stand if you're able I pledge aliance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liy and
justice for all call roll call on my right council person Josh council person BR mayor Jimmy John King council person Craig Anderson council person jerem you're looking for approval tonight's agenda is
there any additions from staff anything from here to approve we have a motion to approve do we have a second all in favor say I oppos that'll carry now we'll look at the regular meeting minutes of September
24th 2024 approves those and see what you think I'll make a motion to approve the minutes do we have a motion to approve do we have a second second questions or discussion hearing none all in favor say
I I oppos that will carry finance and budget you got the accounts payable with the additional listing there there any questions we'll direct them to finance director Carlo I'll make motion approve we have a motion to approve the budget or the
finances there second second all in favor say I I I opposed carry it takes us into motions General business first item under General business tonight is presentation on the highway 30 Improvement project
feedback analysis all right well thank you for uh letting us come down tonight and share with you some more so myself Tom Austin project manager for the highway 30 project and with me is our one of our public engagement coordinators Cindy Morgan from district 6 as well so I
think you got a copy of the summary from the engagement I hope yeah so I just really I don't have a presentation a formal one I just wanted to go through this with you and really take an opportunity to try to answer any additional questions you had and really um kind of move the project along to the
next step so just walking through this real quick uh we had two uh engagements as you know um and through the process of those two engagements there's 31 properties along Highway 30 we had contact with 22 of the 30 so about 70%
of them um not everybody left a comment card feedback but a lot did have comments uh informally at the meetings or by phone so kind of that's summarized there so then just a quick analysis by location so we had 11 properties on the
North side that provided feedback seven that preferred option b which is okay so option b is kind of the the leap things as they are option right we'll put the curves back where they are or really leave the curves and only adjust them where they're needed to be and we're
going to try to make the ADA compliance work within the kind of boundaries that are there it's going to be it's going to be a challenge and it's going to be a little ugly but I think we can do it so it's an option okay so we got to present that as an option now it's B said right
that's B so of the 11 North Side properties that recorded feedback seven preferred option b three actually preferred option A that were North Side properties and one uh provided comments but no rating they didn't have a preference five stated a
preference to keep parking on the North side um and two of those specifically mentioned St John's which I want to just mention I think and so that's you know that's one of the things that we're doing when we're engaging with the public is we can sit in the office and we can look at our engineering and we think we know things and we do we know a
lot we learn a lot um but sometimes there's a lot of value in just meeting the public and understanding what their needs are and how they're using the facility because I actually had no idea how important that Northside parking was to St John's for a lot of their
functions so and I think we talked about this at the second meeting we went back as a design team and talked about it and said you know this is really a fatal flaw because it's not functioning the way it needs to be for them so what we did is we went back and designed an enclave kind of a bump out and I think
we can get at least four or maybe even five parking spots along the north side in that option a bump it out and put some parking in there in front of the in front of the church so that's one of the things that's really beneficial in that engagement is learning some of those things so two specifically mentioned
north side parking for St John's and the um how that was going to be a problem for them four of the respondents cited concerns about their driveway exiting their driveway and that's just really um when I talked to folks it was really just the backing out into the narrower
Lane and they were concerned about that so and that's fine that's a that's a valid concern and we want to learn that um and then there was four that cons Express concerns about the narrow roadway and what that impact would be like with larger a vehicles and the traffic volumes on 30 so that's kind of
the analysis by location on the North side the four Southside properties that did record feedback all four favored option a um two stated they preferred less impacts to their property two noted the design as improving safety non expressed concern about exiting
their driveway I think that's probably a reflection of the fact that they have parking on their side so it feels more comfortable maybe um two spoke with uh we did speak with two additional individuals at the second meeting with a preference preference for option A due to increased safety but as I noted
before not everybody left formal feedback so that was just uh through conversation uh in addition to the north side and the South Side differentiation um eight individuals were out outside of the actual property uh the project limits so they're just in the second
