Call the meeting of the Panic City Council June 16th order. Please stand for pledge of allegiance. >> I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation
under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> All right. Thank you everyone for coming. Right. Next we have the consent agenda and there's some changes and additions to it and Elizabeth could you announce that please.
>> Correct. So the agenda you have before you um is different than the agenda that was posted. There is a request um to add uh a timeline extension and approve part-time employees under the consent agenda. There was a request to remove
the public comment policy from the consent agenda and that has been added to administration and then also um a resolution 2628 has been added under administration as well. Um we probably should have a formal motion to accept the updated agenda.
>> I'll move to accept the updated agenda. Second second. All in favor? Belina >> approved. >> Bolton. >> I. >> Bernins and I. >> All right. Consent agenda. Accept this.
All right. Next. Um, I'll read off the items here just for the consent agenda. So, you know what they are. The May 19th, 2026 regular city council meeting minutes. June 2nd, 2026 city council work session meeting minutes. Request
for alcohol on public property. Request to approve city hall printer lease. Request to approve raffle permit for the Pine Island Youth Baseball Association on December 5th, 2026. Pine Island Football Club crearyy
request resolution 2626 approving election judges for the prim primary and general elections held on August 11th and November 3rd. Request to approve extension of recording deadline. Uh request to approve part-time
employees. Thank you. Next we'll move on to public input. >> We can move the consent agenda. >> Oh, I'll move the consent agenda. Second. Second Elena. >> Hi, >> Copen. >> Hi, >> Brandy.
>> Hi. And >> Vernon and I. >> Next is public input. Uh before we get started on that, I just want to remind everybody that's here about our our rules of public quorum decorum. When people are speaking or after they're
speaking, refrain from any clapping, cheering, doing, no name calling, attacking, etc. We've done pretty good the last few times. let's just keep it going. Um if not, I mean uh this will end up changing our public input policy
down the road. So your reactions here reflect highly on what we do in the future. So with that, I think we can call up our first speaker. Um that will be Susan Blazic.
Suzanne Blazic, sorry. Susanna Blazik, 1315 County Road 3 Southwest. Good evening. I want to address the recently suggested policy and public input. Specifically, the bullet stating that public commenters shall refrain
from allegations, charges, complaints, or name calling against any city employee or community member. Every council meeting, we are reminded to behave properly. Yet during the Cheesefest parade, one of you openly and loudly booed us in the no
data center float in front of children and your constituents. Are the rules just for us but not for you? We've discussed leadership before. Be leaders. You set the standard. The second point concerns the bullet
that prohibits raising new information about matters that have been given a public hearing. I want to talk about water, which we've talked about plenty, but not enough. On page 28 of the AUR, you state about Project Skyway, the Pine Island Hypers Scale Data Center that waste water generated under both
development scenarios would be conveyed to the city of Pine Island's municipal sewer. There is no mention of pre-treatment of this water. Our current wastewater facility built decades ago does not treat or test PAS VOCC's
non-corrosives or emerging contaminants linked to hypers scale heavy industrial data centers. This information is public. The proposed wastewater facility in Zimroda shows no plans to address this either. Air cooled systems, especially closed
water and glycol loops, require flushing to remove construction debris and prevent corrosion and microbial growth. These flushings introduce chemicals, not heavy chemicals or nutrients which we can treat in our wastewater plants, but complex substances into our wastewater streams. And the flushing needs to be
done every 3 to 5 years. Are these contaminants simply going to be released untreated into the North Zumbro River? You keep telling us there are no other options, but we know that
there are many options. Thank you. All right, next up Joe Blaze it Joe Blazic 1315 County Road 3 Southwest. So during Cheesefest, I had the opportunity to talk to a great deal of people. And what I found was that
everyone I spoke to fell into one of two camps. The first camp were those that were uninformed, knew nothing about the data center, and thought it's just a done deal. Camp number two are those people that are highly involved in the community, are anti- the data center,
but fear retribution from the city. So then I ask I ask them are you for it against it neutral and they say well I have to be neutral about it to which I respond you can remain neutral but your silence becomes consent for the
developer for Google and for those that stand to profit and they say well what else are your thoughts Joe? Well, I'll tell you one of the travesties was the zoning of light industrial. Let's talk about power for a minute. The power consumed by Pine Island at around 20 megawatts. The power consumed by
Rochester around 300 megawatt. The power of the state of Minnesota is 10,000. And the data center is 2700. Can anyone guess as to the largest consumer of electricity right now in the state of Minnesota? That's the Pine Bend refinery tipping the scales at 120
megawatts of energy. This facility is 22 times the largest consumer right now. And is Pine Bend a light industrial application? Of course not. All of us know the answer is no.
