before I forget Rakesh your microphone is acting up so whenever you want to talk just hold the button talk hold the button that's prob best okay well good evening once again the quot to order the notice requirements of the open public meetings
act have been satisfied by the placing of a notice of this meeting on the bulletin board at the municipal building filing the notice with the Township Clerk and transmitting the notice to the Hun County Democrat The Courier News The Star Ledger and the Trenton Times can I have roll call please chairman Mr Edward
gettings here Vice chairman Miss Don Drew here miss Robin Fatu here Mr Scott McDade here Miss Michelle kavaki she is asked to be excused Mr Dennis conanan here Mr James Miller here Mr Glenn Sosi here board professionals board attorney
Mr Joe Torell here Township planner Mr Jeffrey ferella here Township engineer Mr raes Dari present board planner Miss Jessica Caldwell here and all other professionals have asked to be excused okay very good thank you I'm going to ask everybody to please
rise for the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence to remember our men and women serving in the armed forces flag uned States stand one nation under God indivisible liberty and justice for all
thank you okay we've got a few things on the agenda this evening uh in terms of comments and reports uh I'm going to with the Chairman's report we had received some information from committee person Fatu on the request to revise
ordinances related to residential development so I had asked her to just give us some background information on that yeah Jessica is gonna do that on the report multi housing I think coming out ofip meeting last evening it's just kind
of proactive and thinking ahead if we could have a few members um which is including je Barella andon and a few others to to just take related to the height the you know
design structure Etc it was even um you know mentioned that there are certain materials to use that we need help terms of fire saf Etc so I think that as we continue to grow as a community and these larger taller structures we need
to be Forward Thinking and ahead of the how the development um both peers but also ensures maximum safety and um and fit with the character of our community too so we'll just kind of work that and
keep updated and then we have a recation we can bring planning well I had seen and for good reason Dennis thank you for stepping up to be part of this are are you looking for another member from the planning board or members be fine is anybody
interested in that I would like to throw my name in there wonderful yes yes okay you only have three right so you've got your three okay you want do that and I'll be part of
that sounds good good deal thanks for raising the quorum good okay uh does anybody have any board comments this evening Engineers comments reesh got anything for us nothing to see Mr okay
good planners comments uh this is where we had received some information on the township committee and the actions that they've taken on the submission of round four round four affordable housing and that plan so Jessica we're going to throw it over to you you were going to
speak to us about that uh Rec yeah absolutely so um as you all know in March of 2024 the new regulations for round four of affordable housing obligations uh were issued and following
that in October on actually October 18th the DCA issued um proposed obligations for all the communities in the state and for raran Township that was uh 44 units of present need which is also Al known
as Rehabilitation units and then a prospective need of 336 units uh that prospective need under this legislation was something that the township could either accept outright or
propose a different obligation so what we did it was actually a fairly different process this time because the DCA issued all of the underlying data that they utilized to come up with the
obligations and there were three different factors that went into how the obligation was calculated uh one was the equalized non-residential valuation factor which is essentially the percentage of non-residential
development uh that the township has built during the round three period uh versus the entire uh region then there was the income capacity factor which is the percentage above the lowest income
Community um kind of spread out throughout the community and compared to the region the percentage of the income above the lowest income community in the region and then there was What's called the land capacity factor and that was
the percentage of vacant land uh that the community was determined to have uh according to DCA compared to the entire region so the first two factors the non-residential valuation factors really
based on uh DCA information from certificates of occupancy that really couldn't be challenged or changed the income capacity Factor was based on census data so that was really also set and we didn't feel could be a challenged
or Changed by the municipality but the uh land capacity Factor uh was something that we could look at and determine locally whether or not the land that the DCA had utilized um really met the standard of
vacant developable land under um the regulations so what we did was we undertook an analysis there was um over 600 acres that were determined to be vacant and developable within the community uh we went through those uh
