So, the first item on the agenda is meeting minutes of June 9th. Anybody have any comments? I didn't find anything I would change. Yeah, I thought they looked pretty good.
I did have one comment about the quorum on the 11th. I mean, I I think we said point blank that we were not going to be having a public hearing on the August 11th because we won't have a quorum. So, it it says there may there was mentioned that there may be an issue
meeting the quorum and I think um neither Julian nor myself are going to be there. So, I don't think we're going to be able to quum. I I thought we said that not just tossed around. I thought we said there would be no meeting on the 11th, but yeah, I can
update that wordage. Okay. I mean, does anybody else remember that? No, we we did. What I remember is Yeah. because I definitely be there. Okay. Um I'll be somewhere over the United States flying back. So yeah, we can eliminate
that. Well, I mean if somebody wants to chair being chair or we can just No, the I think the August 11th meeting is going to get cancelled. That was the intent. I think that's what we were discussing is that we were going to cancel it because we
weren't going to have potential quorum. So, um obviously nothing has changed and you know this is going to be what our we have two more meetings before that meeting. So, you know, obviously if
anything changes, you know, we can make that adjustment. But the intent is for us to I'm going to be basically telling people if they submit that we're not going to have a meeting on the 11th. So um that's that's kind of the the I guess the thought process going forward. So
anything that we have to um continue uh at the end of July will be to the September will be se till September. That's all. It's cleaner that way, right? Um one in a Oh, is there a first one in August? Yeah. So the 11th is the
the one meeting in August and then I believe there's another meeting in August, right, Megan? No, August 25th, I believe. Oh. Oh. Oh. Okay. Okay. Okay. So, at the end, the the last one in July, then we'll just have to defer to August 25th. Any correct continuation? Continuations. Yes. Okay.
All right. Well, with that revision, uh any other comments? And if not, we can look for a motion to approve the minutes of June 9th as uh edited. I'll make that motion.
Second. Thank you. Uh motion by Lisa, seconded by Paxton, and thirded by Dan. Um we'll have Dan and Paxton. How do you vote?
I I And we're going to record Thomas vote as abstension. Uh and then Lisa and Marky wrote I I and I'll vote I as well. The motion carries.
Uh and then the next item is discussion slash plan re Oh about plan revisions for two uh 37 Mansfield. So John, what's that about? So, um, in my memo that I sent over to
the commission, um, we kind of ran into a little store where the, uh, the vision efficient game had ran into a little snafu with ADA compliance. So, they had to make some modifications to the site design. Um, and Mike Count actually um, from their team is here to speak if anybody has any questions, but I kind of
gave a kind of a summary of the information and I uploaded the plan up onto the Google Drive. Um, if anyone wants to see those changes, I can show them on the screen or maybe Mike can show them if he has it the ability to do so. It looks like he does.
So, Mike's going to show it doesn't sound too controversial, but I think we can just take a quick look. Sure. Yeah, it's not controversial. Um, but Mike, you should have screen sharing capabilities now. Great.
Are you seeing the plan on the screen? Yes. Okay. Uh yes, we do. All right. Yeah. Thanks. Thanks for uh putting this on the agenda here with short notice. Uh been working with John on this project uh since
guess the contractor broke ground in around February out here and uh trying to wrap things up. Um, essentially we ended up having to raise the seawward end of the parking the pave parking area
by about a foot to meet that ADA compliant 2% max slope. Um, you can see that here. So that that was a miss. Um, you know, between us and our consultant. Um, it was a little bit over that. It was about
3.7% going down. um to the proposed walkway uh for the canoes and kayaks. So, in order to make the elevations work, we had to modify the ramp itself. So,
essentially, we have an accessible walkway at 4.33% uh about 20 ft long starting at the pavement that's down now. And then that transitioned to a pre-cast concrete pad ramp which is at
12.69% uh a little over 25 ft long um and both 6 feet wide and 3 in. So obviously dealing with an increase in elevation. So in order to account for
that, we created these retention ponds on either side as compensatory flood storage. So there's a net a net, you know, zero essentially for flood storage when you look at what was
originally proposed and what we're proposing now. Um it was a little too much finagling of elevations for us to feel comfortable to just proceed with this as a field change and a modification um without you know running it by you
guys. So um appreciate you guys looking at this and um yeah, we're just looking to get this site wrapped up as soon as possible. Um, our office has a maintenance team of three guys who are going to go come in and finish this off.
