Ladies and gentlemen, while the board members are getting set up, could you make sure that your phones are silenced, please? >> [clears throat] >> Sparrow on. That was Okay. call the order the July.
uh 16th, 2026 regular meeting of the Akoi Code Enforcement Board. Please stand for the invocation by member Brown and the pledge of allegiance by member whittle. >> We like to start off by a moment of
silence, please. Thank you. >> I aliance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and
justice for all. >> Please seat. [clears throat] >> Mr. Cruz. Can we have a roll call to verify board? Member Corn, please. >> Chair Bander, >> present. >> Vice Chair Lewis, >> present. >> Member Schultz, absent. Member Whittle,
>> present. >> Member Wilson, >> present. >> Member Brown, >> present. >> Quorum is met. >> All right. Since we have quorum met, can we have a swearing in of the officers and any uh people here that are going to speak this evening?
>> All right. Officers and those who wish to speak, please stand and raise your right hand. >> All right. Do you and each of you solemnly swear and affirm that the testimony you're about to present today shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? >> Yes. >> You [clears throat] may be seated. >> All right. Thank you. Sergeant
Rodriguez, do we have a consent agenda, sir? >> Yes, sir. >> Please. Chairman Vander, Vice Bear, Vice Chair Lewis, and code board members. Good evening. I am Sergeant Joseph Rodriguez with the Okoy Police Department's code
enforcement unit. We have six cases that came into compliance. First is 2026 01201 704 Center Street. 2026 01348
2220 Essex Drive 2026 0142215 Sanp Pine Drive 2026 01512 20003
Adair Street 2026 01556 2120 New Victor Road and 2026 01886 328 Little Rock Court.
All right. Excellent. And we have some cases that we need to bring to the front of the line. And uh Vice Chair, would you like to make a motion to bring these? >> Sure, Mr. Chair. I'd like to make a
motion. like to make a motion that we move the uh consent agenda presented by the city and that in these six cases that we move them to top the order. Case number 2026
000 854 106 Wild Street. Case number 2026 01556 2885 Collins Court case 2026
0157717 Sparrow Song Lane case 2026 01707 530 of Blueford Avenue and case 20 26
01861 1500 Morin Avenue. >> I second. Okay, we have a a motion on the floor made by member Lewis, vice chair Lewis, and seconded by member Whittle. Um that
in in these following uh five cases, we're going to bring those forward and then we will revert back to the um rest of the agenda and also to the accept the consent agenda presented by Sergeant
Rodriguez for the city. Any discussion? All of those in favor press yes. Although of those opposed press no. Somebody double check their vote. Okay. We uh we have uh one well everybody. Yeah. Unanimous. We're just
missing that one because of down in the end, right? All right. Perfect. All right. So, uh so we have our order. We have our disus. Uh we have one thing that we have to do before getting into cases. This is uh
public comments. We're going to open the floor for anybody who has uh uh who is interested in discussing any of the uh issues uh with the the the COE, the city, the the the round or the area,
anything. If they have any questions or complaints or anything, we usually open it up for about three minutes per person. Uh but it doesn't look like we have any takers this evening, so we're going to close that section. All right. So, let's move on to the first of the
old cases. The uh first of the five. Case number 2026-00854. Officer Katie. >> Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. >> Good evening. >> This is a recap on the case of 106 Lyall. uh the continuence till for 30
days that we had. I have been monitoring the location. Uh I have taken several [snorts] photos as you can see there. Way I can just turn them on. [clears throat] Yeah.
Correct. Well, the I took several photos. These first few photos are from the back end of the property uh that that the homeless encampment is part of.
And as you can tell, it's starting to get cleaned up. Uh in the month that I've been there, I've been checking basically weekly. I um on the 27th, I'm
sorry, uh on the 18th, I believe, 19 20th, I think it was, that Mrs. Gonzalez was transferred to the hospital. Uh reference an infection in her feet. She was at OMC for like a week and a half, two weeks. She's now in a rehab center.
But this goes to show this picture here. It shows that the electricity has been turned on. She has running water. This is part of the cleanup in the back yard. And just bear with me with these pictures. The other side of the yard that's been cleaned up. It's an immense
change. Again, pictures in the back. This is one of the seven sheds she had in the back of the house after it's been emptied out. Uh and in process of cleaning these sheds,
piles on the side of the house that are getting cleaned up. And this is the metal work that they're going to they're separating the debris into metal and plastic and whatnot. They're going to get rid of that. Uh I believe uh Mr. Anderson has utilized two
trailers per day out taking trash out. I think he said the comment was somewhere around uh 15,000 pounds of debris to the dump. Uh this is a car we found in their garage. Uh that's been cleaned out.
Uh that's the garage that they're cleaning out. This is the entrance into the house, which I've never actually got into. Uh as you can see, quite a bit of hoarding materials inside, but there is light. So the progression is in the
right direction. Uh on the 11th I had access to this entire property as the photos show. Um I had further access on the 15th and I entered the home itself. There is still a lot of work to be done. I would like the city would like to ask for another
30-day continuence. >> Officer Katie, is there anything else you'd like to add? I don't have anything else at this time. I think we >> need another 30 days to see where they can >> but it it I I I do remember some of these pictures from last month and it
does look like there's been some positive movement. So, I was just reading over uh you said they do have uh uh electric and running water on the property. Yes. I know that was two of our concerns. So, >> well, we
they're going to need a little more time before they can get a certificate of occupancy from the building department. >> All right. >> And Mr. Anderson assures me that they're working on it. And I I see I see work. It's not like they're not doing anything. And the homeless are gone from the back of the house.
>> Wow. >> For the most part. >> Good. >> Okay. Um if you don't have any I guess Mr. Anderson is here. Mr. Anderson, would you like to uh come up to the podium [clears throat] again? State your name and then uh fill us in.
>> Scott Anderson, 106 L Street. Um first of all, I want to thank the board for listening to us last last month and giving us the 30 days instead of the 15 days. I think it was spearheaded by um Mrs. Brown. Uh thank you very much. Um I
also want to thank the police department. They've been very good, very, very aggressive from a standpoint that when we needed them, uh, they came right out there when when the homeless were out there, we got them all out. They did a wonderful job helping us every night on doing that. Next door
neighbor who was here before has been calling me every night if there's someone going on the property and I'm right out there to make sure because Miss Gonzalez is uh, still in rehab. Um, we've used the time wisely and we've done a lot um, as much as possible. It's
not 1,500 pounds, it's 15 tons we've done. And I have the I have the dumps at uh, over on Good Homes Road at the Porter Transfer those bags. We are doing two to three of those big dual axle and
in plastic bags and then a couple other things. But we've been doing that every day and trying to be wise on keeping the trailer to out of the way of egress from other other um people using that. Um
[clears throat] we're going to keep working on this for her and um I think we need um because she's been there 30 plus years, you know, everyone hoards a little bit. She just doesn't have anyone around. So the homeless were becoming friends, but all
they were was just using her. So, um I think that she has the necessary tools where she's at now. They're helping her with her hoarding and uh I think some of her family members will help. They they they weren't before, but I think they're going to and her church members are
helping. So, I think you'll see in the next 30 days, I think you'll see a vast difference in what's being done. Um, and answering the question about uh the only part that we're having a problem with is when you go in the house, I think you were stepping on the foam stuff because
underneath it is pretty pretty rigid. Um, but yeah, we're going to [clears throat] try to do what we can to get all that done to where her quality of life is improved and I I appreciate the board's uh lenience on on helping us out on that part.
