I to the flag of the United States of America and to the repblic for it stands one nation under God indivisible with libery and justice for all and if y'all are going to testify
today if you'll stand and raise your right hand I'll go ahead and swear everybody in do you swear from the testimony you give today is for truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth thank you good afternoon Mr Smith Dan manzer City attorney so just quickly on the
agenda we'd like to take case number 202 24-1 1487 first since the respondents are present for that case problem I was gonna ask you the same thing okay if we can do that uh and with that think code complying supervisor ever Cole Will present to you on
this hi ever Cole good afternoon uh yes sir okay good afternoon ever Co code enforcement supervisor for the city of St Cloud Florida presenting this case on behalf of code enforcement officer Bennett I presenting this case uh number c24 01487740
uh copy of the statement of violation ERS of hearing send via certified mail to the owner of record hand delivered to the owner and posted at City Hall a copy of the PowerPoint presentation Affidavit of postings evidence of mailings the C-section and violation of a copy of the
original deed of the property and a copy of the cost incured if the magistrate finds the responded in violation in the amount of $273 77 cents [Music] I apologize for that uh the respondents
are currently here um I provided them a packet uh for the regarding the copy of the Case Files um on December 20th 2024 the C- compliance division received a complaint about an alleged aboundant vehicle High grass weeds and a motor
vehicle under going moderate and major repairs at this location code officer benett conducted an inspection and observed the violations code officer Bennett sent via regular mail code compliance observation form to the property owner with a code deadline of
January 3rd 2025th on January 3rd 2025 a re inspection was conducted in Code office at Bennett observed a motor vehicle without a current registration tag and areas of high weeds and gr High grass and weeds code officer
Bennett That's the first case we showing that is not correct zero yeah we're 1487 that's not the right one do I got to go back go forward no
needs to go forward it's the next Cas sorry to interrup thank you I was looking at the book I wasn't looking at the screen thank you I just don't respond get confused M yeah we should wait unless you gave a copy of Power
Point respond I did oh no copy the Case Files yeah yeah doc yeah another the part give us a second [Music] all righty uh as we were on December 20th 2024 the C- compliance division
received a complaint about an alleged abandoned vehicle High grass and weeds a motor vehicle undergoing moderate major repairs at this location code officer Bennett conducted an inspection and observed the violation uh CT officer Bennett sent via regular mail a co- compliance observation formed to the
property owner with a code deadline of January 3rd 2025 on January 3rd 2025 a reinspection was conducted and code officer Bennett observed a motor vehicle without a current registration tag areas of high grass and weeds code offer code officer
Bennett received another complaint about a motor vehicle undergoing repairs over the weekend at this location we have five show five photos to show on January 6 2025 code officer Bennett sent out a courtesy notice via regular mail to the owner of record with
a code deadline of January 20th 2025th on January 27th 2025th a re inspection was conducted and code officer Bennett observed the motor vehicle without occurring registration tag areas of by grass and weeds and a motor vehicle undergoing moderate and major repairs at
the time of reinspection five photos were taken on January 28 2025th Cote officer Bennett sent out a notice of violation VIA certifi mail to the owner of record with a code deadline of February 28th 2025th on February 28th 2025th a
reinspection was conducted code officer Bennett observed that the vehicle was backed into the driveway there was a second vehicle in the driveway that had an expired temporary tag attached the violations for high grass and weeds and motor vehicle undergoing repairs were complied with three photos were
taken on March 3rd 2025th code officer Bennett sent a statement of violation and notice of hearing via certified mail and and delivered the notice to the property owner posted City Hall and completed an Affidavit of posting during hand delivery of the statement of violation and notice of hearing court
officer Bennett observed the motor vehicle remain non-compliant five phals were taken on March 14 2025 I conducted a reinspection and it was determined that the property remained non-compliant three photos were taken
on March 18th 2025th I conducted a reinspection of the property at the owner's request it was determined the property had complied we have one photo it is the city's recommendation that the responded be found in violation for allowing abandoned vehicles at this
location the city requests that the cost in cured in bringing this case before the special magistrate be paid in the amount of $273.00 the fact you're seeking is just related to the abandoned vehicles they cured the violation related to the overgrown grass and the automotive work prior to the date set the notice of violation
correct thank you I have no further questions for you respondent you want to yes since we kind of glossed over the beginning of the meeting I'd normally do an introduction and so before you start talking let me introduce myself my name is Drew Smith I'm a private practice attorney I'm not an employee of the city
