--------- Are we ready to begin, Sally? >> Yes. >> Maria, is Brian doing anything that we need to uh >> Brian, are we able >> I am recording. So, >> we can start. >> Yes.
>> Okay. Good. Good. Good. So, May I? >> Yes, >> Brian. The monitors are not showing the meeting here. >> Yeah, that's part of the problem, too. >> Okay. >> Okay. All right. Thank you.
>> Well, we'll begin and see how we do. We're good at improvising. So, I will call the uh March 17th meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency to order. Um, okay. Have we uh and as you've heard uh
we don't have any internet capabilities and well, most of you know because you're living it, but for uh people watching later on, uh we are we're having all kinds of technical difficulties this evening that we're trying to work through. And so we will do the best we can uh to get through the
meeting tonight. So council members, is everybody reviewed the meeting from our November 18th meeting? And is there a motion? >> Move to approve. >> Second. >> Motion to second. Is there corrections or adjustments to the minutes? >> If not, all those in favor say I.
>> Opposed? No. Minutes are adopted. Business items. Let's try this. So, it says redevelopment area general update and our community development director Greg Paulie here to explain or attempt to I will try I hope that we're able to
show some of the uh presentation on screen even if you have to look over your shoulder at the big monitors. I'm not sure. Here we go. Okay, that's a plus. Okay. All right. Well, thank you, sir.
Um, good evening, chair and board members. Again, Greg Paulie, community development here this evening with an update on the redevelopment area. First, I'd like to give you a quick overview of the available CRA properties
offered by the city. The slide image shows the property at 8901 North 56th Street. This property is listed for sale and ready for development. This site is 1.75 acres um located in the southeast quadrant of the redevelopment area right
in the center of the downtown Overlay district. The site is positioned south of the Fountain Shops Plaza and west of Waverly Terrace Apartments. You may recall uh that this we recently had interest on this particular site from a
group that was wishing to build an indooroutdoor pickleball concept restaurant and bar. However, that group was unable to sufficiently satisfy um financial stability concerns previously requested. Since that time, the price for this
particular property was reduced to $1.445 $445 million. Our broker, John Lochner with Florida ROI, has received new interest in the property and is currently accepting proposals. The current proposal window
is open from now through uh April 6th. Once proposals are received and qualified, I will work with Mr. Lochner to get the proposals before this board and if approved by this board in front of the city council as quickly as possible. Next, we have the property located at
8447 North 56th Street. This property is also listed for sale and ready for development. The site is 1.74 acres and is located south of the Enigma Plaza and north of South River Hills Drive. The listing price on this parcel is $1
million. Our broker has also received interest in this property and is currently accepting proposals. As with the previous property, the um proposal window is currently open and will close on April the 6th. Once again, once the proposals are received and qualified,
I'll work with the broker to bring those proposals to you uh and subsequently to the uh city council as quickly as possible. Now, moving on to the current projects in the CRA. Uh first up is our very own emergency operations center. The EOC is
located at 126 Bullard Parkway adjacent to fire station number one. Uh the EOC will be 8,955 square ft of two-story hardened facility. The site development infrastructure work is currently underway and the building permits have
been reviewed, approved and are good to go. Next, we have the Barria Pediatric Clinic located at 234 Bullard Parkway. This project involves the addition of a 7,944
square foot pediatric clinic to be built behind the original structure at 234. You may recall that that structure um was previously in discussion and they were attempting to uh restore that structure as it sits. Unfortunately,
after the work began on restoration, uh it was discovered that the scope of the structural decay to the original structure was more severe than initially anticipated. For this reason, the developer has submitted a modification to their original site plan. uh for a full
reconstruction of the original structure. The modification request will be coming back before the city council in the near future. It's currently working its way through the DRC process. Next up, we have the Enigma Plaza. Uh Enigma Plaza is located at 8633 North
56th Street. Uh this project includes approximately 35,000 square feet of retail space, multi-tenant retail space. Uh the site recently received its certificate of completion for the main structure and the site improvements. Individual tenant buildouts are
currently underway. Thus far we have several shops roughly between 50 and 75% complete. These shops include a coffee shop, three restaurants, a sweets and confection store, a massage spa, and uh
at about the 30 to 40% completion, we have a nail salon. We also have a couple of units just getting started. Uh the permit applications have been received, however, work has not yet begun. And those units include an ice cream parlor
and a perfume retailer. Now transitioning over to the residential town home projects on Overlook. First up, we have Overlook One Town Homes located at 8701 uh Overlook Drive. This project includes
two multifamily structures, each having two dwellings uh for a total of four dwelling units. The site plan was approved on this site in September of 2023. construction is underway and is now approximately 85 maybe slightly greater
percent complete. And just uh compare the uh rendering that was originally submitted to what's there now. Here's just changing the picture on the same slide shows you what's there now. Moving on to overlook two, which is
directly across the street to the west. Overlook 2, very similar project located at 8702 Overlook Drive. This project includes four multifamily structures, each having two units for a total of eight dwelling units. The site plan on
this project was approved in November of 2024. And this project has not yet broken ground. And finally here we have Overlook three town homes located just up the street about a half a block to the north. Um
located at 8727 Overlook Drive. This project includes four multi-family structures each having two dwellings again for a total of eight units. Uh the site plan was approved in November of 2024. The site was previously occupied by an
old residential structure that was in very poor condition. Uh that structure was recently demolished and to make way for new construction. The actual groundbreaking on new construction has not yet begun. And finally, my last slide for you this
evening is the park improvements for Riverside Park and Springdale Pond. Uh you'll recall that this was um discussed back in February. Um phase one planning and design was
approved at that time. The consultant is now working to secure environmental approvals and preparing the proposal documents for phase one construction. Once received, staff intends to publish a solicitation for proposals in late
summer or early fall of this year. And this concludes my presentation. and I'll be happy to entertain any questions. >> Thank you, Mr. Pauly. Board members, other questions? >> Yes, >> council member board member Fernandez. >> So, I have a question for you about the
interaction with our realtor. So, we've we the city are not the experts on on selling property. uh what kind of guidance are they able to offer to us to help make this property as marketable as possible while still meeting our goals
of activating the space? >> I have a um I'll call it an ongoing relationship with our broker. I speak to him several times a week um including today. Um prior to this meeting I I
reached out to him. um they are uh very uh helpful in guiding not only myself but also other members of staff man higher management staff um Mr. Locker of course works for Mr. ODM, the senior
broker in that firm, and the two of them together are a wealth of knowledge with regards to all things commercial. Uh, very strong on the retail fronts. Um, they're able to guide us and and and move us along in that direction. Um, but
they will be the first to uh also bring to the table that some of our challenges are, uh, geographical and districtbased. Um, with regard to the actual CRA area, it's much larger than the parcels that
we people tend to focus on and the obviously the parcels that we have for sale. What are we as a city or what should we be doing to aid investment or encourage investment in the rest of the
CRA? >> It's a very good question. Uh very strong point on the front side. As you know, the entire CRA is nearly 225 acres. Um you'll hear the majority of our discussions focus on that southeast
quadrant. This is the uh the portion of property that the city began to gather some 20 years ago and bank those parcels. Um so all of the uh city initiative and focus uh for the
marketing and sale of those properties have always obviously been focused on those parcels. Um there are other properties uh the overlook project for one is not within that same geographical
regional region. Um and they are uh able to build in this case a uh residential structure that uh is going to suit a a particular housing need in that area but not necessarily have face some of the
same challenges that the commercial piece would otherwise face. As far as otherwise um promoting the area in general, uh everything we do um talks about our CRA.
uh we we we routinely talk about uh the available opportunities within the CRA both for pre-built uh buildings that have tenency availability and obviously we have a couple of remaining um
ready to build sites and then ultimately one of the things that uh that we really have recently been able to and when I say recently I mean the last couple of years we've been able to wrap in the pedestrian master pedestrian plan improvements to kind of connect
everything together and also um now we've got the Riverside Park improvements and the Springdale pond improvements coming online. Um these are all very strong selling points for that area. >> Okay. So I I guess I'd like to ask
I don't expect any answer or any decision from this council, but I would like to to see if we can have a discussion about what we should be doing in order to make or to attract more development to the parts that aren't
owned by the city, but to encourage, you know, remodeling. um building new. I mean, you see this all over Tampa now. Things are being torn down and built and there's, you know, there's investment in certain areas and and what could we do
to help position ourselves for encouraging this kind of investment and we know that Mosy is going to be redeveloped and what can we do? Do we need to see if we can have some sort of
top tier developer, you know, meet with us and give us some guidance or I just I guess I'm just concerned because what happens is that we tend to be on the low totem pole of
development and this has been going on a long time and we need to to have um meaningful investment Beyond. Part: 2
book that was issued by the Junior Women's Club. And you can see that it's handwritten and then run on the mograph, I believe, was the machinery they used. But it's it a
quintessential read of old Temple Terrace with lots of women who submitted recipes who went on from junior women's club to be very active in the women's club and are still active in the community today. Um but it
is handwritten and a little maybe a little bit hard to read, but they've got two volumes. So, uh, some of these things are very interesting to see like what was popular. This this was, um, so we moved to Temple Terrace in 1972 and my mother
was a member of Junior Women's Club and I can't tell you ex the exact year that they published this, but it was sometime in the 70s. So, it was one of their fundraisers. And then
50 year anniversary of Junior Women's Club. I was now in the Junior Women's Club and serving as vice president and president, treasure and what have you. And then and we actually produced the 50-year anniversary of the Junior
Women's Club cookbook with some nod to the past with bringing forward some of their recipes and with current members of the community submitting theirs. So we've got the continuity of young women,
mothers in the community making trying to make a difference and make this community a better place for them. And then I've also got this one's a little more delicate, but this is the first
scrapbook for the Greco. It at the time junior high school PTA and 1981 1982 um that was actually the year I started at Greco. So I just want to read off who the
officers were. Um, this was also a little bit of a handwritten book. Keep in mind, people did not really have computers in their house. They did a lot of typing and handwriting. So, uh, the
president, the first president was Mr. PC Clary, and they they do still live in Temple Terrace. Vice President was Miss Elellanar Wells. Second vice president was Mr. Fred Beam. Recording secretary, Miss Wanda Wittmann. corresponding secretary was
Miss Lee Mole and treasurer was Miss Match Bowers who also still lives in Temple Terrace and they created that was the first creation of the PTA at Reco Junior High School
and we have some pictures I don't know if you you guys can see them but it's um clearly 81 but these are the kind of things that help show how connected the residents are
from the past into today. So, M Bowers, I went to high school with her son. I'm very good friends with her daughter today and I don't want to count how many years later that is, but there's a lot of continuity in the community and and
badge Bower's grandson graduated from King High School with my older son. It's a it's we are a very um continuous community where uh people have served, volunteered, recorded it and um you know
and this is the kind of thing that we want to see if you have something like this at home or some of these books that you have laying around that showcase some element of Temple Terrace's past. if you're interested in bringing them
into the city for us to help preserve them for future people to see and appreciate the community that we've had and the community that we continue to nurture going forward. So, that's my fun
fact. >> Oh, thank you. >> She upped the game on us. She's bringing visual aids now. So, who's next now? What's Who's got it next month? Next meeting. Now, we're going to Yeah. Now you see you got to go find something.
Make up. Bring an old golf club. There you go. Okay. Very good. So, next we have uh really a whole series of special kind of recognitions, but but this first one's really kind of hard to top, which I think is why we put it first. But, uh is Joseph Hartman here? Would you please
come up to the podium? This is going to blow you away. This is quite a story. Wait till you hear this. So, good evening. >> Good evening. >> On Monday, se December 29th of 2025, Mike uh Michael Donahghue, son of Sher
Donahghue and Mike Donahghue, who are here with us, was working out at the family rec center uh fitness center. After returning to the Donahghue residence where he was staying while visiting from New York, Michael suddenly went into cardiac arrest. At the very
moment, Sherry and Mike Donahghue's grandson, Joseph Hartman, uh, who is also a lifeguard at the family rec center, works for the city of Temple Terrace, was also present in the home. Recognizing the gravity of the situation, without any hesitation,
Joseph sprang into action and with calm precision and unwavering focus, he began performing CPR. Sustaining life-saving efforts continuously until the Temple Terrace police and fire personnel arrived. Thanks to Joseph's immediate and decisive response, Michael was
rushed to Advent Hospital. And after a brief hospital stay, he made a full recovery. Emergency room physicians and cardiologists alike have credited Joseph's rapid and expert actions with saving Michael's life. It is with tremendous pride and appreciation that
we recognize Joseph Hartman for his life-saving efforts. In a moment that demanded courage, clarity, and selflessness, he rose to the occasion without hesitating. We're deeply grateful for his actions, and we're extremely honored to to acknowledge his remarkable heroism. So, let's give this
young man Would you like to say a few Oh, you're not getting away that. Or >> would you like to say a few words? Um, I'd just like to thank uh Tiffany and Emra for keeping me so well trained and um my family and God being with me there
that night. Um, it really meant a lot, >> I guess. So, well, thank you and thank and we're uh extremely proud of you and I know your family is too. So, if I can if we can get your grandfather to a council meeting, you know, something extraordinary, we have a uh award for you.
