WEBVTT

METADATA
Video-Count: 1
Video-1: youtube.com/watch?v=nWrJC4a7cqg

Part: 1

1
00:01:59.760 --> 00:02:58.680
Mhm. >> Good evening. It's It's 7:33. I'd like to call to order the June 25th, 2026 Old Bridge Township Planning Board.

2
00:02:58.680 --> 00:03:20.920
Please rise for the pledge. >> I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> Uh roll call, Daniel, please.

3
00:03:20.920 --> 00:03:37.000
>> Mr. DePama? >> Here. >> Mr. Lanning? >> Here. >> Mr. Talamo? >> Here. >> Ms. Cannon? >> Here. >> Mr. Renner is absent. Mr. Petty? >> Here. >> Ms. Masella? >> Here. >> Mr. McIsaac? >> Here. >> Mr. Brennan? >> Here. >> Mr. Ferrara? >> Here. >> And Chairman Latour? >> Here.

4
00:03:37.000 --> 00:03:52.040
>> Okay. Swearing in now. >> Uh you know, I I I don't know what's the technical testimony, but mine's to swear you in anyways. Do you swear or affirm the testimony you're going to give this evening is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Thank you. >> Okay, thank you. Uh first on the

5
00:03:52.040 --> 00:04:10.640
is consistency review amending Township code chapter 250-6, definitions, and chapter 240-42, prohibited uses. >> So, good evening board members. Um, this is an ordinance that was

6
00:04:10.640 --> 00:04:27.080
introduced by uh, the council and um, it is specifically to um, prohibit or ban data centers in the Township. Um, there are data centers are currently not a

7
00:04:27.080 --> 00:04:43.680
permitted use in any of the zones except for three places. Um, it's the I3 and the I10 zone, which is under Segme's redevelopment plan, but those two um, sites have already received approval

8
00:04:43.680 --> 00:04:59.200
from the planning board and they're not for a data center, it's for a warehouse. One of the site is an active construction site, the other one is going through compliance review. The third site that uh, allows data centers

9
00:04:59.200 --> 00:05:17.040
is our own crossroads property, uh, but that's currently under litigation. Uh, so we can't really do much, but by adding it in the prohibited uses section and adding a definition to it, it just reaffirms the council's policy and the

10
00:05:17.040 --> 00:05:33.640
Township policy to disallow um, data centers in the Township. So, um, I believe um, the policy and the ordinance is not inconsistent with the master plan. The master plan never

11
00:05:33.640 --> 00:05:50.280
really uh, promoted or allowed um, or encouraged uh, data centers within the Township. >> Okay, thank you. Uh, any questions? >> No, no, I'll just say so two council meetings ago, it was brought up that we

12
00:05:50.280 --> 00:06:07.440
should do a potential moratorium. I don't know if any of you watched it, my I think my exact comments were, "Let's stop kicking the can down the road and just ban it now." So, and as I've said now in two council meetings, and as Veena just said, this is really just reinforcing what our current

13
00:06:07.440 --> 00:06:22.800
um zoning already is, that it's not allowed. Obviously, we have a couple that are within redevelopment plans, not not within the zone itself. It's not permittable in the zone. It's only in there for the redevelopment, but as Veena said, Segme has warehouses that it's looking to go there, not data

14
00:06:22.800 --> 00:06:39.320
centers that they're approved for. And then the Crossroads project, that is what it that is what it is right now. And um like like Veena said, that's in the litigation, so we can't really talk too much about it. Um but from even from that, my understanding, no data center is looking to go there because

15
00:06:39.320 --> 00:06:56.919
there's not enough power and/or water to supply any level of data center. And that data center, if I'm not mistaken, was put in there back in '04. >> So, 2008, the Crossroads plan was amended uh to add data centers.

16
00:06:56.919 --> 00:07:12.680
Uh but since then, there have be been at least two to three developers who have come in with a proposal for a data center and then backed out because of uh lack of electricity. Um so,

17
00:07:12.680 --> 00:07:30.160
and if if you may recall, even when Regency Center went in, Regency Center as well as Segme struggled to get power. Um data centers require immense power, so we don't have that capacity

18
00:07:30.160 --> 00:07:44.960
either. So, um >> And the the data centers that were discussed at the time, if I'm not mistaken, were more along the lines of the backup contingency sites for for the financial services companies, right? So,

19
00:07:44.960 --> 00:08:01.120
post post-9/11, there was a need for folks to have backup sites in New Jersey, and a lot of a lot of places are. It was never meant for those AI I mean, back in 2008, I don't even know if anyone knew what AI data center would have been.

