##VIDEO ID:Xo2JXfldGRw## e e e e e e e e o' I'm calling the meeting of the city of Paca planning board to order um would you please rise for the invocation pastor P mberry are you there yes sir I'm here would you begin us please sir absolutely good evening everyone father again thank you for this day thank you for how good you've been towards us you brought us together once again for another meeting and we say thank you we pray God that you will grant wisdom uh to every board member and their decision makings God for this historic board pray God for the guidance and your wisdom and all that we under to do for your glory that the city may move forward in a most positive and direct way we thank you now for what you're doing God in this city of Palatka continue to bless us Lord I pray in Jesus name amen amen thank you Pastor bless you M Wilson will you lead us Pledge aliance yes I pledge aliance to the flag of the United States of America the rep for it stands one nation God indivisible liy and justice for thank you may have a seat Alex will you please call rooll thank you Mr chairman um to start with uh Mr Ed KW here Edie Wilson here and for the record uh Chase Barnes excused Mr ER Wallace and Andrew Bernett for the records excused uh George Delo thank you thank you Alex um I don't have my little note up here to read yall today but um is there any any um the anybody on the board that has any expart communication with anything that we have here on the agenda today s okay see none um can I have an motion for the approval of the minutes last month I'll make a motion to approve January 7 2025 meeting we have a motion have a second second M Mr D second all those in favor say I I all those post seeing none unanimous um at this time we will lead into public comments uh your the speakers are limited to three minutes and no action should be expected to be taken today with um with um allowing us to uh if we don't don't know anything about it how about that that workday um is there anybody from the public that would like to speak to any items anything right now I mean you if you going to speak to an item just wait to that item to speak seeing none we'll move on into our regular business um Mr Lorenzo do you going to yes Ryan Michels going to present the staff report on the mostly Heights final plots okay good afterno chair and plan board members &m homeowners LLC has submitted a request for final flat for a six lot residential subdivision located on the northwest side of Mosley Avenue and Ed Edge Street intersection 13-16 [Music] 7 d10 D1 the preliminary plat for this project was included by the planning board on August 6 2024 subject to conditions recommended by staff at that time the applicant proposed six residential lots for future development of six single family homes the width and depth for Lots one2 and three have not changed in the final PL however Lots four five and six have been modified the applicant preliminary to the St John River Water Management District and they had proved for a storm water liation for that track the deps for these Lots four five and six have changed from approximately 230 ft uh approximately 140t toate the final fact shows a Halfacre dry Pond located on the northwest corner that track the proposed subdivision Lots meet the development standards for the requested r1aa roaming for minimum L area minimum WID and the minimum set regarding those aention conditions from the August meeting board approved on the primary plat number one all utility and drain eement with any must be shown FL the applicant attest that all utilities water and R are located in the public rights away of Mosley Avenue street the has identified M number two common area cited in the Declaration of covenants must be shown FL thec declaration Covenant this condition three under General notes any references to puon County be replaced with the city OFA the appli has done that uh the applicant has submitted a title of opinion further this week Monday from an attorney at law Florida and that title of opinion does indicate that there are no taxes on the property the applicant has had a third party license surveyor to review the file flat Morris survey M Incorporated has Rie the FL they have noted three changes one the recc bearing along the North Boundary uh it's not a record and should be removed the app has done that uh section township and range have been added to the description under the flat name and the subdivision to the West B Village has been added we've also are aware that Cleveland Avenue and wanted to for meeting P mail out and we are aware that there is a mo Heights sub division6 lenzo here to answer questions you may have anybody from the board have any question Mr Wallace now I've just told this is not final and You' got yes sir yes sir so if you don't have enough there I [Music] that reviewed the surveys D Mr stud speaks so in the in the in the final plat that was included in your meeting packet that Northern boundary for lot one that continues along to the drive Pond it shows Rec bearing on the revised final plat that I've just handed out that has been removed I think there's okay I'll see what you're talking about understand what you're talking just for the remaining board members for clarification of the record there's a reference on the old plat for a recording that is not on the plat that's in front of you because it was deleted so you're not going to see the reference that Mr Wallace is talking about okay sure the SEC the second um change that more survey and mapping identified was that section Township and r be shown underneath or added in the description under the platin and then third the the subdivision to the West needs to be added I believe that's Brentwood Village um Cleveland Avenue and and uh Swani street now show vacat I believe on the final plat that was in your mailing showed closed the applicant has included vacated for those two rights ways title of opinion has been submitted I believe on Monday um which shows that there are no taxes unpaid on the property and no leans no leans on the