Alrighty, let's see if I can find a pair of glasses. Okay. The Piscataway Township Planning Board meeting will please come to order. Order? Adequate notice of this meeting was provided in the following ways. Notice published in the Courier News. Notice posted on the bulletin board of the Municipal Building. Notice made available in to the Township clerk. Notice sent to the Courier News. Miss, Buckley, would you please call the roll? Mayor Wahler present.
Councilwoman Cahill. Oh, she's not coming. My apologies, Miss Corcoran. Here. Miss Saunders here. Reverend Kenny. Present. Mister Adkins here. Mister Echevarria Here. And Madam Chair. Here. Mister Barlow, would you please read the open public meeting notice? Certainly, Madam chair, I'd like to place on the record where during this meeting, through an online meeting platform, specifically zoom. In keeping with the guidelines that have been disseminated by the Department of Community Affairs. The Planning Board has tried its best
to comply with the Open Public Meetings Act and the DCA guidelines. In addition, any applicant, as matters will be heard this evening, said the login information for the online meeting platform put forth in their notice. Members of the public who wish to be heard will be afforded an opportunity as if they were in an actual, actual physical space. I believe the board has done its absolute best to comply with the DSA guidelines and the Open Public Meetings Act. Thank you, Madam Chair. Flag can be seen over my right shoulder. Can we all, cross our hearts and recite the Pledge of Allegiance? I pledge allegiance to the flag
of the United States of America. And to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Can we have the swearing in of the professionals? Mr. Wyatt Grant will be testifying later for, the. Is he present? Yes, he is, ma'am. Okay. Okay. Can you please raise your right hand? Do your testimony about the give me the truth and nothing but the truth.
I do. Thank you. Mister Barlow or any are there any adjustments or amendments to our agenda tonight? Yes, madam chair. Number 1225 PB 1516 v Raghoovir, LLC, which is 136 Stelton Road, will not be heard this evening. It's postponed to the April 8th meeting as they must notice for their application. That is the only change. Okay. Excuse me, madam chair can record show Mr. Ahammed with us. Plus year here. Okay.
Let the record reflect that Mr. Ahammed present for the meeting tonight. Okay, now we'll proceed with our agenda. Item number seven. Can I get a motion to pay the duly audited bills? Madam chair, Reverend, Kenney I make a mot to pay your duly ordered bills? Can I get a second? Carol Saunders, second. Roll call please. Mayor. Wahler Miss Corcoran. Yes, Miss. Saunders? Yes. Reverend Kenny. Yes. Mister Adkins.
Yes. Mister Ahammed Yes. Mister Echevarria. Yes. And Madam Chair. Yes. I believe, we have adoption of resolutions to be more memorialized. Miss Saunders. Madam chairman, I'd like to memorialize the application. 25 PV, 19 slash 20 V for 51 Holley Road Associates. Minor subdivision and bulk variance. Do we have a second? Chair. Reverend Kenny, second. Roll call please. Mayor Wahler? Yes.
Miss Corcoran. Yes. Miss Saunders. Yes. Reverend Kenny. Yes. Mr. Adkins. Yes. Mister Ahammed Yes. Mister Echevarria Yes. And Madam Chair. Yes. Madam chair, I like to memorialize. Application 25 PB17 slash 18 v KRCX Price Reit LLC. Preliminary and final site plan with bulk variance. Second. Do we have a second? What do we have a second? Reverend Kenney, I'll second it. Roll call please.
Mayor Wahler. Yes. Miss Corcoran. Yes. Miss Saunders. Yes. Reverend Kenney. Yes. Mr. Akins. Yes. Mr. Ahammed. Yes. Mr. Echevarria. Yes. And Madame chair. Yes. Item number nine. We have minutes to be adopted from February 11th. Madam chair, I like to memoralize and adopt the minutes from the regular meeting on February 11th, 2026. Do we have a second? Reverend Kenny, I'll second it.
