for Monday, November 17th, 2025 at 7:30 p.m. Announcement is made that adequate notice of this meeting has been given and that it is being conducted in accordance with NJSA 10:4-6 at SEC of the New Jersey Open Public Meetings Act. Nor would you call the
role, please? >> Mr. Dich, >> here. >> Councilwoman Hernandez, >> here. Mr. Matt, >> present. >> Mr. Npalitano >> here. >> Chairman Dinsmore, >> here. >> We also have a board planner, Miss Winter. Our board engineer, Mr. Pangiano and our board attorney Miss Stein. >> If we could stand for the pledge of
allegiance, please. >> I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> Thank you very much. This meeting is
open to the general public. Is there anyone here who has something they wish to bring to the board's attention that is not on our agenda for tonight? Hearing and seeing none. >> Hey, Mary. I can't block the fire. >> We don't have any resolutions. So, I
guess we go right into the agenda. So calling application number 25 col 515 LTF Lease Company LLC 6A Silven Way Block 202 lot one spot 091. I don't
think I've ever seen one that long. Amended preliminary and final site plan to increase an improved fourle parking garage to five levels. >> Good evening. Uh Mr. Chairman, members of the board, my name is Keith Bachmann from the law firm English Taylor. It's
my pleasure to be here tonight and I want to thank all the board members and professionals for coming out here for this meeting. Um, I'm here on behalf of the applicant LTF Lease Company LLC for property located at 6A Silven Way, which is block 202 lot
1.091, which is located in the south parcel of the township Silven Way redevelopment area. On July 15, 2024 last year, the board granted preliminary and final site plan, preliminary and final major subdivision, and major soil moving permit for a project consisting
of a residential development on the north parcel and a lifetime luxury health and fitness facility and related amenities on the south parcel as memorialized by resolution signed August 12th, 2024. We are back here tonight for discreet reason. We are seeking amended
preliminary and final site plan approval for the lifetime portion only to increase the approved four-level parking deck to five levels in order to increase our parking capacity. This change is still in compliance with the redevelopment plan and bulk standards.
The reason for this change is simple. We are seeking to increase capacity because we found that our clients are staying longer at the facility and we want to ensure that they are not searching for a parking spot when they arrive. So in some we're not asking seeking to increase the amount of people there.
We're just seeking for increased capacity due to our observation in other clubs that cars are staying longer, customers are staying longer. So with me tonight I have three witnesses. They're all going to be very brief hopefully um because this application is well known
to this board. Um but we want to explain the and just give the justification for this change of four to five. So with me tonight is Mario Ionelli of New Deberry, our project engineer who will discuss our site plan, John Cororak of Stonefield Engineering and Design, who
will provide traffic and parking information on the change and professional architect Tariq of Ones Associates who will describe our architectural plans. We also have representatives of lifetime. I'm available to answer any questions that the board or your professionals have.
Unless the board has any questions, I'd like to call our first witness, Mr. Inelli of Duggar. >> We have some waivers. >> All right. Most of these waivers are related to it um having been here last year and already approved. Um so just
any testimony that there aren't any changes that would affect them. Um so for appendix A number nine statement of any and all approvals which are required from other government agencies 12 um
AC and D related to D approvals and wetlands 13 uh copy of any protective covenants and deed restrictions. 15 site photographs, 16 Highlands exemption determination.
On form five, we have 14 for the existing floor plans, 16 for the existing signage, 18 for utility service, 19 uh storm drainage design and improvements.
20 existing proposed site illumination. 22, soil erosion and sedimentation control plan. 25, uh, construction details. 26, a written description. 27, temporary contractors, construction
structures and storage areas. 28, traffic study. 29, environmental assessment. Uh, 30 again, site photos. And then on form seven, one, two, and three related to um the conditions of preliminary and final
site plan and not having separate sheets. >> I think that covers it. >> I read them all. So I hope so. >> Yeah. So we have no changes from that the prior submission. >> So effectively everything is covered in the prior submission. >> Correct. Correct.
>> Right. And you'll be consistent with that. >> We'll be consistent with that. All right. Do I have a motion to approve the waiverss outlined in the AR uh memo of whatever the date is 101325?
