um 18th, 2026. The time is 5:33 p.m. Uh Linda, roll call, please. >> Yes. And just in time for my dog to go crazy. Sorry about the barking if anybody can hear it.
>> Um I will start with Mike Picardley. I think he is absent today. Stacy Rizzo. Daisy, can you hear us? >> I'm here. >> Excellent. Susan Graalisi >> here.
>> Dr. Kelly >> here. >> Carl Spenson >> here. >> Christopher Bowen. Rich Fiske. Absent. I did see him earlier. I thought Don
Surmela absent. Nick Rystrom absent. Mayor Keith. >> I'm here on his behalf. Claudia Coranchi Fista. >> Okay. Tom Sarowski.
Absent. John Stomattopolis. Absent. I see Rich Viske came back. I'm I'm going to do a recall. Rich Viske >> here. >> Thank you.
Anthony Kagglandro >> here. Thank you. John Martelli >> here. Joshua Miranda >> here. >> Chris Camela >> here. >> Excellent. Thank you very much. That
takes care of the quorum. Brian, if you want to take over. You're on mute. >> Sorry, I had other windows up. Um, >> that's okay. >> So, first we have a little bit of housekeeping. First, we have two sets of meeting minutes uh to go through
tonight. Um the first is the January 21st, 2026 set of meeting minutes. Um there are no comments. We'd seek approval of those minutes. >> Motion to approve the minutes. >> Second. >> Roll call.
>> Thank you. Uh Stacy Rizzo. >> Yes. Susan Graalisi. >> Yes. >> Dr. Kelly, >> I'm going to abstain as I was absent from both meetings.
>> Carl Spenson, >> yes. >> Rich Visque, >> yes. >> Mayor Keefe, >> yes. Thank you. >> Anthony Cogleandro, >> yes.
Don Martelli. >> Yes. >> Joshua Miranda. >> Yes. >> And Chris Cermela. >> Yes. >> Thank you very much.
All right. Motion passes. On to the next one. The next set of minutes is for hold on I lost my screen again. February 4th, 2026. Motion to approve the meetings from February 4th.
>> Any second? >> Is there a second? >> Second. >> Second. Oh, we'll go with we'll go with Stacy on this one. Um, and for the roll call, Stacy Rizzo.
>> Yes. >> Cusen Graalisi. >> Yes. >> Dr. Kelly. >> Abstain. >> Abstain. Thank you. Carl Spenson. >> Yes. >> Rich Visque.
>> Yes. >> Mayor Keefe. Representative. >> Yes. >> Anthony Kagglandro. >> Yes. >> Don Martelli. >> Yes.
>> Joshua Miranda. >> Yes. >> Chris Sarah. >> Yes. >> Excellent. Motion passes as well. Thank you. >> Excellent. I'm going to share my screen.
We're going to go into invoice approval. Um we're getting to the point here where you're going to start seeing um you know more invoices as we get deeper into construction and we have testing services and stuff here. So we'll run through these one by one. Uh the first
is the uh left field invoice number 59 which totals $367,186.50. We're billing in the construction uh administration phase and including uh some subconsultant billing both for SGH which is um the firm doing the flood mitigation consulting which will be
ongoing through the uh end of the project result in some deliverables about um basically operations in potential major flooding events. And we have two Sanborn Head uh invoices in here. $65,000 one 113 from budgeted
services for Sanborn Head related to the um all the soil uh issues we've been talking about the last number of months. Uh all of these invoices we'll go through we already scrubbed. We could jump into the budget um if we need to.
the left field section of this budget is is pretty cluttered um with a lot of these um services the SGH service you can see on this line down here um and it is uh 42% complete the Sanborn head services
are approaching um approaching completion but everything is billing in the left field invoice to the appropriate percentage complete everything remains on budget in those invoices is I think we should probably do these one at a time. Um if that's all right. So
there any >> questions on the left field invoice? Otherwise, we'd entertain a motion to approve. >> Motion to approve left field invoice number 59 but $367,186.50. I think that was Anthony.
