I'll call to order this meeting of the Tanosaf Planning Board. Today is Tuesday, September 23rd, 2025. It is 7 o'clock p.m. We are meeting in person at the South Town Hall at 454 College Highway in South Mass. We are also open
for participation via Zoom. >> Uh we are recording the meeting. If you are, that is fine. Just need to let us know. We'll do a quick roll call of the people at the table.
>> Good evening. Alvin Allen, Tom Planner, >> Jessica Thornton, planning board chair. >> Dina, vice chair. >> Diane Job, member. >> Jason Remald, member. >> Marcus Phelps, member. >> Dan Alab, associate. >> Hey, first on the agenda, the town
planners report. >> Okay, good evening. Uh for the town planners report, we have one new item, 55 Hudson Drive. It's a proposed uh yoga studio. It's the only item that we have for the next uh agenda. So I've set that
for the October 7th meeting for 7:05 p.m. Uh secondly, I have received a proposal today for 591 College Highway. It's a lot that's um right at the intersection of uh 50 uh
Route 57 and Route 202. It's across from the mobile gas station, I believe, was a former uh nursery or or daycare. Um they're looking to or a particular entity is looking to purchase the lot to put a food truck there. So, I'm going to
go through the process with them and see what they need to do as far as um permitting it's necessary. Um, third item. I've received uh a few complaints in regards to 163 South
Longard. Uh, I believe that's road uh for so neighbors are saying that this particular um u parcel of land or or there's a home on the there's a house on the land. Uh but
in the backyard suppose allegedly they've created a motocross track. Uh there's been hate noise as late as 1000 p.m. There's been tree clearing. So um I' I've taken those complaints. I've sent you know those complaints to the
heads of apartments um from the town of Southwick and then also I've obviously updated uh the town administrator on Nicole Parker in regards to what's going on and seeing if we can have uh some sort of enforcement officer to that property um in regards to those
complaints. What was the address again? >> That's 163 South Longard. >> And so the last matter I have um I'll do the town report is the Western Mass EDC uh is holding a developers conference and that that will be uh next month
October 15th. I will attend. Uh they are seeking to compile a list of um potential town parcels that are uh up or that we could potentially seek for economic development. So if anyone has any ideas or knows of any particular
lots they like to throw out there, um just let me know. Uh shoot me an email and uh I'll run it by Nicole and and see if uh can uh potentially advertise during the uh
to get out. So, thank you. >> Thank you. Next on the agenda is public comment. If you have a comment for the board regarding something not on the agenda for the evening, please raise your hand. If you're here
in person or online, raise your hand or unmute yourself. Hearing none, we'll move to the next item on the agenda. The next item on the agenda is for 157 Feeding Hills Road as a directive order.
Miss Chbbo will be stepping back away from or just sliding back from the table. >> I'll just slide back >> Mr. Planner. So, yes, I did receive an email from the uh uh well, not the
property owner, but the who's representing uh Mr. Salini uh sent an email stating that uh they have not yet um met all or addressed all concerns by the fire chief. So, they're still compiling information and so wanted to
uh postpone their their item to the next meeting, October 7th. With that, do I hear a motion to continue this public hearing to 7:10 p.m. on October 7th? >> Dave Spina. So moved. >> Do I hear a second? >> Second.
>> Roll call vote. Jessica Thornton. I >> Dave Spina. I >> Dwald. I >> Marcus Phelps. But our great question. >> Unfortunately, we cannot move on to the next item on the agenda as it is
scheduled for 7:10 p.m. >> Um, I think we can skip ahead to one of our discussion items, the planning board review and reevaluation of subdivision infrastructure security at Noble Steve Pro. Evening Jesse Salt Noblestein.
>> Um, so we've continued uh to follow the schedule that I proposed at the last uh uh I don't know maybe it was me to that but we're we're sticking to that schedule. We're working uh the west the
west side of the crossing right now. We poured 100 ft of sidewalk there so far and we've built up the road and uh today we installed um 120 ft of drainage line um that goes
from the existing manhole that's in the pavement um to the where the crossing is going to be. Um, and we're continuing to work uh off that schedule. Um, I emailed Alvin
and John Gddard the um the title search um that they requested so that the conservation restriction can get cir circulated. Um I think Alvin's going to send that over to the attorney
um so that can uh get the final sign for that stuff. And uh that that's that's all I have for right now. We're going to continue sticking to that schedule I provided and I'll come to the next meeting
with another update and and I'm doing my bi-weekly meetings as well with >> um I think you did um send in information that I will get to our town council. the legs forward.
