WEBVTT

METADATA
Video-Count: 1
Video-1: youtube.com/watch?v=7kxBuXNCfWQ

NOTE
MEETING SECTIONS:

Part 1 (Video ID: 7kxBuXNCfWQ):
- 00:03:45: City Council Meeting Called to Order and Roll
- 00:05:16: Invocation Introduction: Shepherd of the Desert Lutheran Pastor
- 00:06:40: Pastor's Invocation: Gratitude and Guidance for Leaders
- 00:08:00: Mayor's Report: Recognizing National Travel and Tourism Week
- 00:11:27: Recognizing City Employees for 20+ Years of Service
- 00:13:34: Recognizing 2026 Scottsdale 101 Citizens Academy Graduates
- 00:16:57: Citizen Academy: Graduate Shares Experiential Learning
- 00:20:23: Approving Special Meeting Minutes and Consent Agenda Items
- 00:21:54: Fiscal Year 2026-27 Proposed Budget Introduction
- 00:25:28: Budget Methodology and Philosophy; Ten Percent Challenge
- 00:31:23: Investing in Public Safety and Infrastructure
- 00:35:31: General Fund Revenue Situation and Sales Tax Projections
- 00:39:34: Operating Budget Overview and FTE Count Analysis
- 00:42:19: General Fund Operating Budget and Ongoing Revenue
- 00:46:15: Operating Budget Breakdown by Department and Highlights
- 00:47:18: Capital Budget Breakdown by Program Area
- 00:49:13: Fire Department Budget: Ambulance and Skills Replacement
- 00:55:02: Police Department Budget: Wellness Initiative and Technology
- 01:01:02: Parks and Recreation Department Operating Budget Overview
- 01:06:06: Capital Priorities: Indian Bend Wash and Dog Park
- 01:12:53: Water Resources: Water and Sewer Operations; Rate Increase
- 01:14:51: Capital Projects: Water Source Supply and Wastewater
- 01:21:33: APRW Funding and Strategic Plan Projects Clarity
- 01:24:48: New Source of 1% Water and Bartlett Dam Feasibility
- 01:35:18: Westworld Proposed Budget for FY2026 2027
- 01:47:00: Drainage Projects and Signage System Design Study
- 01:50:38: Transportation: Pavement Overlay, Thompson Peak Bridge
- 01:53:58: Walk at 6 4th 66th Street New Projects Questions
- 01:55:51: Kill Some of Those Zombies this year Please
- 01:59:09: Flood Control: Granite Reef and 68th Street Projects
- 02:01:09: End Of Budget Presentations. Questions To Follow
- 02:01:42: Public Comment: Daniel Freriedman, Hawk Crosswalk Support
- 02:04:39: Public Comment: Ariela Freidman, Hawk Crosswalk Safety
- 02:22:04: Water Recycling, Bartlett Dam, and CIP Inclusion Advocacy
- 02:23:57: Congregation Betila Member: Emphasizing Need for Safety
- 02:26:08: Dan Isaac: Organized Religion and Crosswalk Opposition
- 02:30:49: David Smith: Alleged Preserve Fund Violations and Objections
- 02:34:33: Raul Zubia: Infrastructure Investment and Climate Resilience
- 02:36:59: Avon Cahill: Concerns About Hawk Intersection and Alternative Solutions
- 02:39:54: Council Discusses Preserve Funds and Crosswalk Safety
- 02:42:54: Discussion Map and Hawk Safety Concerns Detailed
- 02:51:58: Councilman Graham and Council Budget Remarks
- 03:03:55: Vice Mayor Quasman: Budget, Anti-Semitism, and Priorities
- 03:11:36: Councilwoman Whitehead: Thanks to Speakers and Long-Term Funding
- 03:20:59: Councilwoman McCallen: Alignment to Law and Following Rules
- 03:21:48: Mayor's Goal for Reductions in Division Spending
- 03:24:33: Councilwoman Dascus: Budget Success and Investement in Safety
- 03:28:54: Public Comments: Electioneering and Jan Deboscus Recall
- 03:32:52: Boy Who Cried Wolf and Alleged False Claims
- 03:34:46: Quasman, Anti-Semitism, AI-Generated Images, and Hypocrisy
- 03:40:54: Anti-Semitism, Protection, Personal Security, and Character
- 03:43:38: Betty Janick: Water Source Problems and Solutions
- 03:48:29: Mark Wren: Water Shortfall Concerns
- 03:52:17: Dan Isaac: Shenanigans and Senator Senica's Comments
- 03:55:01: Budget Review Commission Report: Presentation Begins
- 03:57:24: Review of the City's Financial Condition Report
- 04:06:57: Recommendations for 26-27 Budget and Water Issues
- 04:14:30: Feasibility Studies for Facilities
- 04:19:04: Discussion of Revenue Streams and Sales Tax
- 04:21:36: Looking at a Federal Funding Cuts Contingency Plan
- 04:25:29: Discussion of Prior BRC


Part: 1

1
00:03:45.360 --> 00:04:02.799
I would like to call the May 5th, 2026 city council regular meeting and work study session to order. City clerk Ben Lane, may I please have a roll call. >> Thank you, mayor. Mayor Lisa Barowski, >> present. >> Vice Mayor Adam Quasman,

2
00:04:02.799 --> 00:04:18.880
>> present via remote. >> Thank you. Council members Jan Deboscus >> here. Barry Graham >> here. >> Kathy Littlefield >> here. >> Marian McAllen >> present. >> And Salange Whitehead >> here. >> City Manager Greg Kaitton >> here. City Attorney Louis Santea

3
00:04:18.880 --> 00:04:34.320
>> here. >> City Treasurer Sonia Andrews >> here. >> And the clerk is present. Thank you, mayor. >> Thank you. And this this evening we have Scottsdale Police Sergeant Eric BS and officers Kyle Shallock and Ray Wilburn as well as Scottsdale firefighters Isaac

4
00:04:34.320 --> 00:04:52.440
Duran and Steven Remky. If anyone requires their assistance, please let a member of our staff know. And thank you for being here, everybody. Uh for the pledge of allegiance, I will ask Councilwoman Whitehead to lead us in that

5
00:04:55.199 --> 00:05:16.080
flag of the United States of America and to the stands one indivisible. >> Thank you very much. And for the invocation, I'll turn it over to Councilman Graham.

6
00:05:16.880 --> 00:05:33.919
Mayor, thank you. Tonight's invocation, I have invited I'm pleased to introduce Pastor John Carolus. He is a pastor at Shepherd of the Desert Lutheran, where he has served as pastor since 2021. And there he currently oversees their

7
00:05:33.919 --> 00:05:50.800
contemporary worship services and spiritual care of preschool students, staff, and families. Shepherd of the Desert started in 1980 out of an office building in McCormack Ranch and built their main campus at the corner of 96th and Sha in 1983.

8
00:05:50.800 --> 00:06:08.479
A preschool opened in 1984 has been operating ever since. Led by uh senior pastor Dr. Scott Sid Sidler, they host 500 in worship in the winter months and 300 during the summer and a preschool enrollment of 175 students.

9
00:06:08.479 --> 00:06:23.919
The United School for Autism has operated from their 96th and Shea property since 2018. With a significant upcoming renovation to the of the of their SHA campus and momentum building and worship attendance, Shepherd strives to be a

10
00:06:23.919 --> 00:06:40.639
family of faith that connects every person in every season to the life of Jesus promise. And I will invite Pastor John to uh open tonight's meeting with an invocation. Thank you, Pastor. Thank you. Uh, Mayor Barowski, members of the city council, thanks for this honor and

11
00:06:40.639 --> 00:06:57.039
thanks for the work you do. Uh, can't imagine what it's like being in your shoes. For those who are who are willing, please pray with me. The eyes of all look to you, oh Lord, and you give them their food at the proper time. You open your hand and satisfy the desire of every living

12
00:06:57.039 --> 00:07:12.800
thing. We thank you, Lord, for all you provide. And tonight, we specifically thank you for the work and role of civil servants, our mayor, and city council. Your word reminds us that you have made everything beautiful in its time and we are blessed to live in such a beautiful city and state together. Guide these

13
00:07:12.800 --> 00:07:29.680
leaders, Lord, in your mercy, that they would have wisdom, patience, and humility to be exemplary decision makers and neighbors. Guide each of us as residents and stewards of this place that we would recognize the opportunities we have to care for one another and enjoy the blessings you pour out of your abundant generosity. In your

14
00:07:29.680 --> 00:07:45.360
wisdom, God, you established the civil government for the servants of its people. Orient the hearts and minds of these servants toward one another in such a way that they would enthusiastically pursue the good of our community according to your mercy. You have placed them in these positions for your purposes. Bless them to be

15
00:07:45.360 --> 00:08:00.960
successful and attentive, recognizing the unique gifts and perspectives each of them brings to the task at hand. All this we ask and implore in the name of the father and the son and the holy spirit. Amen. >> Thank you. Thank you, pastor. >> Thank you very much

16
00:08:00.960 --> 00:08:17.840
for the mayor's mayor's report. First, happy Cinco de Mayo. All right, who brought the margaritas? We got the chips and salsa. Uh, speaking of which, let's talk tourism. Uh, tourism, as we all know, is essential to

17
00:08:17.840 --> 00:08:32.880
Scottsdale's local community and economy. Nationally, travel is a $3 trillion industry that supports 15 million American jobs and generates more than $90 billion a year in state and

18
00:08:32.880 --> 00:08:50.480
local tax revenue for critical services like public safety, education, and emergency response. Here in Scottsdale, tourism is a powerful economic driver. I like to refer to it as our bread and butter and the icing on our cake. Uh

19
00:08:50.480 --> 00:09:05.760
each year our city welcomes 11.7 million million visitors who generate 3.7 billion dollars in local economic impact which supports jobs, small businesses, large businesses and of course a vibrant

20
00:09:05.760 --> 00:09:23.839
community that we all love calling home. Travel strengthens every sector of our economy from healthcare and education to business and innovation. That's why today I proudly we proudly recognize National Travel and Tourism Week and the

21
00:09:23.839 --> 00:09:41.200
vital role th this ind industry especially plays in Scottsdale's success. And I've issued a proclamation today which summarizes what I've just said. And so now therefore, I, Mayor Lisa Barasi, proclaim May 3rd through

22
00:09:41.200 --> 00:09:58.640
the 9th, 2026 as National Travel and Tourism Week here in Scottsdale and encourage our community to recognize the vital role this industry plays in Arizona. and accepting the proclamation is none better than CEO, president and

23
00:09:58.640 --> 00:10:15.279
CEO of Experience Scottsdale, Rachel Sako along with uh Miss Sako this evening is tourism development commissioner Kathy McKver and thank you for your service Kathy. So I'll invite you up here so I can hand this to you, take a few photos and I'll invite my

24
00:10:15.279 --> 00:11:27.200
colleagues down to join us. All right. Ready? Perfect. I don't know if you all heard her say it, but that was Kathy's first uh it's she's been short in the role and look at her success already. So, thank you very much.

25
00:11:27.200 --> 00:11:42.959
All right. for presentations. Tonight, we have the uh the city council recognizes proudly employees with 20 or more years of service as of May 2026. And this evening, we're going to make those presentations, or shall I say, uh

26
00:11:42.959 --> 00:11:59.519
Holly Peralta, communications interim senior director, will talk us through through that, and we will celebrate them. Thank you. >> Thank you. Thank you, Mayor Barasi, and members of city council. as I do every month. I'm here to celebrate our employees who have served 20 or more

27
00:11:59.519 --> 00:12:15.680
years with the city of Scottsdale. And we have three employees here who um are going to join us up front tonight who all have 20 years of service with the city. So I invite you to think back to what you were doing in May of 2006

28
00:12:15.680 --> 00:12:30.480
because at that time these three employees started their service with the city of Scottsdale. And I invite you to come forward. We have Brandon Chapman who is our fantastic citywide volunteer coordinator. We have Christopher John

29
00:12:30.480 --> 00:12:47.079
who is a building inspector and Amy Tinder who manages our website and keeps Scottdale looking great digitally. So the three of you if you can come up we'll take another photo with the mayor and council members.

30
00:13:34.000 --> 00:13:49.279
And for the record, I remember what Councilwoman Littlefield was doing 20 years ago. She was sitting right back there in that seat. Weren't you? >> I was. All right. Uh, as is the case at every

31
00:13:49.279 --> 00:14:06.240
meeting, during this evening's council meeting, the council may make a motion to recess into executive session in order, if needed, in order to obtain legal advice on any applicable item on the agenda and if so authorized by council. The executive session will be

32
00:14:06.240 --> 00:14:22.639
held immediately and will not be open to the public. However, this general meeting would resume following that executive session. Next, I'll move on to the meeting minute approvals. >> Mayor, I I apologize. Uh we have one more presentation uh for this >> recogni. Sorry,

33
00:14:22.639 --> 00:14:39.199
>> they're all here. Yes. How could I forget? Uh okay. Recognition of the city now will recognize and we will celebrate the 2026 Scottsdale 101 Citizens Academy graduates presented by Joy Rine,

34
00:14:39.199 --> 00:14:54.880
community involvement manager. And thank you all for coming over. By the way, >> thank you, Mayor Barowski, members of the council. My name is Joy Racine, and I'm happy to be here tonight to represent Government 101, Citizens

35
00:14:54.880 --> 00:15:10.160
Academy. Dig deep and discover Scottsdale Government 101. That is just one of our quotes created by our attendees on the last day of class, and you're going to hear and see more from throughout the rest of the

36
00:15:10.160 --> 00:15:27.440
presentation. Our citizens academy is interactive, informative, and is stated by one group, know your city, shape its future. Government 101 is designed to equip participants with the knowledge to actively engage in our community,

37
00:15:27.440 --> 00:15:45.199
understand local government, and network with other residents. It's a place for residents to learn, grow, and connect. Over the course of 10 weeks, 38 residents met weekly to hear from city leaders and department heads. They were able to ask questions, learn how

38
00:15:45.199 --> 00:16:02.440
departments operate, and gain a deeper understanding of what services they provide. Together, we visited the North Corpyard, heard a 92year-old play the piano at the Care Cultural Center. We took a walk in our preserve, and we visited the railroad park.

39
00:16:03.600 --> 00:16:21.040
We learned how life is good in Scottsdale by be going behind the scenes at the North Corpyard with our solid waste fleet facilities and a peak into the TMC. We heard ways to get involved and spent one morning at the food bank where we

40
00:16:21.040 --> 00:16:37.440
packaged 323 healthy packs for children at the local schools. We washed over 30 of the bins to prepare for the next pickup and we created two pallets of water. On another morning, we cleared bottles of alcohol, cigarette butts, and other trash all along Indian School

41
00:16:37.440 --> 00:16:57.839
Road. Even some of you as council members and mayor came and shared your perspective on what it was like to start with the city, what got you involved, and why you enjoy being as a part of council. I could tell you more about what we

42
00:16:57.839 --> 00:17:14.480
covered over the 10 weeks, but instead I'd rather have you hear from one of our participants tonight. I have with me Daryl Tubkin, and he's going to share a little bit about his experience with the rest of you. >> Thank you, Mayor and Council, for having me here. Um, my wife and I have been a

43
00:17:14.480 --> 00:17:29.919
resident here in Scottsdale for over 28 years and really enjoyed the Scotsville 101 class. didn't have any uh perceptions of what I was going to get out of this class, but it was unbelievable the experience that I

44
00:17:29.919 --> 00:17:46.640
received. It provided me behind thescenes opportunity to learn about the city. Um it was great introduction on how the departments work together. Um it's really interesting that uh how the budget and the planning and all these

45
00:17:46.640 --> 00:18:02.320
different departments work together. It gave us a special insight of the hardworking men and women that make this thing work like a like clockwork. And the thing that I really appreciated was that the individuals, it could have easily have been an AI presentation, but

46
00:18:02.320 --> 00:18:18.480
they took the time and effort out of their busy schedules to come in to do a presentation to us and we were able to learn about their individual departments, that being uh court or if it was planning. I really enjoyed that

47
00:18:18.480 --> 00:18:36.960
the history le lessons that Bruce gave us. Um you you're very fortunate to have Bruce as a wealth of knowledge of the city of Scottsdale. Uh taking us to the Titus House which I didn't know that would exist or the history of the Stillman uh McCormack Railroad Park. Um

48
00:18:36.960 --> 00:18:53.360
boy, I've been there a few times and I didn't really know how that came about. And thank goodness that we stole that away from Paradise Valley and it's it's part of part part of the city of Scottsdale. Um 75 years is a big uh big big thing for the city and I'm really blessed that

49
00:18:53.360 --> 00:19:09.200
we're here and I know that the next 75 years is going to be great for the city. Um the water water education that we learned during our class was great and the the direction that the city of Scots is going with renewable resources and clean water is is really important. And

50
00:19:09.200 --> 00:19:25.919
I know you, the council, you have a lot of important decisions to make and I'm really excited to see the direction that you're going to be going. The one thing that I want to leave here is that I learned that I want to be involved more with the city and hopefully someday you will see me uh as part of the board and

51
00:19:25.919 --> 00:19:42.080
commissions. So if you see this face someday, I'm the one that's going to be involved. So, thank you so much, Madame Mayor and Council for giving us the opportunity with this class and my fellow classmates for uh putting up with me for the last nine weeks and Joy for putting out and

52
00:19:42.080 --> 00:20:01.600
her staff putting on a great program. So, thank you. >> Thank you. >> Thank you, Darl. And I want to add that it's his birthday today, so he chose to spend it with us. >> Cinco de Mayo, baby. Uh, do you want to have every Are you

53
00:20:01.600 --> 00:20:18.520
still presenting? >> I was just actually I was just going to ask if everybody in the class could go ahead and stand up. That was going to be my next spot. So, perfect. >> All right. >> So, if everybody who's a part of it, if you could stand up, we would love to recognize you. >> All right. Well done.

54
00:20:23.919 --> 00:20:41.120
and I spy one of our own budget review commissioners. So, that's exciting. So, thank you all. Congratulations. All right. Well, thank you, Joy. Appreciate it. >> Thank you. >> Next, we're going to move on to the meeting minute approvals. And if there

55
00:20:41.120 --> 00:20:58.559
are no changes or questions on those, I will entertain a motion to approve special meeting minutes of March 24, 2026, executive se session meeting minutes of March 24, 2026, and regular meeting minutes of March 24, 2026.

56
00:20:58.559 --> 00:21:17.120
>> So move second. >> All right. All those will please vote. Next we have our consent agenda item. Next we have consent agenda items one

57
00:21:17.120 --> 00:21:33.520
and 2a. And I don't I haven't heard any uh I don't see any I'll wait a minute. Does anyone have any questions or wish to have either of these all three of these items uh any questions on any of them? If not

58
00:21:33.520 --> 00:21:51.559
and we have received no uh no speakers on these items. So I will entertain a motion to approve consent agenda items one through 2A. >> So moved. >> Second. >> Thank you. Please indicate your vote.

59
00:21:54.960 --> 00:22:11.440
>> I. >> Moving on to the regular agenda. Item three uh is presented by Scott Seline, budget department director. Greg Kaitton, city manager. Tom Shannon, fire chief. Well, I'm not going to name all the names. They're going to get called

60
00:22:11.440 --> 00:22:33.679
up indiv individually. Uh, but it is regarding the propos proposed fiscal year 2026 27 operating budget and capital improvement plan. Scott, I'll turn it over to you. Thank you, Madame Mayor, members of the

61
00:22:33.679 --> 00:22:49.280
city council. very happy to be here tonight with you. It just wouldn't be Cinco de Mayo without 70 slides related to budget to go through. Looking forward to going over this with you tonight. Um this is one of the more lengthy presentations that we bring to you all. Um we'll strive to get through it in a

62
00:22:49.280 --> 00:23:05.120
thorough and expeditious manner. Um I'll present a chunk of the slides. The city manager will present a few slides and there will be representatives from some of the larger departments to present uh to briefly speak to their individual budgets. Because of the length of the presentation today, if it pleases the

63
00:23:05.120 --> 00:23:23.039
mayor and the council, I'll pause at the end of my section at slide 35 to take any questions that you might have on my before we pass it on to the department heads. Before we get started in earnest, um the release of the proposed budget, it's a very significant undertaking. There are

64
00:23:23.039 --> 00:23:38.400
many people who deserve our thanks for that. Uh the budget team, department staff who participated in this effort. uh the budget review commission who spent um many hours reviewing the budget and developing recommendations as well as city council for their overall

65
00:23:38.400 --> 00:23:55.120
direction and support in this endeavor. What you're looking at right now is the general timeline for the budget adoption. We released the proposed budget on April 3rd and then three times in April we met with the budget review commission where they reviewed the

66
00:23:55.120 --> 00:24:08.559
budget and generated their recommendations. Today we are here for the proposed budget presentation and also a work study with the BRC. On May 19th, we'll bring the tenative budget adoption to the city council and

67
00:24:08.559 --> 00:24:28.640
the final budget adoption on June 9th. This slide shows the FY 2627 proposed budget. Total amount is 2 bill118 million $118.9 million. We have it split up into three overall categories. The operating

68
00:24:28.640 --> 00:24:45.840
budget 838.2 capital improvements just under 882 million and then 398 in contingencies and reserves. What you're looking at right now is a comparison of uh the proposed budget to

69
00:24:45.840 --> 00:25:02.880
the two most recently adopted budgets. We're going to focus on the proposed budget within the oval there. the I'll start about halfway down where it says total operating budget and there's that $838 million figure. When you add in the capital improvements of 882 million and

70
00:25:02.880 --> 00:25:28.000
then 399 in reserves and contingencies, you get the total of 2 bill119 million. And then when you compare that total to the 2526 adopted budget, it's a reduction of 85 million or about 3.8%. The slide's not advancing for me. There

71
00:25:28.000 --> 00:25:44.400
we go. Um, at this point, I'm going to pause and allow the city manager to discuss some uh major budget highlights in the proposed budget. >> Thank you, Madame Mayor, members of council. Uh before I talk about some of the mechanics of how we address the

72
00:25:44.400 --> 00:25:59.520
budget, I want to talk a little bit about our methodology, our philosophy, how we approach this. Uh we can advance to the next slide. Thank you. And so uh as we approach the budget cycle which started actually in the summer with some

73
00:25:59.520 --> 00:26:16.159
I would say some preliminary discussions with departments following up on last year understanding some of their needs uh as we entered into the budget cycle. Also we anticipated that we could have some headwinds as it relates to our revenue stream. So we needed to create

74
00:26:16.159 --> 00:26:33.679
some capacity uh within our budget that would allow some flexibility to make strategic investments. And so that was the philosophy which drove the mechanics which you can read on the screen and I'll describe this just in in some greater detail. But again the philosophy

75
00:26:33.679 --> 00:26:49.360
uh as outlined I would encourage uh even audience members uh it's a short read that it's the budget message by the city manager which really outlines our approach and investment. I refer to a lot of these as investments. They're not just spending. So we invest in our

76
00:26:49.360 --> 00:27:04.720
employees and the return on that investment is phenomenal. Uh customer service that and service that we deliver to our community every single day as an example, investing in public safety, investing in our infrastructure. And so those were the core themes uh as we

77
00:27:04.720 --> 00:27:20.159
embark embark on this budget process. It's important to send the message uh to over a hundred employees that put their hands uh on the budget process and to state that framework for what we're trying to achieve. So what we were trying to achieve was not just the

78
00:27:20.159 --> 00:27:36.559
status quo of what we did last year but really a scrubbing of the budget uh line items. And so that directs me to this uh tool that we used. Uh I am a budget reviewer for GFOA, Government Finance Officers Association. And so these are

79
00:27:36.559 --> 00:27:50.960
mechanisms that some of the best of the best across the country uh utilize uh to develop their municipal budgets for their own city. and we're uh obviously an award recipient of that GFOA award for many years. And so let me describe

80
00:27:50.960 --> 00:28:08.720
the 10% and the 2% exercise. As city manager, I am not able to touch every single line item. Uh I am familiar and have done that in smaller budgets, not a $2 billion budget. So what we embarked on was a process that engaged our employees to do that. And this was

81
00:28:08.720 --> 00:28:24.320
exactly what was done. So let's talk to the 10% challenge, if you will, the 10% goal. And so again, it's a mechanism for our employees and the organization to look at every single line item within our budget. And again, two purposes to

82
00:28:24.320 --> 00:28:41.600
that. I think it's good business for us to continue to look at those line items and not live within status quo. Line items need to change from year to year. Sometimes they go down, sometimes they go up. And really, it's a new philosophy of that approach to budgeting. And then also again creating some capacity so

83
00:28:41.600 --> 00:28:58.960
that we can make strategic investments. And so the 10% exercise you take every line item and you get to pop it is in the finance mechanism you populate what that starts off with. You can start off with the same as you start off had last year. Uh you can do zero that's not uh

84
00:28:58.960 --> 00:29:13.200
zerobased budgeting that's a different exercise or you could start with a different number. So we rolled it with minus 10%. What that did is require the departments to go through every single line item, look at it, and in many instances they're not able to live

85
00:29:13.200 --> 00:29:29.360
within a minus 10%. But that encouraged them to look at other line items where they could find opportunities. And I would tell you in conversations with every single department at least twice uh at large sessions, uh they found those opportunities. That saved

86
00:29:29.360 --> 00:29:46.720
approximately $7 million. We found $7 million through that exercise. The second exercise was a 2% reduction. So if you uh 2% of the positions that you have within your department, so for easy math, if the department has 100

87
00:29:46.720 --> 00:30:01.200
employees, uh then we would be looking for them to eliminate two positions, two position 2% of your total personnel count. However, there are some exemptions. There were exemptions of sworn personnel did not count. And so

88
00:30:01.200 --> 00:30:18.240
the 400 approximately uh sworn 409 in police department approximately 400 in in the fire department did not count. We're not uh reducing sworn personnel. There were also other uh smaller functions uh that did not have vacancies

89
00:30:18.240 --> 00:30:33.840
uh in didn't contribute to that process. Uh but then when you look at the minus two within your department, we went to the positions that were vacant and so it was not eliminating any field position that created approximately saved

90
00:30:33.840 --> 00:30:50.960
approximately uh $2.6 million. So the combination of those two efforts nearly $10 million and then as we will discuss later uh there was the uh subtraction or the elimination of positions but then we were also added positions uh for next year. Just so happens that's a balance

91
00:30:50.960 --> 00:31:06.799
pretty close. It looks as a negative on a on an FTE count or full-time equivalent count. It looks like we reduced uh more than we added. But on a full-time benefited position, I'm specifically uh making a distinction between full-time benefited positions

92
00:31:06.799 --> 00:31:23.679
and uh FTEEs or full-time equivalents. And so the balance of adding full-time positions and eliminating full-time positions uh came out about 33 and 33. And so uh that was next slide please. That was that process. So I go back to

93
00:31:23.679 --> 00:31:39.519
our strategic plan is moving forward with investing in infrastructure, investing in public safety. So how did we invest in public safety? What you see here on the 4.8 million for compensation for uh police and fire. That is in

94
00:31:39.519 --> 00:31:55.440
addition to their steps. Uh the step plans for both of those departments for the sworn personnel uh to add up to about $3.1 million of additional compensation uh included in this budget. And then what we see with the 4.8

95
00:31:55.440 --> 00:32:12.000
million is a combination of longevity pay uh that we introduced last year for the police department and introducing this year for the fire department. That's about 1.4 million each. Uh and then also a 1% market move uh for both

96
00:32:12.000 --> 00:32:29.200
uh that get us to the 4.8. Uh the fire department uh really proud about the significant investment. Uh the chief has been talking about uh the tsunami of retirements that's coming and uh really making appropriate funding all for that.

97
00:32:29.200 --> 00:32:44.720
And then obviously ambulance uh roll out final phase three of three. Uh that's a good number of those uh positions that we added for next year as well. I'll let Chief uh Shannon speak to that in more detail. The 2 million for the public

98
00:32:44.720 --> 00:33:01.840
safety retirement, you'll recall last year it was just on one of the previous slides. We made an investment strategic investment on the police side to the tune of 50 million last year. And this two million uh for the fireside is really anticipating some of that

99
00:33:01.840 --> 00:33:18.240
retirement that we'll see an increased rate over the next couple years and then some significant capital investments for these areas. Next slide, please. Really prioritizing that infrastructure. Uh we've talked a lot about uh pavement over the last couple years. Pavement

100
00:33:18.240 --> 00:33:35.360
condition index, our PCI, it was in the low 60s. We have a goal of a 10-year plan to get that into 75. Really proud about the investment that we made in the current fiscal year of just over $40 million. Just for uh the audience's

101
00:33:35.360 --> 00:33:52.320
education purposes, for most years, it was around $15 million on an annual basis was our regular uh investment in this area. So, we significantly increased it in the current fiscal year uh to just over 40 million. And then we're proposing for next year uh 45.9

102
00:33:52.320 --> 00:34:09.359
million. So we have over 85 million over two years. Uh so significantly moving forward uh to improving that PCI on the 10-year uh plan. And then uh the water uh increase costs uh and that's associated here. And there's we will

103
00:34:09.359 --> 00:34:25.520
talk more about the water infrastructure, but that last bullet there continuing to significantly invest in this area with a significant amount of carry forward and that was part of the strategy as well was finishing up those projects that we already have in the pipeline, pun intended. Next slide.

104
00:34:25.520 --> 00:34:42.800
And wrapping up uh my portion of the presentation here uh economic uh development. As council knows, we've been full steam ahead in this area and continue to make strategic investments uh in really what I refer to is the areas, the facilities that we control.

