Welcome to the zoning subcommittee of the Revier City Council for June 2nd, 2025. All rise and salute the flag, please. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation
under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Roll call of the members. Councelor Aenzio here. Here. Councelor Go SA here. Here. Councelor Jammo absent. Councelor Noasilski
here. And chairman Zambudo here. here. A quorum is present. First item on tonight's agenda, special permit application of New York Capital Investment Group, LLC, 500 Turnpike Street, Cantoned, Mass, requesting a special permit for a car wash use at 350
Squire Road. Mr. Attorney, good afternoon, subcommittee. My name is attorney Jerry Damrosio and I'm located at 14 Proctor Avenue. Uh this is the subcommittee hearing for my client's
special permit regarding 350 Squire Road. Um at the public hearing two weeks ago, I believe we provided uh a pretty good detailed uh understanding of the plans. Uh I I think it's safe to say that uh
I've also detailed uh our position as well as further evidence in our May 14th, 2025 letter to the city council, which again I incorporate herein by reference. Um as that letter lays out the legal legal position, the legal
standards and the facts as they apply to those standards as well as all of the exhibits. Um, I often do that as a as a an extra submission, if you will, because I I want to put you all to bed before before uh it's time for bed at night, but it's
also a very important part of any subsequent litigatory uh proceeding. That's why I do it. It's it's actually not to overbill my client who's sitting here, but I it's it's a it's it's it's very important that uh it's very important that the the record of these
proceedings include that evidence so that if there is any kind of appeal uh that a a sitting land court or superior court judge could see what was before the board. So, that's why I submit it. That being said, I I I believe this parcel, everybody knows it. It's a current blight uh on Squire Road. It's
been a blight for nearly 10 years. Um there's been a number of other projects uh including a large-scale housing uh project that was proposed there that didn't go forward. Uh I've represented the owners of that property as well as the current uh uh proponents before you.
Uh we do believe that the car wash proposal is an excellent one. It is one that uh uh really uh uh enhances the property with a modern state-of-the-art building that uses all brand new uh code
compliant uh car wash features as well as business features uh structural features. Um, I also think that the uh property uh the the the the new project itself in terms of congestion and traffic is much better than some of the
other uses that are allowed by either right or special permit along Squire Road. It by far as a matter of science and the traffic studies show that it brings almost the least amount of traffic for most of the common uses. Uh, and then when you add in that it's
usually closed on average 90 days a year, uh, that really does help even more. And, and why do I say it's closed 90 days a year? Because no one gets their car washed on a snowy day in New England. No one gets their car washed on a rainy day in New England. No one gets their car wash on a severely cloudy day
in New England. So, uh, it is indeed a a minimal uh, impactful use uh, for this issue, for this area. Um, I think what's also important here is that this proposal before you was not the
first proposal that came out. We had a number of community meetings uh in that area. Uh, and we had nearly two dozen neighbors show up early on and because of their input, we actually reconfigured the entire project um, in terms of size,
where it was positioned and how it was positioned. So the plans before you are not something that we initially submitted. They were plans that were the byproduct of at least two community meetings uh with the neighbors as well as a number of other individual meetings. As a result of that, this
project garnered 10 letters of support from the neighbors. 10 I believe a number of people actually spoke in favor of it last time as well. I don't believe they're here tonight, but they've submitted letters. Uh I think uh we had a we we we had one opponent last time um
and even that opponent has now withdrawn uh his objection and submitted a letter of support and that was uh entered into the record today and I believe you all have that. Uh and I think the reason for that was because of the collaboration between the community between my client
uh and uh uh as well as uh the the city council and members of the city council. Uh one other point I want to bring up uh tax the the amount of property tax that the city of River is going to recoup is going to jump significantly. Is it
twice? Is it three times? Is it four times? It's going to depend on how the city calculates it. We know that this is a a $3 million construction project plus the cost of the property and it's going to provide more property taxes to the city of River. An important point and
then finally uh one thing that I didn't bring up at the last meeting but I think is very important that I bring up uh the owners of this car wash near N and Ron and Drury and Ne is here sitting to my left in the back. They are well-known
brothers. They live uh uh not too far from River. They own 25 approximately 25 of these uh facilities throughout the state. I've known them for quite a while. I've done other work for them and they are uh standup guys. Um they are
not just going to show up here today uh and and disappear. They they are going to be involved in this community. Um and in terms of community involvement, they want to make it clear that they are going to provide uh uh uh you know free
services uh to local public safety uh apparatus for the city of River. So if you uh have situations where you have a bad storm and there's salt and ice that's corroding fire trucks, um they're going to be there to help clean those fire trucks. They're not disappearing.
