26. The time is 5:34 p.m. Um, Linda, roll call, please. >> Thank you very much, Susan. Um, starting with Mike Picardi, >> not here. Stacy Rizzo, >> here.
>> You Susan Graalisi here. >> Dr. Kelly, I I was hoping she wouldn't join. She's on vacation this week. Carl Spenson. >> Carl, can you hear us? >> I did. Here.
>> Ah, there you are. Thank you. Christopher Bowen, >> present. >> Thank you. Rich Visque >> here. >> Don Samela absent. Nick Rystrom >> here.
>> Mayor Keith absent. Tom Sarowski absent. John Stomattopolis, Anthony Cogleandro >> here, >> Don Martelli >> here, >> Joshua Miranda
>> here. >> And Chris Camela >> here. >> Excellent. And can we confirm that that is Carl on twice after we had that Zoom bombing with Stacy's
um Zoom that time? I want to just confirm. Carl, are you on twice? >> Keep using me, Susan. Keep using me. >> There's only one of me, but I do hear an echo. >> I'm me.
>> The the other one is is muted, so So, we don't know. >> No. Um, >> we didn't just lose Carl. Real Carl is still here, right? >> I don't see real Carl. Oh, there he is. He moved. >> Yeah. I'm wondering if I just
>> Is this Yeah, I I just put fake Carl in the uh waiting room, so I think we should be fine. >> Okay. >> I don't know what it is. >> I was just going to do the same thing. >> Yep. Perfect. >> Kick them out if we don't know you. Kick them out.
>> All right. Uh, we do have a quorum. So, Brian, if you want to take take over and >> Yep. So, first we're looking at approval. Two housekeeping items. Then we'll go into some updates. First is approval of the meeting minutes from February 18th, 2026.
>> I don't know if there >> approve. Thank you. >> Second have my my screen all the way out. Who was made the motion? >> I think it was >> Chrisa made the motion and Stacy second.
>> Thank you. And for roll call, um, Mike Picardi is absent. Stacy Rizzo, >> yes. >> Susan Graalisi, >> yes. >> Carl Spenson, >> yes. >> Christopher Bowen,
>> abstain. I was absent that meeting. >> Thank you. >> Rich Viscade, >> yes. >> Nick Rystrom, >> yes. Anthony Kagglandro, >> yes. >> Don Martelli,
>> yes. >> Joshua Miranda, >> yes. >> And Chris Camela, >> yes. >> Thank you very much. >> Excellent. Let me uh share my screen to jump into invoices.
One second. Okay, so um invoices for this month. First invoice, oh, excuse me. Um, left field invoice number 60. Um, basic services for construction
administration. The phase we're in now. Um, I'm going to just sort of toggle back and forth so I can just see how we're doing on these. We're building at 12% complete for that. Oh, I just lost control of my screen. I
have to move my zoom controls. Sorry. Okay, I'm not going to toggle back and forth unless unless there are some questions that's messing up. But um basic services for construction administration 12% complete and we are billing three um three different subconultant allowance categories. One
for Sanborn Head, the dewatering and uh remediation permit from amendment 7 and uh one for the dust monitoring uh on site for amendment nine. And lastly, um some of the advertising costs for the recent bidding uh process
um brings the left field invoice 60 values for February to a total of $194,19610. Um any questions on the left field invoice? >> Motion to approve. back in. >> Oh,
>> thank you. Uh, for roll call, Stacy Rizzo, >> yes. >> Susan Graalisi, >> yes. >> Carl Spenson, >> yes. >> Christopher Bowen, >> yes. >> Rich Visque,
>> yes. Nick Rystrom, >> yes. >> Anthony Kaggleandro, >> yes. >> Don Martelli, >> yes. >> Joshua Miranda, >> yes. >> Chris Saramela,
>> yes. >> Thank you very much. >> Next is an invoice that uh for Briggs, the project uh construction material testing. Um, this month we had $15,834 of testing, mostly going along with
ground improvements. Ultimately, this is going to move into um concrete testing and ultimately steel testing. This is a line that we have uh isolated in the budget. Um, we have a $400,000 budget estimated uh for these services. We're
about 6% through these costs. Um, usually we try to ride this out until we're through steel and see how we've done. A lot of this testing stuff is heavy on the front end of the project, but we still think we're on budget with this category. 6% expended,
$15,83 this month. Uh, any question on construction material testing invoice from Briggs? See? >> None. Motion to approve Briggs. Second. >> If I take myself off of mute.
