zoning board of adjustment meeting will please come to order. Adequate notice of this meeting was provided in the following ways. Notice published in the Courier News. Notice posted on the bulletin board of the municipal building. Notice made available to the township clerk. Notice sent to the Courier News and the Star Ledger. Will
the clerk please call the role? >> Give me one second. I lost my sheet. >> No, take your time. >> Trying to get your resos done. Hold on. >> Courtney, I lost my sheet. >> My my book sheet. Thank you.
>> Okay. Thank god. Goodness, Courtney's here. Okay. Mr. Weissman, >> Mr. Patel, >> yes. >> Mr. Reio, >> yes. >> Mr. Blunt, >> Mr. Haka >> here. >> Mr. Minando >> here. >> And Chair Male
>> here. Will everyone please stand for a salute to the flag? >> Mr. Roy is here. >> Okay. >> Thanks, Roy. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God indivisible
and justice for all. >> Mr. Canal, do we have any changes to tonight's agenda? >> Yes, we have quite a few changes. The application of Gimenez on Mitchell Avenue has been withdrawn and will not be heard. The Sony application, Hamilton Boulevard, is adjourned until September
18th, 2025 with no further notice. Delton Black is adjourned. South Second Street is adjourned until September 18th with no further notice. The Lopez application, Howard Street, adjourned until September 25th with no further notice. The Mina application, Old New
Brunswick Road, is adjourned until September 25th. They must notice. The Rouse application on Southwest Court is adjourned until October 9th. They must notice. Finally, Venture Act hose lane is adjourned until September 25th. No
further notice. Those are all the changes I have, Mr. Chairman. >> Thank you, sir. I appreciate that. Let's move on to item number 72-ZB-51V. Vipool Patel. >> Is Vipool Patel present? Is Vipel Patel present?
>> Laura, do you see the applicant? >> No, I do not. Just go to number eight. >> Got it. >> I think he is here. It's at me. >> Where is he? >> Oh, he just muted himself. Wait, he's back. >> Okay. Are you Vipel Patel?
>> Hit unmute. You muted again. Yes. >> I need to swear you in. Could you raise your right hand? >> Do you swear that the testimony you're about to give should be the truth? >> Yes.
>> Your name and address, please? >> Patel 11 Christopher Court, New Jersey 08854. >> Put your hand down and explain to the board why you're here. >> I didn't I didn't understand you, sir. Uh, explain to the board why you're
here. Why are you before the board? >> Uh, I want to put the fans on my property. >> Okay. Um, Jonathan, you have some comments on this, sir? >> Yes. Thank you. Mr. Patel, have you read
the staff report dated June 11th? >> June 11th. Yes. >> Do you agree with all the terms of that staff report? Yes, sir. >> And you understand that no fence permit will be approved until a memorandum of restriction is recorded.
>> What is that means? >> Uh item four in the report, it states that if the township needs to access the easement, you will uh encumber all costs associated with the removal and replacement of the fence or anything else you have within the easement area.
So, it's a document that says that you agree to that. >> Yes. >> Okay. No, no further comments or questions. Thank you. >> Any other any other comments or questions from the board? >> Hearing none, I'm going to open it to the public. Anyone in the public portion
have any comments or questions about this application? >> No one chairman. >> Hey, close the public portion. I'd make a motion to approve this application. Can I get a second? I second it. >> Thanks. Call the role. >> Mr. Patel. >> Yes.
>> Mr. Reio. >> Roy is here. Mr. Blount. >> Mr. Haka. >> Yes. >> Mr. Minando. >> Yes. >> Chairman Cahill. >> Yes. >> Your application has been approved. We will memorialize it in a written document at our next meeting and we'll
send that document to you. >> Thank you, sir. >> Thank you. Have a good night, Mr. Mattel. >> Chairman. Mr. Won's trying to get on. He's having a connection problem. >> Okay, just let us know when he gets in. >> I shall. Thank you. >> In meantime, let's move on to item number 8.25-ZB-22V.
>> Steven Edens. >> Is Steven Edens present? >> Yes. >> I need to swear you in. Could you raise your right hand? >> Yes. >> You swear that the testim should be the truth. >> Yes. >> Your name and address, please?
>> Steven L. leading one Vogle Avenue, PCway, New Jersey. >> Thank you. Could you explain to the board why you're here? >> Uh because of my fence and a shed, I want I'm requesting a variance on it,
I guess. >> Okay. Hey, uh Jonathan, you have some comments about this one as well? >> Yes. So, similarly, have you uh have you read the May 22nd staff report memorandum? >> Yes. >> Okay. Do you agree with all the the
terms of that report? >> Yes. >> Uh including that the shed be removed, the fence along William Street be brought in 15 ft from the property line, not the curb, the property line, and the fence along Vogle be brought in with the in line with the garage.
>> I would like not to have to do that. I would request that uh the fence remain where it is in the shed. Also, >> the fence is required to be 25 ft from the property line. So, 15 ft is a um a
good compromise. It's more than half. >> We could insist on the original. We're trying to compromise here and make it work for both parties here. So, you're requesting that you're
ordering that the fence be brought in 15 feet from the curb >> from the property line. >> From the property line. I don't think I have that much property. >> It would result in the fence being
scale. >> It's only been there since 1983. I know that doesn't matter, but it's been there since 1983. >> On the back corner of your house, it would give you uh about 10 ft from the corner of your house to the pro to the
fence line along William Street. >> What if I just uh took the front portion down and put a 4ft fence up? >> You would be allowed to do that. Okay. Well, I guess that's what I have to do.
What would I be doing? Just the front or what what portion would I have to drop it down to four feet? >> Uh the portion in front of the garage along Vogle and the portion along the um the side of the house that fronts the
intersection of William and Vogle. >> Okay. What about the shed, Jonathan? >> The shed should be The shed should be removed. You're You're way over on your building coverage. >> Shed has to be removed. >> By when?
>> By when? >> Uh we can when you come in for the fence permit, we can agree to a term that's suitable for you. >> Herman, it has to be in the resolution when we have to do this because we have >> 90 days agreeable. Can be 90 days, 120 days.
>> 90 days. >> What about 180 days? I've just had major surgery and unable to do a whole lot of things right now. I had a triple bypass. My wife's recovering from cancer. >> 180 is agreeable.
>> Yeah. 6 months is fine, Mr. Edens. We can do that. >> Okay. All right. >> The fence needs to be brought to four feet. The front the front of the fence needs to be four feet, right? >> William Street, >> William Street side.
It is just the front portion four feet. >> The front along William and the front along Vogle. >> So that's the Lshape. >> Okay. So the Lshape running down uh William Street has to be dropped to four
feet. The whole thing? Really? The whole thing has to be four feet then, right? >> Yes. It's a small property. So, yes. >> But Jonathan, does it have to be 50%? It can't be solid. Correct. >> Oh, if if he wants to ask for solid, he
can, but he wouldn't need the he wouldn't need the variance for 50% of >> Well, yeah. So, just so we know when he comes in what he's going for. Can Can he do the 4 foot solid? >> Mr. Are you doing four foot solid or 50%? >> Yeah, 4 foot solid I would hope to do.
>> Okay, we can live with that. >> No further no further questions. >> Okay, any other Okay. Uh, any other members of the board have any questions or comments? >> Okay. Hearing none, I'm going to open it to the public. anyone in the public
>> including children and babies if they have any comments or questions. >> Are you able to put a regular size 9 foot >> anything Laura? >> No chair. >> Okay. Close the public portion. I'd make a motion to uh approve this application
amended through Jonathan's comments. >> Can I get a second? >> Thank you. Please call the role. >> Mr. Weissman >> here. Yes. >> Mr. Patel. >> Yes. >> Mr. Reio. >> Yes. Mr. Haka, >> yes. >> Mr. Metando, >> yes. >> And Chairman Cahillo,
>> yes. >> Your application, as amended, has been approved. We'll memorialize it in a written document at our next meeting, and we'll mail that document to you. Good luck. >> Good night, midens. >> Move on to item number 10, 25-ZB-57B.
Ammitaba Roy. >> Yes, I'm here. >> Mr. Roy, I need to swear you in. Could you raise your right hand? >> Yes. >> Do you swear that the testimony you're about to give should be the truth? >> Yes. Only truth. Nothing but truth. >> Thank you.
Uh explain to the board why you're here. >> Yeah. I'm here for I requested for a uh to construct a roof over my porch, front porch in front of the front door. Uh so we need this roof. uh we would like to
have especially during rain and snow so that you can step out of the house and during snow it sometime the porch becomes icy and it's a hazardous situation. >> Sure. >> So uh so I need to have the roof.
Another thing is that any anytime I have a home delivery from Amazon or Walmart or Home Depot, the item will be lying on the open in the open and if it rains and something, you know. So, so I would like to have this porch built uh the roof
built on on top of existing front porch. >> Understood, sir. Very valid uh ideas there. So, um Jonathan, do you have any comments on this as well, sir? >> Yes. Since Mr. Roy has received uh prior front yard setback variances, um and a
conversation that I had with Mr. Roy prior to this meeting, uh we're going to ask that the the covering over the front entrance be 4 feet deep instead of the five that's being requested. Four feet in line with what's there existing. So, it's more so just uh covering what's
there now rather than expanding and covering. Is that agreeable Mr. Roy? >> Yeah. Yeah. Actually, right now it is from the property line 30. If you do 5 ft, it's a from the property line it's
33.8 ft. Uh and the dwelling is 38.8 from the property line. So if I do 4T then it will be 34.8 and if I do 5 ft then it will be 33.8 ft. Uh
I I would prefer 5T but you know it's up to you you know. >> Okay. If you if you agree to 4 feet we're uh agreeable to that. >> Yeah I think we can move ahead with this Mr. Roy. If you agree to 4 foot uh footprint >> show the record that Mr. Blown has
joined us. >> Okay. >> Before this one so he could vote >> right. And I see Mr. Weissman's on as well. >> Yes, correct. Thank you. >> Okay, Mr. Roy, are we agreeable with the 4ft footprint? >> Yeah, the 5 foot will not be allowed or
what? No, >> it's it's it's recommended that we go with the 4 foot and I can guarantee you I can a very good outcome on our vote if you go with the 4 foot. >> Okay. >> Okay. Any other members of the board have any questions or comments for this applicant?
