The March 11, 2026 meeting of the administr enforcement board is now called to order. >> Mike, we thought we had under control. >> Yep. >> Okay. The March 11, 2026 meeting of Mutual Code Enforcement Board is now called to order. Our next meeting will
be held on Mar April 8th, 2026. February, please stand for the pledge of allegiance. I >> pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and
justice for all. >> Ladies and gentlemen, the municipal code enforcement board is charged with conducting hearings to determine whether an alleged violation of the city code has occurred. Decisions made by this quasi judicial board will be based on the evidence and facts presented this evening. Our meetings are conducted in
accordance with Robert's rules of order and each case will begin with the city presenting its evidence of the alleged violation. The respondent will then present his or her case. Both parties will have an opportunity to cross-examine all witnesses. The board members may question any witness. Comments by both parties must be
relevant to the case. Persons wishing to speak will be given an opportunity to do so by the chair and must adjust address the board from the podium after giving their name and address. Upon request, copies of materials submitted by staff are available for review. Board members
are reminded to obtain permission to speak from the chair and questions of the city should be directed to the attorney for the city. At this time, I'll ask all persons who expect to give testimony this evening to stand and be sworn in by the legislative assistant.
Please raise your right hand. >> You guys in the back, you you going to be you going to be speaking tonight? >> No. Okay. >> Do you swear or affirm that the testimony you you will provide the board tonight will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
>> Thank you. >> Thank you. At this time, I'd like to ask board members if they had any exparte communications regarding any matters coming before the code enforcement board this evening. If you've had verbal communications, please disclose the sum and substance of the communications when
and where the communications occurred and with whom it occurred. If you've had if you received written communications, please disclose the nature of the communications and provide a copy to the legislative assistant to be filed in the record. Starting on this end, >> I've had none.
>> I've had none. I've had none. >> None. >> I've had none. >> Thank you. Approval of minutes. Hopefully everybody's had a chance to review the minutes of February 11, 2026. If there are no edits or corrections, I'll entertain a motion to approve. >> Move to approve. >> Second.
>> Move. Second. Any further discussion? Seeing none, all those in favor? >> I oppose. No nays. Motion carries. Thank you. Okay. Our hearings will be out of order tonight as per usual. Uh the first case will be the first case 25-4353.
Case number two will be case number 2600568. Case number three will be an off agenda item 20 25-3736 should be the last page of your agenda. Which one? 20 have
>> 25-3736. >> May I speak? >> Sure. >> It's not on their agenda. >> Okay. That's why it's off agenda. >> That's right. >> Very good. All right. Case number four uh will be uh under unfinished 25-3917.
>> 39. Okay. That's number four. >> That's number four. Number five will be under new business 25-4477. >> Number six under new business 25-4596. And then we'll clean it clean up the rest. >> Which which one was number six?
>> Number six is um 25-4596. Okay. >> Okay. >> Hang on. I haven't called you up yet. Thank you. Appreciate your enthusiasm. All right, we're all good. All right,
let's go. 25-4353. Under new cases, case number 254353, City versus Wana Navaro and Primavito Diaz Jr. for the property located at 8701 Triple Oaks Road. This case is before the board based on an alleged
violation of section 8-102 subsection 13 subsection C minimum housing roofs. This case will be prosecuted this evening by code officer Lorie Smith. The the city has evidence that the notice of violation and the notice of hearing were properly served.
You >> good evening, Mr. Chairman, board members. Lori Smith, Code Compliance. This case originated proactively on November the 17th, 2025. My inspection revealed a blue tarp on the roof which might have been rain or caused dampness in the walls of the structure. At this
time, I left a door hanger with a reinspection date of the 17th of December, 2025. My reinspection on December the 19th, 2025, noted no change. Therefore, a notice of violation was prepared with a compliance date of the 19th of January, 2026.
No one was at home, so I posted a notice letter at the front door and requested a copy to be sent certified and first class mailed to the owner of record. I also requested a copy be posted on the electronic board for the 10-day requirement. At this time, I'd like to submit photographic evidence of the violation taken by me on December the
19th, 2025. >> Accepted. Thank you. Exhibit number one shows a notice letter posted at the front door. Exhibit number two shows a blue tarp on the roof of the structure. Exhibit number three and exhibit number four are emails from the property manager, Miss Amanda Rojos.
Exhibit number five shows an email from Lewis Law Group. Mr. Chairman, on the 17th of December 2025, Amanda Rojos with Easy Claim Corporation reached out to me by email. She stated the tarp roof is an insurance claim and that she is actively working towards compliance. On February
17th of 2026, I contact Miss Rohouse for a status update. She said this is still an active insurance claim and she continues to work with the resident as well as the insurance company to resolve the violation. As of today's date, the site is not in compliance on seeking a ruling.
>> Good. Thank you. Any questions for the code officer? >> Go ahead, Bill. So, when was the last time you spoke with uh >> February 17th of 2026? >> 17. >> Okay. And so, was there any indication about when this insurance uh dispute
might be resolved? >> Uh, no sir, not that that I'm aware of that she didn't uh share that information with me, but uh Miss Navaro is here this evening and would like to address the board, so maybe she has some more new information that I don't. >> Okay. Thanks. >> Any other questions for the code
officer? Go ahead, Rod. >> The the house is occupied. >> Yes, sir. >> By the client. >> Yes, sir. >> Yeah. The respon and the respondent is here, right? >> Yes, sir. >> How about coming up? >> Name and address, please. >> My name is Wanda. My address is 8701
Triple Oaks Road. Well, there is. And um it like she stated, yes, there's a tarp on the roof. There is a claim for wind mitigation and easy claim core is the persons who are um taken care of
going back and forth. I currently have a lawyer um because they have not um that they have they've said they didn't want to pay and um they're still arguing back and forth. We did have a mitigation
meeting at the be uh last week of February and I have a letter here that was sent to the city of Temple Terrace from the lawyer group as to uh stating that we have retained them for this property and that it's still pending a
pla a claim and um like I said we had mitigation and nothing was resolved at the mitigation. >> Okay. Um, you said that was sent to the city of Temple Terrace. >> Yes. >> Who was it sent to? >> Uh, according to the Lou, they just said City of Temple Terrace.
>> Okay. Would you like to put that copy in the record? >> Sure. >> Um, the other letters that were going back and forth. I mean, I have uh paper copies of them, but these were all back and forth with between Easy Claim and
the um Jack Shanks is Oh, hi. Yeah, you are recognized. Yes. So, the there there's been emails back and forth between um Easy Claim
Core and him as far as um um to the best of your knowledge, can you tell us where the claim currently stands? What has an adjuster been out to look at the roof? >> Yes, they have. Uh it's in mitigation. We had a um meeting with me, my husband.
>> When you say mitigation, do you mean mediation? >> Mediation. Yes. I'm sorry. Um, yes. And we had that at the last week of February. That's where that letter came from. >> And And was was it settled at mediation? >> No, it was not settled. >> Yeah. So, that's where we're standing
right now where um we're going to court. >> Do you know if they declared the mediation in at impass? Yes, >> they did. Okay. >> Yes, they did. Yeah. Yeah. I don't have paperwork specifically from the lawyer that it was at an impass. mediation essentially failed
>> and now you're going to court over it. >> Yes. >> Okay. Do you have a court date? >> No, not yet. >> Okay. >> Any other questions, Rod? >> Uh, are they supposed to replace the whole roof or just that part? That's it. >> I'm going to assume they're going to replace the whole roof.
>> No. Oh, I'm hoping that they can replace the hood. It even if they just give us whatever that part that they're going to give us, then we just replace the rest of it. I mean, the roof is 11 years old.
