[Music]
for
[Music]
[Music] [Applause] [Music] for [Music]
[Music] started get afternoon my name is Sher suin and I am the seminol County Magistrate um before you today uh the way the process works is the county will
provide its uh the county we'll call a case the county will um have you come up it will provide its case first and um provide any evidence or testimony that it has you can cross-examine any of the County's Witnesses but you will not be
able to provide any evidence or testimony of your own until the county has closed its case once the county has closed its case it will be the opportunity for you to present your case I'll make a decision here today if uh there is a determination that you are in
fact in violation you uh stand to have a penalty imposed of up to $250 a day for each and every day that the violation remains after the Cure period that's been given if you're here for repeat violation you stand to have a a penalty of up to $500 a day imposed
uh for any violation that remains after the Cure period um we're going to go ahead and get started we don't follow the agenda as it's presented so if you have it in front of you bear with us we have our own method um to our Madness
that we call cases um so the first case that I'm going to call is 2431 cesm with a confidential owner um I believe that's your your case um Mr
Jones and officer Hill anyone else who who is um providing testimony if you'll please raise your right hand any County in individuals do you solemnly swear affirm the testimony you're about to give to be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth I
do thank you officer Hill Sone County Sheriff's Office code enforcement code enforcement region this is case 2431 cesm rondon's confidential P Florida State statutes the property is located at 2064
Shady Lane in Geneva violation charge of suo County Land Development code Chapter 30 part 17 section 30302 uses permitted storage and accessory structures on a vacant parcel is not a permitted use in an rm1 zoning District my initial inspection was July
19th 2023 with special magistrate orders on December 4th 2024 and February 12th 2025 with follow-up inspections with postings and the recent most recent inspection was yesterday the results of my inspection the violation of storage
and accessory structures on a vacant parcel remain on the subject property these photos were taken on my initial inspection on July 19th 2023 photos were taken on the same date and since then the camper has been
removed but the remaining structures are the garage and the boat dock this phot is were taken on the day of posting on January 28th that's and those were taken yesterday and there is a notice of commencement so they do have an
application in to put a mobile home on the property they did um do a planning managers appeal January I believe January 20th before the board of adjustment was which was denied and upheld the um planning manager's um
determination um I believe Megan will speak on that behalf good afternoon Megan zorski for Planning and Zoning um it was ultimately um determined between staff and um the
applicant's representative that they're going to submit a um application for for the mobile home as the primary residence um which is going to take them a little bit of time to get through the application process and it was
ultimately decided that once they get to the point of the only thing holding up approval for me to finalize approval for zoning review would be the approval of the variance from the board of adjustments for the accessory
structures um pending it would give them a year to finish NCO the primary structure so that's kind of the holding pattern that we're in now as they need to submit their permit um get it to the point that it's ready to be approved by
me um then come forward with their variants which I believe they've already submitted their application for we're just in a holding pattern until their permit gets to me and everything's resolved I believe they need mitigation credits for flood plane I'm not quite sure where they stand on that they'll
get through that when they get to their flood plane manager here with the building again we're not at that point yet um so if you would like to bring them back in 90 days considering the change over that we're having with code enforcement since we're going to have
some change over with the officers um that way we can kind of get um a status of where we're going to be um if we can start moving forward with the variance process at that point to see where we are with the hearing I think 90 days
might be a good test to see where we are in that process if um that applicant's representative is aanimal to that yeah um Mark Jones here on behalf of the property owner uh we got a contractor
now who who filed the knock and uh according to the they've got the it lined up the unit that they want to put out there we did a a lot fit last week so we know what we can put and where we can put it um so we are we are actively moving forward I'm told you know given
getting the permit that's the first I've heard of any kind of mitigation credit so I'll have to deal with that when it comes at me um it's in the flood plane so it's not up to me I don't deal with that portion I'm I I don't mean to Point At You sorry um so we'll deal with that
but I I'm told that we could have a unit out there within three months so 90 days seems reasonable to me well it the when you say you've done a lot fit you've determined with a county individual what
will go where or just with a contractor what we're going to submit to the county for approval okay and it meets the county codes as far as their all of their setbacks or anything if there is anything I read and write stuff all day
long I don't do building plans okay so it is possible the contractor but no he's a he he knows what he's doing no no I'm sure but it but then it is possible that we could be you know if you're saying it could be in in 90 days right
we may need 120 days because it's got to be correct when it comes to you all too and that's assuming that it's correct my hope is that in 90 days he will they will be set for the agenda hearing for the board of adjustments
that's my hope so that you will know that we have gotten to that point CU with a change over for code enforcement officers I don't know where car that's not an issue for us to be dealing with here so I I um I think
that and I understand what you're saying as far as the variance but I'd like there to be a primary structure on and and I'd like it to be um compliant as well and so I you know that's that's something that we'll need to be dealing
with as well so um let's continue for 120 days let me get an exact date on that the June 12th meeting so compliance would be June 11th um with a compliance hearing on June
12th so I will order the compliance continuance to June 11th with a compliance hearing date of June 12th at 1:30 thank you very much thank you thank you the next case is
2277 cesm BNB land Holdings [Applause] okay is anyone going to provide testimony okay you raise your right hand please do you solemnly swear affirm the testimony you're about to give to be the truth the whole truth and nothing but
the truth I do okay Jason Rucker simol County Inspector this is case number 2277 CM located at 3468 East sr436 on
poka um this case uh was originally heard uh back in October 13 of 2022 um most recently on January 9th 2025 an order was issued extending the compliance date to February 12th 2025
with a meeting scheduled uh for February 13th an Affidavit of non-compliance was filed by the inspector after reinspection on February 12th 2025 uh the administrative cost for the
clerk um is $ 35622 the administrative cost for the inspector was $1,116 72 for a total of $1,472 94 uh we recommend that the special
magistrate issu an order constituting a lean ractive back to January 12th 2025 and continues to acrew at $50 a day um until uh compliance is obtained um I
know that they're here I believe they're going to want a 90-day extension but uh I'll let them speak to that um and I know they have been working on getting their plans and the requirements for engineering done that concludes my
presentation okay ofer we here toer and our engine Steve Saha um so as Mr Rucker had indicated we are going to ask for 90 days um as a refresher on this case we are fully compliant with the underlying Cod enforcement issu so the back wall
and all of that all dealt with but the building permit cannot be technically issued because now we're dealing with sort of the zoning planning environmental side um and so we started working with um that section of the county um there are some folks I think it's joy and then Jim Potter was one of
the main um folks from the the U County side that we've been working with on these new plans um and so as of right now I think the remaining large issues are drainage and so from my engineer uh Mr Saha he believes that that type of um
process kind of to your point in the other um uh Hearing in the other um appointment that this will likely take at least 990 days for us to um submit the plans again have them go back and forth on the drainage um and finally
hopefully get approval um so Mr Saha is here to to give testimony on that um to the extent that you'd like to hear that but at this point I believe Mr Potter spoke with Mr Rucker directly and also sort of said the same thing um that 90 days would be appropriate for us to try to um get the drainage and some of the
wetlands issues that okay great if you want to go ahead and state your name for the record please and if you'll spell your last name for the clerk it's Steve Saha last name is s a okay and um if you'll just explain
what kind of needs to be done from your perspective and and what you anticipate um being necessary for to to achieve compliance right yeah we had met with the county before and we addressed you
