Lord, please bless all our first responders. Bless our citizens, and bless our city staff. Lord. In Jesus name we pray. Amen. Amen. Amen. Pledge allegiance to flag the United States, states of America to the republic for which it stands. One. Nation, nation, under God, indivisible. Liberty, justice for, for all. Roll call please. Chair Nik. Here. Vice chair forges is absent. Member Keller. Here. Member Williams. Here. Member Crocker. Here. Alternate Member Chacon. Here you have a quorum. Alright, so Mr. Chacone, you're going to vote tonight. Congratulations. Consent agenda. Can I get a motion to approve the minutes from March 12th, 2024? I'll make a motion. A motion. Do I have a second? I'll second. Alright, we have a motion to approve the minutes of March 12th by Member Keller and a second by Member Williams. Ms. Vote. Um, mine shall Right here. Somebody Miss. Oh, Member Shaone. We can, We Can redo it. Let's do it one more time. Got it? Yeah. Much better. Old business, none. New business. It's gonna be the Ocoee pickleball Complex cent Sports. LLC. Special exemption Project number 0 3 2 4 SE 0 3 1. Zoning manager, Whitfield. Good evening, Mr. Chairman. Um, board members. Thank you. Audience members. Good evening. So this is the OCO pickleball complex Vasant Sports, LLC, special, special exception. Um, the properties that are under the special, special exception, uh, are addressed at 1000, 1050 and 1100 Jacob Nathan Boulevard. Um, it's also known as lots four, three and six of the Goodman Center commercial Plat. So the property is on the west side of Jacob, Nathan Boulevard at the terminus of Matthew Parish Boulevard. It's a little over six acres in size. The current future lines designation is commercial. It's in the IV study area and does have wetlands on site. Um, and I'm sorry, has flood plains on site and wetlands near it. Um, and all three parcels are currently vacant and wooded. So this is an aerial of the property. Um, this is the surrounding future land use map and the surrounding zoning districts is all C two around it east and west and south side with R three on the north side. Um, then the north R three is a stormwater pond. So the reason why it's here for a special exception is that per our use, table five dash one, an outdoor commercial recreation facility in any of the zoning districts requires a special exceptional approval via a hearing. So the criteria for special exception is, is laid out in sec, uh, section four, four dash eight. Um, there are three criteria that we evaluate the project against, and the first one is that it's consistent with the comprehensive plan in terms of land use, uh, intensity and densities. Um, and that is also consistent with work compliant with the land development code. The second criteria is that the, what the applicant is wanting to do is compatible with the surrounding lands. And then the third criteria, um, deals more with the general, um, health, safety, wellness and convenience of, um, the property owners around them, um, working there, living there, um, conducting business there and whatnot. Section three or criteria three also speaks to bulking, overcrowding, um, pedestrian safety, the impairment of travel ways, movement of vehicles, um, of course fire, safety, noise and all that. And also that the special exception approval does not prohibit or limit the adjacent property owner's ability to utilize their property legally. So this is a site plan, it's conceptual, um, in nature. Um, this is like the fourth iteration between the applicants and us, uh, staff. Um, what they're proposing here, the complex as a whole would have 44 courts and a 14,000 square foot pro shop with cafe. Um, the reason why it's in for a special exception is that this portion in the yellow, those 22 courts are outdoor. They're only covered, but there are no hard walls. So there's no sound, um, you know, sound buffers and, and things like that. Lights, noise. So the 24 courts, um, are the reason why we are here for the special exception. In looking at the criteria. We look at the surrounding land uses. It's surrounded by a commercial, um, on the south and on the east. Um, the north side, although like I mentioned is R three, but it is a stormwater pond. The nearest residential is, um, the subdivision, oops, up here. That is the nearest house. Um, I measured it, I think it's like 200 feet. Um, something, something along those lines, but it's, it's well buffered in terms of this tree line here that's going to stay. This is city property up here on the north. Um, the other things that we look at is circulation. Um, Jacob, Nathan is a private road. Um, so in their plan, what we look at is how is the project going to look from the perspective of the general public traveling on Jacob, Nathan. So the development team has agreed to make the east side of the project very aesthetically appealing, um, like a focal point. Our CRA administrator wanted them to, because of Matthew Parish being here, create sort of a focal visual focal point here. They've agreed to do that. Parking, um, and circulation. The fire marshal's office looked at this and he didn't raise a, an objection to the circulation. It's just, you know, there probably needs to be some tweaks to make that fire turning movement a little