Roll call. Stacy Rizzo. >> Yes. >> Susan Graalisi. >> Yes. >> Carl Spenson. >> Yes. >> Christopher Bowen. >> Yes. >> Rich Visque. >> Yes. >> Nick Rystrom.
>> Yes. Anthony Kagglandro, >> yes. >> Don Martelli, >> yes. >> Joshua Miranda, >> yes. >> Chris Camela, >> yes. >> Thank you very much, everyone.
>> Thank you. Next invoice, the Perkins Eastman uh design team invoice billing to completion of the bidding phase. Um, we are through bidding. They will start billing against construction administration next month. They also have two subconultant invoices. GZA, our
geotechnical engineer who uh is responsible for monitoring uh all of our geotechnical uh on-site items, ground improvements uh leading into pouring of foundations and um Sandborn Head for uh a small value
finishing out some of their geoenvironmental studies that are under Perkins Eastman's contract. We have we have Sandborn Head spread between multiple consultants. This is uh probably one of the last billings through Perkins Eastman. Perkins Eastman invoice total
$588,531.90. Any questions on Perkins Eastman? No questions. Motion to approve. >> Second. >> Q. You will do the roll call. Stacy Rizzo. >> Yes. Susan Graalisi. >> Yes.
>> Spenc. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Carl Christopher Bowen. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Nick Ry. >> Yes.
Anthony Conglandro, >> yes. >> Don Martelli, >> yes. >> Joshua Miranda, >> yes. >> Chris Suroa, >> yes. >> Thank you very much, everyone.
>> Thank you. And lastly, for invoices, the consigly construction requisition 9A for February. Um, as far as direct subcontractor work, we're starting to see the first billings for concrete to start getting uh submitts that'll start rising pretty quickly over the summer as we're pouring. We're also seeing
billings for structural steel. We've um we've got steel and fabrication up in Canada and uh we'll be getting to that fun activity. That's always sort of a nice thing when the steel starts arriving a little later in the summer, but we are in the process of releasing
pieces for fabrication. Um, and these structural steel buildings will continue uh straight through the fall pretty much when we get the skeleton of this building up. Uh the big chunk of this invoice, $3.7 million is site work that remains to be the focus on site both in terms of soil handling, uh soil
exporting and ground improvements prep for the um not only the working pad to support cranes and trucks outside of the footprint of the building, but um to support the work inside of the footprint that ultimately will um ultimately will become
Sorry, something just got on the screen. It distracted me. ultimately will become the base for the foundation. Um the other item here is there is a credit for builder's risk. Um this is we accounted for all the previous builder risk that was build before the city uh procured
their own policy. So this gets us in this in the GMP contract next month. We'll make sure all of those builder risk charges are credited back. This is just an accounting number. That's why you see a negative here. Um, and otherwise the pieces of fee and bonds, general liability, subcontra
subcontracted default insurance all bill as percentages of this direct work down here for concrete, structural steel, and site work. So, we'll probably start seeing a few other subs in the coming months, whether it's waterproofing for the foundation, but we'll really be
hitting away uh banging away at these site work, structural, steel, concrete budgets for the next number of months. Consigly rack 9A totals 5,363,83360. Any questions on the Conigley invoice? >> There are no questions. Motion to
approve Coniglia construction. >> Second. >> Thank you. I will do roll call. Stacy Rizzo, >> yes. >> Susan Graalisi, >> yes. >> Carl Spenson, >> yes.
>> Christopher Bowen, >> yes. >> Rich Visc, >> yes. >> Nick Rystrom, >> yes. >> Anthony Conglandro, >> Don Martelli, >> yes. >> Joshua Miranda,
>> yes. Chrisella, >> yes. Thank you very much everyone. >> Thank you everybody. Thank you Linda. So we are going to um and Linda you might have I'm not positive who might share the screen from Conigley
but we're going to hand it over to Conigley for agenda item four. Um then Jason will be covering agenda item five and I'll be coming in uh bit for six. So construction progress update agenda item four. Next, I'm going to stop sharing.
Um, does someone need permission on the Consigi side to share? >> Just gave um >> if if there's visuals. >> John Lamar's um approval. Um,
>> John, Darren, I have Procore open, ready to go. If if uh you want me to flash up any photos, >> can you can you hear me? >> Yes, Darren. >> Okay, that's trying to navigate through this Zoom. And uh so anyway, yeah, I
have uh I have things to share. I'm just trying to get back to the screen to um to share. So, just bear with me here while I bring up the uh Okay. Uh, can everyone see that?