>> Okay. Does the uh board members have any questions for Mr. Anderson? >> Thank you very much. >> Thank you. Appreciate it.
And uh Officer Katie, um the city's recommending a 30-day continuance. >> Continuence. Yes, sir. >> Okay. All right. Any other questions? If not, we need a
motion made. >> Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion. >> Yes, Vice Chair Lewis. >> Mr. Chair, I move that in case number 2026 00854 that the compliance date previously set
by the board be extended another 30 days until August 15, 2026. >> I second that motion. I second [clears throat] that motion. >> All right. We have a motion on the floor
made by Vice Chair Lewis, seconded by member Brown, that in case number 2026- 0854, that the compliance date that was set by the board be extended until August 15,
2026. Any discussion? No. All right, let's take a vote. All those in favor, press yes. All those opposed press no. Votes are in. Passes unanimously. Thank you, Mr. Anderson. Please [clears throat] keep up the good
work and thanks, Chief, for doing all that to get those people out. I appreciate it. All right. Next case, uh on the old cases, uh let's see. Well, here we go. No, no, old case. Next one's going to be uh 2026-01556.
Officer Katie. This officer Katie for city of AOE code enforcement case number 2026 01556 regarding the property at 2885 Cullens Court. On May 13th 26, this officer observed
the property at located at 2885 Cullins Court to be in violation of the following city code 45-13 permit required. On May 13th, I have verified the property owner to be Alicious Wikcinder as confirmed by the Orange County Property Appraiser. A
notice of violation was then handd delivered, sent by way of certified mail. The owner was given until June 15th to correct the violation. On the 17th of June, the property was reinspected and found non-compliant with the codes as cited. On July 2nd, I not a
notice of hearing was sent to the property owner and posted at the property and posted in city hall lobby. As of today's hearing, the violation remains city code 45-13. I spoke with Mr. Wikcinder as of June
10th. Permit was applied for but denied. He needs to get with the building department to see which trees he needs to be added. Uh, the city is requesting 30 days and $250 a day if not within
compliance. [snorts] And this is, if you all remember, he was here prior to this for the uh structure that was built on the side of the house that he took down. He's taken down or he's stopped work on. And when I went back, he had taken down the
tree. In the meantime, that's the tree. [clears throat and cough] Okay. >> I have spoken to Mr. Wikciner and he's he knows he's got to get with the building department to find out which
trees have to be put in and to get his permit. Okay. Any other questions for the officer at this time? Nope. All right. We have somebody here to speak on this. Mr. Wikcinder.
>> Yes. >> Please come up to the podium. Speak your name, [clears throat] property address, and >> Hey, good afternoon. Um, my name is Wikis. Uh, property address is 2885 Collins Court. So I did speak to uh Mr. Pete and
I already went to the building department. So yesterday I actually purchased to Southern Magnolia and planted on the property to um get that solved. >> So you've been in touch with the permitting department? >> Yes. >> All right. And have they issued you a
permit yet? >> Um it was in progress. So yesterday I planted the tree. So I have to come back for them to um approve it. >> Okay. All right. Board, any questions for Mr. Wickander?
>> No. >> All right. Thank you, sir. Appreciate you being here. >> Thank you. >> All right. We're going to need a uh motion made then. >> Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion. >> Yes, Vice Chair Lewis.
>> Mr. Chair, I move that in case number 2026-01556, the respondent be found in violation of the code as cited as of June 15, 2026 and be given until August 15,
2026 to come into compliance will be fined $250. $50 per day for violation until come into compliance. >> I second. >> We have a motion made by Vice Chair Lewis and seconded by member Whittle in
the case number 2026-01556. the respondent be found in violation as of the as the code is cited and given until uh August 15, 2026 to come into compliance or be fined $250
per day as long as the violation remains. Any discussion? Let's take a vote. All those in favor press yes. Those opposed press no. Votes are in. and it passes unanimously. Thank you.
Okay. >> All right. Next case before us is case number 2026 dash 01577. Officer Katy. Yes, sir. Officer Katie, code code
enforcement, case number 2026 01577 regarding the property at 1717 Sparosong Lane. On May 13th, this officer observed the property located at 1717 Sparosong Lane to be in violation of the following city code 45-13
permit required. On May 13, 2026, I verified the property owner to be Vicash Singh as confirmed by the Orange County property appraiser. A notifi of notice of violation was then posted on the property, sent by way of certified mail. The property owner was
given till June 15th to correct the violation. On June 16th, 2026, the property was reinspected and found non-compliant with the codes as cited. On July 2nd, a notice of hearing was sent to the property owner, posted at the property, and posted in the city
hall lobby. As of today's hearing, the property remains in violation of code 45-13. I have not made contact with the owner of the property until this evening. Um, the city of Koi is requesting a 30-day
compliance time with a $250 day violation per day per comp per violation [clears throat and cough] question. Is it uh compliance June 15th or June 13th and reinspected on 15th? I thought I
heard you say compliance on 15th. He he hasn't been compliant. Uh June 15th, he was given until June 15th to come in compliance >> and was reined. >> On the 16th, the property was in reinspected.
>> Okay. >> All right. >> So, did you give the compliance date? >> What was the compliance date? June 15th is the comp >> June June 15th is the complant date. >> Gotcha. >> Expected on June 16th.
>> Gotcha. Okay. Perfect. All right. Um >> and Mr. V I believe Mr. Vikes Singh is here today. >> Yes. Yes, sir. Any other questions for the officer at this point in time? Board members? No. No. All right. Um Mr. Singh,
uh could you please come up to the podium, please? And again state your name, address. Thank you. >> Picos saying 1717 Sparosong Lane. Good evening. Um [clears throat] in in regards to uh the the notice of
violation here. Uh I did speak to officer Katy this evening uh and will remit the uh the the issue that we have at hand. Um throughout the process when I did get the violation um I did attempt
to obtain the permit which uh quite frankly was a was a process um to get even contact with the person needed to um to obtain the permit couple back and forths with emails and and and so forth.