Thank you. We'll see you next time. >> Okay. Thank you. Have a good evening. >> You too. Thank you. >> Still not quite time. >> Do we um have information
to be heard on 159 Brookshire? I see that Mr. Hail is on nine. Mr. Hail, can you hear us? >> Yes. Good evening, board. Um, I've made contact with um, John at the DPW and I'm
in progress on responding to his letter and u requesting a continuation till October 7th. >> All right, we will see you then hopefully with something in hand. Thank you. >> Thank you. Okay. Did everybody have a chance to review
the June 24th meeting minutes? >> Yes. >> Yes. Are there any I know Mr. Phelps, you sent in just a couple minor edits. Any other edits needed or requested from board members?
All right. Then do I hear there a motion to approve the meeting minutes for June 24th, 2025? >> Dina so moved. >> Dian Ja second. Roll call vote. Just the floor and I. >> Dina I. >> Dian Ja. I >> Jason Warald I. >> Marcus Phelps I
>> Giovani your name is signed on there. So >> Javanni also I >> wonderful and the other ones will come. [Music] Yeah. One more minute. All right. Well, then let's open the
continued public hearing 563C on the road for a special permit and site plan for the expansion of a large ground mounted photovoltaic system. Mr. plan. Do we have anybody here for the applicant
>> is online? Mr. Pinkio? >> Yep. >> Present. >> Good evening. >> Evening. >> Where you get going? I just want to do a mic check. You guys can hear us. Okay. On online? >> Yeah, I can I can hear everyone just
fine. >> Okay. >> You can hear everybody just fine. >> Thank you guys. >> Thank you. >> All right. Mr. planner. Where are we at with this um public hearing? >> So, as far as I know, Mr. Partigio um
still has some information to get to the fire chief as well as um conservation commission, but in regards to planning board matters, I think I believe we should be all set. I'll let Mr. Bio speak to that. Yeah, I think um
thanks for that Alvin. I think the only matter is still pertaining to the proposed design changes we made. Um in you know comments that we received from the fire department. So, in my
opinion, the only outstanding items will be to continue the design for the um dry hydrant as we went over I think a few weeks ago um as well as coordinating with the Kong um in order to get an updated wetland delineation plan which
is going to be part of that um dry hydrant proposed work. So that's where um that's all subject to happen in the next few weeks, which the hope was um if received approval, we'd move forward in
coordinating with Concom um and other respective boards to kick off that um fire apparatus and dry hydrant um sort of sub um project attached to this one.
Um I think what we have done with that in mind is prepare a decision this evening that will reflect um those items being produced in the future as conditions to the special permit.
>> Okay. >> Are there any other questions board members have or concerns about issuing the special permit with those conditions included? Do I have any public comments from town officials
online or in person? Any public comments in general? Hearing none. Do I hear a motion to close the public hearing for 63C on road? >> Dave Spina moved. >> I just second. >> We'll call vote. Jessica Thornton. I
>> Dave Spina. I >> just I >> Jason I. >> Marcus Phelps I >> Then what we will do is move right into the decision. >> Yes. Can you pull that up and share it? >> Yeah. And there's one particular item.
So the the item regards to the dry hydrant I added um to the particular document but I I forgot to print it out for you guys. So that uh there is an item number 17. >> Blend me the last minute ad >> but uh I'll put it on the screen for
everybody. Just a moment. blood [Music] microphone. Okay, before we go forward, uh again, can everyone hear us in the public um or online? >> Yep, we can still hear you.
>> Can you hear us? Okay. >> Yeah, I still I still got you. >> Yeah, >> but we can't hear >> Mr. Vicio. Um see, >> let me try to turn up the volume. >> One moment.
Thank you for your patience everyone. >> Yes, you don't have to do that. >> Does this any better for you guys? True. True. See you soon. Can you hear me? Okay. Online still. Yeah. Yep.
>> Oh, now we >> Okay, great. Hate it. I think have have all the board members had a chance to review the decision that was sent out? Yes. Um why don't you just
scroll down then to the terms and conditions. starts with the terms of conditions that we have. Just want to scroll down to the ones that you added out just to share.
>> Number 10. >> Check number 10. Uh item C, I don't think that's the right word. >> Should be monitoring and maintenance. >> Says monitoring.
