Welcome everybody. We're going to start our um December 9th, 2025 planning meeting. Merry Christmas to everybody. Uh today we've got uh about uh just three things on the agenda along with um uh the audience participation where they
can speak their minds or or bring anything before us. But we're going to start with our invocation. Terry, would you do that for us? Thank you. Our heavenly father, we thank you for this day you've given us. We thank you for the rain that you've given us. And we
thank you for the sunshiny day today. Thank you for these things in Jesus name. Amen. >> Amen. >> I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation
under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> Thank you. Thank you, Terry. Thank you, Kyle. All right, Madame Clerk, can I ask that you do our roll call, please? >> Yes, sir. >> Mr. Merritt, >> here. >> Mr. Hall,
>> here. >> Mr. Striker, >> here. >> Miss Paul Rang >> here. And um Mr. Rego. >> Yes. Here. >> One of these days you call me Mark. >> One of these days, Mr. Mark. >> Everybody get a chance to review the the
minutes? Okay. Very good. any any any uh I I've got one thought that I want to add, but I want to see any of your comments first. >> Um Donna, I know you're acting clerk at this time, and I certainly don't want to put anything unnecessarily on you, but
>> when uh South Louisiana Marine Contracting came before us, u there was a fair there was a large discussion over um the combining of those two parcels of land. And there's nothing in Florida uh law that prevents them from doing that
particular combining of land. They are in different land development use districts. Uh the law states that they can't be in different taxing districts. We had that discussion with him and we let him know that he could do this. Uh but the buildings that go into the
different parcels of land needed to be consistent with those land development standards. And there's nothing in the notes about that. So I would just add a simple sentence that says something like uh could be combined but the buildings must adhere to the to the two different
districts that uh that the parcel is in. So it's one parcel now from a taxing standpoint. However, um you know it's it's both commercial as well as it is uh low density residential. And sometimes people do that so that they could for
taxing benefits or for uh the benefit of uh getting additional um you know um area for imperous nature so that they can build a larger commercial building. >> That's what he was asking >> and you and you can do that but you can't for example build a commercial
building on the residential partial of that land part of that land now. So that division still remains for the districts but the land has been combined. So, if we'll do that, that would be great. And, uh, with that change, um, any any other
changes from the from the commissioners? Okay. I'll look for a motion then to adopt with the changes. >> Make a motion acceptance with the changes. >> All right. Can I get a second, please? >> Second. >> Very good. Can I get a vote, Madam Clerk? Yes, sir.
>> Mr. Merritt? >> Yes. >> Mr. Hall? >> Yes. >> Mr. Striker? >> Yes. >> Miss Paul? >> Yes. Mr. Re. >> Yes. Thank you. Very good. Very good. Okay. Uh ladies and gentlemen, at this time, uh any items from the audience that you would like to bring before us
that are not on the regular agenda? All right. Very good. We're going to get right into the regular agenda then. Um do we have a Mr. Sellers uh here? Mr. Sellers, how are you, sir? If you don't mind coming to the podium, please. And
uh just uh also u we we lost our clerk about three or four weeks ago. So if you would give us the so many of the folks only got the information today. So if you wouldn't mind giving us sort of a a summary of what you're trying to accomplish here, that would help immensely.
>> Okay. Uh I own a house at 4548 Cedar Street. >> Yes, sir. And I just acquired the property next door which is 4530. And I own two lots behind it. And I wanted to combine one lot with the 4530
and the other lot behind it with the 4548 just to make two two house lots right there. >> Yes, sir. >> Cuz it's it's landlocked and there ain't much else you can do with it. So >> Yes, sir. >> And that that'll give me just a little bit more property. >> Yeah. And I think I think that would
help. I'm I'm surprised that a parcel of land like that got landlocked in the first place. It's kind of >> strange. >> Well, that was that was part of that strip of land that the city sold and and they gave they gave all the adjacent land owners u uh uh able to bid on it
and I had bid on three and then turned it into two. I probably should have just combined them right then, but I don't know. >> Okay. Um you mind if I ask you a couple of questions? Sure, go for it. Uh, and anybody else jump in? So, in the state of Florida, there's really only five or
six different items that you have to adhere to in order to combine. Uh, so for the first thing is, uh, do you own all four parcels of land that you're Okay. The Okay. And and they're all contiguous. I can see that from the drawing because that's a requirement.