Project Skyway has largely been the baby of our administrator, engineers, council, mayor, anyone who signed those NDAs. And no one likes being told that their baby is ugly. But what we're asking for is someone to admit a mistake was made along the way and have that
person or those people stand up and help us as a community reverse some of those decisions that led us to where we are today. >> Thank you. Next up, Tucker Oakland.
Tucker Hogland, 14677498th Street Way in Pine Island. Good evening. My name is Tucker Hogland. To be completely honest with you, I was somewhat neutral on the data center project for a long time. That was until my good friend Joe Blazic asked me to
get involved. Joe was a Marine officer who led young men across three different deployments, putting his own life on the line to keep all of us safe. When a man of that level of integrity asks you to step up, you do it without hesitation. Public service runs deep in my own family, too. Uh my late grandfather,
Lyall Hogland, sat on this very Pine Island Council many years ago. My dad, Keith Hogland, spent 15 years on the planning and zoning board of a nearby town. Because of them, the weight of your responsibility is not lost on me. I understand the challenges you face in trying to improve our great city while
keeping residents satisfied. But this data center is a deeply serious issue. A project of this massive scale and location is entirely unprecedented for our community. An unprecedented project requires unprecedented scrutiny. I know
you are all good people trying to do the right thing. If you feel you must allow this project to move forward, I ask you to do one thing tonight. When you lay in bed, ask yourself if you are absolutely 100% positive that this is the right move for us, our children, and our
grandchildren. If you hesitate for even a second, then you owe it to yourselves and to this town to apply that unprecedented scrutiny, even if that means pausing or changing previously adopted procedures. This is permanent. It demands more careful thought than
anything this council has ever done before. Thank you. you. Next up is Rod Lanners. >> Good evening. The shenanag the shenanigans of Ryan companies and
Google. The people of Pine Island should have more influence than Ryan Companies and Google in deciding what is built in our community. If data centers are truly beneficial, why has this project advanced with so little transparency and public involvement? I moved to Pine
Island 53 years ago. Met my wife Joyce here and together we raised three children. We chose this town because of its rural character, small town values, and strong sense of community. These qualities are worth protecting. Today, I
feel cheated and betrayed. If the Google data center project moves forward, residents could face significant safety, health, and quality of life concerns from locating a massive industrial facility so close to homes. It is
heartbreaking to think families may eventually leave or feel pressured to leave because of the influence of a wealthy corporation and decisions made by a city government that has not put residents first. Ryan Companies and Google came to Pine Island because we
have the power, water, and infrastructure they need. In return, a 36 million tax incentive package was negotiated behind closed doors. property was reszoned as light industrial avoiding a more
comprehensive environmental review. Watching this process unfold has been frustrating and disappointing. Fortunately, the court has paused the project so important questions can be answered before additional actions taken. Something should have happened
from the beginning. The project initially presented as project skyway, not a data center, allowing approvals to move forward before residents fully understood what was being proposed. A trillion dollar corporation may not care about the concerns of a small town, but
our local government should. Our health, property values, quality of life, and community character matter more than tax incentives and development deals. Government should protect residents and rural communities, not sacrifice them in pursuit of revenue. Thank you.
>> Thank you, >> Ethan Jones. Ethan Jones, Rochester, Minnesota. Data centers are a cancer upon the land and society that they are built upon. In Canton, Mississippi, ever since the Amazon data center started operations,
residents reported lung irritation, breathing difficulties, and elevated reports of asthma in children in Monterey Park, California. Local modeling studies found that the proposed data centers had the potential to increase fine particulate exposure and cancer risks as well as cause more
issues for California's chronic water scarcity with its 500 million gallons of annual water demand. On top of these issues, data centers can also cause noise pollution that can exceed 90 dB with anything above 85 dB being
considered harmful to hearing and light pollution that disrupts sleep cycles and melatonin production as well as described the migration patterns of birds, bats, turtles, and insects among other creatures. And despite all this, the Democrats and
Republicans of the Pine Island City Council have chosen to not sign the moratorum my organization, Worker Strike Back, have put forward. Instead, they choose to let Project Skyway go on unhindered, effectively giving tax cuts to trillion dollar companies like Google
while also choosing to let their constituents slowly die from cancer and illness from the eventual pollution in the name of profits. Shame upon every single elected city council official and I ask all constituents in this room to remember
this come time for elections. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. Next, Aubrey Dirkson. Aubrey Dirkson, 340 Prairie View Drive, Northeast Pine Island. I actually don't have a type speech for the first time tonight.
