here. Commissioner Vo here. Commissioner G here. Chairman Clark here. Thank you. Uh Mr. Vice Chairman, we have two meetings that we need to approve the minutes on. Do you want to do them one at a time or you like to do them together? I'd rather do them together. Okay. I've read them both and even
though my memory doesn't coincide with the May 6th meeting about 4 4:30, uh I want to approve it. M. So, we have a motion to approve the minutes of April 15th and May 6th. So, we have a second. Any discussion? Seeing none, all those
in favor say I. Opposed? The eyes have it. Minutes stand approved. Uh, nobody public comments. Is that right, Carla? So, we're going to go straight to our item five. We got under advisement an RFP rebid for body removal transport. Uh, uh, you and Eric, uh, come forward
if you don't mind, please. I think um hopefully you've got a recommendation, but why don't you explain to the committee um and to those present how we got here and what we're doing and why we're doing it, please.
Okay. So, um the reason we are here is to consider the bids for the RFP that uh were sent out um for um body removal and transport service for EMS the medical examiner's office. Um the we are here
for I'm sure you never seen me but uh I think the fourth time for me here um basically this is the third time we are considering uh the responses. Um the first time um there was some um
technical specifications that were missed by the two uh respondents uh that we received bids from. Uh so we put it out for rebid uh reminding them to provide all insurance documents. Um, one
of the biders, Trial, provided all the documents. Um, the other bidder did not. Um, it was recommended by me that we send out the, uh, bid again. um the RFP out again um after I consulted with our
uh insurance and risk management to see whether we could tweak the uh insurance to still cover the county but maybe make it more accessible uh to the uh respondents to uh consider the prices um
and their responses. So um they we did have the same two um respondents again. we to get another advisement from there and that's why we're here tonight. Uh the reason for the RFP I think you wanted me to respond that to you as
well. Um was it was actually prompted um by a uh price increase from our current uh vendor. Um when we uh looked to see um why we didn't get any notice in
regards to the price increase uh we were looking back for documentation. Um our current vendor uh started the uh service for us uh back in um I believe we found out was October of
2019. So prior to uh my my be me being in this position and the current administration. Um so we tried to look for documentation of the any agreements or any uh writings in regards to how that agreement took
place. We could not find any. Um the only documentation we could find was a what appears to be an apparent um sales call um and apparent what sales call uh sales call. Sales call. Okay. Thank you. sales call into um wanting a
discussion about providing the transport and removal service back in uh May of 2000 uh no sorry August 2019 and I believe the service started in October uh but that we couldn't find any other provision of documentation once we
realized that we didn't have documentation that the county does require um including the Iran Iran devestment um form which would um and also the requirement for the expected
cost per year of that service. We realized that it needed to be rebuilt. Thank you. As a as a result, we had a contract that we didn't have a contract with the
existing provider. It was in excess of uh the $25,000 which is was required limit at that time. Of course, this committee uh upped that to 50. And so the reason for the RFP, there was been some questions about why are we issuing an RFP is because we do not have an
existing contract that was run through the purchasing committee as required by the private act. So we're trying to correct something that is several years old. So that's brought us to this point. I and and fill in the gaps for me,
Denise and Eric, please. So while we were while we thought well the need to put this out to RFP as required in statute in our private act we thought what are some of the other requirements that her office needs for body transport
and so you we upgraded the requirements I believe there's some requirements like two attendance and these kind of things. Is that correct? That's correct. So we up we up the requirements based on just the need of that uh that service. Yeah. There are certain standards that require
for medical examiner transport. Um as uh as chairman Car mentioned that you know two to two um two transporters in in order to make the um removal as smooth as possible are required things like
that. Making sure that we had sufficient um insurance that would protect um our deedants and their families as well as the county. u making sure that we had those requirements covered as well. So there were certain things that we needed to establish um in an agreement going
forward. So that was why we brought to be clear this is this is not everybody every body. No. Right. That's right. This is just the ones that the medical examin That's right. that are going for um examination. Yes. To to na
to Nashville. That's correct. Thank you, Commissioner. So that brings us to you've reviewed again the there are two RFPs correct two responses yes two responses you have reviewed them do you have a recommendation I do would you
share that recommendation with the committee so they can then ask questions so hopefully we can move to an approval okay um there's a lot of moving parts and a lot of requirements both um mandatory requirements and tech technical specifications that are
involved in um the re the responses um while looking at them. I am unfortunately still on the third try on this um um bid response missing um some insurance um requirements um from the
MTRS build. So to just to regroup, we had two responses, one from Triagle um who is our current vendor and one from Middle Tennessee Removal Service. Um so this the same piece of information is unfortunately still missing from the