>> Make a motion. >> Second. Thank you very much. Uh all in favor I. >> Any opposed? >> Hearing none. >> Thank you. Could I have Mr. Einelli's sworn in? >> You please raise your right hand. Do you
swear? Affirm the testimony that you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. >> Yes. >> Please state your name, spell your last name, and provide your address for the record. My >> name is Mario Ionelli. I A N E L L I. Uh my work address is 600 Parcipony Road,
Parcipany, New Jersey 07054. >> Mr. Einelli, can you please introduce yourself to the court and just briefly describe your educational background, work credentials? >> Sure. Um, I've been in front of this board numerous times. Uh, we were here for the original application. Uh, I have
a bachelor's degree in civil engineering from NJIT in 1993 and a masters in civil engineering in 2001. I've been a licensed civil engineer in the state of New Jersey since 1999. My license is in good order. Um, and I have actually I
think the last time I was here was during this application for the first approval. So we ask that he be accepted as an expert in the field of engineering. >> Any questions on the qualifications of this expert? Hearing and seeing none. Councelor, >> thank you. Mr. Anelli, can you please
describe our site plan and board with an emphasis obviously on what the change we are proposing? >> So I'm just going to mark something because I have a board. One was submitted and one on the left is from the actual resolution compliance plans. So I'll just mark it. A1
>> A1. And then could you just describe? >> Sure. Um A1 >> could you use the microphone please? >> Oh >> A1 A A1 is uh C102 from the resolution compliance plans is the overall site plan and information for general notes.
Uh right to the right of that exhibit is the same sheet that was submitted as part of the amended site plan to give a sideby-side comparison >> and the date of exhibit A1. >> Uh well it's last revised
126 2024. >> Thank you. So, as you heard from uh Keith, the uh the site was the project was approved in July of 2024
uh where there was two parcels. The north parcel was the residential pro part parcel. There's no changes being proposed as part of this amended application on the north parcel. Uh we're going to focus on the south parcel. South parcels is the subject of
this application. It's lot 1.091, roughly 8.9 acres. It was approved with a two-story health club uh with a parking deck that had four levels at roughly 48.5
ft tall. Um it had 11 handicap spaces. Uh there was also uh as part of the approval there's a patio and pool area. Um, so the changes are really and if you look at the exhibit A and you look at the sheet next to it, it it's almost
hard to see the difference. So I'll describe uh the differences in detail. Uh, basically the the proposed garage which I'm highlighting and um on the exhibit A is the rectangle in the middle which I'm highlighting
that that garage is basically being shifted about 6 ft to the north. Um, and the that was really to align the entrances in the front with the main building. Um, and we're adding a level. So now instead of being a fourle garage,
it'll be a fivele garage and the height will be 55.7 ft. Uh, the original project it was had 402 stalls in the parking deck and the new parking deck will have 491 stalls
and eight I mean six handicap spaces. Um the the all the entrances to the garage remain the same. The site circulation remains the same. Um and also the uh landscaping that was around the garage has just been shifted. So basically uh
it's basically like re like moving the deck furniture around on the uh on landscaping just to accommodate that small shift. Um the other thing that's important to note, um there was a couple of other minor changes that were associated with this application that
was outlined in the cover letter. Um there was a relocation of the fire department connection. There was again referring to exhibit A1. It was located on the northwest corner of the main building, which is this rectangle here that I'm pointing out. That is the
actual gym that's being relocated to the west side which is located in front of the building here which is just where it was with when the final design of the fire department connection that's where it ended up. Um there are
uh a couple other minor changes that we we want to bring to your attention um that you know as I was reading the engineers letter he had said for us to highlight make sure we enumerate all the significant changes. Um I'm going to
walk through them very quickly. Um there was some again if you look at the exhibit A1 I'm highlighting the pool deck area on the on the south side of the uh main uh gym or should you say uh fitness
center the pool if the the deck is the exact same location but basically what we did is we shortened some walls up. We basically you know refined some of the the outline of the pool. there's a slide minor shifts in like kind of just pulls
and tucks as the design got cleaned up. Um, so these changes are very I would consider them very dimminimous. There is also a uh change in the front building as you're approaching. I'm going to actually pull it up that partition a
little larger so you can see it. This is C 111 from your packet. Um, one of the things that also was for the request of the owner, we had it there. This is the garage in question. There's the uh the actual lifetime
fitness building. They had asked us in this crosswalk, instead of being a flush crosswalk, they simply put a raised crosswalk. I was talking to the engineer today, the proper signage and everything else will be accommodated. They just basically wanted a tabletop type crosswalk versus an atrade crosswalk.
