All right, let's call to order the council meeting of Thursday, February 5th, 2026. Start with the pledge of allegiance and moment of silence. I pledge algiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and
justice for all. >> Bow heads for a moment of silence, please. >> Amen. Mr. Madden >> here. >> Mr. Barnes here. >> Mr. Pchini >> here. >> Mr. Hartzel here. Mr. Love. Mr. Winslow here. Mr. Crowley
>> here. Adequate notice of this meeting has been given pursuant to public law 1975 chapter 231. We'll go to the mayor and administration for the reports, please. >> Thanks, Terry. All right. Just got a couple things. Um, the public works team is still working to clear the ice and
snow uh on a few areas around town. I asked them to go to the schools and the churches around so pe all the kids and people could park. So, we're trying to hit some of the high uh traffic areas. Um but uh I think there's again they're doing a great job. It's going to be really cold this weekend. So, please uh
look at your neighbors. The fire department and police department for the last couple days have been all over the place because it's gotten warm enough for the water to start breaking some pipes. So, if we can just help our friends and neighbors and just let them know that this weekend uh the music pier
uh froze up, the bathrooms froze up, they are they have been fixed, but uh we opened Sixth Street and 12th Street again. We've cleared the snow away from them. So, those three bathrooms are up in the Bora. We've gotten a lot of phone calls of people getting a little stir crazy. So, um our Bora contractor is
about the only contractor still working in Ocean City right now. So, he's got all the stringers up. They've laid a lot of conduit and the project looks ahead of schedule and they they had a wood delivery I think today. Right. Right. Okay. Um we're still working with our
federal and state uh people on our full beach replenishment project. So in the meantime, as I keep reporting, we're still harvesting and stockpiling and we'll be ready for the summer season. So um down at Pex Beach Village, uh where our new affordable housing on Fourth Street
has started. Uh the lots have been cleared. Some pilings have started to be installed. This project would all would add new units for families and will help Ocean City meet its state mandated requirement to provide affordable housing. The new homes are expected to be completed before the end of 2027. And
we've always taken care of everybody in our community and I'm proud that Ocean City can partner with the Federal Housing Authority to create this opportunity for local families. stopped by the community center late or earlier today and our girls swim team was in there and they won. So now they're
waiting to see who they go and then our boys start on uh Monday at the aquatic center. So our swim teams are doing great. Um stopped down at the library today. There was a demonstration on a drunk driving simulator for the school and law enforcement. So, the hero
campaign uh for designated drivers has purchased the equipment and our community policing unit is hoping to work with the prosecutor's office and a school district to educate students about the dangers of drunk driving. So, with the simulator there, it was me and the superintendent and the VA and a
bunch of them. And uh I'm the only one that ended up in the hospital. Everybody else can drive. So, for the guy that doesn't drink, I maybe I should have started. But, um, but Lan County has this program, but I tell you, it's um it it's amazing uh what you can do with
technology, but with our police department and Kate May County, LA County, and they're going to try to get all this program started um before prom season. Again, Bill Bill Elliott was here earlier in the Hero campaign. I think he told me too, um the congressman
got him a big chunk of money to wrap cars all over the country with the hero fund. So, that's a a great thing. >> That's awesome. >> Uh I want to also remind you our annual public safety recognition ceremony will be held at 6:00 p.m. Wednesday, February 25th at the Ocean City Tabernacle. This
event recognizes men and women from the OC Police Department, the fire department, and the beast patrol uh for performing heroic actions in the chorus of peace. I encourage you all to come out and support our first responders. And I want to end with uh someone we
lost this week, Dick Stannis. He passed away at the age of 86. Dick was the president of the Ocean City Tabernacle for 11 years until he retired in 2013. Tabernacles has always been a central part of Ocean City. Dick had a vision for the tabernacle to play a greater
role in the year-round community of Ocean City beyond just a place of worship. Under his leadership, the TAB opened the Cole Youth Center in 2008. It expanded from an auditorium and a few offices to a much larger facility that hosts businesses and community events
throughout the year. He liked to call the tabernacle the anchor store of the north end of Aspbury Avenue. One of his greatest contributions was in helping to lead an islandwide effort to provide relief to homeless families after supertorm Sandy. Thousands of pounds of
food and hundreds of volunteers came in out of of the tabernacle in the aftermath of Sandy in 2012. It was a community showing that a community could be. He said after recovery, I get sentimental thinking about it. So again, we we lose a lot of great people and
they're they go to a good place, but uh Dick was one of them. I sat with him on committees first night and I think he was on the hero campaign too, but uh he really did uh love this community and he did a lot for the tamarind and I know everybody that came in contact with him,
but he was a he was always a gentleman. So our thoughts and prayers, I hope I can speak for council to our thoughts and prayers go out with the family and my understanding is they're going to have a ceremony later in the month. Uh the funeral was going to be private. So that's all I have. >> Thanks Jay. I appreciate it. With that,
we'll go to citizen comment. First citizen comment is on agenda items only. So, please give me your name, address, and the agenda item that you're speaking on. If anything else, we'll have another public comment, so everyone will get heard. Um Dave, >> hi Dave Hayes, Ocean Steady. Yeah. Uh my
wife and I, my wife Marie and I have been full-time residents for 22 years. I'm requesting that you pull resolution 2656 on the consent agenda for discussion and specifically it's requesting a temporary appropriation for 175,000 for the police
department. I I don't know what that's for. Also, can you please shed some light on the current they call it a current fund that totals 31,48 and $373. Thank you. >> Thank you, Donna.