Shocking. But something that has been standing out throughout all of this. Never underestimate the capacity and the propensity for the local government to make poor decisions. It's been the number one lesson learned from this.
As residents, we deal with the brunt of the impact when the local government fails. And none of you have been able to actually acknowledge that there's been any impact. And when you fail
and that impact falls on us, the cleanup in turn also falls on us. We have repeatedly asked you to change course. what you have been doing, responding in punitive ways that infringe upon our
First Amendment rights, that ignore environmental laws, that continue to maintain one-way conversation instead of two-way conversation, that continue to exacerbate the problem that got you here in the
first place. It's not working. The request has been the same this entire time. Slowed down, two-way conversation. We are at the table. We are awake. We are active.
That is an asset. And the call is for you to actually rise to the occasion and actually join with the residents in two-way conversation about the betterment of the community, which you have not done. That ask is still there. You can still
change course. Thank you. Next is David Dirkson. Reverend David Dirkson, Pine Island. On Sunday, I sent you all an email about the change in policy and my concerns about that.
There's a proverbs, Proverbs 20:11 says, "Even children are known by the way they act, whether their conduct is pure and whether it is right." So this evening, I'm asking you to do the right thing and not make this
change. The purpose of the change says that it's for efficiency, efficient common period. Our government is built on efficiency. Dictatorships are though.
I stood here before you last session saying, "Let's have a conversation. We have an opportunity to come together just as my wife just said, have a two-way conversation." Instead of building on that opportunity,
we got this policy put into the order for tonight. a policy that restricts conversation. That's not how we repair relationship. If you have someone who's upset with you, you don't say, "I can only listen
to you for 2 minutes, and if you say certain things, I'm not going to listen to you anymore." Period. End of story. Just because I don't like what I'm hearing from you. That's not how you repair relationships. Yet, that's what's under consideration tonight.
So what I ask you is to do the right thing. Our government is based on robust dialogue. That's our freedom under the Constitution. Let's have robust dialogue. Even if we don't like necessarily, we might not agree. That's
okay. But that's how our government is based and it's a cherished right. Let's honor that. Thank you. >> Thank you, Jason Lindall. Hello council. Thank you for this opportunity. I do want to show my
support repeatedly for your approach to community development, economic development, and managing the needs of this town. Thank you. I do want to address a few things. One, I see the opposition to the one project
that has people riled up, brings a lot of literature. They're they are organized. I give them that, but I don't have that approach. I have an approach of looking people in the eye with no paper, no computer, no phone.
I would like to have conversations, but I do understand that representation and our democratic process relies on people being elected and doing a job, the job you were elected to do, and I know how thankless that is.
I am in a representative role in my labor union, Salt of the Earth people. But I grew up here. I've said it before. I've watched countless opportunity miss this town. I grew up on a family farm
that lost its availabil or lost its possibility of a future. Right? The farming is not is not happening. I support farmers to this day. Everyone I don't believe this land would be sold if the farmer wasn't willing to sell it.
And and I know that there's lots of CRP land that we're paying to not farm. So I don't believe that is the heart of this issue. Also, the MNPCA, one of the strictest in the United States, has approved this or we are stricter than that. So, I don't
understand why we were told that this is such a bad project, but the environment when this one of the strictest in the country says that it is okay. Um, I was also I like to address the closed loop glycol system.
