uh evening meeting of the town of sou planning board started a Tuesday February 25th we are meeting here in person and also hybrid on Zoom we will be recording this meeting and we'll post it in a couple of days online on the town website if you're are recording as
well that is fine you just need to let us know anybody in the audience are online being none first thing on agenda Town planner report thank you Mrs shair just a couple of uh items to share with the planning board
um I'll touch upon this in slightly greater detail uh when the public hearing for the accessor dwelling unit bylaw comes in um but uh while examining how that would mesh into our bylaw I came up with a small adjustment that I
think we'd like to consider under the site plan review section um we'll talk about great greater detail shortly um I'll mention it in passing today and I think that would be
sufficient um since it's related to that ongoing public hearing for us to uh rather for me to prepare um a letter to the select board on your behalf try to get that ball rolling so we can have a public Hearing in March um all right let's see I did
receive inquiry uh from the developer at uh Magnolia States that's a Hillside Road five lot subdivision I they were looking to renew um or extend their decision um I you had to circle back to them but that
one would have lapsed I think last uh I think it was just in December but the Perman extension act has breathed new life into that and other permits uh so it remains valid the developers over at The Greens East
we went through a couple lot plans the last meeting um the developers have reached out so that we can work through uh cost estimate process with DPW in preparation for lot releases I expect to be managing um at the next
meeting uh let's see for fun I have to admit that um my head's been so immersed in guess the sudden and dramatic change uh regarding the accessory uh dwelling units uh that there was another change
in the affordable housing that that just somehow went straight past me but sure enough was um active um when that passed in November uh you all may be very well aware of it but uh it came up just in
some reading this past week where uh the merger Doctrine has essentially been at least to some degree undone uh so where Lots held in common ownership um that are adjacent to each other are combined
for the purposes of zoning uh the affordable housing act essentially provided an opportunity where if the Lots conformed when they were created and I think if each one had 75 ft of Frontage 10,000 feet of area I say each however many might be reconsidered
right um then a single family home may be built on any one of those lots not to exceed I think 1,00 or 1850 uh square feet in the area uh I only mention this because well we do live around the col L we have a
lot of non-conforming lots out there uh and in my short time as a town planner there's a small handful of lots that um you know routinely come around people saying hey can I divide this whatever else uh the next time it comes around my answer is going to be maybe they'll have
to do some work with their attorneys uh we'll have to look at the um Lots carefully with the surveyor but that was an interesting uh change and that had somehow escaped my attention thought I just to share with everybody that brings to
707 that's it that's it all right well first we'll do public comment anybody in the audience here have a public comment on something that is not on the evening's agenda anybody online public
comment none okay then we will move on to 707 662a College Highway continued public hearing Mrs chair I have a letter from uh Jim Bole Premier Self Storage and Chris Chamberlain uh professional
engineer over The Berkshire Design Group Dear John G South planning board on behalf of Jim B Premier Self Storage LLC regarding the application for special for self storage facility at 662a College Highway F Design Group respect requested the application for the
special per withdrawn we all Prejudice thank you sincerely Jim and Chris um I did clarify with ver Design Group that their intention was to withdraw the concurrent storm water management permit
uh um with the expectation that they're retooling and we'll resubmit at some point in the future so they are indeed with drawing the storm water as well that is correct they understand that that might mean that waiver of an application fee that
we had on the table no I think it's I think we're just fine to continue extending the offer regarding the storm water permit application fee okay uh if only because we combine these into a single hearing uh and to the degree that
the special permit application fee is intended to cover a portion of the public uh notice um and the storm waterers intended to cover certain administrative hours in review I think it's okay to if you'll continue in the
future for this project to wave the storm water management permit application fee um but the special permit one will have to U be paid once more okay very good all right then do I hear a motion to dismiss the application
without prejudice da piso moved s second call vote Jessica th and I I I thank you you gentlemen want to come on up we will start [Music]
at hey guys the public hearing for 660 College Highway for special permit and sight plan approval for closed retail marijuana establishment gentleman name and address for the record please Michael Albert 438 College Highway I'm Jason Fury 104 Feeding Hills
Road evening ni where are we at Mr lner well since you asked me first I'll say everything in reverse order and you get some straight it up yep um these gentlemen in their group uh it was I