several of them you know were not developable had en environmental constraints uh were you know dispar or small too small to be uh developed for affordable housing um or also had uh other types of
constraints were already built under under construction for a different project that didn't show up on the tax data things like that so we were able to reduce that land capacity Factor down to around 120 Acres there was a 50%
reduction because of the planning region that you're in and that brought it down to 62.2 one Acres so essentially what that all meant is when we reround the calculations we came up with a prospective need of 229 units instead of
the 336 that was proposed by DCA so the township um prior to the January 31st deadline adopted a resolution U proposing that alternative perspective need of 229 units uh
accepted the 44 units of present need and then sent that into essentially the courts through a declaratory judgment process and that goes to what's called now the dispute resolution program that was set up through the
legislation there is a deadline of February 28th for any interested party to object to the proposed obligation that the town Township adopted so we're waiting for that deadline if there are no objections on March 1st Our
obligation becomes um set and then our next step is to uh draft and complete an housing element and fair share plan uh which is due by June 30th of this year and that step will obviously be with the
planning board as well as the governing body happy to answer any questions I know that's kind of a lot of information but we are sort of really at the beginning of the process for the thess of this report
that you all have to riew and the methodical detail in which they outlin the various cuts that were made to reduce those numbers and and being able to have this kind of detailed report in providing the state really helps to
substantiate because the state just doesn't have that level of information and visibility um so I know the township committee um very comp and the work I
forward thank you thank you guess Jessica my my only question is when is it during the development of now the plan when the issue of the lack of sewer capacity comes into play so it seems
like that wasn't you know that wasn't an issue that D let you look at correct we weren't able to say you know there's no sewer capacity so it's you know very limited um yes so during the planning process that's when
we put that into the plan uh we proposed is what's called a durational adjustment uh which essentially I mean we'll have to solidify numbers but right now the understanding is there's really no capacity so when that occurs what you
have to you almost have to duration adjust all of the units because you can't guarantee that anything can be built during the round three process unless they have some sort of Prior um capacity that they purchased
or happen to have on the property for another development that they can retrofit so we do what's called The durational Adjustment through in the in the plan to answer your question right and my other question because we did
modify our land use ordinances to allow um accessory residential structures now on single family lots does that come into play with numbers we could propose an accessory
apartment program with that that could be something we could do and that could go to our numbers potentially yeah I mean even for the maybe the present need you know whatever I just was Wonder because you know I know the State's starting to really push
that as a concept and we did it already I mean we're ahead of the curve yeah definitely so anyway okay than you okay anyone else for Jessica Jessica thanks very much all right thanks for
having me thanks for it was a good overview thanks take care bye bye bye attorneys comments anything for us this evening just that there's a land you Symposium at Ron Valley Community College for April 26th that I'll be
participating in again you did you get send it out to everybody so that's it that's all I had so we get to hear you speak is that it again okay very good okay great in terms of Correspondence uh we did have some
information that we received this week actually yesterday that I routed to everybody on the sustain sustainable land use Pledge nothing for us to do on that this evening I just want to have it in the record that it was distributed to everybody
okay all right so now we are to our minutes we have a few of those to approve uh this evening the first is from our December 11th 2024 meeting uh these were all circulated to the board members in
advance does anybody have any comments changes suggestions to the December 11th meeting minutes I do not there being none can I have a motion to approve chairman Miss ER gettings yes Vice chairman Miss Donna Drew yes Miss Robin
Fatu Mr Scott McDade yes Mr Dennis conanan yes Mr James Miller yes Mr Glenn Sosi yes very good thank you next up are the meeting minutes from from our December 18th 2024 meeting same thing does
anybody have any comments or suggestions questions on the meeting minutes I do not there being none can I have a motion to approve second chairman Mr Erbert gings yes Vice
chair Miss Donna Drew yes Miss Robin Fatu Mr Scott McDade yes Mr Dennis conanan yes Mr James Miller yes next up we have some minutes from a closed session that we had regarding uh legal aspects of the current litigation