Donna Moore, I'm sorry. >> That's good. >> Sorry, I'll get you. >> Sorry, I didn't realize I had two Donna. >> That's okay. >> Um my um I'm Donna Moore um Ocean City and
I have a handout which pertains to resolution seven and >> Sure. Yep. Thank you. >> I understand that resolutions number seven is a routine um public landscaping
contract um in continuation of a contract that was begun I believe two years ago and it encompasses 61 parcels of land and I was unable to confirm that pesticides
applications are included in the costs of the weekly charges for this um contract, but I assume based on my understand contracts that the passage applications
are included in the routine landscaping contracts. So, this leads me to um the fact that there are residents here who still believe that we're pesticides free because we were for one
year and they still trust that our public lands are pesticides free, but they're not. We have parcels in our neighborhoods, all over our parks, even the welcome center, all being um
receiving pesticide applications from March through November, different kinds depending on the season. And it's time to be transparent about what we're doing to the people
here who are coming to our family resort and people who live here, our visitors, trusting that this is a family resort with everyone's family interests in
mind. But yet pesticides are being applied all over our public lands where children run and play and roll and fall onto the grass and pick up the pesticides and then go home to their carpets and roll on the carpets. Pesticides are in deposit on the carpets
and then they're handming the pesticides. Since we have returned to using chemical pesticides, we need to be transparent as a municipality
to the residents and the visitors. This is what we're doing. We're putting pesticides on all of our pest public lands. Children are particularly vulnerable. Their endocrine systems are not fully developed. Endocrine
disruption occurs in brain and growth development, emotional development among other immune system issues with development. So these are real
sciencebased facts that you've been hearing me say for years. It's time to at least if we're not going to go off the pesticides, we need to be honest about what we're doing and warn the people who
walk and play on our public lands. Thank you. >> Thank you, Donna. Donna Sabre, >> um, >> I just heard your comment about if it's not pertaining to a specific resolution to address it later. So, I I guess
that's what I >> Yep. Everyone will get a chance to talk if whatever app we'll get to. Yep. Thank you. >> All right. Can I have a motion to adopt the All right. Hold on. City Council reports. David >> u just want to report that I think it's been publicized but I'll reiterate on uh
this coming Saturday morning at 10 a.m. at the Chris Mahoney LI uh lecture hall at the library. This Warwalk subcommittee will be uh providing their initial findings and the re and review all the research that we have done over the last several months as we try to
come up with plans for the boardwalk later on. This session will be not there will be no information given about what our plans are because we don't have not formulated. We're just collecting data. So we want to share the data with you.
It won't be an opportunity to it will be an opportunity to ask questions about the data. It will not be an opportunity to give your thoughts on the future of the boardwalk. That'll come at a later date. We will and everybody's encouraged to attend and it will be uh taped and
placed on the city website. So if anybody can't make it, you can view it later. Thank you. >> Thank you, Jody. >> Thank you. No, I'm good. >> Keith, >> uh yeah, I I received an email right before we got here with the mayor. Just wanted to make this announcement. So, his service is Sunday, February 22nd at
300 p.m. Um, I just happened to see it before I came in. And the doors open at 2:30. It will be just a remembrance service at the tabernacle. Yes. >> Thanks, Steve. >> So, trust in the Lord. That was his favorite side. >> Yep. >> Great. Sean, >> nothing. >> Tony, >> Peter, >> no reports.
