e [Music] [Music] [Music]
[Music] [Music] [Music] the uh March 12th 2025 meeting Municipal
Code Enforcement board is called to order uh before we get into pledge and everything just glad to be back uh couple of reminders for the for the board um one is it's not don't just raise your hand and start talking wait
till you recognize it otherwise it messes up the minutes the uh other thing is it's we really have like three pieces the first piece is questions pertinent to the case second piece is the motion and the second after that is when we get into the discussion so prior to that
just keep uh your comments to questions only and then and savior comments for our discussion portion okay with that if everybody would please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one
nation under God individual liberty and justice for all thank you ladies and gentlemen municipal code enforcement board is charged with conducting hearings to determine whether an alleged violation of the city code has occurred decisions made by this
quasi judicial board will be based on the evidence and facts presented this evening our meetings are conducted in accordance with Robert's Rules of Order and each case will begin with the city presenting its evidence of the alleged violation respondant will then present his or her case both parties will have
an opportunity to cross-examine all Witnesses the board members may ask any questions of any Witness as long as they're pertinent to the case comments by both parties must be relevant to the case persons wishing to speak will be given an opportunity to do so by the chairman and must address the
board from the podium after giving their name and address upon request copies of material submitted by staff are available for review board members are reminded to obtain permission to speak from the chair and questions of the city should be directed to the attorney for the city at this time I'll ask that all
persons giving testimony this evening to stand and be SW morning in by the clerk everyone could stand and raise your right hand you attend be given testimony do you swear or affirm that the testimony you will provide the board tonight will be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth thank
you he we will be taking cases out of order if you guys want to mark your agenda our first case will be 25- 0620 number two is 2449 46 number three is under unfinished
business I'm sorry yeah under under unfinished business 2445 97 number four 24 4862 number 5 24
4917 number 6 25 0068 and then we'll finish up with the ones that I didn't mention okay exart Communications this time I'd like to ask all board members if they had any expart Communications regarding
any matters coming before the code enforcement board this evening if you've had verbal Communications please disclose the sum and substance of the communications where and when the communications occurred and with whom it occurred if you received any written Communications please disclose the nature the communications and provide a
copy to the city clerk to be filed in the record stud on understand I have not I have none I've had none I've had none I've had none I've had none very good approval of minutes everybody hopefully has had a chance to review to February 12th 2025 minutes if there are no
additions Corrections or um anything else to add to the minutes I'll entertain a motion to approve motion to we have a motion do we have a second second motion a second all those in favor I opposed no n motion approved on to our
first case first case this evening will be case number 25- 0620 City versus circle circle case Stores Incorporated for the property located at 5602 East Fowler Avenue the cases before the board based on alleged violation of section 12
d1047 Landscape Maintenance section 12-10 49 Landscaping perimeter and section 12-10 43 plant material and design the case will be prosecuted this evening by code compliance officer Lori Smith the city has evidence that the notion of notice of violation and notice
of hearing were properly served thank you good evening Mr chairman board members Lori Smith Code Compliance this is a notice of repeat violation this case was presented by Officer Robinson to the board on July the 10th 2024 MCB case number
24758 the board found a violation did occur and the property was brought into compliance prior to the MCE be hearing on February the 5th 2025 I observed dead and missing plant material lack of mulch and a functional irrigation system a
notice of repeat violation was issued on the 5th of February 2025 Affidavit of service was obtained by hand delivery to the store manager if hackru Islam spoke with him about the repeat violation and request immediate
action to correct the violation at this time I would like to submit photographic evidence of the violation taken by myself on February the 5th 2025 and a copy of the order of finding in 24758 except that thank you thank you
sir thank exhibit number one shows the front of the business along East Fowler Avenue lock lacking the three-foot Hedge buffer exhibit number two shows dead or or missing landscape along East Bor Avenue in North 56 Street exhibit number three shows dead or
missing plant material on the north side of the site number four Dam irrigation tubing on the south side of the site number five shows lack of irrigation at the southwest corner of the site exhibit number six shows the lack of irrigation and mulch at the southeast corner of the
site as of today's date the site has been out of compliance for 35 days based on a repeat City staff recommendation would be a fine of at $25 per violation so it's $75 a day times 35 days out of
compliance would be an amount of $2,700 any questions for the code officer Mr chairman I just have to clarify this it's not in compliance no sir it's not in compliance City's recommendation here is $25 per day $75
but it's still or up to $75 per day depending on what the board wants to do but it's not compliance so there can't be a total amount if it's not in compliance okay okay so so but so currently it's been it's been out of
compliance for 35 days yes sir as as of tonight it's still out of compliance yes sir as of today it is it would be 35 days out your point is we can't just find them $2,700 because it remains out of compliance that's correct so it would be 20 you know if we if the board
chooses it would be $ 2700 plus $75 a day while it continues to be out of compliance want to make that clarification thank you um Mr chair yeah could you repeat that last part it would be you said something it would be 20 it's currently out of compliance for 35
days so it's $2,700 if we follow the recommendation but the but if we also follow the recommendation it will continue to grow at $75 a day 25 for each violation until it until it until it
brought into compliance ER Mueller on behalf of the city of Temple Terrace because it's a repeat violation the actual fines can begin the day that it was observed which would be going back to 35 days but then it would continue to
run until the violations are corrected so it's little saying just a little bit different what you were saying instead of a set sum we would just have the F if you make a finding of a violation we don't have to make a finding as to it as to the the past violation would just say
that that we if if they're found in violation that there is a continuing F from the day starting on February 5th until it's brought into compliance is that the start is that the start of the 35 days you calculated yes
then but we don't have to give them there's no flat fine no there won't be because it's it's our position that it's still out of violation but of course that's ongo it's all your determination but if you find there's a violation and
it's still an active violation then there would be no flat it would just be a a if you whatever fine you daily fine you would come up with that would start on February 5th but we already did the daily fine of $75 per day no no no that's the recommendation way oh that's
the recommendation by the board okay the code board oh okay all right got you all right sorry I I now that we settled that do we have any questions for the code board for the code officer yes also uh the respondents are here as well I could answer question yes um uh I want to ask
you why why we consider them I know they had the same issue before and that's why they became repeated violation they never corrected that issue before Oh no sir they did uh the violation was corrected it was brought into compliance it just it didn't stay in compliance it
fell back out of out of compliance um I think that maybe uh was maybe the landscapers the contractor that they were utilizing possibly um you know not not properly uh functioning irrigation certainly doesn't help for uh you know