pending on Flemington 202 properties so does anybody have any questions on those minutes there being none can I have a motion to approve so moved chairman Mr award gettings yes
Vice chair Miss Donna Drew yes Mr Rober P Mr Scott McDade yes Mr Dennis quanon yes Mr James Miller yes no we don't we should do okay okayif
yes okay so can you say that again Joe yeah I I was asking because again I'm I'm new to the party typically on Executive session minutes there's an approve and hold so that they're not released to the public and I but I didn't hear that in the
motion I heard approve so I think in the future for executive session you should call for a motion to approve and hold so that the record's clear what what we're doing I can amend my motion if you want um well we voted on it already so I'm trying to think uh
so I guess we could let's let's let's just do it again yeah do do an amended just do an amended motion to approve and hold make a motion to approve and hold yeah second James
got chairman Mr we getting yes Vice chair Miss Don Drews yes M Rober P Mr Scott McDade Mr Dennis conanan Mr James Miller yes thanks for the clarity okay last up are the meeting
minutes from our January 8th 2025 meeting does anyone have any comments or questions on these meeting minutes I do not I'll make a motion to approve second chairman Mr Edward gennings yes Vice
chairman Donna Drews yes Miss Robin Fatu Mr Scott McDade Mr Dennis mcon M James Miller Mr Glenn toosi yes very good we do not have any resolutions this evening uh next up is Citizens privilege
if we have anyone in the room with us this evening who would like to address the planning board on any topics other than what's coming up in the public hearing here moment arily now would be a good time to do that okay there being none we can move
on to our public hearing of Woodmont Ritt and flex LLC this is the minor subdivision wasn't bad we got to you in 20 minutes perfect thank you is this on ta is the Red Dot on Red Dot is on then it's on all right terrific hi good
evening everyone John which is Scala uh with the law firm of engelo Taylor uh it's my pleasure to be here before the board this evening I'm actually uh pinch heading for my uh partner Johnny Gino tonight uh I am here this evening on behalf of Woodmont Ron Flex LLC which is
an affiliate of Woodmont properties uh my client is the owner of the property that's the subject of this application it's located generally I think it has an address of 100 Vorhees Corner Road more important is the uh block and lot it's block 40 lot five on your tax map uh and
it is located in the Township's o to Zone District uh the property is approximately 90 Acres 90 and change in size it's currently vacant and undeveloped aside from a few old abandoned structures that exist on the property uh we're here before you this
evening seeking minor subdivision approval it's essentially a lot line adjustment uh and what we're looking to do is to uh subdivide this property into two lots one consisting of 35 acres and the other consisting of 55 Acres the
large tra uh uh would be identified as lot 5.04 uh and the intention here is uh for the um applicant uh to convey that property uh to the municipality pursuing
to agreements uh uh that that they they already have in place uh we are not proposing any improvements to the property we don't do not have any variances this is you know in theory these are the simplest of land use applications where you take a big big piece of property and we're not quite
cutting it in half uh but uh you know with that uh we are not proposing any easements uh and and I know your ordinance when it speaks to subdivision speaks to creation of conservation easements and things of that nature I think that's really intended we were
taking a 90 acre parcel and subdividing it into a big residential subdivision with with things but again all we are doing is is creating a a lot line through this property uh so and again with no improvements uh and I raise that just because it you know there's
questions that come up in the professional reviewer reports so uh that being said I have Steve santah with me tonight I think you all know Steve he's Executive Vice President for Woodmont General councel uh Steve's gonna uh say a few words here and go through it uh
and then we have our uh project surveyor Ken Kennan who prepared the minor subdivision plan we'll call on him and uh and that's the game plan uh we did publish in Serv notice uh with respect to this uh although it is a minor subdivision I'm not sure if it's technically required uh but but we did
so anyway um just to make it easier can you have everybody who you are you're going to call as well as the board professionals we'll just do the we'll do it once okay so if you can raise your right hand and
you swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to give in this matter is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth I okay and then starting left to right we'll start with Mr sento if you could State your full name and spell it for the record then you sir in the back and we'll go right across to the board professionals thank you sure
Steven Santa s n t o l a I'm Executive Vice President and general council at Woodmont properties 100% Avenue in Fairfield New Jersey my name is Ken Kennan I'm with Kennan surang I'm the owner in um uh
