All right. Very good. So, with that, call the meeting to order. Good evening, everybody. Welcome to our renovated home. Glad everybody can make it. The time now is 7:34. This is the regularly scheduled meeting of the municipal land use board of the Burough
of River Edge. It's no November 19th, 2025. This meeting of the municipal land use board of the burough of river edge is being held both in person and remotely via Zoom in compliance with the provisions of the open public meetings act and associated regulations. Notice of this hybrid meeting was published in
the Bergen record posted at Burough Hall and posted on the burough's website. The notice included the dialin and login information necessary for public participation and access to this meeting remotely. Copy of the agenda for this meeting was made available on the bureau's website near the posting of the meeting notice and included the dialin
and login information. Please silence all cell phones at this time. During the public comment period of this meeting, if you would like to make a public comment, you may step up to the microphone and wait to be recognized by the chair. Press the raise hand button on Zoom or dial star9 on
your telephone keypad to raise your hand. You may mute and unmute yourself by pressing the microphone icon on Zoom or dialing star six on your telephone keypad. You must state your name and address clearly prior to making a public comment. And if I ask, would you kindly
all stand? We'll salute the flag. Uh, for for some reason I can't hear anybody. Can you hear me, Jason? >> Now I can hear. Yes, >> but we can't hear you. All right, we'll take a pause for a moment.
>> Can Can you hear me? No. Hello. >> Yeah, I can hear you. Can you hear me? >> All right. Are you good now, Jason? >> Yeah, now I can hear you. >> Thanks. >> What point did you start your ex,
Jason? At what point? >> After uh we sell you the flag. That's That's it. I >> All right. So just a summary of >> um for the record for what we missed after the flag. The roll call, everyone's present except for the mayor,
Miss Woland and Mr. SA are excused. Also present. Um our zoning officer, Mr. Duckin, and our board engineer, Mr. Flores. Um we approved the minutes of 9:24 with everyone in favor except for Mr. Given
abstaining. And then now we're on to the memorialization of KCK Bagels withdrawal. And this one there were was testimony in a hearing on this application, but after the board um made a decision, they requested a withdrawal.
And so this is a proposal to void the board's original decision on the application and to just accept the withdrawal of that. So everyone's eligible to vote on this. >> Okay. Thanks. Everybody's caught up with that. There is a draft resolution provided.
How is a question from the board on the draft resolution? Being none, I'll look for a motion to approve as provided. >> So moved. Is there a second? >> Second. >> Mr. Cass. >> Yes. >> Mr.
>> Yes. >> Mr. Becker. >> Yes. >> Mr. Craig. >> Yes. >> Mr. Council Glass. >> Yes. >> Mr. Gibbons. >> Yes. M. Yes. >> All right. The motion passes. >> Okay. Thank you. We're going to move now under completeness review on our agenda.
The applicants are B and Mavanis. Property is 241 Berkeley Road, block 906 lot 7. Application is seeking approval of a proposed addition renovation for building.
Will you be happy? Jason perhaps just kindly if you could go over the apps submitted by the applicant were I reviewed them prior to the meeting and I found them to be sufficient for the board to hear the application.
>> Um good evening uh chairman uh board members and uh board of professionals and the public in general. uh our office received the architectural plans uh uh you know prepared by Mr. Bruno uh dated September 9, 2025. Uh we received a copy
of the boundary survey um prepared by a submit surveying dated August 1st. Uh our office also review uh Mr. Deepkin's uh you know letter of non-compliance and the signing application and we find all the information sufficient to proceed
with the hearing tonight. Mr. Din. Uh, yes. Thank you, Janice. Yes, I believe they can uh is a completeness check is uh approved and can be heard tonight. Okay. Thank you.
Council pass to complete for a motion to the application. So move to sign. >> Yes. >> Mr. >> Yes. >> Mr. Becker. >> Yes. >> Mr. Frag. >> Yes. >> Mr. >> Yes.