Um, so these changes again, we're still coordinating with the gas company and other utilities. They're, you know, kind of giving us direction on where they want like maybe a gas meter to go or, you know, these little minor changes that
we're still working out. Uh but these are really small like just adjustments and really they're all mainly about utilities for the most part because unfortunately when you go through the process utility companies always come in later and they always dictate a little bit like move this top this. So these
changes are pretty small. Um but you know I believe they're very much engineering in in nature. Uh I mean they're very just they're really about servicing the building. Um the other thing that was one of the things that by moving the
fire department connection uh this came up just recently. Um the fire department connections being moved. So I'll give you an example of where we're trying to finish up some of these small details. Um there's a small wall located
uh it's about 4t tall and it was a wall that was proposed that came off perpendicular from the building in a northward direction. Um that wall was there really for the fire department connection to actually stop the grade from going up. As we're relocating the utility, there's a chance we can
eliminate that wall and have it just grass. Um we have still worked out the det working out the details with the uh fire department. So in speaking um I I did speak uh reached out to the engine uh
the planning board engineer today talked about some of these things. So, not to catch, you know, anybody offg guard, but I would consider these changes very dimminimous and just about refining and kind of tweaking the design as we go forward. Um,
the changes that we're posing here has no impact on lot size. Uh, the main building is the same coverage, has no impact in any regulatory area from a wetlands perspective. Uh, the impervious coverage stays the same because we're just sliding the building over. Uh the
principal building setbacks remain the same. Actually um some of the one of the improvements is is that when we slid the garage to the north uh the setback to the accessory structure or the garage actually increased slightly from um from
Silven Road from 257.4 to 263.8. So we actually got a little further from the road, excuse me, from the road. Um so these changes are are dimminimous in nature and won't affect drainage patterns. The landscaping will
still be per the approved plan. Um and from uh an overall utility perspective there's some minor changes to accommodate just the shift and also the final design. Uh again it's very important to emphasize the excess o all the hard work we did at this board about
you know the maneuverability the circulation the sidewalks all of that remains the same. There's just a a couple changes of like for instance a sidewalk along uh the front of the building shifted a little bit because the door shifted. These are literally the types of changes we're talking
about. Um and back to the garage, like I said, the height that we're proposing is five levels, 55.7 ft, where six levels and 80 ft is permitted. Um the rear the rear yard uh does get a little closer because the rear yard we're talking
about by the way is the rear yard in between the two properties. Remember there's a subdivided line. So we're getting a little closer with the garage to the uh to the to the residential building which is not moving. So from the outside it's not going I mean
outside the perimeter of the property it will almost look like no change. Um and I think there was a couple of items that uh that was requested to hit some direct testimony. Um there was the question about the number of EVs. Uh based on the
proposed number of spaces and 4% uh we are required to have 24 EVs. We have 25 in the garage. Um and I believe there's some other questions that'll be handled by the garage consultant when it comes to the direct testimony on the handicap parking.
And that's really about all that I have about the changes. >> Mr. Kangiano, do you have any uh >> Yeah, I mean I agree with the testimony that it is dimminimous changes, a little a tweak here, there and around. Uh so in general there it is the same plan. >> Yeah.
>> Um so I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around. So when you go to construction and not only for your contractor but for the the town engineering department and their inspectors and compliance with asbuilts,
what is what is the what is your plan for making a one comprehensive set of drawings um for this? I see you have selected sheets in this application and other seats are remaining unchanged. I'm I'm assuming.