Roll call please. Mayor Wahler. Yes. Miss Corcoran. Yes. Saunders. Yes. Reverend Kenny. Yes. Mr. Adkins. Yes. Ahammed Yes. Mister Echevarria Yes. And madam chair. Yes. Item number ten. There's a discussion, regarding the amended fourth round housing element and fair share housing plan. Madam chair, if I, I'll, just address it briefly, and then I'll hand it off to Mr. Grant.
The board had previously adopted the fourth round housing element and the fair share plan. As part of the ongoing affordable housing, issues in the state of new Jersey and the litigation that came from there. And the mediation program the township's been involved in, there are some deadlines that require the municipality to amend the fourth round Housing Element and Fair Share Plan plan, known as a hefsp hefsp
And as part of that, Harbor Consultants and Mister Grant is here from Harbor Consultants prepared a report as to, the why and the what for about it. And, I'll turn it over to him and he'll educate the board on, what's going on? Okay. Good evening everyone. Good evening. If I'm able to share my screen that may be helpful to explain just a little bit of the background. Okay. Is everyone able to see the screen right now.
Yes, sir. Yes. Yes. Okay. So, in June of 2025, the township adopted its housing element fair share plan, which essentially outlined how how the township would be providing affordable units over the fourth round period of 2025 to 2035. Based on its state mandated state mandated obligation. So the obligation for the fourth round was 539 units. And when the plan was presented to the board
and the township, in June of last year, we had conducted a vacant land adjustment which calculated the realistic development potential of 316 units. And we provided a chart with the crediting, which I won't go over too much because the board approved essentially this chart last year. But I just wanted to give a background of to reference later when I'm talking about the updates to the plan, for this chart. So we originally had an RFP of 316, which was met through, several different projects
which are listed in this chart. And we can go over later in time. And that resulted into meeting a RFP of 31 and then subtracted from the source, found prospective need of 539. That left us with an unmet need of 223 units, which we addressed to these different mechanisms. You can see in the chart here what happened over the course of time is through the amended Fair Housing Act. By the end of August 2025, after the township had adopted its plan in June of 2025.
Any challenger had the opportunity to challenge the plan. Through a formal submission process. And the township did receive two challenge letters, one from M & M developers, which was proposing to have their property, included in the plan, which it wasn't included in the plan in 2025. And then also Fair Share Housing Center had challenged the plan. To help with the town basically down to to mitigate the issues
with M & M and also to clean up some other items of the plan. So, over the course of negotiations of the fall of 2025, the township has been, through the process of the Affordable Housing Dispute Resolution program, has been going through negotiations with M & M the Challenger and Fair Share Housing Cent and had a series of settlement conferences over the course of the fall. There were four different conferences, and by the deadline of the end of 2025, the township hadn't fully settled with M & M
and proposed an amendment to the Fair Share housing plan. Based on those negotiations and, that proposal was submitted to both the Affordable Housing Dispute Resolution Program and the court. And I'll go to that plan now. And this is essentially the plan that after has been submitted to the court. The township also received a letter of recommendation from the program judge and then also a decision from the Superior court judge. Of Middlesex County
that is essentially backing this chart that you're seeing right here that we're proposing the planning board, to adopt this evening. Pending ongoing negotiations with M & M on the site, which the township is still going on, but it's based on the density of this chart. So this chart, once it's approved, would be essentially attached as an amendment to the plan from 2025 with revisions to certain, elements of the plan, which I'll go over, very briefly, to help,
sort of breakdown the chart. I tried to kind of color categorize the chart for, projects that were already in the 2025 plan, but just the density changed, which are in the orange color. Some are existing projects which are in the 2025 plan and just the type of, you know, change. So it may have been listed as a family unit and now it's age restricted. And purple is for an existing project and it's moved from the unmet need to the RDP because the main, the main issue to these negotiations in the 2025 plan, we had broken the plan
down, to enter RDP and unmet need, because a town had conducted a vacant land adjustment. And now this proposal, we're completely getting rid of the vacant management, and fully satisfying then the town's entire fourth on an obligation of 539 units. And then lastly, we've added some new projects based on the challenge, the challenges from both Fair Share housing center and M And those are highlighted in yellow. So moving forward, the Stelton apartments project, this was already
included in the 2025 plan, but we increased the density of the site. Based on discussions with the property owner and developer of the site. So on the 2025 plan, this particular project was at 32 units, and now we've increased it to 43 units. But the set aside of 20% remains the same. Eventually, at the 32, when it was at 32 units in 2025. Excuse me. Let me get my notes real quick. It was proposed at 160
total units, inclusive of 32 affordable. And now, based on further discussions, we have changed that to 43 affordable. Which are part of 250 total units on the project. Some of the other changes are that we included a new site to the plan Turner place in South Washington Avenue. Which will be an inclusionary family project. A total of 34 units. At a 20% set aside of seven affordable units, which will be credited toward the town's overall prospective obligation.
