construction last year to um to make the Saturday construction from 7 to 8. And however, there was one section the code that that was not updated to reflect that. So, we're just cleaning that up. Very simple, just a little glitch. Uh
the second one here is creating a green building incentive program. Um so this is um an initiative that's been a priority of the village council and the environmental advisory committee um that we've been working on with the
environmental committee for for about 6 months or so. Um these were workshopped with the EAC and the village council in 2025 and they're intended to encourage sustainable uh development practices within the village. So, common green building incentives are
property tax abatements or exemptions. Uh, that would be where you're discounting somebody a property owner's taxes in order to offset the cost of of green building incentives. Another one is expedited permitting and expedited inspections. So, you'd be getting
priority root plan review and priority inspections. Another one is just a pure reduction of permitting fees. Um, which, you know, those can be kind of costly. So, that's one nice carrot that we have. Uh, another one is just offering pure cash grants or rebates. Uh, another one
is density and height bonuses. So, what we've really honed in on, we don't have we unfortunately, you know, don't have the type of money that, you know, there's a lot of big cities like Chicago and Miami that offer really robust green building programs. They
have a lot of money. Um, they have a lot of money in their coffers. it's very easy for them to offer those. We don't really have that kind of opportunity. Um, so we really think that the the easiest thing to do is offer expedited permitting inspections and reduce permit
fees. So we've done a a lot of research on what smaller municipalities do and those are the kind of the more common ones that smaller municipalities are able to offer. Um, one thing and to Questa I think everyone
knows it's a you know density and height are dirty words here. That's a that's a no, a hard no. So we're not really able to offer those um for green building incentives at least at this time. So, we did talk to our building
department and they have agreed that they would be able to do expedited plan review and inspections for qualified green building projects. And we'll be able to offer this to single family homeowners and to larger commercial and multif family product uh projects.
Generally speaking, you're more likely to see them on commercial projects. On single family homes, it's much easier when someone's doing a subdivision. So like when Coulter did Alton, they're able to offer, you know, that as as one of the models and say, "Hey, you can you can get the choose from these six
models. One of them is going to be green building certified." It's a lot more challenging for an individual homeowner that's doing a custom build to do it. So you're generally not as likely to see it. There are a few examples in North Palm Beach County. I think there might
be. Is it me? There's one in Jupiter Island. Is that right? I think there's like one in Jupiter, one in Jupiter Island, but but it's not done very frequently. >> Buildings. >> Yes. >> So, when we were trying to figure out how to work this permit reduction
program, we we also wanted to kind of look at the cost of certification. There's four big different certification types. I think everyone might be familiar with LEAD. that's kind of the the gold standard and it was the first big green building certification that
that kind of came out. Um those are the highest and it's probably the most prestigious of all of them uh at this time. There's the Florida Green Building Coalition. Um there's the National Green Building um certification and then Energy Star. So this is actually
different than just having like an Energy Star rated refrigerator. I think seems like most people have those. Energy Star has actually created their own rating system to make sure that the entire house is green certified. Um, but as you see, it's a a little bit lower of a cost and the barrier to to get
certified is a little bit lower. Similarly, same thing on a commercial project, you know, it can be pretty expensive to do lead. Um, the other ones are, you know, a little bit less expensive. And so, because of that, we we basically created this kind of tier tiered approach. So the other thing is
all these different certifications have different levels. So lead has certified silver, gold and platinum. Um the Florida green building coalition and national green building have bronze, silver, gold, platinum and then energy star just has one. So we kind of created
this sliding scale that was based on the the level of cost, right? So on lead to to be lead platinum, you're going to be spending a ton of money on really putting a lot of expensive stuff in in a building to make a green uh lead
platinum and the certification itself is going to be expensive. So we're proposing, you know, you get a 10% reduction if you met that and then it goes down a little bit as it gets gets a little bit easier. So you're ideally incentivizing people to to to do the higher level of certifications.
Does anyone have any questions on that? That's my last slide on that topic. Okay. Uh the next one is construction site requirements. So the village building department has a construction site policy manual. Whenever people are
building um new homes or commercial projects, these are given to the homeowners. Um however, they're not codified. So if someone ever really pushed back on some of these requirements, it's it's it's right now it's just kind of a procedure. It's not
a It's not actually codified. So, there's a possibility we'd maybe have to back off of it. So, just just being safe, we um put a lot of the the things in there in the in the actual code. So, one of them is to require temporary
construction fence. So, you may notice when you see a house that's been torn down, temporary construction fence around it. And all the construction activities are required taking place. So, so the the dumpsters, the storage of material should be in there. And if there aren't, that's a code enforcement
violation and especially would be a code enforcement violation now if it's actually literally codified. And then another one is requiring a silt fence on construction sites. So silt fences are the those small little fences you see and they prevent um dirt and and
materials from and rubbish from getting especially getting into the waterways. It's really essential for for protection of of our waterways. So, u these would be codified and again it makes it easier for us to enforce and take code enforcement action if ever needed.