>> Yep. >> Second. >> Thank you. And then um I'm just going to note that John Stomattopolis just arrived. So >> um we will start with roll call with Stacy Rizzo.
>> Yes. Susan Graalisi. >> Yes. >> Dr. Kelly, >> yes. >> Carl Spenson, >> yes. >> Rich Visc, >> yes.
>> Uh, Mayor Keith, >> yes. >> Anthony Cogleandro, >> yes. Don Martell. >> Yes. >> Joshua Miranda. >> Yes. >> Chrisa.
>> Yes. >> Thank you. >> Uh, next on the list is going to be two in a row related to insurance. So, a couple of months ago, we did have the committee approve um the full value of
the builder's risk policy. um subsequent to that meeting um there was some the city worked out sort of paying that in chunks. So there's an old invoice that um did approve the full value of this policy. However, since it's being paid
in increments the city worked out with the Balden Group um we are invoicing the second of what will be three um invoices for the Baldin Group to cover the builder's risk insurance. The value is $46,728.25. Um, and the next installment, I believe,
is supposed to bill in March. And that will be the premium for that policy will be paid in full at that point. >> Motion to approve the Baldwin Group of 46,72825. Second. >> Thank you for the roll call. Stacy
Rizzo. >> Yes. >> Susan Graalizi. >> Yes. >> Dr. Kelly. >> Yes. >> Carl Spenson. >> Yes. >> Rich.
>> Yes. >> Mayor Keefe. >> Yes. John Stematopoulos. >> Yes. >> Anthony Kaggleandro. >> Yes. >> Don Martelli. >> Yes.
>> Joshua Miranda. >> Yes. >> Chris Saramela. >> Yes. >> Thank you. >> Sounds good. Next is um KFDA is the uh Balden Group that we just went through is the carrier for the insurance policy.
KFDA is the city's uh risk advisor. A number of month months ago, Rich uh Viske, who's on this meeting, presented um the idea to bring this um under the umbrella of the city as opposed to Conigley. KFDA is more or less the agent that helped um set that all up, vet the
policy, make sure we had everything we needed. Um the committee at the time approved the $10,000 not to exceed uh value for that. We have the invoices for them helping uh get the builder's risk policy to an executable point. Those two
invoices um together um total $9,937.50. And I will just say this is all carried all of these are carried on this line 105 builder's risk insurance here. You can see that there was a $2 million budget in between the actual policy and
this plus or minus $10,000. We have about 1.6 committed. Um so there is savings on this line. We're going to keep that there in case there are any insurance events that occur over the job. But um this is um a line that will
hold at 2 million that right now we only have 1.6 committed against it. Um to my knowledge, this should be it for what we need for KFDA at least in terms of setting up. If we have any claim events in the future, we'll revisit whether we need um them to consult the project and
city. There are no questions. We would look to approve the KFDA invoices totaling $9,937.50. Motion to approve. >> Second. Thank you. I will do the roll call with Stacy Rizzo.
>> Yes. >> Susan Graalisi. >> Yes. >> Dr. Kelly, >> yes. >> Carl Spenson, >> yes. >> Richard, >> yes. >> Mayor Keith,
>> yes. >> John Stomattopolis. >> Yes. I'm going to note that Anthony Kagglandra had to jump off. John Martelli, >> yes. >> Joshua Miranda, >> yes.