dead dead plants especially in Florida so yeah and the definition of repeat is what's the what's say five years five years within five years yeah so if whatever the violation is whether it's parking in your yard or or under grass
or whatever if that same violation occurs within five years it's considered a repeat and yeah I know I understand but five years for landscaping I'm just trying to understand the case a little bit better to be to be fair do you have any
additional questions well that's that's about it you know can I let me clarify it came into compliance earlier this year in 202 did or 2024 I should say last year in 2024 we're not we don't have to look back five years yeah that was we look
back less than year yeah that was my question it it it seemed if I read it right it was in May of 2024 is when that I don't know if it came into compliance then but then it fell out of compliance in yeah so it's been it's been recent it hasn't been 5 years I think maybe uh um
some light would could be be shed on the subject um if uh respondents possibly come up and be able to speak to them one up if you want to hi I'm Teresa Wilson uh representing
Circle pay in the store address please uh the address at this location is 5602 East fer Avenue thank you um I'm the new Regional director for the area and the district manager that originally had the store before and had spoken to Laurer
his name was Audrey and she has since then been terminated from the company we have a new district manager named Candace who just assumed the market less than 30 days ago um I just now received the email about the compliance being out of compli iance on March the 7th so this
is the first I'm hearing about it as of March the 7th so I have not had time to bring it into compliance because the assistant manager that Lori has spoken to several times has not brought it to the DM or my attention that it's been out of compliance or it would already have been fixed I am meeting her at the
store tomorrow I reached out to her when I found out about it and got the email I'm meeting her at the store tomorrow at 10:00 in the morning and I already have a landscaper meeting me there to take care of the problem and issue but I just found out on March the 7th
okay any questions for the respondents yeah is uh do you anticipate being able to complete this within a month perhaps 30 days I should be a week within a week okay he's my TSM he's
facil manager can you identify yourself please sir since you're spoke I'm the facilities manager for Circle K for this region your name Steven clarkk thank you thank you uh I was involved with the uh the old market manager for the first violation
and uh I brought uh copies of invoices where we dealt with it fixed the irrigation and we replanted the plants if you want to see that from the May June you don't mind youall want to see it sure we did at that time but we had
issues with homeless people messing with our power for our irrigation at the since that time we put lock boxes on everything so we'd go over there find the irrigation box unplugged you know why is it getting unplugged we looked the cameras people at night were using it to charge phones and that kind of
thing so we put lock boxes on the irrigation like all of it's locked up and you know we understand that we use a third party as a national company to save cost money so what that is is a company that hires the cheapest person to do your Landscaping right
it's they they run over our sprinkler heads you know we we get it right well we decided today at our corporate office that we're going to actually hire a local landscaper for this location moving forward that way we don't have these issues moving forward great and
they will deal directly with me and the district manager and we get it you know we understand we're here to make it right but we did address it we didn't get this information to our office so once you issue your whatever it comes our corporate office here in Tampa we got it last Friday and we acted right
then so store people don't communicate stuff I apologize you know once we find out we're here to do the right thing okay any any other questions thank you thank you can have a seat thank you thank you there's no other questions I will
entertain a motion I'll be glad to make a motion thank you in case number 25- 0620 I move that the city has proven by a greater weight of the evidence the following violations of the city of
Temple teror City code exist on the property located at 5602 East Fowler Avenue um applicable code sections 12 d1047 Landscape Maintenance section 12-
1049 Landscaping perimeter and section 12-10 43 plant material and design this motion is based on the sworn testimony this board has received from the code enforcement officer Smith along with any other evidence including photos affidavits and the notice of violation
all of which is received and entered as part of the record of this hearing I further move that the respondent to be found to be a repeat violator as defined by city code section 1-63 because the respondent has been found to have violated the same provision of the city code within the previous 5 years regardless of property
address I further move that a daily fine be assessed for the repeat violations from the time of the notice of the repeat violation until the time the repeat violations are correct upon considering the following factors the gravity of the violation any actions taken by the Violator to correct the
violation and any previous violations committed by The Violator I move that the fine to be $75 per day we have a motion do we have a second second motion a second any further discussion I I I don't like the
75 will you uh the reason is because you know I I I as you as you see to be fair they the real people who would really act on this which is became repeated violation
because they did not get the right information and Mis communication like they uh mentioned I think we I I would say $25 per day just I'm I'm disagreeing I can't I can't not make it or beat violating
because violation because it's a city code but um it's it's unfortunate so that's why I'm objecting to the amount so are we talking $75 a day from today we're talking feu February 6th February
5th 5th okay so I okay I just think we we we have a history of of multiple violations being more than $25 per day I mean I think that we need to be consistent at the very least yeah I understand uh for people who would really intentionally it
doesn't seem to me I'm not convinced they they did this intentionally now you know as you see this is a big Corporation so to to get that information and they just fixed it and I agree with them I own business here we got homeless people that don't don't
leave the place alone you cannot have guards for these places no but intentional to me is is they don't intend to do it however they need to have practices in play place and it took this to get there can we get that um
invoice back Joe because there was some language in the invoice that specified that some of the damage did come from mowers on the irrigation system there was testimony to that yeah they had this so um you just I do like to have it in
black and white um and per the city's recommendation of $25 per violation per day we just wanted to maintain that consistency that I think we seek which thank you y yeah like you okay well we have we have a motion we
have a second um all those in favor I I I opposed n one nay motion passes so you you've been found in violation the fine is $75 per day starting on December 5th I'm sorry on February 5th until such
time as the property is brought into compliance thank you next case please remind them that they can come back if you have a problem yeah yeah thank you um you do have the opportunity can can is there a uh there's no is there a um
can they come back and no well here's yeah the situation is Norm you allow that when You' set a deadline for compliance there is no deadline for compliance but I mean is already running can is um what's the word I'm looking for sorry I've been lean reduction lean reduction they have absolutely can do a
lean reduction when they come into compliance yes on once you bring the property in compliance you can um ask for a lean reduction that'll you'll be dealing with with earning on that um but you have to bring the pro property into compliance first
okay next case next case is case number 24- 4946 City versus Terrace Ridge Incorporated for the property located at 5509 East of fer Avenue the cas is before the board based on an alleged violation of section
12- 234b 48b outdoor seating restaurants the case will the case will be prosecuted this evening by code compliance officer Lori Smith the city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing were properly served thank you good evening again Mr chairman board members Lor Smith C compliance this case originated
