17. >> Okay. We're on record handicapped children. So, we have to turn back. >> All right. So, good evening and welcome to the meeting of the Township of Pipony Troy Hills Board of Adjustment. Today is Wednesday, February 4th, 2026, and is
7:30 p.m. Announcement is made that adequate notice of this meeting has been given and that is being conducted in accordance with NJSA 104-6 at set of the New Jersey Open Public Meetings Act.
>> Do you want me to swear Mr. Dion before you call the RO? Yes. >> Stand repeat after me. >> Okay. I Danny Desai >> I Danny Desai >> do solemnly swear >> I do solemnly swear >> that I will support the Constitution of
the United States >> that I will support the uh Constitution of the United States >> and the Constitution of the State of New Jersey >> and Constitution of the State of New uh New Jersey >> and that I will bear true faith >> and I will bear true >> faith >> faith >> and allegiance to the same
>> and allegiance to the same >> and to the governments established >> and the government established >> in the United States >> and the United state >> and in this state >> and this state >> under the authority of the people >> under the authority of the people. >> Oh, so help me God. >> So help me in this state. And I do further solemnly swear
>> And I do further solemnly swear >> that I will impartially >> I impartially >> and justly >> and justly >> perform all the duties >> perform all the duties >> of the office of >> office of >> board of adjustment alternate member number two >> board of adjustment alternate member
number two >> township of precipany Troy Hills >> township of Detroit >> according to the best of my ability >> according to the best of my ability. >> So help me God help me. >> Okay congratulations. >> Thank you. Congratulate. Welcome. >> Well, it's my honor. Thank you to be
part of this board. Thank you. Appreciate it. >> Welcome. >> Welcome. >> Just need your signature right there. >> Sorry. We'll move on to the roll call. Mr. Burkowitz >> here. >> Mr. Desai >> here. >> Mr. Joshua
>> here. >> Mr. Modi >> here. >> Miss Neglia >> here. >> Mr. Ready >> present. >> Chairwoman Griani >> present. >> We have our board planner Mr. Chadwick >> present. >> Our board engineer Mr. Lmanoitz >> here. >> And our board attorney Mr. Johnson >> here.
>> Could you please stand and join us in the pledge of allegiance? Ice flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible with
liberty and justice for all. >> Is there anyone present that has something that they would like to speak of other than what is on our agenda this evening? I see none.
Yes, please. >> Can you state your name, please? >> Yes. >> My name is Laura Peters. Um, good evening members of the board. Thank you for allowing me to speak. My name is Laura Peters. I'm here with my wife, Soria.
Um, I'm here today to humbly request an earlier hearing for our variance application. Jennifer Smith advised me to come tonight to plea with you to be heard sooner than the date we were given. We were at the last zoning board meeting on Wednesday, January 14th, and
due to a clerical error on the part of the engineering department, we were forced to reschedule our meeting to March 18th. The issues in the letter were addressed on our part in three business days. My family is facing a real hardship due to this delay. We need to temporarily move for construction,
but with my wife being pregnant, it's incredibly stressful for us to be away from our home during this time. Returning to the to our home before the birth of our child is very important to us, not just for convenience, but for our family's well-being and stability. She has been going through IVF
for over a year and we planned her pregnancy, excuse me, specifically around the hearing on January 18th. An earlier hearing would make a world of difference and ease a very difficult situation for us. I understand you have many cases to
consider and I deeply appreciate your time, your understanding and any consideration you can give us to our request. Thank you. Nora, is there anything that uh is available? >> As I have already advised
uh to them that I have no earlier dates and if I did have an earlier date, which I do not, you would have to renotice. That's an expense, but I do not have any earlier dates. >> Okay. I when speaking to Jennifer, this
is just what she suggested. I was just following what Jennifer had suggested us doing. >> Yeah, that is true. But, you know, you have to do all these applications and all this stuff. So, >> we submitted our permits. So, our permits are almost finished. Um, it's just with building now and we've
resubmitted with zoning. So, we're at the we're at the finish line. We're we're at the mercy of your of you guys. So, we're just >> you've spoken to the engineering department. >> Resolve that in 3 days. >> Okay.
I believe that was the issue. You didn't receive the >> You never received the letter. >> You didn't receive the letter, but you have spoken to them and those issues that they brought up have been resolved. >> Yeah. You gave us the letter on the Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, and then it was Martin Luther King, so Tuesday it was completed.