know a lot of the issues regarding uh the building and some of the structure and once what they had asked for was that the site plan be separated from the building permit and also um submitted separately and that
also had triggered the review uh by site engineering by Jim Potter so the site plan was submitted it was seen previously but once it was separated that's when it triggered his review um so he had a lot of drainage uh storm
water issues that he wanted to um have uh taken care of so spoken with him he also did recommend uh the 90 days um I've spoken to him kind of kind of come up with an
unofficial um idea of what he's looking for in order to take care of the treatment but you know it is storm water um there have been previous permits and we just want to make sure it's all in compliance so that some sometimes can um take a little while to get done so
that's why I think he recommended 90 days and why I would kind of back that up okay the 90 days is for the back and forth and the actual to get some approvals for correct to get approval of the permit okay yes and just for clarity
for you madam magistrate that the comments from Jim Potter came like I think the day before our last hearing too so this was the first iteration of that can you speak into the mic they're having a hard time picking you up I am so sorry no no no not at all um just to clarify that Mr Potter's comments came I
think the day before the last hearing so these are these are new to that extent and so we have addressed them or he's spoken with them and so now we're about to submit to him okay okay then I will go ahead and um do you have anything further um officer Rucker that you would
like to add and there's no um objection they have been working with you all along and keeping you aware okay then I will go ahead and um extend compliance date to May
7th with the compliance hearing being held on May 8th thank you thank you thank you okay case 252 cesm hyam Fuller Mr Fuller if you'll please state your
name for the record ion Fuller okay and if you'll raise your right hand please do you solemnly swear firm the testimony are about to give to be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth I do thank you Jason Rucker SEL County Inspector this is case number 2502 cesm
is for the property located at 4454 radio Avenue violation charge is simol county code chapter 4 appendix a 105.1 um the violation is the installation of an accessory structure on top of the house without a required
permit the initial inspection was done on uh April 2nd 2024 uh the notice was given to the respondant um on 4324 uh there have been several
compliance dates and extensions a followup inspection both uh on site and via the computer uh showed that the violation remains on the property this is a screenshots showing that Mr Fuller is the owner of the
property this is a copy of the green car coming back that he did receive his notice and then here are some pictures of the structure this is different okay I'm sorry go ahead okay
these are some pictures of the structure uh most recent I was out there at the end of January January 29th we go through and we see that no go ahead um go ahead go ahead all right and this shows
the uh County system showing that there has not been a permit obtained for that last permit was in 2010 next shot is the copy of the code um chapter
40 SE appendix a section 105.1 based on the testimony and evidence presented in case number 2502 CSM it is determined that the respondent is the owner record of property located at 4454 radio Avenue in possession and control
of the property and is in violation of semal county code chapter 40 appendix a 105.1 it is further recommended that the special magistrate order the respondent to correct the violation on or before
April 9th 2025 in order to correct the violation the respondent shall obtain the required permits for the sighted violation if the respondant does not comply with the order a fine of $50 will be imposed for each day the violation
continues or is repeated after compliance the respondent must contact the inspector to verify compliance I have presented a copy of this presentation to the clerk and request that it be entered into the record that concludes my Pres
presentation Jason let me um is it not an expansion of a of a dwelling I'm not sure I understand installation of accessory structure on top of
a a home is that I mean it looks to me like it's Blended in on the side to the home is it not an IT building on house interpretation it was a shed that was placed on top of a house but wouldn't
that just require a building permit for a home expansion also I I mean because technically you can't get a permit to put a shed on top of your house and speaking to jham the the
interim building official he has talked to Mr Fuller and he's probably he he's going to ask for more time to come in and probably talk us to see how we need to handle this whether it'll be an addition or whether it'll be considered an accessory
structure at this point I don't know if it connects to the structure inside I don't know if he's taken and set that on top I mean we can ask himim I have haven't talked to him about it but um if he's just taken the structure and set it
on top then I don't know what you would call it I mean it's an accessory structure but you can't get a um under the the code for zoning purposes you can't put an accessory structure on top of your house that's a good
question I don't know that we have anything in the code that prohibits putting an accessory structure on top of your house um but I'm more concerned about the overall height of that structure well and that would be a potential zoning violation as well correct um our maximum Building height
to from grade to mean roof height is um 35 ft for any residential zoning District um and depending on the original I mean it appears that the original roof is a flat
roof um and it appears that that's like that's what it that's what it appears appears so there there might be some some wiggle r on mean roof height it depends on what the the plans are but so
I would feel more comfortable if the county is amable to it to amending it to where we're discussing um an addition to the home and then yes if
perfect I agree with you I would I would consider this to be a um addition to to a residential structure uh its use would be a utility use but it's still an addition to the home so that's what I would categorize this as okay great and
then if it's not permitted because of some various zoning things then we'll have to deal with that but I don't want to give the impression that you can put an accessory structure on top of your home and when I spoke to him earlier to to try to help him resolve this I I told him there might be some alterations to
what you've already built to even bring it into Building Code Compliance and and of course maybe zoning compliance as well but he um he is aware that there might be some modifications that need to be made okay great thank you okay do you have anything further no
that that concludes my presentation okay great yes sir can you tell us um what you've done with the structure kind of on the inside so that we understand yes ma'am what this basically is is it's a
high roof section to what's there and all it really does is it exhausts all the hot air out of the building and what it does is it draws air in and um exhaust the hot air out and from the
interior from the front of the building where it's goes up it's a high roof section and it is fastened to what's there it's not a shed on top or anything like that it's structurally sound and I
would be willing to uh you know get the required um drawing for what's there the current permit that was running is still in active I've kept up on that all all along and paid the money you know and
kept it active the whole time that it's been you know being worked on it's been quite a project and uh with what's going on right now it's uh I have a stucco problem on the back wall that needs to
be repaired and I'm trying to work with the you know and get it all in compliance with what's there what um did did you cut into the existing roof it's
fastened into what the structure is everything is steel framing and it's all Heavy gauge it's uh I have some pictures of uh what's there you know and I've had an engineer out there and he looked at
it and they liked what was there other than uh the owner of the engineering company had moved to Venice and uh another engineer took over for him here
in Sanford and uh he said that you know everything looks good I just don't have the drawings for everything yet and uh I spoke with Mr ham and uh he gave me
another guy to talk to to show him what's going on and try to move forward from here so you said it's fastened can you get to that top portion through the existing
structure no so they're not accessible it's fastened down but it's basically what it does is exhaust the hot air out of the flat part of the existing addition okay okay and the
height is uh approximately 27 foot okay all right special magist can I ask your question sure So when you say it's exhausting so there's no holes in your roof underneath underneath that structure that's there what the addition that's
there um can you ask the question again sir yes so you say it's exhausting from down below so in my mind if you're exhausting it there would have to be a hole in the roof no sir underneath that structure no
sir so how are you exhausting it well what it does is it keeps the radiant heat and all the UV heat off of the flat section of the roof through the top it sucks it in through the front and the
back exhaust fan and it exhaust through the center at the top okay so how is it fastened to the existing roof it's fastened through anchors and
braces that fasten down to the existing okay all right with uh screws Clips angle uh Clips every you know Corner every