president and here tonight representing um Woodmont k n n o n Ro Dary with environment resolutions the township engineer Jeff F Town planer
thank you at this time I'd like to call Steve Sant hi good evening everyone it's great to be back um just to give you a little bit of the the playing field um as you recall when we acquired the property there was a Redevelopment plan in place
there there was not a Redevelopment agreement we had acquired some of the lands around the uh site that was subject to the Redevelopment plan and included one of those Parcels donated and made a conservation easement um along bores Corner Road um and then the
municipality I won't say extracted but negotiated a more than a handful of accommodations in the redevelopers agreement so in section three of the redevelopers agreement one of the provisions is that we will subdivide the adjacent tract which we owned and donate
55 Acres closest to the school um to the municipality uh and that was left very broad whether it would be donated as a conservation easement whether it would go to the board of ed whether the town would take it Etc but we need to make it at separate lot in order to achieve that um one of the issues I know that we were
talking about was access to case Boulevard section three of the redevelopers agreement does limit access to case Boulevard through emergency access uh only um so um with that issue being resolved there's other Provisions about how we'll handle the zoning of the
remaining track which aren't really before you tonight our goal here tonight is to get the 55 acres into its own lot so that we can transfer to the municipality pursuant to our agreement from back in November of 2023
okay just a clarifying question so at this point as part of the um subdivision of the parcels are you proposing to put a note in that um acknowledges access to case Boulevard is for emergency vehicles
only well it's in the redevelopers agreement yeah but that wouldn't follow with the deed then oh well it's recorded okay okay I I you know it's just an issue I wanted no no understood and we don't know where that driveway is going to be if it's going to be an emergency
access we can do nothing there so yeah I think that I don't have a I have a very strong suspicion that when we come back no one on this board is going to forget that terrific okay any other questions um I it it's probably not for you Mr
santoo but um there is a board engineer report dated February 7 2025 have you had a chance to review that yes okay there are certain um I'm going to call them conditions that are raised specifically
2 a c 3 A B C D and and um for d and e and and J and K and L M N O P Q and R as I interpret as conditions
um do you have an objection to any of them or um as part of the approval you agree to that they those would be included as conditions to the approving resolution so and I I I went quickly and I'm happy to we I'm happy to revisit
them slowly uh it was more of a general question that um what I like to do is to focus on the board's report call out what the conditions are focus on that because to the extent that there's no disagreement it makes it easy when I'm
putting the resolution together right so I my suggestion uh we're gonna have Ken uh get up shortly and go through uh Steve's not going anywhere anyway so we will go through I think uh most of the comments are technical in nature they are technical coordinates
plans Etc we haven't decided uh whether we're going to record this by way of uh assuming it's approved by way of plat or by way of subdivision deal right right and the only thing I would suggest yeah the only thing I would suggest in there in the report that's specifically um I
believe that's item 4G in in the engineers report I I would just ask that would ever way you do it that it be reviewed either by the township engineer or the township attorney absolutely yeah I would expect that anyway whatever okay we'll dra
assuming it's a deed we'll draft the documents Rees will review the descriptions and so forth I think we already have them I'll go to the township attorney here get signed ultimately by the by the chairman and perfect and because it's technical I I understand but that at least I think
will inform you as to how to proceed with your next witness y thank you we have two reports here so it's your choice yeah we've got I know we've got engineering and planning so and then then there are a couple of there several other reports that are appended there
too as well so Mr kenon can you please provide the board uh with a brief summary of your educational professional uh background and licenses you hold yes I'm a licensed land surveyor the state of New York New Jersey and Pennsylvania
I've been in practice for about 50 years and um uh been in business in Somerset County uh since 1996 okay thank you you're acceptable to the board thank you chairman U Mr Canon you prepared the uh the subdivision
plans that before the board is that correct yes can you please provide the board with an overview of what is being proposed here looks like looks like we have a board up there with a plan on it which presume is the exact plan that was submitted and is before then correct it was we don't have any new exhibits or
anything else to present other than what's before the board correct all right so why don't you please just uh give the board the overview uh the overview is as you stated before 90 acre piece of property that's being split into two a 55 and a 35 acre