believe earlier this month they appeared before the CCC um for their provisional license hearing and that was granted um they were kind to provide us with a copy of a provisional license for our file um that was checkbox number one
check boox number two uh subsequent to the first um opportunity to discuss this at the public hearing a security plan was submitted um to the police chief um who
had personel at the department review that and they have uh returned um a statement that they have no comments or concerns at this time and we have not received any other comments or concerns from other Town departments that is correct gentlemen anything to add yeah
um we would like to address the the bond if we could could yeah Absol so we came prepared we we actually we called our attack our canas guy and as well as a lawyer we actually have a bond in place for it through the CCC application process yeah um so we didn't I didn't
know that at the time but I do now your email I was like wait I think I have so but it's through the CCC so if you look at the last page that's actually what the bond will cover there's a lot of language in it but this is the CCC regulation for the bond requirements Y and if you look at number one
destruction of Canabis goodness is the violation which is basically fored so um you probably are protected from you know like a dispensary going out from under for that reason this it's mostly product that's already prepackaged it's not like we're growing
in thousands of square feet of product I think like the nature of that Bond requested is really designed for people with grow facilities that you're going to be stuck with this massive amount of waste and that would be tens of thousands of dollars to distribute I have no idea what their license Bond would require through the CCC it might
be much higher than this this one just a $10,000 it's a per percentage of your application fee yes okay yeah the higher the grow facility the higher your accounts okay yeah so so I don't know all learn things seems like I'm learning
too so Y and and if anything were to arise too we we have that safe net of having the the Westfield retail store currently operating so if anything were to happen we would just do a um a marijuana product uh transfer manifest and just bring all the product to the Westfield store um and then disperse of
it accordingly so um it this is this is like an a you know gwiz scenario um that we don't see a rising ever no retail really is it it was mainly designed from our Consultants uh standpoint point it was mainly designed for these giant grow
facilities that you know what do you do when you have you know 50,000 plants that are in their midstage and you know you have to hire a team of people to go cut them all down and waste them and grind them in with coffee grounds and render it useless so um but they they couldn't not do that with the retail
stores as well they have to treat everybody fairly so um that's kind of how it was explained to us so um and we do have one in place in our Westfield location um it's a automatically renews every year for the $10,000 limit um so right now we have two bonds out one for South o and one for Westfield and that
was from November um the 12th of November so of 2024 so in November 12th of November 2025 it'll renew for another $110,000 Bond so just one to kind of so I don't know if you need just to supply you with a copy of the bond every year we can come up with a plan for that sure
what we got to do y okay the L so does that work for you guys in terms of the bond board members how do you feel about that for me dick how do you feel about that the bond
being held by the state CCC you okay with that I guess I have to be thank you okay thank you appreciate your input either way um all right did anybody else have any other questions on the board in
regards to this application it's pretty thorough are there any Town officials here in person or online that have a comment or question hearing none any public comment concern
question hearing none Mr Gard I assume that after this discussion we have nothing else holding right that's it uh those three items what a security plan a discussion about um a bond um and I've already forgotten
the third one I start I'm sorry license of course that's what we're waiting for um no our bylaw is written rather straightforward for this particular process and as an existing
site genuses anyways the it's straightforward by law and the site appears to have adequate capacity so I don't see any reason not to close
the public here would like to check in one more time with my board is anybody have any other questions or concerns they would like to address before we close the hearing none all right then I will hear a motion to closed the hearing for 660
College Highway Dave SP so moved c a second roll call vote Jessica and I Dave i s i very good so gentlemen what we will do we will follow our usual special permitting process where we will write
out a decision draft and have it available at our next meeting where all board members will review approve and then make their vote special Department sounds excellent I'll share the draft with your team as well beautiful and um just to touch on the police as well once
our security system is installed in the building um I've invited them to come um for a tour um and I think they're going to roll the the police department in uh in short format through the facility just because it's the first one in town um or hopefully first one in town um and
uh getting ahead of myself here um but so I I would I think it's important for us to we did that in Westfield as well had the detectives Bureau come through and kind of but there was already two operating in Westfield at that time so they were kind of bored with it but um the uh yeah like yeah whatever um so I