on December the 31st 2024 when I visited the business on their outdoor seating requirements a check with Community Development that same day noted a site plan requirement was not submitted the city planner for review or approval on January the 2nd
2025 I spoke with the business manager on the changes of the code ordinance that was implemented back in July of 2022 a check with city planners on January the 31st 2025 noted no no site plan submitted therefore a notice
violation was prepared with a compliance date of February 17th 2025 I sent over a copy of the notice letter by email and the property man manager confirm delivery uh manager Stacy Robinson a check with that city planner noted no change on February the
28th 2025 at this time i' like to submit photographic evidence of the violation taken by me on January the 30th 2025 accept that thank you thank you cibit number one shows tables and chairs out side in
the Breezeway and as of today today's date the site is now in compliance at this time I'd like to submit an Affidavit of compliance and I'm just looking for a finding that thank you any questions for the code officer is the respondents here no sir
they are not are they oh yes yes I'm sorry yes yes sir they are yes she is did you want to do you want to approach do you want to come up and say anything um I just no no wait till you get up here name and address name and address my name is Sharon Dean and the address
is 5509 East Fowler Avenue Flor is yours um I just wanted to reiterate what she said we did come in compliance on March 3rd um for New York New York Pizza small pizza shop we're
kind of unfamiliar with the processes of a city municipality we operate and other Hillsboro County city of Tampa City of Temple Terrace is a little bit different for us but we did make some phone calls we came down I came and visited downtown
your office here to try to see what all we would need to do um in order to come into compliance so that we can have that outdoor seating and and what we were I think were told yesterday morning was that there would have to be pylons put
in there for the seting and as you can see from the picture um there's not a lot that outside of putting pylons up you know there's a curb area that's probably 8 and 1/2 in in depth you know there's
also a speed hump that goes out there there's columns and pylons there but they're not the ones that the city of Temple Terrace is looking for um which makes that a little bit of a stretch for a small business like us so um we have
removed the seating cuz we at this point we don't know really what else to do um but that's this stend that I have thank you any questions for the respondent seeing no no entertain a motion I'll do it thank you in case
number 24 4946 I move that the city has proven by the greater weight of evidence the following violation of the city of Temple City code did exist on the property located at 5509 East Fowler
Avenue with the applicable code violation section 12- 234 subsection B subsection 48b outdoor seating Resturant this motion is based on the sworn testimony this board has received
from the code enforcement officer Lori Smith along with any other evidence including photos Avid David and the notice of violation of which received and entered as part of the record of this hearing I further move that there would be no fine imposed because the violation were brought into compliance
prior to the date of this hearing we have a motion do we have a second second motion a second any further discussion seeing none all those in favor I opposed no n motion carries so you have been found in violation but because you brought it in compliance before this
evening there's no fine okay now having said that if within the next five years if you have outdoor seating without the requisite pylons whatever you need to do that's considered a repeat violation and
the findes go up from there okay we'll go through the process all right thank you have a good night you're welcome to stay you can leave whatever whatever you feel like doing Pizza next case Please Mr chair just a quick question uh Miss Dean are you also here for case 24
4945 that would gabbas never mind just wanted to double check much next case next case is under unfinished business it is case number 2445 597 City versus Matthew W and Kelly J Godwin for the property located at
8608 Beverly Drive the deadline for compliance is midnight tonight this case uh last month was presented by Steven Valley uh this was for a few violations in operate Vehicles premise to keep premise clean sheds in
the rear yard uh just want to kind of update you the respondents are here this evening to request an extension for the so I just need them to come up sure just state your name and my name's Wayne sther I live before do any of that
have all three of you been sworn in I believe so yes except this I haven't you haven't that's what I thought you right hand uh do you swear or affirm that the testimony you will provide the board tonight will be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth yes sir hey name and address my name is Wayne
Suther I live at 8608 Bly Drive my brother and sisters uh are the owners of the house I live there and uh I pretty much cleaned up everything I had to clean up I I did finish it today but at the last moment but I all three sheds
are down taken down the vehicles have been moved before I think we cleared that case up last time I was here on the vehicles they've been moved already um got the water in the uh the the water in the garbage like it's supposed to be now the city I had a hard time getting
it because my name wasn't on the paperwork and as far as being owner of the house and I didn't have a lease so they wouldn't turn it on for me so I was using somebody else's my next door neighbor that owns the house it's empty but I now have it in my name back in my
brother's name though but it's turned on in our name now and uh I've cleaned up everything I'm supposed to clean up will you be home tomorrow yes sir can I come by and take a look sure you can Y what time is good for you sir anytime want to come over tomorrow I'm not
working tomorrow so I'll be okay very good you guys want to add something to that I have nothing to add okay Ernie can we give them a extension of 48 hours or do we have to give it to the
next we got to do I think 30 you can give as long of an extension as you want I just think it would probably be easier to do the standard okay extension to the next meeting all right what's the what's the board's preference I would say 30 days I need a next
meeting need a motion everyone timebody um I will make motion to extend uh in case number 40 uh 24 4597 till our next meeting um on April
9th 2025 we have a motion do we have a second second motion a second any further discussion yes sir I'd like to ask a question um my brother too late hang on there's no further discussion all
those in favor I I opposed no Nays motion carries okay so you've been given an extension until April 9th okay um to get to get it all cleaned up okay okay hang on hang on let me finish you you you've said that it is already all
cleaned up yes sir so once they take a look at it and confirm that uh they'll fill out the requisite paperwork and you'll get something in the mail yes sir um I was just going to say the next meeting do they have to come they live way on the other side of town nobody has to come if it's cleaned up okay right
okay if it if if they go out there tomorrow the next day and it's all cleaned up um that's the end of it okay okay the only reason you would have to come back here is if they find something and then you have compelling reasons why you can't get that fixed up by April 9th
okay okay thank you sir thank you thank next case next case is back under new cases case number 24- 4862 City versus 7021 East Fletcher Avenue LLC for the property located at 7021 East
Fletcher Avenue the cas is before the board based on an alleged violation of section 12- 234b 48b outdoor seating restaurants the case will be prosecuted this evening by code compliance officer Lori Smith the city has evidence that the no notice of violation and notice of
hearing were properly served good evening again Mr chairman board members Lor Smith Cod compliance this case was originating was originated by building official Dallas Foss on December the 18th 2024 I visited the business on their
outdoor seating requirements a check with Community Development that same day noted a site plan requirement was not submitted to the city planner for review or approval on December the 28th 2024 I received a phone call from the owner Matt he was apologetic and said he would
