Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the March 4th March 9th, 2026 zoning subcommittee. Please join me in saluting the flag. I aliance to the flag of the United
States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. >> Madame clerk, >> welcome the members. Councelor Agenzio >> here, >> here. Councelor Kaggleandro
>> here. >> Here. Councelor Gino Slaya >> here. >> Here. And council Kelly >> here. >> Here. Quorum is present. First item on tonight's agenda is a zoning ordinance further amending title 17 of the revised ordinances of the city of Rebear relative to special
permits. Anyone here in favor? Anyone? Okay. Closing that side. Anyone here against? Okay. City councilors. Okay. Would would you like to take a roll call as amended? >> No.
>> Councelor. >> Yeah, Mr. President. So, um I think we talked about it during the council meeting and uh um
I'm in favor of uh keeping the uh keeping the uh giving control to the city council. over the uh uh one and two families in the um
NB district. Uh I'm h I'm having a little trouble here. Give me give me a second to to sort this out. I I want to >> That's good, Mark. That's that's that's real good. Uh
Yes, council Kelly. >> Um, this might be for Tom. Um, so I understand the changes here. The issue that you brought up was the zones that are located within that the
MBTA communities law will cover and we can't make any changes with those because of the obligations we have to meet regarding minimum criteria and all that. Is there any way to change or amend this so that those zones are taken out and we
just apply it to the other the RA whatever else. >> Um >> but my brain is functioning again. So when she's finished off >> okay >> so that would be my only question. Thank you. So, so uh section six and seven
obviously >> councel hold on let let's see if Tom has any answer for >> I suspect my my thoughts would be aligned with the now awoken thoughts of uh councelor Zambo. >> Thank you very much. >> Okay, Council Zamutoo.
>> Okay, so uh you know we keep this gives special permanent uh powers to the city council. Uh and and I know there's been some talk that uh some people think that would overburden the council and there would be too much. Uh but I looked at
this and over the last four years we're talking about an average of five special permits. Now I for one uh have been telling my constituents for years I have no control over that. That's a ZBA issue and I want to have
that control and I want to be held responsible. So, um, my hope is that we will keep section six and seven, uh, and give the powers back, in essence, back to the city council that used to have
it. And, um, it might be taken a little bit away from the ZBA, but I think it's our responsibility to be accountable. I'm not looking to have a you know this this was designed for uh um you know neighborhood businesses like a
convenience store not a not an apartment building and and and uh this is this is kind of why I I think the city council needs to have this control and that's why what I'm looking to do. Of course, you know, my original thing was to take
control of all of it and then uh there's a little thing like the MBTA law that got in my way. So, uh but uh I think this is good for us and and that's why I'm advocating for it. Thank you. >> Thank you, councelor.
Council Kelly, did that help alleviate the question or >> I I think I know I I might be able to fill in some gaps on the question you had, which was I think the one area where we could change a Y in the use table to an SP and still be compliant
with MTA communities would be in the neighborhood business districts, which is also what um Council Zamutoa was was alluding to somewhat there. Councelor Jenzio, >> Council Kandro. >> So, just for clarification, we are
modifying this by removing sections one through five. We're and we're going to keep six and seven. Just want to make sure that um that's what we're changing here. >> If I may, councelor did submit this to
you today, but read it into the record. It's up to >> It's up to the chairman >> and uh councelor Zambudo did submit um some proposed amendments earlier today. Um, it was just sent to the chairman. If
it's the will of the committee, the city clerk could read them into the into the record if you'd like, >> please. >> Councelor Zambudo, this afternoon, early this afternoon, had submitted the proposed changes to councelor Sylvester,
chairman Sylvester, as follows. Um section council Zambo is proposing to keep section one. This speaks to the residential uses within the NB district. The NB district was not included in the
calculations for the MBTA MBTA communities act. So by changing yes to special permit for the NB district that would not and and give that power to the city council uh that would not affect the NBTA communities act. Council Zamutoo
proposes to strike sections two and three in whole as that would knock the city out of compliance with the MBTA Communities Act. Proposed amendment to section four.
you would have to remove the reference for just NB only and not GB. So the new proposed section 4 would read section 17.16.060 town houses in the RB RB1, CB and LI districts is hereby amended by deleting
RC, RC1, RC2, RC3, NB and GB and inserting in place thereof the RC districts and just GB. Section five would be amended as follows. So the city can maintain by zoning within the GB district.