And then, uh, they're in the same city test tax district, so there's there's no issues there. And are all the are there any outstanding taxes on either of the four properties? N. >> Okay. Very good. And is there a lean holder or a mortgage on any of the on
any of the properties? >> Nope. >> Okay. Uh those are the those are the five items and and it's if you had a lean holder or a mortgage on the property, it's not that you could not combine it. However, you just have to alert them and then our city clerk would have to uh receive some written document
from them indicating that they're okay with the combining >> of the property. So, as long as those five things, and that's true for both items, uh, right? The, uh, the first parcel combining to the the landlocked item in the back and then the second
parcel with the landlocked item in the back and then and then both of those properties then have plenty. It looks like you're turning by adding uh that property, it looks like you're adding like point almost a quarter acre to each of the the homes. That'll take each lot
to almost threequarters of an acre, which is going to be a nice nice homestead for somebody. >> Well, for me. >> Yeah, for you. Very nice. Even better. >> Yeah. >> Guys, any questions for Mr. Sal? >> And I'm getting a I'm going to have a house built on the other property. So,
>> outstanding. Very good. Very good. >> I already tore down that old nasty trailer that was over there. You know, I saw the um yeah, I did see on the properties appraisers uh notification that they showed the home and then they show they showed still the mobile home
on it, but those pictures are often very old. So, >> Yep. Yep. >> Good to hear that. >> Outstanding. And it looks like he's solving a problem by combining it because both properties were indeed landlocked. So, you couldn't build anything on them anyway. They have to be
>> it it's low density residential. It would have to be combined to another property before you could even build a darn shed on it because we have land development rules that state you can't have accessory buildings unless there's a dwelling on it. So, it solves a lot of
issues, right? Very good. Um, any questions then for Mr. Sellers? And I I think because it's two items, we have to take two votes. So, uh, for the combining of parcels 25516-000000, uh, to 25529-140000,
I'll ask for a motion, uh, to, uh, send to the council for their review and and potential approval. Uh, either a approval, approval with conditions, or a denial. I'll make a motion. >> Okay. Please do
>> to approve. >> Okay. Very good. Can I get a second, please? >> I'll second. >> Okay. Madame Clerk, can I get a Can I get a vote, please? >> Mr. Merritt? >> Yes. >> Mr. Hall? >> Yes. >> Mr. Striker? >> Yes. >> Miss Paul Rang? >> Yes. >> Mr. Reagan? >> Yes. And Mr. Sellers, sorry to put you
through this except that because it came before us as two separate incidences, uh, two separate combinations, we have to take a second vote. The circumstances are identical for uh the second parcel of land uh which is
parcel 25522-0000-0000 to 25529-130-0000 and that one would have uh that would be at 4530 cedar. Okay. So the the front edge road that would then uh be that property in its entirety uh would be at
4530 seed or the first one we just voted on would be at 4548 Cedar Street. So I will ask for a motion uh to either approve approve with conditions or deny the combination to send to the council
members for their review and approval uh the combination of 4530 Cedar Street. I'll make a motion to approve it to the council. >> Very good. Can I get a second, please? >> Second. >> Very good. Madame Clerk, can I get a vote, please? >> Mr. Merritt? >> Yes.