think it would be important to bring bring them through um as many as we can just if in case there wasn't even to happen um they knew right where our panel was how the uh U building works the place is going to be like Fort Knox so there's a lot of stuff to go over with those guys so I think it would be
uh it' be beneficial so in um the the chief uh seemed open to it so thank you absolutely thank you very much apprciate thanks so much almost all right next on the agenda
11:15 is the continued public hearing for the proposed accessory dwelling unit bylaw Mr shair I do have a couple of uh points I'd like to share under the planning board um I remember when
we this is when we opened this public hearing because we enabled that process early on waited until the right juncture to open it uh and I began reading my way through and I remember stumbling over a word or two if only because what I had in my head no longer match what was on
the paper um so to the point of accessory dwelling units being accessory structures and setbacks did I mention this at the last meeting yes I did okay that's all set good well did did we find
and land on I mean we all felt that we had to agree that it would be the less restrictive of it and that was the accessory use structure dimensional that's right want to make sure we're up to speed on that um so for review purposes it isn't from
front of uh Town Council at the moment I received word uh late last week that the municipal law review division of the AG's office is welcoming um draft by laws and ordinances from municipalities
um and they are offering courtesy review ahead of the meeting that would vote on it so once I get um attorney beg Lan's uh notes assuming nothing has too much gravity attached to I'm going to pass it on to the A's office just to sh up I
guess where we are uh although I saw a couple of items um appear today in my email from um professional uh um a serve there we go uh related to the uh draft regulation I don't think it's been
released just yet and the model if you will bylaw not the regulation from the um they're waiting to get all of our examples and we'll find them first of all that's the smartest room be right
many sounds like that's what's happening so let me touch upon uh quickly the site plan review element that I think we need to modify um so I bring this up as related to um our accessory dwelling unit bylaw um but this part here is what
I'd like to approach the select board with uh first sentence under site plan review 18537 no building permit shall be issued for any new structure except single family residents and accessory buildings agricultural buildings so on
and so forth without first submitting a plan so the fact that it identify single family homes and accessory buildings um as being exempt um uh from this particular section I think we need to add or slightly modify
that sentence here add something in that talks about the accessory dwelling units um being subject to this while other accessory structures uh such as uh sheds barns so this is where in site plan 18537 site plan review the very
first sentence no building permit shall be issued for any new structure except single family residents and accessory buildings without first submitting a plan of the proposed work to the planning board for S plan review and so I want to make sure that that
accessory building is no longer accepted from that requirement okay all right so then we would need to mention this to the select board as well as part of our let you know that we may be addressing
this at town meeting to make the adjustment that's correct yep uh the uh the track will follow is go ahead and advancing request to them so you can authorize that public hearing okay um so if I'm lucky I get to hold this um in the end of March we still have ample time to to figure this out like figure
out I'd try to frontload what I can here um what I share with the select board will be an explanation of this conflict further within our zoning bylaw um a suggested resolution and I'll let the pl Bo if you will work out the the bock
okay okay um the one thing I wanted to touch back on Is We I don't know that I saw the language afterwards that we included for special permitting procedure in the AC Zone let
me open it up I go following the meeting I if you will edited the document so that it would at least reflect our discussion we'll see if you agree [Music] in this particular
instance oh that's perect um so that second sentence is what I added to that use description and that satisfies right and looking at our chapter 185
today I did happen to come across a couple of permitted uses that land in the IR and the BR Zone and it basically reads allows any accessory use for an existing residents such as barns garages swimming
pools Etc shall permitted without a special permitting procedure so understanding that the state Adu bylaw is a by right only in zones where single family residents are allowed by
right in these zones though if we have pre-existing non-conforming and if we are allowing the potential pathway for residence in the a Zone to allow an
Adu do we want to extend that pathway Not Right But A pathway to apply for a special permit if there is a pre-existing residence in the BR or in zone can't immediately think of a reason
why not you know the the the immediate kickback is we don't want to make it any more yeah non-conform form in right however in light of the intent of the Adu byw and the
understanding that as a state and a locality we are short on housing units and if somebody comes forth with a plan that is appropriate for that particular parcel in the location and the time that of the planning board that they happen to come in front