>> Hearing none, I'm going to open it to the public. Anyone in the public have any comments or questions for this application? >> I have one one. >> Oh, sure. >> Couldn't Couldn't um You said the >> Hold on. You need Hold on. You need to identify yourself. >> Oh, okay. >> And I need to
>> My name Okay. What do you >> What's your name, sir? >> Alonzo Bryant. >> And your address? >> 6 Avenue, Pascato, New Jersey. >> Thank you. Could you raise your right hand? I need to swear you in. >> Sure. Do you swear that the testimony you're
about to give should be the truth? >> Yes, definitely the truth. >> Go ahead with your question or comment, sir. >> My com comment was um is the gentleman in question is he aware that the 4oot footprint is just the concrete on the
ground. The roof could stick out 5 foot >> because I mean I think he's worried about the overhang. The footprint is a concrete base. If he wants the overhang slightly bigger, that's not part of the foundation. So, he should be able to get that, right? >> It's not the recommendation that we're
getting from our engineering department. >> The foot your in I'm sorry for your engineering is always calls the footprint the building itself. Right. >> I I called this the footprint of the of the porch that he's trying to cover. >> We have the We have the drawings. We
have the drawings that were submitted as part of this application. And it's showing it's showing 5 ft >> for the footprint or for the roof >> on the roof. >> The porch is >> sorry the porch is 4T >> right >> 4T width for porch
>> but the but the roof can be 1 ft more than the porch. Uh that's what I think >> right we're proposing we're proposing that it covers the footprint of the porch at four feet. That's what we're s that's what we're promoting. roof.
>> The roof roof has to be 4 ft just above the porch. >> If you agree on that, we can move forward. >> Okay. But one more thing, but don't most homes, every home actually out here, don't they all roofs all overhang the footprint? >> Not the You're talking about the roofs on the actual structure. You're talking
about a porch roof. >> A porch roof doesn't necessarily grow out further. No, >> no. The roof on every foundation out here extends past the foundation. >> Mr. Brian, >> if they don't need a front yard setback variance, that's fine. This application
needs a front yard setback variance. That's why this application >> Mhm. >> and they previously were granted a front yard setback. So, we we are not granting further relief from that front yard setback. >> Understood. >> Okay. Thank you, sir, for your comments. Laura, anyone else in the public portion?
>> No, chairman. >> Okay. Close the public portion. I take a motion to approve this application with the 44 uh roof. >> Second. >> Can I get a call? Roll call. >> Mr. Weissman. >> Yes. >> Mr. Patel? >> Yes. >> Mr. Reio?
>> Yes. >> Mr. Blamp? >> Yes. >> Mr. Haydaka? >> Yes. >> Mr. Midando? >> Yes. >> And Chairman Cahill? >> Yes. >> Your application's been approved as amended. We'll memorialize it at our next meeting and send a copy to you.
Good luck. Thank you, Mr. Roy. >> Thank you. >> Move on to item number 11. 25-ZB-52V. Alonzo Bryant. >> Right back in the game. Take yourself off mute, sir. >> Okay,
>> there you go. You're good to go. >> It may seem ridiculous, but I have to swear you in again. Could you raise your right hand? >> Do you swear that the testimony you're about to give should be the truth? >> Yes. Absolute truth. >> Thank you. Could you explain to the board why you're here? >> Yes. Um, I need I can show you. There's
a We need a air condition on my building because it has water in it. Um, I have a bathroom and I need to keep the water pipe. It's a HVAC system I putting in cuz it's my workshop. And we want to bring the air condition on this side of the fence with which would leave me only
I supposed to be 10 ft. It'll only leave me 8 foot from the fence. But my fence, as you can see, um, is a 6ft fence. It goes all the way around. And my neighbor next to me, he has no problem with it. Um. >> Okay. >> So, that's
>> understood. Uh Jonathan, do you want uh >> Yeah. What's the What's the nature of the workshop? >> Well, the nature of the workshop is first for me, I'm a contractor. And second off is cuz we have a dog, right? And my wife does not want the dog taking
a bath in the house. So the re original reason I even built the building to begin with is because she wants my my daughter takes care of the dog and she wants the hair out of our tub. So I put built the building so that with the dog shower in it, you know, so she we wash
the dog to take the dog out back and do it. And I was like, "Well, since I'm in it, I already had a shed cuz that's already on my permit. You'll see that." I just extended this to allow space for her to work and me still have my workshop. I do a lot of, you know, different miscellaneous hobbies.
>> Okay. And we we recognize we recognize that that that conversion did happen in 2019. Uh you listed it as a uh proposed cabana to accompany a pool. There there's no pool on the property, correct? >> Yeah. Right. >> Okay. Um
so this structure being used as a as a workshop kind of extends beyond what a cabana would be used for. It sounds like you're also using it for your business, which is not permitted. >> I'm not. No, keep No, it's not for my
business. I have a I have my truck and I have a shop. That's my hobbies. That what I do is, you know, I I fix things. I just do it because that's what I can do. It's not I'm not getting paid for that. That's like everything my wife wants rather than me tan up my house
with, you know, how much tools I have because of I am a tradesman. I can't. >> So, you're not operating a business out of that? >> Oh, no. I'm definitely not. >> Okay. Okay. And there's no there's no other way you can move this HVAC equipment to the other side of the structure.
>> See, now I personally wanted to put it on the other side of the structure, but I ran into a problem with my wife. She was saying that if you notice my property itself, right behind my house, I have two air conditioners feeding my existing house. And the air conditioners are not I mean, they're right next to my
patio, my deck. And my wife claims that when they cut on and we have company and she's on the deck, it makes a lot of noise. That's those two. If I put this air conditioner on the same side of the building, it'll be pretty much close to these two. And then she's going to complain it up. So that was the only
reason I even, you know, went out this extra $500 to try to ask for this variance because, you know, I have to I'm putting a lot of work in. I have to so make an effort to try to please her as well. >> Understood, sir. We're bunch of us are married, so we all know.
>> Would you would you agree to uh a deed restriction that this won't be used for any any form of occupancy or business? >> You Yeah, you they've already given me you gave me that for my first the when you first approved the building. So, yes, I agree to it. It's already in writing. Y'all gave me a memo with that
already on it. This can never be used as an occupancy. >> All right. And I'll I'll hold any other comments if there's uh neighbors that come out. >> Yeah, that's what I was saying. The same thing. Let's open it to the public and find out if he has any neighbors that have any issues with this. Um, first and
foremost, does anyone else on the board have any questions or comments? >> Hearing none, I'm going to open it to the public. Anyone in the public portion have any comments or questions? >> No one, Chairman. >> Okay, close the public portion. And Jonathan, with no comments from the
public, I'm going to go ahead approve this application. Uh, can I get a second? I'll second. >> I'll second it. >> All right. I have something to say. Uh >> yes, >> the the porch uh the porch in length is
8 ft. But from the door door is not centerely placed. It's not in the center. So one side in the porch I might have to increase 1 ft or 2 ft. This is I'm talking about the length not the width. Width will be four 4T.
>> Width will be 4T. >> Mr. Chairman, we're done with that application. >> Yeah, Mr. Roy, we already took the vote on that. I'm sorry. Okay. Okay. >> No, that's fine. And again, we we have to be on this Zoom call. You can you can go enjoy your evening if you want. >> Okay.
>> Can uh Laura, give me a call, a roll call on the Mr. Bryant. >> Mr. Weissman, >> yes. >> Mr. Patel, >> yes. >> Mr. Reio, >> yes. >> Mr. Blount, >> yes. >> Mr. Haka, >> yes. >> Mr. Morando, >> yes. >> And Chairman Cahill,
>> yes. >> Mr. Bryant, your application's been approved. will memorialize this in a written document in our next meeting and we'll mail that document to you. Good luck. >> Thank you. >> Good night, sir. Let's move on to item number 12. 24 25-ZB-26V.
Heather Fam. >> Is Heather Fam present? >> I'm going to be honest. Probably not. >> You don't you don't see her, Laura? >> No. Well, they have a friend helping them with this and communication is very difficult to say the least. They did
notice. >> Well, let's skip and >> we'll skip them and by the end if not we'll push them to the next meeting. >> Got it. Let's go on to item number 13. 25-ZB-23 Muslim Center of Middle Sex County. Mr. Archer.
Uh >> David's going to do this one. Oh, >> okay. Is he on? >> Yes, David. >> Apologize. I couldn't figure out how to get it unmuted. >> That kind of >> uh good evening board chair, members of
the board. Uh David Prasad from Bob Smith and Associates. Uh here tonight for the application for uh the Muslim Center of Middle Sex County, MCMC. Uh it is a final major subdivision application. The property is located on 1 Hose Lane East, Piscatoaway, New
Jersey. Uh block 12201, lots 3, 4, and 9.03. Um, as I said before, we are looking for a final major subdivision. The board had granted a preliminary preliminary final sub uh preliminary major subdivision in
October of 2020. Um, and I would like to tell the board that the all the conditions of the preliminary approval have been met. So, we are seeking tonight the final approval for the subdivision and then the consolidation of all the lots into new lot 9.04.
Um, as a board is aware, we do not get scheduled for final major subdivisions unless all the conditions of preliminary are met. Um, but just in case there are any questions, I do have our engineer, Mr. Sharif Ali present to answer any questions of the board or if there's
anything that comes up regarding the preliminary approval. Um so with that I welcome any questions or confirmations needed by the board members or professionals to Mr. Sharif Ali and um that's all I have for this application. Thank you. >> Thank you David.