105
00:34:42.800 --> 00:34:58.160
It really started with a management restructuring under uh Miss Doyle's leadership and the portfolio of city facilities that look a little different than than some of our other typical government operations. And so really proud of the partnership with the Giants

106
00:34:58.160 --> 00:35:13.599
to continue forward uh with that and and the Charles and continue forward with that investment. And then Westworld, we've uh talked a lot about Westworld in this room and in many other rooms and uh making good progress there uh on some really the drainage and the significant

107
00:35:13.599 --> 00:35:31.599
capital investments uh in there. So that wraps up my section. I look forward to some discussion later. Thank you. Uh next port next portion of the presentation looks at our general fund revenue situation. Uh what you're looking at is the total

108
00:35:31.599 --> 00:35:48.560
revenues uh for the general fund in the proposed budget for fiscal year 2627. The three largest categories uh taxes, local, state shared revenues and property taxes. Primary property tax encompasses about 75% of our total

109
00:35:48.560 --> 00:36:04.560
general fund revenues. Uh looking a little bit more closely at the taxes local uh category, that blue wedge of the pie down at the bottom left. Um that's mostly our 1% general use sales tax, also our 0.1% public

110
00:36:04.560 --> 00:36:21.680
safety tax. And um there are also a few smaller sources within that category like electric and gas franchise tax and cable TV franchise fee. Um those are much smaller in comparison to the other two I just mentioned. the orange wedge of the pie chart. State

111
00:36:21.680 --> 00:36:37.599
shared revenues that consists of state shared income tax, state shared sales tax, those are the two largest and then also auto and loo tax which comes from vehicle registrations that uh that are shared with cities. And then finally, primary property tax

112
00:36:37.599 --> 00:36:52.880
is about $41.1 million in the proposed budget. I'm not going to go into specific detail on all of the smaller wedges unless of course there are questions later. Uh but the remaining revenue sources make up about 25% of the general fund revenue and the total is

113
00:36:52.880 --> 00:37:13.440
$472.8 million. This shows our projected sales tax collections for the 1% uh general fund sales tax. We just do that one u on this slide to kind of show what we're seeing in terms of sales tax in future years. In the orange bars, we are projecting

114
00:37:13.440 --> 00:37:28.560
some slower growth in sales tax over the first two years of the five-year planning period. A growth of about 3% in the first two years before we gradually return to a more, I guess, traditional rate of growth in years four and five of

115
00:37:28.560 --> 00:37:48.920
4% and 4.5% respectively. We show this slide just to emphasize that Scottsdale's overall sales tax rate of 1.7% is one of the lowest in the valley when compared to our our peer cities.

116
00:37:51.040 --> 00:38:08.079
This slide shows our state shared revenue projections. We base our forecasts on projections from the state for these state shared revenues. Um right now those forecasts are showing modest growth in state shared sales tax as well as state shared income tax. Those are the two major categories in

117
00:38:08.079 --> 00:38:23.040
the state shared revenues. I do want to call your attention, it's mentioned at the bottom of the slide there, depending on what the state does um in its budget regarding conformity with federal tax law. It's possible that there will be a the potential hit to our state shared

118
00:38:23.040 --> 00:38:38.160
income tax in fiscal year 2728. That's not the first year, but the second year of the 5-year planning window. Uh we calculate the potential impact to be about 3 million if they do full conformity, but ultimately it will depend on what is enacted at the state

119
00:38:38.160 --> 00:38:57.920
level. We show this slide to show that our general fund rainy day funds um are intact still over the five-year planning period. the the major the largest one the blue bar there is the emergency and operating reserves that's by our financial

120
00:38:57.920 --> 00:39:14.480
policies 25% of general fund operating expenditures. So that's why you see it kind of fluctuate over the 5-year period. We also carry a $12 million contingency in the orange bar there and a $15 million revenue loss reserve. That that

121
00:39:14.480 --> 00:39:34.160
was a new one that was started in uh the current year, fiscal 2526, and it was meant to offset potentially unexpected decreases in revenue. So now moving on from general fund revenue, we'll have a discussion about the um operating budget at a high level.

122
00:39:34.160 --> 00:39:52.000
Overall, it's $838 million of that $2.1 billion total budget. This slide shows that our operating budget is structurally balanced. So, what this table does is it um it takes all of the major funds on the lefth hand side. That's the first column. And then

123
00:39:52.000 --> 00:40:07.680
the second column is the proposed expenditures in the proposed budget. And then the third column is the projected revenues into that fund in 2627. So, we'll just start at the bottom on the total line. you'll see the total 838 million operating budget.

124
00:40:07.680 --> 00:40:25.040
And when you compare it to the total revenues, it's just over a billion dollars in revenue. And then if you look at the individual funds as well, you'll see that overall the proposed expenditures are um in line with the projected revenues. A large portion of the operating budget

125
00:40:25.040 --> 00:40:41.839
is uh has to do with the FTE count uh within the city. Uh this slide shows the crosswalk from the 2526 adopted FTE number of 2,796.9. It has a crosswalk from that point to the proposed FTE level in 2627. I'll

126
00:40:41.839 --> 00:40:57.040
just go over them very briefly. Phase 3 ambulance will bring 22 new FTE positions. Parks and Wreck will receive six six FTE positions. Those will be funded by the 0.15% park and preserve tax. There's 12.5 other FTE positions

127
00:40:57.040 --> 00:41:12.319
around the city. And then there was a total of 48.83 vacant positions eliminated. When you add all those together, you get a net reduction of 8.33 FTE and you get to the final proposed FTE number of 2788.57.

128
00:41:12.319 --> 00:41:29.040
Um, as the city manager was talking about, another way to look at the overall staffing within a city is full-time benefited positions. So, um, as he spoke to earlier, the departments were instructed to review their vacant positions and with the goal to potentially eliminate 2% of total

129
00:41:29.040 --> 00:41:43.680
position count without impacting the service levels. And there were a total of 33 full-time vacant benefited positions that were identified for elimination through this through this uh initiative. And the the eliminations by department are listed on the right hand

130
00:41:43.680 --> 00:42:00.880
side. And then when we talk about the additions of full-time benefited positions, there was a total of 33 full-time benefited positions that are recommended to be added in the proposed budget. So those are completely offset by the eliminations that we just talked about. 22 will be going to fire, six to

131
00:42:00.880 --> 00:42:19.760
parks and wreck, and then a few others a few more in a few other departments. Looking more specifically at the general fund operating budget, we're going to focus on the proposed budget inside the little oval there. Um, if you look at our base, what we call

132
00:42:19.760 --> 00:42:36.640
our base operating expenditures, you add in the PSPRS additional payment of 2 million and you get the total general fund operating budget of 424 million. Then when you factor in the transfers out to the ambulance fund for debt service and capital projects, you get a total general fund operating budget of

133
00:42:36.640 --> 00:42:57.680
$472.7 million. Okay, this chart shows ongoing revenues in blue and ongoing expenditures in red. You see historically going back to fiscal year 1718 that the revenues and expenditures u ongoing are more or less

134
00:42:57.680 --> 00:43:13.440
aligned and they kind of track with each other. Then when you get to the early fiscal 2020s you see the revenues start to take off and the expenditures kind of lag behind a little bit. The reason for that is when pandemic era revenues started to come in higher than projected

135
00:43:13.440 --> 00:43:29.359
before the expenditures could catch up. If you start to look at fiscal year at the red line, fiscal year 23 24, that's when you see the re the expenditures start to catch up to the revenues a little bit and they continue doing so until we get to the proposed budget and you see a little break in the rate of

136
00:43:29.359 --> 00:43:45.280
growth in the expenditures. That break continues throughout the five-year planning period. Um the delta between the two stays pretty much constant um over that five-year planning period. And the reason why we're able to maintain that is various reasons. um

137
00:43:45.280 --> 00:44:00.880
first of all the exercises that the departments went through that the city manager referenced also some uh debt service that will be maturing and then finally um the expected decreases in the PSPRS rate that due to previous investments made by

138
00:44:00.880 --> 00:44:18.480
the city. Just to emphasize the debt service piece. Um starting with the proposed budget about $10 million in debt service in 2627 and that climbs 13 and 14 million but then falls to about 7 million in uh 2930 and 3031

139
00:44:18.480 --> 00:44:35.920
um as some Westworld and TPC debt comes to maturity. Looking at the PSPRS issue a little bit more closely. Um the blue line well these these show the historical contribution rates for tier one tier 2 employees in PSPRS police in blue and

140
00:44:35.920 --> 00:44:52.000
fire in red looking at police first at the high point of 63.3% in 2223 that represented over a 75% increase when you look at it compared to 27 on the left hand side of the chart. So at the high point is when the city

141
00:44:52.000 --> 00:45:07.359
started making some investments beyond what was required um into PSPRS and you started to see some of the the impacts of that start to trickle into the contribution rate the projected in 2728 that's where you see a big drop that's

142
00:45:07.359 --> 00:45:23.280
when we'll see the impact of the $50 million that we're contributing this year typically you see the impact two years after the contribution is made then looking at fire very briefly you start at 12.5% on the lefth hand side and that increases by more than 100% and gets

143
00:45:23.280 --> 00:45:41.520
over 30%. At the right hand side of the chart, uh PSPRS historical cost, this shows the total amount paid to PSPRS split up between police and fire. And just looking at PD, it starts at 19, gets to about 22 and holds steady for several

144
00:45:41.520 --> 00:45:56.800
years. And then we see it start to fall off a little bit as a result of the contributions that have been made. And we anticipate the larger decrease again happening in 2728. Then looking at fire starting at 5 million. It kind of grows over time. There have been some additions to fire

145
00:45:56.800 --> 00:46:13.079
through ambulance and some other service expansions. Um but you do see it increase and we think that with the $2 million that it's in the projected the proposed budget that that will cause that amount to hold firm and not increase.

146
00:46:15.440 --> 00:46:31.359
This is the operating budget by department. I'm not going to go into every wedge of this pie chart here, but combined together, police and fire make up about 55% of the total general fund operating budget of $424 million. We have some other major departments listed on the slide here. And then

147
00:46:31.359 --> 00:46:47.760
everything else is kind of condensed into that other core services in the bottom right. Uh before wrapping up with the operating budget, uh just wanted to highlight in addition to the citywide the 1% market up to 3% merit and 5% step for sworn,

148
00:46:47.760 --> 00:47:02.640
there is the following personnel related items in the budget. Uh the city manager mentioned uh an additional $4.8 million for additional sworn compensation adjustments. There's $ 1.5 million for some focused targeted classification and comp study

149
00:47:02.640 --> 00:47:18.079
projects. And there will be a one-time adjustment for employees that are currently maxed out in their range. That'll be about 600,000. And then about 4.1 million in vacation, trade, and payouts for for when people leave the city.

150
00:47:18.079 --> 00:47:35.040
Okay, moving on to the capital budget. It's about $882 million of the $2.1 billion budget. This separates the capital budget by the individual program areas. Um, I'm going to just highlight the total line there

151
00:47:35.040 --> 00:47:50.079
at the bottom in the oval. So, there's about $549 million in carry forwards. That's, you know, remaining budget for projects that are already underway. There will be another $47 million in either new projects or new budget for

152
00:47:50.079 --> 00:48:06.680
existing projects. When you add those together, you get 956 million on the right hand side. And that 956, it says it in the title, is a combination of the 882 plus the 74 million in contingencies within the CIP.

153
00:48:06.800 --> 00:48:23.359
We talked about the one-year capital budget. This is the five-year total of $1.88 billion. This is the breakout between the various programs between water and transportation. That makes up almost three quarters of the total fiveyear CIP. and you can see the the

154
00:48:23.359 --> 00:48:38.960
other programs and what's going to them over the five-year CIP. With that, we've covered the budget from a big picture perspective. Um, before we transition to having departments come up, I'd be happy to open myself up for any questions that you may have had on

155
00:48:38.960 --> 00:48:55.680
things that have been presented to this point. >> Councilman Graham, >> I just want to bookmark that. I do have questions but I think we're going to I think maybe to let the departments come and then we have public comment and then and then I'll present my qu because I

156
00:48:55.680 --> 00:49:13.359
may hear things from public comment for example and other department chairs but I do want to share some thoughts and have some questions. So thank you. >> All right Scott, why don't we do that? Uh I don't see any other speakers on the dis here. So, >> okay. At this point in the presentation,

157
00:49:13.359 --> 00:49:29.200
we'll be having representatives from some select departments come up and speak to their specific budgets and CIP projects. Um, once one is completed, the next one will come up. And then once all are completed, I'll get up and conclude the presentation and once again um accept any questions that you may have.

158
00:49:29.200 --> 00:49:47.920
So, thank you. >> Thank you, Scott. >> Welcome, Fire Chief Shannon. Tom Shannon. Good evening, mayor and members of the council. Uh the fire department's uh budget for 2627 includes uh as the

159
00:49:47.920 --> 00:50:04.400
city manager mentioned the execution of phase three ambulance which will bring our total investment uh in into uh the the realm of nine ambulances daily uh servicing over 20,000 calls uh a year for service in terms of transportation.

160
00:50:04.400 --> 00:50:21.599
And so, uh, it seems like it's gone quite quickly, uh, but perhaps not for you at the Deis. Uh, the city manager mentioned an investment in skills replacement. That cannot be underestimated. Uh, this is the first real investment to get ready, the next

161
00:50:21.599 --> 00:50:36.240
generation of firefighters. The incumbent firefighters that exist inside the fire department require an upstaffing of skill sets that are departing as our members retire. And uh this investment is notable because it

162
00:50:36.240 --> 00:50:51.359
won't it won't go on into perpetuity. It'll be over the next few years. I would say probably no more than four years total. Uh and then that we'll see a reduction in that investment. Um and uh included in this is also the upkeep

163
00:50:51.359 --> 00:51:09.359
of the normal everyday work that is goes on out in the fire service in terms of uh uh assuring that our folks are ready to meet the needs of the citizens. It was mentioned that there's an additional $2 million investment in PSRS uh on the fire side to stabilize uh that uh

164
00:51:09.359 --> 00:51:25.280
unfunded liability over time. Uh bringing our fisc year budget in 2627 to uh just over $103 million. Uh I mentioned phase three of the ambulance uh nine ambulances uh with the ability

165
00:51:25.280 --> 00:51:40.800
to peak at 10 as needed. Um, these will be spaced uh north and uh south in the uh city in three uh zones if you will. Uh we've had a great partner in Maricopa Ambulance and uh they will continue to

166
00:51:40.800 --> 00:51:57.599
service us uh through the balance of this year until we're in in service probably by late December of this year, no later than January. Uh, additionally, um, the, uh, the fire department annex, which all of you were at, uh, for the

167
00:51:57.599 --> 00:52:13.359
groundbreaking, will help us serve, uh, that south community by providing quarters, uh, for those southern ambulances. And so, that that is an an outstanding addition to the capability. Uh, in the area of Prop 490, uh, we have

168
00:52:13.359 --> 00:52:29.599
begun the investment. Uh, of course there was a small lag in the execution of the use of those dollars and we wanted to make sure that uh we were uh fully capable of of of executing the plan for hires. Um, you may recall that we have uh three community risk

169
00:52:29.599 --> 00:52:45.200
reduction captains that were already out doing the work of prevention services particularly in what we call that wildland urban interface. Um, and we have transferred those folks fully into the fund. Um we have uh just concluded

170
00:52:45.200 --> 00:53:02.640
our wildland urban interface uh position interviews um and we hope to make an offer very very soon in that regard. And then we've enhanced those technical capabilities. We have a second TRT team in place with enhanced capabilities in and around the preserve and open spaces

171
00:53:02.640 --> 00:53:20.720
of Scottsdale. Uh in addition uh to all those services, we anticipate the use of approximately $1.7 million from that fund uh annually. Uh there's a substantial surplus uh that's carrying over from this year because of the late execution of the plan, but uh we feel

172
00:53:20.720 --> 00:53:37.680
very good about that. Um the great news, I just saw the renderings today of fire station 604, which many of you may know is right next to district 3, and uh it is truly going to be a beautiful building. what was a Jify Lube will become this beautiful, beautiful

173
00:53:37.680 --> 00:53:54.960
structure that complements uh D3. Um that investment uh is highlighted at about $10.3 million with a total project investment of 14.2 once uh capital projects makes the necessary adjustments in all areas of that uh project. But I

174
00:53:54.960 --> 00:54:10.880
cannot say how proud I am of not only our CPM team, but the fire team and our selected contractors and uh architects for what is just going to be an outstanding building. I can't wait for you to see it. As I mentioned, the ambulance annex uh

175
00:54:10.880 --> 00:54:28.240
that you broke ground on uh recently was an addition to uh the program. So the the capital investment that was made for the uh ambulance project was a little bit larger than what the intent was when we first uh discussed this project in

176
00:54:28.240 --> 00:54:44.960
previous councils. Um this city manager saw the need to have contemporary uh uh capabilities to house our members. We were going to invest in a quite frankly a very very tired building uh just to the north of that location. And as I mentioned at the groundbreaking, he he

177
00:54:44.960 --> 00:55:02.559
saw the need to do better and keep those keep those buildings contemporary and healthy for our firefighters and members. Uh that is going to be a busy house that that is going to service well over 8,000 calls a year for service and uh that ambulance will be a very important part of that service delivery.

178
00:55:02.559 --> 00:55:16.880
That is my presentation. >> Thank you. Very well done. Appreciate it. And next I see Chief Joe Leuk coming up to talk to us about police. >> Good evening, honorable mayor, council

179
00:55:16.880 --> 00:55:35.599
members. Uh our budget reflects a uh significant investment in employees through as a city manager said, but in addition to things like uh incentives such as longevity pay and aggressive market adjust adjustments that we've already realized even from last year uh

180
00:55:35.599 --> 00:55:52.480
some incredible numbers and filling our vacancies both in for example dispatch and officers. This year we will realize for the first time uh zero vacancies in our police officer rank which is quite an accomplishment. Um it also reflects an ongoing priority uh to utilize

181
00:55:52.480 --> 00:56:09.200
technology to achieve our mission of public safety. Um we're very focused on finding ways to make our effort more efficient and more effective. We invest heavily in things like the real-time crime centers, our drone programs, and then other automation. We're also this

182
00:56:09.200 --> 00:56:23.359
budget will reflect an investment in artificial intelligence. We're trying to apply that to communications just to add efficiency and we found great value in that. Um in addition to that uh we've really leveraged um investment in our

183
00:56:23.359 --> 00:56:40.559
specialty units and staffing. So when we talk about specialty units these are the units that uh such as our digital forensic unit or our human exploitation unit. um experts that really go a long way in not only preventing crime but solving crime. And if you look at all of

184
00:56:40.559 --> 00:56:56.400
this stuff together, all of these investments together, Scottsdale realizes some of the lowest crime rates and some of the highest clearance rates rates, which really include um talk about our our arrest rate. Um so we're far below the a national average in um

185
00:56:56.400 --> 00:57:12.319
crime rates and far above the national average in clearance rates. And I truly blame uh some of those priorities that I just discussed as as why we're able to do that. What's up on the slide are some of the out of out of budget packages that we are funding in this budget. Um

186
00:57:12.319 --> 00:57:28.160
first one was a wellness initiative. Uh for the last several years we really started to focus on the wellness of our employees. um critically important and uh this is really kind of the first time that we have a budget line item for it and uh it will help us do uh employ some

187
00:57:28.160 --> 00:57:45.359
really critical uh processes um and initiatives and efforts towards that um additionally uh additional security footprint at Westworld and what that really means is contractual services for more municipal security guards over at Westworld. We found that as a critical

188
00:57:45.359 --> 00:58:01.440
need and so we're making an investment with that delivered as an out-of budget package that was approved and to meet our hiring needs um we really need to expand our our polygraph uh group. We had one full-time polygraph examiner. We needed to expand that to another

189
00:58:01.440 --> 00:58:16.960
part-time just to keep up with the applications that we're getting um to make sure that we're processing them through and trying to put as many people in the academy as we can so we don't fall behind. So, that was very uh important to us. And then it shows what our uh proposed budget is um up there as

190
00:58:16.960 --> 00:58:33.760
well, $156.3 million. Want to talk quickly about the park and preserve tax and this also filled a very critical need for us as you're as you look at Scottsdale with the largest urban per preserve in the nation. Uh but then add on to it 46 municipal parks,

191
00:58:33.760 --> 00:58:50.079
you know, all equaling about 31,000 acres of parks, preserve, and entertainment areas. It takes um very specific and specialized uh park rangers or officers that are specially trained to use uh equipment such as off-road

192
00:58:50.079 --> 00:59:06.079
vehicles and um electronic equipment such as uh more rugged drones to go out and search for lost hikers and whatnot. So, we're looking at um this budget through this park preserve tax supporting six warn park rangers, a sergeant because they need a supervisor.

193
00:59:06.079 --> 00:59:21.200
We're expanding that program and we added a real-time crime center technician to help on the back end which really marries up with those drone operations and the other electronics and cameras that are out um and about these preserves and uh whatnot to really

194
00:59:21.200 --> 00:59:37.359
support that work unit. So, it's a critical need um and we're very pleased about that. And then we also um so basically it's just an enhanced safety footprint for the parks and preserve that were needed very badly. So, we're very pleased about that. Just to cover a

195
00:59:37.359 --> 00:59:57.680
couple of our uh CIP projects. Um, one of the things that we're working on right now uh is to renovate and expand the Civic Center jail uh and the downtown police facility to meet demand. We've talked about this before. That building is very unequ. So, the first step is moving the

196
00:59:57.680 --> 01:00:15.200
employees out. That's going to happen in July. Um and then construction should begin August 1st with a completion year around 2028. And also at the same time or slightly into the uh downtown jail project, we're looking at renovating the Vinda police

197
01:00:15.200 --> 01:00:32.720
station to increase efficiency again uh antiquated floor plans not really meeting the demand of the staff that we have in there have in there. This year we completed the top floor project which uh was a remodel of our communications center and um the RTCC and now we're

198
01:00:32.720 --> 01:00:48.160
focusing on the other two floors. The basement floor which is our patrol area that is in bad need of an uplift and then our detective area which is on the first floor of that building. Um so that project uh should start in probably January of 2027 and we're looking at

199
01:00:48.160 --> 01:01:02.799
about a two-year remodel with that. And that was a 2019 um bond project. And with that, we'll go to parks and recreation. Thank you. >> Thank you, Chief Leuk. And I just want to also point out along with every other department in the city, your department

200
01:01:02.799 --> 01:01:25.359
saw just amazing results with um crime reduction and you know, some very highlighted uh events and good job. Can I Good evening, Madame Mayor, members of city council. Nick Mullinary, senior director for the parks and

201
01:01:25.359 --> 01:01:40.960
recreation and preserve department. I'm There we go. I'll start with I'll jump right in and we'll start with a highle look at the parks and recreation department's operating budget. You'll see our operating budget has

202
01:01:40.960 --> 01:01:56.400
increased by approximately $5 million from fiscal year 202526 to the proposed 2627 budget. I think it's important to note that the majority of that spending is not new spending. That's the result of a reorganization

203
01:01:56.400 --> 01:02:11.680
and the McCormic Stillman Railroad Park moving to the parks and recreation department from enterprise operations. And then we have some additional increases in operating. They're minimal. We have approximately $179,000

204
01:02:11.680 --> 01:02:28.400
in increases from 2526 to 2627 in the parks and preserve fund and then about $190,000 increase in the transportation fund which serves as a transfer in from transportation for the parks and recreation department to maintain all

205
01:02:28.400 --> 01:02:46.000
the city-owned medians and rightsway. Next slide. This slide speaks to the 14% parks maintenance allocation for the parks and preserve tax. So that's an operating budget that's specific to park

206
01:02:46.000 --> 01:03:02.640
maintenance. The highlights for this budget which is the fund is budgeted at 3.3 million are the addition of approximately it's 6 point it's six new employees. We did we had a little bit of shuffling with the eight that will be a support position that will be split

207
01:03:02.640 --> 01:03:18.640
between the parks and recreation department and the preserve department. So we're we're working to efficiently manage those resources to the best degree possible. And then we have about $300,000 for new vehicles for those new parks employees.

208
01:03:18.640 --> 01:03:36.559
Next slide, please. This next slide, the allocation for this is the parks improvements allocation, which is a 51% allocation from the new parks and preserve sales tax. That 51% allocation is really the

209
01:03:36.559 --> 01:03:54.240
majority of that is capital. There are some non-C capital expenses in the park improvements budget, but the highlights include uh $6.8 $8 million in transfers to the CIP for park improvements, about $300,000 for the replacement of

210
01:03:54.240 --> 01:04:10.240
park benches, uh, picnic tables, barbecues in our older aged parks in the southern part of the city. And then one thing is important to note, we haven't talked about it here tonight, but we have followed a similar path and a similar

211
01:04:10.240 --> 01:04:25.680
approach to the rest of the city regarding capital. So we did go with a a design first approach for capital with all the projects that are in this budget. So we took out projects that had been in the the plan

212
01:04:25.680 --> 01:04:41.839
last year in 2526 that were just estimates that we had put together to match revenue. We are working on those estimates in 2627 as part of the proposed budget. Those estimates, the designs would be for improvements at

213
01:04:41.839 --> 01:04:57.680
Elorado and Vistadel Camino Parks, Agu Linda, which is Scottsdale's first park, Pike Neighborhood Park, Apache Park, and then improvements to Chapperel Park and the Chapperel Park dog park. Next slide.

214
01:04:57.680 --> 01:05:15.280
This allocation, which is the 18% of the 0.15% parks and preserve tax, is for preserve operating. And I think it's important to note that in 2526 we eliminated the general fund allocation to the preserves operating

215
01:05:15.280 --> 01:05:33.599
and that was was assumed by the parks and preserve tax. So the highlights of this tax of this fund we have it's approximately three $3.4 million in total expenditures that's 10.2 2. So the other the other part of the 0.8 FTE in

216
01:05:33.599 --> 01:05:50.720
the parks and recreation fund approximately $2 million of that is preserve planning and admin. That's staff, vehicles, fleet, healthcare. And then we do have 1.4 4 million for various preserve initiatives that were defined through the parks and preserve

217
01:05:50.720 --> 01:06:06.240
sales tax initiative for sonor and desert education or for sonor and desert preservation wildland fire mitigation invasive plant management and sonor and desert education. Next slide please. So the next two slides will focus on our

218
01:06:06.240 --> 01:06:21.760
most our highest priorities related to capital and they're both 2019 bond projects that we continue to make progress towards. The Indian Benwash lakes and irrigation project is focused in Vista del Camino and Elorado. We are

219
01:06:21.760 --> 01:06:38.079
making significant progress with that project right now. They just started to fill the two new lakes on the the Vista Del Camino side which is exciting for us. Um that 2019 bond project has incurred three 13.4 million to date. Um

220
01:06:38.079 --> 01:06:56.559
we do project the 21.2 million in 2627. We think the project will be done close to the end of 2627 and the total project budget is 34.6 million. This is a really critical project for those two southern Indian

221
01:06:56.559 --> 01:07:12.079
benwash parks which haven't had the investments that we've made in Indian school came back and chaperel parks. So that'll enhance water quality. It'll eliminate seepage in the lake. There's significant erosion in the lowflow channels. So, we'll see some major

222
01:07:12.079 --> 01:07:29.680
improvements in those South Scottsdale parks as we wrap up this project. Next slide. And then we are moving fast and furious on the new dog park at Thompson Peak Park. That is a 2019 bond project. The

223
01:07:29.680 --> 01:07:46.079
total project budget is 6.4 million. We've incurred 1.8 to date. The additional budget is 4.6 million. We expect that project to be done at the end of the summer. So, we're really excited about that. And that'll be a three and a halfacre dog park that will

224
01:07:46.079 --> 01:08:03.200
have three separate dock cells. Happy to to answer any questions that anybody might have. >> Nope. No questions. >> No, there are. Oh, Nick, give me one sec. One second. Uh, yes, if you wouldn't mind sticking up there for for a minute. Councilwoman Whitehead.

225
01:08:03.200 --> 01:08:19.920
>> Uh, thanks. Can you go back three or maybe four slides? Go. Yeah. Right. That one. So the bottom bullet point, can you explain? You said you you removed CIP projects. Could you explain that last B bullet point? >> Yeah. So we have some transfers to the

226
01:08:19.920 --> 01:08:37.199
CIP. That Thank you, Councilwoman Whitehead. I I did probably didn't cover that enough detail. We have some transfers to the CIP for replacement of aging asphalt tennis courts throughout the city. I think there's three of them to replace the the aging water feature

227
01:08:37.199 --> 01:08:52.640
at Elorado Aquatic Center. And then the rest of the projects we have taken the project budgets out of the five-year plan and we have budgeted for design. So we have designed for Vista Elorado improvements that were identified in the

228
01:08:52.640 --> 01:09:08.719
2018 master plan. Improvements at Chapel Park, Aguual Linda Park, Pyute Park. So those projects we will we will move into design for those projects in 2627 and then as we have a realistic expectation about what those project

229
01:09:08.719 --> 01:09:25.120
budgets are we will bring them forward to council. >> So that's a departure of how we do things because it implies that these costs aren't coming but the costs are coming. So the design is a small part. Do we have estimates of how many uh how much was pulled out? I guess I could

230
01:09:25.120 --> 01:09:41.520
look at I have my CIP book right here. Can you do you have an estimate of how much uh we've pulled out of the CIP? >> Councilwoman Whitehead, as it relates to the parks and preserve tax, um I I don't have that information in front of me. I'd have to get that preamp. >> Okay. Thank you,

231
01:09:41.520 --> 01:09:56.640
Councilwoman McCallen. >> Thank you, Mayor. Um thank you for your uh um explanations on everything. Uh Director Molinari, um I started to laugh when you said the water was being filled in the lakes. I received two texts from

232
01:09:56.640 --> 01:10:12.719
citizens. Um, one with pictures from former commissioner Davis. He was on his bike watching. People are very excited about this and you know they keep asking the questions how deep the lake is, all that. But um, actually I asked you that and for aation but my questions are not

233
01:10:12.719 --> 01:10:29.840
about the lake. Congratulations on working on them. Um, my questions are about the uh, and I don't know if this is you or another area. So I'm asking you the sh the shade and tree plan throughout the city. Is that under your department, >> Mayor Bowski? Councilwoman McCallen? No.

