WEBVTT

METADATA
Video-Count: 1
Video-1: youtube.com/watch?v=5ewqSsqzAyw

Part: 1

1
00:00:06.040 --> 00:00:45.360
What's that? Right. But, bye. I didn't know they left, but I had heard from I'll ask him what's wrong with these people. That's the they don't trust the city employees, so But, also

2
00:00:45.360 --> 00:01:27.040
I don't think it has to be. If we can treat that we can stop violating something that's No, maybe we should do that. They have fun on that. Hi. Is anybody still repeating their Bible? Are you still living at your mom's house? >> Okay.

3
00:01:27.040 --> 00:01:47.080
>> if there's no struggle with your dog. But, there's lots of We need lots of practice. sports history. I don't think my husband thinks anything of it. I don't know what he thinks. The very next day she sends this video.

4
00:01:47.080 --> 00:02:33.360
Right to the Here she comes. But, you know, I love her. So, I don't know what to do about that. And my sister had the same thing with her dog. Her dog the price Yes, I totally just wanted to coach Say hey real quick.

5
00:02:47.681 --> 00:04:25.987
>> [laughter] >> I saw. >> [laughter] >> Yeah, summer meetings. Yeah, summer meetings. I'm going to have quite a few this year. >> I'm going to have quite a few this year. >> Uh-huh. Oh, yeah. You guys >> Cuz there's no >> [laughter]

6
00:05:07.800 --> 00:05:30.000
>> You going to do the do one presentation but in the four public hearings? Let me ask you this. Do we do one presentation, they do one public hearing? What do you mean before the I just thought I would ask. You never know. Okay. Well, before we start, I'll

7
00:05:30.000 --> 00:06:06.920
I'll mention that, too. >> That's so not what we talked about. >> Okay. >> I started acting weird tonight. I had a really bad case of insomnia yesterday. And so, my wife looked at me like a dog all

8
00:06:06.920 --> 00:06:42.440
weekend long. Thank you. I I had a few moments today where I sort of spaced out. I'm doing everything I I've had it before. It's not the first time I've had it happen. Okay. Sounds good. Okay. Actually,

9
00:06:42.440 --> 00:07:36.600
can I show you something? The mirror The mirror has food. I I I made a stupid comment. And basically, It's It's not over here. >> Mr. Britton, I want to make sure you can hear us okay. If you can unmute your mic.

10
00:07:37.080 --> 00:09:12.880
>> Oh, wait. I'm fine. Excuse me. >> Can you give us a quick mic check, Mr. Britain? 10-4, we hear you. You can mute the mic if you like. That was good. That's why I looked at you know, what I did was I looked at over here where it says this is what a special event is.

11
00:09:12.880 --> 00:11:43.880
I said, "Okay. Well, if it's a non-profit non-profit and it's this stuff here, then I don't know." >> So anyway, I've got this. It's It's available at the front desk. But yeah, please do. It's going to >> I was sitting here going, "Well, I don't

12
00:11:43.880 --> 00:12:08.640
hear it." Well, my hearing's gone anyway, so I think his change is already in here. >> It sounds like this one. Actually, it's a >> Okay. I heard he's a Okay. >> Okay. >> I I would I think he's here. I'm going >> He's going to speak about >> He's going to speak it.

13
00:12:08.640 --> 00:12:28.040
Also, he he brought this up. Okay. Okay. >> But he's calling in. Where's he at? He's calling in from the Where's he been? >> Uh he's gone like a sabbatical for 2 weeks. He's gradually making his way to Wisconsin.

14
00:12:28.040 --> 00:13:21.280
>> Okay. >> I thought I was later than I am. >> No, you're good. >> I'm I'm I'm all right. I think we're on. Check, check. You guys had a good vacation? >> Yeah, we had a great time. Just needed to like unplug on a mountain. >> Yeah, nice.

15
00:13:21.280 --> 00:13:39.680
>> Yeah, so >> Where about in Colorado were you? >> We did a big loop. So, we flew into Denver, went up to the Rocky Mountains, then went out to Grand Junction. >> As long as it doesn't fall on you and hurt you. >> All right, but you never have the >> Get the You have to probably don't put

16
00:13:39.680 --> 00:14:04.080
it on that. Ah, yeah, don't put it on there. Yeah, don't leave it on that thing. Yeah. >> [clears throat] >> I do like the dog I feel like it's we're like close to them leaving. I know, right? Like we we can all put some like little chickens balanced.

17
00:14:04.080 --> 00:14:21.880
It's a good horse chicken. >> It could be yours. >> It could be. >> There's only No. [laughter] Somebody bought it. >> No, but I I love it. >> I think all but one are for sale. >> Which one's not?

18
00:14:21.880 --> 00:14:44.080
>> One of them says not for sale over there. >> Wow. >> The the teacher told me the student the student Yeah, wanted to keep it, yeah. >> That is pretty cool. >> I like the City of Loveland pins that we got now. >> [laughter] >> I like that the coin was made in the

19
00:14:44.080 --> 00:15:04.560
United States. Yeah, that's nice. I've got almost one I've got >> Yeah, you picked them up one day and you were like, "What is >> What is this?" Got two notepads this week, I guess. Guess I'm going to take a lot of notes.

20
00:15:14.839 --> 00:15:47.880
>> And my my official pen where I put that I broke the topper out. >> Okay. Yeah, we should find out. We can put it in the report. >> Yep. >> Yep. >> Good evening, everyone. Welcome to Oviedo City Council Chambers. If you could all please rise for the Pledge of

21
00:15:47.880 --> 00:16:18.520
Allegiance. >> I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> Please join me in a moment of silence. I'd like to call our meeting to order.

22
00:16:18.520 --> 00:16:46.000
It is June 15th at approximately 6:30 p.m. and we have four members of council in person and one online, so we are all present. We're going to start out with our first item, which is the ceremonial item, so we're going to go on down and I'll hand this over to the mayor. >> Good evening, Oviedo. Tonight is a very

23
00:16:46.000 --> 00:17:03.280
special night here at Oviedo City Hall because we have the state champions for softball from our very own Hagerty High School in the house. Want to invite in Coach Keeling so he can introduce the team and give us a rundown of all of their momentous successes this year.

24
00:17:03.280 --> 00:17:18.920
>> Thank you. >> Thank you. Thank you. If I take as long as I want, it's going to end up like one of my post-game speeches. All right. Um first off, Ms. Mayor, thank you. City Council, thank you guys for having us. Uh very proud of this season. So, to recap, uh we won the 7A state

25
00:17:18.920 --> 00:17:37.080
championship. Thank goodness it was local. THAT WAS NICE. >> [applause] >> UH TO TRY TO TELL THE STORY about what happened this year, I think you got to go all the way back to what happened a year ago, last year. We had a second straight final four for the team, second straight second straight year of playing in the state

26
00:17:37.080 --> 00:17:52.720
championship game. We just happened to go through a 7-hour rain delay last season. We ended up playing at midnight, and the game ended right before 2:00 a.m. So, for the girls to have the resolve to set a goal, to come all the way back 365 days later, a whole year later, and set

27
00:17:52.720 --> 00:18:07.920
a goal to make it back to the state championship, very proud of what they accomplished. Uh 27 total wins, a third straight district championship, a second straight regional championship, two final fours, two state championship games, and one title. So, the real thanks is to these girls

28
00:18:07.920 --> 00:18:28.927
right here. So, I'm going to introduce each one of them, starting with Mattingly Klein. She's our shortstop. >> [applause] >> Bree Rodammer, she was a utility player, catcher, infielder. >> [applause] >> Emily Wilkie, outfielder.

29
00:18:28.927 --> 00:18:51.198
>> [applause] >> Riley Richards, outfielder. Janning Udine, outfielder. >> [applause] >> Uh Campbell Downing, our catcher and first baseman. >> [applause] >> Uh Sammy Gartner, catcher and outfielder.

30
00:18:51.198 --> 00:19:21.440
>> [applause] >> Uh Addie Dilger, one of our pitchers. >> [applause] >> Addie Bell, outfielder and catcher. >> [applause] >> Uh one of this year's team a junior infielder, Alaina Gallagher. >> [applause] >> Uh, outfielder infielder Michaela

31
00:19:21.440 --> 00:19:48.838
Bielenson. >> [applause] >> Uh, pitcher outfielder Tori Sambell. >> [applause] >> All right, the real stars of this season, the 2026 class, our seniors. Starting off with Alyssa Gutierrez, outfielder. >> [applause] >> Uh, Riley Oakley, outfielder.

32
00:19:48.838 --> 00:20:17.920
>> [applause] >> Another one of this year's team captains, senior third baseman Nikki Thompson. >> [applause] >> Outfielder Abby Fitch. >> [applause] >> Infielder pitcher Nisa Fatsinger Rodriguez. >> [applause] >> Uh, and then a head coach is only as

33
00:20:17.920 --> 00:20:34.960
good as the staff that he brings on, so I want to take the opportunity to announce my coaching staff, as well as they're just as much a part of this as anybody. So, we'll start with the longest tenured assistant coach, Wendy AC Seaman. >> [applause and cheering] >> Haggerty's

34
00:20:34.960 --> 00:21:02.240
Olivia O'Quinn, state championships. >> [applause] >> And then Brooks. >> [applause] >> And Maya Murray. >> All right, and with that, we're going to the edge, because this is about you guys. So, y'all come to the middle, we're going to the edges. I want to get a picture with everybody. And if you

35
00:21:02.240 --> 00:21:58.600
have like an official order you go in, and there's a two row situation happening, that probably would be awesome. >> [laughter] >> Let's give them another round of applause. And also, seniors, thank you again for coming back after your

36
00:21:58.600 --> 00:22:53.640
graduation, so we could celebrate you along with the whole team. Well done, ladies. >> [applause] >> You good? >> Yep. >> Okay. Um moving right along, we're going to go on to your second order of business, which is the approval of the minutes. What is the pleasure of council?

37
00:22:53.640 --> 00:23:08.600
>> I'll make a motion to approve the minutes for May 18th, 2026 regular session. >> Second. We have a motion and a second. Any discussion? >> None. >> Okay. All those in favor, please signify by saying I. >> I. >> The motion >> I.

38
00:23:08.600 --> 00:23:25.760
>> We got We got all of us. All right, we'll move on to public comment. I do not have any written requests to speak other than for specific items. Is there anyone looking to address council at this time? If so, please come up to the podium. Hearing none, I will close public

39
00:23:25.760 --> 00:23:41.040
comment and move on to the consent agenda. What is the pleasure of council? >> I move we adopt item number five from the consent agenda and move item number four Uh or or I don't mind just discussing it. But there's a potential I might not vote for number four. So, I guess we should

40
00:23:41.040 --> 00:23:58.000
remove that. So, I move that we approve item number four on the consent agenda. >> Did Are you pulling item number five? >> Yes, and we make No, we So, approve item number five and move item number four to item number 13A.

41
00:23:58.000 --> 00:24:15.240
>> Okay, so item number four, resolution number 4733-26 is going to go down to 13A. >> Hold on a second. I have the wrong meeting up here. >> Okay. >> Sorry. >> So, now we've got the consent has just

42
00:24:15.240 --> 00:24:35.400
>> I'm still good right now. Thanks. >> has item number five. It That's a motion. Is there a second? >> Uh Yes, second. >> Any discussion? >> No. >> Councilmember Britain?

43
00:24:36.320 --> 00:24:59.800
>> I'm good. Thank you. >> Okay. I'll ask the clerk to call the roll. >> Mayor Slayton? >> I. >> Councilmember Ott? >> I. >> Deputy Mayor Tucker? >> I. >> Councilmember Boteford? >> I. >> Councilmember Britain? >> I don't know if you heard me. I. >> We got it. Okay, the emotion uh uh

44
00:24:59.800 --> 00:25:15.960
carries. We are going to move on to item number six, which is our public hearing um ordinance number 1766. Mr. Bowes, would you read this by title only? >> Thank you very much, Deputy Mayor. This is ordinance number 1766, an ordinance of the city of Oviedo, Florida, amending the zoning map of the

45
00:25:15.960 --> 00:25:32.280
city of Oviedo concerning approximately 63.16 acres of land generally located on the west side of Eastridge Drive and north side of East Mitchell Hammock Road from planned unit development PUD to planned unit development PUD and approving a second amendment to

46
00:25:32.280 --> 00:25:48.520
Kingsbridge development agreement for the Kingsbridge planned unit development and providing for findings and legislative intent, implementing administrative actions, a savings provision, correction of scrivener's errors, conflicts, codification, severability, and an effective date. >> Thank you, Mr. Cobb. Would you provide a

47
00:25:48.520 --> 00:26:06.560
brief intro? >> Uh thank you, Deputy Mayor. Dr. Correa will be providing staff presentation. >> Good evening, Mayor, um Deputy Mayor, council members. So, um well, this is the public hearing um for the Kingsbridge PUD

48
00:26:06.560 --> 00:26:23.000
um Reformed Theological Seminary amendment. >> He stays. >> Okay. [laughter] >> He stays. I think we're good. Thanks. >> Okay. So, um next slide, please. So, this is ordinance 1766.