>> It's coming. >> Yeah, it looks like it's loading. There it is. >> There it is. >> Okay. Yeah. So, screenshot of the um of the site here. Um, so as we've spoken about, uh, we're
starting to finally get into some really tangible evidence of a building after all this, u months of, uh, testing soils and a lot of things that are not very exciting. We're finally getting
into a building here. So um screenshot here of the site specific to the building. You can see that the perimeter of the building is established with the uh the support of excavation.
the the back half of this building um which we call buildings F and uh G are the areas of the uh building closest to the um the MBTA and uh those are the
areas that we are currently preparing to uh well we are excavating right now in building F as you can see and I'll I'll move to the next uh slide here um that we you know we're uh moving across
the building from back uh of building to front of the building. Um this kind of shows establishment of the front of the building from this view. You've got a a uh a rig in the uh three rigs out there
in the footprint of the building all doing uh CMC's ground improvements uh in preparation for uh the foundations. Another view of the site. Um obviously we've had a lot of uh weather and
therefore a lot of water. So you can see we're trying to keep the water at bay. A nice dry area over here in the background is the building footprint, which is good. That means all the water is outside of it, meaning our supportive excavation is doing its job.
Um, again, another aerial again um of the of the site. I'm just going to scroll through here a little fast. So, we start uh showing some of the uh utilities that we're putting in around the perimeter of the building. Um and
you know for those that uh know about some of the details relative to means and methods we had to install uh some bypasses. Both bypasses have been uh completed and therefore um we're now uh
connected uh if you will. So that's good news. Um, and as you can see, uh, now we're in the process of excavating foundations, pouring mud mats, and, uh, getting ready
to start the foundational work. These are preparations for the foundations. These are not the actual footings themselves, but just FYI. Um uh we've done uh in fact I apologize
this is this is you know this is area here that we've been doing to cap off the CMC's uh what we call a mudmat. Um we've also done some work with getting preparation for establishment of quality of
workmanship by uh uh building a mockup of the foundational walls um that we would have the design team review to make sure that they improve the quality. more more uh progress of of
uh ground improvements being installed in the building footprint. As you can see, you know, it's still pretty muddy out there, but the we're doing a lot of dewatering um to keep the water even manageable within inside the building
footprint. So, um in general, let me go back to kind of the overall footprint of the building. the overview. Um we have uh reinforcing steel for the
first uh the first foundational work. Uh that reinforcement steel is being delivered tomorrow on site. This is all the rebar that goes in the foundational footings that are going to be installed along the back perimeter, which is what
we call building F or where building F would be the um the gymnasium for reference. So, uh we've got two crews that will be starting uh one in building F working uh
counterclockwise and another crew starting in building E working clockwise. So that we'll be racing each other, each crew racing each other around the building uh with installation of uh foundations. So between now and
next month, we're going to see some uh good progress on foundations uh which is really good news. Are there any questions? And then assuming just to wrap up here the
outlook again I think uh Brian mentioned about steel. Yes, we are supporting the steel erectors, the steel suppliers uh buildings for the material,
but that material is currently has been in fabrication since February and will continue to be in fabrication uh through uh June. The intended delivery date for steel is uh mid July.
So, um, that's what we're trying to do now is to race across this building footprint as fast as we can and get the foundations in as as far as possible before the steel hits the site. And then we start throwing the steel up as fast
as we can. And it's a race to get to uh get all that steel up before next winter. >> Any >> I'll just add one thing. >> Hi. Go ahead. >> Um I couldn't figure out where the how
to raise my hand for some reason. Um my question was I know a while back because of the soil testing we were behind like two to three months and then we had caught up on another month like is are we behind still anytime from the scheduled progress that we originally
intended or we have we caught up? Well, it's more accurate to say that we've been able to uh move some things up in the schedule to accommodate what we call schedule assurance uh which is to ensure that we are ready
for steel in mid July. So the things that occurred uh relative to the soils are mostly behind us and therefore uh we're out of I would say we're pretty much out of the woods in regards to uh
the soils uh affecting the building foundation and footprint. We still have a lot to do on the outside of the building as you as you move towards the um towards the northern side of the site. Uh foot building footprint here.