20
00:08:01.120 --> 00:08:17.240
Even then, that that that site I don't even think it's large enough for what they would look to do because of all the constraints on the land. So, like again, like I said, this is really just a us putting our foot down and saying, "This is our zoning. Now we have an ordinance. If you want something,

21
00:08:17.240 --> 00:08:33.840
it's not happening. Go find somewhere else to go do it." >> Okay, thank you. Uh any questions on my left? Okay. Well, we're looking for a motion to uh >> I'll move it. >> What's up? >> Second.

22
00:08:35.039 --> 00:08:50.680
>> Mr. Palmer? >> Yes. >> Mr. Lenning? >> Yes. >> Mr. Clama? >> Yes. >> Ms. Cannon? >> Yes. >> Mr. Petty? >> Yes. >> Ms. Masella? >> Yes. >> Mr. McIsaac? >> Yes. >> Mr. Brennan? >> Yes. >> Chairman Latour? >> Yes. >> Okay. Uh before we go to the resolutions, we're going to jump to the

23
00:08:50.680 --> 00:09:07.080
uh application 53-2024P HB Warehouse LLC major preliminary site plan with a C variance, uh turn it over to Mr. Sedilla. >> Uh thank you. Uh this application is going to is being adjourned and carried

24
00:09:07.080 --> 00:09:25.200
to the August 27th uh 2026 regular planning board meeting. Uh it will be held here uh rather than at the senior center. Um so, any member of the public here for that application or watching online, uh please be advised that that application is being carried uh to the

25
00:09:25.200 --> 00:09:42.360
August 27th planning board meeting here at the uh town hall, and no further notice will be provided. So, this is your notice, uh if you're watching at home, uh that that is the new date for this application, the public hearing on it. And if any other meeting or special meeting is scheduled for this, that will

26
00:09:42.360 --> 00:10:12.520
require public notice. But if this goes forward on the 27th, no further public notice will be provided. >> Okay, thank you. >> Well, I mean, I I I don't want to get into the specifics, but I will say that just so the public's knowledge that this adjournment is not being requested on

27
00:10:12.520 --> 00:10:28.440
behalf of the applicant, it's being requested on behalf of the board. >> Okay, thank you, Mr. Sedillo. Okay, we're going to jump to the minutes of June 11th, 2026. Any >> Make a motion. >> Okay.

28
00:10:28.440 --> 00:10:43.440
>> Second. >> Mr. DePalma? >> Yes. >> Mr. Lenning? >> Yes. >> Mr. Talamo? >> Yes. >> Ms. Cannon? >> Yes. >> Mr. Petty? >> Yes. >> Ms. Micela? >> Abstain. >> Mr. McIsaac? >> Yes. >> Mr. Brennan? >> Yes. >> Chairman Lawlor? >> Yes.

29
00:10:43.440 --> 00:11:03.000
>> Okay, next resolutions, 0-2026P, Wawa Inc. Do I have a motion? >> Move it. >> Second. >> Mr. DePalma? >> Yes. >> Mr. Lenning? >> Yes. >> Mr. Talamo? >> Yes. >> Ms. Cannon? >> Yes. >> Mr. Petty?

30
00:11:03.000 --> 00:11:18.200
>> Yes. >> Ms. Micela? >> Yes. >> Mr. McIsaac? >> Yes. >> Mr. Brennan? >> Yes. >> And Chairman Lawlor? >> Yes. >> Okay, next 53-2025P, Walmart Real Estate Business Trust. I need a resolution. I mean, a a motion,

31
00:11:18.200 --> 00:11:34.240
sorry. >> Move it. >> Second. >> Mr. DePalma? >> Yes. >> Mr. Lenning? >> Yes. >> Mr. Talamo? >> Yes. >> Ms. Cannon? >> Yes. >> Mr. Petty? >> Yes. >> Ms. Micela? >> Yes. >> Mr. McIsaac? >> Yes. >> Mr. Brennan? >> Yes. >> Chairman Lawlor? >> Yes. Okay, next is resolution

32
00:11:34.240 --> 00:11:49.480
authorizing the Township Planner to conduct a preliminary investigation to determine whether certain properties qualify for designation as an area in need of non-condemnation redevelopment pursuant

33
00:11:49.480 --> 00:12:07.000
to NJSA 40 A colon 12 A -1. Vena? >> Sure. Um Thank you board members. Um just to give you a little background. I started working on this

34
00:12:07.000 --> 00:12:23.360
7 years ago um because of the high level of vacancy in um the shopping center that I call the gold shopping center, but but there are a couple of stores there.