49
00:26:23.000 --> 00:26:39.400
Um so, this the request is to amend the city's official zoning map um to change the zoning district for approximately 63.16 acres located on the west side of Eastridge Drive and the north side of East Mitchell Hammock Road

50
00:26:39.400 --> 00:26:56.400
from PUD to PUD and approve a second amendment to the Kingsbridge um development agreement and approving also the CDP. Um the applicant is Derek Waters, P.E., from Catalyst Design Group. And next slide, please. So, the Kings

51
00:26:56.400 --> 00:27:11.360
Bridge was formerly approved as Oviedo Groves and that was approved in 1988. And these were the entitlements for residential, commercial, and office,

52
00:27:11.360 --> 00:27:28.680
and park. The parties were just Evans Groves and the the city of Oviedo back then. Next slide. In 1995, then the Kings Bridge PD was created. It was expanded for more

53
00:27:28.680 --> 00:27:46.320
parties in the agreement. That was when the Reformed Theological Seminary became a party of the agreement and the uses were also expanded to include multi-family and institutional. And that was in 1995.

54
00:27:46.320 --> 00:28:03.840
Next slide, please. This slide just By the way, I skipped all the historic, you know, uh uh perspective that we had in the previous presentation because we presented twice already. These slides

55
00:28:03.840 --> 00:28:20.920
a comparison um from what the entitlements were in 1988 to the Kings Bridge 1995 PD and what the RTS is requesting today.

56
00:28:20.920 --> 00:28:36.000
So, as you can see the multi-family was created in 1995 and it was to allow up to 120 units with a density of 20 unit 12 units per acre.

57
00:28:36.000 --> 00:28:53.880
And then institutional uses. What they are trying to do now is to limit the the still 120 units, but realized by 163 beds. So, they are self-limiting

58
00:28:53.880 --> 00:29:10.520
um um to beds now. And that is to be um developed in both tracks, F and H combined, up to 40 from this 163 up to 40 on um track F

59
00:29:10.520 --> 00:29:26.240
as a dormitory. Dormitory, and I will show that was a prohibited use under the 1995 um um development agreement. So, that is what they are requesting in addition to single two single-family um detached

60
00:29:26.240 --> 00:29:42.800
dwelling units, one in each lot in each tract, uh tract F and A H, um as the caretakers of the property. Next slide. >> So, this is the >> RTS um um

61
00:29:42.800 --> 00:29:59.440
property. Next slide. An overview. Uh again, the um hatched area is the RTS property. There are two lots. Lot one is at the one in the bottom. Lot three is the um uh one in the north.

62
00:29:59.440 --> 00:30:16.040
Next property Next slide, please. Um this is what um the DA in '95 um established um a maximum of 120 units, um commercial at maximum uh intensity of

63
00:30:16.040 --> 00:30:31.080
10,000 square feet per acre, not to exceed 163,000, office at a maximum of 16,000 uh square feet per acre, not to exceed 63,000, single-family residential um

64
00:30:31.080 --> 00:30:50.120
um lots not to exceed 800 units, and um for the tract H and F, the 12 dwelling units per acre, and uh and commercial um associated with that. But the note what is important is the note A that the

65
00:30:50.120 --> 00:31:06.480
um development agreement did not allow um dormitory and that's what they are requesting now. Next slide. Um so they are maintaining the cap for the multi-family. They're restricting the

66
00:31:06.480 --> 00:31:24.400
number of beds. Um they can do 163 beds in both tracks up to 40 in tract F and two detached single family units. Um one in each lot. Next slide. This is the

67
00:31:24.400 --> 00:31:40.960
impact on the traffic. Um the original agreement had 750 students uh planned. They never realized that number of students. They are dropping to 163 now.

68
00:31:40.960 --> 00:31:57.000
And um we use the off-campus student apartment IT category because there is no on-campus um student apartment category in the IT. And you can see the reduction in the

69
00:31:57.000 --> 00:32:13.520
number of trips. And because they are on campus then you imagine the reduction will be even greater because then you have internal um capture. Next slide, please. So the CDP is

70
00:32:13.520 --> 00:32:30.240
amended to reflect what is in the DA. Um there are no general changes on the general layout. We still don't have the footprint of the buildings they are going to going to bring. They are not going to be um major changes on the layout.

71
00:32:30.240 --> 00:32:46.680
Um they still have the same access points. So one is Bridge Drive and another one in Mitchell Hammock Road. The open space uh requirement is still the same at a minimum of 30%. The maximum building height is still at 35 ft.

72
00:32:46.680 --> 00:33:02.760
The protections on the conservation and the wetlands are the same. And we still don't have the the specific building layout. This will be addressed at the site development order level and there is adequate capacity for

73
00:33:02.760 --> 00:33:18.600
recreation, solid waste, and transportation to accommodate the proposed use. Next slide, please. This is just to talk about the fence discussion that we had in the previous um uh meeting

74
00:33:18.600 --> 00:33:32.840
this last um week. Staff managed to go on site. Um we had the deputy director going with the development review manager, another planner, the city manager went with the

75
00:33:32.840 --> 00:33:49.360
environmental consultant in in the um representatives from the RTS as well. And they went through, you know, some heavy vegetation to check and they located um this berm that is on red over

76
00:33:49.360 --> 00:34:04.520
there is earth and weir that serves as a physical barrier to prevent boat access. So, with that, we could confirm that the requirement that you have in the DA is still, you know, um

77
00:34:04.520 --> 00:34:20.560
um valid without the fence. And with that, the city has no objection to with the removal of the fence. And no change to the DA is required because the the berm still has uh provides the

78
00:34:20.560 --> 00:34:36.679
barrier that was um planned for. Next slide, please. So, the recommendation is for city council to um hold a public hearing and adopt ordinance 1766.

79
00:34:36.679 --> 00:34:52.760
And I'm available to answer any questions that you may have. >> I just had a quick one on the the fence. We confirmed it Did we confirm it with St. Johns? It's all >> So, I reached out to St. Johns, you know, 2 weeks ago and uh

80
00:34:52.760 --> 00:35:07.400
they did not have an issue with the with the with the fence. Um but there was a um comment from a resident that it might be a violation. It was never confirmed. I

81
00:35:07.400 --> 00:35:23.000
heard now, but I did not have any confirmation from St. Johns any written confirmation from St. Johns that it was not a violation and they had no objection for the removal. So, there is no violation of keeping the fence, but they have no objection of removing the

82
00:35:23.000 --> 00:35:38.800
fence. But that was verbal. It was not in writing. >> Got you. >> Uh Deputy Mayor, when we were out on site with the RTS representatives, they said they had also had conversations with St. Johns and they had no Uh St. Johns told them they had no objection to the fence as well.

83
00:35:38.800 --> 00:35:55.520
>> Okay. Perfect. Thank you. >> I I I recommended they get it in writing. >> Yeah. All right, any questions while she's up? >> So, did we ask the the owners of this property about the fence that, you know, should be removed or suggested that it

84
00:35:55.520 --> 00:36:12.400
doesn't need to be there? >> I think they are here. You can ask them directly in this >> going to ask them to come up next, so. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. And please just state your name. >> Uh Rob McAdams on staff at Reformed

85
00:36:12.400 --> 00:36:28.920
Theological Seminary, 1231 Reformation Drive. Uh the fence, yes. Um we I I did get verbal confirmation from St. Johns that the fence is not on their easement. They were not opposed to the removal of it. They did understand that portions of it

86
00:36:28.920 --> 00:36:44.760
had fallen down. That's where this whole conversation began. They gave me, again, verbally the okay to remove those as long as we were careful with any machinery. So, uh myself, a couple of our students, and some members of our staff were actually out there with uh the city staff uh last

87
00:36:44.760 --> 00:37:01.920
week, and then again this morning um with just hand tools cutting and removing and and ripping out as much as we could. Um so, I believe the photos that were presented at the last meeting uh of city council June 1st, um that whole area has been cleared up, and that that fallen fence has been removed. Um

88
00:37:01.920 --> 00:37:19.040
we're not opposed to removing the rest of the fence, either. So. >> Okay. And then, did you have any comments on what we're voting on here today? >> Uh I would say my only comment uh I just would sort of want to give some history, if I could, as to where this is coming from. We, when the property was being

89
00:37:19.040 --> 00:37:34.240
conceived and developed back in the mid-90s, virtually 100% of our students were moving to uh Central Florida and going to our campus full-time residentially. Um and so, that's the language that's in in the in the uh in the agreement right now is that we would

90
00:37:34.240 --> 00:37:49.720
have student housing. It would be multi-family, and it would be conceived for people who are moving here for 3-4 years to do a degree. Um we obviously have not built those uh to date. And in the last, what, 30 years, uh the education landscape has changed

91
00:37:49.720 --> 00:38:04.840
in such a way that a number of our students, more than half probably, are now doing hybrid and online programs, where they're only coming to our campus once or twice a year for a week, maybe two. Um and one of their largest obstacles to coming and getting that

92
00:38:04.840 --> 00:38:20.160
coursework done on site is in finding housing. They're looking for Airbnbs, they're going down to UCF, finding neighbors in Kingsbridge. I know there are a few who who host them for those weeks. Um some who are here. Um and we've thought, you know, we we

93
00:38:20.160 --> 00:38:36.320
have this approval for housing, could we put up a facility that they could use just for a week or two at a time. We met with city staff, looked at the DA, saw it. We figured that our they were able to figure out that the closest language in Oviedo building uh

94
00:38:36.320 --> 00:38:51.920
definitions was a dormitory, which was unfortunately disallowed originally. So, that's where we're coming with this dormitory, looking for short-term housing for students who are here for 2 weeks at a time. >> Okay. >> Okay. Thank you. All right. Um this is a public hearing,

95
00:38:51.920 --> 00:39:10.320
so I do have a written request to speak. Uh if you'd please come up and state your name. I have William Ryan. >> Hello, my name is William Ryan. I live at 458 Lake Park Trail. Uh I have a small I I I think it's a minor objection, but I I I think it's

96
00:39:10.320 --> 00:39:27.240
rather important. So, if you could go to the next slide. So, when >> [cough] >> I guess the the the title of my talk tonight is protecting neighborhood stability. And specifically, I'm I'm speaking of tract J. Um of tract J, four four acres are are

97
00:39:27.240 --> 00:39:43.800
owned by the seminary. The other 81.4 acres are owned by the residents of King's Bridge King's Bridge East. So, the current language you see and and and when when the developer updated the the text in the PUD, what

98
00:39:43.800 --> 00:40:00.400
they did is they added some additional language for tracts F and H, but they did nothing for the language in tracts J. And so, you can see the current language is is on the left-hand side here, and it says architectural guidelines shall be created. Now, I guess this is what from the original PUD. I don't know. I've

99
00:40:00.400 --> 00:40:16.280
never seen the original PUD. But it it still indicates a future action to be taken. And the close proximity to the tracts F and H statement could result in some confusion maybe in in the future. Now, I I up at the first LPA

100
00:40:16.280 --> 00:40:32.840
meeting, and I was assured by city staff that there was no intention to do anything with tract J. Uh it was just F and H, but if that's the truth, then then why don't we put that in into writing in the PUD? I don't So, I've put my requested

101
00:40:32.840 --> 00:40:48.480
language on the on the right-hand side here. So, I'd like to change the shall be created to the architectural guidelines for tracts J and J1 shall be unaffected by this amendment and shall continue to apply as set forth in exhibit E of the original PUD.

102
00:40:48.480 --> 00:41:04.080
So, the the bottom line of all this is verbal assurances of intent do not bind future development. They basically mean nothing. So, the only explicit only the explicit text of the ordinance carries the force of law. So, whatever we do

103
00:41:04.080 --> 00:41:20.720
whatever we plan to do with with with tract J, we should make sure that that's shown in the PUD and that's that's the intention is stated in the written text. That's it. >> Thank you. I do not have any other written requests to speak. Is there anyone else in the audience that would like to address

104
00:41:20.720 --> 00:41:38.480
council on this item? Hearing none, I will close >> You have another one? >> I will close public comment. What is the pleasure of council? >> I'll make a motion to approve ordinance number 1766. >> For purposes of discussion, I second it.

105
00:41:38.480 --> 00:41:56.040
Okay. >> Any discussion? Councilman Bradford. >> Yeah, so I think it's interesting what uh Mr. Ryan just kind of brought up and I guess I wanted to ask Teresa, I mean, is there any objection to what he's suggesting? >> I would defer to the city attorney on

106
00:41:56.040 --> 00:42:11.240
that one, but I can clarify why we added the language. Uh so, the city just to clarify in general, we the city doesn't have architectural standards for single-family homes in the code. We we don't have, we never had, we don't intend to have. Um

107
00:42:11.240 --> 00:42:28.080
the Kings Bridge is already developed, uh, but we do have for multi-family. So, that's why we included, you know, the language for the RTS property. But, on the specific change that Mr. Ryan is raising, I will defer to

108
00:42:28.080 --> 00:42:43.720
Mr. Voss. >> Mr. Voss. Thank you very much. Uh, so, just a couple things, uh, real quick. Uh, I alluded to this, uh, before at the last, uh, last meeting of this by Zoom, but of course I was breaking up a bit, so I'm going to go ahead and mention it again.

109
00:42:43.720 --> 00:42:59.320
Uh, the entire uh, development agreement amendment that is before you tonight is, uh, targeted specifically to tracks F and H. As you've heard from the member of the public, um, tracks J

110
00:42:59.320 --> 00:43:20.760
>> Ryan is speaking about? >> Tracks J and J1, uh, are not owned >> Councilwoman Britain, can you please mute? Thank you. >> Uh, tracks J and J1 are not owned just by RTS. If they were, we might be having a slightly different conversation.