beam exactly like the other is built okay and so in order to get a building permit he's going to what does he have to submit to you all does he have to submit engineer drawings to get the building
permit yes okay um and you your engineer he's been out there but hasn't started drawings or anything well no he hasn't started the drawings uh CA uh I may have
to figure out where we're wanting to go with this including they would be willing to draw draw the drawings I'm sure okay but I paid him to come out there as soon as I got the the violation to come out
within a week of uh getting the paperwork in the mail he came out and looked at it so he looked at it last year in April yes ma'am and has he been in contact with you
no so after he looked at it last year in April you didn't make a attempts to contact the County to um yes I contacted uh Jason I think and told him
that I had the engineer come out and uh I was trying to figure out how to go forward on it yes ma'am okay so when was the first time that you were contacted by him was directly after the notice of code
violation for the for the hearing no for the first violation notice where I posted on the in April correct and then you hadn't heard from him in between okay all right but I have been keeping up with the current permit that's on there
and uh the what is the current permit that's it's the addition from 2010 I um haven't finaled out on that yeah so we're still open on a 2010 permit yes but I'm I've been
paying the extension every time to as I said there was a problem on the back wall with the stucco and so that permit doesn't include this extension but it or this addition but it does include you're
you're aware of it and it is being handled yes okay and it's still current also in and up to dat with that and that is correct on as far as your okay I'm just not sure that he's going
to be able to come into compliance by April I after reading that I agree I think he's probably going to need some more time um I'm going to um go ahead and give
you until well I don't want to not keep up with this I I think that if I give you some deadlines then that will I promise I'll keep in contact with Mr uh Rucker along the way and everything and okay
constant uh well then if you will do that for me and make sure that you are constantly contacting the county and letting them know what's going on I will give you a compliance date of June 11th okay with a compliance hearing on June
12th or a penalty in the amount of $100 a day would be imposed so you need to come into compliance by June 11th I think that that's probably plenty of time if you consistently do
what they ask you to do yes ma'am I will okay all right all right thank you thank you Mr thank you okay just want me to put it on okay the next case 2425 cesm
[Music] and that is Amed and Sakina neurom neurom Mohammad okay anyone who's going to provide testimony for this case if you have you
Sarah will you sworn in previously okay all right good afternoon for the record McGregor love 25 North Yola Drive yes sir Jason Rucker simal County Inspector this is case number 2425 CM located at
846 Al point um this case was originally heard by special Magistrate on April 11th 2024 and an order was issued given respondents compliance date of July 10 2024 um uh there have been several
compliance dates issued um on December 12th 2024 an order was issued extending the compliance State February 12th um 2025 with a meeting scheduled for today February 13th 2025 an Affidavit of non-compliance
was filed by the inspector after reinspection on February 12th 20125 uh the administrative cost for the clerk is $27.72 the administrative cost uh for the inspector total is
$554 34 uh for a total administrative cost of $825 6 um recommend special magistrate order uh
Lan retroactive back to February 12 2025 at $50 a day and continues to acre until in compliance that concludes my presentation okay good afternoon your honor um so last time I was before you uh my client
was in the process of getting an engineer to kind of put together an analysis of the existing condition and just to I want to provide some more background and kind of give you an idea where we are now and and and what the path forward might look like so um last
year Sarah who's here today kind of gave me two options and and and we we elected option two the first was show plans with the section that's within this easement area and it's a so to to remind you this is an easement that's sort of labeled as a
drainage and conservation easement on the plat but it it's it's a man-made lake in the Lake Forest community and it it really functions as a as a really just a drainage easement um and and when we were able to discuss that issue
that's Sarah presented two options one was to move the portion that's encroaching or the second is if it can't be moved which it's currently constructed there uh to submit an engineered plan that shows that this won't have a negative drainage effect
and uh we submitted those plans uh we have not the permit has not been open for for the reason that I I'll get into in a moment uh but I we sent them to the county for review and I'm not a a drainage analyst but the the there is a
drainage conclusion that there's no net runoff increase being provided um and uh what what we'd like at this point is for the county to have the opportunity uh to review it at least formally um and I understand the
County's position is that they're not able to uh issue or or um issue the permit um until the uh HOA approves the plans separately um but the the the path that I suggested and and would like to
go down and I'm happy to hear other Alternatives from the county is that the county be allowed to open the permit to review it and if they're inclined to you know provide you know uh comments and have one remaining before work can can
recommence that is the HOA needs to approve this so that we can bring that back to the HOA and and as evidence that they actually do have the authority to to uh to approve this because that's the issue we're currently dealing with uh
and and I included as part of the uh record um and I don't know if you have it before you a letter that I sent back in July um and really the operative part is that um starts on the um second
paragraph but there's a there's a disconnect between the um design criteria that this Architectural Review Committee looks at um and the source material for this part of the design
criteria which is the can Lake and Canal regulations so design criteria says they can't approve um any uh structures in the easan area where the lake and Canal regulations say that no docks retaining walls are permitted within the
conservation and trading easement without pre-approval from seminal County government and the Ark respectively so we have not succeeded in even having a conversation with them about that since
the initial meeting back in June uh but we believe that if seal County can review this and approve it subject to ARC approval that we can convince the HOA they do have the authority uh so that is that is where we where we are we
have plans that we we think have a drainage analysis the county wants to see I understand the remaining issue from the county side is the HOA but you know I'm I'm happy to work towards an alternative solution but that's that's kind of the catch22 we're in
okay hi everyone good afternoon for the record Sarah Harang development services natural resource officer um I agree with what Mr L said those were the two options that I presented either remove from the conservation easement or provide number one detailed drainage
analysis and that lettera from the arc so before it's been our policy kind of uh per staff and per management if a easement is dually dedicated to the HOA and to the county we need to have the hoa's Buy in first I have had external
meetings with the HOA um they asked me to come out about a month ago and I I went out to the community and and we spoke about this and they are pretty firm in their position and not wanting to allow this this wall uh this retaining wall in the conservation area
if the area if the part of the wall that is in the conservation area is removed then they're then they're happy with that but from my correspondence with the HOA and other staff's correspondents they are not interested in and even entertaining the idea so and and that to
that point um that when we met with them in June we weren't given a substantive denial uh which by that I mean they did not review it and give us any reason why they were
going to deny it uh they simply said we don't have the authority to approve it uh so that what that sounds s like the conversation you had with them perhaps acknowledged that they had the authority but they weren't inclined to approve it
um so at at a minimum I would I would like the opportunity to have that conversation in the context of a substantive review um and if we can have some more time to do that my client can make a decision about you know whether
there's a path forward but for every interaction I've had with them has has been that they don't have the authority to even look at it which was a legal disagreement I had with them but sounds like there's substantive
disagreements okay so I'm I don't have any thing that actually shows me you said the portion of the wall that's in the conservation is there a portion of it that's not yes ma'am okay because nothing I have is showing like like I
can see on the the property appraisers I can see the that there is an easement back back there so I'm assuming it extend extends maybe 15 10 15 20t of the yes ma'am it's 17 ft um I have the the
plat sheet if I could show it just for for reference and I can enter this into the record as well and if you'd like a copy of what I provide I'd be happy to get that that's that's okay I know you got it but just in case you want thank you though I appreciate that and while she's bringing that up
