[Music] I'm trying to see if it looks better with the light on or with the light off. We're already live. >> Oh, I wanted to make sure that it looks good. >> And can I use the um >> clicker? >> Yeah.
Let me see about that. [Music] This thing is so ugly and nasty. You don't understand. Our heat. [Music] I put the clicker over there. Let me
know if it's working cuz if not, I may have to go get some AAA's. I don't have any triple A's on here. >> Is it on? >> Turn it on on the side. Bye.
My mom says natural testing. >> Woohoo. I found Mike. are live. >> The mics are live. Yeah, since I got it yesterday.
>> Mics are live. The mics are live. >> Welcome back. >> I'm alive. >> I am surviving. >> I will survive. >> Okay.
[Music] I don't know. [Music] [Music] It's good. It's my back. That's a lot. >> It's Exactly.
>> You ready? >> I'm ready. Good evening. Welcome to the LPA the November 4th meeting. We get a roll call, please. >> Yes. Present tonight we have Daryl Lopez, Katherine Hunt, David Dever,
Bruce Kavanaaugh, Dr. Arian Bryant, Lisa Ramsey, and confirm absent is Ryan Hulcom. >> Thank you. We can all please silence our cell phones just so we're not interrupted. Next item on the agenda is approval of minutes from our October 21st meeting. What is the pleasure of
board to make a motion to accept the minutes? >> Thank you. Is there a second? >> Second. >> Thank you. All those Any discussions on the minutes? >> Who was the second? >> David De. >> Yes. >> Thank you. >> Seeing no discussions, all those in
favor say I. >> All those post say nay. Moving on to public comments. This is a time where anyone wishing to speak to this of the LPA is now is the time to do so. Seeing none, I will close the public comments. Public meeting items. We have no public
meetings. Next thing on the agenda is public hearing ordinance number 1760, evaluation appraisal report, comprehensive plan. Staff ready? >> Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The LPA is um asked to recommend
transmitt of the ordinance and this is the evaluation and appraisal report. Um the city last conducted a major rewrite of the comprehensive plan back in 2022. Um and at that time we brought our um
comp plan up to um the at least met the requirements and we exceeded the requirements because we took the planning horizon out to 2045. Um since then um we every seven years the state requires that we evaluate our
comprehensive plan to make sure that is consistent with any additional um changes to state statutes. And so this is what um we are doing tonight is just um showing you all the recommendations that have been made by staff to our
city's comprehensive plan to bring it up to to date with the new statutes since 2022. The amendments that we made to the city's comprehensive plan are to the elements of the land use element, transportation element, housing, capital
improvements, as well as the map amendments. And we'll go over these map amendments. And the categories that we um put these changes in are either changes to the Florida statutes, clarification in some instances, um
completion of a comprehensive plan requirement, and you'll see that with our mobility um our transportation element where we've put in policies um that we were going to bring our transportation, we were going to remove concurrency and replace it with mobility
um plan and mobility fee. and we did that back in 2022 because we knew we were in the process of updating um and adopting a new mobility plan and mobility fee. We also have typographical corrections and then um the map
amendment. So the first element is going to be the land use element and I'm just going to give you a summary of some of the changes. So the land use element um and you'll see the policy we have in in our um land use element in our
categories. So we have like rural, we have um low density residential, we have different categories commercial, office um we have these titles called primary, secondary and other in those categories. So we wanted to add a definition of what
um primary, secondary and other um means in our comprehensive plan. So we um we amended policy 1-1.1.2 land use classifications. Primary permissible uses are allowed by right
pursuant to the land development code. Secondary permissible uses are allowed with the issuance of a special exception use order as a permissible use or within a mixeduse development in accordance with the land development code. And then other permissible uses are allowed with
the issuance of a special exception use order and they shall not be deemed to satisfy the mixed use requirement as set forth in the comprehensive plan. So that's new language that we put into the comprehensive plan. Then you'll see um our the statute 16
33205 requires that we put in um solar facilities. So you'll see solar facilities. You'll see that it's underlined in red there. We also had to put in floating
solar facilities because that's also required by um statues. And then this section you'll see we have the primary um permissible uses but we in this we you'll see solar facilities and floating um solar facilities and
that's required by Florida statutes 1632051. We um amended the rural, industrial, and public feature land use designations to allow for floating solar facilities as permissible uses. And you'll see it there. You'll see the rural, industrial,
and public. We also this policy is for the mobility plan and mobility fee. As I mentioned earlier, um back in 2022, we amended our comprehensive plan to just um say that we are in the process of adopting a
mobility plan and a mobility fee. Um and at the time that we adopt it, we're going to come back and change the comp plan to remove transportation concurrency and replace it with the mobility plan and mobility fee language. And so that's what that is. um we're
going to ensure um that the mobility plan and mobility fee encourages the movement of people. So, a lot of the policies is removing the transportation concurrency language and also the language that says we're in the process
of adopting a mobility plan and it says we have adopted a mobility plan, a mobility fee. So in the transportation element, you're going to see the same thing. This is basically
um showing that the city is has adopted a mobility plan and mobility fee and all of the elements that's um that we've stricken through in the transportation element is just removing transportation concurrency.