111
00:43:20.760 --> 00:43:35.640
Over 81 acres of it is owned by all the other property owners within tracks J and J1. A a single applicant, uh, that owns just a piece of a piece of property in a PUD cannot apply to change, uh, a portion of

112
00:43:35.640 --> 00:43:51.720
a PUD that applies to property other than what they own. And so, this sentence that was that was mentioned there, uh, applies to all those other properties, which is the nature of his concern. Um, that here's a couple things I would offer to you with regard to this

113
00:43:51.720 --> 00:44:09.360
language. Because this the the that single sentence there is not does not have either underlining or strike through. It's not being changed by this amendment. It is not being changed by this amendment. This amendment uh the the

114
00:44:09.360 --> 00:44:24.520
state of the PUD with regard to those tracks remains as it was when the original PUD development agreement was adopted. All right? In addition, with regard to the language, it's a little clunky uh how it

115
00:44:24.520 --> 00:44:41.120
was written back in '95, but what it is saying is architectural guidelines shall be created for tracks J and J1 as shown in exhibit E. Exhibit E is a static thing. It has a discrete list of things. Um it could be changed by a subsequent

116
00:44:41.120 --> 00:44:57.040
amendment with all the, you know, potential, you know, all the property owners who would need to uh file an application to amend it. But um it's saying shall be created uh as shown in exhibit E, a static exhibit, and will

117
00:44:57.040 --> 00:45:12.960
be incorporated into the homeowners association documents for Reese Village. That has, I can just share with you because we were looking at the um all the matters relating to the fence, we learned that that has in fact occurred. Everything that's in exhibit E has been incorporated into those HOA docs.

118
00:45:12.960 --> 00:45:27.760
Um so even though it's it was speaking in the kind of future tense there back when it was first adopted, that does not leave it open that there would be some change or could be some

119
00:45:27.760 --> 00:45:43.880
change to that exhibit E in the absence of an application coming before the council going through the entire process filed by all the property owners that would need to to make that change, which would be the property owners that would be affected by it.

120
00:45:43.880 --> 00:45:58.760
Uh so as a theoretical concern, I I really want to caution you you don't want to go making changes to a single word of a uh PUD development agreement that affects property other than the applicants. It

121
00:45:58.760 --> 00:46:14.800
runs contrary to the state statute that uh that allows this amendment to occur just on the piece and you'd be fooling with other folks property rights. So I mean I understand it's very innocuous change here. It's just basically saying this doesn't change anything, but that is the state of the

122
00:46:14.800 --> 00:46:31.600
law right now. >> To clarify, are you are you >> Mayor, okay. >> No, I mean that's that's interesting. I didn't I didn't know that. So you know, appreciate that. So No, I mean it's only question in my head there.

123
00:46:31.600 --> 00:46:46.720
>> Mayor Slayton. Just to clarify, 100% of the property owners in tracks J and J1 would have to all agree to change anything. That is correct? >> Yeah, either it would it would have to be one of it would be one thing

124
00:46:46.720 --> 00:47:01.840
definitely and there potentially an alternative. It would have to be either 100% of the property owners apply to make that change, all right? Or if there's something tucked away and I haven't looked for this, if there's something tucked away in the HOA docs

125
00:47:01.840 --> 00:47:17.920
that says the HOA can apply for changes to the PUD with respect to everything within it, that's something you find sometimes. You would then need the HOA plus RTS because RTS is not bound by the HOA. So you need one way or another something to legally bind >> [clears throat]

126
00:47:17.920 --> 00:47:39.200
>> all those property owners to applying either directly or indirectly. >> All right, thank you. Any further questions? No? Okay, Councilmember Roth. >> Uh nothing for me. >> Councilmember Britton. >> Yep. Can you hear me now?

127
00:47:39.200 --> 00:47:59.080
>> Yes. >> I'm good. I'm going to tap to unspeak. >> Okay. Um I'm good as well too. So with that I will ask the clerk to call the roll. Councilmember Butterfield. >> I. >> Mayor Slayton. >> I.

128
00:47:59.080 --> 00:48:16.720
>> Deputy Mayor Tucker. >> Aye. >> Councilman Britton? >> Uh aye. >> Councilman Art? >> Aye. >> The motion carries. We will move on to item number seven in our public hearings, ordinance number 1767. Mr. Rose, can you read that by title

129
00:48:16.720 --> 00:48:31.680
only? >> Thank you, Deputy Mayor. This is ordinance number 1767, an ordinance of the City of Oviedo, Florida, amending the land development code of the City of Oviedo, specifically Article 3, development agreements, orders, and permits, and Article 18, basic

130
00:48:31.680 --> 00:48:46.920
definitions and interpretations, providing for conflicts, severability, codification, correction of scrivener's scrivener's errors, and an effective date. >> Thank you, Mr. Cobb. >> Uh thank you, Deputy Mayor. If you think back a few months ago, we had a discussion about special event permits,

131
00:48:46.920 --> 00:49:01.480
and uh about uh um outdoor sales events, and some issues that the staff had experiencing and Council gave us direction to move forward with amendments to the land development code, as well as amendments to the code ordinances. Both of those

132
00:49:01.480 --> 00:49:17.800
ordinances are on the agenda tonight. Uh land development code amendments do require two public hearings per state statute, so this is a public hearing. We will need you to not only read by title, but also conduct public hearing, and then uh we're requesting that a second public hearing be scheduled for

133
00:49:17.800 --> 00:49:35.840
July the 6th. Uh Dr. Kraya will be uh presenting the staff's recommendations. >> Thank you. >> So, good evening again. Um the next presentation, please. Um so, as Mr. Cobb mentioned, we had a

134
00:49:35.840 --> 00:49:52.080
work session um in February, and we got consensus um for the following, to amend the code to um allow special event permits to be issued for no more than three consecutive days, and no more than one

135
00:49:52.080 --> 00:50:10.800
single special event permit per month for the same applicant property and event. And also to to treat farmers market as special events and not outdoor sales event permits. Next slide. So, this amendment um

136
00:50:10.800 --> 00:50:26.320
accomplishes the following. We are clarifying when a special event permit is required and that is a proposal from staff. Um the second one exempts not only places of worship. Oh, and in the work session in February, we also got

137
00:50:26.320 --> 00:50:42.600
direction um from council to work with the mayor to tweak a little bit the language on the the places of worship and and we did that. So, uh exempts not only uh places of worship

138
00:50:42.600 --> 00:50:57.520
from special event permitting, but also organizations with events located on properties owned by places of worship. And the three allow special events to occur um um once per month instead of once per year

139
00:50:57.520 --> 00:51:13.360
and reducing the time frame from 14 to 3 days. And then provide um consistency provides consistency with the definition of for special events. So, let's go over the the changes. So, the first section was

140
00:51:13.360 --> 00:51:31.400
uh 3.5 um um section I um we changed uh and that is the requirements for a special permit, when we require them. And we added in the end and that comes from staff that the activity requires city services for

141
00:51:31.400 --> 00:51:48.240
its implementation as determined by the land use administrator or designee. This is already practice, so we require when there is um a need for city services, but it was not clear in the code. So, we are, you know, um including that in the LDC.

142
00:51:48.240 --> 00:52:06.440
Second slide, please. Um then we changed um the uh in the code it was written before that only events organized by um places of worship and by um schools would be uh

143
00:52:06.440 --> 00:52:23.000
uh exempt. And now we are saying events organized at properties owned by places of worship and schools. And I'm just going to clarify the reason why we do that. It's not because of the uses, it's because those properties are um

144
00:52:23.000 --> 00:52:39.160
were designed to accommodate assembly. So that is basically why we do that. Um so we we um remove um number uh It should be a not number I think the numbering is not

145
00:52:39.160 --> 00:52:54.480
correct, but the activities organized by the place of worships or school because it can be that is not a requirement in anymore. If it's on property that um um belongs to a a place of worship or

146
00:52:54.480 --> 00:53:08.840
school, that would be exempt as well. And then we changed the duration of the activity to be limited to three consecutive days giving the land use administrator the ability to extend it um

147
00:53:08.840 --> 00:53:25.120
but allowing more events. So instead of one single event per year, now it's per month for the same applicant on the same property for the same or similar type of event. Next slide.

148
00:53:25.120 --> 00:53:42.480
Um here we changed uh we removed farmers market um reference from outdoor sales event um because it's considered now a special event permit. Next slide. We then changed the definition of

149
00:53:42.480 --> 00:54:00.920
special events to um reflect what the code says. And then the requirement also includes that activity requires city service services for its implementation as determined by the land use administrator or designee.

150
00:54:00.920 --> 00:54:20.720
Next slide. I think that's the end. With that We recommend that council holds a public hearing and um schedule the second public hearing for July 6th. >> And I just wanted to clarify one thing. Is it section 3.5 or 3.4?

151
00:54:20.720 --> 00:54:35.520
>> 3.5 >> Cuz when I look at it on our LDC online it's 3.4. >> The LDC online is not the >> Okay, that's what I thought. I just wanted to make sure. >> Unfortunately, it's the we codify it now. We just received the the the new

152
00:54:35.520 --> 00:54:50.200
one to revise. So it's being codified now finally. Yeah. >> That's what I thought. Just wanted to make sure. >> It's 3.5. >> Okay. Anybody have questions while she's up here? All right. Thank you. Uh this is a public hearing. I do have one written request to speak. Um Mr.

153
00:54:50.200 --> 00:55:12.040
David Williamson. >> Good evening, mayor, deputy mayor, council. My form has my address on file. I have no objection to the proposed language to the development code. I would just to suggest a friendly amendment. I think this is already circulated with um uh city manager and and and a couple of

154
00:55:12.040 --> 00:55:27.640
you, but um you can see the red line document um you got that from the clerk, right? >> Yes. >> Okay. >> I don't have one of those, but >> That was on purpose. >> [laughter] >> Oh, it's up there. There we go. I guess I have three notepads now.

155
00:55:27.640 --> 00:55:43.000
>> So the the red reflects my suggestions. The blue is is more or less what the staff is proposing. Um the current language uh exempts events organized by um places of worship or houses of worship under certain circumstances. My recommendation is simply to

156
00:55:43.000 --> 00:55:58.880
replace that phrase with non-profit organizations, if that suffices. Um, places of worship should already be organized as non-profit organizations. So, this change would not remove any existing benefit from religious institutions. Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples, uh, other religious organizations would continue to qualify

157
00:55:58.880 --> 00:56:14.080
for the exemption under the same standards as other non-profits. The advantage of this change is it creates a neutral and consistent rule. Um, the advantage, uh, or I guess the city would be regulating based on organizational status and land use impacts. I heard Dr.

158
00:56:14.080 --> 00:56:30.520
Correa mention, uh, an occupancy of assembly. Right? That's a whole other category that's not addressed here. So, if if you're trying to equally apply this to a land use occupancy, then that's a different consideration altogether. I hadn't thought about that, but I appreciate that insight.

159
00:56:30.520 --> 00:56:45.640
Um, so, if the purpose is to accommodate community-serving organizations conducting activities on their own property without city services, then all similarly situated non-profit organizations, religious or not, should be treated equally.

160
00:56:45.640 --> 00:57:01.640
Um, whether that's the American Legion, the Oviedo Women's Club, or Hope Helps. And while they may or may not have place on site right now, may they may or may not have an occupancy as assembly hall, um, they deserve equal treatment under the law now and into the future. So, I leave the details to you and

161
00:57:01.640 --> 00:57:18.360
capable staff to wordsmith that. As a related matter, um, you should also note that, um, several organizations, non-profit as well as religious congregations, lease their spaces. So, the ownership, um, is an issue for some of those organizations, and that may not be your

162
00:57:18.360 --> 00:57:33.440
intention. Some of those organizations may be sharing common space with others, right? I can think of at least one non-profit and a a house of worship here locally that is leasing a space with a shared parking lot, shared frontage. So, those

163
00:57:33.440 --> 00:57:50.200
considerations might need to involve the owner of the property. Um but again, I leave it for your staff and your capable selves to resolve. But thanks as always for your consideration. >> Thank you. I do not have any other written requests to speak. Is there anyone looking to address council on this topic?

164
00:57:51.440 --> 00:58:08.720
Hearing none, I'll close public comment. What is the pleasure of council? >> I move we adopt ordinance 1767 with Mr. Williamson's amendment and perhaps another one. >> For purposes of discussion, I'll second that. What's that?

165
00:58:08.720 --> 00:58:23.840
>> I schedule a public hearing. >> Sorry. >> Oh. >> On July 6th, 2026. >> Um okay. Oh, and schedule a public hearing for July 6th. >> So, instead of adoption, you propose scheduling a public hearing for July 6th.

