND BUILD THAT COME AND THAT  NON SORRY ALL THEY HAVE TO DO  START BUILDING RESIDENTIAL AND  THEN PAUSED THE COMMERCIAL  HOW'S THAT WORKING FOR I THINK  I THINK THIS BARNES HAS LAID  OUT HOW THAT WORKS AND IF  THERE IS A PROCESS FOR THAT.  AND WHETHER YOU AGREE WITH IT  OR NOT THERE'S A PROCESS FOR  THAT AND. BUT.  >> SPEAKING FROM EXPERIENCE.  DEALING WITH THESE TYPES OF  MIXED USE PROJECTS.  >> IF YOU.  >> REQUIRE BUT THEY BUILT ALL  AT ONE TIME WE SIMPLY WON'T  HAVE ANY. AND THAT'S THE  REALITY INDUSTRY.  >> SO CAN WE FIND A COMPROMISE  THAT ON THE PARCELS THAT ARE 5  ACRES OR LESS THEY HAVE TO DO  IT ALL AT ONE TIME AND THEN  THOSE PARCELS THAT ARE 5 ACRES  OR MORE THEY CAN DO IT FACED.  SO THAT WE THEN THINK GOING  OUT RESIDENTIAL BUILT AT THE  SAME TIME I THINK PULLING OUT  OF ARBITRARY. CRUNCH.  >> NOT  >> VERY FEASIBLE I THINK THE  WAY THAT WE HAVE THIS  STRUCTURE. IS ONE OF THE  BETTER WAYS TO DO I HAVE SEEN.  TRIGGERS WHERE YOU CAN'T GET A  C A R YOU CAN'T GET IN AN  OCCUPANCY, YOU KNOW FOR AFTER  THE CERTAIN CERTAIN UNIT  UNLESS YOU BUILT A CERTAIN  AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE.  >> HOWEVER I WILL TELL YOU  THAT THAT HAS IN IN MY PAST  EXPERIENCE ALSO HINDERED  DEVELOPMENT TO WHERE THE  PROJECT JUST STOPS I HAVE SEEN  MIXED USE PROJECTS. ABANDONED.  HOTEL HOTELS THAT THE  STRUCTURES WERE BUILT AND  APARTMENTS WHERE THE  STRUCTURES WERE BUILT AND THEN  THEY WERE ABANDONED BECAUSE  THEY COULDN'T DO IT ALL AT ONE  TIME. I'M SORRY THEY COULDN'T  FACE IT AND THEY COULDN'T MEET  THE THE TRIGGERS AND SO THEY  JUST ABANDONED THE PROJECT AND  I DON'T THINK WE WANT TO SEE  ABANDONED PRODUCTS EITHER. YOU  WE WE RUN INTO A LOT OF ISSUES  WHEN WE START PUTTING THOSE  HARD TRIGGERS AND THE. AND  PROHIBITING PHASING I'M IN  COMPLETE AGREEMENT WITH THE  WITH THE PURPOSE ABSOLUTELY.  SEEN IT HAPPEN TOO MANY TIMES  AND IF YOU TALK TO ANYONE IN  THE MIXED USE INDUSTRY. THEY  WILL TELL YOU THAT THE  PROJECTS HAVE TO BE FACED  THERE'S NO OTHER WAY TO DO IT.  >> OKAY YOU WANT WHEN YOU WANT  TO DO.  >> NOT GOING GETTING SUPPORT  MY BIRTH. ON PAGE 37. AS A  REMINDER, THE MASTER CONCEPT  PLAN IS THE SAME THING IS WHAT  WE CALL TODAY DMP.  >> IT'S SIMILAR. THE MASTER  CONCEPT MP IS THAT YOU SEE  TODAY AND REALLY ASIDE FROM A  SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL  WHICH YOU TALKED TO THAT ARE  GENERALLY THE MP MORE DETAILS.  MASTER CONCEPT PLAN ALLOWS FOR  A LITTLE BIT LESS DETAIL SOME  CASES IT CAN BE A POSSIBLE  PLAN. WE'RE NOT EXPECTING A  MASTER CONCEPT PLAN TO SHOW  WHERE ALL PERCENT GOING TO BE  AND WHAT SIZE IS YOUR WE WANT  YOUR GENERAL USE AREAS, YOU'RE  OPEN-SPACE AREAS. WEAR YOUR  MAJOR ROADWAY NETWORKS ARE  GOING TO BE A AND YOUR MAJOR  WATER AND SEWER. LINES AND.  THAT IS GENERAL CONCEPT. UNDER  THE MASTER CONCEPT PLAN SOME  TIME. ALL THAT'S HAPPENED. A  TURN AND THE LEVEL 2 PER EYE.  THE SIGNIFICANT DETAIL THAT WE  ASKED OUR UNDER OUR  DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN. WHAT  HAPPENS IS WHEN THEY GET A  NEXT STEP IN THE PROCESS THEY  FIND THAT THEY HAVE TO ADJUST  SOMETHING AND THEN THAT WANT  THEM UP MY MASTER PLAN BECAUSE  IT HAS NOT CONSISTENT WHEN  THERE ARE MORE REFINED SITE  PLAN SO WE WANT AVOID.  APPLICANTS FROM HAVING TO COME  BACK FROM ANOTHER PUBLIC  HEARING PROCESS AND LOSE 4 TO  6 MONTHS AND THE PROCESS  BECAUSE ASKED FOR CONCEPT PLAN  THAT REALLY AS MORE MORE  OUTSIDE PLAN. I WANT THEN AN  INDUSTRY STANDARD EXCEPT IT ON  PLAN LEVEL OF DETAIL. ALL  RIGHT SOME HAS DEVELOPMENT  MASTER PLAN YOU OFTEN APPROVED  WAIVERS ON OCCASIONS UNDER THE  CURRENT CODE AND CONCEPT PLANS  YOU'LL BE ABLE TO APPROVE  WAIVERS YOU MIGHT SEE A LITTLE  LY LAST DETAIL ON THOSE AND  YOU'RE USED TO UNDER A MASTER  PLAN. AND AGAIN THERE IS A  REASON FOR THAT. A REASON FOR  THAT IS MAN'S. REALLY NOT THAT  NOT TO THE LEVEL OF DETAIL  THAT YOU SEE IN YOUR  DEVELOPMENT MASTER AND WHAT  HAPPENS. IT HAPPENS REGULARLY.  WELL I WILL PREPARE ON PLAN OR  ON A PLAN, THE CATS OR THE  KIND OF ALL. AND THEN WHEN  THEY GET YOU THERE SUBDIVISION  OR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN  THEY'VE GOT TO MAKE  ADJUSTMENTS AND THEY'RE NOT  THE SAME AS WHAT THEY SHOWED  ON THERE. ALL MASTER SO THAT  THEY HAVE TO COME BACK OR NOT  A PUBLIC HEARING. X 7 TIMELINE  OF THE PROJECT 4 TO 6 MONTHS  BECAUSE OF PUBLIC HEARING. WHY  AM JUST AND A MINOR CHEF. AND  THE THE AND THE THE. WE DON'T  WANT HAVE OUR THE DOW UP 1  ONE. A MINOR ADJUSTMENT RETAIL  WAS DOWN ON THE COST AND WHAT  CAME BEFORE YOU.  >> SO THE PROCESS IS THE  COMMISSION APPROVES THE  CONCEPT PLAN AND THEN STAFF.  WHERE DOES THE ADMINISTRATIVE  APPROVAL SITTING INTO ALL OF  THIS PROCESS  >> SO IT'S IT'S PROJECT  REQUIRES MASKS FOR CONCEPT  PLAN BECAUSE OF THE NATURE OF  THE PROJECT HORIZONTAL MIXED  USE FOR EXAMPLE OR THEY NEED A  SPECIAL EXCEPTION OR THEY WANT  WAIVERS. THEY DO A MASTER  CONCEPT PLAN. THAT COMES  BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION.  THE CITY COMMISSION THAT'S THE  GENERAL LABOR OF THE PROJECT  AND WHERE EVERYTHING IS GOING  TO BE LOCATED ON THE SITE AND  THE BACKUP DOCUMENTATION AND  JUST HAITIAN FOR THE WAIVER  REQUEST. AND THE STAFF  ANALYSIS AND THEN YOU ARE  CORRECT THAT. IF YOU ARE ABOUT  THE COMMENT FURTHER SITE  DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE  AND WHERE ALL THE. ULDC DESIGN  STANDARDS SETBACKS STORM WATER  REQUIREMENTS LANDSCAPING  REQUIREMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR  ALL TECHNICAL REVIEW BY THE  CITY. ALL OF THE VARIOUS  DEPARTMENTS.  >> WHEN IS THE NEIGHBORHOOD  MEETING TAKE NEIGHBORHOOD  MEETING TAKES PLACE PRIOR TO.  >> HIRED THERE'S A PUBLIC  HEARING REQUIRE. I HAD TO THE  PUBLIC HEARING. IT WAS  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR  RESIGNING AND THEY DON'T HAVE  A CONCEPT PLAN TO SHOW THEM  THEY BUY DO THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD  MEETING NOW THE TO DO IT  AGAIN. BEFORE THEIR  PARLIAMENT, OUR SUBDIVISION  POT AND THEIR OR THEIR  DEVELOPMENT AND  INFRASTRUCTURE. IF THAT'S ANY  SITE DEVELOPMENT  INFRASTRUCTURE WHICH IS FOR  ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW. THEY  APPLY. THEY GOT ONE ROUND OF  COMMENTS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT  REVIEW COMMITTEE. THAT'S WHAT  THEY NEED TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS  FOR CODE COMPLIANCE ISSUES.  THEY CAN DO THAT BEFORE THEY  PRESENT IT YOU ONE OF THE  ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVED  PROJECTS OF AMENDMENT OR  STRUCTURE THEY SAID MATT.  THERE'S ONE LEVEL OF STAFF ARE  YOU ONE ROUND OF STAFF REVIEW  THAT MAY HAVE BEEN ABLE  >> SOUNDS LIKE YOU NEED A  FLOWCHART HERE SO THAT  EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS WHERE  EVERYTHING GOES BECAUSE YOU  UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS IS GOING  TO LOOK LIKE I'M SURE MISSILE  LANDED UNDERSTANDS WHERE THIS  LOOKS LIKE. BUT FOR OTHERS THE  DEVELOPERS, THE NEIGHBORHOODS  WHERE DOES IT FIT IS IMPORTANT  FOR THEM TO UNDERSTAND TOO.  AND THAT'S WHY I'M ASKING  THESE THING THAT I AM. SITE  DEVELOPMENT IS THE  ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL.  >> CORRECT IT'S CALLED SITE  DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE  PLAN.  >> SO WHEN DOES THE CITIZENS  IF THEY DON'T WANT TO APPEAL  HAD THAT WHERE DOES THAT FIT  IN THIS FLOW CHART.  >> ISSUANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT  ORDER AT 30 OUT.  >> I WILL THEY KNOW THAT THE  DEVELOPMENT ORDER HAS BEEN  ISSUED.  >> MOST OF THE TIME SOMEBODY  IS OBJECTING TO A PROJECT AND  THEY'RE INTENDING TO APPEAL  THEY ARE IN CLOSE CONTACT WITH  US REGARDING THE STATUS OF THE  CONTRACT. SO.  >> AND YOU KNOW AND ALSO WITH  THE NEW ACELA. SYSTEM ONE THAT  COMES ONLINE.  >> IT IS IT IS OPEN TO THE  PUBLIC IT IS SO TRANSPARENT SO  THEY GO LOOK UP THE PROJECT  ONLINE WITHOUT EVEN CONTACTING  US AND SEE IF THE DEVELOPMENT  ORDER WAS ISSUED.  >> SO I WANT TO JUST THROW IT  OUT THERE BECAUSE  ADMINISTRATIVELY I JUST I'M  NOT A FAN OF I MADE THAT VERY  CLEAR I'M NOT A FAN OF  ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL.  PROCESSES THAT'S PART OF OUR  ROLE.  >> WITH THE NEW ULDC. SHORTLY  AFTER THE PREVIOUS ULDC WAS  WAS DONE. THERE WERE A LOT OF  HICCUPS THAT NEEDED TO BE  CORRECTED AND STAFF AND THE  COMMISSION WORK TOGETHER TO  GET THOSE CORRECTED BY HAVING  ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL.  >> WE DON'T KNOW WHAT NEEDS TO  BE CORRECTED I'M SPEAKING FROM  EXPERIENCE WHEN THERE'S A  CITIZENS GROUP RECOGNIZES  THERE'S A CODE THAT NEEDS TO  BE CHANGED AND AMENDED.  CITIZENS WORKED REALLY REALLY  HARD TO GET THOSE AMENDMENTS  MADE WITH COMMISSION AND STAFF  WORKING ALTOGETHER BY HAVING  ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL WE'RE  WORRYING REMOVED FROM THAT  WHOLE EQUATION  ♪ NOT KNOWING THAT THERE'S A  POTENTIAL CODE THAT NEEDS TO  CHANGE. SO THAT MAKES ME  CONCERNED. TABLE 29 PAGE  ♪ 29 THE TABLE. THERE IS NOTHING  IN HERE ABOUT RE PLAT. I GUESS  INITIAL POT. WE'VE SEEN BOTH  THAT ARE QUASI JUDICIAL.  THAT'S NOT LISTED ON HERE ALL  THAT'S LISTED AS FINAL PLAT.  THE TABLE MA'AM WHERE PAGE  IT'S THE TABLE 2002002.1.  >> SO I'M A SOUTH DIVISION  MINOR AND ASSAULT DIVISION  PRELIMINAR BOTH ASIDE  JUDICIAL. THEY'RE COME TO THE  CITY COMMISSION. A SUBDIVISION  FINAL PLAT. WELCOME TO CITY  COMMISSION WILL BE ON THE CITY  COMMISSIONS CONSENT WHAT  REMEMBER 8 THE SUBDIVISION.  IT'S A DIVISION IS A  SUBDIVISION THAT DOESN'T  MATTER IF IT'S A IT'S A A NEW  SUBDIVISION OR HENRY  SUBDIVISION OR A ITS STILL A  SUBDIVISION.  >> WHEN WE SEE IT WE SEE REPLY  AND THAT'S WHY I WANTED TO  BRING IT UP JUST TO MAKE SURE  TO GET OVERLOOKED.  >> THIS HE'S NOT PLANNING AND  ZONING ADVISORY BOARD IS ON  THE CHART. THAT'S CALLED THE  DECISION MATRIX HOWEVER THEY  ARE NOWHERE ON THE CHURCH  ITSELF.  >> THEY ARE NOT ON THE CHART  BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT THE  DECISION-MAKER THEY ARE A  RECOMMENDING AND THAT IS  PROVIDED PROCESS ACTION.  >> IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING WHEN  THERE'S A COMP PLAN  INTERPRETATION. THAT'S I GUESS  STAFF MAKES IT GETS APPEALED  TO THE PEACE  >> THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HELP  AND THE COMPREHENSIVE DOESN'T  NEED TO BE IN THAT DOESN'T  NEED TO BE IN THE ULDC  BUSINESS EVERYTHING ULDC NOT  EVERYTHING ULDC AND  >> I THOUGHT THAT MIGHT HAVE  BEEN WHY THE ZAP WAS LISTED  HEART OF THE ABBREVIATIONS IF  THEY'RE NOT IN THE CHART THEY  DON'T NEED TO IN THE  ABBREVIATIONS. THAT'S JUST MY  OPINION. ARE TO ADVISORY BOARD  IS ALSO NOT IN THE CHART. BUT  THE ART ADVISORY BOARD HAS  THE.  >> RECOMMENDATIONS AND  AUTHORITY TO APPROVE WITHOUT  MEETING REQUIREMENTS.  >> THEY DON'T AND THEY I MAKE  A RECOMMENDATION AND BAD IT  COMES TO COMMISSION FINAL  SESSION SO SO AD ALSO DOESN'T  NEED TO BE ON THAT BECAUSE  THEY'RE NOT IN THE CHART.  >> THAT'S YOU KNOW THAT'S THE  SCRIVENER 3RD SOME DOCUMENT  HAS COME THROUGH VARIOUS  READER REITERATION OVER YOU  KNOW WE'RE CERTAINLY WON'T  CONSIDER MAKING THOSE  CORRECTIONS HOWEVER WE DO HAVE  A LIMITED TIME BETWEEN FIRST  AND SECOND READING. AND WE DO  AUTHORITY UNDER CHAPTER WANT  TO MAKE THE MINUTES FOR  PATIENTS LONG AS IT DOES NOT  CHANGE THE INTENT OF THE CODE  THAT WOULD INCLUDE. CRAIG OURS  OR MOUNTAIN.  >> SPELLING EVEN. PROCESS  ORDERS THAT DOES NOT PAY ALL  OF THAT DOES NOT CHANGE THE  INTENT OF THE CODE AND THAT  UNDER THE GENERAL PROVISIONS  WE CAN MAKE THOSE CHANGES  WITHOUT AN ORDINANCE COMES TO  WITH THE CITY COMMISSION.  >> AND THAT SAME CHART MA'AM  THERE'S ZONING HEARING OFFICER  THE AUTHORITY TO APPROVE MAJOR  VARIANCES. BUT THAT'S NOT  LISTED ON THIS CHART. I WOULD  LIKE IT TO COME TO COMMISSION,  I KNOW I'M NOT GOING GET  SUPPORT OF MY FELLOW  COMMISSIONERS OR STAFF SO I'M  JUST GOING TO APPEAL TO YOU TO  MAKE SURE GETS ADDED TO THE  CHART SINCE THEY'RE THE  AUTHORITY.  >> I'M MAJOR VARIANCES YOU  HAVE A MINOR BUT NOT MAJOR  IT'S VARIANCE ALL BE MINOR AND  THAT'S VARIANCE JUDICIAL IT'S  ORDER BY ZONING HEARING  OFFICER THE SECOND TO LAST ON  PAGE 29 MAYBE IT JUST EASIER  TO JUST PUT MAJOR.  >> THEY'RE SINCE WE DO BREAK  THEM OUT MAJOR MINOR VARIANCES  JUST THROWING IT OUT THERE  POINT. OKAY.  >> COMMISSIONER AVERAGE ARE  STILL THERE DID YOU HAVE ANY  QUESTIONS ABOUT ANYTHING. NO  >> OTHER THING I'D LIKE JUST  PASSED OUT IS FORMER OF. I  DON'T REMEMBER THEIR NAME. THE  SECOND PEOPLE THAT ULDC. THEY  HAD A REALLY COOL OUT OF HOW  THE ULDC BOOK TO REALLY EASY  TO FLIP THROUGH THE PAGES KNOW  THAT I MYSELF WHEN I WAS  TRYING TO FLIP THROUGH THE  PAGES WHERE IS THE SECTION IT  WAS REALLY EASILY OUTLINE  SIDE, I'LL SHARE IT WITH YOU  GUYS MAYBE STAFF MIGHT BE  AMENABLE TO DOING SOMETHING  SIMILAR I DON'T BUT. THE WHOLE  THING IS TO JUST TRY AND MAKE  THIS POPE EASIER TO READ  FLIPPING TRYING TO FIND THE  PAGING TRYING TO FIND SECTION  VERY DIFFICULT TO MAYBE STAFF  OF POPPING. I'M JUST THROWING  IT OUT IN THE ORDINANCE  BETWEEN LIKE ONE 24 1.25. IT  IS MISSING CHAPTER 54. CHAPTER  54 IS PART OF THE CURRENT 2,  BUT IT'S NOT BEING REPEALED IN  ITS ENTIRETY LIKE ALL THE  OTHERS THAT ARE ONE I'M SURE  IT WAS I IT'S THE SAME BUT  COULD POP YOU IT'S JUST  EXAMPLE OF IS JUST AN EXAMPLE  WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE FRONT AND  BACK WOULD WRITE 300 PAGES. SO  IF YOU ON ONE 24 1.25 IN THE  ORDINANCE SAYS CHAPTER 53 IN  TITLE IS REPEAL CHAPTER 55 IS  REPEALED BUT THERE IS A  CHAPTER 54 THAT IS NOT PUNCH.  I'M SURE IT'S JUST A SCRIPT I  DIDN'T HAVE A CHANCE TO SEND  IT TO YOU I APOLOGIZE, I RAN  OUT OF TIME REVIEWING THIS  COLD. DONE THERE, OKAY. AND  THAT'S THE BODIES.  >> WHY SO IT'S REALLY ON  RESPONSE. THANK YOU SO MUCH.  PUBLIC COMMENT.  >> YES, DOWN LOW BACK FOLLOWED  BY JOSH SMITH AND THE WEST  THEIR RUN.  >> TAKE THE MINISTERS  APPRECIATE THE LETTER  SUGGESTED WORDING IN THE COMP  PLAN AND COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL  TROOPS LAST BOARD IT AND ALL  OF YOU FOR PROVING IT. AND  THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE IN THE  ULDC SO YOU'VE GOT TO BUILD ON  THAT. IN A WAY THAT WILL  PROTECT THE ENTIRE THAT WAS  APPROVED WAS A FOOTNOTE  ACTIVITIES CENTER 2. THERE  WERE QUESTIONS WERE WISE AS  WEATHER. MOST OF THE COMMUNITY  LOWS OF THE HOMES THAT ARE  SOUTH OF WHAT I DRIVE FOR A  COUPLE BE PROTECTED FROM  RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE  GOLF COURSE. AND THAT'S WHY WE  GET TO THE ULDC BECAUSE NOBODY  EVER RESPONDED TO BUT YOU HAD  MANY MANY PEOPLE SAY THE PCB.  THAT WAS SOMETHING IN THE COP  AND THE SAYS THAT NOW THAT FOR  THAT THE CHANGE THAT  DEVELOPMENT OF. NORTH OR SOUTH  WHAT I WAS IT IS GOING TO BE  AVAILABLE FOR THE CDS OT  YOU'RE ELIMINATING THE DO SO  AND WITH THAT ELIMINATING THE  REQUIREMENT FOR A MASTER PLAN.  SO WHEN THE DRI EXPIRES IT  WILL BE YOU KNOW THAT PLAN. WE  ARE URGING YOU BEFORE YEAR  AUGUST 6 YEAR AND THEN THAT  YOU TO DRAFT CONCLUDE THAT  YOUR CONSIDERATION. A  REQUIREMENT THAT WHEN THE DEER  A SUPPLIER WILL BE A  REQUIREMENT FOR A MASTER PLAN.  FOR ENTIRETY OF COMMUNITY. YOU  DO IT WITH THE BE ABLE KEEP  THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE MASTER  PLAN. THOSE ABSENT THAT I CAN  TELL YOU THE DEVELOPERS GOING  TO IN AS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND  PARTICULARLY NOW THAT YOU  REMOVE THAT 24 ACRES OF GOLF  COURSE. YOU KNOW THAT  LEGITIMATELY AND LEGALLY IS  THAT IN YOUR PLAN FOR MANY  YEARS. YOU KNOW STAFF NEVER  GET AN ANSWER ABOUT WHY YOU  COULD NOT TAKE THAT OUT. KEEP  RECREATIONAL SPACES QUALIFY.  THE VISION. ANOTHER PROVISION,  YOU'RE DOING HERE IS SAYING  THAT IF YOU'VE GOT RESIDENTIAL  DENSITY YOU KNOW WALKER LOOK  AT THE NUMBER UNITS OF THE  ACRE. PARCEL. YOU CAN TAKE THE  WHOLE AREA. AND SQUEEZE AND  OUT OF THE ONE AREA THAT  VIOLENT YOUR COMPREHENSIVE  PLAN. IT DOES ADDRESS THE  PARCEL K ISSUE THEY'RE TRYING  TO MAKE IS YOUR NEXT TIME  AROUND FOR THIS DEVELOPER GET  150 HOMES IN THE MIDST OF  SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. EVEN  THOUGH THAT VIOLATE SO MUCH OF  WHAT YOU TRY TO MAKE IT IS  YOUR BY ELIMINATING THE  DEFINITION OF DENSITY UNIFIED  AND DEVELOPING COAT. AND  FINALLY DON'T TAKE AWAY THE  PEOPLE'S RIGHT TO A PUBLIC  HEARING. AND YOUR APPROVAL O  MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.  SO WITH THE 3 REPORT. THAT'S  WHAT WE THE PEOPLE KNOW THAT  AUGUST 6 THOSE COSTS BACK AND  WE'RE JUST HOPING TO HAVE A  BETTER PRODUCT FOR THEIR.  >> JOSH SMITH PRESIDENT PORT.  BEAT THE DRUM AGAIN. IT REALLY  BOTHERS ME THAT WE'RE NOT  LIVING EVERY CITIZEN KNOW THAT  THEIR PROPERTIES BEING RESULT.  >> ALL I HAVE A REAL FEAR, BUT  THEY'RE GOING HARD WE'RE GOING  OUT OF HEAD OF US. WE HAVE GOT  TO LET THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS  NOW WE HAVE I DON'T KNOW IF  THERE'S A FEAR THAT THEY'LL  HER AT APARTMENTS, I DON'T  KNOW WHAT IT IS THERE'S NO  REASON WE'RE NOT INFORMING  CITIZENS. SECOND BY MISS. I  TRY TO BE THE VOICE OF HEY  LOOK AT THIS IS WHAT THE  CITIZENS ARE THINKING FOR YOU  GUYS. IF YOU THROUGH THE  SECOND LESSON I WISH I HAD  DONE MY BUILDING IS COMMERCIAL  I GOT IT THEN FACES AND I  COULDN'T NOT DONE SOME OF THAT  DONE SOME OF THAT. ONE  RESIDENTIAL PRESENT BOTH  APARTMENT AT ALL AS MANAGING  YOUR THAT'S LAID OUT THERE'S A  DEBT SAID THEY HAVE TO DO IT  TO COST ME MORE MONEY TO  EXTEND MY PERMIT. I UNDERSTAND  THE COMMERCIAL BREAKS AND TAX  I UNDERSTAND THERE'S A LOT OF  THAT STUFF. I JUST REALLY WANT  YOU GUYS TO HEAR HOW IT SOUNDS  TO CITIZENS WHEN WE LISTEN TO  THIS STUFF. THEY'RE THEY'RE  THEY'RE YOU KNOW WE DON'T WANT  THAT SET DATE BECAUSE WE DON'T  WANT TO OFFSET, BUT YOU'RE  BETRAYING YOUR FRONT YARD. YOU  KNOW, I MEAN IT'S JUST ONE OF  THOSE THINGS WHERE I KEEP  ASKING YOU GUYS TO HELP US.  AND THIS IS ONE OF THOSE  SPOTS, YOU KNOW DON'T FORGET  THAT A MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE  WHO LIVE HERE ARE BUILDING  COMMERCIAL. WE'RE BUILDING  RESIDENTIAL VERY OWN  RESIDENTIAL WE'RE TRYING TO  WITHIN THE RULES.  >> I KEEP HEARING THE  ARBORISTS MEANS GET INVOLVED  OR NEEDS TO GET BALL. YOU GUYS  ARE UNDERSTAFFED AND A LOT OF  POSSESSIONS AND IT MAKES IT A  NIGHTMARE FOR US RESIDENTIAL  PEOPLE TO GET ANYBODY OUT  DON'T EFFECT. I KEEP HEARING  CODE ENFORCEMENT'S GOING TO BE  IN CHARGE OF THAT COLIN FOR  SMOKE COME OUT LOOK INTO THAT  WE ALREADY HAVE CITIZENS ARE  SAYING WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH  COURT ENFORCE MY PEOPLE NOW  CODE ENFORCEMENT'S GOING TO BE  IN CHARGE OF COMMERCIAL  BUILDINGS GET BUILT ON MIXED I  JUST REALLY HOPE THAT WE'RE  UNDERSTANDING THAT WE'RE  SETTING OURSELVES UP FOR  FAILURE WITH SOME OF THESE YOU  KNOW CODE ENFORCEMENT WELL, IF  THERE'S A PLAN TO HIRE MORE  CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS,  THERE'S A PLAN TO PAY HIM AND  THAT'S THE PLAN BUT YOU KNOW  NICE TO HEAR THAT. I JUST  REALLY WANT EVERYONE TO  REALIZE THAT WE'RE KIND OF  LEAVING IT OPEN WELL MAYBE AND  HOPEFULLY WE CAN GET REALLY  NAILED DOWN THAT'S ALL I GOT  THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUCK. THANK  YOU.  >> THERE AND ONCE REPRESENT MY  FAMILY.  >> A COUPLE COMMENTS ON ULDC  ULDC WORKSHOP AND THAT'S GOING  ON FIRST OF ALL WHEN I FIRST  LEARNED ABOUT ACTIVITY CENTER  6 SOMEBODY QUICK ABOUT THIS.  MY CONCEPT WAS IS OF I PUT I  COMBINE MY 2 LOTS BUT 5 SMALL  STRUCTURES WHICH WERE  CONNECTED BY BREES WAYS  INSTEAD OF INTERNAL  CONNECTIVITY I COULD AFFORD TO  SMALL STRUCTURES PUT 2  BUSINESSES AND 3 HOMES ON LAND  WHERE I WOULD CREATE JOBS AND  INCOME FOR PORT. BUT I'M NOT  ALLOWED TO DO THAT BECAUSE YOU  HAVE CONTROL CONNECTIVITY  INSTEAD OF THE BREEZEWAY  BETWEEN WHICH WOULD ALSO  QUALIFY ME FOR INCENTIVES BY  PUTTING A SOLAR FARM ON TOP OF  THOSE BREEZE WAYS MAKING IT  MORE GREEN MORE TO ATTRACT  MORE PEOPLE HERE AREA. THE  MAIN REASON I'D LIKE TO TALK  ABOUT THIS AS COMPARED 2  MINUTES SO BASICALLY OVER THE  COURSE OF THE LAST 4 YEARS  I'VE TALKED TO THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT ZONING AND  PLANNING MULTIPLE TIMES I SAID  WHAT WILL PREVENT YOU FROM  BUILDING ON THAT WAY. SCRUB  JAYS THAT'S ALL I SAID I ASKED  IN PERSON PHONE AND EMAIL IN  THE PAST 30 DAYS I HAD 2  MEETINGS ZONING AND PLANNING.  I'VE ALWAYS QUESTIONS MAKE A  KID ANSWER SOME VERY SIMPLE  QUESTIONS THEY CAN'T SAY. LIKE  FOR A COVID NOW TO BILL  THEY'RE NOT ACCEPTING NEW  PERMITS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY  RESIDENTIAL EVEN THE LAST BUT  IT IS OH NO THEY WON'T LET ME  TURN THE PEOPLE WORKING THEY  SAY NO GO AWAY. YOU CAN'T DO  THAT. SO BASICALLY THEY CAN  ANSWER QUESTIONS LIKE SO WE  CAN GET QUESTIONS FROM  DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES LIKE IT  SECRETLY FATHERED IS PROVEN IN  BY AUGUST 6TH. CAN WE SUBMIT  POTENTIAL PARTIALLY COMPLETED  BLUEPRINT KNOW WE HAVE TO  BATTLE A FIGHT BECAUSE WE  DON'T HAVE TIME TO GET IT ALL  RIGHT. SO AGAIN GOING BACK TO  THE STATEMENTS I ASKED  DEPARTMENTS WITHIN THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT AND THERE IS ONE  EMPLOYEE THAT WORKS IN THIS  BUILDING THAT HAS GIVEN ME A  WRITTEN STATEMENT THAT SAYS I  SHOULD PUT THE LEGAL RECOURSE  ARE GOING TO DO. THE REASON  FOR THAT IS IS EVERY TIME  ASKED WHAT WILL STOP ME FROM  BILL IT NOTHING BUT SCRUB JAYS  WELL IF YOU'VE GOT A WORKSHOP  GOING ON SINCE WHEN OBVIOUSLY  YOU GUYS ALL KNOW THERE'S  THINGS GOING THAT WOULD  PREVENT ME FROM BUILDING GETS  RESULTS IF YOU GO IT'S BEING  REZONED SINCE 2021. I BOUGHT  MY WAY AND 2022 WHEN I PUT IT  OFF. WELL SINCE I HAVE HAD  EXPERIENCES IN THE COST TO THE  PROPERTY TAX WE WERE IN THE  WAY OF THE CROSS THE TOOLS AND  SUPPLIES, INCLUDING TOOLS  MACHINERY THE FOOD HYDRATION  YOU'RE COMMISSIONERS WITH  VEHICLES AND GOING OUT THERE.  >> MY TIME CONSULTING THE CITY  BUILDERS MET AT A COST OF  LIVING EXPENSES DUE TO THE  DELAY IS ALL RIGHT PRETTY  EXPENSIVE DEVICE WITH YOU GUYS  WHY WOULD THIS HAPPEN BECAUSE  OBVIOUSLY IF YOU'RE CHARGING  ME MY PROPERTY TAX AND SENDING  ME A STATEMENT THE PROPERTY  TAX. WELL LET'S GO BACK TO THE  STATEMENT COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL MADE ABOUT 20 20, BUT  IT WAS NOT KNOWN TO US WITH  THOSE MOST WITHIN THE PROPERTY  RIGHT WE ARE EXCLUDED BY  PROPERTY AND YOU'RE GOING TO  RESOLVE IT AND YOU WOULD KNEW  WHAT SAYS HERE'S YOUR PROPERTY  TAX PAY THIS IT WAS SO GOOD TO  SOMEBODY ELSE. WELL. THAT  MEANS THE BELL THAT THEY HAVE  ADDRESS. I HAVE NEVER ONCE IN  5 YEARS RECEIVED ANYTHING  SAYING THE REZONING SO HERE I  AM MAKING THESE PLAYERS. MY  FAMILY MY WAY TO MAKE ME GO  OUT THERE THE CHAIN SHOW THE  REALLY REALLY HARD AND NOW I  HAVE TO EXPLAIN TO HER WHY WE  CAN'T BUILD. NOBODY WANTS TO  EXPLAIN THAT TO WIFE. IT'S  MAKING MY LIFE VERY VERY  DIFFICULT SO OUR TIME THANK  YOU.  >> THAT'S KIND.  >> ALL RIGHT MOVING ON PUBLIC.  HEARING NONE, I'M LOOKING FOR  MOTION. MAKE A MOTION DO HIT.  >> I MOVE TO CONTINUE  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH 13  TO SECOND READING ON AUGUST 6.  >> AND I KNOW WE DID APPROVE  THE MOTION I DON'T KNOW WHICH  SHOULD SEE ORDINANCES APPLIES  POINTS TRANSLATE I KNOW IS  THAT CHANGING THE RADIUS  PRIMARILY RADIUS FROM THE  PROPERTY LINE AND NOTIFICATION  PURPOSES CITY CLERK YOU HAD A  REALLY GOOD TO ADD TO THAT  >> INCORPORATING ANY APPROVED  MOTIONS.  >> THAT WE WANT. AS MENTIONED.  A MOTION  >> OKAY WE HAVE THAT MADE BY A  COMMISSIONER HAS CAPTURED BY  OUR CITY CLERK AND SECONDED BY  VICE MAYOR.  >> IS THERE ANYTHING SPEECH  GYMS. SO I'VE FOLLOWING THIS  ULDC SINCE BEFORE BECAME A  COMMISSIONER I SAT IN THAT  FIRST WORKSHOP WITH UNIVERSITY  OF FLORIDA.  >> IT WAS STARTED TO. CLEAN UP  OF THE CODE BRING IT TO STATE  STANDARDS. AND WE HIRED  NUMEROUS WE HAD 2 CONSULTANTS  AND NUMEROUS STAFF. AT THE END  OF 2022 THE EXISTING STAFF  THAT WE HAVE TODAY TOOK ON  THAT CHALLENGE. NO OTHERS  COULD ACCOMPLISH BEFORE  WORKSHOPS ENSUED.  >> AND I HAVE TO MY HAT IS OFF  TO STAFF. I KNOW THAT IT SEEMS  LIKE WE'VE BATTLED IT WAS NOT  BATTLED PERSONALLY WAS BATTLED  ON. CONCEPT WAS BATTLED ON. IT  WAS A BATTLE OF THE WILLS  WASN'T A BATTLE PERSONAL AND I  JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT  THAT IS UNDERSTOOD. MY HATS  OFF TO YOU GUYS BECAUSE YOU DO  A TREMENDOUS JOB WITH THE TASK  AND GETTING THIS TO BE  COMPLETED AND I KNOW ALONG THE  WAY ASK A LOT OF QUESTIONS.  AND I EVEN HAD MORE TODAY, BUT  I KNEW IT JUST WASTING  EVERYBODY'S TIME. THOSE  QUESTIONS WEREN'T TO BE A PAIN  BUT TO ENSURE THAT THIS  DOCUMENT FOUND THE BALANCE  THAT WAS NECESSARY TO ENTICE  DEVELOPMENT. AND PROTECT TO  THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS.  THAT IS WHAT MY WHOLE GOAL WAS  PROTECT EXISTING  NEIGHBORHOODS.  >> THE COMMISSIONER FROM  CITIZENS CONCERNS WHEN IT WAS  A SIMILAR WAS EVERY COACH A  LITTLE STAINS TO REMEMBER THAT  MEETING. WHERE THEY WERE GOING  TO CHANGE THE NAME AND THE  COMMISSION UNANIMOUSLY SAID NO  AND THAT CHANGE DIDN'T HAPPEN.  AND CITIZENS WERE CONCERNED  ABOUT NEIGHBORHOOD BEING  REZONED. AND STAFF AND  COMMISSION CHANGED CERTAIN  AREAS AND JUST NOT TOO LONG  AGO WE HAD THOSE GUT-WRENCHING  STORIES FROM CITIZENS AND  WE'VE PROTECTED THOSE  NEIGHBORHOODS. BUT WE FELL FAR  SHORT WHEN WE DIDN'T SEND OUT  NOTICES TO ALL OF THE OTHER  PROPERTY OWNERS THAT THE  PROPERTIES BEING RE ZONE.  EVERY DAY. AT LEAST ONCE A DAY  WHEN I'M TALKING TO CITIZENS  THEY GO WELL PROPERTIES BEING  REZONED I DIDN'T KNOW THAT. I  MEAN SO MANY TELL ME.  >> OKAY WE'VE HAD THESE PUBLIC  HEARINGS WILL BEGIN WE'VE HAD  THESE WORKSHOPS OKAY WE'VE HAD  THESE PODCAST.  >> PEOPLE ARE BUSY WITH THEIR  LIVES AND THERE'S NOTHING LIKE  GETTING THAT LETTER IN THE  MAIL THAT SAYS HEY PROPERTIES  BEING RE ZONE. SHAME ON THIS  COMMISSION. THEN THOSE SAME  PROPERTY OWNERS WE NOTIFY  OTHER PROPERTIES BEING  RESOLVED IF THERE'S A PROPERTY  OWNERS.  >> THE CITY DOES TO BE  NOTIFYING THEM. JUST THAT'S  COMING DOWN THE PIKE IN THE  THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE  REQUIRED TO PAY.  AND WE SAY HAVE  >> I DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MY  FELLOW COMMISSIONERS STAFF AND  MYSELF WHEN IT COMES TO THIS  REZONING IN BALANCING  DEVELOPMENT AND PROTECTING  EXISTING PROPERTIES. AND WE  CHECKS AND BALANCES. I ALWAYS  SAID THAT THE FOCUS TO  INCREASE OUR TAXPAYERS SHOULD  BE AT THE ACTIVITY CENTER  LEVEL LEAVE EXISTING  NEIGHBORHOOD ALONE. WE'RE WAY  AUTHORITY TO OTHERS THAT IS  OURS WE ARE REZONING THE CITY  THAT AFFECTS THOUSANDS OF  PEOPLE. AND MAJORITY OF THOSE  PROPERTY OWNERS WILL REMAIN  CLUELESS UNTIL THEY GO TO  CHANGE OR SELL OR WANT TO  BUILD. AND THEY FIND OUT THEY  CAN'T. THESE ARE THE FACTS  THAT EVERYBODY WANTS TO KEEP  SHROUDED THAT I KEEP TALKING  ABOUT. OF THAT WE'RE LEAVING  FUTURE COMMISSIONERS AND  FUTURE STAFF TO DEAL WITH  ESPECIALLY THESE UNINTENDED  CONSEQUENCES IS NO DIFFERENT  THAN THE FOLLOW-UP AT GENERAL  DEVELOPMENT OUR FOUNDING  FATHERS. LET US TO DEAL WITH.  FOR DECADES. THERE WAS NO HAS  BEEN PROVEN TO BE THE FLY AND  I CAN'T HELP BUT WONDER WE ARE  GOING DOWN A SIMILAR PATH WITH  THIS CITY-WIDE TO REZONE.  >> I DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER.  >> GOING VOTE THEN. VICE  MAYOR. YES, THERE'S A YES.  >> LANDON'S YES, DO AS A  HELPFUL.  >> AND THAT I MEAN ALRIGHT,  THAT PASSES 4 TO ONE.  >> ALWAYS GOOD TO MOVE THE  THERE OKAY.  >> WHEN THERE WHAT'S THE PLAN  FOR THIS MEETING I HAVE A DOG  AND FIGURE  >> WELL ONE WAY YOU GUYS MIND  IS HAPPY YOU WANT TO DO. HE  WON A HARD STOP DONE WHAT WE  HOW DO YOU WANT TO PROCEED.  >> WANT TO 45 VERY DIFFERENT  ABOUT BUT WE'RE GET STAFF  SILENT SPRING  >> IF WE DO NOT GET THE  ASSOCIATED ORDINANCE THAT DEAL  WITH THE ULDC DONE TONIGHT WE  CANNOT SEND THEM TO SECOND  READING ACT 6 RIGHT.  >> WHAT IT WAS A TALKING ABOUT  WHAT THE GET THE ZONING MAP IN  THE ZONING MAP AND THEN TAKE  45 MINUTE BREAK OR I MEAN THAT  WE HAVE WITH CHAPTER 5 PER  SIGNS WE HAVE ZONING MAP A  SOCIEDAD ORDINANCE. SO DO A 45  EACH THAT.  >> I'M SO WHAT I WOULD JUST  >> NICE AND EASY  ♪ >> OKAY THAT'S  ♪ >> FINE OKAY, 7 O'CLOCK TOLD  WE  >> WE WERE TOLD ONLY NEEDED  THERE. I WANT. FOR 45 MINUTES  YEAH, BOARD THIS MORNING SUN  ARE PERFECTLY HAPPY WITH A 10  HELP BREAK AND WE CAN. BRING  DINNER TO THE BACK OF THE ROOM  MORE THAN HALF OF KEEP GOING.  MIND WHEN YOU WHAT YOU NEED TO  DO. YEAH TAKE CARE WHAT  COUNCIL. YOU GET A CAKE.  >> DO BE LATE.  >> ALL RIGHT SO WHAT  >> WHAT YOU WANT TO WE 20  MINUTES 20 MINUTES. IS THAT OF  OKAY 20 MINUTES.  >> SO IT'S COME BACK  >> HI I MALAYNIA THIS IS  ANSWERS WITH ELENA AND I'M  GOING TO ANSWER ALL OF YOUR  FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS.  CAN A BUSINESS BE BUILT RIGHT  NEXT DOOR TO MY HOME. IT'S A  PENCE ONE OF THE BIGGEST  FACTORS IS HOW MUCH LAND DOES  THAT PROPERTY OWNER, HALF IN  ORDER FOR SOMEONE TO PUT NEW  DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY THEY  HAVE TO HAVE ENOUGH LAND FOR  PARKING BUFFERS STORM WATER  TREE CONSERVATION AND ALL OF  THE OTHER THINGS THAT GO INTO  BUILDING A NEW FACILITY THAT'S  GOING TO MEAN THAT SOMEONE IS  NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO COME  IN AND PUT A NEW BUSINESS ON A  QUARTER ACRE LOT RIGHT NEXT TO  YOUR HOME THEY'RE GOING TO  HAVE TO HAVE SIGNIFICANTLY  MORE LAND THAN THAT BUSINESSES  ALSO TYPICALLY LIKE TO HAVE  FRONTAGE ON A MAIN ROAD SO ANY  BUSINESS THAT COMES IN IT'S  GOING TO BE LOOKING FOR THAT  ACCESS. THAT MAY MEAN THAT  THEY HAVE TO BUY NUMEROUS LOTS  IN ORDER TO HAVE ENOUGH LAND  TO DEVELOP AND TO GET THE  ACCESS ON THE MAIN ROADS THAT  THEY WANT THE ULDC REWRITE  THAT WE ARE CURRENTLY DRAFTING  HAS PROTECTIONS FOR CURRENT  RESIDENTS. SO THAT IF A  BUSINESS DOES LOCATE NEAR YOUR  HOME. WE WILL HAVE ADEQUATE  BUFFERS AND PROTECTIONS TO  ENSURE THAT YOU CAN STILL  ENJOY YOUR QUALITY OF LIFE.  >> DECIDED TO BECOME A  FIREFIGHTER USED TO WORK  HOSPITALITY AND GROUP SALES  AND I ALWAYS HAD FRIENDS THAT  WORK. FIREFIGHTERS AND I  DECIDED ONE DAY THAT I WANTED  AND MY JOB DONE FOR PEOPLE SO.  >> I WENT AHEAD UT AND  PARAMEDIC PROGRAM WITH THE  ♪ FIRE ACADEMY. SAW A NORTH  WE'RE HIRING. AND REALLY LIKED  WHAT THEY HAD ON BETWEEN THEIR  ISO RATING BELIEFS AND VALUES  AND EVERYTHING 5, 5, THEY GAVE  ME AN OPPORTUNITY EVERY DAY IS  DIFFERENT BUT FOR THE MOST  PART WE START OFF THE SAME.  ♪ WHAT WAS GET OUR YEAR ONTO  THE. BRAD US MAKE SURE  EVERYTHING'S OPERATIONAL AND  OUR AIR PACK. ALSO CHECKED  INVENTORY. MAKE SURE WE HAVE  ALL OUR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT.  EVERYTHING'S THAT WAY YOU CAN  RESPOND TO ANY EMERGENCY SO  WE'RE ALWAYS STOCKED AND READY  TO I THINK THE BEST PART IS  THAT EVERYONE'S PASSION ABOUT  THEIR JOB.  >> SO THEY COME TO WORK AND  THEY'RE READY TO TRAIN AND  TAKE CARE OF EACH OTHER AND  TEACH EACH OTHER SO EVERYONE'S  SHARPENED ON THEIR A GAME SO  IT MAKES IT OFTEN AND I JUST  LOOK FORWARD TO COME TO WORK.  >> I ALWAYS GET VERY EXCITED  WHEN ANYBODY ASKS ME ABOUT MY  JOB IN WHERE I WORK AND WHAT I  DO IT'S NOT A SECRET THAT I  LOVE WORKING FOR THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT I WORKED FOR  CHARLOTTE COUNTY AND I FELT  THAT I NEEDED TO DO SOMETHING  DIFFERENT AND I WANTED  SOMETHING MORE AND I WANT  OFFER MY SKILLS IT TO MY  FRIEND DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO  AND I WAS THINKING ABOUT MY  NEXT STEPS AND SHE SAID DID  YOU THINK ABOUT APPLYING TO  JOBS. THE CITY OF NORTH PORT  THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT VIBE  HERE AND SHE SAID LOVE IT AND  I SAID I DIDN'T THINK ABOUT  THAT SO I APPLIED AND I  STARTED MY FIRST POSITION IN A  PLANNING AND ZONING IN OUR  DEVELOPMENT SERVICES  DEPARTMENT I'M PARTNERED WITH  THE DELI DEPARTMENT.  >> BECAUSE MY MIND THE FEES  ARE ASSESSED OFF OF THE  BUILDING PERMITS AND IT'S  STRICTLY FROM NEW  CONSTRUCTION, NEW DEVELOPMENT.  AND THE FIRST THING I DO IS TO  CHECK THE SPREADSHEET TO LOOK  AT THE PERMITS AND DETERMINED  WHICH ONES NEED ME TO ESTIMATE  THEIR IMPACT FEES AND THAT'S  WHY START WITH THAT THEN I GO  TO NUMBERS THAT I HAVE TO PUT  TOGETHER AND I PUT TOGETHER  INVOICES DEVELOPERS OFTEN  TIMES GET PHONE CALL TO GET  BOTH SPEAK FOR THE DEVELOPMENT  COMES THROUGH AND SO  DEVELOPERS WANT TO KNOW HOW  MUCH THEY CAN.  >> BUDGET FOR SOMETIMES I PUT  PROPOSED ESTIMATE TO HELP THEM  LIKE THAT.  ♪ ♪ THE BULK OF IT IS IT'S MAKING  SURE THAT THE FEES ARE IN THE  SYSTEM AS FAST AS POSSIBLE. I  LOVE THE ESPRIT DE CORPS THAT  EXPERIENCE. JUST HOW EVERYBODY  TEAMWORK TOGETHER ENJOY  KNOWING THAT I CAN MAKE A  DIFFERENCE FOR THE CITY AND  THAT MY POSITION CAN HAVE A  POSITIVE IMPACT FOR OUR CITY.  ♪ AND I PROMISE ALWAYS MANAGES  TO THE NORTH PORT.  >> HERE TODAY, WITH MARY OF  ANY PLAYER SCHEDULE FOR THE  CITY OF NORTH PORT SOLID WASTE  DIVISION WE'RE GOING TO TALK  ABOUT PICKUPS TODAY. I HAD A  SCHEDULED VOTE PICKUPS WHAT  SHOULD GO OUT AND WHAT SHOULD  NOT GO OUT TO THE CURB WHERE  TO PLACE THE ITEM TO THEM WHAT  HAPPENS IF YOU HAVE MORE THAN  WHAT A LOT OF CHIEF OF THE  YEAR PICK UP. SO I KNOW WE  CALL 9, 4, 1, 2, 4, 0, 8, 0,  50 TALK TO OUR CUSTOMER  SERVICE REPS THAT'S CORRECT  HOW TO PICKUP HOW ELSE CAN WE  DO THAT.  >> CAN ALSO GO ON A  WEBSITE NORTH PORT FL DOT  CLICK ON SOLID WASTE AND FILL  OUT A BULK REQUEST FOR  EXCELLENT EXCELLENT SCENARIO  WHEN IN DOUBT.  >> IF A PERSON WANTS TO PLAY  SET OUT WHAT YOU THINK PLACE  OUT WHAT'S RIGHT THING WAS THE  WRONG THING BASICALLY FRANK  ANYTHING THAT DOESN'T FIT IN  THE CONTAINER THAT'S GARBAGE  IS GOING TO GO CURBSIDE GOING  TO STAY OFF DRIVEWAYS WHAT'S  NOT ACCEPT IT IS TIRES  CHEMICALS.  >> STUFF LIKE THAT YOU CAN PUT  YARD WASTE OUT THAT'S  CONSIDERED BALK BUT JUST MAKE  SURE IT'S SEPARATE FROM  GARBAGE PILE CONWAY SAYS A  SEPARATE PICKUP, SO WHAT  HAPPENS IF I USE ALL MY UP  BOTH VICTIMS ARE A GOOD  QUESTION. SO YOU CAN HAVE MORE  BUT HAVE TO PAY IT CAN BE 1650  A CUBIC YARD AND THAT'S LINKED  TIMES WITH TIME TIGHT DIVIDED  BY 27 IS ONE COULD BE COUNTED  ANY QUESTIONS OF COURSE LET'S  NOT GIVE US A CALL  941-240-8050.  >> I'M STACEY LOVES OF  EMERGENCY MANAGER FOR CITY  WORK AND I'M GOING DISCUSS  FIRST RESPONDERS AFTER STORM,  SO IT MAY TAKE A WHILE FOR  FIRST RESPONDERS TO GET TO  STORM AND DUE TO A VARIETY OF  REASONS. ONE ALL FIRST  RESPONDERS OFF THE ROADS, THE  TROPICAL STORM FORCE WINDS ARE  SUSTAINED FOR THEIR SAFETY  THAT IS A STANDARD USUALLY  COSTS AND OTHER SO WE WILL  HAVE A BACKLOG CALLS THAT HAVE  COME IN DURING THE STORM THAT  PRIORITIZE BASED AND THE OTHER  RESPONDING TO AS WELL AS THE  CALLS THAT ARE CURRENTLY ON  THEM. ALSO ON THE ROADS MIGHT  BE FLOODED. THERE MIGHT BE  DEBRIS IN THE ROADS ARE  TECHNICAL FIRST IN TEAMS WILL  BE GOING OUT RIGHT AWAY TO  CLEAR THE ROADS ANY HOUSERS A  SKILL THAT OUR VEHICLES CAN  GET THROUGH AND RESPOND  ♪ THE CAUSE. JUST KEEP THAT IN  MIND WHEN YOU CALL AFTER  DISASTER FOR CITIZENS, WE ARE  COMING. WE ARE VERY IMPORTANT  TO US TO CARE ABOUT OUR  RESIDENTS AND THEIR SAFETY BUT  IT MAY JUST ALLOWED FOR US TO  GET TO THE ON OF  ♪ THE  >> I'M STACEY LOS. YOU KNOW ON  THE EMERGENCY IN WATER THEY  ARE GOING SEE STORM SURGE AND  FLOODING NEXT OR SO STORM  SURGE IS STRONG SUSTAINED  WINDS ARE CONSTANTLY GOING  OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME  OVER THE GOAL PUSHING WATER UP  ONTO WILL NOT HAPPEN. THERE'S  A LOT OF FLOODING A LOT OF  BEACH EROSION ALONG TEACHER  AND THE HOME. HOWEVER THIS  STORM CAN ALSO PUSH WATER OF  THE RIVER PUSHED THE MYAKKA  RIVER FOR INSTANCE, GULF AND  THEN THE WATER COMING  DOWNSTREAM FROM THE RIVER HAS  ORDERED TO BECAUSE WATER TO  BACK THAT ALONG WITH A LOT OF  RAIN THAT COMES FROM ALSO  CAUSED INCREASE OF WATER  FLOODING INTO THE RIVER  ♪ AND INTO OUR WATER MANAGEMENT  CAUSING FLOODING WELL. PUBLIC  WORKS WITH A LOT OF WORK  BEFORE THE STORM TO MAKE SURE  THAT OUR WATER LEVELS POSSIBLE  FOR AND THE WAR AGAINST STORM  SURGE FLOODING IN OUR WATER  SYSTEMS IF YOU WANT ADDITIONAL  INFORMATION  ♪ ON THAT AGREED TO A DEAL BUT A  LOT FOLKS  >> HELLO EVERYONE, MY NAME IS  THE VAN PULL ON THE AQUATICS  MANAGER WITHIN OUR PARKS  RECREATION DEPARTMENT WERE  HERE TODAY AT THE NORTH PORT  AQUATIC CENTER JUST TO TALK TO  EVERYONE ABOUT A BLOW FOR LIFE  PROGRAM WE RECOGNIZE THAT  NATIONALLY UNINTENTIONAL  DROWNING IS THE LEADING CAUSE  OF DEATH FOR CHILDREN UNDER  UNDER THE AGE OF SO WE HAVE AN  AWESOME PROGRAM HERE CALLED  FLOAT FOR LIFE. BLOW FOR LIFE  IS A PROGRAM THAT WE TEACH  THAT STARTS WITH THE  FUNDAMENTALS OF FLOATING  BEFORE WE ACTUALLY LEARNED  SWIMMING. THIS PROGRAM IS  TARGETED FOR THOSE CHILDREN  AGES 6 MONTHS TO AND WHAT WE  WANT THEM TO DO IS WE WANT  THEM TO GET COMFORTABLE IN THE  WATER AND IF THEY ACTUALLY  FALL IN THE WATER OR FIND  THEMSELVES IN A TROUBLED  SITUATION, THEY CAN ROLL OVER  THEIR BACK AND FLOAT WHEN WE  LAUNCHED THIS PROGRAM WE WERE  THE ONLY ONE IN THE STATE THAT  WAS ACTUALLY TEACHING THIS  MILESTONE PROGRAM SO WANT TO  GIVE A SHOUT OUT TO OUR NORTH  WHITE ROAD OR E AS WELL WHO  SPONSORED THIS PROGRAM HERE AT  THE AQUATIC CENTER AND  ACTUALLY PAY FOR A TRAINER TO  COME ALL THE WAY FROM NEBRASKA  WHERE THIS PROGRAM ORIGINATES  THERE WE PRACTICE AND WE GO  THROUGH WHAT'S CALLED  MILESTONES HERE SO AS SOON AS  THE KIDS PROGRESSIVE, THE  MILESTONE WE CAN CONTINUE  MOVING ON THROUGH THEM AND AT  THE END OF IT IT'S A PRETTY  AWESOME PROGRAM WHEN THEY  GRADUATE AS ONE OF THE FINAL  THINGS THAT THEY DO IS THEY  JUMP IN FULLY CLOTHED AND THEY  HAVE TO TURN OVER ROLL OVER ON  THEIR BACK AND ACTUALLY BE  ABLE TO SCREAM FOR HELP AND  THAT POINT IN TIME, IT'S JUST  AN AWESOME SEGMENT PROGRAM  THAT LEADS RIGHT INTO OUR  LEARN TO SWIM PROGRAM SO THAT  WAY WE CAN MAKE SURE WE'RE  KEEPING OUR KIDS SAFE IN ON  AND AROUND THE WATER.  >> FRANK THOMAS ALWAYS MANAGER  I AM HERE TODAY WITH NOW  REOPENED DIDDY MARIO TELL  PEOPLE HERE HAVE ONLY BEEN  DOING THIS JOB, I'VE BEEN HERE  5 YES 5 YEARS EXCELLENT  EXCELLENT SO MARIO TELL PEOPLE  WHAT IT ENTAILS WHAT YOU DO.  THE PLAN IS SCHEDULED FOR  SOLID WASTE THE CITY I GO OUT  AND AGREE THE NEW RESIDENTS  TONIGHT, EDUCATE THEM ON  RECYCLE EXCELLENT SOUNDS  INTERESTING VERY SO MARIO WHAT  DO YOU FIND INSIDE THE  RECYCLING BIN SHOULDN'T BE  THERE SO LET'S TRY TO TELL  PEOPLE HOW TO RECYCLE  ♪ MOST COMMON THING I FIND FRANK  PLASTIC BAGS.  >> SO START TO NOT RECYCLABLE  I FIND JUST POSTING THE  CONTAINER OR THE BAD THE  RECYCLE WITH HIM AND  ♪ MISSION IS STOP LEAK THAT'S  RIGHT INSIDE THE BLUE  CONTAINERS. AND THEY SHOULD BE  YOU TAKEN BACK TO THE GROCERY  STORE OR TOSS IN THE TRASH  EVERY YOU SEE A LOT OF  RECYCLING INSIDE THE  CONTAINERS OF I COME ACROSS A  LOT OKAY I WANT TO DO THAT SO.  >> OKAY, SO IF YOU HAVE ANY  QUESTIONS YOU CAN ALWAYS LOOK  AT OUR WEBSITE WW DOT NORTH  PORT FLORIDA DOT GOV SLASH  SOLID WASTE.  ♪ >> I'M STACEY LOSO I'M THE  EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT  COORDINATOR FOR THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT AND WE'RE GOING  TO TALK ABOUT WHY IT'S  IMPORTANT TO HAVE A GO KIT AND  WHAT SHOULD GO INSIDE OF IT,  IT'S IMPORTANT HAVE A GO BAG  BECAUSE IF YOU WAIT LAST  MINUTE TO PACK THEY'RE  DEFINITELY GOING TO BE ITEMS  THAT YOU'RE GOING TO FORGET  AND THE SCRAMBLE TO GET  EVERYTHING TOGETHER SO IT'S  IMPORTANT TO YOUR DOCUMENTS  SUCH AS ID'S INSURANCE  PAPERWORK TITLES FOR YOUR HOME  AND YOUR VEHICLES AND YOUR  BOATS JUST SO THAT IF YOUR  HOME DOES FLOOD OR ALL THOSE  DOCUMENTS ARE WITH YOU AND  THEY'RE SAFE BECAUSE YOU DON'T  WANT TO END UP LOSING THOSE  AND HAVING TO TRY TO REPLACE  THOSE LATER ON ALSO IN YOUR GO  BAG THAT YOU SHOULD THINK  ABOUT WHAT MEDICATIONS YOU  MIGHT NEED TO HAVE AHEAD OF  TIME FOR UNDER A STATE OF  EMERGENCY YOU ARE ABLE TO  REFILL PRESCRIPTIONS AHEAD OF  TIME EVEN IF THEY'RE NOT DO  YET. SO IT'S IMPORTANT TO DO  THAT ALSO IN YOUR GO BAG YOU  SHOULD HAVE NON-PERISHABLE  FOOD FLASHLIGHT BATTERIES, A  RADIO THAT IS BATTERY POWERED  AND EXTRA BATTERIES SHOULD ALL  POWER GO OUT WE WILL BE ABLE  TO BROADCAST ON 97.5 FM ANY  EMERGENCY INFORMATION SO BE  SURE TO HAVE  ♪ BATTERY POWERED RADIO READY IN  TUNED IN TO 97 POINT.  >> I'M STACEY LOS SALE AND THE  EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT  COORDINATOR FOR THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT AND I'M GOING TO  TELL YOU THE DIFFERENCE  BETWEEN PLUG DOWNS AND  EVACUATION ZONES ARE IN  SARASOTA COUNTY. WE CALL THEM  EVACUATION LEVELS. SO FLOOD  ZONES ARE GENERATED BY FEMA  AND THEY'RE USED TO DETERMINE  THE LIKELIHOOD THAT YOU'LL  FLOOD AND THEY'RE USED TO  DETERMINE IF YOU NEED FLOOD  INSURANCE IF YOU HAVE A  MORTGAGE ON YOUR HOME. NOW THE  EVACUATION ZONES ARE BASED ON  STORM SURGE DATA THAT COMES  FROM THE NATIONAL HURRICANE  CENTER. AND THEY USE  TOPOGRAPHY AS WELL AS  HURRICANE VULNERABILITY FOR  STORM SURGE FOR THE AREA AND  WE USE THOSE TO DETERMINE WHO  NEEDS TO EVACUATE DURING A  STORM SO IT'S IMPORTANT  UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS A  DIFFERENCE IF YOU'RE  INTERESTED IN FINDING OUT WHAT  EVACUATION ZONE YOU ARE AND  WHICH WE HIGHLY RECOMMEND YOU  DO. YOU CAN USE YOUR SEARCH  ENGINE OF CHOICE. AND TYPE  SARASOTA COUNTY KNOW YOUR  LEVEL AND THAT WILL TAKE YOU  TO THE SARASOTA COUNTY  GOVERNMENT WEBSITE.  >> WATER IN US WELL THAT'S  KIND OF THE DITCH BY YOUR  HOUSE IS NOT FLOODING.  ♪ WITHIN US AFTER  ♪ STORM EVENT WATER SHOULD BE IN  THAT SWELL TO 72 HOURS AFTER  THE STORM. THAT ALLOWS THE  WATER BUILT TO GET THE STUFF  CAME OUT FOR ROOM AND ON THE  ROAD OUT OF THE WATER SO THAT  WHEN IT REACHES THE  ♪ HABITAT IT NO LONGER HAS THOSE  CONTAMINANTS IT ALSO PROVIDES  AN OPPORTUNITY TO SLOW DOWN  WATERS SO THAT THE WATER  DOESN'T GO SO FAST THAT THEIR  ROADS. ROADWAYS OR ANY OTHER  INFRASTRUCTURE, SO WHEN YOU  SEE WATER IN ONLY YOU KNOW UP  TO  ♪ 72 HOURS SINCE THE LAST RAIN  THAT IS NOT LETTING THAT IS  DOING ITS JOB.  >> HELLO MY NAME'S A VAN FULL  PRODUCTS FACILITY MANAGER WITH  THE CITY OF NORTH PORT AND  TODAY WE'RE GOING TO BE  TALKING WITH YOU GUYS ABOUT  OUR FREE SWIM EVALUATION. IT'S  IMPORTANT THAT WE DO NEED  EVALUATIONS SO KIDS  REGISTERING FOR SWIM PROGRAMS  THEY GET PLACED IN THE RIGHT  CLASS WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT  MORE DOING THAT'S SOMETHING  YOU ATION IS EVERY SWIM LEVEL  HAS WHAT'S CALLED EXIT SKILL  ASSESSMENTS. SO WHAT WE DO IS  WE HAVE YOUR CHILD GET IN THE  WATER AND WILL GO THROUGH  SERIES OF DIFFERENT MOVEMENTS  CAN YOU GO INTO THE WATER I  CAN YOU SHOW US YOUR PHONE  CALL CAN YOU SHOW US BACK ALL  SHOWS ELEMENTARY BACK  DIFFERENT STROKES WITHIN AND  WHAT WE'RE DOING IS WE'RE  TRYING TO SEE. YOUR CHILD TEST  TO BEFORE IT BECOMES A  CHALLENGE FOR THEM AT THAT  POINT WHAT WE ASSESS THAT THAT  WILL LET YOU KNOW AND YOU CAN  GO AHEAD AND SIGN YOUR CHILD  UP FOR THAT APPROPRIATE LEVEL  THERE. IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE  HAVE THESE SO THAT WAY WHEN  WE'RE TEACHING A LEVEL ONE WE  DON'T HAVE KIDS THAT SHOULD  POTENTIALLY IN A LEVEL 2 AND  LEVEL ONE CLASS BECAUSE  THEY'RE NOT LEARNING THE  APPROPRIATE SKILLS THAT THEY  NEEDED THAT POINT IN TIME  RIGHT NOW WHEN WE'RE IN FULL  SUMMER WE HAVE SOME PEOPLE  COME BETWEEN 8.10 DEDUCED FROM  EVALUATION JUST AS YOU CAN  HEAR THE WATER SPLASHING IN  THE BACKGROUND SLIDE.  EVERYTHING LIKE THAT, BUT ANY  DAY OF THE THAT OPEN YOU CAN  COME IN AT ANY POINT IN TIME  ENOUGH FOR SOME EVALUATIONS WE  ALWAYS HAVE A CERTIFIED SO  MUCH DOCTOR ON SITE THAT HAVE  YOUR CHILD TAKE A SWIM  ASSESSMENT.  ♪ >> I'M STACEY LASALLE AND THE  EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT  COORDINATOR FOR THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT AND I'M GOING TO  BE TALKING ABOUT HAVING AN  EVACUATION PLAN IT'S A POINT  HAVE AN EVACUATION PLAN AHEAD  OF TIME AND IT'S VERY  IMPORTANT TO WRITE IT DOWN  BECAUSE THAT WAY YOU HAVE IT  SOMEWHERE PRESENT EVERYBODY IN  YOUR FAMILY CAN SEE IT AND  KEEP IT FRESH IN THEIR MINDS  AND YOU WANT TO ALSO SHARE IT  WITH PEOPLE IN YOUR FAMILY OR  YOUR NEIGHBORS SO THAT THEY  KNOW WHAT YOUR PLANS ARE AHEAD  OF TIME AND HOW TO GET A HOLD  OF YOUR WAY TO LOOK FOR YOU  AFTER A DISASTER FOR YOUR  EVACUATION YOU SHOULD HAVE  MULTIPLE ROUTES TO GET TO  LOCATION. YOU'RE PLANNING TO  GO TO JAIL BECAUSE TRAFFIC WAS  TRAFFIC ON 75 MIGHT BE  GRIDLOCKED THERE COULD BE SOME  VERY GOOD BACK ROADS TO GET TO  WHERE YOU'RE GOING THAT COULD  GET YOU THERE MORE QUICKLY  WITHOUT BEING STUCK IN TRAFFIC  WHEN YOU'RE MAKING EVACUATION  PLAN. WE USUALLY TELL YOU 4  DIFFERENT THINGS YOU SHOULD  STAY HOME IF YOU ARE NOT IN  HIS OWN THAT'S BEING EVACUATED  AND IF YOUR HOME IS BUILT TO  WITHSTAND THE FORECASTED STORM  IF YOU CAN STAY HOME. AND YOU  EVACUATE YOUR NEXT OPTION  SHOULD BE TO GO TO A FRIEND  OUR FAMILY'S HOME THAT IS  OUTSIDE OF THE EVACUATION AREA  AND IT IS STRUCTURALLY SOUND  TO US AND THE STORM OPTION  WOULD BE GO TO A HOTEL.  THEY'RE MUCH MORE COMFORTABLE  THAN I'VE ACCUSATION. CENTER'S  4TH OPTION WOULD BE TO GO TO  ONE OF OUR EVACUATION CENTER  SARASOTA COUNTY HAS FALLEN  BACK AWAY SHUNS CENTER'S.  THOSE CAN BE FOUND ON THEIR  WEBSITE.  >> WHY DO WE FLOOD. DURING  SIGNIFICANT RAIN EVENTS NORTH  PORT NEARLY ALWAYS FLOODS IN  CERTAIN AREAS OF THE CITY.  THIS IS THANKS TO THE LOCALLY  NAMED MYAKKA HACHI CREEK ALSO  KNOWN AS THE BIG SLEW  WATERSHED.  >> THE 195 SQUARE MILE  DRAINAGE AREA FLOWS THROUGH  DESOTO MANATEE AND SARASOTA  COUNTIES THEN THROUGH OUR CITY  TO EXIT AT CHARLOTTE HARBOR.  AS THE CITY OF NORTH PORT IS  LOCATED AT THE LOW END OF THE  BIG SLEW WATERSHED DRAINAGE  SYSTEM. THE CITY'S CURRENT  FLOODING AND WATER QUALITY  CONDITIONS ARE ATTRIBUTED NOT  ONLY TO THE CITY'S GROWTH. BUT  ALSO TO UPSTREAM RUNOFF IN THE  DESOTO MANATEE AND SARASOTA  COUNTY PORTIONS OF THE BIG  SLOW. DURING SIGNIFICANT RAIN  EVENTS PONDING CAN ALSO OCCUR  PONDING OCCURS IN AIR AND  TERRAIN OR SUPER SATURATED  SOILS ARE MOVING ON WITH  BACK-TO-BACK RAINFALL THE  GROUND IS TORY CENTURY WHEN IT  INCREASING DURING A STORM.  >> THE CITY WORKS HARD TO  MAINTAIN STORM WATER TYVIEN  ROADSIDE SWALES AND RADIATION  79 MILES NAMED WATERWAYS, THE  2132 MILES OF RETENTION  DITCHES THAT INTERCONNECT WITH  IS THAT SHOULD GO TO THE CITY  THERE READ.  >> THIS I I DO WAIT. AND THAT  WILL SIGNIFY.  >> COMMISSIONER LANGDON LET'S  WASTE VOTE. VICE MAYOR YES.  >> MIKE MAYERS YES YES.  >> MISTER AVERAGE. YES.  >> OKAY THAT PASSES 5 TO ONE  TAKEAWAY CITY SUMMER 2024 DASH  14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY IN  PORT FEELING TRAPPED OR 29 THE  UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE  RELATING TO SIGN REGULATIONS  REGULATIONS AND CREATING A NEW  CHAPTER 5 SIGNS. FINDINGS  PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION AND  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE  ALRIGHT CITY MANAGER THIS IS  YOUR ITEM.  >> THINK YOU WE ARE WE HAVE  MISSION THAT WE WANT REVIEW  TODAY AND YOU HAVE ANY  QUESTIONS HAPPY THERE'S NO  VISITATION WE'RE TRYING THE  QUESTIONS K THIS.  >> CHART. ALL RIGHT  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL.  >> PAID ONLINE FOR 10 JUST CUT  RIGHT TO THE CHANGE FROM 4  TENANTS AS. THE GENERAL  REQUIREMENTS, MENTIONS OF  SEYMOUR AND DECENT DESIGN  DISPLAY STATEMENT CHARACTER  ILLUSTRATION GETS TO DETERMINE  THAT BECAUSE THE EXISTING CODE  REFERENCE A STATE STATUTE.  THIS ONE DOES NOT.  >> WE HAVE THAT QUESTION COME  UP THE PLANNING AND ZONING  ADVISORY BOARD AND YOU KNOW A  CONCERN THAT MAYBE WE SHOULD  STRIKE WE HAVE DISCUSSED WITH  OUTSIDE COUNSEL. WE ARE ALL  VERY WELL AWARE OF OUR  LIMITATIONS AS TO THE  DEFINITION OF OBSCENE AND ANY  ENFORCEMENT THEY'RE ALL OF THE  FALL TO FEDERAL CASE LAW. SO  FOR EXAMPLE WE CANNOT ENFORCE  ON. EXPLETIVE. POLITICAL THANK  YOUR. IT NEEDS TO RISE ABOVE  AND BEYOND AND IN THE ABOUT WE  HAVE ANY TYPES OF THOSE ISSUES  ARISE WE WILL DEFINITELY HAVE  THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR  DOING THAT IN ADVANCE OF AN  ACTING ANY ENFORCEMENT  PROCEDURES.  >> YOU  >> KNOW OUR CITY'S BEST  INTEREST TO JUST STRIKE ONE  FOR 10 ENTIRELY.  >> BECAUSE OUTSIDE COUNSEL HAS  INDICATED IT IT'S AT OUR  DISCRETION PROVIDED THERE IS  CLEAR UNDERSTANDING THAT  ENFORCEMENT ONLY BE UNDER  COMMISSIONER OF SCENE.  >> I WAS GOING TO SUGGEST  REMOVING IT ENTIRELY BECAUSE  THAT'S A WHOLE PERSON PURPOSE  OF US PRETTY MUCH HAVING TO  REDO OUR ENTIRE SO THAT WE  DON'T MAKE GET INTO THAT KIND  I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S ANY  CONVERSATION YOU WANT TO HAVE  OR DO YOU WANT JUST GET A  CONSENSUS TO REMOVE LINE FOR  10  >> I HAVE WAY QUITE COMES  >> I'M LEAVING IT IN DOES IT  SO GIVE US A SAFETY NASH ARE  YOU KNOW I MEAN WE WOULD HAVE  SOME LATITUDE TERMS OF HOW  ENFORCE IT CORRECT.  >> BY LEAVING AND WE HAVE  SECTION 2 A ABOUT THAT WE DO  WANT TO ACT THAT WHERE AN  INITIATING A CODE ENFORCEMENT  CASE BASED ADMIRAL DEFINITION,  MY PRESENT A LITTLE MORE OF A  BUT AGAIN IT IT CAN GO EITHER  EITHER WAY PER THE ON.  >> I WOULDN'T WANT TO BE ON  THE JURY OF  >> MY QUESTION A CONSENSUS TO  REMOVE LINE FOR TENT.  >> AND I JUST WE ARE RELYING  ON OUTSIDE COUNSEL FOR THE  LEGAL ADVICE HERE.  >> BUT THERE.  >> MISS BARNES IS SAYING IS  CORRECT. THERE IS FEDERAL CASE  LAW GIVES INDICATIONS HERE  ABSENT AND EAST AS SHE SAID  NOT EXPLETIVE IT'S TYPICALLY  SOMETHING THAT IS SEXUAL AND  MADE SURE TO SEXUAL ACT, I  MEAN THERE ARE CRITERIA. IN  CASE LAW. DON'T HAVE YEAR. AND  ON YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE  DIFFICULTY HAVING A BASIS TO  DISALLOW SO IT'S JUST A LITTLE  OK THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL, YOUR DIRECTION. ONE  OF THEM. TAKE IT SO. ABOUT WE  TAKE IT OUT. AND IF OUTSIDE  COUNSEL SAYS WE NEED TO LEAVE  IT IN AND. HAVE THAT  DISCUSSION THAT SECONDARY.  IT'S I WOULD JUST SAY STAFF IS  FINE THE WAY IT IS.  >> LEGAL COUNSEL COUNSEL DID  RECOMMEND. SAID COULD BE  REMOVED, BUT THEY PUT IT THERE  FOR A REASON TO GIVE US THAT  ABILITY TO OR AT ALL. I AGREE  WITH. SITE THAT IT IS  SOMETHING THEY USED TO HANG.  HAVING FALSE OTHERWISE WE WILL  COMMISSIONER DOUBT IT MAKE IT.  SO JUST LIKE. ALL RIGHT  ANYTHING ELSE. FEW OTHERS.  TEMPORARY SIGNS.  >> CAN YOU GIVE A FEW EXAMPLES  OF TEMPORARY SIGNS.  >> GRAND OPENING. ACTUAL SALE  OPEN ELSE 50% OFF. OPEN HOUSE  COULD BE FOR A NON RESIDENTIAL  USE LIKE A SOCIAL SERVICE  ACTIVITY.  >> IT COULD BE WERE CLOSING.  LIQUIDATION SALE.  >> WHAT ABOUT OPEN HOUSE THAT  I'M SELLING MY HOUSE ON MY OWN  PERSONAL.  >> PROPERTY FALL UNDER LIMITED  DURATION SCIENCE. RACEWAY  SIGNS. 3931. THE CHAMBER  REQUESTS THAT A RACEWAY SIGN  THE PERMITTED.  >> STAFF SAYS THAT ITS NOT  AESTHETIC LEE  >> AND THAT IS A COMMISSION I  HAVE PICTURE OF WHAT A RACE  WHITE RACE SIGNS LOOK LIKE.  DON'T KNOW WE ARE IN THE  BUSINESS OF SAYING WHAT  SYSTEMICALLY PLEASING OR NOT  THAT'S VERY SUBJECTIVE. I SEE  NOTHING WRONG WITH A PASS THIS  DOWN OR YOU CAN PUT OTHERS TO  SEE. BUT I I SEE NOTHING WRONG  WITH HAVING ALLOWING RACE WHEN  SIGNS. SHE'S FROM THAT  STATEMENT THAT WAS IN THE MEMO  THAT WE RECEIVED FROM STAFF.  >> REASON WHY IT'S AND THEN. I  MEAN IT'S IN EVERYTHING I DO  FOR HIM, IT IS A REASON WHY IT  SHOULDN'T BE IN THERE. I  GUESS.  >> NOT CHAMBER'S REQUESTING  THERE'S A RACEWAY SIGNS THAT.  >> ALL OVER.  >> THAT OUR CITY I MAYBE THERE  ARE REALLY HAVEN'T PAID  ATTENTION. BUT THEY ARE USED  VERY WIDESPREAD.  >> AND  >> THEY'RE THAT UGLY PLEASING  THAT'S WHY THEY'RE ON THE  PROHIBITED LIST IN THE  CHAMBERS REQUESTING THAT WE  ALLOW. I'M JUST WONDERING WHAT  THE WILL OF THE BOARD IF YOU  WANT TO MAKE A MOTION AND  WE'LL GET THE VOTE. BECAUSE  STAFF ULTIMATELY.  >> SAID THAT IT  >> UP TO THE HOWEVER, THE CITY  COMMISSION HAS DISCRETION TO  REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OF THE  SAME TYPE FROM THE PROHIBITED  SCIENCE SECTION. HER MINUTES  ON. I WANT TO FIX IT'S JUST  IT'S ALL THAT THAT THE THE  STYLE. WHY THE COMMERCE WANTS  ON WHEN I READ IT I THOUGHT IT  WAS SIGN OF PEOPLE I THINK  THEY CALL THEM RICE WINE  BECAUSE YOU CAN SEE THE  RACEWAY BEHIND THAT THE SIGN.  >> RACEWAY IS MECHANISM FOR  THE  >> REALLY HAVE TO LOOK AT  AMONG THE MOTION MAYOR TO  >> THE RACEWAY SIGNS.  >> ALL RIGHT A MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL TO ALLOW  BRAITHWAITE  >> AND SIGN ORDINANCE WE HAVE  A SECOND FOR THAT. GIVE IT A  SECOND OKAY WE HAVE A SECOND  MADE BY. COMMISSIONER LANGDON.  ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION. LET'S  DO A POINTS.  I YES DIDN'T SAY.  YES, NICK DO,  >> COMMISSIONER MUCH IS THAT  YES OKAY SO PAST I WOULD JUST  MAKE COMMENT IF I MAY THAT ARE  THEY'RE VERY COMMON.  >> AND I GUESS BEAUTY IS IN  THE EYE BEHOLDER I FIND OTHER  SIGNS MORE THIS WAY POLICING  RACE WAY  ♪ >> YOU CAN LOOK I'M A IF YOU  LOOK AT THE TABLE LINE ONE  ♪ >> 28 TABLE NUMBER 5 DASH 3  DASH ONE DASH ONE.  >> IT IS FOR EITHER A WALL  SIGN OR STUDENT SIGN IS WHAT I  GUESS SUBJECT MATTER IS WHEN  YOU LOOK AT. MAXIMUM STANDARDS  COLUMN. IT SAYS FREE STANDING  HEIGHT LIKE 3 FEET. BUT THE  SIGN TYPE IS A WALL  FREESTANDING I'M CURIOUS WHY  ARE WE PUTTING FREESTANDING ON  ALL OF THEM. IT MAKES LOOK  LIKE THERE'S DIFFERENT  STANDARDS FOR WALL STANDARD. I  WON'T SIGN JUST TO SEE WHAT  I'M GETTING AT.  >> I'M TRYING TO GET A TABLE  APOLOGIZE. THAT WAS LINE.  >> I'M 1 ONE TO TO 5 DASH 3  DASH 1,  >> ASSIGN TYPE WHILE  FREESTANDING BUT UNDER MAXIMUM  STANDARDS IT SAYS FREESTANDING  SIGNED HEIGHT 3 FEET.  >> BECAUSE DON'T WANT BUY THE  HEIGHT OF THE LAST TIME BUT WE  NEED TO CLARIFY THE HEIGHT  STANDINGS  >> WAS THERE NO MAXIMUM  STANDARD FOR A WHILE WAS HIGH.  >> WOULD BE PLACED ON A  BUILDING ALSO WITHIN THE  PERMISSIBLE. MAXIMUM BUILDING  HEIGHT FOR THE ZONING DISTRICT  MUCH  >> WHILE SIGN COULD LIKE 3  STORIES TOP IT COULD BE.  >> I CANNOT BE ON THE NOT BE A  ROOF SPOT.  >> FINE  >> WITH THE WAY IT'S DRAFTED  DON'T FEEL LIKE WE SHOULD  REGULATE ON WAT STORY ASSIGNED  CAN BE PLACED PRIVATE  PROPERTY.  >> I GUESS THAT MY QUESTION  WOULD BE IS WHY ARE WE THE  MENTIONING OF ALL TIME WHEN  THERE ARE REALLY NO STANDARDS  HEIGHT. FOR A LONG TIME.  SHOULD WE PUT FREESTANDING  SIGN 3 C AND THEN NO  REGULATION FOR WALLS.  >> OK I WILL MOVE OK.  >> MISCELLANEOUS SIGNS ON LINE  1, 1, 8, 0, THESE ARE THESE  DON'T HAVE THE DEFINITIONS  THERE ARE NOT CHARTS CALLED  MISCELLANEOUS SIGNS. THERE ARE  DEFINITIONS AND IN THE CHART  FOR CHANGEABLE COPY AND  DIRECTION ON MENU SANDWICH  BOARDS ALL THE OTHER ONES. BUT  THE TITLE OF IT IS MISSING  IT'S A QUESTION WANT. IT'S  JUST MOVE I'M NOT SAYING. IT'S  >> MANY COMMISSIONER EMERICH  SHOULD YOU TIME HAVE ANY  QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT.  ♪ >> NO MA'AM.  ♪ >> ALL RIGHT.  ANY PUBLIC COMMENT. PARK IS  THERE ANY PUBLIC SORRY. I DID  I'M SORRY FOR THAT.  ♪ ♪ POSING THIS PORTION PUBLIC  HEARING AND I'M LOOKING FOR  MOTION. I SHOW THAT I MOVE TO  CONTINUE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 14.  >> THEY I GETTING YOUR  LANGUAGE THAT CLERK AND SOSA  SAYING  >> INCORPORATING  >> APPROVED MOTION.  >> SO CONTINUE THE ORDINANCE  JUST SECOND READING ON AUGUST  6 2024.  >> SECOND.  >> I HAVE A MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON AND  SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR. THE  WHEN READ THE BACK FOR US.  >> MR.  >> YES. TO FIX THAT OKAY SO  NOTHING ELSE LET. DON THAT  VICE YES, MAYOR ZS LINED THEM  SAY YES DON'T THIS.  COMMISSIONER AVERAGE. YES,  OKAY THAT PASSES BY TO 0.  MOVING ON ITEM H DO I HAVE  THAT RIGHT. I'M HOPING  SOMEBODY HERE HAS BACK AND TO  GET MY RIGHT. LOOKING FOR A  MOTION TO DIRECT CITY TO READ  THIS BY TITLE ONLY SO MOVED.  ALL RIGHT WE HAVE A MOTION  MADE BY COMMISSIONER LANGDON  AND THE CITY CLERK TO READ  THIS BY TITLE ONLY AND THAT  WAS SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR.  THERE'S NOTHING ELSE LET'S  VICE MAYOR. I'M A YES. LAND  AND SAY YES. I YES.  COMMISSIONER EMRICH EMRICK ALL  RIGHT, PLEASE READ THIS.  >> I I ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 15 AND ORDINANCE OF THE  CITY IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA  RELATING TO THE OFFICIAL  ZONING MAP REPEALING ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2010 15 AND THE  OFFICIAL ZONING AS AMENDED  ADOPTING A NEW OFFICIAL ZONING  MAP PURSUANT TO CHAPTER ONE  ARTICLE 2 SECTIONS 2001.3 OF  THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT  CODE PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS  PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION AND  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  >> THANK YOU. MANAGER THIS IS  YOUR ITEM.  >> THANK YOU, MADAM STAFF YOU.  NOT A NEW OFFICIAL WITH  IMPROVED OR DECEMBER 28. WE  FORECAST 15 WAS THE SECOND  READING AUGUST 6 24. THANK  >> ALL RIGHT NOW ARE UP FOR  QUESTIONS. FOR THIS ITEM. NOT  SEEING ANYTHING. DO WE HAVE  ANY PUBLIC COMMENT.  >> BEFORE WE START OUR PART AS  A POSSIBLE TO GET A MAP ON THE  SCREEN PARCELS 1, 1, 2, 8, 2,  2, 4, 2, 2, 9, AS WELL AS PART  OF 1, 1, 2, 8, 2, 2, 4, 2, 3,  0, OR IS THAT NOT POSSIBLE.  THAT'S THE QUESTION A LITTLE  BIT TO THE CURRENT ZONING  THOSE 2 PIECES OF LAND. IF NOT  YOU CAN START MY TIME OUT TO  START TALKING. MATTER BECAUSE  THAT'S LET ME ASK YOU GUYS ARE  PRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL  THOSE 2 PARCELS OF LAND WHICH  ARE GOING TO BE REZONED  ACTIVITIES THAT ARE 60, YOU  KNOW WHAT THAT ZONE RIGHT NOW.  IS IT THAT WAS WHAT I THOUGHT  TOO WHEN I PROPERTY IN  TWENTY-TWENTY HAVE RECENTLY  WHERE LIKE THE LAST BREAK THAT  NO RESIDENTIAL PERMITS HAVE  BEEN ISSUED IN THAT AREA 2006.  2006 BY COMMISSIONERS OF THE  CITY COUNCIL AND ON JULY FIRST  OF THIS YEAR A GENTLEMAN  THAT'S BEEN TRYING TO HELP ME  OUT ON A STAFF MEMBER HERE IS  A WITNESS IN THE ROOM RIGHT  NOW. IT'S PERFECT FOR HERE. I  WOULD MEET WITH THEM THEY HAD  A BUNCH OF QUESTIONS FOR HIM  AS THE HOW I NEED TO GET MY  PERMITS FILE FOR US THAT I CAN  BUILD BEFORE DATES OF AUGUST 6  OCTOBER 28 WHEN THE CHANGES  ARE GOING TO TAKE PLACE.  REPORT HAS ME SOME ANSWERS  BEING THE HEAD OF ZONING CITY  OF PORT.  >> BUT YOU CAN'T GIVE ME THE  ANSWERS NOBODY IS TELLING HIM  EASY ANSWERS. I BELIEVE IF YOU  GUYS CALL MISTER FLORES UP AS  A STAFF MEMBER RIGHT NOW I  DON'T THINK THAT HE'S EVEN  AWARE THAT NO PERMITS HAVE  BEEN ISSUED IN THAT AREA SINCE  2006 WHICH MEANS I'VE BEEN  COMPLETELY BAMBOOZLED BY THE  CITY OF PORT BECAUSE I'M  SUPPOSED TO BE HERE TO TRY TO  FIGURE OUT HOW LIVE MY FROM  BEFORE THE DATE ON THE SCREEN  FOR THIS OCTOBER 28 CHANGE  THAT GOES INTO EFFECT AUGUST  6. BUT EVERY TIME I ASKED THE  CITY OF OWNING PEOPLE WHAT I  NEED TO DO TO APPLY FOR A  PERMIT SHOULD OF THEM SINCE I  DID THE FIRST STATE TO DO JUST  BEFORE I EVEN BOUGHT IT FOR  ME. NO MISTER CHAIRMAN WE  HAVEN'T GIVEN THAT ANY  RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS  THERE SINCE 2006 TO BE  COMPLETELY WASTING YOUR MONEY  AND WASTING YOUR TIME.  >> SO.  >> THAT HAS TO COUNCIL MEMBERS  WHY AM I STANDING HERE TRYING  TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO APPLY FOR  A PERMIT BY THAT TIME NO  PERMITS ARE BEING ISSUED SINCE  2006 AND THEN GENTLEMAN IN THE  ROOM WHO'S BEEN TRYING HELP MY  FAMILY.  >> AFTER I BELIEVE EVEN FOR  THE TIMES I TALK TO MY THE  GENTLEMAN AS A WITNESS IN THIS  ROOM RIGHT NOW WHAT THE CITY  OF NORFOLK BEEN TRYING TO HELP  MY FAMILY AND I WE'VE YOU  CALLING TO THE STAND I DON'T  THINK HE'S EVEN AWARE OF WHAT  BROUGHT TO YOUR ATTENTION.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I'LL BE  IN CONTACT WITH EACH OF YOU BY  MAIL EMAIL AND CALLING ALL  YOUR OFFICES TO TRY TO HAVE  MEETINGS WITH EACH OF YOU  INDIVIDUALLY TO POSSIBLE.  THANK THANK YOU. THAT'S  >> ALL RIGHT BUZZING THIS  PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING  AND I'M LOOKING FOR MOTION.  >> I MAKE MOTION MAYOR GO  AHEAD I MOVE TO CONTINUE  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH 15  TO SECOND READING ON AUGUST 6  2024.  >> AND MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON TO  CONTINUE ORDINANCE 2024 DASH  15 TO SECOND READING ON AUGUST  6 2024 AND THAT WAS SECONDED  BY VICE MAYOR STOKES.  >> NO FURTHER DISCUSSION.  VOICE VOTE VICE MAYOR SPARES  US YES, DIDN'T SAY, YES, I  DON'T KNOW. AND COMMISSIONER I  MEAN YES. AND SO THAT HAS IS 4  TO 0. WE'RE ONE ORDER ONE HERE  I GO AGAIN NOW. WHAT THEY LIKE  TO SPEAK TO THE REASON FOR  DOING THAT.  >> I JUST SENT IT BECAUSE WE  HAVE BEEN TRYING NOT TO HARM.  RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS WITH  THIS REZONE. BUT YEAH THIS  REZONING IS GOING TO HARM SO  MANY PEOPLE. AND THOSE THOSE  SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS,  THERE'S NO DATA OR TIMELINE  THAT SHOWS.  >> THAT THIS WILL FROM THAT  WILL BE FRUITFUL.  >> AND THERE ARE OTHER  LOCATIONS AVAILABLE AND 2.  EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS.  >> I'M OKAY.  >> LET'S MOVE ON TO ITEM. 2020  FORD DASH 16. CITY CLERK  EMOTION TO GET THIS. BY TITLE  ONLY MOVED.  >> OK THANK YOU. I HAVE A  MOTION MADE BY VICE MAYOR  STOKES FOR THE CITY CLERK TO  READ THIS BY TITLE ONLY AND  THAT WAS SECONDED BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL, LET'S  DO VOICE VOTE.  >> VICE MAYOR SPARES OR Z S  LANGDON YES, NO YES.  COMMISSIONER ELRICH. THAT  ASKED THAT'S 5 TO 0 TAKEAWAYS  >> ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE FL  AMENDING THE CODE OF THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT FLORIDA SECTION  2.8 TO CAUSE ADDITIONAL  MATTERS CONSISTENCY WITH THE  UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE  WRITING FOR FINDINGS PROVIDING  FOR COMPLEX PROVIDING FOR  SEVERABILITY PROVIDING FOR  CODIFICATION AND PROVIDING  EFFECTIVE DATE.  >> THANK YOU CITY MANAGER THIS  IS YOUR ITEM.  >> THEY COME THAT ASK THAT  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2021 16  REGARDING MATTERS. THEY  CONTINUE WITH THE SECOND  READING AUGUST 6 20.4.  >> ALL RIGHT SO OPENING UP FOR  ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT ITS  ORDINANCE REGARDING PROVIDES A  JUDICIAL MATTERS.  >> MY QUESTIONS ARE DURING THE  ULDC DISCUSSION ALL RIGHT,  THANK YOU.  >> COMMISSIONER EMRICH SHE  HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS  ONE. NO MA'AM. DO WE HAVE ANY  PUBLIC SO I'M POSING THIS  PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING  AND LOOKING FOR A MOTION.  >> MAKE THAT WE HAVE TO  CONTINUE ORDINANCE 2020 FOR  THEIR 16 TO SECOND READING 6  2024 2ND.  >> ALL RIGHT WE HAVE A MOTION  MADE VICE MAYOR STOKES TO  CONTINUE ORDINANCE 2024 DASH  16 TO SECOND READING ON AUGUST  6 2024. AND THAT WAS SECONDED  BY COMMISSIONER LANGDON THAT  THERE'S NOTHING LET'S DO A  VOTE VICE MAYOR OF MAYOR THE S  LINE DIDN'T YES DO, YES, AND  COMMISSIONER EMRICH.  >> YES ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.  THAT MOTION PASSES 5, 0, AND  COMING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  17. I NEED MOTION TO DIRECT  THE CITY CLERK TO READ THIS BY  TITLE ONLY SO MOVED. WE HAVE A  MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON FOR THE CITY CLERK TO  READ THIS BY TITLE ONLY AND  THAT WAS SECONDED BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL WAS TO A  VOICE VOTE VICE MAYOR MANAGE,  MAYOR ZS LANGDON YES, DON'T.  AND COMMISSIONER EMRICH.  >> YES. ALL RIGHT PASSES 5 TO  0 TAKEAWAY CITY  >> ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  17 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA AMENDING  THE CODE OF THE CITY OF NORTH  PORT FLORIDA SECTION 2 DASH 5,  1, 1, RELATED FINES FOR TREE  PROTECTION VIOLATIONS. FOR  FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION AND  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  >> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.  OPENING UP COMMISSIONERS  QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL.  >> ONLY QUESTION I IS  REGARDING THE.  >> THE  >> ACTIVITY THAT REQUIRES  AUTHORIZATION PERSON TO YOU  AND TO CHAPTER 2 WITHOUT FIRST  OBTAINING THAT AUTHORIZATION.  DURING THE ULDC DISCUSSION I  WANTED TO ASK TREE PERMITS.  I'M CURIOUS WHAT AUTHORIZATION  TO THE PEOPLE NEED TO  HOMEOWNER PROPERTY OWNER,  WHATEVER NEED TO OBTAIN.  >> LAURIE ARMS ASSISTANT  DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.  UNDER THE NEW ULDC PROCESS  TREE REMOVAL.  >> LAND CLEARING UNDERSTORY  UNDER BRUSH REMOVAL IS ALL  UNDER THE CERTIFICATE OF  ZONING COMPLIANCE. AS  MENTIONED IN THE PAST THAT  REMOVES IT AND FROM THAT  BUILDING PERMIT THAT PROCESS  AND REFLECTS THAT BEING  REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH  THE ULDC.  >> CALLED THE WET AGAIN  CERTIFICATE OF SOUND  COMPLIANCE.  WE HAVE ANOTHER  QUESTION KNOW. ANY PUBLIC  COMMENT. CLOSING THIS PORTION  OF THE PUBLIC HEARING AND  LOOKING FOR A MOTION.  >> I MAKE A MOTION IT TO  CONTINUE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 17.  >> SECOND READING ON AUGUST 6.  >> I'LL SECOND THAT. ALL  RIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION MADE  BY COMMISSIONER LANGDON TO  CONTINUE THIS ORDINANCE 2024  DASH 17 TO THE SECOND READING  ON AUGUST 6TH AND THAT WAS  SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR STOKES.  THERE'S NOTHING ELSE. LET'S DO  A VICE-MAYOR SPARES US. THEY  ARE THE LANGDON YES DO YES.  RICH EMIRATE YES. OH YES.  THANK YOU FOR THAT PASSES 5 TO  0. WE'LL ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 18. BUT THE PROMOTION SO  THE CITY CLERK HENRY DESPITE I  DON'T KNOW SECOND ALL RIGHT  HAVE A MOTION MADE BY VICE  MAYOR STOPES TO DIRECT THE  CITY CLERK TO READ THIS FIGHT  I WE IN THAT FUNDED BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON LET'S TO  A VOICE VOTE VICE MAYOR. YES,  THEY ARE MIND AND YES.  COMMISSIONER EMRICH EMRICK  ALRIGHT, THAT PASSES TAKEN  AWAY ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE  CITY IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA  AMENDING THE CODE OF THE CITY  UPDATE REFERENCES FOR  CONSISTENCY WITH THE UNIFIED  LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.  >> MANY CHAPTER 2 ARTICLE FOR  DIVISION ONE HEARING OFFICERS  MINUTES AFTER 4 BOARDS AND  COMMITTEES TO ADDRESS  COMMISSION LIAISONS AND THE  ART ADVISORY BOARD MANY  CHAPTER, 22 ARTICLE 2  FERTILIZER AND LANDSCAPE  MANAGEMENT. MANY CHAPTER, 59  SECTION 59 DASH ONE PARKING  AND STORAGE OF CERTAIN  VEHICLES ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS  WRITING FOR FINDINGS PROVIDING  FOR COMPLEX PROVIDING FOR  SEVERABILITY PROVIDING FOR  CODIFICATION AND PROVIDING AN  EFFECTIVE DATE. THANK YOU.  CITY MANAGER THIS IS YOUR  ITEM.  >> THEY DIDN'T KNOW WHERE THAT  PASSED A ORDINANCE NUMBER 2 24  18. FOR ASSISTANCE THE WITH  UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE  TO SECOND READING ON 24. THANK  YOU.  >> I'M LOOKING FOR ANY  COMMISSIONER QUESTION US.  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL.  >> YEAH, KIND OF CONFUSED WITH  THIS WE HAVE A ZONING BOARD OF  APPEALS. AND WE HAVE A ZONING  HEARING OFFICER. I PULLED UP  BOTH OF THOSE IN OUR CITY  CODE.  >> AND I ALSO REMEMBER  COMMISSION BACK IN 2022. MADE  A MOTION TO TRANSITION. ZONING  BOARD OF APPEALS TO THE  HEARING OFFICER THAT NEVER  REALLY HAPPENED MIGHT HAVE  BEEN BECAUSE WE WERE REDOING  ULDC WHO KNOWS. BUT IF THE  ZONING BOARD OF THEM. IF THE  ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS HAS  AUTHORITY. THAT IS SHARED WITH  HIS SONY HEARING OFFICER NOW  WITH THE NEW CODE ZONING  HEARING OFFICER HEARS  VARIANCES WHICH ZONING BOARD  OF APPEALS CAN ALSO DO. I'M  CONFUSED ABOUT THE OVERLAP AND  I'M HOPING YOU CAN GIVE YOU  SOME CLARITY.  >> THE ORDINANCE FOR UPHILL  SECTIONS THAT REFERENCE ZONING  BOARD OF APPEALS. PLAN IS TO  HAVE THE ZONING HEARING  OFFICER HERE ALL VARIANCES AND  THAT IS DUE TO THE CHALLENGES  WE FACED ZONING BOARD OF  APPEALS MEMBERS ON BOARD AS  MATTER OF FACT RIGHT NOW OR  FOR THE MORE EMERGENCY ORDER  WE WENT WE WOULD NOT BE ABLE  TO HOLD MEETINGS WITH THE  BOARD OF ACCOUNTS WE NEED TO  HAVE THE HEARING OFFICER COME  ANYWAY.  >> ARE REPEALING ZONING BOARD  OF APPEALS. HERE.  >> THE WOMAN LOOKING TO THAT I  BELIEVE YOU'LL SEE THERE'S  SOME REFERENCES A ZONING BOARD  OF APPEALS. THAT ARE STRUCK  AND THIS ORDINANCE AND THE  CITY CODE. BUT IF I'M CORRECT  THE PROVISION IN OUR CODES  THAT REALLY SET FORTH THE  POWERS AND DUTIES OF ZONING  BOARD OF APPEALS HEARD IN THE  ULDC SO THAT'S ADDRESSED ULDC  REWRITE.  >> THE ATTORNEY SLAYTON I  WOULD HAVE REACHED THAT POINT  AND THAT IS CORRECT CHAPTER 2  OF THE CURRENT ULDC DISCUSSES  THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS  AND THEIR ROLE.  >> AND ACTION WAS REPEALED BY  ORDINANCE 2023 DASH 2024 DASH  13.  >> AND YOU SEE AT LEAST ONE  REFERENCE BEING STRUCK ON ONE  7475 OF THIS ORDINANCE.  >> OTHER QUESTION I HAVE  REGARDING THE FERTILIZER. VERY  PROTECTIVE OVER FERTILIZER  BAN. BECAUSE WE INSTITUTED THE  NEW RULES PRIOR TO THE STATE  PREEMPTING US. AND I WANT TO  MAKE SURE THAT BY AMENDING  ANYTHING IN THIS CODE ARE WE  OPENING OURSELVES TOO.  POSSIBLY NOT BEING ABLE TO  FOLLOW OUR NEWLY ADOPTED  PEOPLE WHATEVER FOR.  >> ALLIES SUBJECT THEMSELVES  TO HAVING TO REDO CERTAIN  THINGS TO MATCH SOMETHING.  >> MODIFICATION IN THIS  ORDINANCE IS VERY LIMITED AS  MATTER OF FACT IT JUST REMOVES  THE. UPDATED REQUIREMENT THAT.  THE FERTILIZER APPLICATION  APPLICATORS PROVIDE  PARTICULARLY CAN'T WITHIN A  180 DAYS OF THE ARTICLE WHICH  WAS LONG AGO. THERE IS NOTHING  ON THIS AMENDMENT THAT WOULD  SUFFER OR MAKE ON HORSE OF ALL  THE REMAINING PROVISIONS  CHOPPER. SCIENCE SECTION. 22  DASH 60 SEX OR THE ENTIRE  ARTICLE 2 FERTILIZER LANDSCAPE  MANAGEMENT.  >> YOU SAY SO I JUST WANTED TO  MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT GOING  HAVE TO FOLLOW STATE LINES BY  HIM THAT'S SOMETIMES WHEN WE  AMEND THE CODE THAT WE'RE  PREEMPTED FROM THAT OPENS US  TO NOW HAVING TO FOLLOW  WHATEVER STATE LAW SAYS IT'S  ALL THAT'S WHAT I'M REALLY  CONCERNED ABOUT BECAUSE I  REMEMBER WANTING TO GET RID OF  THAT SENTENCE WHEN WE ADOPTED  THE NEW FLORIDA LAWS OR THING  AND WE KIND OF WENT LET'S JUST  LEAVE IT DIDN'T. BECAUSE WE  KNEW WE KNEW THAT THE STATE  WAS GOING TO BE. BRINGING  SOMETHING AND THEY SIGNED IT  SO MAYBE YOU CAN JUST DOUBLE  CHECK TIRED TO IT BECAUSE I  DON'T WANT TO AVOID OFF. ONE  OF THE LAST ONES THAT WAS ABLE  TO GET IT UNDER THE WATER.  >> THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE  HAS REVIEWED ORDINANCE THAT'S  A MATTER THAT THE STRIKING OF  THAT LANGUAGE WAS TURNING.  >> CAN AND THEN OTHERS  QUESTIONS HERE. ALL RIGHT. WE  HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT. ALL  RIGHT SOME OF THE PORTION OF  THE PUBLIC HEARING AND LOOKING  FOR MOTION. PAGE  >> ORDINANCE 24  >> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY  VICE MAYOR STARTS TO CONTINUE  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH A  TEAM TO THE SECOND READING ON  AUGUST 6 AND THAT WAS SECONDED  BY COMMISSIONER THERE'S  NOTHING ELSE WILL DO A VOICE  VOTE. VICE-MAYOR IS A YES  LANGDON YES DO YES.  COMMISSIONER EMRICH. I MEAN  YES ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU AND  THAT MOTION PASSES 5 TO  >> WILL THEY ITEM ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 19 I NEED A  MOTION TO CITY CLERK HENRY  SECOND ALRIGHT, VICE MAYOR HAS  MADE A MOTION TO DIRECT THE  CITY CLERK READ THIS BY TITLE  ONLY AND THAT WAS SECONDED  BY COMMISSIONER.  >> SO WE'LL DO A VOICE VOTE. I  VICE MAYOR'S YES, HERE'S  LANGDON YES. YES COMMISSIONER  MERGE. YES, ALL RIGHT SO THAT.  PASSES 5 TO 0.  >> CITY THIS IS AND NUMBER  2024 DASH 19 AND ORDINANCES  AND HEARTS ARE REPEALING  ARTICLE ONE AND SECTIONS 26  1926 THROUGH 2026 TO 22  THROUGH 26. I'M SORRY I DON'T  AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA  REPEALING ARTICLE ONE AND  SECTIONS 26 1926 DASH 2026  DASH 22 THROUGH 26 35 OF  CHAPTER, 26 OF THE CODE OF THE  CITY IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA  RELATING TO FIRE PREVENTION  AND PROTECTION AND AMENDING  THE CODE OF THE CITY IN NORTH  PORT, FLORIDA SECTIONS 26 DASH  ONE 26 DASH 2026 DASH 22  THROUGH 26 DASH 23 RELATING TO  FIRE SAFETY AND PREVENTION,  PROVIDING DIRECTION FOR STATE  FIRE MARSHAL REVIEW, PROVIDING  FOR FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR  COMPLEX PROVIDING FOR  SEVERABILITY CODIFICATION AND  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  >> THANK YOU CITY MANAGER THIS  IS YOUR ITEM.  >> OF YEAR TOO 19 KILLING THE  ARTICLE SECONDS AFTER MEANT  WITH SECOND MEETING ON AUGUST  6TH STREET REPORT I THANK YOU.  >> DO WE HAVE ANY COMMISSION  QUESTIONS AT THIS.  >> HOT TOPIC GET IT.  >> GETTING PUNCHY NOW JOKE UP.  NOTHING OKAY. ALL RIGHT, I'M  SAYING NOTHING SO IS THERE ANY  PUBLIC COMMENT.  >> ALL RIGHT SOME BELIEVE THIS  PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING  AND I'M LOOKING FOR A DO THAT  I MOVED TO CONTINUE ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 THAT'S 19 TO  SECOND READING AUGUST ALL  RIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION MADE  BY COMMISSIONER LANGDON OR  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2020 MORE  DASH 19 TO THE TO GO TO SECOND  READING ON AUGUST 6TH AND THAT  WAS SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL. THERE'S NOTHING ELSE  WE WILL DO A VOICE VOTE VICE  MAYOR VICE MAYOR G MAYOR ZS  LANDON, YES, DO. YES.  COMMISSIONER AVERAGE.  >> I MEAN YES ALL RIGHT SO  THAT PASSES 5 TO  >> MOVING ON TO ITEM AND  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH AND  AGAIN I NEED A MOTION TO THE  TO OR CAN BE THIS HOW CAN WE  HAVE A MOTION VICE MAYOR  STOKES TO DIRECT FOR THE CITY  CLERK TO BY TITLE ONLY AND  THAT WAS SECONDED BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON SO WE'LL  DO A VICE MAYOR YES, THEY ARE  THE LANGAN DON'T MISTER YES 5  TO 0 CITY  >> ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  20 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA  REPEALING SECTION 34 ONE OF  THE CODE OF THE CITY IN NORTH  PORT FLORIDA RELATING TO THE  MOBILE FOOD VENDORS, PROVIDING  FOR FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR  COMPLEX PROVIDING FOR  SEVERABILITY PROVIDING  CODIFICATION PROVIDING AN  EFFECTIVE DATE ALRIGHT CITY  MANAGER YOUR ITEM.  >> THANK YOU CITY APPROVE  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2020 OR DASH  20 WHICH IS REPEALED  TERMINATED TOO LITTLE. FOOD  VENDORS AND WE ASKED CONTINUE  READING ON AUGUST 6 OF 2024.  THANK  >> THANK FOR COMMISSIONERS  QUESTIONS GO AHEAD  COMMISSIONER FROM. I'M NOT  SAYING ANY. ANY PUBLIC COMMENT  IS ALRIGHT SOME BOATING THIS  PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING  AND LOOKING FOR EMOTIONAL  AHEAD.  >> I MOVED TO CONTINUE  ORDINANCE 2024 DASH 20 THE  SECOND READING ON 8/6/2020 FOR  >> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY  VICE MAYOR STEPS TO CONTINUE  ORDINANCE 2024 DASH 20 TO  SECOND READING AUGUST 6 THAT  WAS SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON IF THERE'S NOTHING  ELSE WE WILL DO A VOICE VOTE  VICE MAYOR PLACE SO OR Z S  YES, DO, COMMISSIONER AVERAGE.  ALL RIGHT SO THAT. ARIES 5 TO  0. MOVING TO ITEM N. ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 20 WON. AGAIN  A MOTION SO THE CITY CLERK  HENRY THIS BY TITLE ONLY.  SECOND OKAY I HAVE MOTION MADE  BY COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL TO  FOR THE CITY CLERK TO READ  THIS BY TITLE ONLY AND THAT  WAS SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON. VICE MAYOR. THEY ARE  ZS KNOW THAT YES, DON'T.  COMMISSIONER ELRICH. YES ALL  RIGHT SO THAT PASSES 5, 0  MOVING ON TO THE CITY READING  IT I I DON'T OWN ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 21 AND  ORDINANCE OF THE FL AMENDING  THE CODE OF THE CITY AND  LEARNED TO UPDATE REFERENCES  TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES  DEPARTMENT.  >> AND CHECKED IT 34 LICENSES  PERMITS AND MISCELLANEOUS  BUSINESS REGULATIONS ARTICLE 2  BUSINESS TAX RECEIPTS AND  ARTICLE 4 ADULT ORIENTED  BUSINESSES PROVIDING FOR  FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION AND  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  ALRIGHT CITY MANAGER. THIS IS  YOUR ITEM.  >> THANK YOU, MADAM CITIES  THAT THE COURT THAT CITY  COMMISSIONERS WON 2024 DASH 20  WORLD WHICH INCLUDES DEBATES  TO CHAPTERS AND ARTICLES TO  CONTINUE WITH THE SECOND  READING ON AUGUST 6 OF REPORT.  >> ALL RIGHT MOVING ON  COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS ABOUT  ITEM. COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL.  >> AND LINE WITH 5151 IT'S  RELATING TO DON'T USE AND HOW  THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS  TONIGHT. IT SAYS BICE THEY  HAVE NOTIFY THE APPLICANTS BY  OF THE DENIAL BY CERTIFIED  MAIL OR HAND DELIVERING HAND  DELIVERY DAYS I WOULD ASSUME  ARE LONG GONE. I CAN'T IMAGINE  SOMEBODY HAND DELIVERING THE  DENIAL LETTER TO ANYBODY. I  WOULD STRONGLY SUGGEST THAT WE  CHANGE THAT VERBIAGE TO  POSSIBLY ELECTRONIC MAIL.  >> STAFF HAVE NO OBJECTION TO  CHANGE HOWEVER WANT OFTEN  THAT.  >> CHANGES TO THIS CHAPTER OF  THE CITY HAVE TO BE CAREFULLY  THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE  BECAUSE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT  ISSUES. THEY'VE ACTUALLY  LIMITED THE CHANGES THAT WE'VE  MADE AND THIS ITERATION AND IT  IS ON HOST ULDC LIST OF THINGS  TO DO TO UPDATE THE CITY CODE  SECTION TO MAKE SURE THAT IT  IS COMPLETELY COMPLIANT WITH  ALL OF THE CASE LAW THAT IS  THAT HAS BEEN. SENSE I BELIEVE  2002 WHEN THIS WAS PARTIALLY  ADOPT.  >> THAT'S RIGHT A COMMISSION.  WE HAVE ADVISED STAFF TO MAKE  NO SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES TO THIS  CHAPTER AND THIS TYPE OF  CLEANUP. DON'T WORRY TO  BUSINESSES ARE VERY HEAVILY  IMPACTED BY THE FIRST  AMENDMENT AND AS FAR WE DO  ANTICIPATE WE NEED SOME CLEAN  UP TO THIS CHAPTER. BUT IT IS.  LOOKING BACK TO YOUR ORDINANCE  THAT LATEST SIGN COATS IT'S  IT'S SORT OF THAT THE TYPE OF  PROCEDURE TO DO.  ♪ DISCOURAGED ANY SUBSTANTIVE  ♪ CHANGES TO THE CHAPEL CASE  WITH  >> THINK FOR  >> DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER  QUESTIONS HOPE WHEN YOU GUYS  DO YOUR SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES  YOU DEFINITELY LOOK AT LINE TO  96 BECAUSE IT'S UPDATED  LANGUAGE WHEN YOU SAY THE NAME  OF THE BUSINESS UNLESS AND  UNTIL HE OR SHE SATISFIES THE  FOLLOWING THAT'S NOT  PROFESSIONAL LANGUAGE AT ALL.  QUESTIONS.  >> OKAY TO HAVE ANY PUBLIC  COMMENT. POSING THIS PORTION  OF THE PUBLIC HEARING AND  LOOKING FOR A IT I HAD I MOVED  TO CONTINUE ORDINANCE NUMBER  2024 DASH 21 TO SECOND READING  ON AUGUST 6. SECOND.  >> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON TO  CONTINUE ORDINANCE 2024 DASH  21 TO SECOND READING ON AUGUST  6 AND THAT SECONDED BY VICE  MAYOR STOKES NOTHING ELSE WILL  VOICE VICE MAYOR  COMMISSIONERS, YES, THEY ARE  THE S LANDON, NOW YES, MISTER  AVERAGE.  >> I MEAN YES.  >> ALL RIGHT PASSES 5 TO 0  MOVING ON TO ITEM. ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 22 AGAIN I  NEED A MOTION. THE CITY WORKED  TO REBUILD MY ONLY I HAVE A  MOTION MADE BY ICE PIERCE TOES  FOR THE CITY CLERK TO READ  THIS BY TITLE ONLY THAT WAS  SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON. WE WILL DO VOICE VOTE  VICE MAYOR SHARES THE LANGDON  DON'T. MISTER AVERAGE. YES ALL  RIGHT SO THAT BY TITLE ONLY.  >> CITY ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 22 AND ORDINANCE OF THE  CITY IN NORTH PARK FLORIDA  RELATING TO SOLID WASTE MEN IN  THE CODE OF  THE CITY OF NORTH PORT, FL  CHAPTER 62 SOLID WASTE ARTICLE  SECTION DISPOSAL TO CLARIFY  DEFINITIONS AND UPDATE  REFERENCES PROVIDING FOR  FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION AND  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  >> THANK YOU CITY MANAGER THIS  IS YOUR RIGHT.  >> BUT YOU KNOW WE'RE A CITY  STAFF ASKED THAT THE CITY  COMMISSION APPROVED ORDINANCE  OVER 2024 22. FACTOR, 62 LATER  SOLID WASTE SECOND READING  AUGUST 6 TWEAK REPORT. THANK  >> MOVING ON TO QUESTIONS  ABOUT THIS. NOT SEEING ANY DO  WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT.  BUT CLOSES PORTION OF THE  PUBLIC HEARING AND LOOK FOR A  MOTION MAKE IT VICE MAYOR TO  CONTINUE ORDINANCE 2024 22 2ND  READING ON 8/6/2020.  >> I WE MADE BY VICE MAYOR  STOVES CONTINUE ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 20 2 2ND  READING AUGUST 6TH AND THAT  WAS SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON IF THERE'S NOTHING  ELSE WILL DO A VOICE VOTE VICE  MAYOR BASED THERE'S YES MAYOR  ZS LANGDON DO. COMMISSIONER  ELRICH. YES AT PASSES 5 TO 0  ALL RIGHT.  >> AND ON TO ITEM  >> ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  23, OR A 3 THIS BY TITLE ONLY  >> IN  >> THE MOTION MADE BY VICE  MAYOR STOKES. THE CITY CLERK  TO READ THIS BY TITLE ONLY AND  THAT WAS SECONDED BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON LET'S DO  A VOICE VOTE. I VICE MAYOR'S  THEY ARE THE LANGDON YES DO  YES. THIS YEAR AVERAGE.  >> YES ALL RIGHT THAT PASSES 5  TO 0. ALL CITY CLERK TAKE  AWAY.  >> ORDINANCE NUMBER 2020 OR  DASH 23. AND ORDINANCE OF THE  CITY IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA  RELATING TO THE NORTH PORT  ROAD AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT IN  THE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC ROAD  FAY MEN IN THE CODE OF  THE CITY OF NORTH PORT, FL  CHAPTER 66 SPECIAL DISTRICTS  ARTICLES FOR A ROAD AND  DRAINAGE DISTRICT TO ELIMINATE  CONFLICTS WITH THE UNIFIED  LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATING  REFERENCES CLARIFY FORSMAN  PROVISIONS AND CLARIFIED THE  TIMING OF THE PAYMENT FOR THE  CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC ROAD.  PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS  PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION AND  PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATE.  >> ALRIGHT CITY MANAGER THIS  IS YOUR ITEM.  >> CITY. 2024 23. DIDN'T KNOW  ROAD AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT AND  THE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC ROAD  WILL BE IT CONTINUED TO SECOND  READING AUGUST 6 2024. THANK  >> ALL RIGHT SO WE'RE ON 2  QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS. NO  QUESTIONS BUT JUST A COMMENT I  LOVE THE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC  ROAD YET JUST LIKE THE SOUND  OF THAT UK. THEM OKAY.  >> ANY PUBLIC COMMENT IS ALL  RIGHT.  >> OR SHUN THE PUBLIC HEARING  AND LOOKING FOR A MOTION MAKE  GO AHEAD AND MOVE TO CONTINUE  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH 8,  3, 2, 2ND READING ON AUGUST, 6  2024 2ND. ALL RIGHT WE HAVE A  MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON TO CONTINUE ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 23 TO SECOND  READING ON AUGUST 6. 2024 AND  THAT WAS SECONDED BY VICE  MAYOR STOKES. THERE'S NOTHING  ELSE WE WILL DO VICE-MAYOR  SPEARS YES MAYOR, THE S  LANGDON DO. COMMISSIONER  ELRICH. YES. ALL RIGHT SO THAT  MOTION CARRIES 5 TO 0 ON TO  ITEM WHICH YOU. ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 20 THE  PROMOTION. SO ALL RIGHT WE  HAVE A MOTION TO DIRECT THE  CITY CLERK TO READ THIS BY  TITLE ONLY MADE BY VICE MAYOR  STOKES AND SECONDED BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON.  ♪ WE'LL DO A VOICE  ♪ VOTE. AND VICE CHAIR. YES.  >> HERE'S YES, YES. YES.  COMMISSIONER EMRICH. YES ALL  RIGHT SO THAT PASSES BY. I'M  BUSY ROAD. ANY GO AHEAD.  >> IT'S NUMBER 2024 DASH 24 AN  ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH  PORT FLORIDA AMENDING THE CODE  OF THE CITY OF NORTH PORT, FL  CHAPTER, 70 STREETS SIDEWALKS  AND OTHER PUBLIC PLACES  CREATING A NEW ARTICLE STORE  CANOPY ZONE DESIGNATION BUT  FOR FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR  COMPLEX PROVIDING FOR  SEVERABILITY PROVIDING FOR  CODIFICATION AND PROVIDING AN  AFFECTED DATE.  >> ALRIGHT CITY MANAGER THIS  IS YOUR ITEM.  >> THANK YOU MADAM MAYOR THAT  HAS DO WHAT IS 2024 DASH 20 OR  COLDER, THE FOR PORT 70  STREETS SIDEWALKS OTHER PUBLIC  PLACES IF WOULD JUST SECOND  READING AUGUST 6.22.  >> I THANK ALL RIGHT NOW WE'RE  ON 2 QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL.  >> LINE ONE 44 STATES THAT THE  CITY WILL POST SIGNAGE  DESIGNATING A CANOPY ROAN AND  WILL ENSURE MAINTENANCE OF THE  CANOPY ROAD CLEAR ZONE,  CURIOUS WHY ARE WE PUTTING  MORE SIGNS AND ALL RIGHT AWAY.  >> CANOPY ROAD  >> OREGON'S ASSISTANT DIRECTOR  DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.  >> PER PROVISIONS CURRENTLY  EXIST IN THE UNIFIED LAND.  LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER,  45. THERE WERE NO SUBSTANTIAL  CHANGES MADE THEY ARE NOT LAND  DEVELOPMENT SO THAT ALONG WITH  CITY AT SOME POINT THE CITY  COMMISSION WANTED TO HAVE AN  OPPORTUNITY TO DESIGNATE THESE  ROADS AND THEY WANT THEM TO  RECOGNIZED. THERE ARE A NUMBER  OF. GOVERNMENT PLACED SIGNS  AND THE RIGHT OF WAY THAT OR  NOT. TRAFFIC CONTROL WE HAVE  SOME GOPHER TORTOISE SCIENCE  FOR EXAMPLE WE HAVE SOME  DIRECTIONAL SIGNS TO CITY  FACILITIES. IT'S COMPLETELY A  POLICY DECISION BECAUSE THAT  IS GOVERNMENT SIGNAGE  PRIVATELY PLACED SIGNAGE.  >> IN FAVOR OF TAKING IT OUT I  MEAN PEOPLE ARE GOING TO KNOW  TO CANOPY ROAD WHEN GROWN OVER  2 PEOPLE REALLY CARE TO CAN  PEOPLE ROAD. I WOULD BE IN  FAVOR OF REMOVING IT, BUT YOU  KNOW BE THE WILL OF THE  COMMISSION.  >> WE HAVE ANOTHER COMMENT ON  THAT BEFORE I SPEAK MY PIECE.  >> I THINK IT'S IT WOULD GREAT  DOESN'T MENTION I I DON'T  THINK THE ONE ROAD THAT WOULD  EVEN QUALIFY THAT'S BEEN ONLY.  >> WHEN WE HAVE AND THEY DO  HAVE THESE THE COUNTY AND IT  IS IT'S GREAT REALLY LIFTS UP  THE WHOLE NEIGHBORHOOD. WHEN  THEY KNOW THAT THERE'S  SOMETHING SPECIAL AND AS WAS  BECAUSE THAT'S JUST WHAT I  THOUGHT THAT PUT FINDS OUT FOR  GOPHER TORTOISES EVERYTHING  ELSE FOR. I'M SORRY IT'S LATE  SANDHILL CRANES SO CANOPY ROAD  I THINK THAT ALSO GETS A  LITTLE BIT BUT NOTICE TO  TRUCKS YOU KNOW THEY HAVE TO  BE TRIMMED UP THAT YOU REALLY  SLOW DOWN. THOSE TREES SO.  >> I WOULDN'T BE IN FAVOR NOT  DOING THIS AND I THINK IT'S  GOING MAKE A MOTION GO AHEAD  MAKE A MOTION TO REMOVE LINE  ONE 44. ITS ENTIRETY.  >> ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION  MADE BY COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL  TO REMOVE 1 ONE 44. IT IN ITS  ENTIRETY FROM THIS. PART THE.  SAYING THAT RIGHT THAT WAS  MADE BY COMMISSIONER MACAU.  >> SECOND MAKE A COMMENT I I  THINK THAT KIND OF SCIENCE A  GREAT I THINK NO DIFFERENT  GOPHER TORTOISES SCRUB JAYS OR  ANYTHING ELSE AND HIGHWAY IT'S  SOMETHING NICE AND SOMETHING  THAT SOME PEOPLE ENJOY SEEING  AND I DON'T I DON'T SEE IT AS  ENTRANCE OR NOT. DESTRUCTION  TO ANYBODY SO I THINK IT'S  GOOD THINGS. I SUPPORT.  >> ALL RIGHT SO WE'LL DO A I'M  SO HAPPY TO.  >> YEAH GO AHEAD I DO SEE A  DISTINCTLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN  THE GOPHER TORTOISE SIGNS AND  SANDHILL CRANES ENDS ITS  WARNING PEOPLE OF THOSE.  WILDLIFE. THIS IS JUST A  NICETY THAT CONSIDER IT I  THINK ROAD CLUTTER ROAD AND  DRAINAGE WAS HERE. IT'S IT'S  NOT WARNING MOTORISTS OF  ANYTHING IT'S JUST DESIGNATING  A ROADWAY. BUT MOTION MADE  THANK YOU FOR THE SECOND.  LET'S PUT IT TO OKAY WE'RE  GOING VOTE ON NOW IT'S NICE TO  YOU.  >> MAYORS AND NOW PLAYING  SNOW. YES, AND COMMISSIONER  EMRICH. OKAY SO THAT DOES NOT  ASK ONE TOO. 4. BUT I GET MY  NUMBERS RIGHT THAT TIME. I'M  MOVING ON TO ITEM.  ♪ ♪ WE ALSO PUBLIC COMMENT. THAT.  NEED A MOTION. OH THAT'S RIGHT  OKAY. GOT MOTION TO REMOVE THE  SIGN. THAT'S RIGHT THE WHOLE  ORDINANCE HEAD YEAH.  >> MOTION TO CONTINUE  ORDINANCE 2024 DISH 24 SECOND  READING ON 8/6/2024 2ND.  >> THANK YOU VICE MAYOR WHO  HAS MADE THE MOTION TO  CONTINUE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2020  42ND READING ON AUGUST 6 THAT  WAS SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON THERE'S NOTHING ELSE  VOTE ON THAT MOTION ICE BEARS.  YES, YES LANGDON SAY YES,  DON'T. YES.  >> COMMISSIONER AVERAGE.  >> YES, OKAY SO THE ORDINANCE  PASSES TO SECOND 5 TO 0 ALL  RIGHT. BUT YOU GUYS HAVE  IMPACT NOW WILL BE TO OUR  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH 28.  AND A MOTION TO WE HAVE A  MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON TO DIRECT THE CITY  CLERK TO READ THIS BY TITLE  ONLY AND THAT WAS SECONDED BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL. LET'S  DO A VOICE VOTE VICE MAYOR.  YES MAYOR ZS THAT COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE. YES ALL RIGHT SO THAT  PASSES 5, 0 CITY CLERK.  >> WE'RE GOING NUMBER 2024  DASH 28 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA,  AMENDING THE CODE OF  THE CITY OF NORTH PORT, FL  CHAPTER 82 WATERWAYS CREATING  A NEW ARTICLE MARINE VESSEL  REGULATIONS, PROVIDING FOR  FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY  BIDEN FOR OUT OF PATIENT AND  PROVIDING AN AFFECTED DATE.  >> THANK YOU CITY MATCH YOUR  THIS IS YOUR ITEM.  >> CITY STAFF AND CITY  COMMISSIONER TOO ONE NUMBER 21  DASH 8, WHICH EVEN COLD IN THE  CITY OF CHAPTER 82 CONTINUE IN  THE SECOND READING ON AUGUST 6  2024. THANK  >> ALL RIGHT, THANK LOOKING  FOR COMMISSION QUESTIONS ON  THIS COMMISSIONER MC DOUBT,  BETWEEN LINES 85 IN 93, IT  TALKS ABOUT DERELICT VESSELS  AND ABANDONED VESSELS.  >> DON'T RECALL SEEING  ANYTHING DEFINED IN ANY CODES  AS TO WHAT THE DIFFERENTIATION  IS BETWEEN DERELICT VESSELS  AND ABANDONED AND I WAS  WONDERING IF MAYBE STAFF CAN  AND LIKE ME, I KNOW DERELICT  DOES HAVE A REFERENCE TO  FLORIDA STATE STATUTE. BUT I'M  WONDERING WHAT THE DIFFERENCES  BETWEEN DERELICT AND ABANDONED  >> ALL RIGHT LAWRENCE  ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT  SERVICES, YES, THERE IS A  REFERENCE TO STATE STATUTE  THAT THERE ARE A DERELICT  VESSEL IS ABOUT THAT IS IN  DIRECT JUNK. JEAN OR  SUBSTANTIALLY DISMANTLED  CONDITION. VERSUS ABANDONED.  ABANDONED IS  COVERED UNDER.  >> THE.  >> REGULATIONS WHICH ARE  SUBSTANTIALLY AND THE AND THE  SAME CONDITION AS THEY EXIST  AND THE UNIFIED LAND  DEVELOPMENT CODE. SO ABANDONED  VEHICLE. WOULD BE WON THAT HAS  LEFT. ABANDONED AND A  WATERWAY. FOR MORE THAN 72  CONSECUTIVE AS PER THE  DISABLED VEHICLE SECTION  ABOUT. BUT IT'S NOT  NECESSARILY CHANT. OR DAMAGED  CONDITION.  >> WITH THAT DEFINITION OF AN  ABANDONED VEHICLE, HOW IS THAT  DIFFERENT THAN A DISABLED  VEHICLE WHICH IS MORE FOR MORE  THAN 72 CONSECUTIVE HOURS.  >> ABANDONED VEHICLE  >> MAY NOT.  >> THE.  >> DISABLED.  >> IT MAY BE.  >> PERFECTLY CAPABLE OF MOVING  UNDER POWER. SO YOU KNOW NOT  BEING THE ORIGINAL PROPER OF  THIS REGULATION. I THINK THERE  WAS PROBABLY PURPOSE BEHIND  SEGREGATING DISABLED. THEY'RE  ELECT AND A BAND. A SAILBOAT  THAT'S BEEN LEFT. AND NOT  DISABLED, NECESSARILY. IT CAN  STILL MOVE UNDER.  >> SO I'M I'M I'M NOT WHAT  YOU'RE WHAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR  I'M NOT SURE OF THE CURRENT  CODE.  >> AND ANY.  >> WAY SHAPE OR FORM THE FINES  ABANDONED. CALLS.  >> I'M JUST LOOKING FOR  CLARITY ON BECAUSE. IF I HAVE  AN ABANDONED VEHICLE AND IT'S  CONSIDERED ABANDONED AFTER 72  HOURS. IT COULD STILL BE MOVED  IT COULD STILL MOVE UNDER ITS  OWN POWER. A DISABLED VEHICLE  IS MORE FIRST MORE THAN 72  HOURS BUT CAN IT BE.  >> MOVED.  >> SO HOW DOES THE CITY  DIFFERENTIATE IF IT CAN BE  MOVED OR CANNED IF IT'S  ABANDONED OR IF IT'S DISABLED  AND I'M JUST LOOKING FOR  CLARITY ON A COLD THAT I TRUST  US HELPS IT SHOULD HELP.  >> AND CHAPTER 42 ARTICLE 3  THERE IS THE DEFINITION OF  ABANDONED VEHICLE.  >> AFTER 42. THE  ♪ ♪ A REVIEW FOR SECOND.  >> TO I'D LIKE TO JUST CLARIFY  TO GET THAT SOME OF THESE  ORDINANCES THEY'RE NOT A  WHOLESALE REVIEW AND REVISION  OF OUR EXISTING CODES THEY  WERE SIMPLY THESE CHANGES THAT  WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE WERE  SIMPLY TO BRING THEM INTO YOUR  BRING THEM INTO ALIGNMENT WITH  THE NEW ULDC OR SIMPLY TAKE  THE EXISTING REGULATIONS AND  MOVE THEM OUT OF THE ULDC  WHERE THEY BELONGING CITY  CODE. SO IT WASN'T NECESSARILY  A WHOLESALE. REVIEW AND RICK  CRAFTING OF THE EXISTING  ORDINANCES. SO IF THERE IS  LANGUAGE IN SOME OF THESE  ORDINANCES THAT NEEDS TO BE  MODERNIZED CLARIFIED BROUGHT  TO. THAT WOULD BE A SEPARATE  EFFORT. THIS WAS REALLY NARROW  CRAFTING OR IT  >> IF YOU LOOK AT THOSE AND  CREATE THAT EXPLANATION, IT'S  NOT SOMETHING THAT I WAS AWARE  OF ICY UNDERLINE ICU CODE  NUMBER ASK THAT'S WHY I'M  ASKING THESE QUESTIONS BECAUSE  I THOUGHT IT WAS NEW CODE I  WAS TRYING TO UNDERSTAND  THAT'S NICE JUST GETTING IT OR  WITH ABANDONED VESSELS BECAUSE  CITY CODE IS DIFFERENT THAN  ULDC CODE. MAYBE WE SHOULD PUT  A TIME LINE IN THERE THAT SAYS  THAT IT'S ABANDONED AFTER SO  MUCH TIME FOR BECAUSE IT'S NOT  CLEAR. WHERE IS THE ONE ABOVE  IT AND DISABLED VEHICLES IS  >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS TO  NICK. ALL RIGHT ANY PUBLIC  ALRIGHT IMPOSING THIS PORTION  OF THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I'M  LOOKING PROMOTIONAL MAKE MOVED  TO CONTINUE ORDINANCE 2024 IT  28 TO SECOND READINGS WE HAVE  A MOTION MADE TO CONTINUE  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH 20  READING ON AUGUST 6TH MADE BY  VICE MAYOR SOAP AND SECONDED  THAT THING OUT.  >> WE WILL DO OUR VOICE VOTE  VICE MAYOR S NAIR THE LANGDON  YES. COMMISSIONER EMRICH. AND  THAT PASSES TOO SEE IT WEAR.  WE HAVE TO DO DO DONE. THANK  ALL OF THING RIGHT ALL RIGHT  SO WE'RE SKIPPING TO THE END  WHICH IS ITEM 7 PUBLIC COMMENT  CITY CLERK. NONPROFIT'S.  >> WE UNDERSTAND YOU ARE  EXHAUSTED, BUT MEMBERS OF THE  NORTH PARK WAS SUPPORT THE  PORT REPUBLICAN SOME WHO WENT  TO THE MOSQUITO TEST FOR  MEETINGS. WHAT YOU TO KNOW I'M  NOT IN THE CITIZENS EMAILS  WERE READ INTO THE RECORD AS  REQUESTED BY SOME LIKE FORMER  MAYOR VANESSA CARE GOING TO  MAKE THE MEETINGS AND SARASOTA  DURING THE WORK DAY. THE TASK  FORCE DIDN'T ADDRESS STAFFING  LEVELS HIGH THRESHOLD THAT  PREVENTS FRAME FOR OUTBREAKS  AND SAID THEY REVIEWED MONDAY  SHUNS WHICH WAYNE SAID LOOK  THEY DID SO THEY MAYBE THAT  PROVED ON JULY 17TH THE TASK  FORCE REFUSED TO REVIEW ANY  INTERNAL CITIZEN CONCERNS.  THEY SAID IF THEY WERE HIRED  AS CONSULTANTS THEY WOULD HAVE  INVESTIGATED THEM. THEY WON'T  TELL WAY TO RUN HIS DEPARTMENT  AND SAY HE NEEDS TO DEAL WITH  THEM. THEY SENT POWER POINT  SLIDES THAT SAID THE DISTRICT  MET OR EXCEEDED THE  RECOMMENDATIONS IT WILL BE  PRESENTED AT THE COUNTY  COMMISSION AUGUST 27 MEETING  COMMISSIONERS PLEASE GO TO  THAT MEETING WITH THE CITY  MANAGER AND STAFF AND ASKED  THEM. FOLLOW MEMBER ON  GOVERNOR'S RECOMMENDATIONS WAY  TO REFUSE TO ALLOW THEM TO  PARTICIPATE IN THE U.S. WHILE  HE WAS OUT OF STATE, HE ALL  THE RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING  A NEW. MADE A SPECIFIC PEOPLE  LIKE THE DEPARTMENT OF  AGRICULTURE LIAISON, WHOEVER  SEES MISSED MOSQUITO DISTRICTS  IN THE STATE AS THE RIGHT  PERSON TO REVIEW HIGH COUNTY  THRESHOLD NORTH PORT  COMPLAINTS AND HAMMERLY  FACTORS. THIS WAS NOT INCLUDED  WAIT FOR TASK FORCE  CONSIDERATION. THEY DO NOT  MOVE ON TO COMMISSIONER  COMMENTS AND IGNORE LAKE CITY  SENATOR TO MEETINGS CAN AN  UPDATE FROM HIM HIS QUESTIONS  AND CONCERNS WERE ADDRESSED  EITHER WITH THAT CITY  COMMISSIONERS INVOLVEMENT, THE  COUNTY WON'T HEAR US AS THE  TASK FORCE DETERMINED THE  MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT HAS THE  RIGHT TOOLS TO DO ITS JOB. BUT  THEY TO USE THEM IN NORTH PORT  AND NOT TRANSPARENT ABOUT THE  RECOMMENDATION IMPLEMENTATIONS  AND THAT'S THANK YOU.  >> ALL ONTO COMMISSION  COMMISSIONER ELRICH HAVE  ANYTHING. COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL. NO NOTHING OKAY. I  HAVE NOTHING AT THIS TIME  WE'LL BE BACK HERE SOONER  COMMISSIONER I'LL TAKE A PASS  TO NEXT OKAY VICE MAYOR STOKES  I HAVE A LOT LIVES CHARTER  OFFICERS CITY CLERK.  >> CITY ATTORNEY KNOWING THE  THAT THEY ALL RIGHT SO WE WILL  BE BACK HERE AT 09:00AM I  DURING THIS MEETING AT YES YOU  WOULDN'T BUT TEAM.  --------- IS WHAT I NEED TO DO AND.  >> I GET IN MY TRUCK IF I NEED  ANY SUPPLIES PARTS TOOLS BASED  OFF OF THE WORK I WAS GIVEN  THAT MORNING OUT PICK THAT UP  HERE AT OUR SHOP AND THEN I  HEAD OUT IN THEM. MICHAEL FOR  THE DAYS GET AS MUCH WORK AS  THAT WAS ASSIGNED TO DONE AS  POSSIBLE. AND SOMETIMES THAT  HAPPENS AND OTHER TIMES  THERE'S A LOT OF FIRST  RESPONSE CALLS THAT COME IN MY  FAVORITE PART IS THE  UNIQUENESS NOT KNOWING WHAT  I'M GOING TO BE FACED WITH  EVERY DAY. IT COULD BE  DIFFERENT. IT'S NOT MUNDANE IN  ANY WAY.  >> AND IT'S EXCITING WHEN YOU  GET A CALL AND YOU'RE YOU'RE  ON YOUR WAY YOU DON'T KNOW  WHAT IT IS AND YOU YOU HAVE  THE EXPERIENCE AND THE  KNOW-HOW AND THE BACKING TO  FACE WHATEVER IT'S GOING TO BE  SO I FEEL VERY CONFIDENT IN  FACING THESE CALLS AND I THINK  THAT'S WHAT DIFFERENT PART.  >> HI I MALAYNIA THIS IS  ANSWERS WITH ELENA AND I'M  GOING TO ANSWER ALL OF YOUR  FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS.  ♪ TOO MANY PEOPLE HERE WHY  HASN'T THE CITY STOPPED PEOPLE  AND BUSINESSES FROM BUILDING  IN NORTH PORT THE SHORT ANSWER  IS WE CAN'T IF SOMEONE IS HAS  AND THEY COMPLY WITH THE  ZONING AND THE CONFERENCE OF  PLAN  ♪ STATE LAW MANDATES THAT WE  ALLOW THEM TO BUILD. FLORIDA  IS A VERY INTENSIVE PROPERTY  RIGHTS STATE SO WHAT WE CAN DO  IS MAKE SURE THAT THEY COMPLY  WITH ORDINANCES NORTH PORT WAS  ALWAYS EXPECTED TO GROW FROM  ITS INCEPTION WITH ALL OF THE  LOTS LAID-OUT AND SOLD OFF TO  INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNERS.  NORTH PORT WAS EXPECTED TO  HAVE A POPULATION AROUND  270,000 PEOPLE WITH ULDC THAT  WE'RE CURRENTLY WRITING WE  PROJECT THAT THAT NUMBER WILL  FALL ABOUT 250,000 PEOPLE AS  LONG AS SOMEONE IS COMPLYING  WITH OUR CODES THEY ARE  ALLOWED TO BUILD. BUT WE WANT  TO ENSURE THAT THAT BUILDING  THAT THEY DO WILL BE  BENEFICIAL TO THE CITY AND ITS  RESIDENTS. HI I MALAYNIA THIS  IS ANSWERS WITH ELENA AND I'M  GOING TO ANSWER ALL OF YOUR  FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS.  WHY ISN'T THE CITY WORKING TO  BRING IN NEW AND INTERESTING  BUSINESSES WE ARE. MOST LARGER  BUSINESSES ARE LOOKING FOR A  CERTAIN DENSITY FOR POPULATION  AND MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME.  NORTH PORT IS ON THE CUSP OF  HITTING BOTH OF THOSE TARGETS.  ♪ MANY COMPANIES WANT TO SEE A  MEDIAN INCOME OF $75,000 PER  HOUSEHOLD NORTH PORT JUST HIT  78,000 ADDITIONALLY MANY  COMPANIES WANT TO ENSURE THERE  IS AT LEAST A 100,000 PEOPLE  WITHIN A SPECIFIC RADIUS  ♪ OF WHERE THEY'RE LOOKING TO  LOCATE. NORTH PORT. IT'S JUST  UNDER 100,000 AT APPROXIMATELY  93,000 AS OF 2024. SO WE ARE  VERY CLOSE TO THAT  ADDITIONALLY NORTH PORT HAS AN  ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION  THAT IS RECRUITING AND TALKING  WITH BUSINESSES EVERY SINGLE  DAY FOR SMALL BUSINESSES NORTH  PORT LOVES ITS MOM AND POPS WE  HAVE A LOT OF RESTAURANTS THAT  START OUT AS FOOD TRUCKS AND  MANY INTERESTING STORES THAT  STARTED IN SOMEONE'S GARAGE OR  ON THEIR DINING ROOM TABLE WE  ARE VERY BUSINESS FRIENDLY.  AND WE SMART BUSINESSES GROW I  THINK IT AGAIN.  >> ALL MEETING TO ORDER TODAY  IS TUESDAY JULY 23RD 2024 AND  IT IS 10:00AM WE'RE IN THE  CITY CHAMBERS AND A CITY  COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING  ORDER. THIS IS A HYBRID  MEETING THIS PROPERTY HAS  BEEN. THIS MEETING HAS  PROPERLY NOTICED AND WILL BE  CONDUCTED AS A HYBRID MEETING  REQUIRING THE USE OF  COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA  TECHNOLOGY CM KATE, A PHYSICAL  FORM VOTING MEMBERS IS PRESENT  AND CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS,  A HYBRID MEETING ALLOWS VOTING  MEMBERS TO ATTEND AND  PARTICIPATE WITHOUT PHYSICALLY  BEING PRESENT IN THE ROOM  WHERE STORM IS ROLL CALL  MYSELF MAYOR WHITE VICE MAYOR  MISSION ALIGNED IN.  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL, WE HAVE  CITY ATTORNEYS SLAYTON CITY  MANAGER FLETCHER IN THE BACK  WE A POLICE CHIEF GARRISON AND  POLICE CHIEF. TIDE WHY REALLY  APPRECIATE ALWAYS RACING LIKED  SEEING FACT YES IT IS WE WILL  NOW HEAR FROM. COMMISSIONER  EMRICH WITH HIS VIRTUAL  ATTENDANCE STATEMENT. COME ON  >> AS AUTHORIZED BY CITY  COMMISSION POLICY NUMBER 2021  I AM ATTENDING THE HYBRID  MEETING VIA COMMUNICATIONS  MEDIA TECHNOLOGY. EXPERIENCING  A MEDICAL CONDITION INCLUDING  MANY DISABILITIES, PREVENTING  ME FROM ATTENDING THIS MEETING  IN PERSON AT THIS TIME, THANK  >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU  COMMISSIONER, I'M LOOKING FOR  A MOTION TO APPROVE THE USE OF  CMT FOR MEETING.  >> THAT  >> AND WE HAVE A MOTION TO  APPROVE THE USE OF CMT FOR  THIS HYBRID MEETING MADE BY  VICE MAYOR STOKES SECONDED BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON IF  THERE'S NOTHING ELSE WE WILL  DO A VOICE VOTE VICE MAYOR  MAYORS, YES HERE IS THE S  LANGDON IS THAT YES MCDOWELL  NOTE. WE SURE AVERAGE. YES ALL  RIGHT SO THAT PASSES 4 TO 0.  ALSO. 41 FROM ALWAYS SAY THAT  BY COMMISSIONER ALLEN YOU'RE  THE ONE WHO'S GOING TO CATCH  ME WHEN DO THAT ALL THE TIME  WHY DOES.  >> I'M GIVING YOU MORE IT.  PRESENT CARRY CITY CLERK FAST.  AND ABOARD SPECIALIST PARTNER  SITTING UP HERE SO BOTH OF  YOU, I'M GOING TO DEVELOPMENT  DIRECTOR TO LEAD US IN THE  PLEDGE MONDAY.  >> THERE.  >> AND  >> STANDS ONE NATION UNDER  GOD, INDIVISIBLE TO ALL.  >> THANK YOU,  ♪ BEFORE WE MOVE TO BELOVED AND  I JUST WANT DO A FEW  HOUSEKEEPING.  >> THINGS UP SOME THINGS THAT  ARE REALLY IMPORTANT SUCH AS  >> HAHA.  >> KIND OF KNOW WHERE WE'RE  GOING TOWARDS AND ONE WE  SHOULD BREAK OR MAYBE FINISH  SOMETHING SO MAY BE SHOOTING  FROM A THAT SOUND ABOUT BUT  TYPE OF THAT AND 45 MINUTES,  IT'S REQUESTED THAT WE HAVE 45  MINUTE LUNCH. FOR ARE WE DO  HAVE A ROAD AND DRAINAGE  MEETING. AND ANTICIPATING MAY  STILL BE WE WON'T HAVE TO STOP  THIS MEETING HAVE THAT  MEETING.  >> AND THEN.  >> RESUME WITH THIS MEETING  SO.  >> WHAT ARE YOU THINKING IN  TERMS OF HEART STOPPED, I'M  THINKING AND MAY WE HAD THAT 2  O'CLOCK.  >> IN THE MORNING ENDING  MEETING I THINK IT AND THEN WE  GO TILL 8 THEN WE'RE GOING TO  HAVE TO HAVE A SOME TIME A  DINNER BREAK SO WHAT'S YOUR  THOUGHTS.  >> BUT WE JUST PLAYED BY YOUR  MAYORS KIND OF HARD TO TELL  WITH ALL REALLY BIG TICKET  ITEM ON AGENDA, SURE MIND I  THINK WE'RE GOING JUST HAVE TO  PLAY BY YOUR CASE, LET ME PUT  IT OUT THERE THAT WE WILL  CONSIDER THAT THAT WE'RE NOT  GOING GO ALL THE WAY THROUGH  UNTIL FINISHED WITH IT STUFF  IT COMES TO THAT POINT WE  SHOULD MAKE SOME DECISION ADAM  AIR. YES, IT'S ALSO ACCEPTABLE  THAT WE MIGHT DECIDE DEPENDING  WHAT'S LEFT ON THE AGENDA TO  SIMPLY RESCHEDULE THOSE 2  RIGHT THERE OK I JUST WANT  EVERYONE TO BE COGNIZANT OF  THAT THAT THIS MAY GO REALLY  JUST PUSH BECAUSE IT'S NOT  GIVING RESPECT THOSE THOSE  ITEMS.  >> AND WE DO OUR COMMENTS OR  QUESTIONS FROM PARENTS SHOULD  SAY I'D LIKE FOR US  >> TO HAVE 5 MINUTE ROUNDS OF  QUESTIONS OF COMMISSIONERS.  AND FOR PEOPLE IN THE  AUDIENCE. WE DO HAVE COMMENT  CARDS I THINK ARE THEY  ♪ THEY ARE. AND I THINK THERE'S  SOMETHING IN THE LOBBY AS WELL  YOU GO OUTSIDE YOU HAVE TO  COME BACK FOR THAT THE METAL  IF YOU WANT TO SPEAK ON A  SPECIFIC ITEM ON THE AGENDA BE  SURE YOU ULIS THAT ON ME THE  COMIC PART BECAUSE WE'VE HAD  TIMES WHEN PEOPLE CALLED OUT  AND THEY SAID I PUT IN A  COMMENT CARDS BECAUSE HE  DIDN'T LIST THAT SPECIFIC ITEM  SO DO THAT OR GENERAL COMMENTS  THE BEGINNING YOU MAY SPEAK  ABOUT EVERYTHING. ALL OF OUR  PUBLIC COMMENTS TODAY WILL BE  3 MINUTES. PLEASE SILENCE YOUR  PHONES, LET'S CHECK THAT NOW.  TO OF COMES DOWN IF YOU LIKE  SOMETHING OR DON'T LIKE  SOMETHING AGAIN THIS IS REALLY  MAINLY FOR THE BENEFIT OF OUR  CLOSED CAPTION THAT IT TAKES  UP EVERYTHING AND EVEN WHEN I  WAS WATCHING A VIDEO OF SOME  OF OUR MEETINGS THERE WAS  TALKING OVER AND IT WAS REALLY  DIFFICULT TO TO HEAR. WHAT WAS  BEING SAID BECAUSE YOU HEARD  DIFFERENT STATED SO JUST KEEP  THAT IN MIND FROM UP HERE AS  WELL AS THAT'S PEOPLE WANT TO  KNOW WHY IT'S SUPPPOSED OUT  IT'S MERELY FOR THAT. OK AT  THAT EYE MISSED ANYTHING AND  MY LITTLE LIST HERE AND I  THINK WE'RE WE'RE GOOD WITH  THAT FOR NOW ALL RIGHT SO  WE'RE LOOKING FOR APPROVAL OF  THE AGENDA MOVED SECOND. I  MENTIONED COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL TO APPROVE THE AGENDA  AS IT'S BEEN PRESENTED AND  THAT HAS BEEN SECONDED BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON IF  THERE'S NOTHING WILL DO A VOTE  VICE THERE LANKANS YES, THE  COUNTY COMMISSIONER ELRICH.  IDEA WHICH IS. AND NO NOW WE  DO. WHICH THANK YOU OKAY, SO  THAT TOO.  ♪ ♪ RIGHT NOW WE'RE MOVING TO ITEM  2 WHICH IS PUBLIC COMMENT CITY  CLERK.  >> RAN BACK YOU. THINK WAS  DEVELOPED AND SOLD AS A  COMMUNITY OF SINGLE-FAMILY  HOMES CENTERED AROUND MANY  ACTIVITIES PROVIDED WITHIN THE  CIVIC CLUBHOUSE COURSE TENNIS  CENTER AND FULL FITNESS  CENTER. THE DEVELOPER HAS  HIGHLIGHTED THESE FEATURES AND  ALL THE MARKETING USED TO SELL  THE HOMES BUILT NEAR A CREEK.  BOUGHT OUR HOME IN THIS  COMMUNITY SPECIFICALLY FOR THE  LIGHTS ELEMENT AMENITIES  PROVIDED UNDER THE CITY'S  CURRENT MASTER PLAN D RIP  LAMB. THOSE ACTIVITY AREAS ARE  PROTECTED FROM DEVELOPMENT AS  THEY SHOULD THE DEVELOPER  DESIRES TO FURTHER DEVELOP  CURRENTLY PROTECTED LAND. THAT  SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED. THIS  BOARD OBLIGATION AND DUTY IS  TO PROTECT THE RESIDENTS OF  PORT AND APPROXIMATELY 2000  RESIDENTS OF COMMUNITY THEIR  LIFESTYLE AND INVESTMENT BY  ONE TO LEAVING COAST CHANGES  TO ACTIVITY CENTER INCLUDING  THE PROVISION FROM LIMITED  DENSITIES RESTRICT CHANGES TO  THOSE PORTIONS OF ACTIVITY  CENTER 2. TO KEEP THE PLANNED  COMMUNITY DISTRICT DISTRICT  FOR ACTIVITY CENTER TO ALLOW  IT FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL  AS HERE FERGUSON TODAY RATE  CHANGE THE PROPOSED  DESCRIPTIONS OF THE ACTIVITY  CENTER 2 AND A LOW DENSITY  RESIDENTIAL FUTURE LAND USE  MAP LAND DESIGNATIONS INHERENT  BREAK. AND ED GOLF COURSE AND  INTENDED USES CLARIFY THE  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO STATE  THAT IT MUST BE AMENDED IN THE  FUTURE IF THE GOLF COURSE, AND  CLUB PROPERTY IS TO BE  DEVELOPED. I WANT X CREATION  OF BIG DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL  IMPACT DRI THAT OR SHUN OF THE  DRI DESIGNATED FOR HAIR  COUNTRY GOLF COURSE  FACILITIES, JOE RETAIN THE  SAME USE AND 6 MEN THE  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO EXPOSE  SLEEPER HIT RESIDENTIAL OR  OTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE HERON  CREEK GOLF COURSE, BUT IN  2027. PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW HAIR  PICK TO BECOME THE NEXT CAT  TRAIL. SIMPLY ARE THERE  DEVELOPERS POCKETS AT THE  EXPENSE OF THE RESIDENTS. YOU  STARTED. PERSON WE HAVE DAVID  ALL CAN PRESENT AND VALUABLE  AND THERE.  >> GET ME OUT OF THE WAY REAL  QUICK. I'VE LIVED HERE FOR 19  YEARS AND I REALLY DEBATED  COMING HERE TODAY BECAUSE  HONESTLY THE CITY HAS BECOME  SO ON REPRESENTATIVE OF THE  PEOPLE THAT IT'S NOT SEEING IT  MAKES ME SICK.  >> YOU KNOW YOU HAD TIME AND  TIME AGAIN PEOPLE COMING OUT  TELLING COMMISSIONERS WE DON'T  WANT DEVELOPMENT  WARM MINERAL SPRINGS YOU DON'T  WANT TO HOTEL ON KONDO'S WE  DON'T AND YOU GUYS JUST DID  WHAT YOU WANT ACT ON BEHALF OF  PRIVATE. BUSINESS INTERESTS  WHICH IS BASICALLY WHAT  GOVERNMENT SEEMS TO BE GOING  EVERYWHERE AND IT'S WRONG.  IT'S UN-AMERICAN IT'S NOT  REPRESENTATIVE IT'S NOT THE  WAY IT'S SUPPOSED TO WORK. THE  SYSTEM IS BROKEN AND ONE OF  THE WAYS IT PUNISH YOU GUYS DO  A GREAT JOB DISENFRANCHISING  PEOPLE AND YOU HAVE YOUR PR  CAMPAIGNS AND YOU RUN THIS  LIKE SOME TYPE OF COMPANY OF  THE MARKETING DEPARTMENT. IT'S  ALL NONSENSE AND LONG  PROPAGANDA. AND DOESN'T  REPRESENT HARD WORKING PEOPLE  WHO LIVE IN CITY. THE  REFERENDUM IS BEING PROPOSED.  BASICALLY CHANGING THE  CHARTER. NO ONE WOULD HAVE  BEEN AGAINST YOU GUYS SAYING  WELL WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO  BORROW MONEY WHEN THERE'S A  DECLARED EMERGENCY BECAUSE  THERE'S MATCHING FUNDS THAT  WOULD MISS OUT LEAVE IT AT  THAT.  >> EVERYBODY WOULD HAVE SAID  THAT'S COMMON SENSE. TO  BASICALLY SEVERE. THE VOTERS  TO BE ABLE TO BORROW WHATEVER  YOU WANT. WITH THE DEBT  MANAGEMENT POLICY. IS  UNDEMOCRATIC. IT GOES AROUND  THE PEOPLE IT EXCLUDES THE  PEOPLE YET AGAIN AT FROM THE  PROCESS OF THEIR GOVERNMENT  THEIR CITY. I SHOULDN'T HAVE  TO REMIND YOU THAT EVERY  LITTLE THING THAT'S IN THIS  ROOM WAS PAID FOR BY THE  TAXPAYERS MONEY. THIS HAPPEN  FOR YOU TO PLAY GAMES UP THERE  WITH THIS IS THE PEOPLE WHO  LIVED THERE THEIR TAXES FROM  THIS. YOU COULD JUST AFTER  THAT WE NEED TO BE ABLE BORROW  MONEY WHEN THERE'S AN  EMERGENCY BUT INSTEAD KNOW  THAT SEVERE. THE CITY CHARTER  WHY BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR US  TO JUST GO AROUND THE PEOPLE  WHAT THEY WANT WE DON'T HAVE  TO LISTEN TO THEM NOT TO PUT  UP TO A VOTE. IT'S WRONG. IT'S  COMPLETELY WRONG AND EVERYBODY  NEEDS TO REMEMBER THIS AND  EVERYBODY NEEDS TO VOTE IT'S  UP TO THE PEOPLE IN THE CITY  TO TAKE THE GOVERNMENT BACK  FROM THE GOVERNMENT ITSELF  BECAUSE IT'S NOT REPRESENTING  THE PEOPLE. YEARS LAND CHANGES  ARE INCREDIBLY POOR YOU'RE  TAKING SINGLE-FAMILY  NEIGHBORHOODS WHICH USED TO  HAVE SMATTERING NEIGHBORHOOD  COMMERCIAL INTENSITY WHICH IS  ACCEPTABLE A LOT OF PEOPLE  WOULD WANT THAT ON THE END OF  STREET. BUT HEY YOU COULD HAVE  SOME. NOW ALL I WOULD TAKE  HUNDREDS 100'S OF PROBLEMS  RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS MAKE  THEM COMMERCIAL WE INCREASED  NOISE POLLUTION CRIME AND IT  REDUCE QUALITY OF LIFE THAT  WAS GOING TO BE A LEGACY IF  YOU APPROVED THESE CHANGES TO  THE CITY REDUCING THE QUALITY  OF LIFE FOR THE PEOPLE WHO  LIVE IN THE CITY, SO YOU CAN  SELL TO DEVELOPERS.  >> I WAS A PERSON DOWN. THANK  YOU. ROBIN.  >> GOOD I'M THE FIRST ITEM  WOULD BE.  >> THE CONTINUING SAGA WITH  SARASOTA COUNTY MOSQUITO  MANAGEMENT. I'VE PROVIDED YOU  WILL WITHHOLD THAT HAVE SOME  VERY INTERESTING AND MAYBE  POSSIBLE LEGAL ISSUES TO  ADDRESS AND ALSO THE MOSQUITO  MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE. THEIR  CONCERNS AS WELL. SO WHEN YOU  GET AN OPPORTUNITY IF YOU  COULD JUST PLEASE REALLY NEED  IT. AND CONSIDER WHAT'S GOING  ON AT THE POINT WHERE AGAIN  WE'VE BEEN AT THIS POINT WE  HAVE TO DO THAT TAKE THAT.  GOING INTO WHAT WITH ANOTHER.  ALL UNITS UP HOW THE COUNTY  REDICULOUS WHAT'S GOING ON.  THE OTHER ISSUE THAT I'VE BEEN  ASKED BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION  IS WARM MINERAL SPRINGS. AGAIN  I HAVE COME BEFORE YOU GUYS I  DON'T KNOW HOW MANY TIMES SENT  EMAILS. OUTLINING THE  CONTINUED PROBLEMS. THAT ARE  CONTINUING GOING ALL SPEND  IT'S OUT OF CONTROL THE KIDS  STILL TAKEN BOUGHT THE STILL  BRING IN THE BUCKETS TO STILL  CATCHING THE FISH. IT'S STILL  PLAN ON THE THERE'S STILL NO  CHILDREN'S SECTION MIKE WE  USED TO HAVE WHEN I IT AND  EVEN WHEN THERE WAS A  DESIGNATED CHILDREN'S AREA FOR  10 AND UNDER THESE CHILDREN  OFF LOW OVER THE SPRINGS AND  GOING INTO THE DEEP WATER AND  IT'S JUST AN ACCIDENT WAITING  TO HAPPEN. IT'S NO ADULT  SUPERVISION THAT LINE AND  SUNBATHE AND THEN THE KIDS,  JUST WANTING RANT THAT. I MEAN  IT'S OUT OF CONTROL SO I DON'T  WANT TO KEEP COMING UP HERE  THINKING THAT I'M WASTING MY  BREATH. BECAUSE SOMETHING HAS  TO BE DONE. LET'S GO TO NOTICE  LIKE THEY SAID WELL IT'S NOT A  LIFE SAFETY ISSUE. IT'S IT IS  EVERYTHING IN HIS SAFETY ISSUE  AND YOU'RE NOT JUST SUBJECT TO  DOING LIFE SAFETY RULES ON  CONTROL OF THE SPRING ITSELF  TO MAKE SURE THAT THE SPRING  HEALTHY AND IT'S NOT  CONTINUALLY DEGRADED WITH THE  WITH THEM JUST TAKEN MONEY OUT  OF THE BUCKETS AND TAKE IN THE  FISH EVERYTHING IS IS A  BALANCE THAT. SO PLEASE WE  HAVE TO FINALLY PUT THIS TO  REST. I MEAN YOU LOOK AT  SOCIAL MEDIA DO. IT'S STILL  GOING ON THE SAME EXACT ISSUES  STILL GOING SO WHAT IS IT  GOING TO TAKE FOR THIS TO  FINALLY BE ADDRESSED. WHAT IS  IT GOING TO TAKE. THAT'S MY  MAJOR CONCERN THIS MOSQUITO  MANAGEMENT AND WARM MINERAL  SPRINGS, AND THEN I'LL BE  SEEING A LOT LATER. THANK YOU.  THANK YOU ROBIN. MISTER  OLANDER.  >> YOU  >> GOOD I'M BOBBY ON THAT AT  ALL AND THAT K'S VIEW CASE. I  I THOUGHT IT A CASE A YEAR  ANOTHER CORPORATION. I PEACE  AND I GREEN ABOUT STEPPING ME  LIKE ONE. WHY THAT DO YOU  REMOVE THAT TOOL THAT OFF MY  BACK. YOU INSANE THING GOING.  YOU ARE SO BRING YOU'VE ME  THEY THINK THE THINK TEA. YOU  HAVE GOT NO CONSENT TO DO IT  YOU HAVE DOING. I'M YOUR BEST  SEEING 20 TO 23. IMPORTANT AGE  40 WITHOUT FORENSICS. ALTHOUGH  STATE THAT TO FACT THAT MAN IS  BETTING CAMERA. I WASN'T BUT A  THAT WAS AND PROVIDE THAT FOR  PROJECT ONLY CITY WEBSITE AND  COULD NOT FIND COAST ANYWAY. I  WAS SHE GOT AMERICAN EXCHANGE  THE DAYS THAT I DO THAT I WILL  BE I TO BE BOBBIES ABOUT ONE  THAT I SAID ALSO THAT DOWN THE  BACK I'M GONNA LOVE IS ABOUT  $0.80. DOESN'T THEN DO YOU  HAVE DIFFERENT BOXES THAT IS  NO NEED FOR AN ROBOT ARM. THAT  SHOULD BE NOW IN 2020 AL.  BECAUSE OF PAGE 19 BOTH WHAT  WE SAY IT SHOWED THE CITY MET  POSITION IS FROM PREVIOUS  WRIGHT SAID THE NEW AND MIDDLE  THAT IS THAT A NEW ELECTION  SPENDING. FACE GOING WANT TO  GO THE CITY GOVERNMENT FUNDS.  POURED THAT COMBINED  171 MILLION THAT OF 16 MILLION  YEAR. WHAT ARE YOU LIVING  SEGMENT AMEND IT. PEOPLE FOR A  MOMENT YOU SEEING MINUTES  EVERY THESE 2, BUT 3. LIKE  MANAGER AT IT TRY TO BECOME A  THING HE WAS LIKE THEY SHOULD  WHO CONTROL THE MONEY ASKING  PEOPLE OR MOTION WAS.  ♪ SEE YOU NEXT  ♪ SHE LETS ACTUAL BALLOT WITH  THE DETAILS. THAT WAS NOT  WARM. WE'VE ME ABOUT VISION OF  ISLAM WAS IS ENOUGH. MANAGED  COMMIT ON  >> SEEING SAID SHE 76.  >> COME HIM AND IT WORTH. BY  THAT ROBERT L.  >> LOOK BACK AND KATHLEEN, I'M  NOT. THANK YOU MADAM MAYOR  MISTER VICE MAYOR  COMMISSIONERS. I'M AND LOVE  THAT. I'M THE ATTORNEY FOR  FREE COMMUNITY, A CERTAIN AGE.  ABOUT THE TOOTH OUT OF YOUR  RESIDENTS AND MANY AND I'M  HERE TODAY WILL BE HERE LATER  PUBLIC HEARINGS TO SIMPLY ASK  YOU. YEAH ERIN CREEK A CHANCE.  THE PEOPLE ARE CONCERNED THAT  WHEN THE DEVELOPED A IMPACT  THEIR COMMUNITY EXPIRES THE  DEVELOPER WOULD BE ABLE TO  DEVELOP THE GOLF COURSE FOR  RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR  OTHERWISE. STAFF DENIES THAT  BUT THEY GET THE POINT THAT  ANYTHING IN THE COMPREHENSIVE  PLAN TODAY THAT WOULD DO WHAT  THEY SAY. I'VE BEEN A LAND USE  ATTORNEY AS WELL AS AN H.O.A.  ATTORNEY FOR MANY DECADES. AND  I HAVE BIKE YOU ATTEMPTED TO  SPEAK TO IT CUT OFF BECAUSE OF  THE INADEQUATE THAT THE ONE  THING THAT PROTECTS THEM TODAY  IS THE PROVISION IN THE  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT ALLOWS  AND ACTUALLY DIRECTS THIS AREA  APPARENTLY TO BE A PLANNED  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. IF THAT  WOULD BE REPEALED BY THIS. AT  THE BEHEST OF STAFF WHO SHOW  TIME AND TIME AGAIN. THE  DEVELOPER AS OPPOSED TO THE  PEOPLE OF PERRY CREEK. AND LET  ME SUGGEST TO YOU THAT YOU ARE  VIOLATING. SEVERAL STATUTES,  INCLUDING ONE 63 3 A 1, THAT  REQUIRES CONSIDERATION.  RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS  AND MEANINGFUL PUBLIC  PARTICIPATION AND I THOUGHT WE  HAD TO PLAN AND AS WELL AS THE  STATURE REQUIRE REASONABLE  OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD  FAMILY. AND I 28TH. STAFF PUT  ON YOUR AGENDA. WAIT ON YOUR  AGENDA, SO IT DIDN'T COME OUT  UNTIL AFTER MIDNIGHT.  TRANSMITTAL HEARING. THE  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SO A LOT  OF PEOPLE FROM HERE IN CREEK  HAD TO LEAVE. YOU ARE TIRED.  YOU WEREN'T UP FOR ANY  CONSIDERATION OF THE POINTS  ARE ATTEMPTING TO BAKE.  CERTAINLY NOT TO GIVE CREEK  ATTORNEY MORE THAN A VERY 3  MINUTES. GOING TO THE MANY  POINTS OF THE ISSUE OF THE  DOCKET. AND YOU WROTE IT. WE  THOUGHT BECAUSE WE ASKED YOU  TO FOR A CONTINUANCE. OF TRANS  MILL. IT WILL LATER AND STATED  THAT I LISTENED TO THE TAPE  THAT MAYOR AND THAT'S WHAT  YOU. BUT A PRO. AND THAT  VIOLATES STATE LAW SITE IF YOU  WANT TO E-MAIL MANY OF READ  THEM. THAT'S EXPLICITLY  REQUIRES A VOTE A MAJORITY  VOTE OF THE COMMISSIONERS  PRESENT. THE VOTE FAVOR OF  TRANSMITTAL. AND YOU DID NOT.  INSTEAD WE THOUGHT WE HAD TO  COMPLETELY ONCE WE WERE ASKING  FOR. SO WE DID A DOUBLE DOUBT  THAT WE HAVE ANOTHER CHANCE  FOR THE TRANSMITTAL HEARING  HOPEFULLY MEANINGFUL PUBLIC  PARTICIPATION IS REQUIRED BY  STATUTE. WHEN YOUR STAFF  PULLED THE STATE FASTLY THAT  YOU VOTED FOR TRANSMITTAL. WE  ASKED FOR A CONTINUANCE.  >> OF THOSE TODAY SHOW CAN DO  WITH THE STATE REQUIRES AND  GOOD PUBLIC POLICY MANDATES.  AND GIVEN OPPORTUNITY TO TRULY  CONSIDER THE PEOPLE OF COLOR.  I DO THANK YOU. AND THEN THIS  CAPTAIN KHAN  >> WE WILL MOVE INTO  HERON CREEK 14 YEARS AGO WE  LIKED THE SMALL CITY FEEL OF  PORT. I WENT TO A  COMMISSIONERS MEETING IN THE  FALL AND ONE OF THE  COMMISSIONERS READING ABOUT  THE FACT THAT WE ARE THE  SECOND FASTEST GROWING CITY.  THE UNITED STATES. I WASN'T  THRILLED WITH THAT. THEN  ANOTHER COMMISSIONER. POINTED  OUT THAT. THE APPRAISAL ON OUR  HOUSES HAD INCREASED  DRAMATICALLY. I DON'T FEEL TOO  MUCH BENEFIT FROM THAT BECAUSE  I INTEND TO STAY IN PORT UNTIL  I CAN'T ANYMORE. CHILDREN  MIGHT BENEFIT FROM THAT WHEN  THEY SELL OUR HOUSE BUT WE  DON'T. I FELT THAT HIGHER  PRAISE UL ONE PARTICULAR.  RESPONSIBILITY AND THAT WAS TO  PAY HIGHER TAXES. NOW. I FIND  HEADLINE IN THE LOCAL  SINCE NORTH PORT HAS A 7  FASTEST RISING PROPERTY PRICES  IN THE NATION. I DON'T  CONSIDER THAT A GREAT BENEFIT.  I KNOW I'VE BEEN SEVERAL OF  THE MEETINGS WHERE YOU TALKED  ABOUT THE RATIO BETWEEN  RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL.  AND THAT HAVING MORE  COMMERCIAL. MORE BUSINESSES  WOULD HELP US TO KEEP THE  TAXES  UNDER CONTROL. BUT WHAT I SEE  IS JUST CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT  FOR RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY.  AND I JUST WONDER AT WHAT  POINT ARE WE GOING TO STOP  FILLING EVERY. EVERY LITTLE  SPACE IN OUR CITY WITH MORE  RESIDENTIAL LIKE THE NEW NEW  COMMUNITY AROUND TOLEDO BLADE.  I THINK WE REALLY HAVE TO LOOK  AT THOSE TAXES BECAUSE I KNOW  A LOT OF PEOPLE. THIS WAS  GOING TO BE GREAT BENEFIT TO  BE ABLE TO LIVE HERE WITH  SLIGHTLY LOWER TAXES. I JUST  WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT I WAS  CONCERNED WHO DID RIGHT  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL AND I  NEVER SENT A LETTER BACK IN  THE FALL AND I SHOULD HAVE AND  I JUST THINK IT'S SOMETHING  THAT YOU HAVE TO KEEP AN EYE  ON BECAUSE DEVELOPMENT JUST  SEEMS TO BE HELPING OUT THE  BIG BUSINESS PEOPLE AND NOT  THE REGULAR RESIDENTIAL. ALL  RIGHT MOVING ON TO ITEM 3  ANNOUNCEMENTS CITY CLERK. THE  CURRENT VACANCIES FOR THE  FOLLOWING BOARDS AND  COMMITTEES INCLUDE OUR  ADVISORY BOARD SIT ON IT OR  SELECTION COMMITTEE CHARTER  REVIEW ADVISORY BOARD CITIZENS  TAX OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.  >> ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY  BOARD HISTORIC AND CULTURAL  ADVISORY BOARD POLICE OFFICERS  PENSION TRUST ON BOARD OF  TRUSTEES ARTS AND RECREATION  ADVISORY BOARD PLANNING AND  ZONING ADVISORY BOARD THAT AND  SPARKED BY COMMITTEE AND  ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS  SARASOTA COUNTY ADVISORY  COUNCIL VACANCIES INCLUDE ONE  RESIDENT, RESIDENT OF NORTH  PORT TO SERVE ON THE CITIZEN  ADVISORY COMMITTEE. ONE  RESIDENT OF NORTH 47 THE  CITIZENS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE  FOR SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING  AND ONE RESIDENT OF NORTH PORT  TO SERVE ON THE PARK'S  ADVISORY AND RECREATION  COUNCIL IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE  MORE INFORMATION PLEASE SEE  THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE THANK  YOU.  >> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.  MOVING ON TO THE CONSENT  AGENDA ITEM FOR CITY MANAGER  HAVE ANY ITEMS BEEN PULLED FOR  DISCUSSION.  >> WHERE YOU EAT 1, 5, I DON'T  H. WHICH DASHED WHEN GROW.  ITEM 24 YOU MAKE MOTION THERE  GO AHEAD.  >> MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE  THE CONSENT AGENDA AS  PRESENTED PULLING ITEM FOR  DEAN. 4 H AND FOR EYE FOR  DISCUSSION. SECOND.  >> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL THE  CONSENT AGENDA, HAULING ITEMS  D ISN'T DAVID H AND I  DISCUSSION THAT WAS SECONDED  BY COMMISSIONER.  >> NOTHING A LACE.  >> VICE MAYOR THERE'S YES  MAYOR ZS COMMISSIONER LANGDON  MCDOWELL'S COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE URGES THE THAT PASSES  ITEMS AND CITY MANAGER. HOLD  WHAT.  >> FIRST ITEM FOR BEING IT IS  YOU WANT I BUT COMMISSIONER  WITHOUT OK WITHOUT TAKEAWAY I  YES, THE REASON THIS ITEM IS  BECAUSE I HAD A COUPLE  UNFORTUNATELY I HAVE NOT  RECEIVED A RESPONSE MY BIGGEST  QUESTION HAD TO DO WITH THE  FINANCIAL IMPACT. STATE AND  THAT THERE'S 4 MILLION DOLLARS  THAT WE CHANGED FOR THIS  CITY'S CONTRIBUTION FOR THIS  GRANT. AND MY QUESTION WAS  WHERE DID THAT MONEY COME  FROM.  >> RECORD BELLERIVE NOGALES  KEEPING ITS DIVISION MANAGER  WE DISCOVERED THAT THERE IS A  SCRIVENER'S ERROR IN THE  FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT THE  DESCRIPTION THAT WITH. UP HIGH  GRANT ITS OK CAN'T CALL THEY  BE UP GET THE CORRECT PERMITS  SHOULD BE THE  >> MICHAEL FOR PUBLIC WORKS.  FALLS INTO THAT. I LIKE TO  READ IN THE CORRECT FOR THAT.  I WAS FIRST. AS READ THE WHOLE  THING HOW IT SHOULD THAT'S  OKAY.  >> THE TOTAL PROJECT COST IS  ESTIMATED AT  14 MILLION 314 THOUSAND  DOLLARS. BUT THE DESIGN THE  CONSTRUCTION OF THE BRIDGE.  THIS PROJECT OUR CIP ARE 25  MCB. THE WORD FROM THE GRANT.  IT'S 10 MILLION 314 THOUSAND  DOLLARS. MATCHING FUNDING  4 MILLION DOLLARS WILL BE  PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF  PUBLIC WORKS ROAD AND DRAINAGE  DISTRICT. COUNT NUMBER US FUND  IS 1, 0, 7, DASH 5, 0, 0, 0,  5, 4, 1, GOT 6, 3, 0, 0, AND  THE APPROPRIATE BUDGET IN  PLACE FOR THESE EXPENSES. I  PART ARE CALLED USUAL.  >> I THINK ARE ON THAT AND  THEN FALL, GO AHEAD. THANK YOU  FOR THAT EXPLANATION, 4. COULD  YOU JUST REAL QUICK WHAT IS  THAT ACCOUNT NUMBERS AND I  DON'T HAVE MY BEACH TO YOUR  THE BUDGET TALKS WITH DOES  THAT ACCOUNT NUMBER 1, 0, 7,  5, 0, 0, 0, 4, 1,  >> THE 6300 COUNT THEIR  CAPITAL ACCOUNT.  >> SO MONEY IS COMING FROM  CAPITAL EXPENDITURES. START IS  ITS RANGE RANGE, 27. AND SO WE  USE THE WORD AND DRAINAGE  FUNDS TO PAY FOR THE 4 MILLION  IT HAS THANK YOU VERY MUCH AND  PAY SCREENERS HAVE BEEN NO BIG  DEAL I APPRECIATE YOU OWN  EXPLAINING WHERE HOW THEY SAID  BEING VIOLENCE. THANK YOU FOR  MAYOR I HAVE NO FURTHER  QUESTIONS ALL RIGHT. THANK  YOU. ALL MOVING ON ITEM MOTION  TO ACCEPT WANT DO THAT.  >> MAKE A MOTION TO AMEND THE  APPLICATION FOR RESILIENT SRQ  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK  GRANT. DISASTER RECOVERY  PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF  10 MILLION 314 1000 DOLLARS  THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE  MYAKKA HACHI BRIDGE OVER THEM.  BASEBALL. SECOND.  >> ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION  MADE BY COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL  TO ITEM 24 DASH 0, 8, 1, 5,  AMENDMENT OF THE APPLICATION  TO THE RESILIENT SRQ COMMUNITY  DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT  DISASTER RECOVERY PROGRAM IN  THE AMOUNT OF TIME  1 MILLION 314 THOUSAND DOLLARS  FOR  ♪ THE RECONSTRUCTION. OF THE  MYAKKA HACHI CREEK BRIDGE OVER  PRICE BOULEVARD AND THAT WAS  SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR IF  THERE'S NOTHING TO DO A I MAY  REPLACE MAYORS, YES, THERE'S  YES,  ♪ YES.  >> TELL US THIS AVERAGE. YES  ALL RIGHT SO THAT PASSES 5 TO  0. I SORRY. NEXT ITEM IS ITEM  H. I GUESS I CAN ANNOUNCE THIS  MYSELF CITY MANAGER BECAUSE I  PULL THIS IF YOU THAT. ALL  RIGHT I PULL ITEM AGE.  >> BECAUSE AS AN UNPAID BOARD  MEMBER OF THE NONPROFIT GROUP  PEOPLE FOR TREES I WILL BE  ABSTAINING FROM THIS FOE.  CONSENT ITEM H 24 DASH 0, 9,  3, 0, REGARDING THE GRANT FROM  THE SPECIAL EVENT ASSISTANCE  PROGRAM. REGARDS TO THE 13TH  ANNUAL TOUR DE NORTH PORT  BICYCLE RIDE THAT WILL OVER 20  >> MOTION NO QUESTIONS OR  CONCERNS. MAKE A MOTION TO  APPROVE THE FROM THE  SPECIALIST EVENT YOU NEED TO  PASS DO. I MAKE A MOTION IF  THAT'S OKAY WITH YOU  VICE-MAYOR IT IS MAKE A MOTION  TO APPROVE SPECIAL ASSISTANCE  FUNDS FOR THE PEOPLE FOR TREES  IN SUPPORT OF THE TOUR PORT TO  BE HELD ON OCTOBER 20TH 2024  AND THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED  $500. SECOND.  >> WE HAVE A THERE'S NOTHING  ELSE TO HAVE A LOW WITH THE  MAYOR ABSTAINING. MISTER BELL.  >> MCDOWELL, YES. STILL LINE  THEM AS A YES.  >> THE STORM  >> I MEAN YES.  >> VICE MAYOR SO YES, HERO.  YES, ALL RIGHT.  >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. VICE  MAYOR. MOVING ON TO ITEM I  CITY MANAGER WHO PULLED THIS  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL WAY.  >> SO I SENT AN EMAIL ASKING  QUESTIONS ABOUT PROJECT THE  PROJECT IN QUESTION IS THE  HILLSBOROUGH CRANBERRY.  INTERSECTION DESIGN  IMPROVEMENTS. STAFF DID ANSWER  ALL MY QUESTIONS, HOWEVER,  THIS IS A VERY LARGE PROJECT  THAT IS OF GREAT INTEREST TO  THE CITIZEN. SO I'M ASKING  STAFF TO PLEASE PROVIDE. THE  CITIZENS UPDATE ON THIS  PROJECT.  >> IT'S BIG PUBLIC WORKS  DIRECTOR. CRIMINALS BUREAU  BOULEVARD ROUNDABOUT IS  CURRENTLY A 100% DESIGN PLANS  HIS PLANS WERE RECEIVED IN  APRIL OF 2024 WERE SUBMITTED  TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT  TRANSPORTATION TO OBTAIN RIGHT  AWAY PERMIT TO ALLOW THE WORK  TO COMMENCE. THIS PERMIT IS TO  WORK IS BEING COMPLETED WITHIN  THE U.S. 41 RIGHT OF WAY. I  RESPONDED WITH A REQUIREMENT  THAT THE LIGHTING EVALUATED.  ADDITIONAL LIGHTING BE  PROVIDED TO MAINTAIN STATES  LIMITS CRITERIA ON US 41.  REGARDING THE PROJECT SCHEDULE  ON THE APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT  TO THE DESIGN CONSULTANT HAS  STATED ARE LIGHTING DESIGN  PROCESS WITH THE ESTIMATE TO  TAKE ONE MONTH FROM THOSE  PERCEIVED. F DOT RECENTLY  GOAL. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE  FDOT PERMITTING MAY IMPACT  TIMELINE. AND WE'RE ASSUMING  ONE ROUND OF COMMENTS BASED ON  THIS RESPONSE IF THAT REVIEW  AND COMMENTS WILL DICTATE THE  REST OF THE DESIGN SCHEDULE,  HOWEVER THOUGHT EXCEPT THE  CHANGES WITHOUT ANY MAJOR  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. IT WAS  EXPECTED THAT THE CITY WILL  HAVE. ALL CONSTRUCTION  DOCUMENTS SUCH AS PLANS  PERMITS AND SPECIFICATIONS  WITHIN MONTHS. SO THAT PUTS A  SEPTEMBER OCTOBER OF 24.  CONTRACT TIME WITH KIMLEY-HORN  IS REQUESTED TO BE EXTENDED  THROUGH DECEMBER 2024 TO ALLOW  SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE BIDDING  PROCESS IN CASE ANY QUESTIONS  OR DISCREPANCIES RISE NEED  RESPONSE CITY CHARLOTTE COUNTY  ARE SIMULTANEOUSLY WORKING TO  ACQUIRE THE LAND AND EASEMENTS  REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION  PROJECT REQUIRES POSITION OF  PORTIONS OF 2 PARCELS  TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION  EASEMENTS FROM 4 PARCELS AND A  PERMANENT EASEMENT FROM ONE  PARCEL. AT THIS TIME THE  PERMANENT EASEMENT AND ONE  TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION  EASEMENT HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED  REST OF THE ACQUISITIONS HUGE.  >> I APPRECIATE THAT ATTRACTED  A LOT QUESTIONS ON IT AND NO  CENTERED THIS VERY CLOSELY,  ESPECIALLY WITH ALL  DEVELOPMENT IN THAT GENERAL  AREA. SO I DO APPRECIATE YOU  TAKING THE TIME TO EXPLAIN TO  EVERYBODY FINAL ACTION.  THERE'S NO OTHER MAKE MOTION  NOT JUST JUST A COMMENT WE DID  GET THAT IN THE MAIL CORRECT  PRINTED THAT OUT.  >> WRECKED YET AND I DID THAT  SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE THERE'S A  LOT TOO. SO I HAVE THAT SOME  PEOPLE LIKE THIS THAT HAVE  BEEN ASKING HER TO THANKS FOR  DOING THAT.  >> WHILE WE RECEIVED MEMO THEY  WERE GOING TO REMEMBER  EVERYTHING SPEAKS IF YOU CAN  PRINT IT OUT OF PARK MAKE A  MOTION MAKE A MOTION TO  APPROVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT  TO THE AGREEMENT NUMBER 2, 0,  2, ONE DASH FOR ONE FOR  PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING  SERVICES FOR THE CRANBERRY  HILLSBOROUGH DOUBLE  INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS.  WITH KENLEY LINING IN THE  AMOUNT OF $20,615 SECOND.  >> ALL RIGHT WE DO HAVE A  MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL FOR ITEM I 24 DASH 0,  9, 3, 1, TO APPROVE THE SECOND  AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT NUMBER  2021 41 PROFESSIONAL  ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR  CRANBERRY BOULEVARD. HILLSBORO  BOULEVARD INTERSECTION  IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN PERMITTING  FOR LIGHTING DESIGN  MODIFICATIONS TO SCOPE AND  PRICE WITH HIM MORNE AND  ASSOCIATES.  >> AND THE AMOUNT OF $20,615  THAT WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL AND SECONDED BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON IS  NOTHING REALLY BOAT.  >> VICE MAYOR THERE'S THE S  MISSION ALIGNED ANY MCDOWELL,  COMMISSIONER EVERAGE.  >> YES ALL RIGHT THAT PASSES 5  TO  >> SO.  ♪ THINK WE ACTUALLY WENT TO A  DOUBLE AND ON FRONT OF GENDER  AND THROUGH THE ENTIRE  ALPHABET IN THE LAST ONE  ♪ A OKAY. ITEM.  >> PUBLIC HEARING SET IN.  ORDINANCES FIRST READING. 2,  0, 2, 4, DASH 2, 5, THIS IS A  QUASI JUDICIAL HEARING. AND  I'M GOING TO ASK FOR A MOTION  TO DIRECT THE CITY CLERK TO  READ THIS BY TITLE ONLY WE DO  HAVE A MOTION MADE BY VICE  MAYOR STEPS AND SECONDED BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON FOR THE  CITY CLERK TO READ THIS BY  TITLE ONLY. SO WE'LL GET A  VOICE.  >> VICE MAYOR VICE MAYOR ZS  LINED SAY YES WS MISSION OR  AVERAGE.  >> YES ALL RIGHT SO THAT  PASSES 5, 0, CITY CLERK TAKE  IT AWAY.  >> WE'RE NUMBER 2024 DASH 25  AND ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT FLORIDA REZONING  APPROXIMATELY 27.7 8, 1, 6  ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF  SOUTH TAMIAMI TRAIL US 41  PARKWAY SECTION 3233 TOWNSHIP  39 SOUTH RANGE, 20 LEAST OF  SARASOTA COUNTY FURTHER  DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT NUMBER  AND OFFICIAL RECORDS OF  SARASOTA COUNTY FROM NO ZONING  DESIGNATION DISTRICT NZD  CLASSIFICATION TO VILLAGE B  OCCASION AMENDING THE OFFICIAL  ZONING FOR FINDINGS PROVIDING  THE FILE OF CREW FILING OF  APPROVED DOCUMENTS PROVIDING  FOR SEVERABILITY BIDEN FOR  COMPLEX PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE  DATE. EVERYONE WISHING TO  PROVIDE TESTIMONY STAND RAISE  YOUR RIGHT HAND. SWEAR OR  AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY  YOU'RE ABOUT TO PROVIDE US TO  AN ACCURATE TO THE BEST YOUR  KNOWLEDGE SO HELP YOU THANK  YOU. ALL RIGHT.  >> AND NOW WE'RE MOVING ON TO  DISCLOSURE OF EX PARTE  COMMUNICATIONS VICE MAYOR.  >> YES, A BAD NUMBER OF  MEETINGS BACK AND HOSPITAL AS  WELL DISTRICT REGARDING  SPECIFICALLY TO UNDERSTAND  TOO. DESIGNATION FORD'S  PREVIOUSLY UNDESIGNATED PARCEL  AND IT'S GOING TO WHERE  HOSPITALS BILL.  >> ALL RIGHT YES, MEETINGS I  THINK BOTH FRIEND. REGARDING  THE HOSPITAL. PLANS TO COME TO  THIS PARCEL OF LAND.  >> MADAM MAYOR, I ALSO HAD A  MEETING WITH HOSPITAL  REPRESENTATIVES AND THE 2  BONES REGARDING THIS REZONING.  >> ON MAYOR I HAD A MEETING IN  BOONE AND SARASOTA A MEMORIAL  REPRESENTATIVES ON MAY 13. ON  JULY 16TH, I ALSO HAD ANOTHER  MEETING WITH BOARD MEMBER AND  SARASOTA MEMORIAL  REPRESENTATIVES. AND WE  DISCUSS REASONS.  >> ALL RIGHT COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE AND THE TO DISCLOSE.  >> I HAVE THE SAME MEETING WAS  BUILDING AND BUILDING AND THE  HOSPITAL ASSOCIATES REGARDING  THIS PROPOSAL.  >> ALL RIGHT MOVING ON CITY  AGGRIEVED PARTIES OR NOT. MAY  PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT.  20 MINUTES.  >> GOOD MORNING FOR THE RECORD  MY NAME IS JACKSON ATTORNEY  WITH THE LAW FIRM AGENT FOR  THE APPLICANT AND PROPERTY  OWNER SIR CITY COUNTY PUBLIC  HOSPITAL DISTRICT ALSO KNOWN  AS AZZAM AGE.  ♪ ♪ WE HAVE FOR YOU RIGHT NOW THE  REZONING I'M JOINED HERE AS  WELL BY TOM HERE AGO CHAIR  ROUSH NEARLY GOT RICHMOND, H  STEVE JACKSON AND STACY WHITE  WITH FLAT ARCHITECTS. CHRIS  WILL AVOID STANTEC MATT  GILBERT WITH FARM BAR IN  JEOPARDY WITH BEING  ESSENTIALLY THE PROJECT FOR  THE SITE. OUR REQUEST BEFORE  YOU IS A VERY STRAIGHTFORWARD  IF I COULD HAVE THE OVERHEAD  FROM A POWER POINT PLEASE. WE  AS A THE CITY CLERK MENTIONED  IN THE TITLE ORDINANCE WE HAVE  ESSENTIALLY 40 ACRE PARCEL. IT  LOOK AT IT WITHIN WON'T PARK  IT'S LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE  OF US 41 IMMEDIATELY EAST OF  WEST VILLAGES PARKWAY JUST  NORTH OF THE STATE COLLEGE OF  FLORIDA CAMPUS. ESSENTIALLY  IT'S SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF  WHAT IS THE WEST VILLAGES  PARKWAY AND US 41 INTERSECTION  THE PROPERTY HAS A FUTURE LAND  USE DESIGNATION OF VILLAGE IS  HAD THAT FUTURE LAND USE  DESIGNATION OF VILLAGE SINCE  2004. HOWEVER IT HAS HAD  ZONING DESIGNATION OF NO  ZONING DESIGNATION. SMH WHO  ACQUIRED THE PROPERTY IN 2015  IS NOW READY TO MOVE FORWARD  WITH OBTAINING ENTITLEMENTS ON  THE PROPERTY TO ALLOW FOR  FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TO TAKE  PLACE HOWEVER DUE TO THE NZD  ZONING DESIGNATION ON THE  PROPERTY. THE FIRST STEP IN  THIS PROCESS IS TO PLACE A  CITY ZONING DISTRICT ON THE  PARCEL. THE VILLAGE ZONING  DESIGNATION WE'RE REQUESTING  IS CONSISTENT WITH THE VILLAGE  FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION AS  WELL AS THE SURROUNDING WELLEN  PARK AREA WHICH HAS BEEN  PLANNED UNDER THE FIELD  REGULATORY SCHEME. STAFF HAS  REVIEWED THIS REZONING FOR  CONSISTENCY WITH A  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN  COMPLIANCE WITH THE ULDC AND  HAS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. HERE  IS THE THIS IS A CITY ZONING  AS CITY OF NORTH PORT ZONING  MAP. CAN SEE MY CURSOR WE ARE  HATCHED PARCEL RIGHT THERE,  HATCH IS IS PUT ON THE ZONING  MAP FOR THE NEW ZONING  DESIGNATION SO I'M SAYING  WE'RE THE HOLE IN THE DOUGHNUT  WOULD BE INCORRECT OR EVEN  SMALLER THAN THE WHOLE OF THE  DOUGHNUT BUT AS YOU CAN SEE  THE VILLAGE ZONING THE  PROPERTY INTO SYSTEM OF THE  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WE HAVE  THE REQUEST TO REZONE TO  VILLAGE. WE ARE CONSISTENT A  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WE'RE  COMPLYING WITH THE ULDC  INCLUDING THE SECTION ONE 12  CRITERIA. AND WE RESPECTFULLY  REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL. THANK  YOU.  >> OK THANK YOU MOVING ON THE  PRESENTATION BY STAFF. YOU  HAVE 20 MINUTES YOU. JUST  SEEING THE SHARING. AND TO SEE  2 COMMISSIONERS. THANK YOU.  >> GOOD MORNING FOR THE RECORD  MY NAME IS SHERRY WILL ACT ON  DONE AND I HAVE BEEN POINT. I  AM PLAN OR 3 THE PLANNING AND  ZONING DIVISION OF THE CITY OF  PORT. THE PETITION BEFORE YOU  IS THE SARASOTA MEMORIAL  HOSPITAL. SMH OUT WILLING PARK  REZONE PETITION NUMBER IS 24  DASH 0, 7, 9, UNDER THE  ACCOMPANYING ORDINANCE NUMBER  2024 25. AND AS YOU CAN SEE ON  THE SCREEN IN PURPLE IS THE  LOCATION AND AND THE AREA OF  THE REZONE PROPERTY. APPLICANT  IS JACKSON FOOD ESQUIRE AND  THE PROPERTY OWNER IS THE  SARASOTA COUNTY PUBLIC  HOSPITAL DISTRICT. AND THEN  STATED THE CONSIDERATION TO  REZONE 27.7 8, 1, 6, ACRES. NO  ZONING DESIGNATION SUFFOCATION  TO VILLAGE THE CLASSIFICATION  AS STATED PREVIOUSLY THE  LOCATION IS SOUTH JOINING US  41 TAMIAMI TRAIL AND TO THE  EAST ENJOYING SOUTH WEST  VILLAGES PARKWAY. LITTLE BIT  OF BACKGROUND HISTORY. THE  SUBJECT PROPERTY WAS ANNEXED  INTO THE CITY OCTOBER 30TH  2000 UNDER ORDINANCE 2000 DASH  AS PART OF THE TAYLOR RANCH  ANNEXATION POPPY HAS TO PLAN  AMENDMENTS EPA 0, 2, 83  AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE  TO VILLAGE WAS ADOPTED BY THE  CITY COMMISSION ON MARCH 22ND.  2004 I ORDINANCE 0, 3, 2, 8,  THIS REZONE PETITION. WELL, A  SIGN A CITY OF NORTH PORT  ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATION TO  COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF NORTH  PORT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE  LAND USE MAP. REZONE  ORDINANCES ADOPTED WILL  PREPARE THE NEXT STEPS FOR THE  DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE. AND  THE CURRENT LAND CHILEAN USES  VILLAGE IT'S NO ZONING IT'S  CURRENTLY VACANT PROPERTY.  THIS PROPERTY HAS DESIGNATED  AS THE FUTURE SITE WITH THE  SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL. IN  ADDITION PURSUANT TO SECTION  53 DASH I E OF THE UNIFIED  LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE THE  APPLICANT DID HOLD A  NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING ON JUNE  27TH, 2024 IN COMPLIANCE WITH  THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT  CODE. A PRE-APPLICATION  MEETING FOR THIS PROJECT WAS  HELD ON APRIL 3RD OF THIS  YEAR. IT WAS THE REZONE  PETITION WAS PROCESS FOR  MANAGEMENT REVIEW WHICH  COMPRISES OF OUR ST. OUR  MEMBERS AS WELL THERE HAVE  BEEN NO ISSUES RAISED. IN  ADDITION THE CITY ATTORNEY'S  OFFICE HAS REVIEWED AND  APPROVED COMPANY ORDINANCE  2024, 25 AS TO FORM  INCORRECTNESS. AS STATED IN  THE STAFF REPORT WITH THE  STAFF FINDING AN ANALYSIS  STAFF HAS REVIEW THIS PROPOSED  APPLICATION WITH COMPLIANCE TO  FLORIDA STATUTES. THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT COMPREHENSIVE  PLAN AND THE UNIFIED LAND  DEVELOPMENT CODE. AND WE HAVE  FOUND THAT IT IS IN  COMPLIANCE. THE FLORIDA  STATUTES 1, 6, 6, 0, 4, ONE  DOES OUTLINE THE PROCEDURES  AND ADOPTIONS FOR ORDINANCES  AND RESOLUTIONS AND THE NOTICE  REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO THE  STATUTE HAVE BEEN MET AND ARE  DETAILED IN SECTION. 6 OF THE  STAFF REPORT. COMPLIANCE WITH  THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. GO ONE  OBJECTIVE ONE FOR THE ECONOMIC  BENEFIT. IT DOES COMPLY WITH  THAT THE SARASOTA MEMORIAL  HOSPITAL, ALTHOUGH IT IS  EXEMPT STATUS IT ECONOMIC  BENEFIT TO THE CITY HAS A HUGE  POTENTIAL THIS WILL BE A  LARGE-SCALE HEALTH CARE  FACILITY THAT WILL SERVE THE  RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF PORT.  I WILL GO INTO MORE DETAIL  WITH THAT WITH MY SECOND  PRESENTATION. IT DOES NEED TO  THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT  OBJECTIVE 3 POLICY 3.4. IN  REFERENCE TO JOB CREATION AS  OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT I  PROVIDED A SNAPSHOT IN TIME  FOR THE POTENTIAL EMPLOYMENT  OPPORTUNITIES THAT WILL BE  AVAILABLE. IT NEEDS THE  TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT POLICY  4.4. AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT  GOAL. I OBJECT TO 5.1 TO  ACHIEVE ECONOMICALLY STABLE  COMMUNITY WITH THE SUPERIOR  QUALITY OF LIFE ENHANCING  ECONOMIC AND EMPLOYMENT  OPPORTUNITIES. I PROVIDED THIS  IS A SNAPSHOT IN TIME OF THE  TYPE OF POTENTIAL POSITIONS OR  JOBS THAT WOULD BE AVAILABLE.  IN OUR AREA, THIS THE  SARASOTA. READING NORTH PORT  RATING 10 IN SARASOTA AREA AS  YOU CAN SEE THAT DOES HAVE A  POTENTIAL FOR A LOT OF MEDICAL  TECHNICAL POSITIONS.  COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNIFIED  LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER,  ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE  FOR REZONING SECTION ONE 33  HAS ITEMS A TO SHOW COMPLIANCE  THAT ANALYSIS IS IN THE STAFF  REPORT STAFF HAS ANALYZED  PROVIDING COMMENTS TO EACH  ITEM APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED  THOSE ARE COMMENTS IN  RESPONSE. AND STAFF HAS FOUND  THAT IT DOES MEET THE SECTION  OF THE UNIFIED LAND  DEVELOPMENT CODE. UNDER  AMENDMENT BEACH THAT AND THE  PLANNING AND ZONING ADVISORY  BOARD HAS THE PLANNING AND  ZONING ADVISORY BOARD HAD MET  ON JULY 11TH 2024 I DID GET A  CONFIRMING EMAIL THAT THE  AGENDA ITEM IN THE EAST THE  REPORT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO  COMMISSION. THE PLANNING BOARD  VOTED 5, 0 UNANIMOUS  UNANIMOUSLY APPROVAL OF  PETITION. NOTICE THE PUBLIC  HEARINGS WERE MAILED TO THE  OWNERS ON JUNE 25TH 2024. AND  IT WAS ALSO ADVERTISE IN A  NEWSPAPER GENERAL CIRCULATION  ON JUNE 25TH 2024 WILL BE  ADVERTISEMENTS TO MEET THE  TIME FOR ORDINANCE IT FOR THE  FIRST AND SECOND READING IN  COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA  STATUTES. STAFF RECOMMENDS  APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER  20 2425 TO ZONE. THE 27.7 8,  6, ACRES FROM NO ZONING.  SUFFOCATION TO VILLAGE THE  PETITION NUMBER ARE EASY 24  DASH 0 SOMETHING. THANK YOU.  OKAY.  >> SO WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON  TO.  >> REBUTTAL APPLICANT. 5  MINUTES.  >> ALL RIGHT THOSE SHORT  >> FOR THE JACKSON TEENAGER  FOR THE APPLICANT REBUTTAL.  THANK YOU.  >> REBUTTAL BY THE BY STAFF.  GOOD MORNING STAFF HAS NO  REBUTTAL, THANK YOU THANK YOU.  PUBLIC COMMENT. THERE IS  COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS WILL TO  5 MINUTE ROUNDS AROUND THAT'S  NECESSARY.  >> YEAH, I'M JUST CURIOUS I'M  LOOKING MAP THAT WAS PROVIDED  IN THE BACTERIAL. BEING TO THE  THERE'S A LITTLE CAR ABOUT IN  THE NORTHWEST. THAT IS NOT BY  THEM. BUT PROPERTY MAP SERVE A  IS NOT SHOWING THAT COME ABOUT  CURIOUS.  >> THIS NOW FOR THE RECORD  HAVE AGAIN TALKING AND  SHERRY'S PRESENTATION. THE  MAP.  >> I'M SORRY THEY CAN ALL  BLURRED A MAP THAT SHOWS THE  INTERSECTION OF 41  >> IT IT SAYS.  >> IT'S FROM A SPECIFIC  PURPOSE SURVEY FROM BRITS ARE  VAIN. IT'S EXHIBIT PART OF  EXHIBIT PAGE 1420. LOOK AT THE  PROPERTY APPRAISER SITE  THERE'S A SECTION.  >> IT'S LIKE A LITTLE I  BELIEVE THAT IS A LIFT STATION  THAT'S NOT PART OF THE WANT TO  PULL THAT UP.  >> QUESTION HAS TO BE IT. I'M  SORRY QUESTION IS THAT LITTLE  LAKE AREA THAT IS NOT OWNED BY  THEM. MAP IS SHOWING THAT IT  IS WITHIN YOUR OWNERSHIP WHEN  SO SOMETHINGS NOT CORRECT.  >> BUT  >> IT'S GOT HAVE THE STAFF  REPORT THIS.  YEAH IT'S GONE.  >> PROPERTY APPRAISERS WEBSITE  SHOWS THAT MANASOTA BEACH  RICHLANDS WHAT'S THAT LITTLE  >> YEAH THAT SURVEY YOU'RE  REFERRING TO OF THAT CAR. IT'S  REALLY AND THE COLOR IN THE  LINES ARE BLACK.  >> CHRIS PINE EVERYTHING ELSE  IS CRYSTAL CLEAR WITH THE  BOUNDARIES ACCEPT THAT PART  ABOUT DON'T LIKE AREA. I JUST  WANTED CONFIRMATION.  ♪ ♪ >> AND TRYING TO GET.  >> THEN IT TO ZOOM EVEN WITH  THE MEANT TO THE DOCUMENT WE.  ZOOMED YOU COULD SEE IT CLEAR.  BUT THAT IS NOT PART OF THE  REZONE AREA. AND ON THE SURVEY  THAT IT IS NOT INCLUDED IS  CARVED OUT.  >> PROBLEM THERE'S NO NOR I  SEE NOW CARVED OUT IF YOU TURN  IT UPSIDE DOWN. BUT DON'T ON  IT.  >> YOU'VE GOT IT DIDN'T COME  UP WITH THE ARROW SIGNED  YESTERDAY IN TAISHAN OKAY  UNDERSTOOD WITHDRAW MY  QUESTION. THANK YOU, WELCOME.  OKAY, I DON'T ANYBODY ELSE. IN  2. ALL RIGHT SO A MOVE TO  CLOSING ARGUMENTS GREAT  PARTIES SO CLOSING ARGUMENT BY  STAFF. STEPS GETTING THE  APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE 2024  25 THE REASON SHOULDN'T  >> ALL RIGHT. AS ARGUMENT BY  THE APPLICANT.  >> REAL CLOSING ARGUMENT JUST  RESPECTFULLY REQUEST, YOUR  APPROVAL OF THE REZONING AND  YOU.  >> POSING THIS PORTION OF THE  PUBLIC HEARING AND I'M LOOKING  FOR A MOTION MAKE IT GO AHEAD  BY SHOTS THANK SIR. THE  CONTINUING NUMBER 2, 0, 4,  DASH 2, 5 2ND READING ON  AUGUST 6 2000.  >> SECOND ALL RIGHT WE HAVE A  MOTION MADE BY VICE MAYOR TO  CONTINUE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 25 TO SECOND READING  AUGUST 6 2024. AND THAT WAS  SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON. THERE'S NOTHING ELSE  WE WILL DO A VOICE.  >> VICE THERE'S YES, THEY ARE  TOO. YES. COMMISSIONER LANGDON  SAY YES MCDOWELL, YES.  >> HERE'S YOUR UM YES ALL  RIGHT, *** IS 5 TO 0. THANK  MOVING TO ITEM ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 26 THIS AGAIN  IS A QUASI JUDICIAL HEARING  AND I NEED A MOTION TO HAVE TO  FIGHT I MOVES. ALL RIGHT, WE  HAVE A MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON TO HAVE  THE CITY THIS BY TITLE ONLY  THAT WAS SECONDED BY VICE  MAYOR. THERE'S NOTHING ELSE  VICE MAYOR VICE MAYOR'S  THERE'S A COMMISSIONER LANGDON  SAY YES THEY DO, COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE. YES ALL RIGHT. CITY  ♪ >> ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  20 SET ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA AMENDING  THE VILLAGE VILLAGE DISTRICT  PATTERN PLAN WEST VILLAGES AK  WELLEN PARK THEN IN THE  UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE  TO REFERENCE THEM ENDED  VILLAGE DISTRICT PATTERN PLAN  VYING FOR FINDINGS PROVIDING  FOR ADOPTION PROVIDING FOR  COMPLEX PROVIDING FOR  SEVERABILITY PROVIDING FOR  CODIFICATION AND PROVIDING AN  EFFECTIVE  ♪ DATE CAN EVERYONE WISHING TO  PROVIDE TESTIMONY PLEASE STAND  AND RAISE RIGHT HAND. SWEAR OR  AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY  YOU'RE ABOUT TO PROVIDE IS  TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST  OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE SO HAPPY  ABOUT. THANK ALL RIGHT, THANK  YOU.  >> NOW I WILL CALL FOR  DISCLOSURE OF EX PARTE  COMMUNICATIONS ON THIS ITEM  VICE MAYOR AND FORWARDS I HAD  NUMEROUS WELL, UNEMPLOYMENT  AND HOSPITAL SAME WITH THE I  SINCE WARNING THIS MATTER. SO  >> ALL RIGHT AND I 2 ON JULY  16TH THAT WAS JUST HAD MEETING  WITH GOING TO THE MOON THIS  PROPERTY AND ITS. THE PP AND.  BUT WE'RE GOING TO IT  DISCUSSING THAT. THANK YOU,  MADAM MAYOR, YES, A MEETING  AND THAT WITH THE BONES AND  REPRESENTATIVES OF SARASOTA  MEMORIAL HOSPITAL.  >> DISCUSSING REQUIREMENTS AND  POTENTIAL CHANGES.  >> COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL S MY  IS I HAD A MEETING ON MAY 13TH  AND AGAIN JULY 16TH WITH  BURNHAM BONE AND  REPRESENTATIVES FROM AS A  MAJOR AND WE DISCUSS THIS  PROJECT ON JULY 18TH I HAD AN  AGENDA BRIEFING WITH ASSISTANT  CITY MANAGER, YARBOROUGH THE  ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT FROM  CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE. MY  QUESTION SENATOR AROUND WV ID  INVOLVEMENT ON THIS AMENDED.  AMENDMENT TO OF PEOPLE.  >> ALL RIGHT COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE.  >> YES I HAD A MEETING WITH  BONE AND HOSPITAL TEAM  REGARDING BEING DISCUSSED  TONIGHT.  >> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU CITY  CLERK, ANY AGGRIEVED PARTIES.  >> SO  >> WILL MOVE TO PRESENTATIONS  BY THE APPLICANT YOU HAVE 20  MINUTES.  >> GOOD FOR THE RECORD JACKSON  TURNED A LAW FIRM AND ITS  AGING FOR THE APPLICANT  PROPERTY UNDERSERVED CITY  COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL  DISTRICT. SAME PROJECT TEAM WE  HAD EARLIER I DO BELIEVE I  FAILED RECOGNIZE MISS CARRYING  A BIG WITH THE MONARCH  ECOLOGY. SHE'S HERE AS SO WE  HAVE THE FULL PROJECT TEAM.  THIS REQUEST IS A IT'S THE  SECOND PART OF WHAT WE HAVE  WITH ITS DAY. THIS IS A  AMENDMENT TO THE WELL IN PART  ILITCH MILEAGE DISTRICT  PATTERN PLAN RATHER WAS AN  SAPD PP.  >> CONCERNED SAME PROPERTY  PROPERTY WE JUST DISCUSSED IN  THE REASONING HERE. WITH GDP  WAS APPROVED RECOGNIZE THE SMH  PROPERTY IS BEING WITHIN THE  INDEX MAP BOUNDARIES, NOT  WITHIN THE VILLAGE EV DPP AND  AND AT THE TIME GETS MAJOR  PROPERTY WAS TO BE DEVELOPED  NEED TO BE PROBABLY IN THE  BELOVED TV DPP BOUNDARIES, A  PROPOSED FOLLOWING THIS  INVASION PROCESS AND SEEKS TO  ADD YES MAJOR PROPERTY.  ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT  ENTITLEMENTS OUGHT TO PROVIDE  FOR PHASE DEVELOPMENT OF THE  MEDICAL CAMPUS. IT'S IMPORTANT  UNDERSTAND ESTIMATES IS  CURRENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF  MASTER PLANNING ITS PROPERTIES  IN SOUTH SARASOTA COUNTY IN  ORDER TO EFFECTIVELY COMPLETE  THIS PROCESS MUST FIRST OBTAIN  TITLED IT'S ON THE PROPERTY TO  CREATE THE PARAMETERS WITHIN  WHICH THEY KNOW THEY CAN  DESIGN BOTH FROM A SLIGHTLY  OUT PERSPECTIVE AND ALSO FROM  A MEDICAL SERVICE DEMANDS  STANDPOINT. BECAUSE CREASE TO  ME IN FOR CERTAIN SERVICES AND  THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL  BUILDING SPACE COULD HAPPEN SO  QUICKLY WHICH THEY HAVE  EXPERIENCE AT THEIR CAMPUS. A  LITTLE ROAD AND I 75 IN  VENICE. SMH IS ASKING FOR THE  MAXIMUM FLEXIBILITY TO PROVIDE  TO INCREASE SPEED TO MARKET ON  SITE ALLOWING THEM TO GO FROM  INTERNAL PLANNING TO MASTER  SITE IT'S LITTLE STAGE WHICH  RESULTS CONSTRUCTION OF  FACILITIES AND INCREASE MANY  SERVICES IT IT'S IMPORTANT TO  UNDERSTAND THAT THIS PHASE  DEVELOPMENT APPROACH FOR THE  PROPERTY, NOT ONLY LOOKS AT  TODAY TO 10 YEARS IN THE  FUTURE. BUT ALSO LOOKS AT 50  PLUS YEARS DOWN THE ROAD FOR  FULL BUILD OUT CURTAIN. THE  MAIN REQUEST THAT AMENDMENT  ARE. WANT THE PROPERTY WITHIN  THE VILLAGE EBD PPE IN  REVISING ALL THE APPLICABLE  MAPS TO REFLECT THIS CHANGE.  YOU CAN SEE HERE AGE PROPERTY  IS SHOWN IN A BLUE SHADE AND  THEY ARE AT THE WHAT WOULD BE  THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE  TOP LEFT CORNER OF THE MAP.  THERE ARE A SERIES OF MAPS  EXHIBITS LIKE THIS AND DPP NOW  WE INDIGNANT JUST REFLECT THAT  THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN BROUGHT  INTO THE VILLAGE EV DPP  DOWNTURNS. SECOND PART WHICH  IS ONE OF LARGER PARTS HEAT  AMENDMENT. IT'S ADDING THE  PUBLIC INSTITUTION USES CIVICS  IN CIVIC USES AS A USE  CATEGORY IN THE PPP COMPANY  AGE PROPERTY. THIS IS BEST  DEMONSTRATED THROUGH THIS  ADDITIONAL COLUMN HERE SHOWING  ON LIGHT SIDE OF THE 3,  DEVELOP STANDARDS TABLE. IN  HERE LOOK AT CALM AT THIS  COLUMN. YOU SEE THE STANDARDS  ARE DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE  YEARS OF AGE TO ON THE SITE  ALL THE WAY TO A POTENTIAL  FULL BUILD OUT OF THE CAMPUS  WHICH IS WHY THERE'S 150 FEET  WHY THERE'S AN FAA FOR THE  POP. HE STUNNED. 150 WAITS IN  FLORIDA HOSPITAL BUILDING. 3.8  YARDS, A FIGURE THAT  ACCOMMODATES POTENTIAL AREN'T  EVEN IF THE 3 IF THEY ARE WAS  ACHIEVED ON OUR SITE. THE  MAXIMUM ONE IF THEY ARE  STANDARD FOR THE ENTIRE  VILLAGE EV DPP AREA WOULD NOT  COME CLOSE TO BEING EXCEEDED  SO THERE'S NO WORRY ABOUT THE  3 O OUR SITE AND IN FACT FOR  MIXED USE WHICH IS CALL IT  AGENDA COLOR ALL THE WAY TO  LAUGH THAT ALREADY HAS A IS  THE MAXIMUM AND THEY ARE  STANDARD SO WE'RE SIMPLY JUST  CARRYING THAT OVER TO THE  RIGHT IN THE TABLE. WE HAVE  REQUESTED A MINIMUM OPEN SPACE  STANDARD OF 0 ACRES, NOT  BECAUSE WE ENVISION NO OPEN  SPACE BEING PROVIDED IN FACT  WE KNOW THERE WILL BE OPEN  SPACE ON THE PROPERTY EVEN AT  A POTENTIAL FULL BUILD OUT.  HOWEVER THIS FIGURE IS  REQUESTED FOR PURPOSES OF  MAINTAINING MAXIMUM  FLEXIBILITY FOR MASTER  PLANNING SITE. WE ARE  REQUESTING TO KEEP THIS 0  ACRES TO AVOID ANY POTENTIAL  UNFORESEEN ISSUES IN THE  FUTURE. ARE CONCERNED WITH  PROVIDING AN ARBITRARY NUMBER  AT THIS TIME FOR THE OPEN  SPACE ACREAGE THE MINIMUM OPEN  SPACE ACREAGE IS NOT RUNNING  INTO AN ISSUE WITH THE FIRST  NUMBER OF FACES ON DEVELOPMENT  ON THE SITE. IT'S REALLY  LOOKING AT THE 20 TO 30 YEARS  DOWN THE ROAD. IF WE ARE TRULY  CHOOSE THE NUMBER NOW OUR ONLY  OPTION FOR RELIEF IS TO AMEND  THE BPP AGAIN THROUGH THIS  PROCESS COME BACK IN FRONT OF  THE COMMISSION AT THAT TIME  WHICH WILL ONLY CAUSE THE WAY  FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS, THE  FACILITIES, THE SERVICES THAT  HAVE BEEN TARGETED AS NEEDED  ON THE SITE. REQUESTS THE  MINIMUM LOT SIZE AND SETBACK  STANDARDS ARE CONSISTENT WITH  THOSE ALREADY APPROVED FOR  NON-RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN  THE P P AND WE HAVE SIMPLY  CHOSEN TO CARRY THOSE OVER. WE  HAVE ALSO ADDED INFORMATION TO  OUR SITE TO THE OTHER  POLITICAL AREAS SUCH AS  TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTAL  CONSIDERATIONS, WATER  WASTEWATER UTILITIES, WET  LANDS ROADWAYS FREESTANDING  SIGNAGE LOCATIONS AND ADDING  THE DEFINITION OF THE PUBLIC  INSTITUTIONAL USES AND CIVIC  SPACES WHICH HAS BEEN TAKEN  DIRECTLY FROM THE PATTERN BOOK  APPROVED FOR WELLEN PARK AND  THAT'S WHAT THIS THIS IS AT  THE TAIL END OF THE V P P AND  THE DEFINITION SECTION. THIS  IS THIS EXISTS IN PATTERN BOOK  THAT W V P B WELL IN PART WE  SIMPLY HAVE TAKEN THIS AND  CARRIED INTO THE PPP FOR  ABILITY. CONCERNING THE  TRANSPORTATION IN ASSOCIATED  TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES. WE  HAVE PROVIDED AN IMPACT  STATEMENT FOR STAFF TO REVIEW  THE CONTEMPLATE A FIRST PHASE  OF DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE AT  THE TIME OF THE BELLE OF SITE  DEVELOPMENT PLANTS, MIDDLE AS  REQUIRED BY STAFF A  TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS  WILL BE PROVIDED INCLUDING AN  OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE SO  THAT IS SOMETHING THAT EACH  FACE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED  SITE. THE LAST MAJOR COMPONENT  OF OUR AMENDMENT PROPOSAL.  THIS REQUEST RELEASED FROM THE  SPECIFIC LANDSCAPING PARKING  SIGNAGE ARCHITECTURE AND OTHER  DESIGN STANDARDS AS PROVIDED  BY THE DPP AND FOR THOSE THAT  DEFAULT TO THE ULDC AS WELL AS  REMOVING THE WEST VILLAGE'S  REVIEW COMMITTEE FINAL  APPROVAL AUTHORITY OVER A  PROPOSED SITE PLANS IN  ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTURE  SIGNAGE LANDSCAPING AND  APPLICABLE DESIGN COMPONENTS  LOCATED IN SECTIONS 3, 8,  SECTIONS 3, 9, STAFF HAS NO  CONCERN WITH OUR REQUESTS FOR  RELIEF FROM THE STANDARDS AS  THEY UNDERSTAND THE REQUEST  AND FLEXIBILITY DESIRE  ACCOMMODATE THE UNIQUE NATURE  OF A PHASED MEDICAL CAMPUS  FACILITY ALLOWING SMH TO  IMPLEMENT ITS UNIQUE  ARCHITECTURAL THEME AND  DESIGNED SITE AS IT DEEMS  BEST, HOWEVER. THEY DO NOT  PROVIDE RECOMMENDATION ON A  REQUEST MOVE OUR PROPERTY FROM  THE WEST VILLAGE'S REVIEW  COMMITTEE AUTHORITY APPROVAL  WHERE ONE MUST RECEIVE THEIR  APPROVAL ON SITE PLANS BEFORE  THEY CAN BE SUBMITTED TO THE  CITY. AND SOME 8 WANTS TO BE  CLEAR. WE SAID THIS IN THE  PIECE THAT MEETING WAS CHANGED  AGAIN WE WANT TO BE CLEAR THAT  WE BELIEVE WELL IN PART HAS  DONE AND IS DOING AN  UNBELIEVABLE JOB AND MASTER  PLANNING THE AREA. YOU'RE  RATED ONE OF THE PREMIER  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTRY  THERE'S NO QUESTION ABOUT  THAT. SMH UNDERSTANDS AND  RESPECTS THE PURPOSE BEHIND  RETAINING THE REVIEW COMMITTEE  APPROVAL, 40 OVER THOSE ITEMS  TO MAKE SURE THAT WELL IN PARK  MAINTAINS ITS FIRST CLASS FEEL  NOW INTO AND INTO THE FUTURE.  SMH HOWEVER IN TURN WOULD LIKE  THE SAME DECISION MAKING  AUTHORITY OVER ITS SITE WHICH  WILL LIKEWISE BE DEVELOPED IN  A FIRST-CLASS MANNER WHICH CAN  BE SEEN AT THE VARIOUS  ESTIMATES MEDICAL FACILITIES  IN COUNTRY. THIS A SLIDE HERE  SHOWS BOTH ON THE LEFT SIDE  ARE THE RENDERINGS AND THEN ON  THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE ACTUAL  CONSTRUCTION, AND YOU CAN SEE  WHEN SMH COMES UP WITH THE  RENDERING THEY THEY ARE  HITTING THE MARK SAY 99% IF  NOT BETTER ALMOST ON SO  THERE'S AN UNDERSTANDABLE  SCENE ESTIMATES JUST WOULD  LIKE TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO  HAVE THE FINAL APPROVAL  AUTHORITY OF THEIR SITE PLANS  AND THOSE ASSOCIATED  IMPROVEMENTS. AND SOME EACH  HAS BEEN DISCUSSING THIS WITH  WELL IN PART AND WE'LL  CONTINUE TO DO SO WITH A GOAL  OF HAVING AGREED UPON APPROACH  BY THE TIME THE SECOND READING  OF THIS BP HE AMENDED  ORDINANCE ULTIMATELY AT THE  END OF THE DAY AS THE NATION  LOOKS FORWARD TO BEING A GOOD  NEIGHBOR AND PARTNER WITHIN  THE WELL ON OUR COMMUNITY IN  THE CITY A LARGE. STAFF IS  REVIEWING OUR BTP AMENDMENT  FOR CONSISTENCY WITH  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN  COMPLIANCE WITH THE ULDC HAS  NOT RAISED ANY ISSUES. IT HAS  PROVIDED A RECOMMENDATION OF  APPROVAL WITH 4 LISTED  CONDITIONS. WE DO NOT OBJECT  TO THESE LISTS LISTED  CONDITIONS ASIDE FROM THE  MINIMUM OPEN-SPACE ACREAGE  FROM THE SITE WHICH WE REQUEST  TO KEEP IT 0 AGAIN WITH THE  UNDERSTANDING THAT THE SITE  WILL HAVE  OPEN SPACE. EVEN AT AFTER  PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT ALL THE  WAY FOR A FULL WE RESPECTFULLY  REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL WILL BE  AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS  YOU YOU MAY HAVE.  >> GOOD MORNING AGAIN  COMMISSIONERS FOR THE RECORD  SHERRY WILLETTE-GRONDIN  PLANNER 3 PLANNING ZONING  DIVISION AND I HAVE BEEN  SWORN. AGAIN THE PETITION  BEFORE YOU IS THE P A 24 DASH  0, 7, 9, UNDER ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 26. THIS IS AN  AMENDMENT TO THE VILLAGE E  VILLAGE DISTRICT PATTERN PLAN.  >> WHICH IS ALSO CALLED THE P  P.  >> AGAIN AN OVERVIEW THE  APPLICANT IS JACKSON BOONE.  JOHNSON R BEEN ESQUIRE  PROPERTY OWNERS SARASOTA  COUNTY MEMORIAL. SKEWS ME  SARASOTA COUNTY PUBLIC  HOSPITAL DISTRICT. THIS IS  AMENDING THE VILLAGE G VILLAGE  DISTRICT PATTERN PLAN WEST  VILLAGES ALSO KNOWN AS WELL IN  PARK AND AMENDING THE UNIFIED  LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE  REFERENCE THE AMENDED VILLAGE.  DISTRICT PATTERN PLAN AS  STATED PREVIOUSLY THE LOCATION  OF SOUTH NEW JOINING SOUTH  TAMIAMI TRAIL US 41 EAST DEVON  JOINING SOUTH WEST VILLAGES  PARK. AGAIN THE BACKGROUND  THIS PROPERTY IS THE SUBJECT  PROPERTY WAS ANNEXED INTO THE  CITY IN 2000 A COMPREHENSIVE  PLAN AMENDMENT WAS APPROVED IN  2004. ORIGINAL BPP WAS ADOPTED  ON JULY 23RD 2019 UNDER  PETITION NUMBER OF THE DC DASH  17 DASH 1, 5, I. I'M IN A  REZONING REQUEST HAS SUBMITTED  SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH THIS IS  THE PROPOSED FEE DPP AMENDMENT  WILL INCORPORATE THE SMH  PROPERTY INTO THE VILLAGE, A  BOUNDARY. AND TO ALSO  ESTABLISH SITE DEVELOPMENT  REGULATIONS FOR THE HOSPITAL  SITE. AND THE CURRENT LAND USE  IF TELL YOU IS VILLAGE THIS  WILL BE VILLAGE BE PENDING THE  ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 2020 OR  25, SO THE REZONE HAS TO A  CORE. PRIOR TO THIS. A  NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING HELD BY  THE APPLICANT ON 6/27/2024 AT  05:00PM IN PERSON AT SOLAS  HALL LOCATED IN WELLING  PARK NORTH PORT FLORIDA. THE  APPLICATION HAS UNDERGONE THE  REVIEW PROCESS PRE APPLICATION  MEETING FOR THE PROJECT WAS  HELD APRIL 3RD 2023. THERE  WERE NO UNDERWENT MANAGEMENT  REVIEW SDR REVIEW THE COMMENTS  THAT YOU DO SEE HERE ARE  RELATED TO FUTURE.  >> DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE  UNDER FUTURE PETITIONS AND IF  THERE IS A REVISED TRAFFIC  STUDY WILL EVALUATE THAT  CAPACITY AT THE TIME OF  DEVELOPMENT AND THAT FDOT  SHOULD BE NOTIFIED OF THIS  PROJECT IN CASE ANY TIME  THINGS ARE JUST MEANT SUCH AS  ADDING A PREEMPTION DEVICES  ARE NEEDED AT THE  INTERSECTIONS AGAIN THAT WILL  HANDLED AT THE SITE  DEVELOPMENT STAGE. THE CITY  ATTORNEY HAS APPROVED  ORDINANCE AS TOM FOREMAN  CORRECTNESS. SO STATED  PREVIOUSLY FIGURES HAVE BEEN  UPDATED TO INCLUDE THE SMH  PROPERTY IN THE FIGURES ARE  OUTLINE TABLE OUTLINE OF THE  PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE STAFF  REPORT. THESE ARE MAXIMUM  SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR ESTIMATE  PROPERTY. ALSO THE FLOOR AREA  RATIO AS WAS STATED BY THE  APPLICANT. IT WOULD BE 3.0 IT  WOULD NOT EXCEED THE THRESHOLD  OF ONE POINT 0 FLOOR AREA  RATIO FOR THE ENTIRE SITE.  THEY'RE REQUESTING EXEMPTIONS  FROM HEARING TO SECTION 3.8  THE MISCELLANEOUS PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS VILLAGE E DESIGN  STANDARDS AND ULDC REGULATIONS  PERTAINING TO LANDSCAPING  PARKING AND SIGN REGULATIONS.  IN ADDITION WAS ADDING THE  DEFINITION FOR PUBLIC  INSTITUTIONAL USES AND CIVIC  SPACES TO THE DEFINITION THIS  DEFINITION IS TAKEN FROM THE  ADOPTED VILLAGE DISTRICT.  PATTERN BOOK. FIGURE FEATURES  THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARD  TABLES WITH THE CORRESPONDING  NOTES. STATED STAFF HAS NO  ISSUES WITH THE THE PARCEL.  >> AND THE EXEMPTION  >> HAS ASKED FOR EXEMPTION  FROM THE DESIGN STANDARDS.  STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT A  HOSPITAL IS VERY UNIQUE IN  DESIGN. IT'S NOT SOMETHING  THAT WE SEE NORMALLY  NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS SO  WE DO UNDERSTAND THAT THEY DO  HAVE YOU D CRITERIA.  >> AND DESIGN. HOWEVER IN THE  THE DOCUMENTS WE HAVE THE WEST  VILLAGE'S PATTERN BOOK. DOES  TALK ABOUT THE REVIEW  COMMITTEE. THIS WAS GRANTED BY  COMMISSION IN 2017 TO GIVE THE  AUTHORITY FOR DESIGN REVIEW TO  THAT COMMITTEE. IN THE PATTERN  PLAN ITSELF IT TALKS ABOUT  THAT THE WEST VILLAGE'S REVIEW  COMMITTEE LOOK AT THIS AND  REVIEW IT THERE IS A PROVISION  IN THERE THAT THERE WOULD BE A  LETTER GIVEN TO STAFF OR ANY  DEVELOPMENT. IN THERE. AND I  WILL GO INTO FURTHER DETAIL ON  STAFFS.  >> I'M NOT A RECOMMENDATION OR  NOT RECOMMEND PROVIDING THE  RECOMMENDATION FURTHER ON THE  PRESENTATION.  >> THE MINIMUM PARKING  CALCULATION STAFF HAS NO ISSUE  WITH THAT THEY WILL BE  DETERMINED AT THE TIME THE  SITE AND DEVELOPMENT AND  BECAUSE OF THE UNIQUENESS OF  THE HOSPITAL THEY WOULD HAVE  TO PROVIDE.  >> THAT TRANSPORTATION  INFORMATION TRAFFIC  INFORMATION. TO SEE WHAT THOSE  CALCULATIONS SO WE WOULD HAVE  TO REVIEW THAT THE SITE  DEVELOPMENT STAGE SO STAFF IS  SUPPORTING OF THAT. NO OPEN  SPACES PROPOSED STAFF  RECOMMENDS THAT A MINIMUM OF  5% OR 1.4 ACRES BE ALLOTTED  FOR LANDSCAPING AND OPEN  SPACE. REASON BEING WE DON'T  KNOW WHAT THE FUTURE WILL HOLD  AS A 0% WE DON'T KNOW IF THE  PROPERTY COULD BE SOLD IN IN  YEARS TO CALM THAT WOULD ALLOW  SOMEBODY ELSE TO DEVELOP THAT  SITE WITH 0 OPEN SPACE.  ♪ BUT  ♪ SPACE CAN BE FOR STORM WATER.  