I'm sorry folks. Give me about 30 seconds here and we'll start up. Make a quick note here. Um One more minute. I'm sorry. Well, look at that. My computer chews on this. All right, you guys ready?
All right. Good evening and welcome to the February 2026 Semino County Board of Adjustment meeting. Uh before I go into the chairman's opening statement, I want to make a a notice to the folks in the
audience that agenda item number five that is 9483 shortleaf court. The applicant has withdrawn their application. So that won't be heard tonight. So, if you are here to speak for or against that, you're welcome to
stay if you want to, uh, but we won't be hearing that tonight. So, uh, having said that, uh, for those of you who haven't been to one of our meetings before, please allow me to share with you our, uh, normal procedures. As we
move through the agenda, staff will introduce each item for consideration. If there's a matter that you want to speak in favor of or against and you're not the applicant, uh there's a form out in the lobby we'd like you all to fill out, please, and hand it to the nice
lady to the right of the leg term. Uh the applicant and the applicant supporters will be heard first and then those in opposition will be heard next. If the circumstances call for it, the applicant will be given a chance for rebuttal. And we we request that
comments be limited to just what's before the board tonight. We don't get into personal disputes. We do not get into homeowners association disagreements. That's not the purpose of this board. Uh if you're an individual and you're not the applicant, you'll have three minutes to speak. If you
represent a group, you'll have six minutes. Uh and when you come up to the lecture to speak, we ask that you identify yourself by name and address for the record. We ask every speaker to be given courteous uh attention and be treated with respect. We just kind of
follow that. Treat others as you'd like to be treated. Uh don't be surprised. We we may ask questions of staff. We may ask questions of you or the applicant. That's just part of the process as we work through it. So don't be surprised. Uh any information that you share,
photos, maps, things like that do become part of the record and we we need to hold on to them. If what you share is digital, that's okay. We just ask you if you could later in the night or the next day, uh, email it to staff so we keep the entire record complete.
Once we've heard from everybody, I'll ask a mo ask for a motion from the board. And once a motion has been made and seconded, we'll close discussion to the floor. Uh, following board discussion, a vote will be taking taken and during voting, board, members who do not cast objecting votes will be
considered to have voted in favor of the matter. If at the end of this meeting you are not happy and you disagree with one of our decisions, you can appeal our decisions to the board of county commissioners. Uh and staff can help you with that process. But after the meeting and with that number one, please.
>> Good evening. Angie Gates. The first item on the agenda is a request for a north side yard setback variance from 10 ft to 1 ft for a carport in the M1 Industrial District located at 500 Palmosa Avenue. The proposed carport
will be 1,200 square f feet and will encroach 9 ft into the required north sideyard setback. The applicant held a community meeting on December 9th, 2025 as required by for all non-residential variances. There have not been any prior
variances for the subject property. And this concludes my presentation. >> Thank you, ma'am. Are there actually Robbie I Mr. McHugh I forgot to mention this to you. I'm going to have a question to you in a second. So, heads up. But before that, gentlemen, do you have any questions for staff?
Uh, Mr. McHugh from the county attorney's office, just I'd like your clarification, and I know you know this inside and out, so no pressure. No, but just in their application, in their responses to our six variance criteria questionnaire, uh, the applicant had
made mention numerous times about precedent and the actions of their neighbor as president. And I just wonder if you could opine briefly just for the record uh about how precedent does or doesn't affect the actions of this board. >> Yeah, certainly. So the actions of this
board have no presidential value whatsoever. Each consideration is as unique as the individual lot or the property itself, which is in real property. Each lot, even if it even if they're seemingly identical in a
subdivision, there still comes with them differences. No lot is identical. So whatever decision this board makes has no preced president presidential value whatsoever. >> And and is that also true that if a neighbor had done something whether it was approved by this board or not that's
not a precedent not binding on us in any way? >> Correct. Thank you sir. Uh is the applicant here? Would you anything you like to add sir? Um >> you have all our pictures and >> I'm sorry if you we have to have the microphone. I'm sorry. There are folks at home watching and uh we have to have
everyone on microphone. Yes, sir. Right there at the podium. >> If you'd just share with us, please your name and address. >> Pardon me. >> If you'd please share with us your name and address. >> Rod Kubier. Um, personal address is 320 Baja Circle. Business address is 500 Pomosa.