I do have uh what I believe to be uh to satisfy a building permit or a permit. Um and so uh in that 30 days I I will now get that permit and and be in compliance. >> Thank you very much. [clears throat] Any
questions for Mr. Sing? >> No. All right. Thank you, Mr. Sing. Appreciate it. >> All right. I will entertain a motion. >> Mr. Chairman, I would like to make a motion, please. Yes, member Brown. >> I move that case number 2026
01577, [clears throat] excuse me, being responded and finded in violation of the code as cited. Complaint day is June 15th and be given until and be fined $250 per
day and be given until did he ask for 30 days? August 15. 2026. >> A second. >> Okay. We [snorts] have a motion on the floor
made by member Brown, seconded by Vice Chair Lewis, that in case number 2026-01577 that the respondent be found in violation as of June 15, 2026 and give it until August 15, 2026 to come into
compliance or be fined $250 per day for as long as the violation remains. Any discussion? No. Let's take a vote. All those in favor press yes. All those opposed. Someone double check their
vote. There we go. Okay, that was unanimous. All right. Thank you. All right. Next one we have is case number 2026-01707. >> Officer Toby. Good evening. >> Good evening,
>> Officer Toby. Case I'm sorry, Officer Toby. City of Aquoy code enforcement case number 2026-01707 regarding the property at 530 South Blford on 521. This office did observe the property located at 530 South Blofford to be in
violation of the following city code 15-3 that's basically overgrown property I mean overgrown um tall grass and weeds on 521 I verified the property owner to be Edwin Ivy as confirmed by Orange County Property
Appraiser. A notice of violation was then sent via via certified mail on 52120 I'm excuse me 52126 the property owner was given until 622 to correct the violation on 62326
the property was reinspected and found non-compliance with the codes as cited on 7226 a notice of hearing was sent to the property owner posted at the property and posted at city hall lobby As of today's hearing, the property
still remains in violation of code cited. I did speak with Mr. Ivy on yesterday and explained um what needs to be done as far as keeping the property up and mowing and cutting back the weeds and all that.
Based on the finding, the city is rec is requesting in 15 days to come into compliance or impose a fine of $250 per day per violation until property is in compliance. And here are the some exhibits from the the property
itself. >> [clears throat] >> Okay. Does anybody have any questions for Officer Toby? >> I heard I heard the um 15 days, but I didn't hear the amount. Sir.
>> Sir, >> you're speak Phobe. The um the fine amount was 250. >> Yes, sir. 250. >> Thank you. >> All right. Uh we have somebody here to speak on that tonight.
Mr. Edwin Ivy, please uh come up to the public speaking area and state your name, address >> for us. Thank you. >> All right. Uh I'm Edwin Ivy. I uh
uh I had a Guatemalan who was doing a mighty fine job and I even owed him some money, but unair apparently the Trumpster has sent him fleeing for his life, I guess.
So, he hasn't been back. So, uh I was too lazy to get out there in that sun uh May and start mowing myself. But, uh since I got his notice, I got fired up and got on the lawn mower
and decided I'd do it myself and I've gone out and mowed it. And uh I uh I think I've got it all under the only thing that I mentioned to the man was underneath the trees I have Boston ferns
which is ground cover. I not planning on mowing that but everything else uh uh I've mowed and there are some weeds that grew up around some limbs that were in the ground and I put weed killer on that and it seems to be working.
So, uh, I believe that within the next, uh, well, I think I'm already in compliance now, but I will represent that I'll, despite the heat, get the heck out there and get on the lawnmower and
get going. I can't uh I don't think my Guatemalan's going to come back. Something tells me from what I see on the news, he isn't going to be around anytime soon. So, uh, looks like I'll have to do it. >> All right. Well, >> I'll get to work.
>> All right, Mr. Ivy, we appreciate you taking care of that. I know it gets hot out there, but >> just, you know, there's times of the day to go out there and there's times not to, but before you leave, does any of the board members have any questions for Mr. Ivy? >> It is. No. All right. I do. I'm sorry.
M, [clears throat] question. I heard Mr. Ivan, right, say that he was in complant right now. Well, I guess that's his opinion that he's in compliance. >> I just want it to be clear. >> What What What else is there? Have Have
you seen that? But I What other uh uh I've already mowed all that area that you're showing right there? >> Yeah, he did. He mowed some of it, but all the tall weeds by the fence and all that is still there. And see if I don't
know if I have photos of the front of the property. Some of the property he mowed and by the time he gets to the next section, the other property mowed up again. So, it's right back to where it was. >> I understand. Thank you. >> So, he recognizes that he's going to have to continue to mow it. Just a one
time. >> Officer Tubby, I see the reinspection date is June 23rd. Um, was there a more recent inspection date? >> I'm over there like once once a day I I drive by. Every day I drive by there.
>> All right. >> And check on it. So, >> okay. All right. >> And I did notice that um Mr. Ivan said that he refused to cut one section. >> What >> was there a section that you were refusing to cut down?
>> Not really. >> Okay. Thank you, sir. >> I think you were talking about mention ground cover. >> Ground cover. >> The ground cover of the ivy. >> Yeah. Oh, yeah. Well, the wherever the Boston ferns are around the trees. I I wasn't planning on cutting that, but uh
it's the far as the grass, there's no problem. I I'll gladly cut that down. There's no pro reason why not. >> So, you are in agreements that you will cut it down. >> Oh, sure. I'll mow the grass. Yeah, I I
understand that. >> And everything else that puts you in violation, sir? >> Well, I my impression is that's the only thing that was putting me in violation. If there's something else, Mr. Toby can call and tell me about it.
>> Well, uh, Officer Toby, the Boston Firm, [clears throat] is that part of the violation? Does that need to be cut? >> No, sir. By this? >> No, sir. It's It's just the uh tall grass and weeds. >> Okay. >> Around by like the fence line and stuff like that too as well. >> The fence line, the front of the
property, throughout the property because not all of it ground covered. >> Understood. >> Okay. Thank you for [clears throat] >> Mr. Abby. understand what officer is looking for then. >> All right. >> Okay. All right. Thank you. Uh any other questions for Mr. I
>> All right. Uh Miss >> What's that? >> Huh? Well, we'll entertain a motion anytime you guys are ready to go. >> Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion. >> Yes, member Wilson. I move that in the case of
2026 01707 that the respondents be found in violation of the code as cited as of uh June 22, 2026
and be given until July 31. one of 2026 to come in compliance or be fined $250 per day per violation until found in compliance. [snorts]
>> I second that motion. All right, we have a motion on the floor made by member Wilson, seconded by member Brown in the case number 2026-01707 that the respondent be found in violation as of June 22nd, 2026 and be
given until July 31st, 2026 to come into compliance or be fined $250 per day for as long as the violation remains. Any discussion? >> Nope. All right, let's all vote. Those
in favor, press yes. Those opposed, press no. Votes are in and it passes unanimously. All right. Thank you, Mr. Ivy. Appreciate it. [clears throat] Okay.