>> Okay. >> And on 11 you said you added uh that number 176,000. >> Yes. or you were able to quoted. >> So I I received that number from the developer, but again that's up for discussion with the um town council and
NDPW director. >> That all right? >> Sounds good. I like the language there at the end. Sure. That's right. >> We get when we have a fulltime town plan. All right. So, I'm going to scroll down
to 1516 17. So, 15 reads, "An updated site plan, including specifications of the proposed dry hydrant shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval." That's what you guys don't have on your plan. >> Yeah.
>> Mhm. Number 16 reads, "An updated wetlands delineation report shall be submitted to the Southwood Conservation Commission for review and approval. >> The rest of it is just the normal record of vote for each vote that
we would have to take. Are there any other questions or comments on the decision in front of us? Hearing none. Do I hear a motion to grant the special permit and site plan approval for this
application? >> Dina moved. >> Da second. >> We'll call vote. Jess and I. >> D I. >> Diane Ja. I >> Jason I. >> Marcus Felts I. Do I hear a motion to grant a wellhead protection district special permit?
>> Dave Spoo. >> Diane Jespa second. >> Jason Brenwell. >> I roll vote. >> Jessica Thornton. I >> D. Da. I >> Jason. Marcus Fel. >> I love the enthusiasm. Yeah.
>> Do I hear a motion to grant a storm water management special permit for this application? >> Dina. >> They just second. >> Roll call vote. Just before an eye. >> Dina. I. Dian I >> Jason I >> Marcus Phelps I >> do I hear a motion to approve this
decision as written >> Dian second call vote Jessica Borton I >> D I >> Dian I >> Jason Rald I >> Marcus Phelps I >> excellent thank you
>> thank you Mr. for. >> Yes. And Mike, um, I will bring this down to the the town clerk's office for you to sign. >> Okay. >> Whatever available, it'll be there tomorrow. >> Okay. I appreciate the time, everyone. >> Well, take care.
>> Thank you all. [Music] Next on the agenda, we'll do 76 Tannery Road site plan approval for small scale ground mounted otocate system.
Everybody has some paperwork in their packet. Do we have somebody for the applicant online? >> Yes. Uh my name is Rob Decker. I'm from Sunron. >> Good evening, Mr. Decker.
>> How are you? >> Great. >> Great. >> Can you tell us a little bit project at hand? >> Yes. So, we're doing a the proposal is a site plan review for uh a ground mount uh with 20 panels uh situated out uh
behind the property at 76 Tenery. It's approximately uh 20 20 ft uh from the property line uh to the neighbor and then uh it's located in the most optimal area for the
property for solar. Um, what else would you need to know? >> Um, Mr. Planner is 20 ft from the property line. Does that fall in line with our assessment? Is that something we need to wave?
[Music] Do a quick there. So, 20 ft from the lot line. Is there any screening for folks? >> Yeah, they're going to be doing a um a fence around the array, a 10-ft fence. >> We've done a few of these and I've never
had an application come before us with such a high fence before. So, I'm curious, how far of a distance around the panels um is the fence and does that allow for enough sun to reach the panels?
>> Yes, certainly. Um the the sun will reach the panels. Uh it won't affect the it won't obstruct the solar. >> Okay. Do you know approximately how many feet away from the array the fence is
supposed to be? I believe it's about um it looks to be about 10 ft approximately away. >> All right. >> Are the p uh panels movable? >> They're uh there's uh they stand still.
Uh they're stationary. They're black on black. Any board member questions? >> What uh type of fence is this? A chain link or it's a solid type of fence?
>> Um that's a good question. Um all I know is that that they're doing a fence of some sort. I would assume it's going to be a vinyl fence, so um you can't see through it of some sort. It could be a mesh or possibly, you know, vinyl. I would say could be wood,
you know, but they plan on doing 10 feet 10 feet high. >> Yeah. Solid. >> Solid, you know. >> Yeah. [Music] >> Stable, you know. >> Yep. >> Right.
So for the divine standards that we have in our chapter 185, it requires for dimensional and density requirements that all construction of small scale and large scale systems shall comply with yard space and height
requirements of the zoning district in which the system is located. Um unless a more restrictive requirement is contained in this bylaw. In cases where the parcel is in a residential zone or buts agricultural residential zones, parkland or conservation land, the
setback should be a minimum of 150 ft unless waved by the planning board. So that is something that the board would have to consider. We're probably going to pull that up.