166
00:58:23.840 --> 00:58:39.000
>> Um Well, given that this is two public hearings and not a first reading, I'll say whatever you want. >> [laughter] >> Is there a motion to schedule a second public hearing on July 6th? >> Uh yes, so moved. >> And seconded. >> Any discussion? >> Um

167
00:58:39.000 --> 00:58:56.160
I I like these amendments. Um I I brought this up last time, I think. Uh it's been a few months, but um I kind of like the idea of kind of opening this up as as broadly as possible for people to be able to do events at places that are

168
00:58:56.160 --> 00:59:13.000
designed to do events without having to ask the city for a permission slip. Um so, I think this is a good step in that direction. Uh but I would like to hear um from Dr. Correa, is is there some As far as land development code-wise, is

169
00:59:13.000 --> 00:59:28.640
is there a reason why places of worship might need a special carve out in uh for reasons like they would be required to have more parking or the setback or something would be entrance and exit that would be

170
00:59:28.640 --> 00:59:45.040
different from maybe another non-profit. >> that are designed So, what we control and we try to um um we control is impact, right? It's impact on the city. So, if you have a property that can

171
00:59:45.040 --> 01:00:01.320
accommodate >> Right. >> you know, a lot It was designed to accommodate large crowds. And so, schools and places of worship are that type of places that they attract crowds, right? We do not want them to ask for special event permits every time they

172
01:00:01.320 --> 01:00:18.320
have, you know, an event, you know, in the in a school or in a church or in any place of worship, right? So, that that was why that is why they are exempt. Now, if they spill over to require city

173
01:00:18.320 --> 01:00:34.160
services then that's that would be, you know, required. But, usually they are large enough to accommodate in their own facility without having impact on the city.

174
01:00:34.160 --> 01:00:49.160
Opening too much and I I we don't want to to pick and choose, either. >> Right. >> Right? The thing is that if you have a non-profit that is using the parking lot of the mall, which is common for a special event, that was not a

175
01:00:49.160 --> 01:01:06.520
place that was designed to have crowds. And you have an operational mall and an operational parking lot and also a crowd there, we need to protect that crowd, right? So, that crowd needs to be We need to secure the perimeter, police will be there.

176
01:01:06.520 --> 01:01:23.200
That requires city services. So, on those situations, that is a special event. So, if we can >> That asked? >> If we can craft language that allow non-profits that have, you know, the same conditions as, you know,

177
01:01:23.200 --> 01:01:41.320
places of worship or schools to have some criteria. And I think the the city manager may have, you know, already some suggestions. I mean, if you want to entertain that, I mean, we are okay with that. >> So So, the mall is is not owned by a

178
01:01:41.320 --> 01:01:56.720
nonprofit. Right? The mall is not >> if it's rented by a nonprofit, right? Cuz it's If you you're giving the same conditions. This one is if you're renting. Um >> Well, so this says owned by. Is Is renting or leasing is that covered under

179
01:01:56.720 --> 01:02:17.527
this language legally? Is that maybe a mispro- >> No, he did not propose that. And what was >> Okay. >> No, no, I I know, but but you brought up >> I didn't What is the proposal that he has? I haven't seen it. >> It does say owned by. >> [cough]

180
01:02:24.080 --> 01:02:40.480
>> So, it it would be only events organized at properties owned by nonprofits. >> Yeah. >> Right, not lease. >> And And so, that would exclude cuz I was thinking, you know, place of worship could be as small as a place in a a strip mall, right? But that would not be

181
01:02:40.480 --> 01:02:57.360
owned by. So, then it would not be covered under here. Um >> I have no problem with that, but >> Deputy Mayor, if I could cuz >> Yeah. >> Mayor Mayor's Mayor forwarded the email to me this morning this afternoon, and

182
01:02:57.360 --> 01:03:14.040
so I did put some thoughts together. Uh if it's okay, I could I could show you those thoughts. >> Sure. >> Very simple. Uh Ms. Booth, if you could pull it up. Go all the way to the Go to the last page. Uh Mr. I, your question to me, I also put some thoughts together with your question about the duration. So, I've

183
01:03:14.040 --> 01:03:30.640
got that in there as well. >> Okay. >> If you want to discuss it. Uh, what I've done here, uh, is to look at non-profit organizations. Uh, the one of the things that I noticed in the code as it's proofs as presented was that we were talking about events on on

184
01:03:30.640 --> 01:03:47.080
uh, church properties, on school properties where they could be held without any type of city services. And but when when I received the email, I started thinking about, okay, how would we how would we treat non-profits? And the thing I looked at was, okay, how

185
01:03:47.080 --> 01:04:02.680
do we set them up so that they don't they don't qualify as to require a special event. So, I looked at what was required for a special event. And the thing that I also looked at was I made it consistent with what's over in the

186
01:04:02.680 --> 01:04:19.440
uh, code of ordinances for fee waiver. And so, that was one of the things that I looked at was, if it's self-contained on the property, whether it's owned by the non-profit or if it's leased by the non-profit, that's not a material. If it's contained on the property property where it's where it's located, fine. If it doesn't require any city

187
01:04:19.440 --> 01:04:35.360
services, okay. Uh, if it doesn't require off-site signage, that's another one. If it doesn't if there's no food trucks, then there should be no no reason for it to have a permit. And so, what we would do is that we would add this in as a as a as a

188
01:04:35.360 --> 01:04:51.600
individual exemption just for non-profits and leave the, uh, leave the part about the churches and schools, leave that alone, but create this as a new thing as a new exemption instead. So, that that was the thoughts that I had after I received the email

189
01:04:51.600 --> 01:05:09.960
to create for them to say it's it's exempt from having to get a permit if it meets this criteria. >> So, s- um S- schools are government, right? They're not a 501 Yeah, >> [clears throat] >> so so we might have to add

190
01:05:09.960 --> 01:05:25.320
>> So, the schools the schools the schools and the churches would stay over in the existing paragraph that's already there. >> Okay, so we're going to add we would add this. >> Did you go up? Did you go up, please? Uh keep going. Keep going. Okay, stop. Come back down. Come back

191
01:05:25.320 --> 01:05:43.440
down. So, you can see here under D this is the events organized at properties owned by places of worship and public private middle schools and yeah, high schools. So, that would stay there intact as recommended. Mr. If you could go down. And then this would create a a new E

192
01:05:43.440 --> 01:05:58.920
which would be just for the nonprofits. That's what it would do. And so, I was trying to maintain the the integrity of the public schools and the and the and the church uh paragraph, but then also come up with the idea that we could allow nonprofits

193
01:05:58.920 --> 01:06:14.360
to be exempt from a special event permit. And you know, same same situation. If If it's If it's contained, doesn't require city services, doesn't require off-site signages, there's no food trucks that would require special inspections,

194
01:06:14.360 --> 01:06:29.760
uh then then and it it won't matter if they own the property or if they if they're renting the property. >> Okay. So, since this is a public hearing and we have to have two, this is not a first reading.

195
01:06:29.760 --> 01:06:45.840
>> This is a first reading cuz we Mr. Voss did read it into the record. So, it was a first reading. And this is the first public hearing. That's something that I turned to Mr. Voss soon as soon as we started talking about this, I turned to Mr. Voss and I said, "Is this a significant change?" And he said, "No."

196
01:06:45.840 --> 01:06:59.840
>> Okay, that was the question. Do we need to move forward >> Yes, we can continue move >> It's not a change that would necessitate another first year. Right. >> Yeah. >> Okay. Um

197
01:06:59.840 --> 01:07:16.520
Now, so Okay, so what should uh Hm. What should we do? Uh should I amend the motion to incorporate this language? >> If you if you get with that, yes, just give us direction and then follow with that. >> Um

198
01:07:16.520 --> 01:07:33.120
Um, is is there does somebody have an opposition to that? >> You're the motioner, so >> I Well, I know, but I I I'd like it to pass. >> I I would uh second an amendment to I I would second a motion to have it be

199
01:07:33.120 --> 01:07:49.520
this. >> Okay, I amend motion to include >> this language instead. >> Mr. Cobb's language. >> Okay. >> Is that it? >> Do we have a second? >> Second. >> All right, any discussion? >> Can I ask one other question? Mr. Mr. Ott, earlier today or actually yesterday

200
01:07:49.520 --> 01:08:05.280
gave me an email asking about the duration language. And so that is if you look up there, I'll I'll just read to you the final product of it. And what it would say is that the duration of a special event permit shall be up to three consecutive days unless

201
01:08:05.280 --> 01:08:19.839
additional time is granted by the administrator or designated as part of the permit issuance. And so what it means is is that it's a maximum of three days, but you can you can request additional like like in a we talked about in my response

202
01:08:19.839 --> 01:08:36.000
about sometimes an event may go two days and so you need a day for setup, you need a day for breakdown, and then two days for the event. That's four. But at least the four days would be granted through the permit review process. It wouldn't be something outside of that.

203
01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:52.799
And so that was the idea that I had for the duration and I know because you were talking about is there any way to make it one sentence. And that was the that was the only way I could come up with it. >> Okay. I I like that language, too. So Um, I'd like to amend my motion to

204
01:08:52.799 --> 01:09:09.240
include Mr. Cobb's changes, too. Uh well, three. Wherever that's under under duration of activity. >> Okay. We have a second? >> Second. >> Any discussion? >> Uh nothing further. >> Mayor Slayton. >> I like all of the additions um and

205
01:09:09.240 --> 01:09:25.480
clarifications and making sure that this is available to nonprofits and is a content neutral thing available to everybody. So, well done. It's about time we got this figured out and finalized or one step closer to finalized. >> Councilman Britain.

206
01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:41.960
>> I concur. >> All right. Councilman Botterford. >> No, I like the changes as well. So, uh I think that covers what what was brought up. Um so, I'm good with it. >> Okay. And I also agree. These are good changes. Uh I'll ask the clerk to call

207
01:09:41.960 --> 01:09:59.260
the roll. Councilman Ott. >> I. >> Mayor Slayton. >> I. >> Deputy Mayor Tuggart. >> I. >> Councilman Botterford. >> I. >> Councilman Britain. >> I. >> The motion carries. Um we're going to move on to items

208
01:09:59.260 --> 01:10:15.840
[clears throat] number 8 through 11. Um we're going to do the uh presentation first, correct? >> Yes. >> And then we're going to go through title only by each one. So, if if uh we're confusing the audience a little bit, we're going to get through all of them. So. >> And Deputy Mayor, one thing just

209
01:10:15.840 --> 01:10:31.840
procedurally, uh once Mr. Bose will do the he'll review all four ordinances with his presentation and then what we'll need you to do is read each ordinance by title, conduct a public hearing for each ordinance separately, and then take four separate votes.

210
01:10:31.840 --> 01:10:49.040
>> Understood. Okay. So, Mr. Bose. >> I will go ahead and handle the presentation. Actually, if I could ask staff, do you have the PowerPoint for all four? The one that was used back in the work session. Or we can just go through individually as you want to string them together.

211
01:10:49.040 --> 01:11:05.440
>> And if there's no objection, I I don't mind going a little faster than last time. >> I'm glad to go very fast. >> Okay, excellent. >> Well, let me go ahead and hit the uh first since we have it up. Uh so council members, good evening. I have before you tonight uh the four ordinances for

212
01:11:05.440 --> 01:11:20.040
second reading public hearing for [clears throat] four charter amendments that have been proposed by the Charter Review Committee. The first of the four charter amendments is a uh city charter amendment changing the length of council terms from 2 years to 4 years as previously discussed. Uh this would

213
01:11:20.040 --> 01:11:37.200
begin uh with the 2028 election. It would provide a transition uh with a 3-year term at the 2027 regular election so that by 2028 we would transition [clears throat] into uh 4-year cycles that coincide with the even-year presidential and gubernatorial

214
01:11:37.200 --> 01:11:56.440
elections. Any questions on this first charter amendment? Hearing none, we can move on to the second one. This second charter amendment is a charter amendment uh revising council voting procedures for ordinances and resolutions. In particular, uh revising

215
01:11:56.440 --> 01:12:12.920
the uh uh voting procedures for ordinances and resolutions by removing the requirement for a roll call vote as discussed previously. The ballot summary does have additional uh some additional language here to try to clarify for voters what is not going away by this uh change so

216
01:12:12.920 --> 01:12:30.120
folks can feel assured that uh everyone will will still have to vote on matters that come before you. Any questions on this? Moving on to the third charter amendment uh before you tonight. This one is a city charter amendment revising the time frame for holding special elections. As previously

217
01:12:30.120 --> 01:12:46.720
discussed, this was a uh charter amendment that uh originated in on the recommendation with discussions with your Seminole County Supervisor of Elections. Effectively moves out the time frame for holding certain special elections under your charter uh giving

218
01:12:46.720 --> 01:13:01.840
the Supervisor of Elections an additional 30 days uh in a window uh from 90 to 120 days in order to make those things happen so that uh, all of the processes that supervisor has to go through uh, and also meet the

219
01:13:01.840 --> 01:13:17.960
requirements of our charter will coordinate better with uh, current state election procedures and all of the best practices obligations uh, on the supervisor. Any questions on this amendment? Moving on to the fourth and final uh, charter amendment. This is a uh, charter

220
01:13:17.960 --> 01:13:35.360
amendment moving the qualifying period for uh, running for city council from August uh, to June in uh, every year when election would occur uh, with a notation there to let folks know that the elections uh, even with this change would remain in November.

221
01:13:35.360 --> 01:13:51.480
Any questions concerning this charter amendment? [clears throat] Right. With that, uh, those are the four charter amendments that have been recommended by the Charter Review Committee as uh, Mr. Cobb uh, indicated, we would ask you that with regard to each we um,

222
01:13:51.480 --> 01:14:08.640
uh, have the title read, that uh, public hearing be conducted uh, as to the first, have a vote on the first and we proceed through on each. >> Okay. Thank you, Mr. Rose. So, we will start out with number item number eight, ordinance number 1768. Mr. Rose, can you read that by title only?