I have that in my house. My grandpa put it in at 75 years old. You put in a geothermal system that was supposed to be the answer. Thank you. I would love to continue this conversation at my dinner table with anybody that would like to have it. That is one thing I miss about my family farm. When I every
day when I leave for work, I see the farm, the house is gone, but there was an open door with a dinner table where he would discuss anything and I'm the same. Thank you. >> All right. Thank you, Jason. >> All right. That concludes our public
input for tonight. Uh, next up is the administration. Let's move on to I would first like to read off a purple heart uh proclamation here. >> Doug Andrist here. >> Yes. >> All right. Thank you. I will read off
our proclamation here. Supposed to be in the packet. Oh, here it is. Thank you. The city of Pine Island proclamation purple heart city. Whereas the city of Pine Island in the state of Minnesota has always supported its military
veteran population and whereas the Purple Heart is the oldest military declaration in the present use and was initially created as a badge of military merit by George General George Washington in 1782.
And whereas the purple heart was the first American service awarded or decoration made available to the common soldier and is specifically awarded to members of the United States armed services armed forces who have been
wounded or paid the ultimate sacrifice in combat with a declared enemy of the United States of America. And whereas the mission of the military order of the Purple Heart is to foster an environment of goodwill among the combat wounded
veteran members and their families, promote patriotism, support legislative initiatives, and most importantly, make sure we never forget. And whereas the Panaland area has a highly decorated veteran population, including Purple
Heart recipients. And whereas Panalan appreciates the sacrifices our Purple Heart recipients made in defending our freedoms and believe it is important that we acknowledge them for their courage and show them the honor and support they
have earned. Now therefore, as the mayor prom of the city of Pine Island, Minnesota, do hereby proclaim the city of Pine Island as a Purple Heart city and encourage the citizens of Pine Island to show their appreciation for the sacrifice of the Purple Heart
recipients have made in defending our freedoms to acknowledge their courage and to show them the honor and support they have earned. and witness where I will sign it and uh set my hand and cause corporate seal of the city of B
Island to be affiliated the 16th day of June 2026. Doug, would you please come forward? This Eric sign that would be great. Thank you. Thank you for your service.
>> Thanks. Thank you much. And again, we thank all military active and members that have supported our freedoms. So, moving on, we have the next item of here for administration. Do I have resolution
2627 approving liquor license to Los Reyes Kitchen and Bar? Would you like to take that? >> Yes, we have a liquor license request. Um, it will be noted most did have a liquor license in 2025 that did expire on December 31st of 2025. And they did
continue um selling liquor into 2026 um after a few warnings um and getting law enforcement involved. They they did stop and now they have reapplied for a new liquor license. Um our code says
that we could suspend or um not approve a future liquor license. I do believe that um there might have been some misunderstanding about the need to reapply for a liquor license. So we are recommending approval of the liquor license um and then we will work with
them to make sure that they apply for a liquor license again for >> aware of the change. >> Yes. >> Okay. Any discussion? >> If we were to deny it, it would have a significant impact on the business. >> Yes. they wouldn't they would not be
able to uh sell any any sort of liquor. So, and this is for on sale only um for an intoxicating liquor license. >> I'll move approval of resolution 2627 approving the liquor license for Losa's kitchen and bar.
>> Second motion a second. Delena. >> Hi >> Colton. >> Hi >> Randy. >> Hi >> and South Vernon. Hi. >> Next up is to request to approve the facade loan application for Mama Soulies.
Thank you. >> Yes. Good evening council. Uh before you tonight is an application from John Mangoris, the owner of Mamasuli's uh to apply for a facade improvement loan. Uh he's working on installing some awnings, some new lighting, and doing some window
trim work around his building there to improve the facade. Uh the EDA did go ahead and approve this and uh per that agreement per the program, it does have to come before council to uh finalize that. Um so he is requesting uh the amount of $5,000 of the to help pay for
the $16,545 total for that project. Any questions for Mitch? >> Did see the photo. It looked really nice with the outside lighting that they're proposing and everything. >> Yeah, it's going to look great.
>> So, it'll be And for everybody's reference, that is the little Morgan boys in the Chinese >> restaurant. >> Does that include this side of the building? That's some of it purple. >> Yeah, they're going to be painting so that that purple will go away.
>> The purple will not exist. Not that I don't like the purple clearly, but it just kind of >> at least that's my understanding is that he's painting it. >> Okay. So, >> all right. >> I'll move approval for the basone application for mama's release. >> Second.