>> Uh Jonathan you have any comments on this one or? >> Uh no. Thank you. >> Fair enough. Um, if all the conditions had been met that was set forth prior, uh, I don't think we have a problem with this. Does anyone on the board have any questions or
comments about proceeding hearing? None. I'll open it to the public. Anyone on the public have any comments or questions about this application or >> this? None. Okay. Yeah. I'd make a motion to approve this uh, final subdivision. Can I get a second?
>> I'll second it. You vote. >> Mr. Weissman, >> yes. >> Mr. Patel, >> yes. >> Mr. Reio, >> yes. >> Mr. Blunt, >> yes. >> Mr. Haka, >> yes. >> Mr. Mando, >> yes. >> And Chairman Cahill, >> yes.
>> We'll memorialize this for our next meeting. Send a copy to you. >> Thank you, board members. Uh, I will be on here for another application later on. >> We'll see you in a couple minutes. Then let's move on to item number 16. 25-ZB-60 Vira Gillani.
>> Yes, sir. >> Good evening. >> Good evening. >> I need I need to swear you in. Could you raise your right hand? >> I got you. Swear that testimony you're about to give shall be the truth. Thank you. >> I swear. >> Thank you. your name and address, please?
>> Her Gilani, 519 Lynwood Street, Piscatoaway, New Jersey, 08854. >> Thank you. Could you explain to the board why you're here? >> Sure. Uh, I'm installing fence and I want to request for variance. I want to appeal for 10 ft off the property line
along Buttonwood Street. Um, I have a 18-month-old toddler and a severely autistic non-verbal 5-year-old son who has elopment risk and no safety awareness. The reason I'm putting the fence is because of my son's safety. Um,
I cannot take my son to public parks because it's not gated. He runs away from me and it's like a marathon. I cannot take him to most places because people look at him weird and he gets very overstimulated. Um, I want to appeal for more space because I don't
really have a backyard. I have a sideyard. Um, I just want enough safe space for him where he can just run freely and I can have space for a outdoor sensory gym for him and also if I'm spending money on fence, I would
rather have more space for my son. Um, my neighbors are aware the one I share backyard with and they're okay with it. If necessary, I can absolutely provide doctor's mode if it's needed. >> Okay. Uh Jonathan, you have anything uh on
this application, sir? >> Um 40 feet is required from Buttonwood. So uh we're staff is requesting 20 ft from the property line where 40 is required. >> Harry, you understand we're trying to
come to a compromise? >> I completely understand. I really really appreciate it. It's just that I would like to appeal for more space if I can get 10 ft off the property line um just for his sake. Um I really need it for
him. >> So that would the proposal of moving it back 10 ft would uh reduce the area by about 600 square feet. So I I mean we could do >> 15.
>> We could do 15 >> here. Is that okay? >> More than a compromise. 15 is, >> you know, we're bending over backwards because of the situation your family's in. >> Sure. Um >> I can I can give you a not pretty much a
good guarantee that you'll have a positive outcome if you agree on the 15. 15 ft off Buttonwood property line. >> Yes. So 15t off the property line is about
25 ft off of the the curb >> or about 17 feet from the back of the sidewalk if that helps. >> Okay. And um even with medical documentation I cannot have 10 ft
off the property line even if I provide doctor's note. >> Unfortunately here it sets a pre it sets a precedent and even your neighbors who don't have situation that you're in uh technically could come in and and ask for the same request.
>> Okay. So I we we can I think that if you can live with the 15 it's more than generous and I think you'd be very happy with it. I know patience and I I feel for your position. >> Sure. >> But I I think 15 everyone who makes it will be happy at this situation.
>> Sure. Then I'll take that. >> Any other members of the board have any questions or comments? >> Hearing none. I'd like to open it to the public. Anyone in the public have any comments or questions about this application? Laura, >> I have
a James Grogan Goen. >> Yes, sir. Could you raise your right hand? >> Question is, >> lower your computer down. You're echoing.
>> Sir, I need to swear you in. Could you raise your right hand? Oh, sorry. >> Do you swear that the testimony you're about to give shall be the truth? >> Yes. >> I have your name and address, please. >> James Kagan,
9 Hedro Street, Scatteraway. >> Thank you. Go ahead with your question or comment. >> So, the Lynwood Street is one of the two main entrance and exit out of this development. And I just want to make sure that uh this fence is going not
going to go anywhere near the front yard at all because that'll block u the area when you're trying to turn to see where any cars are coming. >> Mr. and Miss Rozie, how many feet is it from going to be from the curb approximately?
>> From the curb will be about >> on the side street >> on this on Buttonwood. It's going to be >> probably about 18 to 20 ft with the rightway. >> About 25 ft. >> Oh, even more.
>> From the from the curb on Buttonwood. >> So, no issues with line of sight. >> Correct. >> Okay. You okay, Mr. Gil? >> Yeah. Thank you. >> You're welcome, sir. Have a good night. Anyone else? Laura? No sir.
>> Okay. Close the public portion. I'd make a motion to approve this application. >> Call the roll. >> Thank you so much. Thank you so much everyone. >> You're welcome. Mr. Weissman. >> Yes. >> Mr. Patel. >> Yes. >> Mr. Reio. >> Yes. >> Mr. Blunt. >> Yes. >> Mr. Haka.
>> Yes. >> Mr. Minorando. >> Yes. >> And Chairman Cahillo. >> Yes. >> Your application as amended has been approved. We will memorialize it in a written document at our next meeting and we'll send that document to you. Good luck. >> Thank you. >> Good luck, ma'am. Let's move on to item
number 17. Shilles and Sonal Patel. >> Yes. Hello. >> Sonel Patel. Okay. I need to swear you in. Could you raise your right hand? >> Do you swear that the testimony you give shall be the truth? >> Sure. Yes, I do. >> Your name and address, please?
Australian and S Patel N Lucil courtway. >> Thank you. Could you explain why you're before the board? Uh so we are planning to put uh a fence around our our property
and uh due to this is because of uh a lot of deer issue lately and then eating us eating all the vegetation and vegetables we are growing and uh that creates a lot of nuisance also probably some health issues they
are creating. We get on a on a regular basis like 12 to 15 deers and they just sometime they just hunker around in the backyard and a lot of uh damage to the vegetation also as probably they are
pooping all over. >> Yeah. >> So it's it's really it's really it has really become a hazard issue now >> and also we we also want to have some privacy probably. >> Understood Mr. Patel. Thank you for clarifying, >> Mr. Chairman. Their fence is in an
easement. That's the reason that they're here. >> Right. So, uh, John, what's the language they need to know before we proceed? >> Uh, we need to know how how tall these fences are. You need to know a vinyl and a chain link. What >> I'm sorry, go ahead.
>> What are the heights of the proposed fences? So proposed fence is 6 ft vinyl uh up to the the the the easement township easement we have or probably half before and then we are
going to put as the plan or the the application we have submitted. We are going to put uh a 16 15 or 16 ft uh gate uh for the opening and then the remaining is the chain link. The gate
also would be of chain link. >> What's the height of the chain link fence? >> Chain link would also be six feet. >> Okay. >> So, it's going to be 15 16 feet wide. >> Yes.
>> Yeah. Okay. Uh so do you agree do you agree to a memorandum of restriction regarding the easement where you will you will uh assume all costs associated with the removal and replacement of the fence which by
putting in the gate you pretty much avoid but would you agree to entering a memorandum of restriction? So to understand even we put a gate you know is there a responsibility for us
>> they'll just use the gate but if you sign the legal document it just it covers all parties so they'll they'll just use the gate. >> Yes. So yeah we are fine and that is why we are putting the gate because of the easement. Right. >> Perfect. >> Very smart move sir.
>> Okay. Any other members of the board have any questions or comments? Hearing none. I'm going to open it to the public. Anyone on the public have any questions or comments about this application? >> No one chairman. >> Okay. Close the public portion. I'd make a motion to approve this application. Can I get a second?
>> Second it. >> Call the roll. >> Mr. Weissman. >> Yes. >> Mr. Patel? >> Yes. >> Mr. Reio? >> Yes. >> Mr. Blunt? >> Yes. >> Mr. Hideoka? >> Yes. >> Mr. Benerando? >> Yes. >> And Chairman Cahill?
>> Yes. Your application has been approved. We'll memorialize this as a written document at our next meeting and we'll send that document to you. Good luck. >> Thank you. >> Thank you very much board and everybody. >> Good night, sir. >> Thank you. >> 1825-ZB-61V
Gordon Aquira. >> You're muted, sir. There you go. >> Thank you, sir. I mean, you swear to Could you raise your right hand? Do >> you swear the testimony you're about to give should be the truth? >> I do. Your name and address, please. You can
put your hand in. >> Uh, Gordon Aqua, 516 Shirley Parkway, Piscatoaway, New Jersey 08854. >> Could you explain to the board why you're here? >> Yes. So, um, I bought a house about two
years ago. I installed on an AC that wasn't working and it's um it's uh 6 ft away from the property line and I'm asking for a variance because it's meant
to be 10 ft away from from the property line. >> Okay, Mr. uh Mr. Rahim. >> So to clarify, the AC unit is is it it's installed now? It's not proposed. It's currently there. >> It's currently there. Yes.
>> Okay. Uh and I'm assuming be a substantial hardship to relocate it. >> Correct. And uh the house is a rental. There's uh two kids there, four and 5 years old. And where it's located, it's
very isolated. So if I'm to move it to the back, I think there'd be some safety issues and there's very limited places I could put it in in the backyard. Okay. >> Okay. Uh you are going to be required to
screen it with either fencing or landscaping from the from the frontage of the property as well as your neighbor to the side. Uh I know when you first came in there was a question about the easement on the side where the AC unit is. Uh I
would consider having that be uh implemented or perfected so that way it's it's recorded properly. Uh but as it is right now on the revised survey, you are not inside that easement. So uh just the just the screening and that's that's all I have.