Um this last section here is uh minimum housing standards. Um, I had put these into the code to um to kind of address um issues related to people buying houses and converting them into rooming
houses or migrant worker housing or carving houses up and making them into Airbnbs, things of that nature. Um, and I took Jupiter's code and really kind of put it in here. But I also didn't realize that we h already we already
have a lot of these in a kind of a supplemental thing of regulations that that are in our code. So it's so it's like an appendix. I didn't when I was writing this I didn't even realize it was there. So So I'm going to recommend that we strike this from from the
ordinance. Um, I believe most of the stuff is already covered in in this um, uniform property standards that we already use by reference via an appendix. And that is all I have for this ordinance. >> Okay.
Okay. >> I have questions. >> And any questions for Jay on Okay. Now, this 03-6, we're going to just >> We'll do each one individually. Yeah, we we'll we're still doing this ordinance. It's just we
>> if you uh move forward with it, I would propose that you strike sections 14 2011 through 1412. >> Oh, I got it. Okay. Okay. >> Okay. >> We're still recommending the other stuff. >> Okay. 212.
>> And I have questions for Jay. Okay. On page 46 of 77 at the bottom it says if and we're dealing with the green building incentive management >> and it's under section 14-94 and it's
the last sentence on the page. If granted, the extension period will begin from the original 12-month deadline following the issuance of the CO, not from the date of the request is made. Extension requests must be submitted
before the original deadline expires. So, what will be the turnaround? >> Can you just give me a second to read this? >> I've read it four times
and I just I'm like I I can't figure out shouldn't you give them a deadline or a turnaround time to We're giving them an extension period. This is a 6:00 brain teaser for me. I apologize. >> Pardon me. >> So, this is a 600 p.m. brain teaser for
me. I apologize. It was >> No, you second. >> This ordinance took me several hours last night. >> This is the easy one. >> And I I wrote Yeah, I wrote this one >> like a month or two ago. So I not looked at it freshly.
>> They have to request the extension before the original deadline expires. So then we're going if if we do, we're going to give them an extension period. Shouldn't we give them a time limit for
the extension period? Yeah, it's it says for residential projects it's a single extension of up to 6 months can be granted >> and commercial up to nine >> and for commercial it's a 9-month extension. >> Oh, I'm sorry that was up there. Okay.
All right. Thank you. >> No problem. >> Okay. The next one is um on page 49 of 77 and it's um it's on the next page. It's number G.
Um it says alternate forms of ground cover may be approved by the building off official. Do we have a list of alternate forms of ground cover? Because there's so many different that some are poisonous now.
Well, they shouldn't be if they're talking about this subject. It wouldn't be allowed. You don't know what people are going to do. >> Yeah. I mean, it says it says to in there they're supposed to be So, this is when a when you remove a temporary
construction fence, you're supposed to bring a site to grade, till it, and plant it with ground cover, which includes soding or seeding and shall have irrigation and be maintained. And then it says alternate forms of ground cover may be approved. And that's just to to keep it open-ended. So if somebody
wanted to plant uh a really nice um some nice shrubs um we wanted we wanted to keep that open open. Um if you wanted to make a caveat that you say nothing poisonous should be planted. Okay. >> I don't think I don't think we would
ever allow anything like that cuz we we already have a prohibited species list. >> Well, I know that. So we we would be able to defer to the prohibited species list. >> All right. Okay. Now, here comes on page
53 of 77 and it's number 11 and um it's for section 14-203 responsibility of the occupant. The owner. >> Okay. >> These are the ones we're striking. >> Mhm.
>> I am looking. This is the one we're striking. >> Yes. >> Okay. I want you to know we need when I went through this, okay, 30 years ago, we had a major problem in this
village dealing with composting. >> Mhm. >> Okay. It was a major lawsuit. >> Hattie Seagull. It's Do the second house in Hattie Seagull had a compost. her and a husband, ratinfested.