Oh, I got fancy. Okay. So those are the ele those are the policies and the measures where we deleted transportation concurrency exception area as well. Okay. Housing element.
Some of you are familiar with the new statute that says that we cannot cities, municipalities, counties cannot add anything more burdensome or restrictive in their comprehensive plan or land development code. Um so in our housing element, we
had language that says that we're going to adopt a green building ordinance um by the year 2025. So we extended that out to 202029. Um so that's the only change that's being made to our um housing element,
capital improvements element. We included some new policies um in the comprehensive plan um that says we're going to do some things by a certain date like within the next 20 years. Um we also updated our
capital improvements table. We um struck through the old table and we just replaced it with the new table, but the new table has some of the old projects and then some new projects. Um and we worked with the different departments. We worked with parks and recreation, we
worked with um public works, um we worked with fire, um and different city departments to update this table. So the table, this is not the full table. The full table you have in your documents is just a um a little snippet of what um
the table looks like. The future land use map. So we are changing um and you'll see on your map we numbered it 1 through 7. Um one is um
north of 419. So you have 1 2 3 4 north of 419. And those are all city-owned properties. Five and six are also city-owned properties and we're changing the future land use um from commercial
um to public for one two three four and then five and six. We're also changing the future land use designation. Um seven is the only parcel that is not city. It's actually the cemetery property. When we adopted our land
development code last year, uh we changed we annexed them, we annexed them back in 2023, I believe. Um so when we annexed them, there was no zoning or future land use designation. So with our update to the land
development code last year, we changed the zoning to PLI. So now they need a city future land use designation. So it's going to public as well. So we only um changed um properties from whatever future land
use they were to public. So all of these are going to public. Um the applicant the not the applicant the owners are aware of um the proposed future land use map amendment. So the schedule for public hearing is we
have the transmitt public hearing tonight and then city council will consider um transmitt of the ordinance on the 17th. It is recommended that the LPA um recommend transmitt to the city
council of the ordinance. This concludes staff's presentation and we're available for questions. Anybody have any questions? >> No. >> The time schedule for the dates and years. Is that going to be feasible or we going to have to extend those again?
>> Which dates? >> The dates that from 25 to 29 the land use. >> Is that realistic? >> We're we're hoping that it is, but we can't do anything at this point that's more burdensome or restrictive. So, we can plan it but not adopt it.
>> Okay. What exactly is a solar facility? I was just curious. Is that part of with a with a rural area with agriculture with >> Yes. >> What is that? >> So, it's a it's like a solar farm. Um
the state has a definition. So, we had to adopt what the state's definition of it is. And then the same thing as a floating flo floating solar um is similar. So, we had to adopt something that was um the same definition as the
state. So, the floating solars I think we have I've been seeing them in these retention ponds by DOT that's owned by DOT. >> I think UCF has >> Yeah, you'll see those floating ones in the retention ponds and we've been
seeing a lot of those there. >> Anybody else? What is the treasure board? >> What do we have to do? >> Approve. >> Recommend that it goes to >> recommend it.
>> Okay. I'll make a motion to recommend that we transmit or pass this to city council for the meeting on the 17th. >> Is there a second? >> I'll second it. >> Thank you. Any discussion between us? See, I'll call the vote. All those in
favor say I. >> I. >> All those opposed, nay. Okay. Moving right along. We The other thing is we have discussion items. Does anybody want anything to speak of? No. Okay. Future meeting. I
was just informed that November 18th might be a working session. Is that is correct? >> Yes. A work session on um the land development code. It's the glitch ordinance that we are want to bring before you all so you all can take a look at the changes proposed changes
because this board is tasked with >> the board is tasked with making a recommendation to city council on the land development code just like you are with the comp plan >> so we want to make sure you all are aware of what's coming before you take action on it. >> So it's the same thing uh changes that
statutes have changed that we have to change that. No, not necessarily. It's um it's a combination of things. It's things that we um some corrections that need to be made, some typos, there's consistencies with um other sections of
the land development code. Um we had to go back and make sure that we're not doing anything too burdensome or too restrictive because of the new statue that came out. Um, so we but we want to bring this forward to you all before you take action on it.
>> I'm going to be out of town that day, just so you know. >> Yeah, I won't be there the 18th either. >> Okay, that's fine. It's a work session. >> Okay. Anything for the 2nd of December or the 16th? >> As long as we have a quorum
to open, right? >> We don't need a quum for work session. >> Do we need one? >> It's just you and me. Huh? >> For that one work session or this? >> We'll let you know. >> No, no, because we had that joint work session between um >> LD LC
>> and us and there was only two of us there. >> Yeah. >> So, I don't think we need a quorum for for the work session. >> Okay. >> I don't think >> we'll we'll check and just make sure. >> So, I get this point. >> Was there anything for December?
>> She didn't say. >> Not that we're aware of. Not right now. >> Okay. So, at this point, I guess we are adjourned for the evening. >> Okay. >> Thank you all. >> Okay. >> Oh, unless we do