>> I have a motion and a second. Elena >> I >> Brandy >> I >> and Vernon myself. I >> Thank you. >> Thank you very much. >> Thanks Mitch. Next up is ordinance 183 revising council meeting order of
business. >> So chapter 2 section 2.04 of our code says uh the order of business that shall be conducted at city council meetings. It seems that throughout my tenure um that councils have requested to change
the order of business uh to fit their needs. And so um council had requested to change the order of business. Um, at council meetings, Attorney Vos and I decided that it would best be to change
the language of what should be um uh what what should be considered at city council meetings, but then leave the order of the city council meeting up to the current council. So that way we don't have to change the ordinance every few years and the order of business can
be left up to the current council. So the same agenda items would be on the agenda. They would just be um appearing in whatever order the city council would wish. >> Any discussion? >> Oops.
>> I'll move ordinance 183 revising the council meeting order of business. >> Second. I have a motion and second. Delena. >> Hi >> Wilton. >> Hi >> Randy. >> Hi >> M. Hi. >> Next is public comment policy and rules
of decorum. >> Um and what this all came about this stemmed from the uh evening where we could not conduct our business basically because of the disruptions that happened during our public input process. So that
is why this has been on the agenda now added at our work session. We had a discussion. The council very much would like to continue the public input, but if this continues as is. Um, our attorney here, Bob Voss, has made it clear that there are and we've also
checked with other cities that they don't have public input at their council meetings. So, the question is is, you know, if we can behave and act accordingly with public decorum, we can continue our public input. And uh we'll
let uh somebody want to speak on this or not? >> I do. Yeah, if I can. >> Yeah. So, acting mayor, um you I've said repeatedly um at your meetings that uh what you just said, mayor, acting mayor, um Minnesota cities are not required to
take input from the public. Uh folks don't like to hear that, but that's true. Cities don't have to in your council meetings take public input. I don't know if a majority of cities at this point don't take public input, but it's getting close to that because people come into these meetings and they
individually call out elected officials. they call them out by name and talk about their kids, talk about uh in in the case of of this of this data project, I've heard multiple occasions where people have accused directly or
indirectly city council members or public officials staff of being on the take of being paid off, being bribed to support this project. It's absurd. It's an absurd allegation to make. No one has
any evidence of that. No one has suggested they have any evidence of that. But yet people say that it would be, if these were not public officials, slanderous. It would be actionable kind of stuff. But these are public officials and it would be very hard for you to sue somebody who makes a claim like that.
But it's absurd. It's absurd to come into a public meeting where people are effectively acting as volunteers for your community and to accuse them of crimes with no evidence. But that's happened here. Okay? And and
what's happened that's happened in in city council meetings across the state and cities have frequently said, "Forget it then. We're not going to have public input. If you're going to come in and you're going to call people out individually by name and accuse them of criminal activity with no evidence, we're just not going to have it anymore.
This city has said, and I commend you. I represent eight cities. I'm city attorney for eight cities. Most of I think all of the cities that I represent continue to take public input. I think it's great. I think that's the way government should work. I think we should hear from constituents. I think
you should hear from your constituents. But if you're going to use the opportunity here at a council meeting to come in and make allegations about people being on the take, but why why does anyone want to serve in government if that's the way it's going
to work? So my understanding is you've proposed some changes to your policy to avoid that. PE people people here have every right to not like this project and to say they hate the project. Think it's terrible for the environment, think it's terrible for their children. They have
every right to say that. If you're going to have public forum, let them say that. But to call people out individually, to to accuse them of criminal activity with no evidence, it's not right. So I'm speaking right now. This is not the opportunity for public input. You are
making my point. Thank you. So anyway, um you have in front of you a change to your policy. Do I think do I think that if somebody stands up in a meeting and refuses to say where their address is, which is part of your
policy, that you can throw them out? I don't think that. Can you have that be part of your policy? And then if people are not going to comply with that, if they're not going to comply with a two-minute limit, get rid of the policy. Yes, you can do that. And I think that's the point of the changes to your policy.