35
00:12:23.360 --> 00:12:39.080
Um the advantage of this is it is in close proximity to our Old Bridge commuter parking lot. There is something that NJDOT offers uh if you are within half a mile radius

36
00:12:39.080 --> 00:12:55.320
of an bus terminus. And in talking to NJ Transit, I've always heard that this bus line has one of the highest riderships. It is comparable to even a train. Um

37
00:12:55.320 --> 00:13:12.960
for areas like this, a township could pursue a transit village designation. And what that does is it's a process. You go through a area investigation study, then you write a redevelopment plan for it. And once the plan is

38
00:13:12.960 --> 00:13:27.880
written and submitted, there's a document that goes to NJDOT. There is a panel that reviews the document. It takes almost 18 months, uh but after 18 months, you're designated as

39
00:13:27.880 --> 00:13:45.640
an transit village. And what that does is it opens you up to numerous state fundings for infrastructure improvements and you know, pedestrians, sidewalks, and bicyclists because it's supposed to

40
00:13:45.640 --> 00:14:02.120
be a mixed-use development where people actually are not auto-dependent, they're dependent on the bus that is easily available, bus service that is easily available. So,

41
00:14:02.120 --> 00:14:18.080
I started the work 7 years ago. We had a pre-application meeting with NJDOT, NJ Transit, but unfortunately, that's when COVID hit. And the bus ridership went down 2 years ago. DOT reached out to me

42
00:14:18.080 --> 00:14:33.839
asking, am I still pursuing? And I was. I was just waiting for the right time. >> [sighs and gasps] >> Luckily for us, we were dealing with the fourth-round affordable housing obligation. And when

43
00:14:33.839 --> 00:14:52.080
the new regs came in, they incentivized transit-oriented developments in the sense that the state is encouraging mixed-use or higher densities along these bus routes where

44
00:14:52.080 --> 00:15:09.920
there's easy access to public transport. And the design of these areas is not purely auto-dependent. In 4 years ago, FTA granted they they offered a grant to NJ Transit

45
00:15:09.920 --> 00:15:25.520
to do a study along the 17-mile route between Howell and Old Bridge Township. And they actually the idea was to study all these nodes and come up with a vision or a plan

46
00:15:25.520 --> 00:15:43.000
because NJ Transit has a plan to have a bus rapid system between these two townships. There are 17 stops. The Old Bridge being the last stop or the first stop going towards New York

47
00:15:43.000 --> 00:15:58.400
City. So, the timing was perfect and we thought we'll take advantage of this to get some affordable units out of it because transit-oriented development generally requires much higher density,

48
00:15:58.400 --> 00:16:14.400
but it is along the highways. It's bus dependent, so it will have minimum impact. Plus, it's at a gateway entrance of our township. If you see even in that aerial imagery, there is a huge parking

49
00:16:14.400 --> 00:16:29.800
lot between in front of BJ's, Aldi, Kohl's, which is almost like 90% empty at all times of the day. That can absorb in more development. They could have shared parking

50
00:16:29.800 --> 00:16:46.360
arrangements and people who live there will take advantage of the bus stop. But, this is again the first step to get a transit village designation, significant public participation is required because NJ Transit

51
00:16:46.360 --> 00:17:03.839
got that funding, they already had three No, they had two public hearing a public uh shreds wherein public was invited to offer their opinion and there were a lot of some a lot of good suggestions, a lot of priorities

52
00:17:03.839 --> 00:17:19.280
that were the a list of priorities that were identified. So, we just are taking that work forward by um asking the planning board to

53
00:17:19.280 --> 00:17:35.920
assign me the duty to go and conduct an area investigation study for this area. If the area qualifies, then the next step would be a redevelopment plan that would be an ordinance. >> Okay, thank you. Uh,

54
00:17:35.920 --> 00:17:52.520
any questions to my right? >> Yeah. So, is this is the uh Sorry. Is the focus of this to get more parking? Um, more commercial, more housing, or is it a combination?

55
00:17:52.520 --> 00:18:08.040
>> It's a combination. It's a combination. It's mixed-use, so a commercial that directly caters to the residents, not a destination commercial, but commercial that really supports the residences that

56
00:18:08.040 --> 00:18:24.560
live there and take the bus to commute to the city. >> Okay. So, just for my own sake, who's parking there now because that lot is full? >> The lot the commuter parking lots are full. So, there are people

57
00:18:24.560 --> 00:18:39.360
>> lot is supposed to was over by Home Depot, but that's not anymore and >> No. So, there is one lot that is owned by Old Bridge Township, which is along Mallette Drive. >> Right.

58
00:18:39.360 --> 00:18:55.360
>> There is a parking area behind KFC, but that's a temporary arrangement. Casey, correct me if I'm wrong, but we closed down the commuter parking lot on Jake Brown Road, which Brunetti was leasing.