STAFF WON'T KNOW AT THE TIME  UNTIL THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT  IS ARE UNDER WATER STORM WATER  IS GROUND STORM WATER TO BE  CALCULATED. SO STAFF IS ASKING  FOR A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT OF  5%. THAT WE CAN COVER THE  APPLICANT SAID THAT THERE IS  NO ISSUE OF COVERING THAT, BUT  WE JUST WANTED TO HAVE  SOMETHING THAT WOULD SUPPORT  THAT IN THE FUTURE. IN  ADDITION, THE PLANNING AND  ZONING ADVISORY BOARD FOR THIS  PETITION, JULY 11TH 2024 THEIR  RECOMMENDATION. IS THEY WANTED  TO SAY A NUMBER BETWEEN 0, 5%,  OPEN SPACE SO THEY RELIEVING  THAT OPTION UP TO THE  COMMISSION. STAFF RECOGNIZES  VANESSA THE NECESSITY  FLEXIBILITY IN SIGN  REGULATIONS HOSPITAL MANY  UNIQUE SIGNAGE THAT IS  REQUIRED. FROM PARKING WALL  SIGNAGE DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE  ETC STEP UNDERSTANDS THAT WE  DO SUPPORT. I WAIVE OR  MODIFICATION BECAUSE WE CANNOT  POTENTIALLY IDENTIFY ALL OF  THE TYPES OF SIGNAGE THAT  WOULD BE NEEDED AT THIS POINT.  IN ADDITION THE NEW UNIFIED  LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WILL  EXEMPT HOSPITAL FROM THE SINE  REGULATIONS AS A SPECIAL  DISTRICT IT DOES QUALIFY AS A  GOVERNMENT IS PER THE FLORIDA  STATUTES.  >> STAFF HAS REVIEWS THE  PROPOSE APPLICATION FOR  CONSISTENCY WITH THE FLORIDA  STATUTES THE CITY'S  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.  >> AND THE UNIFIED LAND  DEVELOPMENT CODE.  >> THE COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA  STATUTES CHAPTER 1, 6, 6, 0,  4, 1, TO FOLLOW THE PROCEDURES  FOR ADOPTION ORDINANCES AND  RESOLUTIONS IN THE NOTICE  REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO THE  STATUTE HAVE BEEN THAT ARE  DETAILED IN SECTION 7 OF THE  STAFF REPORT. SO THERE HAS  BEEN NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS  ADVERTISING AND POSTCARDS  MAILED TO THE ADJACENT  PROPERTY OWNERS. COMPLIANCE  WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.  THE ECONOMIC BENEFIT OF THIS.  SO THE HOSPITAL IS A TAX  EXEMPT AND TAKE HOWEVER, IN  LOOKING AT THE REVIEW TO SEE  WHAT IT WOULD BE. SOMETIMES  ECONOMIC BENEFIT CANNOT BE  MEASURED IN MONETARY TERMS.  IT'S TO BE MEASURED AND  INTANGIBLE TURNS OUT STATED IN  THE STAFF REPORT. THE ONLY  HEALTH CARE FACILITY THAT WE  REALLY HAVE IS THE EMERGENCY  ROOM AND TOLEDO BLADE. AND TO  GET TO A HOSPITAL SARASOTA  MEMORIAL HOSPITAL IS QUITE A  DRIVE. DEPENDING ON IF YOU'RE  GOING TO THE VENICE HOSPITAL  OR SARASOTA YES, AN AMBULANCE  DOESN'T HAVE TO STOP FOR  TRAFFIC. BUT STILL THAT IS  STILL IT TAKES A WHILE IF IT'S  AN EMERGENCY SITUATION YOU WE  WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE  SOMETHING FOR CITIZENS. ALSO  IT WILL PROVIDE ADVANCED  HEALTHCARE.  >> WHETHER IT'S GOING THROUGH  CHEMOTHERAPY SURGERY OR ANY  TYPE OF EMERGENCY. BLOOD  TRANSFUSIONS AND THE LIKE  THEY'RE NOT CAPABLE OF THAT AT  THE EMERGENCY AROUND. SO WE  NEED A FACILITY THAT IS CLOSE  TO SERVE OUR RESIDENTS TO  PROVIDE THESE MUCH-NEEDED  FACILITIES.  >> AND WE'RE GROWING OUR  POPULATIONS ALMOST 80,000 WE  NEED TO HAVE STAFF IS  SUPPORTING THAT AND IT DOES  MEET THE FUTURE LAND EXCUSE  YOUR LAND USE ELEMENT GOAL ONE  OBJECTIVE ONE ECONOMIC  BENEFIT. AND ALSO ECONOMIC  DEVELOPMENT BENEFIT GOAL 5 TO  ACHIEVE AN ECONOMICALLY STABLE  COMMUNITY. NOT ONLY THAT THE  FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT  OBJECTIVE 3 POLICY 3.4 JOB  CREATION THIS IS GOING TO  CREATE A LOT OF JOBS.  >> AS PRESENTED IN THE STAT  SHOT, THERE ARE DOCTORS  NURSES, TECHNICAL SKILLS,  THERE WILL MAINTENANCE PEOPLE  ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF SO THERE  IS A LOT OF OPPORTUNITY TO  CREATE JOBS. IT NEEDS TO  TRANSPORTATION ELLIS POLICY  4.4. THE VILLAGE LAND USE GOAL  5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE  FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT POLICY  13.1 OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN  IN ADDITION POLICY 13.6 TALKS  ABOUT THE VILLAGE BOUNDARIES  THROUGH THE BPP PROCESS IS  WHAT WE'RE DOING TODAY. AGAIN  HERE IS THE SNAPSHOT IN TIME.  THE TYPE OF A PHYSICAL  THERAPIST PERCEPTION IS A  MEDICAL SECRETARY. PROVIDES A  LOT OF OPPORTUNITY. SO CHAPTER  53 THE ZONING LEE FOR VILLAGE.  THE PROVISIONS IN THE ULDC ARE  THE SAME AS THOSE IN THE  FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ALL  REQUIREMENTS INFECTION 53 TO  14 THE VILLAGE DISTRICT  PATTERN PLAN PROCESS WAS  UNDERTAKEN AS REQUIRED. FOR  THE PUBLIC HEARING. WHEN IT  WAS ADOPTED IN JULY 2029 THE  CHANGES IN THE CURRENT  PROPOSED AMENDMENT ARE MINOR  AND TO COMPLY WITH THIS  SECTION. THE AMENDMENTS TO  REQUESTS TO MODIFY THE VILLAGE  EVEN DPP HAS BEEN PROCESSED IN  THE SAME MANNER CONSISTENT  WITH THE INITIAL BPP  APPLICATION HAS OUTLINED A NEW  LDC SECTION 53 2 TO ONE.  NOTICE IS A PUBLIC HEARINGS  WERE MAILED. THERE THEY ARE  PROPERLY NOTICED. STAFF  RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF  PETITION NUMBER OF EPA 24 DASH  0, 8, 9, THE SARASOTA MEMORIAL  HOSPITAL. SMH AT WOODLAND PARK  VILLAGE EVP PMMA THROUGH  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH 26  IN AMENDING THE UNIFIED LAND  DEVELOPMENT CODE TO  INCORPORATE BY REFERENCE. THE  VILLAGE EVP PAY. STAFF IS  SUPPORTING THAT THE THE THE  ESTIMATES SITE IS EXEMPT FROM  THE DISTRICT PLAN SIGN  REGULATIONS RELATED TO A  VOCATION HEIGHTS, ISAAC  CETERA. THE MEETING PARKING  CALCULATIONS WILL BE ANALYZED  AND PROVIDED WITH THEIR THEY  HAVE TO PROVIDE THE SUPPORTING  DATA. FOR EACH PHASE OF  DEVELOPMENT AT THE TIME OF MY  MAJOR SITE DEVELOPMENT OR SITE  DEVELOPMENT. WE'RE REQUESTING  A MINIMUM OF 5% OPEN SPACE  WHICH IS ONE 0.4 ACRES. AND ON  STAFF IS DECLINING TO MAKE A  RECOMMENDATION AS TO AMEND  EXEMPTING THE PROJECT FROM THE  DESIGN STANDARDS AS PREVIOUSLY  STATED IT IS UNDER THE WEST  VILLAGE'S REVIEW COMMITTEE. IF  IN THE GRANTED THE AUTHORITY  TO REVIEW THAT. AND STAFF IS  RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH  STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.  THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, THANK  YOU. WE'RE GOING TO MOVE TO  REBUTTAL. I THE APPLICANT.  >> AGAIN FOR THE RECORD  JACKSON AGENT FOR THE JUST  WANT TO TOUCH ON THE THE OPEN  SPACE MATTER THAT STAFF IS  BROUGHT UP. AGAIN OUR REQUEST  IS FOR THE MINIMUM ACREAGE FOR  OPEN SPACE ON OUR SIDE OUR  SIDE ALONE TO BE 0. IT'S  IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THAT  WITHIN THE VILLAGE EV DPP WHEN  YOU LOOK AT ALL SEE IF I CAN  BRING MY OUR POINT BACK UP.  SHARE THAT.  >> YOU LOOK AT THE USE TABLES  HERE FOR 3, 3, A.  >> IT HAS A. IT HAS ALL THE  ACREAGE.  >> SEE IF I CAN GET THIS  LITTLE BIGGER MIGHT NOT HELP  BUT.  >> THE PPP SPECIFIES THAT THE  STANDARDS SO THAT INCLUDES THE  OPEN SPACE ACREAGE IS NOT  REQUIRED ON A PER PARCEL  BASIS. SO WHEN THE MIXED USE  AREA ALREADY IMPROVED WITHIN  THE P AS A 111 ACRES AND  THERE'S 32 THOSE ACRES ARE THE  MINIMUM REQUIRED OPEN-SPACE  ACRES. IT DOESN'T MEAN EVERY  PARCEL IN THERE HAS TO SHARE  IN THE 32 ACRES OF SPACE. IN  FACT SOME OF THE PARCELS ONLY  HAVE THAT OPEN SPACE AND SOME  PARCELS HAVE OPEN SPACE  ACREAGE REQUIRED AT ALL.  BECAUSE WE'RE THE UNIQUE  SITUATION OF BEING THE ONLY  PROPERTY AT THIS TIME AND  PUBLIC USE IS AN INSTITUTIONAL  PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL USES AND  CIVIC SPACES DESIGNATION WE  DON'T HAVE THE BENEFIT OF  SAYING WELL THERE'S ALREADY  ANOTHER PROPERTY AND HAS THE  MINIMUM OPEN THAT THEY'RE  CARING FOR US. ALSO IN  RESPONSE AND WE DISCUSSED THIS  AT P ZAB WE UNDERSTAND THE  CONCERN OF HEY WHAT IF YOU  TURN AROUND AND SELL IT  SOMEBODY ELSE NOW THEY CAN  MOVE FORWARD AND DEVELOP  WITHOUT HAVING A MINIMUM  ACREAGE REQUIREMENT FOR OPEN  SPACE. WELL THE KEY HERE IS  THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO BE A  PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL USE IN  THE CIVIC SPACE USE TO BE ABLE  TO DEVELOP ON PROPERTY. SO WE  UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN BUT  IT'S NOT AS IF IT HAS  COMMERCIAL GENERAL OR A MIXED  USE ZONING, ANYBODY CAN COME  DOWN AND JUST YOU KNOW GOING  FOR NAS AND SAY HERE I GO  AGAIN THEY HAVE TO BE WITHIN  QUALIFY. IT'S A PUBLIC  INSTITUTIONAL USE IN CIVIC  SPACE USE. ALSO I THINK IT'S  IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THAT  THERE WILL BE LANDSCAPING ON  THE PROPERTY STORM WATER WILL  BE ACCOMMODATED IN ONE WAY OR  THE OTHER KEY. STORM WATER  WOULD YOUR WHAT YOUR STANDARD,  YOU KNOW DRY OR WET RETENTION  POND. IT ALSO COULD BE THERE  ALSO COULD BE A SCENARIO IN  THE FUTURE WHERE 3 AS A  PORTION OF A STORM WATER PAWN  THAT WEATHER IS DRY OR WET  THEY NEED TO ADD A FACILITY IN  THAT LOCATION. THAT STORM  WATER THEN BECOMES BOLTED. SO  WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN ACCOUNTED  FOR OPEN SPACE NOW GOES WAY  BECAUSE OF THE DEMAND FOR  ADDITIONAL SERVICE ON THE  PROPERTY. SO WE UNDERSTAND  STAFF'S POSITION HERE RESPECT  THEIR POSITION. WE HAVE NEVER  WANT TO MAINTAIN OUR REQUEST  OF THE 0 MINIMUM ACREAGE FOR  OPEN SPACE ON SITE THAT  CONCLUDES MY ALL RIGHT, THANK  YOU. MOVING TO OR REBUTTAL.  >> YES, GOOD MORNING  COMMISSIONERS YOEST AF WOULD  LIKE TO REBUT THAT. YES,  ALTHOUGH 10% OPEN SPACES  REQUIRED FOR THE OTHER USES.  THIS PARTICULAR USE IS BEING  CARVED OUT WITH THE 27 ACRES  STAFF WANTS TO ENSURE THAT THE  OPEN SPACES ADDRESS THAT THERE  IS SOME OPEN SPACE AS I SAID  THE FUTURE HAS NO GUARANTEES.  STAFF WOULD LIKE TO PUT THAT  IN PLACES. THANK YOU. ALL  RIGHT, THANK YOU.  ALL RIGHT SO WE'RE MOVING TO  PUBLIC COMMENT.  >> RIGHT  >> MOVING ON TO COMMISSIONER  QUESTIONS AND AGAIN LET'S TRY  JUST SAY WITH 5 MINUTE ROUND  SO WE CAN ALL HAVE CHANCE TO  GET SOMETHING IN THE FIRST  FIRST ROUND THROUGH AND THEN  WE'LL HAVE A SECOND ROUND IF  NECESSARY. COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL.  >> YES, AND FORGIVE ME GOING  HER YOU ALONG WITH ANSWERS.  THE DOCUMENT AND IN ORDINANCE  IS REFERENCING.  >> ULDC CHAPTERS.  >> AND I'M CURIOUS BECAUSE  WE'RE GOING TO BE POTENTIALLY  APPROVING THIS AT THE SAME  DATE AS WE ARE GOING TO  POTENTIALLY BE APPROVING THE  NEW ULDC WHY ARE YOU USING OLD  ULDC REFERENCE NUMBERS INSTEAD  OF POTENTIALLY NEW ONES  BECAUSE DOCUMENT IS GOING TO.  CARRY FORWARD. LONG AFTER THE  OLD ULDC IS RENO.  >> DOES MAKE SENSE MAKES  ABSOLUTE SENSE.  >> AND I WANT TO EXPLAIN THAT  A LITTLE BIT SO I DO WANT TO  PULL UP THE ORDINANCE I'M TOLD  THAT SO THE REASON BEING FIRST  OF ALL THIS WILL BE HEARD  BEFORE THE ULDC ADOPTION.  THESE ARE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC  HEARINGS.  >> THE FOR SECOND READING WILL  BE THE AUGUST. ITS SPECIAL  MEETING. THESE WILL ALL BE  DONE PRIOR TO ALL THE ULDC  CHANGES THAT'S WHY WE'RE  REFERENCING IT I DON'T SINCE  THE ULDC AND THE ULDC  EFFECTIVE DATE IS GOING TO BE  OCTOBER 28TH. SO THIS WILL BE  APPROVED PRIOR TO THAT THAT'S  WHY WE HAVE THE CURRENT IT.  REFERENCES TO THE CURRENT TO  ADOPTED UVALDE SAY. SEE AND  THEY'RE SUBJECT TO THE CODE IN  PLACE AT THE TIME AS WELL.  >> WOULD IT BE.  >> POSSIBLE TO USE OLD CODE  NUMBERS WITH A SLASH WITH NEW  CODE PREFERENCES.  >> THAT WOULD PROBABLY BE A  CITY ATTORNEY QUESTIONED  MISSION DOES RECOMMEND BECAUSE  WE DON'T HAVE A NEW CODE.  >> YEAH I SEE I SEE WHAT  YOU'RE SAYING I'M JUST TRYING  MAKE SURE THAT EVERYBODY  UNDERSTANDS THAT WE'RE  REPEALING THE OLD ULDC SO  WHATEVER THOSE NEW  REQUIREMENTS ARE ARE WHAT'S  GOING TO HAVE TO BE ALL.  >> SO ACT.  >> ELAINE RIGHT DIRECTOR  DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE  RECORD I HAVE BEEN SWORN. IN  FLORIDA AND MOST OTHER STATES  BUT ACCORDING TO STATUTES THEY  ARE SUBJECT TO THE CODES IN  EFFECT AT THE TIME THEY MADE  THEIR APPLICATION. SO EVEN IF  OKAY CHANGES AFTER THEY MAKE  THEIR APPLICATION THERE STILL  SUBJECT TO THE CODE IN PLACE  AT THE TIME OF THAT  APPLICATION THANK YOU FOR THAT  CLARITY.  >> MOVING ON TO MINUTES OPEN  SPACE. YES. I AGREE OPEN SPACE  HAVING IT 0. THIS DOCUMENT IS  GOING TO SURVIVE ALL OF AND WE  CANNOT HAVE IT EASY ROW  BECAUSE. INTENTION CAN'T BE  CAPTURED IN THIS DOCUMENT. I  APPRECIATE THAT THEY INTEND TO  HAVE THIS OPEN SPACE IS PART  OF THE DEVELOPMENT. BUT IT'S  VERY HARD TO CAPTURE ATTENTION  IN A DOCUMENT. SO I I HAVE A  COUPLE OF AS TO HOW WE CAN  POSSIBLY GET THERE THAT I  WOULD LIKE TO KIND OF I AGREE  THAT STAFF'S 5%  RECOMMENDATION. I ALSO  UNDERSTAND THE DEVELOPER IS  CONCERNED WITH HAVING TO COME  BACK FOR A BE DPP AMENDMENT IN  THE FUTURE IT'S TIME  CONSUMING.  >> SO MAYBE THE WAY WE CAN  CAPTURE THAT INTENTION IS TO  KEEP IT AT 5% WITH LIKE A  LITTLE ASTERISK THAT'S SAYING  THAT ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY  FOR ANYTHING FROM LIKE ONE AND  A HALF PERCENT TO 5%. I THINK  WONDER THAT ONE AND A HALF  PERCENT THEN IT HAS TO COME TO  COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL AND I  DON'T KNOW THAT TO A  COMPROMISE I WAS TRYING TO  FIND NUMBER MY XYZ.  >> AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT  WOULD LOOK LIKE ON PAPER. BUT.  >> I JUST WANTED TO THROW THAT  OUT THERE BECAUSE I CAN'T I  CAN'T GOOD CONSCIENCE PROVE 0.  BUT I ALSO SEE THEIR POINT OF  VIEW WITH THE  >> IF YOU GO OUT OF TIME. WILL  DEFINITELY NEED A SECOND OKAY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON.  >> AND THANK YOU MADAM MAYOR.  I MISSED FIRST TIME THROUGH A  150 FEET IN HEIGHT IS HOW MANY  FLOORS ANTICIPATED.  >> IT SPANNED 10 STORIES AND  WHAT YOU CAN FIT 250 FEET FOR  A HOSPITAL.  >> OKAY TERRIFIC. I'M  WONDERING HAS THE WEST  VILLAGE'S REVIEW COMMITTEE HAD  AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THE  RENDERINGS THAT YOU SHOWED US  IN YOUR PRESENTATION IT HAD AN  OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW AND  ACTUALLY BEEN SHARED AT THE  NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS WITH  CAN.  >> MY QUESTION RELATIVE TO  THAT TO THE REVIEW COMMITTEE  EXPRESS ANY CONCERNS WITH  THOSE RENDERINGS FROM A DESIGN  PERSPECTIVE.  >> THE NO MAN. DID NOT EXPRESS  ANY CONCERN WITH DON'T WANT TO  SPEAK FOR THEM, BUT FAR AS THE  MEETINGS CONCERNS.  >> OKAY AND AND YOU.  >> I HAVE SOME COMMENTS BUT  ALL YIELD THE FLOOR TO OTHER  QUESTIONS. OKAY. VICE MAYOR.  >> YEAH I I DON'T QUESTIONS  THIS MUCH SITE TO COMMENT SO  I'M GOING TO TAKE THE LIBERTY  TO. WE SUBMIT THIS POINT BRING  CERTAINLY BRING PROPERTY INTO  DPP. I HAVE NO ISSUE WITH.  SIGNAGE AND PARKING YOU KNOW  AGAIN NO PROBLEMS FROM A  PRACTICAL STANDPOINT. WELL, I  APPRECIATE THE APPLICANT'S  DECIDED OPEN SPACE. THERE'S NO  WAY. YOU KNOW THE KIND OF  QUALITY PRODUCT THAT AT THE  HOSPITAL PUTS OUT AND HAS PUT  OUT HISTORICALLY THAT THEY'RE  NOT GOING TO 5% OR CLOSE TO  IT. OPEN SPACE WITH  LANDSCAPING AND OTHER THINGS  SO. FOR A PRACTICAL STANDPOINT  SEE IT A BIG ISSUE AND AND AND  I WOULD DEFER TO STAFF  SUGGESTION OR RECOMMENDATION  THERE I DON'T THINK IT'S A  REASONABLE NUMBER. YOU KNOW  FAR THAT ASIDE STANDARD-ISSUE  DELIGHTED YOU KNOW THE 2  PARTIES ARE WORKING  COLLABORATIVELY TO WORK THEIR  WAY THROUGH THOSE ISSUES  BECAUSE SO. APPRECIATIVE THAT  DOESN'T HAPPEN TO FALL ON THE  CITY'S PLATE. SO THANK YOU  VERY MUCH FOR YOUR EFFORTS TO  NO IT'S IT'S YOU KNOW THERE  ARE JUSTIFIABLE ISSUES AND  CONCERNS ON BOTH SIDES. I  THINK YOU'RE BOTH GREAT  PARTNERS AND YOU'RE GOING TO  WORK THROUGH THIS ISSUE. AND  MAKE SURE YOU'VE GOT A COMFORT  LEVEL BOTH PLACES THAT THE  DEVELOPMENT OVER A PERIOD OF  CAN TAKE PLACE IN AN  EXPEDITIOUS AND ECONOMICALLY  YOU KNOW SHOULD MATTER AND AT  THE SAME TIME DISTRICTS GOING  BE COMFORTABLE WITH WITH THAT  THEY'RE GOING TO CONFORM TO  REASONABLE DESIGN STANDARDS I  DON'T THINK THIS WOULD BE ANY  ISSUES THERE SO I'M DELIGHTED  WE DON'T HAVE TO REALLY YOU WE  CAN KICK THAT DOWN THE ROAD A  LITTLE BIT FOR SO THANK YOU  VERY MUCH. SO OKAY.  >> I'LL HIT STOP FOR YOU.  COMMISSIONER EVERAGE.  >> YES YEAH, MOST OF MY  QUESTIONS WERE ANSWERED DURING  THE MEETINGS THAT I HAD THAT  MY AGENDA BRIEFING IN THE  FIRST NUMBER THAT CAME TO MY  MIND WAS 5% FOR THE OPEN  SPACE. I SAID THAT IN THE  MEETING EARLIER, BUT I ABLE I  YOU KNOW LESS THAN THAT I I  UNDERSTAND THE REASONS WHY  UNDERSTAND THE REASONS WHY  THEY WANT TO GO THAT ROUTE SO  IF THERE IS A COMPROMISE I CAN  I DEFINITELY WORK WITH THAT.  OTHER PART ABOUT YOU KNOW  HAVING THE REVIEW COMMITTEE.  IT'S KIND OF HARD YOU KNOW  HOPEFULLY THEY'LL WORK IT OUT  KIDS SAME THAT I SAID THE  MEETINGS, I'D RATHER SEE THEM  WORK IT OUT BEING PUT ON OUR  SHOULDERS. ALMOST LIKE BEING A  REFEREE. I I THINK THAT WILL  GO THROUGH THIS WE'LL GET OUR  ANSWERS COME SECOND READING  THAT'S ALL I QUESTIONS.  >> OK THANK YOU SET FOR MYSELF  AND I WANT TO TAKE 5 MINUTES.  >> I HAD A QUESTION  >> SOMEBODY SAID IN THE  FUTURE. DEVELOPMENT WOULD HAVE  TO BE FOR THIS PARTICULAR USE  AND INDUSTRIAL USE. HOSPITAL.  AM I UNDERSTANDING THAT  CORRECTLY.  >> PUBLIC TO TO SHUN PUBLIC  STAND CIVIC SPACES.  >> COULDN'T HAVE I KNOW THIS  WHEN THEY'RE READY BUT THAT  COULD BE A COSTCO BUILT HERE  WITH THAT DESIGNATION.  >> NO COSTCO WOULDN'T MEET  THAT LAND INSTITUTIONAL  SCHOOL. POTENTIALLY SO THEY'RE  SOMETHING SIMILAR.  >> OKAY TO THOSE USES SOME  THINK PUBLIC INSTITUTION  LONGER CIVIC OKAY, CORRECT ALL  RIGHT. I THERE WAS SOME I WAS  THINKING. YES IF YOU OPEN UP  THE DOOR ANYTHING CAN GO IN  THERE, BUT IT'S VERY.  >> WOMEN OKAY THAT WAS MY  FIRST AS FAR AS THE REVIEW I  >> HEARD THAT THAT WAS  ESTABLISHED IN 2017, BUT I  DON'T KNOW IF ANTICIPATE IT.  HOSPITAL.  >> I MEAN THEY'RE UNDERSTAND  THAT THE REST OF THAT PROJECT  THAT WAS A MASK THAT THAT WAS  A MASSIVE UNDERTAKING AND AND  TO HAVE SOME I GUESS CONTROL  OVER WHAT GOES ON, BUT. YOU  SAID THAT'S ALREADY IN THIS  APPLICATION.  >> SO THE THE REVIEW  COMMITTEE, DPP FERTILITY WAS  APPROVED IN 2019 20 AND JUST  THAT THE TIMING SAID THE  HOSPITAL. CHOIR, THE PROPERTY  IN 2015. THE REVIEW COMMITTEE  WAS CREATED VIA SOME APPROVAL  BY THE COMMISSION IN  2017. AND IT WAS IMPLEMENTED  VILLAGES E IN 2019 BUT THE  VILLAGE EVEN 2019 DIDN'T  INCLUDE SARASOTA MEMORIAL  PROPERTY. AND SO THAT'S WHY  THERE'S JUST THE THE  COMPLEXITIES OF THE TIMING OF  HOW THAT HAS TRANSPIRED IS WHY  WE'RE WORKING THROUGH THIS  WITH WELL IN PART TO TRY TO  FIND THE HAPPY MEDIUM  COMMISSIONER LANGDON TO FOLLOW  UP AND YOU'RE ASKING ABOUT  ARCHITECTURE. THEIR APPROVAL  AUTHORITY IS MORE THAN  ♪ JUST ARCHITECTURE. I MEAN  COULD GET INTO ARGUABLY IT  WOULD DEPEND ON THOSE SITES TO  AN ATTORNEY FOR ONE SIDE SAY  THAT ATTORNEY FOR THE OTHER  SIDE SAY THAT DICTATES A  PLACEMENT OF CERTAIN  FACILITIES AND SO ON AND SO ON  SO I MEAN IT IS IT'S IT'S IN  THE VILLAGE EVEN DPP THEY HAVE  TO ISSUE A LETTER OF APPROVAL  BEFORE YOU CAN SUBMIT THEY  ASKED THAT STAFF WILL ACCEPT.  SO EVEN THOUGH WE'RE CONFIDENT  WE CAN WORK SOMETHING OUT THAT  IS A VERY VERY VERY POWERFUL  LETTER APPROVAL AUTHORITY TO  HAVE.  >> STAFF SAYS 8. I CAN'T DO  ANYTHING.  >> SO WE'RE WORKING THROUGH  WITH THEM WE'VE MET WITH THEM  BEFORE WE SUBMITTED  APPLICATIONS. WE MET WITH  THEM. 4 P'S APP WE MET WITH  THEM AFTER PIECE AFTER MEETING  WITH THEM AGAIN WORKING  THROUGH THIS. BUT IT'S A  PROCESS.  >> THANK YOU SO WHAT I'M  HEARING IS. AND INCLUDING THAT  REVIEW BOARD AND THE PROCESS  THAT AGAIN I THINK WAS PUT IN  PLACE REASONS OTHER THAN FOR  FOR HOSPITAL. IT WOULD REALLY  DELAY THIS THIS PROJECT AND I  KNOW WE'VE BEEN WAITING FOR  HOSPITALS IN PORT, A VERY LONG  TIME.  >> DO I HAVE THAT IN MY YES  MANUFACTURER OPINION. VERY  GOOD. IT'S OF THAT.  >> AND I'M SORRY I THINK I HAD  ONE MORE MEETING ONE MORE.  QUESTION HERE ABOUT.  >> THE BILL WOULD YEAH I I  THINK COMMISSIONER THROUGHOUT  HAVE SOMETHING LIKE I'M IN I'M  LIKE I CAN'T GO BELOW THIS, I  WOULDN'T BE COMFORTABLE WITH 0  BUT IT CAN'T GO BELOW  >> SO I JUST WANT TO PUT THAT  OUT THERE FOR WHEN SOMEBODY IS  READY TO MAKE MOTIONS OR  WHATEVER THAT IF I COULD  COMMENT ON THAT TOO WE WE DO  THAT FOUGHT COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL WE THINK THAT  ACTUALLY IS A GOOD IDEA WHAT  WE WANT TO AVOID IS.  >> 5 SOUNDS LIKE A GOOD NUMBER  RIGHT JUST 5 MEAN THE  DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 4, 5%,  RIGHT, BUT 5 SEEMS MORE SOLID.  BUT IF IT'S 5% AND THERE'S A  THINK ABOUT HOW DEVELOPMENT  PURSE FOR A HOSPITAL FACILITY  FOR A PUBLIC HOSPITAL STILL A  IT'S BECAUSE THERE'S A DEMAND  SO IF THEY WANT TO BRING  SOMETHING ONTO THE SITE THAT  DOESN'T EXIST IT'S BECAUSE  THERE'S ALREADY A DEMAND FOR  IT. SO THAT MEANS THAT THE  DEMANDS THEY'RE NOW THEY HAVE  TO GET CLEAN APPROVED. IF IT'S  4% AND WE WE NICK THAT AND WE  HAVE TO COME BACK THROUGH THE  PROCESS WITHOUT HAVING THE  ABILITY. COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL  PUT FORWARD AND WE HAVE TO  AMEND BEFORE WE CAN GET  ANYTHING APPROVED WAS JUST A  WASTE THAT SERVICE ON SO  HAVING THAT FLEXIBILITY WOULD  BE WOULD BE VERY IMPORTANT FOR  HOSPITAL.  >> THANKS FOR CLARIFYING ALL  RIGHT SO I COMMISSIONER  LANGDON.  >> THANK YOU ALL MAKE COUPLE  OF  >> REALLY OKAY WITH THE  HEIGHT. VARIATION THAT A WHOLE  LOT OF IT'S HARD FOR ME TO  IMAGINE A PROJECT THAT  WOULDN'T HAVE AT LEAST 5%.  OPEN SPACE. I'M CERTAINLY NOT  DICTATING WHERE IT NEEDS TO  BE. AND 10 OR 15 YEARS FROM  NOW AND ADJUSTMENT HAD TO BE  MADE TO THAT OPEN SPACE. IT'S  NOT NECESSARILY A BAD THING TO  HAVE TO COME BACK IN A PUBLIC  FORUM AND HAVE THAT  CONVERSATION. AND HAVE A  FUTURE COMMISSION WEIGH IN ON  THAT SO I'M SUPPORTIVE OF  STAFF'S 5 YEARS. I PERCENT  RECOMMENDATION AT TAPS WHAT  WOULD NORMALLY BE CALLED FOR.  AND I REALLY THINK YOU'LL HAVE  NO TROUBLE HITTING THAT 5%  WHEN YOU ACTUALLY LAY OUT YOUR  PLANS.  >> REGARDING THE REVIEW  COMMITTEE.  >> I I REALLY DON'T WANT TO  GET IN THE MIDDLE OF  >> I WOULD JUST REITERATE WHAT  I SAID DURING OUR ONE-ON-ONE  THIS COMMUNITY HAS PAID TAXES.  HOSPITAL FOR DECADES. AND WE  WANT OUR HOSPITALS. I'M  CURRENTLY WELLEN PARK ANATOMY  HOMES AND SARASOTA MEMORIAL.  ENJOY A VERY STRONG SUPPORT  AND BRANDS IN THIS COMMUNITY  DATE. I WOULD HATE TO SEE THIS  PROJECT BE DELAYED AS YOU GUYS  COULDN'T FIGURE OUT THAT  DESIGN STUFF. SO I HAVE GREAT  FAITH AND BOTH ORGANIZATIONS  THAT YOU'LL FIND A PATH  FORWARD AND THAT WILL NOT  BECOME A STUMBLING BLOCK.  REGARDING THE SIGNS CLEARLY  NEED RELIEF FROM SIGNED  REGULATIONS I UNDERSTAND FROM  FROM OUR MEETING THAT WE HAD  ACTUALLY THE STATE DICTATES  SOME OF YOUR ASSIGNED  REQUIREMENTS SO THAT MAKES A  WHOLE LOT OF SENSE TO ME IT'S  SO THE 3 ADJUSTMENTS I DO  SUPPORT STAFF'S  RECOMMENDATIONS. AND I JUST  COURAGE. THE DESIGN COMMITTEE  AND SO MEMORIAL TO HAVE A  MEETING OF THE MINDS  REGARDING. YOU KNOW SPECIFIC  REQUIREMENT I THINK YOU GUYS  ARE UP TO THE TASK YOU'RE  PRETTY SMART. THAT'S IT FOR  NOW I TONIGHT.  >> YES FOR THE FOR LAW FIRM I  HAVE BEEN SWORN. AT RISK OF  BEING THIS DEBT WORSE THAT'S  PRETTY WELL BEATEN UP NOW  ABOUT OPEN SPACE. FOR US TO  CONTINUE TO SORT OF HANG IN  THERE ON THIS ISSUE I HOPE  UNDERSCORES THE FACT THAT IT  REALLY IS IMPORTANT. SO YOU  KNOW I CAN'T HELP BUT NOTICE  ACTUALLY FEEL KIND OF PROUD  ABOUT THE FACT WE TALKED ABOUT  THE HISTORY OF THIS PROPERTY  BACK IN 2000 WHEN IT WAS  ANNEXED I WAS LAWYER THAT THE  ANNEXATION SO I'VE BEEN AROUND  A WHILE AND THEN DEALT THESE  KIND OF ISSUES I CAN ASSURE  YOU THAT I'VE HAD ANY NUMBER  OF INSTANCES OVER THE YEARS  WHERE STANDARDS GET PUT IN  PLACE PERCENTAGES AND THIS BY  THE WAY IS AN ARBITRARY NUMBER  ITS STAFF IS NOT PRESENTED YOU  WITH THE STUDY THE SAY WELL 5%  IS APPROPRIATE HERE FOR A  HOSPITAL BECAUSE WE STUDIED  HOSPITALS IN MIAMI IN ARCADIA  AND EVERYWHERE IN-BETWEEN AND  THIS IS THIS IS THE AVERAGE  PERCENTAGE SPACE THIS IS JUST  AN ARBITRARY NUMBER. SO WHAT  WE HAVE IS AN ARBITRARY NUMBER  THAT. THE ONLY REAL PURPOSE OF  IT IS THE SET UP A SCENARIO.  1015 20 YEARS FROM NOW. YOU  KNOW THAT SOMETHING YOU KNOW  GOT TO TALK ABOUT TODAY'S  MEDICINE YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT  THE FUTURE'S GOING TO BRING  WELL THERE'S A TIME WHEN WHEN  ERIC SELLER ACRES LINEAR  ACCELERATORS IS THE MEDICAL  TERM FOR RADIATION MACHINE FOR  CANCER TREATMENT I SO THERE  WAS A TIME THOSE DIDN'T EXIST  AND WINDOWS CAME ABOUT IT  REQUIRED THAT WAS A NEW  SERVICE TO BE DO SO WHAT IF  THERE WAS A NEW SERVICE THAT  COULD BE PROVIDED. YOU AT THIS  SITE THE BENEFIT THE CITIZENS  OF PORT. AND WE HAVE TO COME  BACK AND GO THROUGH A 4 MONTH  PROCESS. JUST TO JUST TO GET  THAT EVERYBODY WOULD NOT HAVE  A PROBLEM WITH IT WOULD JUST  DELAY THE BEING BUILT SECONDLY  THE DEFINITION OF OPEN SPACE.  AND CHANGE. I'VE BEEN THROUGH  THIS I'VE BEEN THROUGH THIS  DEFINITION THINK AGAIN WE'RE  NOT TAUGHT SO MANY MENTION THE  COSTCO WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT  A COSTCO WHERE AND APPROVAL IS  MADE THE PLANS ARE SUBMITTED  THE COSTCO IS BUILT AND IT'S  DONE THERE'S NEVER GOING TO BE  PHASE 2 OR 3 THIS IS A  MULTI-YEAR PROCESS AND I THINK  THAT NEEDS TO BE TAKEN INTO  CONSIDERATION AND WHAT THE  DEFINITION OF OPEN SPACE  CHANGES. SO THAT SAY WELL WHAT  WHAT THEY DO WITH THAT THING.  SO RIGHT CITY THAT THEY JUST  TOTALLY REWROTE THEIR LAND  DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ABOUT  3 YEARS AGO JUST LIKE YOU ALL  ARE FIXING TO DO. THEY CHANGED  THE DEFINITE THEY CHANGE HOW  THEY MEASURED THE HEIGHT OF  BUILDINGS. SO NOW. THEY HAVE  BEACH PLANS FOR THESE AREAS  THE CONTEMPLATED THAT NOTHING  TALLER THAN A HEIGHT OF THE  BUILDING NOW SUNDAY MEASURE  BUILDING RIGHT THERE. SO WHAT  IF OPEN SPACE GETS MEASURED  DIFFERENTLY AND THINGS THAT  TODAY WOULD COUNT OPEN SPACE.  ALL OF A SUDDEN DON'T COUNT.  SPACE AND THEN THE LAST THING  THAT'S KIND OF A HEAD  SCRATCHER FOR ME SO. THE  VILLAGE REGULATORY SCHEME. THE  VILLAGE DISTRICT PATTERN PLAN  INDEX MAP THE PATTERN BOOK THE  COMP PLAN ALL OF THOSE THINGS  HAVE WORKED TOGETHER REALLY  WELL AND WELL IN PART I THINK  EVERYBODY WOULD AGREE WITH  THAT. SO RIGHT NOW TODAY THERE  COULD BE PROPERTIES GOING  FORWARD IN THIS VILLAGE IN  VILLAGE E THAT WOULD NOT THE  REQUIRED TO HAVE ANY OPEN  SPACE. OKAY BECAUSE THAT'S HOW  THE REGULATIONS WERE. I WOULD  YOU WANT TO TREAT THE HOSPITAL  DIFFERENTLY. ESPECIALLY WHERE  THE NEGATIVE THE ONLY POSSIBLE  NEGATIVE IMPACT HERE IS A  NEGATIVE IMPACT THAT CAUSES  THE WAY. NOW AS JACKSON BEEN  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL TALKED  ABOUT HAVING SOME MINIMAL  AMOUNT SUBJECT TO THE  ADMINISTRATOR REVIEW IF YOU GO  BELOW IT. YOU KNOW THAT WOULD  ELIMINATE THE DELAY ASPECT.  BUT IT STILL NEEDS TO BE A  MINIMAL AMOUNT BECAUSE IF YOU  HAVE TOO BIG OF A MOUNTAIN  STAFF CAN GO YOU KNOW I MOVE I  WANT TO PROVE THAT SO SO 0 IS  UNPALATABLE PERHAPS SMALL  AMOUNT WITH ADMINISTRATIVE  APPROVAL ABILITY PLEASE PLEASE  DON'T TREAT THE HOSPITAL  PROPERTY DIFFERENTLY ON THIS  ISSUE THAN OTHER PROPERTY  WOULD BE TREATED IN THE THANK  THANK THANK MADAM MA US TO  FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS FROM.  >> FOR THAT IS THE  COMMISSIONER TELLS TO WAY  RELATED TO MISTER BOEHNER  COMMENTS. LET ME ASK YOU WHAT  ABOUT 5% WITH THE ABILITY FOR  AN ADMINISTRATOR. REVIEW.  AND SPIRIT OF NEGOTIATION. SO.  >> WORSENING TODAY'S  DEFINITION ABOUT SPACE. SO  FROM THE HOT THE HOSPITAL  FOLKS HAVE TOLD US.  >> THAT THAT'S A RANGE WHERE  THEY WOULD VERY LIKELY HAVE A  PROBLEM. OKAY, LOWER THE  NUMBER THE LESS LIKELY THEY  WOULD BE A PROBLEM. SO 5% AND  AGAIN THAT'S THAT'S JUST.  THAT'S JUST SURE IF THAT'S AN  ARBITRARY NUMBER WITH THAT WE  WOULD BE MUCH MORE COMFORTABLE  WITH. YOU THE REALLY THE  DISCUSSION THAT THESE AB WAS  AROUND THAT'S REALLY KIND OF  WHERE THE DISCUSSION WAS THAT  WOULD BE A MUCH MORE  COMFORTABLE NUMBER AND WOULD  SUBSTANTIALLY ELIMINATE.  CHANCE OF DELAY IN THE  >> AND MY SECOND QUESTION AND  BELIEVE FOR STAFF. AROUND THE  ISSUE OF THE DEFINITION OF  OPEN SPACE. THIS ORDINANCE IS  APPROVED TODAY WITH OUR  CURRENT DEFINITION OF OPEN  SPACE. 15 OR 20 YEARS FROM NOW  IF CHANGING THE DEFINITION OF  OPEN SPACE WHICH DEFINITION  WHAT THIS ENTITY BE REQUIRED  TO  >> COUPLE QUESTIONS IN THE  VILLAGE EV TPP IT LISTS OPEN  TRYING TO PULL IT UP AND I'M  HAVING A COMPUTER ISSUE. YOU  SEE IF I CAN ACCESS IT HERE IT  DOES DEFINE WHAT CAN BE  INCLUDED AS OPEN SPACE THAT'S  PART OF THAT ADOPTED THAT'S  WHAT IT WOULD TO BE. AND ALSO  AND I JUST WANT TO INTERJECT  YOU KNOW SAYING THAT WE'RE  TREATING YOU KNOW THAT 5% IS  ARBITRARY NUMBER. THAT WAS  SOMETHING THAT WE AMONG STAFF  WE DIDN'T HAVE TIME TO DO A  STUDY CETERA BUT PCD ZONING IS  30% OF THE SITE. SO I DON'T  THINK IT'S UNREASONABLE FROM  THE STAFF'S PERSPECTIVE AND  EVEN IF IT WENT FROM ONE  PERCENT TO 5%. WE'RE WILLING  TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT  WERE FLEXIBLE THAT THIS WAS  JUST A BEGINNING NUMBER AND  I'M GOING TO PULL THAT UP  BECAUSE I KNOW IT DOES  IDENTIFY.  >> YOU KNOW FACE AND I WANT TO  HAVE THAT DONE AND LOOKING FOR  THAT I MEAN MAYBE A COMPROMISE  POSITION. IT'S IF. THE DESIGN  COMMITTEE.  >> IS WELLING IS TO LOCK IN A  DEFINITION OF OPEN SPACE FOR  THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT DON'T  KNOW IF THAT'S. FEASIBLE ARE  AMENABLE TO THE PARTIES.  >> YOU LOOKING FOR THE. THIS A  I. I'M JUST GOING SEARCHES.  >> SO THE MINIMUM OPEN STATES  A SPACE CRITERIA. IT SHALL  INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE  FOLLOWING BUFFERS LANDSCAPED  AREAS AND OFF-STREET PARKING  AREAS, DRY DETENTION AREAS  EXISTING OR PLANNED BODIES OF  WATER INCLUDING STORM WATER  MANAGEMENT AREAS, CONSISTENT  WITH THE ULDC ACTIVE AND  PASSIVE RECREATION AREAS SUCH  AS PLAYGROUNDS GOLF COURSES  MULTI-DAY TRAILS I KNOW  THEY'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE THAT  ON THIS PROPERTY. INTERIOR  LANDSCAPED THAT'S WITHIN THE  COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING  PERIMETER LANDSCAPING SO THERE  IS SOME FLEXIBILITY HERE TO  REACH THAT WILL THEY REACH  THAT WITH THEIR DESIGN YES,  BUT THERE'S NO GUARANTEE. WITH  0.  >> I YELLED OK THANK YOU.  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL.  >> YEAH BEFORE WE BEGIN MAYOR,  I WANT TO VOICE OBJECTION TO  THIS FIVE-MINUTE TIME LIMIT  FOR US ASK HER QUESTIONS GET  ANSWER FROM STAFF AND BE ABLE  TO REBUT THAT IT'S JUST.  >> NOT GOOD DECISION MAKING  POLICY.  >> SO NOW I WILL START MY NEXT  5 ON THE TABLE IT GIVES A  FOOTNOTE NUMBER 8.  >> HOWEVER, I DO NOT SEE A  NUMBER 8 IN THE ACTUAL CHART.  SO MAYBE YOU GUYS CAN GET ON  FIGURE OUT WHERE THAT BELONGS  I LOOKED AND LOOKED AND I  COULDN'T FIND I DON'T WANT TO  WASTE MY TIME LOOKING FOR  ANSWER ON THAT BUT I WILL BE  SURE TO CHECK FOR SECOND  READING. I'M GOING FIGURE  6003.1 8 ON PAGE 39. WHEN  LOOKING AT THIS A P P. THERE'S  A WETLAND SUPER IMPOSED ON THE  PROJECT. AND IT'S  APPROXIMATELY ACRES OR MINUS 8  ACRES IS APPROXIMATELY 25% OF  THIS PROPERTY OF THIS PARCEL.  AND I AM REALLY SURPRISED THAT  NOBODY HAS MENTIONED IT DURING  THE PRESENTATIONS GIVEN BY  STAFF OR THE DEVELOPER. I'D  LIKE TO KNOW HOW ARE YOU GOING  TO MITIGATING 25% OF WETLANDS.  ALL.  >> ALL HAVE A CRYSTAL LLOYD A  PROJECT OR SORRY TERRY  MCKNIGHT IS ECOLOGIST BUT  THERE'S BECAUSE BE WILL BE  THERE'S THERE'S REGULATORY  PROCESS THAT  >> GOOD AFTERNOON  COMMISSIONERS KERRY MCKNIGHT  WITH MONARCH ECOLOGY I  ACTUALLY HAVE NOT BEEN SWORN  NOW.  >> DO YOU SWEAR THAT THE  TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO  PROVIDE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE  TO THE BEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE TO  TALK ABOUT.  >> I THANK COMMISSIONER TO  ANSWER YOUR QUESTION ABOUT THE  WETLAND MITIGATION SO WE  ACTUALLY HAVE ALREADY GONE  THROUGH AN EXTENSIVE SWIFTMUD  PERMITTING PROCESS TO DEAL  WITH THE WETLAND IMPACTS I'M  WE HAVE US WITH A PERMIT THAT  WAS ISSUED IN JULY OF 23 AND  THE WETLANDS ARE GOING TO BE  MITIGATED OFF-SITE BY  PURCHASING MITIGATION BANK  CREDITS FROM MIKE A MITIGATION  BANK.  >> SO FOR THIS COMMONER. WHAT  DOES THAT MEAN.  >> IN THE SAME SO WE DO WOULD  YOU HAVE ON SITE WE HAVE 7.7 4  ACRES OF WETLANDS THAT  RECLINED ON SITE ICE WITH WHEN  YOU OF COURSE TO YOU KNOW  ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE  WE HAVE TO IMPACT WEAPONS IT'S  A SMALL SITE IS REALLY NO WAY  TO POINT I'M SO TO DO THAT WE  DO HAVE TO DO WHAT'S CALLED  MITIGATION. AND THERE'S 3  DIFFERENT OPTIONS YOU CAN DO  FOR MEDICATION YOU CAN DO ON  SITE MITIGATION WHICH CAN BUT  CREATION OR ENHANCEMENT OF  WETLANDS EXCEPT YOU CAN FIND  AN OFF-SITE MITIGATION SITE OR  YOU CAN DO YOU CAN MITIGATION  BANK WHAT A MITIGATION BANK IS  ARE THERE BASICALLY  CONSERVATION LANDS THAT ARE  PERMANENT BY THE AGENCIES  WHERE THEY'RE ACTUALLY PERMIT  IN MITIGATION BANKS THAT THEY  ESSENTIALLY DO ALL THE  MITIGATION FOR YOU THEY DO ALL  THE ENHANCEMENTS AND YOU CAN  BASICALLY GO TO THE BANK AND  BY CREDIT AND THOSE CREDITS  ARE BASICALLY WHAT'S USED TO  OFFSET IMPACTS.  >> SO AT THE END OF THE DAY  WHAT I'M HEARING IS YOU'RE  GOING TO BE FILLING IN THIS  WETLANDS HIGH CREDIT TO THE  MAKE TO ABLE TO FILL IN THESE  CORRECT AND THOSE THOSE  MITIGATION CREDITS HAVE  ACTUALLY ALREADY BEEN PAID FOR  IN FULL.  >> THANK YOU SURE THAT'S A  HEFTY PRICE IT'S NOT CHEAP.  ♪ >> AS FAR AS THE WEST  VILLAGE'S REVIEW JUST FOR  EVERYBODY'S INFORMATION THAT  REVIEW  ♪ >> COMMITTEE ENTAILS ONE  INDIVIDUAL FROM THE MASTER  DEVELOPER. 2 INDIVIDUALS FROM  THE WEST VILLAGE'S IMPROVEMENT  DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF NORTH  PORT STAFF IS AN ADVISORY NON  VOTING MEMBER WAS APPOINTED BY  CITY MANAGER. SO THE THE WEST  REVIEW COMMITTEE WAS CREATED  BUT THERE IS OVERSIGHT BY THE  DEVELOPER WEST VILLAGES  IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND STAFF  GETS TO OFFER THEIR INPUT. I  AM ABSOLUTELY CONFIDENT THAT  THE. WBRC THE DEVELOPER WILL  BE ABLE TO COME TO SOME TERMS  WITH BECAUSE I THINK THIS IS A  BENEFIT NOT ONLY TO THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT BUT IT'S A  BENEFIT TO ONE PARK AREA AND  IT'S ALSO THEN IF IT TOO  SARASOTA MEMORIAL. I DON'T  BELIEVE WE ARE OF THE  AUTHORITY TO BE ABLE TO WAVE  THE AUTHORITY OF THE WEST  REVIEW COMMITTEE. I.  >> I HAVEN'T HEARD THAT WE  HAVE THAT AUTHORITY I CAN'T  IMAGINE WHY WE WOULD WANT THAT  AUTHORITY.  >> ESPECIALLY WHEN WE  INSTITUTED THIS REVIEW  COMMITTEE WHEN WE APPROVED THE  BTP  >> WHENEVER YOU GUYS ARE READY  AS FAR AS THE PARKING GOES  THERE'S ALREADY A CODE FOR  PARKING IN SEEMS TO BE  REASONABLE.  >> I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU GUYS  ARE LOOKING FOR AN EXEMPTION.  BUT WE ALSO HAVE TO BE  COGNIZANT OF PARKING KOHL'S  AND NOT GIVING AWAY THE FARM  TO BE ABLE TO DEVELOP DEVELOP  DEVELOP AND THEN YEARS DOWN  THE ROAD NOT HAVE ANYWHERE FOR  ANYBODY TO PARK AND HAVE A  HUGE PROBLEM WITH THE PARK. I  WILL YIELD THE FLOOR NOW MAYOR  THANK YOU.  >> ALL RIGHT, THANK I JUST  WANTED TO GET BACK AND  COMPENSATION BECAUSE THAT  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL TO BRING  THAT UP AND WHERE WHAT THAT  ALL MEANS FLORIDA'S HAVE I  BELIEVE IT'S STILL IN PLACE IS  0 NET LOSS OF WETLANDS BUT  THAT FOR THE ENTIRE STATE  DOESN'T APPLY SPECIFICALLY TO  A PARTICULAR PROJECT IS PEOPLE  ARE ASKING ABOUT HOW CAN THEY  FILL IN THOSE WETLANDS BECAUSE  THEY HAVE THOSE 3 CHOICES.  WHAT TO DO WITH I REMEMBER  WHEN THE WALMART AND HOME  DEPOT BUILT THAT DEVELOPER  SECOND PAID SOME FARMER IN. SO  FOR TO MITIGATE FOR THE  WETLANDS THAT WAS THERE SO  THAT'S YOU KNOW HOW HOW IT  WORKS IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT  SPECIFIC FOR THIS PROJECT THAT  IS. IN THE POLICY A PROCESS.  THE STATE DOESN'T MEAN IT'S A  GOOD THING, BUT I'M JUST  PUTTING THAT OUT THERE THAT  IT'S NOT JUST BECAUSE OF THIS  PROJECT THAT THERE. HANG INTO  A BANK THAT USING THAT OPTION  IS THAT JUST JUST WANT TO  ADDRESS THAT.  >> VICE MAYOR YOU'RE YOU'RE ON  THERE. BUT YEAH, WITH REGARD  TO THE OPEN YOU KNOW SHOULD  HAVE BOTH SIDES OF THAT ISSUE  AND AND I WOULD BE COMFORTABLE  WITH ACTUALLY HAPPENING STAFF  AND THE APPLICANT FIND A WAY  TO WORK THIS OUT IF STAFF GETS  COMFORTABLE WITH THAT NUMBER  BELOW THAT 5% WITH  ADMINISTRATIVE KIND OF  APPROVAL I I CERTAINLY WAIT TO  SEE A CRITICAL SERVICE HELD UP  FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME  SOMETHING THAT I THINK CAN  REALLY BE HANDLED BY  ADMINISTRATIVE LEVEL. I THINK  THEY HAVE. CERTAINLY IRELAND  COMPETENCE TO MAKE THOSE  DECISION SENTENCING COMMISSION  THIS COMMISSION OR ANY FUTURE  COMMISSION QUITE FRANKLY WHEN  IT COMES TO DETERMINING HOW  MUCH OPEN SPACE ON PARTICULAR  PROPERTIES VERY UNIQUE  DEVELOPMENT, SPECIAL AND  DIFFERENT FROM PRETTY MUCH  ANYTHING ELSE I DON'T I DON'T  SEE ANY REASON WHY WE SHOULD  YOU KNOW, PULLED SOME AS  MISTER BOWEN SAYS ARBITRARY  NUMBER 5% THAT MAY DO NOTHING  MORE THAN YOU KNOW THE WAY  SOMETHING THAT COULD VERY WELL  SAY SOMEBODY LIKE SO YOU KNOW  I THINK STAFF CAN WORK THIS  OUT. AND THEN THE APPLICANT.  >> MUCH DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING  TO ASK ARE AT. COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL.  >> YEAH, WHENEVER THE  CONVERSATION IS YOU HAVE JUST  TURN OUR ATTENTIONS.  >> I'M SO WE'RE MOVING TO  CLOSING ARGUMENTS BY STAFF.  >> THIS IS A WONDERFUL PROJECT  FOR THE CITY WE LIKE TO STATE  FOR THE RECORD IT'S TAP AND  SUPPORTIVE OF THIS PROJECT  HOWEVER, FOLLOWING BASIC  PLANNING PRACTICES. WE WANT TO  MAKE SURE THAT IT. COMPLIANCE.  >> WITH  >> REGULATIONS SET STAFF IS  RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. STAFF  WOULD LIKE IF IT'S COMMISSION  DIRECTION REGARDING THE OPEN  SPACE TO COME UP WITH THE  NUMBER IT WAS A GRAY I BELIEVE  IT WAS ONE 0.5% TO 5%. WITH  THE STAFF REVIEW THAT IT  DOESN'T GO UNDER THAT MINIMUM  STAFF IS AMENABLE TO THAT WANT  TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT WAS ON  THE RECORD. BUT WE DO NEED  COMMISSION DIRECTION. SO THAT  WAY IT CAN BE PUT IN THE  PATTERN PLAN.  >> AND NOT DOCUMENT EACH STAFF  IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AND I  THINK THE COMMISSION FOR THEIR  TIME.  >> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.  OPPOSING ARGUMENTS BY THE  APPLICANT.  >> BE WE WE DO AS FAR AS THE  OPEN SPACE IS VERY GOOD  DISCUSSION. I'M HEARING FROM  BOTH YOU ALL YOUR QUESTIONS  HERE FROM STAFF. AND THAT'S AS  WELL. IT AGAIN IT'S THE IT'S  THE WILL OF THE COMMISSION  WILL BE TO HAVE THE MECHANISM  OF THE 5% TO ONE 0.5% WITH  STAFF'S ABILITY TO  ADMINISTRATIVE REALLY PROVE.  CAN LIVE WITH THAT. WE ALSO  CAN LIVE WITH WORKING WITH  STAFF BETWEEN NOW IN SECOND  READING TO TRY TO SEE IF THERE  MIGHT EVEN BE HARD SMALLER  NUMBER THAN 5 THAT WE CAN  AGREE UPON BUT I'LL LET YOU  ALL MAKE YOUR DECISION HOW YOU  WANT TO DECIDE ON MAKING THIS  MOTION HERE. BUT WITH THAT  BEING SAID WE RESPECTFULLY  REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL AND  THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME THIS  MORNING. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.  >> I'M GOING TO CLOSE.  >> THIS PORTION OF PUBLIC  HEARING AND LOOK OR MOTIONS OR  MOTION. MAKE A MOTION. A TRY.  >> MAKE A MOTION TO HAVE STAFF  AMEND FIGURE 3.3 8. IN THE  DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CHURCH  TO HAVE OPEN SPACE P 5.  >> ACRES AID ASKED STRICT. TO  ALLOW ADMINISTRATIVE  AUTHORITY. TWEEN AND SO HE'S  COMMISSIONER 5% I THINK MORE  THAN 80% ONE IF I'M SORRY I  APOLOGIZE FI THE KURDS. THIS  IS DONE BY CORRECT. PERCENTAGE  WELL.  >> WELL, I'M SORRY AGAIN FOR  THE FOR THE RECORD JACKSON FOR  APPLICANT.  >> WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT  PERCENTAGE BUT YOU'RE CORRECT  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL AS FAR  AS THE TABLES DONE NATURE'S SO  THAT WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT  PERCENTAGE AND SO 5% IS NOT 5.  >> HE 5% IS ONE 0.5 ACRE  CORRECT. YES, I'M GOING ACRES  HERE OK. OKAY I'M GOING OVER  AT  >> I'M GOING TO MAKE A MOTION  TO HAVE STAFF AMEND FIGURE THE  DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CHURCH.  >> TO REQUIRE PUBLIC  INSTITUTIONAL USE HAVE A 5  ACRE. AND THEN ASKED STRICT TO  GIVE THEM THE AUTHORITY 2  ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVE  ANYTHING BETWEEN THE 1.5 ACRES  AND 5 ACRES TO BE  ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED  ANYTHING LESS THAN THE 5 ACRE  I'M SORRY LESS THAN THE 1.5  ACRES COME BACK TO COMMISSION  FOR AMEND IT. OKAY NOW.  >> UNTIL I HEAR THE SINGER  STOPPED I'VE THERE AND IF YOU  COULD REPEAT THAT.  >> CLARK. MAYBE THAT'S A  DIRECT STAFF TO AMEND FIGURE  IN THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS  CHART TO HAVE OPEN SPACE BE 5  ACRES WITH AN ASTERIX STRICT  TO ALLOW ADMIN AUTHORITY. TO  ALLOW AUTHORITY TO  ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVE  ANYTHING BETWEEN 1.5 5 ACRES.  WITH ANYTHING LESS THAN 5  ACRES COMING COMMISSION FOR  APPROVAL. WE HAVE TO SLOW DOWN  IF YOU WANT TO RUN DIFFERENT.  >> SO THERE IS A MOTION MADE  BY COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL  LOOKING FOR A SECOND. I MEAN  I'LL SECOND I DON'T THINK SHE  HAS A CLEAR SO WE HAVE TO WE  HAVE TO START OVER. SO BECAUSE  YOU CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT AND  THIS I'M SORRY YOU CLOSE THE  PUBLIC HEARING. I'M GOING TO  HAVE TO ASK AND MAKE A MOTION  TO REOPEN THE HEARING TO ASK A  QUESTION OF SO MY MOTION IS TO  REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING SO I  CAN ASK STAFF A FOLLOW-UP  QUESTION THAT CAN.  >> ALL RIGHT WE HAVE A MOTION  TO REOPEN PUBLIC BY BELL AND  SECOND I'M LIKE SHIRLINGTON  VOTE ON THAT VICE THERE'S YES,  I'M YES, COMMISSIONER YES ALL  RIGHT GO. AHEAD COMMISSIONER  ALL RIGHT. 5 ACRES.  >> WITH A 1.5 TO 5 ACRE.  APPROVAL AUTHORITY FOR STAFF.  >> ANYTHING LESS THAN 1.5  ACRES WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK  FOR COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL.  >> I SEE EVERYTHING KIND LIKE  I'M SPEAKING ENGLISH. AND I  WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S  UNDERSTOOD WHAT THE INTENT IS  HERE.  >> THAT PERCENTAGE OF 20. I  WANT ALL KIDDING ASIDE ABOUT  MINUTES HIGH SCHOOL MATH, WHAT  IS THE PERCENTAGE 27 POINT 7  ACRES. IF 5 ACRES REQUIRED TO  BE  >> THAT'S 6 ISN'T THAT CLOSE  TO A 6 -20.  >> 80% 1.5%. ONE 0.5% YEARS OF  20 SAYS MORE MY  >> NO  >> 27.7 ACRES. THIS IS WHERE  TRYING TO STAY OUT OF THAT.  YOU TO MY NATION WANT TO MAKE  SURE I ARBITRARILY PICK NUMBER  THAT'S GOING TO US ALL RIGHT  AND SOLDIERS. MY QUESTION.  >> STAFF ON THIS CHART, THE  FIRST 2 COLUMNS ARE DONE BY  ACRES. IF WE WERE TO GO IN THE  3RD COLUMN, WHICH IS PUBLIC  CAN WE CHANGE IT TO PERCENTAGE  AND JUST CHANGE.  >> THE HEAVY SO THAT IT ACRES  SLASH PERCENT DEPENDING ON.  >> WHAT IS BEING USED ON THE  CHART SO YOU WOULD HAVE TO  CHANGE MAKES YEARS TO 32  YEARS. MAKES PRESIDENTIAL TO  48 YEARS AND THEN 5% TO  PUBLIC. COULD THAT BE DONE.  >> SO THIS CHART COLUMN IT  WOULD BE DEDICATED TO THE U.S.  MH PROPERTY. AND YOU CAN. DO  THE FIRST PITCH. HAVE PARENT  WEEK WE CAN. YOU KNOW WHAT DO  SOME MATH. HERE WITH ME GUYS,  I'M DOING SOME MATH.  >> YEAH, I MEAN THANK YOU  ELAINE OR A DIRECTOR OF  DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE  RECORD I HAVE SWORN. THIS IS  GETTING REALLY COMPLICATED  FROM STAFF ON THIS TRAIT OF  SIDE WE HAVE CONCERNS WITH.  STAFF DOING AN ADMINISTRATIVE  WAIVER WITH NO CRITERIA FOR  DETERMINING WHAT THE BASIS IS  FOR THAT. FOR WAIVER. AND IT  WOULD BE MUCH CLEANER STAFF  AND THE APPLICANT.  >> TO SIMPLY STATE THIS IS  THIS IS THE FLOOR THIS IS THE  MINIMUM AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE.  >> AND IF THAT 0, 0,  >> STAFF WE WOULD NOT  RECOMMEND 0 SIMPLY PLANNING  PLANNING IT IS A POLICY ISSUE  THAT IS THE PURVIEW OF THE  COMMISSION AND WE WILL ABIDE  BY WHATEVER YOU YOU DEEM  APPROPRIATE, BUT WE WOULD ASK  THAT IT NOT BE COMPLICATED BY  HAVING STAFF TRY TO FIGURE OUT  WHAT CRITERIA TO USE TO BASED  ON.  >> I MAKE A MOTION MAYOR,  THANK YOU WE CLOSE PUBLIC  HEARING. BELIEVE THAT WILL BE  HEARD THAT. YES I THANK YOU  THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR FOR THE  RECORD JEFFREY BEEN. I JUST  CHECKED WITH THE HOSPITAL  FOLKS AND THEY SAID IT WAS ALL  RIGHT FOR ME TO MAKE THE  STATEMENT I THINK THIS IS  WHERE EVERYBODY NEEDS TO HEAR  THIS AND UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE  TALKING ABOUT OKAY, THIS IS  NOT DEVELOP OR THIS IS  SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL.  LARGE ENOUGH PART OF THIS  PROPERTY.  >> IS SET ASIDE AS DEVELOPABLE  WITHOUT SOME FUTURE APPROVAL  OF A DIFFERENT COMMISSION.  THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING  SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL  BOARD. WE'VE HAD TO TAKE INTO  CONSIDERATION BEFORE THEY  INVEST MILLIONS AND MILLIONS  OF DOLLARS IN THE SITE BECAUSE  ONCE THEY START THE FIRST IN  THE FIRST PHASE GOING TO BE  PLENTY SPACE. BUT TO INVEST IN  AMES AND MANTA DOLLARS COMING  OUT OF THE GATE. WHICH MAKES  TO THE SITE KNOWING THERE'S A  CERTAIN AMOUNT OF LAND THAT  MAY NOT EVER BE ABLE TO BE  DEVELOPED THAT COULD.  ROADBLOCK. FOR A HOSPITAL  COMING TO THE SIDE. HOWEVER  THERE'S A NEED TO PAY AROUND  IT'S THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE  5% IN ACRE AND A HALF WRAP  ROUND IF IT'S A SMALL SMALL  NUMBER LIKE THAT. FOR AN  ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL TO GO  BELOW THAT. DOESN'T TOTAL.  THAT THAT WOULD MAKE THAT  WOULD BE MORE COMFORTABLE FOR  THE HOSPITAL AT 5% AND A HALF.  ACTUALLY LESS THAN IT'S NOT 0  BUT AND A HALF WITH THE  ABILITY FOR ADMINISTRATIVE  APPROVAL BECAUSE THE MINISTRY  PEOPLE TAKES THE THE LAYOUT  BUT IT DOES ALLOW FOR SOMEBODY  IN THE CITY TO HAVE A SAYING  YES OR IF THEY WOULD SAY NO  WHEN THE ADMINISTRATION  APPROVAL ALWAYS THE WAY THAT  WORKS THAT CAN ALWAYS BE  BROUGHT TO THIS FUTURE  COMMISSION.  >> FOR FOR IF IT'S STAFF'S IT.  PLEASE DON'T THROW JUST THANK  YOU.  >> I THANK CITY TURNED WE OPEN  PUBLIC HEARING WE HAVE A  MOTION AND A SECOND ON THE  TABLE THAT WE HAVE TO VOTE FOR  THAT GET A SECOND BECAUSE WE  DIDN'T HAVE A SHOW YOU THAT  SORRY BUT VICE MAYOR OKAY.  >> ALL RIGHT DO WE HAVE TO  HAVE A MOTION TO REOPEN TO  CLOSE THE PUBLIC EYE JUST  CLOSE DON'T YOU CAN JUST SAY  YEAH I WANT TO VERIFY THAT NO  ONE HAS ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS  OKAY AND I MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL  QUESTION. I'M SURE OF CLOSE  >> DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT  EXPRESSED SOME CONCERN ABOUT  HAVING ADMINISTRATIVE  AUTHORITY ON THE PART OF STAFF  WITH SOME STRUCTURE. OUR  REQUIREMENTS. WHAT IS THE  REASON BALL. THAT BY SECOND  READING. STAFF COME WITH. SO  THOSE GUIDELINES, WHAT THE.  HOPEFULLY THEY'LL NEED BE  CONCERN THAT SOUNDS LIKE THE  HOSPITAL WOULD BE OK WITH WAY  WHAT WOULD AWAY YOUR CONCERNS  ABOUT THAT LAST VOTE  GUIDELINES WE WOULD NEED TO  LOOK AT THE CURRENTLY ADOPTED.  >> ORDINANCES RELATED TO THE  DPP SEE WHAT IS IN THAT WE MAY  BE ABLE TO UTILIZE. COULD DO  THAT BEFORE. SECOND READING.  AND WE WOULD ALSO NEED TO  ENSURE THAT WHATEVER WE COME  UP IS ACCEPTABLE TO SO TAKES A  LITTLE WE HAVEN'T. SHORT IT'S  VERY STRICT.  >> IT SOUNDS LIKE THOUGH  THERE'S A LOT OF MOTIVATION TO  KIND OF GET THIS NOW WE'D LIKE  TO GET IN DAY OUT WE WOULD  REALLY LIKE TO GET THIS NOW I.  I DO WORRY PROBABLY NOT A TIME  FOR MUCH BACK AND FORTH THE  RESEARCH BECAUSE OF OUR SHORT  TO GET TO THEIR OWN VERY TIGHT  TIMELINE WITH  THEIR BOARD AND WE HAVE ONLY  PUSH TO GET THESE ON YOUR  AGENDA BEFORE WE BREAK. SO I  AM CONCERNED THAT WE MIGHT NOT  TIME TO TURN I WOULD I. I  THINK.  >> AND WE SAID THIS I SAID  THIS PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD  WE ARE CONFIDENT THAT THIS  SITE IS GOING TO HAVE SOME  OPEN SPACE THERE IS SIMPLY NO  WAY TO DEVELOP THE SITE AND  NOT HAVE ANY OPEN SPACE AT  ALL. SO IF.  >> THE.  >> COMMISSION. OVER ABUNDANCE  CAUTION TOO. ENSURE  DEVELOPMENT IS ABLE TO COME  FORWARD DEVELOP. TO ITS  FULLEST POTENTIAL THOSE 0 WELL  IT'S NOT NECESSARILY GOOD  PLANNING PRACTICE. IT IS ALSO  ♪ A CLEAN. ONE ACRE IF IT'S HAVE  WHATEVER IT  >> WE MUCH PREFER AND NUMBER  ♪ >> HARD NUMBER RATHER  >> LEANING IT IN BIG US WELL I  THINK I HEARD IN THE  CONVERSATION 2 AND A HALF.  >> PERCENT ACCEPT OF ALL I  DON'T WANT TO HOLD THIS THING  UP WE NEED TO OFFENSE PROJECT  ALONG BUT I GUESS I'M LOOKING  MISTER BONE TO WEIGH IN ON  THAT FLOOR. 2 AND A HALF  PERCENT THAT FOR A WITH YES  AND THEN JASPER HERE  >> WE SHOULD TALK ABOUT AS FAR  AS THAT TO HAVE BE MORE THAN  5. RE YOU KNOW TIMING IS  PRETTY CLEAR WE WOULD LIKE TO  HAVE THE BUT THERE IS BETWEEN  NOW AND AUGUST 6 THERE'S  ANYTHING WE NEED TO DO ARE  CONFIDENT WE CAN WORK WITH IN  THE SAME WAY WE WORKED ALL THE  WAY UP TO TODAY.  >> ANYTHING ELSE AND SOME OF  THOSE IS A PUBLIC HEARING  AGAIN OF MAKE MOTION  COMMISSIONER ALEX MAKE A  MOTION.  >> SO REOPENING THAT HAVING  THE ADDITIONAL MAKE A MOTION  TO HAVE END.  >> PRIOR TO SECOND READING.  FIGURE THE DEVELOPMENT  STANDARDS TO REFLECT PUBLIC  INSTITUTIONAL USES FOR OPEN  SPACE TO CORE POINT OF 3  QUARTERS OF ACRE. ACRES.  SECOND EXPLAIN HOW MUCH OF  SECOND. THAT IS EXACTLY 3%.  JUST 3%. 7, YEARS. WITHIN  >> SO WHAT THINK THAT'S  REMEMBER THAT'S WHAT.  >> THE APPLICANT IS  COMFORTABLE WITH. I THINK FROM  A PRACTICAL STANDPOINT,  ♪ IT'S GOING TO  ♪ END UP BEING MORE THAN THAT  ANYWAY SO I THINK WE'RE JUST.  ARBITRARY CONVERSATION ABOUT  SOMETHING THAT. NONE OF US  REALLY HAVE HAVE A GRASP THIS  IS JUST ROUND IT AROUND AND  AROUND 2 AND A HALF PERCENT  WORDS FOR THE APPLICANT I SEE  NO PROBLEM WITH YOU KNOW EVERY  PROPERTY DEVELOP BEAUTIFUL  WITH LANDSCAPING SOME OPEN  SPACE IF YOU KNOW THIS SO  WASTE OF OUR TIME QUITE  FRANKLY IN MY OPINION. 2 AND A  HALF PERCENT IS GOOD NUMBER  THAT'S WHAT I WOULD VOTE FOR  SUPPORT MORE THAN THAT.  >> OKAY, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR  THE MOTION MAKER THAT YOU STAY  IN THE MOTION TERMS CHRISTIANS  IS AND WHY IT NOT JUST GETTING  A PERCENTAGE NUMBER OUT THERE.  HE HAS THE REST OF THE CHARGES  AT THAT'S WHY I YOU KNOW I  JUST ROUNDED UP TO 3 QUARTERS  OF AN ACRE BECAUSE 2 AND A  HALF PERCENTAGE 0.7 ACRES  >> SO I JUST ROUNDED UP TO 3  QUARTERS OF ACCIDENT AND THEN  THE NEXT QUESTION FROM A  SHERRY THEN EVERYTHING OF GAS  FOR HENRY QUESTIONS OF HIS  CLOSE BECAUSE EVERYTHING ELSE  WAS TERMS OF PERCENTAGES UP  UNTIL POINT I JUST WANT  >> AND A HALF PERCENT LET  STAFF OF THE APPLICANT DO THE  MATH OK  >> ALL OKAY, SO THERE'S OUR  MOTION CAN WE READ WAS KNOCKED  OUT A WAY TO WIN  >> INSTRUCT STAFF TO AMEND  FIGURE 3.3 8. WHICH IS THE  VILLAGE STANDARDS. PUBLIC  INSTITUTIONAL USE. OPEN SPACE  TO 7. A CURSE. JUST QUARTERS  OF AN ACRE. 3%.  >> OKAY THAT WAS THE MOTION  THAT WAS SECONDED BY VICE  MAYOR. SHOULD HAVE ANYTHING  ELSE. OK SO WE'RE GOING TO DO  A VOICE. WELL ON THAT VICE  MAYOR. MAYER IS A NO LANGDON  NO. I'M A YES. COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE.  >> NO. ANOTHER MOTION.  >> MAYOR DID YOU SAY WHAT YOU  WILL. AND I SAY TO MYSELF  >> YOU TELL US THAT MIKE SUGAR  TRAFFIC, A YES OR NO. I MAKE  ANOTHER MOTION GO HAT. TO HAVE  STAFF. AND FIGURE 3.3 A.  >> WHICH IS THE PUBLIC  INSTITUTIONAL USES CHART. FOR  OPEN SPACE. TO  >> NO MORE 2.5. PERCENT. LEFT  NO NOTE NO LESS THAN 2.5%.  THANK YOU. I'LL SECOND THAT.  >> OK SO WE HAVE A MOTION MADE  BY COMMISSIONER WITH A SLIGHT  CHANGE BUT THE CITY.  >> WITH THAT BACK. TO DIRECT  STAFF TO AMEND. FIGURE PUBLIC  INSTITUTIONAL USES ART FOR  OPEN SPACE TO NO LESS THAN  2.5% AND THAT WAS SECONDED BY  COMMISSIONER LANGDON.  >> MOTION MAKER YOU GOOD THAT.  >> I LIKE TO JUST REITERATE  STAFF IS GOING TO HAVE TO  ADJUST THE TABLE TO REFLECT  ACREAGE PERCENTAGE THAT SO  IT'S NOTHING FURTHER. WE'LL DO  A VOICE.  >> VICE MAYOR VICE MAYOR G S  MAYOR THE A LINE SAY YES,  DALLAS, RICH. YES, OKAY, SO  THAT MOTION ASA'S OTHER ANY  OTHER YEAH WE HAVE TO GRANT  APPROVAL WAIVERS I GUESS GET  OUT HERE, YEAH. I MAKE A  MOTION.  >> 2.  >> ALLOW A WAIVER FOR SIGNAGE.  >> OCEAN WE GOT TO DO MORE  THAN THAT I SECOND IT.  >> ALL RIGHT SO WE HAVE A  WAIVER MOTION MADE BY NOW OR A  WAIVER FOR THE SIGNAGE  REGARDING THE SIGNAGE AND THAT  WAS SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR  STOVES ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT.  WITH A VICE MAYOR VICE MAYOR  IS AIRS. LANGDON SAY YES IT  COMMISSIONER AVERAGE. YES ALL  RIGHT SO THAT PASSES 5 TO 0  AND THEN WE HAD ANOTHER ONE  MAKE THE MOTION.  >> SHOULD APPROVE THE WAIVER  OF THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS TO  BE DETERMINED MAS STAGE.  >> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL  REGARDING WAIVER FOR PARKING  TO BE DETERMINED AT  >> AND A S STAGE WHICH STANDS  FOR. IT'S A STAGE THAT'S JUST  THE PHRASE CAN'T REMEMBER WHAT  ITS EXACT STANDS FOR I DON'T  WANT TO PUT SOMETHING  INACCURATE IN THE RECORD EVERY  IT'S I THINK ADMINISTRATIVE  SITE REVIEW OR SOMETHING LIKE  THAT AND THAT WAS ANY BY VICE  MAYOR OKAY, ANYTHING FURTHER.  WE WILL VOTE VICE MAYOR YES,  MAYOR ZS LINES AND SAY YES  MCDOWELL, COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE.  >> YES OKAY.  >> I DON'T BELIEVE  >> ICE. DON'T THINK THE  COMMISSION NEEDS TO WEIGH  THINK THE THAT'S JUST  DETERMINED ALREADY SO I MAKE A  MOTION TO CONTINUE OR THE 2,  0, 2, DASH 2, 6, EMOTIONS  ALREADY GIVEN TO BE CAPTURED.  WE'RE SECOND READING TO BE  HELD AUGUST WILL SECOND  >> ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A A  MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL TO CONTINUE THIS  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH 20  SEP 6, 2, 2ND READING WITH ALL  OF THE MOTIONS. ACTUALLY ALL  THE MOTIONS THAT WERE MADE  SECOND READING TO BE ON AUGUST  6 2024 AND THAT WAS SECONDED  BY VICE MAYOR WE WILL DO A  LITTLE VOTE. SPACEY ASKED  MAYOR ZS LINE DIDN'T SAY YES  DAHLIAS COMMISSIONER AVERAGE.  YES ALL RIGHT SO THAT PASSES 5  TO 0. WITH THAT. NOTHING  COMMISSIONER THAT WANT TO  THANK YOU FOR DOING THE HEAVY  LIFTING ON CREATE WAS A ALL  RIGHT IT. 5% 5 ACRES THAT ALL  WE'RE GOING OUR LUNCH BREAK  RIGHT OKAY SO ONE WHAT 45  MINUTES PROBABLY ASKED CLOSE  THE MASK, OKAY, OKAY. SO ABOUT  45 MINUTES WHICH IS ONE IS  SAYING ONE  >> I LIKE HELP EVERYBODY WAS  ABLE TO GET SOMETHING TO EAT  AND.  >> REALLY THERE. WE ARE  CONTINUING. WITH COMMISSION  MEETING ON IN SECOND READINGS  ITEM NUMBER 2024 DASH 0, 7,  THINK CAN YOU READ THIS BY  TITLE ONLY.  >> ORDINANCE NUMBER 2020 20  FOR NEXT YEAR IS THAT  ORDINANCE OF THE CITY IN NORTH  PORT FLORIDA CALLING FOR A  REFERENDUM QUESTION TO REPLACE  THE FOR THE QUALIFIERS  LESTER'S OF  THE CITY OF NORTH PORT, FL AT  THE NOVEMBER, 5 2024 GENERAL  ELECTION, PROVIDING A  REFERENDUM QUESTION  DETERMINING WHETHER TO AMEND  THE CITY CHARTER TO AUTHORIZE  THE CITY COMMISSION TO ISSUE  DEBT AND STAND SAYS WITHOUT  PRIOR APPROVAL, PROVIDING FOR  THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED  CHARTER AMENDMENT PROVIDING  FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR AN  EFFECTIVE DATE FOR THE NEW  CHARTER LANGUAGE IF THE  PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT IS  A PERFECT PROVIDING FOR THE  FILING OF THE ORDINANCE WITH  THE SARASOTA COUNTY SUPERVISOR  OF ELECTIONS. HAVE A PATIENT  OF THE TEXT OF THE PROPOSED  CHARTER AMENDMENT PROVIDING  FOR FILING WITH FLORIDA  DEPARTMENT OF STATE OF CHARTER  AMENDMENT IS BY THE CONFLICT  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  >> OKAY WE GO ANY FURTHER I  WANT TO ADDRESS COMMISSIONER  COMMISSIONER, EMRICH ARE YOU  THERE. YES, MA'AM.  >> DID YOURSELF WHEN YOU'RE  NOT SPEAKING I I KNOW  >> I IT'S THAT NOISE WE HEAR  THE LITTLE BALL BY THE WAY.  BUT IT'S VOICE THAT IT'S HOT.  IT'S REALLY NOW TRACK YEAH I I  NORMALLY DO THAT I NORMALLY DO  SOMETIMES LOVED IN ON BY.  >> I JUST HAD TO OUT REPORT  BACK IN LOBBIES BACK FROM  LAUNCH.  >> I WILL BE SURE PULL YOU  INTO THE CONVERSATION DON'T  WORRY AND IF I FORGET I KNOW  THERE ARE OTHER PEOPLE HERE  WOULD BE GUESS IS THAT WE'RE  GOOD. I THANK CITY MANAGER  THIS IS YOUR ITEM.  >> THANK YOU MADAM REGULAR  LAST 3, 3, 4, THAT TO THE  FOLLOWING MOTIONS TO DIRECT  THE CITY ATTORNEY TO WORK ON  COUNCIL TO PROVIDE CLARITY  REGARDING THAT'S PULLING THAT  MS. AND OBLIGATION MEANING AND  PURPOSE. ALSO TO ADELAIDE YOUR  GUITAR SECOND READING STATING  THAT GENERAL OBLIGATION THAT  WILL GO TO VOTERS. I BELIEVE  THOSE ITEMS HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED  IN THE ORDER IS THAT WAS  REFLECTED SUMMIT WITH THIS  DOCUMENT WE ASK THAT YOU  CONTINUE ORDINANCE 24 0, 7 2ND  READING. CAN YOU PROVE IT. WE  HAVE QUESTIONS FOR NUMBER.  >> SO A RIGHT TO QUESTION  AGAIN IT WOULD KEEP THEM TO A  5 MINUTE GO THROUGH IT. YOU  WILL BE ABLE QUESTIONS BUT  JUST SO THAT EVERYBODY CHANCE  BEFORE WE START FADING AWAY.  UP I'M SPEAKING FOR MYSELF,  IT'S ART. COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL.  >> YEAH, THE ONLY THING I'M  THE ONLY QUESTION AND THEN I  HAVE A COMMENT IS UNDER TO BE  TOO LITTLE IT HAS SORRY AND  ONE SINGLE LIGHT IT SAYS THAT  CITY SHALL NOT AVOID THESE  REQUIREMENTS IN THIS SECTION  BY SEPARATE IN SINGLE AND  SIMON TEENY US PROJECT.  >> BUT THAT LANGUAGE IS  MISSING FROM TOO. WHERE THE 2  LITTLE EYES ARE AND I THINK I  REMEMBER BRINGING THIS UP AT  THE LAST MEETING BY NOT HAVING  BEEN IN BOTH PLACES IT APPEARS  THAT IT ONLY IS PRIOR TO  OCTOBER FIRST 25. AFTER THAT  BECAUSE THAT LANGUAGE IS NOT  THERE GIVES THE APPEARANCE  THAT WE ARE NOT THAT WE WILL  ALLOW FACING PATCH. SO I  REALLY AND SORRY TO BE THAT  YEAH TO ME I'M. IT'S ON PAGE  3. YOU LOOK AT IT BE THE VERY  LAST SENTENCE, YEAH. VERY LAST  SENTENCE IS ONLY UNDER PRIOR  TO OCTOBER 1ST. BUT IT IS NOT  UNDER.  >> THE.  >> 2 LITTLE ICE. WHICH IS  AFTER OCTOBER 1ST. SO  >> I BELIEVE IT NEEDS TO BE  UNDER THERE, BUT THIS WILL BE  A COMMISSION DIST DISCUSSION  AND DECISION. I JUST WANTED TO  GIVE THE APPEARANCE OF.  >> POLLS. PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1ST  AND AFTER OCTOBER 1ST.  >> AND THEN I HAVE COMMENTS.  >> WANT TO WEIGH IN YEAH.  >> I'M TRYING TO ABSORB THIS  HERE.  >> COMMENT A LITTLE DOUBLE I  BEGINNING OCTOBER FIRST REALLY  ADDRESSING SOMETHING TOTALLY  DIFFERENT. SO I WONDER. IF  JUST AMENDING. I ARE REMOVING  THE PRIOR TO THE INDEBTEDNESS  INCURRED BECAUSE I THINK THE  INTENTION IS THAT WAY WE WON'T  SPLIT UP PROJECTS IN ORDER TO  COME UNDER THE CAP. I THINK  BELONGS AND I THINK.  >> YES, HELPS. AND WITH THAT  SATISFIED. THE CONCERN. WHAT  IF WE JUST MOVED THAT CENTER  NEEDS READ THE SITATION NOT  AVOID REQUIREMENTS SECTION BY  SUFFERING DO THINGS DIFFERENT  PROJECT. INTO ITS OWN LITTLE  SUBSECTION.  >> IT'S EXACTLY WHAT I JUST  AFTER THE CONVERSATION LIKE  THAT.  >> ALL RIGHT THAT SOUNDS LIKE  A GOOD COMPROMISE. THERE.  >> MAKES SENSE.  >> MOTION TOM I'M THE ONLY  OTHER THING AS A COMMENT.  >> I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S TOO  LATE, BUT WE ARE SECOND  READING AND WE CAN MAKE  CHANGES AS WE JUST DID ARE WE  WILL BE HINDSIGHT IS A  FANTASTIC TEACHER. AND IF I  HAD BEEN THINKING AHEAD  WITHOUT TIME SITES BENEFIT. I  WOULD HAVE REQUESTED TO  SEPARATE REFERENDUMS. AND THE  REASON FOR THAT IS ONE  REFERENDUM FOR EMERGENCIES. TO  MY FRIEND SECOND REFERENDUM  FOR NON-EMERGENCY PROJECTS  BECAUSE I'M GETTING A LOT OF  FEEDBACK FROM CITIZENS THAT  THEY'RE SAYING YES, WE ARE  100% ON BOARD WITH THE  EMERGENCY ORDINANCE.  >> THE EMERGENCY POWER TO  ISSUE DEBT. BUT THEY'RE REALLY  ON THE FENCE OR COMPLETELY  AGAINST. THE NON-EMERGENCY  PROJECTS. SO I JUST. AGAIN I'M  NOT SURE IF WE CAN. IF THERE'S  MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS ARE  MUTABLE TAKING OUT. 2 ENTIRELY  AND GOING BACK TO ANOTHER  REFERENDUM LIKE FOR MONTHS OR  6 MONTHS. THIS WAY WE HAVE  PLENTY OF TIME OF GETTING OUR  DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY DOWN  PAT AND THEN WE CAN GO BACK TO  THE VOTERS FOR THE NON  EMERGENCY PART OF THE PROJECT.  I'VE SAID ALL THE GOAL IS TO  TRY AND GET IT TO PASS. WITH  THE COMFORT OF OUR CITIZENS.  AND THE ONES THAT I'M HEARING  FROM OUR TELLING ME THAT YES  FOR THE EMERGENCIES, SO MUCH  ON THE NON EMERGENCIES. SO I'M  JUST THROWING THAT OUT THERE.  AND I YIELD I'LL MAKE A MOTION  WERE TOO BASED ON  CONVERSATION. VICE MAYOR. IT'S  FUNNY. WHAT IS GOING TO HAVE  PROBLEM. WHEN THERE'S AN  EMERGENCY.  >> OR FAILED INFRASTRUCTURE.  >> WE GET THAT AND AND AND  THAT IS PRETTY EASY TASK FORCE  INNOCENCE. I THINK EVERYBODY.  >> WE COULD WRAP THEIR HEADS  AROUND IT AND I AGREE WITH  COMMISSIONER BUT HE ASKS.  HOWEVER. THE ISSUES BEFORE ARE  BIGGER THAN THAT AND. AND WHAT  IT ON EMERGENCY NOW CAN  BECOME. WE HAVE 64 I BELIEVE  WATER STRUCTURES THAT ARE WELL  BEYOND THERE FOR WHITES. WE  HAVE BRIDGES. WE HAVE ROADS WE  HAVE UTILITY ISSUES ALL OF  WHICH ARE. I CONSIDER TO BE  VERY VERY SERIOUS ISSUES THAT  THIS CITY NEEDS TO ADDRESS  PRICE BOULEVARD IS A SHINING  EXAMPLE, WHAT CAN HAPPEN. WHEN  COMMISSIONS AND CITY  LEADERSHIP KICK THE CAN DOWN  THE ROAD AND DON'T DO THEIR  JOB SO WAY THEY'RE SUPPOSED  TO. AND I DON'T WANT TO SEE  THAT HAPPEN AGAIN THE ABILITY  TO BORROW IT'S A TOOL. WE ARE  NOT TALKING ABOUT BUILDING A  POLICE HEADQUARTERS WITH THIS  MONEY. WE ARE NOT TALKING  ABOUT BUILDING. POLITICS ENTER  WITH IT. OKAY WE'RE TALKING  ABOUT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS  THAT ESSENTIAL TO OUR CITY  AND AND THE ABILITY TO PROVIDE  THOSE BASIC SERVICES WE'VE ALL  BECOME ACCUSTOMED GOOD ROADS.  WATER AND SEWER. RIDGES WATER  STRUCTURES THAT FUNCTION  PROPERLY. I MEAN WE LIVE IN A  SWAMP FOR GOD SAKES WE HAVE SO  MUCH THAT WE HAVE TO DO TO  CATCH UP WITH THE YEARS OF  NEGLECT AND KICKING THE CAN  DOWN THE ROAD TO ME THESE ARE  ESSENTIAL PROJECTS AND JUST  HAVE TO GO BACK OUT TO  REFERENDUM FOR EACH AND EVERY  ONE OF THEM. IS IS IS NOT A  REASONABLE FIT. I JUST DON'T  SEE IT I THINK THAT THE  CITIZENS AND AND WELL. IT'S A  IT THIS WAY I THINK  COMMISSIONERS AND I THINK  STAFF IN EVERY WAY WE CAN. ITS  UK POPULATION. DISCUSS IT.  POINT HOW VALUABLE HOW  IMPORTANT THIS AND I THINK WE  GO TO REFERENDUM. AND WE ASKED  PEOPLE TO GIVE US THIS  BORROWING AUTHORITY. IF THE  CITIZENS TURN IT DOWN. GOING  TO COME BACK AGAIN AND AGAIN  OR WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO COME  OUT WITH MULTIPLE REFERENDUMS  EVERY SINGLE YEAR AT  SIGNIFICANT COST FOR TAXPAYERS  BECAUSE WE CANNOT NOT TO THESE  PROJECTS. THESE PROJECTS HAVE  TO GET GOING THEY CAN'T GET  DONE 5 YEARS FROM NOW 10 YEARS  FROM NOW YOU NEED TO GET DONE  NEED TO GET STARTED.  >> AND SO I SEE HIM EVERY BIT  AS CRITICAL AND THEN AN  EMERGENCY AS A FAILED  INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT I  REALLY DO BELIEVE THAT AND I  THINK IT'S TIME FOR OUR  CITIZENS. JUST TO COME MAKE  THAT DECISION AND AND THEY'RE  NOT COMFORTABLE WITH IT AND  THEY WILL KNOW. THEN WE'LL  HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO GO OUT  FOR A REFERENDUM AND IF THINGS  FAIL. AND IT TAKES 6, 9.12  MONTHS TO GET PERMISSION TO  FIX SOMETHING. IT'S IT'S GOING  TO ALLOW BELL. OUR CITIZENS  MINDS THAT THIS IS THE  REPERCUSSIONS OF NOT BEING  ABLE TO PROVIDE TOOLS  ESSENTIAL TO RUN A CITY OUR  SIZE AND YOU KNOW THAT THAT'S  JUST HOW I FEEL I'M ALL IN ON  THIS I THINK WE HAVE GONE.  REALLY. IT WE'VE REALLY TRIED  EVERY WHICH WAY TO MAKE THE  SEX LAVATORY TO NOT MAKE IT  FRIVOLOUS TO 2 TO 7 OR 8 AND  EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCES  BETWEEN YOU KNOW WHAT THIS  MONEY WOULD BE USED FOR THIS  IS NOT  >> TAX DOLLAR MONEY ARE  DEPARTMENTS NOW OR DISTRICTS  NOW USED THESE DOLLARS.  >> FOR THEIR INFRASTRUCTURE  PROJECTS BUT THEY CAN'T  LEVERAGE. SO THEY ONLY CAN DO  WHAT THEY'VE GOT THE CAPTION  AND TO DO THEY LOSE OUT ALL  KINDS OF OPPORTUNITIES. TO GET  MATCHING FUNDS WHICH IN SOME  CASES GET FORGIVEN. THERE ARE  JUST SO MANY BENEFITS TO THE  CITIZENS OF OUR CITY AND  ALLOWING THIS TO HAPPEN AND  AND IT'S INCUMBENT UPON THEM  TO SPEND THE TIME IN THE NEXT  4 MONTHS TO UNDERSTAND THOSE  BECAUSE WITHOUT DISABILITY IT  IS GOING TO COST OUR TAXPAYERS  MORE IT WILL COST THE SCHOOL  MORE MONEY AND WE'RE NOT  ASKING FOR ANYTHING  UNREASONABLE YEAR EXCEPT THEY  HAVE THE SAME TOOLS THAT  EVERYBODY ELSE AND SO WE CAN  MORE FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE  THAT'S WHAT CITIZENS OF ALWAYS  ASKED US FOR TO BE IS FISCALLY  RESPONSIBLE TO BE THE BEST  STEWARDS OF YOUR TAX DOLLARS  AS WE CAN POSSIBLY THIS TOOL  IS IN REALLY IMPORTANT AND  IT'S INCUMBENT UPON TO TRY K  AND ALL OUR CITIZENS TO TRY  WRAP THEIR HEADS AROUND OK,  THANK YOU, OKAY, THANK YOU.  >> COMMISSIONER THANK YOU  MAYOR I'LL SAY BASICALLY THE  SAME THING IT'S VICE MAYOR BUT  IN THE LAST FEW AT AND THAT IS  TO SEPARATE THESE PROJECTS.  >> IS ACKNOWLEDGE OUR  COMMUNIQUE.  >> THAT.  >> THE NON EMERGENCY PROJECTS  ARE SOMEHOW FRIVOLOUS THESE  ARE NOT FRIVOLOUS PROJECTS. I  REALLY LOOK AT THEM. AS  EMERGENCY SLASH DISASTERS  WAITING TO HAPPEN. IF WE DON'T  KEEP UP WITH OUR  INFRASTRUCTURE WILL PAY THE WE  WERE LUCKY. LUCKY AFTER THAT  IT WASN'T WORSE LOT OF  STRUCTURES HELD ALL I'M AMAZED  THAT THEY HELD UP. SO THESE  ARE VITALLY IMPORTANT EVEN  THOUGH THEY'RE NOT CLASSIFIED  AS EMERGENCY AND VICE MAYOR  THAT'S RIGHT THE BURDEN IS ON  TO COMMUNICATE THAT TO THE  PUBLIC. SO THAT PEOPLE FEEL  COMFORTABLE VOTING FOR THIS  REFERENDUM. AND IF FAILS WE'LL  COME BACK AND AND WELCOME  WELCOME BACK BECAUSE IT HAS TO  BE DONE. IT JUST HAS TO BE  DONE.  >> OK THANK YOU DID REALLY  WELL WITH THAT COMMISSIONER  EMRICH. THEY GOT A SECOND  ROUND.  >> AND AGREE I'M HERE CAN AND  C OKAY.  >> I AGREE WITH MY AS WELL,  THE ONLY OTHER THING IS YOU  KNOW. COMMISSIONER LANGDON  SAID WE CAN COME BACK WE CAN  COME BACK COME BACK. THAT'S  ONE SCENARIO THE OTHER  SCENARIO IS THAT WE'RE IN DIRE  NEED THERE WILL BE AN  ADJUSTMENT WITH THE AD VALOREM  TAXES, THE WORKS GOT TO GET  DONE ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.  WE'VE GOT WE CAN GET THE LOAN  IT AS A TOOL AND AND AND WITH  OUR DEBT RESOURCES. WE CAN DO  IT THAT WAY WITHOUT TOUCHING  THAT BULL ARM. IT GOES THAT  ALARM. PRETTY SIMPLE. ALL I  THANK YOU.  >> YES, NOT WAY AND I AND YOU  ALL OF YOU PUT THE SO SO AND I  AND I CAN EVER FORMULATE MY  THOUGHTS A PAIR, BUT FEW  THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN NOT DONE  THROUGH THE YEARS AGAIN THOSE  OF YOU THAT DON'T KNOW WE HAVE  BEEN HERE SINCE 1990 AND  THERE'S THINGS THAT I KNOW WE  HAVE WATER CONTROL STRUCTURES  THAT IT WAS ALWAYS OUR  ANNIVERSARY I'M SURE WE HAVE  45 YEAR-OLD WATER CONTROL AND  JUST SAY SOMETHING FOR  EMERGENCY THAT'S A REACTIVE  TYPE OF A RESPONSE WAIT UNTIL  THE BRIDGE WENT OUT ON PRICE I  THINK IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE  BEFORE THAT AND IF WE HAVE THE  ABILITY TO BAR PRIOR TO THAT  TO MAKE SOME TEMPORARY OR NOT  Y PRICE AT THAT TIME BUT  BRINGING UP PRICE. YES, I  STILL REMEMBER GOING TO  NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS SOME  YEARS AGO MOST ICKES ON WHICH  DESIGN YOU LIKED AND THEN IT  JUST THERE NO MONEY TO DO  THESE ARE THINGS WE HAVE TO  GROWING CITY AND WE ARE REALLY  AND THAT'S THE REALITY AND FOR  SOMEONE BEEN HERE FOR A LONG  TIME I FEEL YOUR PAIN BUT I  ALSO KNOW THE REALITY WHEN I  MOVED HERE THAT THE CITY WAS  GOING TO GROW. WE HAVE TO HAVE  THINGS IN PLACE THAT WE CAN  KEEP UP WITH THAT GROWTH AND  IT WAS IT'S BEEN MENTIONED UP  HERE THAT IF A STRUCTURE FAILS  AND SOMEONE IS BUT NO HOUSES  THAT WERE DONE SOMETHING  HAPPENS AS A RESULT OF WE  DIDN'T FIX SOMETHING WHEN WE  KNEW IT WAS WAS FAILING  THEY'RE NOT GOING TO CARE  ABOUT. IT'S A GOOD THING WE  DIDN'T VOTE FOR THAT THEY'RE  GOING TO WONDER WHY WE DIDN'T  PUT THAT IN PLACE GOING TO SAY  OUR GOVERNMENT FAILED US  BECAUSE THEY KNEW THOSE  STRUCTURES FAILING AND THEY  DID NOTHING AND TO TRY TO FIX  THEM GET TO WHERE THEY SHOULD  BE. SO THAT'S THAT'S WHAT I'M  THINKING UP THIS IS DEFINITELY  A PROACTIVE APPROACH TO  GETTING THINGS AND WATER.  SORRY THAT PEOPLE DISTRUST.  >> THIS BOARD. WE HAVE A  REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF  GOVERNMENT IN THIS COUNTRY  PEOPLE ARE ELECTED TO TO MAKE  DECISIONS THAT ARE IN THE BEST  INTERESTS FOR PEOPLE. DOESN'T  MEAN YOU'RE GOING TO BE HAPPY  ALL THE TIME WAS ALL OF THOSE  DECISIONS BARRING FROM  PRESIDENT LINCOLN YOU'RE NOT  GOING MAKE ALL THE PEOPLE  HAPPY ALL THE TIME. BUT WHEN  TALKING ABOUT THIS IS WHAT  SHOULD BE DONE. FOR THE HEALTH  SAFETY AND WELFARE OF PEOPLE.  THIS IS WHAT I KNOW HAS TO BE  DONE. SO.  ♪ THAT'S ON GOING TO SAY  ♪ ABOUT THAT. COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL.  >> I'D LIKE TO CORRECT A  COUPLE OF THINGS BECAUSE I'VE  HEARD IT REPEATEDLY. AMID  PRICE BOULEVARD. WE APPROVE  THAT PROJECT AND THEN WE HAD  TO GET THE MONEY. AND THE  COMMISSION AND THAT TIME GAVE  DIRECTION TO BRING FORWARD  IDEAS AND SUGGESTIONS ON HOW  TO PAY FOR IN A TIMELY MANNER  AND THAT NEVER.  PRICE BOULEVARD. WE WANT TO  GET THAT DONE IN A TIMELY  MANNER. WE HAVE COVID THEN  UNFORTUNATELY WE  MISSTEPS IN LEADERSHIP. THEN  WE LEADERSHIP. AND NOW WE HAVE  THE VOTERS WHO APPROVED THE  REFERENDUM FOR A PRICE  BOULEVARD. IT'S NOT LIKE WE  FAILED. WE WANTED TO GET TO  THE BEST COURSE TO BE ABLE TO  PAY FOR PRICE BOULEVARD.  UNFORTUNATELY OTHER THINGS  TOOK PRIORITY. THE COMMISSION  STARTED CONVERSATION BECAUSE  OF HURRICANE IAN IN THE  DISASTER AND WHAT IT PRESENTED  UPS.  >> ALL I WAS DOING WAS SHARING  WITH YOU GUYS, A CONCERN THAT  THE EMERGENCY DISASTER  RECOVERY IS NOW TIED INTO.  INFRASTRUCTURE. EMERGENCIES  AND NON EMERGENCIES. AND I'M  SHARING WITH YOU WHAT I AM  HEARING FROM THE CITIZENS  ABOUT YES, THEY WANT TO DO THE  EMERGENCY RECOVERY, ABSOLUTELY  THEY SEE THE NEED. BUT THE  OTHER PART IS WHERE THEY'RE A  LITTLE BIT ON THE FENCE OR  OUTRIGHT AGAINST. TIME WILL  TELL THE COMMISSION HAS SPOKEN  I AM POSITIVE THAT THIS IS  GOING TO PASS TODAY AND AND  THEN THE NEXT STEP IS IT GOES  TO THE BORDERS AND ULTIMATELY  THE VOTERS ARE THE ONES THAT  ARE GOING TO DECIDE. WHEN I  HEAR MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS  SAY JUST KEEP GOING BACK TO  WHERE WE'LL JUST KEEP GOING  BACK EVENTUALLY THAT'S GOING  TO COME BACK AND BITE YOU TOO  BECAUSE I'VE SEEN THAT WHERE  LISTEN TO US WANT TO KNOW  RIGHT AGAIN. SO JUST BE  CAREFUL. THE WHOLE GOAL WAS TO  GET THE EMERGENCY RECOVERY.  APPROVED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE,  SO WE DID NOT HAVE OUR HANDS  TIED. HOW THE REST OF THEM  ALONG THE WAY. YOU KNOW PART  OF THE CONVERSATION  >> I HEAR ALL ABOUT NOT  SEPARATING THE 2 PRIVATE THE 2  COMPONENTS EMERGENCY DISASTER  RECOVERY FROM THE OTHER  SECTION NUMBER 2. SO I'M NOT  GOING MAKE A MOTION ON THAT,  BUT IT ONE POINT MAYOR I DO  WANT TO MAKE A DIFFERENT  ANOTHER MOTION.  >> OKAY VICE MAYOR.  >> AS A POINT TO GET A  CLARIFICATION YOU KNOW THEY  THE COST COMING BACK AND MAYBE  I COULD ARTICULATE IT. MY  POSITION A LITTLE CLEAR. IF  THE REFERENDUM DOESN'T PASS  NOVEMBER. WELL FORESEE  HAPPENING. THIS COMING  SESSION. THIS 25 THE SCHOOL  YEAR WILL BE MULTIPLE  REFERENDUMS FOR SPECIFIC  INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS. THAT  ARE ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL TO  THE CITY. THAT PROCESS WILL  COST A LOT OF MONEY. IT WILL  TAKE UP IN NORMAL AMOUNT OF  TIME ON THE PART STAFF AND  COMMISSION. AND THE CITIZENS  TO FOLLOW EACH OF THESE  MULTIPLE REFERENDUMS OVER THE  PURPOSE OF DOING THE EXACT  SAME PROJECTS THAT WOULD BE  DONE IF THIS REFERENDUM GETS  PAST. SO THAT'S WHAT I MEAN I  I COMING BACK AGAIN AND AGAIN.  WE WOULD NOT BE RESPONSIBLE TO  OUR CITIZENS. IF WE DID NOT  FINALLY LIKE DOUBLE IT AND  START TO ADDRESS  INFRASTRUCTURE. PROBLEMS. THIS  COUNTRY HAS OVER 2. BILLION OR  TRILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF  INFRASTRUCTURE THE NATION THAT  IS BEHIND THE 8 IN THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT WHERE 65 YEAR  OLD CITY. IT HASN'T DONE  ANYTHING TO IMPROVE ITS  INFRASTRUCTURE. WE HAVE SOME  SO UNDER WATER SO TO SPEAK. IF  WE DON'T ADDRESS THESE THERE  JUST TO SEE MISTRESS WAITING  TO HAPPEN. FOR MORE STORMS  MORE AND MORE MONEY. MORE AND  MORE PROBLEMS SO ONE WAY OR  THE OTHER WE HAVE TO DO THEM.  I SAY TO THEM AS PART OF A  COMPREHENSIVE BORROWING  PROGRAM AS OPPOSED TO HAVING  GO OUT ASK 2, 3 TIMES EVERY  SINGLE YEAR WHICH WHAT IT WAS  THAT WE WOULD LEFT ALL THAT  WOULD BE LEFT FOR US TO DO AS  A COMMISSION WILL BE TO HAVE  TO COME BACK AND ASKING  REFERENCES MULTIPLE COMES FROM  PERMISSION FOR SPECIFIC  PROJECTS WHICH DOESN'T SEEM TO  MAKE ANY SENSE TO ME. ARE  >> OKAY MOTION NO NOT YET.  >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR.  COMMENT BEFORE WE MOVE PUBLIC  COMMENT. ALL RIGHT SO PUBLIC  COMMENT.  >> KRISTINE ASSESSMENT. ONE  VACATION I THINK IT'S WORTH  CONSIDERING ON THE ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 '07 PERTAINS TO  PAGE 3 OF SECTION 2 B TO ME IS  BROKEN DOWN INTO 2 SECTIONS TO  BE ONE AND 2 B 2 IN REFERENCE  TO THE TIME PRIOR TO OCTOBER  FIRST 2025 AND BEGINNING  OCTOBER ONE 2025. IT SEEMS ODD  THAT THE FOLLOWING MORNING IS  ONLY LISTED UNDER THE FIRST  SECTION 2 B OCTOBER ONE 2025  TO CITY SEAN NOT POINT THE  REQUIREMENTS IN THIS SECTION  BY SEPARATING A SINGLE  SIMULTANEOUS.  >> WHERE CAN CURRENT PROJECT  IN THE PARTS IF THAT STATEMENT  ISN'T REPEATED UNDER THE  SECOND SECTION TO ME TO  BEGINNING OCTOBER ONE 2025.  SECTION IS THAT LANGUAGE NO  LONGER DETECTABLE AFTER  OCTOBER ONE I THOUGHT IS THAT  THE LANGUAGE EITHER UNDER TO  ME ONE AND 2 B 2 OR HAS BULLET  TO ME. I DOING EITHER OF THESE  OPTIONS WOULD ENSURE PARITY  THAT THE PROJECT'S CANNOT BE  BROKEN UP BEFORE OR AFTER  OCTOBER 2025 IN ITS CURRENT  STATE THAT HAS ME WONDERING IF  THIS IS A GAP OTHERWISE THAT  WOULD NO LONGER PROVIDE  LIMITATION AFTER OCTOBER ONE  2025. DESPITE MEETING IT FOR  IT TO ALL THE COMMISSIONERS  SPENDING TIME AFTER READING  VIA MULTIPLE AVENUES OF  COMMUNICATION. EXAMPLE, TOWN  SOCIAL MEDIA EXCEDRIN ON  BUILDING TRUST AND EDUCATING  CITIZENS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND  THE LANGUAGE IN THIS THAT MORE  FEEL COMFORTABLE SUPPORTING  THE BARRING ABILITY. THANK AND  PERSON WE HAVE DO HAS AND  ROBYN SAMPRAS AT TIME. JOE  CENT.  >> A LITTLE GAME. SO  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL THAT IS  EXACTLY WHERE I WAS GOING.  BECAUSE I HAVE HEARD NOTHING  AS FAR AS PROBLEM WITH THE  EMERGENCY WE ALL KNOW IT'S  DEFINITELY NEEDED. BUT AT THE  SAME TIME WE KNOW THAT WE ARE  LACKING SEVERELY.  >> INFRASTRUCTURE AND WE KNOW  THAT THERE'S NO WAY TO GET  THERE MUST ABLE TO BORROW  MONEY. SO WHAT I'M HEARING IS  AND WHAT MY CONCERN IS OK,  IT'S BY THE WAY 15 MILLION  DOLLARS PER PROJECT NEEDS TO  BE PUT BACK IN YOUR.  >> WHAT IS THE ANNUAL CAP IS  IT JUST LIKE THE BLIND CHECK.  IS WHAT I'M HEARING SO IT'S  15 MILLION DOLLARS PER  PROJECT. HOW MANY PROJECTS  WE'VE GIVEN HIM. THAT'S  ANOTHER CONCERN SO IS THERE A  WAY YOU CAN MAYBE PUT A CAP ON  IT OR ANY KIND OF LIMITATION  OR FOR THE GENERIC.  >> THE OTHER ONE IS. I DON'T  SEE WHERE THIS SAYS IT TAKES  SUBJECT TO THE DEBT MANAGEMENT  POLICY IS THAT JUST BE  UNDERSTOOD. DO WE NEED TO PUT  THE WORDS IN BUT THIS WILL  BECOME SUBJECT TO THE DEBT  MANAGEMENT POLICY. OTHER ONE  IF YOU LOOK AT THE WAY THAT  THE NOTICE A REFERENDUM IS IS  READING RIGHT NOW THE WAY YOU  HAVE IT ON PAGE  >> UNDER. I I IT SAYS TO  RESPOND TO A DECLARED  EMERGENCY OR DISASTER. WITHIN  THIS DOCUMENT ORDINANCE YOU  HAVE EXISTING DECLARED.  EMERGENCY. SO THAT SAME VERVE  IT SHOULD BE USED IN THIS  PARTICULAR WAY WORDED. YET  DURING 6TH AND 7TH DECLARED  EMERGENCY OUR PROJECT AGAIN  HAS TO BE PUT ALL OVER THE  PLACE 15 MILLION PER PROJECT.  >> I WOULD SERIOUSLY CONSIDER  IT AS THEY WAITED TO SEPARATE  AND MAKE 2 SEPARATE BUT FOR  QUESTIONS. I KNOW IT WILL PASS  ON THE EMERGENCY. BUT I'M NOT  SURE NO MATTER HOW MUCH  EDUCATION YOU CAN DO OUT THAT  THE PEOPLE DO NOT TRUST. GIVEN  YOU GUYS BLANK CHECK. THAT'S  WHAT I'M HUMAN. NOBODY'S GOING  TO BE A BLANK CHECK AND OKAY  15 MILLION PER PROJECT IT 2030  PROJECTS THEN WHAT. THAT'S WHY  I'M SAYING YOU DEFINITELY  EMERGENCY REFERENDUM QUESTION.  BUT IT'S. I IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S  7030 THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO  PASS A. SO MAYBE YOU CAN  ACTUALLY SPLIT INTO 2 SEPARATE  QUESTIONS IF YOU CAN AT THIS  POINT AND AND IN SOME KIND OF  A TAP. FOR BEACH WHERE IT'S  NOT TO EXCEED A LOT ABOUT  PEOPLE ANNUALLY OR SOMETHING  LIKE QUARTERLY. ENSURE THAT  PEOPLE THAT WE HAVE JUST GIVEN  YOU A LIVE CHAT. THAT'S GOT 7.  >> OKAY.  ♪ ♪ HAVE  >> AND JUST TO CLARIFY THIS IS  FOR REVENUE BOUGHT THIS SOURCE  OF REVENUE IS THAT OKAY, KNOW  WHEN YOU'RE SAYING BLANK CHECK  I DON'T WANT PEOPLE THAT TO  GET THAT IMPRESSION THAT IT'S  JUST.  >> ALL RIGHT AND THEN I THINK  THE DEBT MANAGEMENT.  >> POLICY WORKSHOP IS  SCHEDULED TO BE IN SEPTEMBER  FOR THAT WOULD WILL BE COMING  BACK TO SO YOU WANT AND OTHERS  KNOW THAT AND THAT'S WHERE  IDENTIFY WHAT THE REVENUE  SOURCE SO. JUST WANTED TO MAKE  THAT CLEAR SO WE DON'T BRING  ANYTHING NEW INTO THE NEXT  THAT IT IT MUSTARD ABOUT.  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL. AND IF  YOU'RE.  >> IF YOU'RE READY, HAPPY TO  MAKE A MOTION.  >> OKAY.  >> THAT'S IT FOR PUBLIC  COMMENT. PUBLIC HEARING AND  YES GO MAKE A MOTION.  >> MAKE A MOTION TO AMEND  ORDINANCE NUMBER 0, 2, 4, DASH  0, 7,  >> TO CHANGE ITEM 2.  >> I.  >> LAST SENTENCE. THE CITY  SHALL NOT AVOID THE  REQUIREMENTS IN THIS SECTION  BY SEPARATING A SINGLE  SIMULTANEOUS OR CONCURRENT  PROJECT IN 2 PARTS TO AVOID  THE LIMITATIONS SET HEARING  HAS ITS INDIVIDUAL I 4 UNDER  SECTION 2.  >> HAVE A MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL AND CITY  CLERK DO YOU HAVE THAT  >> YOU HAVE AN CITY PARK  CONTINUE NOT DOESN'T. SO 2 MEN  ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024. DASH 0,  7, SECTION 2. THE VERY LAST  SENTENCE WHICH I READ IN ITS  ENTIRETY. TO BE STAND ALONE.  2. I WHICH IS FOR.  COMMISSIONER DO MY SUGGESTION  TO CLEAN UP A LITTLE BIT  BECAUSE I DON'T THINK YOU WANT  TO BE.  >> THE 2 THINK WHAT YOU'RE  ASKING US FOR THE LAST MONTHS  TO BE ONE TO BE MOVED COME A  NEW SUBSECTION 2 B OR. THAT'S  WHAT I KNOW YOU SAID TO BECOME  TO BE 2, 4, TO TO BE IT.  >> SO SECTION. IT SECTION.  SECTION 2 B.  >> AND I V. WHICH IS FOR NEW  WORLD FOR. SPECTRUM.  >> I'LL SECOND THAT IF THE  CLERK HAS A.  >> I HAVE TO AMEND ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 0, 7, TO  REMOVE THE LAST SENTENCE OF  SECTION 2 B. BUT ALL I AND TO  CREATE SECTION 2 B I 4 STATING  THE CITY SHALL NOT AVOID THE  REQUIREMENTS IN THIS SECTION  BY SEPARATING A SINGLE  SIMULTANEOUS OR CONCURRENT  PROJECT INTO PARTS AND TO  AVOID THE LIMITATION SET FOR  KAREN.  >> IS THAT THINK THAT  >> WE HAVE THE UTMOST EVERYONE  MADE BY COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL  IS RIGHT BACK BY.  >> OUR VERY CITY CLERK AND  SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON DO WE HAVE ANY OF  THEIR. DISCUSSION ON THAT.  COMMISSIONER EMRICH SHOW YOU  THAT. YEAH OKAY, OKAY BECAUSE  WE'RE GOING TO VOTE. WE'LL DO  A VOICE VOTE VICE VICE MAYOR'S  YES, THERE'S A COMMISSIONER  LANGDON YES, MCDOWELL YES,  MISTER AVERAGE. YES. ALL RIGHT  SO THAT PASSES 5 TO 0 WITH  CHANGED A BIT. WE DID BUT OKAY  MAKE A MOTION AHEAD.  >> MAKE A MOTION ADOPT  ORDINANCE OR 2, 0, 2, 4, DASH  0, 7, HAS PRESENTED WITH THE  MOTION. INCLUDED. PREVIOUS  MOTION PREVIOUS,  >> ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION  MADE BY MISTER MCDOWELL TO  ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 0, 7, HAS PRESENTED WITH  THE WITH THE PREVIOUS. MOTION  CHANGES INCLUDE. AND THAT  SPEAKS YES AND THAT WAS  SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR I GO  AHEAD COMMISSIONER, YEAH  ♪ WE'VE DONE ALL WE CAN DO ON  THIS I.  >> SINCERELY HOPE EVERYBODY  SITTING UP HERE IS GOING TO  NEW EDUCATE CITIZENS. AND  ULTIMATELY YOU KNOW WE'VE  SPOKEN. AND NOW IT'S THE  VOTERS TURN AND WHATEVER THE  VOTERS DECIDE IS WHAT WE'RE  GOING TO HAVE TO FIGURE OUT  ♪ FROM THERE. THANK YOU FOR THAT  CONVERSATION AND LOOK FORWARD  TO NOVEMBER. I THINK ITS 5TH  WHEN WE GET THE DECISION FROM  THE VOTERS. SO WHAT DO A  VOICE.  >> VICE YES. LANGDON YES. DO  YES. COMMISSIONER HEMORRHAGE.  YES.  >> AND THAT PASSES I 2, 0,  MEANT RIGHT MOVING ON TO ITEM  D. ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  0, 9, CITY CLERK CAN YOU READ  THIS BY TITLE ORDINANCE NUMBER  2024 0, 9, AN ORDINANCE THE  CITY IN NORTH PORT FLORIDA  AMENDING THE CITY OF NORTH  PORT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VOLUME  ONE REPEALING CHAPTER ONE  PLANNING FRAMEWORK.  >> CHAPTER TWO'S FUTURE LAND  USE ELEMENT REPEALING AND  REPAY PLACING THE FUTURE LAND  USE MAP AMENDING CHAPTER 2  GREAT TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT  AMENDING CHAPTER FOR UTILITIES  ELEMENT MENDING CHAPTER 5  CONSERVATION ELEMENT. MANY  CHAPTER 6 RECREATION AND OPEN  SPACE ELEMENT AMENDING CHAPTER  7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL  COORDINATION ELEMENT. MANY  CHAPTER 9 PUBLIC SCHOOLS, THE  ELEMENT AMENDING CHAPTER 10  CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT  AMENDING CHAPTER 11 ECONOMIC  DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT, PROVIDING  FOR FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR  ADOPTION PROVIDING FOR  TRANSMITTAL OF DOCUMENTS  PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING SEVERABILITY  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  >> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU CITY  MANAGER SAYS YOUR ITEM. ONLY  28 WITH 24 CITY COMMISSIONER  ITEM AND VOTED SEVERAL  OCCASIONS TO WHICH CARRY WHAT  WITH NUMBER 20 REPORT AS THE  ONLINE. A SECOND READING IT TO  BE DETERMINED THAT 2 MOTIONS  THAT GERRI ALL REFERENCE TO  HAPPEN. WELL IT HAVE I SICK OR  DOORS OR TO CLARIFY INTO  PURPOSE OF COULD YOU AND TO  GIVE THERE WERE 2 TO REMOVE  THAT PARCEL FOR 2 ACTIVITY FOR  MEDIA THIS WEEK ORDER INTO  PUBLIC NATION. THE ORDINANCE  BEFORE YOU FOR THE SECOND  READING THE MINUTES REFLECT  THOSE.  >> IT'S FUN PLAY WITH 4 WIRE  FLORIDA STATUTE STAFF TO  PROPOSE A COMPREHENSIVE.  >> IT BUT IT IS YOU KNOW  REVIEWING TO PROVIDE COMMENTS  ON BOAT AND THEN IT. CITY  COMMISSION APPROVED ITS NUMBER  22. FOR THAT THANK YOU. ALL  RIGHT, THANK YOU.  >> JUST TO REMIND EVERYBODY TO  SECOND READING YES KIND.  COMMISSIONER QUESTION SO. THE  THAT YES ON PAGE 5.  >> WE USED TO CALL.  >> AND THAT'S ONE IN A MIX TO  IT WAS CHANGED. NOW IN THIS  FUTURE LAND USE ITS BEING TOO  THERE'S THERE'S A COMPONENT  BEING CALLED MDC WHICH IS  MEDIUM DENSITY CORRIDOR AND  HTC WHICH HIGH DENSITY WHEN I  READ THOSE 3 WORDS ALL I SEE  IS RESIDENTIAL. IN MY OPINION  AND SHARED THIS WITH STAFF  WANTED SUBMIT A COUPLE MEDIUM  DENSITY CORRIDOR. THESE ARE  NOT RESIDENTIAL AREAS THESE  ARE INTENSE. DEVELOPMENTAL  AREAS. THE TITLE OF THIS  DESIGNATION DOES NOT. DO NOTE  INTENSITY THAT WE'RE TRYING TO  DRIVE THAT IN MEDIUM AND  HIGH-DENSITY CORRIDORS. IF I  WAS TO READ THIS FOR THE FIRST  TIME I WOULD KIND OF GO. I  DON'T HAVE ANY COMMERCIAL, YOU  KNOW IT'S IT'S ALL THIS MEDIUM  DENSITY AND HIGH DENSITY AND  THEN YOU LOOK AT THE  RESIDENTIAL AREAS WHICH IS LOW  DENSITY MAYIM DENSITY AND HIGH  DENSITY SO I JUST THINK THAT  IF WE'RE GOING TO CALL IT WHAT  IT IS WE PROBABLY NEED TO JUST  SAY MEDIUM CORRIDOR OR HIGH  CORRIDOR OR MEDIUM DEVELOPMENT  CORRIDOR HIGH DEVELOPMENT  QUARTER JUST REMOVE THAT INTO  THE WORD BECAUSE THIS IS  GENUINELY MORE INTENSE. SO I  DON'T KNOW IF STAFF WOULD LIKE  TO WEIGH IN ON IF YOU GUYS  WANT TO WEIGH IN ON IT, BUT  I'LL BE HAPPY TO MAKE A MOTION  AFTER WE'VE HAD A DISCUSSION.  I DO HAVE OTHER ITEMS, I'D  LIKE TO BRING FORWARD SO I'M  NOT SURE HOW YOU WANT TO WORK  BECAUSE I DO HAVE 3 MINUTES.  OKAY.  >> PARNES  >> LORRY BARNES ASSISTANT  TRACTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.  >> IF THE COMMISSION CONSENSUS  IS TO CHANGE THE NAME OF THE  MEDIUM AND HIGH-DENSITY  CORRIDORS STAFF OR SO JUST THE  TERMINOLOGY MEDIUM INTENSITY  CORRIDOR AND HIGH INTENSITY  CORRIDOR.  >> THAT WE WOULD AS PART OF MY  MOTION.  >> SO I WILL MAKE A NOTE TO  BRING THIS BACK FOR A MOTION  AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME MOVING  ON OKAY.  >> ACTIVITY CENTER 7 WHEN  SPRINGS. YOU LOOK AT PAGE 7.  IT SAYS AND THIS IS DIRECTLY A  RESULT. THIS CHANGE WAS  DIRECTLY A RESULT FROM WHEN WE  HAD OUR P 3. AND IT NEVER GOT  CHANGE BACK.  >> IT SAYS USES MAINLY  CULTURAL AND COMMUNITY  FACILITIES COMMERCIAL HOTEL  RESORT OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL.  ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION  GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC SCHOOL  SHOP ALSO BE ALLOWED IN 70.  >> WE ARE WORKING VERY HARD  TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT TO  DO WITH WARM MINERAL SPRINGS.  >> AND WE ARE.  >> WE SHOULD PROBABLY GO BACK  TO JUST HAVING IT BE NATURAL  AND SERENE KIND PARK-LIKE  SETTINGS REMOVING THE  COMMERCIAL AND HOTEL AND  OFFICE AND RESORT OUT OF WHAT  THIS COMP PLAN IS BECAUSE THE  COMP PLAN IS OUR FUTURE THIS  IS WHAT WE ARE A TEAM TO GET.  AND BASED ON ALL OF THE PUBLIC  COMMENT VARIOUS THINGS IN THAT  THE FAILED P 3. I'M NOT SEEN  THIS BEING COMING TO FRUITION  AND I REALLY WOULD LIKE THAT  TO BE CHANGED. BACK TO MORE  PARK LIKE. AND PRESERVATION  CONSERVATION KIND OF  CONNECTION. INSTEAD OF HOTELS  AND RESORTS IN COMMERCIAL.  WHEN YOU IN ON THAT SAME VEIN  AND I KNOW I HAVE 36 SECONDS  SO I WILL HAVE TO YOU. JUST  RIDICULOUS.  >> DID  >> YOU HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT  THAT KNOW WE DID MY TIME'S UP  MAN, BUT WE CAN. YOU WANT TO  TALK BY OTHER PARTS THAT ARE  CONNECTED TO IT COMMISSIONER  LANGDON. YEAH.  >> REGARDING ONE  MINERAL SPRINGS COMMISSIONER  MC DOLLARS COMMENTS ARE WELL  TAKEN.  >> WE HAVE NOT.  >> MATT AS A BOARD TO DISCUSS  FUTURE OF ONE MINERAL SPRINGS  I UNDERSTAND THAT IT WILL BE  COMING.  >> VERY AFTER BREAK.  >> SO I THINK THAT WOULD BE A  BETTER TIME FOR US TO HAVE  THIS CONVERSATION IN TERMS OF  WHAT IN ALL OF OUR COLLECTIVE  HEADS OF WHAT TO DO WITH THAT  LAND SO. I REALLY NEED TO  REVIEW IT. AND I THINK THAT  BETTER TIMES WILL SPRINGS IS  ON THE  >> I'M GOING ON THAT SAME  ROUTE TO SENSE. WE DON'T KNOW  WHAT THE PLANS ARE CITY  ATTORNEY I GUESS THAT'S THE  QUESTION FOR YOU. WHEN WE HAVE  THAT A CONVERSATION AND THEN  AT THAT TIME WE WANT TO CHANGE  THE COMPANY COULD STILL.  >> DO THAT AND AT THAT  PARTICULAR SECTION CORRECT.  THIS PART  >> THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN  AMENDMENT CAN BE AMENDED TO  COMMISSION DIRECTIVE AT ANY  TIME. THE ACTIVITY CENTER 7 B.  >> DENSITY AND INTENSITY  STANDARDS WERE WERE. BASED ON  PRIOR CONVERSATIONS GUESS THIS  IS TRUE. HOWEVER INCORPORATING  THIS ALLOWABLE INTENSE IS IN  THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO  STOP. MANDATE THAT THE  PROPERTY WILL BE DEVELOPED IN  THAT MANNER BECAUSE THE CITY  OWNS THAT PROPERTY. THE CITY  COULD APPROVE A LOWER  INTENSITY DEVELOPMENT, THEY  JUST COULDN'T APPROVE ANYTHING  MORE INTENSE AND WATTS  OUTLINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE  AND I ALSO WANTED TO KNOW AT  THE FIRST READING THERE WAS A  MOTION TO REMOVE REFERENCES  ARE RESORT HOTEL AND OTHER  INTENSE IS MOTION BLOCK FOR A  SECOND.  >> THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING. I  LIKE TO GO COMMISSIONER  LANGDON DON'T KNOW WHAT OUR  PLAN I THINK HE SHOULD CLOSE  ANY DOORS BUT WE ALREADY KNOW  SHOULD SAY MIGHT WANT TO GO  THERE. IT IS CITY-OWNED  PROPERTY AND WE CAN DICTATE  GOES THERE. SO. VICE MAYOR  JEFF I THINK. YOU KNOW THE ONE  HAND.  >> I LIKE THE IDEA OF  MAINTAINING MAXIMUM  FLEXIBILITY BECAUSE WE DON'T  KNOW WHAT THE PLANS. BUT I'LL  TELL YOU. CITIZENS IN THE CITY  HAVE SPOKEN SO LOUD CLEAR WE  OURSELVES LEAN TOWARDS THE P  3. WE THOUGHT REALLY RING UP  GREAT PROJECT. AND DEVELOPED  INTO THAT AREA AND IT FELL  APART. AND I THINK. THERE'S AN  ARGUMENT TO BE MADE FOR IT  SENDS A REAL LOUD MESSAGE  CITIZENS THAT WE LISTEN TO HIM  IF WE WERE TO TWEET AND AND  AND MAKE THE CHANGE  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL IS  SUGGESTING. I KNOW IT MAY  FORCE TOLL. OTHER WAY DOESN'T  FOR SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT ON THAT  LAND. IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM  AT THIS POINT BUT I THINK. IT  SENDS A MESSAGE THAT YOU KNOW  WE HEARD IT WE'RE PURSUING AND  AND IT PUTS OUR MONEY WHERE  OUR MOUTH WE'RE HEADING DOWN A  ROAD OF EXPLORING OTHER  ALTERNATIVES THAT ARE MUCH  LOWER INTO THAT ARE DEVELOPING  THIS AND MUCH MORE PARK LIKE  ENVIRONMENT.  >> AND TO LEAVE THIS THE WAY  IT IS. SOURCE SAYS HEY YOU  KNOW WINK WINK NOD SOMEBODY  COMES ALONG AND WANTS TO BUILD  A RESORT HOTEL OR WHATEVER WE  CERTAINLY WOULD JUMP ALL OVER  THAT MAYBE THAT'S THE WRONG  MESSAGE. SO I DO YOU KNOW, I'M  KIND OF REAL LIKE ON THE  FENCE, I DON'T SEE THE PROBLEM  WITH DOING AND I THINK IT SAYS  TO THE CITIZENS WE HEAR IT. WE  THAT THIS. YOU KNOW LET IT BE  SOMETHING LOW INTENSITY AND BY  LET'S LET'S LOOK FOR ECONOMIC  DEVELOPMENT ARE BANK FOR A  BUBBLE ALONG ORTIZ THAT  UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE  COUNTY THAT THE COUNTY'S DONE  NOTHING TO TO RESUSCITATE  REJUVENATE AND AND AND LET  DEVELOP A LOOK AT THAT AREA  THAT WILL ENHANCE ENTIRE AREA  TURNED INTO MAY BE A GREAT  DISTRICT MAYBE THAT'S A BETTER  ROUTE TO GO SO I YOU KNOW  DON'T KNOW WHICH I'M LEAVING  BUT I CERTAINLY WANT TO MY  BECAUSE. IF YOU LEAVE IT THE  WAY IT IS. IT'S JUST TELLING  THE CITIZENS THAT YEAH WE DO  YOU KNOW. WE HEARD WHAT YOU  SAID, BUT WE STILL WANT TO  RESERVE THE RIGHT TO TO TO GO  THE OTHER DIRECTION AND I  DON'T THINK. WE WANT TO GO THE  DIRECTION I DON'T THINK MAYBE  WE SHOULD BECAUSE OF SO ONCE  LIKE. PEOPLE WANT. AND THIS  ONE. I MEAN. THINK RICK  >> SOMETHING ON THAT SAME YEAH  IT.  >> WHEN I'M THE MOTION LAST  TIME I DIDN'T GETTING SUPPORT  I'D COMPLETELY FORGOTTEN ABOUT  THE P 3 WAS THAT EVENING AT  LIKE 3 O'CLOCK IN THE MORNING.  I SAID THE ONLY REASON THAT IN  THERE. AND THE ONLY REASON  CHART GOT CHANGED IS BECAUSE  OF THE WE NEVER CHANGED IT  BACK.  >> AND. THANK YOU VICE MAYOR  BECAUSE YOU'RE RIGHT. A  DEVELOPER COME AND SAY THIS IS  WHAT I WANT TO DO GRANTED.  IT'S CITY PROPERTY IN THEY CAN  MAKE THIS ARGUMENT THAT HEY  THIS IS GOING TO FOLLOW YOUR  COMP PLAN.  >> THAT'S WHAT IT'S THERE FOR  JUST THIS IS THE ROAD MAP ON  HOW. WE WANT OUR CITY TO LOCK.  WE HAVE THAT CONVERSATION.  THAT'S HOW I WANT THE CITY TO  LOOK AND IF WE DON'T CHANGE IN  THE COMP PLAN TO ACCOMMODATE  WAS SUPPOSED TO LOOK LIKE THAT  WAS APPROVED BY THE MASTER  PLAN.  >> THEN.  >> WE AREN'T WOULD NOT AND  EVEN AGAIN THESE MIXED  MESSAGES TO THE REST OF THE  WORLD AND LET'S PUT IT THAT  THE WAY THAT IT WAS TO BE THE  PARK LIKE A MASTER PLAN WAS  AND THEN WE CAN ALWAYS AMEND  IT TO WHATEVER IT'S GOING TO  LOOK LIKE WHEN WE DECIDE WHAT  THAT'S GOING TO BE. BUT RIGHT  NOW IT'S TELLING THE WORLD. WE  WANT A HOTEL RESORT.  >> AND THAT'S NOT WHAT I'M  HEARING FROM A SENSE THAT'S  NOT WHAT WE HAVE HEARD.  COMMISSIONER LANGDON.  >> YEAH I I JUST I HAVE TO SAY  I TOTALLY DISAGREE IT. NOW IS  NOT THE TIME TO MAKE THAT KIND  OF CHANGE I WOULD WITH NOT  HAD. WE HAVE NOT HAD THE  OPPORTUNITY AS A BODY TO HAVE  THE CONVERSATION ABOUT WHAT  COMES NEXT. I THINK WE OWE IT  TO THE COMMUNITY TO HAVE THAT  CONVERSATION PUBLICLY NOTICE  MEETING SO PEOPLE CAN COME  HERE COMMENT AND SHARE WHAT WE  HAVE TO SAY I'M NOT PREPARED  TO HAVE THAT CONVERSATION  TODAY, I HAVE LOTS OF IDEAS IN  MY HEAD. IT'S A LOT LESS  INTENSE AND THE P 3 SO IT'S  NOT THAT I DISAGREE WITH  CHANGING THAT INTENSITY.  NUMBER ONE WE DO ALL THE LAND  7 O DEVELOPER CAN COME IN AND  TRY TO PREEMPT US AND LET'S BE  REALISTIC WE'RE GOING TO BE  TALKING ABOUT THIS IN  SEPTEMBER OCTOBER TALKING A  MONTH MAXIMUM 2 MONTHS AWAY.  SO LET'S DO THIS RIGHT. CHANGE  IT WANTS HAVE THE  CONVERSATION. CHANGE IT ONCE  AND FOR ALL AND WE HAVE A PATH  FORWARD ON WHAT WE WANT TO DO  WITH THIS PROPERTY.  COMMISSIONER AVERAGE WANT TO  WEIGH IN ON THAT. YEAH WHY  NOT. THE WAY THAT I LOOK AT IT  I'D LIKE TO KEEP INTENSITY THE  SAME AND I THAT WE'RE NOT  LOOKING TOWARDS GOING WITH THE  HOTEL. OUR CONDOS THAT'S NOT  THE REASON BEING THAT IS THAT  I'M STILL LEANING TOWARDS THE  REASON BEING IS WE MAY FIND  SOME AMENITIES THAT COME LIKE  SPOTLIGHT, BUT MAYBE A  CONVENTION TYPES ON OR  SOMETHING ON THAT PROPERTY  THAT WOULD FALL UNDER THE  DENSITY REQUIREMENTS NEEDED  FOR SOMETHING THAT BENEFITS  COMMUNITY JUST PUTTING IT OUT  OF PARK LIKE. I'M AREA YOU'RE  YOU'RE JUST KILLING ALL OF  THAT. SOLITUDE BUT YOU'RE  LOOKING AT NO RECORDS WITH  THAT WITH ANY BENEFITS TO THE  CITY. THE 2019 PLAN I'VE HEARD  IT OVER AND OVER AND OVER  AGAIN. IT'S A NICE QUIET COMP  PLAN. BUT WHAT IS THE CITY  GOING TO DO BUT SIDES PUT  MONEY INTO MAKING ON THE BACKS  OF THE TAXPAYERS. SO I WOULD  JUST SOON KEEP THE DENSITIES  THE SAME UNTIL WE HAVE THAT  CONVERSATION KNOWING EXACTLY  WHAT WE WANT TO PUT IN THERE  OR WHAT'S VIABLE AND STILL  LISTENING TO THE CITIZENS  BECAUSE THEY MAY HAVE OTHER  TYPES OF HIGHER DENSITY.  SCENARIOS THAT THEY MAY WANT  TO GO IN THERE AS WELL. IT'S  IT'S AN OPEN DOOR THAT'S ALL  IT IS. IT'S AUGUST.  >> I THANK AND YES, YOU KNOW  WE TALKED ABOUT PEOPLE WANT  THERE MAY BE OR CAN SEE CAFE I  DON'T KNOW IF THAT WOULD IT WE  WOULD HAVE TO HAVE.  >> CLASSIFICATIONS IN ORDER TO  EVEN ENTERTAIN THOSE IDEAS,  BUT AS LANGDON SAID WE DON'T  HAVE A PLAN WE DON'T KNOW  WHERE WE'RE GOING.  >> WITH THIS AND I NEED TO  HAVE ANY DOORS CLOSED WHEN  WE'RE HAVING DISCUSSIONS AND  VICE MAYOR YOU SAID IT WITH  ONE MEANING WE'RE TALKING  ABOUT THE BIKE PATH GOING TO  FORMAL SPRINGS AND YOU SAID IT  WOULD BE LIKE A PATH TO  NOWHERE IN ORDER TO HAVE SOME  THINGS THERE AND WITH THAT  SOMETHING THERE SO PEOPLE CAN  BIKE THERE ENJOY SOMETHING AND  THEN BACK WE DON'T KNOW WHAT  THAT WOULD ENTAIL AS FAR AS  THIS AND NOTHING'S GOING TO  CHANGE. AS FAR NO ONE'S GOING  TO COME IN THERE TO MARS ARE  GOING OUT OUT THAT'S NOT GOING  TO HAPPEN AND BECAUSE ITS  CITY-OWNED WE HAVE THE LAST  SAY. ON THAT AND WE'VE HEARD  PEOPLE, LOUD AND CLEAR WHAT  THEY DON'T WANT SO. THAT THAT  SHOULD BE OFF THE TABLE  ALREADY. I THINK THAT YOU KNOW  THAT WAS MADE VERY CLEAR  PEOPLE DIDN'T WANT TO SEE  THEIR AND. SO AT THIS POINT I  DON'T SEE ANY PROBLEM JUST  KEEPING IT IN THERE UNTIL WE  DO HAVE A PLAN AND I AND I  DIDN'T EVEN THINK ABOUT  COMMISSIONER LANGDON SAID THE  ABILITY FOR PEOPLE TO KNOW  THAT THAT WARM MINERAL SPRINGS  IS BEING DISCUSSED THAT THAT  WAS NOT ON THE AGENDA FOR  TODAY TO THAT THAT EXTENT  RATHER THAN THAT IS DONE IN  THE PROPER SETTING SO THAT WE  CAN MOVE FORWARD. THE WAY WE  SHOULD BE MOVING FORWARD WITH  WITH A WELL THOUGHT OUT PLAN.  SO THAT'S. THAT'S SAY THAT  THAT COMMISSIONER DOW YEAH  THIS WILL BE MY FINAL THOUGHTS  ON  >> IT IS CLEAR THAT THE PEOPLE  DON'T WANT.  >> AND THEN THE NEXT WAS OK TO  KEEP IT IN. WE'RE TALKING  ABOUT COMP PLAN. THIS IS WHAT  WE WANT FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR  CITY.  >> GRANTED WE THIS  CONVERSATION.  >> HAS TO GET INTO THE  POTATOES. IS OBVIOUS BASED ON  WHAT BEEN HEARING. HAVING A  HOTEL RESORT IS NOT WHAT OUR  CITIZENS WANT FOR OUR CITY.  BUT IT'S NOT OK THEN TO KEEP  IT IN THERE. WE CAN DISCUSS  NOW. THIS IS THE TIME. THIS IS  THE COMP PLAN. SO WE CAN TAKE  IT OUT AND WE CAN ADDRESS AND  THE FUTURE ONCE WE DECIDE WHAT  THE WHITE HOUSE SPRINGS IS  GOING TO GROW UP TO BE. OK  THANK VICE MAYOR.  >> REALLY COULDN'T THE SENATE  ALL THAT MUCH BETTER I MEAN WE  ARE TALKING ABOUT THE COMP  PLAN HERE AND. IF WE CHANGE  IT. IF PUT IT BACK THE WAY IT  WAS DID IT BECAUSE OF THAT  PIECE RAY. AND I THINK IT  LET'S CITIZEN SNOW THAT WE  HAVE EVERY INTENTION  PROCEEDING WITH ITS VERY LOW  INTENSITY APPROACH TO THIS  PROJECT AND IF FALLS. SOME  ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION I MEAN  DEFINITELY SHOULD WE DON'T  HAVE A PLAN FOR METALS  FRIENDSHIP AND THAT'LL YET.  BECOMING UP BEFORE I SEE THAT  YOU KNOW, I MEAN I SEE NO  REASON TO WAIT TO DO THIS  BECAUSE YOU KNOW THE PEOPLE  HAVE SPOKEN I THINK WE'VE COME  OR I HOPE THAT WE'VE COME TO  THE REALIZATION THAT THAT THE  SHOULD BE MORE PARK LIKE. IT  NATURE IF WE DON'T DO IT NOW.  AND WHEN YOU SPRING'S COMES  MONTH OR MONTH AND A HALF FROM  NOW OR WHATEVER IT AND WILL DO  BUT EITHER WAY IT NEEDS TO GET  DONE BECAUSE. I DON'T SEE A  HIGH INTENSITY OR MEDIUM  INTENSITY DEVELOPMENT GOING  THERE ANYMORE. I MEAN HOW MANY  YEARS IS IT GOING TO TAKE.  >> HOW MANY CITIZENS SURVEYS  HOW STATIONS AND FUTURE  ECONOMIC VIABILITY THE CITY  JUST NOT REST ON DEVELOPING  THAT 60 ACRES INTO SOME  ECONOMIC JUGGERNAUT. I'VE COME  TO ACCEPT LET BE IN THE PARK  LIKE SETTING IT SHOULD WE CAN  HAVE ALL KINDS OF WONDERFUL  AMENITIES AND REASONS FOR  PEOPLE TO COME TO IT TO INTO  IT TO ENJOY OF DIPPING THEIR  TOES IN THE SPRINGS, MANY  PEOPLE DON'T HAVE AN AFFINITY  FOR AND WE CAN DO THAT AND  THIS CHANGE. IT'S GOING TO  TAKE PLACE NOW OR A FROM NOW  OR 2 MONTHS FROM NOW, BUT  SOONER OR LATER IT'S GOING TO  TAKE NOW WITH THEM.  >> THINK SPORTS COMMISSION  FOUND THAT YOU OTHERS BEEN  WERE TAKING TURNS I KNOW WE  SYSTEM I DON'T HAVE A RIGHT  NOW WITH OTHER QUESTIONS SO GO  AHEAD.  >> SO IN THAT SAME I DON'T  HAVE A COPY OF THE COMP PLAN  IN FRONT OF ME I YOU KNOW THE  CHART ACTIVITY CENTER CHART ON  PAGE 13 WOULD NEED TO  ADJUSTED.  >> GOING TO DO. BACK TO THE  FIRST READING I HAD THIS GIVEN  STAFF.  >> A LIST OF VARIOUS MAPS THAT  ARE PART THE COMP PLAN ELEMENT  TOO. SINCE WE'RE REPEALING ALL  CHAPTER 2 THAT WOULD INCLUDE  THE MAPS I WOULD HAVEN'T HEARD  ANYTHING BACK FURTHER ABOUT  THE MAPS BUT THERE ARE A LOT  OF MAPS THAT ARE AFFECTED IF  WE WERE TO CHAPTER 2 A LOT OF  THE MAPS NEED TO BE ADJUSTED.  IN SOME FORM OR FASHION AND I  I'M CURIOUS SO WHAT'S  HAPPENING WITH THAT E-MAIL OR  THAT. TOOK THAT I GAVE YOU IF  STAFF AT FIRST READING.  >> TITLE OF ORDINANCE FRANCE  AMENDING CHAPTER 2. WHICH  INVOLVES AMENDING IT OR LAND I  LAMENT AND NOT TO THE  REMAINING MAPS TO REMAIN IN  PLACE. THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT  AMOUNT WORK INVOLVED AND  CREIGHTON IN AMENDING THOSE  MAPS AND IN SOME CASES, THOSE  ONLY TO BE CREATED FROM  SCRATCH. STAFF REALLY WAS  HOPING TO AWAIT UPDATING OF  THE ENTIRE MAP SERIES BECAUSE  OF PROBABLY TOUCHES OTHER  ELEMENTS NOT SERIOUS AS WELL  TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT FOR  EXAMPLE. OR AMENDING THIS MAP  SO THAT WE WOULD BE. LOOKING  TOWARD AMENDING ANY MAP THAT  IS IMPACTED BY THIS MAN MEANT  AS PART OF A FUTURE  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT HIM  AND ALL OF THE MAP SERIES AT I  TOUCHED BY BECAUSE AMENDMENT  HAS BEEN PLOTS. THROUGH THE  ULDC WORKSHOPS THE CHANGING OF  THE ZONING MAP THE  MODIFICATIONS THAT WERE  MADE OF FIRST STREET IN THE  MODIFICATIONS THAT MAY BE MADE  THIS STREET IN. WE PREFER TO  HOLD OFF ON THAT. AND UPDATE  THOSE MAPS ALL IT  INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH WE DID  NOT RECEIVE ANY THE STATE OF  FLORIDA AND REGARDS TO  RETAINING THOSE 6 ESTAN MAPS  AND INCONSISTENCIES THAT MAY  EXIST BASED ON THE NEW INTERIM  LAND USE ELEMENT.  >> YOU HAVE AN ETA WHEN THOSE  MAPS WILL BE ADJUSTED BECAUSE  THAT  >> LOSS.  >> WHATEVER THAT LOOKS LIKE  HE'S GOING TO LOOK AT THOSE  MAPS NOT BE ABLE MAKE HEADS OR  TAILS OF DO YOU HAVE AN IDEA  WHEN MAPS MAY BE ADJUSTED.  >> WE HAVE A NUMBER OF  INITIATIVES THAT NEED TO BE  COMPLETED IMMEDIATELY AFTER  THE ULDC UPDATE. SO I WOULD  HAS TO GIVE YOU A DATE. I CAN  TELL YOU THAT THAT'S NOT  SERIOUS. REMAINING MAPS AND IN  CHAPTER 2 ARE BASICALLY  REFERENCE THEY DON'T ALL THE  FORCE OF LAW LIKE A FUTURE  LAND USE MAP. US. AND AS MUCH  AS THAT CONTROLS YOUR  DENSITIES MEN 10 STUDIES. IF I  WERE TO VENTURE TO GUESS  HOPEFULLY BY THE END OF THE  YEAR. HOWEVER WE DIDN'T HAVE A  NUMBER OF A NICHE AND WE'RE  STILL DOWN PLANNING STAFF.  >> I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH TIME  I HAVE MAYOR A SECOND, I DON'T  ANYBODY ELSE I. I BELIEVE  THERE IS A POTENTIAL CONFLICT.  IF YOU LOOK PAGE.  >> 22 FUTURE LAND ONE 3.3  FUTURE INVESTMENT. IT SAYS THE  CITY SHALL CONTINUE REQUIRING  THE DEVELOPER AGREEMENT FOR  DEVELOPER FUNDED UTILITIES  EXTENSIONS LEVEL LAW. BUT IF  YOU GO PAGE 6 OF THE COMP  PLAN. IT BASICALLY SAYS THE  SAME THING EXCEPT IT HAS THE  WORD MAY. AND WE KNOW  HOMESTEAD OR WITH THAT  NEIGHBOR SAYS SHELL. 6.  >> ALL SECOND REFERENCE AND  YOU MENTIONED HOLDING IT UP IN  SECOND I THINK I WORKED ON THE  LAST PAGE I THINK IT'S UNDER  THE UTILITIES ELEMENT. OKAY,  SO THE ELEMENT THE THE  LANGUAGE AND THE UTILITIES  ORDINANCE I'M SORRY PAGE 6 4  THE SNOW.  >> THAT OF SO THE FIRST  PREFERENCES PAGE 22 OF THE  FUTURE LAND USE AND PAGE 6 OF  THE ORDINANCE IS THE SECOND  REFERENCE. THERE'S THERE  APPEARS TO BE A CONFLICT. THE  WARDEN SAYS MAY BUT THE COMP  PLAN SAYS SHOP.  >> OKAY IT'S IT'S REGARDING  THE SPECIFICITY AND THE FUTURE  LAND USE ELEMENT, ONE 0.3  SPECIFICALLY DISCUSSING.  DEVELOPER EXTENDED UTILITY  LINES.  >> WHEREVER THEY'RE AVAILABLE.  AND THE CITY RIGHT OF WAYS TO  THEIR SITE. THE UNDER  OBJECTIVE.  >> 3 OF THE UTILITIES ELEMENT.  IT'S MORE GENERAL. IT DOESN'T  TALK ABOUT EXTENSION OF  INFRASTRUCTURE FROM.  >> IT'S SPECIFIC LOCATION TO  SERVE A SIDE AND IT HAS BEEN  INTERPRETED IN THE PAST THAT  EVERY PROJECT REGARDLESS OF  WHETHER THEY'RE DEDICATED  PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE TO THE  BUT THEY'VE BEEN SOLVED HAS  BEEN REQUIRED TO I THREW A  UTILITY DEVELOPER GREEN THAT A  LOT OF WORK FOR EVERY PROJECT  WHERE AND THERE MAY NOT EVEN  BE ANY UPPER STRUCTURE  DEDICATED TO PUBLIC. SO IT'S A  DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EXTENDING  UTILITIES TO SERVICE SIDE. AND  SERVING A SITE WHERE UTILITIES  ARE AVAILABLE AT THE PROPERTY  LAW. I HOPE I EXPLAINED THAT  I'M NOT. THERE TO BE  UNDERSTANDING WHY IT ISN'T  CONFLICT SO ITS EXTENSION TO  THE SITE VERSUS SURVEYING THE  SITE WITH THE UTILITIES UP  PROPERTY LAW.  >> AND THAT SCENE THE  DISTINCTION THAT YOU'RE STATED  BUT I WILL YIELD TO YOU FOR  OTHER. 1 THAT'S ALL I HAVE.  >> JUST BOUNCED OVER THE YEAH  WHERE STATE FARM LAND IN PORT.  YEAH, THANK THEY DID SO THE  REFERENCE TO OUR LAND IS TO TO  STATUTORY PROVISIONS.  >> OF COMPONENTS MUST BE  INCORPORATED IN YOUR  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SO DOES  NOT SUPPORT HAVE ANY  PARTICULARLY DEDICATED  FARMLAND KNOW, BUT WE DO AND  AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT  WHERE FARMS PUT STOP LIST. AND  THAT IS WHY YOU SEE THE  REFERENCE WERE REQUIRED BY  STATE LAW TO INCORPORATE  POLICIES TO PROTECT FARMLAND.  >> AND MAYBE IN THE CITY.  >> THANK THAT'S THAT'S  APPRECIATE THE SMART BECAUSE  EXACTLY THE SAME THING  >> I'M NOT SAYING ANYTHING  ELSE. COMMISSIONER AVERAGE  FINAL FINAL SAY QUESTION ABOUT  ANYTHING ON THIS ITEM. NO OK.  MOVING TO PUBLIC COMMENT.  ♪ >> COMMISSION MEETING. MEMBER  TO SHOW  TO PRODUCTION OF  ♪ ♪ LEGAL TEAM ERROR THAT REMEMBER  IN THE BECAUSE OF YEAR.  ♪ ♪ DON'T CHANGE THE THAT THE  COUPLE.  IN 27 HAVE STAVE HEART STRICT  THE PATH TO GET PLAN LOOK AT  THAT. MEANWHILE PROTESTS.  ♪ ♪ THE EXISTING PLAN AND  INCLUDING THE BORDER. WHAT  EXTENSION OF EXPIRATION 3RD  RESIDENTS TO HAVE THE  RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITY THAT  THERE A GO FOR WITHOUT ANY  REDUCTION THANK YOU.  ♪ >> MY NAME IS RICK BUT WITH  WHITE BALL NUMBERS PORCH  PUBLIC COMMENT IS FROM  ♪ JULY 23RD COMMISSIONERS  MEETING BEING HELD 10:00AM  THIS MORNING. NUMBER 2024 IN  OPTIONAL THE NORTH PLANT.  ♪ ♪ CONTINUE ROLL OUT A REAL  PUBLIC INPUT. YOU NEED TO  CHANGE TO LEAVE THE CHANGE  NUMBER TO INCLUDE A PROVISION  FOR A LITTLE THESE.  ♪ IT WILL BE SENT HOME. BUT  ♪ QUESTION THEY'RE PRETTY GOOD  AT GOLF COURSE, CLUB IMPENDING  USES. IDEA THAT THE  COMMISSIONERS WENT OUT BACK  OUT GOT PUBLIC INPUT LIKE THEY  SAID THEY WOULD PAY 28. BUT  THE WAY WAS DESCRIBED PROBABLY  COMMISSIONERS, THANK YOU.  >> REALLY 0, 0, 14 6  THE CALL EVERY GOING ALL OF  THE 23RD OF APRIL 20 OUT 24  ADMISSION MORNING TRAINS 1.2  EUR NOT ALWAYS OPTION SHOULD  GIVEN MORE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2,  0, 2, 4, 0, 9, THAT WE 5, 3,  TO 2. WHAT LIVE IN 2005 WITH  THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WE HAD  IT ENDED COMMUNITY WITH FLU  CALLED PORCH. AND MANY OTHER  THE REPUBLICANS ON THE GOLF  TOTALLY INCONSISTENT WITH THE  TERMS CONDITIONS AND OFFERING  OF THE MARKETING EFFORTS FOR  THE DEVELOPERS FOR MANY YEARS  AND WILL BE COMPLETE CHANGE IN  THE WE BOUGHT INTO MANY YEARS  THANK YOU FOR HEARING CHURCH.  >> BY THE YOU WANT WHEN  ♪ I TREAT THEY WON'T 23RD 2020  BY PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IN  ♪ 2024 THERE'S CONSIDER TO  ISSUED  ♪ REGARDING 20 KEEP OUR  ♪ >> COUNTRY CLUB AND PERSONALLY  CONSIDER THE ISSUE. ONE TRUSS  BUT AIR. WE KNOW IT AND THE  REST OF HER LIFE. AND WITH THE  WE DON'T WANT HEAR WEEK. ALSO  MADE A POOR START THEN JUST  ONE EXAMPLE HIGH DON'T WANT  WHEN IT ALL AND NORTH ARANSAS  FOR STORAGE AND INTERNET  CONNECTION THAT WE PURCHASED  OUR CAN SINGLE FAMILY HOME  WHERE THE ORIGINAL PLAN TALK  ABOUT LIKED BY WE BATTLE AND  MAKE SURE THAT THE UNIT.  DIDN'T WANT TO TRY I WANT TO  TO REPORT. WE APPRECIATE  DIDN'T KNOW OUR COMMUNITY TO  THAT IT IS A PRECIOUS  COMMODITY 2020 24. THINK  PROTECT AGE HEALTH ANY  INCLUDING WITH  ANY NEEDED EXTENSION OF THANK  YOU ALL.  >> YEAH, MY NEED  DRY. YOU KNOW PART THAT REPORT  THAT I DON'T KNOW 3 A JURY THE  MEETING THAT TAKING ONE OF  2020 OR.  THE CHANGE TO ACTIVITY THAT  ARE INCLUDING THE  AFOREMENTIONED PROBLEM, IT GOT  TO OR RESTRICT DON'T CHANGE  IT. IT'S PORTION OF THAT  COMMITTEE SENATOR TO ALL OF  CHANGE TO ONLY IN AREA THAT  YOUNG THE JOINING GOLF COP AND  NUMBER DID GREAT AT THE END OF  MANY DISTRICTS ARE ACTIVITIES  THAT OH GETTING TO THE  RESIDENTIAL DON'T GET THAT  CAME REPEAT REQUIRE IT COME  BY, BUT THEY GET  TODAY AND JERK AND UP THANK  YOU.  ♪ DRIVE. AND 2 40 THAT  EXPECTATION THAT.  >> WE WERE GOING WANT TO GIVE  A AND ENJOY THE BUT THE  ATTEMPTING TO TO CHANGE ALL  THAT.  ♪ PLAN THE EXPENSE OF  ♪ THE DESTROYED. BELIEVE THE  CALL. IN DISTRICT IMPLEMENTING  DISTRICT REPUTATION OR 2.  ♪ ACTUAL IT'S VERY SHOW TODAY  THIS CHANGE WILL KEEP WHAT  THEY CALL HALF TO PLAY.  APPEARS HELP  ♪ DEVELOPMENT OF ARE  THOUGHTFULLY PROF OF 8. THANK  YOU FOR AND  ♪ ♪ MY NAME CAR. WAITING YOU FOR  AND YOU  IT. COREY  >> THE TOMORROW, JULY 23RD  2024. BEEN A WHAT SHOW.  CHANGES NO.  ♪ ♪ STORM OR TO 4 K. YOUR  OWN  ♪ ♪ TO BE DEVELOPED. CARE I KNOW  YOUR SHE NOTICED THE CHANGE DO  AND YOU  WHAT WE SAW WITH THE BALL.  THANK YOU. GOING INTO. THANK  YOU.  ♪ >> COMING THE TOP OF  ♪ WERE TO REMAIN  ♪ ENVIRONMENTAL AREA. WE LOOK AT  PLANS FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD.  SINGLE-FAMILY THAT'S GOING TO  BE GATED COMMUNITY WITHIN  COMMUNITY.  ♪ ♪ IN NEIGHBORHOOD. DID WANT  THAT.  ♪ ♪ SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN AWAY FROM  CREATE.  ♪ ♪ >> 40 WHAT EVERY CREEK. I'M  LIKE BY THE 0, 3, 4, 1, THE A  LOT 23RD OKAY. ABOUT TO CHANGE  CHANGE I THINK THAT THAT'S  KIND OF CRAZY. A LOT OF  PROBLEMS FOR 2 OF THEM ARE  THEY'RE HEY DID YOU REALLY DO  HAVE RECREATE WHAT TO CALLED  HOME. MAY.  ♪ ♪ BY THE BORDER. PARTICULAR IT  WITH UP TO THE AND A LOT OF  AND WEEK A LOT GREAT FOR TO TO  KEEP ALL THOSE SERVICES OR THE  ADDITIONAL TRAVEL PROBLEMS  THAT ARE GOING TO TOLD IT AND  IT IT AND UP PROBABLY  SOMETHING CALLS IT ONE LIVING  THERE GREAT. YOU KNOW TO THE  CHANGING. BE IN THE QUITE  CONCERNED HERE ON THE THANK  ♪ >> THE WEEKEND.  ♪ ♪ >> AS I'M A POSITION TO CHANGE  IS PENDING TO ORDINANCE NUMBER  2024 0, 9, THERE IS NO PLAN  PURSUE OKAY SHOULD REMAIN AS  ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED VIA THE  DEVELOPER DENSITY RESIDENTIAL  BUT A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF 4  UNITS PER NOTING PARCEL CHAOS  ON THE 9.7 ACRES LAW FOR A  MAXIMUM OF 39 UNITS THIS  PROPOSED ORDINANCE REVISION  VIOLATES THE OFFICE FEW TO  FUTURE LAND USE MAP FLUME OF  THE PORT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS  LITTLE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL  WITH A MAX DENSITY OF 4 UNITS  PER ACRE. THIS ORDINANCE IS  COMPLETELY CHANGE THE  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY  IS NOTHING MORE THAN A  GIVEAWAY AT THE FUTURE OF OUR  CITY TO DEVELOPERS AGAINST THE  WILL OF THE PEOPLE EVERY  NEIGHBOR I HAVE SPOKEN AS  OPPOSED TO THESE COMMISSIONERS  VOTED ON THIS MATTER MAKE  CLEAR EXACTLY THEY REPRESENT  EITHER THE PEOPLE OR I DON'T  KNOW DEEP POCKETS. CENTER. I  HONOR AND THEY HEAR A GREAT  DEVELOPMENT, I'M STRONGLY  OPPOSE THE PROPOSED CHANGE TO  THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IN  TURN THE COMPANION CHANGE TO  THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT  CODE WHICH REMOVES PLANNED  COMMUNITY DISTRICT PC DAY AS  THE IMPLEMENTING ZONING  DISTRICT FOR COMMUNITY. AND  THE PERSON I HAVE JUST MET.  THEN  >> FOLLOW JOSH SMITH SYSTEM  ABOUT I MEAN TODAY OF THOSE  MEETINGS WE'VE DEFINITELY GOT  TO WATCH YOU GUYS WERE ONLY  LAST VOTE AND YOU KNOW  CONTINUE TO COME UP AND FIGHT  FOR WHAT THEY WANT TO AND SOME  ALWAYS CORNER OUT ALL THE WAY  TO GET A TOE. IT'S A SUNS  CONTINUE TO BET YOU TO DO  CERTAIN THINGS TO TAKE CARE OF  OUR RIGHTS FOR YOU KNOW  THERE'S A GIANT PORTION OF THE  CITY THAT'S NOT GOING TO BE  INFORMED. THERE'S ALWAYS  CHANGING. SUMMER IS IN STATE  STATUTE SAYS THEY DON'T HAVE  TO AND THE CITY GOOD ENOUGH  FOR US. IT'S REALLY SAD TO  SAY. WE'VE GOT TO HAVE A QUICK  PEOPLE HERE. WE WERE PROMISED  A BILL OF GOODS. YOU KNOW,  UNFORTUNATELY WE HAVE A CHANCE  TO PROTECT KIDS ARE PROBABLY  NOT GOING TO UP. I FEEL THAT  YOU KNOW I BEEN SAID MAYBE  THEY WOULD GET IT THERE'S  THINGS THAT WE NEED TO DO THE  CITY. TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS  RIGHTS. THAT'S ALL WE HAVE  IT'S REALLY YOU. THERE ARE ARE  REALLY LOOK FORWARD TO THE DAY  WHEN THIS COMMISSION PUTS IN  THE PER PER CITIZENS AS THEY  DO FOR DEVELOPERS, THANK YOU  VERY  >> AFTERNOON MY NAME IS ROLAND  OVER PAY RESIDE AT 51 31 PUNCH  AT THE LAND. AND HARRY CREATE.  OWN THE PROPERTY SINCE 2006.  THEY'VE ALSO BEEN WITNESS TO  ALL OF THESE PROMISES THAT A  DEVELOPER HAS MADE. AS YOU CAN  SEE WE A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO  ARE YOU HAVE TO TALK AND ALSO  LEFT TALK AS ACTIONS TO THE  PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CITY'S  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE  COMPLEXITY AND SCOPE OF THESE  OBJECTIONS AND THEIR IMPACT ON  OUR LET'S ADDRESS BY A TRAIN A  LITTLE BACK AND HIS E-MAILS TO  YOU. YESTERDAY. AT THE RISK OF  PILING ON HERE. I LIKE TO MAKE  LIKE TO BRING UP A FEW MORE  POINTS. PEOPLE HAVE TALKED  ABOUT ELIMINATING THE PLANNED  COMMUNITY DISTRICT WHICH AN  AMENDMENT AS THE IMPLEMENTING  DISTRICT OR CREEK DRA. THEY PC  DAVID CARR'S A MASTER PLAN  ADOPTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION  IS AFTER PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR  ANY DEVELOPMENT IN THE  DISTRICT. THAT IS A HUGE  IMPORTANT PROTECTION FOR EVERY  AND IN THE FUTURE ONCE THE DRI  EXPIRES. WITHOUT THIS KIND OF  A MASTER PLAN. THE DEVELOPER  CAN MORE EASILY CONVERT GOLF  COURSE LAND INTO RESIDENTIAL  OR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH  POTENTIALLY UNLIMITED DENSITY  UNDER THE PROPOSED LAND ZONING  OF NEXT YEAR. IT'S APPARENTLY  NO TEXT THAT WE CAN FUND AND  THEREFORE POSE COMPREHENSIVE  PLAN THAT REQUIRES THE CITIES.  APPROVAL OF ANY DEVELOPMENT OF  THE COURSE ONCE THE EXPIRES  PROTECTION EXISTS TODAY WHICH  IS THE MASTER-PLANNED  REQUIREMENT OF THE DISTRICT.  THAT'S WHY THIS IS SO  IMPORTANT. HOWEVER THE THE THE  CHANGES THAT THE CITY IS NO  CONSIDERING IT'S GOING TO TAKE  THIS AWAY FROM CREATE. IF THE  NEW PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE TO  MIXED USE IS APPROVED FOR OPEN  GOLF COURSE LAND LOCATED IN  ACTIVITY CENTER 2 WEST OF  SUMTER BOULEVARD THIS COULD  CREATE AND TIME AND FOR THE  DEVELOPER YOU COULD THEN  ANYTHING HE WANTS LAND SO LONG  AS IT COMPLIES WITH THE ULDC  MATRIX OF APPROVAL LAND USES.  FOR THIS ACTIVITY CENTER.  THAT'S ENTITLEMENT WOULD  LIKELY RUN WITH THE LAND AND  SURVIVED THE EXPIRATION OF THE  HERON CREEK DRI. THIS IS NOT  ACCEPTABLE TO OUR H.O.A. AND  RESIDENTS BECAUSE IT WOULD  VIRTUALLY MAKE AN IMPOSSIBLE  BUT IT'S IT PUT THE CITY TO  SAY NO DEVELOPING PRO GOLF  THANK YOU. THANK YOU.  >> GOOD AFTERNOON, LADIES AND  GENTLEMAN. MY NAME IS GREG I  LOVE IT 5286 WHEN I DRY. CREEK  COMMUNITY. TAKEN LONG WITH  WITH A NUMBER OF OTHER PEOPLE  SAID. I'VE BEEN HERE FOR 21  YEARS. I WOULD SOLD A BILL OF  GOODS IF I BOUGHT MY HOUSE ALL  RIGHT I WOULD HAVE THAT GOLF  COURSE FOR THE REST OF MY WIFE  IF I STAY GREAT. WE'VE BEEN AN  EXTRA AMOUNT MONEY TO HAVE A  GOLF COURSE IF YOU. BECAUSE  THAT WAS SO IMPORTANT TO  DEVELOPER. I. WE HAD A SECOND  WE DECIDED TO GO FROM ONE  HOUSE TO ANOTHER THE STATEMENT  HERE CREEK BECAUSE WE LIKE  THAT WHY BECAUSE OF THE BEAUTY  THAT TIME AND THE DIFFICULTY  OF THE GOLF COURSE REALLY  ENJOY IT GOES BY 5 TIMES A  WEEK IT IS OUR ENJOYMENT. IT'S  OUR RETIREMENT. IT'S SOMETHING  THAT WE ENJOY IT SOMETHING  THAT WE WERE SO. OHIO WANTS A  BILL OF GOODS. LET'S SAY WE RE  ADVERTISEMENTS THAT ONCE WE  MOVED NOTHING WHATEVER  HAPPENED TO THE GOLF COURSE IT  WOULD STAND TO GOLF COURSE IT  WOULD 3, 9, HOLES. ALL RIGHT.  >> SOMETHING THAT THAT'S  THAT'S SOMEWHAT IRRITATING IS  IS THAT. IF THIS GOES THROUGH  IF YOU PASS THIS VENTURE AND  DO AWAY WITH WITH THE THE  RIGHT OF THE GOAL OF COURSE TO  STAY THE WAY IT IS RIGHT THERE  GOING TO BE SO MANY HOMEOWNERS  LIKE YOURSELF, I'M LOOKING  AROUND LOOKING. WELL I SEE A  LOT LOT OF GREAT WORDS APPEAR  DISLIKE ME OKAY. YOU'RE GOING  RETIRE OR YOU WANT TO HAVE A  GOOD LIFE YOU WANT TO BUY INTO  SOMETHING THAT YOU THINK IS  GOING TO SATISFY FOR THE REST  OF YOUR LIFE. I LOOK AT THIS  AND I HATE TO SAY THIS. BUT I  LOOK  AT AS THE DEVELOPER BEING  GREEDY. HE WANTS MONEY. IT'S  BASICALLY WHAT HE WANTS. IT'S  MY UNDERSTANDING AND MAYBE I'M  WRONG ALL RIGHT IT'S MY  UNDERSTANDING HE OWNED THE  PROPERTY ACROSS THE STREET  FROM HERE KUWAIT. AND HOW MANY  HOW MANY HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS  OF APARTMENTS AND HOMES ARE  GOING UP THERE. WE NEED TO  MORE IN HERE CREATE. MY LAST  COMMENT AND I. THE DEVELOPERS  MOTIVATION. IT'S GREED AND  MONEY. IF YOU FOLES. SEE NEED.  ♪ LETS YOU DO AWAY WITH WITH  ♪ 40 PASSES MOTION AND DO AWAY  WITH OUR RIGHTS AS A  COMMUNITY. WHAT WILL PEOPLE  THINK OF YOUR MOTIVATION.  THANK YOU.  >> AND THAT AND ENTAIL. WELL,  I FEEL LIKE I'M IN A DREAM.  >> I'M GOING BACK ALL THE  PEOPLE ARE SPEAKING OUT  AGAINST WARM MINERAL SPRINGS  THAT WE'VE GOT THE PEOPLE  BREAK. WHEN LISTEN TO THE  PEOPLE WANT MINERAL SPRINGS  YOU'VE GOT TO LISTEN TO THE  PEOPLE THAT WEEK. YOU HAVE TO  LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE. I TRY TO  COME UP HERE LOWER MY VOICE  AND BE VERY NICE. I'M SO  PASSIONATE WHEN IT COMES TO  WOMAN WILL SPRINGS AND  LISTENING TO THE PEOPLE SPEAK  TIME AND TIME AND  TIME AGAIN. THEY USED THE  WOMAN THINGS THAT COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL AND COMMISSIONER  SPOKES AGREED UPON SHOULD BE  TAKEN AT. OKAY CREATE A LITTLE  BIT MORE WHAT IT SHOULD BE IN  HERE RIGHT NOW. THERE'S SO  MANY DISCUSSIONS GOING ON  REGARDING WOMAN SPRINGS, AND  THE POSSIBLE PRESERVATION OF  THE BUILDINGS AND WITH SOME  NOT PROFITS COMING IN AND WHAT  SOME GRANT MONEY COMING IN  THAT CANNOT GO BACK TO THE P  DESIGNATION AND WHILE YOU  CHANGED IN THE FIRST PLACE AND  HOW IT REFLECTED THAT IT  SHOULDN'T BE TAKEN OUT. AND  YOU'VE GOT TO LISTEN TO THE  PEOPLE WE KEEP SPEAKING IN  FRONT OF YOU GOT LISTEN TO US  AT SOME POINT. I'M WAITING TO  SEE WHAT GOING TO DO WITH THEM  CREATE IF YOU REALLY GOING TO  WE DESIGNATE ACTIVITY CENTER  OR ARE WE GOING TO DO WHAT YOU  DID WITH WARM MINERAL SPRINGS  DETAINED THE PIECE 3. UNTIL  IT'S JUST SMACKED IN THE FACE  LEFT YOU'VE GOT TO LISTEN TO  THE PEOPLE IT'S NOT GOING TO  GET ANY BETTER AND THEN I LOOK  AT THE CORRIDORS IT'S LIKE  LITTLE BIT OF A NEIGHBORHOOD  IS GETTING AND SAY IT AND SOME  OF THIS OF THE USES THAT EVEN  SPECIAL EXCEPTION USES AND  THESE COVID TOES. WE DIDN'T  KILL US. NOBODY BROUGHT IN  UNDER THE CONSUMPTION THAT  WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A HOTEL  RIGHT NEXT TO A LITTLE BIT OF  A POSSIBLY HAVE A A REPAIR  SHOP, AN AUTOMOBILE SHOP NEXT  DOOR US. THAT'S ABSOLUTELY  RIDICULOUS. THERE'S NO RUSH  AND TRYING TO GET THIS THROUGH  THE WAY IT HAVE TO TAKE A  BREATH AND SORRY YOU HAVE TO  TAKE A BREATH AND BE  CONSIDERED WHAT'S GOING ON  HERE, TOO MUCH THINGS WITHIN  PLAN THAT'S CRAZY. WHEN IT WAS  LOUIS AIR.  >> I REPRESENT 7 SOULS WANT  HER SPEAK IN FRONT OF YOU. 2  PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN THE  NEIGHBORHOOD AND ACTIVITY US  ACTIVITY CENTER 6 IS CURRENTLY  ZONED RESIDENTIAL THAT ABOUT  TO CHANGE. I'M SPEAKING ON  BEHALF OF THE WOMAN THAT LIVES  OUT THERE RIGHT NOW AND  ANOTHER MAN THAT WAS HALF  THEIR HALF OF NEW YORK CITY  AND TRAVELS AS A MUSICIAN. THE  OTHER 5 SOULS FOR MYSELF MY  FIANCEE KIMBERLY WEEKS, 22  YEAR-OLD SON TRAVIS WAS ACTIVE  MEMBER OF THE ARMY NATIONAL  GUARD AND ALSO SERVE RESCUING  PEOPLE DURING HURRICANE IAN IN  THIS AREA ISOM THEODORE'S 2  YEARS OLD TO BE TOO AUGUST 6.  PART OF PORT THAT 2 YEAR-OLD  IS ALREADY DEVELOPING EMPATHY  FOR THE ANIMALS IN THE BIRDS  OUT IN THAT AREA IS DEVELOPING  RELATIONSHIP WITH THE NORTH  PORT POLICE OFFICERS AND  RESCUE BECAUSE MY FAMILY HAS  BECOME SELF-APPOINTED  NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH OUT THERE.  WE PREVENTED 2 CAR BY FORMER  FIRE AND RESCUE. WE HAVE  ASSISTED THE CITY OF NORTH  PORT POLICE BY ME BEING ON  PHONE WITH THEM MAKING A  FELONY DUI STOP AND NOT BEING  ABLE TO FIND THE PERSON OUT  THERE. SO WE'RE MAKING THESE  THINGS OUT THERE TO HELP  SUPPORT OF COMMUNITY. WE  BOUGHT A PIECE OF PROPERTY IN  2020. WHEN THE PANDEMIC  STARTED TO REDUCE OUR DEBT  MOVE OUT OF THE HOUSE OR SO  WE'RE AT WE SOLD A HOUSE LAS  VEGAS. WHAT WE READ IN  SARASOTA SO WE CAN MOVE DOWN  HERE TO DEVELOP A WHOLE. WE  DID OUR DUE DILIGENCE IN 2020  EVERYTHING FROM THE SIZE OF  THE HOUSE IS CHECKS. WHAT  PROPERTY WE CAN BUILD THEIR  WHAT WE HAVE TO DO THAT WE CAN  HOMESTEAD AND BUILD OURSELVES  BECAUSE THE REALITY OF TODAY'S  WORLD. I CAN'T BUILD A HOUSE  MUST I DO IT MYSELF FOR UNDER  $200,000 IF THIS BECOMES  ACTIVITY CENTER 6. I CAN'T  DEVELOP THAT WAY IN FOR  WESTERN A MILLION DOLLARS AS  AN INDIVIDUAL TRYING TO  SUPPORT MY FAMILY NOW IS BY  RENT HAS DOUBLED SARASOTA. I  CAN'T DO ANYTHING. AND I'M  GRATEFUL THAT VICE MAYOR  STOKES MADE A POINT THAT WE  CAN'T MAKE A POINT WITHOUT THE  INFRASTRUCTURE THERE AND HERE  WE'VE BEEN APPLYING FOR  PERMITS AND THE CITY OF NORTH  PORT ZONING AND PLANNING  CANNOT GIVE US ANSWERS ABOUT  GRANDFATHER IN THAT WE APPLY  FOR THE PERMIT. WHEN DO WE  HAVE TO HAVE THIS 5, 4, BUT  THEY'RE WORKING ON ANSWERS  THAT THEY CANNOT RECEIVE SO  ASKING THAT WE REPAIR THAT  MAYBE THE COUNCIL PROPOSES A  MOTION FOR CONFORMING  EXCEPTIONS FOR FAMILIES LIKE  MINE TO BE ABLE TO STILL  DEVELOP PRESIDENTIAL OUT THERE  BEING ONLY 2 CITY BLOCKS AWAY  RESIDENTIAL AREAS AFTER THE  CHANGE. EXCEPTION FOR  NONCONFORMING SO THAT BIBLE  MULTIFAMILY OUT THERE THE  STRUCTURES CAN GET TAX BY  BREES WAYS AND NOT TO  BUILDINGS TOUCHED EACH OTHER,  SO WE COULD STILL HAVE  MULTIFAMILY UNITS OUT THERE  LIVE AND BE CONFORMING TO THE  FUTURE USES BUT WITHOUT YOU  GUYS DOING THAT THERE'S  FAMILIES TRYING TO LIVE OUT  THERE THAT HAVE ALREADY BOUGHT  HOMES. THIS MAY PROVE THAT MY  FAMILY FROM LIVING HERE ANY  LONGER YOUR GOAL IS AN ACTIVE  SOLDIER WHO IS CURRENTLY  APPLYING TO BE A LAW  ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. I I WANT  TO GO TO SCHOOL HERE 1, TO 2  YEAR-OLD GO TO SCHOOL THE SIGN  ON THE WALL AND NEED TO  IMPLEMENT SAYS IN GOD WE TRUST  THAT'S WHY I WANT MY FAMILY  PART OF THIS COMMUNITY. AND  I'M ASKING YOU TO PLEASE  CONSIDER EXCEPTIONS FOR  FAMILIES LIKE MINE AND  EVERYTHING JUST SAID I'M GOING  TO FOLLOW EMAILS PAPER MILL TO  ALL OF YOU AND FARMS BECAUSE  THAT MAP IT JUST MEANT  PREVENTING THE ANSWERS TO THE  QUESTIONS SO MY FAMILY CAN  SUCCEED AND PROSPER IN THIS  COMMUNITY.  >> THANK YOU THANK  ♪ ♪ >> AND THEREFORE YOU START THE  CLOCK OF MY I HAVE RESPONSE TO  MY REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME  RATHER THAN THE BARE 3 MINUTE,  EVERYONE HAS BEEN MINUTES,  LET'S THAT EVERYONE HAS 3 MEN.  