We've reached 4:00 in the afternoon on September the 2nd, Tuesday. Um, I'm calling this uh meeting of the Palaka Planning Board to order. Um, with that being said, I'm going to ask if everybody to stand could stand, please.
Mr. George Delo is going to say our invocation and John Dolan's going to do our pledge. >> William, we pray. Our father in heaven, be great for this beautiful day. We're thankful for the opportunity to live this
community and the city of Pala. We're thankful for the opportunity to be serving on this board. We're thankful for the citizens we have here and all who make this city run as it does. We pray thou bless us as we go into this meeting that we'll do the things be pleasing unto thee, but also for the
best of this community and for the citizens that are here as part of it. We pray for all of our first responders who work for the city and this county for all that they do. Pray thou bless us that we might accomplish the things that
need to be accomplished this day. These things we pray for humbly for be thy will in the name of thy son Jesus Christ. Amen. >> Amen. >> Pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the
republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Okay. Thank you. Please find your seat. Miss Hayes, will you please do the roll call
>> here? >> Here. >> Mr. Bernack >> here. >> Miss Wilson >> here. Mr. >> President. >> Okay. Thank you. of the appeal appeal and procedures expart communication. If
any person wishing to appeal any decision made by the planning board with respect to any matter considered at such meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purposes may need to ensure that verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Which record
includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. Uh Florida statute 286.01 0105. Um I guess at this time I will ask is anybody on the board has had any expar
communication with anything um being considered today by the board? >> No sir. >> No. >> Okay. Thank you. We will move along. Um approval of minutes. >> I'll make a motion we approve the
minutes of our last meeting. Motion and second. All those in favor signify by saying I. >> I. >> I. >> I. >> Motion passes. Um public comments at this time. Anybody from the public have anything to say? Um your
uh speaker will be limited three minutes and do not expect us to take any action on any of the items that you is not on the agenda. Okay. Seeing none, we'll move on to the regular business. Um PB case 25-16
annex amend future land map use and reszone um 625 South State Road 19 unit one. Oh, there you are. >> Good afternoon everybody.
This is a request to annex a parcel measuring approximately 0.36 acres into the city of Palaca for the purpose of connecting to city utilities. The request includes amending the future land use map from Putnham County Urban
Services US to City of Palaca Commercial COOM and reszone from Putnham County Commercial Intensive C4 to City of Palaca Intensive Commercial C2. The parcel is located at 625 South State
Road 19, unit number one. This property is currently partially used as the back half of Crystal Tractor and Equipment Metal Storage Building with the rest of the parcel being vacant. The parcel is adjacent to Crystal Tractor and Equipment and is within the
boundaries of the city. The proposed annexation meets Florida statute 171 which governs annexation in the state. The annexation meets the contiguity requirement as it borders city limits to the north and west. There
is water capacity to serve this property. The parcel is within a mix of commercial and residential areas. The subject property currently has Putham County Urban Service US. The request is to designate city of Halaka commercial
COOM in the future land use map of the city and to reszone to intensive commercial C2. The proposed amendment to the future land use map is consistent with the comprehensive plan criteria for land use designation change.
As indicated in the staff analysis report, the reasonzoning also meets all the standards required in the code chapter 94. The analysis of the annexation future land use comprehensive plan amendment and resoning is in the staff report
included in the agenda packet. Staff recommends approval of the request to annex the approximately 0.36 acre property into the city and approval to amend the future land use map from
Putham County Urban Service US to the city of Palaca commercial COOM. Approval. Also, approval to reszone the parcel from Putham County Commercial Intensive C4 to City of Palaca Intensive
Commercial C2 be approved. The applicant is here. If you have any questions for them, Miss Kathleen's here. >> Okay. Thank you. >> You're welcome. >> Um, would the applicant like step up and speak to us?
Okay. >> All right. Is there anybody wishing to speak against it? Okay. Seeing none, I'll bring this to the board. What's the board's >> What's the board want to do with this? >> I'll go ahead and make a motion to We
got to do it in three part. >> Yes. Okay. Um, Mr. Chair, I make a motion um to pass the request to annex approximately.36
acre into the city be approved and it's partial number 11-10-26-0000470-0021. South State Road 19. >> Okay, we have a motion. Do I have a second? >> I'll second. >> Mr. Bernette second.
Any discussion in the board? Seeing none, all those in favor signify by saying I. >> I. All those opposed. Okay. Unanimously passed. Now we need to have a motion on the future land use map.
>> Mr. Chair, I recommend going with staff's recommendation um to amend future land use map from Putham County Urban Reserve URL intensive commercial C2. >> Okay, we have a motion to have a second.
>> Mr. Deuts. Is there any discussion on the board? Seeing none, we will um ask that you all those in favor signify by saying I. I >> all those opposed seeing none. It passes unanimously.