there is a it's I don't know how big the version of the uh plan that I submitted um earlier is uh before you but it is reflected on there it's it's pretty diff pretty pretty difficult to see uh and I believe that the the large majority of
the wall is within the easement area um but I will I Sarah may know more about that actually yeah okay great I don't know if this is on um yes
it is great so uh this is per note 13 of the plat 17 ft um per lot 687 through 694 inclusive and then this is going to be page two of the plat where I've just highlighted lot 689 thank you Megan um
in the blue there so that is the that's the property that we're currently in discussion so that is the combined and combining drainage and conservation easements was very common practice in so the wall there's a part of it that goes into the easement I'm not sure if
we have a large enough copy of it yeah excuse me for a moment sorry there's a lot of errors here sorry is the outline in Black where the wall is it's um the the edge of the
wall that's correct right here right where um my fingertip is okay and then the edge of the properties here so and then the easement give me the I I don't see where the the easement is a dotted line just
the the South there the darker dotted line or the so here what's the darker what's the dark dotted line that's around the entire thing that is not the easan area um what
is it though I was hoping you weren't going to ask that um let me see yeah it's okay great again my apologies there's lots of lines on here but we do have this dashed
line here that's yes please thank you Karina starting here that's where the drainage and conservation Ean is so is his pool enclosure partially within the pool is just on the edge of
the conservation ement okay yes and that was permitted yes because it does not encroach into the eement and so there was no setback from the eement correct there was no required setback from that easement and then there were wall is how
far from it is hard to see Mr love do you know how much of it is it you think the entire thing Falls yeah there's a very little sliver at the South kind of like at the very East Eastern end of the retaining wall you can see a sliver there that's outside
the easan area um okay but it's it's really very little of it is and you know you may recall but the the the reason for this was Hurricane flooding I mean the it was it is remains a serious issue there's a separate issue the owner wanted me to bring up today that is sort
of related but I think instructive but he has a separate violation for the pool enclosure which he can't really properly keep up and that he's been told and I I would wouldn't say this is like sort of an admissible um admission from the not
admission but statement because it's it's certainly here say but the code enforcement officer has opined that the retaining wall has to be finished in order to really properly enclose the pool and uh she's been you know verbally
supportive of his effort to get it constructed because it he's having difficulty meeting that sort of state level requirement and County requirement of a pool enclosure um because he doesn't have a completed wall to a fix it and night um so that's a related
issue and and really shouldn't have a bearing on on what we're discussing right now but um it's a a code enforcement violation not a homeowners association VI that's that's a county code enforcement violation okay so in Mr McGregor's letter he has
indicated that the County's code and I don't have a code section so he not able to put this says that Lakefront lots are subject to conservation and drainage easements along the shoreline of the
lake um well maybe is this your so I think that's referencing note 13 on the plat where says no construction or related activities can be permitted within the drainage and conservation easement which does
conflict with what the HOA has in their in their bylaws saying that if the county and the HOA approve of the location or of the specific activity then that in a plat note uh the the a
surveyor note the plat note 13 um what I what I showed on on here um that's surveyor's note number 13 a surveyor's note is not a a a restriction it's a surveyer note it does say construction
activities related th to are hereby prohibited within said drainage and conservation e so a surveyor cannot by a surveyor note impose restrictions on anyone that's a surveyor note um if there was a dedication block
that said there is a restriction on something then that can impose a restriction um but just because a surveyor says it because a surveyor can say anything a surveyor could actually put in their notes that you can't have
buildings that exceed X in height would that be you you wouldn't be able to impose that against a person so um I'm more concerned about this um the the regulation and the this is actually it's
not a county code the second portion is a a covenant restriction also is that of your letter the second portion that says that without preapproval from simol County corre correct that is the that is a covenant that's part of the Covenant
restrictions yes okay so the county is saying um they can't give you approval until the association approves the association won't give you approval until the county approves and and that's not it's not a for foregone conclusion they'll give us approval at that point
either they just won't have a conversation with us about even so who maintains the drainage Pond whose is it it's the it belongs to the HOA so the county does not regulate the pond at all
other than saying that there had to be a Water Management District permit well and through the Land Development code and this is also a plan development so there is a developers commitment agreement and a development order that does restate all of the items
that are listed on the plat and do you have that with you no it's recorded in the public record but I but I don't have it to see it no we don't have it with us plat notes do not do a thing now if you give me a developers agreement 100% um
but plat notes do not impose restrictions on people because a surveyor again can put anything in a plat note so if you want to have something in a dedication if you want to have something where it's truly dedicated then yes but a plat note does
not control um now if you have it in your regulations Your Land Development code in a developers agreement something like that then it does but a plat note does
not impose restrictions understood okay um so my problem though is that I've got um no this is the third fourth time that we're here with nothing and everybody's
at a at a stalemate so we've got to come up with with some way to get us off this Mark um and if the county doesn't regulate um I understand that the
county gives the fence permit or the the wall permit um but I don't know why outside of there being an agreement
between a developer and the county um why the county is concerned at all with HOA restrictions um because if they are not County rules you cannot impose them so
if the county rule he's in violation of the county rule then let's deal with that if he's not in violation of a county rule let him deal with his HOA and if they give him a violation and he gets a fine there and starts collecting
his fine his HOA can foreclose on him that's that's a wholly different Arena but what the County's rules and regulations are let's only deal with those so if you all can look at this
application for this wall permit and you are able to Grant him a permit based on your rules and regulations then you can grant him a permit if you can't Grant him a permit because he doesn't follow County rules and regulations then you
deny the permit but at least we've got a a process going um because the the HOA operates completely independent of you all so I think at this point if um you submit everything
to the county for the permit how long will it take to review usually I'm done within 48 Hours typically within 48 hours between Megan and I okay um if we need something else from drainage they're also about 48 hours but we would be happy to look at
another round of review we haven't received one we've received some things via email but that's not a formal submission that we can that we can go for so whatever you have you're more than welcome to resubmit and when it comes into our queue we will look at it okay okay great and then if there are
any fees anything that they're requesting you need to do all of that get everything that they need to be able to do their their prod and that was really what why what led me to suggest that we open it up because I wasn't trying to ask for free review I know
that this cost you know this is this is L you know this is real time so I wanted I wanted the county to be compensated for their review okay so what I'm going to do is continue it one more time for 30 days yep so that's acceptable thank you
hopefully we can have an answer and if it's you know denial you can't get the permit you can't get the permit he needs to remove the wall yes however we need to do that but if he can get the permit then the county will give him the permit
and then the h way will independently deal you'll he'll have to deal with them separately great thank you I appreciate it um so that continuance date would be March 12th with a compliance Hearing in March 13th thank you honor appreciate
it you can have that for the record get this PL um the next case is 258 cesm um 1815 Larin Avenue 28 actually it's 1824 Lake Street
Clarkin Avenue is the name of it we did the same thing sorry tricky tricky but is that the name name of the okay thank you that's the name of the owner L yes that's the name of the the owner yes okay I was trying
to call the owner not the address okay all right sir and if you'll please state your name for the record and your affiliation with the case yes my name is andresa and I'm one of the owners of 185
canav okay LC LC okay great yes okay go ahead sorry for the confusion there yeah let me uh go ahead and swear you in okay do you solemnly swear airm the testimony are about to give to be the truth the whole truth and nothing by the truth I do yes thank you good afternoon Jason Rucker