Next case before us is case number 20126-01861, Officer Katie. [clears throat] Yes. Officer Katie, city of Koi, code enforcement, case number 2026 01861 regarding the property at 1500 Morin
Avenue. On June 2nd, 26, this officer did observe the property located at 1500 Morin Avenue to be in violation of the following city codes 6-4H6 off streetet parking and 115-3
declaration of nuisance and menace. On June 2nd, 26, I verified the property owner to be the life estate of Ricky Adair as confirmed by the Orange County Property Appraiser. A notice of violation was then posted on the property and sent by way of certified
mail. [clears throat] Excuse me. The property owner was given until June 16th to correct the violation. On June 18th, the property was reinspected and found non-compliant with the codes as cited. On July 6th, the notice of
hearing was sent to the property owner, posted the property, posted in city hall. As of today's hearing, the property remains in violation of code 115-3 and violation 6-4H6. I had received a call from the homeowner
within the first week of the violations and was told he was working on the violations. There have been 11 notices of concern on the property since 2019. 10 have been closed compliant by the city. One is in progress.
And I have some photos here. This is these tires. As of today, when I went by the property, the tires are gone. The trailer is still in the in the yard. The RV is now gone. That's the trailer.
He still has con uh construction equipment behind where the RV used to be. And as of this morning, they have this is still here where this trailer is. The trailer's moved over to the left and there are two
cars sitting in the grass area as of this morning. The city is recommending 30 days to come in compliance or two if not a $250 per day per violation. [clears throat]
Officer Katie, um I know you have six um 6-4H6 listed twice, but it's only two violations. Correct. >> Correct. There's only two violations, sir. >> All right. Does anybody have any questions for Officer Katie at this point? I believe there's someone here to
speak on this tonight. Is there a >> Oh, sir, you have to come up to the podium and speak if you would please. Uh, state your name and obviously the property address. Thank you.
>> My name is Rickyair. >> My name's Ricky Adair. The property address is 1500 Morin Avenue, Florida. Uh, the I actually had two trailers there. One still there to clean up the
rest of the mess. The bigger one's gone. And that's not construction equipment. That's mechanic equipment that I'm cleaning out the room on the front of the garage to make room to get it in there out of the weather. But I mean, most of it's taken care of
and a 30-day continuence. Grateful for it. I'll take care of it. >> All right. Do you think you can get it done in 30 days? >> I'm by myself, but yeah, I think I can. >> Appreciate that. >> I'll take care of it. >> All right. Does anybody have any board members have any questions
[clears throat] for uh Mr. Dare? >> No, I have no questions. No, I'm asking the board. I'm sorry. Anybody? No. All right, >> Mr. Deair, thank you for being here this evening. Appreciate it. >> Not a problem. >> All right. I need to enter uh I'll entertain a motion. >> Okay. I'd like to make a motion.
>> Yes. Member Whittle. I move that in case number 2026 01861 that the respondent be found in violation of code cited from June 16, 2026 and be given until
August 15th to come into compliance [clears throat] would be fine. $50 per day per violation until found in compliance. >> Sorry, could you repeat the um amount again? >> Sure. $250 per day per violation. >> Perfect. Thank you.
>> Until second motion. >> Okay. >> All right. We have a motion on the floor made by member Whittle and seconded by member Brown and Wilson that the responded uh I'm sorry in case number uh
2026-01 861 that the respondent be found in violation as of June 16, 2026 and given until August 15, 2026 to come into violation or come into compliance or [clears throat] be fined 250 $50 per day
for each of the violations uh as long as they remain non-compliant. Any discussion? >> Let's take a vote. All those in favor press yes. All those opposed press no.
Votes are in. And it passes unanimously. Thank you, Officer Kat. All right. I think now we're going to resort revert resort revert back to the uh original agenda. This will bring us to case number
2026- 01608. Officer Toby Officer Toby City of AOY code enforcement case number 2026-01608 regarding property at 321 Misty Meadow
on 520. This officer did observe the property located at 321 Misty Meadow to be in violation of the following city code 165-3 inoperable vehicle on 52026.
I verified [snorts] the property owner to be John Wescott as confirmed by Orange County property appraiser. A notice of the of the violation was then sent certified mail on 52026. The property owner was given until 64
26 to correct violation. On 68 26, the property was re reinspected and found in non-compliance with the city codes as cited. On 7226, the notice of hearing was sent to the property owner, posted at the property,
and posted at city hall lobby. As of today's hearing, the property remains in violation of city codes at cited. I haven't had any um conversation or any contact with the owner. Based on the finding, the city is
requesting 15 days to come into compliance or impose a fine of $250 per day per violation. And the exhibits are as you can see here. There's a u the vehicles here. Now there's actually two vehicles
matching same paint job, same condition in the driveway here. from this morning when I went by to um reinspect again >> and no contact from the homeowner? >> No, sir. >> Okay.
>> How many days did you say? I'm sorry I didn't do that. >> I'm sorry. 15 days. >> 15 >> or $250 per day thereafter. >> All right. Any questions for Officer Doby? >> No. I'll entertain a motion. >> Mr. Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a
motion. >> Yes. Member Wilson. [clears throat] >> I move that in the case of 2026 01608 that the respondent be found in
violation of the code as cited as of 64 2026 and be given until July 31 of 2026. to come in compliance or be fined $250 per
day per violation until found in compliance. >> I second that motion. >> And uh member Wilson, just for clarification, what was the date that you recommended? >> July 31.
>> July 31st. Okay. We have a motion on the floor made by member Wilson, seconded by member Brown that in case number 2026-01608 that the respondent be found in uh a violation as of uh June 4th, 2026
uh for the code cited and be given until July 31st, 2026 to come into compliance or be fined 20 $250 a A for as long as the violation remains. Any discussion?
If not, let's vote. Those in favor, press yes. Those opposed, press no. Votes are in. Passes unanimously. All right. Thank you, Officer Toby. Okay. Next case before us, 2026-01810.