All of this area as we as we move towards uh Shamut Street and so forth uh still have to be done. But in terms of a critical path to keeping a project on schedule, um we're we're where we we are
where we were uh a month ago. And uh we have improved in terms of our ability to start the foundations earlier, which gets us more foundations in place quicker so that we can be assured that we will be able to
get the steel up when we uh planned on doing it. >> And overall, Susan, we're still um we're not back into a summer move and uh we we won't be. Um, so we're we're still
holding the schedule that that is the delayed version of the schedule. We're still targeting a uh winter holiday 2028 move in. We'll touch upon that a little more when we start talking about the budget update, but um right now we think
the forecast is going to that forecast is going to remain for a while. If we see some sort of light along the way to um to hard accelerate, we're going to go after it. that more is for as Darren said schedule assurance. Uh we think
Conigley believes we believe it's it's really unlikely that we could get back onto a summer move, but we're if we if we see a window of opportunity after we're past steel and we're into the next two years of the projects, we're going
to lean into it and try to accelerate. >> Thank you, Brian. Thank you, Darren. Um you know, it's always that's the million-dollar question. Now that people see progress, the question is always when's the anticipated opening date? So I don't want to give any information and I just
want to make sure that I have the same information that you're giving us to so I can give to the public. >> Yep. >> Yes. I I think I think also it should be noted that there were actions that were taken uh in
January and February that have allowed us to get to this point because originally we were not going to be starting foundations until uh middle to third week of April. So to your point,
we have brought that in, but what that does is just allows us to get more of the foundational work in place quicker, which frankly is a risk because of the time of the year that we're trying to do that kind of work. So the earlier we can
get started, the better because if we do uh uh encounter, you know, weather delays, we'll have gotten a head start on it. Very good. Thank you very much.
>> I'm going to stop sharing now, uh, Brian, so that you can, uh, if everybody's good with, uh, this presentation, I'll I'll I'll stop. >> Sure. Jason, did you have something to add?
>> I was just going to say that the pictures don't do the curved concrete mockup justice. that that mockup that you saw in one of the photos um is a mockup of you know as everybody knows the design of this building is a wave so there's a lot of curves and that's
what's mocked up and I think it came out great. So um just pictures don't do it justice. >> Yep. >> So um we are going to move into item number five. Uh, I'll cue this up. Um,
and and I think Jason's going to run with it a little bit, but uh, huge milestone coming next month. Um, and I'll say right now, we uh, between Linda and I, we will be emailing you in the coming week or so. We're we think we're targeting April 22nd for the next
meeting. We know that's vacation week. Um, so between whether or not we have a quorum and we might end up choosing to um push it back a week, even if we do have a quorum, but we're either going to be meeting on the 22nd or the 29th of April. The main purpose of that meeting
is going to be to approve the guaranteed maximum price GMP contract. Um, it's a massive milestone for the project. It more or less is the and I'm not trying to steal your thunder, Jason, but um it's more or less the the culmination of everything uh we've been talking about
as estimates becoming bids and real numbers. Um I'll let Jason talk about it for a bit, but we wanted to just give you guys a idea of what this document was. We're going to get it out to you a week in advance of wherever that meeting uh lands. We'd ask you guys to look at
it. As always, you can reach out to me uh text, call, email if you have questions or want to walk through it with me. And um Jason, I don't know how helpful it is to sort of um use this as a as a screen here, but we wanted to
just sort of use a table of contents from another project's GMP to sort of talk through what's in here. Um because it is quite a big document. And um Jason, I'll hand it over to you to just sort of uh summarize the uh the purpose and function of the GMP.