>> Mr. Hall? >> Yes. >> Mr. Striker? >> Yes. >> Miss Paul Ring? >> Yes. >> Mr. Reega? >> Yes. And Mr. Cles, thanks for improving the neighborhood. We sure do appreciate it. >> Oh, yeah. I needed it. >> Thank you, sir. >> Very good. >> One way to take care of it. Now, I think
now uh what you will need to do is Donna Purdue is is our acting clerk. Uh so what she'll do is she'll inform the council members that planning is recommending both combinations of property. Uh and uh and then you have to
come before them. They do require you be there. Okay. >> Uh to answer any questions they have, but they'll see a full transcript of or watch the movie uh and see what what occurred here. >> Okay. >> But I I I don't see any reason why those two parcels couldn't couldn't be uh a
joined. >> Okay. >> All right, sir. >> Sounds good. >> Thank you, sir. Merry Christmas to you. >> Yeah. Merry Christmas. >> Appreciate it. >> Um so, uh will they schedule this to the uh >> should be on the council next week? >> Okay. Next week. Yes, sir. >> Okay, that'll be good.
>> Yeah, we'll try not to hold you up. >> And then at that point, you'll have to um uh go to the uh clerk of courts uh and ultimately apply for the combination and uh and then then you're done. >> Okay. >> They may have a fee. I don't know what
it is. >> All right. Ain't no big deal. We'll get that taken care of. >> Yeah. Very good. >> Uh so what before I go down there to the >> clerk of courts, you clerk the courts. Yeah, you do have to you do have to get the approval by the we we are an advisory committee.
>> Uh it has to go to our council members which are actually our lawmakers. What they'll do is they'll vote on it. Uh and then once you they've got that approval, you'll probably get a letter from Donna. You'll take that letter to the clerk of courts. Who's the uh who's our uh clerk
down there? Bill Bill Kinsel. You'll go to Bill Kinsel's office. Thank you. uh you'll go to Bill Kinsel's office and then um tell them what you're wanting to do. They they will ask for a survey of both of those properties. Uh >> I'll have to get the survey done before
I get >> they will need that survey. Okay. Um and because quite frankly they're they'll have those properties. If you give them uh your partial numbers, they'll have that, but they will ask for a survey showing the two properties adjoined.
>> Okay. Yeah. Well, that that's what I >> or or property one and property two and then you just have to identify what you're doing. Okay. >> Well, I I I got to get it. It's got to be all reserveyed anyway cuz cuz I want to straighten that one line out. >> Yep. >> Get it done. >> That makes sense. >> Okay.
>> It'll be a little cleaner, too, on on on the Bay County Property Appraisers office. >> Yep. Very good. But before all of that, come before the council members, tell them what you're doing and along with Donna will provide the same information that we received and uh land land
combinations are easy, particularly when you're eliminating a landlock parcel of land. It kind of helps the city. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Thank you, sir. Yes, sir. >> All right. >> Very good. All right. Uh ladies and gentlemen, uh there's a fellow by the name of Mr. Descertie. Uh and he could
not be here. Uh however, he did provide us a survey. Uh he doesn't actually have to be present at the planning uh meeting because we can still review the data or review it for what it is and then make a recommendation to council members. He is
aware that uh that the council that he has to be present at the council meeting because they're likely going to have some questions. Okay. So, here's what I found out. When you look at his property, the survey that was provided, the survey
that was provided, um, Bay County Property Appraisers actually shows his split already having occurred some time ago. Um, however, when you look at the la the dimensions of the land,
I think they just got it wrong because the dimensions of the land actually show that he's got 73 acres and they're showing 38 acres. When you look at the pictures and oftentimes the boundary lines are wrong when you look when you
go to them and they're showing clearly the structure that you see in your survey at the top as a as a single family dwelling and then they're showing the mobile home and the concrete block building as a separate parcel of land.