And then, responding to the challenge from M & M that the town received last fall. And through these ongoing negotiations, this property has been added to the plan. Right now, under negotiations, we've proposing 613 total units on the site. One component will be 475 family rental units, which with a 20% set aside of 95 affordable. And then there will also be a 138 age restricted, market rate units on the site.
There's also additional nonresidential space on the site. And the extent of that is still under negotiations with Eminem. But the overall affordable housing obligation at 95, is staying the same. And that's what we're proposing. As part of this amended plan. I if I may, Madam Chair, I want to jump in on the Eminem. I just want to let the board know. And I know several of you do know that, Eminem, pretty much when they came in a proposal, was trying to destroy the townships.
That contract. So we still have to sit down under the auspices of the, the courts. However, their motive was always to destroy and just put, you know, thousands of units out there. So which would, would, would, would have been a disaster for the town. So go ahead. Go ahead. Why? Yeah. So Eminem, when they had eventually come through with the challenge, came in, at a very high density. They had originally put together, a concept of over 900 units. And through negotiations, the town, is working
with Eminem in the process, but right now has held to 613 units. And that's what's being credited toward the plant. Well, 613 total units, to be clear, only 95 affordable from the project. Units towards the town's obligation. Two other minor changes is that the rear site and the 44 Stanton Road sites, they were included as unmet need. But since the town has gotten rid of the vacant land adjustment, and so these projects had moved forward. For example, re already has final site plan resolution.
At that time last year, I had not received that. So it's moved as a more viable project towards crediting towards the township's front on obligation and then the DiLeo site it originally had been listed in. The 2025 plan is family, and the township has changed that project to be age restricted. And then finally, to fully wrap up the town's, compliance with its overall affordable housing obligation. It's added an 100% affordable housing site
at the Macedonia Freewill Baptist Church properties and for up to 83 units. So the 83 isn't a finite number. The actual unit count is still, in the process. As we're working with the developer to prepare the concept plans. But as part of this plan, they're committing to up to 83 units, so it could be 83 units or less. And as you can see, the that totals up to with all these credits and units in the chart, the 583 total units and credits. And based on the obligation of 539, that's fully being met.
So that's essentially a breakdown of of the compliance mechanisms. I'm happy to take any questions, that anyone has on any of these sites or any of the mechanisms. But I just want to, madam chair, jump in there to let the, board members know at one time, when this, discussions got underway, the courts and the master, the court, they actually were using GIS mapping, and they actually had over 100 plus units in our public works unit.