It was disgusting. And then you have the two pieces of property next to her that were totally immaculate. This went on for years. So, if you decide to do something like this,
because I spent so much time on this last night going through composting because I remember years ago, the solid waste authority because when I was on, my husband worked for the solid waste authority and when I was sitting here on
on the council, the solid waste authority at that point had composting bins. They don't have them anymore because it created a problem. So, they got rid of it. But we need we need to remember because I'm not always
going to be sitting here to address composting. And it it really you need to be specific because I mean they were just throwing trash out in the back. I mean
it was just the smell. I I mean but I I spent so much because the rats and the insect it was just rid but yeah >> so we're fortunate that we don't have those type of issues now. When I used to work in North Palm we had a lot of more
of those issues in a and in a certain area and so we're fortunate we don't deal with that. Um but as I mentioned so we we've um adopted the international property maintenance code in our code. It's an appendix. That's how I missed it. It's not technically in the code.
>> So there is a section there that says rodent harbor and that all property shall be kept free from rodent harage and infestation and when found they should be exterminated by approved processes that will not be injurious to human health. And so >> well maybe they
>> so if if there is a rodent harbor infestation we can uh use code enforcement on that. >> I apologize for making you look at that. Well, I mean, you just you had my whole thing going last night. It just brought
back a lot of memories. >> I apologize. >> Okay. And I think Oh, here was the other This is my other pet peeve. page 57 of 77 and it's item number I under section
14-209 209 clothes dryers exhaust systems should be independent of all other systems and shall be exhaust exhausted in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
Shouldn't the exhaust of a dryer be going outside and not in the attic? Cuz I can tell you how many homes have exhaust fan that their heat, their dryer goes into their attic. >> True. It really
>> and it shouldn't be. It's a fire hazard and it should be addressed here that it should be outside of the home and not inside the house. But that again manufacturers instructions
>> it but if you're not specific in your code >> right that's what I'm saying instructions they say ventil yeah it's wide open >> I mean there's a lot of people that have their dryers vents in going up into the
attic >> many condominiums do >> they should be vented to go outside of the building because it is a fire hazard. >> So again, that's part that's >> you might want to ask.
Yeah, that's going to be stricken and whatever is in the international property maintenance code is what we would have. So I would assume that it would not have anything that's a fire hazard, but I'm I'm trying to look right now. And that's my last question now. Aren't you excited?
>> See, I thought you were going to be all interested in the construction uh one instead. So, I called that wrong. >> So, we did >> that one. Okay. >> Okay. So, and we can also ask questions
about the um the construction site and this one >> and public comment too. >> Right. Right. Um, I want to make sure everybody has asked any questions regarding any of the ones that you've gone over. >> Okay. And, um, I didn't have a lot, but
I did notice in some spots as far as building official, the word he is used, and sometimes it's he or she. So, it's done right in some spots. And um, but it's just one of those little >> That was Dylan. >> No, I'm kidding. I I tried making it
gender neutral. So, if if that happened, it's an oversight. I noticed a couple of them were right and a couple were >> those are scribbers areas that we'll we'll clean up. Do they need to make that part of the motion? >> Yeah, we'll clean those up. >> We'll clean up before it goes to council. >> I know one of them's in the part we're strict striking anyway.
>> And then I did have um it seems like I heard that this state was coming out with the mandates as to that overrides everybody's on the artificial turf, but um what was it? The state either is or
has come out with >> regulations >> regulations regarding which will override everything that >> that that's coming. >> Oh, for the next >> that's part of the next wave of changes coming the state actually. So the state last year
uh passed a rule that said that on single family properties under 1 acre municipalities would be limited in their ability to enforce artificial turf. And then they directed the DP to create specific standards for for that and how
that would be enforced. And so those the DP created those and they workshopped them and I think they just got adopted in just like a week or two ago. Um but I've already looked at them and incorporated them into our old code.
We've kept things where we could. There are some spots where we're preempted. Believe it or not, the state made things a little bit more restrictive in a few spots for like environmental purposes. So, the D threw a few decent things in there. Um, but for the most part, we already had a lot of the checks and
balances in there for like the environmental stuff. >> And I regarding that, I was curious, the LED program, it seems like George Gentiel, maybe a year or two ago, he said that that they require use of artificial
turf. So, I just Could you repeat that? >> Um, George Gentiel, it seems like a year or so ago, one of these projects out here, he he >> he said that for the LED program that they require the use of artificial turf
>> less water intensive. Yeah. >> Yes. Yeah. So, that is part of this program as well. But, but it, you know, we don't know what's going to be if because if the state overrides everything, >> then they'll have to go by what state requires, I guess.