Officer Laughler. Good evening. >> Good evening, >> Officer Ller, City of Vcoi, code enforcement. Case number 01810 is 48 480 Meadow Sweet Court. On May 28th, 2026, this officer did observe and
selfinitiate a code action regarding uh junk debris that was littering the property overgrown tall weeds and grass on the front side and rear yards of the house and in the easement by the sidewalk and growth that was covering
and encroaching the pedestrian sidewalk. Also, no visible address building numbers on the structure or the mailbox. On the same date, a violation notice was posted at the location sent out certified service by the clerk to the property owner of record, Steven Oorio,
as identified by county records for violations of ordinance 54-3A1 regarding the lack of building numbers, address numbers. 10835 for the public safety nuisance of the weeds and grass that were covering and blocking the
pedestrian sidewalk. 115-3B for the overgrowing tall weeds and grass in the front, rear, and sideyards and the easement and 10824D regarding the miscellaneous junk, debris, trash that's scattered about the
property, and it's includes mop buckets and old appliance, wood, plastic, and vinyl items. The property owner was given until June 13, 2026 to cut the tall weeds and grass and fix numbers to the house or mailbox, clear the safety nuisance from the
sidewalk blockage, and remove the described miscellaneous junk and debris. On June 16th, the property was reinspected and found non-compliant with the codes as cited. On July 1st, a notice of hearing to this hearing was posted at the location in the city hall
lobby and sent certified service. As of this date, the property has only deteriorated further with tree limbs now laying on the sidewalk blocking it. The city's recommending a 15-day compliance time frame and a fine amount of $250 per
day per violation for every day not in compliance with any issued orders. There's been no contact with the uh occupant or owner of the house other than someone takes the postings down,
but there has been in prior history a lot of contact. So, the owner rides a bicycle and I see the bike moving around. So, he's there, but >> we need to get that sidewalk clear. Officer Laughler, was the um notice of
violation posted on the property? >> Yes, sir. Was posted on the front door. So was the notice of hearing. It's not in these particular pictures, but >> you know, I'm a big fan of those. >> Yes. Yeah, I am. >> Okay. Thank you. All right. Anybody have
any questions for Officer Laughler? No. All right. I'll entertain a motion. >> Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion. >> Yes, Vice Chair Lewis. >> Mr. Chair, I move that in case number 2026-01810, the respondent be found in violation of
the code as cited as of June 15, 2026 and be given until July 31st, 2026 to come into compliance will be fined $250 per day per violation until he
comes into compliance. I second that motion. I'm sorry. I second that motion. >> All right. We have a motion on the floor made by Vice Chair Lewis, seconded by member Brown. And in case number 2026-01810, that the respondent be found in
violation of the four codes as cited uh and be given until July 31st, 2026 to come into compliance or be fined $250 per day per violation as long as the violations remain.
Any discussion? Let's vote. All those in favor press yes. All those opposed press no. Votes are in. It passes unanimously. Thank you, Officer Love. >> Thank you. >> Okay. Well, don't go too far. Case
number 2026-01899. Officer Laughler. Officer Laughler, City of AOE, code enforcement. [clears throat] Case number 01899 is 50 North Circle Key in the Pioneer 1 neighborhood.
On June 3rd, 2026, this officer did selfinitiate a code enforcement action regarding a pile of four old car tires, overgrown tall weeds and grass in the front, rear, and sideyards, and miscellaneous junk and old furniture parts in the front yard.
On the same date, a violation notice was posted at the location and sent out certified service to the owner FA Moody as identified by county records for violation of ordinances 115-3B regarding the tall weeds and grass and
115-3A3 regarding the junk, the litter, and the old furniture and tires. And I have some exhibits here. >> [snorts] >> pretty self-explanatory
and some of the items have changed and become other things. That was as of today. The property owner was given until June 18th to correct the two violations. The notice was signed received for proof of
service on June 6th in Georgia. On June 10th, a representative of the property owner called stating that they felt the neighbor was placing the junk on the property, but that they were going to take care of it. June 19th, 2026, a reinspection revealed non-compliance.
On July 1st, 2026, a hearing notice to this hearing was posted at the location in the city hall lobby and sent certified for proof of service and it was signed on July 7th by the property owner. As of today's date, the property remains non-compliance. The city's
recommending a compliance time frame of 15 days and a fine amount of $250 per day for every day not in compliance with any issue ordered issues issued orders. Any questions for our officer?
>> No. >> I'd like to make a motion. >> Yes, member Whittle. >> I move in case 20126 01899 respondent be found in violation of code as cited as compliance date. I think you
said it was June 18th. and be given until July 31st, 2026 to come into compliance or be fined $250 per day for violation until found in compliance. >> I second. [snorts]
>> We have a motion on the floor made by member Whittle and seconded by member Wilson that in case number 2026-01899 that the respondent be found uh uh in violation as of June 18th, 2026 of
the two violations and be given until July 31st, 2026 to come into compliance or be fined $250 per day per violation until they come into compliance. Any discussion?
Let's vote. Those in favor, press yes. Those opposed, press no. Votes are in. It passes unanimously. >> Thank you. >> Thank you, officer. >> Okay. Next case before us 2026-01954,
Officer Katy [clears throat] again. Good evening, Officer Katie, City of AOE, code enforcement. Case number 2026 01954 regarding the property at 2525 Dovetail Drive. On June 8th, 2026, this officer did
observe the proper property located at 2525 Dovetail Drive to be in violation of the following city code 115-3, public nuisance. On June 8th, I verified the property owner to be Aria Cherry as
confirmed by the Orange County Property Appraiser. A notice of violation was then posted on the property, sent by email. The property owner was given until June 25th to correct the violation. On June 26th, the property
was reinspected and found non-compliant with the code as cited. On July 2nd, a notice of hearing was sent to the property owner, posted at the property, and posted in city hall lobby. As of today's hearing, the property remains in violation of city code 115-3.
I've also made contact with the owner on June 8th. I explained to Miss Cherry that the city code as well as informing her of what was in violation. She was not very responsive to my comments. Additionally, since July 2023, the
property has had 21 complaints. Out of those complaints, five have been dismissed. Out of the 16 remaining complaints, seven of them have been related to the violation being present today. Besides the case being presented today, the property does have another case that
was brought forth for operating a business without the business tax license. That case is currently acrewing fines. Overall, the property has been a nuisance with multiple complaints being filed and several phone calls and contact being made by the code
enforcement unit. And I'm going to let you take a gander at these pictures, [clears throat] tires, trash around the the east side of the home, broken down toys. These here are actually bounce houses as part of
the business. Where's the rest of my photos? Okay. The rest of my photos are Yeah. Officer Katie, so you've been in contact with her? >> Yes. Just the very first day when I
posted the first uh notice of violation >> and she hasn't been very receptive. >> No, sir. It No. >> Okay. Uh just out of curiosity, um I know you mentioned you posted a notice on the on the property. Um where did you post that notice?
>> I post anytime I post any notice, either notice of hearing or notice of violation, I do it on the front door. >> Perfect. Um in the future, could you make sure you take a picture of that? >> I I I I actually do have the pictures of it. >> All right. >> I must have not uploaded them correctly.
>> I understand. Well, um I appreciate that. >> Yes, sir. >> Okay. Does anybody have any questions for Officer Katie at this point? >> What was your recommendation? >> Oh, yeah. >> Uh 15 days and $250 per violation. >> If there's no um questions for the
officer, I'll take a motion. >> I'll go ahead and I'll make a motion. >> Uh >> go ahead. member will >> I move that in case number 2026 01954 the respondent be found in violation of
code as cited as of compliance date of June 25th 2026 and be given until July 31st 2026 to come into compliance or be fined $250 per day per violation until found in
compliance. >> I second that motion. All right, we have a motion on the floor made by member Whittle, seconded by member Brown, that in case number 2026-01954 that the respondent be found in violation
as of the compliance date, June 25th, 2026, and give it until July 31st, 2026 to come into compliance and be fined $250 per day as long as the violation remains in non-compliance.