Uh if a little league needs support, they're going to be there for the little league. uh if any other charitable organization in the city needs help, they will be there. They will be there because they have a number of these facilities. And in addition to that, they live nearby. So, they're not going to disappear. They're not going to
simply open up a car wash or two or three and never be around again in the city. They're going to be very involved. Uh that that that being said, I'm here to answer question the uh project engineers here, but I'll I'll leave it to uh the chairman. Thank you. Uh, I'm
going to I'm going to open this up to counselors. No, no, no. Yes, we're going to read the conditions, please. Splay review committee has submitted several conditions to for the special permit if approved. One, there
shall be no vehicular access or egress provided from Keaney and Augustus streets. The landscape and buffer plan shall include the installation of an 8- foot high stockade fence and the planting of 34 evergreens along the rear of the property between the abuing residential properties and the project
site. The landscape plan shall be in compliance with the landscaping plan filed with the special permit and dated April 15, 24. Three, there shall be there shall not be any illuminated or digital signage allowed within the site. Four, a street and sidewalk bond must be
placed on file with the DPW to secure performance for the installation of utilities. Construction of concrete sidewalks and granite curbing. Construction of driveways, construction of retaining walls, if applicable, and landscaping. Five, a sore connection and water connection permit must be obtained
from the DPW. The city engineer and DPW superintendent must review and approve the proposed sore and sore service and water service plan as well as a storm water management plan. Six, the plans must be reviewed and approved by the fire department. Seven, the project proponent must pay a sore mitigation
fee, which is based on 10 times the number of GPD of water use times $1.30 per gallon. The soore mitigation fee shall be utilized to remove inflow and infiltration from entering the soore system and shall be paid to the city of
River in two installments 50% prior to the issuance of the building permit and 50% prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. Eight concrete sidewalks with granite curbing shall be installed along the full frontage of the property on Key Street and Augustus Street, including the planting of two
deciduous trees at the back of the sidewalk on each street. Nine, all existing drains, water lines, and sewer lines within the site shall to be abandoned shall be abandoned and capped at the main and removed. 10, the building design and materials plan as
well as the landscaping and streetscape plan shall be approved by the site plan review committee. 11. The site lighting scheme within the site and all lights within the parking areas that may impact abuing residential properties. shall provide screens, deflectors, and/or soft
or directional lighting to minimize light being reflected on a budding residential properties. 12. A trafficked impact analysis shall be prepared for the proposed development and the developer shall be responsible for undertaking all pedestrian traffic safety measures recommended in the
traffic study. 13. All landscaped and open space areas to be maintained by the owner of the property. The annual landscape maintenance program shall include the replacement of all trees and shrubs which may be damaged within the project site, weed control, mulching, grass cutting, watering, and
fertilizing. The owner of the property shall be responsible for the removal of all litter and debris within the project site. 14. In accordance with chapter 1747 of the reair revised ordinances, the capital improvement trust fund is applicable to this project. Under the
community improvement trust fund, the developer must contribute 3% of the cost of construction above and beyond what is allowed as of right towards the fund, which must much must be spent exclusively towards capital improvement projects within the impacted area. 15. Irrigation systems shall be installed
for all landscaped areas within the project site. And lastly, the project site shall be subject to the completion of an environmental assessment. We have a member that just showed up and I want to give him a chance if he wants to weigh in on this car wash. It's okay.