>> Okay. All right. I'm I'm sorry for the delay. I um I wish you the best of luck with your baby and um hopefully you'll get on the you're on the agenda and uh you go forward. Okay. >> Thank you. >> Thank you.
Nora. Uh, correspondence, please. >> We have correspondence received from Joseph O'Neal. request an application 2535 be carried from February 4th, 2026 to March 18th, 2026 without further
notice and with required extensions through March 31st, 2026. Is there a motion? >> Motion second. >> All in favor? >> I Which date was that, Nora? I'm sorry. >> March 18th. >> March 18th. >> Thank you.
>> Is that at 7:30, Nora? It is at 7:30. And then we have correspondence correspondence received from Joseph O'Neal requesting application 2559 be carried from February 4th, 2026 to May 31st, 2026 without further notice
and with ex uh required with that with required extensions. Is there a motion? >> Motion second. >> What was the date? May >> 31st day. Mhm. >> I thought we 7:30 Nora. >> Yes, it is.
All >> in favor? >> May 31st. >> May 31st. >> Thank you. >> Okay. Then we have resolutions. Application 2573 uh 48 Ronald Road. Uh those who can vote
are Burkeitz. What's here? Nia, Ratty, and Grenani. Is there a motion? >> Some moved. >> Second. >> All in favor? >> I call roll. Burke. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Neglia. >> Yes. >> Ready? >> Yes. >> Grani.
>> Yes. >> Application 2522. Uh 39 Pit Road. Those who can vote. Burgit. >> Neglia. Ready. Grani. Is there a motion? >> So moved. Second.
>> Uh Burgitz. >> Yes. >> Neglia. >> Yes. >> Ready? >> Yes. >> Grani. >> Yes. And then finally 243716 North Beverick Road. Those who can vote. Burkowitz, Joshitz,
>> Neglia, Ready, and Grenani. Is there a motion? >> So move second. >> Burkowitz. >> Yes. >> Joshitz. >> Yes. >> Neglia. >> Yes. >> Ready? >> Yes. >> Griani. >> Yes. >> Thank you. >> Application 25 col 39. Muhammad Hassan,
three Graham Court, block 199, lot 8, zone R3, a C variance to legalize driveway expansions, contrary to section 430-275X and section 430-35,
column 13. This application was carried from October 29th, 2025. Hassan, are they present? No, >> doesn't look like it. >> Doesn't look like it. >> Did you hear from them? >> No.
>> The engineer signed off. >> Yeah, the engineer did sign off on it. >> There's a silly question. Do they have to be here? >> Yeah. >> You got to get testimony. >> They do have to be here. >> Okay. You gave them this date the last
time they were here, correct? >> Yes. That's my That's what my notes look like. I think they will hold the date on the record. >> Well, why don't you just hold it off for now and we'll deal with it at the end of the meeting. >> Sounds good.
>> Okay. Application 2553. Abdul Raja, 215 North Bevwick Road, block 705, lot 24, zone R3, a C variance
to legalize a shed, overhang/pagota, patio, and stairs, pa walk, driveway, and block wall contrary to section 430-10 C. >> Can you raise your right hand, please?
Do you swear or affirm that the testimony that you're about to give shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but truth? >> Can you make sure you have the microphone close to you? Okay. >> Can you state your name and spell your last name, please? >> Abdul Raja R.
>> And uh what is your address? >> And you're the owner of the property, correct? Um and um my recollection and my notes would reflect that the last time you were here there was a report that came from the engineer. Do you recall that?
>> Yes. >> Have you met with the engineer since the last time you were before the board? >> Yes. >> What happened? >> Can you please speak the microphone? >> No. >> You got you got to bring it closer to >> bring it closer to you, sir. Thank you.
>> There we go. I got a letter from right. >> You want me to bring it? >> Wait, so you you have the letter from him dated November 25th, 2025. Is that right? >> Yes. Okay. Yes. Number 219.
>> So he indicated in the letter that it appears based upon the information that he has that no additional impervious coverage has been added since 2021 which would seem to indicate that the items that you came for approval about
were all done before 2021. Is that right? Yes. >> Okay. >> So, he indicated in the letter that no storm water management um was required. >> Is that your understanding as well?
>> Yes. So, you want the board to grant you permission um to to legalize the improvements that you've made that were outlined in your application. Is that what you want? >> Yes. I don't know about that. You know, why it was illegal. It is done maybe 30
years ago. >> I'm sorry, sir. Could you please repeat what you just said? I said these things what I got they are 30 40 years ago. >> The things that you got are many years ago. >> Yeah.