So you would delete RB, RB1, CB and LI and inserting in place thereof RB, RB1, CB, LI and NB. And council Zambo proposed to keep section six and seven
as proposed. that speaks to one and two family non-conforming structures. So, if I'm understanding this correctly, one and two family non-conforming structures,
any modifications to those structures would be perview from now on by special permit of the city council. Is that correct? If this were adopted >> right now, non-conforming one and two families
under the current zoning ordinances go to the zoning board of appeals. This would take this and this these proposed amendments that which was advertised that would be for the city council would have that power
>> special permit power for one and two families. So, all non-conforming structures would now go to the city council if the city council were to approve this zoning. >> Very good. Thank you, >> Councelor Aenzio. >> Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh to you, Mr.
Saroski. Uh there seems to be some confusion. I I understand the neighborhood business. Is the one and two family nonconforming part of your calculation or is it not? I I think those were just two separate
but linked amendments that councelor Zambudo had made. Um so the amendments respective to the ones and the twos I think is across districts not necessarily particular to zones. Um I
would say the planning board voted to keep things as is. I would be remiss if I noticed didn't note that and I I would note I'm as I did in the record not necessarily in favor of that second um proposal although I understand the intent behind it.
>> Okay. So not being in favor of it and running a foul of the MBTA two different things. >> We would not be running a foul of MBTA communities. >> Okay. Thank you very much. >> Thank you councelor. Any other counselors?
Council Gos. >> Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I just have a um a question. And I don't know if anybody um council Zambudo President um if you have the answer to this, but since the um special permit decision is quasi judicial under the um
Massachusetts zoning law, has the solicitor advised whether shifting the authority to the city council changes the legal exposure or procedural requirements um of the council for the council. So, is does it
change anything? Could we could we be exposed to lawsuits? >> I I no more than the zoning board of appeals is exposed to lawsuits. Should we wait for that? just simply we're just
simply we are just simply taking back what used to be the power of the city council to control zoning and and uh you know the zoning board of appeal is to is to uh circumvent these laws and so I'm
just saying that I it's my opinion that we should be controlling this and not the ZBA and there's not a lot of them we're talking about you know in in the the non-conforming realm, we're talking five a year probably, uh, which has been
the consistent average over the last five years, I believe. So, uh, it's it's just a way of having a little more control in the city council and being a little more responsible when, in my case, my constituents come to me and
say, "What the hell are you doing?" and I say, "Well, that was a ZBA issue." Now, I can't say that anymore if we if the council, you know, finds it uh a good idea like like I think it is. Unfortunately, I don't have a vote in
this committee. Uh so, I can only uh tell you how I feel. Uh uh I think it's important and I've put a lot of thought into it and thought that it would make us better here and uh so that's why I'm for it. Thank you.
Thank you, council. Council Gw. >> Thank you. >> Okay. Any other councils? Take a roll call. >> Chairman, you need to take up the amendments first. >> Okay. So,
separate >> the amendments each amendment separately. >> No, I'm asking. It's the will of the committee, but the amendments as proposed by council Zamutoo could be taken up altogether. It
would be it's but it's up to the committee. >> We we'll do it all together. Yeah. >> On the amendments as proposed by council president Zambudo, councelor Aenzio. >> Yes. >> Yes. Councelor Kogandro.
>> Yes. >> Yes. Council goa. >> Yes. >> Yes. Councelor Kelly. >> Yes. >> Yes. and Chairman Sylvester. >> Yes. >> Yes. The amendments have been approved. >> Okay. And madame clerk, if we can roll call the ordinance as amended, please.