The contractor, um, his final his final day is basically June 30th of fiscal year. So, he's essentially going to finish up these swailes on either
side as originally designed and we're going to tie into those. Um, any additional runoff will end up being diverted into these retention ponds and then out towards Mountain Reservoir. Um,
so you can kind of see on here the sections for the dense grade accessible walkway at 4.3%. The ramp essentially has a 6-in wide granite curb on either side with 6 in
reveal. That'll really help maintain the area that'll stay in place. And then, you know, if there are any wash out areas with the dense grade, we'll just come in and touch those areas up over time. Um, and then it transitions down to the car top launch ramp, which has
the uh 3T x 6 foot. Um, pre-cast concrete pads that we typically use at a lot of similar sites. um the 3-in gap between them fill with dense grade to allow any water reaching this area to
run off and infiltrate. Um and then you know on either side we'll lment seed this area as originally proposed. So the limit of work is essentially the same as what we were originally um authorized under the order
conditions. And that's about it. I can answer any questions. Okay. Anybody? Oh, yeah. I just had one. The So, the quantification of impacts that was under the existing order. Um,
is there any note on this plan that that provides um updates to those numbers? Um, basically we had the volume calculations for the
compensatory volume. So that was included and we essentially have a net cut volume. So additional storage of 6 cubic yards, 6.57 cubic yards, which gives a little wiggle room, you know, for the actual construction.
Um, I'll go out there and stake it out for our guys with RTK GPS, the limits and, you know, the high and low points of these retention ponds. Um but yeah, essentially the footprint
is is the same. You know, there's a self stock that was placed out there at the limit of work that's still there and will remain there till until we complete our work. Um yeah. Okay, that's that's fine. That's good. You have the compensatory volume
calculations there because when you go to do the asbuilt, we just want to make sure that the volume matches. That's all. We'll just want to see that comparison when you do your asbuilt. So that's that's great. Thank you. Sure.
Any other questions? Um, so I mean I think to just make it totally unambiguous, uh, we can entertain a motion to, uh, accept the, uh, changes as presented
and allow the, uh, project to move to completion. Uh, does that sound acceptable to people? Yep. So, I'll make a motion to accept the plan changes for file 250-1125. Second.
Uh, we have a motion by Lisa, seconded by Paxton. Uh, and uh, let's see. Dan and how do you vote? I I
Lisa and Mark, how do you vote? I I I and I'll throw in an I. So, the motion carries. So, I think we're all set with that. Would you agree, John? Yes. Thank you, Mike. Um ju just a quick note. Uh
there's some place on the plan where it says cruised stone instead of crushed stone. Just just for your own uh information. Think it's inside. Dan, they were cruising to get that plan to us as quick as
possible. That's what it was. Yeah, it worked. All right. Next up is vote on request for continuation. Now, uh I I'm guilty. I didn't go through every detail of Google Drive. So, do we
have requests for continuation on uh anybody? Uh, I think zero Leonard Street put in a request today. Is that correct, Megan? Yes. Uh, until um until the next meeting. So,
uh, 14th of July. Yep. So, I'll make a motion to continue the public hearing file 250-1178 to the July 14th meeting. Second.