meeting Citywide and four of those eight preferred option A with one mentioning a favor for ADA compliance one of the eight was neutral um did PR mention a preference for north side parking and
then three preferred option b of the of the eight individuals that were outside of the project area um and then just at the bottom is just taking all the numbers running them down just strictly by the numbers um of the 22
respondents both by feedback or by phone or by conversation 13 had a preference for a 10 had a preference for B two were neutral which is which is fine um I mean and like we talked at the at the meeting it's really not a like a voting thing
it's more of engaging and understanding trying to learn what the Public's needs are and really understanding you know how they feel about the project so uh with that did you guys have any additional questions or things that you were wanting to some more information on
or some clarification I don't know if you wanted to add anything Cindy yeah I if I could I'll I'll add in just a little bit as I ran the analysis on comments I mean it was pretty clear that um we were seeing that division of North versus Southside you know who's going to have more impacts that perceived impact
um and so to me it just really spoke volumes of like we're kind of picking winners and losers at this point in in these individuals eyes um and and so unfortunately like it's really nice when everybody agrees but we didn't get that out of this particular situation like a
clear Direction about which way to take it and so as I advised Tom it's like I feels more like we maybe just have to come down to uh what we feel is the best choice and especially like engineering wise like maybe that becomes a higher factor in some of that decision making
then too um because most folks were more vocal in the north side but some of the threads that I saw indicated more of like um perceived loss which you know tends to make me people really more vocal where the South Side didn't leave
as many comments um potentially because uh they didn't perceive that loss as much they felt like maybe it could be an improvement for them and what they're currently at um so those are some of the larger them that that I noticed when I
wrote down what the survey had we haven't finished discussing how we're going to do the light either have we no not completely I think um you know we were talking about eliminating some of the continuous lighting after second and looking at more intersection lighting which would be a significant cost
savings for the city um and we had some high level we looked at some high level costs on that uh but not it's not nailed down I did talk to our traffic folks and I know um when we talked before we were talking about how the city would have to
do the engineering of those of that lighting system and I think we have agreement within the district that we could do the intersection lighting design as well we probably have to do the The Continuous system that first block but the
intersection lighting itself beyond that we can take that on as well and be able to do the engineering of that so there'd still be a City cost for the the actual work but the engineering of what I think we could we could take care of that so if you if you guys settle on what you're going to do I mean you decide which way
you're going so I mean we talked about that a little bit is a project team and this is in the district and we kind of feel like we we feel pretty strongly that there's a lot of benefit to a to the road diet reducing the road there's just the safety benefit of the fact that it is a proven benefit in slowing
traffic down it increases The Pedestrian accessibility it provides a nicer facility for everybody that's using it um it's just it's a win-win really you'll still try and work some of that in for St John's and stuff like that absolutely yep we're going to get that
built that parking piece in there for St John's you bet yep um so I mean as we talked about it we felt like you know if it's so if it's a little bit of a situation where it's like the city doesn't want to it's you know I can see you have constituencies are kind of
split between the two sides right we're we're okay with saying hey mad looked at this we pretty feel pretty strongly we're going to make a decision to move forward with a we're not going to go forward without you but we're not really saying that you have to make that decision and then we'll react we're
willing to say we'll go up front we'll make that decision in partnership with you but we'll kind of be the bad guy maybe is a way to look at it and say m that feels very strongly that a is the right solution for Highway 30 and we're willing to put our necks out and say we're going to do this you know not in
opposition to you but with you but being being kind of the decision maker like Cy said really kind of taking that engineering judgment and saying we really feel like this is the right decision to make and we're we're okay with doing that myself kind of had that feeling go
that way get go long as we can work some of this stuff in you know like the parking the lights uh might have to do some note parking stuff on some intersections so trucks can get around and stuff like that yep
yeah absolutely me it is your role yeah but it's not those days are kind of gone where where the do comes in and says it's our role we're going to do what we want and so I don't want you to take that message from what I'm saying if the city is like absolutely dead set
against that road diet we'll figure out a way to make be work but and I'm not trying to say this to be be like fearmongering but it's not going to be pretty especially on the South Side you pretty well show back that most but we can make it work and so if