>> I just want to make sure you guys had the pictures and our plot. Pretty much describes it all. >> Sounds good. Gentlemen, do you have questions for the applicant? >> All right. Thank you, sir. That was easy. >> Simple enough. >> Absolutely. Uh, is there anyone in the
audience to speak in support of this matter? Seeing none, anyone in the audience to speak in opposition to this matter? Seeing none, gentlemen, your preference, >> your chair, motion to approve. >> We have a motion to approve for Mr. Wright. Do we have a second? >> Second.
>> I'm going to see a rhythm here real quick for this evening. All those in favor? >> I. >> Those opposed? All right. Enjoy, sir. >> Thank you. >> And ma'am, >> number two, please. Item number two is a request for an east sideyard setback variance from 10 feet to 8 and 1/2 ft
for an for enclosing a carport and the R21 and2 family dwelling district in the Slavic Village subdivision located at 2605 Holly Road. The existing carport will be converted into approximately 247
square ft of living space and encroaches 1 and 1/2 ft into the required east sideyard setback. The applicant applied for the appropriate building permit, permit number 2513331, and at that time it was determined that a setback variance would be required.
There have not been any prior variances for the subject property. And this concludes my presentation. >> Thank you, ma'am. Gentlemen, do you have any questions for staff? Seeing none, is the applicant here? Sir, is there anything you'd like to add to what staff had shared? >> We love meeting our neighbors. Come on
down. Just when you get on up there, please just let us know your name and address. >> Ishmail Palmer, 3248 Stratton Circle. >> Yes, sir. >> Um, so that the carport's been there since in the 70s, 1972. Um, the when
it's enclosed, we're not going to take on any of the additional land. So, everything will stay in the existing footprint that it currently has and had since 72. >> It's just the land development code has changed since that was built. Yeah. Um, gentlemen, questions for the applicant.
>> All right. Thank you, sir. >> Thank you. >> Uh, anyone here to speak in support of this matter? Seeing none, anyone here to speak in opposition? Seeing none, gentlemen. >> Move to approve. >> Motion to approve. Mr. Levant. Is there a second? >> Second. >> Mr. Wright. Seconded. Those in favor?
>> I. >> Opposed. >> Enjoy. Item number three is a request for a height variance from 5 feet to 7 feet for fence columns in the A1 Agricultural District located at 500 Sweetwater Club
Boulevard. The existing columns within the 50oot front yard setback vary in height with the tallest columns being constructed at 7 feet in height. The property owners received a notice of code violation case number 25-31 for the
installation change of columns without required permits. The previous columns complied with the previous land development codes height requirement. However, the new columns exceed the newly adopted land development codes height requirement by 2 feet.
The president of the Sweetwater Club Homeowners Association submitted a letter of support and stated the property owners were not bound to the Sweetwater Club covenants and restrictions. Uh, and three letters of support were received by surrounding neighbors. There have not been any prior
variances for the subject property. And this concludes my presentation. >> Very good. Thank you, ma'am. Gentlemen, questions for staff? Seeing none, is Oh, I'm sorry. Mr. Leon, did you have one? >> No. >> Okay. Uh, is the applicant here? Anything you'd like to add, sir? >> No.
>> Okay. Do you all have questions for the applicant? >> All right. Anyone in the audience to speak in support of the matter? Seeing none, anyone in the audience to speak in opposition? Everyone's going to go home quick on a cold night.
All right. Seeing none. Gentlemen, your pleasure. >> Move to approve. >> Mr. Levance, move to approve. Mr. Wright. Second question, but that'd be >> I would for discussion. >> Y >> All right. For discussion purposes, we have a second. >> Your question, sir.