>> Come on up. Good job. >> You're still with us. I told you you're going to like that story. Hard to beat that one. So, um, related to that same event, you might notice that we have a number of our
firefighters are here. Um, where is Oh, here we go. Okay, I'm losing my place. and some of our police officers here related to the same event. So, um would I don't know if I can bring you all up to the podium. Can you see okay from where you are? All right,
let's do this. Let's just stay there and then I'll have up for the certificate. So, um Joseph Hartman, would you like to return to the podium, please? I I'm just doing this the way they're telling me it's supposed to look good this way.
Um there's too many of the rest of them to call up. So, um, Joseph Hartman acted without hesitation, demonstrating extraordinary courage and the compassion in stepping forward to save the life of a person experiencing cardiac arrest. At the same time, we
recognized a swift and coordinated response of our emergency services personnel. Police Officer Christian Gush was the first member of the city's emergency response team to arrive on the scene, immediately assessing the situation and providing essential assistance. He was
quickly joined by a team of our dedicated firefighters to include rescue cl crew Corey Sullivan and Ethan Brown and engine crew Chris Sers, Jesse Oats, and Austin Smith. Their professionalism, professionalism, skill, and teamwork ensured that advanced medical care was
delivered without delay. Cardiac emergencies demand rapid action and the seamless efforts of everyone involved from the initial life-saving intervention to the arrival of our trained police and fire professionals were instrumental in securing a positive outcome.
Thank you to Joseph Hartman, police officer Gush, and our firefighters Corey Sullivan, Ethan Brown, Chris Sers, Jesse Oats, and Austin Smith for your decisive actions, unwavering commitment, and except exceptional service to our community. because of your great
teamwork, a life was saved. And so, thank you everybody involved. Okay. Now, if you're one of those crew, would you join us up front, please? >> Oh, you got to stay here. police officer here,
>> chief. >> Oh, he's >> I need your help. Good job. Thank you. >> All right, we got to figure out how to center >> and we need you want to be Three,
four, six. Maybe you want to be in the middle. I don't know. One, two, three. One, two, three. Okay. >> Oh, it's working. It's not turning off. >> Yay. Yeah. Look, it didn't m
Okay. Next, we have a proclamation for Women's History Month. Is Kylie Dumis with us tonight? >> Yes. Please approach the uh podium. Good evening. Kylie is uh one of our USF interns
working with the city right now. So, community development, right? I thought so. Okay, good. So, thank you for accepting the proclamation. Whereas, the US Congress proclaimed the month of March as women's history month in 1987 and has proclaimed the
observance each year since. American women of every race, class, ethnic background have made historic contributions to the growth and strength of our nation in countless recorded and unrecorded ways. Women have played and continue to play critical economic,
cultural, and social roles in every sphere of life by constituting a significant portion of the labor force. For centuries, socioeconomic forces women's progress. However, despite these obstacles, America boasts a rich rich
history of courageous women who defied the odds. The city of Temple Terrace has been home to many dynamic and great women leaders, community servants, entrepreneurs, and business professionals, educators, constructed a path to ensure the Temple
Terrace community continues to thrive. Now, therefore, I, Andrew Ross, by virtue of the authority vested in me as mayor of the city of Temple Terrace, Florida, hereby designate March 2026 as Women's History Month. And so, that's very good. Kylie, would you like to say
a few words? Sure. Thank you, mayor, allowing me to accept this proclamation this year. And I just wanted to say I've had a really great time here um interning in community development and being able to interact with the archives that we have of this city.
>> Very good. And so I know you go to USF. What year are you? >> I'm a senior. >> Senior. So you're graduating this this spring? >> Yes. >> Very good. You're going to come >> grad school >> and then you're going to grad school. >> Okay. For what? Um what's your major? >> Public history.
>> Oh, wonderful. So in a employment opportunity here. We've done we've done that before. So very good. Well, thank you very much. >> One, two, three. One, two, three. Good. >> Thank you for your work.
>> We have Rabbi Laser Rivkin and I think that's his lovely wife, D'vorah. >> Yes, >> with him. Good evening, ma'am. >> Good evening, everyone. >> Good evening, Rabbi. Thank you for joining us tonight.
>> Good evening, uh, Mayor Andy Ross. >> So, you're very welcome. So, we've always for many years now given a proclamation for Passover. And this year, uh, Rabbi, the other Rabbi Riiffken, is he your brother? >> No, he's our son.
>> Oh, he's your son. Okay. So, he asked us >> came here who was a half a year old. >> Okay. He asked us this year to do a proclamation for education and sharing day and passover. And so that's the reason that it's a little different this
year was upon his request. So uh whereas education has long been recognized as the cornerstone of a strong and vibrant community, empowering individuals with knowledge, character, and the values necessary to contribute positively to society.
Education and sharing day is observed annually to establish the importance of education underscoring our dedication to encouraging the nath nation's youth to build a solid foundation for a lifetime of accomplishments. Education and Sharing Day pays tribute
to the unique efforts of Rabbi I'm sure I'm gonna I'm gonna try my best on this uh Menisham Mendel Schneerson who made outstanding and lasting contributions towards improvements in world education, morality and acts of charity and was
awarded the Congressional Gold Medal and in addition Congress established his birthday as a national day to raise awareness and strengthen the education of our children. The holiday of Passover encourages the sharing of stories across generations, reinforcing the importance
of education, remembrance, and transmission of values that strengthen families and communities. The themes of education, compassion, freedom, and mutual responsibility reflected in both observances provide an opportunity for our community to reaffirm its commitment
to learning, respect, and unity among people of all backgrounds. Now therefore, I, Andrew Ross, by virtue of the authority vested in me as mayor of the city of Temple Terrace, Florida, recognize the observance of education and sharing day and Passover. And Rabbi,
would you like to say a few words for us? >> Sure. It's now 50 years that myself, my wife, and our children here, Temple Terrace was a lot smaller then.
And thank God it has grown and it is filled with men, women, children from all over the world. When I came here in 1976, my wife and our son and I 100 is considered a
fullness, a double jubilee. 26 is the numerical value of God's name. This is a city that has always been based on the principles of
and God we trust. We are an in gathering of all the peoples of the world here. Abraham was the father, you could say the philosophical father of all of humanity in a sense. And so when his
children went into exile in Egypt and then came forth from Egypt, a nation, they were a nation that took upon themselves the concept of a belief in one God. All of us here are descendants of those
except maybe a few rare indigenous peoples. But from those immigrants that came here to these sore shores and with God's help built a wonderful flourishing America.
A United States the word is and the key is united states each separate with each's beliefs and goals and aspirations. But united we stand.
We are in turbulent times. May God bless us, guide us for the principles upon which this country was based whereby our founding fathers and God we trust. And they came
here to a shore of liberty, of freedom from oppression, of being given the opportunity opportunities to become a great nation, the greatest nation, one can say in the
world and in history. For in unity there is strength. And because we come from all the four corners of the earth here, we have the strength to create a garden of Eden here. So, thank you all of you.
It's good to see a packed room. >> Thank you, Rabbi. >> And in a way, just a little footnote. I remember writing in the temple terrace beacon. I'm happy to see that it came back after a period of uh time that uh
it was waiting for the new generation to come. Thank you very much. >> Thank you very I'm glad they pulled you up. Thank you for coming. Happy fall be rejuvenated again
in a peaceful world. >> Thank you, Rabbi. Next, Brother Steven, would you please come to the podium? So, Brother Steven is here with us tonight from the Catholic Brotherhood of Hope. Um, he's a friend of mine and a neighbor
also, not directly across the street, but right down the road. And so, thank you for coming here tonight. >> I know you're I think you're left home alone because everybody's on spring break. Is that uh >> nice and peaceful? Well, thank you. Whereas Easter is the
most sacred observance in Christianity and symbolizes new life, hope, and renewal, billions of Christians around the world celebrate Easter with worship, prayer, fellowship, and acts of service that reflect the enduring values of compassion, forgiveness, and charity.
The Temple Terrace Christian Community contributes meaningfully to the civic, cultural, and charitable life of our community through faith-based outreach, volunteerism, and support for neighbors in need. Easter is also a time when families and congregations come together
in celebration, reinforcing the bonds of community, encouraging and encouraging acts of goodwill, generosity, and unity among residents. Recognizing the diverse traditions and beliefs represented in our city, it is fitting to acknowledge occasions that
hold deep meaning for members of our community that inspire service, hope, and shared humanity. Now, therefore, I, Andrew Ross, by virtue of the authority vested in me as mayor of the city of Temple Terrace, Florida, recognize the profound significance of the Christian
community's celebration of Easter. And so, brother, would you like to share a few words with us? >> Well, thank you, mayor. It's a blessing to be here. I have not been here as long as Rabbi I've been here three years, but the great gift it is to be able to living in Temple Terrace. I love it. I
came from Boston this time and just living here and the community getting to know the folks has been a blessing. but also as we work with the students seeing the eagerness, the hope, the desire for God that is there and their responsiveness to it and what a
privilege it is to be part of that and working with the young men and women and seeing their response. We have overflowing crowds uh at our services but also at others we've seen them and so it's a real joy and a blessing to be here. Thank you. Well, >> thank you brother and thanks for joining us tonight.
>> Thank you. It's nice and peaceful, is it? >> It is. Nice and quiet. >> Sorry. One, two, three. One, two, three. >> Thank you for coming.
Okay, we do actually have some city business that we're going to move on. So, council members, has everybody had an opportunity to review the meeting the minutes from our March 3rd meeting and if they're acceptable, is there a motion to approve? >> Move to approve.
>> Second. >> Motion to second. Any corrections to the minutes? If not, all those in favor say I. >> I. Opposed. No nays. The minutes are adopted. Next, we have persons wishing to be heard on items not listed on the agenda
or items on the consent agenda. Request to address the mayor and council are in the back of the chambers on the table um back near the door to the AV room. Uh we do have a 30 minute time limit for this section of the meeting.
Uh if it's necessary, we will then stop the public comment section, move on to complete our agenda, and then resume public comment after the agenda has been done. That's not been a problem for a long time, but I like to announce it once in a while. Uh we do have a
threeminut time limit imposed on each speaker from the public. We ask that speakers come to the podium and state their name and city of residence. During public comment, we want to assure everybody that your comments are taken seriously and that the city manager, the directors, and your council members and
your mayor do take notes and follow up on issues that are brought up. So, I currently have a number of requests to speak, but it's not too late. If you change your mind and request to address the council, you can still fill out a form and just give it to the city clerk. Our first uh request is from Nancy
Hudson and Anita and June and Dave. So you guys can all come up and let me guess what you're going to talk about. I can tell by the attire. Good evening everybody. It's good to see you again. >> Nancy Hudson, Temple Terrace. Um thank
you Mayor Ross and council members. Um we are here to share our event that's coming up which is our major fundraiser for the Arts Council Art on Blanc. It will be on March 28th. It is at Woodmont Park. It's from 7 to 10:00 p.m. This is our 14th year holding the event. And
again, it is our major fundraiser for the arts council. And the arts council does so many things in Temple Terrace, but one of the main events it does is the arts festival in November. And this is one of the one of the ways that we secure the funds to be able to make sure that we can hold the festival successfully in November. Um, we all
dress in white. Everyone wears white to the party. You can get your tickets on Eventbrite or on our website. You can buy a table or you can simply buy a ticket. Um, one of the fun things and what one of the art parts about it is that we have a contest for all of the um, centerpieces and for the tablescapes
and there are awards given. So, everyone has there's a lot of energy and a lot of art all around the event. It's really fun and we enjoy doing it. We enjoy putting it together. Um, the council is very small but very mighty. So, we hope that we'll see all of you there and we want to definitely invite the community to join us again this year for the 14th
annual Art on Block. >> Thank you. Thank you guys for being here. Nice to see you. Next, uh, Mr. Loe. Madame Clerk, don't forget the clock. Thank you. >> Good evening, Mr. Lo. >> Good evening, everybody. Uh, Charles Lo,
Terrace Park. First of all, wish you h happy St. Patrick's Day. Have a little green on my thing. And I put my green ink in my thing too in my request to speak. Uh, over the speaking of events, there's been quite I didn't know about that one, but there's quite a few coming
up or have been. Uh the one event that I thought about is March 26th to March 28th which is the library sale coming up. Uh but we have had over the first half of the month five events uh which I listed down on the u on the
thing. Uh however the thing I want to focus on particularly tonight is the comp plan. Uh I was thinking about some of the details and some of the things that I was talking about. Uh number one I want to address this to the mayor. Uh I was uh they were telling me that they
plan on revising the uh Fowler Avenue vision study from 50 to 56th Street. Now what I asked him was let's suppose the mayor wanted to go further east. Uh would would you be willing to do that? And when I asked them that uh they said yes. So that's something you might want
to think about rather you would want to uh have Fowler Avenue studied the area studied further east or not. The other things I wanted to talk about were several things on the presentation, several numbers on it. Uh the first number was about $70,000 is the median
income around here. Uh which is fairly comparable from what I saw in the Fowler Avenue vision study for Hillsboro County and uh and the city of Tampa. Uh so I'm not going to make too much about that. Another little bit surprising thing is that the median age is 36.3.