>> No, what we would do is the board chose act positively on this application. The resolution compliance for this amendment will be the new consolidated plan. >> Okay, good. That makes sense. And you have a consolidated >> Yeah, we will consolidate the plans if the board chose to act positively on
this application this evening. We would consolidate it as part of the resolution compliance and that would become plan. >> Right. That makes sense. Good. Um so to that end uh and there's like you said there's a shift here a dimension change there mention change there for the
uh compliance review I think this the the simplest approach is something to the degree of a like a comparison plan with uh a revision cloud so we can see if the dimension was 3 feet 2 in and now
it's 4 feet one inch we need to see that and and bet that there's a change and we realize it's dimminimous change, but we need to follow along to make sure that nothing's been missed and everything still is as represented last time and
and we don't have any issues. I think instead of uh the the review engineer taking hours and hours and trying to figure out exactly what changed and where that if you if you give at least an interm like comparison plan for engineering or planning review to to
identify the dimensions uh that that change. >> Absolutely. Actually in preparation of this meeting I actually did that overlay >> a red uh improved as red over the ex the amended. >> We can absolutely make that available for the engineering department or
whomever needs to look at it so they can see the changes and that we're like we're an open book. We're trying to do this the right way. >> Well, we asked that to be submitted for our review during this, you know, as part of a a condition of approval. And then uh I I think that you wouldn't need that for the engineering part. You would
just be issuing your final revised full set of plans. >> Yes. When I said engineer, I meant you. >> Okay. >> I didn't mean the council. >> Yeah. Got it. Um that that's that's my only comment on on the >> Yeah. Okay. Members of what Gordon?
>> Oh. Um so two quick questions. So for the uh for the health club, you're now at what close to five per thousand parking spaces. Uh, I don't have the ratio, but I think that's about right. >> I mean, it's like 490 something spots
and 102,000 ft. >> So, there's 493 and there's I can double check that. >> I mean, that could there will be a traffic consultant coming up. >> No, I'm just I'm just curious. So, it's about 5,000. That sounds like Well,
>> they got some of the information you're looking for in the bulk zoning table. >> Okay. Um, the square footage of the building. Hold on a second. >> All right. Another another quick question >> as I'm putting this together.
>> Um, traffic control. While people are doing while any of your contractors are working on Silven Way, are there notes that they have to follow METCD on the plans? Um, there are notes that they're responsible for traffic control.
I don't know if they reference. >> Okay. It's just that like today I almost drove into a concrete truck and all they had was a couple cones out. They should have closed the lane. They should have had proper traffic control and that's the second time I went by and they weren't properly closing lanes. >> I will absolutely bring that to their
attention and make sure they understand that. >> All right. Thank you. >> Other members of the board have questions. >> Mr. Chairman >> question. So uh for the four levels of parking is it already constructed or is still being
>> the the construction has started but the the deck has not the actually site work predominately is being done right now. So uh the the actual construction of the deck itself has not started. >> Okay that makes sense because I was thinking you know once you construct four levels how do you shift it
>> right? So that the term show that good point but the it has not started the the loop road is basically in the utilities or what's in what I mean by that is the horseshaped uh horseshoe shaped road and the actual utilities but you know that's what we're doing now it's mainly
infrastructure. >> Okay perfect. Yeah and I have another quick question. So we have a 12 accessible parking spots on five levels now. No, we have the accessible parking. We we have six right in front of the front door. I'll show you right here.
>> Um referring to again C11, you have 1 2 3 4 5 six right at the front door and then there's six at the garage level which garage. >> Okay. All right. Perfect. Thank you. >> Okay. >> Other members of the board, Mr.
Npalitano. >> Thank you. Uh, who can use this garage? Only the people who go to the gym. >> My understanding it's related to the people who use the gym. >> All right. So, if you if you live in the condos behind, you're you have to park in that garage and if you go to the gym, you got to park in this garage.
>> Yeah. The garage for the residential is a separate garage for the >> res. So, we're not expecting anyone that living there has to be parking there. That's my question. >> My understanding is no, there's no cross parking going on between the two. >> Not without a gym membership. >> Did I get you? I almost gonna say that.
>> Thanks. >> They won't be letting the part Troy West players >> I want to make sure. >> So, any other questions by members of the board or professionals? >> No. He hearing and seeing none. Councelor.