>> Okay. court. I don't know the answer, but I think >> Do you have a pending um violation? Is that correct? >> They do. You know if that's true, Nora? Does he have a pending violation?
>> Uh off the top of my head, I am unsure. the fact that they legalize in very well may be >> right. >> Yeah. I don't remember if it was this one or the last one actually had a pending. >> Have you talked to your neighbors about this?
>> Yeah, I sent letters to everybody. About 30 letters. I'm sorry. Could you speak a little louder? >> I said I I sent letter to everybody. Certified letters. >> And did you hear back? Did you speak to anybody or is it just you sent the letters? >> No. >> So, you didn't hear good nor bad?
>> No. >> So, is this just a case of work he did gets fine or gets notified and now the engineer says everything is good? >> He doesn't. Yeah, >> seems like it. >> It does. Nobody complains.
>> Well, I I I don't know that we know how it came to the attention of the zoning department, but it came to the attention of the zone. >> We're talking about a shed. Where is the shed located? >> Oh, we've got a different >> That's the draw right back there on the back.
>> Okay. >> We put the shed there. Did you put the shed in the back corner of the property or was it there when you bought the car? >> It was there. >> I'm sorry. >> It was there. >> It was there. >> I think digging some places.
>> So, what are they going to do? Yes. >> Are there any questions from the board? >> Any members have any questions of this application? >> Not really. >> Can can I ask something? >> Surely. >> So, Mr. Raza, you had done little bit
improvement than originally whatever you had it before. Correct. >> Yes. >> Not a major improvement or major expansion done. No. >> Okay. Thank you. What is the condition of that shed in
the back? Is it good condition or is it something you're going to replace? >> It's in between. Not good, not bad. >> I'm sorry. >> It's in between. >> Okay. >> In between. >> It's in between. >> Not good, not bad.
>> Not good, not bad. If you look at the survey of your property, >> okay, it looks Is that chain link fence in the back of the property? Is that your fence or your neighbor's fence? >> My neighbor. >> Your neighbor's fence. >> Chain link.
>> Let me ask you about that shed again. Are you planning to >> take it down? >> Take it down. Put put something better up or not? >> Yeah, >> I can do that. I >> if you if you take it down, I'm going to recommend to the board that it be at
least what's our rule? Six feet. >> Six feet. >> Six feet. Okay. >> Maybe we could compromise going from zero feet to >> three three or four feet. Yeah. >> Off the back corner.
>> Can you do that? >> What? >> Can you move? Yeah. Go ahead, John. >> If in the resolution, the resolution would state if you remove the shed, the new shed must be 3 ft from the property line rear and side.
>> No, I can finish that one, you know. >> I'm sorry. >> I can repair that one that's not broken, you know. >> Well, I didn't I didn't know what you you seem to indicate maybe I will and maybe I won't. Good. So, you'd repair it
in place as opposed to moving it. >> Please come up. >> If you want to come up, if you want to say something, then you've got to >> swear. I get swear. >> Swear in. Please. >> Raise your right hand, please. Do you swear or affirm that the testimony that you're about to give should be the truth, the whole truth, and not the other truth?
>> Can you state your name, please? >> Jabin Raja. Jabin Raja. >> And same address. >> Same address. What's your relationship to the applicant? >> Husband. >> Gotcha. So, you also own the property, correct? >> Okay. What would you like to say? >> Um, I just want to say the shed is not
the issue. I mean, it is it's just a storage, but we can take it out and we whatever the town recommend, we can do that. >> Great. >> If you could take it down, that would Yeah. Well, what the resolution would say if you take it down then the new one
has got to be 3 ft off the side. We will find >> if you repair it, >> which seem to be a an alternative, then you can repair it where it is. >> Either we can I mean it's a good condition. It's not a bad we just put our tools there.
>> Just you know whatever you decide. >> Yeah. So um if if the town recommend to remove that and put >> No, we're not telling you. We're saying that decision is your decision. If you take it down, >> then it'll be 3 ft off the side and 3 ft off the rear.