track uh any variances associated with the application or is a fully conforming based on fully conforming fully conforming um no uh I mentioned earlier we are not proposing any easements uh there's no necessity for that with respect to this project there are no
prop improvements propos correct correct uh have you had a chance to uh review um the environmental resolutions uh report yes of um what date is it February 7th 2025 yes uh why don't we just roll through that
because uh you know Council had pointed out some things I think we can hit on them quickly uh and then Mr Dary if he's got any questions or followup can follow but uh just just reviewing the letter I'm at page uh 204 uh there are some
Administrative Code Provisions there 2 a to see uh any issue with respect to compliance there none at all uh there are also comments in item three uh recording law of course we mentioned we may do may do plat or we may do deed but
otherwise comply with these requ re ments yes uh General notes for ABC there's some stuff in there about you know adding address owners uh Etc uh four A and B are acceptable is
that correct yes 4 C pertains to a wetlands area along bhe Corner not having a buffer area we are not proposing any just going to say anything dealing with the wetlands we can probably uh strike from our letter that was all handled as part
of the site plan approval so we just terrific thank you I just want to make sure so I'm going to move on it's probably just easier chairman which is just to keep rolling through and I know it's gonna make Joe's life easier too so our normal way of doing this is to go through these
reports you're doing perfect that's how we like to do it so I'm on to page uh three of four uh we've got a I think we'll strike that too because it has to do with the wetlands and the buers and I apologize for the uh the numbering uh snap yeah I know somehow we ended up
back at a it's okay now we're at D I believe Microsoft second one down um no Deeds noted on the plan for lot five information of deed record that that's acceptable yes so that's okay we're on d e date okay yes F uh closure
reports legal descriptions yes right yes we'll provide them um g g was actually an observation that uh the engineer made uh we had two references to the same uh transmission
easement it was 300 ft wi 305 ft wide as part of the survey we did for lot six which isn't really part of this application uh there were it encroaches 205 feet onto lot six which is an adjoining property so for this
application it would just come off anything associated with lot six will come off okay so that takes care of h& yes um so just to clarify it is 300 it is thank you all
right um Jay is a monument comment yeah we'll add the time that'll be there um I don't know do you do we have any issues with any of the r of these K through r no okay it's easier agreed approvals permits uh we've
already filed and I think I think we received conditional approval from hun County uh yeah I don't know I'm sorry coun could you go back to number P uh I sure can I'm sorry which one p
p oh yeah so we have a health officer I I I appreciate you calling that out uh I'm not really quite sure what health officer review we have uh with respect to a lot
L I'm not aware either uh I think that's for minor subdivision anything having to do with the health department or I think there was also some question regarding existing septic systems on the abandoned houses and existing Wells on the abandoned houses
yeah yeah we're not proposing anything that really isn't in the purview anyway on a subdivision uh itself so if there are any issues uh to be discussed that would really be between them but I can address that abandon I can address that those abandoned buildings there was no
uh septic or well apparent when we did the survey but isn't it a requirement from the health department that all Wells that are abandoned be properly closed and well yes absolutely Wells have to be properly abandoned and closed you actually need to file with the
health department just for for abandonment of the wells that's a good point to our knowledge to our knowledge there isn't any there so you would agree to the extent that they exist you'll properly close as verbage in in the resolution okay yep
that's it thank you good point I that'll be acceptable with me as well I'm sorry raes I couldn't understand what you say the button yeah that's two things at once I know I can't two
bubble g walk it was a tough weekend it's a great weekend but a tough weekend um no I that that is also acceptable to me as far as a condition if should they uh find any Wells they agree to properly band them
and also report that to uh you know to my office and to the to the health officer okay very good thank you and I think the rest of it just speaks for itself uh taxes esc's fee Etc all standard uh turning over we've
got I have one I know you have a marked up one yeah so just uh I'm now reviewing um Mr vella's report of February 8th 2025 uh I there are just comments up front uh again we're not proposing any
improvements here uh I don't think there's anything we need to address on the first page observations uh I think Jeff gonna want to hear your comment on number 10 yeah I'm just
shap file reference to New Jersey state plane coordinates on page two yeah once the we typically do that once the map has been approved and finalized then we provide the uh JIS