223
01:14:08.640 --> 01:14:24.440
>> Absolutely. Thank you, Deputy Mayor. This is ordinance number 1768, an ordinance of the City of Oviedo, Florida proposing an amendment to the charter of the City of Oviedo, Florida proposing a charter amendment changing the length of council terms from two years to four years, providing for a referendum on the

224
01:14:24.440 --> 01:14:40.640
proposed charter amendment, providing for the ballot title and ballot summary for such referendum, providing for direction to the city clerk in coordination with the Seminole County Supervisor of Elections, and providing for implementing administrative actions, findings, conflicts, severability, codification, the correction of

225
01:14:40.640 --> 01:14:59.320
scrivener's errors, and an effective date. >> Thank you, Mr. Rose. There are no public written requests to speak. Is there anyone in the audience that would like to address Council at this time since this is a public hearing? Hearing none, I will close public comment. What is the pleasure Council?

226
01:14:59.320 --> 01:15:15.960
>> I'll make a motion to approve ordinance number 1768. >> Second. >> We have a motion and a second. Any discussion? >> No, I think as we talked about this before on these charter amendments, we had a charter review committee made up of residents. Couple of them are here tonight. You

227
01:15:15.960 --> 01:15:33.120
know, it was a very diverse group. They came up with these and you know, they want to put these to the voters and I'm all for it. >> Okay, Mayor Slater. >> I may not agree with all of these, but it is not my place to prevent voters from choosing their form of governance. So, on they go.

228
01:15:33.120 --> 01:15:48.960
>> Council member Pratt. >> [laughter] >> Yes, it is, Madam Mayor. I will try not to repeat myself too much since this is the third time going through it. But, this is the public hearing. Um, but I will summarize. Uh, the state statute says that charter

229
01:15:48.960 --> 01:16:05.680
amendments are made by referendum called by ordinances of the governing body. We are the governing body and that power is vested in the Oviedo City Council. The state statute does not mention charter review committees.

230
01:16:05.680 --> 01:16:21.840
We created a charter review committee to give us advice as to what things we might put uh, to an ordinance. A delegation of that authority is an abdication of our responsibility

231
01:16:21.840 --> 01:16:36.880
to do as our original resolution said, um, propose revisions and or amendments to the city charter as the city council deems appropriate and in the best interests of the city. So, we are called to put forth charter

232
01:16:36.880 --> 01:16:53.280
amendments for referendum which are in which are appropriate and in the best interest of the city. And with that, I do not believe that uh is the first one, right? Yeah, changing length of council terms is in the best interest of the city. As we have it right now, we have

233
01:16:53.280 --> 01:17:08.040
2-year terms. The proposal is to go to 4-year terms. Um right now, uh so there's a few reasons. Right now, we can uh if you don't like what's going on in the city council, you can vote people off every single year. Every single year you have

234
01:17:08.040 --> 01:17:25.280
an opportunity uh to make changes uh to this governing body. Um the other reason for this one is that this went before the voters uh last time, 5 years ago, in a very clean uh charter amendment, and it was defeated. And I I don't think it's right to keep

235
01:17:25.280 --> 01:17:41.160
going back to the voters every time we do this and uh try to ask for the same thing, especially something like this where it kind of looks like it's self-serving to us. Even though I concede that it may or may not be, because when you change the rules um of

236
01:17:41.160 --> 01:18:02.480
something like an election, all kinds of things change. So, you know, that's that's not an absolute. But uh regardless, uh I don't know on this. [clears throat] >> Councilmember Britton. You're still muted. >> All right. >> There we go. >> I I have no comments. Thanks.

237
01:18:02.480 --> 01:18:17.480
>> Okay. Um I want to greet and thank our Charter Review Committee. I think they did an excellent job. Um and as far as you mentioned abdicating um our role up here, and I completely disagree and just want to point out that this is one of

238
01:18:17.480 --> 01:18:33.480
the few things that comes through council that affects council. So, I think if we even put our hands on it, um it could be taken as being in our own best interest. And I think that's why we kind of give that to a council of citizens to come up with how they want their city council to

239
01:18:33.480 --> 01:18:49.960
operate. So, um but with that, I will ask the clerk to call the roll. >> If I could add one thing though that is important to have on the record, our charter itself calls for the creation of a charter review committee. So, even though having a charter review committee

240
01:18:49.960 --> 01:19:06.200
is not required under state law and we are allowed under state law and under our charter to appoint ourselves as the charter review committee, we must have one. So, you know, our charter says we we've got to have a charter review committee. So, there it is.

241
01:19:06.200 --> 01:19:24.120
>> I'll ask the clerk to call the roll. Council member Rutherford? >> Aye. >> Mayor Slayden? >> Aye. >> Deputy Mayor Teggert? >> Aye. >> Council member Britton? >> Aye. >> Council member Ort? >> Nay. >> The motion carries. We move on to

242
01:19:24.120 --> 01:19:41.080
ordinance number 1769. Mr. Voss, can you read that by title only, please? >> Thank you, Deputy Mayor. This is ordinance number 1769, an ordinance of the city of Oviedo, Florida, proposing an amendment to the charter of the city of Oviedo, Florida, proposing a charter amendment revising council voting procedures for ordinances and

243
01:19:41.080 --> 01:19:56.120
resolutions, providing for a referendum on the proposed charter amendment, providing for the ballot title and ballot summary for such referendum, providing for directions to the city clerk in coordination with the Seminole County Supervisor of Elections, and providing for implementing administrative actions, findings,

244
01:19:56.120 --> 01:20:12.520
conflicts, severability, codification, the correction of scrivener's errors, and an effective date. >> Thank you, Mr. Voss. I will open up our public hearing. I do not have any written requests to speak on this. Is there anyone in the audience that would like to address council on this item? If you could please come up to the

245
01:20:12.520 --> 01:20:40.240
podium. >> Charles Zuber from 1064 Will Lake Circle here in Oviedo. Um, this particular uh, section kind of goes against the code of knowing who's voting which way.

246
01:20:40.240 --> 01:20:56.600
If y'all are up there saying I together or nay, you get I I I nay and it's all coming together at the same time, you don't really know who's doing what. So, come voting time I don't have that selection

247
01:20:56.600 --> 01:21:11.640
to find out who I need to vote out or vote in for what you're passing. So, that's still what's happening upstairs in the Congress and in the House of Representatives, you can still tell

248
01:21:11.640 --> 01:21:28.560
who's voting which way. So, I'd like to know that kind of thing even locally. Thank you. >> Thank you. Is there anyone else who'd like to address council on this item? Hearing none, I will close public comment. What is the pleasure of council?

249
01:21:28.560 --> 01:21:44.200
>> I'll make a motion to approve ordinance number 1769. >> Second. >> We have motion and a second. Any discussion? >> Yeah. Mr. Vera, don't when we do uh not the roll call, don't you actually have to acknowledge who voted which way?

250
01:21:44.200 --> 01:22:00.000
>> Yes, I do. >> And you put it you put it in the uh in the record, right? >> Yes, I do. >> And it is available to the public. >> Yes, it is. >> Okay. That's all I had. >> Mayor. >> Nothing. >> Councilmember Roth. >> Yeah, so I I agree with Mr. Zuber. Um

251
01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:17.560
I to that though, um I I did when this first came up it was at my very first meeting and and you brought it up uh Mayor that the charter required this and you wanted to follow the charter. Um one thing I did ask um Mr. Rivera is

252
01:22:17.560 --> 01:22:34.400
that in trying to determine what the uh impetus might be cuz you know um didn't really know and uh ask. Um is that uh you I asked you whether it's difficult to separate our voices in

253
01:22:34.400 --> 01:22:49.560
a voice vote, um if that was perhaps um the issue that was being uh brought up. And And you told me at the time that it it was not difficult to um ascertain our voices in a voice vote. Is that still uh >> That's the case. Yes, I

254
01:22:49.560 --> 01:23:04.600
I recognize your voices very well. >> [laughter] >> Um okay. So, um with that uh even so, I still think this one's silly to take all the way to the voters, so I'm still out, but I just wanted to clarify that. Thank you.

255
01:23:04.600 --> 01:23:24.360
>> Council member Britten. >> I'm good. Thank you. >> Okay. All right, then I'll ask the clerk to call the roll. Council member Butterfield. >> Aye. >> Mayor Slayton. >> Aye. >> Deputy Mayor Tuke. >> Aye. >> Council member Britten. >> Aye. >> Council member Art. >> Nay.

256
01:23:24.360 --> 01:23:40.600
>> The motion carries. We're going to move on to ordinance number 1770. Mr. Bose, can you read that by title only, please? >> Thank you, Deputy Mayor. This ordinance number 1770, an ordinance of the City of Oviedo, Florida, proposing an amendment to the charter of the City of Oviedo, Florida, proposing a charter amendment revising

257
01:23:40.600 --> 01:23:55.640
the time frame for holding special elections, providing for a referendum on the proposed charter amendment, providing for the ballot title and ballot summary for such referendum, providing for direction to the City Clerk in coordination with the Seminole County Supervisor of Elections, and providing for implementing

258
01:23:55.640 --> 01:24:12.040
administrative actions, findings, conflicts, severability, codification, the correction of scrivener's errors, and an effective date. >> Thank you, Mr. Bose. Is there a public hearing? I do not have any written requests to speak. Is there anyone that would like to address council on this topic?

259
01:24:13.920 --> 01:24:30.080
Hearing none and seeing none, I will close public comment. What is the pleasure of council? >> I'll make a motion to approve ordinance number 1770. >> Second. >> We have a motion and a second. Any discussion? >> No, we talked about this one before, so I'm good with it. >> Mayor Slater? Council member Ott? >> Sounds fine.

260
01:24:30.080 --> 01:24:46.800
>> Council member Britton? >> I'm good. Thank you. >> I'll ask the clerk to call the roll. Council member Brodhead? >> Aye. >> Mayor Slater? >> Aye. >> Deputy Mayor Tuke? >> Aye. >> Council member Britton? >> Aye. >> Council member Ott? >> Aye.

261
01:24:46.800 --> 01:25:02.480
>> The motion carries. We will move on to ordinance number 1771. Mr. Bose, can you read that by title only? >> Thank you, Deputy Mayor. This ordinance number 1771, an ordinance of the City of Oviedo, Florida, proposing an amendment to the charter of the City of Oviedo, Florida, proposing a charter amendment

262
01:25:02.480 --> 01:25:18.160
moving City Council qualifying period, providing for a referendum on the proposed charter amendment, providing for the ballot title and ballot summary for such referendum, providing for direction to the City Clerk in coordination with the Seminole County Supervisor of Elections, and providing for implementing administrative actions, findings,

263
01:25:18.160 --> 01:25:38.080
conflicts, severability, codification, the correct correction of scrivener's errors, and an effective date. >> Thank you, Mr. Bose. This is a public hearing. I do not have any written requests to speak. Is there anyone in the audience that would like to address Council on this topic? Hearing none and seeing none, I will

264
01:25:38.080 --> 01:25:53.360
close public comment. What is the pleasure of Council? >> I'll make a motion to approve 1771. >> Second. >> We have a motion and a second. Any discussion? >> No, again, the Charter Review Committee reviewed this. This was their their their suggestion, and I think from their

265
01:25:53.360 --> 01:26:09.280
suggestion it should go to the voters and they make a decision. >> Mayor Slater? >> Onward. >> Council member Ott? >> No, just as before. Um moving qualifying, so on the on the on the substance of it, moving qualifying up to be equivalent to where the county

266
01:26:09.280 --> 01:26:26.000
has it, which is last week. Last week or week before? Last week. Yeah. Um that is way too early for us. The county has it early because they have either a primary election in August, which we do not, um or they have their main election

267
01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:42.480
in August and they have their runoff in November. Uh either way their qualifying is earlier because their election is earlier. If we move our qualifying this much earlier, we're going to have an even longer period between qualifying and election

268
01:26:42.480 --> 01:26:58.640
uh than the county does. And that does a couple of things. One of the things it does is that it favors incumbents because incumbents are going to be more kind of, you know, tuned into the political process. Um and and the other thing it does is it makes it so that I guess this also

269
01:26:58.640 --> 01:27:14.040
favors incumbents. So, it favors incumbents in a few ways. It makes it so that almost if the terms were to stay at 2 years, almost um 1/4 of your term is served in a period where somebody

270
01:27:14.040 --> 01:27:30.480
cannot come to challenge you, right? You may have a challenger come before that, but no additional challengers could come after that that period. Um and I think that's far too long to have that type of um to be in that type of of mode, so to

271
01:27:30.480 --> 01:27:45.720
speak. Um so I think we should leave qualifying as it is. As to putting it on the ballot, um this is one of those things where um most people don't speak in these terms about qualifying and all this kind of

272
01:27:45.720 --> 01:28:01.960
stuff. Um you know, as I said before before I ran for office, I was, you know, vaguely aware that there were things you had to do to get on the ballot. Um I did not speak of them in the terms that would be on the ballot language. So, I'm not saying that this is a thing that's difficult to to

273
01:28:01.960 --> 01:28:18.280
understand, uh but it is a thing that will take some some effort to understand. Um and so I don't I So, for those reasons uh I I don't think we should do it. >> Okay. >> Council member Britain.

274
01:28:18.800 --> 01:28:35.840
>> I don't have any comments on this. Thank you. >> Thank you. Uh, if the clerk can call the roll. Council member Bottsford. >> I. >> Mayor Slater. >> I. >> Deputy Mayor Tukur. >> I. >> Council member Britain. >> I. >> Council member Ott.