234
01:10:29.840 --> 01:10:45.199
The the tree and shade plan is not okay. >> Is not managed under my department. However, we are working very closely with the planning department on the implementation of the tree and shade program. There's actually some shade components that will go into Vista Del

235
01:10:45.199 --> 01:11:01.760
Camino Park as part of the the project that we're working on now. That will be additional trees and shade that are funded through that. So, we're working very closely. We're a partner with with the planning department on the tree and shade plan. >> Excellent. Okay. So, then my next question with that is I believe there's

236
01:11:01.760 --> 01:11:17.040
a position, a new position, an urban forestry person. Will that person answer to you or to planning >> council? The urban forester will live in the parks and recreation department. Okay. >> So, it will report through us and we

237
01:11:17.040 --> 01:11:31.600
have that position was actually funded in this current fiscal year, the 2526 fiscal year. So, we're recruiting for that position now. And two of the new positions, two of the six or 6.8 positions in the 2627 budget are urban

238
01:11:31.600 --> 01:11:48.560
forestry techs. So, really a a process of building our urban forestry team so that we can start to assume some of the work that we've been contracting out for for a long time. And we we are really really excited about that initiative where we can gain some autonomy in how

239
01:11:48.560 --> 01:12:03.840
we care for our trees. >> Excellent. And is that out of 490 funds by chance? >> It is. Yes. >> Yes. Okay. Thank you. Um, one more question for you. Um, in the CIP, uh, community facilities, the parks improvements, it talks about, uh,

240
01:12:03.840 --> 01:12:21.040
construction related design. Um, but it says demolish and reconstruct, renovate, uh, restrooms and storage facilities. Uh, Elorado, Vista, Thompson Peak, and Chapperel. But next to Chapperel, it says boat dock. Are we re rebuilding the boat dock at Chapperel? Currently, we do

241
01:12:21.040 --> 01:12:36.239
not have a plan to rebuild the boat dock, but we do have a plan for planning of improvements and design of improvements at Chapperel Park. So, that boat dock is something that we hear a lot about and we we have people who are very passionate about the boat dock. They love the boat dock. So, that's

242
01:12:36.239 --> 01:12:53.440
something we'll look at and we certainly recognize the the value that our community sees in that in that space. >> I was going to say that is definitely community outreach worthy. Um the amount of people that use that. Thank you for your time. Sorry I had so many questions but um love flying parks and wreck.

243
01:12:53.440 --> 01:13:11.760
>> Thank you very much uh Nick. Appreciate the presentation. >> Thank you. >> And next we'll ask Thyra Ryden Diaz who is the interim water resources senior director to talk to us about water resources. >> Good evening. It's Tira. It's Tira

244
01:13:11.760 --> 01:13:28.400
right. So it's a silent H. So um I know it's a hard name but you'll get it. Um, so I'm just going to jump in and go quickly down the slide. This is day seven for me. So work day seven. So I have our assistant director, David Wallby, in the back in case I need

245
01:13:28.400 --> 01:13:45.440
backup. So next slide. So this is our water and sewer operations for this um proposed budget. So um the rates were brought to you at the end of February and there was a council

246
01:13:45.440 --> 01:14:01.440
presentation on that. So that's a 4.5% water rate increase. Um 3.5% of that is operations and maintenance and 1% is new source and supply. Um which has all been in the news lately. So that will um

247
01:14:01.440 --> 01:14:16.239
help us with that. Um there's a 3.5 sewer rate increase and then an additional $4.1 million for additional for utilities. So that's mostly power um requirements. And then um just under a

248
01:14:16.239 --> 01:14:32.960
million dollars for um additional water purchase costs and chemicals. The chemical markets just um accelerated quickly. And then um a note to the budget is that the Bartlett Dam feasibility was moved from capital to operating. So we are participating in

249
01:14:32.960 --> 01:14:51.040
that feasibility study with I think 23 other communities to um ascertain um what the capital investment would be to um raise that dam. So, next slide. So, these are just a highlight of three of the capital projects that are in the

250
01:14:51.040 --> 01:15:07.120
proposed CIP. Um, the first one is the water source and supply. This is actually $100 million that is not in this year's CIP. It's in next year's in the 2728 in the five-year plan. So, and that's to obtain and facilitate um water

251
01:15:07.120 --> 01:15:25.199
support water sources and supply. Next slide. Wastewater system improvements is the next project we're highlighting. And so this is to design and construct sewer lines to complete treatment plant work and to rehabilitate sewer manholes.

252
01:15:25.199 --> 01:15:41.280
Next slide. Crossroads east is the water system improvements in the crossroads reach reach area. It's to um increase the site 55A booster pump pumping facility. And actually, we have um a design contract that we're just working

253
01:15:41.280 --> 01:15:58.159
through right now that will come to um for your review and um and hopefully approval in June to um kind of rebuild that whole site and and provide some increased capacity. Um and then it's also this capital project also um

254
01:15:58.159 --> 01:16:16.719
includes to install approximately 4200 linear feet of 30-inch transmission main to serve current and future connections. So, I'm happy to answer any questions. >> Councilwoman Whitehead. Thanks, Mayor. Welcome, Tara. >> Thank you.

255
01:16:16.719 --> 01:16:33.120
>> How many days? >> Well, I mean, I've been at the city 27 years. >> Yeah, but the seven >> day seven. >> Working day seven. >> Working day seven. >> I studied over the weekend, so we could count those, too. >> Let's count them. All right. Um, can you go back a few slides to the source and supply?

256
01:16:33.120 --> 01:16:50.320
Well, that one, too, as well. I mean, I I I guess I'm you know, I know that this budget is evolving, but um the needs the needs and the approved plans and um are for this year, not for 2728 because

257
01:16:50.320 --> 01:17:07.760
we're looking at uncertainties. But just go back one more slide. Let's talk source and supply. Where was where was that? Um right there. Yeah, I have a question. So, the term source and supply is pretty open-ended. Um, is there some

258
01:17:07.760 --> 01:17:23.199
is there some place in this that that tells the rateayer that in fact this money is dedicated to strategic plan top objectives? I mean, where do I find that? Because I couldn't find it.

259
01:17:23.199 --> 01:17:39.760
>> Madame Mayor, I'm uh happy to help answer that. >> Yeah. support support my colleague that's been on this position for seven working days. Uh and so let me it's not going to be a short answer because I think a good number of community members

260
01:17:39.760 --> 01:17:57.040
are also interested in this answer. So I think it's helpful to back up uh and when we back up when we presented uh the budget capital budget about a year ago to the budget review commission uh there was a project in the budget review or excuse me in the capital budget for

261
01:17:57.040 --> 01:18:13.760
advanced water purification and we had previously estimated this project about 15 to 20 million and what we proposed a year ago was that it was going to move up to $67 million and the budget review commission said, "This has significantly

262
01:18:13.760 --> 01:18:30.080
increased. You should take a look at this. You really need to take a hard look at this project." So, we did just that. So, what we embarked upon was having a third party engineering firm review uh the advanced water purification. This goes by a couple

263
01:18:30.080 --> 01:18:45.040
different names. Now, it's emerging as pure water. And so, at the time of putting together the budget, we did not have the capital uh expenditure number. Since then, we have a draft and we've shared that with city council. It is

264
01:18:45.040 --> 01:19:01.440
still emerging, but we at least have a realistic number. And lo and behold, guess what? It is more than the 67 million. So, we were we were wrong on the on the 15 million. We were wrong on the 20 million. And I'll come back to why it has changed or at least a component of why it's changed.

265
01:19:01.440 --> 01:19:19.120
>> Greg, can I interrupt? So, my question is a little different than the answer I'm getting. So, let me maybe I better rephrase the question. So listen, if certainty was a requirement in a CIP budget, the budget would be zero. There is no certainty. So

266
01:19:19.120 --> 01:19:34.640
that's not my question. My question is that the city council, the city has a strategic plan that tells the rateayers how we're going to get from today to tomorrow with a more diversified water portfolio. And if that's going to

267
01:19:34.640 --> 01:19:50.480
change, that's a whole another public discussion that we need to have with data, community input, a work study session. We've had none of that up here. So my question is very specific. It's not how much it costs. My question is, are the rateayers getting what they're

268
01:19:50.480 --> 01:20:07.199
paying for, what they are expecting, which is that these dollars fund the strategic plan projects. There's four of them. And those one of the project that is considered most urgent is the APRW

269
01:20:07.199 --> 01:20:23.600
what you just called pure water and as you yourself said in a meeting with me it is the only water source that we have that is certain and cost effective. So the question is if we pass this budget we have what looks like a very

270
01:20:23.600 --> 01:20:40.719
open-ended uh line item water source and supply. That's not usually how we do things. We we tell the rateayers or we tell the taxpayers depending on what the line item is what they're paying for. So the question is really just a yes or no.

271
01:20:40.719 --> 01:20:58.239
Does this water source and supply fund APRW or does it give staff some sort of leeway to change a policy um administratively? That's the question. It's really yes or no. is does this fund APRW and the other

272
01:20:58.239 --> 01:21:16.640
initiatives or can it be used for other other sources? And I know that you've done a good job looking for other sources. We'll probably need other sources, but we have a strategic plan and it's it's and that tells us how do we get to uh a a more diversified secure

273
01:21:16.640 --> 01:21:33.360
tomorrow that's also cost-effective. >> Madame Mayor and uh Council Member Whitehead, I apologize. I thought you wanted a complete answer. The answer is yes. Thank you. >> Okay. So, that's really good. Thank you. Can Can we get that in before we adopt

274
01:21:33.360 --> 01:21:50.159
the the budget, it would be good to just simply say water source and supply and add that it is strictly for APRW. >> It's not for that. So, no. >> Okay. So, the answer is no. >> Well, you changed your question. Your question was two different times when you restated it. I was answering your

275
01:21:50.159 --> 01:22:06.080
first question, which the answer was yes. And the second question, you switched to the AWP. Okay. So, I'm I'm Let's let's let's make sure that everybody in the audience knows what we're talking about as well as your your council members. Okay. So, >> I was headed in that direction with the first answer. >> Okay. No, I'm and I'm sorry it's going to be a long night. I'm trying to keep

276
01:22:06.080 --> 01:22:22.560
it short. So, my question is water source and supply uh does that allow you does that allow changes to the strategic plan projects spending outside of the strategic plan? Can those changes be made administratively versus via a

277
01:22:22.560 --> 01:22:38.880
policy from the council? >> As you see from the screen, Madame Mayor, Council Member Whitehead, this is 2728. We're proposing the 2627. >> Yeah. Well, I'm that's another concern of mine. >> Can't change anything that's not in next year's budget. >> Yeah. Well, that's a concern, too. >> It's not in next year's budget. >> Okay. Well, I would say that Okay. It's

278
01:22:38.880 --> 01:22:54.320
Okay. So, we're not funding the strategic plan. Thank you. >> I issued a memo today to answer the the update on the strategic plan. I >> I read that. I read that and I had the same >> that provides a complete answer. Thank you. >> Actually, I read read it and it did not. So, I would say that that's concerning

279
01:22:54.320 --> 01:23:10.159
to me and I I'll be looking forward to a work study session where we discuss a council approved policy and whether or not we're sticking with it because uh water is the most important service we provide. Thank you. Just to chime in before I move on to

280
01:23:10.159 --> 01:23:27.199
Councilwoman McCallen, I have to tell you, Coun Councilwoman Whitehead, your your questions were not clear and so I don't think we had a clear discussion on any level. So, you know, I know Tyra here is kind of on the spot, but um

281
01:23:27.199 --> 01:23:42.960
let's let's just focus on asking as direct questions about this particular budget as possible. So, Councilwoman McCallen, go right ahead. >> Thank you, Mayor. Um, thank you and congratulations on your new job. Um, you

282
01:23:42.960 --> 01:23:57.920
are being thrown into the fire. Good thing it's water um to save you. Uh, I would like to see um I saw the memo that you issued, city manager, and um it does seem specific, but numbers aren't

283
01:23:57.920 --> 01:24:14.560
attached to it. Uh it does seem like it's just a global number. I would like to see and maybe that's also a a suggestion from the um BRC uh specifically outlined what's that hundred million for and if we're if it's

284
01:24:14.560 --> 01:24:32.239
not there yet I would like to also see a study session so we can decide on that if we're doing um advanced water purification pure water and how much as well as if we're purchasing other water someplace else and how much not just um

285
01:24:32.239 --> 01:24:48.000
one big number. Uh so that's just my suggestion. Thank you. >> Thank you. Uh I have a question going back to uh slide page 55 which is the one immediately before this. We discussed water rate increases of 4.5%

286
01:24:48.000 --> 01:25:02.719
uh earlier uh in the year. The 1% new source and supply I think might be what Councilwoman Whitehead was getting at which is kind of the flex if you will. um what will that be applied to? Not

287
01:25:02.719 --> 01:25:17.760
necessarily the purification process, but uh alternate supplies as we go through the process. So, Tyro, do you have a comment on that? Can you talk to us about that 4 and a.5% and what the 1%

288
01:25:17.760 --> 01:25:35.440
uh new source means to us and how does that plug into the conversation about future additional supplies? >> I'm happy to help if you want. >> Yeah, absolutely. >> I can try. >> Y >> Okay. Good job. >> You need to save me. You can save me. Um, so mayor and members of council, so

289
01:25:35.440 --> 01:25:50.800
the 1% from what I understand, and I was here for the discussion in February when we were talking about the 1% is to find those new sources, right? We're in a situation that we didn't think we were going to be in this soon in this century. um you know the um

290
01:25:50.800 --> 01:26:08.320
you know um so I mean everyone's seeing the pictures right of like me and it's dropping like I think that today they told me it was dropping um one foot every four days you know rapidly going down to the critical

291
01:26:08.320 --> 01:26:26.080
elevation so it's it's it's all concerning right and we could have like a great rain season we could have big snow pack next year that may not be but there are dwindling supplies that the memo that um you all received about you know the hydraulic lookout on

292
01:26:26.080 --> 01:26:41.679
the Colorado these are all things we just have to consider. So that 1% when it came in was to be like we knew we need to find new sources, right? We need to make sure we're sustainable and we have other sources. We've done a great job at banking water. We've done all the things to make us very sustainable, but

293
01:26:41.679 --> 01:26:57.600
we need to look for that next step. And so that's what the 1% was there is the 1% was to go out and find the next step. And then you know and as to the strategic plan um you know there's five points of the strategic plan. It's not just water purifying. It is also finding new

294
01:26:57.600 --> 01:27:14.800
sources and additional sources and you know expanding our and finding different ways that we can use water that's already in the valley or obtain it or get other long-term storage credits. So it's a number of things and our sustainability for water is not just one

295
01:27:14.800 --> 01:27:32.000
thing. There's not. So, I just attended the Arizona Water Conference this um last week and one of the really simple takeaways I got it is they said, you know, there's no silver bullet to this water. There's buckshot, right? So,

296
01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:47.360
there's bunch of things we need to do. And that's actually kind of what our strategic plan does. It says we need to look at, you know, water purification. We need to look at, you know, perhaps reclaiming some of our sewer flow. So there's a lot of things that go into it. So we really need to think about it

297
01:27:47.360 --> 01:28:04.320
broadly. And you know the 100 million is sitting out there because to say we know we're going to have to do something. We just don't know what that is. And you know I've been an engineer for a long time. I like to have actual numbers not these numbers where we're like we think this is what it is right. We need to

298
01:28:04.320 --> 01:28:19.600
have a little bit more. I'm a little my background is all capital projects and planning them and I've never been over budget here at the city and my 22 years of capital projects and to really plan that and that just takes extra time to plan it up front and I know it's not the

299
01:28:19.600 --> 01:28:34.719
quick answer. it's not the thing, but it's a more precise answer and it also allows us to really evaluate if those costs are what we want to want to pursue or not. And we're in a great position um to pursue some of these things that are

300
01:28:34.719 --> 01:28:49.600
more expensive for other cities to do and we have the funding to do lots of things that will cover the buckshot items. >> Thank you for that. We I appreciate that. uh and the Bartlett Dam feasibility and move from capital to

301
01:28:49.600 --> 01:29:05.600
operating. So clear this up for me. Uh does that ensure that we've got a seat at the table in the Bartlett Dam feasibility a position is maintained? Nothing's changed, right?

302
01:29:05.600 --> 01:29:21.520
>> No, mayor. Um members of council, so I think um I was having discussion of water resources day. I think some of the problem with the Bartlett Dam issue is that everyone thinks we just had this number out there and we were going to participate. There's 23 other 23 communities are participating. So our

303
01:29:21.520 --> 01:29:37.679
payment into that that collective um feasibility study is our seat at the table. And then whether or not that we will you know how much we'll we'll buy into it or how much capital cost that we'll buy to get the percentages is um when Roosevelt was brought up I was

304
01:29:37.679 --> 01:29:53.600
educated today that same thing happened where people participated but then only a few cities bought in to get that extra water. So those are things to look at and see. So we've got our seat at the table for that and when we know have more information about how much that water is going to cost us then we can

305
01:29:53.600 --> 01:30:08.080
have that discussion with council and we can decide what's you guys can decide what's best for the city going forward. >> Agreed. So a policy that's a policy decision. I I thank you for that answer. Uh so the the capital it the capital is

306
01:30:08.080 --> 01:30:24.560
just the feasibility the um sorry the operating is just the feasibility and the capital would be developed once there's the buy in and that's decided upon. >> Yeah. Mayor members and councils. Yeah. And I think that's just a a a lot safer way to go that we know what the money is

307
01:30:24.560 --> 01:30:42.080
as opposed to saying making a policy decision that we're going to spend 200 million and maybe it's not maybe it's more like we don't know what that is. So let's get the study back. like I'm a big proponent of doing feasibility studies, design before we and then have really construction numbers. That's sort of my my wheelhouse. And so um we just can

308
01:30:42.080 --> 01:30:58.400
make much better decisions that way. >> Okay. And so the discussion that was just had about the hundred million that's in that would be brought forward in the next uh fiscal year budget, not this one. >> Yeah. Mayor's memory c. So it is in the

309
01:30:58.400 --> 01:31:14.800
fiveyear. it shows in the fiveyear but it's we wouldn't have that now if there's something that happens we could certainly come to council you could appropriate other money um I mean there's there's options but we know it's out there because there was a lot of comments about not having a placeholder so it's sort of our placeholder in that

310
01:31:14.800 --> 01:31:32.560
fiveyear cip and when we know more um we'll absolutely share with you that >> but it's not earmarked for any specific project as of this point in time >> it is not Okay. Uh okay. Uh with respect to because I

311
01:31:32.560 --> 01:31:49.840
think this was the goal of the discussion earlier with respect to the advanced purification uh system or you know part of our water um product or or infrastructure, excuse me. That is a big

312
01:31:49.840 --> 01:32:04.560
that has been a big focus for Scottsdale, a forward-thinking SC uh focus in terms of, you know, how to have a a backup plan or a secondary plan for for water shortages. And so, can you

313
01:32:04.560 --> 01:32:21.280
describe for me um where that project stands right now? I know it's been taken out of the uh CIP and you know I understand the explanation which is we have no idea what it's going to cost. So in the interest of being prudent and and

314
01:32:21.280 --> 01:32:36.960
responsible we're not going to be funding a project we have no idea how much it costs. The concern that I would have about that and again this is a policy decision. We're not having that discussion right now. The concern I would have about that is we aren't

315
01:32:36.960 --> 01:32:53.440
funding it on a five-year projected uh cycle, which we ordinarily would be doing for the CIP project. So, talk to me about where that project stands in particular. Mayor, um members of council, so um one of my first projects when I moved up to

316
01:32:53.440 --> 01:33:10.239
CIP from development services was doing I had been there a couple years and I did um I managed the expansion of the AWT. So we started that in 2007. We can kind of complete it like 2010 2011. So I was involved with all of that and that was all cutting edge and we were the first in the country and there's a lot

317
01:33:10.239 --> 01:33:25.199
of things to be proud of there and we had a lot of very smart people think out of the box and so because of that legacy if we choose to move forward with the with the with the pure water we're ahead of the game. So we don't have to start from scratch. We can do things we can

318
01:33:25.199 --> 01:33:41.280
add a couple of things to our process. The problem is it's has to do with the um the rules of the state. So we don't know what the rules of the state are to know what the process would be. So these are there's a bunch of unknowns and there's quite a few unknowns like we can

319
01:33:41.280 --> 01:33:56.239
solve engineering problems with a few unknowns and have some factors safety in there. There's a lot of unknowns in there and so um so we're in a good situation if we choose to do that. But knowing what the rules are um is really

320
01:33:56.239 --> 01:34:12.639
important to kind of make that policy decision. >> That made a lot of sense. Uh so ADQ moved the ball a little bit. I understand or maybe a lot of it. Is that what >> um mayor members of the council just um Yeah. And I I it's not it's not completely clear yet. It's not as nailed

321
01:34:12.639 --> 01:34:29.679
down as um we are to kind of move forward and those are shifting a little bit. So um when we really have a and that was a really big discussion at the water conference last week. So, um there's a there's a lot of balls in the air, so we just got to wait till, you know, they catch one and keep it.

322
01:34:29.679 --> 01:34:45.840
>> That makes sense. Okay. And this question is for city manager Kaitton. And just getting back to the $100 million uh I guess not specifically earmarked um CIP funding. That would be just to

323
01:34:45.840 --> 01:35:03.280
confirm a policy decision by the council as to where that money would be allocated. Is that accurate? >> Absolutely. And and just to briefly expand on the thought process is once as my colleague is saying some of that uncertainty is settled and then we'll

324
01:35:03.280 --> 01:35:18.400
return to council in that discussion over the next six to nine months and then that will prepare us a year from now. then we will have the decision whether we move forward with acquisition of new water or that project. So, this really prepares us for that. Thank you, Madam. >> Great. I appreciate both of your

325
01:35:18.400 --> 01:35:36.480
responses. Uh, Councilman Graham, >> thank you. Thank you, Mayor. It's good conversation. I kind of wanted to um hold my questions till after, but I just want to say a few comments about the water issue, even though I wanted to I I

326
01:35:36.480 --> 01:35:52.000
wanted to hear from the public kind of before we got into this. So, but every time we have a I I also understand that we're kind of going topically and people have questions they want to ask the um I'm excited we're doing the Bartlett

327
01:35:52.000 --> 01:36:06.960
Dam. Can you say just a touch more about the Bartlett Dam and um well, first of all, I agree that the feasibility should definitely be in the operating budget. I mean, that doesn't to me it wouldn't make sense to put it anywhere else. And maybe just say just a little more about

328
01:36:06.960 --> 01:36:22.800
the timeline of that. And um do you have any have you modeled like your forecasted any like you know percentage of our water portfolio that might that might supply or is that still is

329
01:36:22.800 --> 01:36:40.239
that premature? And and I don't want this I want this is a budget conversation. This is not a policy conversation. So, I don't want to go too far into policy, especially knowing that we're we have a water policy discussion coming up. So, thank you. >> Okay, Mayor um Councilman Graham and

330
01:36:40.239 --> 01:36:57.199
members of council, I um I don't have any of that detail. Okay. I haven't done a deep dive. I understand um the the capital number that was in there and that took it out that it was really just a you know number we kind of grabbed and and popped in to you know kind of

331
01:36:57.199 --> 01:37:13.520
encapsulate it. So I don't have it but I'm happy to find out. I have not had any of those meetings yet but um I will and I'm happy to return some information to you. >> No that's fine. Maybe you could um remember that for when we do have our work study. >> Absolutely. >> We could then we could that'd be a good

332
01:37:13.520 --> 01:37:30.400
opportunity to talk about that. Um, I read Greg Kaitton's city manager Kaitton's strategic water plan correspondence and I I I thought it was clear. I mean, we passed the strategic water plan in 24. And, you know, like you said, it's got multiple

333
01:37:30.400 --> 01:37:46.239
prongs, five prongs. It's not just one, and it's not just one, you know, pass or fail acid test. Are we doing toilet to tap or are we not doing toilet to tap this year? So, I I thought it was a good memo and a good communication. I wanted

334
01:37:46.239 --> 01:38:04.480
to I wanted to share my opinion on that. And um I think uh I just maybe if we can try to refrain from the the the strategic plan or water study debate here and just focus on

335
01:38:04.480 --> 01:38:21.119
um focus on this as a budget discussion. the I mean the $und00 million that's a placeholder. We have flexibility with that. We're our people are exploring ways to strengthen augment our portfolio. There is I mean like you said there's

336
01:38:21.119 --> 01:38:35.840
there's it's going to be kind of a multiple multipleprong approach and it's it's probably a reasonable placeholder amount. It's not this year. We have a five-year capital budget. It's in the it's within the five years. Not

337
01:38:35.840 --> 01:38:50.880
only is it within it, it's next year. And it gives us um flexibility to be able to adjust to opportunities that may arise. And you know the the reality is that there may be opportunities that

338
01:38:50.880 --> 01:39:08.480
come up as far as as far as acquisitions. We've tried some of that. Um purchasing water rights partnerships, you know, re how you going to re you the

339
01:39:08.480 --> 01:39:25.280
the ideas that are going to come up on this we don't even we can't even predict in my opinion there are going to be opportunities and it's good to have a placeholder for that but also this our staff and this council can be flexible and when time comes we can adjust we can make

340
01:39:25.280 --> 01:39:42.159
adjustments and I mean it just doesn't says nothing about plus it it also just sets the tone like we're not like we're doing nothing or we're falling behind I think that's what this conversation kind of does. We don't We're not talking anything about how much water we've been banking. We

341
01:39:42.159 --> 01:39:57.600
get way more water from the cap than we use and we bank it. We're not even talking about the home inspections and efficiency audits and water smart technology and advanced metering that we're doing. We're not talking about the rebates for permanent savings, turf,

342
01:39:57.600 --> 01:40:14.159
turf removal, water sense fixtures, smart controllers, spa and pool removal. We're not talking about our reclaimed wa uh water leadership and what we already already doing with the advanced water treatment facility at our water campus. Um, so

343
01:40:14.159 --> 01:40:29.199
we're not talking about any of that. And it sounds it might give the impression that we're falling behind and the toilet totap concept. I mean, ADAQ ADQ is developing uh standards and those are changing and those are actually becoming

344
01:40:29.199 --> 01:40:46.159
more stringent and nobody else does that in SC in Arizona. Nobody else does that. Not a single municipality pumps uh that into their drinking supply. Nobody. Is that correct?

345
01:40:46.159 --> 01:41:02.320
>> Um, mayor, um, Councilman Graham and, um, members of council. So, there are plants that are being are under construction. City of Phoenix has a Cave Creek one. Um, we went to lots of presentations about it. So, um,

346
01:41:02.320 --> 01:41:19.440
>> we are doing purified water. So, and I mean that is probably I mean to understand that that's a really big question. And >> but I'm saying right now nobody's pumping it in right now. So Phoenix is hoping for 28 2029. Um I know Tucson is building one and

347
01:41:19.440 --> 01:41:35.520
they're looking at 2031 and it's like hey you know why don't we thoughtfully observe them and we can learn from them. >> Sure. >> But we're I it's just nobody does it right now. I know >> it's blending >> blending purified water straight into

348
01:41:35.520 --> 01:41:51.600
the drinking system in Arizona right now. California does have that occurring and has had that occurring for a while. So, Orange County, so there are other places. So, yeah. >> Um, so I kind of sort of broke my rule a little bit and wanted to save my questions till

349
01:41:51.600 --> 01:42:07.199
later, but I am going to turn it back over to the mayor. So, thank you. >> Thank you very much. And, um, in keeping with your comments to keep it to the budget discussion, that was your point. And so I think we wandered a little, but meanwhile um I want to hear from C uh

350
01:42:07.199 --> 01:42:24.320
Councilwoman Littlefield. >> This isn't directly uh regarding the the current budget, but I just had a thought in my head and I was wondering if you had any information regarding it. Uh is there any thought or or a discussion

351
01:42:24.320 --> 01:42:39.280
about working with Mexico who is also on the river water and below us um to do a some sort of a joint desalinization plant? >> Um Mayor um Councilman

352
01:42:39.280 --> 01:42:55.520
Littlefield and members of council um we are not directly doing that to my knowledge. Scottsdale is there has been some talk there has has been some discussion about doing that as a as a larger effort but um to my knowledge Scottsdale is not directly involved with that at this time. >> Thank you.