Um, okay. Were there any more questions for Jay on any of these? And okay, opening the Florida public comments. Maurice, if you'll state your name and address for the record again, please. >> Perry, I live in the country club. I have a lot of comments on the minimum housing, which I will hold if you're
going to strike it, but I just wanted to make sure. Otherwise, I'd like to put them on the record. >> Okay, we got three minutes. >> No, you want to hear all of them. If you're are is the motion going if the mo I'm happy to be done right now. Yes, we'll straight I just
be quiet. >> 2011 through >> Sorry. No. >> Okay. >> Okay. Um if there are no other public comments, we'll close the floor to public comments and any other board comments >> before we proceed. Okay. And so we'll
take these one at a time. Okay. So um so for ordinance 03-26, how would you like to go proceed? That's on the um
green building incentive program. So staff's recommendation would be to uh adop recommend adoption of it as written with striking sections 14201 through
14212. >> I'll make a recommendation >> with those with that requirement. >> Okay. >> Okay. And how do you all all in favor? >> I any opposed? Okay, the motion passes.
Okay, and we will move on to ordinance 04-26. And let me see that one is >> it is an ordinance of the village council of the village of Tquesta, Florida, amending chapter 22, community development, providing multiple
recommended community development code updates. Amending chapter 22 at art or art or art or art or art or art or art or art or art or art or article 2 community appearance at section 2253 powers and duties adding special exception review to the planning and zoning board's responsibilities at section 22-55 authorizing notice be published on villages public notice
board providing that every other section subsection of chapter 22 shall remain full force in fact providing conflict causeability clause authority to codify effective date for other purposes. >> Okay. and Jade. >> Okay, Jay Hop again. Um, presenting
0426. Um, so this one should be a little bit quicker. Um, so a few years ago, the state um created a new policy where it allows municipalities to do public advertising in what's called a public notice portal
portal rather than in newspapers. Um, it used to be very expensive for us. every time someone did something, we'd have to put, you know, spend $600 to advertise a zoning variance in in a public newspaper. And so now the public notice portal is free. Um, and then also to um
residents can sign up for something that also has them where we have to mail them a letter and send them an email every time we put something on the public notice portal. So if you want to stay in the loop on things, you you can sign up for that. Um, so then rather than paying
$600 or $800, we're paying, you know, four bucks for for stamps. >> And uh, in the village code, there's a lot of different sections that require public notice or that mention public notice, and it always says that we have to provide public notice in newspaper. I
simply amended it so that uh, reflects what the state statutes say um, which is that we can now use the public notice portal for public noticing. This ordinance only does the change that's in chapter 22 because that's the um Dylan Dylan has broken up all of our
ordinances based on the chapter being updated. So chapter 62 and 78 will be coming in future ordinances. So that'll be part of those. Uh the next one is something I think we've been talking about for a little while, which is to give the PCB the ability to make
recommendations on special exceptions. So, that's pretty standard in and just about every other municipality I've ever dealt with. Um, ours are a little bit strange where you guys will be reviewing a site plan that also has a special exception, but we have to say, well, you
guys are just looking at the site plan, not the special exception. Uh, this will give you the ability to also look at the special exception and make a recommendation on it. Again, that's what everyone else does. It only makes sense if you're providing a recommendation on the site plan that you would also do it
on the special exception as well. >> We did write it to exempt to exempt this unique situation where um when we did our zoning overlays, we created for you know the formula restaurants, formula retail and formula businesses. Mhm.
>> And we one of the things when we did that is um required special exception on some of those formula uses and the council and some people in the business community were nervous that you know anytime a bit a tenant change like let's
say three n let's say three natives closed that's a bad example let's say Starbucks closed and um Dunkin Donuts came in um it would be a pretty long process for them to have to come all the way back through through PZB if it's
just a simple tenant change out. >> So, we created a process where they could just go straight to council within 30 days. >> And so, because of that, we wouldn't want to have to send them all the way back here, especially if there's not even a site plan associated with it. So, uh that's how it's been crafted and
that's it for this ordinance. >> That may be a like. >> Yeah, it's it's a like for like >> Yeah. Okay. Um, yeah, >> makes sense. >> But if it was like Starbucks and then a dental office is going to move in, that'd be something different. That would be
>> correct. Correct. And and it was more so when it's just a tenant change out, not a site plan. Okay. >> Right. So if someone came in and was like, I'm going to build an entirely new Dunkin Donuts structure, then you have a site plan associated with it. It goes through the whole process and they and they go together.