Mr. >> Thank you, Jonathan. >> Mr. Aquira, you're okay with the screening and the >> Thank you. Yes. >> Okay. Any other members of the board have any questions or comments? >> Hearing none, I'm going to open it to the public. Anyone in the public have
any comments or questions about this application? No one chairman. >> Okay. Close the public portion. I'd make a motion to approve this application. Can I get a second? >> Second. >> Thanks. Please call the role. >> Mr. Weissman. >> Yes. >> Mr. Patel?
>> Yes. >> Mr. Reio? >> Yes. >> Mr. Blunt? >> Yes. >> Mr. Haka? >> Yes. >> Mr. Minando? >> Yes. >> And Chairman Cahillo? >> Yes. >> Your application's been approved. We'll memorialize it in a written document at our next meeting and we'll mail that document to you. Good luck.
>> Thank you. Have a good night, sir. I think we're moving on to item number 22. 25-ZB-3132V MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Good evening again, board members. Uh David Prasad from Bob Smith and Associates. Uh here tonight representing
the applicant MSN Pharmaceuticals um for application 25 ZB32V. Um, tonight we are seeking preliminary and final site plan approval with a D6 height variance pursuant to uh 40 colon
55D70- uh 70D6. Um the applicant tonight is ex uh proposing to expand the existing warehouse building and also proposing to uh extend the height of the building or
a portion of the building from where 50 ft is permitted to uh 70 ft. Uh the purpose of that 70 foot height variance is for an inventory conveyor system um as I mentioned um and for additional storage space. Um, currently the
property is utilized by MSN Pharmaceuticals as a pharmaceutical uh manufacturing and distribution facility with offices. Uh, there's also warehouse space for storage. Um, the property was purchased by MSN Pharmaceuticals in 2017
and in that same year uh they received planning board approval under application 17 PB34 to convert the use from warehousing solely to uh pharmaceutical manufacturing and distribution. Uh the site has frontage on Duke Road
and also at the rear of the property or the south side of the property there is uh route 287 and there is substantial buffering between u 287 and the property as well. Uh in addition to the devariances and the preliminary and final site plan uh application we are
seeking some bul variances. One is for off- streetet parking where 653 spaces are required and 206 are proposed. Uh we are seeking a minimum a variance for the minimum number of loading births required where 12 births are required.
Three are existing and eight are currently proposed for total for this application increasing the number um of births. Um and finally we are seeking a minimum drive aisle width where 25 ft is required and 24 feet is this is
highlighted in numerous approvals for this property um all the way back to I think 2011. Um, tonight we have a number of witnesses and professionals. Uh, I have the applicant or a representative for the
applicant here, Mr. uh, Vishu Vishnu Arapaya from MSN Pharmaceuticals. I have our engineer, Robert Murray, who is from Menllo Engineering. I have the architect, Miss Sushita Shaw from KSD Architects. And I have a traffic
engineer, Mr. John Ray, from McDonald Ray Associates. And finally, the professional planner, uh, Miss Christine Kofone from Confone Consulting Group. Um, for the record, I also like to mention that we do have three staff reports from the township. Uh, we have the Piscataway Township staff report
dated July 1st, 2025. We have the uh, John T. Chavoc planning report dated July 16, 2025. And we also have a Dolan and Dean report which we received recently dated August 12th, 2025. Um, that is all that I have. I would
like to call my first witness, Mr. Arapia from MSN Pharmaceuticals. If the board can swear him in, >> please proceed. >> Sir, could you raise your right hand, please? >> Mr. Ara, could you raise your right hand, please? >> Yes.
>> Do you swear that the testimony you're about to give shall be the truth? >> Yes. >> Your name and address, please? Vishnu papaya MSN pharmaceuticals 202 roadway New Jersey 08854 >> thank you
>> welcome sir >> thank you Mr. Canaly >> um Mrape can you please uh describe your role and relationship to MSN pharmaceuticals inc please >> uh definitely Mr. 11. So I I take care of engineering and facilities at MSN
pharmaceuticals. I'm being with MSN pharmaceutical from 2022. I used to work for MSN in India uh before I come here. >> So overall you've been working for MSN for quite some time just recently uh in Piscatoaway. >> That's correct. >> Okay. Uh can you tell the board how long
MSN has been located in Piscatoway, New Jersey? Yeah, we MSN purchased this property in 2017 as you mentioned earlier and the same year we received planning board approval to convert the building into pharmaceutical manufacturing and uh distribution center. >> Uh and you want to continue your
business in Piscataway. Can you please let the board know why you would choose Piscatoway New Jersey? >> Yeah. Uh Piscataway is actually a great town for a business and to grow. Our particular location is perfectly uh suited for MSN where we are surrounded by all industries and u minimum
residential involvement limited also the proximity our building is right next to the 287 it's allows our business to minimize travel time and limit traffic in town >> okay and um the nature of the business again is pharmaceutical manufacturing
and distribution correct >> that is correct >> okay um can you please let us know the hours of operations are for the business. >> Uh we operating from 6:30 a.m. uh to 11:00 p.m. >> And that is Monday through Friday. >> Yeah, Monday to Friday. That's correct. >> Uh how many employees uh do you
currently employ at this uh location? >> Uh currently we have 110 employees uh in the site. Uh when we expand our building uh we may extend like another 30 more employees we will recruit. >> Okay. >> So altogether 140. >> Okay. Um can you explain the reason that
we are seeking a 70 ft uh D6 height variance as opposed to 50? >> Yeah, MSN would like to install state auto the automatic storage and retrieval system. It's basically it's operated by robots. We store all our products into
the racks. It's a high high height racks. So the robots we call the material particular material the robot will pick up and it will bring it to the particular pickup location and pack location where our our employee can pack for the delivery.
>> And you said the racks are high and that um that requires robots to utilize >> to retrieve the pallets. >> It's a fully automated uh storage and retrieval system. >> Understood. um for the board. Can you explain why there uh the additional
storage space and the automated system is proposed? >> See, currently whatever products we manufacture at the site also the parent company MSN Laboratories private limited in India we are using third party uh warehouse where we are storing all our
products. So instead of buying a new property or constructing a new warehouse, we feel like having everything in one place at this site, it's easy for us to increase our efficiency also instead of uh
I don't know how the residents locally will take if we construct the new facility. It's better to have all in one house. That's why we feel this will be beneficial to the town as well as MSN to construct extend this building to suit our needs.
>> So just to clarify for the board, it it seems and as we all know warehousing is not a great um business model in Piscatoaway at the time or anywhere in New Jersey. So uh it's true that you are expanding your warehouse to avoid building another. Is that correct?
>> That's correct. Uh currently can you explain how many uh deliveries by truck you receive per day? >> Uh approximately three to three three to four trucks a day delivered. >> Okay. And with the uh with the proposed expansion of this facility, how many
trucks are you expected to increase? >> Uh we are expecting 8 to 10 uh which includes 3 to four inbound and 4 to six outbound. Okay. Um, also your site is, as you mentioned, closes at 10 p.m. Um,
how many uh are the lights on in the facility around the parking and around the building uh until 11:00 p.m. or is it they remain on? >> Uh, currently the light remain on throughout the night until morning actually. >> Okay. Uh, and if we can, I would like to
address uh some of the items on the staff reports. Uh first item would be uh item number three on the Piscataway Township staff report. Um can we agree for all EV charging stations to be operational at the time was granted? >> Yes.
>> Okay. Uh item number five on the Poscataway Township staff report. Can MSN install the fiber optic conduits along the property frontage? >> Yes, agreed. >> And finally for the John T. Chadwick planning report item number eight. Um, it is a concern for the township that
the lights remain on 24/7. Is it possible that we can turn the lights off during non-b businessiness hours? >> It's possible. Yes. >> Okay. Uh, that is all the questions I have for this witness. If the board does have any questions, >> um, Jonathan, do you want to address
each expert each time, uh, professional I should say, or do you want to wait till the end to summize? >> Uh, I can do it as they come up so it's all fresh. Um, perfect. That's okay. >> Proceed. >> So, uh, my question is regarding the
retrieval system. I'm assuming something this state-of-the-art is modular in nature. >> It's going to be custom fabricated for the for the space. >> That is correct, Jamaat. >> So, why can't we come down in height for
the expansion? Why does it have to be 70 ft? Uh basically the number of pallets we have limited space. The pallets are numbers are high. So we wanted to go high to increase the number of pallets we can store.
>> And this is for a increase in capacity for future for future expansion or is this based on an existing need? >> It's for the future expansion as well as existing need both.
Okay. I do have questions that I'm going to say for other professionals. >> Uh but if if it's for future need and it's not an immediate if it's not for the immediate operations of the business, it's modular in nature. Uh I I
would want to see it reduced in height. >> Okay. Thank you, Jonathan. Mr. >> Press, please put on your next professional. >> Sure. Uh for my next witness, I do have Mr. Robert Murray. Hold on. Hold on. John. >> Yeah. I don't know whether this is to the representative or not. Are you
planning to put any signage on this building? >> Sorry. Can you repeat the question, please, sir? >> Are you planning to put any signage on this building? >> Uh, existing signages are sufficient for us now. >> So, so there's no signage proposed on
this new building. >> We have already signage at the front and back of the building. So that's going to remain the same. >> Remain the same. Correct. Got it. >> Okay. >> And you commented on the lighting. It happens to be item seven. I just for the
record. And the >> colors of the building, I assume that's an architect's >> Yeah. >> response. Okay. >> Thank you, John. >> And the No, just one other thing. Do you know if there's anything on the top of the roof or is that again the architect?
>> The architect will address that as well. >> Okay. Okay, >> thank you. Uh, for the next witness, I have Mr. Robert Murray from Menllo Engineering. If the board can swear him in, >> Mr. Murray, are you present?
>> Yes. >> Could you raise your right hand? >> You swear the testimony you're about to give should be the truth. >> I do. >> Your name and address, please? >> Robert Murray, 261 Cleveland Avenue, Highland Park, New Jersey.
>> Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Canaly. Um, uh, Robert, can you please give the board the benefits of your qualifications? >> Yes. I graduated Stevens Institute of Technology in 2017 with a bachelor's degree in civil engineering. I've been a professional engineer for four years
now, and I provided testimony in front of numerous boards in New Jersey, including Piscataway. >> And your license is current and in good standing. >> Yes. >> Thank you. >> Qualifications are fine. Please proceed. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. Uh, Mr. Mr. Murray, if you can please explain to the board the current layout, uh the proposed layout
and other engineering factors that are taking place and the site improvements if you don't mind. >> Yes, if I can present our existing conditions exhibit >> and we can mark that as A1. >> Can everyone see? >> Yes.
>> Thank you. Which this is a aerial photograph of the site and its surrounding areas. And just to orientate my drawings tonight, north is up. The property better known as 20 Duke Road is lot 10.01
of block 4302 in Piscataway Township. The site is located south of Duke Road, west of Freeway Drive, and north of 287. Access is provided off both Duke Road and Freeway Drive. Overall, the property is approximately
15.48 48 acres and is located entirely within the LI5 light industrial zone. The site is also surrounded by industrial uses within the LI5 zone. As it exists today, the site is
currently a 236,851T industrial building with 33.5 ft in height. This includes office, warehouse, manufacturing, and lab. Also, the site has an existing 1,125
ft accessory building which is currently not being used. The site has currently has 40 spaces along the south and the west sides and three existing loading spaces on the east side of the building. Now, if I could present our overall plan
exhibit, which is a colorized rendering of the submitted site o overall plan with the aerial background and landscape turnon. The applicant is proposing a 55,477
ft warehouse addition with an 88,984t roof extension to 70 foot in height. The applicant seeks to demolish the existing accessory building and a portion of the parking to the south of the building.
The proposed conditions will have 206 spaces with 653 is required, eight of which are ED spaces and seven of which are ADA spaces. The spaces will be 9 by8. The site has a existing non-conformity
of a 24 foot uh aisle width, but the applicant is proposing a 30ft width to the south of the proposed building. Proposed addition, excuse me. Site improvements also include a 5ft
sidewalk, crosswalk, and ADA compliant ramps on the south end of the building. The site will utilize existing utilities and other improvements include lighting and landscaping. For landscaping, 17 trees are removed.
However, se 22 deciduous trees are provided which meets the Piscatoaway Township ordinance. The site will utilize existing lighting with the addition of two wall-mounted LED fixtures approximately 22 feet high.
This will provide a minimum of 0.5 uh foot candles and an average of 2.3 in the parking area and provide safe and adequate lighting meeting township standards. The site is considered a major development since it disturbs over an
acre of land. Therefore, storm water management is required. The site um site will accomplish storm water management by uh maintaining the amount of imperous coverage for quantity and recharge requirements and reducing
motorized vehicle surface to um satisfy the water quality rags. Existing non-conformity of the site include uh loading where where eight is provided but only 12 are required.
Parking aisle width where 24 uh exists where 25 is required. Parking variance where 206 spaces are provided where 653 are required. variants include the building height for
50 um 50 feet uh is required where 70 is proposed. I also have read the uh professionals letters and I have no problem with satisi satisfying the comments. However, I do want to draw attention to two of
the comments on Dolan and Dolan's uh letter from August 12th. Uh, comet SP2, the operation will have a WB WB67 tractor trailers
and comment uh uh SP4. The comment uh asked whether circulation can be maintained with a 60 foot long loading space. The operation of the site will have the first tractor trailer to come in on site to load in the mo
southernmost bay and all others following will take the next one north. After parking the tractor trailer, the cab will be detached and parked on site. Therefore, uh um circulation will be maintained.
However, if the board looks favorable on this application, we can work with the board professional to uh satisfy any comments they have on uh trailer um trailer movement. And u that concludes um my portion of
the uh testimony. >> Thank you, Mr. Murray. I have no direct questions uh as you address the Dolan and Dean um uh report. Um does any uh it's up to the board to the board of professionals. Any other questions for Mr. Murray? >> Yeah, I was wondering if Jonathan wanted to jump in on this too based on
>> Yeah, I'm uh Thank you, Mr. Murray. I'm definitely going to want a truck turning diagram uh showing it. It's fine if you want to show just the um just the trailer parked in one of the bays, but I want to see the ability of a fire truck uh as well as another
um uh delivery truck being able to access these bays with the trailer being stored in the bay. So, that's something that we're going to want to see because I I have some serious concerns about circulation, especially for for emergency vehicles if any of those bays
are being used. Uh, I'm I'm okay with the the pre-existing non-conformity with the aisles, the the parking I I I just want to highlight the the traffic engineers report about 140 spaces are estimated to be used where
200 spaces are being proposed and those were my main those were my main points. Uh, thank you for addressing all all the comments otherwise. Thank you, Jonathan. Any other members of the board have any questions or
comments for Mr. Murray? >> Mr. Chairman, I Oh, I'm sorry. >> No, jump in, sir. >> Uh, there's that small building in the back. One plan shows it remaining the architectural plan and your plan shows
it uh Mr. Murray removed. Who's right? >> Uh, the accessory building will be removed and we can revise plans to be consistent. But there was one other item. Are you involved with a lighting plan? And can the lights be extinguished
during non- business hours but for security lighting? >> Uh yes. Uh as the applicant explained, uh we can uh comply with your comments on lighting. >> I wasn't sure if you did or not, but
that's fine. And just to piggy back off of that, John, um can we can we add shielding to the the lights along the uh the the parking lot with the adjacent building on Duke? >> Yes.
>> Okay, great. >> That it, Sean? >> That's it. >> Thank you, sir. Any other members of the board? >> Mr. Chairman? >> Yes. >> This is Betsy Dolan. Dolan and Dean. I just wanted to echo Jonathan's comments about the vehicle circulation. I did
have um some offline dialogue with Mr. Murray. Uh but I agree that those um template diagrams should be submitted. Um and I'm fine with the parking variance. I ran it numbers and I think the analysis by Mcdana, which you're going to hear probably next, um I'm
satisfied with. But uh I agree the circulation exhibit should be provided. >> Great. Great. Thank you, Betsy. >> You're welcome. >> Devin, you can proceed with your next book. Correction. >> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Um, I do, uh, John Ray is not next. I do have the architect
up next, so I'll address some of the other comments and, uh, to give you some renderings of the building. So, if I can call Miss Sushita Shaw from KSD Architects and have her sworn in. >> Hi, everyone. Can you hear me? >> Uh, excuse me a second. Miss Nor, can you unshare your screen, please? >> Yeah, I'm I'm trying to find where the
button is. Sorry. >> While we're doing that, Miss Sha, could you raise your right hand? Do you swear that the testimony you're about to give should be the truth? >> I do. >> Thank you. Your name and address, please. >> Sure. Uh, Suchita Sha, spelled S U C H I
T A Shaw S H A H. Address is One Liberty Way in Cranberry, New Jersey. >> Thank you, >> Miss Shaw. If you can please give the board the benefit of your qualifications and whether your license is current and in good standing. >> Sure thing. Um I am a registered
licensed architect in New Jersey as well as 10 other states. Um I was a graduate of CR institute uh with a bachelor of architecture in 2013. Um and I have presented or testified in
front of uh at least 20 boards. I haven't kept count. >> Qualification qualifications are acceptable. Please proceed. >> Thank you. >> Thank you Mr. Chair. Uh, Miss Shaw, if you can please describe the building modifications that we are seeing, including the height, and also if you can address the comments on Mr.
Chadwood's report regarding uh the mechanical equipment and the additional signage and also the color palette. >> Uh, sure thing. Um, I'm going to share my screen. Um, can everybody see the the photo?
>> Yes. Okay, great. So, um this is just to show what's existing on the site at the at the moment. Um I was lucky enough to be um with KSD architects uh at the time of the 2017 uh alterations inside this building and
um glad to be kind of on the team again. >> Um one second. No. >> Yes. Sorry. Was there a question? No, I think that was just that's okay. Please proceed to shop. >> Okay. All right. So, this is the
existing site aerial view. Um, and I will go over uh the plan first. Uh, just give it a second to load, please. Okay. So, uh this is uh we're looking at sorry, let's start from here. SK1 dated
February 15, 2025. Um, completed by KSD Architects. Uh this is a an existing building expansion plan showing the building asis. Uh in the uh hatched markings here it's
about 236,000 square ft. Um we are proposing two additions. One on the south side of the building and one to the northeast side of the building as was described. And I will go to the next slide here to
SK2 to to show you kind of the different roof levels that are proposed. Um so all the hatch diagonal hatch markings that you see are existing to remain roof heights. Uh the gray solid hatches are the areas that are proposed. So um
you'll see again that southside edition being proposed at 70 ft of height and you'll see the northeast edition at 28T height. Um in addition the center portion of the building um to the east
side will be uh added in height to 70 ft. Um it is currently about 38 most of it is currently about 38 feet high. Um there are different levels back here. So we are um proposing those additions. Um,
these are elevations of the existing and proposed um, ex expansions. And I'm going to show you a little bit better uh, a view of these. I I understand that 2D can sometimes be a little confusing, especially in this um, kind of uh,
varied roof level situation. We're going to see. Give it a second again to kind of load. Okay. So you did see in the first slide I showed you on uh this new sheet called existing site dated August 14th 2025.