>> Chris Saramala, >> yes. >> Excellent. Thank you. >> Next here is um Briggs. >> Can I say something just before we go on? >> Yep. I just a quick note um for the record and a thank you to Rich um
Visqueke for his diligence that $10,000 we just voted saved us an estimated 400,000 in the overall budget. So I think it's important to make that note. >> Good. >> Thank you, Dr. Kelly. >> Uh moving forward, Briggs is the
project's construction material testing agent. They were procured um through the um through the city as an independent uh consultant to the city. This is required. They test all sorts of items from soil to compaction to welds to
steel uh to concrete. You'll be seeing an invoice from them uh pretty much for every month until we get a lot closer to this building being done. The invoice this month uh is for $1,352. Um, this is an item that shows up
towards the back side of the budget. I'm going to jump back in here. Uh, this testing services line, uh, was started with $400,000. We've we've, um, still have 400 budgeted. I think we're going to end up using the whole 400, but
the initial commitment, um, is $300,000. As we get a little closer through the next probably year of construction, we'll see the volume of testing um which is really tough to predict in advance just based on the specifics of the schedule. But we'll keep our eye on this
uh as we go move forward. There could be a point in the future where we need to supplement this. But um for now we've consumed um a tiny fraction um you know one something less than 1% of the initial $300,000 commitment and we have
$400,000 on the line. Uh if there are no questions we'd seek a motion to approve the Briggs uh construction material testing invoice. >> Motion to approve. Second. >> Thank you. Uh for roll call. Stacy
Rizzo. >> Yes. >> Susan Graalizi. >> Yes. >> Dr. Kelly. >> Yes. >> Carl Spencson. >> Yes. >> Rich.
>> Yes. >> Mayor Keith. >> Yes. John Stenatopoulos. >> Yes. >> John Martelli. >> Yes. >> Joshua Miranda. >> Yes.
>> Chris Camela. >> Yes. >> Uh next Perkins Eastman invoice this month. Um billing against the bidding phase. uh which were pretty much is the the quick phase that's straddling between completion of construction
documents and construction administration as well as uh against uh reimbursible allowance for the uh architectural access board variance fee of $55. Um if we go to their basic service section, this is the bidding line um
that we're bidding against here. Uh it is 60% complete. We'll get a little more into um bids in the general project update, but for right now it's pretty simple. Um January invoice for Perkins
Eastman totaling $660,55. Motion to approve at the price of $660,55. >> Second. >> Second. >> Thank you for roll call. Stacy Rizzo. >> Yes. >> Susan Graalisi.
>> Yes. >> Dr. Kelly, >> yes. >> Carl Spenson, >> yes. Rich Visque, >> yes. >> Mayor Keith, >> yes. >> John Stoopoulos, >> yes.
>> Don Martelli, >> yes. >> Joshua Miranda, >> yes. >> And Chris Camela, >> yes. >> Uh, last one. We're almost there. Um, Consley Wreck 8A for um construction
services. We are out of the pre-construction business. Um, I apologize. I'm I've been getting in the habit of marking up percentage complete on this form because it's easier to track through the budget. I'll make sure we keep doing that. Um, this wreck as far as as far as the direct trades um
demo structural steel site work, those all bill to the uh appropriate percentage complete as reviewed by Conigley left field and Perkins Eastman. Um, the rest of these items as usual, fee, bond, insurance, bill as a percentage of what's complete. And
there's always the retainage amount that we hold on every construction invoice until we start completing these much later in the project. And um, we'll start releasing retainage back to the contractor. So again, everything here on budget. Um, no no change order exposure
on any of this. And I do apologize, I didn't have the percentage completes on here, but um we and the architect have certified that they're billing to the appropriate point um based on progress in the field. Consigly invoice totals 5,319,95748.
>> Motion to approve. >> Second. Yes. >> Thank you. Roll call. Stacy Rizzo. >> Yes. >> Graalisi. >> Yes.
>> Dr. Kelly. >> Yes. >> Charles Spencson. >> Yes. >> Rich Visque. >> Yes. >> Mayor Keith. >> Yes. >> John Stmatopoulos.
Yes, >> Don Martelli. >> Yes, >> Joshua Miranda. >> Yes, >> Chrisella. >> Yes. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. We will move on to agenda
item number four. So, um we have been producing uh these um monthly reports for um a while um for a number of years now and there's been some discussion about um just they haven't really been being circulated to the SBC. So, we're
going to uh be including these every month in your committee packet. Uh we encourage you to read through them. I encourage you to either bring questions to this meeting or contact me, Linda, directly if you have questions based on this. But what we wanted to do is just give you a really quick just overview.