>> Okay. And are there any questions for Jay from >> I do. I have under section 22-53 powers and duties. If you go down to the last one, it says number four, special exceptions. And then the next line it
says 4-5. Shouldn't it just be five? You have five underlined. So >> they probably didn't. >> Yeah, that's right. Is it could be a typo? >> It's a leftover strike through. I think it's just a typo. >> Oh, I see. It is struck through. Okay. The four is struck through and the five
is underlined. Okay. >> Okay. So, it's probably a typo. So, that needs to be removed four with the >> No, I I think it's correct because this used to be >> Yeah. Well, that used to be four, but we
put special exceptions at four because >> the number the the last one is the which should always be there last in the sequence. So, it's that was that used to be four. It's no longer four. >> It's five. >> And it's five. So it's underlined as five
>> and the four is struck the four is struck through. He just it just happens to be a bar with >> it. Okay. >> Yeah, >> that's that's it. >> And if there's no other questions, we'll open the floor to public comment. Okay. No public comment. Uh any further
questions or discussion from the board? I will make a recommendation to approve ordinance 04-26 amending chapter 22 of the community development. Okay. Second. Okay. Um so we
recommending re recommending approval of ordinance 0426. All in favor? >> I. >> Any opposed? Okay. Motion passes and then we will move on to number five, ordinance 05-26.
Ordinance 05-26 is an ordinance of the village council of the village of Tquesta, Florida, amending chapter 22, community development. Article three, reasonable accommodations, requiring village council review of reasonable accommodation requests, clarifying requirements for recovery residences,
and requiring compliance with minimum housing standards, providing that each and every other section and subsection of chapter 22, community development shall remain in full force and effect as previously adopted, providing a conflict clause, a separability clause, an authority to confify, providing an
effective date, and for other purposes. I'll turn it over to Jay. Jay, I'll just mention that I think this ordinance probably contains some references to the stried out provisions of our um maintenance standards. So, we may have to update this ordinance to reflect
references to the I international property maintenance code. >> I think there's one reference to it. So, we could make that uh great great catch. I'll make that part of my uh recommendation at the end. Okay. So, Jay Hop, uh, presenting
ordinance 0526. Um, so this one's, um, a little bit complicated, so I'll try and explain it a little bit. Um, section 397487 of Florida statute says that by January
1st, 2026, the governing body of each county or municipality shall adopt an ordinance establishing procedures for the review and approval of certified recovery residences within its jurisdiction. The ordinance must include a process for requesting reasonable accommodation from any local land use
regulation that serves to prohibit the establishment of a certified recovery residence. And then in uh in 2025, we adopted ordinance 1225 establishing a reason reasonable accommodation procedures that
were in compliance with that. Um we we crafted that and adopted it. Um however that that reasonable accommodation process that we adopted had a staff level review and a staff level approval
and some of our council people um indicated that they would like to see us create a process where the village council had the ability to review this. And I uh highlighted that when I had been in North Palm Beach, we had a process there where reasonable
accommodation procedures went to the village council for approval. And so um we kind of went back to the drawing board a little bit and and kind of mimicked what um what the North Palm Code says. Now I will backtrack a little
bit and try and explain and simplify this process. So, a reasonable accommodation is a change or adjustment that allows a person with a disability to have equal access to housing, employment, public services, or education without causing undue hardship
or fundamentally altering the program or service. And so, there are several federal and state laws that um require this. Uh the Americans with Disabilities Act, the federal and Florida Fair Housing Acts, and the Federal and Florida Civil Rights Acts. Uh so this
actually dates back to 1968 uh with the civil rights act initially. And so um according to the state laws um when a municipality creates an ordinance for reasonable accommodation uh it has to be consistent with state
and federal fair housing laws. It has to establish a written application process for reasonable accommodation. It has to establish time frames that a reasonable accommodation shall be processed and approved and establishes minimum application requirements. Should also
point out that things like recovery residences um and the people that that um utilize those are considered people with disabilities by federal law. So by federal law and state law, a municipality can't exclude these people
from certain types of of housing and they can request a reasonable accommodation in the situation um where they normally would not be able to be approved in that location. So we what we did is we took the state's
laws and adopted a lot of the procedures that are in there. So, we created an application that meets the state's requirements for the for the information you have to provide. You have to prove that you're a certified recovery residence and and several other things. Um, we also took something from the
North Palm Beach code and that is that you you should de that the applicant is supposed to demonstrate that they that the proposed uses sufficient distance from other reasonable accommodation requests so that you don't ultimately create a de facto social services
district. Um, and that is, you know, a little bit of a gray area, but it gives the village a little bit of an opportunity to perhaps push back if if there was a proliferation of reasonable accommodation requests in a in an immediate area.