of do we build it into it now to allow that special perit process to happen hearing no objection OB I take dick I'm okay you're okay with that yep we add to that sentence then I think
we can let me or another sentence that says in a let's let's let's go with your vision first all right uh I only want to mention as we go into we do have a opportunity I don't know how much of an
escape hatch this is because uh to be blunt I was waiting for attorney beglane um to try to bat this one around because sometimes I learn best with an example in front of me right so under Section F we say if an Adu is proposed for pre-existing non-conforming primary
residents then the requirements of our nonconforming um lot structures and uses by law um shall apply provided that no special permit consider the Adu use or impose conditions on such use so to
be direct the last Clause of that sentence is where I'm I'm a little uh jammed up given that our non-conforming Lots uses inst structures bylaw um offers special permit opportunities to intensify and so on so
forth um so I think perhaps what you're suggesting is necessary I'm not sure if that's if what we have under Section F there I just think because if we call out the AC Zone as a Zone you know that it's
not the first thing you when you think pre-existing nonconformity maybe the lot is there's not enough Frontage right or something like that so you know I think that kind of covers that general area but if we're going to call out a Zone because the nature of the single family
home isn't allowed by right because that's how this is built out from the state is based on as a single family residence by right yep y we are adding to that and saying okay
well there's a pathway forward for pre-existing nonconforming structure but also in specific there is a pathway forward via special permit in these particular zones as our bylaw already is written to allow them in that purpose
but in this other section of our ir and BR zoning we specifically say they can do it without special procedure process so I feel like we have to call it out here that yes you can do it but yes you do need to have a special permit in
place despite what you might get from A5 in the IR Zone that says any accessory use kind of almost what you're saying with the site plan like I don't know if we want to touch those to I don't want to I don't want to
let's just cover it in this um I'm okay yeah so if we can toggle that in there do you wish to you and B Lane can oh it
around just put them a give me one second um not the regular I or B because they're not allow to bear with me um we're talk about the existing residences within those districts are there single families in
there because it specifically calls out none it's IR zones and BR zones are I don't if you want to drive me for a second please maybe I got a little spun around had one idea in my head and I was looking for earlier today so
that's why my head is a little crossed but that's okay at the special permit condition we want to be able to extend to to those other properties that already have a residence single family residence um in in a district so not conforming to the
those District requirements is that correct yes oh okay yeah I just because in our zoning the I Zone and the B Zone don't have the permitted uses A5 allow any so so
that's where my head left we'll double check it I will work with attorney beglan to likely merge those two highlight items together figure out a scenario that I think is adequate okay how many scals do I have I only
have not a lot Public hearing are there any um comments questions from the public or any Town officials online or in person hearing none right do we have an agenda for this
meeting oh U to be honest since I made a mistake um no on the one public W schedule then it's wide open yeah so I guess we'll put this on for
710 sounds great and that was March 11 yes do I hear a motion to continue the proposed accessor dwelling unit bylaw public hearing to 7:10 p.m. on March 11th Dave spis moved C second roll call
a vote just th and I I I thank second cat my notes here yep Randy bring ad for this I left the folder behind I might read that okay well then have
the privilege I'm extending this evening then I'll share the appication okay okay notice is hereby given in accordance with provision of Mass General Law chapter 48 section 11 that the planning board and tree Warden will hold a hybrid public hearing on Tuesday
February 25th 2025 at 7:20 p.m. via zoom and in the lenus hearing room Town Hall 454 Highway South Massachusetts for request from the south tree warden for written consent and approval to remove multiple trees on CL Anderson Road which
is a designated Scenic Road Zoom information is provided the applicant proposes to remove multiple public shade trees along clerson Road for drainage improvements The Proposal is in accordance with Mass General Law chapter
40 section 15 C and chapter 87 Section 3 a copy of The Proposal may be inspected by Conta the town planner any person interested or wishing to be heard on the application should appear at the time and maners designated Jessica thoron chairperson sou planning board and R Brown tree tree Warden
excuse me let me just share the application all right what are we doing today good uh so Randy Brown DPW director in to tree warden so we have I know was I was here maybe a month or so ago doing a similar tree hearing uh we weren't quite ready for this hearing at
the time but uh we are looking to remove 27 shade trees on Claus Anderson Road uh they are across from number 10 Claus Anderson Road we are planning some drainage modifications in this area which would include infiltrating storm water runoff