we don't have a mortgage e compl so there can be no no mortgages showing up in the title I believe that's correct yes sir do you have the attorney's title opinion with you I do and I'll just take a look at that while Mr Wallace continues to ask whatever questions he might have if I could just look at it based on the Northerly boundary of golf club Heights there is no North Boundary of blood that is correctly it's not showing correct it needs to be added 177 says it's got to be a monumented line well defined yeah it's not there all right you have any further questions Mr W you have any further questions or comments honest I got to that point and went made a PO me and said the heck with it I'm not going you know there there's I'm sure there's it's I don't know how to leave kind it's sloppy Mr chair if I may uh yes sir Ryan hasn't finished his okay I was just making sure he didn't have it I just want to make sure that he I'm not closing it I just want to make sure Mr Wallace was okay with what we were doing moving on okay go ahead sir yeah I'm I'm pretty much wrapped up uh it's the staff recommendation to after the planning board recommend that the city commission approve the final plan based on any uh changes that you all may have we know that mostly Heights is already a a named that's already in use so that would have to change in as Mr Wallace pointed out boundary of Cl Heights and this the subdivision names Mosley Heights there's an old subdivision here in t down 1946 I think it was mostly Heights uh but I marked that one too because now I find out while these changes have been made when when we should I'm I may be speaking on we we're going to recommend based on staff and the planning we're going to recommend that the city Commission accept this as a final plat except this is not what this is not the final plat there's changes going to be made to make it compliant with Florida Statutes 177 tell me if I'm out of turn here somewhere you know but U so how are we going to how are we going to recommend to the city commission that they accept this and it's file for record when there are going to be changes made that we we don't know uh like I said I got uh I'd had enough and there was enough that I found on the plat that I had as being the plat being submitted that uh there was plenty here to turn it down so I quit and went and got some coffee [Music] and I I just I don't see how we can recommend that it be a good plat when they've just said it's going to be changed does that make sense or am I just out in left field somewhere no that makes sense to me okay the change number one would be the name and then what's number two we're missing that North Boundary that's correct there's a fa it's these aren't Little Things you know I mean you can say them off in one sentence like and then next number two okay and then but these aren't small things and uh they they need to be fixed and app submitted a final form before we can sit here and say oh that's good from that's Earl's opinion Mr chairman yes I think I think we have two options uh to the board today one would be that these changes be made to to the to the plat and people back to you at the next meeting that will be one option the second option is that you that uh you recommend approval subject to condition be met and we just pointed out at least two conditions uh staff will not schedule uh the review by the city commission until those conditions are met so I think those are the two options that you have today and we also have you know the the applicant here today and she might want to say something understand are you through with your presentation sir yes sir okay all right the applicants present would would you like to speak man please give me your name and address Toby mcgan Green Coast Springs Florida um I was not aware that mostly Heights existed until I don't know 30 minutes ago so that can be changed and then whatever I mean I'm okay either way you guys decide you know I mean I want to make it easy if it's better to just wait till the next meeting and have a detailed list for me to make sure we get done um you know I think that' be the and I noticed in the packet that you've got a homeowners association already established with the name Mosley Heights that it's not established yet it's just a it hasn't been recorded okay it's just PID so that's that's just that's got to be changed too yeah unless you want to have homeowners I mean no that hasn't been recorded yet so that can be changed um I guess the next question would be do I need to update the title as well on that the opinion of yes um the title opinion was silent on the existence of a mortgage one way or another so if you could simply have your uh attorney insert a provision that there is no mortgage and if there is a mortgage you got to have a morage any any you've got to have a mortgagees consent on here but if there is none you don't have to have it I'll have them note that on there okay any other yes Miss W I I am going to suggest since we haven't had the ability to have your expertise on everything since you decided to give up and go for a cup of coffee um there's nothing wrong with that no no sir there's not fear now the truth comes out to the audience but the problem with you know option two of recommending approval with conditions we don't know what those conditions are um without a comprehensive list so that's a an issue it's a pig and a poke what he said [Laughter] sorry Miss West is from the big city she don't understand those things sorry that's why I said I'm sorry so do we need to table it for next month you need to continue actually to the next meeting that's what you going to do okay anybody so yeah so we don't have to reti okay I say it I I'll do it but it's G be Ted or continue just a motion to continue this agenda item for the date certain of the next planning board meeting March whatever it is 6 that would be your motion okay I make a motion to um continue this um for the next meeting on March 6 this being what fourth March 4th March 4th March March 4th excuse me this being what