Um, it also requires an applicant to pro provide a floor plan that demonstrates that a proposed use meets the village's minimum housing standards. So, as Dylan astutely pointed out, um we should actually change that to to note that it
doesn't meet the mil village's minimum housing standards, but it meets the um international property maintenance code as adopted in the village code. Uh as far as the actual procedures itself, so the the state law says that that we actually have to approve these
within 60 days of the submittal. So, normally if we're creating a process where something goes to council, we would try and get it to come to PZB2, but because there's such a really, really tight window for us to get this approved, it it we're having it go straight to council.
Uh, it does give the village the opportunity to reset the clock, that 60-day clock we have, if we have to request additional information. So, if someone didn't demonstrate that they met our our housing standards, uh we would, you know, submit the application back and say resubmit that and it resets the
clock. It also allows um the village staff and the applicant to appeal a decision that was made by the council to the special magistrate and uh that prevents it from going straight to civil court, I'm sorry,
circuit court uh and and uh then s somebody could appeal it to a circuit court after the special magistrate if if so desired. And then it also grants village staff and the ability to revoke a reasonable accommodation if someone was in
violation. So, uh, you know, one of the stipulations you have to be a certified recovery residence. If someone lost their state certification, we would be able to immediately go in and revoke their reasonable accommodation. >> Um, and you know, anything of that nature.
And with that, that is my presentation. Happy to answer any questions. Can I just have one? If on page six of the ordinance, page 74 of 77, you went from 60 days and you lowered it
to 45. >> It's 45 days to make the staff um the for staff to make a written determination. So that's that's for staff to basically write a staff report and and because we we would we would
also then uh provide a a written interpretation uh if we think it meets reasonable accommodation or if it doesn't and so that's that's why that's there. >> Okay. So that's the that's where the 45 Okay. I couldn't All right. That that's my only question. Thank you.
>> Any other questions for Jay? Um I do have one. I'm not quite clear on the recovery um homes. Are these uh residential homes or >> Yeah. So, this is this would be when somebody could be buying a single family
home and making it a home a single family home that's geared towards um recovery. >> Okay. And of specific ailments or >> Yeah, it could be for a number of things. It can be for drug drug rehab. It can be for alcohol rehab. Well,
actually, I'm sorry, the state's criteria of a certified recovery residence, I believe, correct me if I'm wrong, Dylan, is specific to alcohol and drug rehabs. Correct. >> I'm not sure if the state definitions for recovery reference are specific to
those particular ailments. There are definitions as to what constitutes a disability under the FHA and and ADA, and they're fairly broad. would it entail? Say somebody purchased a house and they
wanted to convert it into a home to train uh people with Down syndrome. Is that allowed under this? >> Well, it's not necessarily a question of whether it's allowed or not. It it
provides individuals a opportunity. If there is a government regulation that is preventing someone with a disability that meets those requirements, it allows them a process to request an exemption from that regulation, which requires a process and a hearing and a
determination. >> Include any um specific renovations to accommodate. >> It has to ameliorate the disability. So whatever the the exemption request is, you have to show that that that thing
will help ameliate this particular issue that qualifies under the FHA. >> And and if it's in a residential area, is are there limits to how many people in cars and traction? you are
still allowed to enforce uh government regulations that relate to, you know, things that are enforced against anyone regardless of whether they have a disability or not. Things like parking, noise, that sort of thing. >> Okay. >> You can still completely enforce other
existing governmental regulations. >> Okay. >> Are we dealing with any of this right now? >> No, we're not going because I heard before. No, we are for certified recovery residences. I mean, we have futures, which is a a rehab, a separate
one. And there was a a group that was looking to do something of this nature over on County Lane Road. And um it's a little bit of a it's it's a little bit different from this. Um >> that was a dementia facility, correct? Wasn't it a skil wasn't a ski?