from the road along the edge of the road and then a basically a Swale to direct any overflow towards a nearby Brook um so with these trees are within that area we're looking to provide the infiltration um there's a list in the
application uh most of them are they're almost all maples ranging in size from 3 inches to 24 inch in diameter I do have some pictures here um I know you can't see them on Zoom but if you want to take a look some pictures or I you drove by say you see the yellow tag and trees uh
there are some other trees that we're also taking that in the same area with this for the same purpose as as these trees uh but they are some of them are dead or diseased um there are some that are sumx I don't qualify as a shade tree uh but just for um Serv for being open
that there are other trees that don't qualify qualify for this hearing that we are also taking with the project so uh like said um we uh um I'm sure what else I can when are we hoping for the drainage work to be completed uh soon so soon soon I would
say within a couple weeks no later than that even maybe even this week if we got as the one we're waiting on for the other no no no this one's going to be more expl correct yes any questions from board
members take good yeah all right any questions from public officials or public comments being and hearing none all right do I hear a motion to close the public hearing for the public
shade tree removal that Anderson ro da moved singer second vote just and I iing I do I hear a motion to approve the tree removals as proposed on CLA Anderson D
moved singer second roll call vote just and I D singer I I good and you I think I vote to rainy Ron I I
wasit all right very good so we will prepare a decision and vote on it much appreciated much next up we have the discussion for the planning Board review and reevaluation of subdivision infrastructure security for Noble Ste
Crossing Jesse you want to come up yes is mar Ste evening how you doing um so I I just got an update um I met actually met with Terry Reynolds this weekend and
finalized some stuff with him and he gave me the contact drawing from cont contact unit that we're going to be using for the C Crossing and uh an
emplo a preliminary plan that I'm going to give to you guys and just an email confirming that he said he's going to have a plan finalized in a couple weeks and um he also called um Randy and John and
confirmed that as well and um I know the weather hasn't been cooperating with us as far as getting worked on there this winter but um we're hopeful that like in the next week or two things the snow melts and we can start
work back up on the water quality base and get that wrapped up and then finish up the sidewalks as as soon as it gets warm enough to or concrete again So the plan is done but it hasn't yet been submitted it hasn't been submitted yet
he's finalizing some stuff on it so once it's I'm staying on top of it so as soon as I have't answer I would say I would Circle back with you guys in like two
weeks and hopefully it should be completed and in the submittal process by then Mr G to add uh I don't think so um
I appreciate um both your Consultants um and you've keeping us up to speed um with at DPW and here with the planning board um when that uh submitt uh takes place I think it's important that uh you should
get confirmation from DP essentially because they're gonna start a clock at that point in time if you could share that notification with this and I understand I think March 11th might be a little bit um tight if it's in by then fantastic um but based on what Terry was
sharing with us me is going to happen between our next two meetings land but I think it's important to Monument that Milestone I'm being optimistic that's okay you over I'll try to work it out in the middle
um I think it's meaningful um to have this uh well if we think back to April this was an unforeseen task um I do see this as a meaningful uh element
of progress uh for the subcision that was the goal last April was to try that steady progress so uh even this administrative step is design step um I think it carries some some weight any comments good questions
concerns thoughts no all right um I glad to hear that the plan is done it was starting to take a little bit too much time we' been waiting um on it since I think at least October was
looking at some other meeting minutes and that had been mentioned already back then and um understanding that that is the big big ticket item that yeah would cost the town some cor bucks if we had to complete it on our own so I'm happy
to hear that that's done um I would advise that if it's not submitted before April May that we're going to start having more hard discussions about numbers again um so that we're not waiting on that and
leaving us agree vulnerable I agree so then I would we're going to put you on for a discussion on the 11th okay if we know for certain it isn't done you can reach out to Johan and Randy and let them know where that
is exactly and I think if there's no new news to add have to spend Tuesday with us and also we're GNA um start up our bi-weekly meetings again excent once the weather breaks a a bit
here like if we start to work out there uh in the next two weeks then we'll we'll take off the our bi-weekly meetings again where they'll be updated and we'll have you know progress meetings every two weeks great and week this week you guys
are marked but y the BR thank you very much thank you team business first Deion the confirmatory vote in decision for Shaker Farms Country Club excavation
renewal I have a document share want to bring that up I ask for confirmatory vote only because uh let's see that was the first meeting in January and a lot of things happened at that meeting and it kind of the board as a group kind of steam rolled right