>> All right. I have nothing to report. Um, with that, I have a motion to adopt the regular city council meeting minutes of Thursday, January 22nd. So moved. >> Second. >> Mr. Madden. >> Yes. >> Mr. Barnes. >> Yes. >> Mr. Pchini. >> Sustain. >> Mr. Hartzell. >> Yes.
>> Mr. Lupch. Yes. >> Mr. Winslow. Yes. >> Mr. Crowley. >> Yes. >> Okay. We have one ordinance tonight and first reading and introduction. Can I have a motion to introduce ordinance 2601 on first reading? >> So move Winslow. >> Second. >> Mr. Madden. Yes.
>> Mr. Barnes. Yes. Mr. Pulchini. Yes. Mr. Hartzel. Yes. >> Mr. Lovechuk. Yes. >> Mr. Winslow. Yes. Mr. Crowley. Yes. >> Ordinance 2601, an ordinance amending and supplementing chapter 25, zoning and land development of the revised ordinances of the city of Ocean City
2026 residential mechanical. >> Good evening, council. This was originally going to be a much longer, much more involved um mechanical ordinance with many different subp parts, but what you've got in front of you this evening is in response to the
recent adoption and effectiveness of the the re NJ regulations. They became effective January 20th and this was what we were anticipating that the construction standards would change in anticipation
of rising sea levels according to the NJD rulemaking authority. It was unclear whether these these regulations would go into effect or be paused by the new governor and we've concluded we've confirmed that they were not paused. So
as of January 20th the net effect is of thousand pages of regulations the bottom of residential buildings has been raised by this rule making authority by 2 feet
that impacts the zoning that's that's construction every building that is built in Ocean City now finished floor will be 2 ft higher than it was in mid January it affects zoning in that we measure height for zoning purposes from the first finished floor and typically for
residential uses we measure from the first finished floor to the peak of the roof and that's a 30foot building envelope and has been since shortly after Sandy and you've seen the effect in the kind of architecture we've had since that time it's been it's been a
greater variety and in some great part that's because of the 30foot building envelope which has given the architects great latitude in terms of the roof designs. There are controls in place to maintain
building bulk including eaves set to within 19 ft of the ground. So th these two feet that they've taken out of the bottom will take two feet out of the building unless council adopts
an ordinance which adds those two feet back into the building. And that's what's before you. And rather than tie it to, you know, this used to say BF plus three, we we heat it to a specific number. This language instead ties the
ZF, the point at which you begin measuring height for zoning purposes to the D regulation plus the D requirement or the building code requirement for 1 foot3 board. And that sounds like a lot, but basically what I'm saying is instead of us picking
a number, we're tying this beginning point for measuring buildings to the regulations. There's been some talk about counties or municipalities challenging these regulations. We have no idea whether that will succeed. But if it were to succeed and for instance
reduce this height, this new height by 1 foot, this ordinance will not have to come back before you because as the state laws change. Our height will float up or down with the regulations that are mandated by the state. So we're taking
one run at this. This is just for the residential. We'll bring we'll be bringing forward other ordinance for you obviously for the commercial height. This is the first one because there are so many families who have their long-awaited homes in the pipeline. And
as of today, a a home that has been designed to comply with the standards from as recently as January 19th can't comply with both the building code and our zoning ordinance because they're
typically a 30foot from floor to peak building envelope. This restores the prior status quo. And that's what we have for you. And as I said, we will be bringing forward other things for your consideration to see how you want to handle this new world of the NJD re.