>> On the ordinance as amended, councelor Aenzio. >> Yes. >> Yes. Councelor Cogleandro. >> Yes. >> Yes. Councelor Gino SA. >> Yes. >> Yes. Councelor Kelly. >> Yes. >> Yes. And Chairman Sylvestri. >> Yes. >> Yes. The ordinance as amended has received a favorable recommendation and will be forwarded to the full city
council this evening. Next on the agenda, >> next item on tonight's agenda is a special permit uh at the request of floor Gomez, 276 Malden Street, requesting a special permit to enable the appellent to modify a non-conforming structure by converting a retail flower
shop to a restaurant at 619 Broadway. Petitioner, >> name and address of the record, please. Just start that over the public hear. >> Okay. >> Can you hear me now? Good evening, Riviera city column members. I'm Aaldo Lemus aka Aussie with
Designs by Oz Architectural Engineering Design Services Solutions for the past 20 years. I'm here representing the owners of 619 Broadway, Ree F. Gomez and Carlos Sanchez for an application for a special permit in an effort to recreate
an admirable attractive building for the city of River bringing in more revenue and continued to stay in harmony with the main streets of and character of the city of River. The building is located in the intersection of Broadway and school streets where there was once a floral shop. Uh the proposed
architectural concept for the building with the plans submitted, I don't know if you guys have them in front of you. I have an easel here where I can show them if there's any more further questions. I have already uh explained this last week. Uh I'm here just to reiterate what
we talked about last week and if there's any further questions, I'm here to gladly uh answer them. Thank you. Anyone else here in favor? Okay,
council go. >> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Um, I'm concerned about the parking and the traffic impacts around that area. Um, especially on True Street and and School Street
with limited off- streetet parking. Where are the residents going to park? if I'm if we're having all kinds of people parked there for the restaurant. Um, we try we have to try to protect the neighborhood. So, what do we do? >> The parking does fall within the the the
regulations >> for adequate parking. Obviously, we probably have to maneuver the way they're going to be moving in and out. So essentially we probably would only have two parking spaces for the restaurant and the other two would be
for the resident upstairs and staff. So essentially it only be two parking spots that people would have to use in and out. >> Right. But how would it >> probably enter through school street which is not the busier street versus the Broadway which is more traffic. I'm
more concerned about School Street than I am about Broadway because School Street is where the residents park to go home. >> There is no entry through Broadway. >> So that's absolutely not not an option. The driveway, the curb cut, Yep. is on
uh School Street as it is today. Now, if we were to do a curb cut on the other side, you'd probably lose a parking spot. >> Okay? And that would have to be rellandscaped and reorganized. So, uh,
that wouldn't be feasible. >> Council setandro. >> Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Azie, thanks for coming today. >> Thank you. >> Um, I'm always in support of a business and I do understand uh councelor Goaya's concerns. I know that there's 30 seats of the capacity. Yes,
>> that includes the seven at the bar. That's a full Yes. Okay. >> So, I think the concern was and this is something ward counselors deal with is that if there's nowhere to park on Broadway, there's nowhere, you know, that that they will then park on School Street, True Street, you know, that whole area over there. So, I think that
was a concern. Um, and you know, if you guys could encourage people to use Broadway, the metered spots, and not trickle into the risk, because I own a business on a very busy road as well, and if I get a car from my school that parks on a side street, we get a phone call,
>> you know. So, um, we do everything we can to make sure that the people don't go into the neighborhood. >> We could probably accommodate some signage to say this is where we would prefer you to park. I think that would make a lot of the residents in the area happy that you guys are being good neighbors. So, um, but I I think you
answered all of our questions last week and I'm in full support of this as the ward counselor. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Thank you, counselor. Any other councils? Councelor Kelly, >> just um I might have missed it, but what were the hours of operation >> for now? They're going to be probably 11
to let's say 9 10 11 and they're probably going to change as we grow the restaurant. So, it's like like the owner said before, there's going to be entertaining small couples. There's already 30 seats. So,
they'll be serving dinner. >> All right. Thank you. >> Thank you. Thank you, counselor. >> Yeah, I was just about to ask about those. Yeah. um all the comm conditions that have been submitted. Uh are you >> Yeah, we're addressing everything that
the regulations, everything from sewage to water health, parking, >> the uh >> structures, everything. >> Okay. Grease traps, all that stuff. >> Grease trap. We could definitely work with that. Uh I definitely my opinion is
that it's overcalculated. >> I'm not sure that's up for a debate though. That's >> yeah, >> it's something we could talk about, but uh I think it's overkill in my opinion. >> Okay. Well, that's that's not something that's that that's not something that's
up for debate. This is like a condition of the city. So, it's either going to be put in >> or it's not going in. >> Okay. >> Yes. >> So then, >> absolutely. >> You just said it was up for debate. the size and the calculation because they're asking for something extremely big
>> which gets really expensive and this is a really small restaurant that would be my only argument >> otherwise would definitely have grease trap in there >> for sure >> councel >> thank you Mr. chairman um through you to to the designer. Um so I think what what
this is this is a condition that site plan review put on and what we mean that it's non-debatable here is that it's not a condition that the council placed. So there's nothing that this body can do to change the conditions that they put forward unfortunately. Although we do have to read them in and accept them as
part of the special permit we do not have the authority to change it. So your your fight would be with the with site plan. Like I said, it's my opinion, but we will put in a grease strap. Accept that condition. >> Council Zamuro.