275
01:28:35.840 --> 01:28:51.080
>> Nay. >> The motion carries. We'll move on to item number 12, which is a first reading of ordinance. We are up to ordinance number 17 1772. Mr. Voss, would you read that by title only? >> Thank you, Deputy Mayor. This is ordinance number 1772, an ordinance of

276
01:28:51.080 --> 01:29:08.000
the city of Oviedo, Florida, amending the code of ordinances of the city of Oviedo, Florida, specifically chapter two, administration, article three, chapter two, administration, article 11, chapter 22, environment, article four, and chapter 28, impact fees by public

277
01:29:08.000 --> 01:29:24.760
facility, article one, and providing for conflicts, severability, implementing administrative actions, a savings provision, codification, correction of scrivener's errors, and an effective date. >> Thank you. Mr. Cobb. >> Uh, thank you, Deputy Mayor. As I mentioned before, back in February

278
01:29:24.760 --> 01:29:41.440
when we had our work session, one of the items that staff brought forward was some amendments uh, our concerns about some of the language in the uh, section 2-291, which deals with waiver of fees. And

279
01:29:41.440 --> 01:29:57.200
Council gave us direction to move forward with changes. When staff was working on the changes, they also came across some things in our noise ordinance uh, as as well as with our public arts board. And one of the the public arts board was one where we had already

280
01:29:57.200 --> 01:30:13.440
talked with Council about it, and you you said we can move forward with it as well. The changes to the um, the noise ordinance is more of a practice that we felt like we should actually put into the code. So, I'll I'll turn it over to Dr. Correa and let

281
01:30:13.440 --> 01:30:33.440
her bring you the staff's presentation. >> So, good evening again. Um So, this is ordinance 1772. So, we have four amendments to the code of ordinances. The first one was a direction given by council during a work session last year and was to allow the

282
01:30:33.440 --> 01:30:48.600
public arts board to have discretionary um spending authority up to um $1,500 per fiscal year from the public arts fund um to use toward expenses related um to an

283
01:30:48.600 --> 01:31:04.480
approved project of any accessory um um um need um related to an approved project that limited or may include but not limited to any if you need a plaque, of lighting, landscaping, or mer-

284
01:31:04.480 --> 01:31:20.600
merchandise again associated with an approved um public art installation. So, this is just to um codefine that uh um direction and that is in section 2-83.

285
01:31:20.600 --> 01:31:36.160
Next slide, please. This is in the section um 2- um 20 um 291 and it's the waiver of development and special event and other fees. Uh we just um

286
01:31:36.160 --> 01:31:53.160
removed um has the city manager has the authority to to say the city manager shall wave um in the in the table we remove that may to show that there is no discretionary

287
01:31:53.160 --> 01:32:09.120
powers on the city manager. The city manager usually um always um waves the fees for um um those situations that described in the ordinance, so we remove that see fees to be waived. And we

288
01:32:09.120 --> 01:32:25.200
clarified that for nonprofits um, we waive the special event permit application fee and sign permit fees, but not the tent permit fees because they are building permit fees and um, that needs to be reviewed by the

289
01:32:25.200 --> 01:32:43.400
building services. So these are were the changes that we did to 2-291. Next slide, please. Um, this one is something that we wanted to include. We don't have the amendment showing here because it's a lengthy one.

290
01:32:43.400 --> 01:32:59.240
It's in the memo and of course in the ordinance. Um, but this is just showing what it accomplishes. Uh, we already have um, uh, an exception for the noise ordinance for um, uh,

291
01:32:59.240 --> 01:33:16.080
construction during 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Um, uh, every day except Sundays and um, um, holidays. Um, but in in some special situations we have to grant permission for

292
01:33:16.080 --> 01:33:31.840
um, uh, uh, contractors to pour concrete specially if they are um, large concrete pads that they need to have continuous the pouring of the concrete during a lengthy

293
01:33:31.840 --> 01:33:51.280
uh, period of time and to ensure that they are not hit by severe weather what you know, heats or whatever and they need to cure, you know, properly at least in the beginning. So they use usually ask

294
01:33:51.280 --> 01:34:06.160
public works to um, the permission to pour the concrete during early hours. And the so this is already a practice, but it was not in the code. So we wanted to codify that and give the criteria

295
01:34:06.160 --> 01:34:22.360
when that would happen. So how much time they would need to notify the city and also notify the residents up to 100 ft around the the property and

296
01:34:22.360 --> 01:34:37.880
also limited to just those situations of large-scale concrete pours and curing processes. So it's not if the work is delayed for any other reason that they need to work overnight. These

297
01:34:37.880 --> 01:34:54.920
are just the good reasons that we would make an exception to the noise ordinance. So this is something that staff is bringing and that is already as I said practice, but we wanted to codify. Next slide, please.

298
01:34:54.920 --> 01:35:12.720
This one is to remove the indexation the the automatic indexation that we had in the code for the periods where we did not have the study for impact fees. So this is section 28-12.

299
01:35:12.720 --> 01:35:27.680
We had in the code that during years that no update happens that in the beginning in the July 2020 we would have automatic indexation of the fees to

300
01:35:27.680 --> 01:35:43.360
address inflation. With the new statutes, we cannot do that anymore and we have our schedule already planned for you know several years. So we had to remove. So this is something we cannot enforce anyway. So we wanted

301
01:35:43.360 --> 01:35:58.440
to clean the code and remove that. So these are basically the four amendments that we are doing to the code of ordinances. Um this is the first reading and um we recommend council to

302
01:35:58.440 --> 01:36:15.360
um uh schedule the public hearing for July 6th. And I'm available to answer any questions that you may have. >> Thank you, Dr. Pereira. Uh what is the pleasure of council? >> I move we schedule a public hearing for

303
01:36:15.360 --> 01:36:32.000
July 6th, 2026 for ordinance number 1772. >> Second. >> We have a motion and a second. Any discussion? >> Yeah. Um so I um wrote an email about this uh the other day that started off with something pedantic, but um bear with me

304
01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:47.800
on this. There is a point, I promise. Um can can we pull up the uh um let's see. Um Uh >> On the noise? >> Uh yeah, on the noise. Oh. >> I have thoughts on that, too. >> Where is Where's the best part to do

305
01:36:47.800 --> 01:37:05.320
this? Staff report? Um Probably >> the ordinance attachment. >> Pull up the ordinance attachment. >> And it's page number three of that PDF. >> Ah, very good. Page three. Uh

306
01:37:06.600 --> 01:37:23.840
>> Subsection >> Sorry, where is uh I'm looking for >> Yeah, so it's it's about halfway down page number three of five. Well, maybe not. That's the notification. >> That it would be the actual ordinance. I think it's quite Mr. Oxley again. That's >> Yeah, this is the actual ordinance. Yeah, this is the five-page actual

307
01:37:23.840 --> 01:37:40.040
ordinance with the underlines and the strikeouts and all that. >> I'm just going to >> The memo has the the line to Oh, yeah. >> Yeah. I think the >> All right, so >> Yeah, so if if go to where you're looking at the second half of page two. Yes, that's what you just said. >> Keep coming down. A little bit further,

308
01:37:40.040 --> 01:37:55.360
Ms. Booth. >> A little further. >> A little >> Okay, you're right there. So it started out with uh so 2C and then where it says I there, that that line where the mouse is. Um technical justifications, I started off by saying

309
01:37:55.360 --> 01:38:10.320
um that IG or that IE should really be an EG because it's just an example of the situation where a continuous uninterrupted process is required by engineering standards. Um and I sent that to Mr. Cobb and he said, "Oh yeah, yeah, definitely EG."

310
01:38:10.320 --> 01:38:27.360
And then I spoke to Dr. Korea who said, "Oh, no, no, no. We're not setting up a set of things that could potentially trigger this. We want large-scale concrete pours in the curing process to be the only thing that triggers this."

311
01:38:27.360 --> 01:38:44.400
So, what I would like to do is to rewrite that so that that is clear because Mr. Cobb and I both read it the wrong way. >> I did. >> Yes. >> And could we say that so just instead of IE limited to

312
01:38:44.400 --> 01:39:01.800
large-scale or large-scale pours and curing processes without the parentheses, would that work? >> If that works for >> Is the example even necessary because situations where a continuous uninterrupted process is required by engineering standards is pretty clear.

313
01:39:01.800 --> 01:39:18.280
>> So So, Dep- Deputy Mayor, that that's kind of question I had as well, but I been talking with staff, it was staff's intention to actually limit it to that discrete circumstance there. And >> And they've contemplated internally, apparently, and worked with public works

314
01:39:18.280 --> 01:39:34.320
and so on and basically came to the conclusion that that they want it to be narrow and that's the only one they reasonably understand could trigger it. So, they want to make it explicit. >> Do you have a preferred wording? >> I think I think something to the effect of limited to large-scale concrete pours

315
01:39:34.320 --> 01:39:50.960
and curing processes. So, it's Latin confuses things if you can say it in English. So, limited to, I think would handle it. >> Okay, so I'd like to change my motion to change the i.e. in section I think I have it written

316
01:39:50.960 --> 01:40:06.080
here somewhere. Uh >> Section 22 >> A limit to delete the i.e. perhaps. >> Well, to delete the i.e. and add limited to. And that's in section 22-123 >> 123

317
01:40:06.080 --> 01:40:22.320
>> paragraph C sub paragraph two uh >> Wait a minute. Say it again. >> bullet C bullet I >> That's not what this I'm I'm looking at page two and it looks like it is section three C subsection C two

318
01:40:22.320 --> 01:40:37.240
C again. >> Well, cuz it says >> That's what he just said. >> Is that what you Is that what you just said? >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> Can I say it again? Or do we have it? >> C2C >> Okay, yeah. >> We we know the language. >> [laughter] >> We know the language. >> Okay. >> It's fine.

319
01:40:37.240 --> 01:40:53.560
>> I'm I'm not following with the ones and twos and the eyes one eye two eyes >> Well, then Mr. Vosel have to teach me how to say those. >> So we have a changed a motion do we have a second? >> Can I propose another friendly amendment? >> Sure. >> All right. Up there there is mention of

320
01:40:53.560 --> 01:41:09.360
on page two five days notice to the city. I'd like to propose we move that to 10 days notice to the city. So that would be for two A. We're Are we on that We're not on that page. Down a little bit. It's that same

321
01:41:09.360 --> 01:41:24.880
section section three. And then down on page >> Can we pause on that one? You want to change that to 10 and I guess I would ask why? >> Because on the next page I'm going to ask for seven days notice to neighbors not just 200 feet from the noise but

322
01:41:24.880 --> 01:41:41.000
1,000 feet. I have been a neighbor more than 1,000 feet and I got no notice and I got on my bike at 3:00 a.m. and I went and I was standing in the middle of a continuous concrete pour with no notice of it. There's no reason for people not to be

323
01:41:41.000 --> 01:41:57.000
told in advance about this so they can figure out how to not be there, figure out that they need brown noise, whatever that whatever the situation may be. It is incredibly loud and it is not fun. And I perhaps more than other people have gotten a lot of

324
01:41:57.000 --> 01:42:12.840
emails from people who are adjacent to, for example, an apartment building being constructed and construction noise that is not to their liking. >> I don't have an issue with that as long as we're not rigid on if they say I'm

325
01:42:12.840 --> 01:42:28.080
going to pour on this exact date because things change in construction. So, if they notify you 10 days before, it can be a week or two later. Or if you know what I mean. >> Well, I I would like there to be some way Yeah, if weather pushes it there's got to be some way

326
01:42:28.080 --> 01:42:44.276
someplace like on the city's website somewhere that the that a person can go to sleep at 8:00 p.m. and be like, "Okay, I could be woken up at 3:00 a.m. I know this could be the night." Like, you just have to let people mentally prepare cuz I was very pregnant on that day and I will never forget it.

327
01:42:44.276 --> 01:42:59.640
>> [laughter] >> So, Deputy Mayor, there is a subsequent request if an additional event or alternative date is required for the same activity and based on the same technical justification, written notice must be provided at least two business

328
01:42:59.640 --> 01:43:14.640
days prior to >> Okay. So, if they tell you 10 days before and then it gets pushed a little bit, they just tell you again, "Hey, it's >> two days. Yeah. >> Okay, that seems fair. >> Wait, two days but they need but but the people should be notified seven days in advance, not 48 hours in advance cuz the

329
01:43:14.640 --> 01:43:32.000
And here right now it says 200 ft 48 hours. I'm proposing 1,000 ft seven days. Cuz then you can order your brown noise machine. You can arrange to go stay at a friend's house. Whatever you need to do that gives >> one? What page is it?

330
01:43:32.000 --> 01:43:49.600
>> That is uh subsection E, right in the middle of page three of the PDF. Notification of neighboring properties. >> Right there. >> And I I went to the property appraiser and I kind of did a a thing and saying you know how far out will you be able to

331
01:43:49.600 --> 01:44:10.160
hear something this big and this loud? And it's beyond a thousand, but by then it's you know maybe a little farther away. >> And that's only if they're doing that in the morning outside of normal hours. >> Mhm. >> It's a very narrow very narrow thing.

332
01:44:10.160 --> 01:44:26.240
And it's such a big deal like I would think they would know in advance we're going to have this many concrete trucks lined up like this is a big deal. You know you're doing it. >> The The only thing would be what What happens if it pours rain one day and you're delayed? That's >> Then then they just need to let They

333
01:44:26.240 --> 01:44:43.040
need to let Somewhere in this notice there should be a thing that says and and I think it specifies that you should be able to contact super somewhere in here. So you can call and be like, "Hey, doesn't appear that this happened on this day. When are you going to do it?" So you'll at least have gotten notice. Yeah, it's There's there's a mechanism.

