Okay, thank you. Okay, I apologize for the delay. Thank you everyone. Welcome to the Township of Springfield Board of Adjustment meeting for June 17, 2025. The time is 6:13. Uh, adequate notice of this meeting was given in accordance with Sunshine Law. Notice was published
on January 2nd in the local source, one of the official newspapers for the township of Springfield for the year 2024 and 2025 and post in the annex building on January 2nd, 2025. Can we please stand to salute the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One
nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. May we please have the roll call. Mr. Steven Hawkstein here. Mr. Michael Wex. Mr. Steven Fersenbound present. Miss
Marla Naparano here. Mr. Peter Shewitz here. Miss Ana God Dodson. Mr. Randy Pearlman here. Vice Chair Mark Cunningham here. And Chairwoman Jodie Cohen here. Excellent. Uh first order of business is resolutions to memorialize.
The first resolution on the agenda is application 2025-5 for 250 Miltown Road, block 20001, lot 16. Has every member of the board had an opportunity to review the resolution and any questions or comments? If there are none, is there a motion to
approve? I'll move. I'll second. Mr. Hawkstein, yes. Mr. Fersenbound, yes. Miss Napano, yes. Mr. Shewitz, yes. Mr. Pearlman, yes. Vice Chair Cunningham, yes. And Chair Cohen, yes. Motion passes. Second application on for
memorialization is application 2025-854 country club lane block 1807 lot 7. Has every member had an opportunity to review the resolution? Are there any questions or comments? If there are none, is there a motion to approve?
I'll move. I'll second. Mr. Fersenbound. Uh yes. Mr. Sheitz. Yes. Mr. Hawkstein. Yes. Miss Napirano. Uh, Mr. Pearlman, yes. Vice Chair Cunningham, yes. And Chair Cohen, yes.
And the third and final resolution on for memorialization is application 2022-23 amendment for 8995 and 109 Victory Road, block 301, lots 5 and 7. This was an amendment to the 2023 site plan
approval. Uh, has every member had an opportunity to review? Are there any questions or comments? If there are none, do we have a motion to approve? I'll move the motion. All right. All at once. Second.
I'll second my Mr. Hawkstein. Yes. Uh, Chair Cohen. Yes. Mr. Fersenbound. Yes. Miss Neparano. Mr. Sheitz. Yes. Mr. Pearlman. Yes. And Vice Chair Cunningham? Yes. Motion passes. Excellent. We're going to
move on to the applications this evening and the first application that we're going to call is an application that's a continuation from our May meeting and that's application 2025-9. This is for 4 Hampshire Court block 3201 lot 18 council.
Nice to see you again. I'm in a suit this time. How are you? How are you? Uh for the record, I'm sorry. Sure. I don't know what exhibit or we do application A1.
Uh yeah, did we have any did we have any exhibits from the previous hearing? A1 like application. No. Okay. Um well, I guess we could do that. Why don't we do that anyway for double A for the
second meeting and we'll just call it that. A A1. Perfect. GI application of a dozen or so emails and conversations between the applicants engineer and the township engineer
questions about the calculations two tanks in the rear yard which capture all but I believe the maxow The second exhibit is in response to some of the neighbors concerns about foliage
and trees that we planted to absorb the water. Excuse me. Can you speak into the mic, please? Oh, I thought I spoke loud enough. Sorry about that. Yes. And just let's slow down for a second. So, the first exhibit we're going to call AA1, correct? Is the drainage plan. Correct.