353
01:42:55.520 --> 01:43:10.560
>> Thank you very much. And Councilwoman Whiteheads us out. >> Thank you mayor. And I am going to stick to the budget but I do want to answer uh Councilwoman Littlefield's question sort of in a budgetary way. So Del is available from California at $7,000 an

354
01:43:10.560 --> 01:43:28.159
acref foot. Uh right now the city of Scottsdale is paying $300 an acre foot or so from the cap. So water's available, it's just how much do you want to pay? Um and that's why we had the strategic plan was to get the most certain water at the cheapest price. Um,

355
01:43:28.159 --> 01:43:44.880
so when I my concern about this budget is that if we put no numbers in recognizing we are going to have needs for water next year even, you know, and

356
01:43:44.880 --> 01:44:00.480
and we know that the costs are coming. What we're doing is modeling ourselves after Gilbert and that didn't work out so well. So my point is we don't ever have certainty. I'm an engineer. I worked on capital projects in the government as well. So we're uh you know

357
01:44:00.480 --> 01:44:16.480
we're aligned there but we always put a placeholder in so that our rate payers don't get spiked um down the road. So we know the we know the dollars are coming or we know the costs are coming and we

358
01:44:16.480 --> 01:44:33.360
we do a disciplined rate increase based on modeling to make sure that we don't have spikes. And nobody ever minds if we have to uh uh you know bring down those or stabilize the rates, but I just want to that is what I'm looking for in this

359
01:44:33.360 --> 01:44:50.000
budget. I don't think I'm going to get it, but we know the costs are coming. We need to anticipate the costs and do that conservatively so that our rates reflect those future needs. And I just want to say out of the budget, out of the strategic plan, there are besides

360
01:44:50.000 --> 01:45:06.560
conservation, there are four major sources. and two of them are recycled water. So, we're always looking for that forever water, not that one time groundwater. Thank you. >> Thank you. And I think we just to close us out on this um I thought I thought we

361
01:45:06.560 --> 01:45:21.760
just identified two placeholders in the budget in this proposed budget upcoming budget. So, I think we're good with respect to, you know, forward thinking. So, thank you very much. Appreciate your time. >> Sure. Thank you. >> All right. Moving right along, we have

362
01:45:21.760 --> 01:45:38.000
Westworld and Will Loft will tell us what's new and exciting at Westworld. >> Thank you, your mayor, members of council. I'm Will Loftall, general manager of Westworld. I'm here to outline the proposed uh budget for

363
01:45:38.000 --> 01:45:55.920
Westworld for 2026 2027. In 2025 2026, we adopted a budget of 8.1 million. And in 2026 27, we're proposing a budget of 8.7 million. The amounts do not include indirect costs or a significant portion of utilities that are budgeted within

364
01:45:55.920 --> 01:46:12.320
facilities. This is this is why the total budget does not line up with the quarterly Westworld statement of operations. We have an increase of five FTE positions. We have we've added an an event director up for the last number of years. We've had one event director with

365
01:46:12.320 --> 01:46:28.639
with the number of events that we have. Last year we only had eight days where we didn't have an event. So we're we're doubling up on on our event directors so uh we can better service our clients. We're also adding eight part-time maint proposing the adding of eight part-time maintenance workers.

366
01:46:28.639 --> 01:46:45.119
We're as we're going to have a reduction in contractual services which is a decrease of for costs of property liability and workers workman's compensation uh insurance as well as organic waste removal. And we're requesting additional funding for equipment needs. We we're asking for a

367
01:46:45.119 --> 01:47:00.760
reach lift for our maintenance department and also for uh for a disc pull for our uh our uh for the grooming grooming of our equestrian arenas. And we're asking for a software package to help uh with event management.

368
01:47:00.800 --> 01:47:17.199
We're looking forward to uh four drainage projects coming up in the next while. The first one we'll initiate here in July, which will take a a drainage pipe across uh 94 Street over to 96, which will drain which will help dramatically the draining of of uh of of

369
01:47:17.199 --> 01:47:32.239
rainwater that we get during uh during uh the rainy times of the year. Uh we're also looking at uh an upcoming project along West Drive for uh widing widening that channel. And then the in the core campus, we're looking at projects coming

370
01:47:32.239 --> 01:47:54.239
up next year and the year thereafter. As far as capital projects, uh we're looking to do a design study for $150,000 for a Westworld compre comprehensive wayfinding and signage system. This is a big weakness at Westworld. We don't really have very

371
01:47:54.239 --> 01:48:10.800
good signage for a facility that is nearly 400 acres. So, if approved, this will be a a big benefit to us. And again, that's for the design of that project. And we're also asking for a design for a cover of Westworld Arena Number Seven. Um uh a num number of our

372
01:48:10.800 --> 01:48:26.639
shows um u are highly desirous of having arena number seven and the uh the Raven Horse Show in February. Um they they require that. So having that added to our uh our our portfolio would be a great advantage

373
01:48:26.639 --> 01:48:42.320
to us. Be happy to answer any questions that you might have. >> Uh great job. I'm excited to see that drainage repair or improvement, I should say, get get going. Where is Arena number seven?

374
01:48:42.320 --> 01:48:59.360
I should know those, but which one is it? >> It's on the uh it's on the south side of the the facility. Um, >> is it covered currently? >> It's not covered. No, >> you're going to cover it. >> Are you going to cover it? Is that what you said?

375
01:48:59.360 --> 01:49:16.159
>> Okay. >> We're asking for Right now, we're asking for for monies with which for a for a for a study for the uh for the design. >> Oh, gotcha. So, it's not approved yet.

376
01:49:16.159 --> 01:49:32.080
you're >> not approved yet. Just the design is what we're asking for. We we >> hopefully the following year we we could maybe do the do the cover >> or maybe >> I think if we're going to be asked to to contribute or to approve funds for the

377
01:49:32.080 --> 01:49:48.800
design, we should be looking at approving the project too. That would seem to make sense. Just my my two cents there. It'll take this year to do the design and then then we'd we we'd be looking for uh for doing the cover the following year, >> right? I understand that. But we

378
01:49:48.800 --> 01:50:05.760
wouldn't want to approve the design cost if we're not approving the project. Are you following me? >> I mean, this isn't a feasibility study because you already have the evidence that it's 100% needed out there or thereabout. So, typically, don't we

379
01:50:05.760 --> 01:50:21.600
approve the design once the project is approved? Madame Mayor, we're taking this I appreciate the question. We're taking this in two phases to do the design and then we would plan in the just the subsequent year to we would plan to add

380
01:50:21.600 --> 01:50:38.960
the construction or the after we have established the design the cost through the design. >> Okay. As you wish. There we go. Uh I don't see any other speakers on this one. Thank you all. >> Thank you. Uh Allison Timku, city engineer and

381
01:50:38.960 --> 01:50:53.440
transportation and infrastructure senior director. You are going to talk to us about transportation and infrastructure. >> Thank you. >> Thank you, mayor, members of council.

382
01:50:53.440 --> 01:51:09.199
Next slide, please. Okay. So, um this is our pavement overlay pro um program and um I know that city manager Greg Kaitton had uh done a brief overview of this in his slides, but basically we're looking to

383
01:51:09.199 --> 01:51:26.960
fund this at 45.9 million this year. We did do um a big increase from previous years where we had previously last year we increased it to approximately 40 million and years before that was kind of routinely funded at about 15 million. So this is, you know, a big investment

384
01:51:26.960 --> 01:51:44.639
in our paving program. Um, next slide, please. So this project is a bond project. It's build a bridge on Thompson Peak Parkway over Riata Wash to improve safety. Um, it's uh basically we have the eastbound bridge out there. Um, it

385
01:51:44.639 --> 01:52:03.679
was built by DC Ranch back in I think it was 2000 and I think I have the year. you probably know 2004 I think oh 2000 and uh with the agreement that the city would build the westbound portion and that was approved

386
01:52:03.679 --> 01:52:18.800
through the bond 2019 and we're currently in design of that and the scope is basically to construct design and construct the bridge and realign the roadway. Um next slide please. Okay so those are the two projects that I was going to discuss. I also wanted to just

387
01:52:18.800 --> 01:52:35.280
quickly highlight um the Shea and 66th Street um pedestrian crossing. I know that there was some questions from council on that. Um so basically that project is a new project and it's to build a uh pedestrian hybrid beacon or

388
01:52:35.280 --> 01:52:52.239
otherwise known as a hawk at 66th Street in Sheay. And that area um of Sheay has a lot of high volume, high speeds. It's a very wide crossing. Um those are areas where we would typically look at um

389
01:52:52.239 --> 01:53:09.119
facilitating the crossing with a hawk. Um and there was a study done back in 2024 that had looked at the number of pedestrian crossings. the number of pedestrian crossings was just um a little bit lower than the threshold of

390
01:53:09.119 --> 01:53:24.880
when we normally do a hawk. But that doesn't preclude us from doing it because basically it's a safety issue and we really wouldn't want people crossing midblock without the light, without the beacon. And that's what we found is happening. So we've done some

391
01:53:24.880 --> 01:53:42.159
modification at 64 Street to the traffic signal and the timing to actually assist with getting people across the street. um and that was not effective. People were still crossing midb block. Um it is a thousand feet away. So um again that's why this project is in the budget and

392
01:53:42.159 --> 01:53:58.159
it's at just under $600,000. So and with that I can have any questions or if you want to continue on to the next presenter. >> Councilwoman uh we do have a question. Councilwoman Mallen. >> Thank you mayor. Um thank you for your presentation. Allison, um you said the

393
01:53:58.159 --> 01:54:15.360
walk uh the hawk at 6 uh 4th 66th Street, that's a new project, >> correct? >> Okay. Or was that put above other projects that have already been aligned? Is it is it pushing other projects back that had been done prior had been waiting?

394
01:54:15.360 --> 01:54:31.440
>> Um we had looked at all of our projects and prioritize them amongst each other. With the new CIP review team, we look at all the projects from all the departments and we look at the priorities. So again, my question is, is this being moved up and other ones being moved back? >> No.

395
01:54:31.440 --> 01:54:47.119
>> Okay. >> I don't see any. Oh, yes, I do. Council Councilman Graham, >> that's kind of how capital budgeting works. I mean, you just you have projects that

396
01:54:47.119 --> 01:55:03.520
the projects that changing in priorities and you every year you reassess. I mean, that would that wouldn't make sense for us to to be stuck to a two years ago budget approved

397
01:55:03.520 --> 01:55:19.599
by a prior, you know, completely different city council under using totally different circumstances for us to somehow use that as a measuring stick against ourselves, right? Is that right? >> Um, that's correct, mayor, Councilman um Graham, and we did precisely that this

398
01:55:19.599 --> 01:55:34.960
year. We looked at all the projects from all the departments and had to re-evaluate which projects maybe were no longer a priority. When you're looking at new projects, you have to compare them to the existing projects as well to see where the priorities lie.

399
01:55:34.960 --> 01:55:51.599
the um I mean I I've always kind of thought that our CIP the projects in our CIP there were too many zombie projects and not to use kind of a colloquialism but um I think that

400
01:55:51.599 --> 01:56:09.199
it seems to me like staff has really tried to kill some of those zombies this year. Can you maybe can you name a I made one person laugh. Um, can you name uh maybe a couple examples? >> Um, okay, Mayor, Council Member Graham.

401
01:56:09.199 --> 01:56:25.199
Yeah, at one of the council meetings, I did present to you two projects that were removed. One was the um the Fifth Avenue and Goldwater Park. Um, again, we had removed that from the budget because there's a lot of private development construction in the area and a lot of impact on the local businesses. So,

402
01:56:25.199 --> 01:56:41.760
we've moved that out of the five-year plan and it can come back at a future date if it it becomes a priority again. And then the other one was um the Puma Park pickle ball courts that I mentioned. Um again, we would plan to do those in the future when we actually are able to do the improvements to Puma

403
01:56:41.760 --> 01:56:59.040
Park, but that is uh relying on a large drainage flood control project that uh we have funding for, but we have not yet secured the the total amount that we need from uh Maricopa County Flood Control District to do that project. So again, another project that we took out

404
01:56:59.040 --> 01:57:14.960
um and will hold for future placeholder if becomes appropriate. >> Later on tonight, I'm going to give a sermon about how happy I am about the $45 million for road pavements. So I'll be delivering that sermon later. Thank you. Thank you very much, Allison.

405
01:57:14.960 --> 01:57:29.760
>> Thank you, Mayor. >> Thank you, Councilwoman Whitehead. >> I just want to make a correction on uh the phrase zombie projects. Um maybe perhaps uh before the next budget session we can have a list of projects that might be uh pulled out because

406
01:57:29.760 --> 01:57:47.280
they're just excess money uh for projects that are already done. That's what I would consider zombie projects. The two that um you mentioned um are important projects. So uh there was land our last canal parcel owned by the city

407
01:57:47.280 --> 01:58:04.239
slated for development and and the city was ready to sell it. I'm very proud to say I stopped the sale and that will be a new park. And so I'm sorry that that got defunded because the development around there does want the park, but hopefully we'll get uh funding back in and get that new park, the Rose Garden

408
01:58:04.239 --> 01:58:20.960
Park in. So that's certainly not a zombie park. The other one came by citizen petition. It's nice that residents can come to us and then their the budget changes because of their requests and the citizens um down near the Puma Park wanted uh pickle ball

409
01:58:20.960 --> 01:58:37.199
courts and we absolutely complied as we always do to be efficient with your dollars. We combined the pickle ball court construction with um a drainage project. The drainage project has gotten delayed. So the pickle ball courts are

410
01:58:37.199 --> 01:58:53.920
getting delayed. So also not exactly your zombie project. I think residents would be very upset to hear that it is it those projects are moving forward. They're just not moving forward right now. My preference would be to keep them in the budget. We think it will be within the five years. Um so rather than

411
01:58:53.920 --> 01:59:09.760
create an illusion of cost savings, we should just keep those projects in. But you know we we balance a lot of needs. So both of those projects are very exciting and I happen to have been involved with both. Thank you. Thank you, Allison. Appreciate your time

412
01:59:09.760 --> 01:59:25.920
and presentation. Uh, lastly, we have Hassan Mashtag. Hopefully, I'm saying that correctly, drainage and flood control manager, and you will talk to us about flood control and drainage CIP

413
01:59:25.920 --> 01:59:47.239
projects. >> Good evening, Madame Mayor and members of the council. I am Hassan Mushtak. I will be highlighting couple of the drainage and flood control projects from the requested budget for FY26 and 27.

414
01:59:48.080 --> 02:00:05.840
This project is titled Granite Reef Wash Phase 2A. Total budget for this project is $13.9 million. It's a storm drain project from Thomas Road down to McKelps Road and along Mccalip Road from M uh Pima Road to 84

415
02:00:05.840 --> 02:00:21.360
Street alignment. We have a intergovernmental agreement with Flood Control District of Maricopa County through which they will pay us $7.5 million. We have a separate contract with the Salt River Puma Maricopa Indian

416
02:00:21.360 --> 02:00:36.719
Community to pay us another $4.2 million. That leaves us the city liable for only $2.4 million. Next project, this is a small project. 68 street storm

417
02:00:36.719 --> 02:00:52.320
range south of Camelback Road from it's a storm drain from Camelback Road south to Arizona Canal. Budget for this is $3.2 million. Once again, we have a an IGA with flood control district where they will pay us

418
02:00:52.320 --> 02:01:09.679
about $1.3 million, leaving us liable for $1.9 million. So, those were the two slides I had and I think I will hand it over to Scott, department director, budget director Scott Selene for wrapping it up. Thank you.

419
02:01:09.679 --> 02:01:25.199
>> And I didn't see any questions on those, so thank you very much. Welcome back, Scott. Thank you, Madam Mayor. Um, just to highlight very briefly, uh, the timeline that we're on, we looked at this earlier tonight, is has been the proposed budget presentation and work study with the

420
02:01:25.199 --> 02:01:42.320
BRC. We'll be back on May 19th for the tenative budget adoption. And that brings us to the end. Um, happy to entertain any questions or no, >> and I think we're going to wait on uh questions until we hear from the public. So, stay tuned.

421
02:01:42.320 --> 02:01:59.760
Uh this is the time for comment on the proposed fiscal year budget and I'd like to call up in order of signing up Ariela Freriedman followed by Daniel Freriedman

422
02:01:59.760 --> 02:02:26.480
followed by Paris Blumenthal. >> Oh that's okay. Well we can we can go with Daniel Freriedman first. There we go. >> Uh, right there. Excuse me. There. There you go. >> Do I need to do anything >> there? There you go.

423
02:02:26.480 --> 02:02:41.679
>> Hi, my name is Daniel Freriedman. I'm not related to Ariela Freriedman, but I do know her, and I think we're all related somehow. Um, I'm here to talk about the Hawk crosswalk, as I understand that. Um, I

424
02:02:41.679 --> 02:02:59.199
live at 64th and Gary, 6431 East Gary Road in Scottsdale. I'm currently a single dad of three kids, 13. Just had his bar mitzvah two weekends ago. He did very well. Uh, a

425
02:02:59.199 --> 02:03:16.239
13-year-old, a 11, 12y old, and a 10-year-old. I have my kids every other weekend and we traverse 66 and Shay twice a day on Saturday. I'm an active community member at my synagogue. I go

426
02:03:16.239 --> 02:03:31.360
every day. As I said, I have the kids on the weekends and we go across the street. Yeah, we could probably go to 64th and Shay at the light, but my kids like to ride their bikes and so I don't really want them riding their bikes on Shay,

427
02:03:31.360 --> 02:03:50.239
even on the sidewalk. So a crosswalk at 66 and Shay would be uh tremendous. In fact, when services are over on Saturday, we usually bring home 10 12 kids aging ages 9 to 13. Uh, hurting

428
02:03:50.239 --> 02:04:04.960
three kids across the street is a task enough, but hurting 12 to 12, 10 to 12 kids uh, every other Saturday across the street is extremely difficult. So, a crosswalk at that location would be

429
02:04:04.960 --> 02:04:22.080
literally a lifesaver and a tremendous asset to me personally as a single father. And I know that uh there are many other community members, neighborhood members that I know that uh would find this also very very useful. Thank you for your time, mayor, council

430
02:04:22.080 --> 02:04:39.199
members, and city. >> Thank you, Daniel. And Ariela Freriedman uh is next. Thank you. Followed by Paris Blumenthal, Benjamin Benson, and then Mark Grunts. >> Okay. Hi. Good evening, mayor, council

431
02:04:39.199 --> 02:04:54.159
members. My apologies for having to step out earlier. Um, I'm Dr. Ariela Freiedman, a Scottsdale resident for the past 10 years. I'm a surgeon, double board certified in adult and pediatric urology who treats vehicular trauma patients. I'm an assistant professor with dozens of peer-reviewed chapters

432
02:04:54.159 --> 02:05:09.199
and papers, including on surgical trauma. I've served on the medical executive committees at Banner Thunderbird Hospital and surgery centers. But today I also speak to you as a mom of four young children regarding the proposed pedestrian pedestrian crosswalk at 66th Street and

433
02:05:09.199 --> 02:05:26.239
Shay. One day while walking home from synagogue, my elderly father who can't walk the extra half mile to the corner crosswalk attempted to cross Sha Boulevard mid street. Thinking it was safe to cross, my four-year-old daughter followed him and ran into the street. Both misjudged the speed of the oncoming

434
02:05:26.239 --> 02:05:42.880
cars or perhaps hadn't thought to check. Traffic had to come to a halt on both sides of Sheay as cars reached within a few feet of them until they made it to safety. My entire family and others were screaming from the sidewalk, helpless to prevent the unfolding horror. I wish

435
02:05:42.880 --> 02:05:58.639
this was an isolated occurrence, but scenes like this happen every week at this location. Children cross independently, stuck in the middle of Sheay, and traffic comes to a complete halt to allow pedestrians through in the middle of the street. Foot traffic has only increased during this time and this

436
02:05:58.639 --> 02:06:13.920
is becoming a more frequent catastrophe waiting to happen. Congregation Batsilas serves over 800 local Jewish families, many of whom walk to and from synagogue weekly and on holidays because driving is prohibited. But this area is also home to Chapperel Christian Church,

437
02:06:13.920 --> 02:06:30.880
preschool, and K through8 school, a CrossFit gym, and Kokopa Middle School, which has over 850 students in sixth through 8th grade. This is an area serviced by hundreds of families. For anyone walking to or from any of these institutions from east of 64th Street, the existing light at 64th and Sha is

438
02:06:30.880 --> 02:06:47.119
inadequate and too far. There have been multiple attempts to make the light at 64th and Shay Sabbath compliant. And each time they haven't worked. The only solution that the city of Scottsdale has been able to offer was to have the synagogue encourage its members to use that non-Sabbath compliant light or walk

439
02:06:47.119 --> 02:07:02.880
to the next nearest light at 70th Street. That hasn't worked. Human nature is what it is and our members and their children are just not walking an additional mile in 115 plus degree heat in the summer. It has not been an effective solution. It is standard and

440
02:07:02.880 --> 02:07:19.440
routine for all major synagogues with walking families in the Phoenix metro area to have these crosswalks. In fact, Congregation Bethila is both the largest and fastest growing such synagogue in the area. The cost of the crosswalk was greatly exaggerated previously by a previous speaker, as was the burden on

441
02:07:19.440 --> 02:07:35.440
regular traffic, as this crosswalk would only be activated by the presence of a pedestrian looking to cross. There has already been a vehicular related death at that exact location in recent years. I don't know how many more people need to die before this crosswalk is built. I humbly request that all opposition to

442
02:07:35.440 --> 02:07:51.880
this much much neededed crosswalk cease and we can all get on board to protect our most vulnerable citizens, our families, our elderly parents and our young children. Thank you. Thank you. All right, Paris Blumenthal

443
02:08:03.920 --> 02:08:20.400
Good evening, Madame Mayor, council people, fellow residents, and the police protecting us. My name is, my full name is Paris David Blumenthal. Became a resident of Scottsdale in 2015 and a half. started a

444
02:08:20.400 --> 02:08:36.159
company eight and a half years ago, moving company, which I'll be representing the city of Scottsdale and the state of Arizona for the Better Business Bureau for being one of the torch award finalists for the western region. That'll be coming up in July.

445
02:08:36.159 --> 02:08:53.840
I um my kids went through Cocoapa Chapperel High School. Now they're in university and one's in the military. The crosswalk what we were just mentioning before is one of the reasons why I'm here. You had mentioned that

446
02:08:53.840 --> 02:09:09.599
tourism is very important for the Scottsdale. Both the rabbi and I believe the clergy or the priests of the church across the street have been uh fantastic. They've been bringing in a lot of people from all over the world as well as residents and people from out of

447
02:09:09.599 --> 02:09:27.599
state. A lot of people don't know their way around there, but that's a very busy Shea Boulevard, as you know. It's pretty busy. And 64th and 56th, Cactus and 56, Cactus and 64th, Sheay and 64th and

448
02:09:27.599 --> 02:09:44.400
Sheay and 56 are one of the highest accidentprone locations. Only two blocks from there is um the 66 we were talking about. So with kids crossing the street, it's it's

449
02:09:44.400 --> 02:10:01.760
better to prevent than heal the cost of ambulances and everything else, god forbid, and hurting all the children and the young people from Sundays and Saturdays and the tourists coming in and on the weekdays. It's very important that we do have a crosswack placed there and we'd appreciate that all of you have

450
02:10:01.760 --> 02:10:18.880
common sense and would rather prevent than heal. We would like and that's why we voted you all in and we want to thank you. I met two of the cons the council people last night. They're fantastic. It was a really good uh interesting conversation we had. So, I want to thank you all and uh for coming today, people

451
02:10:18.880 --> 02:10:34.480
listening to this. And let's see if we can get that uh crosswalk and you can ask answer yourself one question tonight. Why did the chicken cross the road? Because you wanted to try out that new crosswalk on 66th and Shay. Thank you.

452
02:10:34.480 --> 02:10:50.800
>> Thank you. Next we have Benjamin Benson. Mark Wren will follow and then uh Susan Wood has donated her time to Dan Isac. So after that would be Jason Alexander. Go right ahead Mr. Benson.

453
02:10:50.800 --> 02:11:09.119
>> Hi. Good evening uh mayor and council members. Thank you for uh running our city. Um my name is uh Dr. Benjamin Benson. I'm one of the members at CBT. Uh I'm coming to you to humbly request uh the crosswalk at 66th Street. Uh

454
02:11:09.119 --> 02:11:26.079
something that has already been mentioned is a lot of us are younger our families with young children. And as our families grow, you know, it's it's very difficult for a pregnant mom in her sixth, seventh or eighth month of pregnancy to cross that street very

455
02:11:26.079 --> 02:11:43.639
quickly when there's like a small lull in traffic. So, if it would be possible to get a light at that location, it would be tremendously beneficial to the young families that are living in Scottsdale. Thank you for your time. >> Thank you, Mark Rence.

456
02:11:54.800 --> 02:12:09.440
Thank you, mayor, council members, and uh city staff. Uh I'm here speaking on my own behalf. As I mentioned last week when I introduced a citizens petition on water, which is what I'mma focus on in

457
02:12:09.440 --> 02:12:25.119
my short period of time. Uh I before I retired, I was the Association of California Water Agency's uh director of regularatory affairs. Aqua's public water agency members were responsible

458
02:12:25.119 --> 02:12:41.440
for approximately 90% of the water consumed in the state of California. So I had quite a bit of exposure to a quite diverse number of water agencies. What I found was that the most successful p public water agencies were those that

459
02:12:41.440 --> 02:12:57.199
had a diverse water portfolio and those that invested in innovative technologies to efficiently use, reuse, and conserve their water supply. The reason I bring those two points

460
02:12:57.199 --> 02:13:15.520
forward tonight is uh it's my understanding that the city of Scottsdale's water portfolio is anything but diverse. Over 70% of the water supply comes from the Colorado River. And as uh we all know, the

461
02:13:15.520 --> 02:13:31.679
Colorado River is the subject of much discussion at the Bureau of Reclamation with regards to uh cutbacks on the downstream water diversion and that includes Scottsdale.

462
02:13:31.679 --> 02:13:47.360
But on the second point, Scottsdale is noted noted for its innovative water management tools. It has developed green building codes, incentives for water for

463
02:13:47.360 --> 02:14:03.599
voluntary water conservation, advanced purified water recycling that is the envy of cities across the United States and quite honestly throughout the world and expanding water storage at Bartlett.

464
02:14:03.599 --> 02:14:21.280
Now is not the time to back off from those uh projects, especially given the crisis we've faced. The worst time to be b buying water out on the water market is when you're in the midst of a water crisis. Trust me, the prices that you

465
02:14:21.280 --> 02:14:37.280
think are absorb exorbitant today, you might consider quite reasonable tomorrow as the market plays out. So I encourage the council to ask ask your staff who ma who made an

466
02:14:37.280 --> 02:14:51.679
excellent presentation tonight. What is our contingency plan for reduced Colorado River water? What constitutes transfers out which is

467
02:14:51.679 --> 02:15:10.320
calling for a 30% reduction from fiscal year 25 26 to fiscal year 20s 20 26 27 and I will leave with this last point since I'm out of time a five a 9.5%

468
02:15:10.320 --> 02:15:27.760
reduction in water supply and reclamation seems shortsighted to in a time of water crisis. Thank you very much, Mayor. >> Thank you, Mark. Uh, next we have Jason Alexander, followed by Boaz Curtis, then Linda

469
02:15:27.760 --> 02:15:52.480
Milhaven. Uh, thank you, Mayor Barowski. My objection to the Hawk Project at 66th Street uh has absolutely nothing to do with the goals of it. Of course, it is important to respect the Jewish community, to respect their faith and

470
02:15:52.480 --> 02:16:09.280
the uh tradition of walking on the Sabbath, safety, of course, for pedestrian safety and multimodal transportation. I've been in favor of that on many past projects. My objection to this project is the appearance of it being a pet project intended to be put

471
02:16:09.280 --> 02:16:24.239
forward by council memberwasman without a proper justification. This was studied uh in uh 2024. There was an email sent around to the entire council by the former transportation director.

472
02:16:24.239 --> 02:16:40.960
Uh could I have the overhead please? I know it's a little hard to see from this. um if they could zoom in a little bit. But a couple of quotes from the email from uh transportation director Melenko is that the uh crosswalk the location was not conducive to pedestrian

473
02:16:40.960 --> 02:16:58.080
access that is not located near a major intersection. Staff did observations and do not see enough pedestrian crossings. It went on to say that uh they didn't meet the established volume and the synagogue is primarily used on Saturdays when this would be a very expensive

474
02:16:58.080 --> 02:17:13.519
proposition for not a lot of people using it. Again, my objection is to the appearance that this was a pet project. Why wasn't it studied again? This study was done only two years ago. And if the project is justified, by all means, let's do it.

475
02:17:13.519 --> 02:17:29.920
But let's study it again. You know, interestingly, this council has a bad habit of not wanting to study transportation issues. They did not want to study the parking garage despite the fact that Mr. Graham just recently talked about the importance of rep prioritizing

476
02:17:29.920 --> 02:17:46.719
constantly. Seven years went by from the time the citizens voted for that and it wasn't rep prioritized. I'd further like to criticize Mr. Quasman's handling of this issue and the way that he framed opposition to it is anti-semitic. I was raised Jewish in New

477
02:17:46.719 --> 02:18:02.479
York and New Jersey. I've seen plenty of experiences of anti-semitism. And about the only thing worse than anti-semitism is false flags of anti-semitism like Mr. Quasman who regularly claims anti-semitism when things don't go his way. I can

478
02:18:02.479 --> 02:18:19.280
think of four possibly five instances of Adam doing this. this crosswalk here. >> Point of order. >> Madame Mayor, is this conversation have to do with the budget? Can you enforce that, Mayor? Madame Mayor, >> uh ye yes, I certainly can. And uh your

479
02:18:19.280 --> 02:18:35.519
answer is uh Mr. Alexander is talking about a crosswalk that was part of the um budget uh presentation. So, continue on. And your focus obviously is the crosswalk.