Any discussion? Let's take a vote. Those in favor press yes. Those opposed press no. Votes are in and it passes unanimously. Thank you, Officer Key. All right. So, that that re uh takes care of uh our cases for the evening. We have
some case resolutions that we need to go through. All right. Yeah. First case is uh 2024-03865. Officer Laughler. Yes, sir. Uh that [clears throat] was the case that involved uh Stonegate
Drive with no address, just a parcel ID number. On May 21st, 2026, the property was found in violation of code 45-13A and that was for the tree removals throughout the community.
And they were given until by this board June 20th, 2026 to come into compliance or be fined $100 per day per violation. As of today's hearing, the property is still non-compliance with all the codes as cited. The city is requesting a order
imposing fine of $100 per day for the violation starting on June 20th, 2026. I think it's the one violation 45-13A. >> We have somebody here to speak. >> Oh, we do. >> Uh yes. Good evening. Uh Nick Lip, development services director for the
city of AOE. Uh we're actually working with the homeowners association right now on doing a revised site plan to demonstrate the trees that they removed and a tree replacement plan. Um so I guess the development services team would ask for continuence of this as we
work with the homeowners association to develop that plan which would have to come forth to the uh city commission for approval and then we can bring it back to you all as a plan for uh remediating you know this code violation. >> All right. Can can you I'm sorry I I I
missed all of that at the beginning. Oh, sure. Can you explain again who you are and and your relationship to this case? >> So, uh Nick Lep, I'm the development services director for the city of Akoi. So, in part of our code of ordinances to remove a large number of street trees, you have to come into the development
services department with a site plan identifying the street trees that you want to remove because it's more than just one. It's a lot and it's on a homeowners association. So it's not associated with each individual homeowner itself. It's part of the whole HOA as it was designed as part of the
plan unit development. So in order to remove these trees, which several have been removed, which is the violation, uh we're working with the HOA to not only identify the trees that were removed, trees that may still need to be removed based on their arborist report, and then
a plan to replace those trees uh within the development. So, that's going to take us a little bit of time to work through. Uh, we've already met with the HOA and come up with the kind of the framework of which trees have been removed and we have an idea of where we would like to replace the trees. Uh, we
just need to come up with that formalized and then bring it in front of the city commission per our code uh to get approval of that since it was part of a large development and then after that we can present it to the code enforcement board to help uh alleviate this code violation.
>> So, so how do I'm sorry. No. So essentially what you're saying is this this actually may not be a violation if these trees that were removed were deemed >> necessary to be removed. >> No, it was a violation because they removed them without coming to us to
begin with with a plan itself of saying these trees are causing hazard. We would like to remove those. Here's our overall site plan and here's our remediation plan. >> Since it was not done previously, that's why they are violation of the code. But we are working with them currently to
make sure that they can become in compliance by going through all of our proper procedures. >> So how does your role as a city agency um work in conjunction with the recommendation that the city is saying now?
>> So I'm not sure that that has been conveyed to officer Lafler. Uh so we are going to be working with uh them uh more frequently on these code violations and what the development services department is doing to help alleviate that. The HOA
came to us uh with this idea and plan w as a code violation. We just did not get the opportunity to work with code enforcement to make sure this was continued or to let them know that this project we're working on this project with the HOA hoping to have a nice elegant resolution uh to this code
violation. How much? >> But they're recommending a fine right now. They're recommending that the city that we impose a fine. >> So if we impose a fine, how does what you're doing uh negate that? >> There will be a fine starting from June
20th. >> And it seems like it's going to be a lengthy process what you're going to do. So they're going going to be fined $100 a day >> until you come up with something and then you're going to go back to the code enforcement. Well, what we're asking for is a continuence of the fine and not do
a fine right now as we're working with the homeowners association to remedy this situation. Uh they have been in contact with us and working with us quite diligently on this but we still need to bring it and put it in front of the commission agenda which depending on the how much room there is and with
budgeting coming up that's why I don't have an exact time frame but we are working on that with the HOA president uh currently >> but that's not what the city's asking. >> Yeah. based on what the city's asking for. >> What the city? >> Yeah. >> Well, the city, we are both a city and the city's asking.
>> Yeah. Yeah. We're both continu You're asking for a fine. >> Previously, we were not on probably the same page. We're looking to get on the same page as two departments uh to make sure that we don't come into this situation again. But yes, uh this was previously done and now we're looking to coordinate a lot more on these code
violations along with uh the building which is why not put not to put officer Laughler on the spot here >> but uh I would not he he he's a gentleman who who brought this uh to our attention and this is the first time we're meeting with you and we appreciate
you being here and and explaining what the uh the development services uh you know um department is planning on doing. Um, and we appreciate that. But Officer Laughler, um, do you want to weigh in on this? Yes.
>> The city's got a new recommendation. [laughter] >> So, >> to continue with this case. >> So, my my question here would be, sorry, is you're asking, but you got to give us a date for continuence. So you got to give us a date because as
we stand here, you ask us to continue, but the fine is still there wrapping up. >> So if you want us to continue, you got to give us a date that you think this could come to a resolution so we could recommend that date. >> Sure. >> And move on.
>> I would recommend 45 days, but you >> Good evening, chair and board. Um, being that this is going to be a lengthy process, this is nothing new. This of course this should have been worked out. Um can we I would recommend a 90-day
extension until we can make sure that we get these u permits and everything cuz we talking about homeowners association a plan and all of that stuff. So at 90 days we can come back and evaluate this. >> Okay. >> Does that sound reasonable? >> Because I don't think 45 days is going
to be enough to get the trees and the plant. >> Now we got three city people in here. >> I know this should have been worked out prior to. So this this is This case is over a year year and a half old. Yeah. >> And there was a complaintant or I wouldn't even have known about it. So >> because this has to go to commission the
agenda a whole bunch of variables in this equation. >> So then the recommendation would be from the city for a 90-day >> 90day extension. That's correct. Yes. >> With no fine >> with would but but still the but still with the imposition of the fine if it
isn't resolved or you ask for another continuence then >> a continuous on the fine and that for 90 days please. Uh what what did you just ask? >> So what we we don't want a finding a violation. >> No you you're asking but you would be asking for a 90-day continuence but if
it's not resolved either for another continuence but you we would still have to impose the fine >> after 90 days. I I I think when we return, we'll decide whether we impose a fine or have another continuation. >> Yeah, it it sounds like, you know, um
there's some type of remediation you were saying that would probably happen anyway. So, >> a fine right now would not be beneficial. >> So, if it if it ends up coming down to being a finable offense, does it go back to the June 20th 26th date? >> That's what I'm trying to get. That will
be the original date, right? Yes. >> Yeah. If no resolution occurs and no compliance. Yes. >> Okay. All right. >> All right. You got your you got your leverage, Mr. Lip. [laughter] >> All right. Now, after all that, somebody's going to have to make a motion.