AND AGAIN AT THE BEGINNING AND  A PUBLIC WHAT IT OUT OF THAT  VIOLATE STATE LAW FOR  MEANINGFUL PARTICIPATION AND  THE FACT THAT YOU FAILED TO  VOTE FOR TRANSMITTAL AND  INSTEAD VOTED FOR A  CONTINUANCE WHICH HAS NOT  OCCURRED SETTING SO BUT FOR  PROCEDURAL. TRIAL. REGARDLESS  LET'S TALK ABOUT THE SUBSTANCE  OF THIS. WE KNOW THAT THERE IS  A TREND THROUGHOUT FLORIDA AND  ACTUALLY. OF DEVELOPERS  TRAINING GOLF COURSES INTO  RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. AND  ABOUT BUT WAS THE DRI EXPIRES  THERE'S NOTHING TO STAND IN  THE WAY OF THE DEVELOPER DOING  THAT STAFF TO SAY OH YES,  THERE BUT THEY HAVEN'T POINTED  TO THERE IS ONE SINGULAR WHICH  PREVENTS THE DEVELOPER CHANGE  IN THE GOLF COURSE AT THAT  POINT IN TO DEVELOP. AND THAT  IS THE PROVISION THAT MANY  WITH TALK TO YOU ABOUT THIS  NOW BEFORE THIS. AND THEN WE  HAVE SAYING TO HER. OVER AND  THAT IS THE FACT THAT YOU  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SAYS THAT  IMPLEMENTING ZONING DISTRICT  PRETTY BOTH THE NORTH PART OF  THE SOUTH PART IS PLANNED  COMMUNITY DISTRICT. PLAYING  COMMUNITY DISTRICT IN YOUR  ZONING CODE MAKES THAT THE  ZONING DISTRICT. YOU'RE  PROPOSING IN THIS AND ULDC  REVISION TO 8 PC. SO THAT WHEN  THE GOLF COURSE IS ELIGIBLE AT  THE ROCK SPIERS THEY COME IN  AND ARE ACTIVITIES THAT ARE  TOO. AND THEN A RESIDENT. AND  YOU CLEARLY IGNORED FAILED TO  RESPOND IN ANY RESPECT  SENSIBLE PLAN FOR AS THE  ATTORNEY ERIC REID PEOPLE LAND  USE EXPERTS. LAST 30 YEARS. IN  YOU NEED TO ADD TO THE USES.  IN THOSE 2 AREAS, GOLF COURSE  AND GOLF AND TENNIS CLUB HAS  ALLOWED TO USE. THAT'S NOT IN  THERE NOW UNDER THE STAFF  PROPOSAL. I WOULD PASS OUT THE  VIEW OF VISION IGNORE WELL.  THE CHANGE IN THE LAND USE MAP  PICTURE OF HUGE CHUNK OF THE  GOLF COURSE WITHOUT THOSE MADE  FOR RECREATION SLASH OPEN  SPACE. AND TURNS IT INTO BEING  ELIGIBLE FOR RESIDENTIAL  DEVELOPMENT. NOR ALSO 2  BROTHERS HAVING MORE THE  MAXIMUM WHEN UNITS ON PARTIAL  PAY. AND STAFF SEEKING TO AID  AND ABET THAT AFTER OUR APPEAL  SUCCEEDS WHICH SHOULD.  >> ALL RIGHT BY PUTTING IN  THERE THAT THAT THERE CONTROLS  WHICH HAS BEEN THEIR ARGUMENT  COUNTRY LAW. ALSO THIS TO  LEAVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD  COMPETITIVE COMPATIBILITY  POLICIES AND THE COMPREHENSIVE  PLAN THAT GIVEN YOU THE  NUMBERS THAT I DON'T HAVE TIME  READ READ THEM, IT WOULD  INCREASE MAXIM RESIDENTIAL DO  THAT ROLLING INTO THE 20  UNITS. THE GOLF COURSE IS ABLE  DEVELOP. AND THERE'S BUT  YOU'RE CUTTING ME OFF. AND  THAT GOES CONTRARY TO STATE  LAW THAT WE  >> REASONABLE UP TO PUBLIC.  ♪ >> I HOPE YOU KNOW TAKE PART  OF THE TOURNAMENT REQUEST.  THEM RATHER THAN JUST TURN  YOUR BACK ON A LITTLE FOR  SHARES PEOPLE 2 THANK THE 5181  PRO. SO COURT WITH JANUARY  THIS YEAR. I JUST WANT TO  SHARE SOMETHING THAT THE  COMMISSION. MISTER FLETCHER  SHARE WITH US RESPONSE TO  CONCERNS. OFTEN YOU KNOW OF  THE COMMUNITY ABOUT THINGS ARE  GOING ABOUT THEIR. AND HIM FOR  SOME OF THE LETTER REACTION TO  MAYBE A LITTLE BIT THIS  OPENING MY POINT WE'VE HAD  SOME DIFFERENCES BUT HERE'S  WHAT YOU SET SO THEY A GREAT  GOLF COURSE IS AN IMPORTANT  PART OF CITY'S IDENTITY. THE  CITY IS NOT TAKING ACTIONS. IT  WOULD CREATE INCENTIVE MAKE IT  EASIER. WE DEVELOPED THE GOLF  COURSE ANOTHER USE. THE CITI  SHARES THE HERON CREEK  COMMUNITIES DESIRE. THE COURSE  TO HAVE A WARM SUCCESSFUL  FUTURE. BUT ENJOYMENT TO OUR  RESIDENTS AND VISITORS. THAT  HAS ADDRESSED. THE CONCERNS IN  THE REASONS WHY THE COMPETENT  SHOULD BE AMENDED. WE ALSO  PROVIDE LANGUAGE THE INCLUDED  THE COMP PLAN HELP PRESERVE  THE GOLF COURSE AS IT IS.  ANYONE WHO'S BEEN CREATE WILL  TEST IT'S BEAUTIFUL. IT'S  RESERVED NATURE AND MY WIFE  AND WELL EVERY NIGHT AND  WALKED PART WITH THEIR GOLD.  AND WE DRIVE AROUND SUNSET AND  JUST KEPT UP. THE THAT WOULD  BE DESTROYED PUT UP. WHAT DO  WE IT'S JUST A SHAME. ASK THAT  THIS COMMISSION. LISTEN TO  WHAT MISTER FLETCHER HAS TO  START. THE GOLF COURSE SPREAD  AND STAYED. AS HE SAYS INDICAN  JOY IT PEOPLE TO COURSE CAN  ENJOY IT. AND I ALSO SHOULD  SET. I'M QUITE SURE WHAT DO  YOU WHAT THE ECONOMIC IMPACT  WITH PAY. ALL THESE WITH THE  GOLF COURSE REDEVELOPED FOR  PURPOSE. I THINK EVERY MORE.  THERE PEOPLE THAT TAKE ABOUT  30,000 ARE CUT. A GAS, BUT I  THINK THERE'S SOME MULTIPLY  THAT THROUGH HOMES. THE BY A  LITTLE MORE IN THE SO THAT'S  STARTED THANK YOU.  >> ALL RIGHT RIGHT REALLY  HERE.  >> PASTOR. QUESTIONS  DISCUSSION, BUT WANT TO MAKE  IT OFFICIAL COMMENTS  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL. YOU  KNOW WHAT. I DON'T YOU BUT I  ADMIT I DON'T KNOW EVERYTHING  THERE IS TO KNOW ABOUT  HERON CREEK. BUT I GOT TO HAND  IT TO THE CITIZENS THAT HAVE  COME OUT TIME AND TIME AND  TIME AGAIN PLEADING THEIR CASE  AS TO WHAT WE CAN DUE TO  ASSIST THEM. OUR HANDS ARE  VERY MUCH TIED BECAUSE OF YOUR  DR. THAT WAS APPROVED WAY WAY  WAY WAY WAY BACK. THERE ARE  SOME THINGS THAT WE MIGHT BE  ABLE TO DO HERE AND I'M GOING  NEED THE ASSISTANCE OF STEP.  BUT BEFORE WE GO FORWARD WITH  THAT I WANT TO REMIND THEM  BECAUSE IN THIS FUTURE LAND  USE.  >> I LOVE LITTLE FOOTNOTES  BECAUSE SEEM TO GET LOST  EXCEPT FOR DETAIL, ORIENTED  PEOPLE. THERE'S A AFTER INTO  THE CENTER TO THAT SETS. CREEK  HERON CREEK DEVELOPMENT  STANDARDS ARE GOVERNED BY THE  DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT  DEVELOPMENT ORDERED NOT THE  STANDARDS HERE SO I HOPE THAT  HAS ONLY A LITTLE BIT CARS.  BUT WE ALSO HAVE THIS FUTURE  LAND USE MAP AND I REMEMBER  DURING FIRST READING IT UP.  ABOUT WHY. DID WE GET RID OF  RECREATION OPEN SPACE. IN THE  CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE MAP  THERE IS A RECREATION OPEN  SPACE COMPONENT. THAT IS YOUR  GOLF COURSE. THAT HAS BEEN  REMOVED. THIS CURRENT FUTURE  ZONING MAP. IT'S SPORT, IT'S A  PERFECT LITTLE SQUARE.  >> AND IN THE PROPERTY  APPRAISER'S OFFICE WEBSITE. IT  SAYS THAT ITS PROPERTY USES A  GOLF BY REMOVING THAT  RECREATION OPEN SPACE ON OUR  FUTURE LAND USE MAP. DOES IT  GIVES ME CONCERN GAMING  CONCERN FOR STREET AND I STILL  HAVE THAT SAME CONCERN.  >> SO WE'VE HEARS THAT FROM  FIRST.  >> READING. THAT WE COULD ADD  THAT BACK IN BUT IT WOULDN'T  BEING CALLED RECREATION OPEN  SPACE BECAUSE STAFF. REMOVE  THAT AND NOW NEEDED  CONSERVATION. AND NOW NOT IN  THE BALL FOR US, BUT ALL OF  THE WRECK OPEN SPACE HAS BEEN  CHANGED TO CONSERVATION. I I  REALLY REALLY BELIEVE THAT 40  CITY TO HAVE BALANCE. YOU  CONSERVATION RECREATION OPEN  SPACE DESIGNATED AREAS YOU  HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGNATED  AREAS YOU HAVE A COMMERCIAL  DESIGNATED AREAS REGARDLESS IF  IT'S ON YOUR FUTURE LAND USE  MAP OR ON YOUR ZONING BY  REMOVING THESE THE RECREATION  OPEN SPACE.  >> WE'RE TELLING THE WORLD.  >> DOESN'T MATTER US.  >> AND THAT CONCERN ME FIRST  READING AND IT CONCERNS ME  THAT. I'M HOPING THAT STAFF  COULD COME UP AND GIVE ME  SOME. IDEAS ON HOW TO. SO IS  THE RECREATION OPEN SPACE THAT  IS ON THE EXISTING FUTURE LAND  USE MAP THAT IS THAT SQUARE  FOR AND CREED.  >> AND PUT THAT BACK. AND THEN  GO BACK AS CONSERVATION.  BECAUSE THAT SEEMS TO BE WHAT  EVERYTHING THAT WAS RECREATION  OPEN SPACE CONVERTED OVER TO.  AND OF COURSE I UNDERSTAND  THIS WOULD ALL HAVE TO BE  AMENABLE TO MY FELLOW  COMMISSIONERS I GET THAT.  >> BUT IF WE'VE GOT START THE  CONVERSATION SOMEWHERE AND HAD  MY  >> A LORRY BARNES ASSISTANT  DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT  SERVICES.  >> BEFORE WE DELVE INTO THE  OPEN SPACE QUESTION I WANTED  TO VERY BRIEFLY TALK ABOUT E  IT'S REALLY AND AS A NATION ON  HERE AND CREATE IT YOU COULD  BRING UP THE SCREEN. THE NORTH  SIDE OF HERON CREEK ACTIVITY  CENTER. THE SOUTH SIDE OF  SINGLE FAMILY. WELL ANNE MARSH  CREEK. ORIGINALLY WAS CALLED  MARCH GRAHAM I CAN FORWARD  WITH THEIR DRI THE FUTURE LAND  USE DESIGNATION OF  SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ON  THE SOUTHSIDE OF PROPERTY SHUT  UP AND CHANGE TO A FUTURE LAND  USE THAT ALIGNED WITH PLANNED  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ZONING  DISTRICT. WHAT THAT WAS I WILL  NEVER NOW. WE HAVE PLANNED  DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY  DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT  WHICH IS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED  FOR USE AND ACTIVITY SAUNDERS  APPLIED OVER THE WHOLE  HERON CREEK PROPERTY EXCEPT  FOR THAT TINY LITTLE SQUARE  AND THAT TINY LITTLE SQUARE  RIGHT THERE IS THE DRIVING  RANGE. OKAY THE OPEN-SPACE  FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION  AND THE CITY'S CURRENT  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS  INCREDIBLY MISLEADING. THAT  WRECK OPEN SPACE WAS APPLIED  ON PORTIONS OF HUNDREDS OF  PRIVATE PROPERTIES THAT WRECK  OPEN SPACE ELIMINATING THEIR  DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS DESPITE THE  FACT THAT THEY COULD ACHIEVE.  DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZATIONS  UNDER STATE LAW. WHO ARE  BUILDING ON THOSE PROPERTIES  EVEN IF THEY WERE  ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE  PROVIDED. THANK ALL OF THE  RULES YOU HEARD EARLIER THIS  MORNING ABOUT THE 3 OPTIONS. 2  MITIGATE WETLANDS. THAT IS ONE  THAT IS THE PRIMARY REASON WHY  WE HAVE ELIMINATED RAT  OPEN-SPACE IT EARLY AND  BECAUSE PUTS THE CITY IN A  PRECARIOUS POSITION BECAUSE IT  ELIMINATES DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS  ON A PORTION OF SOMEBODY IS  PRIVATELY OWNED PROPERTY.  NUMBER ONE NUMBER 2 WE DID  APPLY ALL THE CITY ON  PROPERTIES OR CONSERVATION OF  THE CITY ON PROPERTIES AND  THOSE FIRE MENTAL SENSITIVE  AREAS. I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND  BRINGING THE WRECK OPENS ITS  FUTURE LAND POT. EVEN IF WE  WERE TO APPLY IT TO THE  DRIVING RANGE ON THIS PROPERTY  THAT DOES NOT SOLVE THE  CONCERNS THAT PROPERTY OWNERS  CREEK PROPERTY OWNERS. YOU  KNOW AND THAT'S UNFORTUNATE  THAT THESE ISSUES WERE BROUGHT  TO LIGHT WHEN THEY PURCHASE  THEIR PROPERTY. ARTICLE 17 OF  THE 1999 REPORTED  DECLARATIONS. COVENANTS  RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS IN  THE CASE THE PRESENT OR FUTURE  USE OF THE GOLF COURSE FOR  GOLF CARTS PURPOSES MAY BE  DISCONTINUED OR SUSPENDED ANY  TIME HERE AFTER BY THE COUNTRY  CLUB OWNER. THAT IS TIME THAT  RELATE RACIAL COVENANTS  RESTRICTIONS. I WANT MORE THE  D R I DOES INCLUDE NOT COULD  BE A MANDATE TODAY. TO WORK  LAST. A CHANGE DEVELOPMENT  RIGHTS ON ON THE GOLF COURSE  PROPERTY. IT'S A COMPACT IT'S  IT'S AN AMENDMENT TO AN  EXISTING DO YOU NOT. YOU HAVE  IN YOUR DRAFT FUTURE LAND USE  ON THAT PROVISIONS THAT  REQUIRE THE CALL PARENT CRATE  OFTEN COUNTRY CLUB TO ABIDE BY  THEIR DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL  IMPACT IF THAT EXPIRES WILL BE  REQUIRED TO COME BEFORE THE  CITY COMMISSION THE  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT  TO ASSIGN ACTIVITIES THAT  CITY'S AND INTENSITY OR  SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL  DENSITIES MEN TAX OR SOME  OTHER DENSITY IS AN INTENSE IS  UNDER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN  IF DRI OWNS WHAT. AND WILL BE  A PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS FOR  GUARD, LET'S. YEAH, THEIR  DEVELOPMENT IT'S GOING TO  INVOLVE AN E. WAIVERS TO THE  UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.  THEY WANT TO LOOKING AT COMING  BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION  WITH A NEW MASTER CONCEPT PLAN  OR MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT  CONCEPT PLAN. APPROVAL BY THIS  COMMISSION SO I CAN UNDERSTAND  THE CONCERNS. THE DEVELOPER  ALSO HAS PROPERTY RIGHTS AND  IF WE ENTER SEED AND START  APPLYING. A FUTURE LAND  DESIGNATION THAT AUTHORIZES  NOT ABOUT THAT.  IT'S A TAKEN. AND WERE SUBJECT  TO A HARRIS ACT IF WE DO THAT  PROHIBITS THEM FROM DOING  ANYTHING ON THEIR PROPERTY  THAT THE CURRENTLY AUTHORIZED  TO DO SO. TO TAKE IT AND WE  COULD BE SUBJECT TO HARRIS ACT  CLAIMS. SO YOU KNOW IT IS  CONCERNING THAT YOU HAVE A  NUMBER OF CONSENTS  CONSTITUENTS HERE THAT ARE  CONCERNED ABOUT THE FUTURE OF  GOLF COURSE, THE CONVERSATIONS  THAT THEY NEED TO BE HAPPEN.  WITH THE GOLF COURSE OWNER AND  SEE CAN BE TO ENSURE LONG-TERM  FINANCIAL VIABILITY AND  CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE  COURSE. THE CITY AND HERE. AND  A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CITY AND  ASKING STATE LAW NOW.  CORPORATES PROVISIONS THAT IF  WE WERE TO LOSE WE WOULD BE  PAYING THE DEVELOPER'S  ATTORNEY SO THOSE THINGS ALL  NEED TO BE TAKEN INTO  CONSIDERATION AS YOU MAKE YOUR  DECISIONS.  >> WE JUST REAL QUICK GO BACK  BECAUSE YOU WHEN WHAT I HEARD.  YOU SAY, NO NO NO I'M SORRY  PUBLIC COMMENT IS OVER. KNOW  THAT THAT'S LAW.  >> WE NO ABOUT NOW. NOW.  >> WE'RE COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL  QUESTIONS AND WITH THERE BEING  ADDRESSED. SO WHEN I ASKED  ABOUT THAT THAT'S RECTANGLE  AREA. I THOUGHT I HEARD YOU  SAY THAT IT'S A DRIVING I'M  LOOKING GOOGLE MAPS OR  WHATEVER IT IS THAT THE  PROPERTY APPRAISER USES AND IT  LOOKS LIKE THERE ARE ACTUAL  GOLF COURSE HOLES.  >> AND THIS IS AND I'VE BEEN  THERE I DON'T BUT I'VE BEEN  THERE IT IS THE GOLF COURSE,  AND IT CURRENTLY HAS  RECREATION OPEN SPACE BY  CHANGING INTO RESIDENTIAL ON  OUR FUTURE LAND USE GOING BACK  TO THIS IS THE MESSAGE WE'RE  SENDING TO THE THAT THIS COULD  BE RESIDENTIAL IS THERE A WAY  THAT WE CAN RETAIN THE  RECREATION OPEN SPACE FOR THAT  AREA. I KNOW YOU'VE ALREADY  CHANGED THE CITY-OWNED  PROPERTY FOR CONSERVATION I  DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN CHANGE  THIS TO CONSERVATION. CAN WE  CREATE THE RECREATION OPEN  SPACE ON THE FUTURE LAND USE  MAP THAT AREA IS RECREATION  OPEN SPACE.  >> I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND IT.  AND I DON'T BELIEVE THAT IT  WOULD YIELD A RESULT AT YOU.  THINK THAT IT IT'S A VERY  SMALL AREA. NO IDEA WHAT  ACREAGES. BUT CHANGING JUST  THAT PORTION. WOOD. WHERE THE  HARM IN DOING IT WITHOUT  MINIMAL. HARMON DOING IF WE  CHANGE.  >> IF WE INCORPORATE WRAPPED  UP IN SPACE BACK INTO THE  FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT. IT'S  A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF WORK  NUMBER ONE NUMBER 2 END UP  HAVING THOSE CONVERSATIONS  ABOUT WELL WE SHOULD HAVE READ  OPEN OVER HERE TO WAR OVER  THERE TOO. THE IMPACT OF THAT  LITTLE SQUARE A WRECK OPEN.  IT'S NOT SIGNIFICANT LIGHT OF  THE DEVELOPERS RIGHT UNDER  THEIR DRI. NOT AGE DOES NOT  SHOW AREA KNOWN JUST AS.  PRESERVATION RECREATION OPEN  SPACE IMPROPER TO IT. SO I'M  I'M NOT SURE WHAT YOU'RE  TRYING ACCOMPLISH I DON'T  THINK WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING  FOR THAT SMALL SQUARE IT'S  GOING ACCOMPLISH MUCH AS FAR  AS ALLEVIATING ANY CONCERNS OR  REDUCING ANY ANY SUBSTANTIAL  ANY REDUCTION TO DEVELOPMENT  ENTITLEMENTS.  >> AND IF ITS RECREATION OPEN  ON A FUTURE LAND USE MAP.  >> IS. IT IS SAYING THAT.  >> THIS AREA CANNOT BE  DEVELOPED SINGLE-FAMILY WHERE  IS THE PROPOSED.  ♪ FUTURE LAND USE MAP IS SHOWING  IT AS POTENTIALLY DEVELOPABLE  TO SINGLE  ♪ FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. IS THERE A  PROHIBITION TO PUTTING IT INTO  CONSERVATION BECAUSE THE  CONSERVATION LAND BY THE  DEFINITION OF CONSERVATION  WE'VE SPENT A LOT OF THINGS  ALL YOU WOULD HAVE TO ALSO DO  IS JUST GOLF COURSES TO THAT  DESCRIPTION AND ARE  >> CONSERVATION IT BRING UP  THE SCREEN PLACE AND I  UNDERSTAND PARCEL K IS NOWHERE  NEAR YOU'RE NOT WORRIED ABOUT  PARCEL K THAT IS NOT OUR  CONCERN BECAUSE THAT IS PART  OF DR. I I'M TRYING FIGURE HOW  TO PUT BACK SOMETHING AN  EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE MAP  OKAY OKAY SO HERE'S MY PAGE.  >> MAP THAT SHOWS THE SERIOUS  THE DRIVING RANGE. IF THEY  WANT TO CHANGE THAT UNDER THE  CURRENT DRI.  >> THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO DO  I USED CALL THE NOTICE OF  PROPOSED CHANGE.  ♪ AND APPLYING THIS WRECK OPEN  SPACE ON  ♪ THIS AREA WHICH. YOU KNOW IF I  HAD TO GUESS I DON'T KNOW HOW  MANY ACRES WOULDN'T WANT TO  GUESS 24 ACRES.  >> 24 ACRES.  >> IF WE WANT TO APPLY IT  DOESN'T CHANGE THEIR  DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS UNDER THE  DR. THEY WOULD NEED AT AGE.  OKAY. WE CANNOT APPLY  CONSERVATION. IF WE APPLY  CONSERVATION THAT INVOLVES NO  DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS AT ALL. AND  THAT WOULD TAKE THEIR RIGHTS.  TO USE THE PROPERTY AS THEY  CURRENTLY USE THAT FURTHER,  WHY WOULDN'T RECOMMEND  ALLOWING GOLF COURSES IN  CONSERVATION WE NOT  NECESSARILY WANT TO ENCOURAGE  MORE GOLF COURSES WITH WATER  UTILITY CHALLENGES WE HAVE IN  THE CITY.  >> IS THERE A PROHIBITION AND  ACTIVITY CENTER TO UNDER THE  DESCRIPTION ADDING THE WORK  HOSPITALS.  >> AND ARE ACTIVITY CENTERS TO  COURSES A PERMITTED USE IT IS  NOT A PERMITTED USE IN  SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND  WE DO NOT RECOMMEND CHANGING  THAT'S RIGHT BECAUSE IT'S  SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NOW  HAS FUTURE IN IS WHY ONE OF  YOU KNOW WE WANTED TO APPLY  THE ACTIVITY CENTER ACROSS THE  ENTIRE AREA BECAUSE IT'S  ENTITLED UNDER THE DRI FOR  MIXED USE  >> THE ACTIVITY CENTER. SO  SENDING DISTRICT ALLOWS ALL OF  THAT USES THAT THEY'RE  PERMITTED AND THAT YOU KNOW  ELIMINATED ANY QUESTION AS TO  WHAT'S ALLOWED AND WHAT'S NOT  A LOT. INSTEAD WE REVERT BACK  TO THE SINGLE EMILY FUTURE  LAND USE DESIGNATION BECAUSE  OF ALL THE CONCERNS THAT WERE  RAISED BY THE COMMUNITY ON THE  L BECAUSE IT'S NOT REFLECTIVE  WHAT THEY'RE ALLOWED TO DO  UNDER THEIR DRI.  >> WHAT STICKY WHEN IT.  >> THE CONCERN THAT I'M  HEARING FROM THE RESIDENCE IS  PRESERVATION OF THE GOLF  COURSE, AND ALSO HEAR CONCERNS  ABOUT PARSE OK FOLKS THERE'S  NOTHING WE CAN DO ABOUT MY  FOCUS IS TRYING TO PRESERVE  THAT. AREA THAT IS THE SQUARE  ARE NOW HEARING THAT THAT'S  REALLY NOT ALL THAT POSSIBLE.  SO I DON'T KNOW ANY OTHER  COMMISSIONER WANTS TO WEIGH IN  ON I CAN ALSO TRY AND MAKE  SOME MOTIONS AND MY SPEARS AND  MISTER CHAIR. THANK YOU FOR  THE CONVERSATION.  >> IF THE DEALER LIKES BUYERS.  FELLOW OVER WANTS TO BUILD ON  THIS GOLF COURSE. WILL THEY  HAVE TO COME TO THE CITY  COMMISSION TO GET PERMISSION.  AND CAN THE CITY COMMISSION  SAYING NO.  >> THEY WILL HAVE MOUNT A  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO  ESTABLISH NEW DENSITIES  INTENSITY IS OUT OF ARE OFF  EXPIRES. AS FAR AS THE GOLF  COURSE IS THAT THE PERMIT USE  ON THE ACTIVITY CENTER PORTION  THE PROPERTY. SO THEY COULD  KEEP THE GOLF COURSE TO KEEP  THE GOLF COURSE ON THE SOUTH  SIDE OF THEY REQUIRE A  REZONING IF THEY REQUIRE. AND  A WAIVER ANY WAIVER TO THE  UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.  IF THEY WANT TO INCORPORATE  HORIZONTAL MIXED USE INSTEAD  OF OR TO CALL THIS IS IT'S A  DUAL MASTER CONCEPT UNDER THE  PROPOSED ULDC. THERE ARE  SEVERAL DIFFERENT SCENARIOS  THAT COULD OCCUR AT THE VERY  LEAST THEY WOULD BE TO DO A  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THAT  MEANT MOST COMPREHENSIVE PLAN  ON THAT REZONING AND A MASTER  CONCEPT PLAN.  >> WHICH CITY COMMISSION WILL  HAVE THE RIGHT TO DENY. IF  THEY SO DECIDE.  >> THE CITY COMMISSION HAS  DISCRETION TO APPROVE OR DENY  LAND USE DECISIONS TO THE  EXTENT THAT'S A.  >> OUR OFFER US UNDER OUR  UNDER FLORIDA LAW.  >> QUICK QUESTION. JUST FOR A  VERY QUICK QUESTION WHEN DOES  THE DRI  >> ALL RIGHT NOW. THEY HAVE  SENT NOTICE OF AN EXTENSION OF  THEIR BUILD OUT FOR PHASE 4 TO  JUNE 23RD 2028. IT'S BEEN A  >> SO IT WON'T EXPIRE UNTIL  2020 FOOT UNLESS THEY HAD  STARTED THE  >> AND WHO AUTHORIZES  EXTENSION.  >> THE THE STATE ALLOWS THEM  TO EXPAND UNDER THE EMERGENCY  ORDER AND THAT WAS THE LAST  EXTENSION THAT THEY REQUESTED.  WE DO NOT. AND OUR CODE AND  AUTOMATIC EXTENSION PER DRI  DEVELOPMENT ORDER. SO IF THEY  WANTED TO EXPAND THE TIME  FRAME. OUTSIDE OF THE  EMERGENCY ORDER AUTHORIZATION  ON THE STATUE ONE  >> WHICH COME BACK TO OFF BUT  DURING THE EXTENSION PERIOD  CAN THEY BUILD. HOW CAN THEY  BUILD HOUSES MAKE COURSE OR  NOT UNTIL CANNOT BUILD  ANYTHING THAT IS NOT  CONSISTENT WITH MAP AGE THAT I  JUST SHOWED YOU SO BASICALLY  EVEN HE GOES AND EXTENDS IT.  YOU CAN'T DO ANYTHING SO LET  REICH'S EXPIRES AND AT THE  POINT IN TIME WHICH EXPIRE FOR  HIM TO BUILD HE'S GOT TO COME  BEFORE CITY COMMISSION AND GET  PERMISSION TO DO THIS STUFF.  >> AND THE CITY COMMISSION HAS  JUST ONE CLARIFICATION HE PUT  A MASK. ALL RIGHT BRING A  CHANGE MAP IT'S ALL WORD TO  YOU ALL RIGHT, BUT WE COULD  DENY.  >> IF WE SO CHOSE.  >> GO BACK TO STICKY WICKET  OKAY YOU. I HAVE A COUPLE OF  QUICK QUESTIONS, BARNES HAVE  WE RECEIVED ANY RATE PLUS FROM  THE DEVELOPER TO CHANGE THE  USE OF NECK, GOLF COURSE HAVE  WE GOTTEN ANY INDICATION.  >> THAT THAT IS IN THE I HAVE  IN MY FILES THEY HAVE NOT  APPLY FOR A THEY HAVE SUMMIT  IN ANY FORMAL APPLICATION.  >> IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT  THERE WAS SOME TIME AGO A  GENERAL INQUIRY BUT I DO NOT  HAVE IN MY POSSESSION IN RIGHT  DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES  I CAN SAY THAT LEAST SEVERAL  YEARS AGO PRIOR TO TO EITHER  ONE OF US COMING THE DEVELOPER  HAD A CONVERSATION OR  EXCHANGING E-MAIL OR LETTER OR  SOMETHING WITH A PREVIOUS CITY  MANAGER ABOUT WHAT WOULD THE  PROCESS WE WANTED TO LOOK INTO  DOING MATT THAT'S AS FAR AS  ANY DISCUSSION WHEN IT. SO  THERE NEVER BEEN ANY SINCE OUR  TIME HERE WITH THE DEVELOPER  OR ANY OF THE DEVELOPERS  REPRESENTATIVES ABOUT THAT WE  DID AND I WILL DISCLOSE WE  HAD. WE HAD A DISCUSSION WITH  THE OWNER. THE GOLF COURSE.  DID STATE THEY NEED TO BOOST  THEIR MEMBERSHIPS IN ORDER TO  BE FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE. FOR  THE LONG TERM. AND THAT'S  SIMPLY BECAUSE OF GOLF COURSE  BUT BUT THERE WAS NO  DISCUSSION. DURING THAT  CONVERSATION ABOUT  REDEVELOPING THE GOLF COURSE  INTO ANYTHING BUT IT'S STAYING  A GOLF COURSE.  >> AND MY SECOND QUESTION  START WITH AND THE AND I'M  SURE THAT EVERYBODY UP ON THIS  DIET AGREES WITH THE PEOPLE  HERE WE WANTED HERON CREEK  GOLF  >> IS THERE  >> POSSIBLE WAY. WE CAN  MITIGATE THE RISK. OF  SOMETHING LIKE THAT THEY HAVE  TO COME BEFORE A FUTURE  COMMISSION TO MAKE THAT COMP  PLAN AMENDMENT BUT BEYOND THAT  IS THERE ANYTHING WE CAN DO.  >> TO CREATE HURDLES OR  DISCOURAGE OR TRY TO  SIDESWIPE. ANY ATTEMPT TO  CHANGE THE USE OF THAT POINTS.  >> I I UNDERSTAND THAT ARE I  CAN SAY THAT WE BELIEVE THAT  THE. CONFERENCE OF PLAN IS  CLEAR THAT IF THEY WANT TO DO  ANYTHING BUT A GOLF COURSE  THEY HAVE TO COME BACK TO US.  BUT IF THE COMMUNITY DOES NOT  FEEL THAT THAT'S CLEAR WE CAN  SPELL IT OUT EVEN MORE CLEAR  AND WITH THAT SOMETHING THAT  SIMPLY VERY CLEARLY STATES. IN  ORDER TO. IT. WE ALSO HAVE TO  MAKE SURE WE DON'T WE DON'T  VIOLATE THE BUT EXPIRATION WE  COULD WITH SANTA ANA  EXPIRATION OF THE DRI THE.  PROPERTY WILL TO UNDERGO A  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT  TO ESTABLISH. THE LAND USES  AND INTENSITIES CAN THAT BE A  FUTURE LAND USE UNDER THE  FOOTNOTE NUMBER ONE CHART.  IT'S LIKE THAT. I MEAN I CAN  SPELL IT GOOD LIKE SO YOU CAN  SPELL IN CRAYON WE WE WANT TO  MAKE IT  >> WE WE ARE NOT TRYING TO DO  ANYTHING THAT WOULD MAKE IT.  >> EASY OR ROBOTS IT  DEVELOPING THE GOLF COURSE TO  REDEVELOP THAT COST.  >> SO WHAT IS THE WILL TAKE SO  I CAN USE ITS OUR MOTION.  ♪ >> WHAT WAS IT THAT YOU JUST  SAID I JUST I JUST SAID THAT  SHOULD DR. SHOULD BE MARCH  CREEK HERON CREEK DRI.  ♪ >> EXPIRE. THE COMPREHENSIVE  PLAN AMENDMENT. WOULD BE  REQUIRED. TO ESTABLISH NEW.  DENSITIES. IN 10 CITIES AND  LAND USES FOR THE PROPERTY  >> HAVE CRAFT ON THE AND IT  WOULD BE REQUIRED.  >> TO ESTABLISH NEW.  >> IN CITIES. IN 10 CITIES.  AND LAND USES.  >> FOR THE PROPERTY. FOR THE  GOLF COURSE PROPERTY.  >> ONLY GOLF COURSE PROPERTY.  FOR THE HIGHER RATE GOLF AND  COUNTRY THANK  >> OKAY SO WOULD BE REQUIRED  TO ESTABLISH NEW DENSITIES  INTENSITIES AND. LAND USES  CALL FROM EXCELLENT THANK YOU  VERY MUCH USE THAT. THANK I  JUST I OF JUST JUST. THAT'S  FROM THE DR. EXPIRES CORRECT.  BUT STILL IT'S PLACE THAT  COVENANT THAT AT ANY TIME THAT  OVEN AND PART OF AIR AND CREEK  THAT EVERY RIGHT TAP WATER GOT  A COPY OF.  >> RIGHT AND I THINK IT WAS  THAT IN THE LAST. I MEAN WE  MET HERE AT THAT WOULD HAVE  BEEN DISCOVERED DURING OR  SOMETHING THAT THERE IS A  COVETED ATTACHED TO BUY BUYING  PROPERTY SO THAT WOULD HAVE  BEEN IN THERE THAT THE.  >> GOLF COURSE AT A TIME TO BE  DEVELOPED BY BY IT WAS ROCK  FRIENDS AS THE TOP AS THE  RECORD OR DOCUMENT COVENANTS  RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS  WITH THE OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK  AND PAGE. SO YOU KNOW ANY  ATTORNEY REPRESENTING UP  PROPERTY OWNER WOULD HAVE  LOOKED AT THAT I'M AT A BUYER  BEWARE INDIVIDUAL ALRIGHT  SHOULD HAVE READ THAT FROM  FRONT TO BACK TO UNDERSTAND  THEIR ROLE. ALL OF THE  RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS  ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMMUNITY  THEY WERE BY HAND AND SOME A  PORCH LIGHT ITSELF, SOME WERE  NOT AWARE SOME BUT ALSO THE  CITY CANNOT CONTROL THE  CONTINUED OPERATION.  >> A COMMERCIAL SO WE WE HAVE  NO CONTROL OVER THAT AS TO  WHETHER IT FAILS OR SUCCEEDS  WE HAVE NO CONTROL OVER AND NO  AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE  BUSINESSES TO STAY OPEN OR TO  CONTINUE YOU RIGHT EVEN IF IT  WASN'T IN THE COVENANTS WE  WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO CONTROL  STATE YOU LIVE IN 2 OF THE  MEMBERS THEY DON'T HAVE THOSE  GOLFING MEMBERSHIPS AND IT  COMES TIME AND THEY OWNER  FEELS.  >> I NEED TO DO SOMETHING IN  ORDER AND THAT MEANS A BILL  THAT HE STILL HAS THAT THING  THE OWNER COULD CLOSE THE GOLF  COURSE ANY TIME THAT I MEAN  SEEN IT HAPPENED ON GOLF  COURSES ALL THAT COUNTRY.  >> SO IT'S ENTIRELY POSSIBLE  THAT IF THEY DON'T OR CAN'T  MAKE THE NUMBERS WORK ANYMORE  TO OPERATE THE GOLF COURSE  THAT HE COULD CLOSE IN JUST  LEAVE THE PROPERTY. I MANAGED  RIGHT.  >> WE SURE ABOUT THIS LINE  WHICH IS THAT I THINK IT TAKES  MAYBE THE ONUS OF WHATEVER  GOING TO BE SITTING UP HERE  THAT THIS REALLY WE'RE VERY  LIMITED TO WHAT CAN DO AS FAR  AS CONTROLLING AS IT'S GOING  STAY OPEN. WE CAN'T WE CAN'T.  TAKE TAKE THAT SO I THINK THIS  GIVE SOME CLARITY TO THAT  LANGUAGE THAT WAS MISSING. THE  VERY BEGINNING SO THANK YOU.  ALL RIGHT COMMISSIONER  MCDOWELL YOU READY I AM IF  Y'ALL ARE GOING OK THEN A FEW.  FIRST BEFORE WE LOSE OUR TRAIN  OF THOUGHT MAKE A MOTION. TO  INCLUDE THE VAN E ACTIVITY  CENTER'S THE FOOTNOTE NUMBER  ONE FOR ACTIVITY CENTER 2 TO  REQUIRE. SHOULD THE DRI  EXPIRED NOT GOING TO READ IT  ASK FOR BECAUSE I THINK YOU'VE  ALREADY STARTED TYPING IT. YOU  DID APOLOGIZE. SO  >> E.  >> ACTIVITY CENTERS ON PAGE 13  THE CHART. THERE'S A FOOTNOTE  NUMBER ONE THAT THE MARSH  CREEK HERON CREEK. SHOW THE  DRI EXPIRED. COM PLAN  AMENDMENT. WOULD REQUIRED. TO  ESTABLISH A NEW DENSITY  INTENSITY AND THE USES. 4  HERON CREEK GOLF AND COUNTRY  CLUB. I MEAN TO SAY IT UNDER  FOOTNOTE NUMBER ONE. CREATED,  I'M SORRY MARCH CREEK  HERON CREEK. DR. I SHOULD ADD  DRI EXPIRE. COM PLAN AMENDMENT  WOULD BE REQUIRED. TO  ESTABLISH NEW DENSITY  INTENSITY AND LAND USES FOR  HERON CREEK GOLF AND COUNTRY  CLUB.  >> AND THERE ARE THE 30  SECONDS NOTICE YOU KNOW WE'RE  GOING TO WE'RE GOING TO BE LOT  OF REAL NO PUBLIC COMMENT  BEFORE LEGALLY RULE WE HAD  READY. IF IT LIMITED FACT  RIGHT THAT SENATOR TO GOING TO  BACK A MOTION TO MAKE SURE WE  HAVE THAT.  >> TO INCLUDE UNDER ACTIVITY  CENTER'S PAGE, 13 CHARTS BUT  NO ONE MARCH CREATE AND  HERON CREEK SHOULD THE DRI  EXPIRE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN  AMENDMENT WILL BE REQUIRED TO  ESTABLISH NEW DENSITY  INTENSITY AND LAND USES FOR  HERON CREEK GOLF AND COUNTRY  CLUB.  >> ALL RIGHT THAT WAS MAYBE  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL AT THE  SECOND. TO IT REALLY HAVE A GO  AT ITS MY UNDERSTANDING THE  ENTIRE HERON CREEK ALSO  COUNTRY CLUB IS NOT JUST THE  ACTIVITY CENTER. IT IS LIKE.  >> THINK CENTER  >> OKAY DO WE HAVE ANYTHING  ELSE. ON THAT.  >> WELL ABOUT READY.  >> ALL RIGHT MY PHONE MY I HAD  CHAT.  >> VICE MAYOR YES, THERE'S THE  S MIND AND SAY YES. SO YES.  COMMISSIONER  >> I MEAN OKAY SO THAT PASSES  5, 2,  >> MY AUNT WHY HAVE.  >> ON  >> THE COMMOTION TO CHANGE THE  FUTURE LAND USE DISTRICT  NAMES. OF MEDIUM DENSITY  CORRIDOR. 2 MEDIUM INTENSITY  CORRIDOR. ALONG WITH HIGH  DENSITY CORRIDOR TO CHANGE IT  TO INTENSITY CORRIDOR.  >> I'LL SECOND DISCUSSION.  OKAY.  ♪ COMMISSIONER READ  ♪ HER MOTION. WITH REGARDS TO  THE MEDIUM INTENSITY AND HIGH  INTENSITY WANT TO READ THAT  BACK COURT.  >> TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND  USE DISTRICT NAMES, A MEDIUM  DENSE TAKE ORDER TO MEDIUM  INTENSITY QUARTER AND  HIGH-DENSITY CORRIDOR TO HIGH  INTENSITY CORRIDOR  >> THAT WAS SECONDED BY LINE  AND OVER THE LAST JUST LIKE TO  APPLY THAT SAME LANGUAGE TOO  LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOW  INTENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR  SYSTEM SAFE. I CAN'T AGREE TO  THAT BECAUSE THAT IS THE  RESIDENTIAL. AREAS. AND IS THE  RESIDENTIAL PART OF THIS  FUTURE LAND USE. THAT IS THE  RESIDENTIAL DENSITY. THAT'S  THE YELLOW ON THAT I OKAY.  >> ALL RIGHT SO THAT IS THE  OPTION ON THE TABLE ANY OTHER  DISCUSSIONS, SURE EMERGENT IF  BOW. NO OK SO WE'RE GOING TO  VOTE WELL.  >> VICE MAYOR VICE MAYOR IS  YES, THERE'S YES LAND ANY YES.  I DO MISTER AVERAGE.  >> I MEAN YES ALL RIGHT SO  THAT MOTION REGARDING  INTENSITY ASA'S 5, 0, THAT YOU  HAVE ANOTHER ONE I I GOT A  COUPLE MORE TO GO.  >> UNDER.  >> ACTIVITY CENTERS. UNDER.  ACTUALLY WE DO IT IN ACTIVITY  CENTERS. THE CHART THAT SHOWS  DENSITY COMMERCIAL IT DOESN'T  HAVE A TURRET NUMBER ON HERE  BUT IT'S A PAGE 13. ON PAGE 13  EMOTIONS GOING TO BE TO CHANGE  ACTIVITY CENTER. CHART ON PAGE  NUMBER 13 REMOVING ACTIVITY  CENTER 7 BE IN ITS ENTIRETY  SHOULD ACTIVITY CENTER 7 AND  ACTIVITY CENTER 7 PAY. I GET A  SECOND WE CAN TALK. REPEATED  I'M AND PAGE 13 OF THE FUTURE  LAND USE. ITS ACTIVITY  CENTER'S THERE'S A CHART. I AM  MY MOTION IS TO REMOVE  ACTIVITY CENTER 7 IN ITS  ENTIRETY THE SECOND WE CAN  DISCUSS. YEAH, YOU KNOW SECOND  THAT US. IS A COMPONENT OF THE  P 3.  >> WE HAD WHEN WE FIRST DO  ACTIVITY CENTERS AND WE  SEPARATED ACTIVITY CENTER 7  FROM 7 A 7 WAS ALL CITY-OWNED  PROPERTY 80 ACRES. WAS THE  PRIVATELY OWNED PROPERTY. THIS  WAY WE SHEEN THE C ACTIVITIES  CENTER SEVENS. MAXIMUM DENSITY  AND INTENSITY THROUGHOUT. AND  REMOVING JUST WHAT WAS  CONSIDERED A HOTEL IN THE  RESORT BY REMOVING THIS IN ITS  ENTIRETY WE WILL THEN BE ABLE  TO REMOVE IT FROM. FUTURE LAND  USE DESCRIPTIONS ON PAGE 7.  BECAUSE THEY'RE RELATED YOU'VE  GOT TO HAVE ONE WITHOUT THE  YOU'VE GOT ONE WITH THE OTHER.  OKAY COMMISSIONER LANGDON.  >> I WOULD NOT SUPPORTIVE OF  THAT THE SAME THAT NEED TO  DISCUSS ONE MINERAL SPRINGS  AND ITS ENTIRE DAY.  >> AND MAKING ANY CHANGES. BUT  AT THIS POINT.  >> YOU KNOW WE AGAIN WE  HAVEN'T HAD THE DISCUSSIONS SO  WHY WOULD YOU CHANGE IT WHEN  WE DON'T HAVE A PATH FORWARD  FOR THAT WHEN WHEN WE HAVE THE  CONVERSATION ABOUT  WARM MINERAL SPRINGS THAT  WOULD BE THE TIME.  >> IF WE SO DESIRE TO COLLAPSE  7, 7, B. BUT I THINK THAT  CONVERSATION AND THAT DECISION  THE DECISION AS PREMATURE.  >> OKAY ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY  COMMENTS ON THAT.  >> BUT THINK IOS DO  >> YOU KNOW FROM SUPPORT OF  CHANGING THIS UP BUT WHERE I'M  ON THE FENCE SERIOUS IS THE  APPROPRIATE TIMING DISAGREE I  MEAN I'M I'M I STRONGLY  BELIEVE NEEDS TO. THE ADDRESS  BUT YOU KNOW PERHAPS WE WINDS  COMING UP SEPTEMBER AND THIS  IS A COMMON COMP PLAN ISSUE  NOW I MEAN. THAT WE CAN ALWAYS  MAKE AMENDMENTS THAT LED TO  YOU KNOW I DO TO CHANGE ITS.  LET'S HAVE THE CONVERSATION  AND MAKE ONE.  >> DECISION AND THEN CHANGE  ALL UNDER AND EXCEPT WHY WE  HAVE BELIEVE THAT WE'RE GOING  TO DEVELOPING ANYTHING OTHER  THAN A LOW-INTENSITY THERE AT  THIS POINT WHICH CASE WHY NOT  DO IT NOW AND SEND A CLEAR  MESSAGE THAT THIS COMMISSION  IS COMMITTED TO EITHER  SOMETHING LIKE THAT WELL  SOMETHING LIKE THE 2019 WHERE  THAT WE ARE NOT GO TO SIT OUT  THERE AND WE'VE A QUESTION IN  EVERYBODY'S MIND AS WHAT WE'RE  GOING TO DO HERE. I WHAT WOULD  WE DO IT NOW THAT SO I VICE I  KNOW THINGS DIFFERENTLY I KNOW  APPRECIATE I APPRECIATE YOUR  POINT OF VIEW. SUPPORT THIS.  YEAH, WE'LL SEE ANY REASON NOT  TO DO IT NOW.  >> OKAY SO THAT LIKE MISSION  MCDOWELL AND I DID HAVE A  SECOND MIND EVEN IF I IF I  COULD MEAN COMMISSIONER  ♪ >> JUST AMENDED ENTIRELY AND  JUST REMOVE 7 BE ENTIRELY FROM  THE COMP PLAN AND JUST GO BACK  TO 7 AND  ♪ 7 A. JUST WHAT WE HAD. PRIOR  TO THE P 3. I WILL MAKE AN  AMENDMENT TO REMOVE 7 IN ITS  ENTIRETY. IT REMOVES THE HOTEL  RESORT ALL OF THAT  CONVERSATION. AND WE CAN GO  NUMB END IS NEEDED. WE HAVE A  FIRST AND SECOND CORRECT.  >> FIRST FOR THE MOTION BUT I  MADE AN AMENDMENT TO REMOVE  ACTIVITY CENTER 7 B IT'S IN  TIRED. SO THAT'S YOUR  AMENDMENT TO THE AND OCEAN.  >> VERY SECOND. WE ARE  EXPECTING THE FIRST SO I MEAN  I'M LOOKING AT VICE MAYOR HE'S  OKAY WITH THE MONEY.  >> SHE NEEDS A SECOND TO HER  ROUND  >> SECOND DISCUSSION ONLY  BECAUSE I'M SO YOU'VE GOT  SECOND. I KIND OF LIKE THE  IDEA OF KEEPING 7. ONLY  BECAUSE I THINK THAT THEY  SHOULD BE DIVIDED PARCELS IN  TERMS OF OUR ABILITY DOWN THE  ROAD AS WE ADDRESS WHAT WE  WANT TO DO WITH BECAUSE THERE  MAY BE SOME REAL VIABLE  OPTIONS WHICH RECORDED 2  DESIGNATIONS OF THAT WHAT WE  SAID WOULD NOT THIS THEY CAN  MAKE ALL THE OLD, BUT IT KEEPS  OUR OPTIONS OPEN THERE RATHER  THAN SOLVING IT US OR MAYBE 2  DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS FOR 7 A  WORK FROM 7 TO BE I STILL FEEL  WE YOU KNOW MAKE WHATEVER  APPROPRIATE CO-PLAYER CHANGE  WE NEED LIKELY FOR MEDIA  ATTENTION TO THOSE ISSUES WE  THAT WE SPECIFICALLY. CREATED  AS A RESULT SO I'M KIND OF NOT  SUPPORTIVE DROPPING 7 IF I CAN  WEIGH IN.  >> YES BY ALL MEANS.  >> 7 B IS THE 60 ACRES IS  PRIVATELY OWNED HAS NOT RIGHT  THAT IS NOT PART OF THIS  DISCUSSION ABOUT IT, 7 IS THE  WATER REBUILD CERTAIN TO OKAY  BY REMOVING 7 B. WE ARE  STARTING WITH A CLEAN SLATE.  THAT WE COULD DECIDE THAT  WE'RE GOING TO DO WHAT WHEN  THAT TIME COMES. AND WE'RE  JUST PUTTING 20 ACRES IN THE  60 ACRES AND PUTTING THEM BACK  TOGETHER. STAFF HAS THE MAP  THEY CAN SEPARATE AS NEEDED  WHEN WE HAVE THAT DISCUSSION  BY REMOVING IT ENTIRELY WE'RE  STARTING WITH A COMPLETELY  CLEAN SLATE.  >> A A. WAY TO DO IT WE CAN  ALWAYS DIVIDED AGAIN WE DECIDE  WE WANT TO GO TO DIFFERENT  DIRECTION. SO WHAT DO IT DO IT  I MEAN THAT SOLELY OKAY WELL  WE HAVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE  MOTION SO WE CAN VOTE VOTE ON  THAT  >> MOTION MAKER WAS  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL AND VICE  MAYOR SECONDED SO WE'LL DO A  VOICE ON THE AMENDMENT WHICH  IS TO REMOVE 7 BE CORRECT.  >> VICE MAYOR MAYOR IS  PLANNING KNOW. DON'T JUST.  COMMISSIONER AVERAGE.  >> DOMINO.  >> OKAY SO FOR IT. NOW WE'RE  GOING TO THE MAIN MOTION.  >> WHICH WAS REMOVE 70 MPH  BURTON.  >> IT'S ALL FOR SHOW.  >> YEAH, YEAH. MOST  COMMISSIONER DOWNSIDE. WE'RE  ON THE MAIN MOTION NOW.  >> TO REMOVE ACTIVITY CENTER  70 IN ITS ENTIRETY ON PAGE 13  CHART KEEPING ACTIVITY 7  ACTIVITY CENTER 7, 7, A OKAY.  I  >> YES.  >> I MEAN NOW I'M GOING KNOW  THEY DON'T YES.  >> COMMISSIONER AVERAGE.  >> KNOW.  >> THOSE ARE 2 TO 3 SO THEY  BOTH FAILED. ALL YES, STARTING  TO GET A MONTH OR SO THAT SHOW  UP. YEAH JUST TO CLARIFY  PENSIONS OPT INTO AGAIN IT  DOESN'T MEAN THAT WE'RE GOING  TO GO OUT TO MARGOT HOTEL IT'S  AGAIN TO HAVE OPTIONS OPEN AND  SO THAT WE DO GET TOGETHER AND  TALK ABOUT PLANS THAT WERE NOT  LIMITED IN WHAT CAN FIND  BECAUSE WE DID SOMETHING AND  WE NEED TO CHANGE SOMETHING WE  CAN I.  >> I AS A NUMBER OF TIMES OF  THE CITY ATTORNEY AND  EVERYBODY THAT THIS  COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS NOT  WRITTEN SO IT CAN BE AMENDED  AT ANY TIME SO IN THIS BUT  COME BACK AND I THINK IT WOULD  COME BACK WITH.  >> SOME MORE.  >> INSTRUCTION ABOUT WHAT  WE'RE DOING ONCE WE HAVE A  PLAN IT WILL MAKE MORE SENSE  THEN CHANGE THE COMP PLAN TO  ACCOMMODATE THAT PLAN BUT JUST  TO CHANGE BECAUSE PEOPLE WOULD  LIKE TO SEE THAT I DON'T SEE  THE POINT THAT, BUT IT DOESN'T  ALREADY WON A BOWL. SORRY DO  WE WANT TO TAKE A SHORT 5  OCEAN I I'M AND HE ON THAT. A  MAKEUP GO AHEAD. I KNOW THAT I  MOVED TO.  >> DOT ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 0, 9,  >> INCORPORATING THAT THE.  >> WAS A MOTIONS THAT PAST.  >> WE A MOTION MADE BY  COMMISSIONER MINDED TO  ORDINANCE 2024.  >> O 9 WITH TIP THAT YOU SAY  TO AMENDMENTS.  >> OR TO PRETTY CLEAR IT WAS A  2 OR 3 MOTIONS THAT PASSED ON  THIS ITEM EVER AS AMENDED BY  PREVIOUS MOTIONS AS AMENDED BY  MOTIONS ALL ALL RIGHT SO THAT  IS  >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON AND THAT YOU VICE  MAYOR. JUST MAKING SURE.  ALRIGHT SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR  THERE'S NOTHING ELSE WE'RE  GOING TO GET.  >> VOTE ON THAT VICE THERE'S  YES MAYOR ZS MIND AND SAY YES  MCDOWELL NOW. COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE. I MEAN YES OKAY  PASSES 4 TO ONE. MISTER  MCDONALD WANT ANYTHING  DIFFERENT ON THAT SO WE'RE  INCORPORATING A COMP PLAN.  >> THAT IS FUNDAMENTALLY  CHANGING OUR CITY IS CHANGING  OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. IT IS.  POTENTIALLY WE DON'T KNOW.  IT'S GIVING THE GREEN LIGHT  FOR WARM MINERAL SPRINGS. AS  IT IS ALREADY NOW STATED IN  THE COMP PLAN. I CANNOT  APPROVE THIS HIGH DENSITY OR  INTENSITY. THAT WILL HARM  EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS. AND IT  REMOVES THE DESIGNATION OF  RECREATION OPEN SPACE WHICH IN  MY OPINION IS A VITAL  COMPONENT OF A BALANCED CITY.  REASONS I JUST CENTER.  >> ALL RIGHT. WHAT IS THE  40'S, 3.43 WE DO HAVE A IN  JANET PUT WHAT YOU WANT TO  ABOUT WE JUST DO THE NEXT ONE  WHICH MAN WITH AN TO OUR THIS  IS GOING TO BE ONLY GOING TO  BE A QUICK OKAY. OKAY. THOSE  WORDS CAME IN A COMMISSIONER  DALLAS NOW JUST PUSHING VOTE.  YES QUESTION GET RIGHT TO  >> ORDER NUMBER 2024 DASH 11  CITY CLERK AND YOU'RE RELEASED  BY TITLE ONLY.  >> ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024 DASH  00:00AM MORNING TO THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT FLORIDA RELATED  TO THE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC  ROAD, A ROAD IN THE CITY  OF NORTH PORT FLORIDA SECTION  66 DASH 69, PROVIDING FOR  FINDINGS PROVIDING FOR COMPLEX  PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND  PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  >> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. A  CITY THAT ARE THIS IS YOUR  ITEM.  >> THANK YOU MADAM MAYOR OF  THE CITY COMMISSION HEARD ITEM  PREVIOUSLY AT THE JUNE 2324  MEETING AND VOTED TO CONTINUE  WHAT IS THAT WHAT REPORTING  LIVE WITH THE SECOND READING  THE DAY IN A REPORTER STATUTE  SECTION 1, 6, DO CITY TIME WE  POST IT. THIS IS IN FACT FOR  THE DAY NEWSPAPER PUBLISH OF  THIS, WE DID YESTERDAY THAT  YOU APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER  20 THE  >> NOW MOVING ON TO  COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS. ANY  QUESTIONS.  >> YOU NOW.  >> NOW IN PLACE.  >> WE'RE  >> TALKING ABOUT ORDINANCE  NUMBER 2024 DASH 11 RIGHT IF  ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS OR  PUBLIC WE HAVE MAKE A MOTION.  OKAY.  >> I FORTUNATE THE PUBLIC  HEARING AND GO AHEAD  COMMISSIONER MCDOWELL IF  YOU'RE READY MAKE A MOTION TO  ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 2, 0,  2, 4, DASH 1 ONE HAS PRESENTED  SECOND.  >> ALL RIGHT WE HAVE A MOTION  MADE BY COMMISSIONER DOWN TO  ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024  DASH 11 PRESENT IT AND THAT  WAS SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER  LANGDON IF THERE'S NOTHING DO  A VOICE.  >> I MAY YES MAYOR ZS LANGDON  SAY YES $6. YES. COMMISSIONER  AVERAGE NUMBER YES, ALL RIGHT  WHAT CAN WE DO THEM ALL LIKE  THAT AS CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC  ROAD THINK THERE WE GO NOW  PASSES 5 TO  >> KEPT THE SHALL I LIKE THAT  GET ALL RIGHT SO NOW WANT TO  TAKE A LITTLE NEXT. ONE IS YES  WE NEED TO  >> AND LEGAL TERM THIS MEETING  AFTER THE ROAD AND DRAINAGE  MEETING IS THAT THE MOBILE  TIME CITY THIS.  >> TO OKAY OKAY SO WE'RE GOING  TO RECESS AS WE HAVE A ROAD  AND DRAINAGE BEATING AT 4  O'CLOCK AND WE WILL RECONVENE.  >> RIGHT AFTER THAT