That is correct. So, that's what we will call that. And then the second exhibit which we are going to call AA2 is this full size sheet which is shows us landscaping. Is that correct? That is
correct. Okay. So we're going to call that the landscaping the applicant's landscaping plan proposed landscaping plan. Great. Okay. And this this is done by the contractor. That is correct. Okay. So this is this is done by the contractor. This is the engineer
on Lind. Correct. Okay, great. All right, proceed. So, the landscape design was done in response to some of the neighbors concerns and the board's concern about plants that would absorb water. I will comment that my client has
a video of what the backyard looks like after the several days of rain. And I do believe there was a discussion based upon extreme rain. I wouldn't say what we had recently was extreme rain, but the there's no standing water in the backyard. However, they have plans to place seven trees along the border of
the neighbor that was here, the woman that was here. I forget her name, but she's the neighbor to the right rear to create foliage in that area. And they have seven trees that are uh arboride trees that are called green giants. I have photographs of them along the left
side of the rear yard where the two tanks will be. If you'll notice at the drainage diagram, there's two tanks to accumul to take care of any surface runoff or water accumulation. And there are 2,000gallon tanks. And
there's going to be a swale or berm created that all the water will run from the right side rear of the property to the left side rear of the property where the two tanks are. This is in addition to the tank that's in the front of the yard. So in total, there's going to be
three tanks on the property. to handle extreme weather surface runoff. And just refresh my recollection, this is three new tanks. The the one in the front yard did not exist. Correct. So one in the front yard did not exist. However, most of the
concerns of the neighbors and the board were of the rear yard. That's why since the last board meeting, the concentration and the effort was made to accommodate the water in the rear yard. I understand there's a unique anomaly that happens at this neighborhood where all the neighbors run towards the back
of the yard. So, it's not only my client, but it's accumulation of neighbors. So, what we did was we turned our concentration to the rear yard. There are two $1,000 tanks, which was done in conjunction with multiple conversation with Mr. Michael Disco and the engineer that was hired by my
client. So, there two 1,000 tanks appear on the left side of the property rear with a swale that goes from the right side of the property where all the foliage is. And I believe there's one giant tree which the name escapes me. I know it's on the plan, a cypress tree which will be planted
near the pool in the middle to accumulate to accumulate uh more water and more surface runoff. We believe this is more than enough but it brings the over it brings the overage down to the lot requirement of 22 and a half%. Okay, let's do this first. Since the applicant
will speak, why don't we swear her in? Um, let's do that. Katiana Morales. Yes. All right. Great. So, is there anything
that you would like to add to this? Is your engineer here? No. Okay. So, it's just you two. All right. Um, is there anything that you want to add before I open this to questions? I think he stated everything that we pretty much did. We just followed what
was requested from the board, said that to our engineer. Our engineer like he mentioned, spoke to Mike Disco and we were in compliance with what the county and the state also um require for how much um I believe the seepage tank, how
much it holds. And then that's pretty much it. I mean, besides that, there's going to be also stone around the tank once those are installed and that's pretty much it. Okay. Thank you. All right. So, members of the board, I'm
going to open it to questions for the applicant for you. Mhm. Um, if these tanks overflow, is the overflow directed to the empty property in the back so it doesn't go on the neighbors? So, the there's a an entire drain uh
drainage and area drains along the back property line. So, if the pit were to fill up, it would find the path of least resistance. It would probably come out of one of the area drains or out of the sea pitch pitch top if it was an open top and and it would go to the back, not to the It would follow the primary
drainage pattern, but again, they're designed for 8.7 inches of rain plus Governor Murphy's modifier of 35% above that calculating for year 2100 rain. So, we're we asked Mr. Cunningham said he'd like to see it back to the 22.5. They've
done all the overage. So, um, they're taking the roof area going to the front, taking other areas to the back. So, it's actually can can overflow. Yeah, sure. Certainly can. But it's way better than it was. Way better than it was. They're putting a um series of trees with the
area drains. All we asked was, you know, direct the water to the area drains rather than over. They've they've consented to that. They've done everything the board has asked of them. Mr. Disco, is there Have you seen a plan by the engineer?
Yes. And does it satisfy you uh in total? Yes. Thank you. Any other questions from the board? None. At this time, I'm going to open it up to the public.
This is for questions as to what was presented, not to speak on the application itself. Any questions for what has been presented? And is there any member of the public that wanted to take a look at
what is actually presented? Okay. Excellent. Anything that you would like to add at this time? Yes. I actually had a discussion with my client that it was one board member and one board member alone who said they want to remediate
back to the men. I had said suggested to my client that's just one board member and she said that was enough for her to remediate back to that level. So in my opinion my client wanted me to explain the application. Not that she didn't want to testify but she's literally done everything. I don't want to use the word capitulated because it sounds
condescending but she's literally done everything the neighbors asked. She's done everything the board has asked. and she worked closely with Michael Disco on every email with her engineer and she finally said, "John, just let's give them everything they want because they want to be able to enjoy the pool. They want the additional pavers. She's okay
with the additional foliage. They want to actually be good neighbors and they want to comply." And to your to your comment, I think the extreme weather that would be needed to fill two 1,000gallon tanks is almost like another storm Sandy or Ida where there's going to be water everywhere anyway. So absent
that event, I think she's done everything the board has asked and everything the community's asked. She just wants the application approved. Thank you. Okay, I'm going to open the application up to the public. Anyone member of the public wish to speak on this
application? None. Okay. members of the board deliberation. Um I think that where I originally felt that um there was too much impervious and not
enough accommodations to mitigate the runoff. Um, I believe that the applicant has worked with the municipality and the engineer um to get this uh to a point where um we can be happy with the
outcome and the neighbors will not be um impaired negatively by this. I don't think that I would see a detriment to this because of the amount of um drywalls that have been placed on the property and the volume that they could
hold. I also appreciate the landscape plan um and that you have um that you have proposed to put the arborvite and the cypress um towards the adjacent neighboring lot where they were concerned. So for that I would be in
favor of the application. Excellent. Mr. Cunningham. Yes. Mr. Hawkstein. Yes. Mr. Finenbound. Yes. Miss Napano. Yes. Mr. Sheit. Yes.