>> Sure. Um, I'd like to be recognized. >> Remember what? >> Yeah. I move in um >> I move that in case 2022 44 03 865
uh the compliance date set by the board be extended 90 days to October 14, 2026. Can you say that again? I'm sorry. >> Sure. I move that in case 2024
03865 that the case be continued to October 14th of 2026 to be reviewed for at that code board meeting. >> I second that.
>> All right. We have a motion on the floor made by member Whittle and seconded by Vice Chair Lewis that in case number 2024-03865 that this case be continued until the >> October 14th, 2026 code board meeting. Is that actually the
date that we have a code? >> I got a feeling our date is going to be the 15th. I'm sorry. >> 15. Okay. So, it'll be continued uh until >> the 15th. >> All right. We still agree to that, right? >> Yeah. Okay. >> Second.
>> All right. So, again, we'll we'll uh and that's the 15th then, right? >> Right. >> All right. So, we're just going to change that by date. So, again, uh member um motion on the floor made by member Whittle, second by Vice Chair Lewis. that case number 2024-03865
uh be continued until the u October 15 2026 code enforcement board meeting. Any discussion? All those in favor favor press yes. All those opposed press no. Votes are in and
it passes unanimously. All right. Good. >> Thank you. >> Okay. Uh, case number 2026-0000648, Officer Laughler. >> Yes, sir. That was uh 86 Sundial Key. And if you remember, they had a lot of issues there and we got it down to just the trailers.
>> Yes. >> But unfortunately, a large camping trailer that was abandoned on uh Palm Drive is now on the side of that property sticking out in the street. So, and the other trailer is still there. On May 21st or on June 18th, 2026, this
property was found in violation of code 6-4H6B and that's for the trailers and was given until July 3rd, 2026 to come into compliance or be fined $250 per day. As of today's hearing, the property is
still non-compliance. The city's requesting a order imposing fine of $250 per day starting on July 3rd, 2026. Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion. >> I'm sorry. What was the fine amount? >> 250. >> Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion.
>> Yes, [snorts] Vice Chair Lewis. >> Mr. Chair, I move that in case number 2026-00648, >> uh, that the board impose a fine as previously said for July 3rd. That's $250 per day for the violation.
>> I second until we come into compliance. >> I second that motion. >> All right. We have a motion on the floor by made by Vice Chair Lewis and seconded by members Whittle and Brown that in case number 2026-00648
that the board ino impose the fines as previously set by this board. Any discussion? Let's vote. Those in favor press yes. Those opposed press no. Votes are in. And it passes unanimously.
Perfect. All right. Next case. 2026-0000821. Officer Katie. Okay. On June 18th, 2026, this property was found in violation of code 115-3A
and was three and was given until July 3rd, 2026 to come into compliance or be fined $250 per day per violation. As of today's hearing, the property is still non-compliant with all codes as cited. The city is requesting ordering imposing
the fine of $250 per day per violation starting on July 3rd, 2026. >> [clears throat] >> Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion. >> Yes, Vice Chair Lewis. >> Mr. Chair, I move I move that in case number 2026-
00821 and the board impose the plan previously said by the board, which was uh $250 a day starting in July the 3rd. >> I second that motion. All right, we have a motion on the floor
made by Vice Chair Lewis and seconded by member Brown in the case number 2026-0000821 that the um board imposes the fines as previously set by this board July 3rd, 2026 and
$250 per day for violation. Any discussion? No. Let's vote. All those in favor, press yes. All those opposed, press no. Votes are in. And it is. We need to do it again.
One more time. Reccast your vote. All votes are in. It passes unanimously. Perfect. All right. Next case. 2026-0000978. Officer Katie. >> Yes. On May 21st, 2026, this property
was found in violation of code 6-4H6A and was given until June 20th, 2026 to come into compliance or be fined 250 a day per violation. As of today's hearing, the property is still non-compliant. Actually, as of today, I
drove by the the property is compliant. The uh residents have never notified. I just happened to be passing by the property and noticed that the trailer was gone as of today. So, what did that and I would uh request that we impose a
fine of $250 per day uh starting on June 20th until today. $100. I'm sorry. It was $100 per day. >> 100 per day from June 28th until >> Yes, sir. >> Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion.
>> Yes, Vice Chair Lewis. >> Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion in case number 2026-00978 that the respondents be fined $100 a day from June 20th until today's date, July >> 16
>> 15 that was previously said by the board. >> Second. >> All right. Um, we have a motion on the floor made by Vice Chair Lewis, seconded by member Wilson
that um, case number 2026-0000978 [snorts] that the respondents be found in violation of the code decided uh, from between June 20th, 2026 through July 15, 2026
and be fined $100 per day for as long as that violation was and um non-compliant. Any discussion? Let's vote. All those in favor, press yes. All those opposed, press no. Votes
are in. Passes unanimously. All right. Next case, 2026-01 08. Officer Laughler. I'm [clears throat] pleased to report that 124 Periwinkle Key did install all brand new skirting and it looks real
nice. It's full compliance. No further action. >> Excellent. Thank you. Case number 2026-01234. Officer Lawler. >> That's 1000 fluing. [snorts] On June 18th, 2026, the property was found in
violation of 51-13. This was a room addition without a permit that has subsequently turned into a carport. He was given until July 3rd, 2026 to come into compliance or be fined $250 per day. As of today's hearing, the
property remains non-compliant. City's requesting an order imposing a fine of $250 per day starting on July 3rd, 2026. >> Mr. Chairman, I would like to make a motion. >> Yes. Um, member Brown,
>> I move that in case number 2026-01234 [snorts] that the respondent be found in violation of the code as cited as complaint date July the 3 and be given until
you say 30 days. impose a fine >> a fine >> impose a fine of $250 per day per fine [snorts] until this um per day per per violation until find
found in compliance. >> Um >> this is actually a case resolution so it's going to be uh this is going to be a little different. So, >> okay. >> Um, since nobody second that, would somebody like to take another shot at
this? >> Yeah. Uh, Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion. >> Yes. Member Wilson. I move that in case 2026 01234
[snorts] that the board imposes a fine as as previously set by the board of $250 as of uh July 3rd. >> Seconded. >> Okay.
>> All right. All right, we have a motion on the floor made by member Wilson, seconded by Vice Chair Lewis, that in case number 2026-01234, that the board imposed fines as previously set by this board of $250 per [snorts] day for the violation beginning
July 3rd, 2026. Any discussion? Let's vote. All those in favor, press yes. All those opposed, press no. There we go. We got our votes in. Passes unanimously. All right. Good job, guys. >> Thank you.