Um what we are proposing to do is shown on the second page. It's called R101. Sorry these are large kind of photo files. So okay. So here's the existing building and here's the
expansion. So you can see that most of the expansion is going to be at that 70 foot height. Um to aesthetically kind of tie everything together. Again, nobody's going to see that from an aerial bird's eye view. They're going to see something like this. Um and even uh this is kind
of an exaggerated view since uh nobody's really going to be in the trees when they're looking at the building. But just to give you an idea of what the expanse of the building will look like. Um again this is uh all quoted as sheet R102
and um we're showing again the existing building up to about this line is where it's existing and then we're going to this is where that I think southside expansion is going to be. Um, so to kind
of address some of the questions in the reports and uh that were kind of asked today, I'll go into first uh the let's go first I'll I'll answer the signage question. Um, there are no building signs proposed. There are no building
new building signs proposed. Um, as Vishnu was kind of referring to, we have building signage already at the front entrance and that will remain the front entrance. And as this this is all one building, there is no need for new signage.
Um, to get into the material pallet, um, a lot of these materials were selected to complement what's already there. So, uh, when we did the the
alteration in 2017 to 2021, that kind of period of time where where, um, MSN, uh, was renovating this and then they they changed the facade a bit, we added, um, a modernized Nicha panel, which is kind
of shown here. It's it's a brick looking panel, but it's made out of fiber cement. Um, we're going to just extend that throughout the facade. And we also had these aluminum composite panels bordering the top. We're going to
extend that as well to the end to the south end. Um, so those are all We have the existing material pallet that we used uh back at that uh renovation. We're going to continue that to kind of tie the building together. And um the
rest of the building is actually going to be again nitiha panel on the bottom or base. And then there are two different um alum aluminum composite panels that will be used. Um one will be sort of a kingpan blue which is uh what
we're calling Chicago blue in a Benjamin Moore color and the other will be a gray. Um that is the clear micica that you see right here. Um these are just like the existing uh
these are the two existing colors that are um on the building currently. And then the white looking border is actually a light gray called alabaster. So these are actual colors um and actual manufacturers that will match and
complement what is already at the existing building. Um, so I think I hope I've satisfied I think the material question. If there if there's any specific question to that, I can certainly go further. >> Um, before we go into those questions, uh, Miss Shaw, can you just address the
comment about rooftop mechanical equipment? >> Yes, absolutely. So, um, so the the rooftop mechanical of the existing building, I'll just show you, uh, where it is. And fortunately, the addition is
actually going to cover a lot of that. So, uh, in in the 2021, let's say, um, renovation, we had a lot of rooftop equipment that was added on this side of the building. Um, now that you see that we're going to kind of add the portion
to the south of the building that will be screened naturally because of the building. Um, I'll show you that in a second. Um the so that so that rooftop mechanical it's not shown here or depicted here but it will it will stay
it will be existing to remain it will just be screened by this. So now 287 has no chance of seeing it. They they can't see it now anyways. Um the other so the added portions of the building which are storage basically warehouse functions
they're not um particularly complex or need any type of special mechanical attention. So they don't need like to maintain a certain temperature or maintain a certain humidity or anything like that. So really what we're talking
about are regular small um independent units that uh you see on everyday warehouses. It's just to maintain comfort for the people who are um working inside the warehouse. So there are these like small uh DX units that we
call um that will sit on top of the roof and they are going to be sort somewhat centered so you won't again see them from the roof line anyway by code. They need to be a certain number of feet from the edge. So there will not be um any
type of vision to them as well as uh any need for screening of those. >> Understood. Thank you, Miss Shaw. Uh I have no further questions of Mich. >> Yeah, I was wondering if Jonathan wanted to address anything be great.
>> I can get started. Um, Misha, have you done a cross-section um through uh the highway to the proposed addition? Do you have that topo in your model? >> Um, we don't have it in uh in the model,
but I believe that would be the next step. Um, I know that there would be a sort of a grading plan done by our site engineer and certainly that would be that >> Yeah, because I I I think of a visual impact assessment from a driver on the road. I mean, we're talking it's it's
it's like 200 feet from the from the drive aisle of 287. So, a 70 foot tall structure is definitely going to be within the viewshed. Um, I know the picture you took is kind of from ground level on the side, which is a little bit which is a little bit
different. Um, so I think I I I think I'd want to see either a cross-section or a rendering taken from 287 looking at the building. It's um also if there's any consideration to
swapping the blue with the gray, kind of taking a having it almost camouflage it, tricking the eye, thinking that it's more sky than building. But I I don't know if there's any anything else we could do to um
visually pair this down. >> That That's a great um that's a great point. Um, Jonathan, actually, we did it this way to kind of neutralize it as it goes up, believe it or not. So, I I believe that this may um actually stick
out less if the color is towards the bottom, if that makes >> Okay. >> Um, so that was a consideration if that matters. Um, >> it does. Thank you. >> I do um I do we're we're happy to do a rendering from 287. Um, but I I do know
that uh there's there's no there's really no chance that that they're going to see anything. There's a whole tree um on that side if you kind of see it from and now I don't know what this the size of the trees are. We can defin we can
definitely look into that. Um, but as you can see, like there's a natural it's a beautiful natural screen that that uh will prevent really anything and and they're they're, you know, uh, they're evergreen puniferous, so I don't think they will be um, seen
from >> and I did have the applicant in last year for removing a bunch of trees. They're not in the best health and it's fairly mature. So, I wouldn't be surprised if more of those trees are on their way out. So that that's why I'm why I'm asking.
>> That's >> I'd like I'd like to jump in on this comment with I agree with Jonathan. I mean, we all go up and down 287 multiple times a day, some of us. And you can see a lot of these buildings all
along 287. So this is going to be one of the bigger buildings in that corer. And the coloring system to me needs to
try to minimize the scale of this building as opposed to emphasizing it. And I think the blue color does emphasize the scale of this building as opposed to minimize. >> Okay. Um
>> but I think that the gist of this is what is the impact to the 287 corridor as you go along and we don't have that cut. Right.
If it does please a board, we we can uh work with the architect and um also the applicant and try to get a rendering so it's a more visual um exhibit to show the the visual impact from 287 if that would satisfy uh the >> I mean that would be appreciated.
>> Yeah. To be candid from 50 feet to 70 feet is not not insignificant. I mean there's no question that the scatterway master plan speaks to its economic base and
encourage expansion, retention, etc. But there has to be a balance to that. >> Understood. And we absolutely will try to provide all the exhibits that are being requested by uh both Mr. Chadwick
and M. Any other members of the board have any questions or comments? >> Yeah, I I I do, Sean. Um I look around the property. I don't see any hydrants. Um what is it with fire suppression around here?
>> Uh I would defer that question to our our uh engineer if uh Robert can come back. >> Hi. Um, so I did do a site visit uh earlier today and I did identify that there is a fire hydrant near uh Duke
Road. >> There's only one hydrant. >> Um I can uh if you give me a moment uh maybe after someone else presents I can check our plan to see where the nearest um hydrant is on site besides the
hydrant on Duke Road. >> Okay. Why don't uh David, why don't you proceed with your next professional and we can double back to Mr. Murray. >> We'll do. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Uh my next uh witness is uh Mr. John Ray from McDonald and Ray Associates. He is our traffic engineer. If the board can swear
him in, >> Mr. Ray, >> I lost the audio. >> No, you there. >> Oh, I'm here. I'm here. >> You swear that testimony you're about to give should be the truth? >> I do. >> Your name and address, please? John Ray
Rea. I'm a principal with Mcdana and Ray Associates traffic engineering firm 1431 Lakewood Road, Manisquan, New Jersey. >> Mr. Chairman, I believe Mr. Ray has been accepted as an a traffic engineer expert for this board on priorations. >> I agree. Please proceed, Mr.
>> Thank you, Mr. Conaly. >> Uh Mr. Ray, if you can please go through the parking and the traffic study that you presented that we submitted to the board as well. >> Sure. My my primary uh job this evening is to justify the parking variance. I've made several visits to the site to
establish the existing parking demand for the uh first shift. Uh as uh Vishnu indicated during his initial testimony, uh there are approximately 110 employees. I don't think they all work on the first shift. Uh the bottom line
is the parking uh observations I made during the first shift revealed uh a demand of 80 to 85 parked vehicles. We are going to add 30 additional employees with the uh project if it is uh improved
approved and if they all work on the first shift that will bring the parking demand up to approximately 115 maybe 120 parking spaces. 206 spaces are proposed. So therefore, we meet the uh the actual
parking demand and we exceed it and we will have a healthy surplus of parking spaces. Other than that, I've just reviewed the access to the property which as it currently exists. We've got great access to 287 from to and from the west via Possumtown Road to and from the
east via Old New Brunswick Road. great location for this uh property and uh for this operation as Vishnu has indicated uh but primarily my job was to justify the parking variance. >> Okay. >> I have no further question for Mr. Ray
if the board of board professionals have any questions. >> Uh Jonathan, you want to jump in, sir? >> The only comment I have for Mr. Ray is have you given uh we've been discussing the truck circulation. Do you have any comments regarding that? I I con I concur with uh your comments and Miss
Dolan's comments and I think Mr. Murray and I will work on that and prepare the truck uh turning radius templates and provide them to you. >> Great. >> Thank you. >> Thank you, Mr. Ray. Any other members have any more uh questions for this? >> Uh Mr. Chairman, just to uh comment that
I also visited the site. I concur with the findings on the parking. We also ran it parking. Um the board knows that the uh ordinance requires the calculation for the individual use components and that in my opinion is an overexaggeration. I I do believe as Mr.
Ray said there will be a healthy surplus uh with the renovation more than would be required for this particular user and more than the IT anticipated demand. >> Thank you Betsy. >> You're welcome. >> Um Mr. Murray, do you have any more
information about the fire hydrants? >> Yes. So looking at the site plan, there is a hydrant on the Duke Road frontage. There is a hydrant on the free Freeway Drive frontage. There's a hydrant on the north of just north of the building. And there's a hydrant on the west side of the building.
>> Okay. Okay. >> You hear that already? >> Yes. Thank you. >> Sounds like there's four on the site. >> Thank you, Mr. Murray. Uh Mr. Versad, please proceed. Uh for my final witness tonight, I have our professional professional planner uh Justin Oiello.