bit, you know, smoother without impacting any parking spaces. Um, they did flag, um, the floodplain line. So the floodplain line is this dash line here. And per our comprehensive plan policy, they are required to have a minimum of 25 foot buffer from that floodplain line. So that is where they're, they would be proposing to put a storm, a, uh, retention wall there so that no further development would extend beyond this red line. Um, in terms of storm stormwater, um, there is from the Goodman plat capacity in the city's pond on the north side. So they don't have to provide stormwater on site. So it essentially frees up the site for the development itself. The, um, remaining outstanding issue that the DRC, um, has is relative to the parking ratio in our code now in Article six, section six slash four for parking standards. We don't have one for recreational facilities. We just have a generic, or a general one, 200 spaces, I'm sorry, one space per 200 square foot of commercial. That could just be any kind of commercial. Um, what the applicant team is proposing based on their parking study looking at racket clubs and tennis clubs is, um, 3.17, I think spaces per court. Um, based on, on our staff's research, we are finding courts, uh, that are about four spaces per court. So part of the, and I'll go into that now, the DRCs recommendation is speaking to park to the parking. So the next couple of slides is showing the, um, rendering, um, of the building. This is sort of the center where the, um, Matthew Parish would sort of be looking at this sort of angle. This is a building rendering. Uh, this is Jacob, Nathan, and then I believe that would be Matthew Parish. So the, this portion of this site would be developed as covered and enclosed. Um, this portion would be the open courts inside of this building would also be where the, the pro shop is, will be a championship court for, you know, competitions and special events and things like that. This is an interior of what the external, the outdoor court would look like. A couple of shots on that. Uh, this, and this is another angle, sort of looking ward from Jacob, Nathan. It'll be fenced in, um, you know, where the building is for safety reasons, uh, things like that. So again, um, in terms of our staff findings, um, what they're proposing is well below the FAR of three. So we don't have an issue with intensity. Um, we also didn't find any issues with compatibility. The parking ratio is still something that we would want to further look at at the time of site plan review. Um, and then three again, is at the time of site plan review, looking at, um, um, the circulation movement of the trucks, the fire trucks. So at the DRC on April 2nd, they made a recommendation of approval subject to, um, taking another look at parking and the demand for spaces at the time of site plan review. And at that time, we can look at possible offsite parking by shared parking, which the code does allow them to utilize. Um, so the, you know, as, as we move into that, that stage of the, of the permitting of the planning, we can look at offsite parking options. Um, and with that, staff is recommending that the planning zoning commission make a recommendation of approval for the special exception for the proposed outdoor commercial facility, um, at 1000, 1050 and 1100. Jacob, Nathan, um, for the property zone C two, subject to the condition that we con continue to evaluate parking and the parking ratio. And the applicant team is here if you have any questions of them. And that concludes my presentation. Thank you very much. Are there any questions for staff? Uh, one question if I may, Mr. Chair, um, only because of how close it is on the north side, if I've got my directions correct, being close to where the one subdivision is, is there any thought been giving to flipping so that the enclosed ones are up on the north and the, um, open courts or down on the south making it less noisy for the, We didn't discuss it, but I don't know if, um, you want to respond to flipping it? Yeah, you, you would have to come up here. Yeah, Well, let, let, let's, I'm sorry. Let, let us ask our questions first and then we'll, we'll open it up to you. Okay. So hold your, hold that question. All right. Yeah, that's my only question. Okay, Mr. The Chair? No, sir. We, we didn't discuss that part. All good. Anybody else have any other staff questions for staff? Okay, I'm gonna open up to the public hearing. I'm gonna ask the, uh, I'm gonna ask the applicant to come on up. Sorry guys. You can come up now. Gotta the, I got this guy next to me. He is a lawyer. You know, you pay him extra. Every word he says. Gotta follow the rules. State your name and address Please. Good afternoon. Uh, Chris Leper with Kimley Horn, 200 South Orange Avenue, suite 600, Orlando, Florida 3 2 8 1. Uh, I'm not the applicant, but I'm here to assist with the applicant. And, um, so thank, thank you all, uh, for having us tonight, and thank you staff for working with us on this, uh, project. Uh, again, it's, uh, an exciting project for us. And then we're most interested in, uh, in being able to provide, uh, around 44 courts. And so we are open to working, uh, with staff to, uh, find the best location of the enclosed courts versus the covered courts. Uh, the