480
02:18:35.519 --> 02:18:51.599
>> Thank you. Yes, the crosswalk again, objection to it. Mr. Clausman framed as simple anti-semitism, ran to the news media to complain that objections to this project were based on anti-semitic issues rather than a lack of study. And this is not the first time Mr. Quasman

481
02:18:51.599 --> 02:19:07.120
has done this. When he was in law school, he famously blasted a Jewish law professor on national news. >> All right, point of order. Point of order. Point of order. >> Uh, let me let me just interrupt you. Uh Jason, if you could keep your focus on

482
02:19:07.120 --> 02:19:22.800
the budget discussion with the crosswalk, it would make this go a lot smoother. Thank you. >> Okay. Well, I would just like to point out Mr. Quasman's hypocrisy, his oversensitivity, his refusal to let things be talked about based on their merits. And if

483
02:19:22.800 --> 02:19:38.399
anyone can have the overhead again, is going to be overly sensitive to words and tones. Let's remember that Adam posted this about DEI a year and a half ago. Poison that will be rooted out. Your time is up, so thank you.

484
02:19:38.399 --> 02:19:53.439
>> All right. >> Yeah. >> Boaz Curtis, Linda, Mil Haven, followed by Gila or Gila Leki. Gila. Okay. Thank you. Boaz Curtis.

485
02:19:53.439 --> 02:20:11.600
Okay. Linda Milhaven, you're up. Thank you. >> Thank you, Mayor and Council. My name is Linda Milhaven. live here in Scottsdale on Belgian Trail and I'm here to speak to you today about water investments. We've heard a lot about from this conversation already. I've worked with

486
02:20:11.600 --> 02:20:27.840
two other Scottsdale residents to meet with you to discuss water policy and subsequently we sent you an email outlining our concerns and I'd like to read an excerpt from our email for the record. Um, this email was from me and from Bruce Halen, who is or the retired recently retired Salt River Project

487
02:20:27.840 --> 02:20:44.240
director of water supplies and Rudy Fisher, current board member of the Central Arizona Project. And the re email reads in part, as Scottsdale residents, our concerns rise out of the proposed budget reductions to the water related capital improvement plan projects. the rates and fees

488
02:20:44.240 --> 02:20:59.760
proposed as well as the impacts these changes will have on Scottsdale's preparedness in ensuring a resilient, affordable, and reliable water supply for Scottsdale's residents and businesses. The sustainable water supply is foundational to Scottsdale's health and stability. As we have learned from

489
02:20:59.760 --> 02:21:16.080
past water resource investment, As we have learned from past water resource investments, costs incurred today for water projects are much less expensive than costs delayed into the future. Scott Stillwater's strategic plan does an excellent job outlining options to replace the impending reduction in our

490
02:21:16.080 --> 02:21:31.600
cap water allocations. The solution must be to pursue all the options outlined in the plan without delay. There's been talk about buying water credits potentially in lie of pursuing other options, but this is just one of several options identified in the

491
02:21:31.600 --> 02:21:48.479
strategic plan that need to be pursued to give Scottsdale more control over our water supplies and water security. Net net $261 million has been removed from the five-year CIP for water projects. Two of the largest projects taken out are advanced purified water for 68

492
02:21:48.479 --> 02:22:04.399
million and the Bartlett Dam for2 million. Some of you have gone on record expressing concerns about expanding the use of recycled water. All water is recycled. Many upstream communities dump their waste water into the Colorado River. We treat that water and mix it in

493
02:22:04.399 --> 02:22:20.640
our drinking water today. Continuing our investment in our recycle facilities to meet the state's new requirements is one of the most reliable, cost-effective, and immediate solutions to impending reductions in our Colorado River water. We are losing time by delaying this project. Participating in the Bartlett

494
02:22:20.640 --> 02:22:36.319
Dam modification gives us rights to water in the Verdie River, a new source of water that is independent of what happens in the Colorado and over the long term an inexpensive renewable water supply for the city. It should be a specific line item and not buried in the operating budget. Mr. Kaitton has

495
02:22:36.319 --> 02:22:51.840
explained that he only included projects in the CIP for which he had reliable cost estimates, what he calls hard costs. We must ensure that all water projects are included in the CIP, even only if as a placeholder with best guessed estimates to ensure that we are planning appropriately. The budget in

496
02:22:51.840 --> 02:23:08.319
future years includes the vague category of sources and supplies. We're pleased to see sources and supply. However, we need to be clear what this what is made up into that category and make sure and and make move that forward. This is delaying the budget. It is a planning

497
02:23:08.319 --> 02:23:24.240
document and it pushes the projects in the future which causes delay. It's a critical junction for our city. We must display leadership, move forward with the capital and with this water strategic plan, put the projects back into the initiative and just to take to

498
02:23:24.240 --> 02:23:39.920
call recycled water toilet to tap is irresponsible. that suggests it undermines the project which is for all of our safety when we are still exploring budgets reflect policy. They cannot be separated. And finally, by pushing these projects out, we are falling behind in keeping our

499
02:23:39.920 --> 02:23:57.760
communities safe. Thank you. >> Thank you, Linda. Uh Gila Lei, followed by Dan Isaac and then David Smith. >> Hi everybody. Madame Mayor, council members, thank you so much for giving me

500
02:23:57.760 --> 02:24:14.399
this opportunity to probably reiterate what you've already heard before. Um, I am a member of Congregation Betila, which is the synagogue that has been discussed already. And Dr. Freeman, I think, elucidated a very compelling

501
02:24:14.399 --> 02:24:31.280
argument, uh, very scary argument about why this is such a critically important initiative. We are members of this congregation. We have been for about 10 years. On a regular basis during the week, my husband is there four times a week. I'm

502
02:24:31.280 --> 02:24:47.760
there once a week. There are programs. There are, you know, morning, day, afternoon, and evening. There are people circulating in that area and there are people trying to cross the street. My husband and I have personally witnessed

503
02:24:47.760 --> 02:25:03.359
holding our breath when we walk out of the synagogue and we're walking towards an area that we where we exit. We have seen people trying to cross and we stand and we look and we pray and we we look

504
02:25:03.359 --> 02:25:19.359
at the six lanes. We're talking about a six lane thoroughare right across the street. That's what it is. It's six lanes. And I would encourage anybody and everybody who questions this, go there

505
02:25:19.359 --> 02:25:36.960
physically. If you have an opinion, have an opinion based on reality. Go there and try to cross and see what it feels like and think about whether or not you feel safe. So without belaboring this any further, I say this is absolutely

506
02:25:36.960 --> 02:25:53.280
critical. If one child dies, one teenager, one parent, one grandparent, one elderly person, then we will all be culpable. Thank you for all your hard work. You guys have a tough job and you're doing

507
02:25:53.280 --> 02:26:08.720
great. Thank you, mayor. Thank you, council members. Thank you to everybody that's helping to facilitate a safe and healthy Scottsdale. Thank you so much. Thank you, Dan Isaac. And Dan, I know

508
02:26:08.720 --> 02:26:25.359
you have some donated time. Can we wrap it up in four minutes? >> I'll do my best. >> All right. Thank you. >> Dan Isaac, address on record. Um, there are people in society who look down at organized religion. I am not one of them. And yes, organized religion has

509
02:26:25.359 --> 02:26:41.120
been responsible for some bad things in the past, but I personally believe that organized religion is a key element of the fabric of society. To be able to come together in worship as a community strengthens the bonds within society.

510
02:26:41.120 --> 02:26:57.439
Whether that's through prayer, preaching, chanting, song, it brings us together. And there are those people who have chosen a life that at times is more difficult because they believe it aligns with their faith. The Orthodox Jewish

511
02:26:57.439 --> 02:27:15.200
community is one of those communities. and they do so for the simple reason that they believe it's pleasing to God and aligned with the covenant that they made with God. It's something that should be admired and respected and I'm disgusted that anybody uses it against

512
02:27:15.200 --> 02:27:32.479
them. Um that said, I'm opposed to this crosswalk for three reasons. One, it's unneeded. Two, it negatively impacts many other residents. And three, it costs city money. When I say it is

513
02:27:32.479 --> 02:27:49.600
unneeded, the statistics prove that it doesn't meet the threshold that the city has set for such a crosswalk. That doesn't mean it can't be done, but it doesn't meet the threshold. Second, when this plot of land was picked by the founders, when it was planned, when it

514
02:27:49.600 --> 02:28:05.760
was developed, when it was designed, at no point did they tell the city, "We really need a crosswalk there." Third, with regard to why it's unneeded, there is a crosswalk at 64th and there's one at 70th. Improve those.

515
02:28:05.760 --> 02:28:22.800
We're talking about this crosswalk at 66th only benefiting those people who live between 65th and 68th north of Shea. That is not the majority of the congregation. That is a small part of the congregation. So, it is not needed.

516
02:28:22.800 --> 02:28:39.840
It is wanted and it will make things safer, but that's not the only reason we make decisions on how to spend money. Secondly, it will negatively impact thousands of people who use SHA as well as Hayden and Scottsdale Road. Sheay is

517
02:28:39.840 --> 02:28:56.319
one of the major, if not the busiest, East West arteries in Scottsdale. We are talking about adding an additional random event stoppage of that traffic has huge implications for the entire length of

518
02:28:56.319 --> 02:29:12.800
Shay plus or minus a couple miles as well as the north south corridors that cross Shay. I believe in the first amendment that we should all be able to practice our religion but we don't get to negatively impact other people by doing so. I am a

519
02:29:12.800 --> 02:29:28.800
practicing Catholic. I don't do it well, but I still practice and will till my dying day. I would not entertain Bishop Dolan asking restaurants in Scottsdale to not serve meat on Friday during Lent because it's distracting to me.

520
02:29:28.800 --> 02:29:46.479
I would not entertain a notion a notion from the Imam of our mosque on Vinda that five times a day when there's called to pray and they're supposed to stop whatever they're doing to pray that we stop all traffic to make it easier for them. Our practice of religion stops

521
02:29:46.479 --> 02:30:02.960
when it negatively impacts other people. This will negatively impact other people. And as far as the cost, I don't care whether it's 50,000, 100,000, or a half a million dollars. If one is a conservative, what is one does not spend money on a project that is unneeded and

522
02:30:02.960 --> 02:30:20.399
negatively impacts other people. And I'm all for safety. None of these people were here when this council took a A-rated roundabout in safety and made it a D in safety. These people don't care about safety. and all of you who do care

523
02:30:20.399 --> 02:30:45.880
about safety, I really wish you were here and called them out for making our road far more dangerous. Thank you. Okay, thank you, Dan. Uh David Smith, followed by Avon Cahill and Raul

524
02:30:49.120 --> 02:31:04.960
Zubia, I almost called you. I don't like R. I almost called you by someone else's last name. Sorry. >> Thank you, mayor, members of council. Um, whether good or bad, I'm going to give you something besides crosswalks and

525
02:31:04.960 --> 02:31:22.399
water to think about as you uh consider the proposed budget for capital improvements. Tonight, I want to alert you to five included projects that run contrary to the express direction of the Scottsdale voters and which are in fact disallowed

526
02:31:22.399 --> 02:31:39.520
under the Scottsdale Center charter. I'm referring, of course, to the limitations on preserve investments that were imposed by Prop 420, which voters approved in 2018. In fact, two members of the council

527
02:31:39.520 --> 02:31:56.160
currently campaigned for a passage of this pro proposition and celebrated its passage by a margin of 3 to one. But when the voters approved this, it superseded and negated all prior

528
02:31:56.160 --> 02:32:13.200
authority for spending preserved tax dollars. And after the election, we in fact inserted language from Prop 420, memorialized it in our city charter at article 8, section 13.A.

529
02:32:13.200 --> 02:32:30.800
And it's entitled limitations on the use of preserve funds. And it states without ambiguity that preserve funds shall not be appropriated or spent by the city for any purpose other than acquisition of preserve land,

530
02:32:30.800 --> 02:32:48.080
the building of new trails, or debt service. The proposed capital improvement plan makes no mention of this voter imposed spending limit. In fact, it ignores the limitation altogether.

531
02:32:48.080 --> 02:33:08.880
and lists on page F10 of your budget five different capital projects that are planned for the preserve next year totaling 2,347,400. Four of these projects are for improvements to existing trail

532
02:33:08.880 --> 02:33:25.439
heads, not new trails. They are to update restrooms and improve the signage and provide shaded gathering and educational spaces, resurface parking lots, add equestrian stalls.

533
02:33:25.439 --> 02:33:42.080
The fifth project is to fund a feasibility study and design a wildlife crossing at Rio Drive. I submit none of these projects fall within the definition of the 2018

534
02:33:42.080 --> 02:33:59.680
legally allowable preserve fund expenditures. You must direct the city manager tonight to either remove these projects from the CIP budget or designate alternative funding for them. It's more than just a

535
02:33:59.680 --> 02:34:16.960
matter of keeping the promise we made to citizens. You cannot knowingly approve a budget that proposes illegal expenditures of taxpayer receipts. Thank you for your time. >> Thank you, David. Uh, next, Raul Zubia

536
02:34:16.960 --> 02:34:33.200
and then Avon Kale. >> Mayor, if I just Mr. Smith, can you email that list of projects to us? >> Mr. Smith, >> can you email that list to us? >> Stand back. I'm sorry.

537
02:34:33.200 --> 02:34:50.160
What was the question? >> Can you email us that that list of projects? >> What's he saying to me? >> Council Councilman Graham has a request. >> Yes, >> David, to email the list that you just went over >> to us. Please.

538
02:34:50.160 --> 02:35:08.160
>> Yeah, I have a hard time hearing up here, particularly in this goofy room. Um, >> that's okay. We'll we'll get you a note. It's fine. I I can certainly email the list of projects if that's what you want, but they're in your budget book and the CIP

539
02:35:08.160 --> 02:35:29.600
book page whatever I said F10, but I will email them to you. Yes. >> Thank you, Raul Zubia. >> Good evening, everyone. Raul Zubia uh address on record and I am speaking to you tonight not just about line items in

540
02:35:29.600 --> 02:35:46.720
a budget but about the fundamental promise of good governance. When we talk about infrastructure, we're often talking about invisible systems that make daily life possible. But today we're talking about something much more urgent. The literal resilience in our

541
02:35:46.720 --> 02:36:03.600
community in a changing climate. I encourage you to keep the CIP funding for the Bartlett Dam expansion and the advanced purified water facility in the budget. If we pull these projects, we aren't actually saving taxpayers money.

542
02:36:03.600 --> 02:36:19.920
We are simply ensuring that when they have to build, the cost and material the cost of materials and labor will significantly be higher. But more importantly, we would be sacrificing certainty. So people choose where to live based on whether a city is thinking 30 years

543
02:36:19.920 --> 02:36:35.920
ahead or 30 days ahead. And by keeping these projects in the budget, you're sending a clear signal that Scottsdale is a safe bet. We are community that values innovation, respects the reality of our environment,

544
02:36:35.920 --> 02:36:54.280
and refuses to leave the next generation with a bill they cannot pay for a crisis they did not create. So, please let's keep these projects moving forward. Thank you. >> Thank you, Raul. >> Last speaker on the list, Avon Cahill.

545
02:36:59.120 --> 02:37:13.920
>> Thank you, Council Mayor. Um, my name is Ivan Cahill. Address is on record. I'm here to talk about the Hawk intersection project and crosswalk. And I just want to um make a statement on my behalf for

546
02:37:13.920 --> 02:37:30.560
the Jewish community that um I watched in dismay the 12 news report by Bram Gresnik and indicating that this was something to do with discrimination and I just was so embarrassing that to hear

547
02:37:30.560 --> 02:37:47.520
that because I have not met anybody that is against the project because of that reason. So, I just wanted to um talk a little bit about that. You definitely have my empathy on the situation. Uh the council has a track record of spending

548
02:37:47.520 --> 02:38:03.040
my tax dollars without showing actual proof of the need. The unfortunate situation is the city approved this without the consideration that it was a synagogue and that they would need a crosswalk somewhere when it was

549
02:38:03.040 --> 02:38:19.359
originally approved. So that was a failure on besa on I think on behalf of the planning committee. So people will ask why are we installing a hot crosswalk in the major arterial interrupting traffic flow when two studies conducted by the city showed the

550
02:38:19.359 --> 02:38:34.319
volume does not meet the minimum requirement. My question is to the city and to um the council, has anybody else looked at something different and that is the need for safety?

551
02:38:34.319 --> 02:38:50.399
Crosswalks on a busy arterial I think give a false feeling. How many red light runners are there in Scottsdale? Huge number. And everybody's speed on shade. I go down it every day. I try to

552
02:38:50.399 --> 02:39:07.280
do the speed limit and people going past me. People are running red lights. People are turning left on reds. I mean, it's crazy. So, my worry is from a safety perspective, if you put a crosswalk in there, a hawk light, is it really going to give

553
02:39:07.280 --> 02:39:22.960
um a false sense of being safe at that area? Has anybody looked at another solution? And that maybe being a bridge. I think it would be a lot better solution. I'm I'm sure it'll be a lot more expensive, but from a pure safety

554
02:39:22.960 --> 02:39:37.600
point of view, I would really like to have the project um considered on something else other than the crosswalk that it is. I did try to the traffic department and they said they have done the best to prolong the signal light

555
02:39:37.600 --> 02:39:54.880
there at the crosswalk to accommodate more traffic on those days. So hopefully you will consider more of maybe from the safety perspective rather than is it needed because there's not enough people using it. Thank you.

556
02:39:54.880 --> 02:40:12.080
>> Thank you Avon. All right. So that concludes the uh public speakers on agenda item number three. So, we're going to go back to a discussion. And um before we start, I'm going to ask uh city attorney

557
02:40:12.080 --> 02:40:28.640
uh S Santea to opine on the comments that Speaker David Smith uh raised. Thank you, Mayor and members of the council. Uh there is a subsection in section 13 of the charter that Mr. Smith

558
02:40:28.640 --> 02:40:45.840
um um didn't mention. Um, and so it it's not quite as clear-cut as he he makes it sound. Um, the subsection at issue is subsection B, which says the section does not apply to funding improvements that existed prior to the effective date of this section or those authorized by

559
02:40:45.840 --> 02:41:03.040
sections 12B1, 12B5, and 12B6. So, in order to determine whether um those particular items violate the charter, I I would need more information um regarding when the the improvements originally existed and whether they meet

560
02:41:03.040 --> 02:41:20.640
one of the the other exceptions which include um uh expansion of trail head parking facilities. Um also they um such and also uh completing the construction of certain uh ones like little granite

561
02:41:20.640 --> 02:41:35.680
uh phrase field pima dynamite trail heads and any necessary trail uh connections as depicted in each trail trail heads approval plan prior to the effective date of when the voters approved this. So it's a little bit more complicated. >> So is that something you need more

562
02:41:35.680 --> 02:41:52.240
information from our staff about? Right. Yes, I can I can't appine off the top of my head without looking at it more closely. >> Okay. Well, will you please do that? I mean, certainly if if it's an issue we should be concerned about, we want to know.

563
02:41:52.240 --> 02:42:10.319
>> We will take an in-depth look that at it tomorrow. >> Thank you. I appreciate that. And in order to make this smooth, I'm trying to figure out uh what the best way to approach going through these topics. I do have another uh question and it pertains to um uh Allison Tim Q and the

564
02:42:10.319 --> 02:42:28.280
and the crosswalk. Um so so I'm going to ask my question and then we can go through these category by category. Um so we'll keep you up there and and see if anyone else has questions for you.

565
02:42:39.200 --> 02:42:54.640
Thank you. Do you have a map of where this crosswalk is located? I know generally where it is, but I'm trying to picture the the bookend intersections that, as I understand it, have traffic lights. Is that right? Uh, mayor,

566
02:42:54.640 --> 02:43:08.960
members of council, I don't actually have a map that shows the whole area, but um, 64th Street and Shea is the closest signalized intersection. That's about 1,000 ft to the west of this location.

567
02:43:08.960 --> 02:43:26.080
So, it goes 64th Street and Shea. Um, then 65th Street, 66th Street, 68th Street, 70th Street, >> and 70th is where the Walgreens is, right? >> Yeah. And that's pretty far. The closest signalized intersection is 64th Street at a thousand feet.

568
02:43:26.080 --> 02:43:40.800
>> And the synagogue is on the south side. >> Southside. Yep. And they are uh right there at between 65th Place and 66th Street. >> So there's two two concerns I have with

569
02:43:40.800 --> 02:43:56.720
this. Um it's the process that you know this project didn't come across our radar until it was plugged in recently into uh you know the transportation and infrastructure budget capital

570
02:43:56.720 --> 02:44:14.240
improvement project budget. So I I have a concern about that. It's the appearance of uh lack of transparency honestly um for this to kind of be sprung up. I don't doubt that there's a need there based on uh everything I've

571
02:44:14.240 --> 02:44:29.840
learned since it was plugged in, but I do have major concerns about a hawk there. I mean, I can't tell you how many people I've heard that the hawk at between and Scottsdale quarter should be

572
02:44:29.840 --> 02:44:48.399
removed because of the danger it poses to pedestrians. And I believe I know Sheay is even a more dangerous road than the area at which that hawk is located. So Oh,

573
02:44:48.399 --> 02:45:04.560
there's the map. Okay, that's great. Can you can you just zoom in or zoom out, I guess, is would be the best way to say that and highlight it because I know exactly what you're talking about, but I just want to see. >> Okay. Okay. Can you see the pointer

574
02:45:04.560 --> 02:45:20.560
there? I can. >> Okay. So, that's 64th Street and Shay. That's the um closest signalized intersection. This right here is 66th Street. These two are 66th Street and Shay. The proposal is right here. Um and the synagogue is located right here.

575
02:45:20.560 --> 02:45:36.560
There's also a church located here. Um and then, uh as you might know, Chevron High School is just located a little bit further to the south in that area. So, the Hawk is is set to be in the middle of the two 66 streets. Not even

576
02:45:36.560 --> 02:45:53.520
>> at 66th Street and um Shay. >> Yeah, but you just said it's kind of jag jagged the way 66 >> Well, 66th Street is jagged, but the hawk is planned to be here. >> Okay. So, has there been any comparison? I

577
02:45:53.520 --> 02:46:07.840
mean, I the bridge is a great idea. I just I I don't see the first bridge in Scottsdale being located there. Um I think that could have value, but I just don't see that happening. Has there been any thought or consideration for a

578
02:46:07.840 --> 02:46:24.399
traffic light that was adjusted to be reactive to pedestrian traffic at that location? That to me seems like it would be far safer. I think that's a really dangerous thing to put on Shea Boulevard. Granted, traffic flows are

579
02:46:24.399 --> 02:46:41.359
not as heavy on Saturday and Sundays, but all the other days you talked about, you know, it's it's a freeway. So, the question was for you. >> Okay. So, um, what we did do back when this was initially studied was, um, we

580
02:46:41.359 --> 02:46:57.520
did modify the timing of the pedestrian crossing at 64th Street and Shay to see that if that would improve usage of 64th Street and Sheay at the signalized intersection. However, um, that didn't

581
02:46:57.520 --> 02:47:14.640
work. the the um pedestrians were still crossing midblock even with us trying to modify the existing traffic signal. Um we wouldn't put in another traffic signal at that location for pedestrians. The appropriate uh crossing there would

582
02:47:14.640 --> 02:47:31.200
be the um pedestrian hybrid hybrid beacon which is the hawk. And the hawks do lend themselves well for roads with high speed, high volume, and the length of crossing, which is what is here at um

583
02:47:31.200 --> 02:47:48.240
this location on CH. >> I couldn't disagree more with that. I mean, even the Optima Hawk that just separates the mall and Optima is dangerous. I mean, people just almost run people over there all the time. I've seen it personally having been office

584
02:47:48.240 --> 02:48:05.760
there for a long time. So I don't I don't get the logic there. Um there is you could do a you know a a traffic signal. I'm just throwing out ideas and I'd love you know to talk about this further or get a response a written response from you but a traffic signal

585
02:48:05.760 --> 02:48:22.720
that was just going one way uh i.e. north on 66th Street, I guess, the the further east 66th Street. Um, like it is at Eastwood, for example, and Scottsdale Road. That's just triggered by vehicular

586
02:48:22.720 --> 02:48:37.439
traffic, but it could just as easily be triggered by pedestrian traffic. So, I I have major concerns about the two things I said. Um, with that I would like to and I see city manager wants to say a few words, but I would like to ask for

587
02:48:37.439 --> 02:48:55.600
uh a written um description of when this project was proposed uh and when it was inserted in the in this um CIP project proposal and what other projects um were

588
02:48:55.600 --> 02:49:11.359
eliminated or if none what what were postponed. That's not really the driving factor for me, but the safety factor is. And I'd also like an analysis of some sort of a um a traffic signal there and what the

589
02:49:11.359 --> 02:49:28.800
cost of that would be. City manager, please. >> Thank you, Madam Mayor. I just wanted to briefly answer or touch on kind of how we got to this point. So this came in uh from community member concern also leadership from the synagogue and so this has been on my radar screen for

590
02:49:28.800 --> 02:49:46.640
some period of time. We tried to adjust uh the pedestrian walkways at 64th and 70th uh 64th although closer is kind of the wrong direction for most that they really traveling uh by foot to the north and to the east. And so what so this is

591
02:49:46.640 --> 02:50:02.080
not the first phase. This was probably a second or third phase. I would refer to it. So what we tried to do is make signal improvements. I'll just speak to the 70th because that's primarily the one that was heavily utilized. And so we had it so that it was automatically

592
02:50:02.080 --> 02:50:18.640
triggered for pedestrian. And so we've been stopping traffic uh on Saturdays specifically at the times uh automatically whether it was triggered or not. So, interestingly enough, for the flow of traffic, this will actually increase uh the flow of traffic because

593
02:50:18.640 --> 02:50:34.720
we will return at the 70th signal to the way it would normally react. And I I'll let uh my colleague speak more to the specifics of the device that's utilized. Um but I just wanted to speak to how we got to this point. Thank you, Madam Mayor.

594
02:50:34.720 --> 02:50:51.600
>> Thank you. I mean, I'm satisfied with the answers so far. I would like the answers to my questions though and either you or city manager would could provide those. I'd really appreciate it. Thank you. Uh Councilwoman Whitehead, uh I was just going to touch uh touch on

595
02:50:51.600 --> 02:51:07.600
the item having to do with the preserve and prop 420. Um so I I just want to point out that the author of Prop 420, I was very involved in that citizen initiative. uh

596
02:51:07.600 --> 02:51:24.640
we verified ahead of time. So I understand uh Mr. Smith's concerns, but we verified that the projects approved prior were not impacted. And actually the other project the several projects he mentioned, I'm not even sure about, but specifically I'm talking about the

597
02:51:24.640 --> 02:51:41.760
Rio Verie uh wildlife and in fact pedestrian overpass project. And so that was approved uh in 2004 in that preserve tax. So that's where that project comes from. I just wanted to point that out. And in fact, you know, attempts to

598
02:51:41.760 --> 02:51:58.800
defund it um last year, I think, uh somebody generated, you know, 200 signatures from residents in a matter of weeks. So once again, listening to the people, listening to what they voted for in 2004, and the fact that it was reviewed by staff and by the author of Prop 420, I think we're pretty good

599
02:51:58.800 --> 02:52:14.680
there. and the other projects. I'm not sure. Thank you. >> Thank you, Councilman Graham. >> Well, I guess I'm going to give my remarks to the budget now. Just uh go over it briefly. Kathy's been waiting for these remarks.

600
02:52:14.960 --> 02:52:31.279
Uh quickly about the uh about the uh crosswalk, the um what what's the what what do we call these now? They used to be called hawks, but I was told that we don't I don't even know what the right term is

601
02:52:31.279 --> 02:52:49.920
for these anymore. You can just do we still call them hawks? Uh, yes, mayor. Council member Graham. So, they are referred to as a pedestrian hybrid hybrid hybrid beacon. Pedestrian hybrid beacon. Um, which is the same thing as a hawk,

602
02:52:49.920 --> 02:53:07.120
>> a ph or a phb. You got an acronym for that? You got Can you put a vow in there? >> Yes. >> Um, >> the PHB, the pedestrian hybrid beacon at Kierland is so successful.