They are to make clear to folks what you're going to allow and what you're not going to allow. And if people are not going to comply, if your community is not going to comply, which historically for 50 years, 60 years, I don't know, as long as Pine Pine Island's been a city, everyone's been able to comply until very recently. Um
then I guess you'll consider not having public forum anymore. But that so anyway, I guess I've gone off on a bit of a tangent here, but that's I've sat here and witnesses. I serve as city attorney in eight cities. I go to three council meetings a week. I sit through
council meetings ad nauseium for three decades. And um it's it's, you know, that's the way the country's gone is that people are going to get called out as being public servants. Um and it's, you know, people should disagree about policy
vigorously. that's what America is all about. But to call people out individually and to to call them names and to accuse them of things, it's just it's it's disappointing. So I think that's the point of the change in the
policy and u you know I've rattled on long enough. So thanks for the opportunity to speak on that. >> Thank you. And a lot of this stems I think from the issues too. You got to check your political egos at the door. This is not time for comments right now. So you
>> and we don't do anything here right now. This is >> I just want to talk to you bullet number four. >> We know about that and her attorney has addressed those issues already. So it's taken. >> Thank you. >> Yep.
So any other discussions council >> here? >> No. >> I just want to add that you know we check political eagles at the door. We don't do anything here about bombing Iran or Gaza or anything like that. And we don't appreciate this being used as a
public forum for political positions and stuff like Steve Young did. And we want to maintain the public input from the residents of this town so we can hear what they have to say about the projects and the agenda items that we have on
before us every night. We don't like to be sidetracked on issues that we cannot control or do anything about. So, thank you for that. >> All right. Any other questions or >> not? Take a motion.
>> I'll move approval of the public comment policy changes in rules of for rules of decorum. >> A second. >> We have a motion in a second. >> Why do you change them? you haven't showed anything here. You got to unleash present. >> So, Mayor and Council, let me I mean, I
I went off of my little tilt there. I went off my little tangent. Um the policy is in the packet. It's available online. And if folks want to avail themselves of seeing what you have in front of you, they've had a week to do it or almost a week to do it. So, and I'm I'm not I'm not gonna I'm not gonna
>> I'm not going to engage in the debate about it. >> Sit down. >> Sit down. continue to be removed. Thank you. >> What we are doing has been published out there. It is we are limiting public input to 20 minutes.
>> Her illegal. >> Do you want to eliminate public input completely? We can do that. >> It is not illegal. >> Democratic statement real illegal. Minnesota statutes have that. >> Right. >> All right. That's enough comment from
the galley. We'll move on. Next comment, we'll ask you to leave and if not, we'll have the deputy escort you out. All right. So, back to the discussion. We had a motion and second. Elena, >> I
>> Randy. >> Hi, >> Vernon's eye. Next is resolution 2628 declaring a vacancy for mayor. Anybody with? >> Yes, we have a resolution before you.
Uh, resolution 2628 declaring a vacancy for the mayor position. Uh, the city received a resignation notice from Mayor David Fes. Um, and so I have that letter before you and I also have prepared the
resolution. per Minnesota state statutes, uh the city council may appoint someone for mayor uh until the next election. So that would appear mayor's term is already up at the end of the year and his position would have already been on the ballot. And so it
would be my recommendation to approve the resolution declaring the vacancy, but then uh filling that position at a future council meeting. >> Any questions? Um I'll move resolution 2628 declaring a
vacancy for mayors. >> A second mayor if acting mayor before you take a vote on that just um this is all standard practice where a public elected official resigns a relatively short period of time before a general
election. It would be typical to appoint a replacement until that general election. I mean obviously in this case folks can sign up to run for mayor if they wanted to do that. I guess the only thing I would add uh to the motion you've made which is to approve the
acceptance of the resignation and the declaring of the vacancy. The only thing I would say is if if the council will is to accept um uh folks interested in temporarily being appointed as the mayor, you might want to say that. Or if
you'd rather uh look to your own council, I mean, you you may want to say something tonight about how it is you want to go about appointing uh the replacement uh for the mayor. And so maybe you could have a little dialogue before you take a vote on on that about how you want to go about appointing uh
the replacement >> or would that be something that we >> or you can take the vote and and talk about it at the next meeting. Yep, that's fine, too. But I I want you to I want you to at least uh I think it it it can be it's perfectly legal to come to a
meeting and just appoint somebody. But it's I think it's a better it you know public perception is a bit better if you sort of say what you're going to do to decide who to appoint. So whether you do that tonight or at the next meeting I I guess I'd leave that up to you. But I I would encourage you to say something about that at some point.
So, I want to put on the record that um for everyone in the room that we are just comprehending this ourselves. This just happened. We are going to take into consideration what we need for the city
and we will come to you with a decision next meeting. It is going to be something that we will not take lightly and we will be having deep discussions about it. And keep in mind it is six months.