you going continue what to March the case okay come back okay going to continue the PB 2319 Mosley Heights final PL okay we have a motion do we have a second you have a second I'm so moved second all those in favor signify by saying I I all opposed okay so will who where's this list come from I that's going to be between yeah we we'll get y do that with Toby okay State statut it's State Law chapter 177 and I gave three checklist two okay they all say basically the same thing it was from I think Orlando St Petersburg and I don't know Daytona somewhere but there were there were three list and they all say basically it's just a a checklist and you can run down 177 without a checklist and just if you meet this one check it off and there's a lot of them on there and there's you know floppy I'm sorry I got to say that one more time thank you Mr wal I didn't give anybody chance from the audience to speak against this is there anybody in the audience would like to speak against it Miss kitens algra kitchens 1027 South 12th Street Baca Florida I was going to say basically what Earl said but uh since you all voted to continue it I think that's the wise thing to do this is sloppy it should not been done this way and with a little bit of research it could have been done better and you're very wise not to recommend that the commission approves something like this hopefully when you get the third final PL at the next meeting it will be the final plat and then you can approve it and pass it on to the commission thank you thank you Miss kitens anybody else seeing none we will move on to the next case uh being case pb2 24-23 mlar Cove townhouse preliminary plat I did I threw mine down Mr chairman commission is this is a preliminary plat hang on just a minute yeah let them quit rattling the papers yeah please I'm sorry what I'm sorry I'm waiting on you okay I car you Mr Wallace say what I said you thre do I have your permission to move on okay thank you this is what these surveyors have to look forward yeah see now all right yeah this is a a preliminary plat this is not final so it's a plent opportunity for us to review say that again it's a preliminary plat this is a preliminary plat now called ml not it's not a final one uh this is for the M Glory town hall development and basically it's a request to to subdivide two adjoining Parcels that total about 31 Acres uh into 248 lots and 14 trucks and it's for the purpose of developing the plan unit development which will consist of 248 town houses uh for fee titles if you remember this was in front of you a couple times um last one was for the Pud approval the plan unit development which was uh reviewed by the city commission and approved by the city commission just a few weeks ago now they're moving into the phase of getting the prelim the plat and this is the first step step for the plat which is preliminary plat uh we have review the application against statue and our own standards in in our zoning code I have provided you with a plat this r large plat it has 133 Pages [Music] MH and we are recommended that you approve this preliminary plat subject to some conditions and I would list those conditions right now for the record condition number one would be that all utility ismen must be a minimum width of 15 feet in the ply it shows to be 10 feet so we we need to change it to 15 ft the utility Easten uee must be added to the legend which is missing right now in the plat the payment width and the location of payment on streets adjacent to the parcel must be also shown in the plat uh significant Contour data must be shown at a maximum of of 10 feet per interval they need to submit a proof that all current property tax ta has been paid uh six submit a title opinion of an attorney at law license in Florida and the last one is that the applicant will be required to Bear the expense of a third party license surveyor to review any FAL plat and our recommendation like I said is for approval subject to those conditions staff report too thank you the applicant is here the surveyor who prepared this plat is here and if you have any questions you know you might want to address to the applicant would the applicant like to step up to the podium please give us your name and address please ma'am yes sir shelene Estus um 14785 Old St Augustine Road Jacksonville Florida um Lorenzo did a great job presenting the preliminary plat it is a preliminary plat so um with that said I know there's conditions on there dog in that's that was a wise thing but I do also want him to know that if he's or any of the board has any questions I do have my Consultants here as well to answer them so they're we'll start with Mr Wallace do you have any questions Mr Wallace uh I noticed that you got lots that are 16 feet wide what is this is a Town Home Project okay so is this a condominium or is it no sir they're Town Homes they're fee simple Town Homes they'll be for sale correct and it's a plan unit development so we've agreed to all of this already yes sir and that's none of my business go ahead sir so were there any other questions or do you have any further Consultants any of the board members any of the board members have any questions Miss Wilson Mr Lut I have none okay um thank you thank you chair to mention one forgot to mention one thing uh they have if you approve this preliminary plat they have up to six months to bring it back for final plan okay okay anybody here to speak against okay I'm bring it back to the board what's the board's pleasure I make a motion to approve case pb2 24-23 the preliminary plat at 6201 St John's Avenue and mlar drive okay we have a motion we have a second Mr Lo second any questions all those in favor signify by saying I I I all those opposed seeing none passes unanimously thank you very much now we're moving along to excuse me just a minute this is a lot of paper to go through right here um case pb2 24-24 reone of 0.39 Acres um address is an unassigned address at twig Street take it away yes thank you commissioner this a request for resoning of 0.39 acre parcel on Twix