my role in these proceedings is to be an independent Trier of fact so just as you heard the code enforcement uh division present their case now is your opportunity to to tell me anything you would like me to hear or if you have evidence introduce that evidence so that I can have a consideration of the full case as you heard the city is is all the
city is asking for is that I make a finding that you in violation there would not be any fines they are asking to recover costs incurred in in their prosecution of the case which the statutes authorize me to do um I will enter those costs one question I will have for you so you can if you want to
go ahead and answer it as you speak to me if you need more time than they they'd ask for which is seven days from dat of my order I'm happy to give that time but it is I do find it important for me to assess the cost incurred in prosecution because that's what keeps the taxpayers from having to pay the
cost of the city enfor ing the codes when the codes were violated with that introduction given now is your opportunity to speak to me what would you like me to hear know I would like to translate rather have Claudia do it than
uh whoever is most comfortable I will swear in whoever will be doing the translation are you more comfortable do you swear from the test or do you swear or from the the translation you provide is fair and accurate to the best of
yourability on what the respondent states thank you [Music] [Music] sorry it's okay give an opportunity AA her name isabeth Ayala she's the ex-wife of the um Daniel Ayala
she has two kids and she said that she does receive the cards but the letters but he's the one who has been opening them um she's a dialysis patient who has two children I'm sorry it's the first
sence um so she said that um the two vehicles they had asked the tow truck to come and get them but they weren't um I so the tow truck did not come in time to tow one of the vehicles
one of the other vehicles had a a temporary plate from somewhere I don't know subasta um auction auction um up in Orlando e and so they didn't give him
the title for them to be able to transfer the tags here that she doesn't know what else to say so I have a suspicion that she may not have understand everything that that I had said at the introduction can you explain that what the city has asked for
which is that that the city has stated the property is now in compliance so the city is not seeking any fines um the city is seeking that the cost of prosecution be imposed and that amount is 27377 it and how much time does she
think would be needed to pay that before you do that the city we would change our recommendation to 30 days or whatever the special magist okay see she said yes please 30 days it's 30 days enough
time yes [Music] yeah is there anything else before I roll no based on the evidence testimony provided I will find in favor of the city find that the respondant was in violation for allowing abandoned or
unregistered vehicles to be parked on the property find that that violation was not cured within the time allowed in the notice of violation uh order the respondent to pay the costs incurred by the city in Prosecuting the case uh to be paid within 30 days of the date of my written order and any future violations of the
same code section by the respondent within within five years will be treated as a repeat violation okay thank you if you would um my gosh okay and if you didn't say it that all
of that will be included in the written okay case number 2024 d325 Edgar Eduardo Mano owner location of violation 1233 Handcock Circle St Cloud Florida good afternoon April Bennett
code enforcement officer I'm presenting this case for the property located at 1233 Hancock Circle at this time I would like to to enter into evidence the following items copy of the notice of violation sent by regular mail to the owner of record copy of the updated
notice of violation sent by regular mail to the owner of record copy of the notice of violation sent by certified mail to the owner of record posted on the property and City Hall copy of the statement of violation and notice of hearing sent by certified mail to the owner of record posted on the property
and City Hall copy of the updated statement of notice of violation I'm sorry state a violation notice of hearing sent by certified mail to the owner of record posted on the property and City Hall copy of the PowerPoint presentation Affidavit of postings
evidence of mailings the code section in violation of a copy of the original deed to the property and a copy of the cost incurred if the magistrate finds the respondent in violation in the amount of $378 41 and they are not here
on October 1st after receiving a complaint about this location I observed um abandoned vehicles High grass and weeds tree debris and an unmaintained structure eight photos were taken on October 2nd a notice of violation was
mailed to the owner of record on October 30th after receiving a request from the property owner for additional time I completed a reinspection I was able to verify that the property was mowed however there was a pile of tree debris in the rear yard
there were also abandoned vehicles and the property was still in an unmaintained condition five photos were taken on November 4th and updated stop one second what in this Photograph here what is it that you want me to see the tree de breze in the rear yard is that on the right hand side of the photo yes
sir that's a pile of uh tree debris sir okay thank you you're welcome on November 4th an updated notice of violation was sent by regular mail to the owner of record on November 15th a reinspection was completed and I was able to verify that the property was in the same condition there were abandoned vehicles