>> Um I just want to make sure that the code violation we're looking at was says actions be taken care of by the 25th, which what two days from now? Uh oh, no, this was a year ago. Sorry, apologize. I was looking at the wrong date. um our
action here will make that go away if if it's if we approve. >> Yes, they still have to go through the proper permitting for it. But yes, this is the first step to resolve that. >> Okay. Thank you. >> And we work closely with the code enforcement officers. When we see that
they're doing, you know, action to resolve it, we work closely to let them know. >> Thank you. >> Very good. All right. Does that resolve your your question? >> Yes, sir. Thank you. >> We have a motion to approve. We have a second. Those in favor? >> I >> opposed. All right, sir. Enjoy fence.
>> Number four, please. >> Item number four is a request for a rear yard setback variance from 5T to 2 feet for a pole screen enclosure in the PD plan development district in the Deerrun unit subdivision unit 5 subdivision
located at 528 Pineong Drive. The applicant is proposing to replace an existing pole screen enclosure that encroaches 3 feet into the required rear yard setback. Prior to the current property owner purchasing the property, a portion of the 7 and 1/2 ft utility
easement was vacated. However, a setback variance was never applied for. The deer run homeowners association has approved the applicant's request to replace the existing full screen enclosure. letter of support was received by the adjacent neighbor and
there have not been any prior variances for the subject property. This concludes my presentation. >> Thank you, ma'am. Questions for staff? Seeing none, is the applicant here? Anything y'all would like to add to the record? >> All right. Y'all have any questions for the applicant?
>> Anyone in the audience to speak in support of this matter? Seeing none, anyone in the audience to speak in opposition to this matter? Seeing none gentlemen >> motion to approve. >> Motion to approve for Mr. Wright. We have a second. >> Second. >> Mr. Leavant. Those in favor. >> I opposed.
>> All right. Enjoy. >> As we had said earlier, number five has been withdrawn by the applicant. So now on to number six, please. >> Kathy Hamill Development Services. Item number six is located at 3425 Lee Court. This is a request for a rear yard
setback variance from 30 ft to 9.7 ft for a shed that's located in the Glee subdivision. The applicant received a code violation for unpermanented construction and the shed um well I apologize unpermanented construction of
a shed. This was added on to in an existing detached garage. The total square footage of the garage and the shed is approximately 1510 square ft in which the shed addition comprises of 665 square ft. The applicant states that the
shed is only for storage purposes. The existing home is 1334 square ft. There have been no prior variances for the subject property and this concludes my presentation. >> Thank you ma'am. Gentlemen questions for staff. See none. Is the applicant here?
>> Yes, sir. Do you all have anything you'd like to add to what staff had shared? >> Yes, sir. >> Please come on up. Just please give us your name and address, sir, when you when you get up there. >> Thank you, Mr. Chairman. My name is Erin Harris. My address is 30 North
Wildflower, number 621 in Santa Rosa Beach, Florida. >> Are you are you the representative for the applicant? >> I am the consultant for the applicant. >> Gotcha. >> And the applicant is here also, Mr. Rama Pash. If someone uh if you want to address him. um he hired me, the client
hired me to bring this structure that uh he acquired when he purchased this property. I just like to add a few comments. I'll be brief. Number one, he acquired the property in June of 25. He did not build this structure where it
presently sits. His intention the whole time, however, has been to bring the structure into compliance, meaning do whatever is necessary to make it comply with code, leave it where it is, and then utilize it as an extension of the
garage. I think on one of the the original applications, we may have used the word shed, but in fact, it's just simply going to be an extension of the garage that's already there. that's that's permitted as we understand it. Um
as we as we perceived the ordinance there that the the 30-foot setback was certainly the garage structure that is permitted extends within extends into that 30-foot setback. And so again uh
all we wanted to do is to leave what's there there but but bring it up to compliant, you know, make it uh code compliant. um we don't want to move it and we certainly do not want to utilize it as an u as an ADU of any of any type. In other words, we're going to we we
would propose to put power there to to light it and that's it. No no occupancy of that that that structure. And that sort of is it. Um and I I overheard some conversation, so I'll just close here and say that I'm here to answer any
questions that we can. >> Very good. Gentlemen, questions for the applicant. Did you did you prepare their uh responses to the variance criteria? >> Um it's it's my understanding that we did prepare responses.