So we have a filing period in July and that will h whatever happens there happens there. But we will be addressing it and it will be open and discussed in July. >> All right. I think that sums it up. And
this is declaring the vacancy because of the reservation that was just submitted. So can I get a motion or any discussion? Uh I move for the 2628 declaring of bank for mayor. >> A second a motion and a second. Delena
>> I. >> Colton. >> Hi. >> Randy. >> Hi. >> Vernon. I All right. Let's move on to planning commission. Anything there? All right. Public works and engineering. >> Adam.
>> Get Adam tonight. >> Haven't seen you in a while. >> Yeah. Uh good evening members of the council. I'm Adam Tlescort with Woods Engineering Firm. Um first item on your agenda here is uh approving change order number one on your street project that
we all see right outside our window there. Um essentially what this is is the the project was designed with a 36inch storm pipe running under the ground with an assumed depth of a massive uh duct that Bevcon uses. It's
their main duct that feeds a major part portion of their service area. Um, and then immediately once the project started, uh, that duct was the first thing we dug up because we didn't verify the depth. Um, it was a couple feet lower or, uh, 18 inches lower or so than
we expected. So, we had to switch our pipe from a regular cylindrical 36-inch pipe to an arch pipe um to get underneath that and to keep the same capacity in that pipe. Um arch pipe is very very expensive in comparison to the
regular cylindrical pipe. So, uh to avoid 117 foot long run of that arch pipe, we added a manhole um and just have a 25 foot stretch of arch pipe and then we switch back to the circular pipe. So, all told, it ends up being around $12,700
um additional um that's expected as this change as part of this change. Um but like I said, the the cost savings of running that entire stretch at Arch Pipe is it's over over $25,000 savings. >> Uh it's right outside here.
>> Yeah. Yeah. It's like right next to the It's the duck the duck crosses and then it's right after the the duct crossing. >> It wasn't on the street down there. was right out front here. >> Yeah, the duck goes up this alley here. Yeah. And we had a manhole just 20 25 ft
um be west of there, but we're adding another one >> just to switch the pipe over. >> Has it been looked at like elsewhere to make sure there's no other changes there? >> Yeah. Um we dropped some grades of some other pipes too. There's a smaller store manhole that we have to drop a little
bit too, but um no changes that affect cost really. So this is the main cost difference I guess that warranted a change order. >> So you just need approval for that additional >> Yeah, that's item A. It'll be up to talk
about item B, but I'll be around for other questions, I guess. >> Um, I'll move approval for the change order number one for the 2026 street improvement project. >> I'll second. >> A motion and a second. Elena, >> hi >> Wilson. >> Hi Randy.
>> Hi >> Vernon. Hi. >> Exit. >> Um yes, this item uh it's just payment application number one. We do these monthly. Um the majority of the items on the street project for this portion are uh it's the first one. So mobilization
charge is um a large portion of it and then the rest are removals um and some minor pipe that's gone in but mostly pavement removal, curb removal, mobilization, tree clearing um front end stuff on on a project. So all told it
adds up to 191 or 195,000 um $291. So that is payment application one. If you have any questions for that, I'll be around as well. >> I'll move approval for the 2026 street
improvement project pay application. >> Second and a motion and second. Delena. >> Iton. >> Hi. >> Randy. >> Hi. >> Vernon. >> Hi. >> Out of curiosity, what is the timeline? Me reminded like for the whole
>> Yeah. So, it's a it's an odd project because it's this portion, but it's also Second Street over there, and it's also Willow Circle. >> Yeah. >> It's split up. So, um all told, it wraps up in the fall. Like they pave, you know, October time frame. Um September,
October. Um that's what the contract says, but that doesn't mean that like certain portions might not be wrapped up before then. Um the contractors let us know that this portion will be first. I mean, they've started there. So, um I would imagine it'll be a gravel road with, you know, concrete curb and gutter
pretty early on in the summer or, you know, midsummer, I would say. >> Will there will there be any impacts to the school over here when we get to that one? >> Yeah. Um, so that's in the contract uh that that street specifically needs to be basically started and finished in the
summer months. So, just Second Street's got to do a little extra language there. It might be paved during school, but it'll be um >> open. >> It'll be open. Yeah. And the the all the underground utility work and stuff has to occur. Okay. >> During summer. Um all the concrete stuff.