you guys are like nope we want our parking we really feel like a the B is the better option for our city we're not going to force it down you but we really we're willing to take the lead on the a option as well and you can kind of say hey M that wants to do this and we're we're going to go along with it it's not
our choice but we'll let them do it you know anything else guys do you have something else on no I I I think that was really what I was going to add and it's just like you know it's the acknowledgement that like as you're saying it is our roadway um we really do try to sit back and listen and that will
continue to happen um but yeah because of the split and there really wasn't a clear um you know guidance out of the the community I feel like um you know it is good for us just to take the lead and and make a a strong decision based off
of the information we have so anything from the ja any other questions or discussion up here shrug on the shoulder six and one half dozen of another I mean part of me says why do you have to do the road di but there's nothing been identifi as being a problem
it's just because that's what works in other places and it's the thing to do so the state goes that way but I tend after talking to you the first time I came in adamantly against it and I left just that short presentation looking at the prints thinking that it is plus the way
as far as getting to the ADA compliance that seems to be the way to go with way less problems so to me that that part's probably more important but I do get sick of hearing the road diets everywhere 25 miles hour everywhere in Rochester it's come on man I mean it
doesn't fit everywhere but I think there's more to it I feel better than I just sped that so I hear you y anything else what is the timeline for like start and out good question so
um I have too many projects this is this is scheduled for December of 26 construction after July 1st of 27 so it's it's actually $28 our dollars are 28 so we to be starting after July 1st of
2027 traffic we get new traffic lights right corre there'll be new signal at 63 and and 30 um so a little more to speak a little more to the schedule so our next step is really to really once we had kind of a decision made here tonight and
the city's okay with moving forward and I'm not saying you have to be 100% on board but this that's the direction we're going is is the option a um the design team will then really start digging into the design of it and then we'll have another meeting once we get that design kind of laid out is you know
we we threw out that big layout that's kind of a that was like a sketch level we have a little more detailed one with a lot more of the nuances worked out we'll bring that back to the public to the neighborhood we'll talk about it make sure we're not missing anything else kind of like the parking at St John's you know that nothing else jumps
up at us and says hey this is we got to deal with this you know um so we'll have that meeting um that would probably be springish of next year uh and then after that we'll move through for approval of that and then go into the actual design
of the road plans so yeah once we'll we'll go pretty quick now to get that layout developed and then but we'll definitely come back and have another conversation a good time for us to actually decide and discuss what we want
in those boulevards so we have time to think about that and incorporate what we would want to actually do there so um but we incorporate that in with the approval of that geometric layout in the
spring so um we'll obviously want to incorporate um people's energy see if there's any possibility if there's going to be a lot torn up in the boulevards if um lines can be um underground Y and
then we do get questions throughout the year periodically when you do the intersection traffic lights if a left turn to the east is going to be incorporated and that might have to be designed out no we've done some studies on that at least with the light you
might have to work with a versatile Lane both ways but the light will accommodate left turn to the east east yep not a separate turn L we went through that study sequence of left turn option is available and then obviously our fire
department and said law enforcement is hoping that EVP can be incorporated into that to yeah yep absolutely yeah right thank you sounds good thank you yeah thank you again
looking forward to the next presentation sounds good we'll see you hopefully around March all right we'll talk too we'll work through that at Boulevard question okay you can stay for the whole [Music] me you can go on to your next day
there's always another thing that's tough all right that'll take us to SCH business part fifth United Therapeutics sa L Craig Britt's here from engineer for United Therapeutics he will present to
discuss the possibility of deferring the sack and whack for outl a should visit part fifth typically a portion of a plaid is shown as an outlot the sack and whack are not paid until development occurs United Therapeutics has been working with people's energy on solar array on Outlet a that will benefit the
new building the solar array takes up the majority of Outlet a which could be considered a development so what we're going to do we got the map and stuff in front of us Craig we're going to let you what okay thank you mayor and
Council um thanks for giving me the opportunity to come and present tonight um so again my name is Craig Brit I'm and engineer with WTH representing United Therapeutics um on their proposed development so this is on Schuman drive just on the west side of that um and so