>> All right. Uh case number 2026-01476. Officer Laughler. >> That's case is uh 729 North Lakewood Avenue. That is a uh now vacant uh lot that was overgrown and is highly visible on Lakewood Avenue.
On June 18th, 2026, the property was found in violation of code 115-3A 3B and was given until July 30th, 2026 to come into compliance or be fined $250 per day.
As of July 14th, 2026, the property is in compliance with all the codes as cited. However, the owner failed to come into compliance on the ruled upon compliance date, which was July 3rd. The city is requesting an order imposing a
fine of $200 per day per violation starting on July 3rd, 2026 and ending on July 14th, 2026. And that was for codes, two codes 115-3A and 115-3B.
That was July 3rd through July 14th. >> Oh, I'm sorry. I said July 30th again. >> Starting on July 3rd, 2026 and ending on July 14th. >> Now to find I thought you you mentioned 250, but then you went back to 200. 250
or 200. >> Um I think we requested 250 and you guys might have changed it to two 250. It's 250. There's a typo on this. 250 per day. >> 250 per day. Okay.
>> Anybody want to take a crack at this one? Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion. >> Yes, Vice Chair Lewis. >> Mr. Chair make a motion that in case number 2026-01476 that the board impose a fine of $250 per
day for violation covering the period of July 3rd through July 14th which was previously set by the board. [clears throat] >> I second. [snorts] >> All right. We have a motion on the floor
made by Vice Chair Lewis, seconded by member Whittle, that in case number 2026-01476, that the board impose the fines previously set, $250 per day per the violations 115.3A,
115.3b from the period of time from July 3rd, 2026 through July 14th, 2026. Six. Any discussion? Let's vote. All those in favor, press
yes. All those opposed, press no. Passes unanimously. All right. Case number 2026-01496. Officer Laughler. >> This uh was [clears throat] a trailer in the trailer parked that had two junk
cars in the sideyard. I'm happy to report they're both gone. The propertyy's in full compliance. >> Fantastic. >> No further action requested. >> All right, that takes care of our case resolutions. All right, we got a housekeeping thing that we got to take care of today. And
apparently uh Maya has uh or Mr. Cruz, sorry, has told us it was it's time for the election of the chair and vice chair. So, um, I nominate
Joe for the chair. >> I make a motion to nominate Joe for the chair. Joe Bender. >> I second that motion. >> I second that motion. >> All right. There's a motion on the floor made by vice chair Lewis, seconded by uh
member Brown that uh Joe Bander remain as the code enforcement chair um for the KO code enforcement board. Any discussion? Let's vote. All those in favor press yes. All those opposed press
no. And it passes unanimously. All right. Perfect. And uh now we have to do it for vice chair. >> Mr. Chairman, I'll make a motion that our vice chair stay the same. Member Lewis.
>> Okay, I'll second that one. >> All right. Motion on the floor uh made by uh member Brown, seconded by Chair Bander, that uh uh Mr. Lewis remain in his capacity as vice chair for the
board. Any discussion? Let's take a vote. All those in favor press yes. Those opposed press no. >> Okay. >> I'm sorry. That one might have been me. >> I'm sorry.
>> You made the motion. [laughter] >> Have a change of mind. [laughter] I wasn't >> just putting it out there to see what happens. >> All right. Very good. >> All right. Well, it it passes apparently unanimously. So, all right. Well, thank
you very much. I appreciate it. Anyways, all right. Uh board comments. Member Whittle. >> No, just happy that we're all here and getting through these things really, really quickly and with um you know, with the unanimous vote. I'm glad people
are able to come and speak their mind and we've made our agenda. Really hoping to get people who are here that want to speak up front done and um I feel pretty good. Hope everyone else does too. >> Vice Chair Lewis. Um I'd like to
compliment the police department and working with the nefar case that we had to eradicate or move on the homeless folks. That was a big issue a month ago when we addressed that case. So certainly working with the citizens. I
know you're a victim advocate. Um lady was here this evening, but she's gone. So I'm glad that that association was put together and also the association with the other city agency working with code enforcement. I hope that there'll be more cooperation with other city
agencies with cases that come before the code enforcement to bring about a resolution that's favorable to the city and the residents to get the desired goal without necessarily um just imposing a fine. So, I'm glad to
see the cooperation between the different departments and and the city and I appreciate the uh vote of confidence for the uh um the renomination and election as the vice chair. I hope I'll be able to
convince the uh person that did not vote for me that I will serve that person well. >> Indeed. >> For those that have voted and those that didn't. [laughter] >> Indeed. >> Thank you. >> Uh thank you, Mr. Chair. All right. Uh
member Wilson, please. >> Just great to be serving. >> All right. Thank you. Uh, member Brown, >> I too would like to thank um the code enforcement workers for the hard work
that you do. As I peruse through Okoi, I see you guys are riding around in your trucks working or parked somewhere on a break because this heat is hot out here. And I really appreciate seeing Okoi show
up and wait here while we make these decisions. I really appreciate you guys. Thank you so much. >> Excellent. U Mr. Cruz, >> no comments. >> No comments. Sergeant Rodriguez,
>> I wanted to echo member Brown's um sentiments. I am very proud of the work that the code enforcement team has been working on over the past few months. As you all know, I just came on board in March and
we've done nothing but progress every single step of the way and has nothing to do with me. It's everything to do with them. So, I you know, I applaud them on their efforts and we're going to continue forward and um let's go Spain.
[snorts] Attorney Burton, no comments. All right. Well, geez, there's a lot of accolades that have been going around. So, I I uh I mirror all the ones that have been put out. The code enforcement officers are doing a great job. And you know, u all
these cases are well because they're here up here. Uh Sergeant Rodriguez, I know you've only been with us a short period of time, but I'll tell you what, it really feels like this team is coming together. This is the best uh best I've seen all year long. So, thank you very much for all your hard work, too, as
well. And again, Maya, thank you for all your help, too. Uh, everybody, don't forget to watch your emails when she sends them to you. She wants to get responded back sooner than later. Okay? So, uh, even though she didn't ask me to do that, I know she wants that to
happen. So, um uh I know that uh um I think you guys have seen the the flags outside run at half mass for um uh Senator Lindsey Graham. So, you know, everybody is paying their respects, which is which is a nice thing to do.
So, um I appreciate u your confidence in me in uh chairing this board. I appreciate that. Um, so I really do thank you board members for for keeping me here uh for as long as I'm here. And uh and again uh my my right arm over
here, he's doing a great job, too. So um officers, do you guys have any questions or anything that you guys want to say? Officer Katie >> Laughler, Officer Toby. >> No. Okay, guys. All right. Well, we've been here long enough, so let's get out
of here. Meeting adjourned. Red.