I think I've seen I've seen it all. Thank you. See nothing. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Yes, sir. Well, Madame Clerk, you want to uh get the will to the council? So, uh, I I need a committee member to make a motion here. I'll make a motion
to send this to the council for with a favorable recommendation. That's on the floor. Shall the zoning subcommittee offer a favorable recommendation to the full city council to grant the relief requested subject to those conditions? Councelor Arenzio. Yes. Yes. Councelor
Go SA. Yes. Yes. Councelor Haramo. Yes. Yes. Council Novaski. Yes. Yes. And Chairman Zimbabuto is recused. The special permit has received a favorable recommendation will be forwarded to the full city council this evening. Thank you all. Thank you. Good night.
Next application is 250 Liber Bank Highway LLC, 20 Railroad Street, Revier, Mass, requesting a special permit from the River City Council to enable the appellant to reconstruct the existing building with a new two-story commercial structure with a total of 26 parking
spaces at 250 Leebank Highway. Attorney Lynch. Yes. Good afternoon, uh, Mr. Chairman. Uh, pleasure to be here and through you to the members. Uh, for the record, my name is Richard Lind. I'm an attorney with a business address at 245 Sumar Street in East Boston on behalf of Lee Burbank Highway LLC. The
petitioner right who is a project architect. Mr. Chairman, I have a very brief uh PowerPoint to include for the edification of the members of the subcommittee. Uh and as uh the clerk is bringing that up. I just will give a brief overview of what that uh what our project entails. So, as the clerk had
indicated, uh we are proposing a reconstruction of existing commercial building located at 250 Lee Burbank Highway. Uh it presently sits on an approximately 23,000 foot site. There's an existing building on the site presently uh which sits at about two stories that's used for a combination of
office and warehousing and storage. Our proposal would reconstruct this building entirely. It is uh quite old uh and requires a significant amount of improvement uh and in doing so we would replace that in kind uh with a two-story commercial building for office space. uh
that would be used uh or continue to be used to house offices and operations center for capital waste. Uh Capital Waste maintains over 150 employees, many who do reside here in the city of River. Uh it has operated at this site for many years and will continue its operations at that location. If we can jump down to
slide three or actually let's go to slide four um just to give the members a little bit of orientation of the site as where it's located. So this is located in the TEED uh zoning subd district. Uh it is as the members are probably well aware pretty industrial area surrounded
by Mullen Highway uh River Beach Parkway uh as well as um other industrial uses as well as the railroad. Um our site is located where we've identified that square uh that is the existing two-story structure that will be uh entirely
demolished and rebuilt. Uh in order to do that, as evidenced by the site plan review letter, uh we do require a special permit from the council under section 17 uh I believe it's 0.4 030 for reconstruction of non-conforming structures. Uh, as the chair and the
members are aware, in order for the council to grant a special permit, it's our obligation to demonstrate that the uh or the the council's requirement to make a determination that the reconstruction of this building uh would not be more substantially detrimental
than existing non-conforming structure uh to the neighborhood. I would point out just for purposes of the record to make it clear uh there are several non-existing non-conformities with respect to this particular site. First uh is the lot size. In the TED district,
25,000 ft is the minimum required. Uh we have 22,683 ft. We're proposing to make no change with respect to the size of this lot and therefore uh the size will remain the same. Uh with respect to open space, currently there's no open space on the site as defined by the River
ordinance. Uh the 15% requirement cannot be achieved through this project. However, we will improve that condition from 0% up to 10%. So, uh, just for clarification, the, uh, current condition of no open spaces, the allowed nonconformity, we are actually improving
that condition by increasing about 10%. With respect to the front yard, uh, we're currently at 20'6 in uh, with uh, 50 ft being required. Uh, under our original plan that we submitted, we do indicate that uh, there is no change to that front setback. However, again, as
the chair and I'm sure the members of the committee are aware, um any increase in existing nonconformity or the creation of any new nonconformity requires only a special permit under the section that we've cited um and as cited in the site plan review letter. Uh and therefore, we do have an option to and
certainly subject to uh the subcommittee's uh discretion to provide an architectural overhang. I explain that in a moment when we get to the elevation, but uh that might be the only item that we're actually increasing with respect to the non-existing nonconformity. With respect to the rear
yard, 50 ft is required. I'm sure as the subcommittee is aware, uh we are at a current condition of 21 ft 1 inch. We're not changing any of that. So that will remain uh as the existing non-conformity. Uh I would point out that we do uh include or incorporate a total of 26 parking spaces that do not
presently exist on the site. uh although the non-conforming condition presently exists that would be improved uh and certainly to a compliant level in the TEED district. Uh so that's just a quick overview of the uh particular items that we need to address with respect to the special perm. We can jump down uh
perhaps to slide uh can jump through these very quickly. Uh slide five. Yeah, I would see some street views here just to orient uh the members of the subcommittee of the existing structure. As you can see, it's pretty non-escript. Uh and we would be uh proposing to demolish that in its entirety. We can
probably flip through those very quickly until we get down to uh let's say maybe slide 11, madame clerk. Okay. So, our existing conditions plan uh shows uh existing site along with the uh
structure that is located on the site. Uh and then our proposed changes that we would be including on slide 12 would incorporate uh the parking spaces. If we can jump down to that as well. Slide 12.