we're uh requesting that the council consider deferring uh the assessment specifically on outlot a which is on the west side of the uh BP easement there it's about 15.3 acres in area and um we're asking for the uh deferment of the
sack and whack for a couple reasons uh one typically sack and whack fees are assessed two developments for um any infrastructure improvements so anything that's in place like water towers wastewater treatment facilities um in this case where there's solar planned on
that albot a uh that will have no impact on the sewer and and water uh facilities um so that is that is one of the reasons um solar does have a shelf life um there is certainly a possibility that that portion of the property could be developed um in the future through a
replat um and then you know there's possibility a building could go up in in 15 to 20 to 25 years so uh so we're not looking for a waiver of the black and Sack we're we're simply asking for the deferment of that at such time until
that develops in more of a traditional sense uh with buildings uh that again would have impact on the sewer and water uh facilities uh the main objective of a solar garden is to provide uh solar for U the United Therapeutics facil
um however the intent is to um have this connected to the grid so if there is Excess power that would go back um to um peoples in that in the grid um that would be a benefit for uh the users within that grid for a couple reasons
one um there wouldn't be as much Demand on the grid because uh United Therapeutics would have um a good amount of their power needs uh serviced by the solar garden um and then the other thing with the Excess power that would be a benefit um in the event that the
facility isn't using the amount of power generated from the solar um it could be placed back in the grid so that is the intent of the solar as well so um so um thank you for consideration and and uh here to answer any any further questions
you may have so you're just you're still just asking for a deferral not a forgiveness correct correct yeah and the reason that it it's coming up at this point in time is we're finalizing uh the development agreement and this is one of the items that the U Council would take
Council action um to include in the in the development agreement questions guys so we essentially being asked to for now prate the sack and La just taking out
The Who Going deferred on that 15 whatever percentage of the whole area that is we just take that off or now correct and it would still apply to the lot one block one on the east
side would that transfer if ownership changed on this piece of property too how would that work like if they sold it so someone else would that referral go on with them or would it and that could be negotiating item with them if they
would want to that in the price or however they want to do it but yeah anytime the development would occur than charged yeah that and that's a good question the development agreement would
live with the property so if it land and somebody developed then then would apply you know the second La would be assessed at that time I don't see it I don't see a problem with it I'm willing to deferring it I guess it just kind of
caught me off guard Craig at first the first time we kind of met and talked I thought was just going to kind of be a couple acres up in the corner up there so yeah yeah and that the solar design hasn't fully gotten underway yet that'll start here in November so uh this was
one of their initial initial Concepts just looking at the overall how can you maximize the site to get the the largest array um the property um you know there it could look a lot different than than what it is on on paper here if there's a
change in your in the meantime it's will it be at the new rate or okay so talking the property right here this be just above the road right I thought just there was just a little somewhere have to read it split that's
that's how will this the only question I got for you um I know we're giving them credit for SW for the for the pound or putting in or whatever correct does this effect is this impervious how do this infect impervious
surface is the pond still going to handle it that's my question good question um and we are working on the ordinances for um we don't have an ordinance that deals with um solar so well I understand that but
what I'm saying is is is the pond that we're proposing for them to put in will handle whatever suppos to take care of the 30 Acres right right the supposed to take care of the 30 instead of just half right we'll work through it all
yes you understand what I'm ask we'll work you down that to make sure that those C are in there but yes there is a computation for the yeah the angle of the of the panel itself I'm sure there is I just want to make sure the Pond's going to handle you know like I said the first
Vision we kind of saw was a little smaller than this and figured the pond was great so I just wanted to make sure y enough part is taken care of yep y good question we make sure that's care as well wow I if all that's taken care of and uh I think we can make this work
defir it like this I have no problem with it yeah F any other questions for Craig so do we need motion okay some we
need a motion to consider deferring sack and whack charges for out lot eight I'll make that motion we have a motion do we have a second a second second all in favor to say I I opposed okay thank
you we have a variant request see variant sign 404 5th Avenue Southeast mik 404 four variance from the required 10 foot between