>> Yes. I'd like to now call John Corak of Stonefield Engineering and Design. I think you'll be sworn in. Thank you everybody. >> You please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm that the testimony that you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? >> I do. >> Please state your name, spell your last
name, and provide your address for the record. >> Sure. John Cororak, last name spelled C O R A K um with Stonefield Engineering and Design, 92 Park Avenue, Rutherford, New Jersey. >> Mr. Cory, could you um briefly describe
your educational background and your work credentials? >> Sure. I'm a licensed professional engineer in the state of New Jersey. Have a bachelor of science and civil engineering from the College of New Jersey. I'm an expert in the field of traffic and transportation engineering. Um I've appeared before over 100 land
use boards in the state, including this one. Um prepared over 300 traffic studies for land development applications and my license is currently in good standing. >> Need to offer him as an expert in area traffic. Any questions on the qualifications of this uh expert? I I do
want to say for the record that if there were any questions for the previous witness from the public that I did not ask for you to ask yet when this individual's time is done, he can be called back and you can ask questions of either of the two witnesses. So,
completely forgot to do that. >> All right, sir. >> All right. Thank you, M. Torah, could you uh discuss the amendment from a traffic and parking perspective, please? >> Yeah, so from a traffic and parking perspective, right, this is obviously an increase in the number of parking spaces
on the site via the addition of that fifth level of the parking deck. Uh but an increase in the number of parking spaces is not a direct correlation to an increase in traffic um over you know a peak hour or any specific hour. What it is and what was was mentioned by uh by
Keith at the beginning of this proceeding uh is that what Lifetime is experiencing is that their patrons are staying longer on site. And so they're staying longer. The cars are parked there longer. Uh the turnover of parking spaces isn't happening as quickly,
meaning there's an additional buffer of parking that's necessary in order to provide sufficient parking, especially when we think about peak periods. January is right around the corner, New Year's resolutions. Um but also just so that you're not uh you know hunting throughout the parking lot for the the
one or two open spaces um you know that may be available but you know you do want to be able to to to access your parking um you know fairly reasonably within the lot itself. Um so it does provide that buffer if you will between
the the maximum demand versus the the actual total supply. Um, we've increased that parking supply to answer Mr. Met's question. It's now 5.72 spaces per thousand square feet by my count. Um, and that that the new parking
supply number sits um right in the range of most other lifetimes in New Jersey. So, it's a it's an established number that works well. Um, and I think, you know, from a traffic parking perspective will be a benefit for the overall site operation once it's uh constructed and
up and running. Go ahead. Board has any questions? >> Members of the board have questions on this witness on this testimony. >> So, Mr. Chairman, quick question. Um, so the testimony about the the customers or
clients are staying longer at the Lifetime Fitness. That's based on other locations, not at this location. Right. This is not even customer. >> Correct. >> Correct. The historic information. >> Correct. Across the lifetime. >> Okay. Correct. That makes sense. Thank you. >> Right. Now, any other members?
Are there any members of the public who have any questions on the first two witnesses at this time? If you could come forward and identify yourself and ask your question. Now, now is the time to ask questions if you have any comments. That will be reserved for later. So,
this is strictly questions. >> All right. Uh Camille Pesha >> and your address? Oh, yes. 11 Murray Courtney. >> Thank you. >> So, I'm the third house in from all this
construction and I know exactly what's going on and uh I have a couple of concerns and maybe you can address them uh and then uh we can go from there. I understand that this is a minor shift in
the uh south end. I live on the north end. I will be right behind the um in the residential area right behind the multi- uh facility the h the housing residential. So my concern is I read
your appendix A and I see there are many waiverss and I have a concern about D and Highland requirements. All righty. And I'd like someone to speak to what these changes if they'll
impact the property behind which is on the uh the south side the north side and my street. Again, I'm only the third house in from this facil from all of this work that's being done. And there
is a buffer, albeit a small buffer, maybe 15, 20 ft, maybe a little bit more. Is that going to be impacted at all? Because that's where a lot of the water drains into at this point. And so