Yeah, I think that we had one that had I think there was one right after that that actually had Yeah, that's that would be it right there. Yeah. So, that's the proposed condition. Uh so, we show the orientation of the parking on the site. uh access will still be off of Lee
Burbank Highway. So, there's an existing curb cut uh on site presently. I do not believe we're intending to modify that, although we will look into that and perhaps that may require some additional uh conversations with Department of Transportation with respect to any alterations of that curb cut. Uh if we
go down to the next slide, uh actually let's go down to um probably go to slide 16 to show the floor plans. Uh next one after that. Yeah. Yeah. I think further down. Here
we go. Um so as we can see um the reprogramming of the entire space uh includes a number of uh just divisions of offices and some open uh conference space in the main level. Uh we do again intend to use this for the operations
for capital waste and that is an existing uh use and current condition uh presently. Uh jump down to slide 17. We can look at the elevations. Uh we have our first uh iteration. This is uh the first one is the one before I believe. So I had mentioned earlier that
our first pass at this uh did not incorporate an overhang. Uh the overhang would be towards the front of the building. I can let Mr. Zacherson talk a little bit about the thought process in adding the overhang for some architectural details. So Eric, if you can Sure. There's that. In this in this
version, we were um uh the second floor extended out just a few inches. Kind of a an architectural detail. And as we were going through this uh the um idea came across that perhaps the front should be pulled forward a few more feet
so that it be becomes the um rain coverage you know so that as people are entering the building water isn't uh entering into the um through the doors and that the the space in front of it is is kind of comfortable for people to gather themselves as they as they come
into the space. So I think we illustrate that in the second next slide. This Yeah, the sec next slide shows the um overhang on the front and we removed any uh overhang off of the rear of the building so that we maintain that 21
foot one at the rear. Go to the You can go to the rendering. Oh, and then the next slide should be the rendering. Yes. And so this is the uh the intent on that first floor. We've got um uh the the main entrance lobby, a small conference room and a call center facing
the street and and beyond that offices and conference rooms and on the second floor more offices and conference room space. Um so that is the last slide. I will suggest to the uh subcommittee that um because the use that we're proposing
isn't allowed use in the TEED district. This is merely a reconstruction, an update of a building that's previously existed this site. Uh we do not intend to create what I would suggest is any uh further uh nonconformity on this site that is detrimental to uh the
surrounding context. Again, as this uh subcommittee is well aware, this is a pretty industrial area and the use here is quite consistent with the types of uses that the city of River anticipates or intends for this location. uh and therefore we believe that the standards for a special permit can be met easily
with respect to this proposal and is actually a benefit uh to the city ultimately to allow for this type of use. Uh with that, Mr. Chairman, I'm happy to answer any questions or address any comments of the members of the subcommittee. Thank you. Any committee members?