Can we do a a GIS pull up of that? >> Yeah, sure. >> I could share my screen. I got it pulled up. Sure. Go for it. >> See if it works. I got three screens here. saying it's too close. This is the
property. >> Yeah, I can't get it to work. I tried. >> No problem. All right, I'll show >> you. It's 205 here. >> This is Dary. So, it's 205 from this property. to the
>> Well, it looks like it's 20. But we need to see what's over here. >> So, the blue structure in the field there to the right of your cursor. >> Yeah. >> To the right there. Uh it's approximately 25 ft uh to the back of
that property where the ground mount's going. So further to >> to towards uh towards the back more to to the right. Yeah. Right there.
>> Right around there. And to the indent down, you know, right around there. Yep. And it's from from the uh >> from where it's mowed it it you know it
shows it's like 50 feet from where the different grasses you know but it says 20 feet on my on the plan set and then 25 feet away from the pool. >> So I have a question. Yes, please. Um my question is I guess if you're if you're
looking at because there's a 100 feet that has to happen there and you're looking at 20 feet on 25 ft on that side, could you put it on the other side of the property, the back part of the property? >> Well, then you got a lot more shading uh
to to contend with also and it's a a lot longer of a uh a trench to to get it to the home as well, but you got a lot of shading. So, it's not that optimal for the amount of panels.
>> And the way I'm reading this, you're just fencing in the >> panels themselves, correct? >> Right. The whole the whole structure, >> right? Territory. >> What are your thoughts, Mr. Spina? I'm thinking it's a appears to be a pretty large yacht lot. There's a lot of room
there to I think move it to a more optimally and conforming location. Maybe not fully conforming, but definitely more conforming. >> Yeah. >> You know, instead of it being closer to the lower property line, you know, below
that blue structure, it should be on the upper part, you know. >> Well, that's where the leech the septic leech field is. Oh, >> on the other side of that though. >> Oh, to the up above your cursor. You're saying >> on the other Yeah, on the other side of
the uh the septic. >> I can't point to it. >> Right. So, if you uh move the cursor up like a couple inches >> right there, >> kind of in that area, then there's a lot more shading from from the woods. And >> what about on the left?
>> Yeah. Yeah, that's right close to the where all the shading is, you know, where those trees are pretty tall. >> And what is that blue thing? >> That's a pool. >> That's the pool.
Um, >> so in the past we have provided waiverss for systems closer to neighboring property lines with a lot of screening provided.
This application seems to have that and that their willingness to put in a fence. However, it is still quite close to the property line and it's not like there's any natural streeting either. It's just going to be a
>> a fence box in the middle of what is currently a probably a nice open view from the neighboring parcel. Um, in the past, we've had applicants come in with a letter from the abuter,
um, stating that they've reviewed the application and are okay with the proposed fencing and with it being that close to their property line. Um that doesn't necessarily mean that in the future future property owners of that parcel will be happy with it but at least then we as a planning board have
done our due diligence before issuing a waiver especially one of such great distance in this case. It's not you know 100 ft versus 150 ft. It's 20 feet versus 150.
>> So if we were to keep it uh 50 feet away would that be sufficient? possibly. >> I mean, it certainly would be better. Um, but I think that, you know, having a
good neighbor letter to would be helpful, especially again considering the closeness, the lack of natural buffers that already exist. Like, you know, if there was already a few trees there bordering each property, then it
might be less of an invasive thing. Um, but also considering there's so much additional property within the parcel that, you know, a couple of trees cut down and a lessening of the 10-ft fence on one side to allow more sun coming in
from that section might be better than just building a box around this unit 20 feet away from the above. >> Yeah, self is down in this image, right? I want to say that all the time, but yes, it's south, right?
>> I'm sorry. >> In this in this image, we have it rotated such that south is basically down. >> Yeah, that's correct. So, >> most of those trees up there are in the northeastern part of >> that's blocking morning. >> Just a little bit of morning sun though.
>> So, if we were to move it where the cursor is to that area and kept it uh north of the pool, would that be sufficient? is like the curs of that light green. >> Oh, it's the little hand. >> Oh, the hand.
>> Yeah, right there. >> You know that area there, you know, north of the pool. >> Yeah, I think. And that would bring it closer to 100 ft, right? >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Somewhere in there. >> Yeah.