Now, that might not sound like anything, but it's three years younger than the national average according to them. But the main figure I want to focus on tonight is uh the uh the the what people pay in relation to their income for
their mortgage payments. That's 37.5% typically according to them. This is 7 and a half% over what people should be paid. Uh I asked them if that statistic includes uh like property taxes,
property insurance. One thing I forgot to ask him was toward basic upkeep. I guess the point I'm trying to get at is what I said before it is kind of hard on people because they're paying a lot of money when you put that all together and that doesn't even count other forms of
expenses. I hope uh I I hope in the future that when they do the comp plan that they will do a uh thing where they will consider property taxes, property insurance, basic upkeep and things like that when they do the statistics in the future. I don't I don't know if you want
to call it misery index or anything like that, but the you might call it a true cost of owning property within this community or any other community. Thank you all and good evening and again happy St. Patrick's Day. Again, reminder of the library sale. Thank you, Mr. Loe.
Next, we have Blanch Hampton. >> Good evening, Miss Hampton. >> Hi. Good evening. Uh, my name is Blanch Hampton. I have I was born in Temple Terrace. I've come back to take care of my aging mother. Um, I wanted to speak
to you today. I'm here today to express dismay over the current approach by code compliance to aid in its mission on behalf of the city to increase expectations and standards of Temple Terrace. That is straight from the website. The current courtesy notices
being handed out and the conversations being had need to be reconsidered. They are not reflective of the community that I thought Temple Terrace was. I was born here and have come back here. The courtesy notices and the pressured
conversations are heavy-handed, going out of bounds of a communal interest, and frankly insensitive to the needs of the longest of residents. I happen to live on Royal Grains Drive and the median age about a year or two ago
was 74. That's important because the current approach I think is a bit insensitive to the generational differences of the residents of this community. Um, forcing a housekeeper out of the
house to listen to you when you have been told that the person to speak is not at home is not acceptable in the current climate. threatening that visi threatening that visitor with a courtesy notice a visitor
to the house the housekeeper and stating that the police can ticket her is very unnecessary today. The notices are not a courtesy at all as they are written with a QR code which many residents cannot access. Many
residents just don't use their smartphones, if they have a smartphone at all, if they can open up the handset, if they even know what a telephone is anymore. The notices seem friendly, but they are handed over to the resident. Sorry, this
is not a holistic approach to encouraging homeowners to gather resources that they may not have. What resources does the city have for its aging residents other than Lightfoot? What consideration is given to its older residents who have been here sometimes
for 50 years, paid their taxes, paid for their insurance, made sure that their lawn was mowed, but right now may not have the resources, whether it be time or money or the connections to have uh a
mortar specialist, a Spanish tile specialist on hand. When an officer is called or drives out, what research informs that officer walking up to the door, what do they know about the person within? What do
they know about that resident, how long they've been there, how old they are, what their disabilities are, what their challenges are. calls to the department suggest that code compliance officers see their role as educators and not I'm done cooked.
Thank you. >> Thank you, Miss Hampton. We're sorry for the frustration that you're experiencing. City manager, I'm sure you're going to follow up on that. Would you send the council a update when you do? I'm sure we'd all like to keep informed on that. Thank you.
Uh, Anthony Guido. Good evening, sir. Hello. Thank you for allowing me to speak today. I'm Anthony Guido. I live here in Temple Terrace for almost 10 years now. When I heard the city was having an Easter proclamation, I had to come. Easter is such an important time
for Christians. It's not about springtime and it's not about the Easter bunny. It's about the resurrection of Christ. It's a historical fact that Jesus lived and performed many miracles. He gave sight to a blind man, healed a paralyzed
man, and everybody's favorite, he turned water into wine. For performing all these miracles, he was crucified. Then three days later, defeated death and rose from the tomb. That's what we are celebrating. The resurrection of Jesus Christ, our Lord
and Savior, the greatest miracle of all. I'd like to read a scripture. Mark 16 5-7. As they entered the tomb, they saw a young man dressed in a white robe sitting on the right side. They were alarmed. Don't be alarmed, he said. You
are looking for Jesus of Nazareth who was crucified. He is risen. He is not here. See his place where they laid him. But go tell the disciples and Peter, he is going ahead of you into Galilee. There you will see him as just as he
told you. Thank you. >> Thank you, Mr. Greo. Next is Alyssa Hines. Good evening, Miss Hines. >> Hello. First, I just want to say thank you for the Mayor Ross for that beautiful Easter
proclamation. Um, we celebrate the resurrection of Jesus Christ, but not but to truly understand what Easter means, we need to look at what happened after the resurrection. In Acts 1:3, it says after his suffering, he presented himself to them and gave many convincing
proofs that he was alive. Jesus didn't just sit didn't rise quietly and disappear. He appeared to his followers, spoke with them, and proved that death had been defeated. Because of that truth, everything changed for the disciples. Just weeks earlier, they were afraid to even admit they knew Jesus.
But after witnessing the resurrection and receiving the Holy Spirit, they began boldly preaching everywhere. Biblically, the book of Acts shows us something remarkable. The same 12 disciples who once hidden fear after Jesus was crucified suddenly became bold leaders who changed the
world. Why? Because they had seen the risen of Jesus. The disciples weren't famous leaders, weren't politicians or kings. They were just ordinary men, fishermen, tax collectors, everyday people. But because they believed in the rising of Christ, they spoke boldly and
lives were transformed. When authorities tried to silence them, they refused. In Acts 2, Peter the apostle stood before a crowd in Jerusalem and declared the truth about Jesus. Acts 2:41 tells us something incredible. Those who accepted his message were baptized and about
3,000 of them were added to that number that day. 3,000 people in one day. In Acts 4:20, Peter and the other apostles said, "For we cannot help speaking about what we have seen and heard. That courage is the heartbeat of Easter. And at times we are afraid to share our
faith in Christ because it might make people feel uncomfortable or even reject us." Peter and John's passion for the Lord was so strong that they could not keep quiet even when threatened. But the truth is this. Jesus did not die for us to keep it a secret. The resurrection wasn't meant to be hidden. And the
message of Easter is that the greatest news of the world have ever heard that through Jesus forgiveness is possible, hope is real, and eternal life is offered to everyone. The 12 disciples went on to spread the message around the world. Cities changed, families changed, nations changed, and billions of lives
have been impacted because they refused to stay silent. So for Christians today, Easter is a reminder. Do not be afraid to share your faith. Speak with love, speak with courage, and the same power that changed the disciples lives in us. And for anyone still wondering what they believe, the resurrection invites you to
ask an honest question. What if it's true? Because if Jesus truly rose from the dead and he is who exactly then he is who exactly claimed to be. And that means his invitation still stands today. So follow him and believe in him. Experience life that Easter promises. Jesus didn't die for us to keep it a
secret. So let's have Easter be the moment Christians fight find the courage to speak and moment seekers find the courage to believe. Because the resurrection isn't just a story from history. It's an invitation. The men in the Acts of the Apostles weren't powerful, famous, or perfect, but they had something stronger than fear. They
had witnessed the risen Christ, and because of that, they changed the world. Thank you. >> Thank you, Miss Hines. Lorie Barkley, Colette. Colette. >> Good evening, ma'am. >> I would like to thank the mayor and the
city council for the Easter proclamation. My name is Lori Barklay Colette. I've lived in Temple Terrace since 1987 and I'm a retired neurologist. I was involved in academic neurology at Cornell University and then at
University of South Florida and then was in private practice in Temple Terrace for many years at 12101 North 56th Street. I am now the uh Bible studying teacher and worship leader of New Life Bible Church uh which will have our
first service this coming Sunday in the same location 12101 North 56th Street. I want to thank the city as I said for this proclamation because as a neurologist I can speak personally to
the importance of hope in everyone's life and we live in perilous times in troubling times. We're in the midst of wars. We have had casualties involving troops from our very own city. We suffered so many losses of life and
incurrence of of disabilities from the two thou from the pandemic in 2019 and thereafter we've gone through the devastation of storms and hurricanes in recent years. We are suffering the
effects of economic downturn and joblessness. And with all this, we need to say we need hope. And I believe that the Easter proclamation and its uh respect for the belief that Christians have in the death, burial, and
resurrection of Jesus Christ as the only way to eternal life. I believe that is the hope that the world needs and that temple terrorist specifically needs. And I thank you for that proclamation. The Bible says, and I believe that Jesus was
crucified, came to earth as the uh perfect sinless son of God, the lamb of God, who took on the sins of all the world and paid for them in his own flesh by dying on that cross on our behalf.
And then he was buried and rose again on the third day that all who trust him would have eternal life. I thank you again for recognizing this fact and the hope that it brings to so many people worldwide. Thank you for the opportunity to speak.
>> Thank you, Dr. Patrick Brown. Lauren Brown, are you that I'm assuming that's you? Would are you donating time to Patrick? You are. Okay. >> So, that gives you four minutes, Mr. Brown.
>> Uh well, thank you everyone. It's so nice to see you all. >> Hold on. Let the clerk reset the clock. >> Okay. >> I don't want any confusion here. And we set it for 12 minutes and >> I mean, >> start the filibuster and mess this back up. >> Four minutes. >> Grievances.
>> Okay, now we're good. We're good. Patrick, you're all up. >> No, I do I don't have any grievances. I want to thank everyone up here, first of all, for that wonderful Easter proclamation. Thank you so much. That is what I'm up here to speak about. Um, I am a Temple Terrace resident. Uh I lived
in Temple Terrace for about 10ish years. Moved to Tampa in, uh 2007 to go to college. Um I just wanted to speak about Jesus. So uh so God created the world, right? Um everything was perfect and beautiful in the garden and it was just
awesome. He also created mankind and uh he had a perfect relationship with man and God had a perfect relationship with us and then man decided to sin and and and disobey God and sin in Hebrew means to
miss the mark to miss that uh to miss that target. So we missed God's target and when that happened we fell we fell from grace and glory. Um sin is anything that like I said misses the target or anything that uh
when anything we s think say or do that dishonors God right and uh that that caused sin to enter the world and be broken disease frustrations with the government frustrations with our neighbors frustrations with our our our spouses frustrations with broken
families war death you name it disease doesn't matter People try to escape this brokenness through chasing money, chasing success, chasing perfect health, chasing relationships, pleasure, or new
experiences or anything like that. God knew that people couldn't address their own sin. And that's why he sent his son Jesus. Jesus lived a perfect life, a life just like ours. For many years he was a carpenter and a stonemason to build buildings and have a
business probably inherited in Joseph's business as well. Um and in that he started his ministry led led 12 young men and uh eventually told them hey I'm going to have to sacrifice myself in order to save you. And so he did. He
lived that perfect life a sinless life. And he died that death on the cross that we deserved in a as a ransom to pay for our sins. Three days later he rose from the dead. Uh this proves that he is the son of God and that he is who he says he is. Uh
with this resurrection he defeated death and sin and he is now seated at the right hand of the father and has given all author has been given all authority in heaven on and on earth. So Jesus died to pay for our sins. This is
a gift we have to choose to accept. To accept this gift of salvation, you must surrender your life to Jesus, believing that he died and rose from the dead, repenting of your sin and making him the king of your life. To repent to means to
turn away from sin, to turn back towards your creator and your father. When you accept this gift of salvation, you will become a new person in God. you will enjoy a restored relationship with him and spend eternity in heaven with God and Jesus. The only way to get back
to God is through Jesus's sacrifice. Um, I want to say that when I was a child, I I grew up in the church and my father was a worship pastor or worship leader and uh he would always sing this uh song
or this hymn uh based off of Hebrews 3:15. And I just want to say that as it says, "Oh, that today you would listen as he speaks. Do not harden your hearts as in the rebellion." Uh, thank you once again for this proclamation and I hope you all have a great evening.