tree debris and unmaintained condition seven photos were taken on November 18th I sent a notice of violation by certified mail posted the property and City Hall completed an Affidavit of posting and six photos were taken
on December 9th the reinspection was completed and I was able to verify that the property was in the same condition there were abandoned vehicles tree debrises unmaintained condition five photos were taken I'm ask a question about that boarded window can you go back one
second is is that holes in the plywood or is that that's actually his chimney back it's not a window it's his chimney the siding is falling down off the um the chimney area same question are those holes in the plywood I the dark spots no
I I think it's the um the felt paper uh okay but so it it it is secure correct it's just the sidings falling got it okay yes sir on December 16th I sent a statement of violation and notice of hearing by certified mail posted the property in
City Hall completed an Affidavit of posting and one photo was taken on December 27th I received a call from the property owner stating that he would remove the abandoned vehicles and the tree debris over the weekend he also stated he was in the process of getting a contractor to fix the missing sighting
and the damaged porch pillars he no longer lives at this location and will be selling the property in the near future on December 30th after speaking with supervisor Cole about this case it was decided to pull this case from the January magistrate hearing since the
property owner asked for additional time since his contractor could not could not start the work until the beginning of February on January 6 the reinspection was completed to verify that the cars and tree debris were removed however they were not I called the property
owner and he stated he was not able to get it done over the weekend but it would be completed by January 8th six photos were taken on January 8 the reinspection was completed and I was able to verify that the two vehicles were removed and the tree debris were ALS also removed from
the rear yard the Lexus SUV in the driveway still did not have a current registration tag I called the property owner and he advised that he would have a new sticker um by that week two photos were taken on January 13th a reinspection was performed and I was able to verify that
the sticker on the Lexus SUV was valid one photo was taken on January 14th I received a call from the property owner stating that the contractor was not able to start the repairs until February 20th he also stated that he was not sure if he was
going to get the vinyl sighting repaired or replace it with stucco on March 6 a reinspection was completed and I observed the property was still in an unmaintained condition with missing siding damaged porch pillars I also observed that the Lexus
SUV that was in the driveway had an expired tag on it after investigating I was able to verify that the previous tag that was placed on the SUV did not belong to that vehicle seven photos were taken
on March 7th I sent a statement of violation and notice of hearing by certified mail posted the property and City Hall completed an Affidavit of posting and one photo was taken on March 14 the reinspection was completed and I observed that the property was still in an unmaintained
condition missing citing damaged porch pillars I also observed that the um tag on the Lexus SUV was still expired and I was able to confirm that the property is now for sale 14 photos were taken
am so sorry my phone my PowerPoint got out of whack here it's the city's recommendation that the owner be found in violation of allowing thank
you of allowing the property to remain in an unmaintained condition and not corrected by the time specified and allowing abandoned vehicles to remain on the property the city would recommend that the respondant be given until March 35st to correct the abandoned vehicle violation and the respondent be given
until April 18th to obtain a permit to correct the damaged porch pillars and the siding or a fine in the amount of $250 a day be assessed until compliance is met um also the city would recommend that um he pay the cost incurred in the
amount of $378 in 41 cents within seven days of the Magistrate's written order and that concludes my presentation okay thank you I have no questions for code enforcement and just to be sure looks like we had respondents come in for the respondents in the back you're not here on 1233 Hancock circles correct that's
not your case okay and see no respondent present and based on the evidence testimony presented I will find in favor of the city find that uh the respondent was in violation would you like a finding a fact on the tree debris that came into compliance after you notice a Vi at the
time set your notice of violation you didn't ask for one but it's not necessary find the respondent is in violation for maintenance of the property uh specifically the pillars in the front of the building and the sighting is it sighting all over is it just that chimney stack where the
sighting is so from what I'm able to observe from the road it's just the chimney stack that I can see um now that Zillow has posted photos of the rear of the property all the sighting is removed from the rear of the property as well then I will be General in the speaking on the sighting that the sighting is in
disrepair also find that the respondent continues to have an unregistered vehicle on parked at the subject property um you've asked for two different compliance dates so what I'm actually going to do on the abandoned vehicle I will order compliance by March