There's a lot of information in here. Um, and not going to go through every paragraph or every update, but um, generally speaking, the first number of pages um, that have the left field logo are executive summaries, textbased summaries on where we're at. Um, high
level is the first section. Uh budget status and overview is section two, which we have a lot going on in budget because of all the bidding that we're going through right now. And section three is a schedule overview of specific
items that are driving the schedule. Um this here is actually a little uh chart breakdown of of the overall construction schedule review that's going back and forth between Conigley and left field. Uh there's a section here that more or less captures any contract amendments
that you, the school building committee, have seen and where they're at with execution um at the rever level. This section could also approve a preview of what might be coming next month. Um this month that's not applicable. We didn't have anything ready. Um we don't have
anything in the hopper for next month. And the last section here is a summary of on-site activities that'll get sort of longer and longer as we have more things going on. This right here is um one of the graphics to support all the soil investigations and um testing, soil
sorting, soil exporting to uh landfills. Um so a lot of that dominates this this section. uh there's always an end section here of a look ahead of meetings uh into this month and more importantly I wanted to sort of jump to the very end
in all these attachments um the budget that I think you folks are getting a bit used to seeing this budget uh the left field budget that I just had on the screen is always an up-to-date whoa wrong window always the first up-to-date
attachment the left field project schedule is the second attachment I'm noting as we go through the review noted back here in the report as we go through all these review that our schedule is going to be evolving until we present uh the final GMP construction
schedule to you. We're still holding a um December January the end of 2028 move. So we are on schedule with that schedule but we're refining some of the details. So that will um continue to get updated until it's in lock step with the
consigly schedule that we will all review uh in April when we have the draft GMP out to the committee. Attachment C is a document execution log that is just a summary of the items shown back here. The items that um
contract amendments, budget revision requests that already came through the committee. Uh the next attachment is usually pretty big and there's some interesting info in there and some photos. This is the Conigi December monthly report. So the left field monthly report will always
contain the Consigi report. It's probably the bulk of the pages in here. And what I wanted to just sort of spend a second on is these last two. So, if you're if you really um don't feel like going through the 64 pages that happen to be in this specific report, an easy
thing to try to get used to is to get used to the format of these very last sections. And I'm going to jump all the way to the back here without making anyone dizzy to these items. So, we'll start with
this onepage schedule summary. Um, this is really a a highle summary, a rolledup schedule as we call it. If you go into the left field report or the conigly report, you'll see a multi-page schedule. This rolls up some of the um
activities just that might have hundreds or thousands of activities below them to uh foundations, ground improvements, basically scopes of work um that can be rolled up and considered one item. You can always check the percentage complete
of the individual items here. You can see we got a lot of zeros in front of us. That's because we're trying to get out of the ground and into the concrete and steel business. You'll then see these two columns uh that establish a baseline schedule and a current
schedule. And you'll see a variance of where we are with those items. Again, we're going through a lot of back and forth with Conigi um and the team to optimize the rest of the schedule to coordinate the schedule. So, ultimately when we agree on a GMP schedule that
will become the baseline and uh will be maintained for the duration of the project and the blue columns will always show an updated schedule based upon how we start getting through this, how effectively we are getting through this.