>> You You had a leak, too. >> There was a leak on it. >> Ernie, >> you said in your presentation earlier that it was for wind mitigation. >> That's what they're saying. Yes. >> What does that mean? It >> I mean, is your roof leaking? Uh it was
yeah they came in and they um brought all those missions. Are >> they saying the root cause of it was wind? Is that what the is that the problem or is it >> that's what they're >> Okay. So they're saying that the the the reason for the leak is due to wind. >> Yeah. I just wanted to confirm that
there was a leak because she had said wind mitigation. I didn't know exactly whether that meant some blew off >> doing it from the paper. >> Okay. So So they're saying wind caused it but there is a leak. >> Is that correct? >> Yeah. When and when it rains. Yeah, >> of course.
>> Go ahead. >> How long is the has the the the leak been in >> August? >> August of 2025. >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> Yeah. >> Okay. Uh do you do you have anything of note coming up? Do you have a meeting
scheduled with the insurance company? Do has your lawyer told you anything? >> Court date. >> Okay. You're just waiting for the court date? >> Yes. Yes. Mhm. and and every time I get a letter from you guys, I always send it to the easy course so they can give me an update. I do call them to ask them
for an update because I want it resolved. >> Have you got a contractor out there ready to go or you haven't got to that step yet? >> I haven't gotten to that step. I I keep getting people coming in to um have a contractor come up and um they did have
EasyCore did have somebody come over but I don't have a um come to think of it I when we were in mediation they were talking about um the roof being at 28,000. >> Don't do
>> you have a ballpark number you haven't but you haven't signed contract with a roofer. No. >> Any other questions? >> Just for you. And you you established that the the court there's no court date been set. Is that correct? >> That's correct. Yeah. >> Yeah. Yeah. Because it just we just had that mediation
>> last week of February >> that went in past. Nobody settled anything. >> No. >> Okay. >> Uh if there's no other qu you can have a seat, ma'am. Thank you. There's no other questions. I'll entertain a motion. >> All right. I'm on.
>> I'll go forward with it. Sorry, I wasn't as organized as I'd like to be. All right. In case number 25-4353, I move that the city has proven by a greater weight of the evidence the following violation of the city of
Temple Terrace City Code exists on the property located at 8701 Triple Oaks Road. Uh the code section is 8-102 subsection 13 subsection C. This motion is based on the sworn testimony this
board has received from code enforcement officer Lorie Smith and Miss Navaro along with any other evidence including photos, affidavit, and the notice of violation. All of which is received and entered as part of the record of this hearing. I further move that said violations be corrected
on or before April Yeah, April 8th. If the respondant does not comply with this order on or before that day, they are ordered to pay a fine for each and every day the violation continues past the date set for compliance. Upon considering the following factors, the gravity of the violation, any actions
taken by the violator to correct the violation, and any previous violations committed by the violator, I move that the fine be $25 per day. >> We have a motion. Do we have a second? >> Motion is second by Rod. Any further discussion? Seeing none, all those in favor? >> Opposed? No nays. Motion carries. Ma'am,
so you have you have your house the roof has been found in violation, you have until April 8th to bring it into compliance, which means fixing it um or at least getting the permit to fix it. Um if for some reason you can't make that date, you'll need to come back in
front of us and let us know. At that time, you can ask for an extension. There is no guarantee that you will get an extension, but you are welcome to ask. as a suggestion to you if your attorney is available to u to come with you at that time because you can't you know nothing's happened um I would
suggest you bring him with you okay or if you have if you have a contractor lined up bring his bring a representative from the contractor with you anybody else that can help uh bring further clarity to to where where this is going. Okay thank you. Next case please.
Under new business, case number two 260568, City versus Vernon Milton for the property located at 5417 Rainbow Drive. This case is before the board based on an alleged violation uh repeat violation
of section 12-922 subsection A parking a commercial vehicle in a residential area. This case will be prosecuted this evening by code officer Doug Allen. The city has evidence that the notice of violation and the notice of hearing were properly served.
>> Thank you. You're welcome. >> Good evening, Mr. Chairman and board members. Doug Allen, code compliance officer. This case is a repeat violation violation originated by me on February 20th, 2026 for a commercial vehicle parked in a residential zone. I went
directly to a notice of violation on February 20th with an immediate compliance date. The original case number 25-3736 was presented to the Municipal Code Enforcement Board on November 12th, 2025 and the resident was found to be in
violation and a fine of $25 per day began on December 11th, 2025. I posted the notice on the property and a copy was posted on the electronic board at city hall for the 10-day requirement and copies were mailed both certified and regular mail to the owner
of record. A notice of hearing was generated on February 26 and the case was scheduled for the March Municipal Code Board meeting and I posted a copy of the notice of hearing at the site on March 3rd, 2026. At this time, I'd like to submit photographic evidence taken by
myself on February 20th and March 3rd, 2026. >> I'll accept those. Thank you. >> This time, the site is also in compliance and I'd like to submit an affidavit of compliance. Very >> good. We'll accept that, too. Thank you. Any questions for the code officer? Yeah,
>> go ahead. Go ahead, >> Bill. This is a repeat violation. So, do you have a rough estimate of the number of days it was out? >> Uh, that's okay. >> That's the next thing on the list. >> Okay, great. >> Exhibit one shows the posting of the
notice of violation. Exhibit number two shows the commercial vehicle parked in a residential zone. Exhibit three shows the posting of the notice of hearing. Uh, I am seeking a ruling and a fine for the two days the site was out of compliance, which was February 20th and February 21st, 2026.
>> Very good. Bri, you have a question? >> Any conversation with the owner? >> Mr. Shanks has had lots of conversations with the owner and I believe we have got the issue uh resolved. >> Yes. So, we've had multiple conversations. >> Okay.
>> Um, going back as early as ever of last year. Uh, regarding that, now he is a over the road truck driver, drives across the country. Um, I spoke to him for about two hours last week from California about this. Um, he has
secured a new parking area outside of the city uh to store that. Um, and he promises he will not park within the, you know, the confines of a residential area going forward. Uh so I believe this is should be the last time we we see the
semi. He seems to understand uh the gravity of that and uh the ordinance behind it. >> Is the respondent here tonight? >> Believe there's a family member here but >> does have does the family member wish to
say anything? Would the family member like to raise their hand? Okay. Do you want is there anything you want to say? Okay, you're good. All right. Um, there's no other questions for the code officer. I You got a question? >> Yeah. Okay. Go ahead,
>> Director Shanks. >> Director, >> got a question for you. >> Was Was there a fine uh that you guys had in mind for this particular violation? >> Given the conversation that we had, um, I I would like to keep it low. He
already has a lean on the books for the from the first um iteration of this which um again I I I believe uh he didn't fully understand the gravity of of what was happening and why this is such a big deal. Um so I I
think there is an understanding. So a a low fine in this case I think would be sufficient. >> Okay. Thanks. >> Okay. Any other questions >> for you? Go ahead. >> Um >> how do we do that on repeat that got also um >> so it's a repeat. So you would find them
for the number of days it was out of out of compliance, which was two. >> Two days. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. >> Is there a verbiage there somewhere? >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. There's a there's a repeat. >> I know. But this here says amount. Uh >> repeat.
>> Second page. >> I see it. But it says per day. >> So you can just do the math. >> Oh, okay. >> For the two days. >> Would you like my phone? >> Since it's in since it's in compliance, too. Okay. >> Yeah, it's in compliance, but >> you can try that the first time I do.
>> Okay. Okay. >> Is that anybody has any question? >> Go ahead. Have it. >> Okay. Try. >> All right. >> Just keep in mind it's it is was out of compliance for two days and >> Yeah. Okay. >> Roll that in. Okay.