will that be impacted? Will that buffer remain? I understand it's a small shift, but that shift may impact the buffer area also. Okay. So, I'll try to unpack that as
best I can. Um, so the you're over I'm referring to exhibit uh actually C102. Uh, the residential building is not moving. Okay. It's staying where it is. The limit of disturbance behind the
residential building that was originally improved is not moving. So, what is going on is this garage here that I'm pointing to on C102 is sliding 6 ft over. It's all internal. So, you're basically looking at these two plans
next to each other. This is before the shift on your left and this is after the shift. It's almost iniccernible when you look at it. So when you when we talk about wetlands and we're not this is in the interior of the site this has no
change or no impact on any regulated areas. Regulated areas are in the front of the site in the back of the site. We are working in the middle of the site. We're not changing impervious coverage drainage patterns. Whatever was designed and improved will continue to be operating exactly the same way as it is
with the shift. the shift will have no detrimental impact on the drainage or the impact on any of the regulatory areas. I don't know if that answered your question. >> That answers the part the first part of it. Okay. >> Yes. and and I looked at the I went to the uh office and I looked at the
diagrams and I just want to be assured that this shift albe it as small albe it whatever it is does it impact downhill or uphill more the multifamily homes which will then impact our
residential homes >> the the donor in which this development is defined is the outer disturbance area we're just moving something within like the hole of the donut. We're literally the perimeter is not moving. It's just not move. The perimeter is staying exactly the same and interior. This is
shifting. So you it's not going to get any closer this way. >> Mary, I think it would be helpful too if you just could confirm that there's no change at all on the parcel that has the residential. >> Well, that's what I said. The the residential building is not shifting. No changes. >> The limited disturbance is staying the same. Everything's staying the same. And
my second part of my warm question was, will that buffer be impacted because of the additional spaces that are needed? You're talking about I read it. It said 5,000. It would be 5,000 5,000 5,000
2,000 to 5,000 >> uh that are part of the facility um but they the facility. Thank you. So, so just to be clear, there's no changes at all to the
residential portion at all. Zero. >> Yeah. So, >> the parking deck is getting slightly taller, >> but it's in front of the residential building. And if I'm not mistaken, I'll double check my notes. I believe the parking deck, I believe, is still lower
than the residential building, but I will check that. >> Is there an increase in the impervious coverage by with this change? No, there is not. >> So shifting >> and all the storm water management is appropriate for the amount of coverage
that is proposed. >> The storm water management went through design and review by this board, the board's engineer, the D. It's gone through everybody's review. So yes, it is adequate. Matter of fact, it is uh it
it is designed, so you know, for what they consider the projected 100-year storm, which is 12 1/2 in of rain. So, we are not it's going to operate like it does today or better for even that storm. >> Thank you.
>> You have any more questions or >> No, thank you. >> Thank you. >> Thank you, >> Mr. Chairman. Any question for the uh traffic engineer if you don't mind. Is there a study done that uh that shows response time for a fire department to
get one extra level up compared to if it's only four levels? And then what would be the timing to get the fifth? I'm just throwing out there. If it's a car fire on the top deck, is there that much of a difference to get up one more level? >> Probably the just the time difference of running up the one more flight of stairs.
>> All right. So, the studies have been done. Just whatever that timing is. >> Yeah. I mean, >> okay. 15 seconds. Perfect. Yeah. >> Is the parking deck sprinklered? >> Uh, no, it is not. >> All right. Other members of the board have questions on this.
>> I'm assuming the fire department has uh >> Yeah, they were on there. That wasn't addressed, but Okay, fair enough. All right. Seeing no other question. Are there any other members of the public who have questions on this testimony at this
time? hearing and seeing none. Council, >> thank you. Um I have one more witness. Um our architects of Oness Associates if you could be sworn in. >> Please raise your right hand. Do you swear affirm that the testimony that you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the
truth. Please state your name and spell your last name for the record. >> Spell my last name is W A S >> and your address or business address. >> 528th Avenue, New York, New York.