It was supposed to be Miss Kafone. Uh and Justin is from Conf consult Conf consulting group. So he will be doing the professional planning testimony if the board can swear him in. >> Are you present? What? >> Yes, I'm here. >> Could you raise your right hand? Do you
swear that the testimony you're about to give should be the truth? >> Yes, I do. >> Your name and address, please. Uh Justin Oiello, A U C I E L L. Uh 52 Reckless Place, Red Bank, New Jersey.
>> Thank you. >> Thank you, >> Mr. Oiello. Um can you please give the board the benefits of your credentials and is your license current and in good standing? >> Absolutely. Um so I have a master's degree from Ruters. I've been a licensed professional planner in the state of New Jersey since 2008. I provided testimony
uh in front of this board and and the planning board um in the past. Uh my license is current and in good standing. I provided testimony um in approximately 200 municipalities. Uh >> I think I think we're good. Justin, you can
>> Thank you, Mr. K. Uh Mr. Oiello, if you can please uh do your analysis for the D6 height variance and also if you can address the other bulk variances for off- streetet parking and loading births. >> Yes, absolutely. Um so the D3 I'm sorry
the D6 um height variance that's covered under the uh the Grasso case that's uh that's Grasso versus versus Spring Lake Heights. Um and that's essentially the same standard of relief as a conditional use. Uh in this instance it's it's it's showing that uh the site um you know can
accommodate the excess height um even though of course there there's uh the the exceeding of the height in in the L15 zone. uh the L the L15 zone industrial district uh does anticipate uh largescale industrial buildings and I
think it's important to kind of set the context upfront um that this is the industrial district this is an area um that's right along route R route 287 um this is an area that has industrial surroundings um Mr. Chadwick in his
letter uh did state that the site is located in the industrial section of the township and uh he went on to say that the building is uh remote to to any residential use. So from a planning standpoint uh what that tells me not just from Mr. Chadwick's uh letter, but
uh from my knowledge of the area and uh my review of of the site on foot, uh this is a height that from a planning standpoint um does meet the purpose and the spirit of of the LI 5 zone. Um I
think as you heard uh from our site engineer and from the architect um the site can accommodate uh this height despite the fact that the variance relief is required as you heard uh from the operator. Um the the height variance
is driven by the the operational requirements of the use. Uh it does enable the uh the vertical storage um of the use. Uh and what's important here um as was previously stated that this reduces since it's vertical obviously that reduces the expansion of the uh of
the building footprint that eliminates the need for any uh new disturbance of lands and then of course um that eliminates any need uh to expand or to increase the the impervious coverage. So that's the um you know functional
necessity. Um and with that uh with going vertical that of course has no impact um on the setbacks um and the buffering. Um again this is located along uh route 28 Route 287. I know there were some questions uh that were
asked by the board professionals earlier uh about the location and any visual impacts. I believe the applicant um has has stated or the applicants professionals have stated that um some uh you know new exhibits will be provided uh to prove that there is uh no
no negative impact in terms of the positive criteria for the height variance. Um it's my professional opinion that this application would advance uh criteria A uh the promotion of the general welfare. Um and from that it's uh the advancement of of commerce
in the township. Uh criteria G which speaks to sufficient space and appropriate locations to accommodate. There is sufficient space as you heard from the professionals. Again this is going vertical. Um it's inappropriate location. We're not here for a D1 use
variance. the L the LI5 zone uh anticipates uh this type of use um and and criteria H uh free flow of traffic that really goes to um the the parking variance uh but still I would say that
with the the vertical expansion there is no impact there um and this application as a whole will advance the uh the free flow of traffic in terms of the negative criteria for the the D6 variance um from a planning standpoint I certainly see no
substantial detriment of public good. Um no no negative u shadowing or glare that's associated with this application. Uh the applicant um has agreed uh to go go lights out at the appropriate um hours. Uh no uh substantial negative
impact uh to to the zone plan. The zoning ordinance. Zoning ordinance as I had previously stated does um does permit this use. Um and this is a use uh that certainly uh advances the uh the master band the master plan policies uh
for business promotion and the advancement of uh of these industrial uses. Um in terms of the parking variance uh you did hear from from Mr. Ray uh who who's who who had testified that his analysis showed that the parking is uh is sufficient um on the
site. Um in terms of the um the drive aisle with um as well um I believe Mr. We Mr. Ray um had testified that uh that that his his testimony was was limited
mostly to to the parking. Uh but I believe um he he did state it he did state that the uh the that he found that the width was appropriate and I believe the uh the loading birth uh variance is a pre-existing non-conforming use um
which which again um will have no negative impact um to the function of the site. Again, it's a vertical expansion. So I think I think the positive and negative criteria um that was stated for the D6 variance um can apply to the C variance relief that is
required as well. >> Uh Mr. Oiello I just can ask you one question. We are increasing the number of loading bursts to make it more conforming. Is that correct? >> That is correct. It's more conforming. So, it's a uh it's a better situation than uh than than currently exists and
and that certainly is a is a benefit to the site uh and also the zone plan as well. >> Thank you, Mr. Oiello. I have no further questions for Mr. Oiello if the board of the professionals uh would have any questions. >> Any members of the board have any questions or comments? >> I just have one quick question. Did you
make a any kind of a survey of 287 as to what the highest buildings are along that roadway? Mr. Chadwick, I did not personally do that. Uh I would I would defer over to any members of of the team if uh if
anyone has that. >> Do you have any idea u or any of the team your team members what the height of the hotels are? >> Oh, we we don't have uh any survey information outside of our site. Um
>> okay. >> So we do not have that information. I mean, I would think it would be beneficial to know that height as a comparison to what you're proposing and that you are not out of character.
But we don't know. >> No, John, I agree. And based on the fact that we're going to be asking for uh so far three new items for them to produce for us, um I would ask that they could provide that for the next meeting when we will probably vote on this. I mean to
be candidates, we've got other buildings that are higher than 50 ft and to what degree do they alter the roadscape of 287?
Uh it's right there. I mean it's but we're we we're absent that. So I agree with Chairman Kale. you know, there's a couple things outstanding that are probably best to to produce.
>> Uh, understood, Mr. Chadwick. Um, and as Mr. Kale uh just mentioned, there are a few things that would help the board and the board professionals feel more comfortable with this application. So, we will gladly uh provide those items. I've taken notes so I can make sure that we get them all submitted. Um, and
>> is a month from now too soon? Um, I will ask the uh professionals if that's enough time for them to generate these. Does anyone have any objection for the next hearing next month? >> Laura, what date would that be? >> Huh? Give me >> September 25th.
>> September 25th. Uh, Mr. Pad, >> could you ask your professionals? >> Uh, yeah. Mr. Murray, uh, Miss Shaw, if that if that's uh, doable for no uh, September 25th. That's >> doable. Mich, if that's okay with you as well.
>> Um, yeah, I will not be available personally, but somebody from my firm will be. Um, and we can definitely produce the rendering for that time. >> Perfect. I think we can we can agree to uh September 25th. >> Awesome. All right. Well, let's move on that then.
>> All right. So, should I the end of the hearing? >> Yes. >> Yes. That concludes our testimony and uh we will generate these and get them submitted to the board for review. Okay. Anyone here on the MSN pharmaceuticals hearing? It is going to be carried to
September 25th with no further notice by the applicant. The only notice you're receiving is my announcement here tonight. There will be additional items considered by the board at that time and it will be opened to the public for their comment at that time. Bam.
>> Thank you, Deon. Uh before we proceed, I would ask that if any of the board members have an opportunity to go out to the site to get a personal line of sight on the height of the proposed height, um you know, uh it would be probably in our best interest if you could get out there
between the next month and get a feel for the uh for the area. All right. So, let's move on to item number 23 and that's 25-ZB-3738V Chanel Inc. >> Good evening. Uh, my name is Lindseay Knight and I am managing council real
estate for Chanel. >> Good evening. >> Good evening. >> Please proceed. >> Thank you. Um we are here tonight with respect to our property at 876 Centennial Avenue. Um we are requesting
to install a fence on the property for security purposes. We unfortunately have had multiple instances of unauthorized persons accessing the property after hours, including large groups of cars that are doing um burnouts in the
parking lot. We have people who have been using our EV chargers who are not authorized as well as people who are sleeping in the parking lot. Um, so obviously this is a security concern for us as well for our employees as well as for the general public. Um, so
installing this fence would permit us to be able to close the property off from 10 p.m. >> Sorry. Go ahead. >> Okay. Um so that would this would allow us to um close the property off from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. Monday through Saturday
and all day on Sunday. Um so accordingly we are requesting two variances. Um first from 21619.2 to permit a portion of the fence to be located within an easement and the second is from 21-601
to permit an 8ft high fence. Um, we are in receipt of both the staff report dated August 6, 2025 and the report from Mr. Chadwick dated August 14th, 2025. Um, I saw there were some items noted therein for discussion.
So, please let us know how you would like to proceed. >> Jonathan first, I guess. >> Gladly. Uh, Miss Knight, could you help clarify uh where the
picket style fence is being proposed? >> Um, yes. I'm actually going to ask um Anton Williams from our asset protection group to um share the survey and walk through that. >> Perfect. Thank you. >> Do I need to swear him in?
>> Yes. Miss Knight, does he have to be sworn? Uh, >> yes. >> Miss Williams, could you raise your right hand? >> Do you swear that testimony about the gift should be the truth? >> Yes. >> Could you just identify yourself by name and your position?