structions which is section 135.5 he is seeking his vars in order to build a 26 by 32 garage where his current 20 by 22 garage sit current garage is 8 ft between structures and due to the increase in size he is asking for variance to be 6 feet between
structures finding commission held a public hearing recommend approval based on the findings of facts finding one the request of variance is in harmony with the purposes and intend the order the property continues to stay at their residential lot finding two the request of variance is consistent with the
comprehensive plan as variance will not change character Vis the residential lot SE finding three the property owner does promise to use the property in a reasonable manner its garages are allowed in residential zones and per to continue in this area and is in character of the neighborhood finding
four the landowner has not created a unique City only wishing to increased size and finding five the variants will maintain the essential character of the local locality by continue to keep is a residential garage so pz is all looked it all
over we were fine with it it really only affected like the garage would be a couple feet closer to his house when he red do this and it didn't really affect the neighbors of the fence lines or anything so all those other setbacks are basically staying the same yes side back
everything else yeah his side yard is 6 ft versus his own property questions Josh no it sounds like a reasonable request gr no Jeremiah yeah I don't think this is
anything unusual sta got anything any all right so the council AC request is to proove the variance request as recommended we have a motion we have a motion we have a second second second all in favor say I I
opposed that carries 2024 C it's called user here is that where it is I think so he right it was pretty easy fix staff is Sting the assessment hearing for the 2024 CIP which includes
improvements of BD Bard Southeast PR Court Southeast Highland Court Southeast fth Street Southeast the resolution needed is to declare the cost order preparation of the assessments for the 2024 Capital Improvement project total cost for improvements was 2,572
n135 the city portion is 2,295 46230 cost to be assessed against the property owners is 277,000 185 an additional resolutions needed to call the public hearings on the
assessment staff has recommended the public hearing be held fire hall on November 12th 2024 at the regular council meeting did they get that blacked out today yeah looks good so Council act requested adopt
resolution declaring cost to be assessed order preparation of propos Assessments in connection with 2024 Capital Improvement project motion I'll make that motion second questions hearing none all in favor say
I oppos that one carries number two adopt the resolution going hearing on assessments for the 2024 Capital approvement project you want call on November 12th 2024 to Fire H regular meeting is that what you want yes all right
all we have a motion do we have a second second second questions or discussion all in favor say I I oppose that carries that'll take us on to resolution requesting msas fine Minnesota state aid Street project
during the planning of the 24 CIP project the city council approved resolution project financing unfortunately the processing of the advancement wasn't completed on M so city engineer over has been working
with fost district 6 engineer and he has requested that the council submit a new resolution with the updated figures note that the resolution will still read as if we were requesting the advancement in 23 the advancement will pay our sales back for money spent
during the B Bard Street project there questions for what what happened there um so we submitted everything and um we submitted for
our our reimbursement which was actually were allowed to submit for 95% before instruction and we were not paid all of that too busy trying to figure out cannabis legislation I'm
guess I have no idea um but so we I did ask for it to be tracked down as to what happened and it never actually had gone through completely so is that funding
that could be used every year though yes this is funding we can use every year but since the project was that year we have it well I'm just saying because it got upheld a year we're still putting it in as 2023 so it shouldn't come back and bite us because they didn't get anything
done is what I'm asking no and we're borrowing ahead anyway um so and if we look at our resolution from last year it actually we were borrowing a lot more um so the amount that we need to
complete the project actually went down um and so we aren't borrowing as many years ahead anymore um the project still the date of the project still has to match when we designed and
did the project um but you notice in the resolution there were some dis uh dispersements there so they've already made some payments to us
um and then so we have a total estimated left and we are eligible to do five times what our allocation is um so what I was told is they weren't allowed to now process a resolution with
the wrong numbers from a previous year or the numbers from a previous year they needed numbers from this year so they needed a new resolution um with all the updated numbers and therefore we aren't asking
for the whole five times our allocation anymore um we are only asking for the 648,000 that we need for the portion of the project that is eligible for state aid
funds okay any other questions for Jenna all right what the council needs to act on is to approve a resolution 2024 Das a resolution requesting the commissioner Transportation approve of a municipal state aid Street project