>> You want to go three for three? >> Yeah. Uh Mr. Chair, I recommend the staff's recommendation to reszone from Pton County residential two family R2 and intensive commercial C4 to city of
black to intensive commercial. >> Okay, we have a motion. Do we have a second? >> Second. Have a second. Anybody on the board have any discussion? Seeing none, I ask all those in favor signify by saying I. >> I.
>> I. All those opposed. Saying none. Passes unanimously. Good luck. You're welcome. Okay, we'll move on to PB25-17, the annexation and amend future land use map and reszone partial
37-9-26-0000-0014 [Music] 300 North Highway 17 approximately 3.8 acres. >> There you are again. >> All right. This is a request to annex a parcel measuring approximately 3.8 acres
into the city of Palaca for the purpose of connecting to the city utilities. The request includes amending the future land use map from Putnham County Industrial IN to City of Palaca Industrial IN and reszone the Putham
County Industrial Heavy IH to the city of Palaca Light Industrial M1. The parcel is located at 300 North Highway 17. The property is currently under construction of one large metal building to be used as both storage and an
office. The proposed annexation meets Florida statute 171 which governs annexation in the state. The annexation meets the contiguity requirement as it borders city limits to the east and there is water capacity to serve this
property. The parcel is within a mix of ind industrial and residential. The subject property currently has Putnham County industrial in. It will be designated city of PLA industrial in the
future land use map of the city. The proposed amendment to the future land use map is consistent with the comprehensive plan criteria for land use designation change as indicated in the staff analysis report. The resoning also
meets the standards required in the code chapter 94. Staff recommends approval of the request to annex approximately 3.8 8 acre property into the city and approval to amend the future land use map from
Putnham County Industrial IN to City of Palaca Industrial IN and approval to reszone and the parcel from Putnham County Industrial Heavy IH to City of Palaca Light Industrial M1.
And if you have any questions, the applicant is here as well. Would you like to speak to the board, sir? >> We're not that tough. >> Okay. All right. Okay. Is there any here? Anybody here
wants to speak against? None. I'll bring that back up to bring it back up to the board. Um, do I hear a motion? I'll make a motion that the city of Blacka annex the uh 3 acre property with
a partial number 37-09-26-0000-00 6-0140 to the city of Hawaii. >> We have a Mr. Bernett made a motion. Do we have a second? >> Mr. Delo second. Um, does anybody got any discussion on the
motion? Seeing none, call for a vote. All those in favor signify by saying I. >> I. >> I. >> All those opposed. Okay. >> Passes unanimously. Now, let's go on to the amended future
land use map. I'll make a motion to amend the future land use map from Pen County Industrial I in to city of Palaca Industrial I in be approved for partial number 37-09-26-0000-00-14. [Music]
>> Mr. Bernett's made a motion. Do I hear a second? >> We got a second motion and a second. All those uh well is there any discussion on the motion? Seeing none, all those in favor signify by saying I. >> I.
>> All those opposed hearing none. Motion passes unanimously. Now we move on to the resoning. Make a motion to reszone from Putton County Industrial Heavy IH to City of Palacite Industrial M1 for partial
37-09-26-0000-00-14. [Music] >> Okay, we have a motion. I got a second. >> Second. Anybody any conversation? Seeing none, we'll move on. All those in favor signify by saying I. >> I.
>> All those opposed hearing none. Motion passes unanimously. Congratulations, sir. Okay. Okay, we're moving on to case PB25-9.
Annexation amendment to Bloom and reszoning. Address 136 Corbin Avenue, approximately 0.0 acres. Parcel number 10-10-26-0000-20 or 02 one dash 001.
>> Good. >> Oh, you changed. >> Yeah. Good afternoon, Chairman Kilibru and planning board members. I'm Ryan Mikkels, City of Palaka Planning Department. The applicant is the city of Palaca. This is an application request to annex
one parcel approximately 2500 square feet, amend the future land use map from Putnham County UR urban reserve to city of Palaca OPF other public facilities and reszone from Putnham County AG
agricultural to city of Palaca PBG1 public buildings and grounds. The current parcel has a lift station and serviced by the city's public works department. Uh the parcel is located adjacent to the
Walmart property on South State Road 19 and is owned by the city of Palaca. It is bounded by the city limits on the north, east, and south. The west side is boarded by unincorporated Putham County.
Figure one in the staff report shows the site proposed to be annexed. Uh table one shows the current and proposed future land use map and zoning designations for the parcel and adjacent properties.
Regarding the annexation analysis, Florida statute 71 references voluntary annexation requirements. Properties must be contiguous to the annexing municipality and properties must be reasonably compact.