>> Yeah, thanks Brian. I mean, this is this is a good visual. I've got a couple notes. I'm just going to talk through sort of try to hit all the the major points of explaining what the GMP is and why this is such an important milestone
to the project. Um Brian, you did steal my thunder because the first word I had was culmination. We're getting to the GMP which is the culmination of the 149A CM at risk process which when we think
about it you know this is when all the value of collaboration of bringing the CM on board early kind of comes to fruition. We've been we've been involved in the project early, much earlier than we would have been if we waited for 100%
design and put this out to bid, which would be traditional design, bid, build. That's not what we are here. We're 149A, which is um CM at risk with pre-construction services. So, you've gotten the added value of having Conigi,
our experience, our lessons learned involved in the design process. Obviously, you also have progress on the site because we're engaged early. Um, so even though we're just getting to awarding trade contractors, we've gotten a jump on the site work. Um, but we're
getting to the GMP, which is now when we're going to come to an agreement between the city and the CM to deliver the project within the parameters of 149A mass CM at risk construction. and we're going to be within the parameters
of that, but also within the details of the GMP package that we're working so diligently with this entire group to prepare to present to make sure that everybody involved, every stakeholder understands what we're agreeing to,
including the project team, the school building committee, the city, and all this is done under the purview of MSBA. So I'm going to highlight three of the major pieces of this RGM. This is a sample. RGMP will have a lot of similar
parts and pieces. I'm going to highlight three of them. The first is the GMP summary. So just to reiterate in case folks don't know, GMP does stand for guaranteed maximum price. The way that we do that is we produce a final budget
summary that is based off our pricing of the the issued for construction documents which is the documents we got in December. Sometimes referred to as 100% but more more uh perfectly named. It's the issued for
construction documents um as we have priced them as we put put them out to bid to both the trade biders and the non-trades. Uh this will also include costs from the subs that are already on board that were bought out using earlier sets that has sub
subsequently reviewed the issued for construction documents and presented us with potential change orders for what they see that has changed from earlier designs to this one. Those will all be factored in and baked into this GMP.
Next, I want to touch on what's essentially on this table of contents you're looking at would be number three. This is our summary of holds and allowances which this is also where the real value of precon pre-construction
services and the 149A process having your contractor on board early because we're going to include in this well-developed budget um allowances and hold money to cover items that we anticipate uh pending
design that's that's ongoing. We had a meeting today with uh the traffic engineers who are working to finalize uh the traffic signal improvements um on VFW Parkway and Northshore Road. So, there's pending design. Uh there's costs and risks that are not detailed in the
construction documents that Consley is buying into the contract with the subs based on our experience and our lessons learned on similar projects and again collaboration with the entire design team. So this is a critical aspect to
protecting the budget and making sure that we do not go over this guaranteed maximum price that has some areas built into it for us to draw from for certain things that may come up. And then lastly, uh I will highlight
schedule um which is not highlighted on this sample here, but um as we've talked about many many times, we will be including um a GMP schedule. That is the fully developed detail schedule that will be incorporated into the contract
and uh technically is when we would first truly have our baseline schedule. So, we've been looking back at previous schedules that have been shared with the city at times. Um, but the the true baseline schedule is typically this
schedule that goes into the final GMP. Um, and maybe, you know, worth noting as well, we've had several preGMPS up to this point. Um, so that was our way of getting things started, but the final GMP upcoming in April. We'll have all
these aspects of the contract of the project rolled into one. Um, I'll stop there because that was a lot and see if there's any questions. So, if I don't see any questions, um, as I noted, we're going to determine whether we're meeting on the 22nd or
29th. Stand by for some emails about that. We'll get this out to you a week in advance. Um, at that meeting, we will summarize key items. We'll do a schedule overview. We'll do a full budget overview. Um, it might be fun to just go back into some of the logistics so you
guys can sort of get back in your mind the major phases of the project, when steel going to be up. um building envelope, mechanical systems, etc. So, we'll highlight the important items, but I encourage anyone if they dive into this when we send it out there to um
again reach out to me if you have questions. I don't see any hands. So, um I we have one more construction related item and apologies, I look like I'm disappearing in the sun here. Um, we're going to jump into agenda item six, the last preGMP
award package for Conigley. Um, everything else will be captured in the GMP. Let me bring this slide up and just get it as tightly zoomed as I can. Okay, so as um Jason noted, we have been
awarding early work with these PreGMP documents. This is PGMP number five. It'll be the last one. It represents Conigley contract amendment 9. The overall purpose of this is to award the filed sub trades. Uh these are the
public bid trades mandated to be uh publicly bid. We pre-qualified all these biders months ago. Uh and what you're seeing on the right are the 17 or so filed sub trades. Um, all of the quote unquote private bids that aren't