reason that we had this, this particular layout was to, um, give the, the greatest visibility for those coming off of, you know, off of 50, off of, um, what is it, Matthew, Matthew Parish, Matthew Parish. So, uh, but we, you know, it's about getting the, the density and, uh, about getting about 44 courts. That's, that's important to us. And so that orientation of the buildings and the layout of the covered courts, it's, it's flexible at this point. Um, so we're happy to look into that, uh, based on, uh, needs. Thank you. Thank You. All right. Anybody other have any other questions for the applicant? I, I do, I do have one. Do you only have one entrance in and out, right? Uh, yes, that's correct. Okay. So if you had a fire there and the firetrucks coming in, how would anybody get out? Yep. Uh, so with one, with one entrance, that is, uh, the only way in and out of the project. So, uh, we would have to look at it a second entrance if that's, uh, required by code. Uh, I don't, I don't know if it's a code, but I mean, it seems to me that if our trucks were trying to get in and people were trying to get out, they could be stuck in there. You know, We would look at that as the site part of the site plan review. Yeah. Okay. I mean, The fire marshal approved the plan. Doesn't mean that he doesn't mean that he's, that's not mean he's right. Okay. That, that, you know, He's the fire marshal. Okay. He's a fire Marshal. This is a standard road. This is a standard section of road with parking, right. There is drive isles. So, so there's a number of instances. Generally you try to get cross access to parcels. The parcel on the south is a stormwater pond and open space. I can tell you it's been reviewed by the fire marshal Okay. Is a firefighter does it for a living. And the issue is just that turnaround. When we get to the site planning, they'll, do they have a program where they turn the firetruck around and make sure it, it can make the turn, but otherwise, yes, that has been reviewed. Thank you. Alright, anybody else? Alright. Thank you guys. We're open it up to the, we are open to the public. Does anybody like to speak on this matter? Alright, if not, we'll close the public hearing, bring it back up to the diocese. Any, anybody else have any other questions or concerns? All right. If not, I'll uh, I'll make a motion, Mr. Chair, that we, uh, accept the staff recommendation With the condition With, with the staff recommendation, including their condition. Okay. We have a motion to recommend approval. I'll second. Alright, we have a motion to recommend approval for project number 0 3 2 4 SCE 0 3 1 by member Keller and a second by, uh, member Williams. Sorry, can't speak tonight. Uh, any other, uh, we good? Mike? You guys? Okay. Alright, if there's no other questions, let's go ahead and vote. All right. That passed. Uh, four to one with, uh, member cropper voting now. Thank you very much guys. See you. Uh, front of the commission should be great. Okay, next up, this is going to be 7 8 9 Pine Street, small scale comprehensive plan amendment from low density residential LDR to a light industrial ally and rezoning from single family dwelling R one A to restricted manufacturing warehousing. I one, uh, project number CPA 2 0 2 4 0 0 2 and r uh, RZ 2 4 0 2 0 1. And this is, uh, gonna be director of services, uh, Mike. Thank You. Uh, parcel in question is located up on the east side and north on Pine Street, which is a, presently a a somewhat substandard road and it is adjoining on the east, there's a, a ditch. And then the parcel to the between it and KOA Pop Road was a project that you all saw, uh, recently called the 6 0 6 sports training facility. They were able to purchase pro this property adjacent but across from the ditch and want to utilize this site within their site plan. Uh, again, everything on the north side of Palm Drive and west of Ocoee Apopka is in the business character area and, uh, which call it tries to create that commerce area with retail restaurants, some density, uh, light industrial, uh, banking, any those type of uses. So they were able to secure this property and close on it. And their plans, which you'll see when they come back for the preliminary and final site plan for the 6 0 6 sports training facility, is they're gonna utilize this property as storm water. They'll be able to pipe it across the ditch and that'll free up more space for parking and some field on the 6 0 6 sports training facility. Uh, the storm water pond is not a use that violates any of the zoning, it's just, it's in the character area. So we're just bringing it in, in line with the light industrial land use and the restricted manufacturing warehousing. I one zoning district in my staff report, I just call it all light industrial. So there might be instances where I call the zoning in land use light industrial, I just use it as a general term, but it's restricted manufacturing and warehousing. Mm-Hmm. Uh, this is an aerial of the property. They will be removing the homes, building a stormwater pond, possibly getting some future development if it works out. The wooded area to the right is, well the location to the 6 0 6, the land use is low density residential. It's changing it to that purple, that light industrial, uh, that we have