334
01:44:43.040 --> 01:45:00.560
>> Okay. >> Uh I I I'm not sure where we're at on a motion. Where where are we? >> Amending it. >> Or she's making a friendly amendment potentially or asking for one on changing the amount of notice time if someone's doing a big concrete pour. So I guess we should wait for a motion.

335
01:45:00.560 --> 01:45:15.200
>> Yeah, I'm okay with that. >> Okay, and then I second with all the amendments. >> All right. Do you have any further discussion between >> No. >> Councilman Rotmier? >> I'm good. >> Could you rephrase what the actual motion is now? >> Yes.

336
01:45:15.200 --> 01:45:34.920
>> Okay. Uh the motion is um Hang on. Let me go read the the here. We're going to schedule. This is a first reading of ordinance. So, we are going to I move to schedule a public hearing

337
01:45:34.920 --> 01:45:57.440
for July 6th, 2026 for ordinance 1772 with the following amendments. Um section 22-123 paragraph C, paragraph two bullet point C bullet point

338
01:45:57.440 --> 01:46:19.360
one lower case I will replace the Latin i.e. with the words limited to. Additionally >> section A

339
01:46:19.360 --> 01:46:35.800
just above that will be changed to uh the applicant must submit a written request at least 10 business days prior to the scheduled activity. So, that's just changing the number. >> Mhm. >> And down in section E

340
01:46:35.800 --> 01:46:55.080
changing 200 to 1,000 ft and at least 7 days instead of 48 hours for the time prior to the commencement of activity for notice. >> Okay. Councilmember Britton?

341
01:46:55.080 --> 01:47:10.600
>> I guess I have a question on on these changes. How how would we enforce it? What if someone came up and did something, gave a 7-day notice and did it in 48 hours? What's the enforcement mechanism? >> A pregnant person could show up on site,

342
01:47:10.600 --> 01:47:27.440
walk out into the middle of the cement, and call 911, and the police would come and tell them they must stop. That would is what would happen. And then they would ask nicely, we continue pouring? Please, please." And she might say, "Okay, don't do this

343
01:47:27.440 --> 01:47:44.600
again." >> So >> Mr. Cobb, I will let you answer this. >> All right. It gives the city the ability to issue a red tag, what we call a red tag, which is a stop work order to the construction. >> Thank you. Councilmember Britain.

344
01:47:44.600 --> 01:48:02.520
You got me good. I'm laughing. >> [laughter] >> Nope. I'm I'm good. Thanks. >> All right. Any further discussion? Can the clerk call the roll? >> [clears throat] >> Councilmember Ott. >> I. >> Mayor Slayton. >> I.

345
01:48:02.520 --> 01:48:20.880
>> Deputy Mayor Tucker. >> I. >> Councilmember Bottsford. >> I. >> Councilmember Britain. >> I. >> The motion carries. We'll move on to resolution number 4738-26. Mr. Cobb. >> All right. Thank you, Deputy Mayor. And I see Mr. Coons is already up at the

346
01:48:20.880 --> 01:48:36.600
podium. So, uh this is a request for the council to approve the final design for the uh mural at Snively Park in the marina area. And uh this is on recommendation from the public art board, and Mr. Coons, our public art board chairman, is here tonight. So,

347
01:48:36.600 --> 01:48:52.480
he'll I'm going to turn it over here to him for the presentation. >> Thank you, Mr. Coons. >> Good evening. Thank you for the opportunity to bring this to your attention. We have uh been working on this mural design for some time. You may recall

348
01:48:52.480 --> 01:49:11.040
that we had a first round uh call for designs, and brought some to for your approval, and you declined to choose at that point, and we redid the process. And in our second call, we came uh

349
01:49:11.040 --> 01:49:25.400
we received 23 applications from 15 different artists. We went through a rigorous evaluation process that involved a blind evaluation of all

350
01:49:25.400 --> 01:49:43.080
of our uh council members um our our board members uh and then we um looked at the top five and did a re-ranking of just the top five and decided to bring the top four for

351
01:49:43.080 --> 01:50:02.240
your consideration. Uh the one that's up on the screen now is the top rated design. Uh which came in first place. It was artist number seven, Justin Herman. Can we go to the next one, please?

352
01:50:03.480 --> 01:50:18.440
This is the second placed artist uh with this design by Carl Joseph. And the third and fourth designs actually tied in our scoring. So, this

353
01:50:18.440 --> 01:50:38.240
is tied for third place by John Miller. And uh also tied for third place by John Lozano. So, we bring this for your decision. And we're happy to answer any questions. I have a couple members of the Public

354
01:50:38.240 --> 01:50:53.920
Arts Board here this evening. >> Thank you, Mr. Coons. Uh does anybody have any questions right now? Okay. Uh what is the pleasure of council? >> I I kind of do have a question. How how strongly does the board feel about its

355
01:50:53.920 --> 01:51:11.960
choice ranking order? Or is it kind of like So, like there's there's there are tables, but there's also the sort of the gist cuz you you have to assign numbers, but then there's the the feel I'm I'm asking about the

356
01:51:11.960 --> 01:51:28.760
feeling end of it to the extent you can share. >> So in your in your materials you got the full scoring for the first round. You didn't get the scoring for the second round which was a ranking and as I recall this one came out in first

357
01:51:28.760 --> 01:51:45.640
place by a good margin. >> Okay. Thank you. >> The theme by the way is Oviedo past present and future. And I can add that this top place design appealed to many of us because if

358
01:51:45.640 --> 01:52:01.160
you'll remember the the setting for this mural is on the the little boat house thing down at Center Lake Park. And it was thought that this there at that location the large figure could

359
01:52:01.160 --> 01:52:18.680
be seen from a distance. But then it would pull you in and then you could look at the smaller designs that has additional meaning for the city and the past present and future. >> Say that last part again.

360
01:52:18.680 --> 01:52:33.560
>> You you see the See large figure from far away. >> Yes. Yes and then if you if you move up closer to it you can look at these it's meant to be like tile work. >> The tiles okay.

361
01:52:33.560 --> 01:52:51.600
>> Yes and then there's smaller designs that have additional meaning. >> And now this faces the playground. >> It's the little boat house. >> Yeah. But it's it's the side of the boat house that faces the playground because

362
01:52:51.600 --> 01:53:10.320
in the background of this is the water. >> It's as I recall it's on the side. I think it's facing the the building. >> It's on the back of the cantina. >> It's on the Yeah, on the side of that.

363
01:53:10.320 --> 01:53:26.160
>> Oh, it's on the side of that. >> Yeah. So, you can see it in this in This artist This artist took the trouble to place the design in in the location. >> Facing away from the lake. >> Away from the lake, yeah. Facing the playground.

364
01:53:26.160 --> 01:53:41.600
>> The playground's to the right of it, but yeah. >> It It It faces the other mural. >> Faces >> The other mural. >> Faces the other mural. Oh, it's in that little building. >> Yes. Okay. Okay. >> Cuz there's that other building that looks just like this on the other side, and yeah, you're right. >> You've got You've got the marina, and

365
01:53:41.600 --> 01:53:58.120
then you've got the cantina. >> The marina, yeah. Okay, this is not the marina. This is the >> No, this is the marina building. >> That's the marina building. >> Yes, it's marina building. >> Yes, but the marina building faces the the back of the playground. >> I think you guys did a did a great job, you know. You You put a lot of time into

366
01:53:58.120 --> 01:54:12.560
this, and you know, appreciate I like this idea. I mean, the artist gives us a background. We appreciate I know you get some of your members of the art board up here. Yeah, very in tile work with the connection with the, you know, Avida Spanish

367
01:54:12.560 --> 01:54:31.760
namesake, you know, the the Greek and Roman goddess of prosperity, you know, and he switched her basket of oranges for abundance. I like it. I thought you guys did a great job of picking this out. >> Is there a What is the pleasure council? Cuz we don't have a motion on the table.

368
01:54:31.760 --> 01:54:54.680
>> I like I like the first one. I don't know what how you make a motion to pick the first one. >> It is a resolution. >> Resolution 4738-20 26. >> So, I'll make a motion to approve resolution number 4738-26. >> Thank you. There's a motion. Is there a

369
01:54:54.680 --> 01:55:09.200
second? >> For purposes of discussion, I will second that. >> Okay. Anything further? >> No. I Like I said, I thought they did a great job, you know, I appreciate, you know, what the art board does for us. I like the like the concept. I'm I'm good with their selection.

370
01:55:09.200 --> 01:55:25.480
>> Mayor Slaton, I'm fixing to have an Alan Aut moment here. Okay, so we if we outsource this thing to the art board, >> [laughter] >> so part of me thinks man, we should pass this straight on through and we should not tinker with it. And also, it's an advisory board. And this, unlike our

371
01:55:25.480 --> 01:55:41.520
charter, does not specify that we cannot intervene. So I'm I'm looking at this and there's a lot of things that I really like about the one that ranked first. There are some things about it that are kind of weird. One of them is that there's a pineapple palm. So we we don't naturally have any naturally occurring pineapple palms in

372
01:55:41.520 --> 01:55:57.920
Oviedo. That would be the bottom left there. And then so I just looked at it before reading the explanation. And I was thinking, what's with this gypsy mermaid person? And you know, when you read, then you understand this is a person from Greek mythology. And you we

373
01:55:57.920 --> 01:56:15.120
got a lot going on. We got Greek, we got Spanish. And then there's something I that struck me right away. I was like, is this plum what's that stuff called? Coontie? Is this a coontie branch? No, it's olive. But it looks not quite like an olive branch, nor a native coontie.

374
01:56:15.120 --> 01:56:30.360
Um so I think it's supposed to be coontie, not coontie. Like you know, like pick one. If and it's supposed to be an olive branch according to the explanation. So if if council is wanting to move forward with this and it sounds like the art

375
01:56:30.360 --> 01:56:46.960
board feels strongly about ranking this number one, it would it would be preferable from my perspective for for the palm tree to be something that's native to Oviedo. The olive branch, if it stays an olive branch, to look more

376
01:56:46.960 --> 01:57:02.320
like it's got olives, because there are people like it is it is possible to grow an olive branch in Oviedo. And I think that's an interesting fact factoid that a lot of people don't know um that you can do it, but they're much twiggy-er. It'd be nice to have some

377
01:57:02.320 --> 01:57:18.840
fruit on it, perhaps. Um and I I'm not sure what to do. But maybe the earrings are what's doing it for me, making it look like a gypsy and not like a Greek goddess. I think we're looking for like Is it a It's sort of like a Mediterranean goddess, which is okay,

378
01:57:18.840 --> 01:57:35.080
too, if that's what we're going for. So, anyway, that's my two cents. Councilmember Ruff. >> Um I saw I was kind of recently thinking that if she faces the playground that she kind of looks like a mother

379
01:57:35.080 --> 01:57:50.160
providing for the children on the playground. Perhaps. >> I I'm just worried about her ears. Like when when kids pull your earrings [clears throat] out. I think we're getting a little off topic. >> We're we're getting off topic. Like it or don't. >> Yeah. >> There might be three votes to just go

380
01:57:50.160 --> 01:58:06.800
forward and nobody's concerned at all about the earrings but me and the harmed ears. >> Councilmember Braden. >> Well, I'm not a large expert and I don't claim to be one, but um I think the recommended one I

381
01:58:06.800 --> 01:58:21.880
I'd almost need a a plaque in front of it to explain what it what it's all about. Is that Are they going to provide that? This is a I'm real by uh you know, the artist and explain what the symbology is in it. Or

382
01:58:21.880 --> 01:58:39.040
if not, I I think I'd prefer the fourth one. I guess the fourth one. Hang on. >> And then I guess it's that a question for Dr. Korea on the >> Artist 13. Which is a little bit simpler to to appreciate, I guess, without having a a

383
01:58:39.040 --> 01:58:59.560
lot of interpretation involved. That's just my two cents. >> So, I guess I'll ask Dr. Korea anything about a plaque first. >> So, we did not plan for a plaque. We can still have a plaque and now we have a $1,500, you know,

384
01:58:59.560 --> 01:59:14.560
>> discretion? >> discretion um um from the Public Arts Board. Um so, we can do that. Uh we'll have to make a summary of the um of the narrative to be able to be in the plaque. Um the other thing that I was

385
01:59:14.560 --> 01:59:32.040
going to say that this design um does not meet the the proportion of the of the wall and I provided that, you know, the the the size and the length and the height of the wall. So, when I

386
01:59:32.040 --> 01:59:50.320
informed the the artist that he was selected by the Public Art Board um um depending on the uh confirmation from uh council [music] and I told him you would have to adjust the the design and he said, "Oh, the I

387
01:59:50.320 --> 02:00:08.400
could do it side trim me." So, he will have to do some uh adjustments anyway. So, if council would like to have any suggestions for um changes in the design, that is a possibility as well. >> Okay. >> Um but a plaque if the

388
02:00:08.400 --> 02:00:24.760
council decides to have a plaque, you know, explaining, that's a possibility to do. >> Okay. >> Thank you. >> I I'm opposed to having a plaque. I I don't like plaques. Um I think art shouldn't need an explanation. You shouldn't have to walk up to it and go, "What the heck's all

389
02:00:24.760 --> 02:00:39.920
this about?" Like, it should be something that is understood. Um so, if if we have to ex- if we think we have to explain it, then I would kind of rather not do it because if

390
02:00:39.920 --> 02:00:56.080
I I mean, if people don't get it, they're going to laugh at us on the internet before they go read the plaque. It's kind of the way culture seems to work nowadays. If we think that that's a possibility, then maybe we should pick another one, is my opinion. >> I will So, I haven't gone yet, and I

391
02:00:56.080 --> 02:01:11.800
want to just thank our Public Arts Board. I know that we've gone through this twice. The first time we went through it, we got a lot of AI slop thrown at us from applicants. So, I'm very thankful that the second time we got rid of that. We had a lot of artists put a lot of work into this. And if you do read the bio behind this, it does

392
02:01:11.800 --> 02:01:28.160
have a lot of meaning to it. And sometimes you should look at art and think about it and try to figure out where they're coming from and what it means. And I think they did a great job here. Um I do think an easy fix would be to change the palm tree to make it a native one. I think that's an easy ask for the artist. I don't think they're going to blink twice at that. So, I do think that's something we can ask. But

393
02:01:28.160 --> 02:01:43.960
as far as that, like I would like go forward with the Public Arts Board's recommendation. Is there any other further discussion on this? >> No. >> Okay. Then I will ask the clerk to call the roll. Council member Bottsford? >> Aye.