be reaching out to the city promptly and would be submitting a design plan to gain approval for outdoor seating at the restaurant I explained to him that there was a revision to the code in July 2022 a check with the city planners on January the 31st 2025 noted no site plan
submitted therefore a notice a violation was prepared with a compliance date of February the 14th 2025 Affidavit of service was obtained by hand delivery to assistant manager Dana utl at this time I'd like to submit photographic evidence
of the violation taken by me on January the 30th 2025 we accept that thank you thank [Music] you exhibit number one two and three shows the tables and chairs outside on
the Breezeway as of today's date the site is now in compliance at this time I'd like to submit an Affidavit of compliance and just looking for a finding we accept that thank you thank you different that's from the previous want to
explain H may want to expl be the reason that it can come into compliance you take the the tables and chairs off the Breezeway that makes the violation go away now if they put it back out there um certainly that they're not they would not be in compliance they remove the
table so that again it's not on the Breezeway um anybody in a wheelchair or coming down the walkway is is unhindered passage is is there any anything in the code that allows outdoor seating yes so if you want to have outdoor seating you
have to submit a site plan just what we're looking for is measurements of the Breezeway the size of the tables how many chairs how many tables and it's got to be ADA Compliant but all we're looking for is somebody to submit a site plan of what the outdoor seating style
is oh and once I do that the city will either approve it or not approve it to be ADA Compliant that's our main main reason why we're doing this and just for clarification what sort of site plans are needed like a drawing a draw a drawing okay a drawing with with
measurements yes okay yep it's got to there's got to be a threefoot path so person in a wheelchair can get by gotcha that area there's also some parking restrictions too as far as if if because the extra seating has to be accommodate if it's in a there's got to be a buffer
around the setting of the table any questions Mr chairman and board members I did want to say as well that uh a check this afternoon I have three copies of uh New York kabas and and and Barberitos uh not submitting any anything for City's approval as far as
an application I've made three copies so one would be for each one if you'd like me to submit those other two I can fine but but as it stands right now it is in compliance no sir I mean yes barbarito is in compliance sir and then
also so uh New York New York is is in because they took the table they took the tables out of the walkway correct any other questions and you is the respondent here did you want there was a gentleman here that would like to come up and address
the board one up Mr Sam Pastor thank you thank you have you been sworn in yes okay name and address Sam Pastor it's 721 um East Fletcher I'm here for Barberitos uh I'm an attorney I talked to my client I instructed him what needs to be done he is aware I'm going to
handle getting a site plan to the enforcement and I think this should be resolved rather quickly okay great thank you thank you sir any questions for the respondent thank you you have a seat thank you thanks if there's no other questions I'll entertain a motion I'll
do it thank you okay in case number 24 4862 I move that the city has proven by great with the evidence the following violations of the city of Temple Terrace city code did exist on the property located at 7021 East Fletcher
Avenue where am I my mind just going blank are you looking for yep I'm looking for the violation um violation being section 12- 234b 48b outdoor seating restaurant the motion is based on the
sworn testimony this board has received from the code enforcement officer Lorie Smith and other Witnesses along with any other evidence including photos affidavits and the notice of violation all of which is received and entered as part of the record of this hearing I further move there being no fine imposed because the violations were brought into
compliance prior to the date of this hearing do we have a motion do we have a second a second motion and second from Bill any further discussion seeing none all those in favor I opposed no nay motion carries so your client has been
found in U in violation but because they brought it in compliance there's no fine however just like the last one if they do it again that'll consider repeat fines go up okay and that's for five years okay thank you again you're welcome to stay or you can leave it's up
to you um let's take a very short break yeah okay oh sure e e yes 491 4917 next case is case number
24- 4917 City versus 12260 Group Incorporated for for the property located at 12260 Morris Bridge Road the case is before the board based on an alleged violation of section 8-28 A1 permits app required the case will be
prosecuted this evening by code compliance officer Lori Smith the C city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing were properly served good evening again Mr chairman board members Lori Smith C compliance this case originated proactively December the 10th
2024 my inspection revealed the parking lot had been resealed and striped without a permit at this time I spoke with the general manager Mr pier and advised of a reinspection date of the 26th of December 2024 a reinspection on January the 6 2025 noted no change
therefore notice of violation was prepared with a compliance date of February the 14th 2025 Affidavit of service was obtained by hand deliv to general manager Mr Pier at this time I'd like to submit photographic evidence of the violation
taken by me on December this the 10th 2024 and a copy of the stop work order in Central Square we'll accept that thank you thank you exhibit number one shows the west side front parking area rilled number two shows the West west side front
parking area rilled exibit number three shows the wests side rear parking area rilled Mr chairman I spoke with the owner of the property on the 24th of February 2025 concerning the notice of hearing and what was needed to Abate the violation as of today's date the site is
not in compliance and I'm seeking a ruling very good thank you yes sir questions for the code officer is the respondent here yes sir Mr Pier the general manager is here would like to come up and address the board sir have you been sworn in yes I was okay
state your name and address please yes Ricardo Pi 12260 Maris Bridge Road Temple terce Florida 33637 so I spoke with Miss Lori um on the day of the um the violation unfortunately we were not aware that we
needed a permit since the same company did one of our other properties in Brandon and hillsbor does not require one so once she um informed us they literally stop but again the job was already completed so I've contacted the
Temple Terrace code enforcer I spoke with candy and she mentioned that um we cannot get the permit since we did not do it so I've um called scorpion LLC which was the contractor who did the job and he said he's going to resume and get
the the permit so we're asking for at least 30 extra days to get this in compliance because there's nothing that we can do until the contractor get it done so you contractor said he's going to come in and get the permit or yes so as of right now the CFO um for a company
is holding payment until he gets that part complete so more more than likely have that's a motivator yeah get so we're asking for 30 days until until any questions for the respondent so you think in they already
submitted the permit um I spoke with him today and I spoke to candy from what I was told he has not did the permit as of yet but today he said he was going to get his GC to get that done I I don't know if he called or if he came in that I don't
know any other questions see Noone no entertain a motion I I'll do this okay in case number 24 4917 I moved the the city has proven by the greater weight of evidence the following violation of the city of
Tumble terce City code exist on the property located at 12260 Mor Bridge Road with the applicable code violation section 8-28 subsection a subsection 1 permit application required this motion
is based on the sworn testimony this board has received from the code enforcement officer uh Lori Smith along with any other evidence including photos Avid David and the notice of violation of which received and entered as part of the record of this hearing I further
move that the S violation be corrected on or before uh April 9th 2029 25 20 2029 25 April 9th
2025 if the respondent does not comply with this order or on before that uh that day they are ordered to pay a fine for each and every day the violation continue past the date for uh set for compliance I considering the following factors the gravity of the violation