>> No, no, no. Just I have a I have a question and I don't mean I don't mean to bully up or beat up on anybody. I don't know if you had done it or if your your client had and to whom to direct my question. >> We we sort of did it together. Well, it's just in in in response to the first
criterion, uh, the applicant states that it's an irregular shaped lot. And as I'm looking at at the image behind you or in front of you also, and again, I'm sorry, I don't mean to beat up on you, but what's irregular about it?
>> Um, I I I can't answer that because it's a rectangular lot. So, it's it's it's not an irregular. Um, I think maybe uh >> the person filling out may have meant that it's an irregular shaped building, but it is not an irregular shaped lot.
>> And then there's mentions of there are issues of topography. >> I'm just curious. >> I'm I'm not aware. I mean, there is some obvious, you know, drop across the building, but but it's not it's not something that would like change the design of the building in any way,
shape, or form. So, I I can't speak to that. I'm sorry. Last question and I'm sorry I don't mean don't mean to beat you up here but but have have y'all chatted with the neighbors to get their thoughts. >> I have not. Um I'll ask the client if he has
>> and sir if you please share with us your name and address just for the record. >> Hello sir. Uh hello everyone. My name is Tac Ram Pashi. I'm the owner. I um purchased this in June and I inherited this this issue. But no, um the only people I've met are the people across
the street. Uh I'm friendly with them. The people next door to if I'm looking at the street to the left. Uh we seem to get along well, but I nobody has said anything to me about it. >> Gotcha. just an unfair follow-up question then and I realize that uh
if this this if this was there when you bought it and I you you say it and I don't doubt you any idea how long it's been there I no um from the paperwork uh that I've got actually from the county I think at least a year because there were
pictures taken and it says 2024 on there so that I have but that was provided actually by you all I got in the mail. So, um, at least since 2024, because that's that's the year that's on there. >> I'm sorry you inherited that, but but thank you, sir. That answers my
question. >> Okay. Thank you. You all have any other questions for the applicant? All right. Thank you, sir. Unless there's more you'd like to share. >> Thank you. >> All right. Anyone in the audience to speak in support of this matter? Seeing none, anyone in anyone in the audience to speak in opposition?
Seeing none, gentlemen, >> move to approve. Second. >> Motion approved for Mr. Levant, seconded by Mr. Wright. Those in favor? >> I >> opposed. All right, that was easy. Eventually, >> yes. Y'all stay warm. Now, number seven,
please. >> Number seven is 125 Nshawa Avenue. This is a request for a front yard setback from 50 ft I'm apologize. From 20 feet to zero feet for a fence in the RM1 zoning classification. The RM1 zoning classification is um unique to us. This
is a classification for our mobile home parks and it is located in the mobile h mobile mobile manor second section subdivision. The applicant constructed a 6ft high privacy fence on the front property line. The fence is 10 ft from the
sidewalk and 14 ft from the edge of the applicant did receive a code violation 25-5522 for construction without the permit. There have not been any prior variances for the subject property. And this concludes my presentation. >> Thank you, ma'am. Gentlemen, questions
for staff. >> Seeing none, is the applicant here? Yes, sir. Anything you'd like to add? >> I mean, you don't you guys have questions for the applicant? >> Just Okay, we're good. If if you don't if you don't want to.