Wow, this is this is an easy night here, huh? Please read the conditions. Site plan review has submitted a few conditions for the special permit. One, site demolition and cleanup shall include removal of all dumpsters, storage, and waste containers from the site. Two, a
sore connection and water connection permit must be obtained from the DPW for all new construction. The city engineer and DPW superintendent must review and approve the proposed sore service and water service plan as well as the storm water management plan. Three, the final plans must be reviewed and approved by
the fire department. Four, all existing drains, water, and sewer lines within the site to be abandoned and shall be capped at the main and removed. And five, the building design and materials plan as well as the landscaping, streetscape, and parking layout plan shall be approved by the site plan
review committee. So, what's the will of the committee to move forward? I'd like to put in a motion to to move it to the council right for Thank you. favorable recommendation. Thank you, madame clerk. Shall the zoning subcommittee offer a favorable
recommendation to the city council to grant the relief requested subject to those conditions? Councelor Aenzio, yes. Yes. Councelor Gino Saya, yes. Yes. Councelor Jammo, yes. Yes. Councel Novaski. Yes. Yes. And councelor Zambo. Yes. Yes. The special permit has
received a favorable recommendation uh and will be forward to the full city council this evening. Thank you very much for your time. Appreciate it. Thank you. Next special permit request is that of Natalyia Maria Katano Gomez, 85 Arlington Street, River, Mass, requesting a special permit for a class
2 auto sales use at 195 American Legion Highway. Attorney Simeon. Good evening, Mr. Chairman. Good evening, Mr. Chairman, members of the board. My name is attorney Larry Simeone. I have a law office at 300
Broadway, Massachusetts. I presently represent my client Natalya Maria Cosmo Gomez. She is a resident of 85 Arlington Street, apartment number two in River, Massachusetts. She has uh attained uh
she's looking to attain a special permit in order for her to get a class two license and then go to the com commission. The property is currently 190 AH realy LLC. Um and the resident
agent is Vincent Aranti. The particular address is 195 American Legion Highway, Riviera, Massachusetts. The prior class 2 owner was a a company called Millennium Motors. They operate the used car facility there for approximately
three years and subsequently Millennium allowed that used car license to lapse sometime in February 28th, 2005, leaving no class 2 license on the premises. The property in accordance with the the city of Rivier's assessor's office is in the
IP district and the district is this particular property is approximately 1.801 acres. Given the lapse of the license by Millennium, my client must seek prior to filing an application for secondhand
license uses for the with the city's licensing commission a special permit in accordance with the use regulations of the city of Riviera zoning law. At that point, we've already discussed with you. I'd ask you if you have any questions. My client is here and I'll be glad to
answer any questions. Thank you. Any committee members? Oh, we have we have the ward counselor here. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Good evening. Anthony Carlandro, 105 Newman Street.
Uh, this is a no-brainer. Uh, I've spoken with attorney Simeone. Uh, this new owner promises they won't let this license lapse this time. Uh, this is just paperwork at this point. It's the same business at the same location, same use. I've also spoken with Mr. Ki, the
the property owner, and he's fully on board as well, and so am I. Thank you. Thank you for your input. Motion for a favorable recommendations. If you'll read the conditions, please, madame clerk. Site plan review has issued a couple of
conditions for this special permit. One, the class 2 license shall be subject to the review and approval of the license commission and shall not exceed the sale of 20 vehicles on the site. Two, the parking layout plan shall be reviewed and approved by the fire department and site plane review committee. And three, no vehicles shall be parked in a manner
which will encro encroach with any travel aisle or site entrance or exit. Any problem with those conditions? No, no problems. Okay. So for a favorable recommendation with the conditions. Here we go.
Roll call. Shall the zoning subcommittee offer a favorable recommendation to grant the relief requested subject to those conditions to the full city council? Councelor Aenzio. Yes. Yes. Councelor Gino SA. Yes. Yes. Councelor Haramio. Yes. Yes. Council Novaski. Yes.