>> Um that they're actually one they're they're they're they're one as of right now based on a survey. Okay. So, what he's asking is what Bay County Property Appraiser is already showing has already occurred. So, however, when you look at
the uh when you look at the drawing that he provided us with his survey where he penciled the south border in, you can probably see that he only put it six feet from the structure. And you know, that violates our our uh
>> our setback rules. Mhm. >> So, uh, he's got to be at least 7 ft. Uh, so I told him that we would review it. And, uh, I think what we could do is, um, unless, are there any additional questions about, he's got plenty of land. He's got 3/4 of an acre from a
density standpoint. Uh, you can put five properties per acre. He's actually got enough for three properties. He's only wanting to divide it in two. um which would give each one of them about 33 35 36 37. Um what I think needs to be done
then is the handwritten divider um needs to at least be 7 ft from the south structure so that he has the proper setback. >> Okay. Y >> so we can make a recommendation for sitting in the committee with the with
the um >> with the proper setback >> with the proper setback >> condition with with the condition proper setback being adjusted. >> Yes. And then I would probably throw in there that he be aware that um uh no property can be less than u 7500 square
ft. Uh and um you know so uh none of you know the whatever he ends up with after he does draw the line the minimum lot site has got to be at least 7,500 square feet and then no more than um and you know and he has to he has to start with
point um point4 in order to to start with the division in the first place. And he's got that he's got 73. >> So it looks like he's got plenty of room. >> He's got plenty of room. He's got plenty of room to move it another foot. The only thing that's there is a wooden
fence. Uh and then uh uh I think what he's probably wanting to do is divide it and then sell off the you know the home and then maybe build a new home in the other property. He's got plenty of space there. So Mark, if they're showing it already
split, isn't this more for an amended uh parcel split or >> it would be Well, what what he'll have to do in order to make the split is provide the survey that he's given us and they'll say, "Geez, how did we get it wrong?" Okay. >> But uh but uh because the the land that
he's got right now does show he has plenty of room from where the house is so that he's at least got seven feet. when you look go to the appraisers's website. >> Uh so I think in our case uh to Rich's point, we can recommend that he can
split it how he wants it because I I think the survey is likely right. I think the Bay County Property Appraiser is likely wrong. Um and and it an amendment or not an amendment but a motion could sound something like this. uh planning is recommending to the
council members to to allow for the split as long as uh the the south border has at least 7 feet uh between the uh you know for this proper setback uh and that we be in a position where um you know he's really just taking that 73
acres and splitting it in two. >> Okay. I make a motion to recommend it to the council with the conditions that proper set be addressed the 7 foot clearance and with a minimum block size 7500 as the requirement.
>> Very good. Very good. So he doesn't make that that one smaller than that. Yeah. >> So however how he moves it. >> Yep. Yep. Very good. And you remember he can start is from a there's there's always the density ruling and then there's the minimum lot size. So you can
so if you take four 43,560 square feet which is an acre and divide it by five which you can in a low density residential area you come up to about 8,700 square f feet. So in Parker we have both the density uh requirements
and we also have the minimum lot size requirement of 7500 square feet. So you can take 04 acres, make one of them 9,500 square feet and the other one 7,500 square feet and that doesn't change the density of the neighborhood. So u just making sure that we say he can
split it, but that the density rule as well as the minimum lot size apply. >> So I've got that motion on the floor. Do I get a second? I've got a second. Madam clerk, can I get a >> can I get a vote, please? >> Mr. Merritt? >> Yes. >> Mr. Hall? >> Yes. >> Mr. Striker? >> Yes. >> Miss Paul Ring?