financing want a motion I'll move to approve it we have a second second all in favor say I that takes us on to Hing library after reviewing numerous applications and interviewing a number of candidates we are recommending Aranda
this s to be good Kowski whoa H as a library so the council AC can't say cabal but you can say that approve or deny Miranda to be hired for position of Library pay grade six
step two questions questions on this she the right higher she's the right higher I'll move to approve we have a second second all in favor say I I oppos to say
that handle the next see me do it twice you right I can handle this uh Public Works custodian custodial position due to the due to the approved custodian hire turning down the job offer staff interview a past candidate
that also work for the city falling snow it is recommending to approve hiring J Jackson pay grade 7.4 to start as soon as possible Council ask requested to approve the hiring of Jeremy any
questions or discussion he's uh that's one that you recently met with and he already we had a subsequent interview too so okay and that went well good all right anybody make a motion I'll make a
motion to h j Jackson have a motion to approved we have second second all in favor say I I opposed car here as quick as we can ordinance Amendment chapter 2
attached please find an ordinance amendment to chapter two Administration and operations the amendment changes the salary of the mayor from 6 to 8,000 council members from 4 to 6,000 per discussion and approval of the 2025 preliminary budget the last salary
change occurred in 20 2004 the change in salaries are going into effect January 1 2025 so the Second Amendment is Chang in the time the council means from 7:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. as you were aware this change earlier this summer to see how it
affected general public and to date the city hasn't received any concerns with the time change as this is the first reading of this ordinance no action is required on either one Cheryl
correct all right that takes us out of motion of General business mayor staff consult reports mayor report for name we're going to send our sympathies to the family of Richard King Richard
was was you sure M the much anticipated Fire Department open hous is tomorrow night from 5 to 8800 p.m. our little ciens just love it you all ready to go down there should be nice night that's going be a backed
house get there early if you want a broad or a hot dog and thank you Brandon and all the firefighters that was a great open house breakfast you had out there at the legion Sunday that was huge turnout when I was there too yeah it was what about
the same numbers as what we typically do but it was a little bit different game early football game I think played a part in one our big rough came through so it started rough right away in the morning so they did another great job St John's Fall Festival is this Saturday
check out the stvi star for details Family Services is still hosting a session on dementia October 15th at the United Methodist Church check the star for more details and don't forget the health and wellness fair is October 29th from 9:30
to 11:30 at the center for active adults that's all I got than is on City administrative report uh due to having a chance to visit family last week out of state um and have any report for this time
so any questions for the administrator all right thank you Bill Finance director Carl you yes still um working on the budget for 2025 we did get um numbers from Blue
Cross Blue shieldon um we had estimated at 15% they came in at 133% so they we don't uh we're not you know a lot of savings there as well as just kind of as everybody ages up a year um we see those
increases as well uh on Thursday we will get the last input for um estimating what the inflation is going to be for the salary um going forward for 2025 so we will have some better numbers to use
but at this point it's it's going to look like um it's going to probably be pretty similar to what we had in that preliminary budget and the only cutting um would be moving down on Capital spending that that's where what
we need to do at this point good any questions for car good thank you very much all right uh Public Works director's report Sean there's a report there uh just want to let you guys know
Craig you especially probably with black Ping's done and they also took that hump out onth yeah yeah what was was that all tree RS or what was that no I think it's my opinion is it's Frost heating the storm SE cuz the storm s so shallow and the cold air travels down the storm
sewer in it's foring out May do it again in the future I you shaved it down and then did you patch over it then again or we just took black top out and then lowered the black top but we didn't pull the whole storm s to fix it you probably have to insulate beneath the storm that's that's a coffee spilling bump
there man well that's fixed so should be taken care of cuz it'll spill when it's in my cup holder so I just all right I think I take care I thought about it and you're going to keep the parts
open as long as you can huh we always do that so I do see a forecast for 29 degrees next week for a little long 29 the other morning so we usually if they're forecast in the mid 20s then we're going to quot but they won't freeze at 290 to where they
break but they start to get to mid 20s they forecast that we CL them all right any questions for Public Works doing great keep it up guys thank you city engineer you got a report for
us well now that black to's down snow will'll be following up with grading and getting some sod in and we'll be wrapping up for the winter so when do people when are they allowed to drive on it again like couple asphal