Mr. Pearlman. Yes. And Chair C. Yes. Thank you very much. Thank you. Nice meeting you. Yeah, great job. Uh, the resolution will be on for likely
the July meeting. Mhm. Thank you. Okay. The next application that I'm going to call is application 2025-11. This is 37 Henshaw Avenue, block 1305, lot 40. This is a request for a front yard setback variance for an addition on
the property. is the applicant here this evening. Good evening. How are you? Good. Yourself? Excellent. We're just going to give our council one second. No worries. And he's going to swear you in. Will you be the only one speaking tonight or do you intend on any other family member?
I'm assuming your family. [Laughter] Okay. Okay. So, we'll swear you both in. Please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth? Yes. Each of you, please state your name. One
of you spell your last name and give your home address. Matthew Studyer. S T O U D E M- A Y E R 37. Henchav. Michaela Studier. Thank you. Okay. Um, please tell us a little bit
about what you're looking to do and the reasons that you're asking for the relief. Um, so we did, um, file this and it was approved back in 2020 to do an extension on the house. We weren't allowed to mess with the footprint. So, the only way to
do it is to take the second floor up and build up. So, the reason being is we have two children. We only have two bedrooms and we want to put three bedrooms into the house and then also a functioning addict
storage. Okay, members of the board, any questions for the applicant? This is the same as the plan that was approved. Nothing has changed. The reason why you request the sideyard and front yard are
non-conforming. So going vertically up. So you're massing in the setback, but it's going on top of where the footprint to the property is exactly as per the survey of 2009. Yes, sir.
And you're just coming back because you didn't act on it. So, you're correct, sir. Yes. Prices increased for during COVID and everything got kind of messed up. Not any less now. Very true.
You got the approval in 2020. Yes, it was uh the end the meeting was December and it was approved in January. So it was you get one year to effectuate it. I don't believe they filed building correct it if I might for the board's
edification. I I did look into this and none of the uh extensions that were granted because of co the time frames just did they didn't fall with any of them. Okay. Any other questions? None. Excellent. Any members of the public wish actually
any members of the public have any questions for the applicant? None. Any members of the public wish to speak on this application? Excellent. Okay. With that, uh I'm in favor of granting the approval that we previously granted in 2020. Um and I
think it's an improvement to uh the overall uh property. So, if everyone is or if anyone's in agreement, do we have a motion to approve? I'll move to reapprove. Mr. Hawkstein? Yes. Miss Napano? Yes. Mr. Binbound? Yes. Mr. Sheitz? Yes. Uh
Mr. Pearlman? Yes. Vice Chair Cunningham. Yes. And yes. Excellent. Good luck. See you in four years. on this evening's application 2025-12. This is for 28 Edison Place, block 301
and 210 lot 2, minor site plan, both 301 301 lot 2 and block 210 lot 2. Minor site plan um and use variance is requested. Good evening. How are you? Good evening,
Madam Chair, members of the board. Vincent Lachland for the Atlantic Federal Credit Union. Uh we're here this evening asking for approval to utilize existing space within the building. It's uh currently
used as a waiting room with two chairs in a table. We would like permission and the approval of the board to add a terminal in there which would allow call it a terminal which would allow for the bank to be able to log in certain
transactions that may take place with members. not an ATM, not a teller, but people that would come to the bank and sign paperwork to become a member or would be there for financing and therefore would be able to receive proceeds that could be credited to their
account. It's a extremely limited change. There are no changes proposed for the exterior of the building. The uh credit union received approval from the board to renovate the building in 2020. Since that time they've occupied the
building for administrative offices. There have been no changes made in the occupancy of the building. There are no changes proposed to the exterior use. Uh the as the ordinance requires in the I20 zone. It permits office use but does not
permit anything that might be considered the function of a financial institution. That's where the use variance comes in. So adding the terminal although you know in my world I I think it's hard to detect the difference between and I
certainly am not a techsavvy guy at this stage of my life but I I really don't see much of a difference between a terminal and a computer. The credit union is concerned and interested and always wishes to comply with all
requirements. So there'd be no work required. I think that even would trigger a building permit. I have Mr. Mero who's the chief executive officer as explained in our statement having to do with the use of the waiting room
which is 9 by13 existing space. There'd be no change whatsoever to the size of that room. It's just bringing in a different table and two different chairs. There are two chairs there now. and a table. We change the furniture and add the the what I've been describing as
the terminal. If I might be permitted, Madame Chair, it's part of the application, but I think it it tells the story quite accurately. If I could offer up an exhibit, which is the existing room and the proposed change, I think it's Please do. Yeah. Very helpful.