that you see there, that then you sign a zoning for it, which would be the I one restriction manufacturing. Uh, and the present zoning is R one A. It's a small scale land use amendment because it's less than 50 acres. And with that, uh, development review committee and staff recommends this little sort of formality just bringing it in line with the land use and zoning in the area for a site plan that you'll see. Great. Thank you very much. Uh, anybody have any questions for staff? Wow. Okay. Uh, there, yeah. One. Oh, absolutely. Um, they we're changing it to I one, right? They're gonna use it for storm waters. The storm water gonna take the entire property for the most part. We are just now reviewing that plan. And it doesn't take all of it. There's, it takes it, it does not take all of the land. No, but there is some, but if you know, what's buildable is left, that would front a future Pine Street. I don't know that buildable And I know they, they'll need it, but is there anything stopping them from changing the use after they get the, Well the overlay has specific more stringent zoning criteria than the general i one land development code. Okay. So it in the sense of, um, let's say down the road, could they ever put some of the storm water under the, under the ground and, and Right. Build on top of It, but yeah, it would be industrial or you wouldn't have retail in this location. But it, It does and it doesn't make sense to make the use of, um, a conservation easement or anything or any other kind of use besides the No, No. Okay. And then on the uh, uh, near it will be a new East West road that the 6 0 6, there's a parcel between it on the south side and where the new road will be coming out. Alright, Thank you. Okay. And for that I will go ahead and I will open it up to the public. Is the applicant here? No. Okay. I have a, uh, I have one speaker reservation form for Betty Hill. If you'll come on up to the microphone there, Ms. Hill. We appreciate it. Just state your name and address for the record. Hello, my name is Betty Hill. I live at 7 9 3 Pine Street, which is the property next to 7 8 9 Pine Street. Which side? South side. North side. I'm sorry, which side? Of the North side? North side. Okay. North side. Yes, north side. I'm here because like I said, we own the property next to 7, 8, 9. And my question is, multiple properties have bought, been bought, you know, in the recent months along, uh, pine Street and the, uh, zoning's changed from residential to restricted manufacturing and warehousing. How is that going to affect the other properties on Pine Street? And is there, uh, any future plans of any other property on Pine Street being purchased? Is, um, maybe seven ninth Street going to be one of those offered is, um, are they planning on widening Pine Street? I've heard, you know, heard different things. I've heard there's going to be, um, um, drainage pond put on 7 8, 9. Um, and as I said, uh, we wanna know if the, what's the zoning going to be for those residential homes. Yeah. Um, uh, you said there is, uh, I think you've said or agreed there, Let me answer some of your questions. I may answer all of them that you have. All right. I'm not even think of more so, so long term, the area, the city, uh, through a workshop and through some series of meetings, uh, changed the vision of that area in the future. Just you got the 4 29 that's there, you have the, uh, co pop road. The, the area is growing and we did in this vision plan, we called it the business character area, which envisioned a future better Pine, a real Pine Street that's wide or rep paved in a standard road. And in that vision plan, we included the use, uh, for west side of the ditch between the 4 29 and the ditch behind you all those to have more industrial type uses. 'cause there's not road frontage. There will be two roads that connect to the future Pine Street one to the north, uh, that's built right now, right on the top of the walls property. And that, that new development then there's one, one just south of you all. And so the whole VE area is envisioned to be a mixture. It's a commerce area, like a mixture of light industrial uses like you see going up retail restaurant, some maybe some small density rooftops like a, a small condo or town home or something, but not a big complex. And we're starting to see that along the co apopka road. And you're starting to see that with the property sales on Pine Street. So the trend will be, the opportunity is there for people to come in and develop other than non-residential. Right. In the future. Now the city doesn't have any participation or say on which properties are offered or who who buys which property. Right? So that's totally up to the market. We are looking at a new Pine Street. So for instance, the development to the south, a couple parcels, there's one going in and we've had them cut the road back in their parking short of Pine Street. So they can't use it because Pine Street's not ready. Right. We have a, we have a, we're under contract, we're designing a future, a concept for a future Pine Street to start getting that funded and getting that designed. And we'll work with the community out there once we start making headway there. So to kind of answer your questions, the vision