394
02:01:43.960 --> 02:02:02.480
>> Mayor Slayton? >> I have to sign in still. See, that This is why it would be nice to do it all at the same time. Um I think I'm an aye. >> Deputy Mayor Teichert? >> Aye. >> Council member Burton?

395
02:02:02.480 --> 02:02:19.480
>> Aye. >> Council member Ott? >> Aye. >> The motion carries. Thank you for the public art stuff. Uh we are going to move on to item number 13A, which was previously item number four. Resolution number 4733-26.

396
02:02:19.600 --> 02:02:35.200
Um Mr. Cobb. >> All right, thank you, Deputy Mayor. Uh this is a request for the City Council to award invitation to bid 26-17 to KIB Construction Corporation for to renovate the three bathrooms at Fire

397
02:02:35.200 --> 02:02:53.680
Station 48 uh for the amount of $67,500. I mean, I'm sorry, $65,700. Uh the the renovations, these are complete renovations of the different of the three of the three bathrooms. It will involve

398
02:02:53.680 --> 02:03:10.320
removing all of the vanities, all of the mirrors, all of the the tiles. Uh re-converting the showers. I think even in one bathroom we're increasing the size of the bathroom. Uh and it's to also to

399
02:03:10.320 --> 02:03:27.120
improve the ADA of the bathrooms. These bathrooms it's the original bathrooms from what I understand they're having a difficult they're difficult to work within. And so that's what this does. The one there was one item that the staff did do an add-on and that was to make all of

400
02:03:27.120 --> 02:03:43.320
the showers zero entry. And so the the bid does cover both the all the the reconstruction of the showers plus making all reconstruction of the bathrooms plus making all the showers zero entry.

401
02:03:43.320 --> 02:03:59.480
And so it's recommended that city council adopt resolution number 4736-26. >> Thank you, Mr. Cobb. What is the pleasure of council? >> I'll make a motion to approve resolution number 4733-26. >> We have a motion. Do we have a second?

402
02:03:59.480 --> 02:04:16.040
>> Second. >> Any discussion? >> No. I mean looks like they got a bid to redo the bathrooms in the firehouses. I mean we're doing the floors, zero entry to the the the showers. Um No, I don't have any problem with it.

403
02:04:16.040 --> 02:04:31.200
>> Councilmember Rap. >> Uh I didn't have anything, no. >> Councilmember Slighting. >> I obviously did have something and that is just that I found it a little bit comical that our firefighters need a zero entry shower upgrade price tag

404
02:04:31.200 --> 02:04:47.400
add-on when we expect them to be climbing into burning buildings and all these things. So I just thought that was kind of an unnecessary thing in a season when people are asking for thriftier spending decisions. Um so, remodeling bathrooms to the tune of almost $60,000

405
02:04:47.400 --> 02:05:02.600
in the first place is is pretty solid, but adding it a zero entry when nobody here is probably Yeah, it sounds like we're also getting them up to ADA compliance, which you know, that's a federal law. We have to do things like that, but we don't need to

406
02:05:02.600 --> 02:05:19.240
make them zero entry. So, I'd I'd prefer to see that um removed. >> Council member Braden. >> I don't have anything to add. Thank you. >> Okay. Anything else? >> Yeah, can can you talk about the zero entry? I'm

407
02:05:19.240 --> 02:05:35.920
>> It's like a $2,100 thing. So, you could just be like, what's $2,100? Or you could say, they don't need zero entry. You could walk your 3 inches up or whatever it might be. >> So, I'm sorry. I I don't know what zero entry means. >> Oh, it's where you can roll your wheelchair right on in.

408
02:05:35.920 --> 02:05:51.240
Our firefighters will not be entering a wheelchair. So, there's not, in my opinion, a need to >> Mr. Can you Can you get back to >> correct. It is It is a flat floor. You don't have to step into it. You know, you just walk right in. >> Okay. That's what it is.

409
02:05:51.240 --> 02:06:06.520
And so, that's an upgrade in here that's $2,700. >> That wasn't an additive. Yes, sir. 20 21. >> Okay. And are we required for that for for ADA? >> No, I I think the reason was one of the

410
02:06:06.520 --> 02:06:23.120
It's It's more of a If you think about it, it's more of a safety provision so that you're not stepping up and over. There's no slipping. You know, you can just walk right in. >> And And the reason And so, these are these are decontamination showers, if I remember right from a work session a year ago. Is that what we're talking

411
02:06:23.120 --> 02:06:40.000
about here? >> Possibly. >> So, >> Yes. >> Good evening, Mayor, Deputy Mayor, council members. Actually, part of the zero depth entry is in the two non-ADA shower and bathrooms at Fire Station 48.

412
02:06:40.000 --> 02:06:56.160
We're actually going to extend the wall about 12 to 18 in and as part of that and removing the shower pan, that step up needs to be removed so they can replace the shower pan. So, instead of them reinstalling the step over, we're just

413
02:06:56.160 --> 02:07:12.360
fire requested to have that added zero depth entry. So, with the extension of the wall, they can just turn the corner and walk directly into the shower. And as part of that in those two bathrooms, those shower heads are actually on the east wall or yes, on the

414
02:07:12.360 --> 02:07:27.720
west wall and we're moving them to the north and the south wall for functionality because when they get in there, they have to turn the handle and then turn this way and it's pretty cramped in there. So, we're just sorry, trying to add more functionality for them when they're in their showers as well. >> And

415
02:07:27.720 --> 02:07:42.680
and so, given that these are decontamination also, that I mean, there's a Help me if I'm right. I I can only just, you know, imagine what the situation the scenario is. So, help me if if I'm wrong. >> So, from my understanding >> in from >> They're come These are also for when

416
02:07:42.680 --> 02:07:59.320
they're in their dormitories as well. So, it's also morning showers, evening showers, things along those lines. As far as the decontamination process, I could not speak on that process too much on this to what they is required for all of their equipment.

417
02:08:04.920 --> 02:08:20.080
>> What questions would you have in regards to that? >> so I was trying to clarify like the the scenario is you come in from using the chemicals like fire foam >> going to take all their Yeah. All their gear and everything off and this is just to decontaminate their body. So, they're

418
02:08:20.080 --> 02:08:36.080
basically taking a shower. We bought actually special soap that helps remove the carcinogens and things from them and that's what that is. That's the the decon aspect. We're not washing gear, we're not washing anything else off in the showers. >> The idea is you're moving in quickly to get

419
02:08:36.080 --> 02:08:52.520
toxins carcinogens off of you. >> After every structure fire, they all come back, they decon with the with the the special soap that we provide for them. >> So, the moving in and out quickly and then the zero >> The biggest benefit from >> safe safety issue I'm trying to connect

420
02:08:52.520 --> 02:09:08.880
these things together. >> The biggest benefit for the zero entry like like Mr. Whitaker said is that we're extending the walls, the showers. Two I think two of the three showers are way too small. The firefighters don't even use them cuz they're not even really big enough to get in and and turn and do things to get clean. We got some

421
02:09:08.880 --> 02:09:25.400
pretty big firefighters. Um so, that's what this is doing is this is extending those walls and it would be it it's it's more efficient so to speak to not have to replace that threshold going into the showers and just have it as a zero entry going in with the walls. It makes it easier for cleaning, for

422
02:09:25.400 --> 02:09:41.000
maintaining the grout lines and stuff like that in it. >> Okay. All right. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> If it's easier, then why does it cost more? It sounds like it saves supplies and it saves labor. I'm I'm just I'm not understanding why it's a upcharge or is

423
02:09:41.000 --> 02:09:57.440
it something like we have to do it because it actually would cost more and it's just put in put into the agenda wrong. I mean that could be it. >> I believe some of that has to do with the replacement of the shower pan in there as well and just having that zero depth with the shower pan. I believe that's where the added cost comes in. I

424
02:09:57.440 --> 02:10:15.480
would have to double check with our facility staff on that matter. Um I do not have that information off the top of my head. >> All right, thank you. Okay. If the clerk could call the roll. Councilmember Botterud? >> Aye. >> Councilmember Ott? >> Aye.

425
02:10:15.480 --> 02:10:30.320
>> Mayor Slayton? >> Nay. >> Deputy Mayor Tuckert? >> Aye. >> Councilmember Britain? >> Aye. >> The motion carries. We do not have any discussion items, so we are on to the city manager's report. >> I have no report, Deputy Mayor.

426
02:10:30.320 --> 02:10:45.560
>> The city attorney's report. >> I have nothing to report, Deputy Mayor. >> Mayor Slayton's report. >> I also have nothing to report. >> Council member Rock. >> You've heard enough from me. >> Council member Boteford. >> Yes, well, I did want to recognize somebody who's in here in the room, Mr.

427
02:10:45.560 --> 02:11:01.280
Zuber, who just informed me today that he has retired from his crossing crossing guard duties. So, we just want to say thank you for your service here in town. I appreciate that. And I see we have Mr. Jackson here. I know we have June Teeth coming up

428
02:11:01.280 --> 02:11:16.320
this Saturday, Riverside Park at 10:00 a.m. >> 10:30. >> 10:30. So, that's always a a great event and great turnout for that. That's first time at Riverside or did we have we done at Riverside before? Second time? Great.

429
02:11:16.320 --> 02:11:32.200
Also, we got a Liberty Tree planning, which I had to ask what that was today on June 25th at 9:00 a.m. So, apparently it's part of celebrating America 250 years. Uh it's at 9:00 a.m. here at City Hall.

430
02:11:32.200 --> 02:11:48.680
It's a planning an oak tree. Was that right, Mr. Cobb? >> It's a hickory tree. >> It's a what? >> Hickory tree. >> A hickory tree. Hickory tree. Okay. So, and then I believe we have Commissioner DeLory speaking as well. >> Yeah, he'll give the keynote. >> Very nice. Very nice.

431
02:11:48.680 --> 02:12:04.960
And then I know we also have uh the police summer camp. Does that continue on or is it just one week? It was last week. It's just a one-week deal. So, from what I saw on Facebook, and again, Lisa, great job. Um looks like it was a great event and a good turnout for the kids.

432
02:12:04.960 --> 02:12:19.680
Um want to thank the art board uh for coming in tonight and presenting as you did. We appreciate everybody on our advisory boards. I appreciate what you all do for us. Uh it helps us out. To Mr. Britain's point, we're not really an artist, so, you know, it

433
02:12:19.680 --> 02:12:34.960
helps to have your guys input to tell us what you see. And then lastly, July 4th fireworks. It's all at the mall. Festivities start at 5:00. And then fireworks at 9:30? >> 9:00. >> 9:00.

434
02:12:34.960 --> 02:12:51.600
Very good. So, that's always a a great event. Hopefully, the weather is good for us as it has been in several times. So, you guys do a good job and looking forward to And that is all I got. >> All right. Councilman Britain. >> Uh first of all, thank you for letting me

435
02:12:51.600 --> 02:13:05.960
dial in today. My wife and I are getting off the beaten path, you might say. We're driving off the interstate through this through the countryside and it's it's kind of refreshing to see the country uh as it really is. You know, the

436
02:13:05.960 --> 02:13:21.640
farmlands, the farms, the small towns. So, uh I appreciate y'all letting me do that tonight. Uh Again, I'll I'll reiterate what Mr. Botefur said it for the art committee. Thank you. And and also for the charter committee.

437
02:13:21.640 --> 02:13:38.160
I I saw a parallel in in both of those committees providing us recommendations and allowing us to to confer or not confer with them. Uh and that and their efforts are don't go really unnoticed. So, we we we appreciate that. And with that, I'll see you guys in a couple weeks.

438
02:13:38.160 --> 02:13:53.920
We're heading heading north tomorrow. We'll see you. >> Drive safe. >> Okay, safe travels. Um I'm up next and you actually mentioned everything I was going to, so no report here. So, we'll go on to future meeting dates. Um Monday, June 29th at 5:30 p.m. we

439
02:13:53.920 --> 02:14:09.640
have a work session. Monday, July 6th at 6:30 p.m. we have a regular session. And Monday, July 20th at 6:30 p.m. we have a regular session. Is there anything else for the good of the order? It is 8:28 p.m. and this meeting is adjourned.

440
02:14:09.640 --> 02:14:16.880
>> Boom. >> Boom. >> [laughter] >> Yes.