31 2025 if not brought into compliance by that date I'm going to set a f a $50 specific to that violation that will run each day thereafter if it's not brought in compliance by March 31st okay uh we'll enter your date of April 18th for compliance
on the sighting and maintenance of the structure if they do not come into compliance with that I'm going to it's significant disrepair and because of that I will award the $250 per day if they don't comply with the siding part with the maintenance of the structure part of it okay so $50 will
run if they don't comply with the vehicle by March 31st if they don't comply with the maintenance of the structure by April 18th $250 per day okay I will also order the respond to pay the administrative costs incurred by the city and Prosecuting the case in the amount of $378 41 that amount to be due within seven days of the date of my
written order okay case number Shannon Halas owner location of violation 705 great Avenue St Cloud Florida you're fine you can stay seated I'll call you up when and since you
weren't here when to introduce myself my name is Drew Smith I'm the code enforcement special magistrate I'm not an employee of the city I'm a private practice attorney my role is to be an independent Tri or of fact uh the order of proceeding for each case as you've seen already code enforcement repres it case anything if you have questions for the code enforcement officer you have the opportunity to ask those if they're
related to the case uh if you have no questions then you have the opportunity to present any evidence or testimony you'd like me for me to receive before I rule so when we get there I'll let you know and I'll bring you up thank you s you can proceed okay good afternoon
April Bennett code enforcement officer I am presenting this case with a property located at 705 grape Avenue at this time I would like to enter into evidence the following items copy of the ipmc notice of violation sent by certified mail to the owner of record
copy of the statement of violation and notice of hearing sent by certified mail to the owner of record posted on the property and City Hall copy of the PowerPoint presentation Affidavit of postings evidence of mailings the code section in violation of a copy of the
original de to the property and a copy of the cost incurred if the magistrate finds the respondent in violation in the amount of $329. 77 they are here and they have been provided with copies on January 3rd I received a call from
the St Cloud Police Department requesting code enforcement to respond to this location after a search warrant was completed I observed broken windows um broken doors Plumbing and electrical issues and accumulation 24 photos were
taken can you go back to that photo to describe for me what I'm seeing here so there electrical um extension cords running different um items through the house so they were all plugged into that um one main surge protector so um there
was electrical issues um like I said there was that was powering different items that's what that's and I'm sorry that photo is hard to see but I was just pointing out the broken the broken window above the sink
again that one's a little difficult to see just because there was no Lighting in there um the the arrow on the bottom of the photo there was a bucket there um that hot hot water tank was leaking that picture where the arrow is I don't know if you can see the stream of water but that's what that's pointing
to on January 8th a certified I HMC notice was sent to the owner of record posted on the property in City Hall and an affidavit was completed allowing 30 days for compliance on February 10th the reinspection was completed I observed
that a few of the broken windows at this location had been replaced however there was no permitting on record for those windows the broken front door was now boarded up there was also accumulation in the rear yard and I had not been able to make contact with the property owner
about the plumbing and electrical issues 5 photos were taken on February 11th a statement of violation and notice of hearing was sent by certified mail to the owner of record posted on the property and City Hall and an affidavit was completed on March for
the March 19th hearing I also opened an additional case for the work that was being completed at this without permitting um for the installation of Windows four photos were taken is that case being presented to me today no sir then I don't need to see those
photos Okay this is the actual posting so of the it was all combined in one on the 11th okay on March 14th a reinspection was completed and I observed accumulation in the rear yard broken windows I had not been able to make contact yet with the
property owner to verify the electrical and plumbing violations however I was able to verify that there was no permitting on record to correct those violations seven photos were taken that one's hard to see it's just showing the the front door is now boarded there was a window um in that
door on March 19th I was able to verify that there is not application for permitting for um the windows I have still not been able to verify the plumbing and electrical issues on the inside it is the city's recommendation that the respondent be found in violation of
allowing the property to remain in an unmaintained condition with broken windows electrical hazards Plumbing issues and accumulation in the yard and not corrected by the time specified the city would recommend the respondant be given until April 18th to obtain the proper permits and correct the
violations or a fine in the amount of $250 a day be assessed until compliance is met the city would also request the cost incurred in bringing this case before the magistrate in the amount of $329 77 to be paid within seven days of the written order of the special