for the next 20 years is it transitions from Orange County residential properties to non-residential uses. Right? The city doesn't have any say on who will offers what property and what's bought. Now, when we go to build the road, we might need to buy some properties to facilitate that. We would drive that at that time. And, uh, the, uh, I think your last question was, Um, well you, you, you said that more than likely Pine Street will be widened. Yes. It'll be probably be the preliminary design will be done this calendar year. We might be able to try to start financing, uh, budgeting towards it this next budget cycle. But it's a, we have to design it, we get an estimate of what it costs to construct. You gotta figure out what it's gonna cost to construct a year later and see if we can find some funds for the city to take that project. If not, hopefully somebody will buy a lot of the land and develop it at once and build the road for us. Right. That's what happened with the two other developments. They're building the road for the city. Well, no, from my property down going north we're in or, uh, unincorporated. Yes. Orange County. Yes sir. We're not in OCO per se. Right? Yes. So, And, and with that future Pine Street, we will run water and sewer up there so properties can connect to water and sewer and that's what'll make them more developable in the future. Right. And more, uh, have higher value, but changes the, uh, ability of those properties to develop. Uh, yes, because that's my concern. On the north end of us, there's a, a tree farm Bamboo farm. Yeah. On the south end of us, the tree farm is there. Mm-Hmm. There's a concrete, uh, con uh, where they, I guess they store their equipment or whatever right in the middle of Pine Street and then they just purchased the property down the road, you know, from us on Pine Street. Now it's 7, 8, 9. So Yes. Yeah, We're, I guess my question is where are the residents that are living there going to be, you know, like for instance, if I went to sell my property is, you know, I don't know. Yeah. I'm not a realtor or an appraiser, but I would tell you that, uh, like I'm not sure how your parcels divided out, but yes, it, it's gonna change. We're changing the character of the area. Um, it, it could take, this could be the last project for 10 years. You never know it could, could keep going. Right. So what I can tell you is, as of right now, the developments that are going on, they are not able to access their projects via Pine Street. So the current Pine Street will not have trucks on it or trips or vehicles from these developments. We've, we've cut them short from being able to tie in. Right. Uh, we're gonna try to, uh, in our plan, we recognize we need Pine Street because it takes some of that internal tra traffic off of a COA Apopka road. We're just now starting the process to develop the plans for what a future Pine Street would be. Um, but it, that's kind of the answer. I can't tell you, I don't know if someone's gonna offer you money enough to make it worth your time for, I don't know when that's gonna happen. Thank you very much, Mike. Ma'am, I'm sorry we, we are only allowed three minutes much, but thank you for your comments. Oh, thank you. Is there anybody else in the, in the, okay, we need you to fill one of these forms out. Okay. Okay. Sorry. You can come on up and speak. I am Sarah Boyle. I live at eight 13 Pine Street, um, in the parcel right next to this property as well. Um, to then on the north side. On the north, yeah. Ours is split in 50 50. Okay. Um, so I'm behind, um, we are zoned agriculture. I have horses on this property, so I have concerns over the fact that now we're going to have industrial next to agriculture. Um, I know Ms. Hill also has chickens on her property, which I will as well in the near future. Um, so that is one of my concerns. Suddenly I'm on an agricultural property bordering, you know, this rural residential, which makes sense and now we're adding industrial next to it without any kind of restrictions. A retention pond might make sense. But if we're putting up warehouses, for example, when I had my house, I bought it a year and a half ago when I got the appraisal done, the, I don't know, directions, the warehouses across the ditch that specifically lowered my appraisal value. They said if you have one side that is now looking into a commercial or industrial, that lowered my property value greatly. So having two sides bordering by it is a big concern of mine. Especially, again, there's no restriction. We don't know what they're going to be putting there. A retention pond wouldn't look bad, but a large warehouse building, something like that, parking lot, things like that, I have a lot of the same concerns as Ms. Hill with the traffic coming in and out. And the other concern with a, a retention pond actually is we are on wells. So I don't know how long the construction would take of getting us sewer and water access, but if you're suddenly have a retention pond, I don't know how that's gonna affect our water sources. We all rely on wells out there right now and I feel like that could negatively impact us even getting to shower. So those are some of my concerns. Thank you very much. And I will go fill out a form. Appreciate it. Alright. Uh, anybody else? If not, we'll uh, close it up, bring it back to the dice. Does anybody have any other questions? Uh, if not, I'll need two motions. We'll go with the first one, which would be the CPA. So I have a question just real quick. Um, right now they're planning to put stormwater there, but just make sure I did hear right that it could, if they do something like underground, the stormwater, they could develop above it, correct? Yeah, they could. And how the way that you look at transitioning and buffering a non-residential use adjacent to agriculture doesn't require buffering. 