603
02:53:07.120 --> 02:53:24.080
You can't say enough about it. What that looked like before they built that, I mean, that was just a disaster. People were walking across to Quarter and Kierland. And I was on transportation commission at the time. And um

604
02:53:24.080 --> 02:53:41.279
very happy with how that's turned out. And um I think that yeah uh city manager Kate made a comment that this will return 64th Street and 70th Street potentially to their original cycling the original time it uh uh interval. And

605
02:53:41.279 --> 02:53:55.359
so that I think will expedite traffic and and increase flows. Um I do expect it would be used a lot on weekends. Um, I'm actually thinking about whether, you know, kids from Chapperel would use it. And, you know, if you think about it,

606
02:53:55.359 --> 02:54:12.399
it's not far that far from Kokopa. Um, you know, as I look at a map and I I think it's going to get a lot of use personally. So,

607
02:54:12.399 --> 02:54:32.800
those are some comments on the crossrock that I have. Um, overall the budget I think is um it's a good budget. The um we're going to keep looking at it. Tonight's been a good discussion about it. A lot of our community members had a lot of good

608
02:54:32.800 --> 02:54:50.319
contributions to say about it. Um, you know, the CIP spending is down, which I typically don't like to see that because Greg, Greg, I always say that to Greg, don't I, to the city manager. Uh, because it's like you bring the money in and you want to you want to you want to

609
02:54:50.319 --> 02:55:06.560
invest it. And when you're not investing in your capital assets, you're a lot of times you're deferring maintenance. And there's also because we are s such an asset intensive organization you there's always a minimum amount of investment that you want to make into your net

610
02:55:06.560 --> 02:55:22.560
assets to keep them at a certain standard. Um but I will say that you know we even though the budget is down a little bit we were budgeting our capex our capital budget in the past not our capex um but our capital budget

611
02:55:22.560 --> 02:55:37.680
um we were never spending that anyway. it was always just an approval that never fully happened. So, I think this gets us closer to reality. Um, this is, um, city manager Kaitton's first full budget, you know, when he

612
02:55:37.680 --> 02:55:55.600
when he was, uh, uh, tagged with the city manager role. Um, he kind of, what was that, in March or something? I mean, it was kind of like March 2025. It was kind of like the budget had kind of already been developed by the time that he, you know, took the wheel. And um so

613
02:55:55.600 --> 02:56:11.840
we've just seen from Mr. Kaitton so many reforms uh we've seen so many um I would say like outdated and overdue things uh within the organization that I've been very pleased with. I mean even stuff like moving code enforcement, you know,

614
02:56:11.840 --> 02:56:32.000
to to public safety. Yeah, I there's things like that that just kind of made have made sense to what we've uh been seeing. Um I like the um public safety spending, how it protects our public safety. Somebody almost got there, but we didn't

615
02:56:32.000 --> 02:56:48.960
quite talk about the gray tsunami that um some of our public safety leaders like to talk about. I'm still afraid of that one, but yeah, it I you know, it's going to be >> it just comes. >> Is it happening? When is it when is it happening? Blink twice. Uh, Fire Chief

616
02:56:48.960 --> 02:57:04.160
Shannon, if I'm just No, I'm just kidding. Um, >> it's here. >> It's here. I know. The um but we're watching and monitoring the ambulance service. I think so far the roll out's been good. Um and station

617
02:57:04.160 --> 02:57:19.760
618 annex. Um Scottsdale police were I mean what Chief Leuk said about this is this is the first year no vacancies. So I think that I mean that that to me

618
02:57:19.760 --> 02:57:39.399
is one of the headlines. So I hope somebody writes an op-ed on that. Maybe they will. Um with crime falling, crime is falling, especially violent crime, clearance rate is up. The um

619
02:57:40.000 --> 02:57:56.240
the last thing from a sort of a philosophical standpoint is is the road maintenance. And I'm not going to really give a sermon about that like I like I threatened earlier, unless Kathy, you want me to, but I won't. >> That's okay. >> She's like, "No, please don't." But I

620
02:57:56.240 --> 02:58:12.319
mean, we were spending $15 million a year on our road maintenance, which, you know, it just I mean, just to say what it was, we were diverting money to basic road maintenance over the years. We had an 80 PCI, pavement condition index of 80.

621
02:58:12.319 --> 02:58:29.520
In 2019, very good rating. And by the end of 2024, our pavement condition index was 63. It dropped like a lead balloon and um we were I mean we're just being

622
02:58:29.520 --> 02:58:45.040
outmatched by other other peer cities. I mean I think Apache Junction or Queen Creek has surpassed us. So this year we put in this you know the fiscal year that's ending next month. We put in $40 million

623
02:58:45.040 --> 02:59:01.840
budgeting $45 million this year. And I mean just people know this. People know that we're a tourism destination and you know we welcome over 11 million visitors a year and they know that that generates almost $4 billion of economic impact and

624
02:59:01.840 --> 02:59:19.600
they know that they um form impressions about our city and a large part of the impressions they form about our city are the roads and when they're driving over potholes and roads riddled with cracks I mean it just doesn't leave a lasting impression that this is a you know truly

625
02:59:19.600 --> 02:59:36.160
desirable destination for them to spend their tourism dollars. And it's also not only not only is it the impressions that it leaves on our on our visitors, but when you when you don't defer maintenance on roads,

626
02:59:36.160 --> 02:59:51.680
um, every dollar we delay on preventative work, let's put it that way, uh, costs four to 10 times more later in full reconstruction given, you know, depending on how long you wait and, you know, which materials you choose. And we've seen that too many

627
02:59:51.680 --> 03:00:08.399
times. So, you know, nobody's going to tell you though that part of the $45 million that is not also normal maintenance. That's catchup. That's in some cases that's full reconstruction to catch up for deferred maintenance that our residents suffered through.

628
03:00:08.399 --> 03:00:24.000
Um, so some comments about roads. Um, I still think, um, I'll just sort of register this opinion and I'm going to probably have some meetings with staff. I think our revenue estimates are probably too conservative and too low.

629
03:00:24.000 --> 03:00:39.680
Um, and I wanted to ask about this. Um, Scott, maybe you could tell us a little bit about this unexpected revenue loss reserve because I know what you're doing there, but I is that a new concept and is it possible to pull that up on the screen just so we can you kind of had

630
03:00:39.680 --> 03:00:54.960
that you kind of had that I think you know the chart I'm talking about. I think it was the blue color that was, you know, introduced. >> Yes, Madame Mayor. Uh, and council member Graham, that was slide

631
03:00:54.960 --> 03:01:11.600
uh 16 of the presentation from earlier. Um, that that was a determination that was made during last year's budgeting process. In the face of potential revenue losses, there's always um whether it be at the state level or some other level um potential

632
03:01:11.600 --> 03:01:28.160
uh threats to our revenue streams. Um and the intent was to take a portion of our general fund reserves and create a reserve to um to ensure against any event like that happening to our revenues. >> I mean I

633
03:01:28.160 --> 03:01:46.240
that was a recommendation from the budget review commission. >> Madame Mayor, Council Member Graham. Yes, that was >> okay. They're going to come up here in a second, so I'm going to have to talk to them about that. But it's it I understand what you're doing there. And oh, there it is on the screen. Okay. So,

634
03:01:46.240 --> 03:02:00.160
it was the it's the green one that was introduced. Was that introduced? Has that ever have we ever used that mechanism before or or is or is this the first um fiscal is is this year's budget

635
03:02:00.160 --> 03:02:19.279
the the year we're introducing it? >> Madame Mayor, council members can I can make me respond to that. that was developed last year when the legislature was looking at um uh eliminating the food tax and the food tax generates about 15 million for the city. So the

636
03:02:19.279 --> 03:02:35.359
budget review commission uh suggested that we put a reserve for that in the budget and that would we could use that in the event that food tax was eliminated to continue operations while we realign operating expenses with revenues. So that was what that was for.

637
03:02:35.359 --> 03:02:51.680
So, have you funded that reserve um yet or? >> Yes, it is funded. >> It's already funded. Okay. So, you've so you've already you've already transferred 15 million and then you're just going to you're just going to keep that there. You're going to cap it at that give or take. Is that your plan? >> Correct.

638
03:02:51.680 --> 03:03:09.840
>> Okay. And um the same policies with kind of idle cash as far as what we do with interest applies with the reserves and contingencies applies to this too. What was the question on that? >> The same policies that we do with

639
03:03:09.840 --> 03:03:24.960
interest earnings on the remaining corpus of the reserve and um contingencies will apply to this portion of it. >> They do earn interest. They are invested and the interest earnings are um mostly

640
03:03:24.960 --> 03:03:40.319
transferred for capital projects. >> Okay. Well, I'm glad I'm glad that's funded before we start the the budget fiscal year because, you know, then it's not taking away from those projects and we just have it already nailed down. Those are some of my comments for the

641
03:03:40.319 --> 03:03:55.279
time being. Uh maybe some of my colleagues might stimulate more questions or conversations, but I wanted to share those, put those on the record. Thank you. >> Uh next we have Vice Mayorwasman. And that's pretty tricky. I don't know how

642
03:03:55.279 --> 03:04:11.040
he got on my screen. Who did that? Who did that? Oh, mystery solved. Okay, Vice Mayor Quasman, you're up. >> Thank you, Madame Mayor. Um, can you hear me? Can you guys hear me? Okay, just want to make sure. >> Perfectly.

643
03:04:11.040 --> 03:04:25.840
>> Excellent. Thank you so much. Um, this budget represents exactly what the voters wanted to see out of the uh 2024 elections, which is a fiscally conservative budget. And I ask anybody

644
03:04:25.840 --> 03:04:42.880
who um who wants to take an objective look at this budget uh juxtapose it with what's happening uh to our neighbors to the south right now where Tempee is asking their voters to raise their taxes. Um there is a the difference

645
03:04:42.880 --> 03:05:00.800
could not be stark uh more stark. Uh we believe in limiting government so that you can flourish in the private sector. We believe in um we believe in making sure our infrastructure is fully funded

646
03:05:00.800 --> 03:05:17.200
with reserve so that we don't have any surprises later on. Um, we put in uh the the very very best in that we can offer in terms of a city manager in Greg

647
03:05:17.200 --> 03:05:35.760
Kaitton um and his team uh has just done a phenomenal job. both the both the charter officers and the uh and the staff hired by uh Greg Kaitton and in order to prioritize and uh ensure that we are on the

648
03:05:35.760 --> 03:05:52.319
long-term path to prosperity. I applaud the budget review commission. I applaud the mayor's budget review commission, something that she ran on and um and we brought in uh uh together to make sure that uh that the that the taxpayer is

649
03:05:52.319 --> 03:06:08.399
protected. Now, I want to get to um I want to really really speak to some of the u some of the speakers tonight and want to address something once and for all about anti-semitism and hawk and the whole thing.

650
03:06:08.399 --> 03:06:25.120
At no time did any speaker or or any council member for that matter want to mention in my opinion the most important topic that any city can provide which is our police and fire. We just took it for

651
03:06:25.120 --> 03:06:42.479
granted that that's they did a great job. That's the lion share of our budget is those protecting us. And I applaud Chief Shannon and Chief Leuk for doing such an outstanding job working with the city manager in making sure that we are living within our means

652
03:06:42.479 --> 03:06:58.880
and providing the best of the best protection uh for our uh community members and residents. What are people obsessed about in a $2 billion budget? Something that that that amounts to.

653
03:06:58.880 --> 03:07:14.319
025% of that budget. Now, you tell me where where that's where that is what's everybody's bugger. You tell me why.

654
03:07:14.319 --> 03:07:31.120
The fact of the matter is is that is that I I think it's twofold. One is that it's the Jews. And the two and the second thing is that it happens to be my community. I want everybody to know that this issue came up prior to me being elected to the council by community

655
03:07:31.120 --> 03:07:47.359
members that I happen to be a member of the community of but not for me. This was brought before I was ever elected. I want to be very very clear here that there are speakers today that were uh um

656
03:07:47.359 --> 03:08:04.960
in opposition to a crosswalk to save children stating that not having a crosswalk is safer than having a crosswalk. That's absolutely absurd. And secondly, when people are saying

657
03:08:04.960 --> 03:08:22.319
Adam Quasman uses anti-semitism when he doesn't get what he wants. Oh, but by the way, when he was in law school, he did 1, two, three, four, and five, and it had to happened to have to do with uh with Judaism. I'm sorry. It does not hold anywhere close to a candle of

658
03:08:22.319 --> 03:08:39.359
acceptability. We as a council have got to be better than this. We as a community have got to be better than this. And I'm going to call it out whenever I see it. My community is the fastest growing Jewish community

659
03:08:39.359 --> 03:08:56.399
in uh in uh in Arizona. Happens to be in Scottsdale. We're blessed to have a huge Jewish community. We're blessed to have a growing Hispanic community. I care about all citizens and especially children. And I think that we have to

660
03:08:56.399 --> 03:09:12.800
make sure that that we put the infrastructure in place to make sure that children are safe. It's just it's just as simple as that. Do we want children safe? Yes, we've got to build we got to build the infrastructure.

661
03:09:12.800 --> 03:09:28.560
I I am just I'm dismayed that there are those who would think that um uh uh saying that I would crawl would would uh fly to the press o over an issue when the press coverage

662
03:09:28.560 --> 03:09:44.000
yesterday about that happens to be a crosswalk adjacent but it happened to be because of a deep fake AI video and it was about the future of politics. And by the way, the press person I spoke with, I think you anybody could who would who who knows any history of me in Arizona

663
03:09:44.000 --> 03:09:58.479
politics, he and I are not exactly going to dinner together. All right? I did not run to any press member about this and run and and start clanging anti-semitism. But what I heard tonight actually makes

664
03:09:58.479 --> 03:10:16.479
me think that that if if this were some pickle ball court that we were building, nobody has a problem with spending all this money on a pickle ball court. When it comes to helping children, now we have an issue because I happen to be a member of a synagogue that an issue

665
03:10:16.479 --> 03:10:32.479
started prior to me being elected. This is not about me. This is about children in this community. I want to go back to um what council member Graham said about uh the um a

666
03:10:32.479 --> 03:10:48.080
rainy day fund and and making sure that in case the state legislature takes away tax revenue from us. Uh we should be worried and I'm glad that we were there in the last budget to take care of it and that and keeping that uh singular rainy day fund is is absolutely

667
03:10:48.080 --> 03:11:03.680
appropriate. I support it. Um, I want to make sure that as we move forward, uh, this budget is outstanding, but I want to make sure, and I want everybody to hear this, that we will continue to keep our promises to our, uh, to our police officers and our firefighters and make

668
03:11:03.680 --> 03:11:21.279
sure that they are a top three paid uh, um, organization in and respectively in this uh, in this state. We're going to keep those promises. We're going to make sure that roads are paved, cops and fire are paid, and that you, the taxpayer, is

669
03:11:21.279 --> 03:11:36.880
taken care of once and for all and make sure our children are safe. Thank you, Madame Mayor. >> Thank you very much, uh, Councilwoman Whitehead. >> Uh, thank you, Mayor. Um, I, you know, I do want to thank all the speakers who were here tonight. It's really nice

670
03:11:36.880 --> 03:11:53.040
always have people come and speak. And, um, I support the crosswalk. I support safety on our roads. Generally, I would like to see my council colleagues work harder with me as we have defunded very important road projects that have put um

671
03:11:53.040 --> 03:12:07.760
residents in danger. So, that's something to work on. Generally, on the budget, um you know, what do all of the presentations have in common? I'll let you think about that while I tell you

672
03:12:07.760 --> 03:12:25.040
that a budget is a book of priorities and that funding those priorities is the real trick of good governance, right? And so what all those presentations had in common is those projects were funded by the past councils. They were funded

673
03:12:25.040 --> 03:12:40.960
by the voters, the the past councils listening to the residents, then going with 2019 bonds. That was my first success. And then Prop 490, you saw that on every one of those slides from Westworld to police to fire to parks.

674
03:12:40.960 --> 03:12:56.880
And so I I just have two colleagues in the audience right now. Uh C former councilwoman uh Mil Haven and Betty Janick. Thank you for helping fund this year's budget. Um I there was a lot of talk about

675
03:12:56.880 --> 03:13:14.000
um it being a conservative budget. So the operating budget is what we really look at and the operating budget is basically the same as last year and that's good. The difference is that last year we continued a policy that was be

676
03:13:14.000 --> 03:13:31.040
began on the last council which was to pay down ballooning public safety pension debt. So last year we had a $50 million payown which is saving us $5 million a year. So that's the only variance really. Other than that, the operating budget stays the same. So, how

677
03:13:31.040 --> 03:13:46.239
did we keep the operating budget the same? That's where I have some cautionary concerns I want to share. We have slashed a lot of positions. Now, on the surface, it sounds like, well, if you cut positions, you save money. Now,

678
03:13:46.239 --> 03:14:02.560
as uh Mr. Kaitton pointed out, many of these positions are vacant. But people need to understand that what we should be looking at is why can't we fill these positions? We have a very low employee count per um per population. Plus we

679
03:14:02.560 --> 03:14:20.319
have 11 million visitors every year. And I can tell you in the past that philosophy of reduce the employee count didn't work out so well because our employees for instance many of the employees are gone have generated hundreds of millions of dollars of grants that fund our projects, our

680
03:14:20.319 --> 03:14:35.840
infrastructure projects and then keep our taxes low. And we saw in the past there was a lot of talk from my colleagues which I agree with both of them about deferred maintenance. I always say you want to fix the roof leak before the roof caves into your kitchen.

681
03:14:35.840 --> 03:14:53.120
So in the past when um that philosophy of let's cut staff people, we weren't able to maintain the city to the level we needed to. So instead of fixing bridges, we had to rebuild them at a cost to the taxpayers. So I'm very concerned about that. Um, I think that,

682
03:14:53.120 --> 03:15:10.560
uh, we also have in the past realized that when we contract out because we don't have enough staff, we don't get the quality we get from our excellent staff and it costs us more. And there was a little talk about that with the trees. We heard while we're trying,

683
03:15:10.560 --> 03:15:26.160
thank you to Prop 490, um which not everybody up here uh supported, but Prop 490 gave us the money to bring in our own arborists because then we'll get consistent, better management of our trees. So, I also want to talk about the

684
03:15:26.160 --> 03:15:42.560
rainy day fund and I just want to be really clear, our staff is so good at making things um not pointing fingers, let's you know, politicians, we point fingers, right? So let's be clear, the state legislature again and again and again these last few years have gutted

685
03:15:42.560 --> 03:15:59.359
our revenue and just because they gut our revenue doesn't mean we we don't have to protect you. So we that is why uh we built up on my watch we've built up we've changed policies to require more reserves and then this added little buffer because they're going after our

686
03:15:59.359 --> 03:16:15.439
food tax which costs people just really pennies a day and you have to understand these taxes those 11 million visitors pay in. So we're having to have these um special funds because we have a legislature that doesn't report to you as well as the city council does. Um I

687
03:16:15.439 --> 03:16:32.160
then I want to talk about capital improvement projects. Just because we defund them doesn't mean they go away, but it gives an illusion that we're charging that we're more efficient. And I think honesty goes a lot further.

688
03:16:32.160 --> 03:16:47.600
Nobody picks Scottsdale because we're the cheapest city. We pick it because we believe our government will be honest, transparent, and make sure that what that the services we expect, the safety we expect is delivered. And so I'm I'm

689
03:16:47.600 --> 03:17:02.880
very concerned. And of course, as you already heard me speak on water, our job that is that is maybe more important than you policemen. I don't know. I'm looking at our police, police, fire, water. I mean, these are essential

690
03:17:02.880 --> 03:17:21.040
services. traffic safety. Um, we are looking at tremendous cuts to the Colorado River allocation. We knew that. This isn't a surprise. And that's why we developed uh a strategic plan, but we have defunded it for those cuts are

691
03:17:21.040 --> 03:17:36.960
coming next year. They're not coming 10 years from now or five years from now. And with water, when you go from that silver bullet to that silver buckshot, like our staff member mentioned, it's not a switch we turn on. It's an investment we have to make and takes

692
03:17:36.960 --> 03:17:53.840
time. So, we know that ADEQ, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, is going to add an extra layer of treatment. We know what that layer is. There are there are some uncertainties, but other cities, they haven't stopped. They haven't defunded. They're moving

693
03:17:53.840 --> 03:18:10.800
forward while still negotiating with um ADQ to get the rules so that they're right sized and right priced for our residents or for residents statewide. So, I'm very disturbed that we've defunded the uh the really two out of

694
03:18:10.800 --> 03:18:28.640
four water projects in the out of in the strategic plan for this coming year. We're losing time. We're letting that roof cave in rather than to plug the hole. Um, and I want to talk about the Bartlett Dam because um, water is not as

695
03:18:28.640 --> 03:18:45.600
confusing as people think it is. But the what we're paying for is a study and our staff member mentioned that in past studies people paid in for the study, but they didn't necessarily get the water. That's because people don't drink studies, they drink water. And the cost

696
03:18:45.600 --> 03:19:02.239
isn't the study, but if if we pay for a study, but we haven't we haven't been disciplined in putting aside money to actually pay for that future water, will we will we be one of those who's paid for the study and doesn't get the water?

697
03:19:02.239 --> 03:19:19.439
And I can tell you, I've spoken with SRP engineers who have assured me there are far more people who want that water than there is water. So, I'd like to see the final budget have that same disciplined approach that have guided Scottsdale and

698
03:19:19.439 --> 03:19:37.680
Arizona for decades where you go ahead and you put in the number. If you have no funding in the infrastructure in the CIP budget, you are guaranteed to be 100% wrong. So, isn't it better to put that $100 million in the CIP for next

699
03:19:37.680 --> 03:19:54.399
year, budget accordingly, and we always budget conservatively and then come back and say, "Hey, you know, we um whatever we overd delivered, we undersold, overd deliver, you know, we we gave you more." But to not do it has real costs. And

700
03:19:54.399 --> 03:20:11.680
when it comes to water, everything I've done in my eight years and everything the city's done in the last 30 years is to deliver on a single headline that we all want. And that headline is co um Scottdale thrives despite significant

701
03:20:11.680 --> 03:20:28.239
cuts to Colorado River water supply. And that's the headline we need. And we want to make sure we fund accordingly because guess what? the cost of having one headline that isn't that is going to be is going to be permanent damage to the

702
03:20:28.239 --> 03:20:44.560
city even if water still flows. And as I said before, water will still flow. We're talking about cost and there's a big difference between $300 an acref foot and $7,000 an acref foot. So, I'm looking forward to that silver buckshot. We're going to be more diverse in our

703
03:20:44.560 --> 03:20:59.359
water sources. We're going to be more secure and we just have to continue to follow the plan. Thank you, >> Councilwoman McCallen. >> Thank you, Mayor. Um, I'll be brief. Uh, I just want to reiterate, uh, and this

704
03:20:59.359 --> 03:21:15.520
is to, uh, our city attorney, um, what the mayor said about making sure that we are in alignment with the law. We are, we want to make sure we're following the rules. Um, especially prior to approving a budget, if we have to align things

705
03:21:15.520 --> 03:21:30.640
differently, then we'll have to do that. But um to make sure that the uh the items that uh former Councilman Smith brought up um that we're on the right side of that. That would be my caution to you and that you report that back to

706
03:21:30.640 --> 03:21:48.479
us, please. Thank you, city attorney. >> Thank you. And I don't see any more speakers, but I just want to um it's okay. Uh first um during our a joint session with the budget review

707
03:21:48.479 --> 03:22:06.399
commission last year, I um I challenged the city manager to reduce spending ac divisional spending across the board by 10%. And I got a lot of like shock. So um and I'm I'm glad that I did. I'm glad

708
03:22:06.399 --> 03:22:21.760
that you met the challenge and thank you for doing that. Uh, I still think there's room to sharpen the pencil though and drill down a little further. I know this is the first, you know, first pass at this. Um, I I feel like,

709
03:22:21.760 --> 03:22:37.680
you know, you're really motivated to to do what at least I challenged you to do. And again, I appreciate it. I'd love to see a little more, you know, sharpness, fine-tuning, uh, so that we can really say, you know, not only were 33 FTEEs,

710
03:22:37.680 --> 03:22:54.160
um, eliminated, but there, sorry, that we aren't just saying 33 were eliminated, but yet we have 33 new FTEEs, right? I'd love to see the unfilled vacancy number go down further where possible, and I do think it's

711
03:22:54.160 --> 03:23:11.279
possible. I I don't have any evidence of that, but I trust in your ability to do that. I'd love to see that on our next swipe at this. Um, and to to the to really the rest of the story, I do think this is a great starting point. I think

712
03:23:11.279 --> 03:23:28.319
we're in a really good spot. Um, you know, starting with the 10% savings across the board that you challenged all the departments to do. I mean, things are great. Crime is down. um especially type two is it type two felonies? What?

713
03:23:28.319 --> 03:23:46.080
I forget the the designation. The most the most um dangerous and the most horrific crimes are down dramatically in Scottsdale. We have zero uh zero vacancies in PD, which is exa exactly what we strive to do. Um revenues are

714
03:23:46.080 --> 03:24:02.800
up, expenses for the most part across the board are down. We've paid off debt early so that we have long-term savings year overyear and ultimately in the long run. It's all really great news. Um fire, you know, we've really enhanced

715
03:24:02.800 --> 03:24:18.160
fire protection with respect to burning on the ambulance service and funding that uh funding the additional through the parks and preserve. glad to see those new positions, especially when it comes to the wildfire urban interface

716
03:24:18.160 --> 03:24:33.520
position and the others that you've got in in the uh preserve. So, that's wonderful news and I think, you know, we're really doing a great job and you know, it really looks good on paper. So, thank you,

717
03:24:33.520 --> 03:24:49.520
uh, Councilwoman Dascus. >> Thank you, Madame Mayor. Um I wanted to highlight the um $85 million reduction in a $2.1 billion budget. That's a enormous reduction 3.8% while at the

718
03:24:49.520 --> 03:25:05.520
same time increasing our reserves and contingencies by $20 million. So um cutting the budget in a smart way, not making sharp cuts, but making thoughtful um careful cuts and but also um being able to stash money for a rainy day. So,

719
03:25:05.520 --> 03:25:22.239
that's a that's a really great um way to approach this budget. Um we're adding 22 FTEEs for fire for the ambulance service phase three. So, we're investing in our ambulance service and the health of our community. Um $5 million for sworn

720
03:25:22.239 --> 03:25:37.200
compensation adjustments. We are investing in our sworn officers and uh $3.4 million for the gray tsunami and investment in skills replacement. As the chair of the uh community safety committee, it was my pleasure to hear

721
03:25:37.200 --> 03:25:52.960
Chief Shannon talk about the opportunity to provide more training for the existing team. How are we going to get the guys at the mid level, the ladies at the mid level up to the highest level? Because the highest level, those certifications, those are the ones that

722
03:25:52.960 --> 03:26:09.840
were retiring. Um, and so how do we get that knowledge and bring that into the community? And so these are a couple of years of investment in doing that. One of the things that will do is improve morale. It'll give firefighters an opportunity to learn and grow within the fire department. It's just exciting for

723
03:26:09.840 --> 03:26:25.439
everyone. So, thank you, Chief Shannon, for your continued um effort in that area. Um and then I wanted to highlight 4.5 $45.9 million for roads. We spent $44 million last year. In two years, that's

724
03:26:25.439 --> 03:26:41.439
$90 million on roads. and we're cutting our budget $85 million. It's absolutely incredible money management. There is a road that I travel um that's right in front of our grocery store and it was

725
03:26:41.439 --> 03:26:58.080
rated a 27 PCI index. I went through the calendar that the there's a tool that the city manager's office provides and you can look at the PCI index of the roads in your area or anywhere in the city of Scottsdale. This road was so terrible it was a 27. Anything that

726
03:26:58.080 --> 03:27:16.000
starts with a 50 is teared up and start all over again. So 27 is just absolutely unacceptable. And just over the course of the last three weeks with our spring paving program coming back, that road has been torn up. It was redone and it's absolutely gorgeous. Our investment in

727
03:27:16.000 --> 03:27:32.000
the roads for $90 million over the course of two years is going to have a significant impact on the city of Scottsdale. It's going to have an impact on how people see us when they come to visit on our resident experience and then also on the people the quality of you know the people who want to come and they want to stay here and they want to

728
03:27:32.000 --> 03:27:48.800
live here. They're going to say, "Wow, this is a great place to be. I don't hit potholes anymore." >> So, uh, thank you city manager Kaitton. This is excellent, excellent work. Appreciate it. >> All right. Well, that concludes the speakers from the DAS. And so, moving

729
03:27:48.800 --> 03:28:05.359
right along. Thank you everyone for the presentations. We appreciate it. Uh public comment. This is the time for Scottsdale citizens, business owners, and our property owners to comment on non-aggendaized items. And hopefully

730
03:28:05.359 --> 03:28:21.040
we'll keep it in the fairway and items that are within the council's jurisdiction. Also within the fairway. No official council action can be taken on these items and speakers are limited to three minutes. and it's getting really really late. So, if you can keep

731
03:28:21.040 --> 03:28:36.640
it at least to the 3 minutes, we would appreciate it. If you wish to speak on a non-aggendaized item, please see the city clerk if you haven't already registered. And notably, we still have the joint work study session with the

732
03:28:36.640 --> 03:28:54.560
BRC. So, it is getting late. So, calling all non-aggendaized public comment starting with Steve Sutton, followed by Dan Isaac, Avon Cahill, and then Jason Alexander. Yeah, I don't see Steve either. So,

733
03:28:54.560 --> 03:29:22.560
you're up, Dan. Dan Isaac address still on record. Um, at the last meeting, Adam Quasman disrupted my public comment in an attempt to infringe upon my First Amendment rights. Now, people have a gross misunderstanding of first

734
03:29:22.560 --> 03:29:38.560
amendment rights. The US Constitution specifically says that the federal government cannot limit our speech. However, over the decades and centuries, that has been expanded to state and city government. Now, that does not mean that

735
03:29:38.560 --> 03:29:52.720
I can say anything I want anywhere at any time. If something's threatening or obscene uh or menacing, you government has the right to intervene. But a city council does not have the

736
03:29:52.720 --> 03:30:07.520
right to limit specific words. I sent the case law to our city attorney and to the council and Adam Quasman ignored it. He admitted to me that he never read it. That case law was Aosta versus City of

737
03:30:07.520 --> 03:30:24.720
Co Costa Mesa. It's black and white. A word cannot be prevented from being spoken because somebody might think it is offensive or disruptive. Despite that, Adam Quasman continues to step on