>> Um, are there other members of the public who wish to address the council? That's the last request I have. Are there other members of the public who wish to address the council? Okay. If not, council, uh, is there a
motion to approve the consent agenda? >> Some move. Second. >> Motion second. All those in favor say I. >> I. >> I. Opposed. >> Consent agenda is adopted. Thank you. Next, we have a series of public hearings. The first one is a public hearing and first reading of an
ordinance reszoning Folio 38206.0000 for property located at 7911 Carney Road. and Folio 382 06.0020 otherwise known as RZP-25-04 from agricultural urban to public quasi
public and I will open the public hearing and our city planner the famous Joe Moretta is here to explain. Good evening, mayor, council members. We've already been through the numbers, so I'll go ahead and get right to the meat of the issue. Um, the property
that's subject of the resoning is intended to house the public safety facility, which in itself will uh include the police department headquarters and fire station number three. Um, this is generally located, the parcel is generally located on the south side of
Hornney Road, approximately 1500 ft east of the intersection of 78th Street, North 78th Street. The parcel itself is 5 acres large totaling two part two folios. The site is currently vacant. Uh, the future land
use is community mixuse 12. The existing zoning is agricultural urban and the site will have access to Harney Road which is a Hillsburg County arterial. The adjacent future land uses include to the north community mixuse 12. To the
south and east also are community mixuse 12 and to the west is residential 6 which is in Hillsboro County. In terms of existing land use, to the north is a warehouse distribution center. To the south is underdeveloped property.
To the east is also undeveloped property. And to the west again is in Hillsbor County as well. And that's a single family subdivision. The adjacent zoning to the north where the warehouse is is plan development. To the south and east is agricultural
urban. and to the west is a plan development uh which is the again the subdivision in Hillsboro County. In terms of the review uh the application was transmitted to the planning commission. The planning commission staff reviewed this and found
it to be consistent with the city's comprehensive plan. In terms of your city of Temple Terrace staff, this was also reviewed by the development review committee. Uh the DRC had no objections to its approval. Um the standard district resoning does not
require a conceptual site plan. Uh so the city council will see a final site plan uh brought forward in a separate process in the future. Our findings on the review were that the proposed reszoning is compatible with the existing zoning and land uses in the
area, that it's consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff is recommending approval and we are recommending the scheduling of the second reading on April 7th. I'm available if anyone has any questions. >> Thank you, Mr. Moretta. Are there members of the public who wish to
comment on this item? Seeing none, council members, are there questions? Okay. If there are no questions, I'll close the public hearing and ask the clerk to read the title of the ordinance. An ordinance of the city of Temple
Terrace, Florida, reszoning two partials totaling 5 acres plus or minus generally located on the south side of Harney Road, approximately 1500 ft east of the intersection of North 78th Street, more
specifically described as Folio 38206.0000 0000 7911 Hornney Road and Folio 38206.0020 and legally described in exhibit A.
Changing the zoning atlas map designation on said property from zoning classification agricultural urban AU to public quasi public pqP
providing for amendment of the official zoning atlas map of the city providing for severability providing for correction of typographical errors repealing all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict here with providing for an
effective date. >> Thank you, madame clerk. Uh councel, if there is a motion, we need two things done in the motion. One is to approve this on first reading and second thing what needs to be in the motion is to schedule the second reading for April 7th. So is there such a motion?
>> Move to approve first reading of ordinance reszoning folio 38206.0000 0000 7911 Harney Road and Folio 38206.0020 RZP-25-04 from agricultural urban to public quasi
public and to schedule the second reading for April 7th. >> Second motion and a second. Is there discussion of the motion? If not, all those in favor say I. >> I. >> I. Any opposed? No nays. Ordinance is
approved on first reading and will appear for second reading and public hearing on Tuesday, April 7th, 2026. Thank you, Mr. Moretta. >> Thank you, Mayor. Council members, we'll see you in April. >> Very good. Thank you. Next item is a public hearing and first reading of a resolution approving final site
plan-25-09 for West Coast Brace and Limb located at 13401 North 53rd Street. I'll open the public hearing and our senior planner, the soontobe famous senior planner, Alyssa Livingstone, is here to present. Good evening.
>> Good evening, mayor and council members. I'm Alyssa Livingstone, the senior planner. This presentation is for the consideration of approval for final site plan SPR2509 for the development of a medical office
for West Coast Brace and Limb located at 13401 North 53rd Street. Please note that this is the first reading and first public hearing for this application. The property is 888 acres in size and is
within a plan development zoning district. The applicant seeks to demolish existing single family residents and associated structures on the site. The project involves the construction of a 10,000 square foot
onestory medical office. The property is bordered to the north by west coast brace and limb representing the primary facility for which this proposed project serves as an expansion.
The site is above by medical offices to the west, commercial buildings to the east and single family residences to the south. Here is the overall site plan.
There are 33 on-site parking spaces. This includes two accessible ADA spaces. Primary access to the site and the main parking area is provided via North 53rd
Street on the western boundary of the property. A secondary access point is located on the north north side connecting the site to the abutin longstanding west coast
brace and limb property. A storm water pond is proposed for the southwestern portion of the site. A landscape plan is included in the plan set that is designed in accordance with
the city's land development code requirements. This is the west elevation which serves as the main entry point as viewed from the street. This is the north elevation showing the
side view of the building. This is the east elevation showing the rear side of the building. This is the south elevation showing the other side view of the
building. There are four conditions with this approval. These include standard conditions regarding date stamp on plans and land development code language.
The plan will expire in 2 years as per section 12380 of the land development code. where standards are not specified herein the city's LDC standards or current code standards will apply
prior to any permits being issued by the city. A perpetual easement that is acceptable to the city attorney must be obtained from the owner of the aboting property to the north.
This easement shall allow for portions of the parking spaces, dumpster pad, and cross access aisles that encroach beyond the northern property line of the subject property. The easement must be recorded in the
official records for Hillsboro County. For the record, both parcels are owned by the same individual but are registered under two different LLC or business names.
If approved tonight, the item will move forward to the April 7th city council meeting for the second reading and the second public hearing. Thank you. The applicant's
representative is present and available for any project specific questions. >> Thank you, Miss Livingstone. Do you the applicant wish to make any? You don't have to, but you're welcome to if you'd like to add anything. You're certainly welcome.
>> I don't think >> Good evening. We just need your name if you're >> For the record, my name is Patricia Ortiz. Uh my address is 2810 North Central Avenue, Tampa, Florida. I don't have anything to add, but I'd be happy to answer any questions you have. >> Thank you, Miss Ortiz. So, we'll get to
that next. Thank you very much. >> Are there members We're running out of members of the public altogether, but are there members of the public who wish to comment on this item? Mr. Lo, >> it isn't exactly question. >> Charles Love, Terrace Park. It's not exactly a comment, but really just a
question. I was wondering if the make sure to notify that the synagogue get notified. It's pretty close to the synagogue and I want to make sure that they're notified. It's kind of ironic that the rabbi had left before that to see if they have any comments about the project. It's just on the other block
down there or so. So, I did want to make sure that was mentioned. Uh I guess the rabbi will get the synagogue will get notification about that or I assume so about exactly what it >> Well, we Thank you, Mr. Lo. So we notify according to state law prescribes how we
notify and the synagogues on 52nd Street. This is on 53rd Street. So >> everything I guess is pretty close. Yes, Mr. >> We I realized we haven't done the exparte communication. >> Oh, >> on this. So if we could probably do it
now and for all the items that are under uh you know that are for public hearing tonight. >> For all of them? >> Yeah, we'll do it all at once. So that would be um the reasonzoning we just did. >> Yes. >> This issue of the site plan.
The next is amending the land development code for permitted signs. And the final one is the solid waste collection and disposal. >> Actually, it'll only be 12 A and 12B. They're the quasi judicial >> 12 12A and 12B. So it was the last one regarding the reszoning and this one
regarding the site plan. >> So if we want, we can take care of it right now. >> Okay. If you would like to poll the council. >> All right. Sure. Just asking if any of the council members have had any exparte communications regarding either uh item 12A or 12B, the two quasi judicial items we have in front of you. If you've had
any verbal communications, if you could uh please uh disclose when and where those communications took place, with whom, and what the substance of those communications were, and if you've had any written communications, if you could again identify those and then uh get them to the clerk uh to put in the
record. >> So, Mr. Mr. Mueller, can I just for clarification, this is pertaining to me, but that question it might be pertaining to everybody else, too. So, this is just regarding the reszoning because we've had a lot of discussions
about the public safety complex and the purchase of the property. Most of that would have happened in a public meeting, but >> that's right. Yeah. First of all, yeah, most of your you did have public hearings on those, but yeah, just for the um the reasonzoning >> just for the reasoning
>> for this matter. That's >> and the West Coast Brace and Limb the same thing because that came before us years ago for >> Yes. Just what's in front of you today. If anybody talk to you about these matters. >> Okay. >> Today >> I have none. >> I've had none. >> I've had none regarding these specific
>> I've had none with his present request on these. Just to clarify, you're asking if I've talked to anyone about the Harney Road property in terms of changing its zoning from one specific zoning to another specific zoning and we're not talking about
anything else. >> Correct. >> And I have not had any exparte communications on either of these two topics. >> Good. Okay. Where were we? Questions, right? Is that where we were? Yes. Council member Fernandez. >> So, I have a question. And I'm not really sure who would answer this, but
um I know that both parcels are owned by the same party and that they're going to work together and they have to have the easement agreement in order to move forward. But does that easement agreement then move forward with those
parcels into the future if the parcels are sold? Yes, the uh easement will be recorded into the official record of Hillsboro County, which will then make it run with the land uh with both properties. >> So, if in the future if somebody if
these properties were sold and or maybe one property, but the other property remained in their in this business's possession, how would the city know that this easement runs with the land? what what
do we do in order to ensure that >> we'll get a copy of the recorded easement. Um, also I've been working with uh the uh owners. Uh they have provided me a draft. We they do need to do one more thing which is if they do
modify or somehow try and cancel this easement, they are going to have to get the consent to the city because it will affect the uh whether this you know the site plan approval um and their site plan at all is stays valid. So, that will be in that easement that they will
have to notify us and get our consent, especially if they're going to cancel this easement because it's going to affect uh the site plan. >> Okay. And I just have one more question. It has to do with just traffic in general. >> Okay. >> Um with the 53rd Street. So, this
property would have access from 53rd Street, but it would also have access from the original um property from Fletcher. So, like so people would be able to come in from both Fletcher and 53rd Street.
>> I have a slide for that. Thank you. >> Um, please hold Mario. Um, can you hold back? >> Um, please hold. >> Please hold.