'cause under an agriculture, you could build a 40,000 square foot metal barn warehouse and not even pull permits. So the, uh, use of the property, uh, being feature light industrial type of a use, uh, would incorporate with a site plan. It would have the necessary setbacks, obviously, but those buffers are not required. But what you're seeing in this area is this, this pocket full of Orange County that has been a pop. We know what's going on and it's just everything near the 4 29 is developing and it's is an agricultural use. We don't have an agricultural land use in our comp plan. We foresee single family and non-residential. So, so, uh, if this were to develop in the future, if it were a industrial use, I, you wouldn't get a restaurant or retail here, but it would be a, uh, building and parking. But those general generally utilize less trips than retail commercial unless PMP like a multifamily or a school or something like that. So it could happen. It's just in most codes you don't buffer. Not that we wouldn't do something because there is existing residential there, it's just not a requirement from agriculture to something that's non-residential. That's really when you have single family residential adjacent to high multi-family or non-residential that you have buffering requirements. Cool. I gave the, uh, the ballot over to, uh, member Williams. I, uh, I'm gonna go ahead and, uh, and make a motion. Uh, I'd like to make a motion that we recommend approving CPA 2 0 2 4 0 0 2. And, uh, the reason why I would say it is we've put a lot of money and time into making that a, an overlay character area for things just like this. So, um, you know, we've gotta move forward with it. So that's my motion. So there's a motion for approval of, And I will second That a recommendation, a rec a recommendation of approval. Mm-Hmm. There has been a second. Uh, are there any questions or con if no questions, we'll move forward. All those in favor? Mm. There we go. Somebody Didn't, somebody's not, yeah. Re-vote. Did you do, did you do it Ms. Williams? Yeah. Mine's lit. Press it one more time. Mine's lit. Yep. Hmm. I, I voted said Can we clear and redo? Sure. Okay. There we go. Okay, there we go. The motion passes. Alright. Uh, while you have a gavel, I'll go ahead and make the second motion for the rezoning for RZ 2 4 0 2 0 1. There's for recommendation for approval, There's a recomme, uh, motion for recommendation of approval of RZ 2 4 0 2 0 1. Is there a second? I will second it. All those, any questions or comments? Are we ready for the vote? Yep. All in favor. Thank you very Alright. Get my captain Motion Passed. Thank you. All right. Motion passes. I I will, I will tell y'all, you know, just I'm, make a quick comment that, uh, you know, there, um, that area's changing. Pine Street's gonna be redeveloped for the better. It's gonna be wider. It's gonna help, uh, traffic in that area, especially when the, you know, a lot more of the building comes and the baseball center comes around. So, you know, we think it'll be a good thing even for you as residents there. Okay. Next up we have 1102 and 1104 North Lakewood Avenue. This is the lot. Property annexation, project number AX 0 3 0 2 0 1 zoning measure. Whitfield. Thank you. So the, the, this request is only for the annexation from the county to the city. There is, um, no corresponding initial rezoning like all the other annexation rezonings that you've seen. This one's just strictly the annexation. The property's on the west side of, uh, Lakewood Avenue is about 946 feet south of the worst road and Lakewood intersection. Uh, a little over seven acres in size. The current land use designation, um, per the joint planning area, future land use map is low density residential. And it currently, they currently have an, a county a one designation, um, the smaller lot. So it's this tiny little skinny lot here. And then the big one, the little skinny lot is vacant and the larger one has a small ag warehouse on it. Um, no development plans have been submitted at this time and the properties are eligible for annexation. This is an aerial of the property. Um, the surrounding future land use map and the surrounding zoning map. So, um, in terms of eligibility, it's, it's adjacent to the city property. It can be served with water service. Um, and it's not creating any new enclaves, but rather eliminating the enclaves in the area. So DRC met on this item and the next series of annexations, um, since it's the same applicant team, um, on April 2nd. And with that staff's also recommending that the PCC make a recommendation of approval for the annexation of the lot property into the city limits. And, um, the applicant