Street between 1900 Twix Street and 1814 Twix street that request is to change the existing zoning from residential single family r1a to two family residential R2 the future L designation city of palaka is other public facilities the request would amend the future line use designation to residential medium density and the parcel is proposed to be develop with the duplex duplex is not permitted in the current zoning so that's the reason they go into R2 in order to develop a duplex on the property I have put a in the staff report there is a background description about this parcel um I can read it to you for the public the property is within the city limits of Paca is vacant and is located on the north side of twist Street the site is part of the bird's subdivision which is between Mosley Avenue and South 18th Street and includes a portion of the former right away of the abandonment of Ral Street the par has an existing cut and a slightly thei concrete driveway the applicant property owner notes that the adjacent property which is next door 1900 Twi Street has two single family detached dwelling units sta have researched the researched C records and contacted P County for additional information and information we got is that according to the pan County tax appra record unit one has an actual year build of 1955 and unit 2 has a year build of 1915 uh and let me point out to to just in relation to this point about the two unit on this uh adjacent lot which is Zone also R1 and the fact is that the density doesn't allow to have two units on that parcel their grandfathering you yes uh the R1 zoning requires uh one acre for four units this parcel is only the next door is 0.31 it's not even half of an acre and the two units in order to have two units you will require at least 16,988 Square ft which this property doesn't have so basically what we have we have two units one of them be a nonconform structure because the density it doesn't mean the density maximum density that is for that zoning District it's just a point you know I just bring it as as a point of information another point that I want to bring it up is is that we have conflicting uh conflicting or not consistent zoning and not consistent future line use not just on these property but you know the rest of the of the block and also the property across the street and let me just go over a little bit on that they are inconsistent the future L assignation map and the assign Zony District in this area the future L use designation for the block where this property the subject of the reson is located is designated as other public facilities OPF and Commercial neighborhood along the along the the along the mostly Avenue the OPF does not correspond you know to the existing use that we have on those on the on the on this area the subdivision is all single family homes and to to the West is the commercial and that's not consistent what is existing the existing zoning District of residential single family is not consistent with this future line use designation so I don't know how this happened in the past you know I'm not aware you know how it did but it has the wrong future line designation and the Sony that snackers is not consistent with that so in a way uh by doing this resoning this change to the Future land use map will bring some consistency not for the whole area but at least for this for this lot a similar situation ex is across the street uh the future line destination for the across the street is Recreation re however of that there is a uh the Armory of the National Guard which is that consistent with that Recreation designation not only that the Z industry assigned to is Recreation open space which also does not correspond to the use of the land existing use of the land or to the zoning designation it has a zoning designation commercial neighborhood and residential single family home so we have those inconsistencies uh that at some point you know we're going to have to take to take care of but right now the future L designation doesn't correspond to the existing use and the zoning assign is not consistent with the future line use besid those points uh we have reviewed the the request for the resoning uh it is in the staff report I'm not going to go over all of them but I I just like Point pointed out that it does meet this the requirements in Florida statute for a change in the future langu map and also meet the standard for the resoning and therefore staff is recommending approval to the R2 I believe yeah I believe the the applicant is here in the audience so he might address to you or answer any question you may have Mr hello my name is Preston Sloan Jr have to State an address address uh 2000 Reed Street Paca Florida okay do you have any remarks that you'd like to say Yes um so I grew up here uh my mother used to walk The Ravines which is nearby right across the street from this parcel when I was uh still you know in her tummy and so I have a personal connection with The Ravines I think it's the most magnificent State Park in Florida uh I remember driving down twig Street in the backseat of my mom's car as a child and looking over and seeing this parcel and you know remarking at the fact that it's just a vacant piece of land um I moved back to uh Florida after college and currently am building homes in the city uh I submitted some pictures earlier today to Alex to be able to display as a frame of reference to what I'm all about essentially I purchased a property on Mosley Avenue 112 Mosley that was a blighted home to say the least it was involved in a fire in the early 2000s I also remember being a child and riding down the street in the backseat of my mother's car and seeing that house and thinking oh it's what what a shame that you know it's so overgrown and burned up and wonder why they don't do something about that so I took it upon myself to track down the owners it was a a lovely older couple that live in Satsuma um purchased the property from them demolished the old blighted home and I have now built two beautiful single family homes on that