mandated to be public bids will be awarded in the GMP. These bids have a time clock on them that they're they're valid for uh 31 days. That um after all of our vetting with Conigley and the design team, uh that 31 days is next
week. So, we wanted to award these filed sub trades early to be able to allow Conigily to execute contracts and get all of these filed subpublic bid trades going. Um, so now the uh high level I'm going to start tracking through these
numbers on the upper left. We've awarded about a third of the job to date on the uh PreGMP 1 through 4, which are in Conigi amendments 3 through8 value of about $134 million. That's structural steel, that's earthwork, that's concrete, that's ground improvements,
some other minor items like fencing, etc. The value of this PreGMP number five for all these trades, whether it's masonry down through windows, terazzo, paint, the mechanical trades, uh, is coming in at $129 million. It's another
third of the project that we're looking to award with this contract amendment. So, um, basically you can consider about 2/3 of your project at this point are under contract and awarded. They're no longer estimated values for the vast majority of these items. These are hard
bid values. Um, and now a preview looking forward. We do have all of the other uh most of the other bids. We're still meeting with low bidders outside of these uh for Dcope meetings to make sure they have items covered. The
preview right now is we think that the um remaining two award value, that last third is about $132 million worth of work, which puts us at a draft value, this might vary between now and next month, at a $395.4
million GMP. That is $16.5 million under the budget. uh 4% under the budget, which is excellent news um for a job of this size, especially
um I want to stress that like some of this final number is a work in progress. The 16 uh five under that gets us to 395. We're going to continue to have discussions and there's some discussions that are ongoing with the city of what
to do with this underrun value once it becomes real at next month's meeting. We'll get a lot more into that next month, but um we're going to reserve some money outside of the construction budget from this underrun to hedge
against any potential finding in the eminent domain lawsuit. Um, we're also going to reserve some of this money for the potential to accelerate or recover the schedule if we need it. So, we'll get into that a bit next month. The
bottom line is we're on track to award this job uh in the realm of $395 million 16.5 under budget. Uh, as I noted, we're awarding these trades because we really want to get the contract signed in the time frame that
those bids are valid. We don't want to ask for extensions for those bids. The remainder of the trades will be awarded in April. The last important uh point here is that these numbers all up here
included in these bids um and included in the preview that we're trending to 16.5 million under includes the alternate value to install the lighting at the two athletic fields. We've mentioned before we were going to bid that as an alternate. Uh the cost for
those two fields is about $1.8 million. It is baked into these numbers. So it it wouldn't reduce the $16.5 million underrun by 1.8. If you did not want to do the lights, it would increase the
underrun. Um the last point I wanted to make, this gets a little bit confusing, but we'll go through it in more detail this month. You can see that just in these trades that we're awarding tonight compared back to the original budget, we're 25 million under in these trades.
Um, so how do we close the gap between these trades being 25 under and we're saying we're destined uh we're moving towards a 165 under. It's really that everything else, both this remaining to award and the early awarded items catching up
to the final documents and catching up to all of the soil items we've been chasing. The rest of those items are about 8 and a half over the total budget. So, I just wanted to point that out that, you know, if you were to look line by line just at these trades, we
did really well buying the trades. 25 million under. Uh we did pretty well with the remainder of the non-filed sub trades. Uh and everyone at this point I think should understand that we we hit a lot of surprises in soil that drive the rest of this over. So um that being
said, I think the only number that really matters here is we are trending towards 4% under 16.5 million. we'll be able to reserve some of that money to potentially try to recoup schedule um or to rescue us if we have some sort of um
major storm event, really major storm event in the next few years. And um we'll be able to help out pad the city against any potential finding in the eminent domain lawsuit. So, I'll stop talking in one sec, but I'm going to just show you the next page. Keep in
mind the key decision here is there's two motions here. If the committee wants to uh award with the sports lighting involved, this top motion is the correct motion. It would be a motion to approve consigly contra contract amendment 9 is presented
tonight to award all filed sub bid trades including the ad alternate for sports lighting at the two athletic fields in the total amount of 129,173500. If for whatever reason the committee does not want to keep that sports
lighting in the scope, I just didn't want to have to do this math live. Um, this alternate motion is on the bottom of the screen. This would keep no lights on the sports field. Top motion, which again maps to these numbers going
towards 165 under would be approval and the lights are in. So, that was a whole lot of me talking. Um, a good deal of info. Excellent news, though. I'll pause for any questions and um I can toggle between these screens if
anybody wants to jump right to a motion. >> I'd like to make the motion to um approve consigly amendment number nine that includes the sports lighting. >> That Yep. >> All right. Can I ask a quick question?
>> Yes. >> I'm just I I hate to bring this up again, but I I know Rich is thinking it too. That 16 on your budget, can you pull that side up again? >> Yep. >> Does that include the $10 million deduct deduction to the overall budget or no?