That they wanted to be built and on other wetlands throughout the town that they wanted things built. All you had to do was just look at a GIS. Map, and you could see that it was wetlands and or the public works shortage. That's how screwed up this whole application process is. Oh. Go ahead. What? Yes. This is essentially the amendments to the plan. The main component is at the VLA was removed. The township has gone through negotiations to the program, to amend the plan to add additional sites, being the Eminem site
and the 100% affordable site and other minor revisions to the plan, such as the increase in density to the Stone road apartment site and, now through different, the response that we've had from both the program and the court is that they're supportive of this plan pending, settlement with Eminem and the township is working with Eminem, to to move forward with that process of having a town center. At a density that's acceptable for both the township and the developer. Other than that, I'm happy to take any
any further questions before voting on on what these changes are. Anything. This is Carol Saunders. I did have a question on the Macedonia. Yeah, I thought that was originally slated to be single family homes. That site I know underwent, You, But now it's been added as a 100% affordable housing site. As part of the township's compliance. The the the township doesn't have a concept plan for the site yet. And that's why the unit count is up to 83.
But, to my understanding, it's not proposed for single family homes as part of this plan. What type of housing is it going to be? It's going to be a, a, affordable. It will be units. Senior housing? Yes. Senior housing. Apartments? I believe. Yes. Senior housing? Apartments. Correct. Those senior housing apartments next to single family homes. Is that the proposal?
Yeah. Carol, that's the proposal. Yeah. You said there's going to be a lot of building going on, unfortunately, in our community. And I just want to let the general public know it's not our doing. It's the courts and, fair share housing and, housing advocate. Is that a lot of unfortunately, a lot of, development going throughout the whole town. Is that going to have any impact on the senior housing that's going on South Washington Avenue? No, that's, Madam Chair, that's a separate, separate, separate application and separate.
Yeah. I mean, y you can correct me that this that's still, the one on Macedonia is still a concept. They don't even have, plans yet to then still file the application. So they're probably down the road a little. And the other thing. That would still have the code, Mr. Barr, not to come before the board is. One that one at a time. We need to have one at a time to, you know. 100%. Maybe they still have to come before the board, but they don't even have a concept plan yet. So, and the other thing, you know, board members on the
even with the complexity of all this, the courts didn't really give the municipalities, a large time window because the deadline to do this is March 16th. So March 16th. Marks this. Week. Yep. So the deadline to adopt this plan is what I mean. Not to start. And and what I've seen is over the last month, all the surrounding towns have been scrambling, like like Piscataway has had to because this is kind of being rammed down, you know, the town's throat, so to speak.
This whole law with that, the state legislature, that it was all screwed up. Yeah. So this I mean, Madam Chair, the fact that they actually had our public works yard slated to have well over 150 units there, and we had to convince the judge that was our public workshop when anybody could go on Google Earth or whatever and see that it was a public works just tell you, tells you right there how screwed this whole thing is. Well, any other questions from members of the board? But.
Reverend Kenny, I just, I know that, they were proposing these houses, for seniors like, they still have to have seniors someplace to live because something was. Don't want to live in a building, you know, such as the seniors building and, you know, they want to be able to afford I. I understand a lot of that. And not only this municipality, but they're doing it up in northwestern new Jersey to they're they're fortunate to have the whole state. The government demands this, type of living quarters.
And if you have the land, I we're we're just going to have to the courts going to make us comply with it. Okay. Any other comments? From the board? No. You said we we'll be able to see the plan. My my thing is there's a school the next block over, and the traffic is already a nightmare. Mr. Saunders, this does this plan the the. That's before the board and the board's being asked to adopt is just outlining for the court. Basically, this is how Piscataway intends
to comply with the fourth round over the next. I believe it's ten years. Okay, so the the stuff that's already being built or or the board's approved goes that's why the I think why it was trying to show the different colors. Some of this is proposed and like anything else, they'll have to come before this board for site plan approval with traffic experts and all that and the, you know, each project, the board will get its opportunity to, you know, weigh in and and and comment,
As those projects are brought to bear by each applicant, knowing. These that we're talking about tonight that we've had on this chart, these are already in the process. This is like the fourth rung for for adjustments and amendments to these that are already on the on the planning on the chart to be to be approved tonight. I think you said this is the fourth round for the ones that we're talking about. So the board adopted a fourth round right. Why is the fourth why I jump in if I, if I get this wrong? The board had already adopted a fourth round which had 300 plus units.