Okay, sorry about that. We lost internet earlier on, so Maria. >> Okay, Council Member Fernandez. >> Yes. Okay, I'm following up on your question. So, this is this slide is this
slide refers to the chicane detail. So, on the left on the screen, you're going to see where the existing chicane is on North 53rd Street. The proposed chicane will be relocated 30 ft south of its original position to allow for two-way access
into the medical facility from North Fletcher Avenue. Traffic flow from the neighborhood onto North 53rd Street will remain one way outbound onto North Fletcher
maintained by two and it will be maintained by two exit only signs as currently configured. So on the diagram on the right you're going to see where the chicane will be shifted 30 feet south. The chicane will be shifting 30 ft south, but it won't affect the
functionality of the chicane. This will just allow for entrance and exit out of the expansion of West Coast Brace and L. >> Okay, that's that is what I was asking about because I know that these streets
are one way typically in and out. So, it >> good. Council members, other questions? Council member Schler. >> Yes. Um, you you haven't been here long enough for this and and and and the mayor alluded to this before. This is not the first time the West
Coast has been before the for council. Were there any historical of the historical requests never not completed? This is like we're talking six, seven years ago that this was that there was a there was something coming. And remember
the chicane was an issue and I don't remember what what transacted and if and if all of those projects were ever completed or what the status of that was. >> Yeah, we we approved it. >> Yeah, but I mean was there was there anything that you approved it but I don't know that we ever was ever uh
fulfilled. Is there any any >> 2018? Okay. I'm going to let the representative speak to it >> again. Patricia Ortiz. Um, I think what you're referring to is the 2018
reszoning for this southernmost parcel. >> Okay. That was approve uh requested in 2018 and approved in 2019. There is a time limit within which the site plan must be approved to keep the
uh approval of the plan development active. Uh what we've done um to qualify for this modification was demonstrate that through the permit extension and tolling um was valid
because of the many states of emergency between 2019 and 2024, including CO 19 and a number of hurricanes associated with um you know the state of Florida um and approve
approved by the governor um as states of emergency. So that extended the period within which we could ask for modification of the PD. Uh we did that within the required time frame utilizing those
tolling and extension measures and now we're here before you with the site plan to finally complete the approval process um for this project. >> Okay. is just basically it's a continuation of what was what was approved. >> Exactly. There were some minor changes,
but it was okay. That's fine. >> Very minor. >> I remember the chicane was going to be moved. There was all kinds of issues, but I never I don't remember it ever being completed. >> Correct. And that's because of the state. >> No, it's not a negative question. It was intended. It was just a it was rattling
cobwebs and it was like I thought we had already been down this road once before on this project. Okay, cool. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Other questions? Council member Kravitz. Just want to direct my thanks to Miss Ortiz for investing in uh Temple Terrace and thank you for creating uh what is it
14 plus jobs. So all done. >> That's all questions. >> I I I have a question and I'm not sure who's best to answer it. So I'll just throw it out there and you guys pick. Um, I remember back in 2018 or 19
whenever this came before us, one of the questions I had um concerned GPS and where GPS would take you to get to this property. And what I had asked back then, and nobody really knew the
answer to this because addresses are issued by Hillsbor County and they typically are issued on the street wherever the front door faces. I was try what I was trying to accomplish is to set this up somehow so
that it was addressed with a Fletcher Avenue address so that if you got in an Uber or a lift or you put it in ways or Google Maps to go to this address, it would not take you down one turning off
of 56th Street on 131st and then north on 53rd to get to it because then all of that traffic would be routed by GP. PPS through the neighborhood. Whereas if it had a, you know, you know,
I don't know, 5507B or whatever address on Fletcher, it would I don't know if this would even solve it now. Six years have passed and so much is changing technology. I don't know. I don't know how this even works. I don't know if it would take you through the neighborhood. Anyway, >> I I think I can
>> Okay, cuz I do know from personal experience I I live not far from there and when I Uber from the airport every single time it takes me it turns the Uber south north off of Fowler Avenue into the don't enter the neighborhood and the Uber driver just
freezes because they're not supposed to go off the route and they don't know how to get in and they're gonna I mean they they really like okay am I going to get in trouble with my employer or am I going to get a ticket from the police? What am I going to do? >> Gotcha. So, in this particular situation, we've done two things. Um, we've moved the chicane further south.
That's very helpful. >> That's very helpful. Um, but to answer the first part of your question, most people when they're trying to reach uh West uh West Coast Brace and Limb, they're going to type into their phone the business name and that's going to take them to the address on Fletcher
Avenue. We have two separate addresses because we have two separate parcels. The reason why we have two separate parcels is largely because West the site was annexed into the city after it was built. So because there are
two parcels, there are two addresses, but the official business address is on Fletcher Avenue. That is the if you type into your phone, you know, you're going to West Coast Brace and Limb, it's going to take you to the Fletcher ad the Fletcher address.
>> Okay. That that makes sense. >> Yeah. But the chicane is definitely movement of the chicane was um definitely uh the impetus of that was to keep that traffic off of 53rd Street.
>> Well, that that that is helpful to keep um southbound stragglers from going into the neighborhood exiting. Mhm. >> But it doesn't do anything for people if they are coming into because you're allowed to drive past the chicane to exit. You just can't drive
past it coming in. >> Yeah. >> Um I did reach out to Google Maps and try to figure out how we we could do that, but it's kind of a you know, I got the answer. You're going to type in the business name. It's going to take you to that main business. >> Well, that's there's probably some truth
to that. Okay. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. I don't have any other questions. Are there other questions, council members? >> Okay. If there are no other questions, if the resolution is acceptable, is there a motion? >> Yes, mayor. Um, move to approve first
reading of a resolution approving final site plan. >> Excuse me. I think I need to read the item. >> You probably do. >> Is it Oh, I missed that because it's a resolution and ordinance. I'm sorry. Thank you for Thank you for that. So, I'll ask the clerk to read the title of
the resolution and then you're back. A resolution of the city of Temple Terrace, Florida, approving site plan review application SPR-25-09 for 88 plus or minus acres of property
located east of North 53rd Street and south of East Fletcher Avenue with folio number 03693-000000 addressed as 13401 North 53. 3rd Street to allow for the development of a new 10,000 square foot
onestory medical office subject to conditions of approval providing for the correction of typographical errors repealing all resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict here with providing an effective date. Thank
>> Thank you, Madam Clerk. Vice Mayor, back to you. >> Thank you. Uh move to approve on first reading a resolution approving final site plan SPR25-09 for West Coast Brace and Limb located at 13401
North 53rd Street with the conditions as listed. >> Second. >> Second reading. >> Can you add >> Oh, and add the second reading on April 7th. >> Second. >> Motion and second. Any discussion of the motion? If not, all those in favor say I.
>> I. >> Opposed? No. Nays. Resolution is adopted on first reading and will appear for a second reading of public hearing on Tuesday, April 7th, 2026. Thank you for being here with us. >> Thank you. >> Next is a public hearing and second
reading of ordinance 1591 amending land development code section 12-984 permitted signs. I will open the public hearing and our community development deputy director, Marissa Robinson, is here to explain. Good evening. >> Good evening. Good evening, mayor and city council members, Marissa Robinson
with community development. I'm here to present proposed text amendment to the city's land development code regarding permitted signs. The amendment pertains to section 12-984 permitted signs modifying the matrices
3, four, five, and six. Currently, these matrices limit businesses located on the corner lots to only one wall sign. Under the proposed changes, the sign will be a two wall signs will be permitted on corner lots provided that
they meet the conditions of footnote X, which states on corner lots, a building occupying the corner may be permitted a second wall sign, provided that each of the two wall signs is located on a different street facing facade.
Staff is recommending approval on second reading of LDC 252. And I'll stand for any questions. Thank you, Miss Robinson. Are there members of the public who wish to comment on this item? Seeing none, council members, are there questions?
>> I just have one. >> Council member Fernandez, >> and this is just for anybody who might be listening, just a confirmation that there's no change in the size or the specifications of a sign, only that you're allowed to have a second one on
your wall facing a different street. >> Correct. Other questions, council members? If not, I will close the public hearing and ask the clerk to read the title of the ordinance. Madame clerk, an ordinance of the city of Temple
Terrace, Florida, amending section 12-984 of the city code of ordinances titled permitted signs, amending matrices 3, four, five, and six. Adding footnote X,
providing for severability, providing for correction of typographical errors, repealing all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith, providing for codification, providing for an effective date.
>> Thank you, Madam Clerk. Council, is there a motion? Move >> to approve on second reading, excuse me, ordinance 1591, amending the land development code section 12-984 for permitted signs. >> Second. >> Good. Motion and a second. Discussion of
the motion. >> Seeing none, all those in favor say I. >> I. >> I. >> Opposed? No. Nay. Thank you, Mr. Robinson. The ordinance is adopted on second reading. Next is a public hearing and second reading of ordinance 1592
amending chapter 22 article 6 solid waste collection and disposal. I will open the public hearing and our public works director J Jason Orfelds is here to present. Good evening. >> Good evening Mayor City Council.
This public hearing is the second reading for revisions to ordinance 1592 amending chapter 22 article 6 of the city code of ordinances relating to the solid waste collection and disposal. The proposed changes primarily update language clarity clarify operational procedures and align the city's
regulations with current industry practices and environmental standards. The amendments improve clarity regarding collection requirements, recycling practices, and administrative provisions while maintaining the current level of service for residents and businesses. The ordinance was approved on first
reading at a previous meeting, which was March 7th and proper public notice was has been provided. Staff recommends approval of ordinance 1592 on second reading. Before I conclude, I want to address a few concerns that were
expressed by a city council member. Uh, the city clerk is handing out an updated version to the revisions which addresses a legacy typo error. Under section 22336, the phrase hazardous water is mentioned under the definition for solid waste. It has been corrected
to read danger dangerous hazardous waste materials. There was also a question, when a resident places a cardboard box, piece of broken plastic, old carpet, or furniture into their city issued trash can, would that technically be placing
class 3 material in a container? Yes, that is technically what is not what is what they should not be doing. But if the residential container is spot, I'm sorry, if the item is bagged or concealed in a manner that is not obvious to staff for identification
purposes, it'll randomly occur. If the items are protruding from the residential container and staff are able to spot that, they will continue to follow the current practices by tagging those items or those cans with tags that allow the resident to call public works
for options for their disposal. Lastly, section 22337 was questioned if the title was accurate. This section was previously titled city not to pick up building construction materials. That is not the correct title for that section. It was updated to more an appropriate title
that clearly provided that that provided clarity for the purpose of collection for construction and demolition class 3 materials. And I'm available for any questions. >> I I have one real quick. I was trying to read and listen and that doesn't ever
work. So tell me again what happens if a residential customer puts cardboard in their trash can. >> So >> I know you said it, but So cardboard is in the recycling aspect considered a
clean material. So, pizza boxes, um, a box with contaminants. Maybe you got an oil rag in there and it's can it's saturated with some sort of material that is not that keeps it clean. You place those in your residential trash.
It goes for solid waste. It goes incinerator and it's and it's repurposed that way. So, clean cardboard obviously you put in your city recycling container. We pick it up in our recycling. It goes back in uh back to the recycler and then repurposed. So, um, what I what I had said there was is
if if you put a contaminated cardboard box, food contamination, whatever, a broken piece of plastic, things that are considered construction demolition debris or class 3 materials into your residential waste on a residential level, it's okay. But if
it's an industrial size, if you have a construction renovation project at your home and you're putting all the drywall and the insulation and the and the studs and the flooring in your residential container, that's not acceptable. Those materials are handled by a commercial
type dumpster roll off front load, things like that. >> Okay? But if I buy a new water heater at my house, I can still put the if it I don't know if it comes in a box or not. buy a oven or whatever, a washing machine, you can still dispose of that as a homeowner. You don't have to have a
special >> Correct. Yeah. You that card if it's in a cardboard box, you cut it up, you put it in your recyclables, and we take it. >> Did I I think I saw Did you have a question? >> Yes. Council member Kravitz. >> First of all, I really really appreciate this revision.