>> Thank you. Listen, I'm in favor of your restaurant, and let me just give you a piece of advice. You're you're you're entitled to your opinion that the grease trial might be bigger than needed. Uh if you want to argue that, you can bring in a special engineer and argue that, but
it'll probably hold you up six months from getting your permit. And uh you know this is this is something that uh the wide council said very uh eloquently. We don't have any say it's in the special it's in the conditions
and if you're going to get this special permit you're going to get the grease trap that they're asking for. Now you you may even be correct that it's overkill that it's a bigger grease trap that's needed but you got to decide whether you want to >> no I want to
>> fight that fight. Is that the hill you want to dine on? >> No. >> Okay. >> Dying on any hill right now. >> I want you to succeed, but you you know I don't think >> I will succeed and we will follow the conditions that you guys put on. I mean it's not it's just my opinion again
>> and uh we will put a grease trap in. >> Great. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Thanks. So best of luck to you. >> Thank you madam clerk. As uh and as the conditions please >> the conditions as submitted by Frank Stringy city planner are as follows. One, the installation of an exterior grease trap must be approved by the
plumbing inspector. Two, the dumpsters shall be screened on all sides. Three, the building shall be brought into compliance with all building plumbing, electrical, fire safety, and health codes. Four, a sewer connection and water connection permit must be obtained from the DPW for the change of use to a
restaurant. The city engineer and DPW superintendent must review and approve the proposed source service and water service plan as well as storm water management plan. And lastly, the plans must be reviewed and approved by the fire department, license commission, and board of health.
>> Thank you. >> Shall the recommendation? >> Shall the zoning subcommittee offer available recommendation to grant the special permit? Councelor Aenzio. >> Yes. >> Yes. Council Kaggleandro. Yes. >> Yes. Council Gino SA.
>> Yes. >> Yes. Council Kelly. >> Yes. >> Yes. And Chairman Sylvester. >> Yes. >> Yes. The special department has received a favorable recommendation subject to those conditions. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. Good luck. >> Yep. Thank you very much. And next up is an application by H&J
Realy LLC 126 Morris Street River Mass requesting a special parlament to enable the appellant to reconstruct alter and extend a pre-existing non-conforming residential structure into a fourstory residential apartment structure consisting of nine units at 95 Stanton
A. Hi. Name and address, please. >> Uh, good evening, uh, chairman and city councilors. My name is Nancy O'Neal. I am an attorney located at 14 Proctor Avenue. I represent the applicant in this matter, H&J Realy LLC. And I am
joined here tonight uh, by the principal of H&J Realy, uh, Mr. Harry Patel of Morris Street. As you heard on March 2nd, this project is for the improvement of 95 Stanton Avenue, uh, which currently contains a century old apartment building, uh, which has fallen
into disrepair. Uh, you can see the current conditions of the property here. The proposal tonight is to create a new aesthetically pre pleasing structure on the lot, which will improve the appearance of this tired section of American Legion Highway.
As you can see here, uh this will be an attractive building with an improved architectural facade and new trees and landscaping. The size and scale of the building are consistent with the neighborhood as a whole. And the building has been deliberately designed uh to pull away from neighboring properties and improve setbacks to
neighbors over existing conditions. So this building will increase uh the offset with neighbors and boost the surrounding area. The building will also feature uh sufficient parking at a one:1 uh space to unit ratio. The parking area shall be screened with new trees and
vine plantings uh to enhance aesthetics. So this project represents a major improvement of the property. Since the city council meeting of March 2nd, we have been working with our architect and engineer uh to adjust the project design in response to the feedback of counselors. Uh firstly, you will replace
uh the trash enclosure previously located adjacent to the property line with an internal trash room. Uh so the trash will now be located some distance away uh from neighboring property lines. Uh and secondly, uh we have worked with uh the department of public works as to
the water and sewer needs of the neighborhood and we are happy uh to provide two new water gates on Stanton Avenue uh which will improve utility conditions along that street. Uh so in summary, this is a great project for the neighborhood that will increase aesthetics, provide new housing during the ongoing housing crisis and have
minimal impacts. Uh the directive Butters to the south at 340 American Legion Highway uh have recently submitted a letter of support for this project. Uh so this project it's supported by neighbors and it will really uh improve the stretch of American Legion Highway. My client Mr.