>> All right. Thanks, Daddy. I think that's a great explanation, but um go around the table, David. Well, if if I'm in favor of this of this ordinance and if we go back to 2010 when we had Sandy, the administration got out ahead of the making some changes for
with the impending FEMA regulations. We got we were one of the first communities that got out and raised raised the elevation so that we would uh be com be compliant. And I think this is just another example where we're getting out ahead of it, making making the adjustments now. And I love the
flexibility that if if things change, we don't have to go back every time we make a change. Um, and there's a lot of families that are anticipating having a house built and they have to go back to the architect and all and basically start all over. I think that's un a very unfair advantage. So, I think
this I'm 100% behind this. >> Okay, Jody. >> Yeah, I totally agree. And um you know, realistically, you know, I hope the headline isn't Ocean City just made their homes even taller and bigger because that's not the realistic of of what's happening. What's happening is we're being told by the state homes need
to be built 2 ft taller off the ground now. So, are we going to take 2T away from people's houses now? No, I don't think that's the right thing to do. So, uh you know, it is what it is. Hopefully, uh the state reexamines this and you know, um there's no uh unintended consequences of this. I think we'll be fine. So, I agree with what
we're doing. Well done, gentlemen. Well said, >> Keith. >> Well said, gentlemen. >> Okay, Sean. >> Yeah, for the reasons previously stated, I I agree is a good direction to take. And now my one question is, what's the reality of if the state goes back to the
requirements as they are right now? Who's going to build a lower building? So, in reality, once we hit this go to the taller buildings, we're probably going to stay there, right? If the state were to reduce this from what is in effect now,
>> no, if we if we go to the if the state ads, you're right. Came effected on the 20th, >> right? Our our buildings would float down at the same building envelope. >> So if they reduce it, >> it follows the state statute. >> What's that? >> It follows the state. So if it goes up,
they go up. If it goes down, we go down. >> But in practicality, would that really happen? Why would they do that? I guess they could save building cost, but just thinking out loud. Yeah. Yeah, I'm in favor. >> Okay, Tony. >> Uh, no, I'm in favor of >> Good, Peter. >> Good. Good. All right.
>> Just so County, Atlanta County, most all the counties are, you know, have their lawyers and are suicid, you know, so >> fasten your seat belts because nobody really knows stairs. I mean, this is, you know, I've been talk we've been talking about this for a while now, but
we have no idea where this is going to go, but um if we're going to have to do what the state says, we'll see what all the counties do with all the lawsuits on it. So, whether it is compromise or not, I don't think so. But the higher I guess it helps insuranceances, all that kind of stuff. So, I'm trying to look at the
bright side of the question. It's a new world we are living in now. >> All right. Thanks, Jay. Um, can I have a motion to adopt uh 2601 on first reading introduction, please? >> So, move Winslow. >> Second. >> Mr. Madden. >> Yes. >> Mr. Barnes. Yes.
>> Mr. Pulchini. Yes. Mr. Hartzel. Yes. >> Mr. Lovech. Mr. Winslow. Yes. Mr. Crowley. >> Yes. Second reading of public hearing will be held on Thursday, February 19th at 6 p.m. and will be published according to law. This brings us to our consent agenda. All resolutions listed
on the consent agenda are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted by one motion. If the mayor or any council person wishes a particular resolution to be considered separately, it will be removed from the consent agenda. Does anyone have anything to be removed? >> I'll pull 13, Mr.
>> Mr. A wanted an explanation. >> Okay. >> Okay. >> And I'll pull seven just uh for Miss Moore's comments. >> Okay. Okay. Um, resolution 13, which is 2656, a resolution authorizing an
emergency temporary appropriation. >> Keith, do you do you want me to give an explanation? >> Yes. Pulled it. So, >> I think I Yeah, I think everyone on council was aware of this. Um, we had previously had in the budget uh the purchase of two uh new um police
vehicles. uh Ford who I believe is the Ford rate informed us that they are discontinuing the model later in this year. So uh we had this in the budget already. I spoke to council all individually and we agreed to move up the order that was already in the
capital in the budget so that we could get the two new vehicles before Ford discontinues them. Don't ask me why they're doing it or the reasons. We spoke to the police chief. This was his recommendation and um and we agreed uh to to move it up earlier in the year so
that we could get these vehicles for the police department and that's the reason for the allocation of the 170 and change. Um anyone else? Dave, any other questions? >> Makes sense to me. >> So that's coming out of the 31 million. >> Frank,
thanks Terry for jumping in there for me. I I I actually actually remember I was going to get a break on that one. >> Um, no, I I appreciate it. Um, >> in the first council meeting of every January, council authorizes a temporary
budget, and that's where the 31 million comes from. We're allowed to appropriate 35% of the prior year budget as a temporary budget to get us for the get us first through the first few months as we start to introduce and and deliberate the budget. Um, in that version of the temporary budget, the 175 was not
included yet because we had not planned those purchases yet. But as Terry explained, um, there's a need for the police department to jump on this order sooner than later now. So, we'd like to include the 175 into the temporary budget at this point. >> So, thanks.