>> How close is that to the septic? say that's approximately uh you know I think that's probably far enough away from there you know they just got to go around around it for their conduit run you know >> okay
>> you know yeah so you know that's 100 feet right there you know probably have to move it a little bit further north away from the pool maybe you know just probably more >> that brings it closer to 115 feet you know and then you're asking the board
just to wave 35 ft and it's in the middle of the property and you're providing proper screening, right? >> And there's already um you know additional item on the the property of a pool, you know, in between that and the property owners to the south. I think that would um get a much more
enthusiastic yes from the board. >> Yes. >> Okay. Um that sounds good. So are we talking, you know, your cursor moved up quite uh quite a bit. So, you're talking uh a 35- ft waiver or um I was looking to see if we could situate it a little
north, you know, east of the pool, you know, in that general area. A little bit probably about and a little left right about there, you know. Just about over a hundred, I guess it would be, you know.
>> Yeah. You know, we can keep it 125 if that, you know, that >> Yeah, >> that helps. Any, you know, >> if you talk to the property owner, Miss Lamaro,
and explain the situation and kind of take a look at the design that you have to work with with the leechfield and put it as far north as feasibly possible. >> That would be that sounds like the plan. We'll talk to the owner and, you know, discuss it with her and them and uh
we'll go from there on that, you know, once if if we're approved here and uh we'll keep it as far north as possible there with the leechfield going on. >> Awesome. Great. Um we appreciate it. We our next meeting is the 7th. So if
you're able to speak with her and get it turned around, we'll be happy to keep you on. >> Are you able to to make a decision uh based on uh us doing that? >> No, we prefer to have the site plan in in front of us when we go and approve
it. >> Okay. All right. So that's what when do you when's your next meeting? I'm sorry. >> The seventh. >> Okay. Excellent. Thank you so much. You guys have a good evening. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. Have a good one.
>> Thanks. >> Next on the agenda, we have the signage permit application review for 497 College Highway. this new angle. There's more than one even. >> It's my understanding, Mr. Planner, that we do not have the site plan
modification review for us this evening. >> No. So, if you do have someone online, the only thing we would be discussing would be the signage today. >> All right. Do you have somebody online for 497 College Highway?
All right. Then do we have we have the sign permit application in hand to review. Sorry information for you guys. One moment we'll clean it up. Hello. Can you hear me? >> Hello?
>> Yes. >> Yes. Mr. Carlin, can you hear us? >> Yes. I don't know how to work these Zoom meetings. I'm sorry. >> Well, we're all learning, right? We're all >> We're not doing too good ourselves over here. We've been at this a lot longer.
>> Name and address for the record, please. >> Uh Jim Carlin from A Signs in Springfield, Mass. >> Thank you, Jim. >> So, I'm here to propose some new signings for the uh remodel of the Dunkin Donuts.
>> Right. >> Um on the front elevation, they want to put some new Dunkin letters. Um that will be 21.54 square ft.
Um the existing signage that is there is about 22.22 square ft. So it's a little bit smaller. And then on the right elevation they want to do the uh Southwick runs on Duncan
which is a new sign for that building. And it's about if you round up it's about 15 square feet. And then >> also >> I'm sorry. So of the two walls is 15 and what on the front?
>> Uh 22 21.54 and 14.49. >> Okay. >> And then they want to reface the existing pylon which would stay the same square footage. I believe is 36 square ft.
>> Mr. Planner, does the um square footage meet the requirements for us? >> That I'm not 100% sure. I'll check. Um I refer to Mr. folks.
>> I'm a little rusty on this. I haven't uh looked at I'm just wondering >> what square footage you currently have. >> Sorry to keep you on the spot. >> Mr. Spina has got the book. I vice chair got it well in hand. >> Where are we?
>> We're in a BR zone. Very good. >> Yes. Yeah. Appears to be might be just beat. >> Yeah. Says business owns fronting college highway. >> Yeah. >> One freestanding sign. Two addition
signs. >> Some of the wall roof awning canopy signs 125 square feet or 10% of the area of the facade whichever is less. >> Say they're well. >> Yeah. then and then freestanding sign is a
maximum of 50 square feet. >> Yeah, we're well under >> and the existing is 36. >> Y >> All right. >> Okay. >> And then Yeah. So, we're adding a little bit on the what would be the north facing >> Yeah. >> wall, but it's we're also losing some >> Yeah.
>> from the other. >> All right. Are there any uh questions from board members? Nope. Any questions or comments from the public? Hearing none, do I hear a motion for a
positive recommendation for the signage permit application review for one poll, excuse me, for the refacing of the standing sign and the two wall signs. >> Dina still moved. >> Dian second. >> We'll call vote just the floor and I >> Dina I.