inspector simal County this is case number 2508 CM uh is for the property located at 1824 Lake Street novito violation uh charge Simo county code chapter 40
pendex a 105.1 uh description of the violation is installation of a well canopy multi- mini split units um multiple doors and construction
um of rear deck without uh required permits the initial uh inspection was done on 4224 the notice to the respondent was 4 five of 24 um they've been given a few
compliance States and extensions a follow up inspection was done on site and via the computer and the violation Still Remains on the property uh next slide shows that 1815 Lin Avenue LLC are the owners of the
property through the property appraisers website and there's a series of photos this shows uh where I posted the property at the end of January for this hearing next photo shows the well
canopy uh next photo shows the Min split units that have been installed as well as the following photo and then this shows where uh the back deck and and balcony have been redone and shows some of the
doors there's some more photos of min Min spits what's a mini split mini split is an AC unit that is got an outside condenser and an inside unit but it's one separate unit okay okay the uh next
slide for the permit show that they did apply um for the permits for the many splits um let's see units are currently under review and has not been issued as a permit uh once they're issued as a permit of course that P portion of the
violation will go away um no permits uh have been received for the canopy of the door uh construction of rear deck any of that um this slide shows uh where it's at in
the work flow for the county um for the Mini Splits for the AC units uh this is a copy of our code that requires the permit s county code chapter 40 appendix a 105.1 uh based on the testimony and
evidence presented in case number 2508 cesm it is determined that the respondent is the owner record located at 1824 Lake Street noo in possession and control of the property and in violation of the simal county code
chapter 40 pendex a section 105.1 it is further recommended that special magistrate order the respondant to correct the violation honored before April 9th 2025 in order to correct the violations the respondent shall obtain
the required permits for the cited violations if the respondent does not comply with the order a fine of $50 will be imposed for each day the violation continues or is repeated after compliance the respondent must contact the inspector to verify
compliance I have presented a copy of this presentation to the clerk and request that it be entered into record this concludes my presentation okay do you have any objection to these documents being um that have been presented being entered into evidence uh
no no objection okay we'll accept them into evidence and do you have anything you'd like to add sure yeah um so yeah just as he mentioned we we are actively working with different contractors to pull the the permits that we need to uh
to do the Electrical uh the HVAC and the building as well um the electrical permit is currently under review and it's it's been submitted but has been stuck in the corrections reviews process since September
2024 and we've been speaking with Ruth Goldstein on that and our contractor really hasn't been uh as communicative as as we as we wanted to he's been a little bit um I don't know
if he's busy or overworked whatever the case but we're kind of at the mercy of these contractors as well so that's that's been one of the the things that has delayed us a lot uh the HVAC permit is in process uh we submitted that uh February 4th 2025 and it's currently
under plan review we should have that um approved probably within the next two weeks we did the energy calcul we submitted that so we're basically waiting just an approval from the county there and then we did have a residential alternation permit but it was voided um
and we're actually not sure why it was voided um it was originally submitted but was later voided without clear explanation and we're still investigating whether we need to reapply or if modifications to the original application are required the oh sorry no you're fine the
um the permit was void because due to um inactivity so they have seven days from when they submit it to go ahead and follow through with the process and they didn't do that so they void the permit um the electrical permit that he's saying they applied for is on hold and
it has it has nothing to do with this violation okay yeah because the Min splits that's why I was I was a little confused because you had testify that the many splits were submitted on February 4th 2025 and I did understand
how they were in review with Ruth since September of last year if they weren't so the um electrical permit that you're speaking to that was um it actually was voided out the first time because I'm assuming for inactivity as well and then
when you um resubmit it in August that's what is currently but it has nothing to do with the violations that are before us today the electrical I think it no okay doesn't so to do with the h no well the Mini Splits for the AC units are was
submitted that was submitted in February and that is one of the items that's here today and then if the alteration dealt with the doors the deck um those things need the permit was
voided so you do need to get another permit for that so you'll have to resubmit for for that if that's what that was for yeah it was for uh let me read that to you permit application 25 uh 945 was uh submitted on 12225 but was
void due to inactivity permit application included well canopy multiple doors and rear deck okay so then that would have included the things that it needed to include to Encompass the other items that are before me today
so if you resubmit for that um Al op ation permit and then we follow through and do everything we need to for the Min split so you can get a permit then we'll be in in good shape so those things need to be done the county has suggested that um they're
willing to give you till the the April meeting which would be the April hearing you'd have a compliance date of April 9th um with a hearing date of April 10th do you think that we could have more time just because it's uh it's been a long long process with
waiting to hear back from my contractors and it I don't know if it's it's not priority or not but it it's taking a long time to at least get it plans back and reviews and while I appreciate that I think my concern is this was brought
to your attention in April of last year and so it didn't really seem like it was a priority to you all either um so I'm going to go ahead and just do the two months because I want to make sure that we're following through and if you um you need to stay on your contractor and
let them know the importance of this um and if for some reason they don't um but you're doing everything that you need to do and you're staying in contact with um with Jason then you you're going to
be doing the right things and then that will be what's reported to me back here but if you're not staying in contact with him and he doesn't see the progress then he's going to let me know that as well so um I'll go ahead and find that you are
in violation of um simol county code chapter 40 appendex a section 105.1 in order that you bring the property into compliance by April 10th of 2025 with a compliance hearing date of April 11th
2025 or have a penalty imposed of $250 a day April 9th as the compliance date April 10th as the meeting is that what I said I didn't say that I'm I apologize yes she is correct April 9th compliance date April 10th is the hearing
date okay so I'd have to come back April 10th yes yes um and could I come to the meeting the month before to give an update and possibly ask for an extension in case that we would need one no you would ask
for the extension at the April 10th hearing if you're if for some reason you need one okay okay thank you okay thank you 2336 CS CM McCarthy can you please state your name
for the record Patrick McCarthy and okay and can you please raise your right hand do you solemly swear airm the testimony you're about to give to be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth I do thank you Jason Rucker simol County Inspector this is case number 2336
cesm uh located at 400 East Hill Crest Street um this case was originally heard by special Magistrate on March 9th 2023 um given the uh compliance date of April
14th uh 2023 an Affidavit of non-compliance um by the inspector was issued after reinspection on April 18th 2023 an Affidavit of compliance was filed by the inspector um after
reinspection on December 11th 2024 on December 12th 2024 an order was issue continuing uh the compliance hearing to January 9th on January 9th in order was issue continuing the
compliance hearing to February 13th of 2025 the administrative cost to process this case for the clerk totals $236.8 the administrative cost uh to process the case for the inspector total $674
85 for total administrative cost of 900 or yeah $917 cents uh recommend special magistrate issu an order constituting a lean in the amount of $30 30 $3,400 for uh 68 days of non-compliance
from April 14th 2023 through and including December 11th 2024 at $50 per day um I do know that uh the gentleman has had some medical issues so I'll let him speak to um what his requests are
okay before we get into that I want to make sure that I'm clear I had given an extension to January 9th after hearing it was I was in the hospital called me and
said that he was just getting out of the hospital weren't going to be able to make it so we couldn't make the January date and so that's why it was continue to today yes and then the order the prior order was the prior magistrate correct the original order or was it