NTRS uh response. Um Trial um have bid $275 per deedent uh $50 for any additional personnel um if they were to be required
and then $ 250 per loaded mile um per deedent if we were to um need transport to go out of the county. doesn't happen very often, but it does happen. Um, when uh looking at M MTRS's uh bid, they uh
bid 200 for deedent, uh 100 for additional personnel, and 325 per loaded mile for those cases that would take them out of Rford County. When you say taken out of Rutherford County, every deedent is taken out of Rutherford
County though to picked up from Oh, I see location from outside of county. I was going to say we're taking everything to Nashville, but yes, the the the bid requires them for a flat fee from from Rick County to the forensic center. I got you. Occasionally there's a
situation where the death report did not come in in a timely manner and the body has already been removed out of county. So maybe Canon County, Pum County, something like that to a funeral home there and we've had a need to go and pick the deed up from a different county in Ratherford. So it doesn't happen very
often fortunately, but it does it has happened in the past which is why we made it a requirement of the bid. So just to regroup, uh there is an important um insurance piece missing. Um it's the automobile insurance. We had a
requirement after, like I said, my in my uh consultation with our insurance and um risk management that we required a million dollars um automobile insurance and unfortunately MTS does not have that in
there. Um, so my recommendation would be that we move forward with the triangle bid and that's currently Yes sir. Is that the first bid that you discussed with 275 plus? Yes sir.
Move to approve. We have a motion to approve. Second. We have a motion and a second. Further discussion on the the extra $50. Did you say that we was upping the personnel? The 275 includes the two personnel. So the $50 would only
be if we had an unfortunate mass fatality situation where we required more personnel out to we have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? Seeing none, uh, if there is no objection, Carla, call the role, uh, for
the recommendation for triangle for disease transport, please. Yes, sir. Commissioner Phillips, yes. Commissioner McNe, yes. Commissioner Johnson, I. Commissioner P. Yes. Commissioner Boyd. Yes. Commissioner Gage. Yes. Chairman Carr. Yes.
Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you, Eric. Thank you, gentlemen. I'm glad I could assist. You did a great job. What's good, Mr. Hennessy, you exceeded all expectations. Oh, we're going to under advisement item two, the re uh the RFP for the
installation of a 30 by 30 x6 building. I think that is Captain Holton and Deputy Chief Spence if I'm not mistaken. Sir, All right, gentlemen. I think this is uh just based off of a discussion we had last time. Uh remind us why we deferred
this if you don't mind. We made a mistake in the RFP and some of the biders got the correct information. Others that pulled the bid offline did not get the correct information. So the bids uh weren't
based off the same specs. And so, um, we decided to talk to the county attorney, see what they advised. I remember that that was the recommendation. That's correct. And he said to, uh, ask that y'all refuse the
bids and us to put it out for rebid. I think if the county attorney is making that suggestion, we would be wise to do the same. That'll require a motion. So, move. We have a motion to refuse sub bids and a second. Do we have any
further discussion in this regard? Seeing none, all those in favor say I. I. Oppose. The eyes have it. Uh, please rebid. Yes, sir. Anything else? We've got another Oh, that's right. We got several things. So, now we're under new business. Yes, sir. My apologies. I
just wonder why you were still sitting. It would help if I reviewed the agenda, right? The only one that read the agenda. Do we have uh RFA? Actually, you want to say that a little louder for the rest of us? Commissioner, uh, Commissioner Johnson, I think you're
got good detail this evening. Yeah. Forgot my rope. Uh, we have the we have the RFP for the sheriff's department for the installation of 100 by 30 by6 steel building. You want to describe what we're doing? Um, yes, we're uh we've got
several outbuildings um small barns that contain records and equipment and various items that different divisions have to keep up with um maintenance and fleek. And we're wanting to consolidate that into one roof that is temperature
controlled and that doesn't leak and so we can keep everything in one area um and get rid of all the outuildings that are currently uh you know the rotten around the the door frames and some of them leak and they're not some aren't temperature controlled and okay so if
you're storing radios and records they kind of need to stay in the same climate. That's what we're going to do with this. Uh if if you're able if you're not I understand since this is live you know where this fac I understand where this facility be. Can you share that with us or not? It'll be at the sheriff's office
at 9:40. Oh okay. So it'll be at 9:40 those small buildings. Yes sir. All the green ones. Okay. So how many bids did we get, Carla? We received three bids and Okay. Steve, while we're doing that, could you update us on the shooting range? Are you
right now? They've got the peers uh the weather's delaying them right now to finish that and then they're waiting on the the wall panels to come in and they'll drop them in the the peers still in process. Yes. But they're doing a great job and moving as quick as they can to get it finished. They said panels will be about six weeks
out and once they got here, he could do it in two, three days. So, just drop in. It's going to be nice mission when it gets completed. Look better. I'll let you guys share the original. I don't see pass. I look I'm
going to get it in a little bit. So, I just want to make sure we don't use loose original. I want everybody to be able to view it. So, it's R3 458,000. 458. Yes, sir.