And could you provide the board with some background on your experience in lensure institute 1990 jersey before I have about 40 years experience there
>> and your license in New Jersey is current and in good standing. >> We ask that Mr. Chairman we ask that the board accept Mr. as an expert in the area of architecture. >> Any other questions by members of the board on the qualifications of this expert? Hearing and seeing none, you
handed out a a document to us. I'm assuming >> we did. So, Mr. Wasy, could you um describe what we handed out the handout is? And also, can you walk and describe uh walk the board through the plans for the parking garage which will be used for lifetime uh exclusively for
lifetime? >> Absolutely. I'll share a drawing. Sure. >> And we'll mark it too. >> So the handout will be marked as exhibit A2. Um and then are these sheets just blown up versions of
>> Yes, they are. And this is not the full set. You have the full set of all the plans. >> Okay. >> This is the main elevations of the building. >> That's the last page. >> This is the first floor plan. We're not going to show the handicap parking. All of them are right next to the elevator as close
as we can get them. and they're going up three levels. So every level as you go drive up and you're passing two handicap spaces. Fourth level no longer has handicap spaces needed as the route. >> Do you want to mark that as a
>> they're the same? They both have the the date of 111725. >> Yes. >> The last revised date. >> Yes. 117. >> That's fine. I'll just This is part of exhibit A2. >> Yep. Okay. So you have six handicap parking spaces in the building. You then
have 25 electric ready spaces as well, which are not to be wired right now. They're going to be ready for handicap. I mean for EVs. These main elevations are essentially the same as what we had before. It's all pre-cast concrete and
will be form liner match main building in essence. And where you ask for it to the microphone. >> Oh, sorry. And where you ask for no continuous 20ft spans, we have the same reveals that we had last time. 1 in
deep, 1 in wide every like 5'6 on every single panel going through. So there's no long expanses or anything. And we are allowed two signs on on the parking facility. We have one up on the top floor and one one right over the main
entry when you drive in. This is all branding for the facility and you have I mean everything else was kind of mentioned before. We have 491 spaces going through in this parking facility.
I don't know if you have any other questions that I have not addressed. >> There any members of the board or professionals that have questions on this testimony at this time? Just to follow up and we make a comment in our
review letter. Um the township zoning department, construction department has some um additional checklist and signage requirements for the EV parking. Um the signage such things like phone
numbers, contact 24-hour contact information and different things. So just uh we ask that as a condition you'll update the plan to meet that that checklist requirement and we have the checklist if you if you need a >> Yeah, we have we're listing a lot of here already and we will we will agree
to that. >> Yes, it'll all be on the drawings. Okay. >> Okay. Other questions by members of the board hearing and seeing none. Any members of the public have questions on this
witness on this testimony at this time? >> Hearing and seeing none, counselor, >> that's all I have. Um, we think this is a good change. Um, just adding one more level. We don't think there's any negative impact. We think it's going to improve the project and we appreciate
your consideration. Thank you. >> Are there any members of the public who wish to either comment or voice opposition or favor of this uh application at this time? hearing and seeing none. Uh, this closes
the evidentiary portion of tonight's hearing. Um, do I hear a motion from the board? Let's make a comment first. Mr. Chairman, is okay. >> Yep. >> I I appreciate the public's concern about the flooding over there and such. I believe you guys came forward last
time around with a great plan. I I know from working those fields for many years and raking out all the puddles and vacuuming things that it floods pretty bad over there. But what you brought up last year I was very impressed with. So very happy and like I said I do share your concerns but I don't think a six uh
foot shift is going to affect anything. Trust me I've been there many years a lot of work on those fields. So thank you for that. That's all I want to say. Thank you. >> Do you want to remark first before? >> Yes. Thank you. some of the things that
were agreed upon that the raised crosswalk would have the appropriate signage. Um just complying with the recommendations and comments in the board and township professional
reports. I don't think there are any objections to those. No. um agree to provide a revision plan with the red line or clouded changes to follow so that the board engineers office can follow along for resolution compliance. um
include a note about the traffic controls in the plans. And last one was to agree to comply with the checklists and signage requirements for the EVSC and ADA
and go with everything. I just have one just clarification and then the final issuing of a a fully a comprehensive full set of plans like to testify to. >> Great. >> Okay.
Do I hear a motion including all of those? Uh >> Mr. Chairman, >> Mr. Dich, >> a motion to approve application number 25 col 515 LTF lease company LLC 6A
Silvin Wayway block 202 lot 1.091 amended preliminary and final site plan to increase and approved fourle parking garage to five level including the conditions noted. >> Do I have a second? >> Second, Matt.
>> Nora, would you call the role please? Yes. >> Fernandez, >> yes. >> M. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Dmore. >> Yes. >> All right. Thank you. The result is granting the approval of the application
and >> please >> Nora. Is there anything else that needs to come before the board at this time? >> Absolutely not. >> Any members of the board have anything that needs to come before the board at this time? Do I have a motion to adjurnn?
>> Motion. >> Anybody opposed? Thank you all very much. >> Thank you for being here. Thank you.