>> Okay. Anyone else comments on 13? >> No, I think we should go ahead and we certainly can't short change police department. >> Agreed. Um since it was pulled uh we will go out to public comment on 13 if anyone has anything on this ordinance or
this only. >> Seeing none can I have a motion to adopt resolution 13 >> second >> Mr. Madden? >> Yes. >> Mr. Barnes Mr. Pchini Mr. Hartzell Mr. Love Mr. Winslow Mr. Crowley. Yes.
>> Okay. Ordinant or resolution number seven, a resolution authorizing the second and final extension of city contract 2408 maintenance of city grounds and garden plots with RPM landscape contractor LLC. >> Sure.
>> So mine is I just had a question and Daddy, I'm not sure if this would be in your wheelhouse or not, but typically when I see them spread uh fertilizer, they put down those little flags. So I assume we're still doing that, right? >> That might be a Vince's question.
>> Yes, both us and the uh contractor. >> So So every week or every month or whatever they do it, they we are notifying people. >> I think they do twice a year. Once in the fall, once in the spring. >> Okay. I mean, I know the concerns with with pesticides, but I also know what happened to our lawns when we stopped doing it.
>> Um but I would like to see everybody kept safe as long as we keep I assume there's some type of ordinance or something that says they got to do that or some type of licensing law. Yeah, my guess is it's either the state or federal licensing. >> Okay. But as I told Don, I saw her been meeting before. We're again, we're going
to look and see what's new out there. I mean, a couple years ago, it didn't work. You're right. And it cost the taxpayers a ton of money. And that's the problem. All the environmental stuff, it seems it cost more money, but u we're looking to see what else is out there. If we can find a place for a little test area or whatever, but we're not shutting
it down. We just again it's tough to be responsible with taxpayers money when you're concerned about pestic but we're going to still work on it. >> Okay. Okay. Thanks. Anyone else have comments on seven? >> We'll go out to public comment on this um p resolution. Anyone? No. Seeing
none, can I have a motion to approve um seven? >> So moved. >> Second. >> Mr. Madden? >> Yep. >> Mr. Barnes? Yes. >> Mr. Pchini? Yes. >> Mr. Hartzell? Yes. >> Mr. Lovechuk? Yes. Mr. Winslow? Yes. Mr. Crowley? Yes. Can I have a motion to approve the remaining items of the
consent agenda? >> Second. >> Mr. Madden. >> Yes. >> Mr. Barnes. Yes. >> Mr. Pulchi. Yes. Mr. Excuse me. Mr. Hartzell. >> Yes. >> Mr. Lovech. Yes. >> Mr. Winsow. Yes. Mr. Crowley. >> Yes. >> Pending business. David. >> No. No business. >> Jody.
>> No. >> Keith. >> Oh, good sir. Thank you. >> You're welcome. Sean? >> No. >> Tony? >> No. >> Peter? >> No. Pending. >> New. David. >> Oh, is this is that new or old? Now you're now that was pending. Now we're into new. >> Okay. >> Then we're getting old later. >> I don't know whether it's new old or
pending. But anyway, on the 34, we're getting a lot of questions about 34th Street. And if you driven by there, they're raising the northern side of the road. And there people are have a question. Are they going to do the other side or is it just going to be or is it going to be looks really really high.