Patel is not a developer. He operates a familyrun small business and is a resident of W 6. So this is a project by a city of River resident that will have a positive impact on the surrounding neighborhood and revitalize this area. And for these reasons, we would respectfully request uh that the council
look favorably upon the application for special permit. And we are happy to answer any questions that you may have. Thank you. >> Thank you. Um we'll be taking a fivem minute recess. Thank you. Where were we in a roll call? >> No, we weren't. We were You were still
discussing the project. >> Okay. Uh, anyone else here in favor? name and address please. Yep. >> Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman. Jim Mccurial, Ward One City Councelor, 193 Crescent A Revier. Uh I am in favor of
this project. Uh the developer has uh met the ne infrastructure needs that the city required from them and it was a ask that I had put in for them. Um with two new Watergates being on either side of their services, which is uh much needed.
I was in uh meetings with Chris Chamelo to get this done and they did lower the number of units from 12 to three and I think the the uh I'm sorry >> nine I'm sorry 12 to 9
uh and uh uh I think it's a nice project and it fits into the neighborhood uh very nicely. Thank you. >> Thank you councelor. Anyone else here in favor? >> Hearing none, we'll close that side. Anyone here object? Anyone here against?
Seeing and hearing none. City councilors council go. >> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Um I believe this is a really good project. Um because it replaces a long neglected property that has caused a lot of issues in that neighborhood. Um, from speaking
to residents, the the trash has been thrown all over the place with all the people that are in that that building. Now, um, they have rodent issues that the neighbors next door were talking about. Um, when this project first came to me, it
was 12 units and I had them scale it down to nine with the 1:1 ratio with the parking. Um everything you you talked about um council mccur that we had discussed that during our community meeting that we had um and every concern
that residents next door um the abutters had they actually did address and say say yes to. So they had absolutely nothing bad or against the neighborhood that they were going to do. Um the property owner has also committed to
important improvements. Um and now you added the two gates including upgrading the sewer lines um replacing the surrounding sidewalks, secured the trash storage now the um interior so nobody can see it and the proactive
um rodent mitigation which was really important. U fencing landscaping and proper the one thing that I wanted was the proper con construction controls. So, make sure that none of the dust goes to any of the surrounding homes and stuff like that, whether you have to put
up plastic or whatever. Um, other than that, it's going on American Legion Highway. It's going to look phenomenal compared to what the other one looks like. Um, again, my priority was to make sure that the development um improved the
neighborhood and I wanted to make sure that the quality of life that was there for the neighbors still existed. Um, and I really appreciate all the work you put into this yourself for to make it come to this point where we're at today. Thank you so much. And
I'm in favor. Thank you. >> Thank you, counselor. Any other counselors? Council Kelly. >> Just a couple of questions. Just a couple of questions for you. Um, how many units are there now? >> Uh, there are currently three units on the property.
>> Three units. Okay. So, we're tripling the amount of units that are there. Um, I just can't get behind any projects. I This is an RA1 district. Is that correct? >> It's RB >> RB and it's only about a 4,900 foot lot. Is that correct?
>> Uh, yes. I believe so. >> Okay. So, I think the problem I have with projects like this, um, number one, it's the biggest concern I hear from my constituents is just the the ongoing building of apartments. Um, and I really do feel like they take away from the fabric of the the integrity of single
family neighborhoods. I believe we should try to keep those neighborhoods intact as much as we can. And every time we have a non-conforming structure of a single family or two family or three family and we replace it with two or three times the amount of units that are originally there. To me, that's a gross
magnification of the nonconformity. and it's why we're getting such a strain on our infrastructure, traffic, congestion, and all the other complaints that I hear on almost a daily basis from my constituents. So, I'm sorry, but I won't be able to support it. Thank you.
>> Thank you, councel. Any other councils? Okay, madame clerk roll. >> There are several conditions by site review. >> Can we read those in? >> Yes, >> there are. Yet the following conditions have been submitted by site plan review to be incorporated into the special
permit. One, the existing driveway opening along American Legion Highway shall be closed with granite curbing and continuation of the grass strip. Two, there shall be a landscape buffer and screening area planted with six foot high evergreens between the site and the abuing residential properties. Three, a
soore connection and water connection permit must be obtained from the DPW for all new construction. The city engineer and DPW superintendent must review and approved the proposed sewer service and water service plan as well as storm water management plan. Four, the plans must be reviewed and approved by the
fire department. Five, hydrant flow tests shall be conducted to determine the adequacy of both domestic and fire flow for the proper sizing of domestic and fireflow service lines to the proposed project. Plans for the location of additional hydrants shall be approved by the River Fire Department. Six, the
project proponent must pay a swore mitigation fee, which is based on 10 times 110 gallons per bedroom times $130 per gallon. Based on the increase of 14 proposed bedrooms, the soore mitigation fee shall be $20,20.