>> Council Black. >> Yes. >> Mr. G. >> Yes. >> And >> yes. >> Okay. Thank you. Now move on to new business. Applicant is Cardennis. Prop is 241 Berkeley Zer block 906 block 7
applications seeking appeal for alteration renovation to public addition and legion of the existing single family home for students of building coverage the along with their architect. Good
evening folks. Good evening. >> Well, Mr. Bruno setting up I can get you swear in if you please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm that the testimony that you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and as you know the truth? Please state your name, spell your last name, and provide your address for the record.
>> Brian Cardennis, C A R D E N A S 241 Berkeley Road, Riverad 0761. and Megan Perennis. Um, N E A G H I N C A R D E N A
B will be the truth the whole truth. >> Yes, I do. And could you please just remind the board of your qualifications and your that your lensure is in good standing and current in New Jersey? >> Yes, I um earned my bachelor of architecture degree from the school of architecture at New Jersey Institute of
Technology in 1983 and I was licensed in New Jersey in 1988 and my license is >> questions for welcome back. It's nice to be here in person and see you all in person with I
don't think I've ever been in this room with you. >> If you'd like to bring another chair up that way you don't >> Oh, I'll be standing. >> No, I know you can stand but I'll be stand >> and if you just move that microphone
closer to Mr. Bruno and Jason, you can hear it on there. Hey guys, we'll just quickly introduce ourselves. Um, my name is Brian Cordin. This is my wife Megan. Uh, we moved to
River Edge in 2018 at Newlys. Um, I can safely say when we were looking forward, we knew um for our first home, River Edge was definitely the place we wanted to live. Um we this this this has obviously a great reputation um a great
school system and we uh we were very very set on finding home here. Fortunately in 2010 we were able to find a home on Berkeley Road um and um from since then we grow our family we have two beautiful children both four and two
and um we're starting to outgrow a little bit and we're looking to um modestly expand our house a bit to make it a bit more conducive for a bigger family. So, uh, we appreciate you taking the time to for us to help us walk you through our our
Okay, thank you, uh, taking your time this evening. Um, I at each board member's desk, um, two handouts. One is a photo index. Um, you want to mark that?
>> Yeah, that'll be A1. 21 >> dated November 4th >> dated November 4th, 2005. And the second handout um is dated uh November 19th, 2025. And that is a revised schematic site
plan by um in response to the engineers letter relating the uh the driveway and parking. I hand out I show the um doning extend to another driveway to um to
accommodate the um the proper parking spaces that are outlined in the engine. What I'd like to do first, if I may, is just walk the board briefly through the photo index. We're going to um sort of set set the environment for the uh for
the helm. Um it start with graph number one is the north of the front elevation view on the subject residence and the um proposed addition which would be to the um to the left hand side as as one views the house from the street. That would be
the twotory edition and then there would be a second floor edition above the garage which is situated to the right of the the um the residence. Uh photograph number two is a uh view looking northeast from the southwest corner of
the subject lot. That is the existing deck that will remain and to the left in the left of the photo that's the the rear part of the garage which as I just mentioned would have we're proposing a second floor addition above that photograph number three is the north or
front elevation view of the residents to the east of the subject with residents or to the left as you're looking at it from the street. So, it's it's quite a large home situated to the left or to the east. Um, photograph number four is the north of front elevation view where
residents to the west of the subject residence or to the right and that's the um that's a two-story house with the front porch. Photograph number five is a view looking north from the front entry of the subject residence. So I um I I
took these photos of myself and I was standing right by the bottom of the uh the steps leading to the front entrance of the home. And photograph number six is a view looking northwest on the front of the subject very residents that um
sets the uh the environment for the house. Um the uh in our original application I had uh identified two variances. Uh one was for maximum building coverage. One is probably from saying from the
8.41% is proposed and at present uh we are at 25.45%. So the house as it says today is already um in excess of what is permitting. We've also identified um a front setback
that variance uh to be required 30 speed is minimum. Uh the funding 7.7 is proposed but um in the cost of letter prepared um they determined that the that we were in compliance with the
front yard setback. So that is um that is no longer a variance. But they did mention in the letter that you were deficient in on-site parking uh could be RSIS standards. So um in the handout
that I that I left at your desk this evening dated November 19th which is a schematic site that you see at your desk. Um we show the additional parking and that that actually triggers a variance for for the improved block
coverage or the impervious pavement which is the pavements plus the building. So um given given the 146 square ft of increase in driveway area we would be um at 36.85%