In case number 26568, I move that city has proven by the weight greater weight of evidence the following violation of the city of Temple City code exist on the property located at 5417 Rainbow Drive with applicable code
violation 12-922 subsection A. This motion is based on the sworn testimony this board has received from the code enforcement officer along with any other evidence including photos, affidavit, and the notice of
violation of which received and entered as part of the record of this hearing. I further move that the respondent be found to be a repeat violator as defined by city code section 1-63 because the respondent has been found to
have violated the same provision of the city code within the pre previous five years regardless of the priority address. I further move that the daily fine be assessed for repeat violation from the time of notice of the repeat
violation until the time the repeat violations are corrected. I've been considering the following factors. The gravity of the violation, any actions taken by the violator to correct the violation, any previous violations committed by the violator. I move that
the fine be $25 per day. >> Okay. So total would be how many? 50. >> Good. Thank you. Okay, we have a motion. Do we have a second? >> Motion second. Any further discussion? Seeing none, all those in favor? >> I >> oppose. No nays. Motion carries. So, um
you have he's been found in violation. Uh the fine is is $50 and um just means that if it happens again, it becomes another repeat violation. We got to go through the whole thing all over again. Okay. Um you're welcome to stay. You're welcome to go. Whatever whatever pleases
you. Okay. Next case, please. >> Under off agenda items, case number 201531, city versus I'm sorry, wrong case number. Case number 253736, city versus Vernon Milton for the
property located at 5417 Rainbow Drive. Violation section 12-922, parking, commercial vehicle in a residential area. Affidavit of compliance was received March 9th, 2026 by code officer Doug Allen. >> Okay, great.
>> So, >> so no action needs to be taken. Correct. >> Not. >> Okay, very good. All right, thank you. Next case, please. >> Under unfinished business, case number 253917, city versus Miniraa, Sultana, and Sad
Rana for the property located at 12605 North 51st Street. The deadline for compliance was March 11, 2026. A fine of $25 per day beginning March 12, 2026. Violation section 8-102
subsection 13 subsection Minimum housing accessory structure. Deadline for compliance is midnight tonight. >> Good evening, sir and board members. I just wanted to bring you guys back up to speed uh pertaining to the uh the case. This was for an attach shed in the rear
yard. The roof has was collapsing. Mr. Rana has been in contact with me since our last code board meeting with some progress that he was uh able to make on the site and he's here this evening as well and would like to address the board sir. >> Okay. >> Has he been sworn in?
>> Yes, I did. >> Okay, great. Name and address, please. >> Uh Shazad Rana, 12605 North 51st Street, Temple Terrace, Florida 33617. >> Thank you. Well, I think I stated last time that I don't have the means to fix the shed and
it's detached. Nobody's living in there and I don't have the means. I put a brand new roof on my house. I'm already underwater for $36,000 and that's an accessory structure. Then I got an order from you that I have to
buy the 11th tonight, you know, to fix it. I tried to uh fix the ridge, you know, make it straight a little bit, you know, so it just looks aesthetically better, but I couldn't replace the shingles. Then I I also talked with Bay Area Legal
Services and I retained a pro bono lawyer. I also filed an appeal in the circuit court as I was advised to do within 30 days. and I got a reply from the circuit court that I have 70 days to file a brief.
On top of that, I have a gopher turtle under the shed and it's a keystone uh issue because the you cannot disturb the habitat. I called the Florida wildlife. They said they cannot touch it. Nobody's supposed to touch it. Then I called uh the owl
sanctuary people because they are the people who handles the wildlife. They said they cannot touch it. Then she gave me the number for Jen who is in Lake Okchobee. She's a state biologist or whatever. I left a message. I haven't heard from
her yet. They're too busy. So, uh I don't know how you want to handle it. You want to go through the circuit court or you just want to just go with the state law. You could disrupt the
turtle. Uh sorry, turtles. It's a gopher. It has borrowed down the shed uh uh slab. I'm not disturbing it. I don't mind if he squats in my house. I don't pro no problem.
>> Can I question? Hang on a second. Let's hear from Ernie first. >> Um do you have a case number and stuff from the >> I think I sub >> because if that's the case then we're really uh stayed at this point because it's on a PE. I I I got a case number
from the circuit court and I provided the copy as well as I also I provided the indingency waiver that I I can't afford it. >> Yeah, I've seen this. I just want at the
time. >> Okay, good. Good. >> All right. Well, at this time since we do have and yeah, the brief's done. We are really uh stayed on this at this point. Um I do know that uh there's been Here you go, sir.
>> there's been an attempt to uh try and get him some assistance from the county. Uh so, you know, hopefully that'll come to fruition, too. Uh but at this point, there's really nothing this board can do because of the appeal because it's really in the circuit court now, not
here. Okay. >> So, there's no action required by us? >> No. No. Do we need that in evidence? >> Um, those are your originals, right? >> I have picture of the gopher and uh >> I don't think we need that. Um, you
know, I I guess if if if there's anything that you could do is get copies of those two pieces of paper. >> I did. I did. >> We have them. >> Secretary gave it to you. >> Yes. Uh I I went to the the same day when I filed that appeal. Uh, I came
back and I provided a copy of the indingency waiver as well as the the brief. >> Okay. >> Yes. So, she has a copy of >> Okay. Well, if they if somehow it got lost and we need another copy. >> It's probably with the clerk. >> I went to I'm sure it's with the clerk.
>> I know. I've seen the indigency before >> prior. The only other thing I had seen was when uh he tried to file his appeal and he didn't um have a case number yet. These are the two papers I provided. >> Yeah. Okay. Uh yeah. And at the time I
remember them giving you email back saying you had to do something but it looks like you've done it. So >> yes. >> Um I don't think we >> office has it. >> Yeah. I think the if he's probably giving it to the clerk's office >> and if we don't we'll get in touch with you. So >> thank you for coming down.
>> Yeah. Plus also this new thing the with the gopher you know you'll probably want to investigate that you know >> because it's a state issue now. >> He's not going anywhere. No, he's not going anywhere. But I think that's the law. You cannot touch his habitat. Understood. Right. Oh, thank you very much. Thank you for coming down. So,
>> we don't need to do an extension of the >> Well, that's going to be the uh >> Do we have to make a motion to stay that the case until such time? >> Well, I don't think so. But >> yeah, I think we'll leave it on the unfinished business, but let's keep, you
know, we'll just always remember this thing's on appeal monitor. >> Okay, very good. Next case, please. >> Under new business, case number 254477, city versus Rainree Village Property Owners Association for the property
located at 11805 Raintree Village Boulevard. This case is before the board based on an alleged violation of section 12-860, inoperative outdoor storage equipment. This case will be prosecuted this evening by code officer Danielle Bat.
The city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing were properly served. >> Thank you. >> You're welcome. >> Good evening. I'm officer Bat with Code Compliance. This case this evening was initiated by myself on November 24th, 2025.
Upon reinspection on January 22nd, 2026, the property was still in violation. A notice of violation was prepared on January 22nd, 2026, posted to the property, requested post to the city hall electronic board, and sent both certified and regular mail to the address of record. The violation was
still present upon reinspection. So, a notice of hearing was prepared, posted the property, requested post to the city hall electronic board, and sent both certified and regular mail to the address of record on February 22nd, 2026. As of my last inspection on March 9th, 2026, the property was still in
violation. At this time, I would like to submit evidence for case number 25-4477 supporting the case and asking for a war. >> I'll accept that. Thank you. >> Exhibit A is going to be photos of the violation on January 22nd, 2026 upon reinspection for issuance of notice of
violation. Exhibit B is going to be photos of the violation on February 16th, 2026 upon reinspection for request of hearing be scheduled. Exhibit C is photos of the violation on March 9th, 2026 prior to tonight's hearing. And exhibit D is a copy of the City of
Temple Terrace Ordinance 12-860 section 8-2 definitions including inoperative definitions of inoperable vehicle per Google Florida State statues identified by Google and Florida State statute 320.06
for registration required. All areas are highlight highlighted for ease of creating. >> So are we talking about multiple different cars? >> Yes. Multiple vehicles throughout the property. How many total do you know? >> It varies. The first time I went out there,
>> I could have probably counted a good 20 of them. >> Really? >> The next time. >> Some of the same vehicles are there. It'll change out. It'll be a different one. Some will get fixed, some won't, >> but there's at least at least a dozen or so every time. >> Yes. >> Okay. Any other questions for the
officer? One at a time. One at a time. Go ahead, Bill. >> Oh. Uh, so have you had any conversation with the uh the property manager or property owner? just >> there is no real property manager. It's an HOA. >> Okay. >> So, I've had one person call me along these lines and pretty much told me it's
not their problem >> even though they're the property owners. >> Go ahead. >> So, I'm familiar with with Rainree. So, basically, even though it's a large property, there are multiple HOAs. So probably the HOA that you spoke with
wasn't >> it's the same HOA >> particular >> for the common areas and the common areas are where actually the parking lots reside. >> Okay. So my question is is what is their responsibility with regards to the guest
spots because I noticed some of them were reserved. So those are for residents. So no matter the the property owner is responsible for the property regardless of whether it's a guest or not. >> Okay. >> Ultimately and that's why trying to go after a vehicle that I have no access to
find out an actual registration to the property of the vehicle being a property. >> It actually is located on the property of the homeowners association. So they're ultimately responsible to make sure that's >> taken care of.