action taken by the Violator to correct the violation and any previous violations committed by The Violator I move that the fine be $25 per day we have a motion do we have a second a second motion a second any further discussion seeing none all those in favor I opposed no Nays motion carries
so you you been found in violation you have until April 9th okay to get the permit okay if you don't have a permit by April 9th um fines will begin to acrew against you not to your contractor um but you can come back in
at our meeting on April 9th and ask for an extension there is no guarantee you will get an extension you have the right to ask for one okay now I have another question if by any chance the contractor does not come and get the permit from what I was told by candy the Hotel
cannot do the permit is that correct that's correct cuz you didn't do the work corre and you're not an asphalt contractor correct okay I appreciate okay and again the the fine will begin to acre on April 9th against you not against your contractor I understand yes
I'll let the owners know thank you thank you who had the second on the motion again me okay next case please make sure it's not 2020 9 that's 20225 we got we got on most people do
2024 you you skipped ahead it's on the record we're good I next case please next case is case number 25- 0068 City versus Crystal D Herrera for the property located at 5401 East 998th Avenue the case is before the
board based on an alleged violation of section 12- 8592 RVs boats and trailers the case will be prosecuted this evening by Code Compliance off officer Doug Allen the city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing were properly served good evening and welcome back Mr
chairman and board members Doug Allen code compliance officer this case was originated by me on January 6 2025 for utility trailer in the front yard unscreened from view I left a door hanger with a reinspection datee of January 8th 2025 my reinspection on
January 17th showed no change so I generated a notice of violation on that date with a reinspection date of January 22nd 2025 I posted a notice at the site as well as at City Hall on the electronic board for the 10day requirement and copies were mailed both certified and
regular mail to the address of the owner of record my reinspection on February 28 showed no change so I prepared a notice of hearing on that date and the case was scheduled for the March Municipal Code board meeting this time I would like to submit photographic evidence taken by myself on January 17th and February 28th
2025 accept that thank you thank you Mr alen exhibit number one shows the notice of violation posting exhibit number two shows the unscreened trailer now in the sidey yard and the site is not in compliance and I'm seeking a ruling very good thank you any questions for the
code officer uh I guess I missed the unscreened is the respondent here uh yes sir would he like to approach yes I'm here oh she would she like to approach sorry coming up have you been sworn in yes name and address please Crystal
Herrera 5401 East 998th Avenue Flor is yours okay so um the first violation I didn't get I think it blew off um but basically the reason for the utility trailer is um I was in a car accident between the two hurricanes lost my job lost my car um and in order for me to
try to um you know to support support my family um I've been reselling so my dad let me borrow his trailer um my dad was a landscaper for many years um and so I'm borrowing his trailer so we were just doing a lot of loads and my
boyfriend who helps me he travels for work and I can't move the trailer by myself so when what we had to do is we had to to get it to where it's at now I had to cut a tree down so I cut a small tree down and I was able to get it into the backyard and I do have some fencing I'm going to be putting up so if I could
get an extension till the next hearing so I can try to get the fence so it can be not shown um but I need the trailer to work um in order for me I I resell Furniture um I do like storage auctions I buy them online and then I res I have to pick up the items and resell them um
but I need the trailer even if you're found in violation tonight you'll have until April 9th to bring it into compliance okay and if you bring it into compliance by April 9th it won't be a f uh but you so you you don't have to ask for an extension that's just yeah I'm I'm trying to get some fencing put up um
cuz to take it to my dad's house and loots and like drive back and forth is just a lot it's a lot of like travel already so um you know he's he my dad came and like helped me he was out of town he came and cut the tree for me um so we could get it out of the way and he thought that would be
sufficient how it works any other questions for the respond just for you also ahead just remind them not to be also a repeat violator because this is easy to become a repeat violator we'll talk about that later yeah we're just going to mentioned that the the just so she knows I don't know if this is how
large a fence you're going to put up but that can require permit also right that's not going to require a permit small 15t okay yeah they're just small partitions right on my sides of my yard there I have small area right there on both sides it's open just wanted to be
sure good question you'll be putting a gate there um I well I guess I need to find out more details on how it needs to be covered I thought the side of the yard was fine and he showed the picture and he's saying it's not in compliant so I just got to figure something out well
cuz it's it's surviving right now likeing on how much fence you put up you may need a permit for the fence as well no I heard what he said yeah I just like for me to move the trailer right now I'm just trying to figure out cuz I don't even have another car so it's yeah I just finished my case and stuff so talk to talk to the code enforcement officer
about that about code enforement your options are oh okay thank you any other questions sing n no entertain emotion you can have a seat man thank you oh okay it's motion time I saw Brian hit his oh I was looking go
for all right so in case case number 25- 0068 I move the city has proven by a greater weight of the evidence the following violation of the City Temple Terrace s city code ex exists at the
property located at 5401 East 998th Avenue uh the code violation is section 12- 859 subsection two this motion is based on the sworn testimony this board has received from uh code enforcement
officer Doug Allen along with any other evidence including photos affidavits and notice of violation all of which is received and entered as part of the record of this hearing I further move that said violations be corrected honor before April 9th 2025 if the respondent does not comply with this order on before that day they
are ordered to pay a fine for each and every day the violation continues past the date set for compliance upon considering the following factors the gravity of the violation any actions taken by the Violator to correct the violation and any previous violations committed by The Violator I move that the fine be $25 per day we have a motion
do we have a second second motion a second any further discussion seeing none all those in favor I oppose no n motion carries so you have been found in violation you have until April 9th to bring the property into compliance if the property is not brought into
compliance by April 9th a fine of $25 per day will begin to ACR if for some reason whatever circumstances prevent you from bringing the property into compliance you're welcome to come back on April 9th and ask for an extension there is no guarantee that you will get an extension but you are welcome to ask
okay as far as options as to how to bring the property into compliance you need to discuss that with the code compliance officer he gave me his card okay good and you you're welcome to stay or you can leave it's up to you thank you next case please uh next case this is the last
arrival is case number 24- 2353 C versus James L and Joyce AG Evans for the property located at 11305 East Queensway drive this is under unfinished businesses thank you the deadline for compliance is midnight tonight this is on the unfinished
business this was what's 0547 this is uh 23 353 2353 253 okay 2353 got it okay this was a case that I presented uh three months ago uh for a
nuisance of a building that was from a fire uh Mr Evans has been coming each month requesting he's been providing providing some information to the board but I'm here he's probably here tonight to ask for another extension I'm not