would have been March 9th 2023 okay yeah it was the prior magistrate okay and then the continuation that I gave is because we had some delay in between and okay and then so you came into compliance prior
to the extension date that I had given correct okay okay so the county is asking for um their costs um there was also a um because of the
continuance there you came into compliance so the the daily fine um is not imposed but there are costs that have been incurred by the county related to this matter in the total amount of
$91.79 um how how long would it take you to pay those costs uh with after all the medical stuff and that right now I don't know I could figure out a payment plan if possible or you're saying all one lump payment that you would do what I'm
sorry so I could try to work out a payment plan if optional or if I gave you an amount of time um to pay those though would you I mean that amount of time can be you know yeah it doesn't have to be you know 30 days typically I
would order 30 days but I am understanding that you've had some some issues that you're trying to deal with yeah I I when I first had this brought to me I filed for the permit and there was a variance on it that needed to be addressed and then I came down with some diagnosis medical
issues and I kind of my fault just back bured it forgot about it got caught up in the last couple years of treatment and that and then this last 6 months I have spent mainly in the hospital with surgeries treatments fighting infection and just was released a couple weeks ago
um actually the day before I saw Jason come to my house to bring this and talk with him um since I got this second time around I have been in compliance with them I have made it call talked with all the people I needed to do re got my permit restated and um inspected and did
all of that so was there a variance that was obtained in between did it need a variance or it had originally stated I needed to be 17 ft off of the road her something along those lines but there was a change in the code to where
it only needs to be 4 feet now okay um because of visibility for the corner being a corner lot I'm I'm not aware I'm not aware of the variance part but I mean I would believe what he's telling me if that's the case okay
NE nevertheless he did get the permit so if there was a variance that was required we he would have went through that process our code changed April 1st of 2024 so a side street um was reduced administratively with traffic
engineering review which was why he was able to proceed without a variance we now do them internally from whatever the normal side street is to 5 feet without the need of a variance so he was able to proceeded um internally with a 5ft setback um with
traffic engineering approval so that's how he was able to proceed um because the time had lapsed so so the delay was good on your part yeah it it saved him $300 in a variance application um unfortunately due to health issues um
but that's why the change of um that requirement so it actually ended up working in his favor instead of him having to either relocate the fence or or get a variance but that was the change in the code okay so what I'm going to do is I'm going to
split the costs with you okay okay um so the county has $91.79 in into this somebody do the math for me faster than I can not it not it5 that's why I asked someone else to
do it how much 47 okay that's that's good okay so I'm going to reduce the cost to $457 and I'm going to if you will pay
that um within four months so 120 days to the county thank you and you will receive an order that um indicates that and we'll give you the information on payment and
I mean you take 419 I mean 119 days to pay it okay it just doesn't go into effect until and then what it does is it gets recorded So it would just hang out there as a lean on your property if if you don't pay it okay okay thank you so
much I appreciate that thank you in compliance oh next case is 2043 cesm Neve Castillo can you please State your names for the record
uh Valerie Vega Castillo n vea Castillo can you please both raise your right hand do you solemnly swear firm the testimony are about to give to be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth I do thank you Jason Rucker simal County Inspector
this is case number 2043 cesm uh located at 209 Callis Drive um this this case was heard originally back in June 11
2020 um an Affidavit of non-compliance was filed by the inspector after reinspection on October 2nd 2024 on December 12th 2024 an order was issued extending the compliance date to February 12th
2025 with a meeting scheduled for today February 13 2025 an Affidavit of non-compliance was filed by the inspector after reinspection on February 12th 2025 the administrative costs uh for the clerk are
$723 127 the administrative cost uh for the inspector was $800 82214 for a total of $1,545 41 um recommend the special magistrate
issue an order constituting a lean in retroactive back to February 12th 20125 at $50 per day and continues to ACR until um in compliance that concludes my
presentation okay okay oh thir what one second please I'm just trying to familiarize myself with the history because we are on amendment number five so
okay um she wrote it down on the translation okay okay the engineer I I spoke with the um Jason uhuh Jon H but
him told me this week he was very busy um K the plans everything do it for next week because he contract other person to rraw again because he had too much job I need
maybe one week if he bring me the the cage or the plans Monday or Tuesday I Su me so what she's trying to say is that the previous contractor Jason I'm her daughter by the way um her previous
contractor Jason he's been meaning to come but every time my mom has been scheduling him since our last meeting in November about coming in coming in coming in he's either been in Puerto Rico or he's been apparently getting back surgery and constant um push backs so then we finally had to
get another contractor or I think it's like an engineer the guy who does the out sketch and we finally got him literally two days ago because he kept saying that he was going to come he was going to come and he hasn't showed up cuz we have previous calls previous messages and no response from this guy
so we finally got a contractor yesterday and all my mom is asking for is until Tuesday because this guy he has everything like we've we've changed the doors we've changed the floor we've done all like the electricity things like it's just a building pretty much at this point and we just use it for storage but
um I'm not really sure so Jason have they been in contact with you no I spoke to her today no with him no with the other he spoke with I
Megan Megan is noroski Megan yeah afternoon Megan I've had um had a meeting with the property owner a couple of months back tried to
explain um the issue with the electrical plans because they were still showing the stove the I'm not sure if it was the contractor that came in or if it was the the plans designer that finally came in
had a really what I thought was a really great meaning um he was all gung-ho I want to say that was about a month ago that that he came in went through um the plans gave him a full breakdown actually
went through everything re-reviewed it without um a review cycle so that I could break it down for him again sent him down back to the pl examiner because I knew that the planes examiner was going to have comments cuz they were going to touch the electrical um and there were still some
other plans examiner comments that were outstanding so before he left I wanted to make sure that they touch base with the plans examiner so I hand walked him downstairs as well to make sure he touched base with the plans examiner that had reviewed the plans as well so
they have come in she has been trying um she's at the mercy of her design professionals and her contractors so if she's gotten a new contractor and the plans are done hopefully they can tidy it up it's from what I understand work's been done
they're just trying to get the plans turned in she did the special exception she's gotten the variants so she did all of that she's done all the work we just got to get her through the permitting process okay okay so a lot of these continuances are related to going through and getting her
variants and those have been done for well over a year yes ma'am we've just been trying to get her through this permitting process with her contractor and her design professional Now to respond to comments but I think like three of the extensions that were done before my time they were probably done
in two up to 20123 because of that because of the special exception and the variants correct okay and then you you now have a new design professional that has okay and are we 30 days no he told me suppos
in one week maybe Tuesday Thursday in an abundance of caution cuz it's not just me all they have to do for me is remove the stove off the plans that's all I need which that's a simple fix the plans examiner comments they were a little bit more detailed so they may need for me
simple for the plans examiner it may take another cycle to get through what Wayne needed so in an abundance of caution 60 days just to make sure they get through okay okay um Jason do you have any U
concerns with providing an additional extension of 60 days I don't have any issues with that but I do want to clarify something on record did you say that you guys gutted the place it's all back to what it was before no no no like it's it's empty
like there's no stove it's just like an open room there's no electric I no there's electric yeah there's like lights and stuff like that yeah it's just for storage okay okay I just want to clarify that I I don't have a problem with an extension okay then I'm hoping