>> Any other questions? Is there any representative from Rainry here? >> Not that I've seen. >> Oh, somebody's raising their hand. >> Got one. >> Awesome. Yeah. >> All right, >> come on up. >> Name and address, please. >> My name is Abalino Vida. My office
address is 2906 Bush Lake Boulevard. I am the community manager for Rainree. Um, I've left multiple messages since this has been going on for a while. Um, the second time since I've got it, uh, since when we got the letter to appear here, we started clearing them up. Um,
on Monday, I called, left her a message to let her know that, you know, we've gotten a lot of these taken care of. We're having an issue with one or two of them. All the way up until today when I was calling to and left messages saying, you know, hey, everything is cleared. As
of today, I still never got a hold of anybody. So, um, >> so it's your position that all the cars are gone as of right now? >> As of right now. And I'm going to tell you, we've had one of them that we've towed out of there and the owner goes picks it up and brings it back.
>> So, you know, it becomes an issue. And we we've had a couple of them that have taken a little bit of time um because, you know, it's it's an elder they're elderly and we're trying to work with them to get it done. Um, but you know, without the ability to communicate, it's
kind of difficult. And I will gladly give you my cell phone number. Um, because I've dubbed Lori before in multiple occasions, and I know Lori can confirm that. Pretty easy to get a hold of. And I do manage all of Rantry, uh, PA as she mentions. >> Okay.
>> Oh, that's absolutely. I'll be happy to go out there. >> Absolutely. >> Any other questions? >> Let me know if one came back, but everything and I can show you proof that it was towed. Sure. >> Hang on. Hang on. Want to Has he been sworn in? >> Yeah. Yes, >> he did.
>> Yeah. Okay. Come on up. State your name and address. >> Board President. >> Uh my name is Raymond Cassan and I'm the board president for 11 associations out there out of the 15.
Um the the core of the problem is um if you don't tell us what cars that you're all upset about. Um because when you you know people go to work and everything else and they don't care
about whether their plate is updated or not. We also have some that like there, you'll notice there was that little uh Toyota whatever his name, you know, the like station wagon. Well, the guy had the the tag in his house, but until he
gets told, hey, you got to get that tag on the car ready, you know, that it was properly registered. There was another one where the lady's being treated for cancer and um she didn't even find it. But at any rate, um that uh she was
being treated for cancer. Then oddly enough, she sends her si sister down to put a current tag on the car and she put an expired tag on the car. And I tell her, "You put the you put a 25. We need
the 26." She had the 26. So then she had to have her sister come back and put the correct tag on. car hasn't moved in years because she never leaves the house, but she wasn't in her house. She was at a facility being treated for
cancer. And it goes on just like endless lists. It if there's a problem or something, we're happy to address it, but you it there's 472 units, probably
1,500 cars. uh we have um uh one space for every unit. So you have 472 units plus we exceed the limit needed for handicap spaces. Uh plus then you have the guest
spaces. And now when you talk about oh these cars are in violation. Well uh you you can't be patrolling for endlessly when people go to work and take that car with them. you know, the ones that are really serious. They did
show a little motorcycle there. Uh I have had the um uh split second uh endlessly on the phone about that motorcycle because the guy was playing games with us. Just I tag it and then he
moves it to another convenient location. Um, but all the equipment on our notice it says about storing of equipment, you know, to repair vehicles, that's gone. Cuz when I left the notice and said,
"Sorry, sucker. This thing's going along with the equipment." Um, because I don't have I don't believe in playing around. I mean, if if you're trying, I I'm more than happy to work with you, but I'm not going to endlessly play games. And it's
really really hard to find who uh is the owner of a car. You we have little warning tags we put on them. Um well, Lori can tell you that we we do um patrol the place. It's not like we don't
care. It's we do care. The other thing we do have some active military out there and I have to be very careful on the military because soldiers and sailor act uh covers taking the cars away while
they're overseas. Um, and I got to, you know, I try to the best I can to know who all the vets are and who are the active duty members so that if there's a problem, I'll I'll be aware of it.
>> Your bylaws require um them to let you know what their license, what you know, what they're driving, what the registration, what the license plate is. Is there a database that you keep of the active cars in there? No, because you
have three management companies. You have Avid Property Management, you have Wise. Well, Wise isn't there anymore. Neither is associated, but they got some lawyer in there that uh manages that for Condo 4. And uh then there's also
university um properties, but pretty much we work together the best we can. But if she would have just given me some kind of uh hey over here there's this little little car. Well, we take care of it right
away. No big deal. Um and and the even the address was kind of confusing on this. The other thing very very important. You cannot leave violations in a little plastic bag hooked to the
maintenance gate of the pool because if somebody walks by and throws it away, we won't know that we're in violation. You know, uh we have three pools and on the big pool we have a maintenance gate so that the people that maintain the
pools and um also to keep keep it cleaned up and you know looking good. Um, and I'm more than happy to comply with everything, but I I got to have information. It's very helpful. And
without that, I'm kind of screwed and um and yes, we do try the best we can, but at the same time, I do need some information. >> Thank you. Any any other questions for the respondent? >> Oh, I just had a question for officer
Bat. So, >> you can have a seat, sir. Oh, >> yeah. Yeah, you're done. Thank you. >> Based on his testimony, do you feel like you you got that this is resolved in in a way that you can >> As long as I can go out tomorrow and see it all gone, I'm happy.