where 35% is permitted. So the the um the proposed improvements are as follows. uh expanded kitchen and I'll get to the paint here. So, it would be
expanded kitchen which is on the left hand side or the east side of the the house as you view it from the street or you view it from from the plan. uh first floor interior alterations just to open up the space a bit because it's it's got a lot of interior walls which which
creates a claustrophobic feeling and doesn't allow the uh the spaces to uh to work together. uh front porch and stair uh new second floor bedrooms which would be situated over the the garage and a um
an expansion of the existing small bedroom on the left hand side with a with a laundry room attached to the existing baskets. So the um the um the architecture of the house will be in
keeping with the existing formal u style architecture. not only of the house itself but of the neighborhood. So we would um use someh some stone veneer at the lower level up to the first floor window sill height as well shingle roofing cloud style sliding and we've
got a standing seam metal roof above the uh eyebrow roof cutting across to um above the first floor windows. Um we would respectfully um state to the board that the that that that given the site conditions and the um and and the modest
expansion that we're proposing is that the variances that we're requesting this evening are um could could be considered minor. We already are in excess of the um permitted coverage where uh the the
new coverage um is as I mentioned before is is is strictly for the um the kitchen expansion. We've got a very very narrow space here and it's really not deeply to to modern family life. No kids and dogs
and relatives and and so on. and to create the the covered front porch which gives some um not not only um you know not not only beneficial coverage for entering um and exiting the home but
also as you see from of the elevation going it provides a um a a beneficial amenity to the streetscape improves the the architecture of of of the house um in accordance with the um with with the
burrow ordinance the um the uh the excess or the increased roof area the um the rain water will be captured and diverted to the storm water chamber which is underground and we've designed that to um to a um to 3 in per hour
rainfall and I believe the cost of letter uh took no exception that be questions comments Okay, for start with our professionals, Mr. Dian.
>> Uh, yes, thank you, Chairman. Um, I did do the review in regards to the amendment to the to the lot coverage. Um, I I'll certainly accept Mr. Bruno's facts. Um, the um on that bulk
requirement, it's now called building coverage instead of lot coverage. Um but u other than that u I he's correct in in the statements of the percentages over and the in regards to
the front yard the porch um there's a stipulation in the code uh permitting uh an encroachment of six feet uh into the front yard set. So that's that's all right.
Thank you. Mr. floors. >> Uh good evening. Um can you clarify uh for me uh how are you planning to address the the the parking requirement one more time? >> I um amended the site plan. So we're um
I'm um creating the increasing the driveway at the in in front of the building to a width of 18 ft for a depth of 20 ft. so that we would have um we'd have sufficient to park two cars s side by
side. >> Excuse me, Mr. Jason, you don't have this plan. This was here with the seated, so you may not have that. >> Oh, I'm sorry. Yeah, this was again that's fine. Um no, but I So you're you're so you're going to extend that to the north to the north side of the
property. Uh another uh you you're going to extend the driveway to the north side of the property, right? Am I correct? You're expanding the the driveway to the north side of the property. >> The driveway is being extended to the um to the northwest side to the right side
as you're looking at the um as as you're looking at the uh the site plan. >> Understood. Is that going to put you over the uh lat uh uh the improved lot coverage? >> That brings us to 36.85%. >> So you're so you're requesting that
variance as well. Okay. 85%. >> Okay. Um I uh other than that I I I I don't have any other comment. Uh I would just say that you know um just make sure that the storm water management uh is being placed within 10 ft of the
property lines and uh some soil testing uh it will be addressed. So uh you know you will be required to um to do some soil movement uh permit uh we will address that on there. And the last question that I have is will are you
going to make any uh changes uh uh in grading for the property? Are you going to change the grace of the property around the property? >> There will be the uh the grading of the property will remain as is. It's it's um relatively it's relatively flat site. So we're not planning to to regrade. The
only um the building soil movement on site will be for excavation for the foundations and for the storm water chamber and um with any any soil all soil actually not required to the back will be will will be trucked from the
sun. >> Okay. >> And there'll be uh there there will be um uh you know measures to to control the um soil on site. We've got a we've got a silk fence detail so that um
you know soil will not be blown around the nail by the so the silk fence which is a standard uh practice. >> Okay. Um and the only thing I will remind um uh I will remind uh the board and I will remind you if you extend the driveway to the northwest of the
property um you know we have an ordinance that you cannot be closer than 2 ft to the property line. Um just keep that in mind. I you know I can I cannot scale it from from the plan that I have but uh keep that in mind and other than that I don't have any other question.