file um so we're okay with 10 I should not the environmental commission is attached to this yep although it's a separate letter and also the referenc hunon County planning board is also attached here just so we're all
in the same before you jump ahead there though number eight yeah yeah so no we're not submitting for a Wetlands uh uh Loi on this uh wetlands have been uh situated we have no
improvements proposed uh this is a minor subdivision we do have to record this within 90 days of action uh and there is no reason uh for a wetland letter of interpretation to be sought at this time certainly if there are going to be applications and improvements uh on this
parcel or or the parcel to be conveyed to the Township in the future uh that would all have to be accounted for accordingly but uh uh we are not uh we're not proposing to do to do that I think that's why uh it wases mentioned
earlier just we remove the wetlands references and I would say as it relates go ahead yeah yeah I st it just because the township requirement is every subdivision site plan if there's Wetland Wetland delineation it's it's a
dedicated to the township for a conservation EAS yeah but we're not proposing any improvements here we are we're simply creating a lock line yeah the township can put whatever conservation easement it wants on or
maybe doesn't want depending on what its intended use is uh but we're not proposing any conservation easements or anything even further we haven't you know delved into you know what's going to be on the remainder uh in the future propose something then you know
deal with it accordingly I guess the one question I do have though there wasn't there you have an Loi already don't you for entire parcel or no so because we did the um okay they did the Wetland report okay yeah
just I apologize I I was under the impression that that we already had L for for the parcel okay yeah I guess we're so I I mean historically I thought we've gotten when a wetland area is
delineated even at subdivision we get the meets and Bounds in the pin set so that that area is known and we get the conservation is on um it would apply to both par so I I
guess I'm just struggling Jeff do you know do can you cite this the ordinance section that requires [Music] that cond wet areed to beated
yeah we're not proposing that we and and the issue is again it's a parcel we're doing this subdivision to effectuate you know an agreement with the municipality we are not proposing improvements we have not looked at this I do not know that the township would want
conservation easements put onto a parcel of land that it's getting I would it can address it can address it accordingly but I think that would be the you know the Township's decision in that regard um but to go to the time and expense of
going through the LOI process and delineating it on a parcel of land that we are merely doing a lot line adjustment and proposing no improve improvements uh to the extent we need to request relief in it I'm requesting that
relief uh from that provision I guess problematic umoc on your parcel that both Parcels it would apply to and that gives the township I mean the township always has
the ship always has the protection though the Wetland regulations are the Wetland regulations whether we come in now and we determine that it's a 50 foot buffer 150 foot buffer whatever it is it is and you know in the future we come in if we're going to develop something here
we're going to be subject to that you know down the road it may even be more stringent than it is H today or maybe it's less stringent than it is today but we're not proposing anything here we're drawing a line down the middle of an undeveloped tract of land you know it's not and I do understand
you know sometimes you you you're creating this with the intention of development I use the example earlier a single family subdivision been here done them here before and certainly you're accounting for that because you're creating you know individual lots that are intended for development purposes
and once it's recorded they can be sold sold for residential development that's not what we have here just have a 9 AC or trative land that's in your O2 Zone district and we're drawing a line so we can meet a contractual obligation to convey the property to the town you've
gone through the expense of field delting the wetlands correct but you're not submitting for an Ali at all that's correct I have to space doesn't seem appliable talking about giv property Town own it's just clearly
not applic situation the Township's only only one what explicit Bel would be required if we decided to grant because is it a waiver is it a sign waiver is it a variance I
assume yeah that's a good question I'm 29 296 is in the Land Development in the Land Development I'm not sure if it's zoning if it's a a variance or a lab I mean it's so it's so we're suggesting that the rules
are still apply it's more a request to defer at subject to the time of development whenever that is that those but still need to request the Rel and prevent the provide the testimony related to no I understand they have to
R now request variance and all of that but I'm hearing the impact of a decision the not NE time that's how I'm hearing I wanted to hear J on it because