Okay. and it shows it, I think, very clearly what we're talking about as far as the space in question. It's a two-page exhibit. Roman numeral one is the existing space outlined in turquoise which shows the table and the two chairs
and one for a bank employee. And then Roman numeral two shows the proposed change and the same area outlined in turquoise as far as the same office or waiting space that's used in the building. They're not going to be any partition or
any additional work that's going to be required to reconfigure this space. It again is the only change proposed is to add the terminal and to add that function. There's no ATM proposed. There's no real retail banking change.
It's not going to be a branch bank where you'd have, you know, tellers and cash and that kind of functions. And uh as far as the site work, there's nothing that's going to be detectable from the exterior that this change has even been accomplished. But it is the existing
space. The terminal would be added, a new table and chairs, get new furniture in there, but to have room for two individuals and an employee of the credit union. And again, no other change whatsoever proposed for the site inside,
outside, anywhere. Just for the record, we'll mark these two pages as A1. That would be fine. Thank you, Mr. Bergen. bank has been there since 2020. I understand because it's a considered a financial institution as far as that
function. The building at the present time is used for administrative offices by the bank has been since the approval and the renovation that was done as a result of the resolution issued in 2020. There have been no change in the occupancy of the building. there are no
uh when it was originally approved there was a setback variance and I understand this the board planner has picked up and in the original resolution there was a a variance issued for a generator now I understand from Mr. Mr. I think it's in
his review that a generator is a permitted use. But the only 2020 variance that was triggered for the site was for a setback and there were no other issues. There was more than enough parking. In fact, there were five parking spaces banked in the original
approval back in 2020. So, we're respectfully requesting the variance is a use variance because of course this is not an office use as the ordinance defines it. is considered to be a financial use. Uh therefore, we're
required to meet the particularly suitable standard of getting a Dvariance. We believe it's particularly suitable as an incidental use to the ongoing use of this property by the institution for its services to members
that this is a function that's inherently related to that continued effective use of this property as administrative offices for the bank. I believe therefore the particularly suitable standard as far as relating the use proposed in this case adding the
terminal to the ongoing effective use of the property and the original approval and the successful occupancy of the building since the 2020 approval and the renovation of the building that the bank has accomplished. So I believe as far as the particularly suitable and sometimes
called the positive criteria, I believe that that's kind of self-evident based on the ongoing operations that have been conducted since 2020 without any objection or problem. As far as the negative criteria, there' be no impact whatsoever on the site. In fact, since
2020, we have fewer employees at the building than we used to have. But as far as the negative criteria, the impact on the property is not detectable because it's an interior space and no other changes whatsoever. And I I think I mentioned I don't even think we're
going to need a permits from the town. Maybe an electrical permit based on the conduits that are required for this terminal or whatever the facility is. As far as the impact on the zoning ordinance and the uh impact in any negative sense, there'd be no impairment
of the zone plan or the ordinance by this extremely modest change in the uses of the property and in the change of of what's actually going to be taking place. So, I think overall that it would meet those requirements and standards. Mr. Maro,
the chief executive officer of the credit union is here to respond to any questions or issues the board may have or to give us any or for us to give you any more information that you think is necessary or required for your review of this application.