Who is this from? Carla say this one is from I forgot. That's all right. Be on the front hopefully. Oh, am builders. AM builders. Uhhuh. I'm sorry. Um, am is $395,798
and below that it states if architectural drawings are required be an additional 20,100. Okay. And bid number three is from Fellowship Construction. R3 includes the Are those architectural drawings required?
took the ones that they said if they are required are they? Well, they they asked me that and um I believe the city decides that. Okay. And so I'm not certain. Wow.
Fellowship Construction 59,264 right there on the front page. 59,264 Fellowship Construction. Fellowship construction $59,264 we would like to take it under advisement. That is a splendid response.
I I I I'm getting uh I think it's important um that you make sure that the insurance and all the documentation is there just based on the previous opening where the insurance wasn't there and I think I I I'll speak on behalf of the
command bank. I think it's important that that documentation be available at sir motion to take it under. We have a motion to take we have a second. All those in favor say I oppose. The eyes have it. It's under adisement. Thank you. Thank you, sir. Captain, what was the building for again? For
multi-purpose. It's a storage building. Storage shaped in the parking lot. They're leaking in um not behind the control. We're trying to everything under one roof. We can keep everything protected. We're storing records and radio,
lights, and all the equipment we take out of cars and put back in cars. Yeah. Is a I'm about to show my ignorance, but is a steel building is it movable? No. With concrete floors unfolded to the
concrete. Reason I'm asking is you we're building this could be up to close to half million dollars and we're I mean it's going to be several years down the road, but we'll be should be moving. Right. We took that in consideration with knowing how long it might take for
the the project, but we had to take our equipment. So, it's really needed. Yes, sir. Is that you're on to I think if we can just hold on for a second. I think you're on to something. Is there a way that when since this is a steel frame metal building, correct? Yes, sir.
And but it it I would think that it might be interesting to know if if it could be disassembled. It can't be moved, but it could be disassembled and maybe reconstructed because a half a million dollars is not something I just want to throw away if three to five
years from now we're building a new facility. You see what I'm saying? Yes, sir. Can can can you just kind you guys just look into that and find out if that's even feasible or if it's justifiable or or not? I think I just want to make sure that when we spend a half a million dollars, we're realizing
that investment as much as we can. Yes, that's right. We'll come back with an answer next. I appreciate it. Thank you. Any other questions? Could we possibly use that anyway, even though we're going to build a new building, a new jail? Well, right now it's it's undetermined if we're going to add on to existing or build new ones.