through this one and Prov the went on um we have a slightly different makeup now that is reviewing the decision that comes out of that so I think it's well within um the realm of proper business uh to go to Every affirm that okay we're still in
support of this uh as now a grou of before and um assum you can get there where the decision we do the same thing there uh again this is a a renewal so there's no process spelled out in state law I think that gives us affords us a
little more a leeway just managing we confirm the board's position uh in this decision creative should have said all that after I open the document that's is um so because it's part of
that decision we do will do this first do I hear a motion to make a confirmatory vote to Grant the Shaker Farms Earth excavation special permit renewal Dave spaso moved
take cing a second we'll call vote Jessica Thor and I I singer I and Jess I wonderful you interrupted from my browsing here
unfortunately that is our job let's see okay this is chair this document that we'll see Flex minor edits and reorganization that you executed you may see some lingering
elements that sometimes uh fall out of tract it's I'll give you that's give you the space to be wrong thanks but so so here we are all right just because in my head I think
Hudson Drive is um Wellhead is this not in it is um I was just curious because it didn't include that section there so it's just you know and it's not addressed anywhere within the decision
originally but I found it interesting I've so that being the very subject of why I had to punt off public hearing I accidentally left it off public notice I'm I'm considering that here as well right so this is a renewal um right um of that decision which was
originally for both the Wellhead Protection District special permit um as they merg right the Earth excavation one [Music] expires that doesn't quite it doesn't but it wouldn't hurt to if we could throw it in here it doesn't it hurts
anything to make reference to it here okay nothing else uh moving forward it does draw attention to the fact that you're still in the Wellhead Protection District let's do that what number that again 22 I think it was
22 are you able to read along with with that or do you need it bigger I'm pretty good with it okay for a sand and gravel removal operation I just happened to cross that oh we can just move on to the meeting
potatoes this okay the two notes Here indicating the two separate votes that we're taken we gonna keep that there in the procedural history to make sure it's all good and koser
okay and then everything else from terms and conditions down go ahead if everybody's good e let us know when you're ready to scroll thck I'm ready
okay and keep it up with you when was the last time the building SP was out there uh back in December rather before that January meeting uh dick I spoke with the building inspector I took a trip out to the site in his study okay
thank you add the the district language go to yeah everybody good with the decision yeah all right then do I hear a motion to approve the decision as written Dave
moved second roll call vote Jessica thoron I Dave Spina i s do you need two votes one for the wallhead one for the excavation I this being a simplified renewal document I don't have a seate um
vote established for yeah I good catch okay that's right I mean it's you said we kind of have to leeway right yeah it was kind of a renewal and we we voted it and okay yeah
good when they modify it we'll make sure to do it all that's exact in two in a week when I rewrite the decision [Music] sure the next one
[Music] chair this uh draft decision retains your extract edits so that we can build off of what I distributed last week second I'm supposed to share that
correct here on the first page couple changes for procedural history but nothing [Music] substitute speak I will try to [Music]
bend agree on the Oxford tunel yes but everything we can that's you're not totally unreasonable it's not a typewriter not double spacing I have to [Laughter] disagree that's what we GNA
disag page two see we so for any before we're describing where those slips are exuse absolutely other than that most of the stuff is carried over in the prior decision we get carried over and carried
over and carried over yes and over should be over as for the criteria some minor modifications just related to call tense and what the focus
of this application is right yeah again nothing changes until much further down where you're at the decision I'm I'll just keep grou and everything think is pretty basic
there through one four until we get down to three we begin to reference yours or his restart updates so number three is that the stuff you named I no
yeah it's it's meant to refer to the fact that I I was I suggested to delete other things but I think um further discussion makes sense perhaps just retain him in a single document for a singular reference so I think we can to
eliminate number three I regret to tell the board that may we may have to tweak the language in the following two conditions okay how about this shall I find the former item number 14 no what is that so I'm guessing it's
not the same here just a moment number 14 formally referenced the decision to permit the use of up to 20 trans boat slips that's 20 boats slips for lease or
rent subject to any conditions of related permits or approvals including the chapter 91 license subject to the decision of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts during chapter 91 license proceeding these approv slips will be located on two docks on the southern side of the
property away from the covert the right of switch located the southermost dock which be reflected on the final site plane give me one moment maybe I just need to copy that first sentence friends now know that the chapter 91 license uh