parcel I'm sorry two Parcels um my reason for submitting these photos is just as a a testament to my will and and desire to you know build beautiful residences in the city uh so yeah that's essentially what I'd like to do here um I originally wanted to split this lot it is an unusual parcel in that it contains half of a closed Road it's formerly known as Reynolds Street it was never paved um so it is abnormally large if you'll look at it on a map compared to all of the other Parcels in that block it is significantly larger than most of them um so I originally wanted to split it and just build two single family homes but due to the code um I'm actually unable to do that outright I would have to apply for variance because it is 118 approximately 118 feet wide the code requires a minimum of 60 foot width per single family a lots so my options were either apply to reone it and do a duplex which I would very much love to do um or you know I would have to apply for a variance in order to split it so it was a tossup I think that building a beautiful duplex on this parcel um would not be inconsistent with the area the block um if you were to look at it on the map there are several other Parcels on the east side of this block that are abnormally small and contain I'll be at single family residences but if you look at the total area of those Parcels the density I I am you know less dense than those Parcels Lorenzo did an excellent job of detailing all the inconsistencies in the future land use and the the zoning in this area and my reason for bringing up the my neighbor that has the two uh dwelling units on her parcel I wasn't trying to snitch on her I have no problem with those two dwelling units um it's just an instance of you know multiple dwelling units being in this parcel its zoned r1a um I uh and I understand that they were grandfathered in you know that's that makes sense anyway regardless um I uh would love to build a beautiful duplex on this parcel thank you Mr schine anybody hang on don't step back yet anybody on the board have any questions or any thing to like to address Mr SL withl I got a question okay okay just for I because I understand where this is at but okay is this house coming down or is that just so that's on Mosley Avenue this is the less than a block away from St John's Avenue I got you and then the other right you should have another photo the other photo with the house the the blue house there is today that was taken today yes yes okay got it I'm with kind of matches the beautiful blue sky yeah thank you sir okay okay anybody got any other questions anything Mr okay I'd just like to say that the reason that you you you said a while ago you don't know why these things are like that the the zonings and everything like that that area right there's been around I mean George you probably remember when those houses were bit weren't you don't you I mean that's P of heights that's you know all that back up in there those those have been there forever so I imagine that that zoning mess up has come through the years of what we're trying to straighten up through the through the things like this so I just wanted to qualify that with that statement um I don't think we had zoning till the late 70s there you go that's what I'm saying yeah that's what I'm saying that all those things were just built like you said the two houses I remember the families that lived in you lived up in there somewhere didn't you George yeah I thought so um so anyhow I guess I'm Sorry Miss West I just went back in my mind okay I know you got to laugh at me um okay anybody got further questions thank you Mr SL I'll bring back to the [Music] board oh yeah public I'm sorry public comments anybody got any yes M kitens alra kitchen 1027 South 12 Street Paca alra kitchens 1027 South 12th Street Paca Florida I'm not speaking for or against I just want to back up what Mr killerb said flight subdivision was recorded in 1876 that includes this it was a residential subdivision I don't know why The Flume is the way it is but this was always been a residential area and then the high school was built and then what is now the Veterans Memorial stadium or the Bennett Cooper Stadium I think it is that was built so this has always been residential and then there was a handy way built so the commercial kind kind of snuck in on it I guess The Flume went along with uh some of the commercial buildings but just give you some back background history on it I too remember those houses and at least one of them came from norw Norwalk campsite down in the in the Cal forest and was brought up here so just some background on that thank you thank you Mr kitchen anybody else in the public would like to speak to this thank you very much now I'll bring it back to the board just a reminder because you have a future land use map change and resoning you are acting in both a quasi legislative capacity for the future land use map change and then a quasi judicial capacity for the rezoning and we need a motion for both of those correct correct okay okay yes sir Mr Wallace are you asking for a motion well I was at you I saw your hand move I was just making sure said that go ahead okay dides anybody in the board have any Mr okay can I sir nothing okay um do I hear a motion for the the uh approval of the district Bounty Flume designation from the city of Paka from other public facilities to the city of Paca residential medium warum yes sir I don't have a motion for approval okay I I think we ought to deny it until we do some cleaning in the area to get things more you know consistent okay we we got problems with the future land use the zoning all kind of stuff didn't I hear you say Mr lenzo that you that's part of what we're trying to do here is clean up yeah these these res if you approve today the future land change and the resting it will clear at Le property the consisten it will become consistent with the use and and with the is there more R2 in that little is there more R2 in that little area right there that exactly well then we're throw we're throwing another