59
00:18:55.360 --> 00:19:13.560
So, that was again transferred to here and but but Regency Center was required to contribute $150,000 for this parking. So, I'm hoping that at some point there is a parking garage and

60
00:19:13.560 --> 00:19:29.680
all these developers who come and redevelop the area might be able to get us a commuter parking garage which at nights can be used by these residents. So, it will be like a shared parking arrangement. >> So, the commercial aspect of it would

61
00:19:29.680 --> 00:19:45.400
would that be expanded or improved or >> Yes, it would be. It would need a redesign of this whole area. Probably, Malden Way will become like a boulevard with, you know, restaurants and res-

62
00:19:45.400 --> 00:20:00.160
commercial uses on the ground floor with residential on the top. So, somebody who is going to work and comes back and have a slice of pizza or people who live there will have like personal services, medical offices.

63
00:20:00.160 --> 00:20:17.040
So, the idea is somebody who lives far away is not going to come here unless they're coming for a good restaurant or something. But, it's mostly for people who live there. You're creating a sustainable development so that people are walking. It's It's more meant to be

64
00:20:17.040 --> 00:20:33.240
a pedestrian-friendly, walkable neighborhood. >> Okay. Thank [clears throat] you. >> Thank you. Any other comments or questions to my left? Okay.

65
00:20:33.240 --> 00:20:50.600
Oh, go ahead, Ed. >> Is there any benefit to along Route 9 like McDonald's or the you you have also the car dealership? Is Is there any benefit to those existing stores? >> Yeah, I mean, when you are in an

66
00:20:50.600 --> 00:21:06.040
designated area, an area that is designated as an area need of redevelopment, they can take advantage. They could redevelop their sites, too. And make it better. There could be a developer who comes in and

67
00:21:06.040 --> 00:21:22.560
buys out the McDonald's or buys the Honda dealership to create a cohesive design that can be accessed from the letter which will become like a parallel road. See the issue with these this shopping center, right? This is a

68
00:21:22.560 --> 00:21:38.960
classic example of the planning of the 70s when shopping centers were developed, but they were so far set back that visibility was an issue. Why is the Kohl's shopping center or those that

69
00:21:38.960 --> 00:21:55.800
strip mall failing? It's because it's not visible. Other than seeing the huge freestanding pylon sign when you're traversing on Route 9, you don't really know they exist. So, the newer planning works actually

70
00:21:55.800 --> 00:22:10.000
opposite. You want buildings to be closer and the parking to the to the back so that the buildings are more visible. You're more attracted to go and visit those spaces. So, if somebody

71
00:22:10.000 --> 00:22:26.720
comes in and buys out McDonald's or DCH or even they themselves want to redevelop the site and take advantage, there could be better connectivity between the Kohl's shopping center at the back

72
00:22:26.720 --> 00:22:47.080
and these front uses. >> Okay. Right now, there's no access between McDonald's and those parking lots community parking lots behind there. >> A pedestrian connection is there, but not vehicular. >> make that connection and also for the car dealership and any other

73
00:22:47.080 --> 00:23:02.720
>> Correct. >> There'll be the intersection of different connections of roads and parking lots. >> Yes. Yes, and that is the beauty of having a transit-oriented development. Typically, there are like cross access easements, shared parking easements so that

74
00:23:02.720 --> 00:23:21.520
you know that whole area can be accessed by anybody. >> Okay, thank you Ed. Um any other questions, comments? Okay, I'm looking for a motion to accept this. >> Yeah, and and just to clarify for the board, right now the resolution before

75
00:23:21.520 --> 00:23:37.200
you is just to authorize Vina to do the preliminary investigation. It may turn out that these properties don't qualify or not all of them do qualify and then we'll have to figure out what the the next step would be, but this is just this resolution is only at this point is to have Vina uh do that investigation. >> I'll move it.

76
00:23:37.200 --> 00:23:59.840
>> I'll second. >> Mr. DePalma? >> Yes. >> Mr. Lenning? >> Yes. >> Mr. Talamo? >> Yes. >> Ms. Cannon? >> Yes. >> Mr. Petty? >> Yes. >> Ms. Micela? >> Yes. >> Mr. McIsaac? >> Yes. >> Mr. Brennan? >> Yes. >> And Chairman Lawlor? >> Yes.

77
00:24:00.440 --> 00:24:17.040
>> Okay. I believe that's it. I'm looking for a motion to adjourn if there's no other business. >> I'll move it. >> Second. >> Second. >> Second. >> All in favor? >> Aye. >> Aye. >> Aye. >> Aye.

78
00:24:19.356 --> 00:25:19.640
>> [snorts] >> Mhm.