So we have a motion by Lisa, seconded by Dan. Uh Dan and Tama, how do you vote? I. And Paxton, Lisa, and Mark, how do you vote? I I I. And I'll throw in an I. The
motion carries. Um and let's see any anything further with public inquiries, department updates? Uh it's going to be 100 something plus degrees tomorrow. So stay well hydrated. Uh stay indoors if you can and uh make
sure you water your plants. Yeah. Gave up on the idea that we live in a rainy environment. Um, so next item on the agenda is file number 250-117
4 370 361 Rear Old Colony Road. Do you have a representative of the applicant? We do. Okay. Please introduce yourself and tell us what's uh new. My name is
Rebecca. I work at Silver Engineering. I know you've been dealing with Mike Edwards, but he could not be here tonight. Um, I'd like to show the board some of the changes that we have made. If I could share, I think you would like you have sharing capacity.
Excellent. So, we've took into consideration the concerns with the vernal pool on this latest iteration, and I just skipped ahead to a couple of pages here. Let's go right to the part of the problem. All right,
everyone can see that. Can everyone see? Good, good, good. All right, so we all know this is the vernal pool right here in this cleared out area and we've added the 100 foot no touch area to it and we have now
moved the whole basin outside of that 100 foot. um the repercussions or the cascading effect means we had to raise the elevation to meet what we anticipate groundwater to be and that in turn raised this site 2 ft. So that did make
some changes to some of the delineations for the wersheds for the drainage but the overall balance is that we are predos mitigating our storm water. Um we thought about the discharge location and one thought was going this way but we did not want to impact the neighbor
directly. So having the discharge flow over the 100 to feed the vernal pool over time we felt was the better approach to the discharge that is uh right here for the basin. Now everything else stayed the same. We had the TSS with the oil grit the catch basins. We have manholes conveying around the
building. The building didn't move. The septic moved a little bit to accommodate the grade changes. Um, the roof recharge didn't move. Uh, overall nothing else moved except this fella right here. All right, I can zoom in. Um, so are you
up for questions now? Are you I'm all up for questions. So, John Thomas, do we need this peer reviewed again? Yeah, we do. Um, I didn't know. I mean, last time I sent a message to Mike, I I informed him that,
you know, to be, you know, I guess cognizant of the 100 foot vernal pool buffer, but I never heard back. So, um, you know, obviously this is this is this is going to have to go back through uh peerreview process because they're raising the site up two feet and we just need to make sure that everything checks
out. So, you know, I definitely can if the applicant wants, you know, we can definitely um make sure that everything checks out with storm water uh and then, you know, the commission can kind of take their final uh view on it based on that it checks out for for storm water
because at this point, I mean, I think the site is mostly storm water related um and just making sure everything complies with the storm water handbook. So from my standpoint, I would say that, you know, we just need to have this peer reviewed. We understand it would go for peer review. We just wanted to make sure the
commission had their eyes on it before it went that far. So I do not mind obviously continuing until that's all complete. So did the increase in uh elevation at the building precipitate any higher walls or anything on that side of the
site? Anticipate any I didn't hear you quite well. I'm sorry. Oh, if there was a if there was a height increase to a wall or No, no, all of it was natural grading. Uh we did increase the grades, but there was no walls. Uh this one was here
already. So, yes, this one height did increase. We have a guard rail along it to ensure safety. Okay. And what it what's the wall height on that? And is there a detail? It will vary. It will be a block pre-manufactured wall. So when it comes
to details or certifications, it'll be by the manufacturer. And we have a 1165 for the BM now and a well of 121 4T 4 and 1/2 ft and then it goes down from there. So is there a note on the plan? I
mean typically if we're approving something about, you know, with the wall, we would like to see a detail for the wall. Yep. Can you just skip ahead here? Yeah. One moment. I don't want to skip too far. Okay. So, we do have a gravity type
role. Okay. Yes. And with the note that it be designed and certified, you know, so the whole nice profile with grades and um would be certified by the meeting the structural. Okay. We just want to look at the plan view again. I just want
to make sure there's going to be enough room to construct that wall. Yeah. I I did make sure that we moved away a little bit more. Okay. Um, and we did leave enough room for the guardrail in between the wall. So, you have that was in the writing. We have the edge of page, we have room for
the guardrail, and then we have the wall. Okay. Thank you. You bet. Thank you. Oh, we did address some water department comments, too. Um, which he Oh, shoot. I forgot his name. We We won't need to know that until the
pre-construction meeting. So, don't worry. Just It's in the 100 foot buffer. So, I figured it's We don't. Yeah, we don't have a 100 foot buffer for for that. I'm sorry. I apologize. Here you go. If you want to stay back 100 ft though,
that's uh being very generous. Yes. Complain. Yeah. Can't move the existing septic. All right. Any any further questions or comments?