this is this is the highest I've ever gone five six extensions the only thing that's in that house is like a little inflatable but that's only because my sister just had a baby so we're trying to give her some Independence but she still lives at home it's just like temporary okay um so what we'll do is
we'll have you come back April 9th or a compliance date of April 9th coming back here April 10th he su it before still I need a came came it coming
April yes because um because this case has been going on for so long the county has incurred significant costs so we would um you'd have to be back here April 10th um for the compliance hearing at
that time to ensure that you are in compliance okay okay so I'll go ahead and continue to April 99th thank you thank you thank you thank you next case 2426
cesm Lo compo compos day America LLC thank you and can you please state your name for the record uh Robert harus and Mr William Rome okay can you both raise your right hand do you Solly swear affirm the testimony are about to give
to be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth yes ma'am thank you Jason Rucker simal County Inspector this is case number 2426 cesm located at 345 Jones Avenue
um uh this case was originally heard by special Magistrate on May 9th 2024 and order was issued giving the respondents a compliance date of July 10th 2024 with the meeting on July 11th
2024 on July 11th 2024 an order was given to the respondant with the date of August 7th um with the meeting date of August 8th an Affidavit of non-compliance was filed by the inspector after reinspection on
August 9th on August 6th excuse me 2024 August 6 2024 on August 8th 2024 an order was issued given the respondent u a compliance date of February 12th 2025 with a meeting date
of today February 13th 2025 an Affidavit of non-compliance was filed by the inspector after reinspection on February 12th 2025 the administrative costs for the clerk in this case are $26 and the $ 32 the
administrative cost for the inspector in this case is $648 7 for a total cost of $854 39 uh recommend special magistrate issue an order constituting a lean retroactive
back to February 12th 2025 at $250 per day and continues to acrew until in compliance that concludes my presentation okay I this is the single parcel that has both a commercial property and a
residential address and we have not been able to obtain the permit because we have to apply for a special exception which we did and they have the first public hearing on April 2nd and the final
decision on May 1st I have forwarded a copy of the email to the lady there okay and Megan this is the last time we were here you suggested for us to go upstairs and fill out an application was about $1,000
which we did but they still process in it because they haven't had the hearing yet Hillary Peyton is the project manager um and they do have to have a public um meeting and they do and it then it goes before BCC so that's part
of the process process um and then if it is um approved I'm not sure if those I don't process those um applications so forgive me I'm not sure if there is an appeal period for those um if there is then they would be subject to that
appeal period and then I'm sure there is so probably an additional 30 days so July maybe to bring them back and because they're I don't know if they're still are you still going through the permitting process or yes so they're doing simultaneous RWS so um July would
be safe that okay so may is your hearing date for the the the second hearing the second hearing May okay and that's the BC then for BCC yeah oh BCC okay yeah um is that your your first BCC reading no
the first BCC is will be April 2nd at 6 p.m. okay so you could bring them back for June mhm the second one will be uh after May first or the decision will be made by May 1 right so you could bring them back for June and they should have
their permit if it was approved at least you would know that they would be all their comments should be resolved by then and they would be you know right because if they are approved then they're not going to appeal so any appeal period is not going to matter anyway corre okay um all right yeah
because the special exception would be approved at that point okay yeah I think that um we will and un you have any objections Jason it sounds to me like they have done everything that we have asked them to do um for the process um
so I think that um I'll continue to June 11th for compliance which would mean you would be back here on June 12th okay at the same time 1:30 yes okay that's it yes sir thank you
very much you 24 53 cesm bath assets 3 LLC hi there can you please state your name for the record Joshua suda and can you please raise your right hand do you
somly swear airm the testimony you're about to give to be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth yes thank you welcome Jason Rucker simal County Inspector uh this is case number 2453 cesm located at 3314 Curtis
Drive um on January 9th 2025 an order was issued extending the compliance date to today February or sorry compliance date to February 12 20125 with a meeting scheduled for today of February 13 2025 an Affidavit of compliance was filed by
the inspector after reinspection on uh January 21st 2025 the uh administrative cost for the clerk was $286 97 the administrative cost for the
inspector uh total is $830 29 for a total of $1,172 um recommend special magistrate uh issue an order reducing the fine to administrative costs totaling $1,172 and order these costs be paid
within 30 days or F uh will continue constitute a lean on the property um I know that there were some issues with the site plan stuff not being marked correctly the last time and that's why you extended the case but
that concludes my presentation okay can you remind me why um because this case actually went relatively fast compared to some of our others so um remind me what the hold up in the middle was was he submitting everything he needed to submit he had everything submitt but on
the site plan he only had a portion of the fence marked that was permitted so that's right and at one point we were told we needed a demolition permit because there was somehow never a permit for a fence around a pool and for a pool as I understand it
it needs to have a barrier up which was the fence so okay and you have a pool yes okay that's why I was confused from day one after my assistant had come in we had been told and then most pre previous visit it's like oh wait there was a mix up in the plans that were
submitted because it was submitted like four times we went through multiple I iterations of paperwork submitted oh this isn't the right form this isn't the right form oh we've got to go back to the first form but fill it out correctly this way okay and did you install the fence
or was it installed no it was installed long before our ownership ever had that home okay pool's been Place 20 years I think we've owned it maybe five okay all right
um then I'm going to um split the costs with you someone needs to do the math for me again um be 550 would it just 11 58 55 558 go to
dance okay I'm going to do an even 558 how long will it take you um to pay the cost of $558 should be able to have that put through within 30 days if I get the paperwork okay then I will order that paid within 30 days um costs in the
amount of $558 thank you have a good one you too thank you everybody thank you okay um 2462 cesn Mount Zion Baptist Church hi there sir can you please state
your name my name is Jan Henry I'm the pastor of Mount Zion Missionary Baptist Church okay can you please raise your right hand do s affirm the testimony are about to give to be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth yes ma'am thank you Jason Rucker simal
County Inspector this is case number 2462 CM located at 20001 cyes Avenue um this case was originally heard by special Magistrate on September 12th
2024 and an order was issued given the respondents of compliance date of November 13 2024 with a meeting scheduled for November 14th 2024 on November 14th 2024 order was issued given the respondent compliance date of
February 12th 2025 with a meeting scheduled for February 13 2025 an Affidavit of non-compliance was filed by the inspector after reinspection on February 12 2025 Affidavit of cost for the
clerk total is $148 57 the administrative cost for the inspector totals $53.95 uh given a total administrative cost of $662 51 recommend special magistrate issue an
order constituting a lean retroactive back to February 12th 2025 at $50 per day and continuing to acrew until in compliance that concludes my presentation yes
sir well we everything you asked us to do we have done uh the contractor keep telling us we need this he's not we've been checking up on him because we come we
have a guy that comes every time and talk to these people to find out what we need and he tells us we need a survey we got the survey we had the survey done everything done and then my Deacon came down and
talked to them and they gave us a paper of the things that other things that need to be resolved so we've been trying to follow these things but this contractor that we have he just don't keep up with what we need to know to do
we called him the other day he talking about he forgot to submit the thing to try we trying to get a permit so we can go ahead and finish the shelter all we doing really want to do is put the shingles on top to stop the rain from
leaking on one side one side was already done and they stopped us that we're not going to close it in it's not going to be closed in and it's used just for to feed the people on Wednesday all the people who are
homeless need help we also give them shoes clothes stuff of that nature that's all it's used for and if we have a picnic Church picnic or something that's all it's there for it's not to be clothed in put Electric in it or or any
of those things it's just there to help the homeless and those that in need that's basically what it's there for and we trying to get a permit to find out what else we need to do so we can go ahead and get it done we we we we're on