magistrate and that concludes my presentation has the junken debris been cleaned up no sir so you ask for the property maintenance issues by April 18th is that is that the same date you want the Junkin to be cleaned up that's yes that's fine
okay you have no further questions at this time respondents to come up and I can get you both to raise your right hands for me I'll get you both sworn in do you swear from the teston you give the day is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth yes sir thank you
if you'd start by each of you if you'd state your name for me my name is Shannon how okay Robert Morris menen Hall [Music] okay um just go okay so um I have all the debris that was in the
yard I've gotten probably 75% of it is gone the truck that was out front has been towed I've got the rest of the debris piled in by we have two gates one in the front right side of the house and one to the left side of the house on the far side of the yard I got all the debris lits left piled there with and
there's tarps over it this weekend coming up I'm GNA have my friend come who has a double axle trailer we're going to get it out of there um every window was fixed see there was a old um uh you had an old code enforcement officer with blonde hair heavy set lady so she came there this is what happened
I we were renting a room out to a guy Ryan the cops had a warrant for him right so they came looking for him but he had already moved out but they busted every window in my house out twice now and found no drugs or anything illegal in the house no one went to jail
and the person that would they were looking for wasn't there so to get them fixed is anywhere between $300 and $1,000 a window depending on the mechanics the house is 117 years old so it's got the old like the rope and the pulley and the bearings inside like it's
a lot of work just to even mess with it much less get all them years of paint and stuff I mean it's it's insane to work on one of these windows so to have them all busted 20 22 or 27 windows busted out for no apparent purpose um
was quite a a blow but um I've got them almost fixed before I realized that because the old code enforcement she' tell her just have Robbie do it it's okay just have Robbie fix it this that or the other thing um as far as the electrical goes but all the windows are almost fixed except for like two since we got this notice she
came and told me you can't be fixing this unless we pull a permit I don't have the money to pull the permit until my taxes come back probably like three weeks I filed them like two days ago so I think I got three weeks and then I'll have the money to get the permits so um and the plumbing um where when she came
it was all dug up and it was a mess but um that's all been uh it's fixed now the toilet works the sinks are working everything's working and it's all filled back in um what else uh the debris in the yard yeah I've
got that covered the truck's gone I don't know what else the all the cords in the house each room has one plug because I guess that long ago they um for some reason they only put one plug in each room and it's it's a lot of work to have it to have it rewired you'd have to run Conduit on the outside of the
wall you know what I mean to to add additional plugs to to run it down through the wall is almost impossible the house has been added on to over the decades you know they've added this her dad bought the house in 1985 she's grew up there she's been there in her entire
life um he passed away and she inherited it with all these problems you know what I mean so um it's been rough for her but um I'm trying to do the best I can so with the electrical part from what I saw and if there's something you'd like me to explain that that's different than
what the pictures show the issue isn't that you the issue isn't that you need to run electric to each of the rooms right now that's not what you're it's the way that you're getting electric to those rooms it's that daisy chaining of those extension cords that is an unsafe way of doing it and that's that has to
be undone and so it's not that you have to run the Electric to each room if you have one plug in the room you've got Electric in the room it's how you're getting extra Outlets to that room that's the problem so that's really the electrical problem and what the main problem honestly is um we had uh a
breaker blow and when we went to get it replaced it was going to be like $500 something 50 for one for one breaker and so that one breaker controlled like odd thing like
throughout the house so certain things worked and certain things didn't so that was like the re the me reasoning behind the you the cords and everything rooms none of the lower plugs work because of this one breaker that's bad that cost $650 to replace where the the main
problem we just need to get that one breaker we understand and also I'm sorry so that was the the electric I wanted to point out I mean that's that I'm knowledge about and knew um the dates um all this
happened and I'll be totally honest with you I was incarcerated um so I wasn't present I didn't even know anything was going like like I was when I I got out on the she was there when the cops came February
19th I got out and I was already like behind you know behind the ball like already late on everything trying to get caught up with what had you know what's going on like because I haven't really had a lot
of time to even go through and see what all happened and what all the vi I'm just still trying to learn it the cops have done this twice came and bu Ed every window out of the whole house and not found anything no one went to