>> If you repair it in place, you repair it. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Actually, it should be 6 foot. >> Yeah. New codes. >> I think we got a deal. >> So, six foot. So, conforming it should have three >> 3T
>> 3 ft off each. >> Yes. >> Okay. Just want to make sure I got >> It's a compromise. Are you in agreement with what the board is suggesting? >> Yes. >> Are there any other questions from our board members? Is there any questions from the audience on the testimony that
has been given by Hassan by Cena? Would someone like to make a recommendation? Is there anyone in opposition that would like to speak in regarding this
application? I see none. Thank you. Would one of the board members? >> Sure. I think we've come to a a good uh compromise here. Uh and it's the minimum, so I'll be voting for it. Application 25 col 39 Muhammad Assan 3
Grand Port block 199. >> Oh no, this is >> I'm sorry. Raja wrong one. >> All right. Application 2553 Abdul Raja 215 North Bever Road block 705 lot 24 zone R3 recommend granting a C variance
to legalize a shed overhang pergola patio and stairs paper walkway and block wall contract to section 430-10 C shed side and rear yards. Section 430-35 column 8 patio side yard section
430-275H section 430-275X section 430- 35 column 10 and section 430-35 column 13 with the stipulation if you replace it will be 3 ft on from the back
and 3 ft from the side >> second ready >> yes >> I Yes. >> Josh Boy. >> Yes. >> Modi. >> Yes. >> Neglia. >> Yes. >> Ready? >> Yes. >> Gani. >> Yes. >> Your application has been approved. >> Thank you.
>> You will be receiving notice and at that time you can go get your permits. All right. Lots of luck. >> Um can I say um we took like the six estimated and no none of them told us we will need the
no one. So that's why we did not think that >> it's been approved. >> Good answer, Chairman. >> No need to go further. Your application has been approved. >> Thank you, sir. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> We appreciate it. >> Thank you.
>> Application 2530. Posio Bramberg Newman PC 57 Selvin Way block 202 lot 4.3 zone R a C variance for signage
>> put your appearance on the record >> good evening Joe Pero from Porzio Bramberg and Newman on behalf of the applicant Porzio Bramberg and Newman >> raise your right hand please you swear affirm The testimony that you're about to give should be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. >> I do. >> Say your name, by your last name,
please. >> Uh, it's Sean S. Moransky. M O R O N S K I. >> So, we are here for a sign variance. Um, after 62 years of being headquartered in Marstown, our firm uh relocated to
Parcany on Monday uh at Five Silven Way. We've moved our headquarters uh to the Five Silven Way building. Everybody uh is excited at the firm. Um and we're glad to be in Paripony. Um we are here uh seeking variances for
signage on the outside of the office building. Um I'll let Mr. Moransky go into the details of the relief. We did receive Mr. Chadwick's letter. Um the variances we're seeking, uh we are proposing two wall signs, one on each facade, um where one is permitted. And
we are also seeking uh a variance to allow them higher on the building than what the ordinance would allow. Again, Mr. Moransky is our professional planner. Uh he will provide the uh planning justifications for those variances. Um these signs as noted in
the materials are will not be illuminated. Um they are just the letterers uh spelling the word Porzio. P O R Zio. Um so I can qualify. Mr. Nonsky, can you provide your education, area of expertise, and the licenses you hold? >> Sure. Um, I have a masters in urban
planning from New York University, New Jersey licensed professional planner since the year 2000, member of the American Institute of Certified Planners. I have been uh before this board and your planning board as well on several occasions and my license is current and in good standing.