>> Okay. You got a question? >> This is effectively an apartment complex. I mean, I know it's not, but it's it's mass parking for for homes. I only see two cars in here repeated between your two visits. Every other one was just a single vehicle. Is it going to be the common practice of code
enforcement to say I see a vehicle with expired registration I'm going to immediately cite the property owner for it or >> the only reason I've been following up with it is because it's been a consistent case. It's been a consistent issue. >> So we've got two vehicles that have consistently shown up as in >> but the remainders are just single
>> oneoffs. >> Oneoffs. Yeah. And one of them I think the argument could be made that it can still be safely driven on the road. I would I would argue two of not without >> Well, so it has to have a tag. Yeah. This one has missing just a front
>> headlight. >> You're not supposed to be driving on the road, >> right? But that's a fix it a ticket. That's not like trying to drive on the road with expired. I mean, I think the spirit of the the ordinance really seems to revolve around your cars up on blocks and making an eyesore for the for the
community. these with a few exceptions really seem like people who have just had a lapse in judgment but otherwise are in good standing and it was a singular instance for most of >> and and I think if if it I'm not going to put words in your mouth
but it seems to me that if it wasn't for the repeats then those other probably those other cars probably wouldn't have shown up on her radar >> but since she was out there and saw it she has an obligation to to report it so it's not, you know, you can't, you know,
turn a blind eye to that just because you want to. It's, you know, again, she wouldn't be out there at all if it wasn't for the repeats. And since she was out there, she has an obligation to opine or observe and report on all the violations that she sees. You can't pick
and choose. >> That's Yeah, that's fair. Um, >> if I if I may, go ahead. Um within the past week I drove through there as well and um without even getting in my car I was able to pick them out one after the other. The the reason that we're moving
the way we are is if we don't it's going to continue. It's going to grow and it'll eventually turn into something where uh it's it's going to be a lot of vehicles. It's just it's just getting worse and worse and worse. And I'm not saying that they're not doing uh their
job as a management company. I I believe they are. I've seen them out there. Um I just think we need to uh show a little momentum there from that we we've seen this. We identified this. Uh we need to get it under control before it gets >> and she's now heavy sort of cell phone
numbers or communication should improve and you know hopefully it will it'll it'll get fixed. >> But you can't you can't pick once you're out there you can't pick and choose what you see. At the same time, are we going to police every like we've got about a dozen apartment complexes and you're going to find in up vehicles based on
registration alone no matter what you do? >> Yeah, you can probably go out in the city hall parking lot right now and find one. Um I I'm not I'm not arguing that the ordinance is unfair or unjust. What I am saying though is that if we cite them for having these inop vehicles as a
multi- many many tenant um property, the next time you go out there and one tenant has an inop vehicle in there, that's a repeat violation. That comes with a higher fine. That comes with a bigger stigma and they could have happened that day. They may not have even had a chance to respond to it yet
based on the way these are set. Well, I as you know, the way the system works, typically we're not we're not finding somebody the day it happens. We give them an opportunity that to correct it. And in this particular case, this all started at least in January. Here we are
in, you know, March. Uh so there's been a couple months have gone by and it's probably probably started before that. Right. If I may, I actually have another apartment complex that had the exact same scenario um that I was able they
have an office door. So, I was able to get in contact at that point. I don't know why I was not receiving his messages and I wish I had. Um but neither here nor there. the other gentleman at the other complex gave them
went through found the vehicles contacted a towing company. >> So to your point Dave um yes for the initial violation we usually traditionally we get 30 days repeat violations are fined from the
date of the violation according to the language here. So that means if you go out there next month and you find a new INOP vehicle, one that we don't have a picture of, that's a repeat violation. It comes it if it's not resolved right away, it comes to us.
>> But now she has a cell phone number. She can call them. >> They would also still get a notice of violation as well to give them that time grace period to get it corrected regardless before it came to a hearing. Right. >> Can I mention also at least four of those are out of state. So, snowbird
situations, which that's in another thing. It's summertime. They're all going back. They might leave the vehicle here. >> Well, >> so, but but again, I think, you know, let's assume that we take all those out of the equation, right?
>> There's still still two vehicles that were that had uh tags that were not nobody could find them. So, there's still a violation there. And I I understand your point, you know, and we we like to work with our with our con with our respondents. We don't it's not
a ma matter of, you know, just finding people. Um she has a a phone number now, so she can talk to them, but the violation, whether it's one vehicle or 15 vehicle, still is still a violation. We can talk all about what's going to happen in the future, but even if you
took the vehicles that you referenced out of the equation, they would still be a violation. If you took those vehicles out of the equation, you would have singular violations that didn't appear to repeat. >> I don't think that's true. >> The two vehicles that I cited were the
ones that showed up uh both in February and in March. The rest of them were individual photos of vehicles once. There's >> Yeah, but my point is, let's take the vehicles, the one vehicles out of the equation, the oneoff, >> there's still a violation there. >> So, you can't get around the fact that
there isn't a violation, >> right? and and and the way the ordinance reads, it's not she's not going to go out there and say, "Okay, it's not that license plate. It's another license plate." It's still a violation in accordance with the ordinance. And I'm sorry. You know, it's a big property. I
get it. I'm I also know that she will not just be riding around looking for violations. >> No, I >> Okay, she has her cell phone number. If she sees something, she's going to talk to him and we're going to get it worked out. But even if you if you take the motorcycle out of the picture, you take the one off out of the picture, you take
the out of state cars out of the picture, there are still two vehicles there. >> No, one of the out of state ones was uh was >> Okay, then there's one. Even even if there's one, it's still a violation. >> It's a vi Okay. So, and and I'll drop it at this point because I I can't imagine I'm going to agree with any motion that
finds these guys. But the um usually what we have up here are single home owners that that come up and might have one or two cars in their driveway that are out of compliance. This is this is the first time I've seen us have a ta a case for a you know mini tenant
property with a bunch of cars. I I mean that I don't know if this has happened before, but it just seems so wildly out of the ordinary to hold the uh the property manager who's not even an owner of the property accountable for the
individual tenants who do have deeds to the homes that they're living in. It seems more responsible to hold those tenants or not tenants, but those deed owned owners responsible, but I don't know how we would do that. So, >> right. So, this is actually this is not
a unique situation. Um, what's unique about this is as we've we've gotten to the MCEB level. Um, typically these are resolved well before this, but it sounds like there was a some kind of communication issue. Um, these are generally resolved almost on the spot.
Um, and to your point, we're not going around, this isn't like gotcha moment. We're not going around trying to identify hundreds of vehicles in one location because that's easy to do. You I go to Walmart and, you know, find a several dozen. But this is more along
the lines of this is where where people live. >> And it's it's starting to get to the point where there are just so many. It's hard to drive through and not find something that just sticks at you. And to your point, we can't drive by that. We have to identify it and we have to hold the appropriate people accountable.
In this case, it's not really a people. It's an association. Um, and what we're asking is what they said they were going to do and what they do is identify these and try to get that corrected. That's what we're asking. We know that there's going to be vehicles probably on a daily
basis that drive through there that has some kind of violation. But as long as the management company is doing their part and identifying those and taking action, that's what we're looking for. >> Ernie, you wanted to say something? >> No. No, I'm good. >> You're good. >> Okay. Go ahead.
>> Uh, in a similar instance to a a homeowner, could they cover the car? Like if they are a snowbird, could they cover it and be okay if it's their spot? >> I won't be lifting a car cover to double check.
>> So, unless it's in violation of the HOA rules. >> Yeah. Good. >> Okay. That's >> good to know. >> Okay. Any other questions for anybody? Seeing none, I'll entertain a motion. >> I'm sorry. What?
>> I'm entertaining a motion. >> I think you should. >> No, I'm not following a motion for this. >> Anyone? >> Go ahead. >> Is this It's on a repeat, >> right? No, >> it's complied, right?
>> Yeah, it's No, no, >> no. Oh, it's just a regular. >> It's a regular regular. She goes out tomorrow and >> Yeah. till she goes out tomorrow. >> We're giving 30 days to Yeah. Just >> Yeah. In case number 254477,
I move that the city had has proven by the greater weight of evidence the following violation of the city of Tible city code exist on the property located at 11805 Rentry Village Boulevard
with the applicable code violation section 12-860. 6. This motion is based on the swan testimony this board has received from the code enforcement officer along with any other evidence including photos, affidavit, and the notice of violation
of which received and entered as part of the record of this hearing. I further move that the SID violation be corrected on or before April 8th, 2026. If the respondent does not comply with
the order on or before that day, they are ordered to pay a fine for each and every day the violation continue past the date set for compliance. I've been considering the following factors. The gravity of the violation, any actions taken by the violator to
correct the violation, any previous violations committed by the violator. I move that the fine be $25 per day. >> We have a motion. Do we have a second? >> I'll second. >> Motion to second. Any further discussion? Seeing none, all those in favor? >> I >> oppose.