Staff believes the annexation of this property meets the standard of compactness and does not create an enclave or pockets. Figure two shows the current future land use map. Figure three shows the proposed future
land use map. Per the future land use change analysis. Uh staff is not aware of any natural or historic resources on the site. Staff is not aware of any soil or topography
conditions that would present major problems. The city will continue to use the site as a lift station. The annexation of this parcel would not contribute to urban sprawl and would be contiguous to the city limits.
Figure four of the staff report shows the current zoning map. Figure five shows the proposed zoning map. Per the zoning analysis, section 94-38F1 requires that the report and
recommendations of the planning board to the city commission required by subsection 94-38E shall show that the planning board has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to criteria A through Q in the staff report.
Staff recommends approval of the annexation of 136 Corbett Road, parcel 10-10-26-000000-210-00001. Staff recommends amending the district boundary flume designation from Putnham County UR urban reserve to city of
Palaca OPF other public facilities. and staff recommends amending the district boundary for the zoning map from Putton County AG agricultural to city of Palaca PBG1 public buildings and grounds
>> and I or my colleagues are here to answer any questions that you may have. >> Board have any questions of staff? Okay, thank you. Um, anybody here to speak against?
I have made it through this whole meeting and you ain't got nothing to say. >> I'm We're good. We're golden tonight. Okay, I'll bring it back up here to the board. Anybody want to make a motion? >> Okay. to make motion to annex one parcel
approximately 0.06 acres parcel number 10-10-26000000- 0210- 00001 136 Corbett Road. >> I have a motion. Do we have a second? >> Second. >> Mr. Bernette second. Um, anybody have
any discussion? Seeing none, all those in favor signify by saying I. I. All those opposed? Seeing none, motion passes unanimously. >> It's a move to amend the future land use map from Pton County urban reserve to
city of Palaca other public facilities OPF um for parcel number 10-10-26-000000-210-00001 136 Corbett Road. Second. >> Have a motion in a second. Anybody got any discussion?
>> Sir, >> you already got a second. >> Yes, sir. >> I'm sorry. >> Okay. Seeing none, I'll move on to all those in favor signify by saying I. >> I. >> I. >> All those opposed. I me I'm not opposing. I'm forgot to vote. Sorry. I'm
saying yay. So motion passes. like to move to reszone from Putin County Agricultural AG to city of Palaka public buildings and grounds PBG-1
and for parcel number 10-10-26-0000-0210- 00001 for 136 road they have a motion do we have a second Mr. Second. Have a motion and a second. Any any discussion?
All those in favor signify by saying I. I. >> All those post. Seeing none. Motion passes unanimously. Okay. Staff, do you have any comments that you want to say or? >> I have one comment. >> Yes, ma'am. Um, unfortunately the state
state legislature did a little bit more overreach into home rule this past legislative session and one of the changes that they made was to the plat approval requirements. You are no longer going to be reviewing any plat uh for
the city. That job has been taken away and it now goes just to administrative staff. So just be on the lookout. I'm really glad I didn't have to deliver this news with Earl Wallace in attendance. Yeah. >> Okay.
>> And that that also applies for replats, >> right? >> I'm sorry. Also applies to replats. >> Okay. And um Miss Hayes, did you get everybody's email address as we discussed earlier? >> Um I'm going to request that. If you all know my email address, I would like for
you to send me your personal emails just in case if something happens with our email, I can still do my job and get you your stuff in the timely manner because I've been using all of the apparently >> that's what's happening.
>> That's what's happened. We discovered it. >> That would be great. Thank you. I appreciate it. I already got Mr. K, but that's why everybody was just going to provide. It was just automatically said and I do apologize for the late but I realized it
>> and then I not so I tried to >> Well, yes, it is a problem. I wouldn't have brought it up if it wasn't. >> We can get a problem rectified. >> That's what I'm saying. We're getting it taken care of. >> Got it taken care of. >> Can you
West explain the difference in the plaque? What what effect does that have on this board? Well, uh, and Lorenzo, I I'll defer to you if you want to explain this a little bit better, but basically in the past, this board has always been tasked with
reviewing a replplat or a final plat for any new subdivisions that were going into the city. And it did require a surveyor to do a very careful analysis, and we were lucky to always have Earl's expertise providing us guidance through that process. But now, as a result of
this new law, that all has to be done. administratively and in a very short period of time, >> seven days. >> Seven days. >> And that was from my understanding of the passage of the bill and its committee stops. Um the reasoning was developers felt that it was taking too
long, too much bureaucratic red tape to go through the planning process. And so they mandated that it happen within a week. Um so we'll be outsourcing our review to one of our consultants. >> Yeah. Does that answer your questions?
>> Made it clear as mud for me. >> Make a motion to adjourn. >> Well, hang on. >> We're still doing business. Hey, listen. >> Okay, listen. Yes. >> And
and and the