Yes. And Chairman Zambo. Yes. Yes. The special permit has received a favorable recommendation for the council this evening. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you. Next up are the uh zoning ordinances in zoning subcommittee. Um a zoning ordinance further amending the rea revised ordinances relative to off-
streetet parking. Councelor Kelly. Good evening. Um, this is my motion and basically what this motion is doing is taking away the authority of the zoning board of appeals to grant parking variances and requiring
that parking variance that reductions in parking that are laid out in our zoning code would then be under the jurisdiction or purview or authority under the city council and require a special permit instead. Um, I
think at least what I hear, the most common complaint regarding street congestion, off- streetet parking, not enough parking, um, is really becoming a problem in the city. At least that's what I've been hearing from residents and I experience it myself. So I think
that these decisions should be more would be more proper to be made by a body such as the city council whereas we we are elected officials and we answer directly to the people. Um the zoning board of appeals are made up of members that are appointed. So I would like to
make this change. I know that um in doing a little bit of research there were 51 parking variances granted over the last four years. Um to me that does seem excessive. Um and again I think we should give this more careful
consideration and it should be under the purview of a body that um consists of elected officials. Thank you. Thank you councelor. Any members? Councelor Arenio. Thank you Mr.
Chairman. So, I understand the intent of uh councelor Kelly, but I feel as though we have a zoning board of appeals for a reason. And the reason we have a zoning board of appeals is to make uh decisions non-political. So, I've my experience
with the zoning board of appeals has been positive. So, I don't feel that this is something that, you know, should be under the purview of the city council. We have a zoning board of appeals. They're qualified individuals and I'm comfortable leaving it with
them. Thank you. Thank you, councelor. Councelor Gino Slaya. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I agree with my um fellow counselor, M. Paul Aenzio because
we we choose these people as as the council. We have the final say on whether they get to be on that committee or not. So we should have the faith in them to do their job. Now my question is
council Kelly had mentioned 51 were granted. How many actually came up in front of the committee in the four years? 250 300 400. I I need that number in order to make a decision for
something like that when only 51 were granted in four years. It's not that excessive. Thank you. Thank you, councelor. Councelor Novasowski. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, uh I tend to agree with my colleagues. I feel comfortable with the zoning board
of appeals handling this. Um I know there was an attempt to make zoning of board of appeals an elected position which we all shot down. And uh I you know I feel comfortable with the way it is now. And also when you go with parking, you know, if it's only the
parking, one specific item for parking, I don't believe any of those that were approved were just for parking. They were for a big project. So, uh, you know, I I feel comfortable with the zoning keeping it. Thank you.
Any other uh committee members have any input on this? No. Okay. Uh, we have couple of options. We could leave this in committee for further discussion or we could vote this out tonight. It's up to the committee.
I'm going to Yeah. You want to make them You want to make a motion to vote? Make a motion that we uh take a vote on it. Okay. Madam clerk. Well, isn't isn't it worded for favorable? And then we say yes or no.
Shall the zoning subcommittee offer a favorable recommendation to the city council to approve the zoning ordinance? Councelor Aenzio, no. No. Councelor Goaya, no. No. Councelor Jammo, no. No.
Council Noelski, no. No. And Chairman Zambudo, no. No. This uh this I'm sorry, excuse me. The zoning ordinance has not received a favorable recommendation. Next up, next item is a zoning ordinance for the amending title 17 of the revised ordinances of the city of River
establishing a definition and use for food trucks. Mr. Director, I don't know if that's your title, though. What is your title? Technically, I guess chief of planning, community development. So, Mr. Chief, please. Thank you. Um well, I I feel
like I spoke enough um the the previous public hearing about this item. Um I know at the last meeting there was a request um to delineate the various locations that are being called out here as um locations where food trucks would
be permissible. Um I believe um Clarence Zerillo had done so and and passed out maps to all of you. So hopefully you can identify those districts. Again, it was RC2, PDD1, the HB, and the TED districts are the four that are proposed to be uh
an allowed use. Um, you know, we're certainly open to suggestion and and discussion here, but we thought that would be a helpful starting point. Mr. Chairman, if if
um Chief Scorski could um kindly repeat those districts, the ones that you had suggest, the ones you just said, if you can just repeat. Sure. PDD1, which is SuffK Downs, HB, um the TED district,
and RC2. RC2. Where am I? Where's our RC2 is right along the beach. Got it. And there's a couple HB. Is that right? There are quite quite a few kind of
scattered throughout. Okay. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Councelor Garina Sa. Thank you, Tom. Quick question. Is there anything around um along Squire Road near um the mobile
gas station being planned or anything in that area of Ward 6? So certainly on on the northern end of of Squire Road would be the HB district. The other side is GB. Um so yes and I I believe councelor
Kaggleandro had brought up the SIO site. That would be one of of many throughout that area where this would be eligible. Were they talking about stop and shop? Um, stop and shop would I'm asking because a constituent called and asked that question.