yeah I just don't if we approve it and you technically needed a variance because it is under 296 under on Land Development I don't want things to get mued up yeah no I appreciate that put it very un technically however we need to whatever we need to call it and
we catch all in in our notice anyway you want to take a break from me yeah let's just can yeah yeah take a five minute break perfect okay we're back in session folks yes go ahead yes all right so just for for the record I think we've
resolved the issue I would like um our board engineer to State the understanding that just asked Mr Santa to confirm on the record that he's in agreement and then we'll proceed so go ahead
so um what what I would propose uh is that the mayor mayor can I may mayor you can talk all you want
wa so um the what I would propose is the that the board Grant the relief on the condition uh that the applicant actually submit for uh an Loi and then be allowed to record the subdivision prior to
actually receiving Loi so in essence they don't have to have the LOI in hand uh in order to record the LOI because we don't want to hold up their timing whatever whatever timing they have that way they'll be able to actually record on the condition that they provide us proof that they've submitted for the LOI and then because I can tell you from
firsthand [Music] experience the LOI actually is one of those DP uh applications that do not have a time frame or time limit flood hasard area General permits a lot of these things have 90day actually flood hasard area has a 90-day uh time limit General permits don't but I usually type
General permits and FL areas together but wetlands have no time liit if you just submit for an Loi Wetlands uh but the DP has whatever time they want and they do te some cases a year year and a half to to give you an Loi um so our our
recommendation would be that uh the app if the app is agreeable they file for the LOI prior to the recording of the perfecting of the of the subdivision and then um and then the Lo is received for for both Lots um when it's received and
then um we conservation I would and I spoke to Jeff about this uh I would recommend that the conservation eement portion be handled at the time they come in for a s plan for their portion and the township portion the conservation eement can really be up to the township whether they want to do a conservation easement on their
Wetlands um because the reason is at least from a practical standpoint if the township or the applicant on their parcel wants to do anything with regard to let's say storm water outfall or or maybe some buffer averaging or something like that uh if you have a conservation
easement that's filed on on the wetlands buffer then at that point that becomes increasingly difficult to do so I would recommend that that be handled that time if that's acceptable for that's acceptable to to the applicant
for okay okay was one comment in the environmental commission report incidentally that recommended uh that the proper to be designated for specific public Recreation uses um I think it we're not we're not
recommending anything that's really the township Township's decision again uh relative to the property what about the the issue in the report about the lsrp yeah we well you heard Mr Santa earlier say we've done phase one phase two we're not getting involved in I
don't think that's actually part of the jurisdiction here for a lot line adjustment I think the township again will look at whatever it thinks is appr appropriate prior to the conveyance of of the 55 acre parcel so you you'd be willing to share that for the partial
portion of the parel yeah we'll provide we'll provide copies that'd be great I think that's it on reports you're right we did confirm the appropriate l numbers too so and we have no other Witnesses you good I'm satisfied but I'm
happy to answer any questions board may have I I just summarized it very well thank you coun can I ask you to summarize that in the form of a motion uh I can a mo motion to approve the minor uh
subdivision uh subject to the conditions that were agreed to on the record specifically conditions in the board's engineer report dated February 7th 2025 items two a b and c items three a
through D items four A and B and then items DF um and and J K LM n o p
QR and that the relief will be conditioned on the applicant submitting for an Loi but can record the subdivision without receiving the LOI and uh they will provide copies
of phase one to environmental that's what I have for the conditions did I miss anything that's the oh the gis thank you GIS I did forget that and I even called it I'm sorry in the gis that's the motion okay before we do
anything I just want to note for the record there is nobody from the public who is here with us this evening so nobody can come up and ask questions about the testimony okay you don't count mayor he's not allowed to answer he's not allowed to speak
[Laughter] thank you yes so move second I have James making it got it chairman Mr Edward getting yes Vice chairman Miss Donna Drew yes M Robin Fu
yes Mr Scott McDade yes Mr Dennis panon yes Mr James Miller yes Mr Glenn soosi yes thank you very much everybody appreciate it thank you thank you with that we have uh we just have
one item that was noted for next time I believe the Flemington Concrete Products LLC correct we're good so with that we're Jour thank you all right thank you uh one