>> Well, that that was a an ALF assisted living facility that came in. Okay. >> I'm talking about the ones that are um is it Bill? The ones that are right next to Cassadel Soul >> right next >> Oh, there was a situation that came up
there that that um we kind of dealt with >> and it's still going on now. I understand our our manager um is involved in that condo complex. >> Yeah. >> I don't know. But but we haven't, you
know, we we haven't, you know, knock on wood, seen much of an attempt into our of an encroachment into our residential. Um but having a a process that requires people to go to council does um make it a little more challenging for
people to to move forward with it. >> And how does this affect uh like HOAs or condos? Um I mean, does this override their rules where that would not be allowed necessarily? that those are, you know, I assume moneymaking. Um,
I mean, you're you're not in it for fun. You're >> I I think your HOA wouldn't allow >> Yeah, your HOA. I'm just what I'm wondering if if this would override >> any condos or >> Well, I mean, Dantis has done a lot to override homeowners associations and
condos. I wouldn't put it past them. >> But sometimes it's for our benefit. They don't want to, you know, You know, I'm not being disrespectful to the man, but I mean, it's just Yeah. I You just have to take it on a case by case situation,
I think, and that's where you get into trouble. >> So, it it's a federal law. I I the answer is I'm I'm not sure off the cuff how that interaction plays out between a private individual and the private HOA. Um my my guess would be they would still
have to apply or they would still have to um abide by the federal FHA and ADA law. I I mostly deal with incides incidents which involve the private individual with a disability partitioning the governmental entity
which is the most you know that's mostly my intersection with this with this law. So to answer the question, I believe the private HOA would would. I'm not 100% on that. And >> if there's no more questions, we can open it up to the public. Marie,
state your name and address again for us. >> Marie Superior. I live in the country club. Um, I have a question on section 22-112. Um, and I get the there's an annual inspection that is suggested and it says the village may consult conduct a yearly
inspection. I would recommend if it's possible to do this um that we change that a yearly inspection to on a regular basis or as needed. Um, and the reason for this is if there are problems with these facilities which are businesses in our community. Um, we want to ensure
that we are not limiting our right or hamstringing our right to address those problems immediately since these will be right next to people's homes. >> Okay. >> Okay. >> Possible. I I'm looking in the direction of our lawyer. >> It's a good idea. Thank you.
>> Yeah. You you are allowed to inspect uh these structures like you would any other structure for compliance with. >> Yeah. Well, if a neighbor if a neighbor complains that they would have the right the village would have the right to go and inspect.
>> We can we'd have to look at it on a caseby case basis. Um I'm not sure >> a complaint from a neighbor would trigger a a building inspection. >> Wait. Um so if I may in this section
it's addressing the state and local laws. So their compliance with that. So it's not just building like I mean it would be it would be noise anything like any problem >> parking coding coding enforcement right. So I just want to make sure instead of saying you can only have one if we have
a place that is being operated in a way that's not helpful or not not nice to their neighbors that we can make sure that we're getting to be able to inspect it to address the problems promptly rather than >> leading somebody unbind. take a look and adjust that.
>> Yeah. Yeah. If if the the board wants, you could make a recommendation to have um legal staff and and count and village staff evaluate whether that's legally viable to do um >> to because to do the problem is to do
them randomly is could be seen as discriminatory. And so I think that's why this one says on an annual basis. So that that's kind of like supposed to be more of a routine annual checkup rather than, you know, constantly monitoring
one of these. But we can we can look into whether or not that's that's legal. >> Yeah. I mean, I know I agree. Like, you know, other communities have had problems with like the, you know, drug recovery. Um, >> they start stealing from the neighbors.
um they sleep in the backyard and and I mean but you could I could complain about that and then code enforcement would >> would act. >> Yeah. >> But but to but to but but to um Mr. Superior's point, I know that our code enforcement and generally police
departments would like the ability to look at it as as much as possible. So if if it is >> in that case >> legally doable, we're we're fine with you making that a recommendation. So long as it's something that we can legally do without
being overly discriminatory, >> it's a issue and we're happy to look into it and buff that language on possible. Thank you. >> But even if you can't, just to be clear, nothing about this prohibits you from code enforcement action or from people
calling police for items that demand law enforcement action. >> Correct. But but the inspection is generally when when you're going inside. So in North Palm, they would do an annual inspection. to be the fire department and they were in there looking for things, >> right?
>> So, >> um, okay, if we're no more public comment, we'll close the floor to public comment. Is there any more comment from the board? >> I think we typically have time to like >> Jay or Dylan. >> And just my my last comment would be
that if if you are going to make a motion to adopt it that you make it so that we change that the provision Um, give me one second here. >> Sorry, I lost my place. >> She's got the number.
>> Well, what's the number? >> It was 2212. >> 2212. >> Well, yeah, her. So hers is 22112 but then on 22113 9 we noted that they have to provide an
interior floor plan >> that's compliant with the villages minimum housing standards that should be changed to from minimum housing standards to the intern appendix B international property maintenance code >> okay change it to the international
>> property maintenance code. >> You can also say as read by staff. >> Yes. Okay. >> Oh, that's cool. >> Can I make a recommendation as described by staff to recommend approval? >> Okay. >> Right.
>> And is that a motion? >> Yes. >> Okay. >> Okay. Uh, all in favor of recommending approval of 05-26 with the um >> amending chapter 22.