sure uh but I do know that he has applied and been submitted a demo uh permit uh was probably about 10 days ago so I'm not sure what he has to say tonight bring me up the speed since I missed it you said the house caught on
fire yeah this was a house that caught on fire uh probably almost almost a year ago and uh it's been sitting in disrepair uh it's a nuisance to the neighbors so uh I presented this
case about 3 months ago and he's been like I said said he's been coming each month requesting additional 30 days and was the house completely gutted or yes yes it's on the chimney issue
first yes just Jo do you have the uh burn his caught on fire smoke damage on the inside of the house smoke damage on the inside but the but the walls are still up but he wants to De he's going to demolish we do have like photos from oh do very helpful and whoever else was
not here were you hear last time yeah I didn't think so didn't buy it oh okay that helps yeah you said respondent is here I believe Mr Evans he doesn't need to be sworn in was he sworn in no okay he SW in he was
sworn in not was not okay you'll have to get sworn in have you done each time right do you swear or affirm that the testimony you will provide the board tonight will be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth yes I do and name and address please James Evans 11305 East Queensway Drive Temple terce
33617 um as you know or you don't but everybody else know uh the house has been under an insurance issue since it was burned it's beyond smoke inhal uh smoke it's going to have to be torn down completely the reason we had didn't have
a release from the insurance company to tear it down they had not completed their assessment quote unquote of the Interior um in a good faith effort I went ahead and pulled a demolition permit it and I'm going to start gutting the interior however the good news is as
of yesterday they gave me a partial release on the interior so I can now proceed for the first time with a demolition so I do have a permit for demolition for myself to start tearing everything out of the house that's as far as I could go until literally today so now I can go ahead and hire a fulls
side they made me hire a contractor but I can notify him that he can go ahead and start preparation for the overall demolition I am still going to go ahead and start with the interior on my own which is what I have the permit for today now when I pull the permit I'm not allowed
to proceed until the I get a pre-demolition inspection which is called and is not done yet and Dallas and I talked about tonight I'm going to need to pull another permit uh for a temporary power pole uh cuz we do have the power pulled off the house but they haven't pulled
the wires out from under the ground which we're just going to move over to a power pole so I have power tools to use for the Demolition and somebody we finally got or the other just excuse me I'm sorry go ahead uh what's what's it going to take to bring this property
into compliance is just getting the permit or is the actual demo no the demo of the structure okay demo the F the violation is a nuisance of the structure the only the demo is what has to occur that's correct okay or repair or repair
yeah but you're you're talking demo so yeah I mean the insurance company finally after months and months and months finally decided they just this this it's cheaper to tear it down and start over Okay and when do you anticipate that uh the permit is good till September understood but when do
you actually anticipate to De I'm going to start putting trailers in there but I'm afraid to put a trailer in there because I may get fine for a repeat offence since I had a trailer there before that they cited me while I was dimling the the chimney so I'm not putting anything on that property until I have a okay from the building department saying that I have permission
to start the demolition which is a requirement of their permit but I'm going to start putting the trailers there immediately uh as soon as I get an inspection okay and I've called for the inspection so that's going to happen I'm going to start at least gutting the interior that I can whatever I can carry
and you're here to ask for 30-day extension um whatever it takes just keep going I mean it's like I can't do anything without the insurance money but now that they finally yesterday they signed off on it and I didn't want to take anything out of the inside because that was the only part of the insurance that they hadn't
approved uh was the inside and that's a whole another story we finally found out what the problem was and that's was resolved last week uh and they got at least a partial payment that they issued yet the 12 well I got the letter today the 12th U but they released a portion
of the Interior yesterday does the city have any objection to to an extension um I mean I can pretty much guarantee that the full-blown demolition is not going to occur within 30 days I I just feel like this has been dragged out
long enough um I um I will say I will'll grant another 30 days but after
that uh I'm just about done I mean as far as this has been dragging on for a long period of time the chimney when we dealt with that that took almost a year to get that in compliance so this is a different um
violation Insurance com but any other questions for the respondent uh for the respondent you think in this 30 days this will be all completely done without I'm certainly going to try but I
I'm not I'm going to do my part but as far as a general contractor to go in there with cranes and Wrecking G balls whatever it's going to take to tear it down I don't know I honestly don't they could say oh we're got nothing to do next week we can come right over well I
think I think as I don't know Tom mentioned it's been a long time there been a problem with the insurance it's not a question of me I've done what I can do one at a time please no I'm I'm a little bit I'll just I'll shut up but thank you I have maintained the property
I have mowed it I've kept it up a lot of tearing down the building just tearing explain to me Tom tearing down the building even still some debris there it won't be considered a nuisance because it's work in process and that then will bring it
to compliance it could be done in a couple of days in my in my book that's correct you know but he has a lot of debris inside that house personal property he has a lot of personal property inside that house it is and it could take him over a month just to remove the personal property before the
demo starts yeah okay one at time fine our goal is progress we want to see progress that's what I'm here for that's what I came in I brought you I told you before that I hired an architect I got I have to say again I have to say it again
I got a light in the back progress we're we're here for progress and I know that's what you're here for and that's why I just showed your progress that that's that's what we want and so we've gotten the permits we see you filed for them I I like that that I I like to see
that you're doing the right things but um as far as what you can do what do you think you can do before your contractor comes in to do the big I'm going to start taking the stuff that I know is not in dispute out of the house there's not much be honest I mean there's a few
things that are still salvageable in there right and I'm going to let the big boys come in with just bullers or whatever it takes yeah I'm going to mostly go after all the stuff that I think I can probably save which is my wife's China my grandmother's China yeah this kind of stuff that's still in the
house okay there's very little Furniture there's the stuff I'm going to try to save is mostly heirloom stuff okay and I got to dig under stuff um I mean a lot of the ceilings are down um they're telling me not to even go in there but I still want to at least
try to get stuff that my parents passed away and it's in that house my wife's parents passed away it's in that house I've got family stuff there I've got all my relatives basically I'm I'm an or all my relatives my brothers sisters everybody's passed away to me and I'm
the one that got everything left too so uh it's there's a lot of stuff still in there and most of it is not usable but there's two a few things you're planning to tear down the entire house not just the garage part oh no the whole house has to go okay yeah because it burned
through the main wiring harness so that means every piece of sheetrock in a house has to come out and the second floor almost all the signs are caved in the trusses have to be replaced it's just there's there's just no point in trying to fix it got it that's where we stayed for months trying to figure out how to fix it and then there's it's just
not going to happen thank you you can have a seat I entertain a motion I'm do it okay in case number 2423 uh 53 uh I move that we extend uh