zoning in with all the rest of it that's not cleaning it up that's muddying the water a little more here you got something to say tell me that wasn't too clear to me you know why we Bing the water because the part the block that whole block has an inconsistent future land ignation the zone is not consistent with the future line designation the future L designation for the whole block is OPF which is other public facility and the use is the zoning is residential and our R2 is not o R2 is consistent with the with the residential residential designation Ops is that what you said Ops do not the thing you said the whole it's the block you know the whole block not just this this particular parcel we not we cannot take care of the rest but we can take care of this particular parcel today make it consistent I'm I made a motion if if it flies it flies if it does understand we have a motion do we have a second have a motion a second all Mr Lo just a second all those in favor signify by saying I all those opposed I so if it's a tie the motion fails okay what is the vote what is the vote two two two two and two then fails there okay all right motion fails so where do we go from here miss West the but the no it didn't oh two two you said it fails oh okay so it failed okay now now we just go again you can have another motion so I'm just I'm still confused I just don't understand we clarify what a motion is his motion was to deny so let let's go back and clarify anything so we we don't want any board members voting on anything that they don't understand so if you could verbalize what you're stuck on maybe uh Mr agimo can help you out and my motion was to deny the change in okay that that's failed because it was two two right so now we need another motion which be for well and it's like Miss West said she was trying she doesn't want any board member voting on anything they don't understand okay so I mean did are we clear as mud now no so ear you were denying it because of the the inconsistency yeah the in the whole and future land use has got the block one thing and we've got how many different zonings in that block now so we're going to change one and do another well how will we come back and what what are we going to do about all the other inconsistencies I mean if if they're not going to match he's the planner I'm the c or used to be well and and a lot of these inconsistencies that y'all brought up are across the street they're not in that same block I mean because both both cross the and also on the corner you have the old handyway which is now lack of heating in there that is that is not right okay it's not public facilities you know those are all home right it shouldn't been medium residential or low residential that's what it should have been the future liation not and unfortunately we don't have here in front of us we don't have the rest of the are only this particular La so what I would say is that by you approving this application we are moved in consistently just PL the rest you know is not in front of us whether we do when we do the update to the comprehensive planning which we have just started maybe we'll take care of the future L us consistency that we have and we make all consistent but but when would that happen that will happen in the next few months we're going to that by around May we're going to be having a a workshop presentation by the Consultants you know probably in the next four or six weeks in front of the planning board and we going to give you an update of what we're doing with the update plan okay ask all the residential around there it's 1 188 and then you got those which is the child care and the strip model and the Cuban sandwich no that they had the best Cuban I'm but uh and now we're going to we're going to stick in the middle of a whole block of r1a we going to stick on R2 and say you're cleaning it I don't think so that's just my opinion I'm not a plan okay well I can guess we're at a deadlock somebody want to make a motion to approve it or not make my same motion no you've already we've already that's done I meant okay so you you have to act um yeah I know that's what I'm I'm I can throw something out there that might help do you want to discuss the accessory dwelling unit ordinance that's coming up that might actually give the applicant what they really want instead of a duplex so the city commission will be hearing an ordinance next Thursday an accessory dwelling unit ordinance that will allow a primary structure a primary residence and uh an accessory dwelling unit like a mother and- law Suite um on that same parcel in a single family residential area um so that might be something that the applicant might want to pursue because it would give them actually two structures instead of a duplex it might a better return on the investment I don't know right now it's it's a little bit of a difficulty because we only have four board members so that's going to result in a tie every time if if there's no one that's going to cross party lines here so so can we [Music] um move this like we did the last request to the next would to the next meeting yeah to the the item I mean I don't I think I would rather continue it because something's just not right I don't I mean I don't see it moving forward at this meeting so at least at your next meeting if you were to make a motion to continue you would presumably hopefully have more board members in attendance that would be able to make a decision one way or the other and I'm sure we would I mean I know that Mr Bernett is out today for business um I'm guessing the same thing with Mr Barnes um so can I get a motion for that to continue yes I make a motion to continue it to our next board meeting on March 4th have a motion in a second any discussion all those in favor signify by saying I I all those opposed motion passes unanimously and that is the last thing to come before us today do you have anything else M West anybody from the board have any comments with that being said I will entertain a motion to adjourn the motion to adjourn we are adjourned e