team member is here for all four. Great. Alright. Uh, anybody have questions for staff? Uh, Just one question if I may, Mr. Chair? Mm-Hmm. Um, I noticed that when this moves and I, I guess right now it doesn't become an issue, uh, because we're only annexing, but I noticed that there's, if this changes, which I'm assuming it will, um, from residential, it's gonna leave a rather narrow strip between the light industrials. Um, if this is going the way I'm expecting it will later down the road, is that gonna cause a problem? A narrow strip of light industrial here? Yeah. In between. If you look back on the map, see where that is just south of it? I'm assuming it's south. Um, you've got that strip in between that's going to be the yellow Yeah, the yellow inwe. Because I'm assuming that they're looking to put that, uh, the piece that they're annexing into something other than residential. This skinny little yellow part right here. Yeah. Might just be a mapping error. Um, when we, if this, for this LI portion, we would look at the entire parcel. Um, this change like this, this, um, it looks like li and a little strip of of LDR is still all this one vacant lot. So in order for them to come forward, we would probably make those map corrections at that time. Okay. Thank you. You Are welcome. All right. Thank you very much. We'll open it up to the public applicant. You good? Okay, anybody? No. Alright, we're gonna close the public. Uh, if, uh, I'd like to get a, a motion please. So, Mr. Chair, I move that we recommend approval of annexation AX oh 3 2 4 0 1. Alright, have a second. A Second. Alright, we have a, uh, motion for recommendation of approval of a X 0 3 0 2 X 0 3 2 4 0 1 by member Williams and a second by, uh, member Shaone. No other questions. Go ahead and vote. Alright, good job. Next. 13 0 5 1 1 1 3 OCO Papaka Road, MDTL Enterprises, LLC Property Organization Property number ax, project number AX 0 3 2 4 0 2. Zoning. Major Whitfield. Thank you. This is, um, the next application for accusation from Orange County to the city of oco. Um, this property in the next three applications are located on the east side of Apopka Road. Um, about a half a mile south of Fuller's crossroad. It's a little over four acres in size, uh, 4.32 again, LDR future line use and county A one. Both properties are generally used for ag purposes. Uh, node development plan has been submitted at this time. Um, like the other one, it's eligible for annexation by virtue of eliminating enclaves being served by city services and adjacency to the city boundary. This is an aerial of the properties, uh, the surrounding future land use the surrounding, and again, DRC made a recommendation of approval and we're also asking for a recommendation of approval. Thank you. Thank you very much. Uh, we'll open it. Uh, anybody have any questions? Okay. We'll open it up to the do to the public. You want to, would you like to say anything? Great. We'll close the public hearing. Bring it back up. I'll take a motion please. Mr. Chairman, I'll make a motion to, um, for recommendation for approval for Project AX 0 3 24 0 3. Thank you very much. Do have a second? I'll second. Alright, we have a motion for recommendation of approval by, uh, member Shaone and a second by Member Williams. All those in favor? Let's vote Passes. All right. Next up we have 10 59 OCO Papaka Road, Rogers Property NX Project A x 0 3 2 4 0 3 zoning. Major Whitfield. Thank you. So this is a request to NX from the county into the city. Um, also on the east side of oco Papaka Road. Um, 3,200 feet south of Fullers is about five acres in size. Same future line use, same act, designation or classification, same act, use, um, no plan submitted and eligible for annexation. This is an arrow of the property, these surrounding future land use surrounding zoning. And, um, DRC and staff are asking for a recommendation of approval. Alright, we'll open it back up to the public. You good? All right. We'll close the public hearing, bringing that back it up to the dye. Anybody have any questions? All right, I'll take a motion please. Mr. Chair. I move. Wait, wait. We're number five, right? Right. Mm-Hmm. Move approval. Recommend, recommend approval of annexation AX oh 3 2 4 0 3. Alright. And I will second we have a recommendation for approval by Member Williams and a second by Member Keller. No questions. Let's go ahead and vote. Alright, that passes. Next number six MDTL Enterprises, LLC Property Inion. Project number a x 0 3 2 4 0 4. Zoning manager. Whitfield. Thank you. Annexation from Orange County to City of Ocoee. Um, just moving our way south. Yeah, the east side of Acco Pop Road. Um, well, we have to do it in that order so that they qualify. Um, two point 17 acres in size. Um, LDRA one. Um, the, this little parcel on the east is the one that has the house. The parcel touching. Apopka is the one that's vacant. Uh, no development plan at this time. It's, they're eligible for annexation. This is an aerial of the property surrounding future land use and surrounding zoning. Um, DRC and staff is also making a recommendation or, uh, requesting a recommendation of approval. And this is the last of the applications for annexation for this packet. Thank you very much. We'll put it back up to the public. We'll