>> Yes. >> Mr. Rega. >> Yes. Thank you. Very good. All right. Okay. Um Tony, uh earlier you and I had talked about uh you wanting to maybe say some words here at this planning. Are
you still feeling that way or? >> Yeah. Okay. Very good. >> I'm just going to for y'all who don't know I'm Tony Summerland, public works director. I'm overseeing the planning department right now. Um, I just want to start bringing things to y'all's meetings for y'all to
start deliberating on and trying to look into. Um, and I guess the one topic I'd like to address for y'all to start looking at right now is the 120 square foot no permit required rule that we have for portable buildings, patios, stuff like that. Um, I'm not looking at
trying to make get the city to make any kind of fee or anything off of that. I just think that we might need to make it a requirement in the LDR that there is a review Um, the problem we're having is is that, you know, you can get a 10 x 12 shed and it doesn't require a permit, but nowhere in there does it say how
many 10 x 12 sheds you can have. >> So, we don't have a an impervious look to see that this person has five sheds on the property and the impervious is being taken away. We don't have stacks of sheds going down by the waterway, you know. So, I just want to y'all look at
that topic and maybe possibly address that. You know, it it will require a site view, site review, >> just something that we get a document that you have to fill out telling us that, hey, I want a shed and then we'll look into an aerial and you can tell us all what you already have on your property. Because people do the same thing with porches. They'll put a 10 x
12 porch on, doesn't require a permit. But then the next thing you know, they put a roof over it. Well, now that makes it impervious and it sheds water to their neighbor. So, we just want to try to see if y'all can work on putting a caveat in there that we can have some kind of review in the city to give them a yes or no, not just thinking they can
just do it. >> Very good. Tony, just a couple of questions. So, um are you so the 120 square feet, you're okay with the the size 10 by 12 shed, just you want us to to look at putting uh sort of guidelines
around when you do build one of those sheds because what he's talking about that's dimminima. So we have three different developments here in the city. We got dimminimus which doesn't require any oversight and we've got minor which our city clerk uh has the option to
approve. Then we have the major which planning and then council members approve. So um so is the 120 square foot shed size okay? You want us to maybe take that a little smaller? >> No, I mean the size is okay. I don't have a size. It's just that the city
gets a review. You're not even necessarily saying they need a permit. >> No, not a permit. Just is some of the others that I've looked at ratio. It's just considered basically that they have you come do a site review. >> Yeah. >> The city will do a site review just to make sure that you have the impervious and the land that can hold that without
harming your neighbors. >> Properties. There's one that has nine. >> Yeah. >> Wow. >> 10. Huh. >> Really? They >> you know, if it goes with 10, you know, >> they lit I don't even think they have room to they would have room to do another one. >> Yeah. But but like I said, it's just
>> you start seeing them moving in and you know because it's a 10 x 12, we can't stop them. >> We don't have anything. You know, we have a document that that told them no, you can't have this. We could have stopped them. Right. >> So I think what we're looking at is maybe considering uh considering a maximum accessory number of structures.
Right. >> All right. So, so, um, so, so maximum number >> one. I mean, if they've got 12 sheds already and they want to put another in there, you know, there's got to be >> Well, if we call the impervious
>> Exactly. The impervious, what's going to get them is because you you cover so much of your land. In residential, you're only allowed 40%. >> So, once you start adding multiple buildings, you've already broke that. You've already broke that. >> Yeah. So we can make it as easy and don't have to make it as as detailed as it's
basically just a review. The city can handle the impervious and the setbacks and the we just want to oversee it to look you've got five sheds, you can't have another. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Uh okay. So, uh we'll look at we'll look at putting guidelines around it and we
already have rules for things like you can't put a shed within 5t of your of your property line, things of that nature. Uh, and as Tony said, we have a in low density residential, it's a maximum of 40% impervious. So that includes your house, your driveway, your patios, your your sheds, all of that
stuff. So, uh, maybe the right thing to do is to start looking at what type of So, even though it's dimminimous, there wouldn't be a permit requirement for it, just once it's there that we get a chance to have code enforcement go and
make sure that it meets the rules. >> Would have to go like an LDR amendment when >> Yes. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Yeah. We We have to >> Yeah. I'm just looking for something that's just basically if you're looking to go buy a shed, contact the city. let us do a site review to make sure before you buy the shed or before you build a
porch, patio, anything like that that >> we just help you before you cause a problem. >> Yep. Yep. Very good. All right. Well, that's not for this meeting. >> Nope. That's just for something to work on. >> Just for maybe, you know, as we get into January, February time frame, but thank you for queuing it up for us.
>> Like I said, I want to start bringing something as as we get them and bring them to you because we're going through the book. Um, we're working on cleaning everything up and there's just a few items that we're having that are constantly coming back to being addressed. >> Yeah, >> people always find a loophole.