the um uh compliance till um April 9th 2025 a motion to every second a second motion a second any further discussion what if
we gave him 60 days the only reason I'm saying that is obviously he's working in insurance is what has is is where what we what has brought us here so it's nothing he's done it's
and we all know what insance companies are like um and and Tom is saying there's a lot of stuff in there um and I just I I'd hate to have him come back again and give him give him
another 30 days I I consider that um uh Gina um but it's been over a year yeah but it's also an insurance company I I understand I understand you know it's be real Qui as uh board member Hubert
said we're looking for Progress if if we go 60 days my concern is we don't know what's happening in those 60 days if he comes back in 30 days we can get a progress report and we can keep moving forward and one would hope that uh Mr Evans would allow one of the code
inspectors to see because a lot of this if he's moving stuff from the out you know from inside out and moving it out it's kind of like hidden progress there we don't know if something's happening so hopefully uh there'll be a way for our code inspectors to be able to see that there is progress happening I think
that's you know just we got to keep moving forward and I think monthly status checks do so what has to happen for it to be in compliance the whole house has the whole house has to come down however he has the the permits in progress and he has a plan in progress
our our goal is to make sure that that plan is going according to plan I just I I just I would hate to see you know 30 days from now and progress has been made but the house is still standing well I I I don't expect the house to be down in
30 days I'm not going to lie I but I also I don't want to give 60 90 days and then cuz as you say we all know insurance companies that's the industry I worked in for a very long time
um it's not all on them and there's there's more to it um so we need to see that work is being done on all sides okay I agree I think we need to see progress that's so we have a motion we
have a second all those in favor I opposed no Nays motion carries so you've been given an extension until April 9th and you know the drill thank you have a good night good luck next case please at the very least
I'll have a better idea what the contractor that's going to be the actual okay if you're going to talk you're going to have to come up to the the name and address Kim evids 11305 East Queensway
Drive Temple Terrace all I was going to say is that I can certainly by the next time hopefully the contractor will have a schedule by then I can say when they're going to be showing up with the with the bulldozers look forward all right and I just want us to make sure that nobody comes by and complains about the trailers out front for me loading
them thank you good luck next case please turn back to the beginning of the agenda case number 24-4 665 City versus Thomas and Beckman for the property located at 610 hwood Avenue the cas is before the board based on an
alleged violation of section 8-28 A1 permits app required the case will be prosecuted this evening by code compliance officer Doug Allen the city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing were properly served thank you this case this case was
dismissed yeah I thought it was this was dismiss this case this was a case that was presented last month the couple came in and they purchased a shed and they uh we hit them for not obtaining a permit and the permit the shed doesn't require
a permit okay that's why we closing that case than next case okay that's what I thought next case is case number 24- 4941 City versus Angela Marin for the property located at 520 Courtney Drive the cas is before the board based on alleged violation of of section 10-3 B
sanitation grass weeds the case will be prosecuted this evening by code compliance officer Lori Smith the city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing were properly served that you oh Tom not Lori Smith case uh so I'm going to present
this case uh this case this evening originated on December 30th 2024 when Officer Steve Valley noted overgrown conditions throughout the front yard that morning he left a door hanger with a reinspection datee of January 13th
2025 on January 9th 2025 oo Valley did receive a phone call from the female owner stating that the alow was broken and it needed some additional time W Sur Valley inspection on February 5th 20125 noted no change therefore a notice of
violation was prepared on that date with the February 18th or February 25th uh compliance date offic of Valley inspection on February 26 2025 again noted no change at this time i' would
like to submit photographic evidence that was taken by Steven Valley exhibit number one shows the posting of the notice letter at the front door on February 6 2025 exhibit number two and three are photos that displayed the overgrown weeds in the front yard that
was taken on February 28th I'd like this this accept thank you fabulous thank you so my inspection on today's date noted that the yard had been mowed therefore I'm submitting an Affidavit of compliance great we'll accept that too
thank you any questions for the code officer see none I'll entertain a motion okay sorry ahead in case number 24 4941 I move that the city uh has proven by a greater weight of evidence the
following violation of the city of city of Temple Terrace city code did exist on the property located at 520 cottony drive with the applicable code violation section 10-3 subsection
B this motion has is based on the morning testimony this board has received from the code enforcement officer along with any other evidence including photos Avid David and the notice of violation of which received and enter as B part of the record of this hearing I further move that there
be no fine imposed because the violations were brought into compliance prior to the date of this hearing we have a motion do we have a second second motion a second any further discussion see none all those in favor I opposed no nay motion carries
next case please next case is case number 24- 4945 City versus Terrace Ridge Incorporated for the property located at 5515 East fer Avenue the cas is before the board based on alleged violation of section 12- 234b 448b
outdoor seating restaurants the case will be prosecuted this evening by code compliance officer Lori Smith the city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing were properly served good evening again this case uh Lori Smith Code Compliance this case originated on December the 31st
2024 when I visited the business on their outdoor seating requirements a check with Community Development that same day noted a site plan requirement was not submitted to the city planner for review or approval on January the 2nd 20125 I spoke with the business
manager on the changes of the code ordinance that was implemented back in July of 2022 a check with city planners on January the 31st 2025 noted no site plan submitted therefore notice of violation was prepared with the compliance date of
February the 14th 2025 sent over copy of the notice letter by email confirmed delivery by property manager Stacy Robinson a check with the city planner noted no change on February the 28th 2025 at this time I'd like to submit photographic evidence of the violation
taken be by me on January the 31st 2025 accept that thank you thank you you exhibit number one and two shows shows the tables and chairs out out on the Breezeway as of today's date the site is not in compliance therefore I am seeking
a ruling okay any questions for the code off so uh how long do you think they've been doing this sir I'm not sure repeat it's been been a few years a
while yeah yeah the anybody approach them and tell them that that's wrong or yes she did I know well before this I think he's before this right before no no I meant before this nobody this code section was changed two and a half years
ago okay 2022 it changed where now that was the revision to the code where you have to gain the approval of the city before before I guess they didn't have that that portion of that whoever have a restaurant they have to Show Site plans
and get permission to have outdoor seating yes sir okay we had no it also has to meet certain ADA requirements that is correct so we did not have that in the code before that's correct till two and a half years ago okay that's why I wanted because I've lived here so long
i' I've always seen outdoor seating I never really thought about it I always said Outdoors but you know it it just to clarify it's the what 3 and 1/2 ft for ADA wheelchair liance has to be a buffer protecting the people that are sitting around the the