>> No. So that that's going to the 10 million is sort of buried in there. So, but we're com the the 412 is the the I would say city council and city authorized budget.
We were trying to hit 402. So, we'll be able to isolate the 10 out of the construction costs and we're about 6 and a half ahead of that if that makes sense. Chris, I feel like I might be explaining that confusing. >> No, that No, that makes sense. Thank you. Yep.
Any other questions on the motion? >> Brian, real quick. So, if we vote on the second option, sorry for the noise in the background. We're going to essentially save $1.8 million on lights. >> It would be 1.8 8 million less in the
budget and no lights at the two athletic fields um in front of the building, the baseball softball field and the rectangular soccer uh multi multi-purpose field. >> So, yes, short answer is yes. >> Kind of kind of stuck here because I
can't picture fields without lighting, but the $1.8 million savings is very appealing as well. Tough decision to make right now. >> Um >> Brian, I just motion. If you feel you wanted the second,
>> I just want to bring up the fact that there's a potential um revenue source with putting in those lights over the course of the use of these fields. We use these rent these fields so we could rent our fields around the clock right now when we don't
have enough of them. So, some of that should be considered when we think about that money over the next 30 years this building's up and running. those fields are going to be generating revenue. Um, it will hopefully kind of put some money back in our parks and recck department
and keep those fields open well past 4:00 at night during the winter and probably past 8:00 during the uh spring and summer. So, something to consider. I think it'd be a waste of money to be putting those fields in. They're not going to get used while the kids are in
school. Those fields are for after school and for night activities. So, if it was up, if we start talking about not putting lights, we might want to start talking about not putting fields. Save some more money. >> Any other questions or comments on the
motion? >> No, I just want to say I agree with Kyle wholeheartedly. Do we want to move to a a roll call? >> I believe so. >> So, what was the original motion? >> Um, the original motion was to approve
Conigley amendment number nine that includes the sports lighting. >> And there was a second. >> I seconded that. I'll second it. >> Yep. >> Thank you. >> I will uh I will do the roll call and
we'll see where we end up. I'll start with Stacy Rizzo. >> Yes. >> Susan Graalisi. >> Yes. >> Carl Spenson. >> Yes. >> Christopher Bowen. >> Yes. I just switched from my computer to
my cell phone. I don't want you to think someone else is trying to get in. >> I saw that. Appreciate it very much. Uh, Rich Visque, >> no. >> Okay. >> Nick Rystrom,
>> yes. >> Anthony Kaggleandro, >> no. >> Don Martelli, >> yes. >> Joshua Miranda, >> yes. >> Bella,
>> yes. I think that was eight, which I think is a pass. >> Four, five, six, seven, eight is a pass. Yes. So, uh, the motion passes. >> Okay, Conigi, we are
awarded with the alternate. Uh I will be following up to get that um contract paperwork executed ASAP. And um that is all the scheduled items. We can go through public comment then any new discussions.
Public comment we would need name and address for the record if there is any public comment going once. >> Brian. >> Yes Dan. >> I apologize. I I don't want to uh speak
out of turn here because this is city meeting. Um I would recommend that you know in terms of the discussion about the uh processing and execution of
this amendment is uh important correct in terms of timing. >> Yes. This is one that I'm going to see if we can get back in the coming days. Uh I do know Dr. Kelly is away, so I'm going to talk to some people about maybe
how we get her signature ASAP, but um it would be because Conigley uh there's again a clock on these and we need to execute the subcontracts. Uh we really would like to see this by Friday um into next week early as possible. We could
make work as well. But um to Darren's point, I know Conigley is itching to uh sign these subs up and uh turning around this package I think is one that we need um to ask the city to do fairly quickly. Did I sort of get it? Um your concern, Darren?
>> Yeah. Yeah, it was uh it's not us trying to be pushy. It's more that there is a uh term limit on the on the trade the trade bids and we want to make sure that we can get them procured
but we are not allowed by law to procure them until we get an executed agreement. >> Yep. Okay. We're going to count that as a comment at the end of the last um agenda item.
Darren is not a member of the public. He works for Conigley for those who don't know him, but thank you Darren. Um, last call public comment. Any new business or other business from the committee or consultants?
Seeing none, we would uh anticipate a motion to adjurnn. >> Motion to adjurnn. Second. >> Thank you everybody.