The courts basically came in and said nope, it's 500 plus. So we have to have a plan that reflects the number the courts imposed upon us. So in order to find the additional units, we had to amend this plan and add in these additional sites to get our numbers up. So that's why it's an amendment to the fourth round. And we would go back to the court and say, look, before March 16th, we adopted this amendment.
The numbers would, you know, comply with the court's mandate so that, we are not found to be, you know, in contempt of court, so to speak, for not complying. And the normal development process still takes place for anything that this board hasn't already approved. Right, right. I guess to clarify the rounds is kind of confusing. The round only refers. It's not the round of revision to the plan. It refers to a time period. So since the mountain laurel that time was passed in the 1970s,
this is now the fourth round. There are typically ten year periods. But in prior rounds, the duration of that ten year period was extended because, of this the organization of color at the time, which has now been abolished. But just to be clear, this isn't the fourth time this plan has been proposed. This is just an amendment front for the plan that we're saying how the units are going to be provided for the fourth, fourth round period, which is this upcoming ten year period of 2025 until 2035.
As far as the numbers are concerned, we're just, for example, the 100% affordable housing site. This plan is only committing to a number to say that the town is fully complying with the plan. That's why it says up to 83 units. So 83 is not a hard set number. And like I said, there's not there has been no application before the board regarding, this I mean, there has been a prior application, but not based on the density as proposed in this plan. And the town will be working through concepts
with the developer and the property owner, this site that obviously would go through planning board review, etc. and that's just one component of the compliance mechanisms of the plan. The Macedonians site included in this plan. Correct. It is. It is included in this fourth round. Yes. Correct. Okay. I think I saw someone raising their hand. In the public. No. No doubt that was me and I. Okay. Application and. Yeah. Okay. Go ahead. And just very I apologize.
This is helpful information. You know, from what I'm hearing, clearly is that these are proposed sites that still have to come and improve and all all the steps I need to go into. But this is just an early analysis of where we could potentially put something minor, say that correctly. Is the short and the short version of it? Yes, it would be. The township is committing to providing affordable units for these sites to meet its state mandate obligations. So I guess to go back further on the history, the obligation of 539, that was part of the process
of when the fourth round law was adopted in 2024. Essentially, each town was assigned its affordable housing obligation, the number of units it had to build during the sorts round. When that came forth that was produced by the DCA, the Department of Community Affairs, they produced a report that essentially was based on, population projections. These different factors, like the mayor said, some of it was based on a land capacity. But as a mayor, it was said that there were some errors in the methodology of that process. And that's when the township had an opportunity.
Hey, Wyatt, come on, you're color coded it. There was a major screw up by DCA. Come on, just lay the cards on the table. Yeah. So you're being polite there. So yeah, the the 539 was actually not the town's original assigned number. We had, gone back and produced our own report, and that number was essentially negotiated in and brought down based on our own report. To the obligation for the town of 539 for the ten year period. And then once that number was committed to, that's when the town
could put forth these different compliance mechanisms. So that's what the town was doing over the course of last year. So they had to adopt a plan by June of, June 30th, 2025, producing sites to meet that obligation of 539 and to go back to the prior plan, that the obligation remained at 539. But at that time, we had conducted a vacant land adjustment, which essentially divided the projects into realistic development potential. That's the rate of what the town could produce of 316.
And then unmet need was saying, whatever was that 539 number minus that? 316 we were providing different zoning mechanisms that could capture what was left over based on that plan. When that was submitted to the program and the court, that's what ended up being challenged, by M&M and Fair Housing Center. And that was negotiations that the township carried out over the course of the fall. And like I said, I wasn't able to fully settle with them. So that's why that property site has been included on the plan at that density.