>> Seems qualified. >> Thank you. Thank you, Madam Chair. >> Mr. Mansky, you're familiar with the uh site in question, the office uh complex known as Five Silven Way. >> I am. I did uh visit the site uh and the surrounding area, reviewed uh the
application materials, including Mr. Chadwick's report. >> And uh have you come to any planning conclusions regarding the variance relief that's being requested for the wall-mounted signage on the office building? >> Yes, I have. And uh before I get
started, I have a couple of uh handouts. Um one of which was already in your application package. It's a larger version of the proposed signs. Um that uh we're that we're requesting approval for and I'll give these to your
secretary and capacity. >> Mark those A1. >> Mark those A1. A1 and A2. You have two two exhibits. >> Just make sure Nora gets one. >> Yep. And yes. And the second uh exhibit A2 is a series of six photos of uh the
site and the surrounding area. And I'll go through the details of that in my testimony. >> We'll hand it out. >> Okay. >> Thank you. >> And while those are being handed out, Mr. Moroski, the uh site photos that
have been marked being marked as A2, were those photos taken by yourself? Yes, they were. >> And do they accurately reflect the images portrayed? >> Yes, they do. >> Have they been doctorred or altered in any way? >> No. >> Okay. Uh, as mentioned, we're proposing
uh two facade signs. One on at the corner, the frontage, the northeast corner, and it would be above the third floor on the existing three-story building. The signs are non-eluminated. Um the mounting height is approximately
38 1/2 ft uh from the ground. Each sign has an area of 33.75 square ft. It's the letters are 30 in high and the width is 13 1/2 ft. Um the
variances that we're requesting um we are in the RO zone district and under your ordinance um wall-mounted signs um are permitted but we're limited to one sign. We are proposing two. There's also the requirement that no sign shall be
higher than 25 ft from the ground. Our sign is mounted 38 1/2 ft above the third floor as is noted um on as is indicated on the uh plans. >> There's there's no sign currently on the building. >> There is no sign currently on the
building. Correct. And I will go through my photos uh just to give some uh perspective. Uh the first two photos, photographs one and two were taken from the building to the east of our site,
Seven Silven Way. And just to give a sense of the perspective, although it's hard to see the sign in photograph one, um there is a sign for Blue Foundry Bank on that side. Now, their building is sub set back substantially further. Um it's
at least 250 ft uh from the front. um whereas ours is about 120 ft from the front. Photograph two is the right or west side of the building which shows the other facade sign um the Ferrerero uh sign that's on there. And I would
note that these signs, as with ours, are proportionate um certainly to the facade um intended to fit in the facade area um relative to the design.
On the second page, photograph three. Um that's a GAF building, uh one campus drive. It's just an example of signs that are higher than than 25 ft high. and that's reflective of the the taller building that exists. Photograph four um
is five Silven Way which is the subject site. Um that is the side facade near the corner and in the upper right is where one of the signs would appear. This area this um view is from the parking lot uh area where um cars would
come in um off the driveway. So, in some ways it's it's a um you not only have the view facing to the e um east of the traffic on Silven Way, but it's also by the by the entrance way where you have the drive aisle and parking spaces. On
the third page gives some perspective of the corner uh photograph number five and it shows approximately where the two facade signs would appear. And photograph number six, inadvertently numbered number five on my part, but
it's number six um just to the northeast across Silven Way. Um the office building with the the Dave Hitney sign, which is near the top of the building. Again, that's a that's a three-story building. Um their setback also pretty
substantial about 250 ft back. Just for your information, this board approved that Dave Pittney sign last year >> with the same height variance request that you're making now. >> Thank you. Thank you for that. But I just wanted to give a sense of the signs you see around the area and also the
nature of our facade and some of the others uh surrounding us. Uh we have to address the variance criteria. Uh I believe both these signs can be granted under the C2. the sign variances can be granted under the C2 criteria where the
overall benefits um of what's being proposed outweigh the concerns about a detriment which those concerns would be would the sign would be too high um is it in proportion with the with the facade and I do believe for the reasons
going to outline why um the C2 variance would be appropriate here in terms of the number of facade signs um the entrance does have a significant in setback from Silven Way. All the buildings along there have at least a 100 foot setback. Um we're about 120.
And these signs provide a more efficient uh wayfinding. Whether you're traveling from the east along Silvin or even when you get toward um if you're traveling from the west, you get toward the front of the building, you know you're there because you have several office buildings uh in the area and you would
likely see the sign on the front before uh you reach the main driveway to enter uh the property. Uh and the ordinance permits up to 150 foot square sign. um the two signs combined might be about 40
to 45% of that that size. Um and I do believe that those two signs are more efficient in terms of identification than certainly a large one larger sign would be terms of the sign height. Uh 25 ft is the maximum. Um again this is
about um better identification from a wider area. The lower the sign is, it it it's you don't see it as soon as you would when you're driving along Silven Way as the sign height contributes to more efficient uh way finding when