738
03:30:24.720 --> 03:30:40.800
my first amendment rights. The word is the word that Jan Deboscus said when she filed a false criminal complaint against our mayor and then as a child would do in a fit of jealousy

739
03:30:40.800 --> 03:30:57.040
called the mayor a So, I will continue to remind the people of Scottsdale that Jan Debascus behavior is reprehensible and deplorable until such time as she publicly apologizes to the mayor for the false criminal

740
03:30:57.040 --> 03:31:13.439
complaint and using the porative word. And I will continue to remind people until Adam Quasman condemns her publicly for using the word that he thinks is so offensive. Jan Debasquez

741
03:31:13.439 --> 03:31:30.160
controls way more of this city council than people believe. She comes across as very nice and polite because she has Adam and Barry do her dirty work and she also controls our unqualified city manager which is why we get a crosswalk

742
03:31:30.160 --> 03:31:44.720
thrown into the budget without proper analysis. That is why I and others are starting a recall of Jan Debascus because her behavior is unbecoming of an

743
03:31:44.720 --> 03:32:00.239
elected official. >> Interject you can't use uh her electioneering. That's >> I'm not campaigning. I'm making a statement of fact. Her behavior is unacceptable. >> That that may be the case. But here's the deal. You cannot use the podium to

744
03:32:00.239 --> 03:32:16.160
electioneer on a recall election. as specifically prohibited by statute. >> And I didn't ask anyone to sign a petition, did I? >> Did you? You mentioned a recall election. >> People mention that they are running for office. That's not >> Let's go ahead and close this up and let's just

745
03:32:16.160 --> 03:32:31.520
>> So, >> let's >> that's fine. >> Avoid that conversation. Okay. >> Her behavior is deplorable. Her actions are deplorable. She is unfit for city council and people need to know who she is. Thank you. >> Thank you. All right, moving right

746
03:32:31.520 --> 03:32:52.640
along. Uh, Abon Cahill. And then last, we'll have uh Jason Alexander. >> I know. >> Thank you, Mayor and Council. I just wondering um when we come since city uh comments for the public are at the end now. Could would it be inappropriate if

747
03:32:52.640 --> 03:33:08.479
I wear my pajamas because by the time I get home, it's going to be like really late. Um, I wish I was out celebrating Cinco de Mayo instead of being at the city council meeting for four hours. Anyway, I just wanted to talk about uh

748
03:33:08.479 --> 03:33:23.439
the boy who cried wolf, which is a classic fable by Asop about a bored shepherd boy repeatedly tricks the villagers. In the story, a shepherd boy bored while watching his sheep decides

749
03:33:23.439 --> 03:33:38.239
to play a prank on nearby villagers. He runs to the village shouting, "Wolf! Wolf!" The villagers rush to help him, but find no wolf, but the boy laughing. He repeats a trick a second time, and the villagers again come to his aid,

750
03:33:38.239 --> 03:33:55.200
only to be fooled again. A real wolf then appears, attacks a flock, and the boy cries for help. But this time, no one believes him. The wolf eats a sheep. The boy is left to face the consequences of his dishonesty. The story found in

751
03:33:55.200 --> 03:34:11.760
many children's books teaches the moral that liars are not believed even when they tell the truth, highlighting themes of trust, honesty, and a responsibility to the public. Councilman Quasman, you have called so

752
03:34:11.760 --> 03:34:28.800
many people anti-semite that when one actually shows up, no one will believe you. And this includes very close friends of mine who are Jewish. The public has lost trust in you. Running to the press when you do not get

753
03:34:28.800 --> 03:34:46.399
your way with false claims is not becoming to a council member. Thank you. >> Thank you. Lastly, we have Where was I? Jason Alexander. Okay, we're keeping it in the fairway. It's my That's my phrase for the

754
03:34:46.399 --> 03:35:01.120
evening. >> Great phrase, Mayor. Thank you. Uh Jason Alexander, address on record. I want to circle back to uh to two points. One, I'm actually upset that Adam Clausman is not here in person tonight because every time he is here, the community gets to

755
03:35:01.120 --> 03:35:15.520
see just how much time he actually spends on his phone during meetings. Adam mentioned how irrelevant his history in law school was. So, I want to bring some facts up for an article that I wrote about him for the

756
03:35:15.520 --> 03:35:32.720
AZ Jewish News. On January 21st, 2016, Quasman was a first- year law student at ASU. A respected law school professor who was also Jewish named Joshua Drestler was asked about a student's comment about Senator Ted Cruz's campaign that Donald Trump represents

757
03:35:32.720 --> 03:35:47.359
New York values. >> Point of order. I we we respect First Amendment. >> What's your point of order? >> Um, allow me to make my point of order, please. >> Thank you, Mayor. >> And you you excuse me, uh, Councilman Graham. When you make a point of order,

758
03:35:47.359 --> 03:36:03.600
you don't launch into a dissertation. You ask to be recognized. Okay. >> Thank you for the education. >> Thank you. Go right ahead with the point of order, >> Mr. Parliamentarian. My point of order is um comments at non-aggendaized public items should

759
03:36:03.600 --> 03:36:20.479
be on items under our jurisdiction. >> That's correct. >> So, I would ask the presiding officer to please enforce that with the speaker. I don't know how I don't know how um talking about decades ago in somebody's law school class is under our

760
03:36:20.479 --> 03:36:34.560
jurisdiction. >> If you'd let me continue, Mr. Graham, >> I'm going to I'm going to respond to that. >> Uh that is the rule. That is the rule. Uh it's a little difficult to tell in the first

761
03:36:34.560 --> 03:36:52.479
40 seconds if your comments, your public comments pertain to something within the council's jurisdiction. So please direct your comments in the three minutes you have to items that are possibly or

762
03:36:52.479 --> 03:37:09.520
arguably within the council's jurisdiction. >> Relevant to what Mr. Quasman said how he claimed that opposition to his crosswalk was based on anti-semitism. I would like to show that Mr. Quasman in the instance from his law school class

763
03:37:09.520 --> 03:37:24.960
criticized his law professor who said that Cruz's comments about New York values were anti-semitic to him. And Quasman did not accept that. Quasman said, "Oh, you've got to be kidding. How can you possibly say that?" So, it's ironic that Quasman would then attack

764
03:37:24.960 --> 03:37:40.479
other people and and deny their interpretation of events and then justify uh or or excuse opposition to this budget item as pure anti-semitism. I think we're seeing hypocrisy with Mr. Quasman. Now, one thing I do agree with

765
03:37:40.479 --> 03:37:55.760
about Mr. Quasman and if I could get the overhead for a second is I do agree that we should avoid using so uh fake AI generated images and we should avoid putting them on social media which is why it is upsetting that Mr. Quasman has

766
03:37:55.760 --> 03:38:10.720
never condemned his colleague Barry Graham point of order point of order Mr. I Councilman Graham, what is I'll recognize you. What is your point of order? >> How are these comments under council's

767
03:38:10.720 --> 03:38:26.960
jurisdiction? I will ask you to enforce our rules of rules of procedure. >> As I just did, I asked Mr. Alexander to get to his point with the enforcement. He hasn't finished yet. I understand you don't like the

768
03:38:26.960 --> 03:38:43.279
leadup, but uh can I ask you Jason? Are you going to get to something that's within the council's jurisdiction? >> Yes, I believe I will. >> Well, I need you to. >> Okay. Thank you, mayor. >> So, my point is the hypocrisy we see in Mr. Quasman's complaints that are

769
03:38:43.279 --> 03:38:59.439
directed at his budget items. When Mr. Quasman claims that AI should not be used to criticize him, to criticize his policy decisions, I would like him to adopt a similar attitude toward Mr. Graham's PR person who recently put out

770
03:38:59.439 --> 03:39:16.000
these AI generated images from last week's meeting. Mr. Graham has paid Rod Pritchette $54,600. >> Jason, >> how is this within the council >> point of order talking? >> You don't need to interrupt Mr. Councilman Graham.

771
03:39:16.000 --> 03:39:31.520
>> Thank you, Mayor. I I think I've made my point on this. >> How is this within the council's jurisdiction? It's not. >> Okay. I'll uh I'll refrain from doing that then. Okay. Thank you, Mayor Barowski. Thank you for listening. Have a wonderful Cinco de Mayo. >> Thank you. I hope we get there. I hope

772
03:39:31.520 --> 03:39:48.479
it's not CIA. Wait, is that seven? Is six. >> Nice. >> All right, >> Mayor. We We have one. >> Mayor, I'd like to respond. >> I'm sorry. >> I'd like to respond to the to the comments. >> Okay. Please go right ahead. Vice Mayor

773
03:39:48.479 --> 03:40:04.960
>> say sorry >> de Mayo >> say it'll be safe to >> um I I just want to I just want to say that once again everybody is seeing the true colors of what's going on here and

774
03:40:04.960 --> 03:40:21.920
that this is pure politics and unfortunately everybody has to suffer because of it. But uh but I I I just want everybody to know that uh this community and and these members of the

775
03:40:21.920 --> 03:40:38.319
council are going to continue to focus what matters to residents, public safety, prud prudence when it comes to the budget, and making sure that our roads are the most wonderful in all of Arizona. Thank you. >> Thank you. All right, that concludes we

776
03:40:38.319 --> 03:40:54.520
have one more speaker. Uh Paris Blumenthal would like to speak. Oh, she wasn't on my list. My apology. Hi, Paris. Come on back up. Key. I knew that cuz your your name matches your hat. Paris.

777
03:40:54.800 --> 03:41:10.640
>> Well, it's late. We get >> It's me again. Paris David Blumenthal. Um, I wanted to just mention a couple things. I know that anti-semitism and so forth has been brought forth tonight and it's been a been a set of circumstances and then also picking on some of the

778
03:41:10.640 --> 03:41:26.800
councilmen for whatever reasons I find them quite pleasant. Um there were several incidences that I when I moved here I was living overseas for nine years. Um I had a couple threats from these pro Palestinian

779
03:41:26.800 --> 03:41:43.040
groups and so forth in front of the Jewish community center. Um, I was a in my youth I was a bodyguard uh for Whoopy Goldberg, Steven Seagal, and the uh the and George Burns. And

780
03:41:43.040 --> 03:42:00.560
just just random there looks like they're paid to do this, but there are we were talking about the crosswalk before, but just going there is a real life situation of anti-semitism um which I've never really felt before until the last year and a half.

781
03:42:00.560 --> 03:42:16.399
And one gentleman said that he had a gun in front of me because I was trying to protect an older lady. So I obliged him and the police were there. Um I did ask him to pull it please. And um he he decided not to for smart reasons

782
03:42:16.399 --> 03:42:32.319
afterwards, but there is anti-semitism going through the localities of the the synagogues. There's also a beautiful church next to us which a lot of traffic has been generated because of that. But I just say in regards to this

783
03:42:32.319 --> 03:42:47.840
anti-semitic situation when they were bringing in Vice Mayorwasman, um I don't I know him. I've met him before, but I don't see him crying wolf all the time for sets of circumstances for that.

784
03:42:47.840 --> 03:43:05.200
But it is it is alive here and we're just looking for safety and security for our people who live here. Everybody here seated. They all deserve that. and uh and have earned it. But this anti-Semitic set of circumstances everybody keeps on bringing up. It does

785
03:43:05.200 --> 03:43:22.960
exist, but so be it. But please uh I'd like to have some people if they want to talk to the council people and so forth or the mayor. I'm sure they can discuss it in in a you know, they're very nice people personally on the side, but I don't think we should be bringing up our differences and

786
03:43:22.960 --> 03:43:38.479
uh depreciating the value of their character in any such way. Thank you. >> Well said. Thank you. All right, moving right along to the work study session. Uh there's been no I'll close uh public comment and move on to citizens

787
03:43:38.479 --> 03:43:54.160
petitions, which there are none. And so we're going to move right along to the work study session, which is uh of course a less formal setting for the mayor and council to discuss specific topics with each other and city staff and in this case the budget review

788
03:43:54.160 --> 03:44:11.040
commission. Um and it also provides us the opportunity to uh receive direction or them the opportunity to receive direction from the council. We have received three requests to speak

789
03:44:11.040 --> 03:44:28.800
on the public uh excuse me on the work study session and I'm going to take those first. So starting with Betty Janick, thanks for sticking with us this long. >> Oh my goodness, I'm tired. Yeah, >> now I know why I decided not to run.

790
03:44:28.800 --> 03:44:44.800
Anyways, my name is Betty Janick. Um, and uh, good evening, mayor, city council members, and I want to give a very big shout out to our budget review committee. I attended their most recent meeting. They are on task. They study.

791
03:44:44.800 --> 03:45:01.040
It's open for public review and they bring up topics that kind of are a for showing of what will be at our city council meetings. So, thank you very much. Um, could you turn on the overhead, please? Good. You did. Okay.

792
03:45:01.040 --> 03:45:17.120
Real quick, this is a map that shows where we are right now. Some of you have seen it, but just point it out. The green line is our average water that flows into Lake Powell. This blue jagged line is the actual water now and it's

793
03:45:17.120 --> 03:45:32.560
for the first quarter of our year that has flowed into Lake Powell and we are at 22% of our 60-year average and we are ready to set a new record low. So obviously we have a water shortage now.

794
03:45:32.560 --> 03:45:48.960
Will we be able to sustain it for a while to fill the gap between what we need and what we have? And the answer is yes. It's a very resounding yes because our water department is very intelligent and they saved for years all the extra

795
03:45:48.960 --> 03:46:05.680
cap water that we had available. So yes, but it depends upon how deep the cuts are and it depends upon how much we're willing to conserve. So maybe three years, may not be maybe longer. So let's kind of be thinking about conservation.

796
03:46:05.680 --> 03:46:20.640
Now I want to talk about our new sources of water. Um, I'm going to list some of them. Harua, APRW, Arlet Dam, purchase credits, desalination, and anything new that might come along. And the good news is

797
03:46:20.640 --> 03:46:35.120
David Walby, who's been with the water department, has been recently appointed to cover all these new possible technologies so that we can have a robust source of water. Um, the one I like the best, and you're probably not

798
03:46:35.120 --> 03:46:52.960
going to be surprised, is Whoa, hard to read. Hard to read. It's APRW, but I'll go through it briefly. Number one, in 2019, we had the most advanced process for purified recycled water. We got the

799
03:46:52.960 --> 03:47:07.920
award from the state, the first permit to study this issue, and we were very successful. Everybody liked the beer that was made with the water and people thought the water was very refreshing and I consumed it and I am still alive.

800
03:47:07.920 --> 03:47:24.399
Okay. Number two, um the state just changed the guidelines for this. They've added one more step. It has to do with the sampling of the purity of the water as it reaches its destination. It is an expensive step. So there is discussion

801
03:47:24.399 --> 03:47:40.800
at the level of the state to adjust that. We I would suspect within about a year we should have the final final and um we originally thought this would be ready in 2728. It looks like it's going to be closer to 2030. Um we already paid

802
03:47:40.800 --> 03:47:55.840
for the water. We should we should recycle it. If the Artemis astronauts that wasn't 3 minutes can res was it can recycle so can we. So why was it removed? I'll cut it 30 more seconds. It was removed because we changed the way

803
03:47:55.840 --> 03:48:12.000
we did our accounting. I question that. Arizona and Scottdale's success has been to keep politics out of water policy. This feels like we've crossed the line. But then there's good news. We have a 100,000 million dollars in a C cip.

804
03:48:12.000 --> 03:48:29.279
Brian Beesmeer is coming up and our budget review committee has made the recommendation as soon as the numbers are available for pure water they will review it for inclusion into the CIP as a line item. Thank you. >> Thank you. Uh Steve Sutton Sutton is not

805
03:48:29.279 --> 03:48:54.239
here so we're going to move on to Mark Wren followed by Dan Isaac. Thank you, Madame Mayor. Uh, I've got questions that I hope that your team here can answer, give me better

806
03:48:54.239 --> 03:49:09.279
insight on the plan. But, uh, first of all, I want to thank those comments from this previous speaker. I cannot iterate how important it is for

807
03:49:09.279 --> 03:49:26.960
the council to take this water situation very very serious. I'm just going to leave it at that without getting into too much emotional aspect of it. But I have some questions. First of all,

808
03:49:26.960 --> 03:49:43.040
does the city have a contingency plan in response to specifically significant reductions in Colorado River allocation? It is so very important that it is

809
03:49:43.040 --> 03:49:59.040
recognized that Scottsdale 70% plus of Scottsdale water comes from the Colorado River. If the Bureau of Reclamation cuts back on that water, that will have serious impacts on water supply, it will

810
03:49:59.040 --> 03:50:16.479
also have serious aspects on all this fiscal discussion we've been having tonight. Um, so the question is, if Scottdale has to purchase water to offset Colorado River shortfall, where's

811
03:50:16.479 --> 03:50:34.080
the money coming from? And we're not talking little change either. We're talking money that's going to be very expensive. Water, I mean, that's going to be very expensive. Uh, and I'm not sure I understood what was meant by uh

812
03:50:34.080 --> 03:50:51.840
transferred out, which affects 30% of uh the budget as applies to water supply. Uh, I don't understand why there's no dollars for water source and supply in fiscal year 26 and 27.

813
03:50:51.840 --> 03:51:08.800
I don't understand why there's not any line item budget for recycle water expanding it uh and for uh other infrastructure projects uh most notably the uh increased storage capacity of

814
03:51:08.800 --> 03:51:24.239
Barrett uh dam. I in conclusion I appreciate that uh council uh the council member I hope I pronounce it Dakus uh

815
03:51:24.239 --> 03:51:41.680
gave us a her insight shall we say of fiscal prudence. I would throw back at you, ma'am, that you and others voted on a circle

816
03:51:41.680 --> 03:51:58.479
intersection that was already very close to completion with rejecting city staff's reasoning for the going with the circle. and consequently you threw away

817
03:51:58.479 --> 03:52:17.279
$31 million. I consider that fiscally imprudent. Thank you, ma'am. >> Thank you. And finally, Dan Isaac. >> I'd like to sorry, Dan Isaac address on record. I'd like to echo um Miss

818
03:52:17.279 --> 03:52:33.359
Janick's comments about the BRC doing a yman's job. I've attended one meeting in person and watched several on uh video and they're doing what we need to do and I will also compliment the city overall of really trying to be fiscally responsible. They have done some good

819
03:52:33.359 --> 03:52:50.239
things. However, I would like the BRC to call out shenanigans. One example would be when last year's budget was done, we didn't eliminate

820
03:52:50.239 --> 03:53:06.880
vacant positions. And why didn't we do that? Because some people wanted to come in under budget this year. Now, this for the next fiscal year, they're eliminating those positions so that we can have savings so that we can look like we're fiscally responsible.

821
03:53:06.880 --> 03:53:22.399
This is all gamesmanship. If it wasn't right last year, we shouldn't do it this year. Or if we are going to have an inconsistent policy, we should admit that it's so that we can make things look better. when we take great pride of spending $90

822
03:53:22.399 --> 03:53:38.239
million on improving our streets. We should also mention the fact that there's one council member who's been there for 10 years that allowed the streets to deteriorate and another one who was on the Department of Transportation when the transportation department was playing games with regard

823
03:53:38.239 --> 03:53:54.720
to the pavement quality index. So there are things that need to be called out strongly so that the residents of Scottsdale know the difference between sound fiscal management and electioneering.

824
03:53:54.720 --> 03:54:11.920
That also goes to when they say that safety is one of our biggest concerns. But as the last gentleman mentioned, and I previously mentioned, if safety is such a concern, why did we spend $5 million extra dollars and push $30 million into a next fiscal year delaying other

825
03:54:11.920 --> 03:54:30.399
projects to make something less safe? So, I will conclude with this quote from Senica, and it is really sad that this quote applies 2,000 years later. Beware of men who lie and deceive. They

826
03:54:30.399 --> 03:54:45.359
only wish for power. Their speeches are soothing and fiery. Their vision a paradise. But the reality they create is the opposite. If those who vote could only understand that these men are devils who crown themselves and never

827
03:54:45.359 --> 03:55:01.439
look back on the promises they make. Senica still applies today. Thank you. >> Thank you, Dan. All right, that concludes the speakers on our work study and welcome

828
03:55:01.439 --> 03:55:17.600
all of you. Thank you for sticking with us tonight. So, who is going to kick it off? Mr. Schwiker. >> Um, I believe the city treasurer is going to city treasure. Very >> big. Oh, there you go. Sonia, please.

829
03:55:17.600 --> 03:55:34.080
>> Thank you, Mayor Council. I just have a few quick introductory slide. Today's uh presentation is the commission's report to council. So I'll just quickly go through my introductory slides and turn it over to chair striker. Next slide. I wanted to start by thanking the budget

830
03:55:34.080 --> 03:55:50.640
review commission. Uh we don't have all the commission members here but we have four of them here. I wanted to thank them for the time that that they took to understand the city's finances, the interest that they expressed, the great questions and suggestions that they've come up with and also the effort that

831
03:55:50.640 --> 03:56:06.479
they spent and all the time they took to review the budget fund by fund with us. Thank you for your patience with staff and thank you for all that you've done for us. Um, next slide. Just as the uh a reminder for council and also for our larger audience who may

832
03:56:06.479 --> 03:56:23.040
not understand what the budget review commission does, the budget commute uh review commission is advisory to council, meaning that they do review our budget, but council remains fully responsible for the city's budget. Per ordinance, the BRC is also allowed to

833
03:56:23.040 --> 03:56:38.479
review other budget areas that is outside of the proposed budget. And you will hear from them tonight on some of those areas that they're proposing to look at. And next slide. This is my last slide. And I wanted to recap council's directions and suggestions or guidance

834
03:56:38.479 --> 03:56:54.160
for the BRC. Back in the November 17th work study session, council suggested that the budget review commission look at financial trends and ratios, compare those uh trends and ratios to pure cities, look at budget variances, of course, review the proposed budget

835
03:56:54.160 --> 03:57:08.960
prepared by staff and then bring forward any budget topics for consideration and that is what they have done for the last five uh months and you will hear from them tonight. And I will turn that over to chairw now. Thank you.

836
03:57:08.960 --> 03:57:24.319
Thank you very much. And Chair Schwiker, please proceed. >> Thank you. I'm Mayor Bowski and honorable council members. Sunday, I was at the memorial service for former Paradise Valley Mayor Ed Lowry, with whom I served as vice mayor for six

837
03:57:24.319 --> 03:57:39.840
years. Ed taught me how to effectively run meetings so that everyone was heard and felt their input was valuable. Whenever there were issues where members had divergent views, Ed always had them work together to find

838
03:57:39.840 --> 03:57:55.760
common ground. My old friend David Smith started that with the budget review commission last year, and we continue to work that way. Mayor Lowry always thought that if you studied a situation thoroughly and from all viewpoints, more

839
03:57:55.760 --> 03:58:11.359
often than not, there turned out to be one correct answer. That has proven true with the BRC. Uh this year's BRC is comprised of bright, energized and interested residents, all of whom greatly contributed to our findings. This

840
03:58:11.359 --> 03:58:28.720
presentation was authored by all of them. Mark and Brad and I are merely the presenters and we look at as we look at various subjects. All of our committee members are free to contribute on anything they want to jump in and join talk about. So our task was to make

841
03:58:28.720 --> 03:58:44.880
recommendations that we think are in the best interests of our residents and the city for the next year and beyond. Especially as we reviewed the CIP projects, it gave us an opportunity to recommend ways to futureproof the city.

842
03:58:44.880 --> 03:59:00.640
City revenues are slowing and needs are rising. Roads and water are two of the long-term challenges that we spend a lot of time reviewing. Both are important and we all have trust that the city will keep our roads smooth and our water

843
03:59:00.640 --> 03:59:15.760
flowing. Sustaining police, fire, ambulance, and city services amid unknown challenges to revenue will continue to be issues that need close attention. The BRC could not have done its work without the support

844
03:59:15.760 --> 03:59:33.279
of our wonderful city staff. We greatly appreciate their time and especially the time, effort, and input we received from the city manager and city treasurer. So now let's look at what our work product was. So the BRC had discussions and reviews

845
03:59:33.279 --> 03:59:48.640
of the proposed budget. We started in December and did it through April. Uh if you go to the next slide. Yeah. Um in December we looked at financial ratios, revenue trends, budget variances. Then we moved to preliminary capital

846
03:59:48.640 --> 04:00:06.920
improvement projects. Then we went to the general fund revenues with budget variances and then the proposed 2627 operating budget. And here we are to do a report to the council. So what did we look at?

847
04:00:07.279 --> 04:00:22.960
Mark, you're going to jump in on this one. >> Okay. Go ahead and go to slide seven. Uh yeah, I would like to echo what our chairman said about uh he was very inclusive when it came to the way he ran the meetings and I don't think anyone ever felt like they didn't have an opportunity to have their view aired. So

848
04:00:22.960 --> 04:00:39.359
I do want to thank him for that. Uh the first slide I'm going to go over is the review of a financial conditions report. And that's something that uh a lot of you might not even know exists, but it's something that a lot of time went into to prepare. and it was prepared in a fashion that if anyone ever said the

849
04:00:39.359 --> 04:00:54.800
city of Scottsdale does not take financial s sustainability serious. There are elements of that report that kind of go through each of the measures that a lot of different cities would look at to determine whether or not they're sustainable and whether there's any red flags in there. And it's

850
04:00:54.800 --> 04:01:10.800
actually an excellent document that I'm I'm very close to. and it does a a very good job of uh uh comparing uh comparing us to other cities and in generally uh I'll echo the budget is structurally balanced. Uh the city is focused on

851
04:01:10.800 --> 04:01:26.080
maintaining that structural balance and financial uh stability sustainability and we did have a chart at the end of that that compared us to other cities and you would find that we compared favorably to that. uh we did uh did recognize the fact that I think a lot of

852
04:01:26.080 --> 04:01:41.760
you know we're quite dependent on sales tax and tourism. Uh one other thing I'll add in there because I'm trying to integrate the discussions from earlier today. Uh fund balance is one of the measures that's in there. You saw a slide on reserves. There's like over $und00 million in reserves. That's needs

853
04:01:41.760 --> 04:01:57.120
to be that's a fund balance allocation to help on the bond rating. And then you also talked about this 15 million for lost revenue. My understanding of a lot of the reserves you have are really an allocation of fund balance. That's accumulated excesses of revenue over

854
04:01:57.120 --> 04:02:12.560
expenses over the years and you all have the ability to reallocate those things as you wish. The proposed budget has you allocating over hund00 million of it to the things you need for a general reserve to satisfy bond requirements.

855
04:02:12.560 --> 04:02:27.600
The 15 million is there in case you had a hit in revenue. you already have the fund balance there to absorb that hit is my understanding of how that works. And as you're going to see later, you've got another 50 million in there that's tenatively allocated for potential PSRS

856
04:02:27.600 --> 04:02:44.319
uh paydowns. So, uh I made a recommendation last year that you all periodically look at the roll forward of fund balance. That would be something uh that uh you can decide if you want that. Okay, we can go to the next slide now. Uh slide two, a new thing that was added

857
04:02:44.319 --> 04:02:59.199
this year, we did a quarterly review of budget variances. So we looked at the variances through September and through December for each of those two quarters. Would not have seen anything since then. So we had those two those two to look at. Uh it's a very powerful tool. I think it really helped the understanding

858
04:02:59.199 --> 04:03:15.359
of a lot of the commissioners uh particularly new ones, but all of us an understanding about how the mechanics of the city works. Uh you had a pretty big challenge this year. you had a new ERP system put in. That's a big deal. Uh I uh I'm a retired audit partner with

859
04:03:15.359 --> 04:03:32.319
Ernston Young. Uh and I've audited companies, you know, up to a billion dollars in sales. I have seen a lot of ERP conversions. They're never easy. They're never as uh simple as someone says. You did have uh some uh differences that popped up and I would

860
04:03:32.319 --> 04:03:49.600
categorize uh none of them as any unusual things. And uh I think it really took a toll on your people, but uh they really did an awful good job of managing that and making the corrections that were necessary as as they went in. So uh they really they really did that. That

861
04:03:49.600 --> 04:04:06.319
was that was pretty good. The other thing I'll throw in here uh and u uh city treasure can correct me if I'm wrong. I heard a lot of different comments about flat budget things being done or whatever. City city budgets are very confusing. You have an operating fund, you have an enterprise fund, you

862
04:04:06.319 --> 04:04:22.479
have capital. And when you bundle them all together, it can make it look like things went down by a lot, but one element like capital could have gone way down and it could it can kind of mask what's going on. So, I just encourage you to look at each of the elements. One of the other slides that was in the presentation indicated that your

863
04:04:22.479 --> 04:04:38.560
expenditures were actually flat to budget. But that particular slide included enterprise funds as well as operating funds. So all I want to share with you all my understanding is if you looked at your operating fund which is really the most important one most people view from a city kind of the

864
04:04:38.560 --> 04:04:53.600
general fund the operating fund uh in that case uh your the slide there showed that um your operating fund expenditures actually went up by 12 million. Okay. And then also your expenditures are running 7 million favorable to date this

865
04:04:53.600 --> 04:05:09.600
year. Uh and the projection is that that will be sustained through the end of the year. So, your expenses, just so you know, are going up 20 million this year, but we didn't look into any analysis of that. Some of it's completely explainable. Ambulance is going up.

866
04:05:09.600 --> 04:05:25.439
Therefore, the expense side of the that went up, revenue went up. So, I don't know if you want to look at that or have anyone do any more analysis for you. I just didn't want you all thinking that everything was flattered down because that's not the case when you look at some of the operating the operating things that are there.