>> Thank you very much for doing that. Um I I fully support the intention of this and the goal. I'm not trying to cause trouble as I'm sometimes accused of doing. I just want to make absolutely sure
that we because let's be clear, most people throw a lot of cardboard out. >> Sure. >> And we're fine with that, right? >> Yeah. So, the cardboard will get recycled. I mean, the residential waste goes to the incinerator, which the incinerator burns it to make, right? So,
it gets recycled at some fashion. if it's not in the recycling container, it doesn't make that truck which goes to the cardboard recycler. >> So when it comes to the definition of class three materials >> and I think I think that's sort of like where the legislative cross-section is
here in terms of the problem. Um could we maybe define it as when we have here examples include but are not limited to cardboard etc etc etc. Maybe we just add the phrase in quantities
not typically generated by a resident or something along those lines. This is just me sort of legislating off the top of my head here in terms of the phrasing because right now what we have is a definition that captures cardboard,
carpet and plastic as well as yard trash, furniture and appliances which is which is common. It's common for residents to throw these things out. These are captured as examples of industrial solid waste which are not supposed to go. So the enforcement mechanism here is capturing waste types
that people do commonly throw out that we're fine with them throwing out but we're saying that they're throwing out industrial waste and even though you know you're saying and I believe you that we're fine with that and we're going to pick it up. We have to write that in our statute. Right. So I I think
the the one section or the one piece that is important here is the lie part right. So if if the cardboard's contaminated that it could produce the lie that is when it is no longer a class 3 material it is considered a solid waste material. That is the difference in our handling procedures. So in the
definition it says industrial solid waste that is inert and not expected to produce lee. So if cardboard is contaminated it will produce a leech. It is considered solid waste. it'll go um to the to the incinerator. If cardboard is clean, has no no um leech producing
characters, it'll go to the recycler. So, >> okay, >> residents can throw away their cardboard either in the recycling or in the trash can. It's whether it's contaminated or not, it depends on how we handle it. Now, does does the recycling crew get contaminated material? Absolutely. Does
the recycler accept it? Absolutely. But again, that is in the amount, the volume of what we pick up and what we haul and what we dispose of. It is hard for staff to flip through every piece of cardboard and say, "This one's good, this one's bad, this one's good, this one's bad." We really rely on the recyclers to do
that. We do we do receive a small charge back for large quantities of contaminated materials that go to the recycler. It is a very small quantity where I'm I'm honestly dollars five seven dollars. It's not anything that is
worth us as staff spending time sorting this stuff out. Um the the act of the trucks picking up getting done throughout the day. It takes their day to do their their assigned routes. So we as a department are perfectly fine with the way this is written and explained as
we can share it with the residents and the staff and hopefully get them comfortable. >> I I appreciate that very much. Um, I I understand sort of the direction you're going, but the way this is drafted
doesn't mesh with that. And from what I can tell, so perhaps we could include an exemption for quantities that are typical for a household. How about something along those lines? Just keep the definition and say exempted from this are quantities that are typically
generated by a household, right? And then we don't need to maneuver ourselves into a situation where on paper everyone is throwing out uh industrial plastic, industrial cardboard, industrial furniture and appliances when when they're just they're just people who
live here and they have some junk and they're just throwing it in their trash can because that's what they've always done. Right. >> So I I believe you're and and I'm not abliving it. I just I think I understand this. You're looking at this as more of a enforcement
uh technique, right? >> Sort of. I I mean I'm happy to go into a dialogue. I don't mean to interrupt you. >> Oh, you're fine. >> Um so what what what what we have here is that we have a a section in um class
uh three materials here uh which are not going to be picked up. Right. And that was the header issue that we we also addressed later in this statute where it was a mixup between like this is going to be picked up and not going to be picked up. We revised that. What we have
now is a situation where class 3 materials are qualified as industrial waste and they're not going to be picked up by the city. And then examples of that kind of waste are cardboard, plastic, furniture, appliances among other things. What we can have is a situation where we're defining what people are throwing
out in their municipal trash cans as industrial waste class 3. But then on the other hand, we're saying we're going to pick it up anyway. Even though under our own statute, we're not allowed to do that anymore based on how we've written this. All we need to do to
fix this problem is exempt those things in terms of the quantities that a typical household produces and then and then we're fine because we're saying these might be examples of industrial waste, but when it's just a typical person throwing these things out, it's not industrial waste, right? Because
they're not an industry. They're just an individual. But but what we're we're doing is we're telling everyone in Temple Terrace, you're throwing out cardboard and that's an industrial waste material and technically we're not allowed to pick it up, but we're going to do it anyway. But there's no statute. It's not written like that. That's the
problem. And we don't we don't have to pass this today. We can go back and look at it in two weeks. That was my suggestion. So, but I mean, I think I think I I struggle with that. You know, as uh Mayor Ross pointed out, you know, if what if he gets a water heater, he cuts it up. No
one's checking any of this cardboard for whether it has leech or anything like that. Like you said, the the chargebacks are are minimal, so it doesn't matter in the end. Like what people are throwing out in their trash cans, it just doesn't matter, right? >> So So it does. I mean, it does. If if
the crew were to wheel up to a residential toter that is completely full of cardboard, it could get a tag and not be picked up. And it's not necessarily a violation. It is a different truck that should pick this up. And it's and it's to be packaged in
a different manner. So cardboard should be bundled, wrapped in the container in a different manner. So the staff, this is not changing how we run the business. It's just clarifying the definitions on what we consider appropriate for the
containers, appropriate material. Like if the cardboard if if there are three pieces of cardboard in a residential trash can, staff may or may not pick that up depending on the mode of function. If it's a downpour day and it's raining, they're going to want to hustle and get their stuff done and get through there. Is the cardboard wet or
is it pizza oil, right? They're not going to really know the difference at that time. It's going to go with it uh in the garbage truck. The same way with the recycling container. The recycling container is wet on a rainy day. Is it a is it wet from oil or is it wet from rain? They're not in the they're not
going to be in the position to stand there and go, should I or shouldn't I? They're going to toss it in the truck and run. So I mean the residential quantity piece we don't have well we we have a set standard for what's max capacity every every city resident is
eligible for two totters. So outside of the toters they've already reached their max capacity. >> As far as the resident or the recycling bins we have you know if you want four four right so the the capacity the volume piece is is independent on the resident themselves.
>> Mr. Mr. Mayor may Mr. Bay, you still have the floor. >> Just I'm not taking away from fact if I'm trying to help with the conversation. >> I'll come back to you. >> Was just the city attorney and I were just talking and it it it does seem like there was some concernation particularly with cardboard because so many of our
residents deal with cardboard and Amazon comes to your house three four times a week, right? >> So what if we just struck cardboard from this from the class three material definition? Just take cardboard out because it is causing confusion. It won't change the day-to-day practices that we've as as as Mr. Warfelds has
said, you know, the basic practice is what we were trying to memorialize here. But if it's it's really not helping, it's only confusing things. If we strike it, I think that might address your concern, council member, perhaps. >> Oh, yeah. It addresses the concern regarding cardboard, but not accord, you
know, plastic and other stuff. I mean, it's it's a step in the right direction for sure. I I don't think the it's not the cardboard that's bothering me. It's just like I mean, I don't know. I mean, I don't know what everyone else up here thinks, but for me personally, I think, you know, my my legislative position is we should pick up people's trash, and if
they put cardboard and plastic in their trash cans, then we should pick that up. So, that that is my position. You know, I I don't want people to have to go through a special process to get rid of cardboard or, you know, let's say they have a a household appliance that fits in the trash can that they want to dispose of. I don't want them to have to
go through a special process to get that taken away. So that that's my position, you know, as an elected representative up here. And that's what I think that we owe our citizens who live here uh and and all of our residents as well who who expect to just have their trash picked up unless they're doing something really
crazy with their trash. You know, I've walked around on trash collection day and people put all kinds of things in their trash can. But you're right, a big part of it is in fact cardboard um because people get a lot of deliveries these days from Amazon and other places and they want to be able to dispose of it. And and if we're just gonna start randomly tagging people's trash cans
because they have too much cardboard in there, I mean, we're gonna have a revolution on our hands. So, >> so we do you mind if I ask a a friendly question? You'll have the floors. Just >> Absolutely. Go. >> I'm just curious because I'm following your reasoning. I'm just curious and maybe you maybe you want to ask this,
maybe not. I'll wait my turn. >> I'm just curious if class three material is a definition if that's defined somewhere else or if that's a definition of our own creation. And so you still have the floor. >> I I I believe it is. You know, I'm going to lean out of the window here a little
bit. Again, I'm not a not a legal expert. I'm not in a capacity up here as a legal expert. So, anything I say on legal things is not to be taken as legal advice, but my understanding is that it is a definition in Florida statutes and it's a landfill designation for inert industrial waste. And so I think if we
just like focus in on the fact that it's for industrial waste, we can just easily develop a distinction from that by saying things that are generated by households are just not industrial waste because they're not generated by an industry. So I don't see the need to use
that classification for household waste. So just exempt anything generated by a household from this definition, right? And then we're we're back to the status quo, which we currently have. And then if you have an industry, then by all means, if they're
an industry, make them follow this rule for cardboard. Make them follow it for plastic. I don't care. They're an industry. They can deal with that better, right? They're an industry and they know how to deal with industrial waste because that's what they're supposed to do because that's their job. So that's that's how I'm thinking about it.
>> Sorry, that wasn't really a question. I apologize for that. That's are you're >> absolutely yeah I'm done it. >> So in the Florida administrative code 6271200 class 3 is defined in there in a very similar fashion that we have it. The wording is obviously not word for word
but it is a very similar class three waste means yard yard trash construction demolition debris processed tires asbestous carpet cardboard paper plastic furniture other than appliances and other materials approved by the department that are not expected to
produce lee that possesses a threat to public health and the environment. So we are very similar in our definition as the Florida administrative code. Mhm. >> Now, I will I do want to say when when you're talking industrial uh the cardboard recycling industrial,
we we do as a division have instances where commercial cardboard recyclers contaminate their their cardboard containers. We then have to send a different truck out to treat that as solid waste and not a recyclable at that point. So, as far as the definition
departmental wise, I'm comfortable with the way it is because it allows the department to handle it whether it's residential or commercial. >> Yeah. All All I'm asking for is for a different rule for the residential side. That's all. So, if we just we can exempt
them or we can just say that these rules don't apply to residential households or something like that. I don't want to lump the residential households in with the industrial businesses. That seems like a really the wrong direction for this. And I think it's, you know, I I don't think most people even think about
trash pickup. And it's best that way, right? Like we shouldn't have to have our residents thinking about their trash. It should just be dealt with in the same way that the sewer is just dealt with or the roads are just dealt with. That's what we're here for. We're here to make sure that these basic services run smoothly and that people
don't have to think about whether they're, you know, filing the right permit to get their cardboard picked up that they ordered. That's that's that's my concern. So, my my my my personal preference, you know, I'll make a motion up here if I have to, is um to to exempt
residential households from this, you know, if they're if they're not generating industrial quantities of these things, like you said, the chargebacks are really minimal. Like, it can easily be absorbed. It's you said singledigit dollars. I mean, so it's not
not a big deal, right? So I did is your suggestion to exempt residential properties from being class three required? >> We could do it that way. Yeah, >> I think that would be terrible.
>> Okay. Well, let's talk about what would work here then. So if you want to if you wanted let's let's let's zero in on the main categories then. So, let's take cardboard, plastic, uh, yard well, yard trash, we have a separate pickup, right?
>> So, council member, I do want to not trying to take away, but I want to make sure we do this according to the right order. So, if we're going to get into the discussion, we're kind of outside of the question stuff at this point. >> Oh, yeah, sure. Fair. >> Yeah, we other people have questions that But I mean, I'm not I'm not trying
to squash what >> I've had my 10 minutes. It's fine. Look, it's uh I think let's have a discussion about it. I think also we don't have to fix this here. We could just say please go back and make this nicer for residences or something like that. So with that, I'll give up the floor. >> Yeah, I think I think some of us have some thoughts on this too, but I don't
want to we're taking away from the question stuff. So okay, so you had a question council. Can you go back to the your when you first came up and you made a dis your discussion you were talking about the actual quantity now your interpretation your comments earlier your quantity basic if I remember
correctly was basically pretty much you can put anything in there as long as it fits within the can and it's not you know u it's not laying on the you know 2x4s 8 8 foot 2x4s sticking out the top with sheets of with sheets of drywall
and so forth and a 9 by12 carpet hanging over top of the the uh is that is that what you're saying? >> Correct. >> And that fits within our rules. >> Correct. >> Okay. >> I'm my concern and and now where would paint and things of this nature fall into that?
>> So they fall under the hazardous waste which we do not collect. >> Okay, that's fine. I understand. So I mean if if we start exempting this whatever the whatever a family can put into a a residential trash can, it's exempted. We don't have to worry about it. you start you start finding cans of
paint and everything else in there I would assume potentially and then we have then we have another set of problems >> and I also believe that we're talking about cardboard and contamin you're and and the chargebacks you're talking about from our recycler >> and if we throw cardboard into our you
know we cut up a 100 Amazon boxes they're not going to get you'll fill up your recycling the rest going to go in in into the the the the tan trash cans and they're going to get picked up and tossed that's not being recycled there is no there is No chargebacks or credits for any of that. Am I right?
>> Correct. And and everything that >> everything we haul to the incinerator is considered a recycled product because it goes there to be burned for >> to be burned. Okay. But it's but it's not the recycling and the green and the green bins which is going to the recycling whoever the company is in this
day and age that that recycles and then we get a a check back or whatever. >> Correct. >> Okay. All right. I I Okay. I'm I'm good. Council member Fernandez. >> Um, so I my question I have a couple and
that is with the definition. It seems like the state definition that you read off addresses some of the concerns. So for example where we say examples include you know okay cardboard, carpet
construction and demolition debris. If we say that I mean somebody's if we just exempt a residential household from adhering to any class three materials, does that mean that if they went through and took all the
carpet out of their house that would they could just cut it up and put it in cans or would that still be construction debris? So, if it's part of a renovation project, that is construction demolition. If if you have carpet
squares in your home and one is contaminated with uh it's bleached out from the sun. You pull your carpet square out, you put it in your trash can, I highly doubt and and and frank the assistant managers here, I highly doubt the staff throughout the day is going to see a one carpet square and the number of cans that they toss in the
truck every day. It's just going to be processed with the reg with the other materials. it's going to go to the incinerator and it's going to be turned into fuel. >> So would it So I guess what I'm saying is it's not necessarily at least the way I see it, it's not necessarily
exempting a household. It's exemp it's certain types of trash can't go in the trash can. >> Correct. And this is this is not new. This is the practice that's been forward. It's the definition
that got clarified. >> Yeah. It seems to me the definition you read that's the definition in the state that seemed more clear to me. So I just am curious why we wouldn't just use that definition. >> We we can I mean there's there's it's
just the words in a different fashion. >> That's all my questions. >> I have none. I have a a question, Mr. Warrenfield. I share some of the concerns of Council Member Kravitz, on the definitions, but it seems to me, and I I'm trying not to get into the
discussion because that's going to come in a few minutes, but I need your opinion on something before we have the discussion. I'm concerned about exempting household from class 3 materials because they they very likely put out yard
waste. They put out furniture. Sometimes they put out appliances and that needs to be handled a different way. So if we take them out of the thing, but it seems like we could remove two words in this definition, at least it said,
"Oh, this is what I want your opinion on." What if we just removed cardboard and plastic? >> Because everything else that you list here, carpet, well, we don't want you guys picking up carpet in the normal household trash. construction and
demolition debris, we don't we wouldn't expect you to do that either. Yard trash, there's a separate day and procedure for that. And furniture and appliances, there's a separate day and procedure for those things, too. So, if we just eliminated cardboard and plastic
from your class 3 material definition, I don't know that we'd have a debate up here at all. Now, my question is, what impact would that have on your intent for the ordinance? Is that more significant to me than it seems? >> No, it wouldn't.