No, you you don't have to speak if you don't want to. It's okay. But if you if you want to, you can. Whatever your preference. >> Sure. Come on down. >> Just your name and address, please. >> Yes. I'm 10 fam and I'm 125 Nashville
Avenue. Yes. >> Yes, sir. just uh the fan that the chain fan was there when I was bought it and um and I what we uh re we we six foot high that um I I need to be move into my
property and um I I did move into my property side. Yes, I did. >> Okay. Thank you, sir. Uh any questions, gentlemen? All right. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> We're good. Anyone in the audience to
speak in support of this matter? Is there anyone in the audience to speak in opposition? Seeing none, gentlemen. >> Or do you want to talk about it first? >> Um I make a motion to approve. >> We have a motion to approve for Mr. Wright. Do we have a second?
>> A second. >> Second, Mr. Leavant. All those in favor? I >> opposed. All right. Very good, sir. It's approved. >> Wow. >> Yes, indeed. Number eight. >> Good evening. For the record, JMO
planning and development. Item number eight is a variance request for 3439 Holiday Avenue. The subject property is located in the H holiday Holiday Bay Lake 2 subdivision. The request is for a rear yard setback
bearings from 30 feet to 5 ft for a shed in the R1A single family district. The proposed structure to be constructed will be 600 square ft. There have not been any prior variances for the subject
property. This concludes my presentation. >> Thank you ma'am. Gentlemen, questions for staff. Right. Seeing none, is the applicant here? Anything you'd like to add, sir? >> Any questions? >> You have questions for S for the applicant? All right. Anyone in the
audience to speak in support of this matter? Seeing none, anyone in the audience to speak in opposition? Seeing none, your pleasure. >> Who to approve? >> Motion to approve. Mr. Levant, second uh seconded by Mr. Wright. Those in favor?
I opposed. >> All right. You're approved, sir. and number nine. >> Yeah, I think you have to read it into the record then we'll have a discussion.
>> Good evening. >> Do you guys agree? >> Yes. >> Okay. Sorry. Sorry. Item number nine is a variance request for 1200 Enderberry Court. The subur property is located in the Chula Visa section 2 subdivision.
Their request is for a side street setback variance from 50 feet to 30 feet for a barn in the A1 agricultural district. The subject property is in a corner lot and such is considered to have two front yard setback purposes for
setback purposes. The front of the house faces Enderbury Court. The snow queen drive side is the is where the variance is being sought. The proposed structure to be constructed is going to be 2600 square ft. The applicant applied for the
appropriate building permit 2518034 and at that time it was determined that a setback variance will be required. A letter of support has been received from the adjacent neighbor. There was a prior variance approved on
August 26, 20, 2002 for a lot size from 435 43,000 square ft to 41,000 square ft. I will also like to add that after the staff report was completed, the applicant changed the use of this
structure and we also receive an opposition stating that they the applicant having like a detached garage. This concludes my presentation. >> Thank you, ma'am. Uh are sir, are you Mr. Marino? >> Yes, he
>> come on up. I think we have to have a >> not a big deal, but we have to have a bit of a conversation. >> Sure. >> Nothing necessarily wrong, but but what staff has shared with us is you've decided, and it's your your right to change the use from a residential use to
more like just a barn use. What that means then is what went out as the public notice to the community is incorrect. And I could see some people might say, "Well, that's not a big deal." But we
want to protect you from someone who knows who trying to be a busy body and say, "Hey, the process wasn't followed correctly." Uh, and gum up the works of what you're trying to do. Uh, and if it's the pleasure of the board, would you be okay with us just continuing us
this to next month to just renotice it and make sure there's no procedural hiccups to you getting, you know, a full fair hearing on the matter. >> Honestly, I do have an issue with that. Um, and here's the issue. I never changed the intent for the building
ever. When the original permit was pulled, it was pulled on a barn uh permit application. It's been a barn from the beginning. Never changed. Uh the letter, the original application that we turned in came back to us that we needed to get a variance for the size
and the height of the building because whoever went through the process as was going through the permit, they thought it was going to be something other than a barn. And under the rules with other than a barn, you'd have to have different variances than what I had to apply for. When we designed the building, we actually designed it in its
exact size to fit exactly where it fits. So, I'm not impeding on my chicken coupe. I'm not impeding on a 100-y old oak tree I have on the back side of my property. As far as the setbacks, I even I even designed the building with the farm builder so that it was the exact