So, or if we have to move it, if we have to expand that way, you wouldn't have to. But if we built somewhere else, we could still use that. Hopefully. And we hopefully we can see move it and take it with us. We have firing range there anyway, too. So, yes. And we're
investing money there. Yes. Thank you. Uh were I So, we got um surplus trade in vehicles. Chief, request to trade a 2019 Porsche and a 2020 Corvette that was awarded through
us on drugs through the court system. requesting to trade these two vehicles for two new vehicles. The difference is $27,325.98. So, do that one more time. What did you just say now? Sorry, I couldn't get off the
We had two vehicles awarded to us through the uh courts from drug seizures. A 2019 Porsche and a 2020 Corvette. trade to two new vehicles for Naris can use and the difference would be 27,320, 98. The difference in what
direction? But we pay the difference. We'd have to Oh, so we got we got to pay 20. Okay. Rats, but they're giving us um 28,000 for the Porsche and 58,000 for the Corvette. Well, that's more than I was willing to pay anyway, Steve. Yes. You'll have to
go to gov deals, commissioner. So, we're trading those two vehicles in for two newer vehicles, patrol cars. Uh, no, the narcotics undercover cars. Okay. Very good. New. New. New. Brand new. New. Yes. Brand new. All he needs is
permission to expend that money. Yes, sir. And and to trade the vehicles in that that was awarded to us to do the deal. So, money's coming out of the drug fund. I say Yes, sir. Still on maintenance. So moved. Mr. Chairman, we have a motion. Second. We have a second. Any
further discussion? Seeing none, without objection, Carl, please call the role, sir. Commissioner Mack, yes. Mr. Johnson, yes. Commissioner Phillips, yes. Mr. P, yes. Mr. Boyd, yes. Mr. G, yes. Chairman
Clark, yes. I think you're done. Yes. Thank you, sir. Thank you, gentlemen. We'll see you next purchase. You are kind of like regulars, aren't you? Get awards. And next we have risk management. Mr.
Elen, no. I tell you what. Um, can we hold on a second? I'm going to take go out of order. I'm gonna I'm sorry. What? What? It's easy. Yeah. Okay, never mind. I'm told I've been told it's easy. So, come on up, Ed. You and your group every time. But every time risk management
comes up here, just like I've gotten like, okay, check your watches. Two minutes. Two minutes. Two minutes. Okay. So, real quick, um the Well, we had an R we sent out an RFP for the
uh stop-loss, medical stoploss, and uh we got a lot of feedback. Gallagher is the one that's working with the um carriers and they uh because of the immaturity of some of our high dollar claims and wanting to see how they're
going to work out and this stop loss would cover we have a uh 500,000 first is what the county pays on the claims. Anything over that then the stop loss reinsurance kicks in over that amount and then this is the premium for that. Uh and then that stop
loss they you're trying to ask them to give you a uh coverage for something that starts 111 of 26. So a lot of what they're looking at is what your your high dollar claims that you have now that might exceed that 500,000. Well,
there's been a couple um that's gone beyond that. And part of what they have requested, well, first of all, they said, "Well, we're not bidding in it because we think some of these claims are a little, I guess the word for maybe is immature. We don't see how they're going to go." And there's some other claims that might reach that amount in
2026. So, they're they're saying um you know, either we didn't get beds or they wanted to wait. And so what we have uh talking with Nick is we've asked uh Eric, Nick, myself uh we've asked for
an extension. So what we're doing is we revertising. There's no bids as you can tell. To my knowledge, none of them there's no bids came in. Um and trying to get a better get closer to where they can look at those high dollar claims and
to see what their risk is involved. uh uh some of these claims you might have a um someone that's nearing a some type of a transplant or something like that. So they want to see are they going to get past that or they going to have a transplant which might be a high dollar
claim. Uh so in order to try to get a better pricing is to get closer to 2026 and to allow that um uh bid to come in and ask for an extension. We will readvertise it. I talked to Nick and that's we'll
readvertise that there's an extension and then we'll go come back to you with a RFP to open for the stop. Is that like this fall? Is that what you're talking about? October, November, something like that. August. No, it'll be August. Okay.
That' be August because we have if we go with a new stop loss carry, we've got to get a bunch of file fees and stuff in place before. So, what are you going to ask for in budget for that amount? Michael's got it got it plugged in. So, uh We'll find out here in a little bit. Okay. You You're like a half a step in
front of me. I'm going I'm sitting here going August. I think that's a little outside the budget window. That's why we shot for this date and trying to get it, but then we went to worst case scenario and it's it's h upside down and it's So, let me ask you this, Ed. So, you're to summarize. We
put this out once. We got no response. Correct. We got some response, but they're saying for us to bid it, we feel like some of this is too early. Um, and this is not unusual in other counties. You plug in a number and then and you you get closer
to the 2026 date. Um, so we decided we would just extend it hoping that we would get uh some good pricing out of it. So obviously you and Michael were kind of down a rabbit trail based on the question from the vice chair. So you and Michael have come up with an
approximate number that we're going to use for this particular budget cycle coming up, right? Worst case scenario. Yes. Okay. It's a worst case scenario. Worst case scenario and we're hoping for something better, right? I I hear you. That that's why we're extending this to get to get something better and we feel
like we will with giving them and letting the some of these claims uh mature. Okay. We did get responses. We just didn't get bids. Correct. And we're hoping that now giving it more time that we will get the bids that we want. Okay.