>> One nay. Motion carries. So you it has been found in violation. You have until April 8th to bring the property into compliance. You say it's already in compliance. She'll be out there tomorrow. Um assuming that happens, you'll you'll get a certificate of compliance. However, that like he has
like the board member stated, if it if there is another violation in next five years, it's considered a repeat violation. And at that point, the uh fines go up from there. >> And then how would we we would be able to um fight that? >> Sure. Correct.
>> Absolutely. >> Because I guarantee anytime you go out there, if you're looking for a violation, you're going to find it. Like you said, you could even find one here in your parking lot. >> There's no way that we're going to be a We've got 14 associations over over a thousand. >> Well, come on up. If you're going to be
coming up to Mike. >> Yeah. We've got a lot of associations. I mean, if you're coming out and you're finding one violation, I mean, I there's no way I'm going to be able to stop and have every single car in compliant in my community. It's there's just no way. >> And
I just quickly, our code team is awesome. They will work with you. This is a they they it progresses after it's gone on and on for the most part. They they're just communicate. That's all we
ask. Well, hopefully I'm going to have a cell phone number now where I can >> communicate with. Yeah. >> But I I I think that it's >> I don't think it's very fair that this is going to be now a repeat offender by finding one vehicle
out of all of our homeowners and out of our parking spaces out there. >> The difference in finding the repeat offender at that point would be me calling you or texting. >> I don't think it'll ever get to that. >> That's what I'm saying. If I happen to see one, I'm happy to text or call you with a picture of it and say, "Hey,
>> FYI." So, by that time, it would be compliant either way before it even got to that opportunity. >> I would give you that courtesy. >> Okay. >> Okay. Next case, please. >> Just one. Was is there some time delay as far as she has to give a notice of
violation, right? Is is there a t for a pee violation, there's a time? >> She will give them the opportunity to correct. >> So, there's there'll be some time. It's not we're not out there just writing text, >> right? You know, >> that's what I'm saying. There'll be a time period where they can correct the violation period. I don't know what it is, but there'll be a period of time.
Okay. >> And if it, you know, if it turns out it's a it's a sailor soldier, we'll take that into consideration. I mean, >> it's it's not it's not we're not the Gestapo. >> Okay. Next case, please. Under new
business, case number 254596, City versus Patula King LLC for the property located at 8718 Beverly Drive. This case is before the board based on an alleged violation of section 12-92 subsection B off streetet parking and
driveway. This case will be prosecuted this evening by code officer Doug Allen. The city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing were properly served. >> Good evening, Mr. Chairman and board members, Doug Allen, code compliance officer. This case was originated by me
on December 9th, 2025 for a vehicle parked in the yard. I left a door hanger with a reinspection date of 12125. On January 8th, 2026, I created a notice of violation with a compliance date of January 30th, 2026. I posted a copy at
the site and a copy was also posted at city hall in the electronic board for the 10-day requirements. and copies were mailed, both certified and regular mailed to the address of the owner of record. On February 24th, 2026, a notice of hearing was created, and the case was scheduled for the March Municipal Code
Board meeting. I posted a copy of the notice of hearing at the site on that day. At this time, I'd like to submit photographic evidence of the site taken by myself on December 9th, 10th, 18th, 2025, January 2nd, 21st, and 28th, and
February 4th and 18th at 27th of 2026. We'll accept all that. Thank you. >> Exhibit number one shows the posting of the notice of violation. Exhibit number two shows a vehicle parked in the yard. Exhibit number three shows two vehicles parked in the yard. Exhibit number four
shows a vehicle parked in the yard. Exhibit number five shows a vehicle parked in the yard. Exhibit number six shows two vehicles parked in the yard. Exhibit number seven shows a vehicle parked in the yard. Exhibit number eight shows a vehicle parked in the yard. Exhibit number nine, guess what? Shows a vehicle parked in the yard. Exhibit 10
shows a posting of the notice of hearing. At this time, the site is in compliance and I submitted an affidavit of compliance and I'm seeking a finding. >> Very good. Thank you. We'll accept that. Just one question. How did you manage to pull that off?
>> Magic. >> Any other questions for the code officer? Is the respondent here? >> You are. Okay. Come on up and name and address, please. Michael Stewart. Okay. >> I'm here uh really speaking up for uh Deborah Win, the owners of the house or
pays of the house. They're out of town right now. Um >> and what's your relationship to the owner? >> Uh that's my wife. >> Okay. >> Uh Tina Win is my wife and Deborah Win is my mother. >> Okay. >> So, uh yeah. Uh the car was parked in the yard, but everything has been changed and uh I got pictures of
everything in the yard and no more cars in the yard. >> Okay. Great. Thank you. Any questions for the respondent? >> Uh, do you want to see the picture? >> Do you want to see a picture of the yard? I got on the phone. >> Do I want to see the No, >> picture of the yard.
>> No, we we have we have an affidavit of compliance, so we're good. >> Okay. Okay. >> Okay. >> Thank you. >> There's no other questions. Um, I'll entertain a motion. >> Thank you. In case number 254596, I move that uh I move that the city has
proven by the greater weight of evidence the following violation of the city of Temple terrace city code exists on the property located at 8718 Beverly Drive with applicable code violation section 12-921
subsection B. This motion is based on the swan testimony this board has received from the code enforcement officer along with any other evidence including photos avidated and the notice of violation of which received and entered as part of the record of this hearing. I further move there be no fine
imposed because the violations were brought into compliance prior to the date of this hearing. Okay, >> we have a motion to have a second. >> Second. >> Motion to second. Any further discussion? Seeing none, all those in favor? >> I oppose. No nays. Motion carries. next case. Uh, so you have been found in
violation, but because you brought the property into compliance before tonight, there's no fine. However, if it happens again, it becomes a repeat violation and the fines go up if it's a repeat. Okay. Have a good night. Thank you. Next case. >> Under unfinished business, case number
254425, city versus fi in Harabi in Candi Alagata for the property located at 7932 Terrace Ridge Drive. The deadline for compliance was March 11, 2026. Fine of $25 per day beginning March 12th.
Sections 10-3 subsection B sanitation grass weeds overgrown. The affidavit of compliance was received on 211 by Lorie Smith. And for section 8-102, minimum housing standards, the deadline for compliance is midnight tonight.
>> Very good. So, as I understand it, we have um section 8-102 is still in violation, but section 10-3 is in compliance. Correct. >> Okay. Is the respondent here? >> No.
>> Okay. Um Okay. There's really nothing for us to do then. >> Yeah. >> Let it go. >> Next case. >> I'm just starting from the top. >> Oh. Um one second. Looks like the respondent for 25-4819
is in the back. >> Uh, which is an unfinished business. >> Oh, >> you said 4819. >> Yeah, the last one. >> Okay. >> Sorry, chairman. I thought that was the case. >> I thought that was the one. Okay, that's fine. >> Sorry about that. >> No problem. >> Okay, so um this would be case number
eight. 254819 city versus Ollandbeck Cardettzv and Dunia Cardettzv for the property located at 5106 East 122nd Avenue. The deadline for compliance was March 11th, 2026. The
final $50 per day beginning March 12th, 2026. Violation section 10-4 subsection B subsection 4 nuisance buildings section 10-34 sanitation premises clean section 12-860
inoperative outdoor storage equipment and section 12-861 subsection E subsection 8 fences and walls maintenance deadline for compliance is midnight tonight >> I assume the respondent is here you want to come up has she been sworn
No. >> Okay. Why don't you come on up to the podium? We'll swear you in and then you can um uh state your name and address and begin. >> Please raise your right hand. Do you the testimony you will provide the board tonight will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? >> Yes, I will.