yeah no today they can already tonight got to Str by and I've been checking all week so I could see it was graded last week it sure looked good when I drove by today but they're just finishing up the end coming north again wow so um there be some campers there
that that neighborhood has been the best they have been very very consider I've talked to several of the neighbors and uh Dylan was huge for that project every one of them that I spoke to mentioned that it's the communication made all the
difference in the world and apparently you know we didn't get the updates every week but I think he continued to do it every week with the the people right so he he took the time to do a lot of stuff himself like he was putting the street signs back in and just he's up there the whole time so he was helping to do stuff
since he was up there and he was great yeah there was a couple headaches obviously but every I didn't hear any major gripes they had to deal with so much rain and flooding that whole neighborhood they they were didn't help that we had the big storms and lost all
the trees and luckily you guys were nice enough to come and get the trees but that's all the middle of the whole summer it's like everything is on top of each other so glad it's almost over for J J you got anything else for us not
at this time all right thank you um Nate you going to report any while you're here just a couple quick things um I we on Thursday at 6: PM um we are having an author presentation uh
Teresa willham waldof is uh a historian who um you know um if you have any interest in r War II or uh thought the movie Oppenheimer was awesome this is going to be a really good program to see
um her uh father was one of the chemists who worked on the Manhattan Project and um she's got quite a story to tell and um I'm hoping that we get a good crowd for it um also on Monday our pumpkin
decorating kit goes live and uh we are very excited by our special pumpkin donor this year wait A [Music] guy got to get him there anything else Nate no that's it for me any questions for Nate all right
thank you for the update mate now fire chief chief what do you got for us you uh you took most of my talking points in your marriage reports the only thing I've got to add is um a couple of grants that we were waiting to hear back on we did not receive any
funding from either of those grants so I'll be working with Carl and our secretary to kind of realign our Capital account and our replacement schedule before the end of the year so we can make some decisions on priorities for
what our next step is so all right you all ready to go for tomorrow night though huh ready what time of the do is open 5 about for the early birds isn't there an early birds s 3:30 there'll be people by 3:30
4:00 the BR won't be ready all right I will see you down there tomorrow [Music] night uh no pool direct report tonight pool's done takes us committee commission board reports Chamber of Commerce nothing to packet I don't think
they have anything going on right now e h we got a meeting next Tuesday by do we need a meeting not right now Library Park Board nothing Personnel you guys had a lot of stuff minutes are in
there and we voted on one of the action items tonight yeah pick them again planing zoning same thing there we voted on an action item tonight Public Safety I have nothing we have nothing special uh we've had a few
different community events that we've been a part of with st Cruisers in the Fall Festival but home home gumy home is your no parking sign working over football field still going to talk to Sean we need some
more I got argued today about signs missing so we need a few more signs up there if we're really going to stop it well you had your speed sign out there saying no parking is that still there too yeah just it
today say no parking the road uh right on the road there's a little bicycle you can't park on a bike well did they take the signs again I don't know I don't know what they did there's a telephone poll there that I'm
assuming did at one point have a sign that no longer has a sign and that was the argument well the sign is up there it's not right here so do you really think if we put 6,000 signs down there no so said you put the Pines down there
don't care and I'm sure they're all thinking there's no way they're going to come by and tag me in the hour and a half 3 hour two hours I'm here you know one oh yeah coming there was about 20 cars that
[Music] [Music] got it's helping during some of the ninth grade games and stuff down there in that field after that first time you came down and got some yeah
sometimes par front of but as soon as I showed up today everybody I'll keep it up y thank you Works they're talking about having me yeah we're going to probably have to have some kind of planning meeting we're
looking at some um Public Works complex infrastructure um ideas and then um as we look to the Future for how our city grows to complement the comprehensive plan how we start looking at Water and Sewer infrastructure whether it be the
mains the wells the towers or the wastewater treatment plant so we'd like to have an initial meeting with you don't start taking a look at that right we'll do some survey work with you to times and dayses ready no
report uh just minutes um just to highlight was recognizing Charlie Ryder 48 years withad County for remarkable Transit advisory comme no next week and now we just got noticed
today that's a postpone or canel S Communications about it um let's see anyone want to use the open mic all right make a motion to adjourn we have a motion to adjourn do we have a
second second all in favor say I oppos