Mr. Lton, are you going to swear your client in as we need a witness under oath to testify that everything will is is true. So, Mr. Barl, take the oath. Place your right hand. Do
you swear over swear or affirm to tell the truth? Yes. Please state your full name. Um, spell your last name and give us your business address. Anthony Merrill, MR O. Business address is 2-8 Edison Place, Springfield, New Jersey
07081. Mr. Merl, I've introduced you to the board and you were the uh chief executive officer of the board when the bank received approval from the township for the 2020 resolution that allowed the bank to renovate the building and occupy
it. Is that correct? Actually, I was the successor to the person who received that approval. I was the CEO when the CEO was granted to occupy the building and I moved the president into
and you've been there since then. Is that correct? We moved into the facility a month after the CEO was received in September of 2021. And you've heard me outline to the board the area of the property and the interior space that was
proposing to add the terminal and add that particular function to the bank. correct is highlighted on the and I made certain other statements regarding the use of the property and conditions and also stated that there are no other exterior changes proposed. Is that
correct? That is correct. How do you think Mr. Maro adding this terminal will assist the bank as far as your administrative functioning and the office use of the property and the overall benefit of the operations of the credit union? How do you think this is going to help? I think it'll be a benefit to allow us to assist our
members. And a credit union is a financial institution that's fedally insured. It's a nonprofit financial cooperative. We operate in Union and Essex County for those who live, work, worship, or go to school in those counties. So, it's an added benefit
to those members of the community. And again, given the construct of the facility, it allows us to provide a that are in our reasonable proximity counties serve but not adding any complexity to the transactions keeping them cashless
office no ATM not to facilitate a lot of exterior traffic but to really serve the members of the credit who are essentially owners of the credit itself. Do you feel that if the board were to approve this change that the operations
and functions of the credit union would be improved and allow you to do a better job, if I can use that term as a lawyer, for your members by allowing this to be approved? Is it going to help you in the operations that you conduct in the
business at the property? I believe it allow us to help the members that we serve in the community, provide them ability to access their accounts, open accounts and access, you know, services that are there.
We have other locations. Those are full service offices. I'd just like to highlight it's exactly the same office space. It's exactly the same type of office that's in the building now in various locations close by according to the floor plans. And
again, we believe it's a necessary request for the board and we hope that you'd be able to approve it. And if the board has any more questions about the nature of the space or the purpose of the space or the nature of the activities, we're happy to elaborate
further. Thank you very much. Members of the board, do you have any questions? Yeah, you turned it on and then off again. I didn't see the light. You're in. Thank you. Uh, hi. Good evening. Good evening.
How are your members currently served for whatever the services are that you're currently seeking the application for? They have to go to our East Orange West Orange location or location. So, so
the so they just have to travel to one of the full they have to travel to one of the full service locations and this would be a benefit to your members because now anyone in close proximity I think you testify to wouldn't have to travel to a full service location. They could travel to your home office for the
same the same services for those that are primarily existing members who want to maybe get service on their accounts. For example, you lost your debit card or you have questions on your account that you can't facilitate over the phone. We do operate a contact center.
So we have so essentially we're leveraging to maybe assist those that want to come in. you have a member who has a deposit and can't make that check deposit that's a large deposit traveling all the way to
union they can now drop it off to us in order to make that deposit thank you not catch thank you very much just one quick question since it was a waiting room that you're making to are is there any issue with where the people that would normally sit in there and wait or you
didn't really have that situation the man in That space was laid out as a waiting room. Probably would have been better served if there was a receptionist in that room because anyone who walks into that room is stuck in that space and actually has
to get bell inter. So there's no there's never really anyone waiting because there aren't those kind of services that are being provided. Usually when someone comes on our appointment for one of our let's say office visits, not these types of
transactions meeting, we usually know they're there and they come. Are you concerned when you do open this for more service you're going to have a high influx of members since the other locations are I believe since it's a limited service office so there's not cash transactions that are facilitated
there so we're trying to make sure that we maintain security obviously cash implies a certain level of digital security and complexity in your overall oper operation um and this is primarily a
office purpose use uh that that type of volume of that transactional business isn't the same as let's say a full service office. And will you have another waiting area for people then coming because it looks like you're going right from lobby into that new space. Again, we normally never have