distance for the setback. We don't realize setbacks are not from edge of pavement. Setbacks are from your property line. I don't know if you have the survey you could possibly pull up. >> Mr. Marino, I I apologize and I'm being rude in interrupting you, but here's my concern. even if it's not your
responsibility, not something you did, the public notice that went out >> was discussing one use that's different from what we're discussing today. So regardless of who's whose fault it is, >> there is a factually incorrect public
notice. And I and I and I do you you have your rights, too. But I just >> Yeah, I know. I I'm just frustrated because we did complete the paperwork on time. >> We paid everything. >> We did everything on time. We did find this issue before the time limit was met
to turn in this application. I went down to the county and I spoke with Miss Mareno. I you look familiar. So are you okay? We spoke we discussed what needed to be done so that when the mailings went out the correct description went out. So it's not my fault as the
homeowner that the description went out wrong. I noticed this morning that my letter of variance that I had to fill out the six questions, the wrong one was posted, but the correct one was delivered to her in time. I even have an email back saying that yes, she received
it and it would be taken care of. And in person, when I was there, I was told it would be swapped out. >> And those are all Yes, sir. Those are all fair. >> So, on my end, as a as a homeowner, pushing me back a whole another month means I have concrete that's now going to get pushed out a whole another month. that building is put down in front of a
month and we've already been through a process where the items we were required to have this surveillance for in the beginning back in November when our permit was applied for the wrong things were were written at that point because the intent of the building was however
conveyed wrong. I've never received a phone call or an email even though I sent several emails and phone calls saying please call me, please respond. Nothing. no response other than my driving up here three different occasions to say, "Hey, this is what we're trying to do. Can somebody please
respond to me? There's problems here and I'm seeing a problem, but it shouldn't be a problem because you're telling us to do something that we're not required to do." So, here we are with a variance. Now, I mean, I don't know if the rules are are variances for setbacks from the street or are they from the property line? Because if it's from edge of
pavement, I'm in compliance. I'm at 50 ft. >> Exactly. >> I know. And that's that's we're not at that point of discussion. >> I understand. I'm just saying. So my on my end, >> I've been waiting for this since November and now I'm going to have to get pushed another month because of an
administrative error is basically what I'm being told. Is that correct? >> Well, I don't know if I call it an administrative error or not, but there is an error. And and I can tell you that if you know, even if it's unlikely, if someone came in and brought a challenge, you'd be pushed back a lot further. and
and so I I my suggestion you you your you your you your your opinion you're entitled to your opinion is >> this is the safer approach >> okay so currently we have two letters of support not one there's two >> okay we >> there's only two properties that will
>> and and I was given I was given these at the meeting >> the two letters of support are from the only two homes that will actually see the barn >> now people will drive past it but homeowners who actually reside in their residence there's only two people are going to see the barn >> but more than just your neighbors could object I understand both of those homeowners are fine with it. Were there
any letters of of against >> or are those the only two we received at this point? >> Are there any letters? >> We have a letter of in in opposition. >> We do. Okay. And what is it for, if I may ask?
>> That they oppose it. >> Okay. That >> I mean you're happy to read it? >> Yeah. You don't mind? I mean, I'm just ask question trying to figure out how to assess. How do I want to go forward? >> Well, and the board the board can do what it wants. We're hoping it would be easier for us if you agreed.
>> I'm just I'm just I understand >> you're frustrated. I now have to wait yet another month >> for something that I really shouldn't should be just it's a it's a 20ft setback difference and to be honest that extra 20 ft there is grass in that extra
20 ft. So I am literally 50 ft from from pavement. I'm 107 ft from this from the corner. So it doesn't affect traffic. It doesn't affect safety in any way, shape, or form. And the variance is strictly just due to the fact that we're talking about this 20 ft. There's there's no
safety issue. There's nothing else. It's not about the size of the building where, you know, or anything like that. I don't want to move a tree to push it back. So I have to apply for this variance. I mean, I hope you guys can appreciate I don't want to move a tree. >> Those >> I think a lot of us can agree with that. >> And those are those are fair points.