Thank you. >> Okay. Turn to the board now. >> Mr. the the driveway expansion will be greater than 2 feet from the side property line. Do you know how far that will be?
>> Yeah, that will be um I I can measure that for you. Definitely could have been too approximately 9 ft >> and the storm water calculations took into account that additional 146 square
ft for the driveway. >> It did not. It took it took into account the new roof area. >> Okay. Well, will the would you be willing to make any changes necessary as recommended by the board engineer or burough engine?
>> Absolutely. Yes. >> And so, just to clarify, the additional driveway space on exhibit A2 says 146 square feet. So now we have we've we've broken down our lot coverage requirements to lot coverage excluding
yard amenity coverage with lot yard amenities. So it will technically be two variances. The one excluding yard amenities will be 31.6% approximately and then the one including yard amenities will be 36.86%.
turn now to the board for questions. Mr. Fra, we'll start with you. Thank you. >> Thank you. Good evening. Um, quick question on the stormwater U chamber that you're proposing. Um, how in how is
that different from what's existing? Um, and how does it improve the drainage of the property? I'm not aware of anything existing this um but but this will this will handle the new roof area and will
increase the size of it as as I just responded to to handle the roof area the roof area in in kind with the um with the added pavement driveway extension
>> and the um turning back to the driveway it's hard for me to On the photograph, it looks like um there's room for two cars side by side, but I >> Yes. Yeah. I'm posing that 18. >> So, I'm saying that the photograph
that's in exhibit A4 is a photograph of that. >> So, I think the driveway, the driveway ends at the right hand side of the building. So, so I believe um what makes it look like we've got pavement to the
right is does have a heavy shadow. >> Okay. So, the so the driveway ends at about where the gutter I >> Yes. Ends at the end. Um you'll see on the site plan that was originally uh submitted that the uh the driveway ends
here. >> Okay. >> To the right side of the garage. And and so what you're saying is that um currently based on this what's the conditions are in this photograph, you cannot park two cars side by side.
>> That is correct. >> And and can two cars fit back to back? >> Yeah. Uh the uh the setback there is I believe oh from front to back it would probably be about
35 ft. So um so you could theoretically get two cars that do not substant the sidewalk. >> I see. So he say so if you have a second car it extends it to the sidewalk. So I
believe that's the that's the reason for the u you know the engine as we make sure there >> and if they need a third if they need to park the third part it's smaller then they >> and I'm assuming I'm looking at the
picture I'm assuming the garage is garage >> I have nothing with us. Thank you. J, can you give me the number yourself coverage numbers? So, what what's
>> So, right now the >> and and give me the Yeah, I know. But I want to know what what the uh how much >> for building coverage the permitted is 25% and they're proposing 28.41%. 41%
for lot coverage just without yard amenities. The requirement is max 30%. With the driveway expansion is going to be 31.6. So 1.6% over. Um and then for lot coverage with yard amenities. Our
max is 35% and they're proposing 36.86%. This is an a slightly undersized lot. I thought it was 25. >> It's 25 for building coverage, 30 for lot coverage without yard amenities, and then 35 with the yard amenities. So what
are the automatic exact is the deck is uncovered and it's existing what's you disapprove >> so Jason might be able to chime And on this the we've updated the code. So if
you have a deck that water can go through um the planks, >> it has open joints >> and there's nothing underneath. It's just uh grass or other permeable material. Then you get a discount of is it 50
>> 75 75%. >> Oh 75 added. >> Yeah. I I did not take the um I I did not take the visit. >> Okay. So you might not even >> So how what's the square footage of the
square footage of the bed? >> 365 square ft. Okay. Moving us there. >> So instead of that it's less than 1825. Oh, that's less than 100, right? 7375.