it we want to get it done whatever we need to do to that shelter it was stopped because we did not have a permit when we did it and that's why the everything stopped and and we are so um what are they in communication
with you do you have any have you heard anything before each one of the meetings I haven't spoke to no I haven't spoke to his contractor um I spoke to him maybe a couple months ago you know he was telling me that he did have issues with his contractor but um you know I
there's nothing I can do to help him with that I mean he needs to you know that that's a civil matter between him and his contractor or he needs to get another contractor that's going to follow through um and as far as I know there are items that are outstanding uh for plane review that he
needs to correct that need to be corrected and um I don't know you know if his Deacon came down I wasn't made aware of oh you just did that of uh what the issues were or what he was told so
um but typically they emailed them a copy of all the stuff that needs to be corrected um this is a commercial permit so I'm not reviewing it it's um been reviewed by Caitlyn abgar one of our planners in current planning um it does
have some commercial building plans examiner review regarding the structural um components there are some fire um reviews for Life Safety um but as far as um what is required for commercial
zoning review um there the survey was needed I don't know if that's been actually uploaded by the contractor into the portal um but that was one of the comments that we actually needed to see where the proposed location was or where it actually is since it's um on
permanent construction and um we needed the height of the structure from grade which is a requirement um the setbacks which would have been on the survey um the use of the structure um because there's some
conflicting information that's been provided that um page one of the pages refers to it as living area and a garage under the area tabulation but the structure um is being shown as open area like a gazebo or a carport type
structure um and then there were some comments from the review coordinator because the new um application had been uploaded saying that it was a r roof so the contractor is uploading conflicting information as
well within the same permit so the contractor needs to ensure that when he's providing documentation that the documentation is consistent and complete across all of the plan sheets so let me ask you this are you
have you hired this contractor or is it someone who had agreed to do it um he had agreed to to do it for us uh after we had buil the structure and uh he had a lady to come in and draw it
up we had to get it draw up to show what it was so we had it draw up and after she draw it up he said he would go ahead and put everything in so we can get a permit cuz we figured that's what it was then he said well you need uh to do a
new survey so I said okay we'll do a survey we had a survey come out and they surveyed it it was good that that we had it done because we got more land than what we thought we had so it helped us to know the size of the plot so now we
got that together and then uh we looking for him to tell us what else we need so we can get it done on the the problem is he's not doing it so um do you you probably need to contact a
another contractor I think that's what we going to do because he's not um so here's what I'm going to do I'm going to give you um do you think that um these things if if someone new is brought in that they could accomplish
this in 30 days if they're on it uh I'm not sure 30 days maybe 60 okay what I would suggest is him go ahead and set a meeting with them and the new contractor
with the building official that's okay to be able to go over this so that they can get a clear understanding so that we can print out documentation of what they need to do so they'll have have it okay instead of he said she said I agree and
so I'm going to give you one more shot at this okay um but I need you to get someone else on board that can really help you through it how are we going to do um and I know that that might cost you some money but I need you to do that because we need to get that done right
and and I understand the the good work that you're doing there but we need to make sure that it's safe for those people that are that you are you utilizing it for exactly that's what we want to make sure we want to get everything done so we is you know I'd
hate for you to be having a Wednesday night dinner in the roof falling on that's what we don't want right that's exactly what we don't want we trying to make everything safe we want to know what we need to do so we can get on it and get it done whatever we need to do
take care of that I will go ahead and continue one more time um to April 9th okay and then you would have a compliance hearing of April 10th okay
thank you sir oh thank you okay and our final case 2507 CM Lillian dber Jason Rucker simal County Inspector this is case number 2507 CSM
is for the property located at 109 Champion Avenue uh violation charges SAR county code chapter 40 appendix a section 105.1 uh the V ation is unpermitted structures including mechanical electrical and plumbing without a
permit um the initial inspection was down on 8 2123 notice to the respondent was 8223 there have been several compliance dates and extensions and um both the property has been had on-site
visits and via the computer the violations still remain on the property um the screen shows that proper appraiser card showing they are the owner of record next photo shows to where the property has been posted for this
hearing and the next several photos show the structure in question where is that in relation to the main house it's we'll get to the next one okay do we have we have an
aerial we don't have an areel yeah I was looking through the pictures earlier and I couldn't tell where I got one if you're facing the main the main house is going to be to the left of those structures oh so it's like a whole
little complex right oh nice look at that wow so that would be the main house right there this one's the main so it's a mobile home in the rear with an addition and and then they these are who constructed the roundabout is that on
their property yeah that's champion this is this is all private easement okay and then the road that goes up to it it's all private easement it's a mobile
home um subdivided by deed plat so it's a platted block that was split by deed and then their County Road access is through another property it's
off of a public right of way and then all of their access through this whole original block is private easement which is typical for a mobile home park okay but to this this particular property I don't see is there
like a it's a dirt road it just isn't shown on the plat it they typically aren't for mobile home parks they're all private easement this was done back in the probably the 50s cuz there's not even
it's on the 1971 tax roll the Lots so portion of the law is within whatever this road is that's built and the original plat that I could find that was before it was amended multiple times was created in 65 and this wasn't part of
it this block X was just a giant block before these were and this aerial that I'm looking at the addition on the front of this um structure the mobile home that's there is that an unpermitted Edition as well no it's I mean I don't
know how to answer that it was prior to it's not part of this cas it's part of this case okay thank you the next slide shows uh our our records showing that there hasn't been a permit
um obtained for any of those structures the next slide shows uh section of our code chapter 40 pendex a 105.1 based on the testimony and evidence presented in case number
2507 cesm it is determined that the respondant is the owner of record of the property located at 109 Champion Avenue in possession and control of the property and in violation of the simal county code chapter 40 appendix a
105.1 uh it is further recommended that special magistrate order the respondant correct the violation honored before April 99th 2025 in order to correct the violation the respondent shall obtain the required permits for the cited violations if the respondant does not
comply with the order a fine of $50 will be imposed for each day the violation continues or is repeated after compliance the respondent must contact the inspector to verify compliance I have presented a copy of this
presentation to the clerk and requesting it be entered into the record that concludes my presentation okay I'm going to accept the um electronic case file into the record um can you let me know about the
mailings where they returned uh the mailings that went out before the um notice was posted on the property yes you don't have anything returned or they were all returned yeah yeah they
were all returned and what what was the reason for return on the front it should be a yellow sticker maybe just says return to Center unclaimed unclaimed so then they were not even they would have gotten the card and they didn't even attempt to try
to claim them okay um I'm going to go ahead and find that the property owner was properly noticed to be here today um going to find that the property is in violation of seol county code chapter 40 append a section
105.1 I'm going to find that they have had sufficient notice um of these violations for going on two years and so I'm going to um find that or order that the
violation be corrected by March 12th no March 11 March 12th yes um or $250 a day will um incur each day that the fine remains
with a compliance hearing date of March 13th okay that is all of the cases I'm going to accept the minutes from the January 9th 2025 meeting and and um confirm the next
meeting of March 13th 2025 thank you we're adjourned thank you [Music]
oh