close the public hearing. Uh, then nobody has any questions. I'll take a motion. I don't think you gave enough time for public conduct. We got anybody on the phone? Anybody? Anybody? Uh, call in. We'll make a motion. Oh. Oh, yeah. Okay. Oh. So Mr. Chair, I move that we recommend approval of annexation AX oh 3 2 4 0 4. Thank you. Do I have a second? Second. All right. We have a motion for recommendation of approval by Member Williams and a second by Member Chacon. All those in favor as vote passes. Thank you very much. Excited to see what you're building. Mm-Hmm. That's Gonna be really a great area. All right. Number seven, one Taylor Street. Small scale, comprehensive plan. FLU amendment from heavy industrial. Hi to commercial comm and rezoning from restricted manufacturing warehouses. I one to community commercial C two. Project number CPA 2 0 2 4 0 4. And RZ 2, 4, 3, 2. Developing service director Rome. Alright, Let me, you probably don't know where this property is, but Right. Uh, it's over. You go down McKees Street and right when you cross the railroad track, it's right there on the right. So, uh, city recently purchased the property. It had a history of having outdoor storage on it code enforcement cases. We were able to obtain the property via deed and the property's cleaned. And it, we wanna remove these old antiquated, don't know how they got heavy industrial stones throw from McKees Street back in the day. But we're just gonna clean that up while we have full ownership and occupancy of the property. So we're taking away the heavy industrial land use and the light industrial zoning. There was a conflict there to start with. Heavy industrial has to comply light and light. So we're, we're bringing it to commercial. It's in our downtown, it's in our downtown master plan area, in our downtown redevelopment area. And so we want commercial there in mixed use, not outdoor storage. So while we're the owner, we're the applicant bringing forward, we recommend approval. Alright. Anybody have any questions? Nope. I'm gonna open it up to the public. I'm gonna close the public hearing. Uh, I'll take a motion. Mr. Chair, I'll make a motion that we appro that we recommend approval of CPA 2 24 dash 0 0 4. Thank You. Do we have a second? A second. I have a, uh, motion for recommendation Approval by Member Keller and a second by Member Williams. No questions. Let's vote. Thank you. That passes. I'll take the next one, please. Uh, Mr. Chair, I'll make a motion to recommend approval for RZ 24 dash zero three dash zero two. Thank you. Second. Alright, we have a recommendation for approval by Member Keller and a second by Member Williams. No questions. Let's vote. Well, that'll be on our record tonight, son. Okay. And, uh, Mike, rumor you're up. Song and dance time. Oh yeah. So we're, uh, um, the OCO Village, that large development up at the north end. The apartments have been all been finalized. Cod the road is open. Uh, hope you used the roundabout maybe once or twice. Check that out. Uh, the seven elevens coming along. The, uh, strip center with the Chipotle is coming along as well. You can see the tech school. We've got a lot of development on the north end. Mm-Hmm. Uh, the OCPS technical School is nearing completion. And then we're gonna be, they're, uh, just started a development on adjacent to the high school, a little mixed use center that was approved there called the Ocoee Crown Point Mixed Use Project. The, uh, heading down Apopka Fullish cross intersection area, I mean, Apopka by Damascus. That, uh, development is starting to get checked off in the front, the front three buildings. You can see we have other development on Apopka Road and we finalized all of the alibi project. It's closed, so everything's been inspected and passed and, and such. So we're, we're looking forward to, uh, some other submittals We recently got. We're getting a hotel that's gonna be off West Road, uh, this week. I can, uh, reminds me of the hotel on fifties coming along. Finally, it looks like they'll be wrapping that up soon and looking good. We are in comprehensive plan process. We have, uh, some dates to get some data. So we, we have a good, uh, nothing in May for, we have a planning zoning meeting in May. We'll have a project or two, but not comp plan related, but hopefully right thereafter. And then, uh, we've also just kicked off a land development code update with a consultant to redo the land development code. Kind of combine all of our overlays. We've got the three target areas and the CRA, we've got three overlays wrong, the 4 29. We've got the downtown master plan. Kind of put all that into a nice code that'll let people know what they can do in the downtown urban areas, and also keep those suburban uses. Uh, kind of tidy them up, bring 'em up to speed. Today's, uh, so we've got a lot going on. And when this regional baseball facility hits, it's gonna be a big project, uh, as well. So we, we work on these things so long before someone sees 'em, they just, they become a cousin. Uh, these projects you work on 'em, you hammer 'em, you change. And, and so Any questions? Any questions for, um, Mr. Rumor? No questions. Well, if that's the case, then uh, y'all have a great night. Thank you very much. Alright. That's all she wrote.