table and chairs I just figured that'd be a a good thing to criteria to the outdoor seating and we have no representation from Buddy telling us why they're not inff well we have this sir uh you know like I said I made a copy of each for each business uh that was New
York New York and Carabas and baros uh you know saying that there was nothing submitted for uh as far as a uh a permit application a site plan for any of those businesses here's another copy of each business that presented so each
one has that a check today there has been nothing particular case they were told in December they needed a site plan we now in March and they have not submitted nothing Happ that is correct sir have they've been communicating with you uh no sir uh not all the way no they
have not I I spoke with them in the beginning uh and I've I've let you know through um my uh my testimony of when the uh the contact took took place with each of of the individuals and what was stated um so hopefully moving forward um if
they're interested in outdoor seating sir they just approach the city and get the city's approval any other questions seeing none I'll entertain a motion all right I'll do this one okay
all right in case number 24- 4945 I move that the city has proven by a greater weight of the evidence the following violation of the city of Temple ter city code exists on the property located at 5515 East fower
Avenue code violation section 12- 234 subsection B subsection 48 subsection B so um this motion is based on the sworn testimony this uh this board has received from code enforcement officer Lori Smith along with any other evidence
including photos affidavit and the no of violation all of which is received and entered as part of the record of this hearing I further move that said violations be corrected honor before April 9th 2025 if the respondent does not comply with this order honored before that day they are ordered to pay
a fine for each and every day the violation continues past the date set for compliance upon considering the gravity of the violation any actions taken by the Violator to correct the violation and any previous violations committed by The Violator I move that the fine be $25 per day we have a motion
do we have a second second motion is second any further discussion seeing none all those in favor I opposed no nay motion carries next case please next case is case number 25- 0179 City versus Bruce and Melissa Jameson for the property located
at 1161 North River Hills Drive the case is before the board based on alleged viol violation of section 12- 8592 RV's boats and trailers the case will be prosecuted this evening by code compliance director Tom Baron the city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing were
properly served good evening Tom Bron Code Compliance this case this evening originated on January 13 2025 when I observed the trailer stored in the front yard unscreened from view I left the door hanger that day with a reinspection datee of January 16th my inspection on
the 21st of January noted no change therefore a notice of violation was prepared that same day with the compliance date of January 28 2025 the notice letter was posted at the front door of the violation and I also requested copies to be sent out certified in first class mail I also
requested a copy be posted on the electronic board at City Hall for the 10-day requirement my compliance inspection on February 14 2025 noted no change at this time I'd like to submit photographic evidence that was taken by me on January 23rd 202 five exhibit
number one shows the posting of the notice letter exhibit number two shows the trailer in the front yard on screen from view i' like to [Music] submit so my inspection on March 10th 2025 noted that the trailer had been
removed from the yard therefore the property is now in compliance I'd like to spend an after of compliance we accept that thank you I did received a phone call from Mr Bruce Jameson uh he was out of the country for 30 days uh so
everything compliance was uh delayed because he was out of the country but he's now in compliance he's in compliance okay any questions for the code officer see none or entertain a motion thank you out that one thank
you um in case number 25-01 79 I moved the city is proven by a greater weight of the evidence the following violations of the city of Temple terce City code did exist on the property located at 1601 North River
Hills Drive applicable code sections 12- 859 subsection 2 this motion is based on the sworn testimony this board has received from The Code Enforcement Officers along with any other evidence including photos affidavits and the notice of violation all of which is received and entered as part of the
record of this hearing I further move that there be no F imposed because the violations were brought into compliance prior to the date of this hearing we have a motion we have a second second motion is second any further discussion seeing none all those in favor I oppose
no n motion carries next case please next case is case number 25- 0547 City versus Temple terrorist Associates LLC care of Buckingham properties for the property located at 9221 North 56 Street the cas is before the board based on an
alleged violation of section 8-16 65a minimum standards commercial buffer repair the case will be prosecuted this evening by code compliance officer Doug Allen the city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing were properly served good evening once again Mr chairman and board members Doug Allen
code compliance officer this case was originated by a phone call from the fire chief for a collapsed concrete panel wall impeding access to an adjacent fire hydrant on January 31st 2025 I went directly to a notice of viol vition on
that date with a reinspection datee of February 6 I contacted the property management company and emailed them a copy of notice of violation as well and a copy of the notice was also posted at City Hall on the electronic board for the 10day requirement and copies were
mailed both certified and regular mail to the address of the owner of record a reinspection on February 28th showed no change so I prepared a notice of hearing on that date and the case was scheduled for the March municipal code board meeting this time I would like to submit
photographic evidence of the site taken by myself on February 28th that thank you thank you exhibit number one shows the damaged wall and fire hydron exhibit number two shows the damaged wall at this time the
site is in compliance and I'm seeking a finding and would like to submit an affidavit to compliance we'll certainly accept that thank you any questions for the code officer uh just uh that's the rear of of my business and it is in compliance I
saw W go up any other questions thir did you have anything to do with that wall collapsing no this happened after by the way it happened after the hurricane yes it was caused by the hurricane yes I didn't know that yes
okay thank you any other questions see none entertain a motion R it's fitting I'll do it it's it's in compliance okay last case in case 25547 I move that the city has proven by
the we weight of evidence the following violation of city of timble ter city code did exist on the property located at 5602 East F uh sorry uh 9221 North 56 Street with applicable code violation
section 8- 166 subsection a uh 5 uh subsection a then this motion is based on this one testimony this board has received from the code enforcement officer Doug Allen along with any other evidence including
photos Abid David and the notice of violation of which received and entered as B record as part of uh of the record of this hearing I further move there will be no fine imposed because the violations were brought into compliance prior to the date of this hearing we have a motion do we have a second second
second motion a second any further discussion seeing none all those in favor I opposed no nay motion carries that finishes our new business on the unfinished there are two remaining under unfinished businesses uh case number 24-
2968 City versus Michael S and Spectrum Medical Park LLC for the property located at 311 bullet Parkway a the deadline for compliance is midnight tonight and number 24-3477 City versus hilvano navoo Nava
for the property located at 203 Redwood Avenue the deadline for compliance is midnight tonight that concludes the agenda good any other board action any new business can I welcome you back thank you a second yeah thank you for
I'm I'm glad that you're you're well enough and you're back rocking out any any uh lean report no okay I'll entertain a motion to adjourn motion to adjourn have a motion do we have a second motion second all those in favor
I opposed we are adjourned thank you all [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music]