>> Could Could we just remove those two words hypothetically if we have our discussion? And >> have Yeah, I would say have your discussion. But the way the operation runs, the the purpose of the amendments were to clarify the definitions and get it more aligned with industry standards.
If removing two words fits the bill for um residential purposes, it's not going to change the way the operation runs. I mean the if they if the staff were to see a totter completely full of cardboard, they're most likely still
going to tag that for the res or for the recycling truck to grab it when they come through. >> Yeah. But I understand what my what our colleague is saying though, and that is that, you know, I know what how you're going to operate is one thing, but it should the language in the ordinance counts
>> for sure. And if you just read this definition, it says cardboard and plastic and it doesn't qualify that in any way. It just says cardboard and plastic aren't going to be picked up. And you know, and but if you go to the a few
pages back where it talks about household garbage, it says, of course, now I can't find there we go. Non-hazardous waste generated by the normal daily activities of households. Right. And then later on it talks about,
you know, class three debris. But I I I I kind of see what we're talking about here with those two words being in there. That seems to make sense to me. And I don't see maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like we could take those two words out and we'd be I'll be happy.
I don't know yet. But city manager is that I you >> I mean I don't want to do something willy-nilly up here that has an unintended consequence. >> No, I think that's fine. I mean I look I'm looking at it and of course I'm speaking as a lay person here. My my
biggest concern would be construction demolition debris. You want to make sure that people don't start abusing the the residential containers for that which would still be included based on the direction that at least you're going right now Mr. Mayor. >> Okay. Council, are we ready for discussion? We have any other questions
for Mr. Warren Fields? >> Um, city attorney, >> just real quick, um, this you'll be asking for the, uh, reading of the and then a motion and then discussion. >> The reading of the title, and here's the reason I ask. Depending on what you do
may affect what your motion is. If there's going to be a big change, we might have to go back to first reading. That's why I just want you may want to have a little bit discussion now. >> Well, that's what I was asking for is to have a little discussion before I mean we we do have a little flexibility. I don't have to necessarily have a motion
to. So, yes, we're going to I I think I'm guessing that we may have a brief discussion, have an idea of what we want to do, but I'm going to go back to Council Member Kravitz if you want to be recognized since you're the one that had the most. Uh >> thank you very much. I um I have I have
a thought where we might not need to play with the definition. Just reading I've had a little time now to work my way through this revision that I have here. And um it occurs to me that so in section 22 336 we have the definition
and then in section 22 337 which is the section that follows right after it we have the prohibition of picking up the things that are in that definition. So what instead of exempting solid waste completely like I was suggesting, what we could do in section 22 337 is we
could say um you know the categories of waste that you were talking about cardboard, plastic are exempted um for residential solid waste because we already have a definition just a little bit higher on that page of residential solid waste which is exactly
almost what I was suggesting. Residential solid waste is the non-hazardous waste generated by the normal daily activities of households. So I was saying we just we don't want the stuff that households normally generate just on a day-to-day basis to be captured by this quite in that way.
But I do understand the concern about throwing out you know really heinous items and that we might want to also capture with this. But we we can just exempt in section 22 337 that the prohibition
will apply. Right? So that would be the other angle. But I think at the end of the day, all of us, many of us perhaps seem to agree that we shouldn't be prohibiting people quite in that way from putting plastic and cardboard into their trash. So I think there is a
consensus on that point. At the end of the day, how we get there is maybe not a question. Personally, I don't think I would never draft a statute just like off the top of my head like we're doing right now almost, but it might be worth sending back for a revision in my mind so that we could make sure to to to to
carve that out for people who live here so that they don't need to worry. And I I completely agree. What we put in the statute absolutely does matter because that's what's the law. You know, the law says do this or this is the way it's supposed to be done regardless of how, you know, often kind and extremely
generous the sanitation workers are in in picking things up that they don't necessarily need to. And you know, I've I've seen people literally just put bags of trash next to their trash can and they'll still take it with even though it's outside of the So, you know, I have absolutely no criticism of our sanitation staff. They're fantastic.
They're incredibly popular. Everyone loves you, honestly. So, um, and I'm just trying to make sure that this statute is is, you know, something that reflects how we feel and want to treat everyone. So, that's that's where I'd go with that. So, I we could we could address it
from the back end here in section 337 instead of doing it in the front end at section 336. And, you know, personal preference, >> council members, I I I think the simplest thing we could do right now, we could do tonight, we could
just take those two two words out and the rest of it is fine. If we start getting into the other section in an attempt to do the same thing, it gets a little more complicated because who defines what's normally produced by
residential? I mean, you you you know, how big does a roll of thrown out carpet have to become? Well, hang on a second. How long does it have? How big does a roll of carpet have to become and how more frequently? But when it crosses the line between what's normally, you put
words like what's normally, that's just a recipe for subjectivity. Where if we take cardboard and plastic out, what remains is stuff that we all agree we don't want them picking up. Carpet, construction, demolition, yard trash, furniture, appliances. That's all that's left in there.
So I I mean we could get this done in my opinion tonight as opposed to sending it back. I think we're all trying to get to the same place, but I I think it's becomes a little more problematic when we went with the language in the next section which is
except for stuff normally that's hard. I mean, remember we have a lot of people have home businesses too in their garage. And so, I mean, that becomes a little, you know, what's normal for you might not be normal for somebody else. That gets a little hard to
I I would be in favor with just taking those two words out, pass it. If it doesn't work as intended, I mean, then we're protecting our residences from not being able to get stuff picked up. And if it needs further revisions in the
future, I mean, we could certainly do that if it doesn't work out the way it I mean, I I hear what you're saying about having that in there, but >> Go ahead. >> I'm I'm in favor of pulling cardboard and plastic provide as long as there's no unintended consequences and I'm not sure what we're not going to know what
that could be, but so I mean, if if we do that, we can and it goes back I mean, the the ordinances could be modified again to to to clarify that in the future. You're never going to get it right. You I don't say right, but you're never going to get it exactly the way you want it because things change. So, I
I could support that about excluding cardboard and plastic in the in the definition, but because in reality, it's going to have you're going to take you y'all going to take it anyway. So, you know, as long as it's not, you know, so I mean, >> could could you live with that if we did that tonight? I mean,
>> yeah, sure. Okay. >> If it's a problem later, we can always fix it later. I think we have the same idea about what we're trying to do for the residents. >> Council members, other >> I agree. I think we do what we've been
discussing the concerns are by removing the word cardboard and plastic from the definition. >> Yep. Okay. Um, council member, since you kind of drove the charge on this, would you like to make a motion? >> No problem. >> So, public hearing
>> Oh, I'm sorry. I got ahead of myself. I'm sorry. Yeah, >> I did that twice tonight. Okay. Anything else uh for the public hearing before we I will close the public hearing and ask the clerk to read the title of the ordinance. An ordinance of the city of Temple
Terrace, Florida, amending chapter 22 of the city of Temple Terrace, Code of Ordinances, Utilities, Article 6, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal by amending Section 22-336, Definitions, Retitling, and Rnaming
Section 22-337, Collection of Construction, Demolition, and Class 3 Material by Ordinary Services, amending section 22-3 338 collection by city amending section 22-339
collection supervised by director of public works appeal to city manager amending section 22-340 collection practices for residential solid waste amending section 22-341
collection practices for yard waste renaming and amending section 22-342 special annual pickups amending Section 22-343, collection practices for residential recyclables. Amending section 22-344,
collection practices for commercial collection by renaming and amending section 22-345, storage of solid waste, trash, recyclables, and yard debris. Renaming and amending section 22-346,
disposal of dangerous, hazardous waste. Amending section 22-347 service by private hauler contractors providing for severability directing for the codification of the amendment repealing all ordinances or parts of
ordinances in conflict here with providing an effective date. >> Thank you, madame clerk. That's a mouthful. Okay. Uh Council Member Kravitz, would you like to make a motion? >> No, I I do. Yeah. Thank you. So, question to the city attorney. Is it
sufficient if I read from the words and ordinance to and disposal for the purposes of this motion? >> I'm sorry. Ask what's your question again? >> If I make a motion to pass this agenda item 12D, is it sufficient if I read the title uh in read in the motion the title
from the words and ordinance to and disposal or do I need to go all the way to the bottom? >> Is it sufficiently legally clear what I'm referring to? If I if I >> Yes. Can the clerks read the entire titles? >> Just checking. Thank you. Okay. Uh, in that case, I will move to approve
agenda item 12D, an ordinance of the city of Temple to Terrace, Florida, amending chapter 22 of the City of Temple Terrace Code of Ordinances, Utilities, Article Six, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal with the
modification that in section 22-336 titled definitions, the fifth paragraph graph will be changed so that the words plastic
and cardboard are struck there from >> Okay, we have a we have a motion and I'm passing the gavl to the vice mayor and I'm going to second the motion. >> Okay, there's a motion and a second. Any
discussion? >> Seeing none, all those in favor? >> I I >> opposed. Motion carries. >> Give the gabble back. >> I like the gabble.
>> Thank you, Mr. Warren. >> Uh, last council action item is a resolution approving amendment number two to fiscal year 2026's budget. And our finance director, Jim Ingram, has been patiently waiting for the opportunity to explain. Good evening.
>> Good evening, Mayor, City Council. During the first five months of fiscal year 2026, a few expenditures not included in the adopted fiscal year 2026 budget emerged. Exhibit one contains a
list of unbudgeted expenditures needing to be added to the fiscal year 2026 budget. Exhibit one details the purchase order numbers, vendor, jail account, item or project description, amount
balance for budget amendment and the appropriated fund balance accounts to provide funds to balance the budget. So we have uh four one or the first one
is additional outside legal services of $14,000. The legal department was $14,783 under budget for fiscal year 2025. This would be to appropriate $14,000 of
the savings to the fiscal year 2026 legal outside council budget to allow the legal department to continue contracting services as needed for the remainder of the fiscal year.
Number two, the EOCC construction administration administrative services of $128,90. This reflects the change order approved by city council on February 17, 2026
to appropriate 128,190 of community investment tax reserves estimated to be 1.8 8 million at 2026 fiscal years in for additional EOC
construction administration services. Third, CRA legal and professional services at $17,393. This adjustment appropriates appropriates funds from the tax
increment fund reserves to cover the cost for legal and professional services related to the blazing paddles proposal. TIFF reserves are estimated to be
782,666 at 2026 fiscal years end. Finally, EPC inind projects 183,181. This is to appropriate funds needed for
three inind projects approved by the environmental protection commissions to offset penalties. These projects and appropriations from water and sewer utilities and renewal replacement fund reserves were approved
by city council on November 18th, 2025. Water and sewer utilities reserves are estimated to be 5.2 million at 2026 fiscal years in. Renewal replacement
reserves are estimated to be 1.3 million at 2026 fiscal years in. The three projects are West River CIP lining project for $34,750,
North River Hills to Ridgedale Manhole Rehab for $67,387, and a sanitary lift station 80 kilowatt diesel generator for $81,044. Staff recommends that council adopt a
resolution to amend the fiscal year 2026 budget. And I will stand for any questions you might have. >> Thank you, Mr. Ingram. Are there members of the public who wish to comment? Seeing none, council members questions.
Are there questions? Okay. If there are no questions, Councilman, is there a motion? >> Move to approve a resolution approving the budget amendment number two for the fiscal 2026 budget as presented. >> Second motion in a second. Discussion of
the motion. If not, all those in favor say I. >> I. Opposed? No. Resolution's adopted. Thank you, Mr. Ingram. >> Thank you, >> council. Is there any carryover council business to report or discuss from previous question? Yes,
>> you made a reference. You may It may have just been facitious. You made a reference to the the soon to be well-known Alyssa. Is there something that just aggravated? Okay, that works. >> I'm just gaining fame. >> Just curious. Just gaining fame. >> Okay. >> Any other council business? >> New items.