you'll always be able to read um deltas on the right side of this. So really this is sort of an easy spot to say what is the current baseline schedule green columns versus what is the current predicted schedule um and we can look at
the delta between those two. I know this is still a lot. Again if anyone has questions on what these items are feel free to individually reach out to us. I can walk you through this in person. I can walk you through this on a Zoom or on the phone. But we at least wanted to let you know it's here. And if you get used to sort of reading this,
you can not only get a sense of what construction activities are done, but are they being done with respect to the schedule that we planned them to be done in. I'm going to jump into the other one page, which is about the budget. I know this looks like a lot, but it's easier
to interpret than um this budget that I was putting on the screen. So, anything that's in this one-page summary comes from the bigger budget, but this is sort of meant to package it into an easier to read format. Again, we roll up all those
costs. Instead of having two, three pages of budget, it's rolled up to the feasibility study to the construction value to pre-construction um owners, project manager, project design team, um progress, sorry. Um so, these all add up
to the full project value. Again, you got to keep in mind the feasibility studies in here, the 497. Um, and we will track any approved changes in this column C here. All these green um squares, green cells here are
items that we left field update on a monthly basis. And uh approved change orders. Right now, we have no construction change orders. This is why you see a zero in this this uh cell right here. But when we do have contract amendments and those are executed, those
will show up as change orders to either the OPM contract, the A&E contract. And you can see how the contingencies uh basically fund those lines. So we have um utilized all but $65,000
of the soft cost contingency, which is for services, professional services, etc. We have not touched the $18.5 million construction change order contingency. If you follow this over to the right, um this column D totals up the first few
original budget plus approved changes gives us um current contract budget. We'll be updating the expended amounts on a monthly basis against all of these that rolls up into percentage complete. And then arguably the most important columns on this are the pending change
orders and the current exposures column. So right now you're just seeing a few negative numbers in pending change orders and those are uh items that we know we've already underrun. Um one is the feasibility study. That feasibility
study was completed 24K under budget. And as noted earlier, um this is the the value of the money that was saved against the $2 million builder's risk policy that's going to sit here as savings. Um as we left field and the team hear about anything that could
cause cost exposure that's sort of somewhat known but not real yet, it would show up in this column. Um, as items become real, they would move into the pending change order column. When uh I and we hear about anything that might
happen on the site, anything that might happen based upon somebody needing additional services, we'll enter values in here. And if any of you are interested in where these come from, I'd have to go into the Excel. But this more or less these two columns start telling you what's the exposure out there. What
is the cost exposure? And a lot of these other columns help then calculate these tables down here. Without overloading everyone, the main takeaway that you can look at on these are the yellow squares. These more or
less are looking at contingency values against what we've already completed. The short of this is if we've completed about 9% of the project and we are still maintaining a smaller number of
consumption of contingencies, that's a really good read of we're in good shape. We always want to have more done percentage-wise than the percentage of contingency we've needed to get there. So this is a little bit confusing, but
the quick way to look at this is to see if our consumption of contingency um is less than our progress of moving the whole job forward. Right now it is um with all the current exposure in there, we're still about 9% complete
with the total project and we have utilized uh about 5% of the contingency. That's all again coming from the soft contingency up here. Again, we have not touched the change order contingency. So, um
I that's sort of high level where this document is supposed to go. We're also using the top of this to project um a GMP shortfall. How will that impact the MSBA's grant? If you save money, MSBA saves money. And as we go through
finalizing the GMP and getting the project funding agreement, GMP update from MSBA, we'll be able to lock in exactly um if there are bid savings, how much uh reimbursement did MSBA retract due to those bid savings. So, I know it's a lot. I know this is a little bit
confusing. If anybody on the team has anything you think I missed, feel free to chime in. And again, I'd encourage you to reach out to me if you want a one-on-one sort of um walkthrough of any of this so it makes sense on a monthly basis. Brian, if I can just add a little bit of rationale around these last two pages
that you just shared. Um, the idea there is that we as members of the building committee can quickly look at these summary documents and something should glare at us if there's something wrong. and that would trigger us to start questioning at which point we'd go back
into the more detailed documents and try to track it all out. Um, but I think Brian's summary was right. As long as we're looking at um those percentages in the yellow blocks at the bottom of this page and seeing that our uh project
completion percentage is higher than the expenditure rate of of the other funds, then we're in good shape. And then the other point I wanted to make on this page is um negative numbers are good numbers.