jail I mean $1,000 a window at the upper end of the you know the price range you're talking 22 $23,000 27 so close to $30,000 in damage twice and it's like just walk away I mean and we got to float the bill we fixed them the first
time now we're having to do it a second time so I mean it's like and currently I'm unemployed so the finance you know I is not in great standings right now on my behalf um like I said
said because of you know my little station I was on um together we're about to have four or five four close to $5,000 in income tax return we're going to get a lot of this taken care of let me let me tell you where my head is at you're probably lost and confus no and
before I get there let me tell you where my head is at So based on what the city has presented and and and your testimony I think we're all in agreement that there are violations that have to be cured yes sir you have said you've been working hard on the debris outside you're you're hoping to have that done by the end of this week the city has
asked for a compliance date of April 18th I think you're that that April 18th should be no problem for you to have the drug debris cleaned up outside I would ask as soon as you can get it done get that done because as things clean up from the outside in the city takes less heat gets less fewer complaints all the
reasons why code enforcement gets phone calls and and people are upset the more you do on the outside sooner the better for everybody um as we move towards the windows and the structure you're you're counting on that tax refund to get the money to get the permitting for those
windows get the job done City's asked for 30 days that sounds like that would give you just barely enough time from When You're Expecting that refund and I'm not really comfortable with that so I'm thinking more along the lines of 60 days does that sound like a workable time for you to get those permits get the work completed get everything tidied
up get code enforcement in there before the last day so so if you do have something that you missed that no you're not quite there on this they have time to or you have time they can say nope you still need to get this done is 60 days enough for that sir May 19th would
be the the 60 days does that seem yeah I appreciate that in fact and that would be to do like to do everything everything brought into compliance only thing that I can say that I would foresee that could gr a problem if like
I don't get a job and because financially the window I mean it all really adds up and uh that's the only thing I can see that might be I'm just looking at I'm looking at the calendar I'm G to bump that out to May 30th so that's the last day the last weekday of May so I'm looking at May 30th for
compliance on everything but if you're not in compliance on everything what that means is on uh June 1 i f of $250 a day will run for each day that stays out of compliance any piece of that stays out of compliance okay so important to get it to get progress as soon as possible get it completed as soon as
possible get code enforcement in there to inspect and then just in case there's anything that's not quite perfect but it's a Saturday isn't it start theowing day so we don't wa I know but I'm doing
on I'm setting the 30th so that way code and for because I don't know if they're working on the 31st that way they can go out but I'm sticking with the but thank you um yeah get code enforcement out there to inspect sooner than May 30th give give yourself a week or however much
however much time you can give yourself give yourself that in case there's any lingering things that need to be done that will you have time before those fines start to run yes sir uh I will also order the respondent the respondent to pay the cost incurred by the city and that's in the amount of $329. 77 but I'm
going to set that out to end of June because right now I want you spending that money I'm getting the property into compliance does that sound reasonable yes sir thank you June 30th and like you've heard in the prior cases you'll get a written order that spells all of this out are there any any
questions or anything else you'd like me to I just have one question I don't know if I would even direct it towards you um I don't know like the legal thing how it works with um warrants being the all I all I do and all I can speak to is the
city's code and so that is outside of what I can talk about today okay so again yeah because tot it haven't happened I thought I thought you might have those questions but they're not questions I can answer in my who would I direct those to probably your best bet is to talk to a private attorney oh okay
okay all right so then that's it then we're done here and you'll get yes you're free to go and you'll get you'll get an order from me that that says everything that I talked about here all right thank you unfinished business reduction of lean over 50,000 case number 2023 74-
748 th Florida LP owner location of violation 4201 lavender Way St Cloud Florida so this is the first of several reduction cases that are on the agenda today this one is the one the only one over 50,000 so we're asking the special magistrate to make a recommendation to
the city council the original fine in this matter has ured to $12,250 plus there's unpaid cost of3 $42.90 after discussion and uh back and forth between the respondent and the city manager's office the parties have
agreed to reduce that fine to $4,399 provided it's paid within 30 days essentially that's 20% of the acred fine plus the administrative costs this is a property where there's been several violations on uh from the same responded throughout the city uh there's been