>> Can Mr. Wright, please? >> Mr. Can I have there's in our in our packet there's a uh the letters of support. It basically it looks like the the same letter was written um letter of neighbor consent and support variance
request accessory structure size has a you know a lot of the text in there five bullet points of why it should be approved and then pretty much they've added their signature. Was that was that letter prepared by you? >> It was prep Yes, it was prepared by us and our contractor. We went over
and over. My question to you is everything in this letter that I've seen references an accessory building structure. The word barn never shows up in here. >> Well, that's on the permit. It was a steel bar. >> I understand that. But what what I'm asking you is that there's no everything I've seen in the documentation that you prepared that this letter was accessory
building structure. If it had said barn, >> honestly, >> I understand what you're saying now. >> Okay. So the problem with us is that I have letters basically saying here from approvals that you're asking about that aren't saying barn. >> Okay. >> And the same reason that we have a letter here that says it's a opposition,
>> our we're we're basically looking at it that if we approve something or make a decision one way or another and the notification that sent out was in error regardless. Okay. Um >> we we have a they can come back and and
>> correct. So if we do a continuence I at this point I should go back to those neighbors have that changed so that they can see >> basically to make it all >> that's good advice. >> Black and white I would recommend it. Yes. I appreciate that. I have no problem. >> And staff will make sure that on their end everything is the way it should be. So no doubt it's an inconvenience to
you. >> I know it's just frustrating to make honestly it's easier than for us to >> be concerned and deny it. >> Yeah. No. That would be my that would be my push forward is to deny it and makes you you'll have to go back anyways. But yeah, I understand saying that to to for
>> and in all honesty to you guys it it is going to have storage. I have two classic cars that are going to go in there. I have a tractor that's going to go in there. I have two trailers that we use that are going to go inside rather than have them littering the yard. >> What is the agricultural use of putting cars in there? >> One one whole side Well, the whole the
whole barn itself is >> if I might I don't know if that's something to get into. Yeah. Well, it honestly though for me >> I'm going to be honest with you. The reason let me speak >> the reason that in the the for us to look at this in the as in the manner
that you're asking >> only allows the barn as an agricultural for livestock >> or um I forget the other term but um and that is the only exception is in the A1 district. Otherwise if it's if it's a garage it it doesn't count. That doesn't
count. Yeah. >> So, I want you to be careful with your words that you you're not if if this is a barn, it's supposed to be for agricultural livestock purposes. So, I understand that. Yeah. One whole >> I I would say more than half of it will actually have livestock in it. The rest of it is going to be support with the
two trailers going inside. We've got to have an area for a tack room. We've got to have an area for feed. We've got to have I mean, >> as if there's extra space for me to put a car in there, of course, I'm going to put it in there. But I'm not not going to leave outside when a hurricane comes. Just I just want you to be clear the reason the reason that we can look at
this in the as it's being presented as a barn when >> totally understand >> in the A1 district gives us different leeways than the other district. >> Correct. >> Or or is just a standard accessory building that's being used for another use. That's all. >> Yeah, I totally get it. I totally understand. >> Good. All right. Appreciate your time,
sir. I'm I'm going to put this to the board. >> Any other questions for me before? >> No, sir. No, sir. Thank you. U if it's the board's pleasure the chair would entertain a motion to continue this to next month's uh meeting. >> I motion to continue to the next meeting. >> We have a second. Those in favor
>> opposed. >> All right. So again I apologize for the inconvenience sir but we'll get it right next month. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Uh with that the only other item is the minutes. Is there a motion? >> No made. >> Is there a second? >> Second. >> Those in favor? >> I.
>> Excellent. Thank you very much. And staff, anything else you a minute? >> No, sir. We had no appeals from our last um board meeting, which is >> pretty dispense wisdom. >> All right. Thank you very much. >> I wasn't here, right?
>> We could have been Heat. Heat. Oh, hey.