>> Thank you. >> Name and address. >> Dunia Ramirez Gars 5106 East 122nd Avenue. Do you want to say something first? >> Um, so um, regarding the fencing,
uh, I I already got a update. I replaced the fence all along. the last time that we spoke about the building, you know, um Jack here said that even if the all the rivers that were in or that that was good enough for him, but all the rivers
are in and I'm already on the whole all the process of the putting the concrete inside. Uh, I got the the the the the people coming in today, but something happened with the uh with the compressor because they have to cover all the
holes. But like I'm ready to even like go ahead and pour concrete inside. Uh I remember that we spoke about the framing. Uh of course it's going to be on the way uh for them. You know, that's why I'm not doing the framing yet. And also before even doing the framing, I
have to hire some people who pour something on the floor because it's uneven in some parts. Some part is concrete, some part is broken tiles or old tiles. So even before the framing, I have to level the whole floor. And
um what else? And then of course because I have active I I try because uh I remember you say something about the tiles. I tried to contact you. Um I was trying to to like get rid of some
rubber papers that I have in the in the front yard and then actually even put a drywall uh a driveway in concrete driveway. But that's a long story that I'm going through Dallas. Uh I have to wait three months for the coat to get
fixed in order to fit my specific case. So I want to put in concrete driver but I have to wait. And then of course because I have acting I mean I have I'm covered on paint. I'm still finish painting. So of course the front yard now is a little bit messy but I'm I'm
trying to fix it. But everything else is pretty much uh it's going. >> Okay. So last month we were Yeah. Come on. Um we were wasn't so much about what needed to be done. It was more about progress. Are we happy with progress?
>> Yes, very much so. Um we've seen a lot being since last month. Um a lot wheel has been turning um and very much progress. >> So what I would be recommending or asking for is kind of like a update in
30 days and just keep it >> continuence um because I the progress out there is amazing and how it's turning. >> Okay. So, um, up to the board, but the, uh, respondent is asking for another 30-day extension,
and, um, I just need a motion to address that. >> All right, I'll take over. >> Yeah, I got it. >> I got it. Okay. >> Yeah. >> Whenever they're done, >> do we need to >> go ahead? >> Anything further?
>> Just all you need to do is is either yes or no on the extension. >> Yeah. Okay. I just want to make sure they were >> listening. >> Okay. Yeah. Uh so in case number 25-4819, uh I move that the city extend the uh date for compliance until April 8th 20
Yeah, April 8, 2026. >> Okay, we have a motion. Do we have a second? >> Second. >> Motion and second. Any further discussion? Seeing none, all those in favor? I >> oppose. No nays. Motion carries. So, you now have another extension till April 8th. You know the drill. We'll see you
back here April 8th. And uh hopefully the progress continues and um sooner or later you'll have a roof over your head and be everything will be wonderful. Okay. This is this is the other case. Got to pass it down.
Last one. >> Oh, she did have some concrete. Awesome. >> Cars. Cars. Okay. Are we back to the beginning now? >> Yeah. >> All right. Very good. >> Okay. If I've done things correctly, we are on 4354. >> Yes, sir.
>> All right. >> Case number 254354. City versus Omero E. Cow and Liliam M. Calia for the property located at 8702 Coral Dawn Court. This case is before
the board based on an alleged violation of section 8-102 subsection 13 subsection C minimum housing roofs. This case will be prosecuted this evening by code officer Lorie Smith. The city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of
hearing were properly served. >> Good evening again, Mr. Chairman, board members. Lori Smith, CO compliance. This case originated proactively on November the 17th, 2025. My inspection revealed a blue tarp on the roof of the structure which might emit rain or cause damnness on the walls of the structure. At this
time, I left a door hanger with a reinspection date the 17th of December 2025. My reinspection on December the 17th, 2025 noted no change. Therefore, notice of violation was prepared with a compliance dated the 19th of January, 2026.
No one was at home, so I posted the notice letter at the front door and requested copies to be sent certified and first class mailed to the owner of record. I also requested a copy be posted on the electronic board for the 10day requirement. At this time, I'd like to submit photographic evidence of the violation taken by me on December
the 19th, 2025. >> Accepted. Thank you. Exhibit number one shows a notice letter posted at the front door. Exhibit number two shows a blue tarp on the roof of the structure. Exhibit number three shows an email from property manager Amanda Rojos. Mr. Chairman, on the 17th of
December 2025, Miss Rohouse with Easy Claim Corporation reached out to me by email. She stated the tarp roof is an insurance claim. She's actively working towards compliance. On February 17th, 2026, I contacted Miss Rohouse for a status update. She said this is still an
active insurance claim and she continues to work with the resident as well as the insurance company to resolve the violation. As of today's date, the site is now in compliance and at this time, I'd like to submit an affidavit of compliance. So, I'm just looking for a finding. >> Good. Thank you. >> Yes, sir.
>> So, you probably don't know the answer to this, but I'm going to ask you anyway. Excuse me. I >> said, "You probably won't know the answer to this, but I'm going to ask you anyway. How are they able to get this particular roof fixed so quickly, whereas all the other ones that come in front of us take months upon months upon
months?" >> Sir, I don't know. I'm not sure. >> I didn't think you would. >> There were some >> I'm not sure, but it was the same. >> And it's an easy claim is the same one that's on the other. >> Yes, sir. It was. Yes. The same as Miss Morrow is over there on 8701 Triple Oaks. Yes, sir. It's the same corporation. Okay.
>> Any other questions for the code officer? Seeing none, I'll entertain a motion. >> In case number 254354, city um yeah, I move that the city has proven by a greater weight of the evidence the following violations of the city of Temple Terrace Code did exist on
the property located at um 8702 Coral Dawn Court. And that was uh sorry, I'm losing my place here. 8-102 subsection 13 subsection C. The motion is based on sworn testimony. The board is received
from the code enforcement officer Lorie Smith along with any other evidence including photos, affidavit, and the notice of violation. All which is received and entered as part of the recording of the record of this hearing. I further move that there be no fine imposed because violations were brought in compliance prior to the date of this hearing. >> We have a motion. Do we have a second? >> Second. >> Motion second. Any further discussion?
Seeing none, all those in favor? >> Opposed? No nays. Motion carries. Next case, please. >> May I ask who was the second on that? >> Second. >> Second. Brian. >> Next case is 254620 city versus Deborah Lynn Deio for the
property located at 308 Ferncliffe Avenue. This case is before the board based on an alleged violation of 12-921 subsection B off streetet parking driveway. This case will be prosecuted this evening by code officer Doug Allen. The city has evidence that the notice of
violation and notice of hearing were properly served. >> Thank you. >> You're welcome. Good evening, Mr. Chairman and board members. Doug Allen, code compliance officer. This case was originated by me on December 10th, 2025 for a vehicle parked in the yard. I left a door hanger with a reinspection date of December
12th, 2025. I created a notice of violation on December 16th, 2025 with a reinspection date of December 30th. I posted the notice at the site and a copy was posted at city hall for the 10-day requirement and copies were mailed both certified and regular mailed to the address of
owner of record. Our reinspection on February 24th, 2026 showed no change. So, a notice of hearing was prepared on that date and the case was scheduled for the March Municipal Code Board meeting. This time I'd like to submit photographic evidence taken by myself on
December 17th and December 31st, 2025, January 7th, January 15th, January 21st, January 23rd, January 28th, January 29th, January 30th. February 5th, and February 27th of 2026.