>> So that would account for the increase in the driveway. That would >> it would offset even the driveways 146. >> All right. >> Yeah. If the project if the project were to be approved, then we would >> Yeah.
>> Thank you. Thank you. Um I don't have any I have just comments for you. So then she shows how >> well they contractor would remove access
but but if we don't have it completely >> sorry >> install they'll get access in the absolutely Um, can I say something? >> Yeah. >> Uh, usually what happens is, uh, they'll install the silk fence around the
perimeter of the property. Um, they'll have a gra gravel section if they're removing, uh, are you removing the existing driveway? >> The existing driveway will be removed and and and replaced. >> Okay. So, they're probably going to do that later on in the project. Uh, so
they'll that'll be the path, a truck path for the u construction site. But what the sil fence does, it just maintains uh the soil so there's no soil erosion that goes onto the neighbor's properties or into the right away.
>> And also in the event of wind, it's it's it mitigates the amount of wind soil. I just I see frequently a lot of traffic. Um, >> um, so with those I guess reductions and the amount of percent, the the concern
that I have is the the driveway might not be big enough. I'm just looking at this and just thinking of of two SUVs of reasonable size, one pulling them straight and then the next one trying to get around them. So, I'm just concerned
that you don't have enough if the driveway isn't close enough to the curb to realistically pull in two cars. Well, what we could do is since we have since we have an old with my calculation, we have the old ridge on per the deck, we
can increase the driveway and still be and still be within the um >> That's my thought. Yeah, because I'm just looking at it thinking it's going to be >> it could be challenging, >> right? what kind of car you're driving, but if you got a decent sized SUV, that could be
>> tricky getting those two cars in there. So, if we're not really at 36.86 and you know these numbers are lower, um my suggestion would be to make that driveway as all the way to the curb if that whatever that calculation is and
then that makes more sense for us. >> Um you know, you were you were barely over to begin with and now you're really barely over. Well, I would suggest you make that until two decades sense. >> Yeah. So, you might not even be over at this point, >> right? >> You know, maybe by doing what I'm
saying, you might be over. Um, but I I would I would think that would make uh the most sense. Um, but if you're barely over, you know, it's a minimal project, so >> Mr.
They could have discussed some good >> uh one comment that I would make uh if you were to take Mr. Gibbons suggestion and extend the driveway right to the curb. If you needed to reduce uh you
know reduce your numbers, you could use pavers to further get a discount, right? >> Yeah. We also accept a reduction for permeable fevers. So if you >> Yeah, we could do that and and well because at at worst we'd be where we
where where we state we are. >> Yeah. >> But it's likely to be less right to the deck as >> right. Thank you, Miss Le. >> Uh no questions at this time. >> Thank you.
Before we do, I actually do have a question. I bought a Do you have any issues right now with flooding either in the backyard or in the front yard of your house? >> Thank you. >> Well, at this time, um, I will put a motion to open for public comment.
>> Second. All in favor? At this time, we're now open for public comment of this application. There's no one online, but we do have some. >> Anyone wish to be heard on this
application? In the case, I'll motion to close the public health. Good. Is there a second? >> Second. >> Okay. Favor. >> I close. Any further questions from the commander
or our professionals on the application? So the one question I would ask is we need Mr. Bruno to come up with more independent calculations for us. >> So based on the
discount that is going to be applied, do you think that you can comply with the imp the lot coverages without a variance? >> Believe we can. Can can I um add maybe five minutes to >> Sure. Yeah. rather than shoot myself
>> that's why I asked the question a little bit short >> like that's >> what was the um I'm sorry what is the discount from the uh the deck >> the deck discount is 75% so it's 25 >> 25%
It's still the discount for Good day. Oh, no. So, we're at 305. Yeah, it would be a 30 34 and a half% which >> would be enough. Yeah. >> But but if we're taking 25 25% of the
debt >> Yes. and and Jason will I don't know if you did the calculation for excluding yard amenities would with the with the new um driveway expansion would
that require I don't I'm not sure >> I I calculated an extra 90 ft for the from what we just discussed with the mention right so they'll fit into the to the lock Okay.