trying to find the site, especially as M. Paparo mentioned after 62 years, we're now the firm is now in um Paripany as opposed to Morristown. So, there can be a bit of an adjustment in that regard. Uh we satisfy several purposes
of uh the municipal land use law um municipal action which promotes a public health safety and general welfare. Uh the signs provide improved identification for uh the new occupants of this office building. U purpose eye
promoting desirable visual environment with good civic design and arrangement. Uh the sign design, yes, consistent with the tenant brand, but it's also at a scale that is suited to provide effective ID. Um and in terms of aesthetics, it certainly fits in terms
of the facade based on its scale. Uh the negative criteria, there's no substantial detriment to the public good. We're not lighting the sign. It is permitted but the understanding is is that given the nature of the business that the sign as proposed um is more
than suitable to address um my client's needs. I believe um having this identification enhances the office building and the overall office park area. Uh we've heard for several years that offices um have had some degree of
decline, but this area um there's been an uptick. As Mr. Johnson noted there was another application for an office. So certainly allowing such improvements it it's it's positive in terms of the nature of development for uh Silven Way
and the surrounding area. There's no substantial uh impairment to the intent and purpose of the zone plan and zoning ordinance. Um if the sign were if there were two streets, it would permit two facade signs. Um, but given that the
signs are less than half the size as what would be permitted, I believe what's designed certainly meets the intent of the ordinance in terms of enhancing site identification. Uh, the interesting thing with your sign ordinance is most of the districts um,
where the sign allow only has a 25 ft height limit, the maximum building height is 45 ft as is the case here in the RL zone where we're located. So, I certainly think having the sign mounted higher on the building um is more
efficient in terms of site identification. And finally, in terms of your master plan goals, um preserve and enhancing uh the town's corporate research and professional office areas by implementing land use strategies that respond to modern market and real estate
trends. These facade signs, they reinforce the identity. They improve the wayfinding for this occupant and overall it's it's enhancing uh an area where office in this type of commerce is encouraged. So for the reasons I've outlined, request you grant the
variances under the C2 criteria. Thank you. >> Thank you, Mr. Ross. >> Any questions from the board? >> Uh regarding the lighting like hours of operation or anything? >> No lighting it. No light. >> No light. >> No.
>> Nope. >> Then what's it >> questions? >> Are the building in a good shape or are you trying to paint or anything so it looks nicer currently? >> Yes, absolutely. We uh the construction was underway for many many many months.
Um and everything has been updated, renovated. Um the exterior was I believe powerwashed by the landlord and cleaned before we took occupancy on Monday. Um but there was no issues with the exterior. Exterior is in good shape. Um the tenant that was there previously
left a short time ago. So it hasn't been vacant for long >> because if we putting a new sign and the building looks city, it's not going to look good. And this town require and I suggest all the property should have looks nicer in this town. >> Absolutely. >> That's the reason I'm asking.
>> Absolutely. Is there anyone in the audience that has any >> I have just one comment. If they put the sign in accordance with the audience who right across the windows I mean >> obviously the hardship.
>> Is there anyone in the public that would like to speak in support of this application? I see none. Opposition to this application? I see none. Would one of our members like to make a recommendation for approval of this application please?
>> This is the minimist uh request and it is reasonable for the applicant and it is good for their business and uh all these things. So I'm in favor of this application number 25 col 80 forio
Bramberg Newman PC 5 silverway block 202 lot 4.3 zone rol recommend granting a C variance for signage >> second ready >> uh Bowitz >> yes >> I >> yes >> yes
>> lo >> yes >> neglia >> yes >> ready >> yes >> gyani Yes. >> Thank you. >> Thank you so much and we look forward to being a part of the community. >> Well, thank you for choosing >> Thank you very much. >> Thank you. >> What do you do when a client doesn't
show >> down floor of the old building? >> Great. Lots of luck. >> Did not show up. >> You could dismiss it without prejudice and reapply or you could carry it and see if there's some kind of communication issue, some reason why
they didn't. Nora, you have any knowledge about this applicant? >> But but Phil, when does the when is the time of action? >> Well, that's probably coming. That's >> cuz if they granted to today, then if we
don't do something. >> Yeah, you probably I'm sure that he granted an extension at least through today. But I don't know if he granted an extension through the end of the month. >> You have to dismiss it without prejudice. Have to come back. Yeah. Unfortunately, that's probably
your only avenue because >> Sir, >> typically what you would >> Sir, there's some extra copies if you guys want it. >> Oh, sure. >> I I would imagine that he he only granted an extension through today >> cuz that's what typically we ask the applicant to do.
>> Well, we're here. >> You're right. So, I I I think someone needs to make a motion to dismiss the application without prejudice for failure to prosecute it. >> Motion. >> Second. We need a roll call. >> Yep. Jasperitz. >> Yes.
>> Yes. >> Jo um Kirkowitz. >> Yes. >> Mozzarella. Not here. Modi. >> Yes. >> Neglia. >> Yes. >> Ready? >> Yes. >> Yes. >> May I have a motion to
>> adjourn? Dismissing. >> Second. >> All in favor? All right. >> We off the record door.