>> That was one thing we wanted to make sure happened to reduce the issue with traffic and >> right. Yeah. It would be kind of a nightmare otherwise. So yeah, that was in the plans to Okay. >> to get that done in the summer months. >> Perfect. >> Thanks. Thank you. >> Thank you. Next up in the department monthly
reports legal. >> Oh legal. Sorry I apologize. >> Yeah. No, not at all. I just to acknowledge I think it's been widely reported in the press. There is an additional ruling in the court case involving the data center. Um uh uh
parties have been enjoined from moving forward with construction uh until some additional information is provided to the plaintiffs in the case. the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy is the plainif. Uh, and that is the update. I'm happy to answer questions about that.
Again, I'm not litigating the case, but I'm I've read the order, so I'm aware of it. So, >> and I think that stemmed from the fact that they couldn't certain links and some information. >> Correct. There was an attempt to provide the information apparently, but they weren't able to open it or access it or
something. And so, yeah, that's exactly right. Okay. And I have nothing else. >> Thank you. >> Next up will be claims. >> I'll move claims. >> Second motion and second for claims. Elena >> I
>> Randy >> I >> I now we'll move on to department monthly reports administrator. >> I don't have anything for
about with the wastewater treatment any updates there you >> uh no just that uh we're working with both the state and now >> yeah the bonding didn't come through the amount that we were asking all the cities you know right
>> yeah so we received this $1 million and then uh in the other omnibus bill uh the state legisle put in language that $80 left over from a previous $10 million can be used for project that those were pre-esign that
link so that half million would pop up. >> All right. Well, thank you on the library. Rachel, >> hi. I just wanted to give you guys an update. County funding. We had a bunch of gray clouds last time. Um and this
time it's not quite so gray. Uh we had a meeting with Good Hugh County last week at the outside agency's funding um request meeting and then we've been in communication with them again today with their committee of the whole meeting and they are going to be just freezing our
funding. They are not diminishing our funding, but we're not going to get a bump for the uh standard of living increase >> next year. So next year that'll return um but they're just freezing it for one year and they're trying to do that across the board for the outside agencies. So that's good news for us.
Hopefully we won't be losing the 10. Well, we won't be losing the 10% that we thought we might be for that Mstead County. Um the uh commissioners and the administrator have also been taking a look after we've been pushing back a little bit on their
funding formula that they presented which included programming numbers and they are looking to us we actually have a meeting on Thursday the library directors to look at different ways that we can split the pot of money that they're going to be providing. So, the
libraries will be funded at 1% of the county levy and we can kind of as long as it's in our annual report, it's data that they can um verify, we can use that information. So, hopefully that will mean that
our library is not losing I think that was $11,000 for this next funding year. So, fingers crossed I'll keep you updated for next month. And of course, Dodge County is the same. No changes there. Uh my other big news is that summer reading is going on. We have over
I think we've got we've reached the 300 kid or actually a participant number for summer reading signups. We've had a um 92 stuffies at our stuffy sleepover which was our kickoff the first week of uh the month which was our biggest
number yet. We think we had about 140 people at that program. So, we were very very pleased and we are really appreciating the support. Take a look at our website and Facebook if you're interested in more information or the council packet. Also, I put the listing
of our different programs as well. And also, just to give you all a heads up, I will be out of the office from Monday through Wednesday this coming week, probably Thursday. I am going to a conference on America 250, which will be giving us programming ideas for the anniversary this year. And I'll be in
Cincinnati for that. So, super exciting. Um, and um, then they'll also the the con the conference is also providing a stipen for programming after the fact. So, hopefully we'll have a really good slate of programs this fall.
So, stay tuned. Any questions for me? >> Well, thank you so much. >> Thank you, Courts. Nothing. Thank you, EDA. Fire Department
County Sheriff. Okay. Cemetery Board, License Bureau, Emergency Management. And we already talked about the North Sumber Cemetery District
Image Committee. And we'd like to thank them for all their work on that sign. That was very nice. Everyone got a lot of positive feedback on that stood out really nice and public work and thank you for all your work.
>> Good county board minutes available at Good County. And with that I think we wrap it up to adjournment. >> Move to adjourn. >> Second. >> Have a motion and a second. Zelena Iton. I Randy I Vernon and I. Thank you
everybody for God.