>> Yeah. So, just so I'm clear, I'm counting 25% of the day. >> Yes. >> 35. >> And I think the question was it's 30 less than >> Yes. But so without yard amenities, the
coverages will be below 30% or equal below >> yard amenities is the deck. Now when when when we count the yard amenities, do we count the full deck or the or the discounted? >> The discounted >> the discount. Yeah. >> The discount
>> that's in the full but without any yard amenities. We So the reason why we separated is so that people don't max out their yard their lot coverage without leaving room for the yard amendy. So we're so we have a a
lower reform a 30% max for everything else excluding the yard amenities. >> So yard amen just so we're clear for this conversation. I want to make sure so the yard amenities will be what? The deck. >> Yes. >> Yes.
>> And we just subtract the discounted and the driveway. >> No German it is. So I think you will still need a variance for the lot coverage excluding yard amenities because the existing or the proposed
that you had before the dragway edition is 269 ft. If you add 146 ft that's up to 20 2215 so about 31.6%. But if you expand that driveway a little
bit more, say 90, you said 90 square feet. Maybe >> it' be 146 plus 90 because 146 is the amended plan that I wrote this evening. So 146 + 90. >> So 23
>> 236 running 236 ft to the driveway over and above what was the original application. So it would be about 33%. 32.9% for that. Is that what you're getting,
Jason? >> Yeah. Now, can I can I ask something, Mr. Bruno? Maybe you can consult. I don't know if if the board will take my advice, but um will be possible to replace the dryweight with environmental paper. So you reduce the almost 400
square feet of dryweight by half. I think we I think we need to look into that, >> but I have you without the without the yard amenities. I've got 32.82%. >> That's good. Yeah, that's that's what I'm getting. Roughly 32 point something.
Uh I just >> Are there reasonable peral papers that are for I I don't know. Yeah. >> Well, one of the um I I recently had a project in Leonia where where they were
they were really strongly encouraging us I'll say strongly doing the the perical behaviors. The only problem with that is if the ground is froze it really doesn't wet. So what we did was we took the we
um we we collected the um um we collected the rain water in a trench drain at the um at the interface where the driveway meets the the sidewalk and conducted it to a storm water chamber. So we wouldn't have because the period
papers it's a great idea but it doesn't work in a they they don't work very well in a violent way of ground pieces >> or or over time when they get clogged. >> Correct. So, so we so we we elected to
um to um to conduct the the rain water to a trench drain where the driveway and the sidewalk meet and then that in turn into the into the um storm chain >> I
you know typically that 5% of the amenities because we're protecting people developing property not having the amenity. The amenity is here and it exists underneath the overall coverage and the
coverage input plus. So the issue that normally trying to address is already addressed. So I think you know we get approval variance for coverage of abnormities
and still be needing this department proposal all >> because I think that if I if I may make this request because sometimes at these meetings trying to get the numbers straight I would I would prefer well
may I suggest that the board consider the the variance for the improved lot coverage but we make the we make a considering effort to address your concerns with the you know for the um um
for the mitigation that we've discussed. So that at at least if we're if we're making if if we're making a misstep with the calculating the numbers now, it doesn't cause us to have to come back for another another um round. But we will,
you know, we we will c certainly take the board's um the board's um suggestions and make any effort to reduce the um the coverage, but to allow us to to assume that we're still going
to be over for now. We're saying 35, >> right? >> Because we only just allocated the 5% um separately different purpose than what applies here. So if you're below 35
I mean you need that that's >> that's a good point. >> Oh that's a good one. So so we if we don't have to worry about winter without a minute if we say okay 35 is our >> still is our maximum right then I feel
comfortable moving but there's 10 to >> 36.85 25 and it took the full deck. >> Yeah. >> And we have backyard amenities and a double wide drive. >> So, we're getting a car off the street and we have a property that has
>> and it's undersized undersized to the property. >> Yes. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. We do a bit of a hardship there because, you know, we're 500 feet and 500 feet on a lot this size >> makes a big difference. >> That's your hardship to travel.