So, you're what are you recommending to the committee? Anything? No. Or is this just a No, because we're just extending we're extending the bid and we'll be back to you. But I didn't want to leave you all hanging. I just I'm trying to figure out if there's an action for the committee. It doesn't sound like it. Yeah, that's
correct. And and uh Nick said, "We've done this before, so I said, "Okay, this we just need to readvertise it." Good deal. Just keep us posted, please. Okay. On the agenda. All right. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Thank you. See you shortly. Not paying attention to me.
He was he was being polite when you're done. Uh last item on the agenda, we have a change order at Lanfield Road. Markley, Jeff Jacobo, Mike Hughes, tell us what we're doing, why we're doing it, and uh how you're going to cure War. All right, just as a
reminder, we were here last month with uh two change orders and found the quantities were continuing to change. Uh this is for Landfill Road. Um it's the intersection, isn't it? It it it's for
almost 600 feet in to landfield road and the intersection on T dot right away. The reason we we bid it that way is the the county highway department built most of land rebuilt most of landfield road saving millions of dollars for the
county. Um, but we wanted to make this project large enough to entice biders because if all they were doing was working with T dot and getting the headache of working with T dot, then they we might have less biders. So, so
we put in six almost 600 ft of our own road, county road for that. Um, and the contractor is Hawkins and Price. they were awarded the bid. And on on road projects, we typically bid those as a
unit price because on on each item uh they give us a price on that and those quantities vary a lot of times. um as as they did on this project. And uh some of those uh
variances were caused by a past employee of SEC. Um he did not correctly estimate the quantities. So, uh, but but others were like, uh, we had, uh, one item that was, uh, uh, I'm thinking it was about
$20,000. Um, that was a construction entrance. Um, is that right, Joe? Yes. Yes, sir. Yes. And we didn't have to build the construction entrance, but when we turned a notice of intent in to deec, we have to have a construction entrance on there. So, therefore, we had to bid it, but they didn't have to put
it in. Um, so that saved the county $20,000. And there were a number number of items that we that the amounts changed on. Some added to, some subtracted. And um, at the bottom of
we'll have this here. At the bottom of that, there are three items that uh, were not included in the bid. Um, and um, it was the snow plowable reflectors. And if you look at those prices, you
might um choke on it. $440 for one of those little reflectors that are on the center line or on stripes for one. Yeah. So, for these items, what I did was I went to the T DOT uh 2024 unit prices bid. They keep track of those every
year. Um and I looked that item up and it was very close to that amount. Then you consider, well, we only had um 15 of those. So, I mean, it's not like an interstate where you might have hundreds of them. So, you would get a better price on that. Um, so, um, but the price
was very reasonable on on that. And the turn lane arrow, the plastic pavement marking, double turn arrow. Uh, it I think the amount was around $400 or so on those, but we only had one. And so, it's somewhat specialized. You don't just somebody you don't just bring
somebody out that does a little bit of the stuff. you get somebody that's very specialized in it. So, you you pay a price for that. Um, and then there were another a number of other items that changed. And if you'll look on the far
right column, um, you'll see items that were under are positive. Items that are over are negative. Over the bid amount, that is. So,
um, anyway, when you total all those up, it comes to at the bottom $75,698.70. And that is in addition to the amount that's two columns over at the bottom that I mean, one column over on the bottom,
$896,535, which was the original bid for the project. So, that is a 7.8% 8% increase uh when you divide the 75,000 by the 896,000 and our total amount and this is by the way this is this finishes the
project uh it's all constructed T DOT came out Monday and gave um released the um the bond on that uh so the release of contractor's bond and
Um, let's see. So, what this does is reconcile the amounts of the the the dollar at the end of the project. We would had to done that no matter if we didn't have those three items to add or other items. It
just happens. I mean, these are requirements that miss were not put in the design, but they're still requirements. Those three? Yes. Yes, that's Yes, those three. Yes. Um but the uh quantities for several items changed during construction. Mr. Jericho tell
you about that if you want him to, but um he had um an a grade a that uh asphalt mix that uh they uh substituted the as mix or vice versa
and uh because they already had one out there and it didn't it didn't matter any uh and the same for um a grading B versus a grading BM mix and those dollar amounts I I think on the the B and the BM mix are the same price
uh per ton. But we reconciled all that in this uh tabulation of final quantities. And so when if this is approved then we we can close out this project with a contractor. He submitted
his final invoice and we will um make a recommendation to pay that invoice. Uh and then they'll still have the 5% uh retainage and that will be released um after we do a final walk through and uh
he gives us a uh a lean um waiver for any of his suppliers saying that he's paid all of them. So this project is now closing out. But bottom line, Mark, excuse me,
Mr. The bottom line is that this increase or this change order are things uh that we've added to the project that the contractor didn't have anything to do with. Is that the bottom line? That's right. Yes. Okay. Yeah.