>> Well, and you got to be careful, right? Because I will tell you that um Thank you, Tony. I will tell you that in the state of Florida, there have been many lawsuits waged against municipalities because of personal property right violations. >> So, you have to be very, very, very
careful. Um there's something called esttoppel. You guys familiar with uh pro esttoppel? It's uh so let's say for example you buy a property and you could reasonably assume that you could build something on that property. Okay. If
you've got a municipality that ultimately changes those rules, you can sue based under a stoppple rules. if it's a reasonable if a reasonable person would believe that they could build something and then you have a municipality that changes the rules and they're winning those cases. So, uh we
have to and just so you if you guys want to if you guys want to look some of that stuff up just as part of your thinking um I'll give it to you real fast. Uh let's see. It's going to be under uh
section 70.001 001 private property rights protection. It's also called the the Bert J. Harris Jr. uh law. It uh became law in 2021. Okay. Just just be uh be aware of it. Uh
and uh focus on promisary estoppel. Now, people who are building 10 sheds and violating existing laws, that's that that obviously there's got to be because we also have another the land development rules are peppered with
whatever you do, don't harm your neighbor. So, if you've got an eyesore forming there or if you're violating some of the uh rules regarding uh impervious nature, that's already a code violation. So just think about those things when you start thinking about how
we put barriers around this kind of thing. >> It's kind of a fine line not to be big brother >> you got you know I own my property there things I want to do. >> That's right. >> That's exactly right. That's right. >> And balance it with >> and the other thing is too is something
that may not be uh something that you might not think is an isore uh might be considered an isore for somebody else. So, we have to draw the line of subjectivity. For example, I think your motor home's beautiful. I've never had an issue with it being parked there.
>> However, you know what the rules are around parking them in their front yard. >> Uh so, uh we have to be careful to not be too big brotherish, but also kind of help the neighbor out. So, there's there's always a balance. Very good. Um
All right, Terry, I'll start with you. Anything you want to discuss with the group before we wrap this meeting up? >> We still have an apostrophe on the semis >> the sign by Kendall. >> I always apostrophe over there.
>> I'm I'm going to go put some paint on. >> Yeah, there you go. Just put a little dab on there so I don't get arrested. Whenever you put in in the English language, whenever you put an apostrophe, just >> he's wondering what you're what he's referring. >> Oh, it's it's more coming in the city.
>> No semi no semis. >> Boat race or cherry >> a boat race. Okay. >> When you're coming across boat race coming into Parker, it says no semis. It has an apostrophe. >> There's no apostrophe there. It's not a possessive. It's not a >> See, Terry used to be like a like a
professor. He used to be a teacher. So he's going to catch that kind of stuff. >> I've been I've been griped about that for about what three years now. >> I never heard that. >> Well Well, for example, if I say Donna >> Oh, no. I understand that. I just never heard that about that sign.
>> Oh, okay. I got you. And anything you want to discuss with the group? >> Uh, no. It's been a little while. I missed uh the the October meeting, I think it was, uh, and or November. >> Actually, we didn't have a meeting. >> Oh, okay then. Good. >> Yeah. Yeah.