>> We'll certainly accept all of that. Thank you. >> No Easter egg with this one. >> No, sorry about that. disappointing me, man. There's always next month. Exhibit number one shows the notice of
violation posting. Exhibit number two shows a vehicle parked in the yard. Exhibit number well, I'll just go to the base. Exhibit number 3 through 10 shows vehicle parked in the yard. Exhibit 11 shows vehicle parked in the yard. Exhibit 12 shows the notice of hearing posting. The site is in compliance and
like to submit an affidavit of compliance and I'm seeking a finding. >> Very good. Thank you. We'll entertain. Any questions? >> Yes. >> Go ahead, Rod. >> I I'm I'm just curious. Uh um before it became a case, did you approach them,
talk to them, tell them? >> I left him door hanger. Nobody ever called me. This was a case mom's house and the son, I don't know if he lives there or not, but he stops by quite frequently and uh tends to park in the yard. and he called earlier this week, I
don't remember exactly what day, Monday, and said mom had told him that he needs to stop doing that. >> It looks to me like there's plenty of room in the driveway. >> Yeah, I think >> he said he was just wasn't sure if if he got there before she did that he'd be, you know, she needed to move hers or if
he parked behind her that. >> Thank you. >> But I think they've got it all worked out. Mom said no. >> Mom said too. >> My mom gelled it. Maybe. >> All right. Any questions for the code officer? Seeing none, I'll entertain a motion. >> All right. I'll go with this one.
>> Thank you. >> In case number 25-4620, I move that the city has proven by a greater weight of the evidence the following violation of the city of Temple Terrace City Code did exist on the property located at 308 Ferncliffe
Avenue. The violation is section 12-921 subsection B. This motion is based on the sworn testimony this board has received from code enforcement officer Doug Allen along with any other evidence including photos, affidavit, and notice of violation. All of which is received and entered as part of the record of
this hearing. I further move that no fine be imposed because the violation was brought into compliance prior to the date of this hearing. Have >> a motion. Do we have a second? >> Second. >> Motion and second. All those any any further discussion? Seeing none. All those in favor? I
>> opposed. No nays. Motion carries. Next case. >> Under new business. Case number 254829. City versus >> Hang on. I think we missed one. >> Oh, I'm sorry. >> Um I'm sorry. You said under new business. I'm sorry. My my my mistake. >> Okay. >> Go ahead. >> All right. Case number 254829,
city versus Yandre Galabo Globo Gomez for the property located at 425 South River Hills Drive. The this case is before the board. based on an alleged violation of section 25.750.2 commercial vehicle and residential zone.
This case will be prosecuted this evening by code officer Doug Allen. The city has evidence that the notice of violation and notice of hearing will properly serve. >> Good evening once again, Mr. Chairman and board members. Doug Allen, code compliance officer. This case was opened
by by me on December 31st, 2025 for a commercial vehicle, a food truck parked or stored in a residential zone. I left the door hanger on that date and a reinspection date of January 2nd, 2026. My reinspection on January 6th showed no change. So, I generated a notice of
violation on that date with a reinspection date of January 15, 2026. posted a copy of the notice of violation at the front door and a copy was posted at city hall for the 10-day requirement and copies were mailed both certified in regular mail to the address of the owner
of record. Any inspection on February 24th showed no change so a notice of hearing was prepared on that date and the case was scheduled for the March municipal code board meeting. This time I'd like to submit photographic evidence taken by me on January 7th and February
20th and February 27th of 2026. Exhibit one shows the posting of the notice of violation. Exhibit two shows the commercial trailer. Exhibit three shows the posting of the notice of hearing. The site is in compliance and I'd like to submit an affidavit of compliance and I'm seeking a finding.
>> I accept that. Thank you. Any questions for the code officer? Seeing none, I'll entertain a motion. >> Okay. You >> somebody How about that? >> Oh, I can do it. Yeah,
>> somebody. Thank you. >> Uh, in case number >> I know. >> Yeah, I I know. I thought he was saying he would do. Uh, in case number uh 25-4829, I moved the city is proven by a greater weight of the evidence the following violations of the city of Temple Terrace. City code did exist on the
property located at 425 South River Hills Drive. Applicable code sections 25-750 subsection uh two. Uh this motion is based on the sworn testimony this board has received from quote enforcement officers along with
any other evidence including photos affidavit and the notice of violation all of which is received and injured as part of the record of this hearing. I further move that there be no fine imposed because the violations were brought into compliance prior to the date of this hearing. >> Very good. We have a motion. Do we have a second? >> Second.
>> Motion second. Any further discussion? Seeing none. All those in favor? >> I >> opposed. No nays. Motion carries. Next case, please. I think we're done with new business, right? >> We are. >> Okay. >> Where are unfinished business? Case number 2500
072. City versus Blue Rock Premier Properties for the property located at 6900 Aruba Avenue. The deadline for compliance was March 11th, 2026. The fine of $2,000 per day. Violation sections 8-56 subsection A fire alarm
systems not operational. section 8-57 subsection B subsection 4 fire hydrant access maintenance section 8-57 subsection B subsection 1 fire safety emergency lighting section 8-57
subsection B subsection 2 fire safety extinguisher inspection section 8-57 subsection D fire safety posting addresses section five sorry section 8-56
Fire suppression systems section 8 8-55 fire grills and section 8-55 subsection A subsection 2 fire improper storage affidavit of compliance received February 12th by fire inspector Cletus Squires
next case. >> Wow. >> Oh, sorry. >> That was my bad. >> Yeah, that was that was that was really impressive that they were able to resolve all of that. It was just it was a tremendous amount of work and you guys worked a job hard too. >> Wish they were here so we could thank them. >> Yeah,
>> they didn't want to come again. >> I'm sorry we interrupted so I meant to let you do that part. All right. Next case is 252911 city versus Eddie Antonio Fabbero Escobar for the property located at 6125
Liberty Avenue. The deadline for compliance is March 11, 2026. A fine of $25 per day beginning March 12, 2026. Violation section 8-28 subsection A subsection one permit app required a affidavit of compliance received March
10, 2026 by code officer Danielle Bat. Next case >> Yep. >> 253730 city versus Armentoto family LLC for the property located at 8421 North 56th Street. The deadline for
compliance is March 11, 2026. A fine of $25 per day beginning March 12, 2026. Violation section 14-59, local business tax required. Deadline for compliance is midnight tonight. Next case. Case number 253975.
City versus 5400 Bush Boulevard LLC for the property located at 5400 East Bush Boulevard. The deadline for compliance is m March 11, 2026. A fine of $25 per day beginning March 12th, 2026.
Violation sections 8-166 subsection 1 subsection K. Minimum standards commercial miscellaneous elements. Deadline for compliance is midnight tonight. Next case 2540448 city versus 80 for Barra Mestre for the
property located at 6125 Liberty Avenue. The deadline for compliance is March 11, 2026. A fine of $50 per day beginning March 12th. sections two sections 8-2A sorry sections 8-28
subsection A subsection 1 permit act required affidavit of compliance is received March 10th 2026 by code officer Danielle Bat next case is 254599 city versus Christy anne Reeves for the
property located at 11309 Limb banks place. The deadline for compliance is March 11, 2026. A fine of $25 per day beginning March 12th, 2026. Violation section 12-921 subsection B
off streetet parking driveway. Affidavit of compliance received March 11, 2026 by code officer Danielle Bat. >> I have one question. >> Not yet. One more case.
The last case is an off agenda um case. The case number is 20-1531 city versus Vincent R. Atkins and Cynthia J. Atkins for the property located at 5513 Temple Heights Road
violation section 10-34 sanitation premises clean section 8-102 minimum housing exterior walls. Section 10-3 subsection B sanitation grass weeds overgrown affidavit of compliance with
received March 6 by code officer Doug Allen. >> Okay, you had a question. >> Yeah. Yeah. Just just in case because I know we that was mistakenly selected. Uh I did not know what's the outcome of that one. 25-4425
>> was mistakenly selected. >> No, you remember >> she read that before? You read that before. Is that >> Oh, it's still it's still out of compliance. Deadline is tonight. >> Okay. >> Okay. Okay. Any other board action?
Any leans? No leans report. Any new business? >> Okay. We are adjourned. Thank you. >> Motion. >> Motion. >> Motion to adjurnn, please. >> I I'll second. Motion. I'll second. >> I second. >> Okay. You You made the motion. Rod second it. All those in favor? I
>> opposed. No nays. Motion carries. We are ajourned. Thank you, gentlemen. Robert's rules.