Correct, Brian? >> Uh negative numbers. >> Yeah. Especially in the in these columns. Yes. >> Yeah. We're we're tracking under when those numbers are negative. So um it's important to think of it that way and not think of as negative as a bad. Um,
and then on the previous one, Brian, if you can go back to the other one page or the the schedule one. Uh, this one's important and as Brian pointed out, it's still in flux a little bit till we get to the GMP when we all say we're committed to a particular schedule.
We're still trying to figure that out right now. But the one thing that can really throw off our budget is if our schedule gets off. And so as building committee members, that's another thing that we want to um track and look at and question every time we see something
that's off. Um we really want to stay on target with the schedule because time is money as we all know. Um and so it when we want to manage the budget appropriately, that means we have to manage the schedule appropriately as well.
So the the big old document is awesome. If people have time to read it every month, that's great. But if not, if we can all at least look at these two summary pages at the end, um we'll know if we're in danger or not. >> Thank you, Dr. Kelly.
>> Any other questions, comments? If not, we will move on. Uh okay. So, we're going to jump into agenda item five, general project update. We don't um have a ton to share here. Um what I did want to note is that
bids have been received. Um ultimately, bids came in yesterday. We had a few things last week, a few very late questions that caused a couple late agenda to come out. Bids were pushed to um the filed sub bids were pushed to be
received yesterday. Uh we're not ready to get through any of that. none of the bids have been accepted. We don't want to um speak about them in public until we can vet them, make sure the bids are valid, make sure nobody retracts a bid. Um and once we get to the point of
accepting the bids, we'll be able to give you folks a better update on that. So, tonight, um we did receive the bids. We're on schedule to produce a GMP, move everything forward, but we're not ready to talk about the bid results. Um
instead we have um Consigi I have your slide updates. We wanted Conigley to give you folks a monthly overview of what's happening out on the job site. >> Sure. Brian, can you hear me? >> I can. You just tell me when to click. I
assume I should click right off the front one. Yep. >> Yes. Um so that first one and also the one you're seeing here are the support of excavation. And that's the what we call the S SOE. And that is for those that
may not uh remember from previous discussions, it's kind of the sheeting that goes around the entire uh the entire perimeter of the building. Because we're at sea level, we're trying to stem the tide, so to speak, so that
when we do start uh any subterranean work, foundations, uh underground utilities, etc., we'll be able to keep um the water at bay so that we can do the work. So all the S SOE has been installed uh as of uh this last week
which is good news. Um we can move on to the next slide here. Um as you can see a lot of snow. Uh a lot of it's melted over the last week or so which is good news but unfortunately I think we're headed for a little bit more coming up.
But uh what you're seeing here are just the the cranes used to uh set the S SOE. Um we can move on to the next slide. Um this slide shows uh uh one of the uh
drilling rigs for the ground improvements. Um this particular area is buil uh the building F portion of the entire building. If you can see down on the bottom right, uh we're starting, we
plan to start our foundations and then when steel arrives steel from the back of the building to the front of the building. So we'll be starting at F and E and working our way to to the front of the building to uh A B and C. So
consequently, we'll be uh installing uh the ground improvements uh out in front of all of that, which is what's happening right now. Now the good news is that uh we were able to um get the the footprint of the building prepped
earlier so that we could create the load platform that allows us to drive these very heavy uh uh rigs on top of the building footprint so they don't sink and then we can drill in the ground improvements. Good. Uh so right now the
intent is to get uh a good running start in the ground improvements in buildings F and E o over the next month. Uh we can move on to the next slide and that will then in turn allow us to commence with
the real uh the real big important items which are the foundations. So, um, as you can see here in in the process of getting ready to do all that work, we've had a tremendous amount of soil that we've had to move. And, uh, in order to
move it, and you can go to the next slide if you want, Brian, in order to move it, we've had to, you know, uh, either live load it into trucks and remove it off site as needed, or we have stockpiled in in other areas of the of
the 33 acres of the site. Um, so currently we've had uh some pretty good luck on getting uh the uh facilities, the landfill facilities to accept the soils so that we can live load and get
the soil off site which is our preference as opposed to stockpiling. Um but that process is still ongoing. Uh hence a lot of the um a lot of the efforts by uh Sandborn Head as they
continue to move um move through the process of developing these uh these reports LSPs that we have to submit to the landfills in order to get them to accept the soils. It's a very arduous
process which hopefully kind of tries to explain the efforts involved and the cost involved in getting this soil managed and getting it moved out of the way. Um, so that being said, we're also putting in utilities as you can see here
is an example of some utilities that we we are starting. You can go to the next slide, Brian. And once again, just uh efforts to uh move soil, get areas prepped for uh the
upcoming commencement of foundations. And this last slide kind of just showing, you know, some development here. Unfortunately, with all the snow, it's kind of hard to really show. I think hopefully next month we'll have a better or at least on our next uh meeting, we'll have a a better outlook.