>> Well, but I I noticed I wasn't in the uh I wasn't mentioned in the last minute. So, I did miss a meeting. That was the October. >> Oh, it must have been October. Okay. >> And I I do remember that. >> Shortly before that, we'd had a fire at the boat ramp and the fire department did a great job of addressing that. And
since that is immediately adjacent to my property and um there was a lot of grass and trees that was catching fire and we my boat house right there is where I store my fuel. >> Oh my. Oh, nice. >> I was a little concerned about that. So, we had garden hoses going which weren't
worth the fart and the gale wind candidly, but but we were trying to keep the grass and the trees damp. Uh, and but the fire department got there and did a good job. >> If that failed, just make sure you you got those marshmallows ready. >> We were we were going to go in and get something. It wasn't marshmallows, but
it was >> Anyway, >> Donna, do you have anything you want to tell the rest? Thank you for filling in. We sure do appreciate it. >> Kyle, anything for the group? Um, I'll go on with Ann. Our fire department is just excellent and responsive. Anytime there's a need, whether it's, you know,
someone that we're afraid is trapped in their house or um when the >> uh gas tank blew up across the street from me in the middle of the night. I mean, they're there and they're there to help. And so, I'm very appreciative and proud of our fire >> had a kudos to our police department,
too. >> Heck yeah. >> About 2 o'lock. No, it was 1:30 one Sunday morning. Our alarm went off. Our house alarm. >> Yeah. >> And I got up and I taken some pain medicine that night. I said, "I don't need to be clearing this house." So, I called,
they came right over and did it. >> Very nice. >> Was great. >> Appreciate that. Yeah. They And you know what? Not Florida, but other states have that whole, you know, defund the police. And I'll never live in one of those states, by the way. So, you know what? You can't
be too complimentary of those guys. You go over the top to recog we we had a tree lighting ceremony a couple of days ago and most of them showed up and quite frankly uh you saw a lot of people walking up to them shaking their hands saying, "Hey, thanks for doing what you do." You know, >> we've got good people. We do.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Very good. >> Anything? >> I'm good. >> Okay. Very good. I've got a couple of things. Uh just want to make sure just some housekeeping stuff. Uh just want to make sure uh if you haven't already completed your ethics training uh which
is required uh annually. Okay. Otherwise there could be a fine. The fines don't start until after December. So so don't get there. Uh there are >> I don't remember so I better do it. >> Yeah. Uh so the way you want to do it is you want to go to the Florida League of
Cities. Okay. And they have a video. Uh now now if you do the Florida State thing, you got to pay 79 bucks to do that. Go to the Florida League of Cities. Uh they have a 4hour video uh that's it's broken down where you got two hours of ethics training, uh one
hour of sunshine law, and then one hour of public records training. Uh and it's really not four hours. It's more like three hours and 15 minutes. >> I've done that, but I just I don't remember if I've told anybody. So I better >> Oh, okay. If you've already done it, then all you have to do is you just have
to go ahead and and email Donna uh that you've completed it. >> And then ultimately, she'll probably email is it Chris Dangro? >> Uh who's overseeing that? Probably. >> Uh anyway, I think it's Chris Dangro. Um
so anyway, her her email is c dangro dan glcities.com. and uh just let her know that uh you know you do want some indication from them that they know you've completed it. Um a couple of us got together and actually watched it live when it
happened here back in I think it was October, November, I don't remember. But uh anyway, so if you haven't done it, just go watch the video and then it's on your honor. Just contact, you know, Donna and let her know and then she'll she'll email the appropriate
people. Okay? And then um and and that when you do go to the Florida League of Cities, it's video on demand, so you can just go ahead and and watch it >> and you can you don't have to watch it all at once. You can break it up into however many segments you need to.
>> And then Tanya's Christmas party for, you know, for uh us and for uh workers of the city and everything, you and one of your and a guest is this Saturday from 6 to 8 o'clock in the Parker Community Center. Those are always a lot
of fun and the food's great. Um, so anyway, and by the way, you have an invitation in your inbox right over there in case you want to grab that. Um, and then, uh, >> I couldn't find one last. >> You have boxes? >> I didn't know that.
>> I didn't either. You have boxes. Okie dokie. >> It's amazing what what you learn when you show up at these darn meetings. And you always do them. I'm just joking. Um, and then, uh, Terry, I'm going to be gone in January, so I don't know if
we're going to have an agenda or not, >> but I'm going to be, uh, not able to make that meeting. So, if you wouldn't mind holding the fort down for that, Terry is our vice chair. And if we don't have a meeting, terrific. If we do, if you wouldn't mind driving that for us,
I' I'd really appreciate it. >> Um, >> a lot. >> We do. Okay. Good deal. So, sounds like at least one lot split. And who knows what'll come up between now and the next meeting. >> Well, uh, ladies and gentlemen, thank
you for your attention uh, and for coming to these meetings and for being interested in what we do in the city. Uh, we really do appreciate your insight. Uh, feel free to get up at the podium when we ask for the, you know, audience participation if you got anything on your mind. But with that, I'll just say, uh, merry Christmas to
everybody and we'll close down the December 9th meeting. Thank you. Merry Christmas again.