This has been all engineered. It's going to be even. it'll slope off and the drainage county engineer assures us there will be no drainage issues. So it looks real high but it settles a little bit and then they're going to do the other side for the south side or the in
inbound side once in probably another month or so they'll start on that side. Uh but it will be all flood compliant. >> And Dave, when you go over towards Longport, you know how that one, you know, they raised that road up because they've done this before cuz I thought
the same thing. Common sense is if this is hired, it's going to make Marian Park. The engineering they you know, they they used that example when they were explaining to me, but you know, we're going to hold them accountable. So >> So the idea is going to it's going to the water's going to flow when it's all
finished going to flow towards the marsh. Correct. >> I believe so. There is some drains on the other side. The rate it looks like it's real high. It's under two feet. I think it's 1.93 feet at the highest because highest level because the road went like a washboard when if you
actually took a geographic survey or whatever it is on it. But so they're leveling it off and some places it's only going to go up 6 in or a foot. Some places going up two feet, but that's all. So it looks really high. It's really not. and then it'll slope off to
the one to the one side and then into the other on the other side. So, and they said the little little Marian little Rville Boulevard will not be impacted at all because remember they're going to put new new u shrubbery new
curving along there. So, county engineer is pretty good. So, I I I can trust. >> Good. >> Thank you, David. >> Jody new. >> Good. Thank you. >> Keith new. >> I'm good, sir. Thank you. >> Sean, >> nothing new. Tony, >> just to piggy back off there. Um I have
seen it a couple times. There's a sign there that says don't make the left go to west. >> We've got the red. >> Okay. I'm just I I Well, nobody's said that to me and I'm seeing it. I just wanted to share that. So, I appreciate it. >> But I think we that that needs to be addressed. So, thank you.
>> Yeah. >> I appreciate that. >> We were when you said that to me and a couple other council >> because there's still that left green and there's still the delay. So, people don't know what to do sometimes. >> Yeah, it was the delay. you saw the signs and then it was delay so it confused you. So what they ended up doing I said either take the signs down
>> do whatever. So >> cuz I just saw somebody beeping trying to make the left and then they were going through and it could have been an accident. So I mean it's not crazy this time of year but on we start getting a little busier it could be a problem. So I think we need to address it. >> My understanding right it's all back to what it's back to the way.
>> Oh it was a green arrow >> and you can make the left >> coming on if you're going westbound. So you can make the left one. >> They took the arrow out but didn't take the delay out. So listen, it's government. >> Oh my god. >> All right. >> Thank you. I'm all good. >> That's why I don't go past Ninth Street.
I just stay on stay on the other end. >> All right. Citizen comment. Um start over here. Anyone? Donna, come on up. >> I did. I listen. >> Um Donna 24 aspberry. Um, I was watching
a video of the last council meeting and I heard um you um Councilman Crowley state that um the council would be making the determination of what will be happening at 600 Boardwalk.
And I just wanted to I I remember getting the letter from Mayor Jay and it seemed like a call to help. It was like, you know, I've I've done everything I can and everybody I you know what what
are we going to do next? And that's my immediate reaction was to go down to um County Records. At first I went here to get the um block and lot and then I went to County Records and I learned that the
Wonderland is not the original amusement park on the property. Um, and I only went back as far as 1926 when the property is deed to Leeling Corson and um, Howard Stton and they the
property is deed to them as Sixth Street Amusement Company, um, a Philadelphia corporation. Um, I later learned from talking to people that um before it was Wonderland, it was something called
Stton's Playland. You You probably don't remember cuz you're not born then. >> Not yet. >> Yeah. I mean, I I I remember Wonderland. I >> I think Wonderland when when we were kids, we it wasn't there. So, we just went down to Johnson's and that was
that. But I just it when you're making your call I and and then um an a man that I work with um he went down and spent two days down in county records to get the deed from 1881
and the deed is coming from the tabernacle and he's got slews of restrictions. I mean I've been told that this is a similar restriction. It goes from um the Lake Brothers the tabernacle down to Ocean City Association.
And I'm being told that this is the same restrictions that every homeowner has. So I need to go look at that and see if there's some different restrictions on this property that aren't on. But um I I just I think it goes back to 1881 when I
was a kid in um the next island in Margate schools. our teachers got together because Lucy was in like that you know we caught her pain in the in the rear um and um we got together and and found funded to save Lucy. So she's
from 1880 and this is 1881 as an amusement park. It's been an amusement park for all that time. And we can thank Jay's father for restoring it. But it wasn't it's just when you make any
decisions, it's not just from 1965. It's it's from the founding of this city. And it's it sets the stage for what our boardwalk is and what Ocean City is as a city, America's greatest family resort.
I mean, it's it's if you look at it, you you can see the history. I I I'll go down to records and, you know, compare deeds and see what restrictions are on it because there's all kinds of restrictions that to me say that's why
it's an amusement park because nothing else can happen there. But, um, thank you for your time and once you're conscious that conscious and thank you. >> Thank you. Thank you.
>> Okay. Anyone else from this side? Anyone from this side for public comment? >> Okay. Seeing none, I have a motion to adjurnn. >> Second.