867
04:05:25.439 --> 04:05:42.880
Uh, okay, we can go to the slide. I have two more slides that I'm going to cover for right now. Uh these will go quicker. Slide nine. Uh on slide nine, uh the major revenue trends, the consensus of the group that we got out of that again you know this very dependent on sales and and tourism and as uh I think Scott

868
04:05:42.880 --> 04:05:59.199
mentioned earlier uh there is some risk uh uh particularly from the one big beautiful bill. Uh interesting observation I guess we had on sales tax. Sales tax revenue has increased by 3%. One uh interesting observation that the staff made, they said that GDP growth is

869
04:05:59.199 --> 04:06:15.120
protected projected to be around a percent and a half and inflation is expected to be 2% or so 2 to 3%. So if I just kind of look at that, it's if I add those numbers together, your 3% increase in sales tax kind of smells okay. So just a super high level observation on

870
04:06:15.120 --> 04:06:31.840
that. And then on slide 10, um uh the one of the this tells some of the things we reviewed. We reviewed the CIP and you've talked an awful lot about that. When we get to slide 13, I want to go over the change you made on CIP, which I think you all have a pretty good handle

871
04:06:31.840 --> 04:06:47.920
on it and the impacts on water, which you talked about a lot. So, I'm not going to try to go over things that have already uh gone over, but I I do I will touch on uh some considerations on the new methodology. And then we also reserved the operating reviewed the operating funds during uh three

872
04:06:47.920 --> 04:07:06.160
different meetings that took place. Uh so I'm going to turn the next two slides over back to my chair. >> Thank you Mark. Yeah, we spent a lot of time we uh you know it turns out to one slide but we spent a lot of time talking about water and roads and everything and

873
04:07:06.160 --> 04:07:21.760
that's reflected in I think a lot of the debate that you heard. So, as we look on recommendations for the proposed 2627 budget and CIP, um we had a lot of public comments that were received and we think the council should should know

874
04:07:21.760 --> 04:07:38.960
about those. And um there were a lot of public comments specifically requested that the Bartlett Dam and the APRW projects be reinstated into the 5-year CIP. And during this whole process, the city manager came back and said that he

875
04:07:38.960 --> 04:07:56.080
was putting $100 million in undefined but into water projects back in the CIP project budget because we think that's very important because these projects and you know there is not one thing that's going to solve the water problem. I mean we hear there's four or five

876
04:07:56.080 --> 04:08:12.479
different prongs out there. They're all going to end up eventually being done and they're all big ticket items, but they're spread out over a number of years. So, we felt very comfortable when uh the city manager came back and said that there was going to be 100 million

877
04:08:12.479 --> 04:08:29.359
in the CIP project. So, we like that. Um and then there there were also a public comments about consideration for the loss of federal funding for certain human services programs and the city provided uh a memo on various housing

878
04:08:29.359 --> 04:08:45.279
funds and the risk that were entailed with all of them. So while that wasn't really an answer, it gave us a little bit of comfort knowing that they they were looking at it and they were looking at the different options for that. So now we'll go on to uh the next slide,

879
04:08:45.279 --> 04:09:01.680
slide 13. >> Yeah, 13. So uh back to me on slide 13. Uh a couple of the recommendations. Uh one of the first ones was a lot of discussion of the Granite Reef Senior Center and some of the condition that it might be in. And so there's a recommendation include a feasibility study to determine what would be the

880
04:09:01.680 --> 04:09:18.319
best course of action uh with respect to shoring that up. Uh the second one was a lot of discussion on um uh APRW and uh the conclusion there was we we really didn't look at all the different options in water. So we're not your

881
04:09:18.319 --> 04:09:34.399
water people. We just looked at this and Bartlett because those two projects were taken out of the five-year plan. And so that's why they got some attention. And we've heard some really interesting numbers as far as to what this might cost. But I also understand the

882
04:09:34.399 --> 04:09:51.760
regulations are so unclear right now. Uh I don't know that anyone could actually do a calculation of what it would cost to do that project even though it may be something you ultimately need. So the recommendation here was you should consider restoring it once you see what the cost estimates are and if the cost

883
04:09:51.760 --> 04:10:08.000
estimates make sense uh however you measure that compared to other opportunities or other options then that's why that was one of the recommendations. Uh the third point on the financial sustainability okay on your on your five-year CIP what the city manager did

884
04:10:08.000 --> 04:10:25.520
this year is he took a position that by and large said if I don't have enough information to make an int this is my understanding our understanding intelligent uh and decent calculation of what it's going to be in the years it's going to fall why should I put that in there so a lot of things were taken out

885
04:10:25.520 --> 04:10:41.600
on the basis of the fact that we may need them but we don't have good enough cost numbers to do a meaningful estimate. Therefore, those were generally taken out with the exception of I think 35 million for the wildlife crossing and then you could kind of put the 100 million for water in there

886
04:10:41.600 --> 04:10:57.199
because you don't really know what that is. So, that would be a a little bit of an exception to the the rule that was there. Uh I compared your five-year projection to a year ago and it's $400 million lower. So, a lot of dollars went out of that. Those are some of the

887
04:10:57.199 --> 04:11:14.239
projects that did. The concern there is how does that all impact and this will the city will figure this out but how does this all impact our debt capacity the borrowing we're going to need water rates we need in order to build for certain projects so unfortunately there's probably more questions here

888
04:11:14.239 --> 04:11:31.120
than there are answers but I just wanted you all to recognize the fact that all that those project dollars came out of the five-year plan and I think that raises a lot of questions about how you might have to fund certain things going forward And then the final comment was on PSRS.

889
04:11:31.120 --> 04:11:47.040
The um uh contribute the uh I guess the updated actuarial report isn't in yet. And this is just kind of a reminder of the dynamics there. Uh you do have um what is it? You had uh $54.7 million is in your current budget right

890
04:11:47.040 --> 04:12:03.920
now expected to be available at the end of the year if you needed it. It's tenatively designated for that. But again, you can allocate or reallocate things as you wish when it comes to what's in fund balance. And the reminder there, I think that uh I I think Councilman White had touched on it

891
04:12:03.920 --> 04:12:21.120
earlier, is you're basically earning uh 23% on the money that you have sitting. You've got, you know, several hundred million dollars of fund balance reserves. You're earning a couple of percent on that, but if you in if you put it in the pension, the pension's able to invest it at market rates. that

892
04:12:21.120 --> 04:12:38.080
ends up uh being um it'll be an actual assumption there six seven eight% something like that but you'll actually get the actual returns uh that would defay for uh initial pension cost so it can be a real relief to your operating budget and a real reduction of police

893
04:12:38.080 --> 04:12:53.359
cost if you were to do that but it's up to you to decide we're not recommending that you do that because I don't have we don't have enough visibility into the other ways you might need those funds so we can go to the Next slide.

894
04:12:53.359 --> 04:13:09.920
>> So, Commissioner. >> Yeah. I just wanted to take a second here and expand a little bit on the first recommendation, which is in do a feasibility study for the Granite Reef Senior Center. Um this budget uh it is a

895
04:13:09.920 --> 04:13:26.800
2019 bond proposal that keeps getting kicked down the road because there is no clear consensus on what the potential increase in care for seniors there perhaps in partnership with Honor Health or another community partner could be.

896
04:13:26.800 --> 04:13:42.080
So the city manager is absolutely correct. It should go to a feasibility study, but I have a concern about it keeps getting pushed off year after year after year. Everybody who would benefit

897
04:13:42.080 --> 04:13:57.520
from this, every senior would be a resident of Scottsdale, a resident who helped build Scottsdale. Yet, it's not in the budget. But a health clinic for Scottsdale staff is and we value

898
04:13:57.520 --> 04:14:14.760
Scottsdale staff, but 80% of them are not residents. So all I'm saying is if you're going to value staff, also value your seniors who are residents and put this back in the budget, please.

899
04:14:15.359 --> 04:14:30.720
>> Thank you, Carla. You know, we had great faith in what the city was doing and all their budgeting things, but several of us took the city budget and ran it through a bunch of different AI models and everything to look for sustainability and weaknesses

900
04:14:30.720 --> 04:14:47.359
and everything. And it all came out that Scottsdale is in a really good position. All of them had the caveat that we're very tourism sales tax dependent. So, I think those are all very important things to know. Um, you know, one of the things, this is a pretty short

901
04:14:47.359 --> 04:15:02.800
presentation that we're giving you, and that is because the city staff was so good to work with that as we came up with ideas during our meetings, they were incorporated into the proposed budget that you're seeing right here. But there are some things that uh we

902
04:15:02.800 --> 04:15:19.680
might want to look at in the future. We and these are things that um require approval and direction from the council. So, I'm going to turn that over to Brad Newman to go over over those. >> Thank you, Dan, Madame Mayor, and members of the council. We went through

903
04:15:19.680 --> 04:15:35.439
and and looked at as we as we've gone through the budget, there's a certain amount of spend. We've shifted some of that in terms of more roads, more of the basic infrastructure. Councilman Graham mentioned the the net asset and maintaining that. That's becoming a greater need as the asset base of

904
04:15:35.439 --> 04:15:51.840
Scottsdale has grown. uh but yet the breakdown of the sales tax has not and there are certain amounts of tax going certain areas where the needs may have changed over time. So it's been a while since we've looked at that and so these recommendations are are really around

905
04:15:51.840 --> 04:16:07.760
getting an analysis for next year's consideration of what should that sales tax stack be? Not an increase in sales tax. This isn't a what should the tax be, but what should be the configuration of what we currently charge. So it's it's a it's a non-change analysis

906
04:16:07.760 --> 04:16:23.840
because to raise taxes is a different analysis. So these three recommendations are really to ask the city treasur's office to then um develop what is the revenue demand that we have versus where the structural revenues are going

907
04:16:23.840 --> 04:16:40.000
because they're mandated in some cases mandated by voters. So uh for example we have about 3% going to roads. We have about 3% in total going to preserves. Not saying that's good or bad, but it's worthwhile to have the analysis because if you're not buying land, for example,

908
04:16:40.000 --> 04:16:55.680
with preserves, if you're not buying land, there's a lot of money going there that gets trapped. Um, and then but you the only way to move that around is through mo voter mandate. So, at some point, something has to be done there. And maybe that's a broader strategic consideration to say, let's look at the

909
04:16:55.680 --> 04:17:11.680
stack of what we're going to be spending on roads, what we're going to be spending on other aspects. I've heard things around tourism. We just don't have the data on that to know is that the right mix or not, but then come back with a recommendation next for next year's budget. And that would be an obviously a much broader consideration

910
04:17:11.680 --> 04:17:26.720
for for because that would end up as some kind of voter referendum at some point to decide what the sales tax configuration should be. That may or may not lead to what should the sales tax be, but that's a different discussion. But that's the purpose of the first one here is what's the sales tax structure.

911
04:17:26.720 --> 04:17:43.359
Then when you look at uh the first tax that runs out through 2034 for the per for the preserves that tax was for buying land u main the main purpose of that I know Carl's going to have a comment here and and uh and if we're buying land then

912
04:17:43.359 --> 04:17:59.680
you need that tax. If we're not buying land, you're putting money into an account that it can never go anywhere under the way that's configured. With the Prop 490, that obviously takes care of a lot of needs. And I, as I understand, there are um by by a super vote of the of the council, that tax configuration, that particular

913
04:17:59.680 --> 04:18:16.800
configuration can be adjusted uh depending on what happens with the first tax. So, it's a strategic review of what of what those revenues are. The last one has kind of been answered by Treasur Andrew's. Um, it I threw that we threw that in there looking at that because the 2019 bond that's now 7 years old.

914
04:18:16.800 --> 04:18:32.080
We're not done with that yet. How much of that's been spent? It it was kind of thought that uh a a smaller portion that has actually been spent was spent. It's actually been about twothirds have been committed. It's it's it's hard to think that you would go back to voters to say let's reconfigure the bond when

915
04:18:32.080 --> 04:18:47.840
twothirds of that bond has already been committed and finish those projects. But the question was with COVID changes to the city, have these things changed enough that it it's worthwhile to reconfigure some of how the revenue comes in so it more is more compatible with the budgeting process. So that's

916
04:18:47.840 --> 04:19:04.880
the the focus. Um you've got you have this in your appendix and you can go into more detail, but that'll be something that we're asking the city treasures office to come back with for next year's uh review and then we can go through and have a discussion and make further recommendations on that. Okay. you have comment and Commissioner Carlo

917
04:19:04.880 --> 04:19:21.840
would like to make a comment. >> Thank you, Commissioner Newman. Um, while I agree with Commissioner Newman and my fellow commissioners that these two items deserve discussion, um, there's a couple of clarifications. the Prop 490 tax. While you can adjust

918
04:19:21.840 --> 04:19:37.520
percentages of where the money goes with a supermajority vote of council, you cannot go outside the buckets that it's been identified before for which is parks, preserve, public safety, and some

919
04:19:37.520 --> 04:19:54.000
specific items at Westworld. If you wanted to go outside those buckets, it would take a vote of the people, for example, to bring in transportation. Then on the 2004 preserve tax which the debt will be paid off in 2027 which

920
04:19:54.000 --> 04:20:12.399
leaves an additional seven years. Um I want to stress that the preserve commission has started a year-long process to look at what additional qualified projects would be applicable to be covered in the preserve vision for

921
04:20:12.399 --> 04:20:29.359
with this tax. And the number one is strategic land acquisitions because there are 2,000 additional acres that qualify to be bought with this money. And the preserve commission is evaluating that amongst other things.

922
04:20:29.359 --> 04:20:45.680
And of course, nothing would go forward until after they do their review, they come forward to council for direction. But that is a public discussion and a council direction that will need to happen. So, I don't want anyone thinking there's seven years of free money out

923
04:20:45.680 --> 04:21:00.960
there that we could go to a voter, you know, go out to the voters and repurpose to transportation. Perhaps this evaluation has to happen first and direction has to happen because the voters voted for this for the preserve.

924
04:21:00.960 --> 04:21:17.199
And I will want add one final thing that um Mr. Smith, while I admire his passion, he is incorrect. Um, as the city attorney said, when you look in depth at all the different parts of Prop

925
04:21:17.199 --> 04:21:35.720
420, everything that the staff has in future projects does still qualify for preserved tax dollars under Prop 420. So, just a couple of clarifications there. Thank you.

926
04:21:36.479 --> 04:21:53.120
>> Thank you. You want to go to the next slide? Um Carla, would you like to talk on this one a little bit? >> Sure. >> Okay. >> Um the federal funding cuts contingency plan because we know we've had cuts this

927
04:21:53.120 --> 04:22:09.760
year. We'll have more next year and the following year. A lot of cuts. Many families are going to fall off a cliff because of um some of the federal cuts that have trickled down. And this this recommendation is we would like to ask

928
04:22:09.760 --> 04:22:27.359
you to direct the BRC and staff to look at contingency plans to address how our vulnerable citizens and I stress citizens, residents will be continue to be helped. Many of them are seniors and

929
04:22:27.359 --> 04:22:45.600
without a detrimental impact or at least a full knowledge of the impact on the general fund. So that's the first recommendation. And then the second recommendation is when we did a review at the beginning of our cycle and at and

930
04:22:45.600 --> 04:23:02.000
we're looking at what are we deficit in? We are deficit in looking at aging facilities and making sure that we are looking at how are we going to refurbish or fund them or get them up to snuff. I

931
04:23:02.000 --> 04:23:18.880
mean, you heard earlier about a fire station uh looking at doing Pyute, however it ends up doing, is back in this budget, and I thank the city manager for that. Um, but we need to look at that. And so, we're asking if

932
04:23:18.880 --> 04:23:34.319
you can direct the BRC and staff to look at that over the break and how how we keep up on that so we don't end up in a hole. So, those are the two and we'd be glad to answer any questions. Thank you.

933
04:23:34.319 --> 04:23:51.680
>> Thank Thank you very much. >> Uh, one one second because uh, Councilwoman Mckllen was on the board, but do you have any of these recommendations? I have a question about procedure. Did you take a vote? Can we get an idea of was it a majority um,

934
04:23:51.680 --> 04:24:08.560
recommendation? Was it partial? Was it minority? That would be really helpful. Almost everything we voted on was a unanimous vote. >> Oh, unanimous. Wow. Look at you. It's amazing. All right, Councilwoman Mckllen. >> Thank you, Mayor. Um, I just want to

935
04:24:08.560 --> 04:24:23.600
thank all of you, your entire um commission, but especially Chair Schwiger, Vice Chair Stevens, and then Carla and Mr. Newman for staying this whole night and being so cheery and

936
04:24:23.600 --> 04:24:38.880
presenting these, you know, really um important points. And you know, while we're in a in great shape, we need to be very prudent in how we do things for the future. And my thought when you were

937
04:24:38.880 --> 04:24:56.720
just talking uh Commissioner Carla is before we look to build brand new facilities or add on to a facility, we should take care of what we already have. Um kind of like with the money set aside for the preserve by, you know, so just thank you for your prudence and um

938
04:24:56.720 --> 04:25:13.520
being so cautious. And I also want to thank Sonia and Scott and all of your staff as I'm sure all of us up here do. It's been a long process. you are when I talk to you individually, you're seeing how great the BRC is. The BRC saying how great you are. Uh so, thank you all for

939
04:25:13.520 --> 04:25:29.439
working so well together and um for taking the time. Um >> we do have one more slide to go over though. >> Okay, please do. >> Is that okay? >> Oh, I didn't mean to cut you short. >> I I thought Sorry. Excuse me. Please. >> It's too late to cut the evening short.

940
04:25:29.439 --> 04:25:45.040
Yeah. Right. Right. Right. What but what this one's really about a future direction slide. And I wanted to tell you a little bit about what happened because what was done this year was a lot less than was done in the past. And I I'm going to share a little bit about what happened and I'm going to end it

941
04:25:45.040 --> 04:26:02.000
with us kind of asking you what's the depth of the work you want the BRC doing and what quality do you want of recommendations coming out of it? And then also are you open to allowing seeing if there's a way to allow us access to staff since this year that was

942
04:26:02.000 --> 04:26:18.800
not available to us. So as a result, I can tell you from my standpoint, my effort pad in comparison to last year. So my recommendations weren't the same. I will be providing you all a separate letter indicating things that I think ought to be considered for either the BRC, the uh the staff or internal audit

943
04:26:18.800 --> 04:26:34.800
to consider that I think could make a difference on the budget, but we weren't able to get into that kind of stuff this year. What happened this year was there were some changes and there was a uh we were no longer able to meet with city staff that developed the budget to find out their thought process and what went

944
04:26:34.800 --> 04:26:50.560
into it. A thought was up up there earlier about hey as you're putting it together can we gather information from you without directing you without making any legal decisions in order to be in a better position to come back at a BRC meeting in an open meeting situation and

945
04:26:50.560 --> 04:27:06.080
have more thoughtful discussions. we weren't able to do that. So the preparation I don't think was the same. We also uh our meetings did go too long last year but they were changed this year. Uh staff had recommended that we try to limit them to two hours and there

946
04:27:06.080 --> 04:27:21.680
were only five meetings in which we had time to talk over issues. And so you saw the presentations you got today. You also had the advantage of meeting with people beforehand from what I could tell. Picture yourself getting presentations like you got today. That's

947
04:27:21.680 --> 04:27:38.319
all you get and then you are supposed to talk and come up with some meaningful recommendations. Staff might disagree. They might think that we were able to get anything but it was so difficult to try to get to any people who prepare the information that in my mind it was I was

948
04:27:38.319 --> 04:27:53.199
very dissatisfied and I thought it was very ineffective uh from my standpoint. My views aren't necessarily shared by everyone. But I uh we were told open meeting laws in the application which your legal staff is taking on 3843101

949
04:27:53.199 --> 04:28:11.040
uh does not what I read in there. But that's what we were told we had to live by and we weren't given any options to meet with staff. Now having said that since I might be I may I'm probably the most vocal on this uh if anyone else wants to share their view uh go ahead.

950
04:28:11.040 --> 04:28:26.960
And now for the other point of view Carla. Yes, Carlo. Carlo will say the things that other people won't. Um, with all due respect to m to Commissioner Stevens, he he just went a tiny bit rogue. Um, everything all the other

951
04:28:26.960 --> 04:28:43.840
recommendations were unanimous. Even Brad and I found ways to agree. So, um, you know, so, but what Commissioner Stevens just shared are his personal feelings. I want to stress that staff

952
04:28:43.840 --> 04:29:00.720
was extremely helpful, spent a lot of time with us and legal repeatedly explained why we were constrained by the open meeting law and um treasurer um Andrews worked overtime to make sure to

953
04:29:00.720 --> 04:29:15.760
be the conduit to answer the questions we had. So, I would ask you all to end this by bringing it back around to the actual recommendations that we all agreed on. And please consider putting

954
04:29:15.760 --> 04:29:31.279
some of these items back in your budget and the ones that we're asking you to give us direction to study. Please consider those seriously. Thank you so much for your time. >> I I just have to add one thing on on our our treasurer. I think she and our city

955
04:29:31.279 --> 04:29:46.399
staff are outstanding. She is extremely knowledgeable about city government and what and what's happening here and I think you're very fortunate to have her. My frustration is not being able to prepare for meetings adequately.

956
04:29:46.399 --> 04:30:02.399
>> Thank you. All right. Uh thank you all for your passion and your interest in serving and it's very valuable. Uh I'm going to kick it off because I like a lot of these recommendations. Um, I do

957
04:30:02.399 --> 04:30:19.840
think I for one would like to see you take a closer look at um the increase in expenses for this year. I don't know how you do that structurally before the final budget adoption meetings, but I certainly would advocate for another

958
04:30:19.840 --> 04:30:37.520
meeting or two, whatever it took for you to look at some of these other issues. Um, a closer analysis on the advanced uh purification system. I think there's some it's a murky waters, pardon the pun. Um, really that was a devil and

959
04:30:37.520 --> 04:30:56.880
tandre pun. Uh, murky waters there. So I think that would be helpful to the extent you know you think that's useful for our information and really the puzzle for me uh you know as many years as I've been paying attention to city budgets um what is the what's the actual

960
04:30:56.880 --> 04:31:14.040
impact of taking it out of the five-year CIP how hard is it to catch up there and I think we had some answers about that uh earlier but that would be uh something I would like you to look at and that was on your list um

961
04:31:14.960 --> 04:31:32.239
the 2 million uh for fire the payown was already in there as optional. So I don't I wouldn't concern myself about that because it's for us to decide. It sounds like it's a good idea based on what you said Mark as well. Um,

962
04:31:32.239 --> 04:31:48.720
so the the three options that you set forth, one, two, and three, sales tax structure review, I think that's really good. I think that's a strong item for you to look at. Would that be in this preparation for the next fiscal year? Correct.

963
04:31:48.720 --> 04:32:04.960
>> For the next fiscal year. We can look at whatever you want us to do. We just need some kind of direction or resolution from you as to what you want us to look at. But yeah, those are things. and the advanced water purification. We don't have any more meetings before you adopt the tenativeity budget

964
04:32:04.960 --> 04:32:19.199
>> for next year. >> So, those are all things we can look at over the next year, right? And we're happy to. >> Okay. Yes. And uh I'm just going down your list actually. So, these are helpful. And the 2004 preserve tax

965
04:32:19.199 --> 04:32:36.319
repurpose I think is a good one. I do think that's a good one. You're talking about buying more land. We dealt with that back in 2010 and the answer was no. So, I'd hate to see when Croy Ekla was advising, you know, the council, that was a conclusion that the council came

966
04:32:36.319 --> 04:32:53.600
to way back then, that no more land was needed. Um, but without getting off topic, without getting off topic there, uh, I would love to see that discussion had. Um, abs, uh, absolutely. I have, that's my

967
04:32:53.600 --> 04:33:11.920
note on the 2019 bond audit. I I'll call it an audit of the bond projects. We dealt with that with the parking garage. This was a very big issue determining, you know, and looking at um I guess really the uh the

968
04:33:11.920 --> 04:33:28.959
likelihood or the need or the variance in the bond pro projects that were approved uh back in 2019 versus the useful uhness or appropriateness really of um some of those projects uh looking

969
04:33:28.959 --> 04:33:46.080
at re-evaluating them. So having you on the front lines of those would be of that review would be excellent. And then lastly, I do think that um having an opportunity to hear from staff, have a give and take like we did tonight um

970
04:33:46.080 --> 04:34:01.039
with the staff members or the heads of the departments is extremely valuable and I do think you should have that opportunity. I did talk to the city attorney about this. It would not violate the open meeting law for the for

971
04:34:01.039 --> 04:34:17.520
your budget review commission to request that these staff members visit, you know, come present to you uh alongside Sonia and it would not be inappropriate at all to have that happen. And I do

972
04:34:17.520 --> 04:34:34.879
think that would advance uh the discussion and information completely and that's just within the scope of your open meeting. that's not, you know, going behind the scenes. So, I think that's a compromise that could be really helpful and I would advocate for that

973
04:34:34.879 --> 04:34:51.680
completely. So, of your list, I it's I'm tired and maybe I I didn't capture all of them, but I did like the lists. Um, putting the Granite Reef project back in, I I just really need to know more uh in

974
04:34:51.680 --> 04:35:07.439
order to form an opinion about that. But it's I don't disagree with that idea. Thank you. Anybody else want to talk? I think everyone's asleep. Um >> all right then. I then my my ideas my

975
04:35:07.439 --> 04:35:23.680
ideas go. I'm speaking on behalf of everyone. >> Councilwoman Littlefield likes my ideas. Yay. >> Winning. I like your ideas and I like your presentations. Thank you very much for all the work that you've done for us and the time that you spent getting all

976
04:35:23.680 --> 04:35:41.199
of this material together. Thank you. Um I like your ideas and I think you ought to continue doing exactly what you're doing. Um I like what the mayor said and I support her uh suggestions and actions for what you can do. Thank you.

977
04:35:41.199 --> 04:35:58.400
>> Thank you very much. Uh Councilwoman Dasquez. >> Thank you, Madam Mayor. One suggestion that I might make is for you to consider is um revenue projections. How do we do arrive at the revenue projections? Frequently what Councilman Graham talks

978
04:35:58.400 --> 04:36:13.760
about is that our revenue projections are conservative uh throughout the year, very conservative throughout the year. And that's not necessarily a bad thing. Um but maybe you want to take a look at how do we come up with our revenue projections? Do you think that that's

979
04:36:13.760 --> 04:36:29.359
the right methodology? and um and what might we do consider to do better? You know, the the closer we can get to the budget, then we can really determine how much money we need. How much money do we really need? How much money do we have coming in? How much money we need to ask

980
04:36:29.359 --> 04:36:46.561
taxpayers for? Um and so that might provide us some opportunities for relief from some of these taxes if we're taking a look at at what we need. Um and so if we were able to have a little bit more accurate system, that might be helpful. Or you might say, um, you know, as a

981
04:36:46.561 --> 04:37:02.480
group, we don't want to look at that right now. We we've got our set for the next year. So, uh, just a thought. >> You like looking at money. Good. >> We're happy to look at anything you want us to look at. >> Okay. Yeah. I think it would be helpful because part of what we want to do, we

982
04:37:02.480 --> 04:37:19.199
don't want to end up like Tempe, right? Where now they're looking at a half a point increase. And um, so we want to be careful about how much money do we really have? how much money do we have to spend and could we provide some relief to our our residents or you know

983
04:37:19.199 --> 04:37:37.439
is the current system appropriate? So >> I'd like to share something when you you mentioned something like that. It's probably a question of how deep would you like us to get into something like that. Uh I'm from an audit world. So as a result there's certain things you look at to form an opinion. If it's just

984
04:37:37.439 --> 04:37:53.920
going to be staff making a presentation like they did today to you, we already got that. And so some of us maybe like myself would be happy to dig into something a lot more if there's an area you'd like us to. And I'd be happy to look at how they're uh coming up with

985
04:37:53.920 --> 04:38:09.680
those numbers in a little bit more uh sufficiency. But then that requires me to meet with the staff who are putting the numbers together. And if I'm allowed to meet with Sony and the staff, that's okay. I tried to propose something like that last year. My vision was as they're

986
04:38:09.680 --> 04:38:27.039
putting the information together, let whatever areas you want us to look in, let us piggy back as they're putting it together. That way it's fresh and you're not taking extra staff time. >> So, it's still unclear to me. Maybe next year when we set the scope, you'll have to let us know to what degree we're able

987
04:38:27.039 --> 04:38:43.119
to actually uh get into meaningful information. >> Well, thanks to each of you. Appreciate your time. Thank Thank you for staying late tonight. We appreciate you. >> So, the question was for a council resolution. Uh, Luis, how would you like

988
04:38:43.119 --> 04:38:59.760
us to make this so it doesn't kind of just dissipate into status quo? >> Mayor and members of the council, since it's kind of getting late, why don't we um bring I'll work with the city manager and the city treasurer to bring back a

989
04:38:59.760 --> 04:39:16.160
resolution for a later agenda for you to adopt. >> That would be fantastic. Great. >> Okay. >> Because there's no way I could remember. No, I'm kidding. All right. Well, with that, I think it's a wrap. Uh, thank you very much for your service.

990
04:39:16.160 --> 04:39:31.199
>> Thank you. >> You serve a very big valuable role for us. >> Thank you. Uh, yes, if we can table the council updates until next time. >> All right. >> Yes, I think we can do that. >> Excellent.

991
04:39:31.199 --> 04:39:55.718
>> We'll update. >> Happy Cinco de Mayo. Are you