several cases I think of last cter about 10 separate cases related to this one respondant so that's what we'd asked the special magistrate to recommend to the city council for final approval okay based on the presentation by the city I will enter an order recommending
approval of a reduction amount of$ 24,39 to. 190 if paid within 30 days of the city council approval of s thank you
let me one second let me write that note down okay so the ne the next four cases are all the same property own and in the same uh same property and the same respondant so you want to read them all you can consolidate them want to read
all four in case number 2015 - 2684 AAR KJ LLC owner location of violation 44213 Street St Cloud Florida case number 2017-1
1187 AAR KJ LLC owner location of violation 4213 Street case number 2019 d241 a AAR K LLC owner repeat violation location of violation
40213 Street St Cloud Florida case number 2019-1 1957 AAR KJ owner location of violation 4213 street thank you so these four cases are all fines under under leans under 50,000
so we're asking for the city the special Magistrate's final uh order on these on 2684 well just forall four of them there wasn't a negotiation between the city manager and the uh and the respondent city manager's office and the respondant ultimately it was agreed that each of
these fines would be reduced to essentially 10% of the fine plus the administrative cost uh so with that uh case number 2684 the original original fine occurred to $7,100 with $199 188 worth of um uh of
uh administrative costs the city manager's recommendation and the respondent has agreed to this that the fine would be be reduced to 9988 uh payable uh within 30 days if you want to take a do an order
on each one or I will do an order on each one yeah just but I will for the hearing I'm I'm oh I I will rule here I will rule collectively so you can continue I will enter a written order on each one all right thank you so the next one on
1187 uh this property again accured a fine of up to n of $9,000 with admin cost $179.81 after the negotiation with the city manager's office uh the respondent and the city manager agreed to recommend to the special magistrate that the fine
be reduced to a total of $1,798 in case 421 2019 421 uh the initial fine accured to $1,500 with administrative cost of $316 30 uh and uh the after discussions with
the city manager and the responded the it was agreed between those parties that the fine would be reduced to $ 46630 uh payable within 30 days and in case 19 2019 1957 uh this acred fine uh a total of
$10,800 before coming into compliance administrative cost was two $29.85 uh so the the uh total fine occur to $1,985 the city manager and the respondent agreed that the reduction of
this fine to to a reduction of this fine to $1,289 185 and those are those four cases right yes yes okay based on the presentation by
the city I will uh enter an order on each of those approving reduction consistent with the agreement entered between the respondent and the city manager I will note on the repeat violation and what I was looking for specifically in that agreement it
actually is a higher percentage that's being I'm sorry that one's 20% for the that that that was significant for me on the repeat because I would have I I might have had a little bit of pause treating the repeat with the same the same same way I was treating the first VI first time violations but I was happy to see that yeah I wrote myself a note
to tell you that but I missed it okay all right but those those reach approved consistent with the agreement right okay so if you read the next two and those consolidate those two please yes sir case number 202 24- 403 I6 property Florida LP owner repeat
violation location of violation 510 snail kite Avenue St Cloud Florida case number 2024-25 Water Boulevard stcloud Florida in so in case 202443 as the clerk stated this is a repeat violation case uh this fine
occured to $21,700 plus administrative cost of $27.96 uh after discussion with the city manager and respondant the respondent agreed to pay a fine reduced to $ 45579 and as the special magistrate pointed out this is a reduction to 20%
of the fine because it is a repeat violation in case number U 870 uh same responded this property uh this uh matter recruit a f to $2,400 with administrative cost of $252 188 after
discussion with the city manager and the responded it was agreed by the parties that the fine would be reduced to $732 188 which is again a 10% reduction of the fine plus the administrative costs and we ask for the special magistrate to approve those settlement
agreements based on the presentation I will approve both reductions consistent with the agreement entered between the respondent and the city manager case number 2024-25 Lorenzo Alexander Ramirez Carrington owner Stephanie fin owner
location of violation 828 Wisconsin Avenue St Cloud Florida right and in this matter this is this matter the fine accured to $5,000 with administrative cost of $298 77 on after between discussion between the respondent and the city manager
parties agreed that the fine would be reduced to $798 77 again provided is paid within 30 days uh and this is a 10% reduction of the fine plus the administrative cost a reduction to 10% of the fine plus the
administrative costs we'd ask for the special magistrate to approve that reduction and Bas the president presentation I will approve that reduction consistent with the agreement entered by the city manager and the respondent and I believe that's all we have as I look to my
client it's all we have sir thank you thank you new business none next schedule meeting April 16 2025 okay nothing else nothing else weed oh thank you CL I have um
nothing to do with St Cloud but