is the 757 $76,000 is that was that money was there pot of money set aside for change orders like this that is in we we did not and and I don't know I don't know how the county feels about that I I
have a project right now that it it's a municipality project and the contractor saw that contingency contingency and said that's mine and I'm going after it and he did
and it to me it's ridiculous. It shouldn't happen and I hate to see that happen. It makes me sick to see that happen and I'd rather not them not know that. I mean when you you all have your own opinions about contingencies and I think if you have it you shouldn't let the contractor know. That's just my
opinion. I would concur with that opinion. Yeah. So, where is where is this money coming from? So, this is a this is a part of that $20 million bond project. And so, Michael is keeping up with the tabulation. It's my understanding that
that $20 million we're still somewhere south or just right on the 17 mark. So, this doesn't affect uh appreciably at all. We still believe we're going to return around. So, this be added the bond. Yes, sir. This is coming out of that that portion of that what the
commission used to pay for this project. No, no new money. No new money. That's correct. Yeah, there's this is this is a change order. That's all this is. Sort of using up the savings that we sort of using up the savings we were expecting that we've mentioned. Uh yeah, and
around Yeah. and around. Yeah. Mhm. Did you just move to approve? So move. Second. Who was motion? I thought Allan did. But that's what I said. He said so move. Yeah, that's what I thought he said, but
he said no. So I'll say it. So we have a we have a motion from Chairman Phillips. And we just so for the record, we have a second from Commissioner Gu. Further discussion. Seeing none, and if there is no objection, Carl will call the role. Yes,
sir. Commissioner Phillips. Yes. Commissioner Mcad. Yes. Commissioner Johnson. Hi. Commissioner P. Yes. Commissioner Boyce. Yes. Commissioner Gu. Yes. Chairman Carr. Yes. Okay. Thank you, Mark. Thank
you, Mike. Thank you. Thank you. You're welcome. Um, finally, under other business, uh, we are the count the county the mayor's office is sending out an RFQ request for, uh, qualifications for architect.
Currently, we have an architect in KSA Kleinwinny. They do an excellent job for the county. Uh however, they're the only architect that we have and I think it would be wise and this is subject to commission approval based on the project that we have an alternative architect
given if something were to happen unexpectedly. It's just I think it's from a business standpoint it's prudent. This is nothing more than an RFQ that this body will review for the appropriate time of acceptance once a project comes available that we need to
have architectural drawings on. So there we're sending it there. We're singing an RFQ for this body to consider. So we'll have choices. Yes, sir. That's all this is. So we can have choices. That's something the building authority committee can also
uh use. You know what? I I do not know. I don't see why not. Let me ask Nick and Eric that. But if not, let's find out how if so, how they can access that same RFQ. Again, what you said, chairman, is exactly. is just to give the county more choices. Uh not that our choices that we
have aren't good. They are, but they're kind of singular. Is there any is there any other business before the committee? You need a motion for that or do we uh I I've as I understand it from Nick, we don't need we don't need a motion. Just like the
committee can send out RFQ and RFP, the mayor can send out doesn't mean acceptance. It's just it's just this is I'm letting you know what we're doing uh in an effort to communicate uh so everybody knows what we're doing and why we're doing it. Uh again, when we receive those RFQS, this committee can
then reject them, not accept them or do whatever it wants at that point, but it's just get that ball mo ming so we can have a moving so we have a decision to make. Chairman Phillips, if you have a question, our next meeting is the 10th of June. I'm Oh, we got a second page back. I'm
sorry. Yes. Our next ready meeting is June 10th at 4 at 4:30. At 4:30. Yes. Uh if there are no objections, we stand adjourned.