>> Yeah. So if we um let's just take the um building coverage 1989 divided by 7500 we'd be at 26.52 instead of you know 28.4. So we would be much closer. So
what number would we be asked to have a variance for at this point to cover you of getting that driveway in there? Is it 32.9% or 34 33% to be sure that we're >> well I was well if we're without the
without the amenities. So that I think that's the only variance we're looking at at this point. So, it's not that building >> building coverage and then a lot lot coverage without yard amenities that is going to need to be if you do the 146
plus the 90 then that's around 32.9%. >> Right there. And just to be clear, what are we not counting in >> the deck? We're not counting the deck at all. >> Okay. So, let me just go back to the go back. I think we just need to know what the numbers were actually putting on
them. Yeah, we we need to get a number. Okay. I just want to make sure what I'm doing here. So, I have my building coverage including the deck at 198 89. So, I'm getting rid of the deck for the purpose
of this calculation. Correct. which counts as 25%. Which is 365 without 1624 without the debt. So then we've got
372 which is the driveway to be replaced at this point. I didn't add what we discussed this evening. Then we've got the 73 for the front walkway. Then I had Marina, what did I have for
the driveway that we added tonight? >> Um, >> 36 236 >> 146 + 90 236. >> Okay, we have 2305. I'll write that down so I don't ask you again.
And I divide that by 7,000. That gets us to 32.92. So, we're not adding We're not adding the deck and we're not taking the deck. >> Does it still counts for the 25, right?
>> It still counts for the building coverage, >> right? >> It counts 100% in building coverage, >> right? Which is what I have on my drawing. So, so, so the building So, so the building coverage ask is still 28.4. 41%. >> Correct.
>> I'm sorry. Can you say that number? 28.412 is I don't know about you, but I'm exhausted. It's a lot of numbers. >> All right. So, just those two variances. One for lot coverage without yard amenities at 32.9
and then the building coverage which was 28.41. Yes, >> we don't need the front yard anymore because the porch met the for a closed conception.
Um and the applicant agreed to comply with storm water management soil permanent. >> Absolutely. uh and the recommendations of the burrow and board engineer uh including making any adjustments for the
ch to the chamber size or uh for the additional driveway space. >> Right. So, we'll be taking the we'll be taking that like amount from the roof somewhere >> and then you'll submit revised plans with all the updated numbers and the
change to the driveway. Um and you'll consider permeable favors and some trench drains or any other storm water management that's >> okay this time I will motion on the
application approved. suspension. Thanks. >> All right. Mr. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Becker. >> Yes. >> Mr. >> Yes.
>> Mr. >> Yes. >> Glass. >> Yes. >> Mr. Gibbons. >> Yes. >> And yes. >> Thank you. >> Yeah. I spent three hours that I had
just this time. Um we have nothing left and other than help provide sincere appreciation and congratulations to Mr. Alter for his eight years of
service to this board in both a live and virtual environment. doing this online both happen. I know your service has been invaluable to mostly thing all the agenda items flowing
smoothly at any given time. So I just want to offer you >> my personal best wishes for you. >> Thank you. It's been a pleasure to work for this board. I've been involved with other wards and other towns and I find
this board so committed and dedicated and so sensible when it comes to these issues with the residents. You want to make the residents happy uh and at the same time you want to maintain the town's ordinances. It's a a give and go and this board has been excellent at
doing it. So I appreciate every member. I realize you're all volunteers. I volunteer in my own town. Um, so it's much appreciated and thank you for the kind words. >> Thank you. >> Um, I work in
scores of towns throughout the state and I can honestly say say that Mr. Wald is one of the most helpful and on top of things for for a secretary, administrator, whatever you want to say,
and he's he's always a pleasure to work with and um and frankly makes me better what I do. >> Thank you. >> I'm very lucky. >> Thank you. >> Thanks. >> You'll be missed. >> Thank you. >> Good luck. Yeah, especially at the next
meeting, I'm sure. >> Uh, if nothing further from the board, I'll look for a motion to open this public. >> Do you have any comments for >> that? Second, Mr. All in favor?
>> Any opposing expense? Stand everyone.