>> Okay. Any new business in board or board reports? >> Yes, Council Member Fernandez. Um, first I would like to um let the public know that tonight at King High School during the Saladino tournament, Addison Barger, a recent King High School graduate who
now who played baseball for King High School and now plays for the Toronto Blue Jays had his number retired. >> So that was that's exciting. He's a professional baseball player. Um, and then I do want to ask about the
architectural elements with the former Thomasino building because I suspected that when they got into the renovation project that they would find that the the building was not as uh easy to
preserve, but I'd like to see if before it's demolished, we can salvage some architectural elements. ments or examples of the construction process that that building exhibits. Um, and
then my last item is I've been asked for the growth, the plant growth in the river. I think it's Hillsboro County, but I'm not sure who what jurisdiction actually goes around and sprays the and I've been
asked what it is that they're spraying on those plants to control the excess growth >> and that's all I have. >> Okay. I think Mr. Be I think is going to get you answers.
>> Okay. Other council business car or new business. We're on new business. Council member Kravitz. Yeah, thank you. Uh, just want to say also thank you earlier for the second on that motion. I appreciate it. >> Um, and I wanted to ask Council Member Chambers, is there any interest in developing that idea about maybe using
some of the adopted tree fund to uh spruce up downtown's landscaping? >> Yes. >> Any anything we can do to help our businesses look better? I we just spent 60,000 for several hundred trees on the golf
course. I don't know what a reasonable >> I mean that's that's assuming that it meets the ordinance requirements, but also the businesses probably now can request trees, I would think. >> I don't know if they can on private property, can they?
>> Well, the business the private property owner could request. >> I mean, homeowners can. So, I don't know. It's something to research. >> They might. I don't know. >> I think they could request a tree. Um, sorry to jump in, but I think I remember a discussion some time ago
where we were considering whether we could use the adopted tree fund for things other than trees. So, for example, uh, installing shrubs or um, other landscape features, mulch, things like that. And I think what we
determined was that we could. So, if that's an option, that would give us a lot more freedom in how we might enhance downtown. >> I don't know if it's an option or not, but someone I'm sure is looking at it. I can hear it.
I would I I what I would ask is it would it be possible to potentially use the tree fund to give grants for you know overall landscape approvement that is specifically associated with
street side um because I don't I mean not all of those properties are suitable for actually putting a tree. >> Sure. >> Yeah. That's a good idea. Yeah, we could create a a grant a grant possibility so
people could make an application to Joe Ferris perhaps or whoever might be >> you'd have to you would have to create the whole process and you would have to do it so someone wouldn't keep getting their mulch free forever,
>> you know, things like that. I mean, we want to enhance. Um, so, >> but I do have a question. So, obviously, you won't have the answer tonight, but what we know what we're going to be spending on the golf course retreat and
tree management, but we don't have the report yet for all of the city public space. So, we don't really know right now what would be encumbered from the tree fund to fulfill
that report, but I would be very interested. It's on my list for for goal setting >> to talk about that. But, um, so I I can't commit to this until I know what the possibility is, but I think
it's a good idea. I'm happy to make a motion to ask staff to report back on what the possibilities are in the next two to four weeks if that would be amenable. >> Again, I'm not real thrilled about ever putting a date on that. We don't know. But
>> they they >> I don't know. Just me. >> I don't know. But there's somebody that may have some information. >> I'm not in favor of motions just to ask them to do something and come back and report. I just think that's >> Yeah. But
>> mayor, Mr. Paul. Okay, you got >> Thank you, sir. Um, the information I'm getting ready to share with you is fresh as of just about 3 hours, four hours ago. Um staff would request that um we be
careful about committing the tree fund because in less than a month you're going to get a plan that is very intense and goes over the course of 21 years.
The goal of the plan is to raise the entire city's canopy by 10%. From 41 or 42 up to the 50s. Um, so that would be my only comment and that's fresh information just as of this afternoon that hit my desk. Uh,
no idea what that's going to cost at this point, but it's going to be expensive. >> Okay. So, I don't I don't think that means that we can't ever have a conversation about it. I think we need to get this first and then figure out where we are. >> Good to hear about that, by the way.
Thank you. >> Yeah. Um I like the grant idea. That's pretty interesting. Um I guess we could explore it maybe by doing a more conservative appropriation out of TIFF funds, maybe $5,000, and see, you know, split that up
into $1,000 grants and see if a business wants to take advantage of that. That would be a possibility maybe. >> I mean, it could be, but I think we staff has an idea of what we're thinking and they're going to have to look at other jurisdictions and and all to see what's out there that could help us. So,
>> it's it's not a twoe process. >> Yeah. For me, I'd rather just wait until we get this and see what we're dealing with and then >> if we have the ability to this this is not I'm thinking this sounds really easy and I'm not opposed to the idea, but I'm thinking of all the nothing's as easy as
it seems. Like, okay, so how are we going to put some guard rails on this just to keep from landscaping everybody's private property, right? If they happen to abut a road, we're going to all of a sudden landscape their property. So, we can't I mean, there's got to be some limits to this.
Two is how do we ensure that they're doing this correctly so that they don't plant on these beautiful plants that we pay for half of and then they don't have an irrigation system that is supported and they die or they don't fertilize them ever. They don't ever maintain them which is why they need new landscaping to begin with because they let
everything die. >> So I mean it's not that it can't be done. It's just that there's a lot to think about here in doing it. But I don't know that it's even worth asking them to do all that work if we find out in a month we don't have any money to do
it with anyway. So although there could be other sources of money besides the tree fund. So maybe but anyway go ahead. >> Well there is some precedence for this because um in the early stages of the
full CRA development the city did offer facade. We offered grants for facade improvement and I think that funding came out of TIFF funds. could be. >> But um I I don't want to necessarily commit
anything right this minute because one I want to know what this uh tree plan includes, but two I don't know if we I would rather have more discussion about the full use of TIFF funds because we
may decide that there's actually a better use for it than may than this. I I don't know. But I think it's more of a of a of of a robust discussion than deciding tonight. But there is some
guidance in our past grant program that that might give some guidance. >> My personal opinion right now tonight is that it's a good idea for us to talk about I'd rather wait until we see how much funding we have in that fund and see what we're doing. What's the goal?
And is there a way to I mean, if we can do something reasonable that is going to enhance the appearance of our Yeah, I think that's a terrific idea. I just don't want to send them off doing that level. I mean, it'll still be a good
idea a month, you know. I mean, we're not going anywhere. So, >> yes. Um that that was going to be my comment that we were going to have this tree this tree option the canopy serve was going to be coming back shortly anyway. The only other concern I have
would be with utilizing tiff monies that we take too much tiff money now we're encumbering the future uh payments on the balance of of the loan which is really what that's intended to be to be for we could we can do nickel and dime here and there but uh um and I I I would
think that any kind of grant program would require a a uh a modification to the existing ordinance because I don't I believe that covered public land. I don't believe that that covered private property, commercial, um, storefronts,
etc., etc., etc. So, that would we'd have to review all of that. Uh, I granted I agree it's a good idea. It's something that to help um with overall greens green trees and shrubs and everything. But, um, I think the next
few months a lot of things are going to come come forth and going to become evident to us that we can work with it. >> Okay. Council member Kravitz, you still have the floor. >> Just a quick con comment in conclusion. I'm happy that there's interest in that. Um, a lot of different ways to activate
downtown, make it more pleasant. Um, and this is just a comment in general terms about the food truck idea. I think it has the potential if we do it right and maybe with a little bit more of a lead and if we um develop it as something
that people anticipate and that they're looking forward to that it might even be revenue neutral or revenue positive for us since it was such a small cost originally if we can make it attractive enough to enough food trucks and we you know we had six which is a good number uh perhaps next time we can increase
that I don't know if there's a space for it but if there is we can get more uh and Uh we might even be able to get other vendors to come. Maybe a farmers market would be quite interesting. Uh and then all of the sudden we're using that large space while we have it before
it's sold to uh generate uh an attractor. And we can charge rent to the vendors if it becomes popular enough. If there are enough customers, which you know, if you've sold out all of your food, it is attractive enough. You should be making a good profit. And that will hopefully
lead to a situation where we're not subsidizing it. Although 2,000 is a very low subsidy, but in my, you know, perfect world, we're breaking even or we're even making a little bit of money every time we do it. Um, so just something to consider if we're going forward. That's all I have. Thank you. >> Okay. And for those in who weren't here
for the community redevelopment agency meeting as council member Kravitz had the idea that we have at least another or maybe other events like the food truck event that we had at the redevelopment property that council or
them sitting as the CRA board um agreed that that would be a good idea to look into and city manager is going to talk to staff to determine what it would take to make that happen and report back to us. So, thank you. Anything else? You
still have the floor? No. New business. I have two quick things. Uh, one is an announcement. Sun Coast League of Cities is having its um next meeting, membership meeting is in connection with the event called Chili Blaze over in
Penllis Park on Friday evening. The Sun Coast League meeting is at 5:00 Friday at the Penllis Park Performing Arts Center. Everybody is willing is uh welcome to attend and our guest speaker will be Florida League of Cities
President Holly Smith who is vice mayor of Santael. Um she'll be coming up for the the meeting and the event. Soon as the meeting concludes at 6 o'clock we will adjourn right outside is the event. So we'll walk right out and walk into
the Chili Blaze event. Um I have not been to the Chili Blaze event before so I can't tell you much about that. I know the name is Chili Blaze, so it's chili oriented, but I don't know much about it. So, the second thing is I this is uh
this is kind of tongue and cheek, but there's always some truth in stuff like this. I was talking to the new USF president, Dr. Lameum, over the weekend, and he was kidding to me, half kidding to me. He goes, "You should put me on commission." And I said, "Well, why
would we do that? Because you guys are holding all the money." and and he says, "You should put me on commission because I'm hiring a bunch of people that want to live in Temple Terrace. I'm hiring a bunch of people that are moving here and they want to live in Temple Terrace."
Now, that's a shift if that's Yes, >> that's a shift because Tampa Palms, New Tampa, Hunter Green, that's always been where they and I don't know how many he says, but it's enough that he joked that we should be paying him a commission. So, it must be, you know, I don't know if it's their stadium or if it's the
food truck event. I don't know. But, uh, something is going on, right? Because he, that comment would not have been made two or three years ago. So, anyway, >> send him an edible arrangement. >> What's that? >> Can we send him an edible arrangement? >> Yeah.
>> So, that's what he said. I didn't ask him, but any other new business? Okay, Mr. Beu. >> Thank you, Mr. Mayor, members of council. Uh at the last meeting, uh Council Member Fernandez reminded me actually about the um the spectrum issue. So for the folks, uh in the
audience and or watching at home, if you have a uh traditional cable box, uh you this has probably not impacted you at all yet, but Spectrum is moving towards more of a a streaming box um and what they call their channel distribution network. and people who have been trans
transitioned to that new box. Uh what's what's happening is that Spectrum hasn't yet moved all the public education and government channels, the PEG channels over yet. Um so we we contacted our their Spectrum U representatives and they've indicated to us that the
company's goal is to move all the PEG channels, not just for us, over to the uh what they're calling that channel distribution network. But it's going to take some time because there's a large number of these these PEG channels throughout the the state or the region. Um they anticipated well they couldn't give us a definitive answer uh
informally in discussing with another member of of the spectrum team. They they hoped that within three months they might have our channels over. Um so that's what we will follow up with them if that does not happen and we will continue to report back to the council.
That is all I have. >> Council member Fernandez, did that answer everything you needed? >> Yes. I just I want to make sure anybody watching this is specifically for people who are using the app on their on a phone or a tablet device, not if you're
watching TV with your traditional box. >> Okay. Any questions for city manager? >> Okay. City attorney. >> Uh yeah, just real quick. I have one lean reduction uh to report uh for a property located at 306 South Burling
Game Avenue. Uh that property was foreclosed and as a result three uh code enforcement board leans that were attached to the property were extinguished in that foreclosure. Um uh even though the uh leans were then
wiped out, uh the city did collect costs uh in the amount of $145. Good. Anything else? Any questions for the city attorney? >> Very well. Anything else to come before the council tonight before we adjourn?
None of you are getting up. I can guarantee you that. Right. Okay. Very good. Thank you again for all your hard work and and uh Chief Merly, thank you for your staff. Tremendous work. And Chief Staley, thank you for that. So,
all right, we all journed. Hey, hey, hey.