The roll call. >> Chair Bander absent. Vice Chair Lewis >> present. >> Member Schultz >> absent. Member Smalden absent. Member Fernandez >> here. >> Member Brickram >> here. Member Whittle
>> here. Yep. >> Quorum is met. >> Thank you. We have the swearing in of the officers of any witnesses that will participate in this evening meeting. >> Officers and anybody who wishes to speak, please stand and raise your right hand. Do you and each of you solemnly
swear and affirm that the testimony you're about to present today shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? All right, you may sit down. Good evening. Um, Sergeant Juan Munoz with the Aquoy Police Department. We have one case that came into compliance,
2025 01838, which is 1411 Prairie Lake and one case that is being continued to November 20th, 2025. That'll be case number 2025 0122
611 North Lakewood. A motion to accept the consent agenda is read. >> So moved. >> Have a motion on the floor by member Fernandez. The consent agenda is read. Is it seconded? >> I'll second.
>> Seconded by member Whittle. All in favor yes. Yeah, mine mine hasn't loaded. >> Oh, it's on. >> Here. >> Oh, >> thanks.
Sorry about that. Motion carries. This time we have public comments but uh considering there no one in attendance we just pass over the public comments. Um first case
Case number 2025-02749. >> Good evening. Case number 2025-02749 [Music] 2525 dovetail on 86 2025 in response to a citizen complaint. This
officer did observe at the above mentioned address violation 168-4 vehicle parked in and yard. Think we have a picture of it somewhere.
Yeah. Should come up here a moment. There we go. Okay. On the same day, the violation was certified mills to the above vision address. The notice for violation of 168-4.
the notice provided until 8:21 to correct said violation. On fifth on 10:1525, the property was re reinspected and was found in non-compliance.
On 106, a statement of hearing notice to this meeting was posted location and posted at city hall and sent out certified mail. As of today, the property is still not in compliance. the city's recommendations of seven days
to come into compliance or $50 per day thereafter. >> So, no communication with the the resident or anything? I've I've dealt with these guys for a while and they're just they're gonna do what they want to do.
They're not going to take care of it. >> Okay. >> Thank you. >> Questions motion Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion that in case number 2025-02749, the respondant be found in violation of
code as cited as of August 21st, 2025 and be given until October 24th, 2025 to come into compliance or be fined $50 per day per violation until found in
compliance. Have a motion on the floor by member Fernandez that in case number 2025-02749 that the respondent be found in violation of the code of cited as of August 21st 2025 be given until October
245 come into compliance will be fined $50 per day for violation until found in compiance is Is it seconded by anyone? >> Second move. >> Second by member.
>> Okay. All in favor again. Thank you. lit. >> There we go. >> Yeah. Case is number >> Toby >> Toby.
>> Okay. Case number 2025-03159 1324 Vicers Lake. Actually, this property is in compliance. The property was cited on 9325. came into compliance on 91125, but this property is a re repeat
offender. So, the city is seeking fine of $100 for the seven days not into in compliance because they've um they were brought to the board on 1024 24.
They were cited on 72525 for the same issues. Um, officer Toby, have have they so you said they were brought to the board. So, did the case come before this board? So, they didn't come into compliance before they came before the board.
>> The case back in 10242 24 was brought before the board. They came into compliance afterwards. >> Okay. >> Then officer Laughofner on 72525 wrote them up again. and they came into compliance and then I came back on 9325 for the same issue.
>> Okay. And then it's always the exact same issue, the loss. Okay. >> Thank you. >> Overgrown property. >> I have a question. >> Question. >> So this is the second violation that they had within a year.
>> Yes and no. the one in July actually came into compliance before the the hearing >> and then this one. >> Okay. >> The last one was um 102424. >> Thank you. So, Officer Toby, are you requesting us
to find the um the residents in violation compliant and no fines for the in case they are repeat offender? No, they already are in compliance. >> They're in compliance. They're getting fined for the seven days that they were not in compliance since they're repeat
offender. So the $100 is for the seven days that they were not in compliance. >> Okay. But they're in compliance right now. >> They're in compliance now. Yes. >> So it would be before they came to this board right now this case.
>> Yes. >> Okay. And was there any um sorry Mr. Chair is was there any um conversation communication with the residents at all or >> I haven't spoken to them. They haven't reached out to me at all. >> Okay. Thank you.
>> But they're in compliance now. >> They're in compliance now. Yes. >> Has there been notification sent to them in the past for the violations? >> Oh, yes. Yes. Okay. that you were compliance >> from
9325 till sorry >> 9325 to 9 910 they came it was reinspected on the 11th and it was already taken care of then >> yes 7 Peace.
>> And Mr. Sure. If I may, Officer Toby, because there was no communication, we don't know if these people are tenants and not the actual owners of the property. Is there any indication of that at all? >> No, sir. >> Oh, that's what I thought. Thank you. Is there anyone who would like to make?
>> Well, I know I discussed with the board. I mean, I know Officer Toby and the city has requested $100 per day. >> No, >> that's $700. >> No, sir. Excuse me. It's one flat $100. >> Oh, it's one flat $100. >> One one flat $100, not $100 per day. >> Yeah.
>> Okay. That's >> Okay. >> And is that is that like a statute thing because of the repeat offense or is that just >> the before? >> Now it's a it's considered a repeat offender. So, yes.
Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion that in the case 0 2025 03159 um that the um respondent be found in violation of the code um for lack of
compliance from September 3rd through September 10th of 2025 um for a fine of $100. for the violations of second. >> Yes, sir. Motion on the floor
by member Whittle that this case case number 2025-03159 found violation I second it. There's one. No. Apologies.
>> It's okay. It's okay. >> No, thank you. >> No comments, chair. Thank you. >> No, thank you all for attending the >> adjourn the meeting. >> So moved.
See you. Thank you.