The soore mitigation fee shall be utilized to remove inflow and infiltration from entering the soar system and shall be paid to the city of River into installments 50% prior to the issuance of a building permit and 50% prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. Seven concrete sidewalks with granite
curbing shall be installed along the full frontage of the property along American Legion Highway in Stanton A, including the planting of five street trees along the American Legion Highway frontage within the existing grass strip and two street trees shall be planted within the sidewalk along Stanton Avenue
frontage. Eight, all existing drains, water lines, and sewer lines within the site shall be abandoned and shall be kept at the main and removed. Nine, the building design and materials plan as well as the landscaping streetscape plan shall be approved by the site plan review committee. The exterior building
material along the ground floor and garage area shall be cultured stone, including a raised 3-in cultured stone planter with evergreen shrubs along the American Legion Highway face of the building between the garage and the sidewalk. 10. The developer shall establish a transportation demand
management plan program for the proposed project. The elements of the TDM program shall include an off- streetet park. Off- streetet parking shall be limited by leaseold agreements with tenants to the number of off- streetet parking spaces approved by the project. The leaseold agreements with tenants shall
state that the parking charge will be included in the apartment lease. The project shall provide for bicycle parking in the garage at no additional charge to the tenants and the tenants of the building shall not be eligible for resident or visitor on street permit
parking program. And lastly, number 11. In accordance with chapter 1747, the community improvement trust fund is applicable to this project. Under the community improvement trust fund, the developer must contribute 3% of the cost of construction above and beyond what is
allowed as of right towards the fund, which must be spent exclusively towards capital improvement projects within the impacted area. For the purpose of this special permit, 3% of the construction cost shall be based on the increased density of the project as a result of the increased FR five. Therefore, the
community improvement trust fund fee is calculated at $55,818. >> Thank you, madam clerk. And um I think it's important to to read into um to read this in to the council and to the people at home to know that the uh
direct abutters to this project um are in agreement with it. Um and it says uh my husband and I are the owners of 340 American Legion Highway and are the directors to this proposed project at 95 Stanton Avenue. We support this project
as the new building will improve the neighborhood and feature larger setbacks to our property in which the existing buildings ab absolutely additionally does not do. Additionally, we believe that the project will beautify the American Legion highway area and we
thank you for your consideration and your support. Thank you Adisa and Aliyah Kadika. Um, if we could have a roll call. >> Shall the zoning subcommittee offer a favorable recommendation to grant the relief requested subject to the conditions that were read into the
record? Councelor Aenzio, >> yes. >> Yes. Councelor Cogleandro, >> yes. >> Yes. Councelor Gino Slaya, >> yes. >> Yes. Councelor Kelly, >> no. No. Coun. And Chairman Sylvester, >> yes. >> Yes. The special permit has received a favorable recommendation for the full city council this evening. There's no
further business. That closes tonight's business.journed. Good evening. Welcome to the March 9th Ways and Means Subcommittee. Please rise to salute the flag. >> I pledge allegiance to the flag of the
United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Roll call of the members. Councelor Arenzio >> here. >> Here. Councelor Mccurio.
>> Roll call >> here. >> Here. Councelor McKenna >> here. >> Here. And Council Noelski >> here. >> And oh, I'm sorry. And Chairman Kagglandro >> here. >> Here. Quorum is present. We have one item on tonight's agenda and that's an
ordinance further amending appendix A, the table of fees, the revised ordinances of the city of River. >> Mr. Visque. >> Good evening, council. Richard Visqueke, CFO 2 Broadway. um hit or answer any questions on the uh
fee schedule that you have been provided previous um council meeting. So happy to answer any questions if anyone has any. Thank you very much. >> Thank you, Mr. Visque. Any counselors have questions about the new fee schedule? Anyone else in the audience have
questions about it? to send a favorable recommendation. All in favor? All opposed? >> So ordered. There is no further business. Meeting is adjourned. Thank you.