But that is a density that's been negotiated because that site wasn't originally included in the plan from last year. And as yeah, as I'll repeat what the mayor said, these are very tight deadlines. So put it in perspective. The town had until the end of 2025 to negotiate and work with any challenger, which was Eminem and Fisher Housing Center, which we diligently did. And then we put forth this proposed amendment, and we are working with Eminem. And fair shared this plan that I propose, went over tonight is what for?
The housing center, the court, the program have all signed off on concerning that the town continues its diligence of negotiations with Eminem, which at this point in time, they are on board with, this plan. So this is what the township is proposing to move forward with and has the backing, of the court and the program. But yeah, they put it in perspective. I know it's a tight turnaround because these are all to emphasize. These are all state mandated deadlines. This isn't something the town is pushing through. These are all deadlines that are required by them.
And it's Fair Housing Act to meet. And one of them being this March deadline is to adopt any proposed amendments to the plan, which we've done. And it wasn't until, we received essentially a letter of continued, immunity to builders, remedy lawsuits from the program and the court at the I think it was February 20th is when that letter was issued. That decision was issued. So like I said, these are very tight timelines that have been going forward, and the township has been diligently working through the challenges.
And to come up with this plan. What, why? And I appreciate the explanation. You know, I expressed the same concern as the mayor, but thank you for walking us through it. Yes. So, Phillip, and the other board members, just so you know, there was one judge handling 300 plus towns in the entire state. Well. That's how screwed up this whole, like this, this law is. Why did it come to, come to a head like this? Why was it so, compacted together
and came to a deadline like this? It was the way that the law was written with these deadlines. This is the law that was written and signed into law by the governor at the time. And so it landed in the lap of the new administration. A DCA in charge of saying, oh, well, you have X, y, z. They never bought a look at Google Earth to see if it was developable or not. And they even wanted on the interchanges of 287 for us to put housing on the interchange, meaning
where the ramps are. I mean, the the original plan at the state one, it was four times as worse. All I know is that while this comes to fruition, there's going to be a lot of upset people in town when you see all this housing being built. Well, they need to see it before it's actually being built. Yeah, they'll be as as Mr. Barlow said, there'll be applications before the board. But the problem is, is the courts are mandating Piscataway and 300 plus other towns do it.
That's the problem. Yep. That's what it is. Why you want to unshare your screen? Yes. All right. Can I just ask one more clarifying question? The problems that were shared on that list are those all, spots that are redeveloped or are, you know, currently open space that are would be developed? There are different stages. So I try and try again. I wasn't sure if it was clear, but it's divided between proposed and completed projects.
So some of these projects have already been completed and the units are built. So this isn't any new development that the town is saying they're going to build. There are already existing affordable units that were built since the last round of affordable housing, where we're just simply crowding them to the foreground. Others are in different stages of development, so some of them just simply went through, planning board approval. And, yeah, planning Board approval and might be under construction. Others are in the very early stages of the redevelopment process.
So they're all that different stages. Some of them are very early proposed. For example, the Macedonia site is obviously at the concept stage. Others have already been completed, like, the William Street townhome was constructed. Thank you Lawrence, I ask mayors, I wonder if there's an opportunity to pull Green Acres funding into preserving some of the areas as a way to progressive spaces. But our conversation for another, they're just curious of where the stages. Right. Thank you. I.
Are there any other questions from the board? I mean, do we have are we ready to open it up to the public? You should open it to the public. Okay. Members of the public, you've heard the testimony on this issue. Does anyone in the public wishing to ask a question? You can raise your hand at this time. Seeing no, response at this time, it's closed to the public. So, Madam Chair, unless there's any last minute questions of Mr.
Grant. The process at this point would be, a motion to adopt the amended fourth round housing element and fair share plan as presented by Harbor Consultants, which is the board's affordable housing, experts. And as testified to by Mr. Grant. But someone on the board would like to make the motion as it was set forth by Mr. Barlow.