I I believe Yeah, stop and shop would be eligible. Okay. I'm not sure if the property owner would do that in a grocery store, but it's possible. Thank you, Councelor Aenzio. Thank you, Mr. Skrosski. Uh, and Mr. Chairman, um, the
process to apply for a license. Could you just run through that um, through the license commission? Yes. If Miss Inerillo is here, I'd prefer her answer that question. Oh, I would have too. I didn't see
Maggie in the room. Maggie would answer that much more effectively than myself. Um, the process would be a lot like most other things. They have to apply for it. They have to file an application with us. They would have to advertise where they're going. if they want to park in
say the stop and shop lot, they need property owner permission or some sort of arrangement that is signed by the people who own it. Um, and then the license commission can approve it or disapprove it depending on everything. Um, if someone were to come and speak to the meeting, a resident, counselor,
anybody, then naturally that would be taken into consideration. Okay. So, as an example, the north side of Squire Road, I know there's a couple of restaurants in that area. Mhm. Would would they have any input? Sure. Absolutely. Okay. So, they would be
notified. Yes. We would make sure that there's being notification around. Yeah. Okay. So, what's the parameters for that notification? We would have to determine it. Normally with us, it's just direct to butters except liquor licenses which is a separate world, right? Um but
there's no reason why the license commission could not decide it needed to be say 100 feet or something like that. Okay. So say we would for an example for for sake of discussion Northgate Shopping Center where there are a couple of restaurants. So if somebody applied to put a food truck there, everybody in
the Northgate Shopping Center complex would Yeah. would be notified. Yeah. And and in context, I mean, it's all owned by the same people. So as soon as you notify the people you're under, you're good. Okay. All right. Thank you very much. No, you're welcome. Anytime. Council Novaski. Thank you, Mr.
Chairman. Uh Tom, in looking all these locations, these all seem to be uh commercial areas with large parking lots. Generally, those districts, I'd say, with the exception of PDD1, which
is Suffach Downs, are generally the more high highway oriented districts where you get that more Yeah. suburban typology with large parking lots, things like that. Yeah. The only the only I I'm looking at that um location on Lee Burbank Highway
coming out of Furlong Drive where that one truck is. Is that considered PDD1 area? So that one I I believe would be considered either HB or TED. I I believe
it's actually the TED district. Okay. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, counselor. Anyone else? That's Ted, right? Okay. Move for a favorable recommendation. All right, we have a motion to move this forward.
Shall the zoning subcommittee offer a favorable recommendation to approve a zoning ordinance establishing a definition and use for food trucks? Councelor Aenzio, yes. Yes. Councelor Go SA. Yes. Yes. Councelor Jerio, yes. Yes. Council Novaski, yes. Yes. And Chairman
Zamutoo, yes. Yes. The ordinance uh zoning ordinance has received a favorable recommendation. And lastly, an ordinance further amending title five of the revised ordinances of the city of Rivier relative to food trucks. It's kind of almost the same vote,
right? Okay, we got a motion for a favorable vote. Shall the zoning subcommittee provide a favorable recommendation to the full city council to approve an ordinance relative to food trucks concerning title 5? Councelor Aenzio. Yes. Yes. Councelor
Go SA. Yes. Yes. Councelor Jamo. Yes. Yes. Council Novaski. Yes. Yes. And Chairman Zambudo. Yes. Yes. The ordinance has received a favorable recommendation. Will be forwarded to the full city council this evening. There's no further business. Chairman, and thank you all for your attendance.