>> It's uh Anton Williams. I'm the director of asset protection in our corporate space. >> Thank you. Please proceed. >> Okay. Share my screen. Okay, this is our print and uh let's
see. Oh, yeah. Share. There you go. All right. This is our print. Um and let me just zoom in here just so you get an idea where Centennial A is on the corner of uh Centennial and Nightsbridge. Uh the fence which will be our uh steel
fence will be this part here with the X's and it will run adjacent to the building um on top of our BM all the way into the entrance of the of
the uh building where the trucks um go in. Um and then the the the fence will turn into the parking area. And this particular area here will be a closed fence that will close the property so that if a truck does happen to pull off
or into that particular space, the truck will clear the uh roadway. Um, here is where the fence, another fence will block the parking area for our employees and it will run against
the inside of the BM to the rear of the parking area. And then that's when a uh chain link fence will run into the back space behind the parking area um hugging
the parking area until we get to bear with me here till we get to the end here where Fitz uh Randolph would be. Um the chain link will continue to the entrance on Fitz Randolph where we'll
have a double side swing gate. Um and then that fence will connect into our secondary parking space where there will be a sliding fence. Um and then another um chainlink fence that will touch the back of the building. And this
particular fence will um protect that parking lot where we have incidents. >> Does that answer your question, Jonathan? >> Yes, that's helpful. So understanding that that fence along Nightsbridge with the with the spikes is going to be more
of a a visual deterrent. Correct. >> Yes. >> Yeah. So I I think the the the spikes have to be revised. Uh it's just not it's not permissible. So there is just for the board's awareness,
there is landscaping on that burm along Nightsbridge road. Uh, so if we were to remove the spikes, I I would be open to the I'd be open to the height allowance. Um,
however, the fiber optic would also have to be installed along the frontage as we're requesting with applications of this kind on commercial properties. And then I I also have some concerns about the location of the fence relative
to the uh sanitary easement as well as the flood zone. So the sanitary easement you're you're well inside you're well inside that easement especially yeah there you're just kind of on the corner but uh
further further to the side. Yeah. So you're well into the easement area there. I'm just worried about our underground structures that the town maintains. So, full underground markout would be required prior to the installation of the fence. And if the fence does need to deviate from the plan
to uh avoid any underground structures, I would request that they either come back before the board if it's significant or uh a new layout would have to be proposed and approved prior to the fence installation.
And uh I'd also request a memorandum of restriction in case we do need to access any of those underground sanitary improvements uh if the fence gets installed. >> Miss Knight, are you is the applicant
willing to agree to all of that? >> Um I I would actually appreciate if we could have a little more information on the fiber optic. This was the first we learned of this request today. So I I'd like to understand a little bit more about that process. >> Sure. So the fiber optic conduit would
be two 4 in PVC lines uh along Nights the frontages along Nightsbridge road as well as Centennial. uh they're for township use and a lateral would be required to be run from
the the dual conduit uh to the front edge of the building. So with it being two faces, I I think you you'd likely do the lateral long centennial. Um that would be that would be again for for township use
in the future. Uh we're just trying to get uh fiber optic set up around town. >> And is that something that then connects into an existing system? >> We're creating that system. So we'll connect into neighboring properties as
they improve their lots as well. >> Okay. Um >> this this facility has been Jonathan probably five six years now or longer than that.
The fiber optic policy >> uh two years at most I believe >> but it's been it's been in operation then for full two years. So all of the businesses in town are doing this
type of facility. It's obviously looking future. >> I think it's been longer than two years. I think they've been Imented around five. Yeah. Before co I know that >> um I think it's longer than that but it's SOP now when it comes to approvals
here. I'd just like to clarify the uh issue of spikes on top of the decorative fence. I'm in favor of the dec decorative fence. I think it adds something to the site. Jonathan, what were you thinking? Do you just cut them off flat on the rail or
>> Well, different terminates on it. I mean, I >> I had one one in front of one of my houses. They had like a little hearts on the top. I mean, you couldn't they're purely architectural. >> There's no reason why the why the um
the rail the top rail that can't just be moved up and it would cover the spikes and the top rail would just run along the top of the fence. >> I I I I would rather see it project and put some kind of an architectural
closure on the end. I I just don't think it would look correct with just those rails coming up to a cross piece. Are you uh Lindsay okay with that in terms of putting on I tried to get a
hold of your fence manufacturer and I wasn't unable to on two occasions. So, I would think this manufacturer that submitted all the specs, the various types of fences can come up
with something that is decorative and not dangerous. >> Uh, yes, Mr. Chadwick. Um, Anthony Pagano is actually on the call with us tonight. Anthony, would you be able to respond to this request? >> Yes, absolutely.
>> Could you raise your right hand? Do you swear the testimony you're about to give should be the truth? >> Yes. >> Your name and address, please? >> Anthony Pagano, Statewide Fence, 651 South Avenue, Garwood, New Jersey.
>> Thank you. >> Yeah. In terms of options for the flush uh for the horizontal top rail on the ornamental fence, uh it can be we can do a flush top rail or we could have the standard pressed point. the standard press point for, you know, an aluminum
or a steel fence is not um not typically a hazard concern. As you stated, John, >> you don't have anything that can mimic some of the the old rod iron fences where the rails were had some generally
some kind of almost heart-shaped >> heart top to them. >> Right. So, yeah, it's a it's a press point picket. So when they actually crush the end of the the the tubular material, it creates that point and then it's obviously >> your answer is no. Then you don't have
anything that you could attach to it. >> Well, there's there's a few different options, but flush top is would be the standard for say like a playground fence. >> I I wouldn't I would prefer to see a flush top or I >> I I'm not getting a good answer. I agree
with you, Jonathan. Yeah, I think it would look better if it could be done the way I was talking, but let's not go any further. We beat this to death. >> Thank you, John. Appreciate it. >> Okay,
>> John. >> You good, Jonathan? >> Yeah, if they agree to the fiber optic memorandum of restriction, revising the fence. Uh, I'm okay. >> Yes, we can agree to that. Thank you. >> Awesome. Okay. Any any other members of
the board have any questions or comments? Uh Lindsay, that was your last uh professional. >> Yes. >> Okay. Um hearing nothing from the board, I'm going to open it to the public. Anyone in the public have any questions or comments about this application?
>> No one chairman. >> Okay. Hearing none, I'm going to close the public portion and I'd make a motion to approve this application with the restrictions that Jonathan just gave. I'm not going to do a motion. >> Okay. Can I get a second? >> I'll second. >> Please call the role.
>> Sorry. Mr. Weissman, >> yes. >> Mr. Patel, >> yes. >> Mr. Reio, >> yes. >> Mr. Blount, >> yes. >> Mr. Haka, >> yes. >> Mr. Minorando, >> yes. >> And Chairman Cahill, >> yes. >> M, your application has been approved.
We'll memorialize it in a written document at our next meeting and we'll send that document to you. >> Thank you. >> Good night. day. Have a good night. Bye. Take care. >> Let's move on to item number 24. Adoption of resolutions from the regular meeting of July 10th, 2025.
>> Mr. Chairman, before we proceed, is Heather Fan present on the call? >> Oh, I forgot. >> Laura, do we see her? >> No, there's no one. >> Okay. Thank you for reminding me, John. >> Can we move them to the September 18th meeting?
>> So, anybody and we're going to carry this to September 18th with no further notice. >> Thank you. >> Appreciate Jim. >> Thanks, John. With it. >> Good catch. >> Cassie Uden, would you vote to approve? Mr. Weissman, >> yes.
>> Mr. Patel, >> yes. >> Mr. >> Yes. >> Mr. Blunt, >> yes. >> Mr. Hooka, >> yes. >> Mr. Miranto, >> yes. >> Chairman Cahill, >> yes. Next. Omar Hag to approve. Mr.
Wman. >> Yes. >> Mr. Patel. Mr. >> Yes. >> Mr. Blunt. >> Yes. >> Mr. Hooka. >> Yes. >> Mr. >> Yes. >> Jeremy Cahill. >> Yes.
>> Edith Sproul. Would you voted to approve? Mr. Wston? >> Yes. >> Mr. Patel? >> Yes. >> Mr. Origio? >> Yes. >> Mr. Blunt? >> Yes. >> Mr. Hooka? Yes, >> Mr. Midando. >> Yes, >> Chairman Kale.
>> Yes, >> Eric Pansky. Would you vote to approve? Mr. Weiss. >> Yes, >> Mr. Patel. >> Yes. >> Mr. Oreio, >> yes. >> Mr. Blunt, >> yes. >> Mr. Hooka, >> yes. >> Mr. Miranda, >> yes.
>> Chairman Cahill, >> yes. >> Richard Tron, which you voted to approve. Mr. Weissman, >> yes. >> Mr. Patel, >> yes. >> Mr. Ourio >> yes >> Mr. Blunt >> yes >> Mr. Huga >> yes >> Mr. Mirando
>> yes >> chairman Cahill >> yes >> Amanda Mskoff would you voted to approve Mr. Weissman >> yes >> Mr. Patub >> yes >> Mr. Orettia >> yes >> Mr. Bullet >> yes >> Mr. Huga >> yes
>> Mr. Mr. Mirando, >> yes. >> Chairman Cahill, >> yes. >> Griselda Garcia, would you vote to approve? Mr. Weissman, >> yes. >> Mr. Patel, >> yes. >> Mr. Origio, >> yes. >> Mr. Blunt, >> yes.
>> Mr. Hooka, >> yes. >> Mr. Minando, >> yes. >> Chairman Cahill, >> yes. >> James Broy, would you voted to approve? Mr. Weissman, >> yes. >> Mr. Patel, >> yes. >> Mr. Origio, >> yes. Mr. Blunt,
>> yes. >> Mr. Hooka, >> yes. >> Mr. Mirando, >> yes. >> Chairman Cahill, >> yes. >> Finally, Gindo JL Auto Repair, which you voted to approve. Mr. Weissman, >> yes. >> Mr. Patel, >> yes.
>> Mr. Oreio, >> yes. >> Mr. Blunt, >> yes. >> Mr. Hooka, >> yes. >> Mr. Mado, >> yes. >> Chairman Cahill, >> yes. >> Those are all the resolutions I have tonight. >> Okay. Item number 25, adoption of the minutes from the regular meeting of July
10th, 2025. All in favor say I. >> I. >> Item number 26, adjournment. All in favor say I. >> I. >> All right, guys. Enjoy the rest of what's left of the summer. >> September.