provided no distinction between uh the use of those SS so I think um there be for a second I'm just going to take that part right there all TR say decision per those
20 transion and 20 least slips let me this deletion e how does that read for you he just so let that right it's not gonna happen
now yep y um okay did that make sense for you guys yeah in a similar fashion for the next uh condition where we talk and reflect upon the discussion about coming back to
the planing board uh just to ensure that the site is operating ad in an adequate fashion We Trust he'll come back in good de or is there a process to remind him and remind us for the past two years I honestly
forget if it's been three times you came up as a courtesy Ken's been good to reach out to me um in September and October and schedule that meeting okay now uh with number six seven and eight
I'm just going to temporarily get them out of the way so that we can fold back in remaining conditions I'll put add those two on at the end I think that's where the custom is seeing them oh at the end yes yes them
this assertion already been obtained M uh let's maintain and obtain so long as the action has happened we can call plan things
but we should do that 15 that's the one I just borrowed Andi and we need a revise site plan since we're working with the same one that's on fire
and he's already got a CT ofy yes okay so there we have the laps two years now he hasn't begun which isly he [Music] has on me to rest is
just justess could do anything that's sounds great by me so I think that brings us to [Music] our does anybody have any questions that we' found through it
right did we SP down to the turns there's more oh yes for the everybody's still okay with it yeah all right then do I hear a motion to Grant a modification for the special permit in site plan for 141 Conan Road
da SP so moved take C second we call vote justor and I SP i s i i okay do I hear a motion to Grant a modified Wellhead Protection District special permit for 141 kont Road Dave so
mov second roll call votee Jessica for and I I or I and do I hear a motion to approve the decision as written Dave Fina so moved go a second all call vote Jess th and i d i i
j i very good that will be filed with the town clerk that time tomorrow yes uh so I'll get that
file sound cler I'll email you you little notification what's that you email me copy yep uh and don't forget to come in and sign uh that document at some point with the town cler is their copy and the
one you may beat me to it no it won't be until afterno I keep funny hours employee I keep funing I'll I'll let you know when it's submitted okay thank you Ken thank you
Ken thank you thank you thank you all right great good night you all right next on the agenda is planning board or staff member comments have anything else first Mr
planner I have nothing further to offer for the anybody the master plan implementation committee will be meeting again tomorrow night okay um I believe we've there might be one of us I think
who has not yet submitted all of their prioritizations for did it I did it I like on the hard copy expecting to BR here today then he sent me a reminder saying just scan it okay so I did go so I think we're all and were you able to
afford dick's hard copy over to Mr CH I'll make sure that he has it okay very good I did not Chase on who uh scan folder it's in appreciate everyone getting all right um I'll share with the board that I attended the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission meeting on the 13th and um we
reviewed the coming year's draft budget um and unfortunately it is in fact reflecting an anticipated 11.7% loss of Revenue due to the anticipated loss of federal funding um but they are over the past couple years have kept us very uh close
to Prior budget years and they worked the numbers and were able to uh make a couple adjustments so hopefully we won't lose too much in that sector also the citizen planner training collaborative annual conference is on Saturday March 15th I will be attending
and would encourage anybody who is maybe considering joining the board to think about attending as well it was a good conference conference and each year it's something a little different and they tailor it to what's kind of coming down the planning pipeline so it's a good
time um next we have our meeting minutes to approve you've seen the joint meeting minutes for October 21st now for a couple weeks I'm assuming everybody who was there is good with
that all right do I hear motion to approve the joint meeting minutes of October 21st Dave SPO moved Justice all right roll call vote be Jessica Thor and I da I well done very good all right now we
have meeting minutes for October 29th everybody was emailed them wasn't any real substantive changes no minor just minor changes made but everybody has it in front of them do I hear a motion to approve the October 29th planning board meeting minutes Dave
pis so move take s a second roll call vote Jessica th and I I I you were abent all right and the same goes for the November 12th meeting minutes do I hear a motion to approve
the planning board meeting minutes for November 12th Dave SP so moved take C second we'll call vote J the Thor and I Dave Spa I I just and anything else Mr John you John
do you get my certification for that um conflict of interest thing I did thank you very much I did I did mind to I I just send you the whatever did whatever oh it's awful it's an awful Cho
all right well hearing nothing else do I hear a motion to close the hearing da pis moved second second right everybody together hi nice good night everyone thanks
everybody