Madam chair, and I'll make that motion. Do I have a second. Reverend Kenny? I'll second that motion. Roll call please. Mayor Wahler? Unfortunately, yes, Miss Corcoran. Yes, miss Saunders. With me here. Reverend Kenny. Yes, Mr. Atkins? Yes, Mr. Ahammed Yes, I'm with the mayor. Thank you, Mr. A Echevarria Yes.
And, Madam Chair. Yes. Then, Madam Chair, because, as I indicated, we have to get this, resolution adopted prior to the March 16th deadline. I did, out of an abundance of caution and because of the time frame, prepare a resolution memorializing, the motion that was just adopted. I believe Miss Saunders has so on. Does you have that resolution? Okay, that's not the retention one. Right. Okay. Oh yeah. There. Yeah. There you have. Yeah. Because I have one that has four. So I'm trying to figure out which one it is.
Yeah. You could read it up the agenda. Okay. Okay I think I have it. Okay. Madam Chairman, I like to memorialize the resolution for the adoption of the amended fourth round housing element and future plan. Do I have a second. Reverend Kenny? I'll second that, Madam Chair. Thank you. Roll call. Mayor Wahler Yes, Council. Excuse me, Miss Corcoran. Yes, miss. Saunders. Yes, Reverend. Kenny. Yes, Mr. Atkins? Yes, Mr. Ahammed
Yes, Mr. Echevarria? Yes. And Madam Chair, yes, we approve. All right. We're done returning to our agenda tonight. We have another matter under discussion. Madam chair. This board had previously found the, block 201, lot 101, block 2 or 2, lot 42.02, also known as 1179 and 1776 South second Street to be an area areas in need of redevelopment. At this juncture,
what's being sought is to authorize for site planning to prepare a redevelopment plan. In keeping with that designation, that's an area in need of redevelopment. Mr. Barlow, just for the board members, this is at the end of South Second Street, and that backs up to Dunellen. And, this is where the, there's been a lot of problems there. Illegal dumping and, arson fires and so many old structures there. So this would authorize Mr.
Clark, at a foresight, planning to, see what would work best back there. Obviously better than what the mayor just indicated. Is there? So this is to authorize the redevelopment, plan? Yes. And that. Just anyone do what members of the board after even, the premise set forth by the mayor, would someone like to make a motion? Madam chair, Don Berggren, I'll make the motion that we retain for site planning to. Prepare the redevelopment plan. Do I have a second village variance? Not going to thank you. Roll call please.
Mayor. Wahler. Yes. Miss Corcoran Yes. Saunders. Yes, Reverend. Kenny? Yes, Mr. Atkins? Yes. Mr. Ahammed Yes, Mr. Echevarria Yes. And Madam Chair. Yes. That and again, I, prepared a resolution so that, foresight could start working on it. Without delay. Then I believe Miss Saunders has Madam Chair a Saunders. So I do hold. Yes. One second. Okay. Madam Chair, I like to memorialize a resolution for the retention of Foresight Planning, LLC
to prepare a redevelopment plan for block 201, lot 1.01 and block 202, lot 42.02. Do I have a second. Reverend Kenny? I'll second that. Okay. Please. Mayor Wahler. Yes, miss Corcoran? Yes, miss Saunders. Yes, Reverend. Kenny. Yes, Mr. Atkins? Yes, Mr. Ahammed Yes, Mr. Echevarria Yes. And Madam Chair. Yes.
Moment. Okay. And we have paid the bills. I think, to just a reminder that, the next site plan meeting will be March the 25th and our next planning. Madam chair. And it's Saint Patrick's Day next week. Yes. That's true. Next Tuesday. So we don't want to forget that everyone have a safe and, celebratory. We're all I registered. Yeah. Yeah. Have a good night, everyone. Thanks, everybody. Night, everyone. Motions.
Motion meeting is adjourned.