>> Diane Jessa I. >> Jason I. >> Marcus Phelps I. >> Wonderful. Nice. Well, thank you, Mr. Carlin. >> Thank you guys for your help. >> Have a good evening. >> You too. >> Thank you.
>> Next on the agenda is the decision for 681 College Highway, the proposed marijuana retail establishment. Oh, you want to come up? >> Sure. How's it going everyone? Good. Well,
thank you. Amazing address for the record. >> Brian flag 31 Carol Drive. Bless >> board members were sent. This decision the review is
standard special permitting language and matches For the most part, the one that we issued earlier this year for a similar project details of course have been updated for
this particular applicant. We may need to remove the language um referring to this as a medical marijuana treatment center just because you don't have that provisional license
in hand. And so we can't issue a decision for a special permit if you don't have that process in hand. When you get it, it would come back. It would be a modification to the special permit to okay add that Um so we will update that language within
the decision in front of us. Board members will note that we included in the terms and conditions, particularly number eight, which lists that the applicant will
utilize planters on the non-usable spaces within the parking lot as a means of democation between the two commercial buildings located at 681 and 691 College highway. Additionally means that demarcation shall include the installation of signage indicating which
spaces shall be utilized for this use. Um myself and Mr. Allen met with the applicant on site a couple of days after our last meeting. I approached from the north. I approached from the south. And
I think the personally that the alignment of the buildings and how they are facing makes it pretty obvious to most people pulling in where to go. Um, however, that uh space on the ground is already not usable space and the
applicant is willing to put those planters with some natural plantings in it to provide a vertical kind of line as well as the one that's there on the ground. this um is doable without him having to get permission from his land
owner and it doesn't take away from the usable space and parking um available to any uh future renter or owner of six men. >> Do board members have any other questions, comments, concerns, edits
to the incision in front of us? Great. >> Then with all that in mind, do I hear a motion to the grant for the special permit and site plan approval for 681 tried? >> Dave Spina moved. >> Dian just second.
>> Roll call vote. Jessica Borman. I >> Dave I. >> Dian I. >> Jason Warald. I >> Marcus Phelps I. Then next, do I hear a motion to approve this decision as written? >> Dave Spina. So moved.
>> Diane Jes. Roll call vote. Jessica Thor and I. >> Dave Spina. I >> Diane Jessa. I >> Jal. Nay. >> Marcus Phelps. I >> as a special permit. We need a super majority on the decision and four out of five. So
>> beautiful. >> There you go. >> Thank you. >> Register that. >> Yeah. Chinese work. So, uh, pick it up tomorrow or you can sign. Pick it up tonight. >> Awesome. Thank you guys. Appreciate it. >> Enjoy.
>> You, too. >> All right. Mr. Planner, were there any uh late submitt ANRS? >> No, no ANRS. >> All right. >> Are there any planning board or staff member comments?
I emailed after the last meeting our collective priorities for our support actions and our lead actions for both the planning board and the beautifification the as yet to be created beautififications commission.
[Laughter] Um, and so on those each one of those sheets, it had each of our those who voted individual rankings >> and the spreadsheet actually calculated a ranking based on those kind of average. I went through and kind of
looked myself at, you know, was there any major discrepancies where somebody voted for, you know, one, for example, thought it was a number one priority and two other people thought it was like a number 10 priority or or opposite or where it was just a wide scattering. Um,
at least from my own perspective, there were a few of those that I saw. Um, everyone where I was the outlier, I was fine with what the ultimate >> priority ranking was. I was okay with that, right? >> Um, I don't know if anybody else had the opportunity to do the same. If anybody else had comments or problems with the
>> prioritizations as listed. No. >> No. >> Good. Yeah. >> All right. >> I will report back to the EMPIC that we are good with the calculated priorities. I expect the next charge will be for us to start actually putting forth and
committing to plans for implementation. >> Well, like they actually want us to do something. >> Honestly, that's part of the implementation. idea. That is something >> technicality. >> All right. >> All right. That's good. >> Well, um then I have nothing any
>> I I'd just like to thank Allan for or Alvin for sending out >> the uh decisions ahead of time. >> Yes. For a look. >> That was very helpful. >> Yes. Thanks. >> Thank you. >> Thanks. Thanks for things to move
faster. I'm glad everybody was comfortable reviewing it and happy with it and I love that process and we will deem to do that moving forward. With all that in mind, do I hear a motion to close meeting? >> Dina so moved.
>> I just second. >> All in favor say I. >> I. >> Good night everybody.