>> Uh, as far as the what the staff said? >> All in favor? >> I any opposed? >> No. >> Okay. Motion carries. Thank you. Okay. Um, any questions or >> No, no further comment. I I do expect us
to have another meeting next month with additional or warrants coming your way. >> Okay. >> Um, if I can say one thing towards what uh Marie asked about the population. I think it said in the first one like a thousand in by the 2024 or something
like that. Just that place up on County Line Road where they wanted 96 town homes. I mean that could have easily added 400 people. >> I know. I was thinking that too. >> Thank God. And so there's, >> you know, that would have been almost half going to. >> So it's uh and you know, who knows what
neighborhoods might get torn down and they build multif family homes. So it >> and it's the other thing you have to think of too is that in the future you're going to have like they're doing dealing on the island.
They come in and they buy something, they tear it down and you know and then it gets bigger. >> Yeah. And if we if we're servicing just north of Kenneline Road in Martin County, I mean, we have no control over what they might allow to be put in, too.
So, I guess I guess it's possible you could have >> Yeah. >> quite a few more people that we're servicing. But >> I mean, we we've had people approach the church for our >> I bet. >> Oh, yeah. >> Bacon land. >> Wow. Well, I also think just the bus
stop in our neighborhood, there's a lot more kids than there used to be in our neighborhoods, too. So, I think can't also forget that, you know, as older residents move out, younger families with children move in. >> Oh, yeah. >> The village of choice. Absolutely. >> I I used to be the youngest person IN MY
OLDEST. >> OKAY. SO, for >> before you before you adjourn, I almost updated you on this, but now you prompted me to update you on this. We did just recently get a development application in for the county line property, the Rude. And they have scaled
back their plans from the 96 town houses to 24 single family homes. So there was a deed restriction that limited to 50 houses. So they're now well below that with 24 houses. It's going to go through our development review committee.
No telling how long that'll be, but uh you guys you probably won't see it until sometime this summer at the earliest. It's going to be going to be a back and forth. And then also the Toquesta Country Club was approved uh last week by council.
>> Great. >> So, um yeah, everyone's excited about it and thank you for all your input on it. >> When are they going to start on Sabbrook >> on station 11? Yeah, >> they are. Well, the interior work is
pretty pretty well underway, but the exterior um >> I know the village council didn't approve. They they haven't decided on the color. >> They did decide on the color. >> Oh, they did. Oh, okay. The last time I saw it, they didn't. So, I look at the >> They like They like the blue. So, they
went they went with the blue. They like the They like the idea of trying to match the the rec center and have a little bit of pop of color there. Okay. >> So, they went with the blue. >> Okay. Any news on Jupiter Island? >> What about Jupiter? >> Development downtown blue.
>> Oh, >> um there >> we have vacant building. >> Yeah. >> So, the two, you know, the the units there did not sell. So, they're you know, back at the drawing board and considering a
combined project for both properties. There's a group that's that's working on that and they are potentially doing a conceptual presentation to our council in in March with with a con just a very preliminary
concept plan. >> Um I haven't seen it yet, but um we'll we'll we'll see what happens. I mean, that one had the high-end with the kitchen and I and they said, "Oh, well, nobody will be cooking in the building."
They go, "Really? Give me a break." >> Okay. Strange looking over there, though. >> Yeah, it was. And right now, the building across is virtually vacant, but the doors are >> Oh, really?
>> situation. I don't know. >> We'll Yeah, we'll keep you in the loop as as that one moves forward. But there is there it's a it's a really complicated real estate transaction, too. Um I'm not privy to all of it, but
I know that there's a lot of stuff happening behind the scenes. So, um but we have let them know that, you know, they're going to have to work with the Beach Road Association, nearby condos, workshop it with the council and the community at a conceptual presentation.
So, it'll be a a collaborative um process. >> They did in fact build a new staircase. >> That's good. >> So, they will have a staircase that will, you know, be in front of the vacant building. >> That's good. >> So, I guess it's good.
>> I don't know what they're doing. They built an office and then they vacated that. >> It's just strange. >> Thank you. >> Okay. Well, if we're ready, I make a motion to adjurnn. >> No, not to adjurnn.
>> We want to adjourn, don't we? >> Yes. >> I make a motion to that. >> All in favor? >> No, I think we should stay until next month. Any opposed? >> Motion passes.
>> Okay. Yeah, there's eight there. >> I'm sure a lot of these things will be >> combination. >> You mean 250 300? >> Yeah. Do they have the right to like work? >> I'm not aware of any way to legally prevent that from happening
>> because never had to happen because those were two totally separate zoning codes and they changed one so that they could have a huge they could have prevented it. and red.