things will be melted and you can really see some some definition to the work. But um we we you can see here that you know up in the top right hand portion of the screen uh all those little uh bumps
up there are are just stockpiles thousands and thousands of yards of soil that we've moved in order to prep prepare for uh the ground improvements and followed by the the um preparation of the uh building footprint for the uh
foundation. work. The the good new I would say just to wrap up here, the outlook is good right now for us to start uh foundations uh in March, which is an improvement from the original outlook, which was uh to start
foundations in April. So, we're we're despite the the the obstacles that we've had with dealing with the soils and how to deal with those and the delay in getting those soils out of our own way.
Uh coupled with the winter conditions, we've still been able to uh work with uh our project teams to um figure out a way to get the foundations moved up in the schedule. Thank you, Darren. Any questions,
comments for Conigi or about site progress in construction? Scroll around for hands. Seeing none, jump back to the agenda. We'll go to public comment before we go to any other business or new discussions. Uh if we have
>> Actually, Brian, can I say one thing before we move on? Um I just want to say how helpful it is to have the pictures and see those those drone pictures of the land. It really does set a vision for the change and and lets us kind of understand what's going on. I drive by
the site every day and from the from the parallel it's hard to see what's really happening. So, um just a a shout out and a thank you for the pictures. It's It's really helpful. >> Yeah, that's good to hear. And uh we intend to be a little more um I guess
detailed with some of those pictures as we move forward. So hopefully we'll be able to give you a better outlook on things as we uh present these on uh the the subsequent meetings. >> Thank you. Uh I will keep this on the screen for
now but uh if there is any public comment we will need um name and address for the record. Any public comment going twice? No public comment. Uh any new business or other business we
should be covering tonight? Keep this on the screen. >> Hey Brian, uh Don Martelli here. Thanks for answering the question via email I had about um start times. That was literally a single tree branch falling in a large forest. So I wouldn't worry about it at this particular point, but
just be aware that some folks are cognizant of just um noise in the area as construction's happening, but it's obviously going to happen because things are happening over there. But, uh, small thing, but I have an eye on it. And, if it does bubble up, I'll be sure to alert the group. >> Yep. You got it. I'm going to I'm actually going to make sure you have,
uh, me and, um, left field's other Brian, Brian Johnson's number, Don. Um, does every anything like acute day of, certainly let us know. And >> absolutely, >> what I will say is once we get out of this whole soil stockpiling business, this side of the site will get a little
bit quieter um, until we're out here sort of doing um, more fields work. a lot of the intense work on the site's going to be uh at least removed from the Shamut Street neighborhood. >> Good stuff. Appreciate the update. Good work. >> Thank you, Don.
>> Uh any other new business, other business? If not, we would entertain a motion to adjourn. >> Motion to second. >> Third. Thanks everybody. >> Thank you everybody. >> Bye.
>> That was two motions and two seconds and this man Charles