folks waiting for us. So there's there's not really a use for a waiting area. What sits there today is actually a mailin for for our postal. How would your customers know now that this service is being provided and and
that it's only limited to the check service? We would post on our website that this is a limited service office and the kind of transactions that are that are allowed in that facility. Uh that it would be cashless and there's no ATM. It's an ATM because again the idea
is not to drive those folks that are not let's say members of the credit union to have that kind of access security issues and that volume not something that we're looking at drive. So we'd put it on our website that that's the type of transactions in there or we would we
facilitate if you visited our website we have the ability for folks to make appointments today at our location that facilitated. Currently the this location is just back office. It's administrative headquarters. So it's the executive team
and our our operations team. Were you at There's no retail banking done. There's no retail banking done on that site today. We do have on occasion members that show up um and then we turn them away because we can't take the transaction
by definition. We can't take the transaction. So we say, well, you have to go to West. But this would be this would be considered limited limited service retail banking. Correct. It's a limited service office because again no cash transactions primarily
account servicing and well this is for the professionals by allowing this if we were to allow this use would that open the door to to the bank being permitted to
um do retail banking? No. I think the testimony is what they're saying. If they were to expand or um enhance the banking service, they'd have to come back to the board. That would always be necessary since it
triggers a use variance. So any changes would require further application. That's kind of what I was going to offer limited service retail banking is that under the umbrella retail banking. So
we're able the service, you know, if it ceases to be a success limited service, hey, this is a good spot to expand that. They'd be coming back because they're basically anchored to the one room that we're talking about right now. So, you would never have clients go past
this waiting no waiting room area. No, that's that's those are office personnel. And if somebody shows up with cast, you'll just send them to We would send them out the way we if they did that today. That's what we're doing today. We do that in all the scenarios.
We wouldn't have a way to facilitate the cash, right? Cash operations I have to have safe on site have to have a courier to transport cash that type of insurance
in order to maintain. Do you have any idea based upon like the membership and their location what kind of volume this would bring in? I anticipate that we'd probably see maybe
no more than five customers a day, five members a day at at our peak. Again, we have folks that kind of visit us today, but those are either in transit between where we are. We have members throughout all of Union and Essics because of
that is the community that we serve as a credit union. Um say like we're a community bank for folks who are living in county but again our our position is membership and at the end of the day it's really to facilitate those
transactions that have to be in person. Most transaction business today happens digitally or online, right? You know, we we do we do a lot of our business even via phone, internet, and video. So, those that have that transaction, these are for those folks who don't have
that level of comfort with that type of technology that still want to see someone in person or again have a transaction that is uniquely outside of what is normally facilitated digitally cash or those that are depositing. a
very large check that's over $100,000 online digitally. Does the parking lot accommodate? Yeah, if I I'll jump in. I I was the board engineer for the planning board in 2020. Still am. They took a building that was very dated with multiple tenants. They
spruced it up. It's in a very attractive building and they did a whole site renovation including paving the parking lot. We banked the parking based upon the testimony at the time that they didn't need as much parking. As Mr. Lachland indicated, they've went from 50 to 55 employees down to whatever the
level is. We've had four years of experience watching this site now, and it operates just wonderfully. There's two parking lots. They don't even utilize really the other parking lot. So, even at five visitors a day, there's absolutely no uh issue with the parking
lot or the site or how it operates. That's what I could offer. So, thank you. Sorry. Question. Any other questions from the board? The only access is from Edison Place, which is a dead end culdeac off of Main
Street. Um, there's no access vehicular off from South Springfield or Springfield Road. Okay. Thank you. We respectfully request your approval. Um, I'm going to turn it over to our
professionals if there's any questions or comments. Thank you. I'd like to credit it's a credit union. It's not a a public bank, so it's a limited membership. We even discussed if they wanted an ATM, I don't have a
problem with that, but they're not asking I thank the board professionals for their reviews and providing their memos. Any members of the public have any questions for the applicant?
Any members of the public wish to speak on this application? None. Okay. I think for the reasons that were stated on the record here this evening, I'd be in favor of granting relief and the minor site plan. Right. It's minor site
plan with the use varian. So um if anyone is member is in agreement and wants to make a motion, I'll move to approve. I'll second. Mr. Hawkstein, yes. Vice Chair Cunningham. Yes. Mr. Binbound. Yes. Miss
Napano. Yes. Mr. Sheitz. Yes. Mr. Pearlman. Yes. Chair Cohen. Yes. Motion passes. Thank you. Thank you, board. Thank you very much. Have a good summer. Have a good evening. Thank you. Good luck. Any other business?
All right. Motion to adjurnn. Second. All in favor? All right. Thank you very much everyone.