stop. Uh so because we need to have this peer reviewed again or some process thereof um we need to continue uh unless there's further discussion and our next meeting
is July 14. Is that acceptable? Yes. Is it the 14th or 15th? Is it the 14th? Uh, it says 14, I believe. Best deal. So, I will make a motion to continue the
public hearing for file 250-1174 to the July 14th meeting. Second. Second. Uh, that time Dan got it by a microcond there. Um, so a motion by Lisa, seconded
by Dan, uh, Dan and Paxton. How do you vote? Hi. Hi. And uh Tama, Lisa, and Mark, how do you vote? I I I And I'll throw in an I. The
motion carries. So, um potentially we'll see you on the 14th. Thank you so much. Thank you. All right. Next item. We we don't have any new public hearings. Um, and we have a couple of requests for
certificates of compliance, both full certificates. File number 250, 1164, 153 North Washington Street, um, was decommissioning an existing septic
system, parking, and 3.2 acres of layown area. Um, any comments about that, John? None whatsoever. Everything looks good out there. Um, so
pretty simple. I'll make a motion to issue a full certificate of compliance for 250-1164. Second. Second. Oh my gosh. Second.
Well, uh I think uh Paxton got the second anyway. So motion by Lisa, seconded by Paxton. So Dan and Tama, how do you vote? I and Paxton, Lisa, and Mark. I
I I. And I'll throw in an I. The motion carries. Uh, next up is file number 250-1160, which is 266 Taton Avenue request for a full U involving raising an existing
house that absorated wetland and the building of a new single family house with associated septic. Uh, any comments? Is everything in complete order on this one? Everything on this one is good. The grasses looks healthy
for now. Obviously with the heat wave that we're going to get might get it might not be so good. So but for now as of I was there last week everything looked good. All right. Um make a motion to issue a full COC for 250-1160.
Second. We have a motion by Lisa, seconded by Mark, Dan, and Tama. How do you vote? I. And Paxton, Lisa, and Mark. Patty vote I I I and I'll throw in an I. The motion
carries. Uh that appears to bring us to the end of our agenda. Any further questions, comments? So, um celebrations. Well, I mean, not really celebrate, but uh I guess give thanks to
uh Paxton and Tama for volunteering their time um as they're not going to be ruin renewing their uh terms uh for this upcoming year. Um but we appreciate you and wish you the best on your next uh
adventures. Thank you. It's been a pleasure and I hope that some you get some uh great candidates that can keep up with Lisa and Julian and Mark and Dan and Joe. Well, you can start. Definitely. I won't
I willing up with me is not so hard. I was going to say Julian and Lisa will be tough, but I won't be quite so tough. You know, Julian, I will say it's not all physical. It's mostly mental. I
mean, for you, I mean, you're pretty sharp. Okay. Yeah. And so, we'll uh I'm I'm progressing to needing the trek poles for going to the garden, but I'm still going to the gym, so uh
hopefully things will be better in the future. Um so, I guess we're all set. Our next meeting is the 14th. It should be. Yes, it is Monday the 14th. All right. So, behave yourself. Yeah, I
was going to say everybody have a good um July 4th. Yeah. Be safe. Happy be responsible. Happy 4th of July everyone and drink plenty of water and stay safe and my best bet to stay beat the
library. Okay. Thanks, Peter. And I I think I heard in there a motion to adjurnn. So, yes. Yes. And Megan wins the bet, by the way. So, she said 30 minutes. Oh. Oh, we're just under. Okay.
All right. All right. Take care. later.